Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTraffic Impact Analysis• • EVERGLADES ON THE BAY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for CABI DOWNTOWN, LLC 20803 Biscayne Boulevard Aventura, Florida 33180-1439 by Jackson M. Ahlstedt, P.E. 46 N.W. 94th Street Miami Shores, Florida 33150 (305) 754-8695 DECEMBER 2003 kson M, Ahlstedt, P.E. ionda Registr ti-on #28258 / /,; • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY 3.0 STUDY AREA 3 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 5 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING 6 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS 7 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS 14 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 20 4.4 MASS TRANSIT 22 4.5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 22 5.0 TRIP GENERATION 26 6.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 28 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 30 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT 31 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC 36 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING 41 11.0 PEDESTRIANS 41 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN 41 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS 41 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK 42 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 43 13.0 CONCLUSIONS 43 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA TABLE 2 YEAR 2002 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) 7 TABLE 3 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 8 TABLE 4 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 9 TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 9 TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 2ND STREET BETWEEN NE 3RD AVENUE BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 10 TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 3RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD AND NE 2ND AVENUE 11 TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET 12 TABLE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET 13 TABLE 10 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES 21 TABLE 11 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 23 TABLE 12 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE 24 TABLE 13 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 26 TABLE 14 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 27 TABLE 15 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 28 TABLE 16 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 30 TABLE 17 ANNUAL MDT GROWTH RATES 31 TABLE 18 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT . . 33 • • • TABLE 19 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 34 TABLE 20 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT 34 TABLE 21 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 37 TABLE 22 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 38 TABLE 23 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT 39 TABLE 24 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 42 TABLE 25 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS 44 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION 2 FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA 4 FIGURE 3 PEAKING C HARACTE RI STI CS NE 2ND STREET BETWEEN NE 3RD AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 16 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 3RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE 17 FIGURE 5 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NORTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET 18 FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND STREET 19 FIGURE 7 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE 25 FIGURE 8 AM & PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 29 FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT 35 FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT 40 • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Everglades On The Bay project is a mixed use project consisting of approximately 866 dwelling units and 68,867 square feet (SF) of retail space. The project includes approximately 1,146 on -site parking spaces. The site is located on most of the block bordered So � Band NE 3rd Street on the Northscayne Boulevard on the , For , NE 2nd Avenue on the West, NE 2nd Street over 40 years, the site was known as the Everglades Hotel. Although, currently not operational, included on the parcels are a 39 unit motel, a 370 unit hotel, approximately 1,421 SF of retail space and approximately 1.25 acres of surface parking. The project will result in a net increase of approximately 173 vehicles per hour in the AM peak hour and 323 vehicle per hour in the ©P a peak thour. �o may upon peak hour traffic me on data, the AM volume is approximately Biscayne Boulevard. The PM volume is approximately 15% of the total two-way PM peak hour volume on Biscayne Boulevard. Primary vehicular access to the site is restricted to two, two-way driveways. One driveway connects to NE 2nd Street, while the other driveway connects to NE 3rd Street. Two types of level of service analysis were conducted. The first type of analysis included Intersection and roadway link level of service analysis. The second type of analysis consisted of transportation corridor analysis. For purposes of identifying the specific localized impacts of the project, level of service analysis was conducted for the existing year 2003 conditions, and future conditions in the year 2005 with and without the project. These analyses included link and intersection level of service analysis. The results from the intersection analysis and the roadway Zink analysis, indicate that, with or without the project, by the year 2005 there may be only a minimal deterioration in the level of service on Biscayne. Now physical improvements are needed to mitigate the impacts of the proposed project. Finally, the proposed project is located in the Biscayne Boulevard Transportation Corridor. Analysis of that transportation corridor clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the project. • • 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Everglades On The Bay is a single phase development consisting of condominium units, retail space and parking. As shown in Figure 1, the site is located on the North side of NE 2nd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue. The site is located at 204 & 244 Biscayne Boulevard; 243-303 NE 2nd Street; and 236-242 NE 3rd Street. The proposed development program is summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1 PROJECT DATA RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM 866 DU COMMERCIAL GEITKIE 68, r;; 67 SF PARKING 1,146 SPACES Vehicular access to the site consists of a two-way driveway connecting to NE 2nd Street and a two-way driveway connecting to NE 3rd Street. In addition there is a proposed one- way service drive running north/south through the site. This service drive provides access to the loading dock area. For purposes of this traffic impact analysis, build -out has been estimated to occur by the year 2005. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 1 10 • FIGURE 9 PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 2 • 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The primary purpose of this study is to assess the impacts of vehicular traffic on intersections and roadways within the study area due to the proposed development by conducting a roadway link and intersection level of service analysis. In addition, the report provides a genera! assessment of project impacts on parking and pedestrians. Specific items discussed are as follows: Determination of existing traffic volumes and levels of service for major roadways within the study area; ■ Estimation of the number of trips generated by the proposed project and the distribution of these trips within the study area network. • Estimation of future background and project traffic conditions and levels of service; ▪ Determination of whether the transportation impacts of the proposed project exceed the City of Miami concurrency standards, and solutions to mitigate any adverse impacts; s Determination of project impacts on on -street parking; and, ■ Determination of project impacts on pedestrians. 3.0 STUDY AREA The study area's boundaries were defined to include: NE 7th Street as the northern boundary, SE 2nd Street as the southern boundary, Biscayne Bay as the eastern boundary, and NE 1 st Avenue as the western boundary. This area includes a one-half mile section of Biscayne Boulevard. Figure 2 shows the intersections and roadway links which are most significant to the project. These include the following intersections: NE 2nd Street and Biscayne Boulevard NE 2nd Street and NE 2nd Avenue NE 3rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard NE 3rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue The roadway links include the following: Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd Street and NE 6th Street NE 2nd Avenue between SE 2nd Street and NE 6th Street JACKSON . AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 3 pp 1 ma ion is LI ■ ■ ■ 1 W ■ ■ z ▪ Q, Q ■ 2, • ■ ■ Cf 1 mom roF■m*Non •_11e1•��Mw-Ir�w�.�•■f•IN--� LN E 6 ST J \ \,. N . 1 I-- ■ \v ( N \ 0 1 METROMQVER ■rrrIIN rr111ww -r N • t FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 4 • • 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area was surveyed to observe existing traffic conditions, identify parking locations, identify traffic count locations, and to collect traffic count data. 4.1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS This section describes the characteristics of selected roadways in the study area. Key roadways in and/or near to the study area include Biscayne Boulevard (SR-5/US-1), NE 2nd Avenue, NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street. Of these roadways, Biscayne Boulevard is by far the most significant roadway serving the proposed project. Local access to the site is provided by NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street. Biscayne Boulevard (SR-5/US-1) Biscayne Boulevard is an eight lane divided roadway with a wide median between SE 2nd Street and NE 6th Street. Because of the wide median and the system of one-way streets running east/west the streets between the northbound and southbound lanes of Biscayne Boulevard provide queuing area for left turn traffic. Metered parking is provided on in the median. Traffic signals are located at: s SE 2nd Street SE 1 st Street Flagler Street NE 1st Street NE 2nd Street NE 3rd Street NE 4th Street NE 5th Street NE 6th Street This equates to eight signalized intersections within approximately one half mile. