Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
submission - Comprehensive Plan
SUPPORT THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & MIAMI RIVER INFILL PLAN Keep Middle River for Maritime and/or Low -Mid Rise Residential uses City of Miami Commission February 26, 2004 Prepared by: The law offices of ANDREW DICKMAN, P.A. 9111 Park Drive Miami Shores, FL 33138 (305) 758-3621 andrewdickman@bellsouth.net SUBMITTED INTO THE P!JLC RECORD FOR P2.ON -Q1-Dtt. The Middle Miami River Neighborhood Coalition TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab Pages 1. The Miami River Commission Infill Plan.. 1.1 - 1.23 2. Miami's Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan 2.1 - 2.11 3. Zoning 3.1 - 3.26 4. Traffic Impacts 4.1 - 4.16 5. Site Plan, Land Use and Zoning Analysis 5.1 - 5.17 6. Property Values 6.1 - 6.19 7. Middle River Neighborhood Coalition Petitions. 7.1 - 7.34 8. Images . 8.1 - 8.8 Prepared by The law offices of ANDREW DICKMAN, P.A. 2/25/2004 Policy Committee: Governor of State of Florida — Mr. Jeb Bush Designee: Dr. Pamella Dana Chair of Miami -Dade Delegation presentative Rene Garcia - .signee: Ms. Debra Owens Chair of Governing Board of South Florida Water Management District — Mr. Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr. Designee: Ms. lrela Bague Miami -Dade State Attorney Ms. Katherine Fernandez -Rundle — Designee: Mr. Gary Winston Mayor of Miami -Dade County Mayor Alex Penelas Designee: Mr. Henry F. Sori Mayor of Miami Mayor Manuel A. Diaz Designee: Mr. Otto Boudet-Murfas — City of Miami Commissioner Commissioner Joe Sanchez Designee: Mr. Steve Wright Miami -Dade County — Commissioner Commissioner Bruno Barreiro Designee: Mr. Alfredo Gonzalez Chair of Miami River Marine — Group Mr. Charles "Bud" Morton Designee: Mr. Richard Bunnell Chair of Marine Council _ Mr. Michael Karcher Designee: Mr. Phil Everingham .ecutive Director of Downtown Development Authority - Mr. Dana A. Nottingham Designee: Mr. Adam Lukin Chair of Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce _ Mr. William O. Cullom Designee: Ms. Megan Kelly Neighborhood Representative Appointed by City of Miami - Commission Dr. Erncst Martin Designee: Mr. Michael Cox Neighborhood Representative - Appointed by Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Sallye Jude Designee: Ms. Jane Caporelli - Representative from Environments{ or Civic Organization Appointed by the Governor Ms. Janet McAliley - Designee: Ms. Theo Long Member at Large Appointed by the Governor Mr. Robert Parks Member at Large Appointed by Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Sara Babun nesignee: Mr. Tom Parker ember at Large Appointed by City of Miami Commission Mr. Cleve Jones, Jr. Designee: Captain Beau Payne Managing Director Captain David Miller Miami River Commission c/o Rosenstiel School 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami, Florida 33149 Office: (305) 361-4850 Fax: (305) 361-4755 email: mrc@rsmas.miami.edu January 22, 2004 Honorable Commissioner Joe Sanchez City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Re: Recommendation for Approval of 1/22/04 City Commission Agenda Items PZ 19 & PZ 20 Dear Honorable Commissioner Sanchez: This letter serves as the Miami River Commission's (MRC) "official statement" to all City Commissioners, requested in City Resolution 00- 320, regarding January 22, 2004 City Commission Agenda Item PZ.19 & PZ 20, which impact the Miami River. On September 8, 2003, the Miami River Commission (MRC) heard a presentation from Ms. Lucia Dougherty, Greenberg Trauig, and Mr. Larry Cohan, Brito, Cohan and Associates, regarding the pending Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) application for the "Royal Atlantic" development, located at 1001 NW 7 ST. The presented MUSP application included the pending land use and zoning amendments. The MRC found the project to be consistent with the award winning Miami River Corridor Urban Inffll Plan, in that it is a mixed -use project, featuring retail spaces on the ground floor with residential units above, and a facaded parking garage. In addition, the MRC found the proposed "Royal Atlantic" development to be consistent with the Miami River Greenway Action Plan, in providing a 20 foot -wide publicly accessible riverwalk, and an "on -road greenway" along NW 7 ST. Therefore, the MRC unanimously recommended approval of the "Royal Atlantic" MUSP application, and the related land use and zoning amendments. Sincerely, Robert L. Parks, Esq. Chair, Miami River Commission 411111001110110010 1 YU IN,* r I f 411 i ,) prepared for Miami River Commission, City of Miami, and Miami -Dade County lji 1Erand Associates, Inc. 50300056.02 - MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Miami River from the mouth at Biscayne Bay to the Miami International Airport will get its own identity as a hub of new activity, if the Miami River Commission, the City of N'liami. and Miami -Dade County succeed in implementing this Urban Infill Plan. These three entities along with the efforts of a group of stakeholders including home owners, commercial interests and marine industries along the river have set in motion an unprecedented planning effort built upon earlier plans for the Miami River including the Miami River Greenway Action Plan, Miami River Master Plan, Miami River Study Connnission Report and Miami River Commission's Water Quality Improvement Plan —The Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan The main objective of this Urban Infill Plan is to establish a un vrsron or the future development of the Miami `River Corridor. It is the Strategic Plan that will guide the Miami River Commissions efforts to promote the Miarni River Corridor as a multi -modal transportation corridor, a $4 billion a year economic engine and the home to many of - Miami's oldest businesses and neighborhoods. The Miami giver has been the subject of many plans and a wide variety of competing interests over the last 40 years. This Urban Infill Plan will provide One Voice for the future of the river The Miami River Corridor. Major Themes for the Urban Infill Plan are: • Vision for the River • Investment Along the River • Transportation Along the River • Neighborhoods Along the River • The River Environment • Implementation Strategies Vision for the River: Arguably, for the first time there is a clear vision for the future of the Miami River. The Plan provides a 'virtual tour' up the river, neighborhood by neighborhood, richly describing the wealth of businesses, historic neighborhoods and industries that make the Miami River truly unique. In just 5.5 miles, a tour along the Miami River reveals so much —the 2000 year old Miami Circle, some of Miami's oldest neighborhoods, new riverfront development, the historic Miami River Inn, restaurants, marinas, old and new bridges, parks, recreational boats, marine shipping, and on a perfect 'Miami River Day' even a manatee with a pup. Investment Along the River: The success of the Miami River Corridor will require substantial investment along the river by both the private and public sectors. A redevelopment stimulus package is proposed to provide financial incentives to spur private developments and investment in the public facilities including roads and greenways in the Miami River Corridor. The City of Miami and Miami -Dade County are already investigating the creation of one or more Tax Increment Finance Districts within the Miami River Corridor. Additionally, local governments will support catalytic redevelopment projects within the Miami River Corridor will further generate development activity along the River. The Miami River Commission will assist the private sector with permit facilitation and proper development practices by providing staff assistance and the creation of an 'urban design center' Public investment associated with the design of public buildings and spaces will dramatically enhance the value of property within the Miami River Corridor and will 'set the bar' higher for private sector development through a heightened quality of design on all public projects. Public investment includes parks, greenways, civic buildings and facilities, bridges, streets and utilities. The $80 million investment in the dredging of the Miami River's Federal Navigation Channel and the proposed protective zoning for water dependant and water related businesses sends a clear message to the river's water dependant businesses that they here to stay with the support of the local, state and federal governments. Transportation Along the River: The Urban Infill Plan provides a vision for the multi -modal transportation future of the Miami River Corridor. In total, more than 27 miles of multi -modal transportation infrastructure exists or is planned for the Miami River, including 5.5 miles of waterway, 11 miles of roadway, and 11 miles of greenway. Combined with the existing metrorail, metromover, buslines and the future Miami-Intermodal Center, the Miami River Corridor needs to be recognized and designated by the City of Miarni, Miami - Dade County and FDOT as the only multi -modal east -west connector from the airport to downtown. Once designated as multi -modal transportation corridor, improvement projects can be identified through the MPO process and funding can be sought through the Transportation Equity Act for the 21" Century (TEA-21) and its successor, currently known asTEA3. The Plan outlines specific recommendations to improve pedestrian mobility, provide traffic calming and study potential roadway realignments throughout the Miami River Corridor. Mk4lMl Prepared by Kirnley-Horn and Associates. loc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission r � MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tunnels should be analyzed as alternatives to bridges for future - high -volume river crossings. Minimum clearance heights for bridges must be adopted and adhered to by al] transportation agencies to protect the Federal Navigation Channel. The Plan also includes recommendation for improved transit service, watercraft transportation and comprehensive transportation planning along the Miami River Corridor. Neighborhoods Along the River: The multicultural neighborhoods along the Miami River are in need of protective zoning to preserve structures and fabric that defines them. New Neighborhood Conservation District Designations for the Spring Garden, Lummus Park, Highland Park and ,Eazt Little Havana Neighborhoods are proposed to protectthe scale, character andquality of life in these neighborhoo g - the river, he Plan recommends that the local governments encourage mixed income housing throughout the Miami River Corridor, provided that it does not conflict with or displace existing maritime businessq.s. Other recommendations in the Plan to improve the quality of life in the neighborhoods along the river include establishing Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED) regulations and review - processes, continue funding Governor Bush's 'Operation Riverwalk' and support for the City of Miami Mayor Diaz's 'Clean up Miami Campaign.' The River Environment: The Urban Infill Plan recognizes that the health of the Miami River is of pararnount importance to the long-term sustainability of the Miarni River Corridor. - The 33 recommendations of the Water Quality Irnprovernent Report should remain as the guideline for storm water and sanitary sewer system retrofitting. The Miami River Clean- up Vessel should be reactivated and derelict vessels should be removed. The Miami River Corridor is in need of additional greenspace—new parks should be created beneath all bridges within the Miami River Corridor. The Plan recommends the - continued protection of Manatees in the Miami River through monitoring of the Miarni-Dade County Manatee Protection Plan Implementation Strategies: The sole measure of success for this plan is the ability of the local government to implement the recommendations withirrl. This Urban Infill Plan provides - recommendations for catalytic development projects, a list of urban infill sites and a specific list of implementation action steps. The Miarni River Commission will adopt the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan as their strategic plan and develop a five-year integrated financial plan based on the Plan, A new governance structure is proposed establishing a Riverfront Subcommittee and an Infrastructure Subcommittee, a Miami Riverfront Trust, and a Joint City/ County Miami River Improvement Board. Finally, in order to provide a long- term commitment for the implementation of the urban infill plan, including the integrated financial plan, and maintaining the required stakeholder participation, the MRC, the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County hereby request that the 2003 Session of the Florida Legislature remove the statutory language that sunsets the MRC. Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 2 - MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION - This section of the plan provides a summary of the data collected about the existing conditions within the Miami River Corriodor. A comprehensive understanding of the existing conditions provided the foundation for the planning elements described in the following section. LAND USE AND ZONING The Miami River Corridor Study area includes a wide variety of existing land uses including industrial, parks, single-family, and institutional just to name a few. The land use describes what the land is actually being used for and often differs from the comprehensive plan zoning designation which regulates - the uses that are currently allowed. Both comprehensive plans for the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County contain s ecial provisions addressing the Miami River The County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) contains provisions in the Port of Miami River Subelement. The_goal of the CDMP subelement is to "Maintain and enhance the water ci iality attLactiyeness,itnd economic vitalit of the Port of Miami fiver." The City of Miami's Comprehensive Neighborhood SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Plan also contains a Port of Miami subelement. The Miami River Study is composed of 33 different zoning designations, six of which are special zoning districts. It is also important to note that majority of the area west of 27th Avenue is governed by Miami -Dade County zoning, while the balance of the study area is within the City of Miami zoning jurisdiction. While the predominant zoning in the study area is broadly classified as residential, the allowable uses, heights and densities are often incompatible in scale. In the Melrose Neighborhood residential zoning is directly adjacent to industrial zoning throughout the neighborhood. Furthermore, the existing industrial zoning provides no projection for the water dependant businesses in the upper river. The neighborhoods of Spring Garden, East Little Havana, Lummus Park, and Highland Park have 13.istly,k4ly been low-depsity re ick..aUa1 neighborhoods. Through the zoning analysis it has heen determiner) that there are 7 ning designations within and adjacent to these neighborhoods that allow for developmentinconsistent with the historic character and scale of the neighborhood. Properties with Waterfront Industrial Park Special District Zoning adjacent to properties with Central Brickell Rapid Transit Commercial -Residential Zoning sends a mixed message to the development community 4 MCI ROt F MIAMI INTERMODAL CENTER/ GRAFELAND HEIGHTS ALLAP ATTP.H UUK HAM PARK/ WEST L=TTLE HAVANA CIVIC CENTER (:ROVF PARK! EAST LITTLE HAVANA SPRING GARDEN/ HIGHLAND PARK/ MEDICAL CENTER LUMMUS PARK/ OVERTOW EAST LITTLE HAVANA r OVINTOWNI OV€RTOWN BRICKELL VILLAGE/ RtCKEL Neighborhood Map girlie Miami River Corridor Study Area MIAMI - DAE Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 10 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN BACKGROUND as to the vision and expectations for the lower river. The lower river is also subject to the City of Miami Downtown Areawide Development of Regional Impact. NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING The Miami River Study Area is comprised of a variety of unique neighborhoods, representing a broad cross-section of socio- economic, cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The majority of the neighborhoods are predominately residential in character. Many of the neighborhoods contain historic structures and areas identified as archeological digs including East Little Havana, Spring Gardens, Lummus Park, Overtown, and the Highland Park neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are some of the oldest neighborhoods in the City of Miami as evidenced by the numerous structures built before 1926. Neighborhoods such as the Melrose neighborhood in the northwest corner of the study area suffer from incompatible zoning and lack of neighborhood identity. The Melrose neighborhood is divided 6y the industrial uses of the working river and the adjacent single family and duplex community to the north. Ai the other end of the river the Midtown and Government Center Neighborhoods are predominately of an urban downtown character providing mixed uses including residential, business and governmental. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE There are currently 13 parks located within the Miami River Corridor Study Area. Eight have frontage along the Miami River. The proposed Miami River Greenway will link all of the existing park facilities in the study and provide a continuous recreational corridor on both sides of the river. The Miami River Greenway will also connect into the larger network of county greenways including the North and South Dade Greenways. The greenway also links with the baywalk, connecting to Brickell Key and Bayfront Park. Design drawings are currently being prepared for the Miami River Greenway between 1-95 and 12`' Avenue and a portion of the funding is in place for the implementation of this portion of the greenway. Please see the Exhibits for more information about the parks within the Study Area. TRANSPORTATION The study area is currently served by a transportation network made up of streets, highways, bridges, metrorail, metromover, metrobus and the Miami River. The roadway network within the study area is comprised of local roads, arterials and highways. SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The local road network services the neighborhoods effectively, but at peak travel times absorbs commuter cut -through traffic traveling at high speeds, attempting to avoid the arterial roads. This was observed in both Sony Garden and Fast Little Havana. Part of the problem in Spring Garden is that the portion of North River Drive between 10"' and 12"' Avenues should operate as a local street not an arterial. Clear route identification is needed to direct non -local traffic around Spring Garden. The north -south arterials include 27"', 22"`', 17'', 12"', 7`", 2 and Miami Avenue. North and South River Drives serve as the major cast -west arterials. Flagler and 1" Streets serve as major access and egress routes to downtown. One-way streets within the study area encourage high speed traffic and create physical barriers within neighborhoods inhibiting safe pedestrian movement from one community to another. North and South River Drives are used by many as east -west arterials. The highway system within the study area includes State Road 836 and Interstate 95. Both have interchanges in the study area that provide access to major employment centers including downtown, Jackson Medical Center and the Judicial Center. A negative by-product of the highway system is the physical barrier it creates within and between neighborhoods. Metromover provides service to the lower river and connects to the Metrorail system at the Stephen P. Clark building, just north of the study area and at the Brickell Station, just south of the study area. Currently the only Metrorail station in the study area is the Culrner station. Metromover has seven stations within the study area, four on the northside of the river and three on the southside of the river. MDTA reported that during peak periods, service is provided every 6 minutes by Metrorail and every 2 minutes by Metromover. Bus service within the study area is extensive. MDTA reported the following in September 2000: 'The study area is serviced by bus routes that run east -west and north -south throughout the study area. There are approximately 17 bus routes operating inside the study area, during peak hours approximately 130 buses traverse the study area per hour. There are approximately 298 bus stops contained within the corridor. Additionally there are approximately 504 bus stops lying within a distance of .25 miles from the outer edges of the study area. More than 50% of the Miami River Corridor is located within .25 miles of existing transit stops." Upon further analysis we identified the North Grapeland Heights Neighborhood in the southwest corner of the study area to be the least served neighborhood by public transportation, as shown in the existing mass transportation map in the exhibits section of this document. MIAMI Prepared by Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 11 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN BACKGROUND COMMERCE In 2001, the Miami River was Florida's fourth largest port in dollar volume, having experienced a doubling in trade over 1991. The $4 billion in cargo shipped through the Miami - River comprised nearly 20 percent of the nations $22.1 billion trade with the Caribbean Basin. In addition to cargo shipping and handling, maritime businesses along the river include marine outfitters, shipyards and boatyards, commercial fishing and recreational boating services and marinas. Overall the marine industry supports some L204 well -paving jobs with .a $35 million payroll. Marine -related river businesses responding to an MRC survey reported 2001 revenues of $216 million. PUBLIC SERVICES The Miami River Corridor is currently served by twenty- one Miami -Dade County public schools. In addition, a groundbreaking for the construction of State School " B1" - Elementary on the former Ada Merritt School site at 660 S.W. 3rd St_, and the restoration of the historical building on the property was held on January 17, 2002. There are currently - thirteen private schools located within the Miami River Corridor Study Area. A new kindergarten through 5th grade charter school is under construction. This facility proposed at 305 NW 3"' Avenue and will have a maximum enrollment of - 600 students. Initially there were no colleges or universities located in the - study area. The Jackson Memorial Medical Center, which is a teaching facility, affiliated with the University of Miami is located just to the north and east of the current study area. Early in the planning process it was decided to incorporate Jackson into the study area to access the benefits of a major teaching institution such as University of Miami School of Medicine. The Orange Bowl was also identified as a public facility that impacted the river community and was incorporated into the final urban infill study area. There are two Municipal Police Stations within the Miami River Corridor Study Area, both of which are located in the lower - river. There are also two Team Metro and four Neighborhood enhancement Team (N.E.T.) offices located in the Miami River Corridor Study area which provide neighborhood services such as code compliance and additional police details for high crime areas. During the public involvement process additional police sub -stations were requested in the upper river SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS There is one fire station within the Miami River Cornr Srndy Area, located on the south side of the river in the middle river. Fire service for the majority of the study area is provided by fire stations outside of the study area. POTABLE WATER AND WASTE WATER SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE Potable water and sewer infrastructure is currently available within the proposed study area. Sewer collection service for the area is pumped through Pump Station #1 location on N. River Drive between NW 3r" and NW 4`h Street. Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) is currently looking for a 2 acres site in the study area to locate a new pump station (CP-A) that would service as a backup to the existing system servicing the study area. It was explained by MDWASD in March, 2002 that transmission capacity issues could negatively affect future medium to high -density residential development in the study area if pump station CP-A is not implemented. The Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department is installing grit chamber and odor abatement improvements at pump station #1 located at 390 N.W. North River Drive and proposing the following initiatives; 1. A sewer lateral pilot program to upgrade laterals in the area, where warranted 2. A dye flood study designed to supplement the smoke testing done to detect interconnections with storni sewers 3. A peak flow plan that includes the installation of a booster pump station in the area of the lower river 4. The relocation of pump station #8 located at 1109 Brickell Avenue due to planned upgrading of the stations pumping capacity. Potable water service meets the needs for redevelopment of the study area under its existing zoning. However, existing 6'' and 8" water service along South River Drive between SW. 5" Street and Flagler Street will require upgrading to service mixed -use and commercial development that may be encouraged as a result of this plan. Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 12 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER `EAST LITTLE HAVANA) (I-95 to 12th Avenue, south bank) Much of the neighborhood now known as East Little Havana was once called Riverside — one of Miami's earliest "suburbs", with subdivisions dating from the early 'teens following the construction of bridges connecting the south side of the Miami River with Downtown. Despite its present name, East Little Havana today is home primarily to immigrants not from Cuba but from Central America, with strong concentrations of Hondurans and Nicaraguans. Pedestrians abound on the sidewalks of its regular, tree -lined residential blocks, while its network of one-way streets (combined with the diagonal South River Drive) confounds drivers. Much of its historic housing; stock remains, but has suffered intrusions of larger -scaled residential development and integrity -robbing alterations. zoned restricted commercial, the majority of the East Little Havana waterfront is zoned for waterfront industrial use. While this use is appropriate and desirable, an expansion of allowable uses to include limited office and commercial (restaurant or retail) as accessory uses only, maintaining the requirement for a primary wate> t1 pendent use — would serve to enliven the on - road ereenway plannecl for this portion of South River ive as well as increase the economic viability of the existing waterfront industrial sites. Similarly, consideration should be given to modifying the zoning of the multifamily residential parcels on the south side of South River Drive to allow limited restaurant, retail, or office use while maintaining the principal residential use requirement. East Little Havana's Jose Marti Park While predominantly a residential nei •hborhood, East Little East Little Havana's residential density and human scale — thanks Havana's waterfront is predominantly industrial in nature. to its revelnpment in the 1920s and 1930s as a multifamily Anchored on the east by Jose Marti Park, with a small area district featuring four-, eight-, sixteen-, and twenty -four -unit apartment buildings intermixed with frame vernacular and bungalow -style single family residences — are reinforced by two vital, pedestrian -oriented, nei„hborhood-serving commercial corridors, 8e Avenue and 12'' Avenue. 4 wood frame house with coral rock piers in East Little Havana However, the east -west counterparts of these avenues lack this vitality and safety. The restriction of NW 7'h Street, which links the river to the Orange Bowl to the west, to office use should be reconsidered in light of the opportunity presented by the planned greenway to bring pedestrians west from the river to the historic Orange Bowl stadium. Restricted commercial uses focusing on mixed restaurant, retail, and residential uses should be considered. One-way Flagler, SW 8"', and SW 1" Streets all are less friendly to pedestrian shoppers; Flagler and SW 1' Streets in particular are difficult to cross and lack the intimacy Prepared by Kin ley -Horn and Associates, Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 24 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER East Little Havana Neighborhood Conservation District study area, outlined in red (17) of 8'" and 12'" Avenues. A study of SW 8`h Streethas been proposed to determine the appropriateness and feasibility of returning the street to two-way traffic; this investigation should be pursued. Also, consideration should be given to extending the Downtown Flagler streetscape improvement project west into East Little Havana (16). This potentially could both improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety and also encourage a beneficial synergy between the two neighborhoods. The 5th Street Bridge, plagued by problems since its construction in 1925 has been sited as an obstruction to navigation and is currently the subject of a PD&E study by FDOT. This bridge is heavily used by local residents. Despite the erosion of its historic fabric and the .compromised integrity of its historic structures, East Little Havana remains a significant historic resource associated with the early development of Miami. The neighborhood contains a rich sampling of wood frame and masonry vernacular houses, bungalows, and Mediterranean, Art Deco, and Streamline IVioderne apartment buildings. Rusticated concrete block, cast stone columns, ornamental brackets, and native coral rock piers 5th Street Bridge (18) A recently restored wood,jrame !rouse in East Little Havana and chimneys present themselves to observant viewers. A survey of the neighborhood should be conducted with the intent to identify and designate historic sites and districts, giving particular attention to the identification of concentrations of sites eligible for listing in the National Register that might benefit from the tax incentives associated with National Register designation. For areas identified as significant due to their scale, history, architecture, or environmental characteristics but not meeting criteria for historic designation, consideration should be given to establishment of a neighborhood conservation district or districts to provide protection from incompatible new construction or alterations. Finally, throughout the neighborhood, consideration should be given to establishing height and FAR limits to hI protect the scale and character of this neighborhood. The re -opening of one of East Little Havana's most cherished historic sites, the Ada Merril School, will provide not only a Ada Merril elementary school in East Little Havana (19) Prepared by Kicnley-Horn and Associates, inc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 25 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER Miami River Seafood and Lobster in East Little Havana physical and cultural enhancement to the neighborhood but will provide improved educational opportunity as well. A redevelopment site of particular interest in this district is the former Miami News site, a large riverfront parcel to the east of NW 12`' Avenue. The successful redevelopment of this site is viewed by many as a critical to the success of the surrounding area. While its size and waterfront location are apaealing the site has limited access; the possibility of improving access to the site from NW 12th Avenue southbound should be invested so as to improve the site's linkage to the medical and civic centers flanking 12' Avenue just across the river. Redevelopment site- The former Miami News Site (20) SPRING GARDEN/HIGHLAND PARK/MEDICAL CENTER (7th Avenue to 12th Avenue, north bank) Like much of the Miami River corridor, these neighborhoods were once home to pioneer homesteaders, starch millers, and tourist -attraction operators. One early Miami settler, William Wagner, established a homestead in the 1850s in what is today called Highland Park; the house he built for his family remained in place until the 1970s and now stands, restored, in Lummus Park. Wagner's daughter sold his land in 1909; in 1911 the homestead was platted as a subdivision called Highland Park. The first lots had been sold and the neighborhood's first houses built when in 1913 the area was annexed into the City of Miami, the western boundary of which had previously been 7 5 Avenue. Miami's third mayor, John Sewell, built a mansion northwest of Highland Park in 1916; Halissee Hall, as he named it, remains today in the midst of the Jackson/University of Miarni Medical Center that grew up all around it. Two -stay masonry house in Spring Garden Prepared by Kinney -Horn and Associates. Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 26 - MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER This district's riverfront remained undeveloped until 1918; however, an entrepreneur known as Alligator Joe ran a - successful attraction for tourists visiting by riverboat at the point formed by the intersection of the river and Wagner Creek. Spring Garden subdivision remains today_ as one of Miami's four historic districts and the active Spring Garden - Civic Association. Allowable uses along the Spring Garden riverfront are medium - density multifamily residential; allowable uses along Wagner Creek (known as the Seybold Canal south of NW 11t Street) are liberal commercial, restricted commercial, office, and both single-family and medium -density multifamily residential. Liberal commercial zoning is inappropriate for the riverfront, and should be re -oriented toward water -dependent commercial or industrial use, possibly allowing associated mixed -use development for increased compatibility with the both the Spring Garden and Lummus Park neighborhocds and with the river itself. Similarly. residential_de_velooi rent as allowed under the medium -density residential zoning classification is not appropriate to the riverfront' the establishment of stricter height, FAR, and parking limits for these 1 arcels is recommended so as to maintain the scale and character of the Spring Garden waterfront. As on the riverfront, liberal commercial uses should not be allowed on the Seybold Canal; water -dependent commercial or industrial uses, with associated mixed -use development, should be required where zoning presently allows for liberal commercial. Existing single-family zoning along the canal should be protected, while multifamily zoning should be treated as discussed in the previous paragraph so as to maintain 1 ooking north up the Seybold Canal. On the right is canal front property, that is well suited for water -dependant commercial or industrial uses. Spring Garden Neighborhood Conservation District study area, outlined in red (21) the scale and character of the historic district, Running from southeast to northwest through the Spring Garden/Highland Park/Medical Center neighborhood is Wagner Creek, a partly culverted, partly exposed tributary of the Miami River. South of NW 11"' Street, in Spring Garden, this water body is navigable and is known as the Seybold Canal. Not long ago declared to be the state's most polluted waterway, efforts to improve Wagner Creek have been moving forward slowly; efforts to dredge contaminated sediment from the creek are moving forward and the Miami River Greenway Master Plan recommends improving the banks of the creek with One story masonary house with mediterranean details MtAMI - DADE10 Prepared by Kirnley-Horn and Associates, inc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 27 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER Two -stay masonry house in Spring Garden walkways and passive green spaces to the extent possible. North of NW 11' Street is Highland Park, a residential neighborhood distinguished by its significant concentration of frame vernacular single family homes dating from 1910s and 1920s. Few of its houses are elaborately ornamented, but its wood frame houses feature functional elements appropriate to the climate of the region, with porches, deep overhanging eaves, and layouts inviting cross -ventilation. The design of the neighborhood is of particular significance; Highland Park stretched long and narrow from NW 11' to 20' Streets, with blocks focusing on a series of centrally -located open spaces reminiscent of the neighborhood squares of Savannah, Georgia. The neighborhood fell into decline as the decades wore on, and its original plan was interrupted with the construction in the late 1960s of an embanked highway severing the neighborhood at NW 14' Street. North of 14'' the area was zoned Governmental/ Institutional to compliment the adjacent hospital -related uses, while the southern remnant was targeted for related high -density residential and office development. Construction of the Culmer Metrorail station at NW 11 Street reinforced this intent, but Highland Park failed to develop as anticipated. The area became one of speculative investment and deferred maintenance, with few homeowners and a transient renter population. Another result of the decline was the alteration of the characteristic features of many of its homes — porches enclosed, and floor plans subdivided by the creation of rental units. Preserved, however, were the neighborhood's mature oak, banyan, and mahogany trees, as well as one of its original community greens — a mahogany -shaded circle at the Spring Garden's tropical riverfront character intersection of NW 13'' Street and 8" Avenue. The recent construction of new single family housing in the neighborhood has sparked interest in the preservation of Highland Park, and the Miami City Commission has issued a directive to rezone the neighborhood to lower density. A survey the neighborhood's historic resources is under way; already a portion of the area has been found eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. A neighborhood conservation district should be established to encourage restoration of the neighborhood's historic housing and to ensure that alterations and new development in the neighborhood reflect the massing, siting, and articulation of existing structures. Between the Spring Garden Historic District and Highland Mature tree canopy in roundabout al NW 13th Street and NW 8th Avenue u�xv.�ss.un hilAnAl - 0 Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 28 1 — MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES URBAN INFILL IMPLEMENTATION STEPS SUPPORT THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & MIAMI RIVER INFILL PLAN Keep Middle River for Maritime and/or Low -Mid Rise Residential uses City of Miami Commission February 26, 2004 Prepared by: The law offices of ANDREW DICKMAN, P.A. 9111 Park Drive Miami Shores, FL 33138 (305) 758-3621 andrewdickman@bellsouth.net SUBM1TTED INTO THE - MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • Request that the Miami River Commission assist the private sector with permit facilitation and proper development practices by providing staff assistance and the creation of an `urban design center' • Request the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County and TPL to prepare a comprehensive Greenways signage and wayfinding program • Request that the City of Miami prepare a comprehensive Parks Master Plan for all City of Miami Parks including a detailed needs assessment, design guidelines and a signage and \vayfinding program • Request that FDOT and Miami -Dade County Public Works invite the participation of City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning department and the public in the design of bridges relative to aesthetics and pedestrian amenities. Request that all public buildings in the Miami River Corridor be subject to the same design reviews) in place for private development • Direct utility providers to incorporate undergrounding of utilities for new projects. When this is not financially feasible, utility poles should be consolidated and located at the back of the public right-of-way and `swags' crossing streets and intersections should be buried. • Request that Miarni-Dade Water and Sewer Department develop facade and landscape improvements for Pump Station Number One • Request Miami -Dade County to enter into discussions with CSX railroad to provide a landscape easement in Melrose between the railroad right-of-way and North River Drive DREDGING • Request the United States Army Corps of Engineers to _ expeditiously begin the Maintenance Dredging of the Miami River Federal Navigation Channel • Establish public and political support for funding additional dredging needs including the tributaries and the portion of the Miami River outside the Fedex al Navigation URBAN INFILL IMPLEMENTATION STEPS Channel • Establish a project communication network for the Dredging of the Federal Navigation Channel to keep all stakeholders informed of the project progress RIVER ENVIRONMENT • Continue the implementation of the 33 recommendations of the Miami River Commission's Water Quality Improvement Report • Request that local governments and agencies reactivate the Miami River Clean-up Vessel • Request that the Miami River Commission pursue additional funding for ongoing environmental education programs • Request that the local and state governments continue programs that remove derelict vessels from the Miami River • Request that local and state governments partner to create beautification projects beneath all bridges within the Miami River Corridor • Seek continued protection of manatees in the Miami River through monitoring of the Miami -Dade County Manatee Protection Plan TRANSPORTATION • Request the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County and FDOT to pursue multi -modal transportation funding for the Miami River Corridor • Request the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to initiate roadway engineering analysis along North River Drive from I-95 to the 1" Street Bridge to create a deeper contiguous site for development along the river. • Request the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to initiate roadway engineering analysis along North River Drive from NW 5'h Avenue to NW 7'" Avenue to modify or possibly abandon this portion of North River drive for vehicular use, in lieu of an expanded greenway or new development MINA Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, lnc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 86 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • Request the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County and FDOT to initiate roadway engineering analysis along South River Drive at the 5"' Street Bridge to develop an intersection configuration that addresses the needs of the shipping industry and the local neighborhoods Request the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County and FDOT to initiate roadway engineering analysis along NW 12th Avenue from NW 7'' Street to the Miami River to improve access to properties on the east side of NW 12"' Avenue • Request the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County and FDOT to initiate roadway engineering analysis along South River Drive from 27"' Avenue to 20"' Street to allow for a waterfront greenway and associated development • Request the City of Miami to establish a level -of -service for pedestrians for streets within the Miami River Corridor to encourage a walkable community • Request the City of Miami to develop a comprehensive traffic -calming plan for the Miami River Corridor • Request that FDOT, Miarni-Dade County and MPO analyze the viability of a tunnel as an alternative to a bridge for future high volume river crossings • Request the all transportation agencies adopt the a rninirnurn height of 23 feet clearance for bascule bridges and 75 feet for fixed bridges • Request that the City and County to identify infrastructure, needs and available funding for the Miami River Corridor and incorporate them into the future Capital Improvement Plans. • Request MPO and MDTA prepare a feasibility study for a transit connector from the Orange Bowl to the Jackson Memorial Medical Campus Request MPO and MDTA extend the hours of operation for all Metro Mover Stations in the Miami River Corridor until midnight Request MPO and MDTA partner with the property owner of the 'River Renaissance Site' to develop a new Ivtetrorail Station between the river and SW 3rd Street. URBAN INFILL IMPLEMENTATION STEPS • Request MPO and MDTA establish a dedicated revenue source to leverage federal funds to develop a comprehensive transit system that serves the river community • Request local government cooperation to enhance watercraft transportation including the creation of water taxi and water bus service • Request local government cooperation to enhance watercraft transportation by maintaining existing and providing for new boat slips • Request Miami -Dade County, City of Miami, MRC and FDOT to partner and establish development guidelines and review procedures for the MIC associated development NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS Request that the City of Miami and Miami Dade -County establish formal Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED) regulations and review process for all projects within the Miami River Corridor • Request that the federal, state and local government provide continued funding for `Operation Riverwalk' • Request that the Miarni-Dade County School Board and the City of Miarni and Miarni-Dade County to execute the Memorandum of Understanding as required by the state • Request the Miami River Commission to support the City of Miami Mayor's Office 'Clean up Miami Cam aign • Request the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County and private sector to develop mixed income housing throughout the Miami River Corridor • Request the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County to require that new residential development not displace existing maritime industrial land uses, and should be suitably separated from marine industrial land uses Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 87 - MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN EXHIBITS The Urban Infill Plan was developed under the partnership of the Urban Infill Working Group, specifically: • City of Miami: Sarah Ingle and Clark Turner, City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department and Dianne Johnson, City of Miami Department of Real Estate and Economic Development • Miami -Dade County: Helen Brown and Mark Woerner, Miami -Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning • Miami River Commission staff: Brett Bibeau and David Miller The Urban Infill Working Group thanks Secretary Jim Murley for his devoted volunteer efforts and exceptional chairmanship. The Urban Infill Working Group acknowledges the input provided by the public throughout this planning process. The Urban Infill Plan was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. • Principal Planner: Steven E. Lefton, ASLA, AICP • Professional Staff: Jeremy Earle, Mike Bello, Bruno Carvalho, ASLA Redevelopment case studies were prepared by Zyscovich, Inc. The Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan was funded by the following agencies: • Department of Community Affairs - S50,000 • Miami -Dade County - $50,000 • Empowerment Trust - $25,000 • Environmental Protection Agency - $20,000 • Miami River Commission - $17,000 