Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicant Ltr & Supp Docs• • April, 2004 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 (904) 488-4925 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) SUBSECTION 380.06(19), FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380,06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittal of a proposed change to a previously approved DRI be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this form. 1) I, Dana Nottingham, Executive Director, authorized representative of the Downtown Development Authority, hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following information concerning The Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact, which information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to The City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Bureau of State Planning, Department of Community Affairs and the Florida Department of Transportation. (Signature)' (Date) 2) Applicant (name, address, phone). Downtown Development Authority 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2929 Miami, Florida 33131 Phone: (305) 579-6675 • • • 3) Authorized Agents (name, address, phone). Alejandro Vilarello, Esq. City of Miami Law Department 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Ninth Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) 416-1800 Judith A. Burke, Esq. Shutts & Bowen 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1600 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 358-6300 Lourdes Y. Slazyk City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, Third Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Phone: (305) 416-1405 David S. Plummer, P.E. David Plummer & Associates 1750 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Phone: (305) 447-0900 4) Location (City, County, Township/Range/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change. The City of Miami Downtown Development of Regional Impact ("DDRI") is located within portions of: Sections 30 and 31 of Township 53 South, Range 42 East; Sections 6 and 7 of Township 54 South, Range 42 East; Section 36 of Township 53 South, Range 41 East; and Section 1 and 12 of Township 54 South, Range 41 East. The proposed change is located within portions of Sections 31 and 32, Township 53 South, Range 41 East. 5) Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build out date, development order conditions and requirements, or the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. Response: A. This notification proposes to (i) change the boundaries of the Master Development Order (Resolution No. 87-1148), as amended, of the DDRI to be consistent with the recently amended boundaries of the Downtown Development Authority (the "DDA"), as approved by the DDA pursuant to Resolution No. 31/02 (See Exhibit "A"), as further approved by the City of Miami Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 12307 (see Exhibit "A-1 "), to reflect a change in the DDRI's Project Description and Project Area to include 13.4 +1- acres of submerged land (the "Submerged Land") and 10.8 +1- acres of adjacent uplands 2 • • (collectively, the "Watson Island Property") as such property is legally described in Exhibit "B" ; and (ii) modify the Master Development Program Table for Increment II of the DDRI, as adopted by Resolution 02-1307, in order to accommodate the development planned for the proposed expansion, namely, the Island Gardens Project, (the "Development") by redistributing the land uses authorized by Increment II. There is no change to the development program for Increment II associated the with proposed boundary change. Rather, the proposed boundary change serves only to bring the Watson Island Property into the jurisdiction of the DDRI so that the City, as owner of the Watson Island Property, may participate in the DDRI program. Moreover, the Development, which includes the Proposed Marina, as defined below, will draw from the unreserved development allotments previously approved under Increment II and shall not require any further modification of Increment II, other than the redistribution of land uses as authorized under Increment II. Therefore, neither the expansion of the DDRI boundaries nor the proposed Development constitutes a substantial deviation of the DDRI. B. The Proposed Marina The Development includes the redevelopment of an existing operational marina, located on the Submerged Land, to a fifty (50) mega -yacht wet slip marina (the "Proposed Marina"). Pursuant to a Binding Letter of Vested Rights and Interpretation of Development of Regional Impact Status (BLIVR 11003-001) issued by the Department of Community Affairs on November 15, 2002, attached hereto as Exhibit "C", only eight (8) wet slips of the Proposed Marina (the "Slips") need be considered as part of a DRI impact analysis since forty-two (42) slips of the Proposed Marina were constructed in 1956, approximately 20 years prior to the adoption of § 380.06, Florida Statutes, and, therefore, those slips are exempt from any DRI review. C. Additional Information/Documentation As stated above, there are sufficient unreserved development credits remaining in Increment II to accommodate the construction of the Slips. However, because the Marina land use was not evaluated as part of Increment II, we are providing in this notification additional information, in the form of (i) a response to Question 37 of the DRI Application for Development Approval ("ADA") and corresponding environmental studies (attached hereto as Exhibit "D"), all of which reflect minimal impact to the environment and proper mediation of any disturbance proposed for the Submerged Land as required by the appropriate permitting agency; and (ii) information on the Development's projected potable water demands (See Exhibit 3 • • • "D-8), sewerage (See Exhibit "D-9") and proposed drainage improvements to address storm water runoff (See Exhibit "D-10"). 4 • • • Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. Response: The Project Master Site Plan and Project Map, amended to include the Watson Island Property, is attached as Exhibit "E". A copy of the "Transportation Assessment: Proposed Boundary Change to the Downtown DRI-Increment II" (the "Assessment") is attached as Exhibit "F". The Assessment does not identify any new significantly impacted roadways and therefore, the expansion of the boundaries and the redistribution of land uses, as outlined in this Notice of Proposed Change and as authorized under Increment II, does not constitute a substantial deviation. 6) Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. Response: See Substantial Deviation Determination Chart attached as Exhibit "G". 7) List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modification or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? Response: Approved Development Orders for the DDRI: A. Master Development Order Resolution #87-1148 December 10,1987 B. Increment I Development Order Resolution #87-1149 December 10,1987 C. Increment II Development Order - Resolution # 02-1307 December 12,2002 5 • e The Original DO has been amended 10 times. None of the changes have been found to constitute a Substantial Deviation pursuant to Chapter 380., F.S. and all of the changes were found to be in conformity with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. The modifications are summarized below: Modifications: D. Stipulation of Settlement, Department of Community Affairs vs. The City of Miami and the Downtown Development Authority, State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings Case No. 88-1638, June 2, 1988 (This settlement clarified the meanings of Total Allowable Development, Net New Development and Aggregate Exclusions as applied in the development orders.) E. Resolution No. 91-698, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, on September 26, 1991, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order: (1) updating the name of the authorized agent of developer to Matthew Schwartz and updated the name of the Planning, Building and Zoning Department; (2) the extension of the build out/termination date of the Increment 1 development order from December 31, 1992, to December 30, 1997; (3) the extension of the date under which grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development under the Increment 1 Development Order would not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction from December 31, 1992, to December 30, 1997; (4) the extension of the deadline for completing air quality monitoring from March 15, 1991 to March 15, 1994; (5) the extension of the time to contract for construction of transportation improvements from four (4) years to eight (8) years from the effective date of the Development Order (see condition 6 on page 10 of the Increment I development order); and 6 • • • (6) the simultaneous increase and decrease in the proposed land uses in Increment I: (i) Attractions and Recreation facilities increased from 3,400 seats to 6,500 seats, and Hotels increased from 1,000 rooms to 1,500 rooms. (ii) Office uses decreased by 180,450 square feet, resulting in a change from 7,100,000 square feet to 6,919,550 square feet of office space permitted in Increment I. F. Resolutions No. 94-849 and 94-850, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, on November 17, 1994, approved the following changes to the Master Development -Order and the Increment I Development Order: (1) the extension of the build out/termination date of the Increment I Development Order from December 30, 1997, to December 30, 1999; (2) the extension of the build out/termination date for Increment II from December 31, 1998, to December 30, 2005; (3) the extension of the build out/termination date for Increment III from December 31, 2007, to December 30, 2014; (4) the extension of the date under which the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development under the Increment I Development Order would not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction from December 30, 1997, to December 30, 1999; (5) the extension of the deadline for completing air quality monitoring from March 15, 1994 to March 15, 1997; (6) the extension of the time to contract for construction of transportation improvements from eight (8) years to ten (10) years from the effective date of the Development Order (see condition 6 on page 10 of the Increment I development order); and (7) the Simultaneous increases and decreases in the proposed land uses in Increment I: (i) Marine Facility was added as a new land use encompassing a 230,000 square foot terminal building; 7 • (ii) Office Uses decreased by 242,273 square feet resulting in a change from 6,919,550 square feet to 6,677,277 square feet of office space permitted in Increment I. G. Resolution No. 98-219, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of. Miami, Florida on February 24, 1998, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the increment 1 Development Order: (1) the simultaneous increase and decrease in the proposed land uses for Increment I as follows; (i) Attractions and Recreation Category increased from 6,500 seats to 30,500 seats; (ii) Office category decreased by 81,871 gross square feet, resulting in a change from 6,677,277 gross square feet to 6,595,406 gross square feet. (2) the addition of certain conditions relating to the development and operation of the American Airlines Arena (the "Arena"), including a restriction on events which start between 5:00 PM and 7:00 PM or end between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM (the "Special Daytime Events") but providing for approval of a specified number of such Special Daytime Events upon the filing of an additional NOPC in the future. (3) the submission of a parking inventory as part of the Traffic Control Management Plan to be submitted by the operator of the Arena; (4) the formation of an events committee to coordinate the scheduling of events at certain facilities located in the downtown area. H. Resolution No. 98-787, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on July 21, 1998, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment 1 Development Order: (1) the shifting of the scale of permitted development activity within certain land use categories of the Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order by simultaneously increasing and decreasing allowable development credits in certain land use categories, as provided in the Master Development Order. Resolution No. 98-1153, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on November 17, 1998, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment 1 Development Order: (1) the decrease of development credits in the office category in order to comply with a condition of the Master Development Order. 