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. For purposes of analysis, Biscayne Boulevard was classified as a State Two-way Arterial, Class IV. NE 2nd Avenue NE 2nd Avenue is one-way southbound roadway with parking on either side. North of NE 5th Street, NE 2nd Avenue has three traveled lanes. South of NE 5th Street, NE 2nd Avenue has two traveled lanes. Traffic on NE 2nd Avenue is controlled by traffic signals at: JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 5 • • NE 6th Street • NE 5th Street • NE 4th Street • NE 3rd Street • NE 2nd Street • NE 1st Street • Flagler Street SE 1st Street • SE 2nd Street NE 2nd Street Between NE 1st Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, NE 2nd Street is a one-way (eastbound), two lane roadway with metered parking on the south side of the street. Traffic on NE 2nd Street is controlled by traffic signals at: NE 1st Avenue NE 2nd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard NE 3rd Street Between NE 1st Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard, NE 3rd Street is a one-way (westbound), two lane roadway with metered parking on the north side of the street. Traffic on NE 3rd Street is controlled by traffic signals at: Biscayne Boulevard NE 2nd Avenue NE 1st Avenue 4.2 EXISTING SIGNAL TIMING Existing signal timing data for the signalized intersections to be analyzed was obtained from the Miami -Dade County Traffic Control Center. This data was used in the intersection capacity analysis to determine each intersection's level of service (LOS) and in the roadway link analysis. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 6 • 4.3 EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS There are three existing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) traffic count stations location within or near the study area. Data for these traffic count stations is summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 YEAR 2002 AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) 100 101 LOCATI SR 9681EB SE 1 ST, 200' WEST OF SR 5/US-1/BISCAYNE BOULEVARD SR 968/FLAGLER ST/WB, 200' WEST OF SR 51US-1/BISCAYNE BOULEVARD EB EB 10,500 0 WB WB 0 4,300 10,500 4,300 5047 SR 5/US-1, 100' SOUTH OF FLAGLER STREET NB 21,500 SB Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. 12,500 34,000 Original 24 Hour machine traffic counts were taken the week of December 1, 2003 at the following locations: • NE 2nd Street between NE 3rd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard • NE 3rd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue • Biscayne Boulevard between NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street The count program provided machine traffic counts (without vehicle classifications) summarized every 15 minutes for a 24-hour period. Machine traffic count data is summarized in Tables 6 thru 9, inclusive. Turning movement counts were obtained as follows: • At the intersection of NE 2nd Street and Biscayne Boulevard, on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. • At the intersection of NE 3rd Street and NE 2nd Avenue, on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. • At the intersection of NE 2nd Street and NE 2nd Avenue, on Wednesday, December JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 7 • • • 3, 2003 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. At the intersection of NE 3rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard, on Thursday, December 4, 2003 between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. This traffic count data, adjusted to reflect peak hour volumes for Average Annual Weekday Traffic conditions is summarized in Table 10. Weekly Volume Factors Weekly volume factors to adjust raw count data to Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2002. Rather than using county- wide factors, Miami -Dade County North factors were used. These factors are shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 49 1211 /02 50 12/8/02 12/7102 12/14/02 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. 1.01 1.01 Axle Adjustment Factors Weekly axle adjustment factors to adjust raw count data to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes were obtained from FDOT records for the year 2002. Rather than using county- wide factors, factors for SR 5/US-1 were used. These factors are shown in Table 4. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 8 • • TABLE 4 YEAR 2002 WEEKLY AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 49 50 12/ 1 /02 12/8/02 1217/02 12/14/02 0.98 0.98 Source: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics office. Peak Season Adjustment Factors Peak season adjustment factors were obtained from FDOT records for the years 2000 through 2002. Consistent with the FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, the median weekly factor for the thirteen highest consecutive weeks of the year (the peak season) for each of the three years was determined. The peak season adjustment factor was determined to be 1.026. These factors are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS 2000 2001 2002 MEDIAN 1.024 1.025 1.029 1.026 Source of yearly data: Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Statistics Office. The significance of the peak season adjustment factor is that it shows that there is less than a 3% difference between average annual daily traffic and peak season traffic. This is well within the ability to accurately measure and/or estimate traffic volumes. The roadways in question are not seasonal roadways and average annual weekday conditions are not significantly different than peak season conditions. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 9 • • TABLE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 2ND STREET BETWEEN NE 3RD AVENUE BISCAYNE BOULEVARD RAW DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY ADT 6,017 0 6,017 AM PEAK HOUR 475 0 475 MID -DAY PK HR 621 0 621 525 PM PEAK HOUR 525 0 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.01 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.98 ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2-WAY AADT 6,000 0 6,000 AM PEAK HOUR 470 0 470 MID -DAY PK HR 610 0 610 PM PEAK HOUR 520 0 520 PERCENTAGE OF DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION DAILY TRAFFIC EASTBOUND WESTBOUND AADT N/A 1 00% 0% AM PEAK HOUR 7.83% 100% 0% MID -DAY PK HR 10.17% 100% 0% PM PEAK HOUR 8.67% 100% 0% K(Iaa) 10.43% 100% 0% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 10 • • • TABLE 7 EXISTING TRAFFIC NE 3RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD AND NE 2ND AVENUE RAW DATA EASTBOUN ADT 0 AM PEAK HOUR 0 MID -DAY PK HR 0 PM PEAK HOUR 0 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ADJUSTED DATA EASTBOUN AADT 0 AM PEAK HOUR 0 MID -DAY PK HR 0 PM PEAK HOUR 0 PERCENTAGI DAILY TRAFF AADT N/A AM PEAK HOUR 9.17% MID -DAY PK HR 7.50% PM PEAK HOUR 8.75% K(100) 9.41% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. D WESTBOUND 2,460 222 185 212 1.01 0.98 2-WAY 2,460 222 185 212 D OF IC WESTBOUND 2,400 220 180 210 2-WAY 2,400 220 180 210 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION EASTBOUND 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% WESTBOUND 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 11 • • TABLE 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC NORTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY ADT 23,240 0 23,240 AM PEAK HOUR 1,314 0 1,314 MID -DAY PK HR 1,708 0 1,708 PM PEAK HOUR 2,013 0 2,013 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.01 0.98 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY AADT 23,000 0 23,000 AM PEAK HOUR 1,300 0 1,300 MID -DAY PK HR 1,690 0 1,690 PM PEAK HOUR 1,990 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC 0 1,990 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 100% 0% AM PEAK HOUR 5.65% 100% 0% MID -DAY PK HR 7.35% 100% 0% PM PEAK HOUR K(100) 8.65% 8.88% 100% 100% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY ❑ecember 15, 2003 Page 12 • • TABLE 9 EXISTING TRAFFIC SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET RAW DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY ADT 0 17,663 17,663 AM PEAK HOUR 0 1,391 1,391 MID -DAY PK HR PM PEAK HOUR 0 0 1,260 1,202 1,260 1,202 WEEKLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 1.01 AXLE ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0.98 ADJUSTED DATA NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 2-WAY AADT 0 17,500 17,500 AM PEAK HOUR 0 1,380 1,360 MID -DAY PK HR 0 1,250 1,250 PM PEAK HOUR 1,190 1,190 PERCENTAGE OF DAILY TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AADT N/A 100% AM PEAK HOUR 7.89% 0% 100% MID -DAY PK HR 7.14% 0% 100% PM PEAK HOUR 6.80% 0% 100% K(100) 8.09% 0% 100% JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 13 • 4.3.1 PEAK HOURS This section identifies characteristics of existing peak hour traffic in the study area. These characteristics include AM and PM peak hours, Planning Analysis Hour Factor (Km) factors and Directional Distribution (D) factors. NE 2nd Street The peaking characteristics of NE 2nd Street between NE 3rd Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard are presented graphically in Figure 3. As can be seen from Figure 3, this section of NE 2nd Street experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 7.83% beginning at 9:30am • A mid -day peak of approximately 10.17% beginning at 12:OOpm • A PM Peak of approximately 8.67% beginning at 2:15pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 10.43%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 100.00%. NE 3rd Street The peaking characteristics of NE 3rd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Avenue are presented graphically in Figure 4. As can be seen from Figure 4, this section of NE 3rd Street experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 7.89% beginning at 7:00am • A mid -day peak of approximately 7.14% beginning at 12:30pm A PM Peak of approximately 6.80% beginning at 5:OOpm The K1D0 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 8.09%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 100.00%. Northbound Biscayne Boulevard The peaking characteristics of Northbound Biscayne Boulevard between NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street are presented graphically in Figure 5. As can be seen from Figure 5, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 5.65% beginning at 9:30am • A mid -day peak of approximately 7.35% beginning at 11:30am • A PM Peak of approximately 8.65% beginning at 4:45pm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 8.88%. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 100.00%. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 14 • • Southbound Biscayne Boulevard The peaking characteristics of Southbound Biscayne Boulevard between NE 3rd Street and NE 2nd Street are presented graphically in Figure 6. As can be seen from Figure 6, this section of Biscayne Boulevard experiences the following three peaks. • An AM Peak of approximately 9.17% beginning at 8:15am • A mid -day peak of approximately 7.50% beginning at 11:30am A PM Peak of approximately 8.75% beginning at 5:OOpm The K100 for this section of roadway was estimated to be 9.41 %. The D factor for this section of roadway was estimated to be 100.00%. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 15 • • 122% 1000% 0 Ct" 6,00% 0 Z 4.00% 0 LLJ a. 2,00% 0 NE 2ND STREET BETWEEN NE 3RD AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 1 . 1 i Ir. i IT i 1 7\ . HH . 