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. -June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 190 Q�. miamirivermeetl Page 1 of 2 CONTACT US! For more information, contact us via email at mrc@rsmas.miami.edu :MAAR RIVER URBAN INFILL PLANNING GROUP MINUTES: Minutes of meeting The Miami River Commission 's (MRC) Urban Infill Working Group (UIWG) met Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 10 AM, in the Miami Riverside Center, 444 SW 2nd Ave, 8th floor conference room. Mr. Jim Murlev and Dr. Ernie Martin chaired the meeting. The attendance sheet is enclosed. The Royal Atlantic development_nroiect, located at 1001 NW 7 ST (old Miami News Building) was presented by Larry Cohen of Brito Cohan Architects; Lucia Dougherty and Gloria Velazquez of Greenberg Truing; Don Darrah of Roth, Rousso & Darrah, P.A., and the potential developer, Edwin Verdezoto, Royal Atlantic Developers, LLC. The potential developer has a contract to purchase the site, subject to approval of the small scale comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and the presented Major Use Special Permit (MUSP). The proposed mimed -use project consists of 610 residential units and 8,000 square feet of retail, planned in the following three building phases: ■ Phase I - Located in the middle of the site, features 294 residential units. Lucia Dougherty stated the original proposal for 34 stories has been reduced to 26 stories in response to the concerns of adjacent residents and City Planning comments. The first five of the total 26 stories is a parking garage, facaded along the Miami River side with townhomes and 3,500 square feet of retail facing NW 7 ST. ■ Phase II - Located on the eastern portion of the site, features 280 residential units. Dougherty stated the original proposal for 29 stories has been reduced to 24 stories, again in response to the concerns of adjacent residents and City Planning comments. As in Phase 1, the first five of the total 24 stories is a parking garage, facaded along the Miami River side with townhomes and 4,500 square feet of retail facing NW 7 ST. ■ Phase III - Located on the western side of the site, features 36 high -end 2-story loft units. The first 4 floors of the total 12-story building will be a parking garage, decoratively facaded on all sides. The MUSP application, scheduled for submittal to the City of Miami in October 2003, will include an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Industrial to restricted commercial and a zoning amendment from Marine Industrial (SD4) to restricted commercial (C-1), which allows High Density Residential (R-4) and retail uses. The development proposes a 10-foot boardwalk over the River, and is setback 40 feet from the existing shoreline. The project proposes a publicly accessible section of the setback, consisting of a 10-15 foot wide riverwalk. Dr Martin stated he shares the concern with other "middle river" (NW 7 ST to NW 22 Ave) residents about the height of the ment. Martin stated the Miami MIAMI RIVER River Corridor Urban In f 11 Plan "middle river e" Pg 581 was for xla d n e COMMISSION density, while taller high-densitybuildings were in the "lower river c/o Rosenstiel School prototype" (Biscayne Ba to NW 7 Ave. Lawrence Ress and Judith Lamar, both 4600 Rickenbacker Cswy,"middle river" homeowners, agreed with Martin's concern that the proposed http://www.miamirivercommission.org/infill080503.htm 2/19/2004 s .. miamirivermeetl Page 2 of 2 Miami, Fl. 33149 305-361-4850 Fax: 305-361-4755 e-mail: mrc@rsmas.miami.edu development was to tall and therefore not in character with the surrounding mid -rise Little Havana neighborhood. Jim Murley stated despite the properties current marine industrial zoning, the site has not had any maritime industrial uses for some time. Murley noted the east side of the project (Phase II) faces Anchor Marine, with the parking garage as a buffer between the proposed residential building and the adjacent marine industrial business. Murley noticed the western side of the project (Phase III) is surrounded by the Miami -Dade County General Administration Services building and the City of Miami fire station, and suggested the area be maintained as greenspace to buffer the adjacent public uses. Mr. Cohan, architect for the project, agreed with the recommendation and suggested the 36 units within Phase III be absorbed into Phases I and II. Lavinia Freeman, Trust for Public Land (TPL), offered to meet with the developer to discuss the possibility of TPL purchasing the proposed greenspace area (western side) of the site for public park uses. Brett Bi �u, MRC , rit • ! lte Miami Ricer ctrAdor_Urban I LI P_lan'srecommendations related to this development, induding FDOT to study permitting left had turns onto NW 7 ST when traveling south over the NW 12 Ave brid a providing better access to the site, and including a Water Taxi stop. The potential developer agreed with the Infill Plan's recommendations, The subcommittees completed the attached Development technical review Form, and suggested the MRC recommend approval of the project to the City Commission, subject to the following conditions: • A minimum 20-foot wide publicly accessible riverwalk be provided, pursuant to Miami River Greenway schematic designs. • Cleats on the Riverwalk for recreational vessel tie-ups • An on -road Greenway be provided along the sites perimeter, per the adopted Miami River Greenway Action Plan • Phase III of the proposed development be re -planned to provide for the maximum accessible greenspace adjacent to the Miami River. Bibeau stated the City of Miami had submitted additional information for the draft "5- year Integrated Budget". Bibeau will revise the draft "5-year Integrated Budget" and the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan's draft "15t Annual Update" for review at the next UIWG meeting. The next U1WG / Greenways subcommittee meeting was scheduled for August 25, 2003 (re -scheduled to August 28), 10 AM Lummus Park, 404 NW 3rd ST. The agenda will include the "Hurricane Cove Workshop" and a discussion of the City of Miami studying North and South River Drives, as thousands of new residential units are being proposed for the Drives. The meeting adjourned. HOME CALENDAR ABOUT THE RIVER ABOUT THE COMMISSION DREDGING GREENWAYS URBAN INFILL PLAN STORMWATER RETROFITTING MINUTES OF MEETINGS LINKS http://www.miamirivercommission.org/infill080503.htm 2/19/2004 - mi ami riv ermeet 1 Page 1 of 2 III. Presentation of the development "Royal Atlantic " a residential development located at 1001 NW 7th Street (former Miami News - Building ) Ms. Lucia Dougherty, Greenburg Trauig PA, provided an overview of the project. She explained that Edwin Verdezoto, Royal Atlantic Developers, and Architects Brito Cohan & Associates are present today. She explained that this is a 706 unit residential building, which was originally planned to be three buildings. She stated that during meetings with the Urban Infill Working Group it was recommended that the number of buildings be reduced from three to two towers and the height lowered from 36 stories down to 27 stories. She explained that the design meets or exceeds the Greenway plan and landscaping along the roadway is also significantly improved. The land that is opened by removing the third building is now available for purchase as a park or other civic amenity. (**Mr. Parks advised all present that the MRC is an advisory group to both the City Commission and Miami -Dade Commission and that we review developments or other proposals to determine if they comply with our Strategic Plan, the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan. Mr. Parks stressed that we are not a zoning board nor do we have approval or rejection powers. The MRC is strictly an advisory group and we provide our recommendation to the City and County Commissions for issues that impact the river:`*) Ms. Dougherty continued and made clear that the property is the former Miami News Building and this property has been inactive for many years even though there is a five story building currently on the property. She stated that the planned residential buildings would have a similar footprint to the existing building. Jim Murley, chairman of the Urban Infill Working Group, advised that they reviewed the project and provided their recommendation in the Development Technical Review Report (attached) contained in the August 5, 2003 Working Group minutes. Mr. Larry Cohan, architect for the project, provided a detail overview of the project and how it relates to the neighborhood and the river. The design provides a view corridor from 7th Street to the river and the developer will provide a river access and greenway area. It was stated that these would be condominium units that are on average 1000 to 1100 square feetand_p_ri� in the $225,000 range. The parking garage will not be visible from the river. Commissioner Barreiro asked about U river walk access and availability to the public. It was explained that the river walk will be open to the public in accordance with the city requirements and that it will be 20 feet wide and designed by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. in accordance with the Greenway Plan. Also there will be an on road greenway as it passes the development on 7th Street . Hearing no further questions, Bob asked for a motion. Commissioner Barreiro made a motion to recommend approval of the project subject to comments provided on the Development Technical Review Report Megan Kelly seconded the motion. Ernie Martin commented that Spring Garden was not satisfied with the height of the project, but he was in favor of the project as they modified the development to eliminate a structure and make the land available for purchase by the Trust for Public Land to become a park that will remain in perpetuity and not be used for another development. A vote was taken and this motion passed unanimously. Mr. Parks requested that the Technical Review Report be attached to _any letter the MRC sends to the City Boards.andlor Commission concerning this.project. Commissioner Barreiro asked when the project will commence construction and was advised that they expect 8-9 months for permitting and then construction will start. http://www.miamirivercommission.org/mrmeet090803.htm 2/18/2004 �_2 2 Volume 1 of the MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 1989-2000 GOALS oBJECTIVES PoL!clEs City of Miami • Planning Department • 444 SW 2 Avenue • Miami, FL 33130 July 1,1999 4 The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and has been _ amended by the City Commission through March 24, 1999. Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments have been adopted for the following elements Future Land Use, Housing, Sanitary and Storm Sewers, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge, Potable Water, Solid Waste Collection, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space. EAR based amendments for the Transportation, Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements, and Intergovernmental Coordination elements are tentatively scheduled for consideration by the City Commission in December, 1999 11 RJTBHE IAMB USE Goal LU-1: Maintain a lan___e pattern that (I) protects and en a the gual ;: e the citg's resid¢that hoods; (2) fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic development and the growth of job opportunities in the city; (4) fosters the growth and development of downtown as a regional center of domestic and international commerce, culture and entertainment; (5) promotes the efficient use of «rnd and minimizes land use conflicts- and (6) protects and conserves the city's significant natural and coastal resources. Objective LU-1.1: Ensure that land and development regulations are consistent wiof life in all areas, including the time y provision of public facilities that meet or exceed the ' minimum level of service standards adopted in the Capital Improvements Element CIE) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Policy LU-1.1.1: Dey lop ent orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the CIE. -Policy LU-1.1.2: The City's Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies, shall be responsible for monitoring the current and projected LOS provided by public facilities. The Planning Department shall perform the required concurrency review of proposed development for submittal to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA), as required by Florida statutes and administrative rules. Policy LU-1.13: The City's zonin ordinance rovides for nrotectron of all areas of the city from: the encroachme ati a and uses- (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in a jacent areas that irrupt or egra a pu is ealth and safety, or natural or man-made amenities; and (3) transportation policies that divide or fragment established neighborhoods. - Policy LU-1.1.4: The City will increase its code enforcement efforts by 10% each year and continue the enforcement of performance standards with the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood environmental conditions. Policy LU-1.1.5: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.] Policy LU-1.1.6: The City's street and storm sewer improvement projects will provide curb and gutter, and street landscaping, unless deemed to be physically or economically infeasible. -'Policy LU-1.1.7: Land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of adequate neighborhood shopping, recreation, day care, entertainment, and other neighborhood oriented support activities. Future Land Use - Page 1 July 1, 19999\, Policy LU-1.4.7: The City will continue to enforce regulations within downtown to ensure that retail signage is of high quality and consistent with the design and development objectives for downtown. Policy LU-1.4.8: The City will continue to enforce land development regulations as necessary in - order to encourage rehabilitation and sensitive, adaptive reuse of historic properties and older structures in downtown, and to exempt rehabilitation projects from Development of Regional Impact (DRI) mitigation fees. - Policy LU-1.4.9: The City will continue to promote rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of vacant and underutilized spaces and provide incentives for rehabilitation of older buildings in downtown. Policy LU-1.4.10: The City will continue to develop modifications to existing regulations with the intent of providing greater flexibility in the design and implementation of mixed -use developments within the general downtown area and particularly along the Miami River. Policy LU-1.4.11: The City will continue to streamline the application procedures for Major Use Special Permits to simplify and standardize the process, while ensuring that the regulatory intent of the permits is maintained. Policy LU-1.4.12: The City will continue to implement the Downtown DRI development orders — for downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West, and seek approval for future increments of development in a timely manner. Objective LU-1.5: Land development regulations will protect the city's unique natural and coastal resources, and its historic and cultural heritage. Policy LU-1.5.1: Development orders in the city will be consistent with the goals, objectives and _ policies contained in the Natural Resource Conservation and Coastal Management elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Policy LU-1.5.2: Land use regulations and development policies will be consistent with the - intent and purpose of Miami -Dade County's Waterfront Charter Amendment, Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, and the rules of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Management Area. Objective LU-1.6: Regulate the development or redevelopment -of real property within the city to insure consistency with th objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. " Policy LU-1.6.1: The "Interpretation of the Future Land Use Plan Map" section of this element, which follows these land use goals, objectives and policies, establishes the activities and facilities allowed within each land use category appearing on the Future Land Use Plan Map, and - the City's land development regulations shall be consistent with this section of the Miami Comprehe _'olicy LU-1.6.2: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.] Future Land Use - Page 5 July 1, 1999 .3 Policy LU-1.63: The City's Planning Department shall review all proposals to amend the City's zoning ordinance and any other land development regulations, and shall report as to the consistency between any proposed amendment and the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, to the Planning Advisory Board, the City's "local planning agency,"hv dch will then forward its recommendation to the City Commission for ap r adoption. olicy LU-1.6.4: Any proposal to amend the City's zoning ordinance that has been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the Planning Department, shall require a concurrency review and a finding from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment will not result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards, and will not be in conflict with any element of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning considerations, the Planning Department will forward a recommended action on said amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its recommendation to the City Commission. Policy LU-1.6.5: The City will continue to use special district designations as a land development regulation instrument for the purpose of accomplishing specific development objectives in particular areas of the city. Policy LU-1.6.6: The City will continue to enforce signage regulations to ensure the quality of life in the city's neighborhoods. Policy LU-1.6.7: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.] Policy LU-1.6.8: The City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of open space in development projects in both residential and commercial areas. Ac Policy LU-1.6.9: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of future development. Policy LU-1.6.10: The City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking. Policy LU-1.6.11: The City's land development regulations and policies will insure that areas designated conservation are protected from development other than that which promotes its passive appreciation. Objective LU-1.7: Encourage recreational development within designated recreation use areas, concentrating activities where the capacity of existing public facilities can serve development meeting adopted LOS standards. Policy LU-1.7.1: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are availa• - Goal LU-2: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification, evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's historic, architectural and archaeological urces. (See Coastal Management Goal CM-5.) Future Land Use - Page 6 July 1, 1999 q Objective HO-1.5: Provide for assistance to displaced occupants where public redevelopment programs require relocation. Policy HO-1.5.1: The City's housing program will continue to provide for assistance to occupants displaced by public redevelopment projects so that suitable relocation housing in proximity to employment and necessary public services is available prior to the demolition or replacement of existing housing serving low -and moderate -income occupants. Objective HO-1.6: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.] Policy HO-1.6.1: [Deleted 6/4/98 by Ordinance 11779.] Goal HO-2: Achieve a livable city center with a variety of urban housing typesfor persons of all Income ev . Objective HO-2 1- Argb ble downtown with a variety of urban housing types for persons of all income levels. Policy HO-2.1.1: The City will continue to protect and enhance existing viable neighborhoods by retaining existing residential zoning. Policy HO-2.1.2: The City will continue to revise residential zoning district regulations to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary housing types and mixed -use development with the application of new higher density zoning. Policy HO-2.13: The City will continue to assure that necessary support services, institutions and amenities are available to existing neighborhoods. Policy HO-2.1.4: The City will continue to promote development of new, high quality, dense urban neighborhoods alon the Miami River, in en nc a and in Southeast Overtown/Park West t rough—S-pecial strict D) zonmg. Policy HO-2.1.5: The City will continue to encourage adaptive reuse of commercial space for residential use by working to eliminate unnecessary residential requirements in the zoning ordinance that inhibit reasonable adaptive reuse. Policy HO-2.1.6: The City will continue to target available govenimental housing assistance programs and funds to assist with development of affordable housing in existing viable neighborhoods and publicly designated redevelopment districts. Policy HO-2.1.7: Working together with private developers, the City will continue to apply for Urban Development Action Grants (UDAG's), and Housing Development Action Grants (HoDAG's) in the Southeast Overtown/Park West, Lummus Park, River Quadrant and West Brickell areas, where housing can be developed as a part of mixed -use projects. Housing - Page 4 �.S July 1, 1999 ' TRANSPORTATION Goal TR-1: Maintain an effective and cost efficient traffic circulation network within the City of Miami that provides transportation for all persons and facilitates commercial activity, and which is consistent with, and furthers, neighborhood plans, supports economic development, conserves energy, and protects and enhances the natural environment. Objective TR-1.1: By the year 2000 all arterial and collector roadways and supporting parking facilities that lie within the City's boundaries will operate at levels of service that meet the needs of an urban center characterized by compact development and moderate - to -high residential densities and land use intensities. Policy TR 1.1.1: The City will, through its membership on the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC), continue to participate in Miami -Dade County's formulation of - traffic circulation policies, and will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, support the County's efforts to maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy TR 1.1.2: Within designated Transportation Corridors, the total person -trip capacity of all transportation modes is used in the measurement of peak period' level of service (LOS). In such Transportation Corridors an overall minimum peak -period LOS standard E (100% of corridor person -trip capacity)'- will be maintained. Minimum LOS standards for each mode within both - the Type HS and Type LS Transportation Corridors ' are as follows: 1.1.2.1: Private passenger vehicles: LOS E as measured by person -trip methodology using 1.6 persons -per -vehicle as the practical capacity of a private passenger vehicle; 1.1.2.2: Local bus transit vehicles: minimum 20 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 150% of seated load; 1.1.2.3: Express bus transit vehicles: minimum 20 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 125% of seated load; ' Peak period means the average of the two highest consecutive hours of trip volume during a weekday. 