8 • • J. Resolution No. 99-159, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on February 23, 1999, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment I Development Order: (1) the amendment of Resolution 98-1153 to accurately reflect the cumulative effect of the amendments, substituting Exhibits B-1 and B-2 for Exhibit B in 99-1153. K. Resolution 99-973, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on December 14, 1999, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and Increment I Development Order: (1) the extension of the build -out and termination dates to reflect appropriate tolling periods for appeal; (2) clarification of the completion dates for individual projects .approved under Increment I; and (3) amendment of language to clarify that simultaneous increases and decreases in land use categories may be approved without the necessity of a Notification of a Proposed Change. Ordinance 1307, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on December 12, 2002, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment II Development Orden (1) Amended the DDRI boundaries to include the Watson Island Property thus making the DDRI boundaries consistent with the DDA boundaries. M. Resolution No. 02-1307, passed and adopted by the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida on December 12, 2002, approved the following changes to the Master Development Order and the Increment II Development Order: (1) the issuance of the Increment II Development Order; (2) the simultaneous increase and decrease in the proposed land uses in Increment II as follows: (i) Attractions and Recreation facilities increased from 1,600 seats to 60,000 seats; (ii) Convention use was increased from 0 sf, to 500,000 sf. as a transfer from Increment I; (iii) Government use, 250,000 sf, was incorporated into the Office use.; (iv) Hotel use was increased from 500 rooms to 1,500 rooms; 9 • (v) Industrial use was increased from 0 sf. to 750,000 sf; (vi) Institutional use was increased from 0 sf. to 450,000 sf; (vii) Office use was decreased from 3,600,000 sf. to 1,300,000 sf.; (viii) Residential use was increased from 2,550 residential units to 7500 residential units; and (ix) Retail use was increased from 400,000 sf. to 750,000 sf this simultaneous increase and decrease in land use categories in the DDRI, without need of filing a Notice of Proposed Change provided that the regional impacts of the land uses as changed will not exceed the adverse regional impacts of the land uses in Increment II of the Project as originally approved and as measured by total peak hour vehicle trips; (4) the establishment of the date under which the grantees of building permits or Major Use Special Permits for new development under the Increment II Development Order would not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction as May 28, 2009; and (3) (5) the extension of the build out/termination date for Increment II from to December 30, 2005 to May 20, 2014. 8) Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non -project land uses within % mile on a project master site plan or other map. Response: Not applicable. 9) Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any criteria listed in 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S. YES NO The proposed change for expanding the DDRI boundaries is not contemplated in the criteria presented in Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)(2), F.S., and therefore, it cannot be determined if the change "meets" such criteria. The proposed change for expanding the DDRI boundaries does not increase the amount of development in the DDRI. 10 • 10) Does the proposed change result in a change to the build out date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build out or phasing dates. Response: No. The proposed changes do not change the build out date for Increments II and III, established by the City of Miami Resolution 02-1307 and Resolution 94-849 as May 20, 2014 and December 30, 2014, respectively. 11) Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? Response: No. 12) An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. Response: Attached as Exhibit "E". is an updated map of the Project Area including the Watson Island Property. 13) Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(f), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: a. All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; Response: See Exhibit "H" for draft of Resolution and drafts of the Amended Master Development Order and the Increment II Development Order which are attached to the Resolution as exhibits. b. An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage is/has been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; Response: 11 • • • See attached Exhibit "I" for legal description of Project Area including Watson Island Property. c. A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; Response: Not applicable. d. A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; Response: Not applicable. e. A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down -zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and Response: Not applicable. f. Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-0.025 (7), FAC. Response: Not applicable. 12 • • EXHIBIT "A" DDA Resolution No. 31/02 12 • • RESOLUTION NO. 31/02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ("DDA") OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF THE DDA DISTRICT BOUNDARIES TO INCLUDE THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF WATSON ISLAND. WHEREAS, the DDA is the applicant of a Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the DDA district; and WHEREAS, the DDA district boundaries are established by the City of Miami Commission; and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the DDA, City of Miami and Flagstone Properties, LLC ("Flagstone") the proposed developer of the Northwest Quadrant of Watson Island to have this area included within the DDA district and the Downtown DRI provided that certain conditions are agreed to between DDA and Flagstone, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. Section 1. The DDA Board of Directors hereby supports and recommends to the City of Miami Commission the expansion of the DDA district boundaries to include the Northwest Quadrant of Watson Island in order to include the proposed development by Flagstone within the Downtown DRI. Section 2. This resolution is subject to the attached conditions (Attachment A), which must be agreed to between DDA and Flagstone. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 4e'day of April, 2002. ssioner Johnny L. Winton irman 1 R =A• . K 1 noN, in * rn01.9141 ail ir,elarr, lls+ri'inhi Timm I riN1i.7V51 CSJD:305 3712423' DURATION 1mm4Sl:03-52 SUN-18-2002 14:.54 DAA MIAMI 305 3712423 P.02/05 Aionso Menendez Interim Executive Director A EST: Sandra Hernandez Secretary to the Board of Directors 2 5ARC tirt flMM AT t744f7R1l91.1c.13 DM /F1Ct.m aavtinM Time!' DUI ONiS:7 75 CSID:305 3112413I DURATION (m 14s);0342 JUN-10-2002 14: 54 ADA M I AM I 385 3712423 P. 03/05 • • Attachment A CONDITIONS FOR DDA RESOLUTION NO. NM SUPPORTING THE EXPANSION OF THE DDA DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF WATSON ISLAND 1. Flagstone Properties, LLC ("Flagstone") will pay all reasonable and necessary costs and fees incurred by the DDA fpr the retention of professional personnel and/or expert consultants to review and evaluate t e notice of proposed change (NOPC) and any and all studies submitted as part of the NOPC including but not limited to traffic studies. In addition, Flagstone will pay all agency review fees related to the NOPC. 2. Flagstone shall enter into a Contract with DDA prior to filing the NOPC, in which Flagstone formally agrees to pay the fees and costs charged by DDA's consultants for reviewing and evaluating the NOPC filed by Flagstone, together with any and all studies submitted as part of the NOPC, such as a traffic study. i...2.'A shall obtain proposals from its consultants for such additional review services and such proposals shall be attached to and incorporated by reference into such agreement. 3. If, as a result of the filing of the NOPC to include Island Gardens under Increment I, either the City of Miami or the applicable review agencies impose additional conditions on the DRI Development Order for Increment I, or the proposed DRI Development Order for Increment II, Flagstone shall be responsible for (a) the payment of any such additional costs assessed against either Increment I or Increment II, and (b) the performance of any such additional mitigation conditions imposed upon Increment I or Increment II. Flagstone may challenge any such assessment or condition relating to such addition& impacts directly to the applicable review agencies. Should Flagstone wish to challenge a decision of the DDA/DRI committee that Flagstone is responsible for either (a) or (b) above, as it relates to Increment II only, then Flagstone may request a review by the DDA Board of Directors in accordance with the review process outlined in paragraph 8 below. 4. Prior to May 11, 2002, Flagstone shall not meet with staff from the South Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) or the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to discuss the Island Gardens project. 5. Subsequent to May 10, 2002, DDA authorizes Flagstone to meet with staff from the SFRPC and DCA to explore the viability of filing the NOPC for island Gardens as a non - substantial change to Increment I. After the last of the two meetings, and as a result of same, Flagstone and DDA will have a period of ten (10) days to make a written determination that the NOPC should not be filed because (a) it is not feasible, (b) the filing of the NOPC will jeopardize the review and approval of Increment II, or (c) it will cause the agencies to impose unacceptable conditions on Increment II. If it is determined 3 .. _..a ..I , w,nw.1t It 1 AP# ollit 4174111M t rii IO A11i9J Imm.re1111.41 JUN-18-2002 14:55 DDA MIAMI 305 3712423 P.04/05 • • • by either party within that ten (10) day period that the NOPC should not be filed, Flagstone will no longer pursue the boundary change and DDA will refrain from scheduling and/or withdraw this Rbetween Flagstoneon as an genda and thotem before DL3A/Dlti committee e City orCommission. In the event of a dispute or DDA's consultants regarding such determination, Flagstone may request consent from the DDA Board of Directors for thefiling tliheld. The request foued r conseof nt �ha se hPC, and such all scheduled consent shall not be unreasonably for consideration by DDA at its next available Board of Directors meeting. 6. In the event neither party determines that the NOPC should net be filed by the end of the ten (10) day period, Flagstone, in consultation tewith fi el Dared procill ess the NOPC unroceed with til preparation of the NOPC. DDA shallg liar to occur of (i) the date that the proposed DIZU Development Order for Increment II is approved; or (ii) October 30, 2002. 7. Flagstone's consultants and DDA's consultants shall work together in the preparation of the NOPC in order to insure mutual agreement regarding the underlying assumptions utili2ed in the technical portion of the application. Upon Flagstone's submission of the final draft of the NOPC to the DDA, which will incorporate all mutually agreed upon technical data, DDA will have twenty (20) days after receipt to provide comments. If DDA has no comments, the NOPC shall be filed immediately. if DDA submits final comments, after making any changes acceptable to Flagstone and DDA, the NOPC will be resubmitted to DDA_ and shall be filed within ten (10) days of receipt. Flagstone expressly acknowledges and agrees that DDA will not be required to file the NOPC unless all changes acceptable to Flagstone and DDA have been incorporated into the NOPC. The procedure for mutual cooperation between Flagstone's consultants and DNA's consultants set forth in this paragraph shall also be applied to any amendments to the NOPC after filing of same. In the event of a dispute between Flagstone and the DDAIDRI committee regarding either the final draft of the NOPC, or any amendment thereto, Flagstone may request a review by the DDA. Board of Directors in accordance with the review process outlined in paragraph 8 below. 8. DDA reserves the right not to authorize filing of the NOPC to include Island Gardens under Increment I, if at any time up to July 15, 2002, DDA determines that such filing (a) will jeopardize or unreasonably delay the approval of Increment 11, or (b) shall result in unreasonable additional mitigation conditions being imposed upon Increment IT. In the event of a dispute regarding any decision between Flagstone and the DDA/DRI committee or DDA's consultants under any provision of this agreement, Flagstone may request consent from, or review by, the DDA Board of Directors for the filing or continued processing of the NOPC, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld The request for consent shall be scheduled for consideration by DDA at its next available Board of Directors meeting. In the event DDA has not issued the written determination outlined in (a) or (b) above by July 15, 2002, DDA shall proceed with the scheduling of this Resolution for consideration by the City Commission and shall thereafter proceed with the filing of the NOPC in accordance with and subject to paragraphs 6 &7 above. 