Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 5317 NW 5th Avenue CASE NO: 2004-0774 Pursuant to Article 6, Section 612 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: Lot 4 on Block 11, RAILWAY SHOPS ADDITION 2"d AMENDMENT (3 --- 183) from R-2 "Two -Family Residential" to R-2 "Two -Family Residential" with an SD-12 "Buffer Overlay District". (Complete legal description on file with the Hearing Boards Office). The following findings have been made: • It is found that the subject property is immediately adjacent to the north to a C-2 "Liberal Commercial" designated area under the same ownership. • It is found that the subject property is an empty lot and it is also found that the requested change to SD-12 on the subject property is in order to improve the parking for the adjacent C-2 area. • It is found that the requested change will be beneficial to the area in that it will provide parking for existing commercial uses along NW 5ts Avenue which would otherwise park within the neighborhood, and it will provide new landscaping to the proposed parking area which will beautify and buffer the parking use. • It is found that the requested zoning designation change is consistent with the underlying land use designation and therefore does not require an amendment to the Future Land lise Map of the Comprehensive Plan. Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the application as presented. ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Yes No N/A 1; CASE NO. 2004-0774 In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment. In harmony with established land use. Is related to adjacent and nearby districts. Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City. Maintains similar population density pattern. Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn. Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary. Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood. Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety. Has similar impact on drainage. Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas. Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas. Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property. Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification. Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.