2 Level of service in Transportation Corridors is calculated using the "Methodology for Calculating Peak Hour Person Trip Capacity" contained in the Transportation Corridors section of the Transportation Element (which combines the Traffic Circulation and Mass Transit Elements) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; also separately published as a report entitled "Transportation Corridors — Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami The designation of Types 'HS'. (High Speed) and "LS" (Low Speed) Transportation Corridors is made in anticipation of future adaptation of the 1985 HCM methodology for measurement of highway levels of service,'wherein average speed will replace V/C as the primary measure of quality of service. and different rninknum standards of average speed ("High" and "Low") will be applied to the person -trip measurements for each type of Corridor. Under the current methodology, the minimum LOS standards are the same for both types of Corridors, -with the only distinction being that the HS Type includes Iimtted-access highways and/or rapid rail transit lines, as well as surface roadways, while the LS type indudes only surface roadways and local bus transit fines meeting the LOS - minimum standard in 1.1.2.2 above. Transportation - Page1 July 1, 1999 1.1.2.4: Rapid rail transit: minimum 20 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 130% of seated load. Policy TR-1.1.3: Outside designated Transportation Corridors, the roadway vehicular capacity is used in the measurement of peak period LOS. For such limited access, arterial, and collector roadways that are not within designated Transportation Corridors, a minimum peak period LOS standard E (100% of roadway vehicular capacity)' will be maintained, except as follows: 1.1.3.1: In the Downtown Special Transportation Area (STA), 20% of non -State facilities, as identified in the Downtown Miami Development of Regional Impact (DRI), may operate below LOS E. 1.13.2: Roadways may operate below the applicable minimum if projects which would raise the LOS to the applicable minimum LOS are programmed for construction within the first three years of Miami -Dade County's Transportation Improvement Program (which includes the corresponding years of the FDOT Five Year Transportation Plan), or where adequate provision is made by the developer to make improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development concurrent with the development's traffic generation. 1.133: Roadway segments may operate below the applicable minimum if they are either (1) legislatively constrained (as for scenic or historical purposes), or (2) less than one mile in length, and where adherence to the City's Land Use Plan assures that no significant deterioration to traffic levels of service will occur as the result of additional development along such roadway segments. S 1.13.4: The minimum operating level of service standard for local bus transit vehicles: minimum 60 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 150% of seated load. 1.13.5: The minimum operating level of service standard for express bus transit vehicles: minimum 60 minute headway, maximum load not to exceed 125% of seated load. 1.13.6: For the interim period 1989 through 1994, the minimum acceptable LOS for any roadway operating below LOS E on or before July 1, 1989 shall be 15% below said existing LOS. Beginning January 1, 1995, roadways shall operate at or above LOS E. Policy TR-1.1.4: Issuance of permits for development or redevelopment will be contingent upon compliance with the City's level of service standards. Policy TR-1.1.5: The City, through its membership on the Transportation Plan Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC) and its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency of the existing thoroughfare network by such methods ` level of service for roadways not in a Transportation Corridor is calculated using the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology (V/C) with roadway capacity based on the Urban Transportation Planning System (UTPS) Service Volumes for Level of Service "E' through December 31, 1990. Thereafter, LOS will be measured based on the latest edition of the HCM. Prior to 1991, applicants for development permits may submit traffic studies based on the latest edition of the HCM. 5 Such roadway segments presently existing are: Ingraham Highway from the south corporation line to Douglas Road (S.W. 37th Avenue); Douglas Road from Ingraham Highway to Main Highway; Main Highway from Douglas Road to Grand Avenue; and Red Road (N.W. 57th Avenue) from N.W. 7th Street to the north corporation line. Transportation - Page 2 July 1, 1999 Policy TR-1.1.16: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of its land development regulations regarding downtown parking requirements, together with the powers of the City's Off -Street Parking Authority Department, the City will promote the development of public and private peripheral parking garages near the expressway and arterial entrances to downtown in order to reduce congestion in the core area. Policy TR-1.1.17: Through enforcement of applicable provisions of its land development regulations regarding downtown parking requirements, together with the powers of the City's Off -Street Parking Authority Department, the City will increase the supply of low cost, short- term parking in public facilities near retail and commercial nodes to encourage shopping trips and other business activity in downtown. Objective TR-1.2: Rights -of -way and corridors needed for existing transportation networks will be designated and reserved. Policy TR-1.2.1: The City will maintain and enforce, and where necessary revise, the minimum right-of-way requirements established in its City Code to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network. Policy TR-1.2.2: Provide a comprehensive public rights -of -way improvements program for major commercial streets which have high levels of pedestrian activity. Objective TR-I3: The City's transportation system will emphasize safe and efficient management of traffic flow through maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards throughout the thoroughfare system by continuing enforcement of design standards and presentation of transportation mode options that enhance efficient person -trip and vehicular movements and reduce accident potential. Policy TR-1.3.1: The City will continue to provide an adequate, properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular traffic by adhering to adopted design standards and procedures. Policy TR-13.2: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, will encourage and support Miami -Dade County's monitoring of high accident -frequency locations on the city's streets and its identification of design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions. The City will incorporate such improvements into the City's Capital Improvement Element. Objective T enhance the character of the city's residentia d netg or oo commercia centers t rough coordination with the Lamle Use Plan and adopted Neighborhood plans and re-ammenda ' r miti ation of traffic in sion in residential neighborhoods, and TOPICS (low capital - intensive traffic operations) types of traffic improvements. Policy TR-1.4.1: Seek cooperative agreements with Miami -Dade County to ensure that the County's transportation improvements: are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on city residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined neighborhoods and do not Transportation - Page 4 C4 July 1, 1999 Objective TR-1.8: The traffic circulation system shall be coordinated with the goals, objectives and policies of the Land Use element, including coordination with the land uses, densities, projected development and redevelopment, urban infilling, and other similar characteristics of land use that have an impact on traffic circulation systems. Policy TR-1.8.1: The City shall continue to assure provision of an adequate, properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares through adopted design standards and procedures as contained in the City Public Works Manual as adopted for use in the review process, which at a minimum address: 1. Adequate storage and turning bays; 2. Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts; 3. Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable; 4. Driveway access and spacing; and 5. Traffic operations. Transportation - Page 7 July 1, 1999 r 9 N LEGEND V,/U..t//u.wa MAW C RY Win M aru —srt INBLC 1,04 * GI 9GVl N •N This to certify that this is page 3'( of the Official Zoning Atlas reference to and adopted by reference Ordinance 11000, as amended, of the City of Miami. Florida, adopted March 8, 1990. 9111191iir" 111110116 5iiii iiii2 i J 1 Map �ouo M 1 ; ; o l� IIPJIII, �IlIi 1 S1opP,�131e . o , R4 rallooal iglinian owil i111� ao� �s�, , ot1 pv�opOA 19i s� �� '�•oa 4 , �'s� 0o s' yell ,+i ' e ,,, ems:> � o ss' G dv��� o s f,�� ao�e tree �� S ;.,..V* • ' 'II° oarsd� • s qo` 4' �.��:�,''IN boa' T ,� 0'��� L 11Ml1i� p N�mgS::i��al`lll it*o��➢aer�mim gar; ����o ��Aa��00�� i oap � �J A 0�i. 06* :moo ���►�lA�l ligaUS.tM� x Na :: `: 11M1 �P o 44 $\' y I 4�••r�' ep O 6 AT _. �'_ FT" 11141111 114E1 0o111932 o��- 1111caal`• w. �.1B r L irair 41 N4 N A I I 141 • it o n. LEGEND //uaam /EL MIAMI CITY LIMITS �•` •� IJ �°j ' • ---- RAILROADS ---- SPECIAL PUBLIC INTEREST GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET $4. f.: .. T S I O N ORAN GE BOWL 2 STADIUM 0 G/I H >i .n,• 1 TRACT 3 MIAMI RIVER'; COMPLEX FLORIDA 5-26 I..0 • sr .I' 1111111111 CLVICA 3TA, 1111 M - E k _... CITS1vill 1511011 4�si1111111111L111 ii10111111.1110111 Yy Ci FLAG LE mesevoHll R-2 UD C C•I C-2 YI veaav4aI" NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Preliminaries ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION, 1991 A Part of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Miami PREFACE This volume contains the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami and constitutes the second professional codification and printing of the zoning regulations of the city. It is published as a companion volume to, and part of, the 1980 City Code, as authorized by section 3(mm), building and zoning, and (jj), codification of ordinances, of the City Charter. Source materials used in the preparation of this volume were the original zoning ordinance, Ordinance 11000, adopted March 8, 1990, and all amendments through Ordinance No. 10879, adopted April 25, 1991. A comprehensive index has been prepared, and a frontal section analysis, listing major sections, has also been provided. A feature of this publication that is particularly useful is the comparative table of amendments. Any amendatory ordinance will be listed by ordinance number in this table, and the individual sections or subsections that were amended will be indicated. Looseleaf Supplements As future supplements to this volume are published, each supplement will contain an instruction sheet advising the user of the manner of inserting the new pages and removing the obsolete pages. The table of amendments, as well as the index, will also be updated with each supplement to reflect the new legislation. Acknowledgments The publication of this volume was under direct supervision of Leland F. Raymond, Editor -Supplements, of the Municipal Code Corporation, Tallahassee, Florida. Credit is gratefully given to the other members of the publisher's staff for their sincere interest and able assistance throughout the project. The publisher wishes to thank the members of the Planning Department for their assistance in the publication process. It is hoped that their efforts and those of the publisher have resulted in a publication which will make the zoning ordinance of the city readily accessible to all citizens and which will be a valuable tool in the day-to-day administration of the city's zoning regulations. The preparation of this document was financially aided through a grant from the State of Florida under the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Assistance Program authorized by Chapter 86-167, Laws of Florida. 3.3 // /1 A11 /T __r_L__-A/I/1 /7 nmo 1,1m .Qr f. 1i11ionna — NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604. SD-4 Waterfront Industrial District. 3 httn•//livannhlich mnnirn1lp rnm/(,/1npvt /111/TnfnhacP4(1/1 /15/57f/66(19fn=dnrnment_framp 7/ /7.f(14 NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.1. Intent. This district designation is intended for application in areas appropriately located for marine activities, including industrial operations and major movements of passengers and commodities. In view of the importance of such activities to to nom and the limited area suitable and av 11 b such activities, i is m en e o limit — prinoa and accessory uses to those reasonably requiring location within suc districts, and not to permit residential general commercial, service �if�P or manufacturing uses not brim except for office uses in existing office structures. For the purposes of section 3(mm) of the City of Miami Charter, this district shall be construed as an industrial district. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 11732, § 2, 11-17-98) httn•//Ii�r 11h�ich miinionrlP nm/#i/l-nav+,111/T„f l,nooi111/1 /1 G /ll/1nnn NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.2. Effect of SD-4 district designation. The effect of these SD-4 regulations shall be to supplant district regulations within portions of other zoning districts included within the SD boundaries to the extent indicated herein. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.3. Class II Special Permits. 604.3.1. When required. EA Class II Special Permit shall be required prior to approval of any building permit for erection of new structures or - for substantial changes affecting the exterior appearance of any structure. 604.3.2. Considerations in making Class 11 Special Permit determinations. - The purpose of the Class II Special Permit shall be to ensure conformity of the application with the expressed intent of this district, with the general considerations listed in section 1305, and with the special considerations listed below: 1. Parking. loading, service, utility, and storage area and uses shall be screened from view of abutting zoning districts (other than - and I districts and shade trees spaced a minimum of thirty (30) feet on center. Screening shall not be required along the wate rout. 2. Adequate vehicular parking and loading space, adequate vehicular ingress and egress configuration, and appropriate docking and mooring facilities shall be provided on any lot used temporarily, intermittently, or permanently for loading and unloading of marine vessels. In making determinations in such cases, the planning director shall seek the advice and recommendations of the public works department. (Ord. No. 10771, § 1, 7-26-90; Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) .. in•_______1_1__1_ W..-...... ,]es .... „.,/4/1...,...4 .411 /T...l..L..__ A/1/1 /1 Af1L' _ 1 r - NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 2 Sec. 604.4. Principal uses and structures. - 604.4.1. Permitted principal uses and structures. 1. Piers, wharves, docks, and railroad service to related loading, storage or distribution facilities. 2. Freight terminals; facilities for warehousing and storage, packing, packaging and crating of materials from or for marine shipment; assembly and distribution facilities for marine shipments, except as provided under permitted uses and structures in section 604.4.2 below. 3. Passenger terminals, including related facilities for handling baggage or freight, ground transportation, parking, and establishments to serve needs of passengers and visitors including retail shops, eating and drinking establishments, ticket agencies, currency exchanges and the like. 4. Facilities for construction, maintenance, service, repair, supply or storage of vessels, including shipyards, dry docks, marine railways, shops for marine woodworking, electrical, communication and instrument installation and repair, welding, sail making, engine and motor repair and maintenance; ship chandlers; fuel supply establishments. Manufacture, maintenance, service, repair and/or sales or supply of parts, accessories and equipment for marine needs. 5. Bases for marine dredging, salvage, towing; marine construction offices and yards, piloting headquarters. 6. Sales, charter or rental of vessels, marine supplies and equipment, marine sporting goods and supplies. 7. Establishments for collection, processing and/or distribution or sales of marine food products and byproducts, including eating and drinking establishments related to such operations. 8. Hiring halls for seamen and dock workers. 9. Telecommunication transmission and relay stations; radar installation. 10. Structures and uses other than as listed above for performance of governmental functions (including private facilities supplementing or substituting for governmental functions such as fire protection or provision of security), or relating to operation of public utilities. 11. Commercial marinas, including permanent occupancy of private pleasure craft as living quarters and for temporary occupancy for transients (maximum stay: thirty (30) days) as shall be required for work or security purposes, or for repair work within the district. 12. Cellular communications site provided that where a transmission tower is used the transmission tower shall be by Special Exception only. The transmission tower and anchoring devices, if directly - abutting a residential district, must: (1) be located in the interior side or rear yard of the property; (2) meet minimum setback requirements; (3) be securely anchored, installed and maintained in accordance with all applicable codes; (4) not exceed a maximum height of one hundred and fifty (150) feet; and (5) be separated from adjacent properties by a landscape buffer. 604.4.2. Conditional principal uses and structures. 1. Facilities for storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution of explosive, flammable, or otherwise hazardous materials shalt be permitted by Class I Special Permit only. No such permit shall be issued unless and until the chief of the fire department is assured that, in addition to meeting other requirements of applicable codes, the facilities for such storage, open or enclosed, are designed, located and equipped to make fire protection or protection from other hazards feasible, and that the manner of operation of such facilities will give reasonable assurance of protection of life and property. 2. Except as permitted generally above, or permitted generally as accessory uses and structures, offices, living quarters, commercial or service establishments, manufacturing, processing and other uses shall be permitted only by Class I Special Permit and only upon findings by the zoning administrator that the use as proposed is primarily related to waterfront activities, for which the district is reserved, end n,,m/A/br1avt-111/f.,F,.1-..,,,oA (1 /1 /1 C/C'7FlLL.. n.0 —------- r NextPage LivePublish Page 2 of 2 reasonably requires location within the district, except that by a Class I Special Permit existing office structures may be used or expanded for general office uses. 3. Heliports, helistops, facilities for other VTOL or STOL aircraft, hovercraft, or sea planes shall be permitted only by Class ll Special Permit. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 10932, § 1, 10-24-91; Ord. No. 11135, § 1, 3-24-94; Ord. No. 11732, § 2, rlll{Tnfra,•10.A All /1 IC 7114C_fL_ - NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.5. Accessory uses and structures. 604.5.1. Permitted accessory uses and structures. Uses and structures which are customarily accessory and clearly incidental to permitted uses and structures, - including occupancy of living quarters for watchmen, caretakers or employees whose work requires such quarters on the premises and living quarters for passengers and crews aboard commercial, official or scientific vessels. Otherwise occupancy of living quarters within the district shall be as authorized by special permit below. - 604.5.2. Conditional accessory uses and structures. As for "principal uses and structures" in this district, and in addition: 1. At commercial marinas, or docks, or slips, occupancy of private pleasure craft as permanent living quarters by the public, by Class I Special Permit. 2. Lodgings for temporary accommodation of passengers, visitors and crew members at passenger or freight terminals only by Class I Special Permit, and only upon findings that such facilities are primarily related to the operation of the terminal, and are not for general public use. (Ord. No. 10771, § 1, 7-26-90; Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 10932, § 1, 10-24-91) .t0 httry Mix/1=4111111ichmnnir.ndeenm/6/1next.d11/Tnfohace4fl/1/1S/S7frroc__ _ _ NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.6. Minimum lot requirements. 1. Minimum lot area - ten thousand (10,000) square feet. 2. Minimum lot width - one hundred (100) feet. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) httn://livenublish.municode.com/6/1oext.d11/Tnfnhaedn/i /1 cicif/ 10 -a r — NextPage LivePublish Sec. 604.7. Floor area limitations. The floor area ratio shall not exceed one and seventy -two -hundredths (1.72) times the gross lot area. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) Page 1 of 1 httn://livenublish.municode.com/6/lDext.dll/Infobase40/1 /16/57f/A21-0fr-Ar-.- NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.8. Minimum open space requirements. 604, 8.1. Minimum yards and setbacks. 1. AU yards adjacent to streets shall be a minimum of five (5) feet in depth. 2. All yards on interior lot lines abutting another zoning district shall be the same as the minimum setback requirements for the abutting district. 3. For all yards other than [in subsections] 1 and 2 above, there shall be no minimum yard or setback requirement. 604, 8.2. Building footprint and green space. 1. The building footprint shall not exceed seven -tenths (0.7) times the gross lot area. 2. An area not Tess than one -tenth (0.1) times the gross lot area shall be developed as green space. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) 3�3 httn://livenublish.municode.com/6/lpext.dll/Infobase40/1 /15/57f/6RP7f„—.if..-... .-+ ,1 ,/1.1 ,/1 A A 1 NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.9. Height limitations. The maximum building height shall be one hundred twenty (120) feet or ten (10) stories, whichever is less, above grade or above the base flood elevation, if applicable. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) httn•//livenuhlish_municode.com/6/lpext.dll/Infobase40/1 /1 r — NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.10. Offstreet parking and loading. - 604.10.1. Minimum offstreet parking requirements. 1. For commercial marinas, five (5) parking spaces plus one (1) parking space for each two (2) vessels of sixteen (16) feet or more in length. 2. For dry dockage or boat racks, five (5) spaces plus one (1) for each three (3) boats. 3. For all other uses there shall be a minimum of one (1) parking space for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross floor area. 604.10.2. Minimum offstreet loading requirements. 1. For buildings in excess of twenty-five thousand (25,000) square feet and up to five hundred thousand (500,000) square feet of gross building area: Berth minimum dimension to be twelve (12) by thirty-five (35) feet; First berth for gross building area up to fifty thousand (50,000) gross square feet; — Second berth for gross building area of fifty thousand (50,000) up to one hundred thousand (100,000) gross square feet; Third berth for gross building area of one hundred thousand (100,000) up to two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) gross square feet; Fourth berth for gross building area of two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) up to five hundred thousand (500,000) gross square feet; 2. For buildings with square footage in excess of five hundred thousand (500,000) square feet: Berth minimum dimension to be twelve (12) by fifty-five (55) feet; In addition to the requirements set forth above, there shall be one (1) berth for every five hundred thousand (500,000) gross square feet of building area. 3. By Class I Special Permit, one (1) larger (six hundred sixty (660) square feet) loading space may be replaced by two (2) of the smaller (four hundred twenty (420) square feet) loading spaces as dictated by needs of the individual project. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91) httn://livenuhlish.municode.com/6/lnext.dll/Infobase40/1/15/57f/69a7fn=rin,,,•r.r+ 0.1 I, -, Int es t • — NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 604.11. Limitations on signs. See Article 10 for sign regulations and limitations. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 12213, § 2, 4-11-02) httn•//livennhlich mnnicode.cem/6/lnext.dll/Infobase4O/1 /15/S717An1.0 —a- — NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 2 C t°LA'S!Ze ` Ik`-3 Considerations generally; standards; findings and determinations required. As appropriate to the nature of the special permit involved and the particular circumstances of the case, the following considerations and standards shall apply generally, in addition to any other standards and requirements set forth conceming the class or kind of permit being considered. City agents, agencies, or boards charged with decisions concerning special permits shall make, or cause to be made, written findings and determinations concerning such of the following matters as are applicable in the case, shall reflect such considerations and standards specifically in the record, and shall be guided by such considerations and standards in their decisions as to issuance of permits, with or without conditions and safeguards, or denial of applications. 1305.1. Ingress and egress. Review for adequacy shall be given to ingress and egress to the property and structure and uses thereon, with - particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or other emergency. 1305.2. Offstreet parking and loading. Review for adequacy shall be given to offstreet parking and loading facilities as related to adjacent streets, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, internal traffic flow and control, arrangement in relation to access in case of fire or other emergency, and screening and landscaping. 1305.3. Refuse and service areas. - Review for adequacy shall be given to the location, scale, design, and screening of refuse and service areas; to the manner in which refuse is to be stored; and to the manner and timing of refuse collection and deliveries, shipments, or other service activities, as such matters relate to the location and nature of uses on adjoining properties and to the location and character of adjoining public ways. 1305.4. Signs and lighting. Review for adequacy shall be given to the number, size, character, location, and orientation of proposed signs, and of proposed lighting for signs and premises, with particular reference to traffic safety, glare, and compatibility and harmony with adjoining and nearby property and the character of the area. 1305.5. Utilities. Review for adequacy shall be given to utilities required, with particular reference to availability and capacity of systems, location of connections, and potentially adverse appearance or other adverse effects on adjoining and - nearby property and the character of the area. 1305.6. Drainage. Review for adequacy shall be given to provision for drainage, with particular reference to effect on adjoining and nearby properties and on general drainage systems in the area. Where major drainage volumes appear likely and capacity of available systems is found marginal or inadequate, consideration shall be given to possibilities for recharge of groundwater supply on the property, temporary retention with gradual discharge, or other remedial - measures. 1305.7. Preservation of natural features. Review for appropriateness shall be given to provision for the preservation of existing vegetation and geological features whenever possible. 1305.8. Control of potentially adverse effects generally. In addition to the review of detailed items indicated above, as appropriate to the particular class or kind of special permit and the circumstances of the particular case, review for appropriateness shall be given to potentially adverse effects generally on adjoining and nearby properties, the area, the neighborhood, or the city, of the use or occupancy as proposed, or its location, construction, design, character, scale or manner of operation. Where such potentially adverse effects are found, consideration shall be given to special remedial measures appropriate in the httn !ll;vPni hliah mnnicnde nnm/6/Inext.dll/fnfohase40/1 /15/14c9/1514?fn=d ,-..... — NextPage LivePublish Page 2 of 2 particular circumstances of the case, including screening or buffering, landscaping, control of manner or hours of operation, alteration of proposed design or construction of buildings, relocation of proposed open space or alteration of use of such space, or such other measures as are required to assure that such potential adverse effects will be eliminated or minimized to the maximum extent reasonably feasible, and that the use or occupancy will be compatible and harmonious with other development in the area to a degree which will avoid substantial depreciation of the value of nearby property. (Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 10976, § 1, 4-20-92) hffn //livar.n}�lich mnnirrvdp rnm/1 /lnPxt r111/TnfnhacPd(1/1 /1 c/1 A. nri c+ AOr-- 1 NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 ARTICLE 9. GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS http://livepublish.municode.coml6/lpext.dll/Infobase40/1/15/d1c?fn=-ri NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 2 Sec. 907. Lot, yards, and related terms; definitions; methods for measurement; general requirements and limitations. 907.1. Lot, prohibition against divisions creating substandard lots, n no case o mbinationby private action shall any residual lot be created which does not meet the requirements of this ordinance and they a plicable re ulations. The creation o substan ar o s, as defined in sec ion , is prohibited and shall be construe as vio a ion o this zoning ordinance. - 907.2. Reserved. 907.3. Setbacks and _ 907.3.1. Rule conceming setbacks where abutting lots have different zoning designations. In this type of case, the most restrictive condition applies to all development on both sides of the district boundary. 907.3.2. Rule concerning heiaht of buildings abutting residential districts. Where districts allowing building 170This o ver fortes 401 feetatutiesidential districts on the rear. uch additionaffieight shall set back one oot in the horizontal for every two I22 additional feet in the vertical dimensi n. 907.4. Yard, general limitations on occupancy. A yard shall remain open, unoccupied and unobstructed by any structure or portion of a structure from forty-two (42) inches above the general ground level of the graded lot upward (except for unenclosed swimming pools, whirlpools, and similar facilities, tennis courts and as otherwise provided by these regulations); provided, however, that fences and walls may be permitted in any yard, subject to height limitations established herein, and further provided that poles, posts, and other customary yard accessories, ornaments, and furniture shall be permitted in any required yard if they do not constitute substantial impediments to free flow of light and air across the yard to adjoining properties. In all residential districts and all residential corner lots, air conditioning and fire equipment (such as air conditioning compressors, pumps, exhaust fans, filters and other similar noise producing equipment) is permitted on the walls, roof or windows or within the rear yard if located at least ten (10) feet from the adjacent property lines. In commercial and industrial districts, where yard areas and setbacks are required, air conditioning and fire equipment (such as air conditioning compressors, pumps, exhaust fans, filters and other similar noise -producing equipment) and air exhaust discharge from such equipment shall not be installed within ten (10) feet of adjacent property lines or within the width of the required yard or setbacks, whichever measurement is greater. On corner lots with existing buildings with five (5) feet side setbacks and no rear yard, a soundproof enclosure shall be required for such equipment. In commercial and industrial districts, where no setbacks are required and buildings - are built to the property line, no such equipment shall be installed within ten (10) feet, measured vertically from grade of the property line and air discharge from such equipment shall be directed vertically upward from the discharge outlet. In any event, such equipment shall not discharge exhaust air across the public sidewalk in any district. All such equipment shall conform to city code noise regulations. Such equipment not meeting the required setbacks may be permitted by Class I Special Permit only. 907.5--907.8. Reserved. - 907.9. Buildable area, limitations on occupancy. Buildings may only be placed within the buildable area, subject to limitations on building coverage. - 907.10. Limitations on lots not platted in accordance with current regulations. Where lands have been or are subdivided or resubdivided, but ownership is described by metes and bounds - without recording a plat in the manner and form required by regulations in effect at the effective date of this zoning ordinance, such lands may be used in accordance with the terms of this zoning ordinance provided: (a) That all necessary public facilities, services, and utilities are available to or located on (as the case may be) such lands, or an agreement satisfactory to the city has been made and recorded whereby the deficiencies in necessary public facilities, services, or utilities will be remedied; or http://livepublish.municode.coml6/lpext.dll/Infobase40/1/15/d1c/dgf?fr,=dnr rn' — NextPage LivePublish Page 2 of 2 (b) That a plat of such land be recorded in the manner and form and subject to the requirements existing in regulations in effect at the time of the recording of such plat. - (Ord. No. 10771, § 1, 7-26-90; Ord. No. 10792, § 1, 9-27-90; Ord. No. 10863, § 1, 3-28-91; Ord. No. 11079, § 3, 7-22-93; Ord. No. 11106, § 4, 11-23-93) 3 7\( http://livepublish.municode.com/6/lpext.dll/Infobase40/1 /1 5/d 1 c/d8f?fn=rinri ir,-,A '+ NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 1 Sec. 2500. Genera{ definitions. For the purpose of this zoning ordinance, certain terms or words used herein are defined and shall be interpreted as follows: The word "person" includes a firm, association, organization, partnership, trust, company, or corporation as well as an individual. The present tense includes the future tense, the singular number includes the plural, and the plural number includes the singular. The word "shall" is mandatory. The word "may" is permissive. The words "used" or "occupied" include the words "intended," "designed," or "arranged to be used or occupied." The word "lot" includes the words "plot." "parcel," or "tract." The word "structure" includes the word "building" as well as other things constructed or erected on the ground, attached to something having location on the ground, or requiring construction or erection on the ground. The word "land" includes the words "water," "marsh" or "swamp." — NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 29 Sec. 2502. Specific definitions. — Abuttin To reach or touch1,to touch at the end or be contiguous with; join at a border or boundary_ terminate on. h a term implies a closer proximity than the term "adjacent.' No intervening land. Accessory banking. A banking service(s) office, which may or may not include automated teller machines, however, not including drive through services of any kind. Accessory use or structure. An accessory use or structure is a use or structure customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use or structure and, unless otherwise specifically provided, located on the same premises. "On the same premises" shall be construed as meaning on the same lot or on a contiguous lot in the same ownership. Where a building is attached to the principal building, it shall be considered part thereof, and not an accessory structure. Actual construction. See Construction, actual. Adjacent. Lying near or close to; sometimes, contiguous; neighboring. The term implies that the two (2) objects are not widely separated, though they may not actually touch. Adult. An adult is a person eighteen (18) years of age or older. Adult daycare center. A facility which provides limited supervision and basic services on a part-time basis by day or evening, but not overnight, to three (3) or more adults generally aged sixty (60) years and over other than the family/employee occupying the premises, who cannot perform one (1) or more aspects of daily living. The term does not include community based residential facilities, group homes, nursing home facilities or institutions for the aged. Adult entertainment or service establishment. An adult entertainment or adult service establishment is one which sells, rents, leases, trades, barters, operates on commission or fee, purveys, displays, or offers only to or for adults products, goods of any nature, images, reproductions, activities, opportunities for experiences or encounters, moving or still pictures, entertainment, and/or amusement distinguished by purpose and emphasis on matters depicting, describing, or relating by any means of communication from one (1) person to another to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" as herein defined. An adult entertainment or adult service establishment is not open to the public generally but only to one (1) or more classes of the public, excluding any person under eighteen (18) years of age. It is the intent of this definition that determination as to whether or not a specific establishment or activity falls within the context of regulation hereunder shall be based upon the activity therein conducted or proposed to be conducted as set out above and in these regulations and shall not depend upon the name or title of the establishment used or proposed. Thus, the terms "adult bookstore," "adult massage parlor," "adult motion picture theater," "adult private dancing," and "adult escort service" are - encompassed within this definition of "adult entertainment or services," but the term "adult entertainment or adult services" is not to be deemed limited by the enunciation of specific activities listed before. Adult massage parlor. See Adult entertainment or service establishment. Adult motion picture theater. See Adult entertainment or service establishment. Adult private dancing. See Adult entertainment or service establishment. Affordable housing. Housing with a retail sales price not in excess of ninety (90) percent of current median Dade County new housing sales price, or rental housing rates (project average) not in excess of thirty (30) percent of the gross median Dade County monthly income. Airport. An area where aircraft can land and take off, usually equipped with hangars, facilities for refueling/repairs, and passenger facilities. Alley. An alley is any thoroughfare or passageway (not officially designated as a street) designated as an alley by a recorded plat, deed, or legal instrument, to be a secondary means of vehicular access to the rear or side of properties otherwise abutting on a street. Alterations, structural. Structural alterations are any change, removal, replacement, reinforcement or addition of beams, ceiling and floor joists, reinforced concrete floor slabs (except those on fill), Toad bearing partitions, http://livepublish.munico de. com/6/lpext. dlllInfobase40/ 1 / 15/ 175 2/ 17 5 e?fn=ci oci i m an+_f NextPage LivePublish Page 1 of 2 Sec. 303. Rules where there is uncertainty as to boundaries. Where uncertainty exists as to location of boundaries of districts, or other areas delineated for regulatory purposes in the official zoning atlas, the following rules shall apply: 303.1. Boundaries indicated as approximately following the centerlines of streets, alleys, rights -of way, or easements; variation between actual and mapped location, effect of vacation on zoning status of property. Boundaries indicated as approximately following the centerlines of streets, alleys, rights -of -way, or easements shall be construed as following such centerlines as they exist on the ground (except where variation of actual location from mapped location would change the zoning status of a lot or parcel, in which case the boundary shall be so interpreted as to avoid such change). In the event of vacation, the boundary shall be construed as remaining in its location, except where ownership of the vacated property is divided other than at the center, in which case the boundary shall be construed as moving with the ownership. 303.2. Boundaries indicated as approximately following boundaries of streets, alleys, other public or private property lines, rights -of -way, or easements. 303.2.1. General rule. Except as indicated at section 303.2.2, boundaries indicated as approximately following boundaries of streets, alleys, other public or private property lines, rights -of -way, or easements shall be construed as following such boundaries, except where variation of actual location from mapped location would change the zoning status of a lot or parcel, in which case the boundary shall be, so interpreted as to avoid such change. 303.2.2. Exception in cases of apparently unzoned strips; effect of vacation on zoning status of property. As an exception to the general rule above, where such boundaries are adjacent to streets, alleys, rights - of -way, public property, or easements, and are so located with relation to other opposing boundaries as to leave such streets, alleys, rights -of -way, public property, or easements without apparent zoning designation, such boundaries shall be construed as running to the centerlines of the areas involved. In the event of vacation, the boundary shall be construed as remaining in such central location, except where ownership of the vacated property is divided other than at its center, in which case the boundary shall be construed as moving with the ownership. 303.3. Boundaries indicated as approximately following city limits; changes in city limits. 303.3.1. Generally. Boundaries indicated as approximately following city limits shall be construed as following such city limits. 303.3.2. Effect of removal of areas from city. Where property previously within the city is removed from its limits, the zoning boundaries involved shall be construed as moving to conform with such change in city limits. 303.3.3. Effects of annexations to the city. Where property previously located outside the city is annexed, zoning boundaries shall not be construed as moving with city limits. Applications for required permits may be received and processed in relation to property in such areas, but no such permit shall be issued until the city commission shall have taken action as provided in article 22, Amendments, to establish the zoning status of such annexed property and the permits applied for are found to be in accord with the terms of such amendment. 303.4. Boundaries indicated as approximately following mean high water lines or centerlines of streams, canals, lakes, bays, or other bodies of water. f;_3oundaries indicated as app oximately_following mean high water lines or centerlines of streams. canals, lakes, ba s or other bodies of water s be construed as followin such mean hi h water lines or centerlines. In the case o a c ange in mean high water line, the boundary shall be construed as moving with the change, except where such moving would change the zoning status of a lot or parcel, in which case the boundary shall be interpreted in such manner as to avoid such change. 303.5. Boundaries indicated as entering any body of water. 2-4 httn•n i‘rpnnhlich tyn nirnriP rnm/6/1nPxt r11UTnfnhace4(1/1/1 S/1pd/1-rfOr- -- — NextPage LivePublish Page 2 of 2 Boundaries indicated as entering any body of water, but not continuing to intersection with other zoning boundaries or with the limits of jurisdiction of the city, shall be construed as extending in the direction in which they enter the body of water to intersection with other zoning boundaries or with the limits of city jurisdiction. 303.6. Boundaries indicated as approximately parallel to or extensions of features. Boundaries indicated as approximately parallel to or extensions of features described in sections 303.1 through 303.5 above shall be construed as being parallel to or extensions of such features. 303.7. Distances not specifically indicated. Where distances are not specifically indicated on any map in the official zoning atlas, they shall be determined by reference to the scale of the map. 303.8. Zoning board action in cases of remaining uncertainty, conflicts. In other circumstances not covered above, or where natural or man-made features existing are at variance with those shown in the official zoning atlas, or where the atlas is illegible or unclear, or where interpretations based on the above rules appear to produce contradictions or conflicts with the intent of the ordinance, or upon request from the zoning administrator or from any affected property owner, or on its own initiative upon determination that inconsistencies or uncertainties exist, the zoning board of the city (hereafter referred to as the "zoning board") shall make a finding and interpretation concerning the boundaries involved in accord with the intent and purpose of this zoning ordinance. In cases where such finding and interpretation involve only correction to the official zoning atlas or any official supplement and do not change the zoning of any lot, the zoning board may direct corrections without proposing an amendment to the map involved. In cases where the zoning of any lot would be changed by such correction, the zoning board shall initiate a proposed corrective amendment and transmit its recommendations thereon to the city commission, in accord with article 12, section 1203, of this zoning ordinance. (Ord. No. 10771, § 1, 7-26-90) httn•//livenuhlish mnnicnde_com/6/lnext.dll/Infobase4O/1 /1 S/1 Pa/t - i a- 11 11 N 17 ST t . 1 •2 51 1. 11 i. H1 ST e. rn.e O h iR.0 WOWffi � �i ' 4b • Ar� �.a•sa��.1�_� mr- ININM 21J AIrj •1g40 ; dW�!o�..,.o,..� i...P rob... . 11111101111111011151110A6 t jIlligill b� , 7 7., t je' o — o1111Will .I N i1 li 1) 1. r1 ,. 1 P 1t . . ' -N v ' ism - - - 2 1Ming Vii ... FIGURE 2 STUDY AREA JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. MIAMI RIVER PROJECT August 25,`2003 Page 4 �. Z r NW 7 ST ORANGE BOWL NW 3 ST VICTORIA HOSPITAL NW 6 ST NW5ST NW 4 ST •••5' NW IIST " PROJECT �� 41111 pow•" .1} N TS w z NW 7 ST a z w Q Q Q 4 n o z Z 3 z z z LEGEND C/C w w w CO NW 6 ST C/C NW 5 ST AM/PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DID AM/PM PEAK HOUR ROADWAY LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 8 FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT. P.E. MIAMI RIVER PROJECT August 25, 2003 Page 34 rk impacts of the project; the section of NW 7th Street adjacent to the site should be re - striped to create an eastbound left tum lane to serve the project. The greatest demand for that left tum movement is estimated to be 129 vph in the PM peak hour. The FDOT guidelines for an un-signalized intersection suggest that the length of the Ieft tum storage bay should be determined based upon the number of vehicles during an average 2 minute period during the peak hour. Based upon 129 vph that would equate to approximately 4.3 vehicles. A minimum Ieft tum storage bay of approximately 100 feet appears to be appropriate. Finally, the corridor analysis provided in Appendix D dearly indicates that there is sufficient transportation system capacity in the NW 7th Street Corridor to accommodate the proposed project. TABLE 23 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS • INTERSECTION `� . L rT �; '. t ti " -.4s } ( 4 iY t. •�['.. „Yr , 4144 j. "j roY .. .. y E+,k. f 1,2..1 rX. s fi � -.- '. �-�w..E y,4rn: ,, 2Q0 . LOS zF:. y € ..°t yL ..:Zeo --,2-IDU,-:.ii •tl7�iei .� h e ;. t14 y... .F. d' •t om"r' .-1 i� wit .e t vaFyyS � . 