4 ..., ,...s e • wiriw.1l fl t rnlnAnt J7411111 IN 1V TiAU (mm.crl•ii% ) S N— i e-2002 14 : 55 ,DDA M I Ail I 305 3712423 P.05/05 9. Flagstone will notify the DDA and the City, and provide the opportunity to attend, for City and DDA representatives including DDA's consultants, of all scheduled meetings with the DCA, SFRPC and other review agencies in connection with the NOPC. In connection with such meetings, Flagstone agrees to pay all reasonable and necessary travel expenses for DDA representatives and consultants, as well as DDA's consultant fees for attending such meetings. 10. DDA and the City shall be copied on all correspondence between Flagstone and the applicable review agencies relating to the proposed NOPC. Flagstone representatives shall keep detailed memoranda of all phone conversations with such agency representatives, and shall also provide copies of such memoranda to DDA and the City. 5 __..,,.....�..�.- r_._t+r....�tptfl1.rlftR111E.7o71treirs9Ai1741V)1=N11id?irSi�lR11r1.��1`�i.Si VI MC • • EHXIBIT "D-4" PERMIT SCKETCHES FOR THE ISLAND GARDENS MEGA -YACHT MARINA • • F.K. BLANKENSHIP FL.REG.5541 VENETIAN ISLANDS tCEX OF SHEETS 1. LOCAT ON MAP 2. DIMING COMMONS la. MARINE RESOURCE QUANTEI1ES 3. PROPOSED DREDGING PLAN 4. DREDGE STATIONING PLAN 5. TURBIDITY CONTROL PLAN fi. DREDGING SECTIONS I 7. DREDGING SECTIONS R & FILING PLAN 9. UPIAM ALL SECTION 10. DREDGE V+OLUJIrIE COMPUTATION 11. PROPOSED Imam LAYOUT 11 o.OFFSEASON 50—SUP MAX TIC 12. SECTION C— INKIER ARM OF PIER 13. DECK PROF1.E 14. DETAIL OF BASE DECK TRAFFIC FLOW 15. SECTIONS D AND E 1 B DETAIL OF DECK TRAFFIC FU3W 17. SECTIONS F Ail G 1& SECTION H — WATER TA/0 DOCK 19. SEWAGE PUMP —OUT PIM 20. SEAR DETAILS - trio Frip at rt., rat iiiimAisi RR !lII1IPINE numermai ;wry U nriiii ELL IIIIIMN WO 11111=1 simstris h.■■.■ imasalismi ipu--merest-/rI 1 f i 11 WATSONCRY Of WM RAGS1ONE SAND ommee, tic ISLIAD MINA FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INMENAT1ONAi. INC :4 aesV�nI d GF� �+—nu c eires� Fwd. --'rid* i it �1► .w.' _.r..ra. saw a mom co lim craw, .wanwpo . ar lielasoft «r am. ISLAND GARDE16 1AEGAYN>IT HARBOR ioaaION MAP JOEk 201701 MTE: 10/01/1I3 wt; �p SFfWC 1 OF 21 • • 3 TURNING BASIN a 0 100 2010 SCALE /N FET 1 " = 200' T FLaolklaDiSHiP .I�i.3tl�1G LEGEND FLAGSTONE LEASE UM[TS THAIASSIA TESTiDINUM HALODULE WRIGHT!! HALOPHILA DECIPIENS BARREN SUBSTRATE WITH 5% SPONGES MACROALGAE (SPARSE) EXISTING STEEL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD UPLAND SITE (10.7'm ACRES) 7 SEAGRASS SURVEY PERFORMED ON 08/25/03 BY COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL. TOTAL AREA OF SEAGRASS IS 1.87 ACRES. OIY OF #4 M t RACSTOPE ISLAND GARDENS, 11C WATSON ISLAND UTAK FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS I TTERNAT)ONAL INC rsaw, 3M ► C c.+ew ne.Ia. >s.,. ,t �sf«,- �« ,-E.,. tee.. WA CIF Rae► i! 17074 04444 7u.rmnorm4 04 trelre4414 and w..ownra ISLAND GARDENS MEGAYlI HT HARBOR eEM COMMONS to/ot/r� Vt SHEET 2 OF 21 2ot7ot DAM: Joe 8Y: • . •WIP • IPA. • • • Nom. • ••••• FOOT EW • 727 LECENOt UPtAND PARCEL BOUNCIORY MARINA BASIN DOLMA& THAI-ARRA TESTUDINUN MODULE man HALOPHRA DECIPENS BARREN SUBSTRATE wrm 5% SPONGES (7.500 J. TOTAL) wzgok.cot (s.frnz - 790 14. TOTAL) HALOWILE MAIL L • SW& : 0-20% CCKRAGE WED/ARSE : 21 -40Z COKRAGE - • • " ; 41-60X COVERAGE NED/DETSE : 61-80X COVERAGE DOUGAS W.CATHUlt CAMWAY . -1 TURNING RAM -rretio MARNA 561 SO. FT C)55 =S. L44_11 • 11 ) \ NOES TOTAL AREA OF AGRASS HABITAT tS 1.67 ACM MN AN AVERAGE OF 0.• 35X COVERAGE. • HALOPHEA I:06ff WAS MED/SPARE (21-40X CCMERAGE) FOR ALL TRANSECTS. • AU. AREAS NOT OTHERWISE IABELED HIM THE PROJECT LMTS ARE WW1 SUBSTRATE ▪ ,.•1 0 HARD CORMS AND -25 SOFT CORALS ARE WHIN THE PROJECT liiiPACT AREA • RESOURCEES ON THE ELILRHEAD AND PILINGS ARE NOT RiCLUDED HUCK I k 3 12.5 2 5;:"; Frei = 2.50' • KAPIKOeitso FLREO-551110 COT bg lirreapansmal are OF NM & RAGSTONE SAND GARDENS, Ur WATSON ISLANO FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTFMS INTERNATIONAL, INC tri.= C. Pleadik .13144 UM CI FIANDr ES POP Coot* linditareramed.04InelnwOrli and iberassonsou ISLAND MEGAYACHT GARDENS HARBOR MARK RESOURCE QUANTMES ,IC; 201701 DATE 10/0 1/03 ';: VC HFIT 2A GF 2 I • • COASTAL ISMS .11YYY..NY PROPOSED DREDGING ON CITY LAND OUTSIDE FLAGSTONE LEASE LJMITS PROPOSED DREDGING WITHIN CITY/FLAGSTONE LEASE UFAITS CITY OF MIAMI & RAGSTOP( RAND GARDENS, LLC WATSON ISLAND WNII. Ft. 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC 444 Sough D445 k 1 —U,. Corr CaPm PiaAds 33146 �c Jm/wW-xya fwc ss/isc-isu 1441.461.144644611464 sun a nom pest Gam& lerAeo.wrrri Cis LrMra+t and frAmeen.rt ISLAND GARDENS MEGAYACHT HARBOR PILOPOSID OCEDCI VG PLAN 4E: 201701 )ATE. 10/01 /03 3�: IJJP/VC S=_ET 3 CC 21 • T rt-ieLiarto CITY 0f PAM & RAO-10 E !SLAB) coaxed, uc WATSON ISLAND YflM. FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS IMERNATIONAL, INC 464 1466h C644 CAI C+6441. Mods siK mot a ROM /, 14110 C. 6664m4444,a644444440.4 -- 144,011444446 TAX.. ISLAND GARDENS AAR BB OR MEGAYAC t ffyTyyHARBOR ��pp DRBD{ JTA1T1OI*4C RAN _. 201701 -'_' 14/01 /03 per'. 1.4JP/VC SHEET 4 ,)= 21 • • E.K. Bi AVKrms.rEP ?_C.559SD COASTAL CITY OF MIAM k RAGS -TONE PItOPernE5s LLC WATSON ISLAND 11411, FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC .a t swan OW4 P ..r, cent Gibin,. 'Amid. .uw. I� Y:af'-'.a5-S S1.5:ti' "t'. c . Mrrtrw .eml. Orrtnenswing and i.Srtri/iwnre ISLAND GARDENS MEGAYACHT HARBOR MUM CONTROL PLAN JOB: 201701 CA-_ 10/01/03 BY: MJP/VC SHE:7 5 cc 21 • • 04 10 T EXISTING BUIXHEAD EXISTING GRADE /' // DREDGE AREA PROPOSED DEPTH '- OVER DREDGE AREA 260 460 660 800 DISTANCE FROM BULKHEAD IN FEET DREDGING PROFILE STA 0+00 pOSTING BULKHEAD DIMING GRADE 77/7"/ PROPOSED 'DEMI 3 AREA 0 200 40 860 C. DISTANCE FROM BULKHEAD IN FEET 11 I SCALE: ft 1•*2C0' V: t"-20 DREDGING PROFILE STA 2+00 10 EXISING BULKHEAD 6 I EXISTING ORME I E 0 801 �'is•_ _ xi ./�..4 //////!// ���__ 13ROPOSIM DEPTH MR. DREDGE 'REA 21 T 1 4 6 0 DISTANCE FROM BULKHEAD W FEET DREDGING PROFILE STA 4+00 800 NOTE~ DREDGE TO -18.0' NGVD WITH 1.0' ALLOWABLE _ OVERDREDGE. r.C. 9:,444KE�S f' f LHCv.55810 an' OF MIAMI it RACSTO�FEISLAND GOMA D G Ced Ur WATSON COASTAL iMMIL EL 33132 SYSTEMS COASTAL SYSTS INTERNATIONAL INC. 4M l�wah Obi - arm*, mown, info Tt J041Ml-]�Im F 7f 113-1II4 i R,ew Sal vnOpopm carslL i.:ipamor+d CV butridorer.i wrrporunt ISLAND GARDENS MEGAYACHT HARBOR DIEDGR4C SECTIONS I .:. 