1 0:00 5:00 10 00 15:00 HOUR BEGIN1NG 20:00 FIGURE 3 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 2ND STREET BETWEEN NE 3RD AVENUE & BISCAYNE BOULEVARD JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 16 • • 10.00% 6.00% 0 LL 1- 6.00% u.. 0 4.00°/0 LU a. 2.00% 0 NE 3RD STREET BEWTEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE , HH , 1 . I i I \ i la 0:00 5:00 10:00 15:00 HOUR BEGINING 20:00 FIGURE 4 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NE 3RD STREET BETWEEN BISCAYNE BOULEVARD & NE 2ND AVENUE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 17 • • 10.00% NORTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET 8.00% 0 IL 6 00% IL 4 00% < 0 a. 2,00% 0 0:00 1 1 f , , ../ 11 1 I 1 5:00 1000 15:00 HOUR BEGINING 20;00 FIGURE 5 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS NORTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 2ND STREET & NE 3RD STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 18 • 6.0V/0 7.00% - .600% 5.00'/D .)- 0 LL 4,00% 0 < 3.00% LIJ 0 11 2.00% 0 1.00% 0 SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND STREET Ii I I 1 • 1 IIII 11 IMMIll I tic . 11-1N-4\ ,, I r \ ! 1 1 t44,/ 14- ! 1 i 0:00 5:00 1000 1500 HOUR BEGINING 2000 FIGURE 6 PEAKING CHARACTERISTICS SOUTHBOUND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD BETWEEN NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND STREET JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 19 • 4.3.2 PREVAILING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the traffic conditions on selected roadways and at selected intersections in the study area. Biscayne Boulevard Although heavy during peak hours, traffic flow on the section of Biscayne Boulevard in the study area is acceptable. During peak hour conditions at signalized intersections, queues in the medians may extend back into through northbound traffic lanes. NE 2nd Street Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 2nd Street is good. NE 3rd Street Due to the minimal amount of traffic, traffic flow on NE 3rd Street is good. NE 2nd Avenue Traffic flow on NE 2nd Avenue is good. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 20 • 'd `1031S1Hv 'W NOSK3Vr TABLE 10 EXISTING AM & PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES f, y .4 S� A' & A � Y� k V S ]„ L N - 5 "v\ i - ({ rt5 5 ! i ,. �-ri:Jf I : ,��. :, t v 1 i F i. iY .m 35 ? t „���a,'�Rrn��'3,is�".�a ... - ., r .,, ,<. n, ..y. . v .^., ,�:.: F`. �, -. ��. �, ;1, 'jY!'� :�. h t�f�. I, .JI if Pr k:M :. SW. vi'' ik„ i. .�, y K`-M a 9 1 •+T ( � n'� �'.r � f' � a�S I +l .� ¢ ) 17 T 1., 5 F '. ro. �J i !- i n >v "7 ''yyA'9 :. (�. Yf F 1 � 9f*,". Y ' +e,`-hvt i � - T'< !9 e � ,y. • 1r;'r n..1 t Is, 1 l 4. E •. o- ,r a� � � �- fir, �t,.lN , " r � �, +, ";Tj�• v.V ,1= bx i isrw xV S.\ae..j.A.T+a.: 'T2 . ; 1�y� /1..Ir7.. kw ...51r .3 �r. � L � >` 5� 4 . �:•.' � � .'F `:u,. -: a .4 5- $.,," .- ,,.'`I' S- '• iµy �?u �1� 1 -q_,., ,�•.. '1 M1-ir �. �i' G: n�. K- . Ja iJl'��.ff :fdk �i4i f (� / .erY ( rt--vx AV ,.V- L S E'jh q k.. � � 9F ..,r.'+: Y ;; �, a t- q �`�•rb W d l,� .. �.. "F d+a a+ � ., � ,,, L 'l-tli'� :f'" 71 u yi 3 ,.+v AA. �Y �al'Y, ��'. �:, �.e F _ ,�+T1 � .� a.�.An9a, � �..� :l ,.. �.AFtSY�?�°'d '.d 19, iy j, .'s•ue,- o- �. �.rf ii����1 ,�..L . .' .,:-%. -: �4?` ""<^` r , ... �, ,�xll'3.r � �u�, � �f 1e ' �i�� C+4 J�f..€ a. +�,� d r• - pA'- BSI• ': Z' '�n+ a i ; rL�>5;:4� �.ki � �q �t,, . �r:'. Ey7..,si .. d` r.: t i6 «{ t! �a�„ +:�?.� 6 � � ��: =,. ��dr.� ��d�.�. t M ^'a� a..y �r.. � ,_E �p I 4.. ".�: J .,��. �: - ,: 7� I s..�.� k ' & F . x "�""�e., °, `-. �` %.:'>mtiw 158 93 82 0 _�d 0 0 1 768 0 71 1,128 0 NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 13 168 0 0 0 0 0 577 333 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 130 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 577 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 0 0 14 55 0 71 795 81 0 1,133 142 4t R�:,�(Y.���1 ' .��2M6�MAPtJ�y'"• y'h.W $�!,,,R Y .0 s f'f;.'P :'73 45�i,? ;,np ., atsi ♦..;: Ri " t- r p i a Dar � bi.;.;;.:.d' .I-.<z>•`.r�",.r„ u,j eAr:3:I.�:. .1�a+,+� -:`#.',,��`r�v. r ., l.!..r•p, .3a.,"e';v._m,k 'a4fakk� � .' l kt7° € .A- �.. < a�a.✓o• 445,k� , , a`A.fid , :''' ivMF— t , YSNr.„$ .: . A � .• J r u Y 4>'y�v'j}.,,',i4r�!rd���i�5} Y.4�*at�'!R.b�� iV��LLi NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD <0' 371 225 145 0 0 0 0 1,390 0 153 860 0 0 NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 41 186 0 0 0 0 0 341 265 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 169 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 341 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 0 0 176 94 0 285 1,101 198 0 990 122 1 1 Source: Original traffic counts taken December 2,3 or 4, 2003. • 4.4 MASS TRANSIT The site is located in the Central Business District of Miami and is served by a significant mass transit network. There are numerous MetroBus routes serving the study area. MetroRail and MetroMover also serve the study area. The closest MetroMover station is the College/Bayside Station located on 225 NE 3rd Street. This station is approximately one-half block from the proposed project. Each MetroMover car has a seated capacity of 12 people. Cars are operated in pairs. Metromover vehicles operate at a 150 second headway. The closest MetroRail station is the Government Center Station located at 101 NW 1st Street. 4,5 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE Each of the selected intersections were analyzed to determine their level of service. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology based Highway Capacity Software, HCS Version 4.1 d was used. The results are shown in Table 11 and on Figure 7. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix A. Link analysis, based upon AM and PM peak hour directional volumes, was also performed for the section of Biscayne Boulevard between SE 2nd Street and NE 6th Street using the FDOT ARTPLAN 2003 version 5.1.0 (June 6, 2003) software and FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, Table 4-7. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 12. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 22 • TABLE 11 EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NB=B; SB=B NB=B; SB=C NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NB=A; SB=B NB=A; SB=B NE2NDSTREET&NE2NDAVENUE B B NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD B B JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 23 • • TABLE 12 EXISTING LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE Biscayne Boulevard SE 2nd Street NE 6th Street AM=B PM=B ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS E MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A 2440 4133 4230 4420 2,148 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A 320) 4380 4540 4670 2,148 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average G/C of 0.58. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average G/C of 0.61. 3.) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 5047 (AADT = 34,000; K= 9.20%; and, D = 67.99%) and escalated by 1 % per year for one year. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 24 • • 1 1 NE 6 STII BAYSIDE LEGEND AM/PM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 7 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 25 • 5.0 TRIP GENERATION The total number of vehicular trips generated by the project was determined for the AM and PM peak hours using the process and data contained in the Downtown Miami DRI Increment II Transportation Analysis. This process relies upon Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The number of vehicular trips generated by the project was based on the total number of condominium units and square footage of retail space, using trip generation rates calculated from the "Downtown DRI" and adjusted based upon the process contained in that document. The calculation of AM peak hour project traffic is presented in Table 13; while, PM peak hour project traffic calculations are presented in Table 14. TABLE 13 AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI INCREMENT II TRIP GENERATION RATE ANALYSIS AM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS AM VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES USE IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 3,000 DU 170 723 893 0.057 0.241 0.298 RETAIL 225,000 SF 158 101 259 0.702 0.449 1.151 PROJECT TRIPS ANALYSIS AM VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRIPS USE IN OUT TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 866 DU 49 209 258 RETAIL 68,867 SF _ 48 31 79 GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 97 240 337 VEHICLE OCCUPANCY ADJUSTMENT 16.0% OF GROSS -16 -38 -54 TRANSIT TRIP REDUCTION 22.6% OF GROSS -22 -54 -76 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION 10.0% OF GROSS -10 -24 -34 NET EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 50 123 173 f NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS IN VEHICLES @ 1.4 PERSNEH 70 172 243 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS USING TRANSIT @ 1.4 PERSNEH 31 76 107 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS (VEHICLES & TRANSIT MODES) 101 248 349 DIET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS WALKING OR USING BICYCLES @ 1.4 14 34 47 JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 26 • • TABLE 14 PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC DOWNTOWN MIAMI DRI INCREMENT II TRIP GENERATION RATE ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS PM VEHICLE PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES USE IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 2ES1DENTIAL 3,000 DU 645 396 1041 0.215 0.132 0.347 RETAIL 225,000 SF 515 557 1072 2.289 2.476 4.764 PROJECT TRIPS ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS USE IN OUT TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 866 DU 186 114 301 RETAIL 68,867 SF 158 170 328 _ GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS 344 285 629 VEHICLE OCCUPANCY ADJUSTMENT 16.0% _ OF GROSS -55 -46 -101 TRANSIT TRIP REDUCTION 22.6% OF GROSS -78 -64 -142 "PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRIP REDUCTION 10.0% OF GROSS -34 -28 -63 EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 177 146 323 •NET T NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS IN VEHICLES © 1.4 PERSNEH 247 205 452 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS USING TRANSIT @ 1.4,PERSNEH 109 90 199 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS (VEHICLES & TRANSIT MODES) 356 295 651 NET EXTERNAL PERSON TRIPS WALKING OR USING BICYCLES @ _1.4 48 40 88 As can be seen from Table 13, the estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the site during the AM peak hour is 50 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the site during the AM peak hour is 123 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips entering the site during the PM peak hour is 177 vph. The estimated number of new vehicle trips leaving the site during the PM peak hour is 146 vph. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 27 • • 6M TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT The project site is located in Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 538. The cardinal distribution of the traffic within TAZ 538 was obtained from Miami -Dade County. The distribution is as follows: North -Northeast 11.08% East -Northeast 4.38% East -Southeast 3.32% South -Southeast 6.64% South -Southwest 15.46% West -Southwest 25.24% West -Northwest 19.67% North -Northwest 14.22% The distribution of AM and PM project trips is summarized in Table 15. Based upon this trip distribution, the project trips were assigned to the roadway network. This is shown in Figure 8. NORTH TABLE 15 PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION NNW 14.22% 25 7 18 46 25 21 NNE 11.08% 19 6 14 36 20 16 EAST ENE 4.38% 8 2 5 14 8 6 ESE 3.32% 6 2 4 11 6 5 SOUTH SSE 6.64% 12 3 8 21 12 10 SSW 15.46% 27 8 19 50 27 23 WEST WSW 25.24% 44 13 31 82 45 37 WNW 19.67% 34 10 24 64 35 29 TOTAL 100.01 % 173 50 123 323 JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. 