Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpre legislationJ-02-_11 2/4/02 R-cOLUT:C�r NC. 02- 149 ♦ • V A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO RE,WESa FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST ;UALIFICD FIRMS TC PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERV_CES FOR PUBLIC 'FORKS CATEGORY "3" DESIGNATED PROJECTS FCR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH EACi FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT 'IC EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED =N ATTACHMENT "•n„ FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIR_:; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL. PROJECT ACCCJNTS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION CF THE CITY OF MIA.MI, FLORIDA: Section The recommendation of the City Manager to appro ,e the findings of t!'.e selection cort' t:.ee, pursuant ..o request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms tc provide pro_`essicna1 engineering construction management services for Pub? Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 throuoh 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: The Co_radino Group, Inc, 2. Nova Consulting Inc. 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc, 5. CE$ Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) S. PSS&,7 (ALTERNATE) r, r• I^ e+ S ( 1. '1.0 f CITY CSSION MEETING CIF FEB 1 y 2002 .027 t� ectinn 2. The recommendation of the City Manage: apF= ode the findings c_ the selection committee, pursuant Request for Prcposa=e, as to the most qualified firms rroVICIS professional ADA requirement services for Public r•,orrs Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 20:4, y_sted herein in rank order, are accepted; i 4 S 0 Architects + _ _ar.rers, Inc. Gurr_ Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE) Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager tc approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architectural engineering services for Public Works Category "8" designated projects for 2CO2 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A. ?. Erg. Consultants, Inc, 2. Indicc Service Corporation Section 4. The recommendation of the City war.ager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public Works Category "8,. designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, art accepted: .. Gurr: uatute PA 2. Zyscovicl-,, Inc. 3. R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. 9. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc. 5. Bermelio, Ajami= a Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBSJ (ALTERNATE) Page 2 of 7 02- 144 Section E. The recommendation of the City Ya:-a.;er tc approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified fires tc provide- -A professional environmental engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2 005 , listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. ATC Grip Services Inc. 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. URS Corporation . END Engineers, Inc. 5. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Ins. ( yL'_ ERNATE ) Section E. The recommendation of the City Manger to approve _: a findings of =he selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional general engineering services for Public Works c ;cs Category "B" designated protects for 2002 through 2004, ristes herein in rank order, are ECcectedr H.J. Rost Associates, Inc. 2 , Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc. 3. Metric Engineering, Inc. ft. PBS&J 5. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 6. pap Engineering Corp. 7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE; Kimiey—torn and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 7 The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, purst:ant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3 of 7 02- 144 professional landscape architecture services -fo: Public T4v.K5 Category "B" designated projects for 2002 t`:rcugf. 2C04, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: Falcon & 3ueno 2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. EDAW, Inc, ALTERNATE) Sec_icn ?. The recommendation of the City :tanager to approve the findings cf the selection committee, pursuant Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for Public Worts Categcrti• "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A. 2. Johnsen, Hernandez Associates Inc. ? . Gartek Engineering Corporation ( LTERNATE) Sa tion 9. approve the The recommendation cf the City Manager to findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional structural engineering services for Public Forks Category "B" designated prc;;ects for 2002 tt.rough 2C04, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2. Avart, Inc. 3. EAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation cf the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection: committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 AAA professional surveying and mapping services for Putlic Works Category "8" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, fisted herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc. 3. We_dener Surveying and Napping, P. A. 4. Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. 5. Williams, atfieia & Stoner, Inc. 6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. Sec:i.;n 11. The recommendation of the City Manacle: approve the findings of the seLectio:: committee, pursuant tc Recuesc ;or Proposals, as to the most qaiified firir.s to provide professional value ana:ysis and cos: estimate services fcr Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2304, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: a . A2 Group, Inc. 2. PBSiJ 3. Grace y Naee:n Ucd± n (ALTERNATE) Section _2. The recommendation cf the City .imager to 1 apwrthe `findings of the selection committee, pursuance to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm tc provide professicna:: air conditioning services for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed here:n is accepted: grace & Naeem Udder. Secton 13. The recommendation cf the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified f :rm to provide Page 5 of 7 02- 144 .. - professional life safety services for Public Works Category) designated pro ec_s for 2002 through 2004, listed herein _s accepted; 1. Gurri Matute, ?.A. Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager c approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide ro_`ess_....al roofing services for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 20:2 through 2004, listed herein order, are accepted: Building Diagnostics Associates, PA =..ternationa_ Logistics Group r. ranlS Section 15. The City anger is. authori zedli tc negotiate and execute Professionel Services Agreements, in a form acce^=ai:._e to the City Attorney, with eao?., farm in an amount not to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each specialty for each firm, with funs allocated frorr, individual project accounts. The herein authorization is further subject to comp,:ance with ail requirements that may 1-.e imposed by the City Attorney, including but not limited those prescribed by applicable City Charier and Code provisions. Page 6 of 7 02- t44 Sec:io:-. 16. Th:s Resolut;o- ea"_ become effec_:ve _rnmeda a t e. _ „pcn its a60p: ion and s ignate of the Mayor . il =AESS7t AND ADOPTED :his 14th day ATTEST: Sylv_- Scheider Acting Cit -lerk APPR.Z." D A; "_'O jt7CRM FIND ,,O.RRECT NESS : t AN C' V=LARCLLC ..TY ATTORNEY o= Febraary , 2002. Y M NUEL n, DIAZ, MAv If :no Mayo.- does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective a: the .and of ter. calendar days fron the data it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override 0= :he veto by the City Cornm_ssion, Page 7 of 7 02» 144 V�� ENGINEE7,ING f1i:zt "n" . C:'.M�NT CONSTRJCTION MANAGEMENT: 56CC', 000 L D?. (D=SABLE . ECCIREM£NTS) : S100,000 FRCHITECTURAI-ENGINEERING SEP.VICES (B0.:'_1d�ng & Zoning): SEC0, 000 LRC:?ITECTURE: $60C,00C ENVIRCNXEN.AL ENGINEERING: $6CO3 000 GENERAL ENGINEER:NG: 57'OO, 000 LANDSCAPE ASCHIIECTURE: $400, 00C t:LG: ;t:_CAL ENGINEERING: $200, O0C STPUCTJRAL ENGINEERING: $200, CCC SURVEYING hND MA FINE: $200, 0CC VALCE ANA1Y5:S AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000' AIR CONCI:IONINC;: $202,, 000 LIFE S;F_:Y: $200, 000 ROOFING: 5200,C00 02- 144 TOTAL P.05