3 201701 DDT_: 10/01 /03 B1'. MJP/VC SHEET 6 OF 27 • • i SCALE It 1 = 2001 V: I. 18 20 10 10 EXISTING BULKHEAD i EXISTING GRADE DREDGE AREA__. PROPOSED DEPTH O ER DREDGE AREA T 200 400 600 DISTANCE FROM RUMEN) N FEET DREDGING PROFILE STA 6.00 200 400 - 600 800 DISTANCE FROM BUIJCFEAD IN FEET DREDGING PROFILE STA 8.00 DUSTING BULKHEAD EXISTING GRADE DREDGE AREA PROPOSED DEPTH OVER DREDGE AREA 200 I 400 600 800 DISTANCE FROM BUU(HEO IN FEET DREDGING PROFILE STA 10+00 NODE DREDGE TO -18.0' OR -25.0' NGVD WITH 1.©' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE COASTAL SYSTEMS an, OF 11 AM k HTONE RAND GAR086 LLC NAM* ISLAND AWL FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL. INC. Ms 60�� Owi I �Ca Cain.% . - .• ]:1M6 ` :Te J ,'7 J-)166 fs 1-1914 awarAPRIalribmitase at or nm to pato cam wAommrt c +rP..-- i .i.d w.le..e ISLAND GARDENS MEGAYACHT HARBOR DREDGING SECTIONS N JOB: 201701 OArE: 10/01/03 .'Y: MJP/VC -J-:.,T 7 21 MACARTHUR CAUSEVVAY MP..il=. TURNING BASIN s r w 40 SUBSARCED PARCEL N 0 10B 20t7 SCkf w FELT 2X 7.K aW+K`kSNiv V r7s v-•.JS kEF COASTAL SYSTEM; an OF MINA A SANDWATSON GAR.0 »B6M U MAAK R. 33132 COASTAL SYST146 INTE'KNM11ONA . INC +1s s.. obi/ c-n�wl:Gb lirio.'rowr. 'row ►s �+4/- . w.sr.e�rwr�.r. SUM Of UM a MC C....t 11.rnium•04 04 1114.1mo e w wwew..ed J1 AND AREA TO BE F1U1D ri1TH DREDGE MATERIAL ISLAND GAMINS IIIEGAMCH1 HARBOR RING MAN MIL Jlt 2017mt MATE io/o /Q3 ALP ! SNIT a OF 2I • • 4 dEA�.KE Nra1.111. F CU-! ,I0 COAITA %r,▪ 4s ▪ s wua s.ti...m c CflY OF HAM *RAGSTONEy�SON � WA 471•MO WM, FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL. INC. 441 SaM 0100 t •.r. CTh ►tarsi. 13144 r.R Cr P 121 41*X0 Co-:W. frowcw wwM. CSA 6pMr..Y w.$ w,sme.r4 ELAND GARDENS 1AEGAYACHT HARBOR as. 201701 DATE: 10/01/03 sr- LL1R/VC SHEET 9 Y 21 • • i DREDGE AREA DREDGE AREA AND VOWME INSIDE OF RAGSTONE LEASE DREDGE AREA (ACRES) 11.63 DREDGE VOLUME TO —18' NGVD (c.y) 118,247 DREDGE VOLUME TO —25' NGVD (c.y) 29,492 OVER DREDGE (c.y.) 18,765 DREDGE AREA AND VOLUME OUTSIDE OF RACSTONE LEASE DREDGE AREA (ACRES) 3.56 DREDGE VOLUME TO —16' NGVD (c.y) 35.927 OVER DREDGE (c.y.) 5,755 c a. '.K CChr.KENSHIP Ftr.RE;..5S9' 0 CO.A5TAI. SYSTEMS .K.Y11'wi.�y CITY K b4M4 £ RAC TOPE &APC CAMS, II..0 WATSON ISLAND MAIL FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC 444 Ste% Old, tNe+r+Rf. Carr+ Crbt.r. noddy. 11146 w 1251661-3E55 rr, !GS/961-1914 ws.[®td$,.l<ralYeal 5147 r;ORSIA :E E'z7 Co towdrorrrmaat, C+.t r w.rrwrs and ,.Yrrprront tSL&ND GARDENS MEGAYAClT HARBOR RER VOLUME CONFUTATION J©t3: 201701 CAT! 10/D1/03 Ef: I4JP/SIC S.fc. T 10 JF 21 • a I' ilAKENS.:-4I? r .N{G.3S31Q COASTAL QR' OF NMI & RACSTyCP�Ey ISLAND CAROM UC %�� ISLA D WIY� a 33132 COASTAL MIDAS M7 SEM1477Ck4W, @VC. 454 swat L1} 1.110..up, Caw! Gm 3tW 31411114111111. Far S,41tia+-two _ ' SUP MIX TABLE VESSEL SU1 WAVIER, OF SIES _ LENGTH 300' 200' 160' - 140' 125' F1S RI1 9QA1S 44 ' WATER TAXI 30' 1 3 1d 2• 2. 4 2 330` eac' 2.992' MO' 275' 171l1< air TOTAL 32 5,27 ' ISLAND GARDENS UEGAYACNT HARBOR PROPOSE] MARINA LAYOUT ^_3. 201701 ?'.TE 10/01/03 MJP/VC ShEFi 11 OF 21 • R AEi..51910 • CRY OF MIA E RA:STONE NAND GARD06,1.tC SLAW WA R. 33132 COASTAL 5Y51Th6 Q TERNA ZONAL P C IM ONO OW FIBamili Wiiti iriii — i� XtV1/1 ]M he 7Q4�-11�. waL Y.a� Slit sr now o pier A TA SY'JTams fail �lM MEG :y1 HARBOR SIMUP tm xet 201701 DATE 10 %01 f 03 EN: it M SHEET 11A OF 21 • • i ELEV. +30.0 TOP OF 24' PEE PLANTER. ° ' +2D.Q UPPER DOCK -- FINGER PIER - SYSTE 1 1 -- PILE BEYOND SHRUBBERY, 1YP. 77 ALir1ANUM 171--0 unurr PEDESTAL — / STEEL JACKET. o TYP. ROLLER TYP. ,- CONCRETE �/ FLOATING- DOCK it 1i •00000 000 Q21��. 1`-- UTILITY CONDUIT, TV. 11.--0" s ELEV. -18.0 11'-0" T 11'-0- +1_8 (I HW) - 2 0.0 NGYD -0.6 (LILW) _— 24' CONCRETE PILES SCALE SC'.LE 1" = 8. AMID Ft.REC. 55970 COASTAL 1x,TIIU 0.114.411,11+1. CFIY O & RAGSTONI 61AM GB Yip. WATSON ISLAND WAIL F. 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMSINiIRNATIONA[ INC 464 6666 C644 441106.06 Cwii CAM. Poi& 3?t746 lit he -1Pt4 MRaw. UM Of PAM 1 MI Owis& Orimmusii. C7/ Nosid wM1 _ wig iArwig.w+t WWI WI 3711I�B.��Ri>i7 • �GAYA HAR�p BOR BOR SC104 C • NO OM an Apt CAT;.. 10/0t/e3 St MkP/UC - 5 tEt7 12 _ 21 • • rQ-,£ 11 11 u u n 4 N 11 • TSB V+f OF PA &MGM( SAW GARDENS, Lim. 1A1SON ISLAM COASTAL Mk F' 33132 r,--•:,, COASTAL SYSTEMSMAT1ONA1. INC. .M. Stark OM, fiesimar. Cord au.. w.rr nrt«. i1L SIS M1 — F Ml-M1i halm' SW SF MOM al PIO S Y 1 T S I►1S Cum* bMsmuseiL W fWPwMM old w PrrwSrR 1S.AND GARDENS lallEGATACHT HPRBOR DECK PROFILE J0& 201701 MiE 10/01/03 WET 13 of 21 • • • i NON -SECURE AREA Oit NON -SECURE' AREA -SERVICE CORRIDOR a 0 8 • O -El SECURE AREA 11'-0- 3r-0" MOVABLE SECURITY FENCE, (IYP.} - EDGE OF CONCRE1t FLOATING DOCK f INDICATE TRAFFIC FLOW DETAIL OF INNER PIER BASE DECK TRAFFIC FLOW SCALE 1- = 8' 7.. 3;A Vn:E, 45A FL.REG.55910 COASTAL • TATrs Ma, rub... MY Of MINA * RTOtEa ISLAND CASEe4 ILC WATSON t WM,ft33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS U4T NATIONAL. INC. 4M soda Oii. C7•t t"i1M, . riaM i* allAOI-�kll! �i—k$14 awL __— yr !0i[ OF Vila EN pill Cinnik16.6119•161194 o4 _t, .r M..ryra.M ,�ISL`xs AND r i�v MIR RI &ISE DECK 11AFRC ROW Joe X11701 LY1TE 10/O1/D • BY: Mkr/%C J SIMI 14 of 21 • • r•, • + 1.6 1.I1i'N 0.0 NGVD ,trELEY_.+ 13_0 ELEV. -18.0 24. PILES 20.0' UTILITY PEDISTAL MILT Y CONDUIT TYP. - CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK AND WAVE ATTENUATCR ♦ + 1.6 LIHW 0.0 NG1+D .6 MU% TYPICAL SECTION • OUTER ARM OF PIER SC.