2008 ,LQ� S E• * n..s 3 Y W(�, , : r-y; .%, ' Sx 4.-J �1f t . y(,.-(1 ik •.. :.�v'i.3 , 20:08 LbsY tad 7 fe x +r {SC'. t n'7,;- AKt 'MOOtF y Uf K{� — .l_•:'t h-. . CA ON53. kY1 0 • . . AM 1' ' • 4=. �� PM, �c E.. t..r �:AIIlF M•,' .'3 <- AM: v tr+F + i:y ,�""'� . NW 7TH STREET & NW 12TH AVENUE F. E° E N/A N/A NW 4TH STREET & NW 8TH AVENUE C C C C N/A N/A NW 7TH STREET & NW 11TH AVENUE B _ B B C N/A N/A JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. MIAMI RIVER PROJECT August 25, 2003 Page 38 4N TABLE 20 FUTURE INTERSECTION LOS WITH PROJECT WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS ExtttVTERSEGTION t w .T L.-.Y y : j' f Y 1 .- k ° E s.- a� .� R' Ft' - 't. r ['tl✓ti�Y 'Q yl A^ 2003 LQS Y k -y F i'. -.. i 5-. 7l yk 1�. v Y �, iC ss ti t z t n3 .. ,y, 1 '� k� 1. !'k J KY'yFi°s 7 _; k20 8_-, �05 ; ..1 Ai)yb '�k�r "A "/F�■�A 17` W/ O POJ4��.FT�E k - w 4�b1 f L: r1aE �'«'1 r 'F swY,, ' � 3-'sty Lf ^ 200> -, A ildW i�YyxFjJ 'N. C �'' F � x,•+ '' .h-.170 '+,--, ,,,, �- �PROJ'r.+:CT 'S .t N ;.. _ e-7 .ii-Y 4 } } r 'J• Y Jyt: N.y . I t a 34-F. •p,.��R4' 7Y?[-'S."v y{mot '4' ' t . _ ~ �T a ;J�.:.. �je1 . .i.` ?'.... _ .. . . ._tee i� .... _ .� �. .. x`»` .L ...�- NW 7TH STREET & NW AVENUE F E F E F E NW 4TH STREET &TAW 8TH AVENUE C C C C C c,------1 NW 7TH STREET & NW 11TH AVENUE B B B B B C TABLE 21 FUTURE LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT , E STREET ti ;. Srw• S - , 3 FROM ' -� .- * • �1w3'�' ^ yL>„L TO r-'� "'�" ,' �k z .y * LOSs ... NW 12th Avenue NW 3rd Street NW 11th Street AM=D PM=D ARTPLAN LOS CRITERIA PEAK HOUR LOS MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONALVOLUME (VPH) A B C - D E AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A N/A 1320 1890 1990 1585 PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volume (VPH) N/A N/A 1240 1940 2060 1585 Notes: 1.) AM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 100 seconds and average G/C of 0.51. 2.) PM Peak Hour Directional Service Volumes are taken from ARTPLAN analysis using a cycle length of 120 seconds and average G/C of 0.53. Maximum peak hour directional volumes are calculated from year 2002 FDOT data for count station 5012 (AADT = 23,500; K= 9.20%; and, D = 67.99%) and escalated by 1% per year for six years and includes committed development traffic and project traffic. JACKSON M. AHLSTEDT, P.E. MIAMI RIVER PROJECT August 25, 2003 Page 33 �. s 02/20/2004 17:12 3052220994 BANYAN ELEMENTARY PAGE 05 at: -11tt_tt_ .-^+erstor of f Slott of Florida :b Bush ;nee: Dr. Parndla Dacia hair or &Matra -Dade Dideptien aepresentsrtive Rene Garcia Designee: Ms. Debra Owens hair or Governing Board of outh Florida Water Management .sistrkt Mr Nicolas 1. Gutierrez.. Jr. ,Designee: Ms. beta Begot :lade -Dade Stets Attorney .-Is. Katherine Fernandez -Rundle Designee: Mr Gary Winston —layer of Mis Dade County layer Alex Penelas 'esignee: Mr. Henry F. Sore Mayor or Miami "'-iayor Manuel A. Diaz *signer Mr. Otto Boudct-Murflu City of Miami Commissioner Commissioner Joe Sanchez -nesignec: Mr- Steve Wright flbuni-Dade County Commissioner Convnissiorter Bruno Barreiro - esignee: Mr. Alfredo Gonzalez :hair or Wand River Marine tironp Mr. Charles "Bud" Morton designee: Mr_ Richard Bunnell r of Mariat CouncU Michael Karcher Designee: Mr. Phil Everingham --Ixecutive Director of Downtown )c.doprr,ent Authority .At. Dana A. Nottingharn Designee: Mr. Adam Lakin — hair or Go -toter Mtarnl Chamber ,r Commerce _,fr. William O_ Cullom Designee: Ms. Megan Kelly —yeiglrbnrhoad Representative 1ppointed by City or Miami OIIMnission Dr. Ernest Martin Designee: Mr. Michael Cox tleighborhood Representative +appointed by Miami -Dade Commission Ms. Shcye Jude designee: Ms. Jane Caporelli tepresent*tive Rom timlronmental or Civic Organization Appointed by the —Governor Ms. Janet McAlilcy )esignee: Ms. Theo Long Member of Large Appointed by the Governor Mr_ Robert Parks .Member at Large Appointed by * " 'mi-Dade Commission 'Sara Babun ,lgnee: Mr- Tom Parker Limber at Large Appointed by City or Miami CommLssioit Mr. Cleve )ones. Jr. —Designee: Captain Beau PPync Managing Director FCif, Miami River Commission t_/o Rosenstiel School 4600 RiekGrbs&tr Causeway J Mtiaitni, Florida 33149 Office: (305) 361-4$50 Fez: (305) 361-4755 email: mrc®rsinas.mfemi_edu November 21, 2003 Mr. Jose Abreu Florida Dept. of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 Re: 12th Avenue Bridge Replacement over the Miami River Dear L . Abreu: This letter is written to provide you with the comments and recommendation of the Miami River Commission (MRC) concerning the replacement of the NW 12th Avenue Bridge. On November 3, 2003, the MRC Policy Committee heard a presentation from Luis Costa and Adriana Manzanares, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Project Manager for the 12 Ave Bridge replacement project. The MRC unanimously recommended the following • A tunnel to replace the existing bascule bridge • Shifting the Riverwalk to the shoreline instead of behind the bascule bridge • Preserving the existing "Long's Motorcycle" business rather than leveling it for a stormwater retention pond • Coordinate any temporary construction related river closures with the marine industry to ensure continued operation • Request FDOT to provide quarterly reviews of the design for all Miami River related projects addition, ttte Miami River Corridor Urban Il it Plan, which is the MItC's award winning strategic plats o recommends vehicles trave tug sou over e n ge ernnitted to take a left onto NW 7 ST, which is not currently planned. Attached is an economic study (completed in January 2003) comparing a bascule bridge with a tunnel at the 12th Avenue Miami River crossing and it reveals that over the average 70-year life span of a Miami River bridge, a tunnel is more economical than a bascule bridge_ Thj rivercrossing is a very busy vehicular crossin . and the primary route for ern ency vehicles heading to the numerous hos its s located in the Civic Center area. A tonne woo sign: cantly improve traffic flow and guarantee emergency vehicle prompt response times- 02/20/2004 17:12 3052226994 • BANYAN ELEMENTARY PAGE 06 Miami River Commission _ Mr. Johnny Martinez, FDOT November 21, 2003 Page 2 J Development and population projections for this area are nothing short of astounding. Currently, construction projects totaling over $2.65 billion and over 7000 residential units are either under construction or in the permitting process along the river corridor. This significant - increase in population density will cause severe traffic problems if the crossing is replaced with a bascule bridge, as clearly evidenced by the Brickell Avenue Bridge traffic problems. Miami is a fast growing major metropolitan area and emerging as a "world class" city. Utilizing the - significant improvements in tunnel technology and construction in lieu of antiquated bascule bridge construction is essential to meet the demands of the future of this metropolitan area. It also seems to me that in light of the money and effort that has been invested by many groups, including the Miami River Commission, that the Greenway should be a part of the riverfront and not screened off from the river in the manner in which it is presently designed. This was never agreed upon by the residents and our Commission, created by the legislature, has - taken a very strong position with developers whose projects we have been asked to review that they make sure that the riverfront itself is available and accessible to the public. Please reconsider this. Finally, it would appear that a number of potential problems on bridge design as far as the river is concerned, could be prevented if the Miami River Commission was given information at quarterly increments during the design of any bridge. We would love to have someone from the district office come to us when the design drawings and plans are 25% complete, 50% complete, etc. By the same token, we would be happy to have one of our staff or commission members come to the district office for that briefing and report back to us. Please consider this. The Miami River Commission looks forward to working with you and others to bring about a river crossing solution that will best serve the public interest. Should you have further questions or would like to meet with the MRC members on this matter, please contact our Managing Director, Mr. Brett Bibcau or me. Yours Very Truly, Chairman, Miami River Commission Bncl: Miami River Tunnel Study Cc w/encl: Dr. Pam Dana, Director of Tourism, Trade and Economic - Development, Office of the Governor w/encl Colonel Robert Carpenter, District Corrunander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District - Captain Greg Shapley, Director Seventh Coast Guard District Bridge Management Program Mayor Diaz, City of Miami - City of Miami Commissioners Mayor Penelas Miami -Dade Commissioners - Rep. Rene Garcia, Chairman of the Dade Delegation Mr. Johnny Martinez, FDOT District 6 Secretary k� 02/26/2004 17:12 3052228994 BANYAN ELEMENTARY PAGE ©2 Annetta* L'O"Eb1t - Oeecmiyer 9. 2003 J Florida Department of Tr portati rt 1000 Northwest ill~ A vstfae ?Mani. Florida 33172 veil. Root L. Parka Cha y 1, Rives C r iuic - do Mentalist Schcol 4600 Bicluetlbsckat Causeway Hirst. FL 33149 Rc: 12* Avcb04 Bridge over too brain! Rivet - Letter dated A%ynnsher 14, 2003 Dear Mt. Pasha, 3OE *BLEU itcaErn►ttr Seessouy Ahrens itae as: d that : retl_as lidiami River Cocs1 'i ( C) concamna reseeding duo 124 Avenue Bridge aw.Luenserit Projoz, The FloAds Department of Tratstp s* *n fee' `j Increasing redeveloptneet activities la the vialeitty of this project and also the associaseA shag :,.,.le blei. to the catntaUtnity. These thetas contribute to the urgency to tcplace this bridge, whicr, is severely detetictralcd and fanctiooaliy acute T e nroieset is is _Fee artrs: ixu isaehaeWad for a duaetraetictn letting In May 2005. yalinca fa ycxiir tame ass dteesed ' 1 • <, baton advancing b 0ma1 denier. Mal' undertook a cruet Mvolapmens Led Envlto ar t (PDT Study. !lima sally evaluator' various crossins al lives end chicly involved the contourstly and the Missal Rivet stakeholders. It. aitermdveK eansideted doting ibis n ads Study Included =habilitation of die existing brides, replaceesant with a hear Vie. ireplsoeinent with a 19ued higJi-level bridge: and roplacensoat with a tutmtil. S. Atbachentat A drys is a insu st of tha alternsivas coastbsred and the screeds used :tea s. Am you will see, the tunnel alternative was estimated dt $74 million and the baiieule bridges was a*meted at SU ga. Additionally. the Impacts (access and ccoastruedoa) associated with the bushel alteenadvte were a r.slficantly greater than those 4:aoelated with the bs,as/e bridge. the Lindy referenced tzt your letter -Carepartng Coon of Options for Recaastsyeang ,lien in and 271 Avenue .- 9,rids- Over fir _Miami 1Uver" (MRC Twirwl Sooty) bases its nosonenendation of a Hemel alternative on an Lanttmed ptojcct cop of $40 imU;.en. This con it hosed on a nsaicl pit le this wee does oat take WO account detailed dte-spcci6c issues. The MRC Tunnel Study also iacludee !a its .cost analysis a $20 minion rehabilitation coat every 20 years fora bascule bridge, In the State of Maids. bascule bridge rababidtatice cum have averaged bowmen $2 million and $4 million, In addittOns Out MRC Tunnel Study it anent regartling the maintenance and apesanemai coos thrd *ta huturcd with tnb. Those cons are associated with the ventilation system_ pumps for *totter water removal, a traffic Incident moniteringlcorttrol centres. and prorjaloas for mains - the tunnel in the event of flaodhag. Based on the analysis performed during the I'D& Study. logs! eat ,breed that the tunnel .kcn.ativo is trot feasible. �e� _tetendaltiili Z _ y� ,� itivtntr=llk �o tiffs >dbQrelitia ins ad of b d thrailotle bridge Dunne the Baal design of this project. it was deemed economically unfeasible, to extend the clear spat► of the bridge, to accommodate this riverw.lk in front ai the bwseuie piece. A/easn,Aodating the riverwalk under the male span would require an additional 40' lea .pay, length, which resllss in signiteently higher costa and additional community iaypacta. It has bona estimated that the additional span lettgth would increase the cost of www.dot.stt.ft.uc m hlCYCten•it►eA yce 12/20 2004 17:12 3052228994 BANYAN ELEMENTARY PAGE 03 12 2000 2;42Pt'I eK1R$I Ge1V6R carthisSiom Mr. Robert L. Paola — December Sr. 2003 Page 2 2106 361 4756 tBe pst4eet by S5 tenon to SIO miUim ie addition to sdthefaemut tight of way impacts. Leg the tiverwalk behind the bascule piers was one coaside led & tigolfCaat Simon In design sines the MRCa Miami River Urban is e:s Plan rho w the dverwalk. tc be located t 's,Y foam the river's edge as the project's location. Relocating the path in r 1 of flea glens escagd sea inotense the pemt•s cotmeeti"tt'. since the Martin mamas* e ropmty — precludes the coostsutdon af the path along she waterfront- Ws reoogelae that tie: oanditloa to t tip toast ideal for the MAC. heft the tooatioo shown lie our pia espeownts a compromise that Waltzes the mods of treaspcc1etdes what seetionmedatiog dm intent of ! l River Will Plan- - i sba 'want to rettissas that this issue was coordinated as a mocclog held art June 21. 2002 whir Ms. iai. Pomona who le the Rivetwaik Program hamarr= for the Trust for Public Lands and is elan a member of Writes ingestrway Sr...annbless d with Mr.. Ernie Martin who is a ElliMibet 01 d.. '.:. R�. Coomealesice and a • nee dent of di. Spring Gerdes arighbr>thoati. nit • .. t_ . t•.. ltelSUMNifIRMIO It was dctacmanod goring the fleal &sign stage- thilateh the taalYais of 0416141ADS grad ac6t1CaiC faaC , - Westing a slaloms s peed On Ole "[aces Motorcycle" parcel mad the pareel adjacent to it resented tip most sappoasiaiily pnldrnt stdutieas to the saina4va treat . u. +1e.iti of the Miami liver. Every option for storm waes t eras c i.st&at , and sbe p mpeosented the once is eibc solution, • $$1$ .t ,-_ ---• -• Ls- ,-. s .., .,: , .,, •• Teroporsey closures of the river will be coordinated with the USCO and this rastem Weimar, as required to de - plats, specifications, and irpcclal provisions to the ecmsttuction contract 11 la out intent to implement lemons katteed to the oratscructim of nee: completed 2"'s Avenue Piddle to t''iea comoractiosi of this sod Moans bridges. As 1 vilkerb t above, the Miami loves ,C'otezeiseian was eland, involved with d PM& 9hady alterne t'e development process. Dialog the design phase. two coordinations titi¢..i' 1► free been held with i!t seprearetstives seed a general labile workshop was reeeatiy bold. FDOT cad ire staff art atwuyt avaiiahl° to '.:'• -der !it NOW . end will continue to do so at yata request. ter RQoafitgqulation — Arrant ieR tatrl. m+ L41�L�1(. 3i'4 �t rehidea taveii soon d oa X-4-V212111 —� The seed far a Sff left tea lase et the interaction with NW 7th Street Was Dat identified in the traffic analyse Perfetteorl for the PDE study. 1.+* -uetiu am oat ot=actly wited at emit lansmection time it awl mine traffic queues first would loiterfss* ad& theialIAntue alas test sa sdaeatiietTtiaa. Amon desirable movement for vehicles traveling soothbouad — en at NW 71* Street world 6e for them to Writ alert at NW 7' Selma cad aaceas South PMi Drtws that cassass nettle ttbr. ,:.apa�d 13' AVOW* bridge. Thla loop unrirmaeeth the p+ro�,ad •: d:t1 result in cater and more eftident travel for all motorists in the area — is t achiaio will =edam with our count design for the 12' Avenue Bridge- Our staff will cGntlnne so cocdtnsse projcct activities with the MRC on this and figure pso;+ects_ If you require additional insucmadm, please contact me at 305.470-5197. Tu „. tVl rvt Secretary U 1TX5112or004pC 12rw.tim r• 3 �9 02/20/2004 17:12 3052228994 BANYAN ELEMENTARY PAGE 04 DEC 13 2000 2$42PA MIP.M2 81VER COMP I$$1oN Mr. Robert I.. Parks Cresaimber 9, 2003 rage 3 303 381 4786 r.4 ec S caemry Imal Abner. Plosids,. Department of Transportation Dr.. PlrueaDas&. Director of Tourism. Trade and Beessomic Development. °MIIrar attbs O vess>tar Colonel Robert Corp District Commandar, US Army Ceps of Eas}aorss. Jscirson4il a Captain Cosa Ampky. Dimmer Seventh Cast Gnarl MIAs*. Btidss Ataamineaesi Program Rep. Rent deeds. Chairman sf Dade Delegation Mager Aka Pmeisa. 'Aug bade CeanO• Miami -Dade Caramisaiosess RAWror balmy Dias. Qry 4 Maui — . Qty of Miami Commissioners U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard Commander Seventh Coast Guard District PUBLIC NOTICE 02-04 909 SE 1 a Ave. Miami, FL 33131 Staff Symbol: (obr) Phone: (305) 415-6736 Fax: (305) 415-6763 Email: brich@d7.uscg.mil 16591/3836 January 23, 2004 The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District has received an application from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6, 1000 Northwest 111 th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172-5800, requesting approval of the location and plans for replacement of a movable span bridge over a navigable waterway of the United States. WATERWAY AND LOCATION: Miami River, mile 2.1 (3.36 km), NW 12th Avenue, Miami, Dade County, Florida (T53S/S35/R41E). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposed project consist of replacing the existing double - leaf bascule bridge with twin double -leaf bascule bridges. The bridge crossing has become an integral part of Miami's present local transportation system and provides an important line for surface transportation across the Miami River. The existing bridge was built in 1929, so it is deteriorated and in poor structural condition and has a sufficiency rating of 20 out of 100 makin.g the bridge structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. Improvements to the NW 12 th Avenue drawbridge are required to accommodate both vehicular and marine traffic to help sustain the regional economic entities. The project will improve traffic flow as well as pedestrian flow along NW 12th Avenue, in large part due to the reduced number of drawbridge openings. These improvements to traffic safety are expected due to the reduction of congestion and the increased roadway capacity. The existing drawbridge facility services such entities as the University of Miami -Jackson Memorial Hospital, the Ryder Trauma Center, Columbia Cedars Medical Center, the Veterans Administration Hospital, numerous related medical facilities, the Richard F. Gersten Justice Building and various State, County and City government facilities, all of which are major employers in south Florida. Major community facilities include the. Orange Bowl to the south, and Bobby Maduro Stadium and Miami -Dade Community College's Medical Campus to the north. The roadway network also services a portion of the Miami River Marine industry (Merrill -Stevens Dry Dock Company). The proposed replacement bridges will provide for three lanes of traffic in each direction for a total width of 110 feet (33.5 meters) and 677 feet (206.3 meters) in length. The existing drawbridge is an undivided four -lane urban arterial roadway with four 12-foot (3.6 meters) traffic lanes, no shoulders, a 10-inch high curb, and a sidewalk on both sides and is 60 feet (18.3 meters) in width and approximately 677 feet in length. The crossing point over the Miami River will remain virtually the same with widening predominantly to the west. 16591/3836 January 23, 2004 PUBLIC NOTICE 02-04 COMMENTS: Our final decision to issue or deny the permit for the proposed replacement drawbridges will be based upon the effects of the project on navigation and the environment. Interested agencies, organizations, and individuals are invited to express their views, in writing, giving specific reasons for support of, or opposition to, the proposed work. We especially encourage comments on the project's possible impacts on minority and/or low income populations, if any; on the adequacy of the proposed navigational clearances; and on the need for a fender system. All interested agencies and persons are requested to comment on whether the proposed drawbridge replacement project is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species listed, or proposed to be listed or result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitat that might be present in the area. Comments should be sent to Commander (obr), Seventh Coast Guard District, Room 432, 909 S.E. l S` Avenue, Miami, FL 33131-3050 and should be mailed to arrive on or before 30 days from the date of this notice. These comments will be made part of the case record. The project manager for this bridge permit application is Mr. Brodie Rich and may be contacted at (305) 415-6736 or by mail at the above address. Enclosures: (1) Permit application drawings 3 PENSACOLA 4311141111t%!f 'l ACKSONVNIE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT PLANS F INANCIAL PROJECT ID 249640-I -52-0I (FEDERAL FUNDS) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY STATE ROAD NO. 933 / NW /2TH AVENUE END PROJECT STA /99+20.00 SURVEY M.P. 2.699 EQUATION: PT STA 184+11.77 SURVEY BK.= STA 184+12.96 • SURVEY AH.= TO HIALEAH EQUATION: STA 219+60.83 CONST. BK.= STA /79+6%.77 @ SURVEY AH.= END BRIDGE (No. 8706621 STA 273+60.42 € CONST. T 53 S T 54 S TO CORAL. GABLES BEGIN BRIDGE (No. 8706621 STA 266+75.42 CONST. BEGIN PROJECT STA 261+80.89 € CONST. M.P. 1.994 TO NORTH M/AMI TO CORAL GABLES cc N v CC W v 4, 6* fibt/P T 53 S T54S TAMP 0 '' �1 MAPLES 0 Illri KEY WET PROJECT LOCAT ION PIERCE 1 2 Mlles TO MIAMI BEACH LOCATION MAP PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF MY 12TH'AVENUE DRAWBRIDGE OVER THE UMW RIVER, MILE 2.1 (3.36 km) Y/AMI, M/AMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPLICANT: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OWNER: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHEET I (of 4 1 DATE JULY 2003 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2003 e Channel / t WO 11r 1 /, O rd..►..i�dmit A st#raiAZarardr.. 4 `:�. r AIP" 4Iliil:t-iite4Pl--A"rlfm"rM7 1NIAiVALWIWJWARJ2 w A _ vawrmsmro IL AliFfr r Adiar -rz.,:rd-z_ 4,, r�m/—i��/--ii�I1►��� ,r iv/t���i�%�.r��slF►�� ,.i�._ - �.�ql��' Ii� r # olor AMR 4 AF i if /VoALA /" $\ 0 30 60 90 /20 Lat/t/ud e: 025°46'93" Longitude: 080°12'88" PROPERTY OWNERS 0 ACKERLY COMM OF FL, INC 5800 NW 77 COURT MIAMI, FL 33/66-3509 02 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT/ON 1000 NW 111 AVE MIAMI, FL 33172-5800 °HELEN PULTS & M/CHAEL SWEETING 120/ NW S RIVER DRIVE MIAMI, FL 33/25 ® MIAMl-DADE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 111NW 1ST MIAMI, FL 33128-1909 05 MERRILL-STEVENS DRY DOCK CO. 1270 NW /1 ST MIAMI, FL 33125-1601 © CITY OF MIAMI, DEPARTMENT OF P&D ASSET MANAGEMENT DIVISION 444 SW 2 AVE, SUITE 325 MIAMI, FL 33130-19/0 FEET LOCATION MAP 'ROJECT DESCRIPTION: N.W. l2TH AVENUE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE NO. 870662 OVER MIAMI RIVER 'OTES: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NAME Lull C SIGNATURE CERTIFICATE N0. 4117 6›st DATE' PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF ANY 12TH AVENUE DRAWBRIDGE OVER THE MIAMI RIVER, MILE 2.1 13.36 km) MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA APPLICANT: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OWNER: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHEET 2 (of 4 ) DATE JULY 2003 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2003 1 1 I I I Ackerley Comm. of Florida Inc. State of Florida, DOT Latltlude: 025°46'93" Longitude: 080°12'88" 60 40 — 20 — 0 — -20 43 H e/ en Pul is & Michael Sweeting Bulkhead MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Bulkhead - overall Le • PLAN th = 677'-0"(206.3 M1 Channel / 0 Merrill -Stevens 60'-0" p8.3 MI Dry Dock Co. Exist. Brldge Bulkhead City of Miami Dept. of P&D I Bulkhead 30 60 90 /20 FEET City of Miami Proposed N.W. l2th Ave. (SR 9331 • City of Miami Dept. of P&D 132'-0" (40.2 M) Span l m� ¢1 7 N L 132' -0" (40.2 MI Span 2 100 year Flood Elev. = 9'-0" Al! elevations based on National beodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (N.G.V.D. - '291 IIIIIIIIIillil n1nrnnII II II 1111 Existing Minimum Between Fenders Existing Minimum Closed Position at = 10' -0" (3.0 k(1 (17.7 MI Bascule Pier 3. 