HomeMy WebLinkAboutpre legislationMAY-23-2002 10!45 a CI ti CLERKS OFFICE
305 858 1613 F . C2
J-02-211
2 /4 /02
RESOLUTION NO. 0 2- 144
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAM CITY COMMISSION,
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS
OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED
FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR
PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "S" DESIGNATED PROJECTS
FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY wN
RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENTS WITH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THE` AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A"
FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS.
PS IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings
of the selection Committee, pursuant to
Reaues_ for Proposals, as
professional engineering
to the most qualified firms to provide
construction management services for
Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. The Corradino Group, Inc.
2. Nova Consulting Inc,
3. Marlin Engineering Inc.
4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc.
5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE)
11.1 •. o e: � fl : w
cirrvcotimmmmulaR
pommumcCF
FEB 14 2m02
`I) 2- 1.4 .:;
•
NRY-25-20e2 10; 45
C:TY CLERKS OFFICE 305 e e 1610 F.03
Section 2. The recommendation of the City Manager
to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuan=
to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to
provide professional A#DA requirement services for Public
Works Category "B" designated projects for 20C2 through
2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. R 0 Architects + Partners, Inc.
3. Gurri Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE)
Se^=ion 3. The recommendation o= the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architectural engineering services for Public Works
Category
B R
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc,)
2. Indigo Service Corporation
Section 4.
The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve tie findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional architecture services for Public Works Category "3"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein 4n rank
order, are accepted:
1. Gurri Matute PA
2. Zyscovicr, Inc.
3. R.J. Heisenbott,e Architects; P.A.
4, R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc.
5, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners, Inc.
6. . PBSJ (ALTERNATE)
Page 2 of 7
(ALTERNATE)
02' 144
P1P1'-29-2CO2 10 0 46
CITY CLERKS OFFICE 3e5 S58 161a F.04
Section 5. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request fcr Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional environmental engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" des.gnated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. ATC Group Services Inc.
2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc.
3. •URS Corporation
4. END Engineers, Inc.
5. Nova Consulting :no. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science,
.:nc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional general engineering services for Public Works
Category "2" designated projects for 2002`through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
H.5. Ross Associates, Inc.
2, Kunoe, Sprecher & Associates, Inc.
3. Metric Engineering, inc.
4. NBS&J
5. marlin Engineering, :no.
6. PHS Engineering Corp.
7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE)
8. Kimley-Horn. and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section 7, The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 3 of 7
02-b 144
•
JIAT-29-2002 10: 46 CITY CLERKS OFFICE
305 658 1610 F.e5
.professional landscape architecture services for
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. Falcon. & Bueno
2, Curtis & Rogers Design. Studio, Inc.
3. Xirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
4. EDM, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Pubic Works
2004, listed
Section E. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works
Category `5B" designated
projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
Louis J' Aguirre & Associates, P.A.
2. Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc.
?. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE)
Section 9. The recommendation of',,the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional structural engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed'
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. San Martin Associates, Inc.
2. Avart, Inc.
3. SAC Consulting, Inc.
Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
Page 4 of 7
ne).. IAA
r1;—29-2002 10 s 46
C I i r CLERKS OFF I. CE 305 856 1610 F. eS
professional surveying and dapping services for Public Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. PBS&J
2. Fernando Z. Gatell P. L. S., Inc.
3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A.
4, Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc.
5. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc.
6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc.
Section 1.. The recommendation of the City Manage; to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms ;.o provide
professional value analysis and cost estimate servides for Public
Works Category "3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. A2 Group, Inc.
2. F S&J
3. Grace & Namara Uddin (ALTERNATE)
Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
professional air conditioning services for Public Works Category
"3" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Grace & Naeem 'Jddin
Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide
Page 5 of 7
02- 144
NAY-29-2002 10: as
CITY CLERKS GFFICE ?05 s s 1610 F.e7
professional life safety services for Public Works Category
',ABS/
designated projects for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein is
accepted:
1. Gurri Matute, P.A.
Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection commitzee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B"
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank
order, are accepted;
1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA
2. -nterrationaa. Logistics Group
Section 15. The City Manager is author±zedll to negotiate
and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a form
`
acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm in an amount not
to exceed he amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each
specialty for each firm, with funds allocated from individual
project accounts.
t.
The herein authorization is further subject to compliance with all
requirements that may be imposed by the City Attorney, including but not
limited tc those prescribed by applicable City Charter Ord Code
provisions,
Page 6 of 7
02- 144
Rir -2S--2 C2 10:4 CITY CL.E KS OFFICE
3e5 B58 1610 'r .06
Section 16. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.``-'
pASSEt AND AbG?_ED this 14th day of February
ATTEST:
Sy1v4 Scheider
Acing Cit - erk
RP?RO D A O,FORM AND CORRECTNESS : t/
AND-0 VILARELLO
TY ATTORNEY
W5975 : LB
11
2002.
WU EL A. D IA Z , MA
•
If the May does not sin this Resolution, it shall become effective az
the end or ten calendar days from the date it was passed and +adopted. If
the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shay_ become affective immediately
upon overr_da of the veto by the City Commission.
Page 7 of 7
a
02•. 144
MAY-29-2002 10:47 CITY CLERKS OFFICE ,
305 85S 1510 ,09
ATTACHMENT "A"
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: $60O,OCO
ADA (DISABLE REQUIREMENTS): $100, 000
ARCHITECTURAL -ENGINEERING SERVICES (Building & Zoning): $600,000
ARCHITECTURE: $600,000
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: $600,000
GENERAL ENGINEERING: $700,000
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: $400,000
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: $200,000
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: $200,000
SURVEYING AND MAPPING: $200,000
VALUE ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000
AIR CONDITIONING: $200,000
LIFE SAFETY: $200,000
ROOFING: $200,000
02- 144.
TOTAL P.09