HomeMy WebLinkAboutpre legislationJ-02-_11
2/4/02
R-cOLUT:C�r NC. 02- 149
♦ • V
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS
OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO
RE,WESa FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST ;UALIFICD
FIRMS TC PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERV_CES FOR
PUBLIC 'FORKS CATEGORY "3" DESIGNATED PROJECTS
FCR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN
RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS WITH EACi FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT 'IC
EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED =N ATTACHMENT "•n„
FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIR_:; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL. PROJECT ACCCJNTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION CF THE CITY OF MIA.MI,
FLORIDA:
Section The recommendation of the City Manager to
appro ,e
the findings of t!'.e selection cort' t:.ee, pursuant ..o
request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms tc provide
pro_`essicna1 engineering construction management services for
Pub? Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 throuoh
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
The Co_radino Group, Inc,
2. Nova Consulting Inc.
3. Marlin Engineering Inc.
4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc,
5. CE$ Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
S. PSS&,7 (ALTERNATE)
r,
r•
I^ e+ S ( 1. '1.0
f
CITY CSSION
MEETING CIF
FEB 1 y 2002
.027
t�
ectinn 2. The recommendation of the City Manage:
apF= ode
the findings c_ the selection committee, pursuant
Request for Prcposa=e, as to the most qualified firms
rroVICIS
professional ADA requirement services
for Public
r•,orrs Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
20:4, y_sted herein in rank order, are accepted;
i
4
S 0 Architects + _ _ar.rers, Inc.
Gurr_ Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE)
Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager tc
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architectural engineering services for Public Works
Category "8" designated projects for 2CO2 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A. ?. Erg. Consultants, Inc,
2. Indicc Service Corporation
Section 4. The recommendation of the City war.ager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architecture services for Public Works Category "8,.
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, art accepted:
.. Gurr: uatute PA
2. Zyscovicl-,, Inc.
3. R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A.
9. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc.
5. Bermelio, Ajami= a Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. PBSJ (ALTERNATE)
Page 2 of 7
02- 144
Section E. The recommendation of the City Ya:-a.;er tc
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified fires tc provide-
-A
professional environmental engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2 005 , listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. ATC Grip Services Inc.
2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
3. URS Corporation
. END Engineers, Inc.
5. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science,
Ins.
( yL'_ ERNATE )
Section E. The recommendation of the City Manger to
approve _: a findings of =he selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional general engineering services for Public Works
c ;cs
Category "B" designated protects for 2002 through 2004, ristes
herein in rank order, are ECcectedr
H.J. Rost Associates, Inc.
2 , Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc.
3. Metric Engineering, Inc.
ft. PBS&J
5. Marlin Engineering, Inc.
6. pap Engineering Corp.
7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE;
Kimiey—torn and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 7 The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, purst:ant tc
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 3 of 7
02- 144
professional landscape architecture services -fo: Public
T4v.K5
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 t`:rcugf. 2C04, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
Falcon & 3ueno
2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc.
3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
EDAW, Inc, ALTERNATE)
Sec_icn ?. The recommendation of the City :tanager to
approve the findings cf the selection committee, pursuant
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional mechanical engineering services for Public Worts
Categcrti• "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted;
Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A.
2. Johnsen, Hernandez Associates Inc.
? . Gartek Engineering Corporation ( LTERNATE)
Sa tion 9.
approve the
The recommendation cf the City Manager to
findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional structural engineering services for Public Forks
Category "B" designated prc;;ects for 2002 tt.rough 2C04, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. San Martin Associates, Inc.
2. Avart, Inc.
3. EAC Consulting, Inc.
Section 10. The recommendation cf the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection: committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 4 of 7
AAA
professional surveying and mapping services for Putlic Works
Category "8" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, fisted
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc.
3. We_dener Surveying and Napping, P. A.
4. Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc.
5. Williams, atfieia & Stoner, Inc.
6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc.
Sec:i.;n 11. The recommendation of the City Manacle:
approve the findings of the seLectio:: committee, pursuant tc
Recuesc ;or Proposals, as to the most qaiified firir.s to provide
professional value ana:ysis and cos: estimate services fcr Public
Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2304,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
a . A2 Group, Inc.
2. PBSiJ
3. Grace y Naee:n Ucd± n (ALTERNATE)
Section _2. The recommendation cf the City .imager to
1
apwrthe `findings of the selection committee, pursuance to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm tc provide
professicna:: air conditioning services for Public Works Category
"3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed here:n is
accepted:
grace & Naeem Udder.
Secton 13. The recommendation cf the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified f :rm to provide
Page 5 of 7
02- 144
.. -
professional life safety services for Public Works Category)
designated pro ec_s for 2002 through 2004, listed herein _s
accepted;
1. Gurri Matute, ?.A.
Section 14.
The recommendation of the City Manager c
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
ro_`ess_....al roofing services for Public Works Category "3"
designated projects for 20:2 through 2004, listed herein
order, are accepted:
Building Diagnostics Associates, PA
=..ternationa_ Logistics Group
r.
ranlS
Section 15. The City anger is. authori zedli tc negotiate
and execute Professionel Services Agreements, in a form
acce^=ai:._e to the City Attorney, with eao?., farm in an amount not
to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each
specialty for each firm, with funs allocated frorr, individual
project accounts.
The herein authorization is further subject to comp,:ance with ail
requirements that may 1-.e imposed by the City Attorney, including but not
limited those prescribed by applicable City Charier and Code
provisions.
Page 6 of 7
02- t44
Sec:io:-. 16.
Th:s Resolut;o- ea"_ become effec_:ve
_rnmeda a t e. _ „pcn its a60p: ion and s ignate of the Mayor .
il
=AESS7t AND ADOPTED :his 14th day
ATTEST:
Sylv_- Scheider
Acting Cit -lerk
APPR.Z." D A; "_'O jt7CRM FIND ,,O.RRECT NESS : t
AN C' V=LARCLLC
..TY ATTORNEY
o= Febraary , 2002.
Y
M NUEL n, DIAZ, MAv
If :no Mayo.- does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective a:
the .and of ter. calendar days fron the data it was passed and adopted. If
the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately
upon override 0= :he veto by the City Cornm_ssion,
Page 7 of 7
02» 144
V��
ENGINEE7,ING
f1i:zt "n"
. C:'.M�NT
CONSTRJCTION MANAGEMENT: 56CC', 000
L D?. (D=SABLE . ECCIREM£NTS) : S100,000
FRCHITECTURAI-ENGINEERING SEP.VICES (B0.:'_1d�ng & Zoning): SEC0, 000
LRC:?ITECTURE: $60C,00C
ENVIRCNXEN.AL ENGINEERING: $6CO3 000
GENERAL ENGINEER:NG: 57'OO, 000
LANDSCAPE ASCHIIECTURE: $400, 00C
t:LG: ;t:_CAL ENGINEERING: $200, O0C
STPUCTJRAL ENGINEERING: $200, CCC
SURVEYING hND MA FINE: $200, 0CC
VALCE ANA1Y5:S AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000'
AIR CONCI:IONINC;: $202,, 000
LIFE S;F_:Y: $200, 000
ROOFING: 5200,C00
02- 144
TOTAL P.05