*LE 1 ` = 8' .Q.EV. +30.0 -- T 8. PILES PLATFORIt CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK TYPICAL SECTION - PLATFORM SCALE i.K. BLANK ENSAIP F LREC-55910 COASTAL eTs7arls ..:........... an' OF MINAt i 1ONE ELAND CA111:06, LLC 1t41SON ISIMKf YAv. FL 33132 COASTAL SYSTEMS D4TaNATIONAI. INC. tM !re _ c=41i` :larch nw SYR fit h 11 /IA/ COMP& Seamorwall. CIA iiiiftwolft d DAmodoomiNt ISM© GARCE16 IEGAYACHT HARSCO SIMI 0 MD E J06 2017O1 QAT iO/O1/03 m' hhlrt AC SHEET 13 OF 21 Exhibit "I" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA INCLUDING WATSON ISLAND PROPERTY • EXHIBIT • • DORI Boundaries as of February 1, 2004 Begin at the intersection of the centerline of N.W. Fifth Street and N.W. Third Avenue (east side of N-S Expressway (I-95)), thence run southerly along the centerline of N.W. Third Avenue and the easterly side of N-S Expressway to the centerline of West Flagler Street; thence westerly along the centerline of said West Flagler Street to the centerline of the Miami River; thence meandering southeasterly along the centerline of said Miami River to a point of intersection with the easterly right-of-way line of Metro Rapid Transit right-of-way (formerly Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad right-of-way) said right-of-way line being 50 feet easterly of and parallel with the centerline of said Metro Rapid Transit right-of-way; thence run southerly and southwesterly along said easterly right-of-way line of Metro Rapid Transit to the intersection with the centerline of S.W. 15th Road; thence southeasterly along the centerline of 15th Road to a point of intersection with the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Costa Bella Development Subdivision (107- 14); thence northeasterly, northwesterly and northeasterly along said westerly line of Costa Bella to the intersection with the southerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, northerly, and northwesterly along said southerly and westerly right-of-way line of S.E. 14th Lane and S.E. 14th Terrace to the intersection with the northwesterly property line of lot 31, block 2 of amended plat of Point View as recorded in plat book ? at page 93 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said lot 31, to the northeasterly side of the existing ten -foot alley in block 2 of said Point View; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly side of said ten -foot alley to the intersection with the property line between lots 4 and 5 of said block 2 of Point View; thence northeasterly along said line of lots 4 and 5 and its prolongation thereof to the centerline of S.E. 14th Street; thence southeasterly along said centerline of S.E. 14th Street to a point of intersection with the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence meandering northerly along the existing bulkhead and shoreline of Biscayne Bay to a point of intersection with the southerly boundary of Claughton Island Bridge; thence easterly along the said southerly right-of-way line of Claughton Island Bridge to the intersection with the et westerly said bulkhead line being part of theMetropolitan bulkhead Tine of Claughton Island, a 18 of the public Miami -Dade County bulkhead line as recorded in plat book we7sterly, foat llowing said existing ag records; thence southerly, easterly, northerly and Y bulkhead and its westerly prolongation thereof around the island to. the intersection with the mainland on the easterly shoreline of Biscayne Bay, thence meandering in a northwesterly and westerly direction along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay and the Miami i - River to the intersection with the easterly right-of-way line of BrickellbAvenueulkhead Bron the (S.E. Second --Avenue); thence north along said bridge to the existing northerly shoreline of the Miami River; said bulkhead line also being the so erly boundary of the Dupont Plaza Center and Miami Center Joint Venture property, thence northeasterly along the southerly boundary, of Dupont Plaza Center and lineMiami of Chopin Joint Venture property to a point of intersection with the easterly properly Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership; said property line being along the shoreline of Biscayne Bay; thence northerly along said easterly property line of Chopin Associates and Miami Center Limited Partnership property along Biscayne Bay to the southerly property line of Bayfront Park; thence continuing northerly, northeasterly and Bayfront Park Miamarina; northwesterly along the bulkhead line of Bayfront Park and Bis e Bay Bay to a point of ne of thence continuing northerly along the bulkhead hStreeti extended easterly; thence westerly intersection with the centerline of N.E. of along the centerline. of N.E. 17th Street and its extension thereof to a point intersection with the centerline of North Bayshore Drive; thence northerly a d nd northeasterly along the centerline of North Bayshore Drive to a point of inters ection easterly extension of the northerly lot line of lot 1 of block 1 of Seaport amended as recorded in plat book 149 at page 79 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, eof Florida; thence northwesterly along the northerly lot Tine of lots and its rtherly lotextension line of lot 6 of across a 15-foot-wide alley to the easterly extension of the block 8 of Miramar amended as recorded in plat book al5 ong page 4 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northwesterly 9 the northerly lot line of lot 6 to a point of intersection with centerline of N.E. 4th Avenue; thence southwesterly and northerly along the centerline of N.E. Fourth Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of N.E. 19th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 19th Street to a point of intersection with southerly extension of the easterly lot line of lot 4 of block 1 of Miramar amended as recorded in plat book 5 at page 4 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 4 and its extension thereof to the southerly lot line of lot 8 of Coral Park as recorded in plat book 2 at page 66 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence easterly along the southerly lot line of lot 8 to the southeast corner of said lot 8; thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 8 to the southerly right-of-way line of N.E. 20th Street; thence easterly along the southerly right-of-way line of N.E. 20th Street to the southerly extension of the easterly lot line of lot 7 of said Coral Park (2-66); thence northerly. along the easterly lot line of lot 7 and its extension thereof to the northeast corner of lot 7; thence westerly along the northerly lot line of lot 7 to a point of intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly lot line of lot 7 of block 4 of Bayside Park amended as recorded in plat book 2 at page 40 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 7 and its extension thereof across a 15- foot-wide alley to the northeast corner of lot 7; thence continuing northerly across the right-of-way of N.E. Oth Terrace to the southeast corner of lot 7 of block 1 of Bayside Park amended (2-40); thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 7 to the northeast corner of said lot 7; thence across a 15-foot-wide alley to the southeast corner of lot 5 block 3 of Bayonne Subdivision as recorded in plat book 2 at page 35 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida; thence northerly along the easterly lot line of lot 5, and the northerly extension of its easterly lot line thereof, to