177 146 EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 28 • • FIGURE 8 AM & PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 29 • to 7.0 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Programmed and planned improvements in or near the study area were identified using the Miami -Dade County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), 2004, the "Downtown DRI" and the Downtown Miami Transportation Master Plan. Of the numerous improvements noted in these documents, the improvements detailed in Table 16 will have the most direct impact on the project. TABLE 16 PROGRAMMED AND PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS A N 2nd Street NW 1st Ave Biscayne Blvd Convert to 2-way Operation N 3rd Street NW 3rd Ave Biscayne Blvd Convert to 2-way Operation E 2nd Avenue Biscayne Blvd Way NE 13th Street Convert to 2-way Operation N 2nd Street NW 2nd Ave Biscayne Blvd Pedestrian Improvements The conversion of NE 2ndd Street and NE 3rd Street to two-way operation may have serious impacts on traffic operations around the site. The current one-way scheme simplifies traffic operations on Biscayne Boulevard. The wide median in Biscayne Boulevard serves as a queuing area for left turns and for accessing parking. The proposed conversions to two-way operations may pose problems at the intersections of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Street and Biscayne Boulevard and NE 3rd Street. Additionally, it might be noted that both NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street are relatively narrow with two traveled lanes plus parking on only one side of the street. Conversion to two-way operation may result in delays to through traffic due to left turns into the project. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 30 • • 8.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT Future traffic conditions without the project were analyzed. Future traffic consisting of background traffic and committted development traffic was estimated. Background traffic was estimated by applying an annual growth factor to existing traffic. The annual growth factor of 1 % per year was developed based the average growth rate developed in the "Downtown DRI" and the historical traffic count data shown in Table 17. 100 TABLE 17 ANNUAL AADT GROWTH RATES VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER DAY (VPD) SR 968/EB SE 1 ST, 200' WEST OF SR 5/US-1/BISCAYNE BOULEVARD 10,482 11,000 10,500 0.01 % 101 SR 968/FLAGLER ST/WB, 200' WEST OF SR 5/US-1/B1SCAYNE BOULEVARD 6,273 5,300 4,300 -2.20% 5047 SR 5/US-1, 100' SOUTH OF FLAGLER STREET 31,430 35,500 34,000 0.46% Total 48,185 51,800 48,800 0.07% Future traffic conditions were analyzed for year 2005. The growth rate of 1 % per year was applied to the 2002 FDOT traffic counts and the 2003 original traffic count volumes in order to achieve 2005 traffic volumes. in addition, City of Miami data on major committed developments was researched and the traffic associated with those developments was included in the analysis. These developments consisted of the following projects: • Committed Developments Contained in Increment I of the "Downtown DRI" • Increment II Development of the "Downtown DRI" = Miami Center "B, C &D" The Mist Table 18 provides the future traffic volumes without the Everglades On The Bay project and shows these volumes with the associated movement. These volumes were used to determine intersection level of service by using the same software programs as used for the previously described analysis. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 31 • The intersection level of service for the future traffic volumes without the Everglades On The Bay project are shown in Table 19 and on Figure 9. The analysis shows not significant change in the intersection level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix B. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions was performed on the previously identified roadway link. These results are summarized in Table 20. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 32 • • 3'd 'jA ls1Hb' W NOs)4ovr TABLE 18 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 161 NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 161 83 0 0 199 141 0 0 NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 378 289 148 0 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 0 232 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 1 1333 13 219 0 0 0 0 14 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 1361 0 2263 0 0 72 { 111 82 0 0 156 1614 940 940 1619 1664 42 266 0 0 0 0 0 724 0 179 0 0 0 0 96 0 367 1968 0 38 202 0 724 1797 0 340 145 0 270 0 125 • • TABLE 19 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS W/O PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NB=B; SB=B NB=B; SB=C NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NB=A; SB=B NB=A; SB=B NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD TABLE 20 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT Biscayne Boulevard SE 2nd Street NE 6th Street AM=C PM=B ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS A 8 ID MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A 2440 4130 4230 4420 2,648 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A 32g0 4380 4540 4670 3,031 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average GfC of 0.58. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average G!C of 0.61. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 5047 (AADT = 34,000; K= 9.20%; and, D = 67.99%) escalated by 3% per year for three years and includes committed development traffic. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P,E. EVERGLADES ON THE SAY December 15, 2003 Page 34 • Li BAYSIDE NE 2 ST SE2ST LEGEND AM/PM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE (A FIGURE 9 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 35 • • 9.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC Future traffic conditions with project traffic were analyzed for the year 2005. This was accomplished by using the 2005 estimated traffic volumes without the project and adding the traffic generated by the project (as shown in Table 15). Table 21 details the future traffic plus project traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours. These volumes were then used to determine the intersection levels of service using the same procedures as previously stated. For the most part, there were only minor changes between the year 2005 future intersection level of service with and without the project. This is shown in Table 22 and on Figure 10. The intersection level of service analyses are included in Appendix C. The link level of service analysis for future AM and PM peak hour directional traffic conditions with the project was performed on the previously identified roadway links. These results are summarized in Table 23. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 36 • '3'd `iaaiS'1HV ' N NOS)IJVf TABLE 21 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 1 NM. , 3 �.,.� T: ��. 'x'i t ". >. �., i..,... �1 �,:. 1j ...: ... . ,. ..,sG ,,•f :. t } . i ..n , f'. � ��� a �f ^R, '� -� 3,_ . ^, c �'n'., ..;c ti"r): �1F -.J^ 1 x .j .9G} l Ak ;.. ��tlf'Y{�..�}, `'C?C�`. .' .4 ,.j,AP �'enh r�f.�>sYr..`°1}. ::, .. .� f tt,.i4,�Y1 '��;-''. 's §*:i : ?�? r � �: i F Y ..�. d, d tio"r -, S','-.f^e'w, L '.2'.._ ,`. d ..-. p z Y � f , �.�. t � :� �`V�� '�'µ`iy, .+dli '..; a.Y%}'Y� M ., 3tY, . F y' S 5'� '+'�S 4-.;T, f1 't ^' . .l'3 i. � 3 EA rT _ i"vF 'R - y Gr 1 � ]�: ti�.t,r> !E�'r'i _SL.3+.^C t i�.c-�,.r f �i t J; f,, {may 4.3 n.;.f.�,:e #� , � r E.T 2 ' �3 k - '1 ' L�. sr '._,4 ,lit-�f : w a ; ;' �," S fi` .rS I�. 'l. T. ` . s "' n w M 1%a ,kL�-..iM. -? $ f! .f`-t 7.. e �UR>� ` � ��l ..R•., G:. �y'� 1 �.. y Ely,lr, z r»tip,-°a'ir' i3�x M4w�?TFy4��%iiGs^-`^ii'�,^u' �'1 ���4 i' -, e�ay. d �;Y �� a `re3 s " �'��i���_ 1 !r -ti �'.v��i,��'� �Y,. + P1 ,��� . � F 'cfi .�.7R�o-a ?ra^N . '' �� �. r°;,t.' �' -27 ���r 1 T'' z! ' .v F , y NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 214 214 139 0 0 0 1 1353 0 72 1614 0 NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 32 263 0 0 0 0 0 949 340 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 205 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 948 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 0 0 14 116 0 180 1378 82 0 1619 162 +'i .i4 k:;;v,�.n �,. ;-°`�-�< "v?, . "r' ... -.. ,:. ... r A ..xL., _,. - z<n »v�2-C�, '.1-,7.fi�"."�', ,;�, 1.. *",.. ^t �� " �i''r rriGf '�.a�l syc�..'..`+°rtG'SiP¢h`gr 4t R `?7< 1 7 p ^. u* _ y " 4 i -. `:xt u. $ :4 :^i} vN. i5:.F'Cf, �c �}' -sn%m. i.ye.S.� M Y1di:r �Y, y.f";v� i n 3 dig .�r:,r5:� M f %g'. ,s 'E. � . �(.. ,�_ ,.�,,�y ,y h'i �A{ F T 4ia5 ry :M`§ `° , n':4, �,rsy��', .��.,'�'i hl�. W'I. .6r E(€N.f 'r't ''F^ F:.�i ,,, .F?' {fr' z l b C {, :! . js.: �Y� `jtS.,., 4 ��F,-,-.} .v riAA1 � 5Ot f elf p�xll i uu�t�Q VI ' IT�wix`ni3n E{ k;SG�i'E✓ isf'iSi :,:,:r.. V t yy '.3� ,-.., ram. t.�e � lq "xv:�p( L':`t- "S �:_i'�y ;., -,; { a " r �i" 3(r•.•• � @ ] V N-s- L, ^'� .R s ..C', v� Cf'r3. .: as k+ � u Y *'° 'a. 1F! 'ka 6 :, A ,�,fi.. 1 .pr�1a Si _ a ? �b x 5 ! :�',:y[. ? a ��'x� " m & �ts 'y} r NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 408 319 tl . 178 0 0 0 0 2328 0 156 1664 0 NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 126 329 0 0 0 0 0 757 . 270 NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 256 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 769 0 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 0 0 179 181 0 452 1978 202 0 1797 181 • 2ND AVENUE NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD TABLE 22 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NB=B; SB=B NB=B; SB=C NB=B; NB=B; NB=B; SB=B SB=C SB=B NB=B; SB=C NE 3RD STREET & NE NB=A; SB=B NB=A; NB=A; NB=A; NB=A; SB=B SB=B SB=B SB=B NB=A; SB=B NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE B B B B NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD B B B B JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 38 • • • TABLE 23 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT .:t Biscayne Boulevard SE 2nd Street NE 6th Street AM=C PM=B ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) A S C D E AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA 2440 4130 4230 4420 2,704 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) NIA 3200 4380 4540 4670 3,085 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average G/C of 0.58. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and an average GIC of 0.61. 3) Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 5047 (AADT = 34,000; K= 9.20%; and, D = 67.99%) escalated by 3% per year for three years and includes committed development traffic and project traffic. JACKSON M. AI-ILSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 39 • I I NE6STE BAYSIDE NE 2 ST iSE2ST LEGEND AM/PM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 10 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 40 • 10.0 ON -STREET PARKING There are metered parking spaces on the south side of NE 2nd Street and the north side of NE 3rd Street. There are no existing on -street parking spaces adjacent to the site. The project will not result in the elimination of any existing on -street parking spaces. The project will provide some 1,146 on -site parking spaces. Parking will be provided for residents, employees and visitors to the site. 11.0 PEDESTRIANS Significant pedestrian activity was noted in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are pedestrian provisions in the signalized intersections at Biscayne Boulevard and NE 2nd Street; Biscayne Boulevard and NE 3rd Street; Ne 2nd Avenue and NE 2nd Street; and, NE 2nd Avenue and NE 3rd Street. The proposed project will not significantly impact pedestrian movements along Biscayne Boulevard. Project driveway traffic will have to interact with pedestrian movements on NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street. Because the project does not front NE 2nd Avenue, driveway activity will not directly impact pedestrian movements on that street. 12.0 PROJECT SITE PLAN Traffic and transportation aspects of the proposed site plan were reviewed and analyzed. 12.1 PROJECT DRIVEWAYS The proposed project includes two, two-way driveways. One driveway which serves the residential parking connects to NE 2nd Street. The other driveway which connects to NE 3rd Street serve the retail parking. Table 24 summarizes the AM and PM peak hour driveway volumes anticipated at the service points to the parking garages. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 41 • • • 25 TABLE 24 AM AND PM PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY VOLUMES IN VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 107 25 16 96 81 59 88 Queuing analysis was conducted basedpinbound lane and anon the assumtion that access to he © gbougnd e will be controlled by a card reader system and consist of a lane. Analysis of potential inbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 95% probability that the queue should not exceed 3 vehicles including the vehicle being processed. Analysis of potential outbound queues for the AM and PM peak hours indicates that there is better than a 95% probability that the queue should not exceed 3 vehicles including the vehicle being processed. Although control point locations are not finalized on the ground level plan, provided by the project architect, identified as "Large Scale Development Board Review 11 /10/03"; it appears that the potential control points could be well within the property. For the retail garage the control point could be over 100' from the south curb line of NE 3rd Street. For the residential garage the control pont appears to be approximately 75' from the north curb line of NE 2nd Street, and that the anticipated queues could be accommodated without impacting off -site traffic flows. 12.2 PROJECT LOADING DOCK The proposed site plan depicts a loading dock area with four bays internal to the site. Access to the loading dock is from an internal suld be adequate toervice drive ting serveEt edtype Street and NE 3rd Street. The loading dock area JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 42 • • • magnitude of the proposed mixed -use project. Loading dock maneuvering will occur entirely within the property and will not affect pedestrian and vehicular movements on NE 2nd Street or NE 3rd Street, 12.3 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The proposed site plan provides pedestrian access to Biscayne Boulevard, NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street. 13.0 CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the results from the intersection analysis and the roadway link analysis, it can be concluded that with or without the project, by the year 2005 there may be only some minor deterioration in the level of service on the intersections and streets most impacted by the project. The intersection analysis, conducted for the intersections shows only a minor degradation of the level of service during the AM and PM peak hours. There are no physical improvements which needed to be implemented to mitigate the impacts of anticipated development in the area. The roadway link analysis yields similar level of service results, indicating that roadway levels of service may be only marginally reduced through the year 2005 with or without the project. The results of all of these analyses are shown in Table 25. Finally, the corridor analysis provided in Appendix D clearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 43 • • TABLE 25 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NB=B; SB=B NE 3RD STREET & NE NB=A; SB=B 2ND AVENUE NB=B; SB=C NB=A; SB=B NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD NB=B; SB=B NB=A; SB=B NB=B; SB=C NB=A; SB=B NIA NIA NONE REQUIRED NONE REQUIRED JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. N/A N/A NONE REQUIRED NONE REQUIRED EVERGLADES ON THE BAY December 15, 2003 Page 44 • • • APPENDIX A Existing Intersection Levels of Service HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound 1 L T R I L T R L T R 1 No. Lanes I 3 0 0 [ 0 0 0 0 4 0 LGConfig 1 L [ T Volume 1158 768 Lane Width 112.0 I 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 28.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1242 4435 0.14 0.28 27.2 C Westbound Northbound 27.2 C 3485 6224 0,24 0.56 11.4 B 11.4 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 14.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET I Eastbound IL T R 1 No. Lanes 1 3 0 0 LGConfig 1 L Volume 1.380 Lane Width 112.0 RTOR Vol 1 SIGNALIZED Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 4 0 T 1426 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 18.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate GLp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 798 4435 0.50 0.18 39.2 D Westbound 39.2 D Northbound T 4108 6224 0.39 0.66 8.1 A 8.1 A Southbound Intersection Delay = 14:3 (sec/veh) Intersection. LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-2 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • Analyst: J. ABLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound I Northbound L T R ] L T R 0 2 0 TR 93 72 12.0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 1 4 0 L T 71 1128 ;12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 ES Left Thru Right P Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBI) or Similar Signal Operations 2 3 4 5 6 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WE Right 8 28.0 56.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 827 Westbound Northbound 5outhbound L 883 T 3384 2952 0.27 0.28 28.9 C 28.9 C 1577 0.11 0.56 10.5 B 6043 0.41 0.56 12.9 B 12.7 B Intersection Delay = 14.9 (sec/veh) Intersection. LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-3 HCS2000: Signalized intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S 5t: SE BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound Westbound Northbound I L T R L T R 1 L T R I No. Lanes i 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 LGConfig I TR Volume I 225 145 Lane Width i 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 Southbound L T R 1 4 0 L T 153 860 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 18.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate DelayLOS Delay LOS Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Eastbound TR 534 2969 0.83 0.18 53.1 D 53.1 D Westbound Northbound Southbound L 1041 1577 0.18 0.66 7.0 A 6.9 A T 3988 6043 0.22 0.66 6.9 A Intersection Delay = 20.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: AM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY j Westbound 1 Northbound L T R 1 L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 I 0, 0 0 LT 13 168 12.0 1 1 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 TR 577 333 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 P P 28.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 6 NB Left Thru Right Peds 5B Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 54.0 4.0 8 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach FLOW Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1007 Northbound Southbound TR 2600 3236 4334 0.21 0.31 23.3 C 23.3 C 0.41 Intersection. Delay = 12.2 0.60 10.0- A 10.0- A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-5 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZE➢ INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R L T R 0 0 0 ; 0 2 0 LT 141 186 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 3 0 TR 341 265 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WE Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NE Right EB Right SB Right WE Right Green 52.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1673 3217 0.15 0.52 12.7 B 12.7 B Northbound Southbound TR 1715 4287 0.39 0.40 22.0 C 22.0 C Intersection Delay = 19.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-6 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound J Northbound IL T R 1 L T R i L T R I 1 No. Lanes J 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 LGConfig I TR I Volume 1 130 138 1 Lane Width I 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 I 0 3 0 LT 1109 577 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 54.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Perforivance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 902 2900 0.38 0.31 25.4 C 25.4 C Westbound Northbound Southbound LT 2693 4488 0.31 0.60 9.2 A 9.2 A Intersection Delay = 13.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-7 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGCanfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R BAY Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 2 0 TR 169 180 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbounct L T R 0 3 0 LT 37 341 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SE Right Green Yellow JUL Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 5 NB Left p Thru p Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 28.0 54.0 4.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection Perfo Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) 6 8 Cycle Length: 90.0 uance Summary Lane Group Approach v/c g/C ➢elay LOS Delay LOS secs Eastbound TR Westbound 908 Northbound Southbound LT 2706 2919 0.46 0.31 4510 0.15 0.60 26.6 C 8.0 A Intersection Delay = 17.4 (sec/veh) 26.6 C 8.0 A Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-8 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.Id • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound j Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 LTR 73 816 83 12.0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WE Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4022 6094 0.28 0.66 7.3 A 7.3 A Southbound Intersection Delay = 7.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-9 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound 1 Northbound L T R L T R 1 L T R 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 LTR 1 285 1101 198 1 12.0 l 0 S outhbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration. 