Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutpre legislationMAY-23-2002 10!45 a CI ti CLERKS OFFICE 305 858 1613 F . C2 J-02-211 2 /4 /02 RESOLUTION NO. 0 2- 144 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAM CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "S" DESIGNATED PROJECTS FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY wN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE` AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A" FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS. PS IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection Committee, pursuant to Reaues_ for Proposals, as professional engineering to the most qualified firms to provide construction management services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. The Corradino Group, Inc. 2. Nova Consulting Inc, 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc. 5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE) 11.1 •. o e: � fl : w cirrvcotimmmmulaR pommumcCF FEB 14 2m02 `I) 2- 1.4 .:; • NRY-25-20e2 10; 45 C:TY CLERKS OFFICE 305 e e 1610 F.03 Section 2. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuan= to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional A#DA requirement services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 20C2 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. R 0 Architects + Partners, Inc. 3. Gurri Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE) Se^=ion 3. The recommendation o= the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architectural engineering services for Public Works Category B R designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc,) 2. Indigo Service Corporation Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve tie findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein 4n rank order, are accepted: 1. Gurri Matute PA 2. Zyscovicr, Inc. 3. R.J. Heisenbott,e Architects; P.A. 4, R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc. 5, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc. 6. . PBSJ (ALTERNATE) Page 2 of 7 (ALTERNATE) 02' 144 P1P1'-29-2CO2 10 0 46 CITY CLERKS OFFICE 3e5 S58 161a F.04 Section 5. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional environmental engineering services for Public Works Category "B" des.gnated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. ATC Group Services Inc. 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. •URS Corporation 4. END Engineers, Inc. 5. Nova Consulting :no. (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, .:nc. (ALTERNATE) Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional general engineering services for Public Works Category "2" designated projects for 2002`through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: H.5. Ross Associates, Inc. 2, Kunoe, Sprecher & Associates, Inc. 3. Metric Engineering, inc. 4. NBS&J 5. marlin Engineering, :no. 6. PHS Engineering Corp. 7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE) 8. Kimley-Horn. and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 7, The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3 of 7 02-b 144 • JIAT-29-2002 10: 46 CITY CLERKS OFFICE 305 658 1610 F.e5 .professional landscape architecture services for Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Falcon. & Bueno 2, Curtis & Rogers Design. Studio, Inc. 3. Xirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4. EDM, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Pubic Works 2004, listed Section E. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works Category `5B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: Louis J' Aguirre & Associates, P.A. 2. Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc. ?. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE) Section 9. The recommendation of',,the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional structural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed' herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2. Avart, Inc. 3. SAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 ne).. IAA r1;—29-2002 10 s 46 C I i r CLERKS OFF I. CE 305 856 1610 F. eS professional surveying and dapping services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc. 3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A. 4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. 5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. 6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. Section 1.. The recommendation of the City Manage; to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms ;.o provide professional value analysis and cost estimate servides for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. A2 Group, Inc. 2. F S&J 3. Grace & Namara Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted: 1. Grace & Naeem 'Jddin Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide Page 5 of 7 02- 144 NAY-29-2002 10: as CITY CLERKS GFFICE ?05 s s 1610 F.e7 professional life safety services for Public Works Category ',ABS/ designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein is accepted: 1. Gurri Matute, P.A. Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection commitzee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; 1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA 2. -nterrationaa. Logistics Group Section 15. The City Manager is author±zedll to negotiate and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form ` acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm in an amount not to exceed he amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each specialty for each firm, with funds allocated from individual project accounts. t. The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all requirements that may be imposed by the City Attorney, including but not limited tc those prescribed by applicable City Charter Ord Code provisions, Page 6 of 7 02- 144 Rir -2S--2 C2 10:4 CITY CL.E KS OFFICE 3e5 B58 1610 'r .06 Section 16. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.``-' pASSEt AND AbG?_ED this 14th day of February ATTEST: Sy1v4 Scheider Acing Cit - erk RP?RO D A O,FORM AND CORRECTNESS : t/ AND-0 VILARELLO TY ATTORNEY W5975 : LB 11 2002. WU EL A. D IA Z , MA • If the May does not sin this Resolution, it shall become effective az the end or ten calendar days from the date it was passed and +adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shay_ become affective immediately upon overr_da of the veto by the City Commission. Page 7 of 7 a 02•. 144 MAY-29-2002 10:47 CITY CLERKS OFFICE , 305 85S 1510 ,09 ATTACHMENT "A" ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: $60O,OCO ADA (DISABLE REQUIREMENTS): $100, 000 ARCHITECTURAL -ENGINEERING SERVICES (Building & Zoning): $600,000 ARCHITECTURE: $600,000 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: $600,000 GENERAL ENGINEERING: $700,000 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: $400,000 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: $200,000 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: $200,000 SURVEYING AND MAPPING: $200,000 VALUE ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000 AIR CONDITIONING: $200,000 LIFE SAFETY: $200,000 ROOFING: $200,000 02- 144. TOTAL P.09