The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutpre. legislation 21. • I I I.,LGfkr,.J 61r f 4 J-02--i11 2/4/02 RESOLUTION NC. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION or THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "B" DESIGNATED PROJECTS FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY IN RANK ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS W;TH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A" FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS. BE IT RESOLVED PY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OE MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section {, The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the .findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional engineering construction management services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. The Co:radino Group, Inc, 2. Nava Consulting Inc. 3. Marlin Engineering Inc. 4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc, 5. CES Consultants, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. PBS&J (ALTERNATE) . I • ry { V o aH r (M.. r'r iL CITY COtec§SION MET OF FEE) 1 II 2002 Y^Cy- 11ri IJ i 440 Section: 2. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional ADA requirement services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&0' 2. R 0 Architects e Planners, Inc. 3. Gurr_ Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE) Section 3. The recommendation of the City Manager tc approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional architectural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 2. CSA Southeast, Inc. (C.A.P. Eng. Consultants, Inc,) Indigo Service Cornoratior_ Section 4. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, a$ to the most qualified firms to provide professional architecture services for Public Works Category "B„ designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; 1. Gurri Matute PA 2. Zyscovich, Inc. 3. R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. 4. R.E. Chisholm Architects, Inc. 5. Bermello, Ajarni- a Partners, Inc. (ALTERNATE) 5. PBSJ (ALTERNATE) Page 2 of 7 02- 144 r L=+'r-29-2002 05: a7 LIT LL.GRK:, urn r ter= Section. 5. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant :.o Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional environm-tentaengineering services for Public works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. ATC Group Services Inc, 2. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 3. URS Corporation 4. END Engineers, Inc, 3. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE) 6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERCATE) Section 6. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of :he selection, committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional general engineering services for Public Forks Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. H.J. Ross Associates, Inc. 2, Kunde, Sprecher & Associates, Inc, 3. Metric Engineering, Inc. 4. PBS&J 5. Marlin Engineering, Inc. 6. PMS Engineering Corp. 7. URS Corporation (ALTERNATE) e. Cimiey-Harr, and Associates, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 7. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3 of 7 02- 144 MA1-29-2002 09:4 CIT's CLEKK Urr1�t .717 LGlU professional landscape architecture services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted, . Falcon & 3ueno 2. Curtis & Rogers Design Studio, Inc. 3. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4, EDAW, Inc. (ALTERNATE) Section 8. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional mechanical engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted; Louis J Aguirre & Associates, P.A, 2, Johnson, Hernandez Associates Inc. 3. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTERNATE) Section 9. The recommendation of the City Manager ,o approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional structural engineering services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. San Martin Associates, Inc. 2, Avert, Inc. 3. EAC Consulting, Inc. Section 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, Dl rsuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified Firms to provide Page 4 of 7 Al)_,1 A A r'i C-29-.21 2 • ®y ; 47 C : 7 1' CLcH 5 LA-1- i tx w34'�' JJV 1 _J professional surveying and mapping services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. PBS&J 2. Fernando Z. Gate11 P. L. S., Inc. 3. Weidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A. 4. Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. 5. Williams, Eatfield & Stoner, Inc. 6. Leiter, Perez & Associates, Inc. Section 11. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Recruest for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional value analysis and cost estimate services far public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 2. 3. A2 Group, Inc. P$S&J Grace & Naeem Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide professional air conditioning services for Pubic Works Category "2." designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted: 1. Grace & Naeem Uddin Section 13. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firm to provide Page 5 of 7 02- #44 ITI T-47-WCI JG LLGf:C.Q professional life safety services for Public Works Category designated pro::ects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein is accepted; 1. Gurri Matute, P.A. Section 14. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide professional roofing services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1. Building Diagnostics Associates, PA 2. international Logistics Group Section 15. The City !tanager is authcrizedi' to negotiate and execute Professional Services Agreements, in a fora acceptable to the City Attorney, with each firm in an amount not to exceed the amount indicated in Attachment "A" for each specialty for each firm, with funds allocated from individual project accounts. :ha herein authorization is further subject to comp:.ian❑e with a;1 raquiremen a that may he imposed by the City Attorney, including but not 1irr ted to thosq prescribed by applicable City Charmer and Code provieion5. Page 6 of 7 02 t44 1 In i TG 7- XJYJC VJ • 4LJ tit I y1 I 4 .. Section 16. Th_s Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its acoptian and signatl.ire of the Mayor.' PASSED AND ADOPTED mhis 14th ATTEST: SyIvOt Scheider Acting Cit - lerk 0 XORM AND CORRECTNESS:eV APPRO day of February AND VILARELLC TY ATTORNEY W59"l5:LE , 2002, M., NUEL R. DIAZ, MA If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective a- the and of ter. calendar days _rom the data it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override o_ the veto by the City Commission, Page 7 of 7 02.- 144 ATTACHMENT "A" ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; $6C0,000 ADA (DISABLE REQUIREMENTS): $100, 000 ARCHITECTURAL -ENGINEERING SERVICES (Building & Zoning): $EC0,000 ARCHITECTURE: $600,000 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: $600, 000 GENERAL ENGINEERING: $ 00,000 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: $400,000 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: $200,000 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: $200,000 SURVEYING AND MAPPING: $200,0QC VALUE ANALYSIS AND COST ESTIMATE: $200,000 AIR CONDITIONING: $200,000 LIFE SAFETY; $200,000 ROOFING: $2d0,000 02- 144 TOTAL P.05