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right ; EB Right SB Right l WB Right Green 22.0 70.0 Yellow 4,0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Plow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4239 6056 0.43 0.70 6.7 A 6.7 A Southbound Intersection Delay = 6.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-10 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTE➢T Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound Westbound Northbound I L T R L T R L T R i No. Lanes 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 LGConfig 1 L LT Volume 1 14 55 Lane Width 1 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 Southbound L T R 0 4 0 TR 1133 142 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru F Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 26.0 62.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 422 1624 0.04 0.26 27.8 C LT 845 3249 0.10 0.26 28.3 C 28.2 C Northbound Southbound TR 3690 5952 0.40 0.62 10.0- A 10.0- A Intersection Delay = 11.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Vo l ume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Westbound L T R 0 0 0 1 2 L LT 176 94 12.0 12.0 Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : EXISTING N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Northbound L T R 0 0 0 0 i � I Southbound L T R 0 4 0 TR 990 122 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 8 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left P Thru P Right Peds NB Right SB Right 70.0 Green 22.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 Eastbound Westbound L 357 LT 715 Northbound Southbound TR 1624 0.61 0.22 42.6 D 3249 0.15 0.22 31.9 C 39.0 D 4163 5947 0.30 0.70 5.9 Intersection Delay = 12.7 A 5.9 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Say Appendix A December 15, 2003 Page A-12 • APPENDIX B Future Intersection Levels of Service Without Project HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAR HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R L T R Southbound L T R 3 L 161 12.0 © 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 T 1333 12.0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1242 4435 0.14 0.28 27.2 C Westbound Northbound 27.2 C 3485 6224 0.42 0.56 13.1 B 13.1 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 14.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTDR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 3 0 0 L 378 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 4 0 T 1664 12.0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right Right SB Right Right Green 18.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 A21 Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity EB WB Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) v/c 6 7 Length: 100.0 secs Approach g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 798 Westbound Northbound T 4108 Southbound 4435 0.50 6224 0.46 0.18 39.2 D 39.2 D 0.66 8.6 A 8.6 A Intersection Delay = 14.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-2 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 TR 161 83 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 1 4 0 L T 72 1614 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 56.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 839 2998 0.40 0.28 30.6 C 30.6 C Westbound Northbound Southbound L 883 1577 0.11 0.56 10.5 B T 3384 6043 0.58 0.56 15.1 B 14.9 B Intersection Delay = 17.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-3 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 2 0 TR 289 148 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 L T 156 1664 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SE Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 P P 18.0 4.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection Adj Sat Flow Rate NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 6 7 8 66.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group Approach (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 539 2994 Westbound Northbound Southbound L 1041 1577 T 3988 6043 0.96 0.18 71.6 E 71.6 E 0.19 0.66 7.0 A 0.43 0.66 8.4 A 8.3 A Intersection Delay = 21.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: Date: Period: Project E/W St: J. AHLSTEDT 12/15/2003 AM PEAK HOUR ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 2 0 LT 13 219 12.0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 TR 940 340 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left P Thru P Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 28.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red App r/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 54.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Intersection Perfoiivance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS secs Eastbound Westbound LT 1008 3239 Northbound Southbound TR 2634 4390 0.26 0.31 23.9 C 23.9 C 0.57 0.60 11.8 B 11.8 B Intersection Delay = 13.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-5 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • • Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: PM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound i L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 2 0 LT 142 266 12.0 0 0 0 3 0 TR 724 270 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 P P 52.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 5 6 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 40.0 4.0 7 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection PerfoLmance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1677 Northbound Southbound TR 1752 3225 0.21 0.52 13.2 B 13.2 B 4380 0.62 0.40 25.6 C 25.6 C Intersection Delay = 22.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-6 HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • EB Left Thru Right P Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right 5B Right Green Yellow All Red Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/5 St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound Northbound L T R I L T R L T R 0 2 0 j 0 0 0 TR 199 141 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 3 0 LT 111 940 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WE Right 28.0 54.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 917 2948 0.46 0.31 26.7 C 26.7 C Westbound Northbound Southbound LT 2702 4503 0.47 0.60 10.6 B 10.6 B Intersection Delay = 14.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-7 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 2 0 TR 232 183 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 LT 38 724 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 28.0 54.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red. Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach. Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 919 2954 0.55 0.31. 28.1 C 28.1 C Westbound Northbound Southbound LT 2713 4521 0.31 0.60 9.1 A 9.1 A Intersection Delay = 16.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-8 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: AM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CB➢ or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 LTR 120 1361 82 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SF3 Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 26.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WE Right 5 P P £' 66.0 4.0 6 7 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4047 Southbound 6132 0.45 0.66 8.5 A 8.5 A Intersection Delay = 8.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-9 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. Agency: Date: Period: Project E/W St: AHLSTEDT 12/15/2003 PM PEAK HOUR ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 LTR 367 1968 202 12.0 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 22.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 6 7 8 NB Left P Thru P Right P Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 70.0 4.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) Length: 100.0 secs v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4276 Southbound 6108 0.68 0.70 9.5 A 9.5 A Intersection Delay = 9.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-10 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 1 2 0 L LT 14 56 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 4 0 TR 1619 145 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 25.0 62.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 422 1624 0.04 0.26 27.8 C LT 845 3249 0.10 0.26 28.3 C 28.3 C Northbound Southbound TR 3705 5976 0.55 0.62 11.6 B 11.6 B Intersection Delay = 12.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: PM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK I-IOIJR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 Eastbound !L T R 1 1 1 1 1 1 Duration Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE W/O PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Westbound Northbound IL TR L T R 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0.25 Area Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds Right Right NB 5B Green Yellow All Red 1 P 22.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 2 1 L LT 1179 96 112.0 12.0 1 Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 3 4 Intersection Performance Southbound L T R 0 4 0 TR 1797 125 12.0 0 5 6 7 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 70.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Summary 8 Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate s) v/c Approach g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound L 357 LT 715 Northbound Southbound TR 4189 1624 0.62 3249 0.16 5985 0.51 Intersection Delay = 11.7 0.22 43.1 D 0.22 32.0 C 39.3 D 0.70 7.5 A 7.5 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix B December 15, 2003 Page B-12 • o • APPENDIX C Future Intersection Levels of Service With Project HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Westbound L T R Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Northbound L T R 3 0 0 L 214 12.0 0 0 0 0 4 0 T 1614 12.0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left P Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red 28.0 4.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 2 3 4 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 56.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) Lane Group Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 1242 Westbound No rthbound 4435 0.19 0.28 27.7 C 3485 6224 Southbound 27.7 C 0.51 0.56 14.1 B 14.1 B Intersection Delay = 15,7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: ➢ate: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 3 0 0 L 408 12.0 0 0 0 0 4 0 T 2328 12.0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 798 4435 0.54 0.18 39.8 D 39.8 D Westbound Northbound 4108 6224 0.64 0.66 10.7 B 10.7 B Southbound Intersection Delay = 14.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-2 HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R SIGNALIZED Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 2 0 TR 214 139 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 L T 72 1614 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left Thru Right P Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green 28.0 Yellow 4,0 All Red 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left P Thru P Right Peds EB Right WB Right 56.0 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 832 2973 Westbound Northbound Southbound L 883 1577 T 3384 6043 0.58 0.28 33.9 C 33.9 C 0.11 0.56 10.5 B 0.58 0.56 15.1 B 14.9 B Intersection Delay = 18.