58'-0" (17.7 M) Bascule rtil Between Bulkheads -�. P, lef 4 Iv7 ! 1, VII'I�I'I I MHW Ef. 2.10 ft. jabil'I'I'l' 132'-0" (40.2 M) Span 4 165' -0" (50.3 Ml Span , /50'-0" (45.72 M1 /�► Mtn. Horz. Clear. UM 1�1 - - 701 nne,nr�r nr rn. 11ni 111111nunu11........ II I ;,Approx Mudllne """" "El. -16.5 ft. Horizontal Clearance = 85'-0" (25.9 Ml Vertical Clearance In Face of Fenders W L 1.0.00 ELEVATION ft. �Cnn_ rnfrt nmmnnnnn 11 1r 11 1. ,. 11 .1 1, 1. 11 ,,.........1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: N.W. 12TH AVENUE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE NO. 870662 OVER MIAMI RIVER NOTES: 1. Span 3 are Twin Double -leaf Bascule Spans. 2.0veralllength of Existing Bridge = 627' -I" (191.1m1 3. Volume of fill below M.H.W. El. = 2,496 cubic yards 4. Affecting 0.2acres of wetlands. FORMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP©! T MD©N NAME: .L[/ SIGNATURE ( ,L//�- CERTIFICATE NO. a{L el,)(,, 60—FT. 40 — 20 0 -20 — -40 PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF NW I2TH AVENUE DRAWBRIDGE OVER THE MIAMI RIVER, MILE 2.1 (3.36 km) MIAMI, M/AMl-DADS COUNTY, FLORIDA APPLICANT: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OWNER: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHEET 3 (of 4 1 DATE JULY 2003 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2003 Unlimited Vertical Clearance Between Tips of Leaves with Bridge Full Open 125'-5" (38.23 M) M/n. Horiz. Clear. (Between Tips of Leaves) 75' Minimum Vertical Clearance Between , ace of Bulkheads with Bridge Full Open 150'-0" (45.72 M) Min. Horiz. Clear. ;I I I, I: 12 4,4 • I� I0 Io Ico Profile Grade o It, I 72° 00' 00 Bascule Pler Footing L c_o 26'-10/2" (8J9 Al) Min. Vertical Clearance u) Face of Bulkhead rs- (Brldge Closed) M.H.W. El. 2J0 ft. (Between Bulkheads) 29'-I0" (9.10 M) Mln. Vertical Clearance Channel (Bridge Closed) I Approx. Exist. River Bottom -/6.5 ft. 22'-II%p" 6%00 M) Mln. Vertical Clearance m Face of Bulkhead (Bridge Closed) CLEARANCE DIAGRAM WEST LEAVES SHOWN - EAST LEAVES SIMILAR) Bascule Pler Footing ROJECT DESCRIPTION: N.W. I2TH AVENUE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE NO. 870662 OVER M/AMI RIVER 'OTES: The controlling /ow member steel is the outboard main girder of the North-East Bascule Leaf (Min. Vert. Clr. = E LO ° ODA DD [ PARTIAEN4 OF T ° ANSPOO TATOON NAME: SIGNATURE ,/� CERTIFICATE NO. l 403O DATE /i .I4 3 PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF MY I2TH AVENUE DRAWBRIDGE OVER THE MIAMI RIVER, MILE 2.1 (3.36 km) M/AMI. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. FLORIDA APPUCANT: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OWNER: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHEET 4 (of 4 1 DATE JULY 2003 REVISED SEPTEMBER "J3 1 THORN GRAFTON, ARCHITECT, AIA ARCHITECTURE PLANNING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, HISTORIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. #202, Coral Gables, F1. 33134. 305.461.4007 305.461.6002 fax COMMENTS ON MUSP - ROYAL ATLANTIC 1001 NW 7TH STREET, MIAMI 2/26/04 1. The project is out of scale with the surrounding historic neighborhoods. The primary problem is height. (2) 280 foot -tall buildings is unprecedented outside of the downtown / Brickell area. Since when does such unprecedented and incompatible scale get rewarded with an up -zoning? In my opinion, and as a matter of fair play, the mantra of property rights should not be raised until the issues of neighboring property rights are satisfied. 2. The proposed buildings across the river are taller than the distance than they are separated from Spring Garden properties. Winter afternoon sun angles will cast shadows on portions of the neighborhood, including 2 parks where residents come to enjoy the view at the river, as they have for decades. Why has the developer not attempted to work with residents and come up with a scheme that would minimize this obvious problem? Why has the developer not addressed the concerns of the residents of an abutting historic district? The zoning district lines between Spring Garden and Royal Atlantic join in the middle of the river. Therefore you are being asked to change the zoning adjoining a historic district, to allow a project that is obviously incompatible with the scale of the historic district. If approved, this will make adverse headlines in the Preservation movement across the country. Your Planning Department is supposed to help keep you, and all of us in the City, out of situations like this. 3. The residents of Spring Garden pursued and achieved Historic District status at great sacrifice of the possibility of achieving a quick financial return, preferring instead the road of making a place to call home for generations. Again, the expectation was not having a looming backdrop demeaning their special context. 4. The largest buildings south of the Jackson Memorial complex all the way into East Little Havana, east of 12 Ave. to all the way to the edge of downtown, (in other words for a very large radius around this site) are about 8 or 9 stories tall at Victoria Hospital. The buildings at Jackson and Cedars are not that much taller, and are part of a distinct district or node. Will there be other tall buildings to join this on the horizon, so that some day it may be compatible with a new context? Not likely, and not unless the Commission continues to up - zone the surrounding properties. Zoning classifications in the immediate area, while R-3, 0, and G-I classifications exist that would theoretically allow unlimited height buildings, the reality is that these classifications are applied to small blocks, half -depth blocks, and to one smaller piece of government owned property with a currently viable and compatible use. If built the Royal Atlantic project will look like an example of incompatible spot zoning, because that is what it is in my opinion. t.Qrafton(iPmindsprine.com Florida Registered arehitect #8200. Member, American Institute of Architects since 1980. to Printed on recycled paper containing a minimum of30% post consumer waste. PLEASE RECYCLE! to COMMENTS ON MUSP - ROYAL ATLANTIC 1001 NW 7T H STREET MIAMI 2/26/04, p. 2 5. The C-1 classification entitled Restricted Commercial being sought for this project is, to quote the City Zoning Code, located preferably in areas served by arterial or collector roadways, or directly accessible via mass transportation systems. The impending expansion and reconfiguration of the 12th Ave. bridge will alter the roadways in the area significantly, and eliminate southbound left turns onto 7th street. While not a traffic expert, I was certainly expecting the future of the traffic situation after the bridge expansion to be dealt with more convincingly in the developer's traffic study. Another reason the C-1 classification may have been inappropriately applied here, due to greater detachment of the street from the current traffic flow combined with increased numbers. 6. The traffic analysis appears to be contradictory. The executive summary states that the traffic on 7th Street east of 12th Avenue adjacent to the project will increase an additional 43 to 51 % of existing peak traffic levels. It then goes on to conclude "that with or without the project there will be only a minor level of deterioration in the level of service to those roadways most affected... ". Since when is a 50% increase at rush hour a minor deterioration? For instance, the peak afternoon hour will generate 354 vehicles entering and leaving the project's driveway. That is 6 per minute or 1 every 10 seconds on average, enough to make getting from one side of the retail storefronts to the other across that driveway quite exciting during this after -school hour. 7. Starting in 2002, I began to work on historic preservation efforts in the historic Spring Garden neighborhood. I was pleased to find out during a presentation of the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan that the prototype development proposed for the mid -river section was low to mid -rise mixed use and water -dependant industrial business, which would have minimal impact to Spring Garden. The plan was a good one — it would have strengthened neighborhoods in mid -river, by making places that over the long term retain overall property values, and retain value as desirable places to live and work, ie. quality of life. Why has the essence of the Miami River Corridor Infill Plan been ignored by some of the same entities who helped write it, help fund it, including the City Commission? Just to get a riverfront greenway? A greenway could provide many benefits to any sized project, as part of overall good design and neighborhood compatibility, not in place of it. Projects all up and down Biscayne Bay ware putting in shoreline walkways and understanding how to manage them. This access to our waterfronts while not guaranteed, is becoming a part of our community identity. 8. The ability to revitalize existing neighborhoods that possess human scale and historic character with compatible new development is the essence of good urban design. Urban design is meant to inform Re -zoning and urban design is meant to inform the MUSP process. The notion that anything can go anywhere is no urban design, with individual mistakes able to create grave damage to much larger urban systems, for years to come. The Royal Atlantic, as currently planned, radically out of scale with its surroundings in this low -scale riverfront neighborhood, is such a mistake. Until these issues are corrected, you need to defer this project. This summary report and opinion was prepared on a pro-bono basis, at the request of the residents of Spring Garden. I am a resident of the City of Miami. - Thorn Grafton, AIA THORN GRAFTON, ARCHITECT, A 1 A ARCHITECTURE PLANNING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, HISTORIC & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 901 Ponce de Leon Blvd. #202, Coral Gables, F1. 33134. 305.461.4007 305.461.6002 fax Professional Resume (abbreviated) THORN GRAFTON, A.I.A. Florida Reg. Architect # 8200 Principal Architect FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION: Environmentally -sensitive, sustainable site planning, building design & construction techniques for environmentally -oriented projects. Historic rehabilitation, adaptive re -use, new additions to historic resources. Community Design & Development planning for urban and inner city neighborhoods. Project design & planning for persons with special needs and disabilities; elderly and children. PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: (1976) B. of Architecture. TULANE UNIVERSITY School of Architecture, New Orleans, La. Professional continuing education courses, at U of Miami, F.I.U., & Harvard Graduate School of Design PROFESSIONAL: (1979-current) as Partner or Owner of own firms for 24 years, Thorn Grafton, Architect, AIA, has been responsible for appx. $92 million in construction values over that period, not including a variety of community planning and master planning studies. Historic / Community planning, and Architecture, partial list: Opa-locka Boulevard Main Street Improvement project Feasibility Analysis for 1929 Sears Building, incorporation into the Performing Arts Center Miami Master Plan for Seacamp, Big Pine Key, FI. Miscellaneous Newstands, Restaurants & Bars, Miami International Airport, appx. 22 individual units Allapattah Activity Center (community center for the elderly), for the City of Miami Toussaint L'Overture Elementary School, Little Haiti (Zyscovich & Grafton Architects) National Trust for Historic Pres. Planning Grant — Convention Center Hotel vs. historic district of South Beach. Post -Hurricane Andrew New South Dade Planning "Charrette" team leader for regional transportation issues Brownsville Renaissance Center (inner-city Caribbean village -style retail shopping center) St. Agnes Rainbow Village Child Care Center in Overtown. Historic Royal Palm & Shorecrest Hotels, part of Royal Palm Crowne Plaza Resort, Miami Beach 340 space Park One Collins Ave. Parking Garage, Miami Beach historic district Stranahan House Museum, Ft. Lauderdale, incl. urban design for Riverwalk Plaza adjacent to Las Olas Blvd. Historic Master Plan for Cauley Square, South Dade. AFFILIATIONS: AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, member 1979-2003. Board of Directors, 1989 — 90, & 2004. Chair, Miami Chapter AIA, Committee on the Environment, 2002-03 UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, part-time Professor & Lecturer, 1985 — 2003. MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS BISCAYNE NATURE CENTER, 1988-2003, President 1993 — 95. Chair of Building Committee & helped raise $800,000 in our share of funding for project MIAMI DESIGN PRESERVATION LEAGUE, Member, 1979 - present. DADE HERITAGE TRUST, Member starting 1991, Vice President, 1997-1999. METRO-DADE COUNTY SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD, 1995-2004. MEMBER, CITY OF MIAMI URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD, 1998-99. MIAMI CHAPTER, US GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL, Steering committee member, 2003-04 t.gratton @ mindspring.com Florida Registered Architect #8200. Member, A merican Institute of Architects since 1980. Printed on recycled fibers made from 30% post consumer waste. PLEASE RECYCLE! ▪ • • acosowa sours R'VCR N.W. 11TH AVE. ZONING PROPOSED: C1 W WruOLGEO IP MI F001f9M1 MOSS 1.01 AREA w.__2_. N.W. 7TH ST. (A TIMESCROSSLOTIREN 122.531 SO. F1. .32<� 381169 50. fl. I.•...._ Brtto, Cohan Associates 4242 1.IRn. Ik,m 9.1E 200 CR141 ONK Rah 33146 Ti 205.6113.13102 FAX rumen Rolm. 0.1111 RIOSTM,d N11W MOLRID MVO.CON, . IxA550C. 2003 ©µl RInnS RESERVED OC 6. ▪ W` = • CeB ommoN Fz. Q..ct 8 a 0 Og OAF streowe 10/23/00 LL4S0. AFRr,91M 0314-01 de me MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT A0.4 a a i 75 2 a a O ( 80'-0. NEW PHASE 2 r PHASE 1 N.W. 7TH ST. PHASE 1 L. FARTA9WIDI PHASE PMSE2 TOM 0 r.A* (RESI E/1101) S.091 Sf. 2.267 Si. 0.559 S<. O 7.AA (REIAI) 6.5E7 Sr. 5560 II. 12.197 SI. O r.AR (901- RCSE0I705) ' 9.051 Sr. 59T SI. 7.921 Sf, 1012E NE2 C4.010110 91 WE 15,719 u. 12.696 SF. IA427 Sf. Q R01- CAR 14157 Sr. 1420 Sr. 51,797 Sr. 1012E COWED SPACES 52.201 Sr. 30.992 If. 63.224 SS. WAGE 11,071 Sf. 27.993 SI 57.065 Sr. 0A2 OJT 0 CWAR E ASSOC. 2005 7LL )4Gn75 RESERVED Brito, Cohen Associates IMP GROUND FLOOR PLAN A1.1 • LL.,4,Lic_#101_4/441.1 fLATA034.411C9 1/44.32 A 144/322 TOTAL 0 rALIT 5.176 SI. 4345 Sr. 9,321 S.T. 0 MCP- 114,4t 2102 U. 1342 sr. 6.320 U. 0 WW1 36.116 ir. 39.500 Si. 74,690 Sr. AKA CALOULIED IN FAR. 5.176 U. .145 Sf. 9.321 Si. AMA 1101-5.5.O1.A110 91 MA. Z972 SE 3,363 Sf. 6,„320 SF. TOTAL CC400 V/423 _11_4215/. 743 V. 15,64157. 08:TO. k ASSOC, 2003 r11,4 ..... Brit°, Cohan Associates mew.: kal $ib 210 Ome Calm 'YAM 33/ 46 Td. 18.861.3182 rIO 335.56311,112 FUND, 4106110 11116114.104 wife A10:611.1 C DEVELOPERS ,www APPuCADO. v• . SY SECOND FLOOR PLAN A1.2 c DSBocA k.em.- do.+.e. i OCT0110111.11113 AUGUST Z2. MJ. MA. SXTlT LS-1 i i r .n. MI n1761Hb Y.ultu.n O .�Y cra lr.w[sl Brit°, Cohan Associates 462 tNaa. I..l Sub 20( Cad Cobh*. RAM 33t66 TM. 36UoettR Fix X6R111e116 Roo, WNW 423531%10. um" maxim ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS 0 CIL OCR Q I 0/22/03 •.uSp. •••.. 0n O31.-0 ©BRIM. Ca,. • 655C0. 2003 µ� pip1T5 REARl.0 VOW SITE SECTION NORTH/ SOUTH Ntl A2.1 .04 3 r�. F— w w w w w w , w _. of u w w w w u w W w w w w u u u u u w w w ww ww ww ww ww ww u'.w w Hill 1111 ■I 111 111111 11.1- J% I■ lints F Nl �U .r6 • ��W a�i■ �a� 71t1, 1 iilril In 9.1111111 11 I. i ii a 1 min 1� IIIIII''�.�.IAaiw�ir'uee. gnit.4l■�nm D1;lw9tllu, SIII III ®m�-¢�81eu.4uygl�mA 91s.Ym` P.m.4�>a�®�.'�ta��l x9i,/� 1 l< Y1 .....iiri ���� ,Yr■ �� i= rr/�iIC�:E1�1�a .ijJ ■ i�il ���ly��d:1J1)C l�— � RETAL PHASE II GATE HOUSE RETAIL GARAGE ENTRY NW 7TH STREET PHASE I L�i- Brlto, Cohan Associates 4042 IA3..r elm! srl. Iro Coal Calks. flee!. 33116 T1 X6.66311163 fAf X6141DO112 ROW. NO.RCC 1661KAMM 1fl ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS DC ILA DC as. NIZOID 10/I3/0.3 WISP. lscir 1 N 0314-V OM NO MIA. /BMi^or.�e SOC. 3003 SOUTH ELEVATION PHASE I AND U A3.2 1 1 1 1 1 1I I t'lbr° •24fir4P.'- .4M-444"" 4t&ARP-4— •02.4.34"'"`" 'MIAMI RIVER - RIVER WALK POOL PHASE I El B3 EH Ei3 EB RI RI ER B3 ER RI GATE HOUSE NW 7TH ST. Brlto, Cohan Associates 4042 44800 Road 540s 20) Oaal 0201.2. ? 3314 Td. 325.0132162 FM =scam n.cao, KOS000. MOD NiC033179 ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS ILI Ce <8 10/23/03 1.31. •PPLIC.T. 6314-01 PHASE 1 WEST ELEVATION 0811110. CC.A“ k ASSOC. 2003 A3.4 I 1 1 0 P. \0314-01 YI( 71rr Apt.\PRELIM—DESIGN\PLOTS\A3.5.Arp [I IXI7] Oet 22, 2003 2.3 NW 7TH ST GATE HOUSE W w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w ww OT n n�l111��l� r MINIM IE-n n H Htipu . '1 !!I!!1! N H !lIAn!!I mA!1!!! N H !�! !e a Ilia!!<I In II II" �!! _�! lsr�lll�. W w !! � W 1!f w W 119PIRICAP I!1l11!!11 11!!4,:= " F lII!lIrJ- w . nlRa "1!! n n HMSO n,IJ! IEI!u n IA:: ! : " w u . !! n wu !Ili W !! u n n u y. W W{,,},�, wwI�i11..w..,> Ilp. w ¢�wy ! n 11 1![�f!l l W WallN. W 1� W W w w w w PI rh:w W W •,. !! w w w 0111114 W W W >; • POOL RIVER W PHASE 11 w w w w w w w w IOWIOWRIVER Brito, Cohan Associates KL. 1t Weave Read Shc. ]0 ORd Cal., Amide 731.6 TeL X6.663J1162 305.84ee2 m, RpMOO R0, a[06.Y01 MAW .013129 ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS Ind deed 10/13/03 IYIL. IPP/ATIO. 0314-0I ORat T0, CC... i ASSOC. 3003 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PHASE IIEAST ELEVATION A3.5 w w WwW w ww 11li rvI un 1sG yw1 �I���6 1sin �� A- �• 1�y 7'.�il��a�l,a'r N.1 �..-t �.7r 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 i liver Apta\PRELIM—DESIGN\PLOTS\AJ.6.Evp (11XI7J Oct 22, 200J 3'02 11 UPPLIIIIIIIM1111211!!! it 1.11initgiff- 11 11 !!A!!!!LZ II II 11 11 �`1I-l.. 11 U ! J! M!!!N :!! W N !!I:'11P.!!n!RI! IEVI!! 1 !!!!At!!L"I'11.." N Lump! 1 r! lA11 11 11 .111l1 1 M U RIII`1 _!! 11 N u 11, a I11*1111rn a !'1! 1 •IUUUI1!I 11 !! 11 u u 11 a IIIIJIII u u 1111! 1 u II�a011`1 .1! u 1 1.!!I! Ill ' n1D(i a 11 1 1 -! I11111Lf1 11 III11 11 11 II AIIiL1 11 N 1 !!tom !�!�!!I !! a :!!1! 1 n! !!!�1 !!_L !! 11 1111 11.. 11 1m11 11 11 11I1 TI 11 _�11�11�1!1ry1 11 11 �11 We Il. Il 1 1llc., W 1 !,.:.,eS�a•'gl� W ,ll W,�,. �lIIIIl1 if- 11 1111 !!!! u N 11 I q 11�1�111AI1 11 11 11 11 ll �����!I u N lI a l! !! 11 11 ! 1! 1 n !1! a e m 0 l 1 1., 71 01, � II w w �.y 1111110!!!I1uI1n a `:11E,; II, 1 :Z ;a. u H .: nee gui a ilnn l�lr!II ni +1�+Iii i p el it uiiminel n �Lu lffYuji 1� TOWN HOMES SERVICE COURT NW 11TH AVE Brito, Cohan 8 Associates 4942 iabn Iced Ms 2W Coal C40199 Rola 3314S u 3:691913I12 FM .13I0611/12 naea Mama mnsmunt rea MmeIA ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS NW 7TH ST. ©BAIIO. CON. • ASSOC. 2003 ALL NlLH IS RESERVED OM MONO. 10/23/e3 guy. »WAOI 0314-0I Omma M▪ O MN MO, VMS PHASE 1I WEST ELEVATION ONO A3.6 1 1 1 0 a b eamilma Uhiu11i III I::I IIIuIIII alIIIlI1111. 111ui11WI1l;�RII111 I 'II::I I::I�ilunl�Nll�u��1���� 1����lllnl�ln 1 I:GMG:I I I�.III IIl1 I1111111111111;;11 IIMI11111111 111111 G:Ii:I L.I IIIN!11l 4N111I�U11�r•� IluIalIIUIIullIIII IIUI::I 1::I!.11e1111ons4UOIIIgl1�u:.w1JWnpomillI1`:Ira 1::1.2211WI.Iu11�11P111111111�""INIIuIIIIIIM CIII III Ir.1 I::u IIILlille"I11IuIIII111 111::01::111 1111111.1111 1I11II JI::1 1::I gl.ul.I 141iq P1111 � 1111111PulI�IIJ11.111!. 1I I I::u:: U.!. IIuI _ ■u.� lu1� III1111!■:•.IIII 11 r•u::l r.:n�iI111�gtu�:uulnlJl.nll�Ic�nli■1nng11■::ulll /lIVa1::1 I::u:: III�IIIII.:IIIPIIII 1uIl O lull UIIlnl� Jlul ll 1•:u:a I::II:.n1u■11I11•:Il,IulIIIHI lUI11JlNIIIIII-1I111:1!! mumII1i1111 111II1 pI1pIIe'1I :ilplllU1011 1t 11 III I::1 ca 111!IIII II110111yphIl :n11 lIM�1111 �Ji11111 �11:1 1 ��11/gl��lllu11�1■111 no g11U1u1IIonnIII 'mann 1 u • alI■IIII IIPIII111IIhm II11tu/ll u■1111 II I :uI I JI% �l_ /ri gP1711 gO11O11111 I I1uI1iulull! 1 RI 4 4" 14. I u.: I IIIu1 :n1UgU uq1: 1 nu1i 1uI IlII1 "11tp q L:II::1 1 I1.1:11111PIPMM1Uullllltl� �I�111J111111N:11111n11C.1r.:1 -- -- - 1 I 1 I/111'1111/111111111�II 1111�1111u11 ��"' 1t III IIII►IIhIIII Ilir' III131 " ' "" """""'�'' II 1' 'Q`'1I'Uu'"''111 "I I T .■ 1^.1 III ■All i�'. 111 I 11. 1�IJPI. ;91111 .TI ■AfYI_N '\!711111111'hI1f�1111wr -�w f■ 1 1 I it ■ ,rail' I .IIL o� Gi =a' {kfllll ,11Jl�lh. a it.,IY 1 �nll ■ IILa IIJ(tlAlllufil: IYn/g11GYf ■ 1Y�IYII1%w�il ■ ■ TOWN HOMES RIVER WAU( MIAMI RIVER PHASE 1 111l II...III n1 1 11� II�UmGllillll ioli4";ingiimuu .1, I1U 11II1LLL-I (1■' ,' 1in�11tA111111 1 111.101=11=a141 III I1• I'••i1-111 _.,I yliw��i icriwAil:'. 1,1 1..'11COMIV.!'IIII 11.-L-u.=ll.II 2 l 1i_ -.Y. 1,1• � [1111 ,,I ►A �JLIIIP' ' •P ig'-. n'i:.., 11:..�iV111� 1-l^, I1m:I:ug�11i111Iin n .� '" .■ _ IINToIMul1I1111 I u- ffassw11IAI 11�1111. JCL. I • If /� 17+1u/ IC:71/••Iiiiiiiiiiii CA liliiiiiii TOWN HOMES PHASE II ©efhlo. COIMI 1/ASSOC. 2003 .LL 0,00,0 RCSCR4CO Ma' Brito, Cohan Associates OAi I.Y.. A..1 Sal NO lbN Gm.. PAY 371N Ti IdIQ1142 Da MAIM 110.1 roam R061..■I luau 11®aA ••Y•l • ;► DEVEL•PER‘ AAA 0AI WOO MINSIOS 10/23/133 .uv. ENCATO' ern ode Ms EEO. WE mlw, NORTH ELEVATION PHASE 1 ANDRIV11 RIVES A3.1 VI 11 C I I I li I I' l' I O at Ora T Ma WIL fax 111111. OWN OW • t • n--5.----_ .w.irvn _r er .. - --- - - rk• {3-" - - --1=4 — .1^.rmL - ----- WI an is " -r eL• �S.d _s — --+1 On VII • -IF"`° ------ • n'" I------1- • " - --- noon Gain Anna CAW !Maw &ant Anna Saar Lan.6 AEA VII II an an O -� WOO VII osI 140 VW A an INT on W I A ow LOW an A an VII VW A W I WOOW OWNW WOOW Ft N 9 aa— a 1JN as 9 Na� N VII aa— a� aa— aU 9as a — a aka— a, a a — a� a— a� aa— a: a— a aa— a WI A aa— a aa— N VII VII • a — a. — N aG On A Brito, Cohan -- 3 — Associates — - —4142 Wow 46 S104. Soo Drd G— RAM 33146 T. 30526111112 333.1631662 VII VII ©84140, CM.& ASSOC. 2000 ALL MG15 PCSFA4CD rA. • • • T • NTIC DEVELOPE • W ce Qg nat MAO o 10NN1 runs. APPUCA1. 0314-01 SITE SECTION EAST/ WEST A2.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: lroct A of SPORTSMAN'S PARK SECTION -A', occording to the plot thereof. os recorded in Plot Book 50 of Poge 81 of the Public Records of Micmi-Dode County, Florida. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: - This site lies in Section 35. Township 53 South, Ronge 41 fast, City of M;omi, Miami-Dode County. Florida. - All documents ore recorded in the Public Records of M;om;-Oode County. Florido unless otherwise noted. - Lands shown hereon were obstrocted for eosemenls and/or rights-of-woy of records per Commonweolth Land Title Insuronce Compony Order Number 50150400CA, effective dote of June 3. 2003. All casements and or rights-of-woy of record per title commitment that ore plottoble ore shown on (his -Boundary Survey. With reference to said Commonweolth Lond Title. I hereby certify os follows: SCHEDULE B - Section 2 1-4 Stondord exceptions 5 Reservations, Restrictions, Dedications and Eosements of the plot of SPORTSMAN'S PARK SECTION "A", os recorded in Plot Book 50. poge 81. Affects porcel and eosemenls ore shown on survey 6 Reservation of rights contained in Worronty Deed recorded in Deed Book 4210. poge 50. Affects porcel, agreements and eosemenls ore shown on survey 7 Easement deed os recorded in O.R. Book 4210. poge 56. Eosemenl is shown on survey 8 Eosement deed a5 recorded in O.R. Book 3244, poge 341. Eosemenl ;s shown on survey - Bearings hereon ore referred t0 On assumed volue O( S87 54'25"W for the North Right-ol-woy line of N.W. 7th Street, sod beoring is idenlicol with the plot of record, end evidenced by two (2) found nail & disks no identification. - Elevotions shown hereon ore relative l0 the City of Miami Datum. being and Elevation of + 5.80 Locoted of the Northeast corner of NW 7th Street and NW 11 th Avenue. - Londs shown hereon ore lacoted in Federal Flood Zone AE (E 9) per Community Panel No. 120650-0187-J, doted Morch 2. 