the centerline of N.E. 21st Street; thence easterly along the centerline of N.E. 21 st Street to a point of intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly lot line of lot 3 of block 1 of Bayonne Subdivision (2-35); thence northerly along the easterly lot line and its extension thereof, to the southerly lot line of tract a of Caruso Subdivision as recorded in plat book 79 at page 23 of the public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida: thence easterly along the southerly tract line of tract A to the southerly extension of the easterly right-of-way line of • N.E. Fourth Avenue; thence northerly along the easterly right-of-way line of N.E. Fourth Avenue and its extension thereof to the centerline of N.E. 24th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 24th Street to the centerline of N.E. Second Avenue; thence southerly along the centerline of N.E. Second Avenue to the centerline of N.E. 17th Street; thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. 17th Street and N.W. 17th Street to the easterly right-of-way line of the FEC Railroad; thence southerly along the easterly right-of-way line of the FEC Railroad to the limited access right-of-way of 1-395; thence southeasterly and easterly along the limited access right-of-way of 1-395 to the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard thence southerly along the centerline of Biscayne Boulevard to the centerline of N.E. 5th Street, thence westerly along the centerline of N.E. and N.W. 5th Street to the point of beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UPLAND PARCEL Commence at a point shown marked by an 5/8" diameter iron rod and Cap Stamped F.D.©.T., shown as P.T. Sta. 25+50 on the "Official Map of Location and Survey of a portion of Section 8706, • designated as part of State Road A-1-A in Dade County, Florida", prepared by the State Road Department of the State of Florida, as recorded in Map Book 56, at Page 71 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said point being the point of tangency of the original center line of the Douglas "MacArthur Causeway running Easterly and South Easterly from the Westerly lirnits (West Bridge) of Watson Island as shown on Sheet 3 of the State Road Department Right-OWay Map, Section No. (8706-1 12) 87060-2117, revised March 25, 1959, said rnost Northerly curve havinga radius of 1432.69 feet and a central angle of 62'.00' 00 seconds" ; thence South 59 ' 51' 26" West departing radially from said centerline a distance of 987.36 feet to a Projected Bulkhead line; thence North 17 ' 12' 21" West along said bulkhead line, a distance of 238.86 feet to the point and place of beginning; thence North 17' 12' 21" West continuing along said bulkhead line a distance of 924.70 feet to the Southerly right of way line of State Road A-1-A Douglas MacArthur Causeway; thence along said Southerly right of way line the following courses and distances; South 89' 10' 55" East, a distance of 73.08 feet; thence North 86 ' 44' 00" East, a distance of 67.09 feet to non - tangent curve concave to the Northeast whose radial line bears North 393 29' 18" East having a radius of 160.00 feet and central angle of 22 09' 33"; thence along said curve an arc length of 61.88 feet; thence South . 72 ' 40' 15" East continuing along said Southerly right of way line a distance of 276.49 feet; to a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 600.00 feet and central angel of 46 ' 17' 39" thence along said curve,air arc length of 484.79 feet to a point of tangency; thence South 26' 22' 36" East continuing along the southwesterly right of way line of State Road A- I -A, a distance of 196.59 feet; thence South 54 ' 07 39" West Departing Said right of way line, a distance of 532.16 feet; thence North 35' 54'.03" West, a distance of 132.74 feet; thence South 54' 07' 39" West, a distance of 150.14 feet to the point of beginning. The combined Upland and Submerged Parcels contain approximately 24.2+/-- acres LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBMERGED PARCEL Commence at a point marked by an 5/8". diameter iron rod and Cap Stamped F.D.O.T., shown as P. T. Sta. 25+50 on the "Official_ Map of Location and Survey of a portion of Section 8708, designated as part of State Road Al -A in Dade County, Florida", prepared by the State Road Department of the State of Florida, .as recorded in Map. Book 56 at Page 71 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida. Said paint .being the point of tangency of the original center. line of the Douglas MacArthur Causeway running Easterly and South Easterly from . the Westerly limits (West. Bridge) of Watson Island as shown on Sheet 3 of the State -Road Department Right -of -Way Map, Section No.' (8706-. 112) 87060-2117, revised March 25, 1,959, said most Northerly curve having a radius of 1432.69 feet and a central angle of 62 00' 00"; thence South 59 51' 26" West departing • radially from said centerline, a distance of 987.36 feet to a projected bulkhead line; thence North 17 12' 21" West along said bulkhead line, a distance of 238.86 feet to the point and place of beginning; thence South 49 3 32' 57" West departing said bulkhead line a•tdistance of 550.92 feet to a point of intersection of lines of turning basin limit as -established by U.S. Army Corps of engineers and position by coordinates North 527,878.62 feet, East 926,135.22 feet (based on North American Datum 1983-NAC83): thence North 31 03' 50" West, along the limits of said turning basin a distance of 428.44 feet to a point of intersection with the East right of way line of the intracoastal waterway; thence North 03 27' 54" West along said East right of way line a distance of 874.43 feet to a point of intersection with the Southerly right of way line of said Douglas MacArthur Causeway, said point of intersection being a point on a curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 10,716.59 feet, a radial line to said point bears South 01 ' 15' 15" East; thence run Easterly for 387.46 feet along the arc of said curve and along said Southerly right of way line, through a central angle of 02 ' 04' 17" to a point of tangency; thence South 89 ' 10' 55" East continuing Easterly along the said Southerly right of way line, a distance of 31.87 feet more or less to a point of intersection with an existing bulkhead line; thence South 17 12' 21" East along said bulkhead line a distance of 924.70 feet to the point of beginning. The combined Upland and Submerged parcels contain approximately 2 4.2+/-- acres 3 1