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-3 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2304 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 TR 319 178 12.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 1 4 0 L T 156 1664 12.0 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 66.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 537 2985 1.10 0.18 110.9 F 110.9 F Westbound Northbound Southbound L 1041 1577 0.19 0.66 7.0 A T 3988 6043 0.43 0.66 8.4 A 8.3 A Intersection Delay = 32.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound I L T R L T R 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left P Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red 28.0 4.0 0 0 2 0 LT 132 263 12.0 1 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 2 3 4 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 TR 949 340 12.0 0 5 6 7 8 NE Left Thru Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WB Right 54.0 4.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1005 3230 Northbound Southbound TR 2634 4390 0.34 0.31 24.8 C 24.8 C 0.57 0.60 11.8 B 11.8 B Intersection Delay = 14.2 Everglades On The Bay Appendix C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS — B December 15, 2003 Page C-5 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • Analyst: J. Agency: ➢ate: 12/ Period: PM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET SIGNALIZED No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 0 Inter.: 2309 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE INTERSECTION SUMMITRY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 2 0 LT 126 329 12.0 Southbound L T . R 0 0 0 3 0 TR 757 270 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds Right EB Right Right WE Right 52.0 40.0 4.0 NB SB Green Yellow All Red 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 6 7 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound LT 1665 Northbound Southbound TR 1754 3201 0.32 0.52 14.3 B 14.3 B 4385 0.64 0.40 26.0 C 26.0 C Intersection Delay = 22.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-6 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: AM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE SIGNALIZE➢ INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound Westbound Northbound { Southbound I L T R L T R L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 0 2 0 LGConfig # TR Volume 1 205 141 Lane Width I 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 LT 1130 948 1 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 28.0 54.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 A11 Red Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 918 2951 0.47 0.31 26.8 C 26.8 C Westbound Northbound Southbound LT 2699 4499 0.49 0.60 10.8 B 10.8 B Intersection Delay = 14.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-7 HC52000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 2ND STREET SIGNALIZED No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R 0 2 0 TR 256 183 12.0 0 Inter.: 2305 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NE 2ND AVENUE INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 0 3 0 LT 110 769 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left Thru P Thru Right P Right Peds Peds WB Left SE Left P Thru Thru P Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SE Right WB Right Green 28.0 54.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound TR 922 2965 0.58 0.31 28.7 C 28.7 C Westbound Northbound Sorthbound LT 2702 4504 0.35 0.60 9.5 A 9.5 A Intersection Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) Intersection. LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-8 HCS2000: Signalized intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 LTR 452 1978 202 12.0 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left NB Left P Thru Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds WB Left SB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 70.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4271 6102 0.70 0.70 9.9 A 9.9 A Southbound Intersection Delay = 9.9 {sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-9 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: AM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CB➢ or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: NB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 LTR 180 1378 82 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 26.0 4.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 P P P 66.0 4.0 6 7 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound Northbound LTR 4042 Southbound 6124 0.47 0.66 8.8 A 8.8 A Intersection Delay = 8.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-10 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: J. Agency: Date: 12/ Period: AM Project ID: E/W St: NE AHLSTEDT 15/2003 PEAK HOUR EVERGLADES ON THE BAY 3RD STREET No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: 2308 Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound 1 Northbound L T R I L `I° R 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 L LT 14 116 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 0 4 0 TR 1619 162 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left Thru Right Peds WE Left P Thru P Right Peds NE Right SB Right Green 26.0 62.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 4.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS NB Left Thru Right Peds SE Left Thru P Right P Peds EB Right WE Right Eastbound Westbound L 422 LT 845 Northbound Southbound TR 1624 0.04 0.26 27.8 C 3249 0.20 0.26 29.5 C 29.3 C 3701 5969 0.56 0.62 11.7 Intersection Delay = 13.1 (sec/veh) B 11.7 B Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-11 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d • • Analyst: J. AHLSTEDT Agency: Date: 12/15/2003 Period: PM PEAT{ HOUR Project ID: EVERGLADES ON THE BAY E/W St: NE 3RD STREET Eastbound 1 L T R 1 No. Lanes LGConfig 1 Volume 1 Lane Width 1 RTOR Vol 1 Inter.: 230E Area Type: CBD or Similar Jurisd: Year : FUTURE WITH PROJECT N/S St: SB BISCAYNE BLVD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L LT 179 181 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 4 0 TR 1797 181 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: CBD or Similar Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 EB Left NB Left Thru Thru Right Right Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left Thru P Thru P Right Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 22.0 70.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c 7 8 g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound Westbound 357 LT 715 Northbound Southbound 1624 0.62 0.22 43.1 D 3249 0.29 0.22 33.6 C 38.4 D TR 4173 5962 0.53 0.70 7.7 A 7.7 A Intersection Delay = 12.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Everglades On The Bay Appendix C December 15, 2003 Page C-12 • • APPENDIX D Corridor Analysis • • INTRODUCTION A level of service analysis was conducted using the techniques contained in the adopted Transportation Element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1989-2000. These techniques are contained in the City of Miami publication Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami as revised September 1990. In performing the analysis, of the three possible scenarios available, Scenario 2 - maximum auto was used. The level of service analysis for the Everglades On The Bay Project is documented in Tables D-1 and D-1. The proposed project is located in the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor. The Biscayne Boulevard Corridor was generally defined to include the area between Biscayne Bay and Miami Avenue. Major roadways providing capacity to the corridor are: • Biscayne Boulevard • NE 2nd Avenue • NE 1st Avenue • Miami Avenue Major transit routes providing capacity to the corridor are: • Metrobus Routes 3, 16, 48, 51, 53 95, C, S, 9, 10, K, T, 6, 7, and 8 s Metrorail • Metromover EXISTING 2003 LEVEL OF SERVICE Table D-1 presents an analysis of the existing 2003 corridor level of service. Roadway vehicular capacities (column 2) were based upon data contained in the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact Increment II dated March 2003 (Downtown DRI"). Roadway vehicular volumes (column 4) were taken from Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6 published 2002 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data. This data was adjusted to 2003 by applying a growth factor of 1©lo per year. These AADT volumes were adjusted to reflect peak hour conditions by applying factors contained in the FDOT publication Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning, also known as the FDOT 1998 LOS Manual. Roadway vehicular volumes on NE 1st Avenue, NE 2nd Avenue and Miami Avenue were Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 PAGE D-1 • • taken from data in the Downtown DR!". Mass Transit person trip capacities (columns 8, 9 and 10)were taken from the uDowniown DRI". Transit volumes (column 12) were taken from the Downtown DR!" and escalated by 1 % per year. As Can be seen from Table D-1, the existing Biscayne Boulevard Cottidor cutt`ently Operates at Level of Service "A" Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2Q 3 PAGE D-2 • • TABLE D-1 - EXISTING 2003 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ROADWAY MODE 1 MASS TRANSIT MODE CORRIDDR TOTALS CORRIDOR NAME 2003 ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAY ROADWAYII BUS MOVER RAIL RAN TOTALTOTAL TRANSIT 'CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRDOR Princiral Road a s CQRR VEHICULAR PER. TRIP VEHICULAR PER. TRIP EXCESS PERSONRI PER TRIP PER TRIP PER TRIP TRANS T TRANSIT PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON PERSON I TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY VOLUME VOLUME PER. TRIP IMEIMIIII I CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY PERSON IIMMIIIIIME TRIP I TRIP TRIP JJY PPV= CAPACITY V/C LOS LOAD = LOAD = LOAD = LOAD = TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY VOLUME EMI V/C LOS 1.6 =MEMNON= DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN VOLUME CAPACITY CAPACITY (Notes) (1) (2) (3) (4) INOMMI (8) (9) (11) (12) IrgallIMMMIIMI (16) IMIMI BISCAYNE CORRIDOR HS .1111. EIMME111.1 Bisca ne Boulevard 504 3 140 5 024 2 148 3 007 2 017 0 60 A 2 486 1 440 MEM 3 926 429 3 497 8 950 3 437 MIZIMIMEINA 6.372 0 17 A NE 2nd Avenue 3,070 4,912 684 =MEN= 0.20 A 1,330 1,440 2,770 352 2,418 7,682 1,310 NE 1st Avenue 3 070 4 912 611 855 4 057 0 17 A MEM= 1 440 =El 3 554 417 8 466 1 273 7,193 0.15 A IlV.tuo EIMIIMIIMMIIMMINIIIMMIEMMEMIIIM MII=M1.1.1.1.. 2,040 3,264 408 571 2,693 0. 8 A MIN 1,463 1,997 I 790 1.207 5,261 1,361 3,900 0.26 A =Mil 11.1.1==.1%== limn .11...1111111.11111. 111=11.11.11.1MMEIMMINE1111111.11.11=EIMIIM TOTAL =IIMMMMIIIIIIIIIMIIMMIMIIIMMII 11,320 18,112 3,852 5,392 12,720 0.30 IN A ll 1.111111111111.. IIIIIIIIIEMIMEMMIIIIIIIMEI 6,464 4,320 1,463 12,247 1,988 10,259 I MIMI 30,359 7,360 22,979 .24 • A TOTAL 11,320 18,112 3,852 5,392 12,720 0.30 VI 6,464 4, 20 1.463 12,247 1,988 10,259 30,359 7.380 22.979 0.24 ill ...11111.1MEMINIIMIMMINIIIIMEMINIMIll MIIIMINIMEM11.1.11.1111 111.1=11111 .111111111.15=1.1 LOS TABLE AUTO PERSON TRIPS 5,392 73.06% =IMEMI MEM EIMIIIMINE11.1111.11MMIll TRANSIT PERSON TRIPS 1,968 ENIIMIMIIIIMMI0.00A 0.60 A TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 7,380 100.00% MIIMIIMIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIMIMIIIIMIMIIIMIIIIMIIIIMIIIIIII 0.61 B MI MEI EMI 0.70 BIIIIIIMI=Mill .111=111111111111=1=111111.1111M 0.7 EMIIMIIIIIMIIIIME111111111= IIIIIMMIIM 0,80 11.1.1111=11111 =III 1111.1.1111.=M11. 0.81 D MI= IIIMIII. MIMI 0.90 D EN IIIIIMINIMI.11.1=1 W 0.91 E NEM 1.11.111.11111111 MIMI MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMII= 1.00 E MENEM'. Ell I 1.01 F IMIIIM=IIMIII 11111.1111111 I 1.111=1.1 NM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 PAGE D-3 • • YEAR 2009 LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH AND WITHOUT THE PROJECT Table D-2 presents an analysis of the future year 2009 corridor level of service with and without. Non -Person trips volumes and capacities were taken from Table 21.D10 of the "Downtown DRI". Project person trips are taken from Tables 13 and 14. As can be seen from Table D-2, it is estimated that the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor will operate at Level of Service "A" in the year 2009 with or without the project. Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 PAGE D-4 • • TABLE D-2 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR ANALYSIS WITHOUT & WITH PROJECT CORRIDOR NAME CORRIDOR TOTALS Principal Roadway(s) CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP CAPACITY CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP VOLUME CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP EXCESS CAPACITY CORRIDOR PERSON TRIP V/C LOS BISCAYNE CORRIDOR Biscayne Boulevard (5047) 10,924 5,013 15,937 0.46 A NE 2nd Avenue 7,917 2,027 9,944 0.26 A NE 1st Avenue ` 8,669 2,841 11,510 0.33 A Miami Avenue 5,231 1,595 " 6,826 0.30 A TOTAL 2009 W/O PROJECT r 32,741 11,476 44,217 0.35 A PROJECT 651 ?? ERR TOTAL 2009 WITH PROJECT 32,741 12,127 44,217 0.37 A LOS TABLE 0.00 A 0.60 A 0.61 B 0.70 B 0.71 C 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.90, D 0.91 E ... 1.00 E 1 n1 F Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2 O3 PAGE D-5 • • • RAW DATA & CALCULATIONS • NE 2 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST NE 2 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3 ST WIO BISCAYNE BLVD NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST NE 2 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST 1 6,017 23,240 AM 9:30 AM 7:00 AM 9:30 AM 8:15 AM ERR PEAK 12:00 PM 7:00 AM 4:45 PM 8:15 AM ERR 2 ADT 6,017 2,460 2,460 23,240 17,663 17,663 MID 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM ERR K 10.32% 9.02% 8.66% 7.88% ERR PM 2:15 PM 5:00 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM ERR PSF 1.026 1.026 1.026 1.026 1.026 1 EASTBOUND EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND NORTHBOUND EVE 18:15 18:15 18:15 18:15 K(100) 0.106 0.093 0.089 0.081 ERR 0.000 2 WESTBOUND WESTBOUND SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND PEAK 12:00 7:00 16:45 8:15 ERR D 100,00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ERR Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 NE 2 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST NE2STW/O NE3STW10 NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN BISCAYNE BLVD BISCAYNE BLVD NE2&3ST NE 2 & 3 ST NE 2 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLVD NE 3 ST W/O BISCAYNE BLV❑ NB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST SB BISCAYNE BLVD BTWN NE 2 & 3 ST • AM 9:30 AM 7:00 AM 9:30 AM 8:15 AM ERR MID 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 11:30 AM 11:30AM ERR 1 621 1,708 ERR PM 1 2:15 PM 525 5:00 PM 4:45 PM 2,013 5:00 PM 1 475 1,314 2 222 1,391 ERR ERR 2 185 1,260 ERR 2 212 1,202 TOTAL 475 222 1,314 1,391 TOTAL 621 185 1,708 1,260 TOTAL 525 212 2,013 1,202 • a� 7.89% 9.02% 5.65% 5.99% 0 0.00% 10.32% 7.52% 7.35% 5.42% 0 0.00% 8.73% 8.62% 8.66% 5.17% Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 • • RAW DATA NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 760 0 156 92 81 70 1117 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 1376 0 367 223 144 151 851 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 571 330 13 166 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 338 262 41 184 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 129 137 108 571 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 167 178 37 338 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 70 787 80 0 0 0 0 1122 141 14 54 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 282 1090 196 0 0 0 0 980 121 174 93 0 PM FDOT SEASONAL FACTOR 1,01 AADT ADJUSTED DATA NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 768 0 158 93 82 71 1128 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 1390 0 371 225 145 153 860 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 577 333 13 168 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 341 265 41 186 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 130 138 109 577 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 169 180 37 341 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 71 795 81 0 0 0 0 1133 142 14 55 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 285 1101 198 0 0 0 0 990 122 176 94 0 PM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 • • FDOT PEAK SEASONAL FACTOR 1.026 PEAK SEASON ADJUSTED DATA NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET &BISCAYNE BLVD 1 788 0 162 95 84 73 1158 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 1426 0 380 231 149 156 882 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 592 342 13 172 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 272 42 191 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 134 142 112 592 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 173 184 38 350 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 73 816 83 0 0 0 0 1163 146 15 56 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 292 1130 203 0 0 0 0 1016 125 180 96 0 PM PHF 1.026 0 0 0 LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0.25 0.90 ERR 0.91 0.82 0.75 0.76 0.82 ERR ERR ERR ERR AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD ERR 0.89 ERR 0.95 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.97 ERR ERR ERR ERR PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.85 0.88 0.81 0.88 ERR AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.92 0.90 0.79 0.90 ERR PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.83 0.76 0.66 0.85 ERR ERR ERR ERR AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.80 0.86 0.92 0.92 ERR ERR ERR ERR PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0.70 0.90 0.67 . ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.87 0.77 0.88 0.64 ERR AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0.89 0.87 0.89 ERR ERR ERR ERR 0.91 0.74 0.81 0.86 ERR PM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 • • EXISTING AADT NB EB SB WB L LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 768 0 158 93 82 71 1,128 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 1,390 0 371 225 145 153 860 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 577 333 13 168 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 341 265 41 186 0 PM NE 2N❑ STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 130 138 109 577 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 169 180 37 341 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 71 795 81 0 0 0 0 1,133 142 14 55 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 285 1,101 198 0 0 0 0 990 122 176 94 0 PM GROWTH FACTOR 1.02 FUTURE BACKGROUND AADT NB EB SB WB L LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 783 0 161 95 83 72 1,151 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 1,418 0 378 230 148 156 877 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 588 340 13 171 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 348 270 42 190 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 133 141 111 588 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 172 183 38 348 0 0 0 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 72 811 82 0 0 0 0 1,156 145 14 56 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 291 1,123 202 0 0 0 0 1,010 125 179 96 0 PM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 • • COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 550 0 0 66 0 0 463 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 845 0 0 60 0 0 787 0 0 0 0 PM ,NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 352 0 0 48 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 376 0 0 76 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 352 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 376 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 48 550 0 0 0 0 0 463 0 0 0 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 76 845 0 0 0 0 0 787 0 0 0 0 PM FUTURE WITHOUT PROJECT NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 1,333 0 161 161 83 72 1,614 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 2,263 0 378 289 148 156 1,664 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 940 340 13 219 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 724 270 42 266 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 199 141 111 940 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 232 183 38 724 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 120 1,361 82 0 0 0 0 1,619 145 14 56 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 367 1,968 202 0 0 0 0 1,797 125 179 96 0 PM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003 • • • PROJECT TRAFFIC NB EB SB WB LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 20 0 53 53 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 65 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 19 44 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 84 63 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 6 0 19 8 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 24 0 72 45 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET &BISCAYNE BLVD 60 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 60 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 85 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 85 0 PM FUTURE WITH PROJECT NB EB SB WB L LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT LT T RT NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 1 1353 0 214 214 139 72 1614 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 0 2328 0 408 319 178 156 1664 0 0 0 0 PM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 949 340 32 263 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 757 270 126 329 0 PM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 205 141 130 948 0 0 0 0 AM NE 2ND STREET & NE 2ND AVENUE 0 0 0 0 256 183 110 769 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0 mm 1619 162 14 116 0 AM NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 180 1378 82 NE 3RD STREET & BISCAYNE BLVD 452 1978 202 0 0 0 0 1797 181 179 181 0 PM Everglades On The Bay December 15, 2003