1994 and index mop revised July 17, 1995. - Dimensions ;ndicoted hereon ore field measured using o total station electronic distance measurement (EDM), unless otherwise noted. - Londs shown hereon containing 274,911 squore feel, or 6.311 ocres, more or less. - Precision of closure 1:10.000 - Commerciol Class Survey. - Roof overhong not located unless otherwise shown. - Underground improvements and/or underground encroochments not shown unless otherwise indicated. - Legal description shown hereon furnished by client. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: (N.G V.D) I hereby certify that this -Boundary & Topogrophic Survey wos mode under my responsible chorge on August 19, 2003. and meets the Minimum Technical Stondords as. set forth by the Florida Boord of Pralessionol Surveyors and Moppers in Chapter 61G17-6, Florida Adn,inistrotive Code. pursuant to Section 472.027. Florida Statutes. 'Not valid without the signature and the arfpnal raised seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyei and rAapper FORTIN, LEi VS';SKILES.INC., LB3653 Daniel C. Fortin, For The Firm Surveyor and Moppet:. LS2853 State of Florida. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPMENT ➢ The Market Analysis report for the Royal Atlantic indicates that the local target market supports an average sales price of $225,000 per unit. ➢ The financial analysis of the applicant indicates that the construction cost (hard cost) of the proposed 27 stories buildings is $50 S.F. ➢ The applicant indicates that based on the above assumptions, the developer will realize a profit of around $35 MM, with a return of 168%. ➢ The applicant indicates that after the purchase of the land, at around $10 MM, no significant amount of additional equity will be required. ➢ Based on current construction cost (hard cost) of similar developments currently under construction, it has been estimated that the appropriated cost per S.F. should be no less than $150 S.F. ➢ The revised development cost comparison (attached) indicates that the average cost per unit for the proposed development should be $333,000/unit. ➢ Assuming a return of 20% (industry standard) the average sales prices has been determined to be approximately $400,000 per unit. ➢ Based on the development cost comparison, it has been determined that the developer will be required to provide, after the acquisition of the land, no less than an additional $15 MM in equity. ➢ The proposed development will be competing with about 17 to 20 developments (similar in size and development cost) for a total of over 8,825 new residential units. ➢ The location of the proposed competitive developments is more desirable in terms of location, proximity to the water front, location on the river (lower river prototype of development), and access to the Downtown area. ➢ In order for the proposed Royal Atlantic development to be financially feasible, it will have to adjust the price significantly, and therefore, will loose its only competitive advantage, price. The required price adjustment to the average sales price of the units (from $225,000 to $400,000) is not supported by the applicant market analysis. 6, NEGATIVE IMPACT OF MUSP APPROVAL > If the requested MUSP is approved, the ONLY development permitted to be constructed on the site is the proposed Towers. Any variation will require the developer to resubmit a new proposal, and the process starts again from the beginning. (City various departments approvals, Miami River Commission, Planning Advisory Board and City Commission) > Because of the negative financial feasibility of the current MUSP request, the most likely scenario is that the site will remain undeveloped, in its current status, for a long , long period of time, until a new feasible proposal is submitted for approval. > Because of the high cost of land acquisition, around $10 MM, the positive financial feasibility of any new proposed development becomes very difficult to achieve. > As a direct result of the speculative proposed land transaction, and even if the development does not get built, all the available land in the surrounded neighborhood will reflect a substantial increase. This speculative land cost increase will negatively impact the Redevelopment of the East Little Havana Neighborhood, making almost impossible the development of housing and business available to moderate income families and individuals. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS A B Comparative Development Cost Proposed by Royal Atlantic (MUSP application) Phase I Phase I Units 383 383 Land $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Total S.F. 652,660 652,660 cost s.f. $ 150 $ 50 Hard Cost 97,899,000 32,934,000 Soft Cost (20%) $ 19,579,800 (25%) $ 8,233,500 Total Cost $127,478,800 $ 51,167,500 1 Aver. Cost/Unit $ 332,843 $ 133,597 Ave Sales price (RA) $ 225,000 $ 225,000 Profit (loss) (107,843) 91,403 Total Profit (loss) (41,303,800) 35,007,500 Break Even Analysis 1 Aver. Cost/Unit $ 332,843 $ 133,597 Investment Analysis Return on Investment 20% 168% Aver. Sale Price $ 399,411 $ 225,000 Investment Proforma Total Development Cost $127,478,800 $ 51,167,500 Bank Financing 80% $101,983,040 80% $ 40,934,000 Investor's Equity 20% $ 25,495,760 20% $ 10,233,500 Equity Provided Land 10,000,000 10,000,000 Equity Required 15,495,760 233,500 47 List of competitive developments; proposed and/or under approval Name Location Floors Units Cost Cost/Unit Ten Museum Park 1040 Biscayne Blvd 40 200 $ 70,000,000 $ 350,000 Mist 888 Biscayne Blvd. 58 516 TBA River House Lofts 350 West Flagler St 33 170 $ 80,000,000 $ 470,588 Metropolitan (MET1) 301 SE 3rd Ave 40 447 TBA One Miami 205 South Biscayne Blvd. 45 896 $ 300,000,000 $ 334,821 Miami River Village N. Miami River 3 & 4 Ave 48 1200 TBA Neo Vertica 690 SW 1st Ct 36 443 $ 80,000,000 $ 180,587 River Place 615 SW 2nd Ave 455 $ 215,000,000 $ 472,527 Brickell Commons 750 South Miami Ave 1700 $ Brickell in the River 27 SW 5 St 43 712 $ 200,000,000 $ 280,899 Carbonell Brickell Key 40 284 Brickell Bay Club 801 Brickell 38 275 $ 101,000,000 $ 367,273 The Beacon 30 SE 8 St 39 252 $ 60,000,000 $ 238,095 The Club at Brickell 1200 Brickell Bay Ct 43 645 $ 160,000,000 $ 248,062 Jade 1295 Brickell Bay Dr 48 340 $ 295,000,000 $ 867,647 The Sail 170 SE 14th St 30 152 $ 36,000,000 $ 236,842 The Residences at Brickell 170 SE 12th Trr 22 138 $ 28,000,000 $ 202,899 Total comparative Units under construction/proposed 8,825 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 City of Miami Project Development Project Report: 1996 - Present Summation Table ao 04 \G w1 o' ,/ / / y f / e • !/ COMPLETED PROJECTS 16 2,867 1,305 821,156 99,755 7,961 $1,130,761,144 $19,955,268 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 10 4,351 491 278,440 351,580 7,847 $1,096,886,559 $31,573,325 APPROVED PROJECTS 49 15,203 486 2,068,504 1,389,820 30,904 $5,218,655,446 $85,514,212 APPLICATION PROJECTS 15 7,081 271 770,316 213,313 11,385 $2,433,643,268 $34,514,549 PRELIMINARY PROJECTS 68 11,560 605 183,225 528,736 21,688 $539,553,377 $16,522,004 CITY TOTAL 158 41,062 3,158 4,121,641 2,583,204 79,785 $10,419,499,794 $188,079,358 j / Units Square Footage Cost/Revenue j /r�_L_.. _._. 7n 7/1/1A1 C: AllmyworklUrbanalogy Miami Development DatalDevelapmen! Project Report (04-0220) (Summation) Page I of 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I f I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 CITY OF MIAMI DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORT: 1996-PRESENT Total by NET Areas No. ''. :ras.7)li'R •:` .,_ .,, �;t1�,> . ^"".,: ,� Parking Spaces _.. .�o �1-J ..� ate? /... .., s 1 Ad Valorum Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail Construction Allapattah 7 1,896 0 337,000 71,429 4,567 197,354,692 2,788,918 Coral Way 18 2,421 0 832 59,017 4,044 267,093,336 4,734,230 Downtown 57 22,937 2,908 3,147,659 2,041,608 46,681 7,775,042,694 145,346,22E East Little Havana 13 1,643 0 22,000 32,318 2,241 114,091,770 6,028,569 Flagami 5 3,223 0 9,500 24,556 5,903 133,900,000 1,839,694 Little Haiti Model City 1 1 20 134 0 0 25,216 0 35,015 0 181 199 11,900,000 4,700,000 783,000 204,000 NE Coconut Grove 12 1,098 250 0 5,884 2,217 528,254,670 7,540,489 Overtown SW Coconut Grove 3 2 470 43 0 0 353,849 2,399 12,424 9,217 1,169 116 47,900,000 42,267,399 895,623 581,161 Upper East Side 6 730 0 195,582 130,200 1,833 297,452,195 4,233,985 West Little Havana Wynwood/Edgewater 8 25 2,006 4,441 0 0 0 27,604 47,786 113,750 3,952 6,682 10,000,000 989,543,038 0 13,103,460 TOTAL 158 41,062 3,158 4,121,641 2,583,204 79,785 $10,419,499,794 $188,079,358 eoruary tv, C: A1lmywork.UrbanologylMiami Development DatalDevelopment Project Report (04-0220) (NET Area) Page 1 of l I I i I I I I I I I I I 1 i I DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and Completed Construction (Sorted Al REPORT: 1996-Present applicable Class II & Special Exception Projects Projects t habeticall ) Description Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning District(s) C.C. Dist Rea / Condo o Hotel Mee Retail Parking Spaces FAR Construction Ad Valorum DRI (Y/N) Resolution Permit Date Permit Number C.O. Date C.O. Number Approval Date eme Type of Permit Address can Airlines Arena MUSP 601 Biscayne Boulevard 24,000-seat Multi -Purpose Arena for Miami Heat NBA Basketball team & other events Downtown 36 PR 2 0 0 37,500 40,000 1,147 176,000,000 2,464,000 Y 1998 I:arclays Financial Center (including Marriott) MUSP 1111 Brickell Avenue Office & Hotel w/acce gory commercial uses Downtown 37 SD-5 2 0 302 540,000 27,550 1,321 172,000,000 1,078,828 Y 1999 Children's Museum MUSA 980 McArthur Causeway (Watson Island) Watson Island (South Side) Downtown 22 PR 2 0 0 0 0 142 13,500,000 Exempt 26-Apr-01 loisters on the Bay MUSP 3471-3571 Main Highway Residential: Single Family Homes NE Coconut Grove 46 R-I, SD-18 2 41 0 0 0 98 0.72 (20%) 36,487,729 1,214,258 8-Dec-98 11-1u1.00 0-5012812 7-Jun-02 our Seasons (Millennium Project) MUSP 1435-1441 Brickell Avenue Mixed -use: Residential, Retail & Hotel Downtown 37 SD-5 2 190 426 243,656 I1,716 1,171 279,000,000 8,772,969 Y 1998 0-5018094 I andarin Hotel iami Stadium Apartments MUSP MUSP 500 Brickell Key Drive 2301 NW 10th Avenue Hotel with accessory commercial and recreational space. Residential Downtown Allapattah 37 20 SD-5 R-3 2 1 0 336 327 0 0 0 10,000 0 501 502 Information not given 25,500,000 680,000 216,750 2002 26-J111-01 ' atrot Jungle MUSP 901 McArthur Causeway (Watson Island) Entertainment complex Downtown 22 PR 2 0 0 0 0 588 46,000,000 250,000 16-Nov-00 I' .tz Carlton in Cacoem Grove • Tequesta MUSP 3300 SW 27 Avenue 2730 Tigertail Avenue 888 Brickell Key Drive Accessory function and commercial/retail apace Residential NE Coconut Grove Downtown 46 36 0, R-4, SD 19 0, SD-5 2 2 208 288 250 0 500 564 2.49 (44) 148,000,000 1,300,000 28-Apr-98 1995 wo Tequesta MUSP 808 Brickell Key Drive Residential Downtown 36 0, SD-5 2 273 0 0 0 438 Information not given 500,000 1999 ee Tequesta 848 Brickell Key Drive Residential Dowmiowe 36 0, SD-5 2 237 45,000,000 2-Jul-99 99-5010578 18-0ct-02 Mark (Yacht Club I at Brickell MUSP 1111 Brickell Bay Drive Residential with accessory commercial and recreational uses Downtown 37 0, SD-5 2 357 1998 e Metropolitan (Chateau Mirage) MUSP 2473 Brickell Avenue Residential Coral Way 37 R-4 2 199 0 0 0 319 19,400,000 119,000 22-Jun-99 99-5009829 25-May-01 e Mutiny Condominiums ache Club 11 (Homewood) MUSP MUSP 2951 South Bayshore Drive 2989 McFarlane Road 1155 Brickell Bay Drive Mixed Use: residential & retail Residential with accessory commercial and recreational uses NE Coconut Grove Downtown 46 37 0, SD-2 0, SD-5 2 2 383 355 0 0 0 0 5,384 4,605 705 465 132,573,415 37,300,000 1,959,463 1,400,000 Y 1998 1997 5-May-00 0-5008382 99-5002172 1I-Jul-02 9-Oct-01 (February 20, 2004) C: UUmyworklUrbonologvLNiami Development DalalDevelopmenl Project Report (04-0220) (Completed) Page ! of / L TOTALS 161 2,8671 1,3051 821,1561 99,755[ 7,961V�A 1,130,761,1441 19,955,2681 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORT: 1996-Present Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II & Special Exception Projects Projects Under Construction (Sorted p a etics y Type of Atlas Zoning C.C. Resl Parking DRl Permit Date Permit Number Approval Date Resolution Name Permit Address Description Net Area Pg District(s) Dist. Condo Hotel Once Retail Spaces FAR Construction Ad Valorum (Y/N) Coconut Grove Courtyards i i 2630 SW 28th Street Residential w/accessory recreational uses NE Coconut Grove 45 R-1 4 60 0 0 0 63 2,003,040 information not given 7-Mar-02 2.5004566 \The Performing Arts Center of Greater Miami MUSP 1300, 1301 Biscayne Blvd Entertainment complex w/4,880 seats Downtown 23 SD-6 2 0 0 0 0 0 163,000 000 13,700,000 Y 28-Apr-98 One Miami (Parcel A) MUSP 205 South Biscayne Blvd. Mixed Use: office, residential, commercial Downtown 36 CBD 2 900 0 24,000 17,000 1,200 274,474,625 5,407,154 Y 26-Apr-01 Biscayne Tower (Biscayne Plaza) Class II 2003-0150 1800 Biscayne Boulevard Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater 23 C-1, SD-20 2 175 0 0 24,136 291 Information not given Information not given The Club at Brickell Bay (Brickell Bay Plaza) MUSP 1201 Brickell Avenue Residential w/accessory recreational and commercial & retail uses Downtown 37 SD-5 2 641 0 0 13,149 786 154,770,665 2,597,772 1997 1-5007931 Brickell View MUSP 1200 South Miami Avenue Central Brickell area/Mixed Use Downtown 37 SD-7 2 600 0 30,521 23,461 843 96,109,791 2,107,546 Y 8-Feb-0l Espirito Santo Plaza MUSP 1395 Briekell Avenue Mixed Use development /accessory recreational uses including a health club/37 stories tall Downtown 37 SD-5 2 144 203 223,919 22,945 970 106,000,000 850,000 Y 26-Apr-01 Mary Brickell Village (Brickell MUSP 900 South Miami Avenue Mixed Use: retail, restaurant & hotel Downtown 37 SD-7 2 382 288 0 197,380 1,040 110,528,438 1,010,853 Y 2000 Main Street) Park Place at Brickell MUSP 1 SE 15th Road Residential/Mixed Use development in Downtown 37 SD-5 2 773 0 0 36,554 1,400 190,000,000 3,300,000 Y 15-Nov-01 3 phases / park -like setting. Modified The Jade (Bayshore Palms South) MUSP 1201 Brickell Bay Drive Residential w/accessory recreational and commorciaVretail uses (Phase I has been renamed "The Jade". Downtown 37 0, SD-5 2 676 0 0 16,955 1,254 Information not given 2,600,000 Y 1998 (Fehruary 20. 200.0 TOTALS 101 4,3511 4911 2784401 351,5801 7,847V A 1,096,886,5591 31,573,3251 C:1.40myivorktUrbancilogythliatni Development Data3Desrlopment Prajecr Reporr (04-0220) (Construction) Page 1 of 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORT: 1996-Present Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II & Special Exception Projects Approved Projects (Sorted by Net Area > Alphabetical> Date) Date CC Reso. Type of Permit Parking Spaces FAR (Boom) DRI (Y/N) Name Address Description Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning District(s) C.C. Dist. Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail Construction Ad Valorum 1-May-03 03-344 MUSP Univ. of Miami Clinical Research Buidling & Parking 1150 NW 14 ST Clinical Research Office Building w/Parking Allapattah 24 r Gil 1 0 0 336,000 60,000 1,410 157,794,692 2,424,168 26-Jul-01 13-Nov-02 Approved Modified Approved MUSP Class II Brickell Bay Village Apartments (Skyline) Coral Sea View 2101-2105 Brickell Avenue 1401 Coral Way Residential tower to be located along Brickell Avenue fronting Biscayne Bay/ Includes recreational facilities Mixed -use project w/ accessory recreational uses Coral Way Coral Way 37 38 R-4 R-4 2 3 359 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 548 92 88 000,000 696,364 I4-Dec00 Approved MUSP Coral View Residential (The Aston) 3000 Coral Way 2960-3014 Coral Way 2963-3019 SW 22nd Terr Residential/Mixed Use Coral Way 42 C-I 4 226 0 0 16,897 429 2.20 (28%) 12,915,000 479,247 23-Oct-03 03-0047 MUSP Gables Marquis 3202, 3232 Coral Way Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Coral Way 42 C-1, R-2 4 177 0 0 5,000 335 2.49 Bonus 81,588,336 949,889 25-Sep-03 03-521 MUSP Midtown Lofts 3179, 3181, 3185 SW 22 Terrace 3178, 3180 Coral Way Mixed -use residential project. Coral Way 42 C-1, R-2 4 85 0 0 2,800 131 2.21 (25%) 7,190,000 455,379 14-Dec-00 Approved MUSP 1060 Brickell Option "A" 1060 Brickell Avenue Mixed -use project, residential development in two phases with accessory commercial uses. Option "B" which was also approved included offices for the Dominican Republic Consulate to complement its 619 units; 5,000 sq. ft. of Office; 25,000 sq. ft. of Retail and 1,207 parking spaces ($270,357,783 Construction and $4,032,929 Ad Valorem taxes) Downtown 37 SD-5 2 543 0 0 25,000 1,022 7.05 (65%) 243,269,993 3,628,553 Y 2001 Approved MUSP Bay Parc Plaza (Miramar Centre (Phase D+III) 1744-56 N. Bayshore Drive Mixed Use: Residential, Office & Recreation Downtown 23 SD-6 2 635 0 92,260 18,112 763 217,841,343 3,310,034 Y 13-Jul-95 Approved MUSP Brickell Bayfront Club (Fortune House) 185 SE 14th Street Mixed Use w/ accessory recreational uses including a health club Downtown 37 SD-5 2 297 0 1,440 1,895 342 37,000,000 800,000 Y 23-Mar-00 Approved MUSP Brickell Commons 750 S. Miami Avenue Mixed Use Development Project with 5,000 seat movie theater Downtown 36 SD-7 2 1,700 0 0 585,938 3,241 8.00 649,896,708 14,461,545 Y Approved Modified MUSP Brickell Emerald (Brickell Premiere All Suite Hotel) 218 SE 14th Street Residential (Originally 120-room hotel w/1,000 sq ft of accessory retail) Downtown 37 SD-5 - - 2 142 0 0 0 183 132,573,415 1,959,463 /February 20. 2004) C: UllmyworklUrbanologylMtami Development Data)Develapnent Project Report (04-0220) (Approved) Page ! of 4 1 I ! 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 ( I APPROVED Date CC Reao. Type or Permit i3@1F-,r`Nr-Y,. Parking Spaces FAR (Bonus) DRI (Y/N) Name Address Description Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning District(s) C.C. Dist. Res / Condo Hotel Once Retail Construction Ad Valorem 17-Feb-00 Approved MUSP Brickell Grand (Brickell Summit) 1010 South Miami Avenue Mixed -use development project Downtown 37 SD-7 2 427 0 3,787 26,669 536 4.35 70,246,327 1,267,564 Y 26-Jul-01 Approved 01-782 Modred MUSP Brickell on the River (Approved 1995) 27 SE 5th Street Residential w/accessory retail & office (Originally 508 units+325 hotel rooms w/17,426 sf office and 30,729 sf retail) Downtown 36 SD-7 1 712 0 0 2,600 872 87,000,000 4,900,000 27-Jan-00 Approved DRI Brickell Square Phase II 851 Brickell Avenue Mixed -use: office -retail DRI Downtown 37 SD-5 2 440 0 0 16,350 644 27-Jan-00 Approved DRI Brickell Square Phase III 901 Brickell Avenue Mixed -use: office -retail DRI (Option B for Phase II is 560 units with 793 parking spaces) Downtown 37 SD-5 2 0 0 500,000 18,650 1,101 24-May-01 25-Sep-03 Approved 01.515 Ext. 9-23- 02 Approved Modified MUSP MUSP Brickell Station Towers Coral Station at Brickell Way Village 92 SW l lth Street 1470 SW 1st CT, 101 SW 15th RD, 104 SW 13th ST Mixed Use: residential & retail Includes Mixed Use development project, accessory recreational uses Downtown Downtown 37 37 SD-7 SD-7 2 3 718 204 0 186 0 201,400 17,550 62,333 1,346 1,267 3.17 254,514,604 233,583,668 3,790,290 3,563,984 Y 7-Mar-03 Approved Class II Fortune Plaza 1421 South Miami Avenue Commercial project Downtown 37 0, SD-5 2 0 0 10,405 0 22 Y 18-Dec-03 Approved MUSP Latitude (River Place) 615 SW 2nd Avenue Residential, Office, & Retail Downtown 36 SD-7 3 455 0 225,000 20,000 1,006 5.06 215,057,272 2,771,415 26-Apr-03 18-Dec-03 Approved Modified Approved MUSP MUSP Metropolitan Miami (Parcels B, C, D) Miami River Village 205 Biscayne Blvd. 300, 312, 316, 330, 340, 350 South Miami Avenue Mixed Use: residential, retail & entertainment Mixed Use: residential, retail, office & restaurant Downtown Downtown 36 36 CBD CBD, SD-6 2 2 1,500 1,304 300 0 9,000 92,043 218,625 32,532 4,284 1,992 5.38 688,306,558 235,000,000 9,952,832 3,200,479 Y Y 17-Jul-03 03520 MUSP Neo Vertika (Neo Loft) 690 SW 1st Avenue Mixed Use: residential & retail Downtown 36 SD-4 3 443 0 0 24,676 575 158, I89,810 2,286,161 Y 6-Sep-02 15-Nov-01 Approved Modified 9/23/03 Approved MUSP MUSP South Bayshore Tower The Beacon Brickell Village 1390 Brickell Bay Drive 30 SE 8n Street and 830 SE 1" Avenue Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Residential project /with accessory recreational uses Downtown Downtown 37 37 R-4, SD-5 SD-7 2 2 347 260 0 0 0 0 11,888 5,745 514 364 6.70 (44%) 102,873,438 1,494,514 Y Y 23.Oct-03 15-Nov-02 Approved Approved MUSP Class II DWTDRI The Mist The Sail Residential project 824 Biscayne Boulevard 170 SE 14th Street Mixed: Residential & Retail Residential project Downtown Downtown 23 37 SD-6 SD-5 2 2 516 152 0 0 22,500 0 29,300. 2,262 800 198 8.40 347,247,529 4,403,648 Y 25-Apr-02 Approved MUSP Watson Island Visitor & Aviation Center Watson lsland (South Side) Transportation Center Downtown 22 PR 2 0 0 0 0 180 0.17 6,400,000 Exempt /F. t,..,,,.,, ,n rnnet C: U llmyworklUrbanolog lkiami Development DaralDevelopment Project Report (04-0220) (Approved) Page 2 of 1 11 — — - APPROVED Date CC Reso. Type of Permit , .., .7 '„;A44.11#5,7..',, -WART'Z, —460A '4.iiiiiihiggffiWiftfOrAL.:::-: Net Area . At-..faiN10141-F0 Atlas Pg Zoning District(s) C.C. Dist. .. Res! Condo 7 Hotel ,„ ,`;' Awn. Office Retail Parking Spaces FAR (Beaus) D.A.R047144iiiggar Ad Valorum DM (YIN) Construction Name Address Description 22-Feb-01 Approved (1-01-85) MUSP Brickell By The Roads (Brickell West) . 529, 537, 545, 551 SW I 1th Street Residential East Little Havana 37 R-3 3 40 0 0 0 72 1,850,000 Information not given 25-Nov-03 Approved MUSP Roads End Village 928 SW 10th Street 915 SW I 1th Street Residential townhomes East Little Havana 38 R-2 3 26 0 0 0 56 0.72 Bonus 22,622,270 140,000 16-Nov-00 13-Dec-02 Approved Approved Modified MUSP ChM 11 Blue Lagoon Apartments Design Centre 4909 NW 8th St. 155 NE 38th Street 2 phases Mixed -use: Showroom, Retail, Warehouse, Office & Residential Flagami Little Haiti 28 16 R-4 C-1, SD-8 1 5 602 20 0 0 0 25,216 0 35,015 1,004 181 2.48 (44%) 63,900,000 11,900,000 1,839,694 783,000 27-)an-97 Approved PUD Northwestern Estates 800 NW 69th Street Residential: Single Family Homes Model City 12 R-3 5 134 0 0 0 199 4,700,000 204,000 22-May-03 03-077 MUSP Grovenor.(Naval Reserve Pro•erty 2610 Tigertail Avenue Residential project NE Coconut Grove 45 Gil 2 192 0 0 0 455 2.49 Bonus 178,919,466 2,551,959 15-Nov-01 Approved MUSP Royal Bay Estates South Bayshore Drive in Coconut Grove just north of 17th Avenue (1641 South Bayshore Drive and 1640 Micanopy Avenue) Single family residential PUD /one unit is a rehab of the existing historic structure along South Bayshore Drive. NE Coconut Grove 44 R-I, SD-18 2 3 0 0 0 6 0.80 (33%) PUD 2-1999 Approved MUSP Silver Bluff Harbor 1660 South Baythore Corzrt Residential project NE Coconut Grove 44 R-3 2 11 0 0 0 Information not given 93,500 25-Nov-03 Approved MUSP Villaggio in the Grove 2740-54 SW 28 Terrace Residential NE Coconut Grove 42 SD-19 2 86 0 0 0 119 30,271,020 421,309 1998 2002 Approved Approved MUSP SEOPW MUSP SEOPW Lyric Village & Lyric Dolts Overtown Transit Village West side of NW 2nd Avenue between NW 96-lOth Streets (Village) and NW 8th-9th Streets (Oaks) Overtown Arena Metrorail Station Residential Condos (Village - 54 units) Townhomes (Oaks - 42 units) Office/Retail Overtown Overtown 23 23 R-3, SD-16 RT 5 2 96 0 0 0 0 353,849 0 12,424 66 588 5,200,000 250,000 23-Ian-03 02-991 MUSP Grove Garden (The Taurus) 3540 Main Highway Mixed -Use Project, ground floor restaurant and and retail. Utilizing Taurus historic structure. SW Coconut Grove 46 R-1 2 43 0 0 9,217 106 1.39 Bonus 42,267,399 581,161 24-lan-02 2003 Approved Approved MUSP Special Exception Tuttle Street Project River Run South 3720, 3750 ,378O Biscayne Blvd. 399 NE 38th Street 293 NE 37th Street 2415 NW 16th Street Road Mbred-use project Residential Upper East Side West Little Havana 15 25 C-1, SD-8 R-3 2 0 0 174 0 0 168,000 0 115,000 0 664 314 2.45 Bonus 117,214,257 Information not given 1,677,668 Information not given 27-Feb-03 03.136 MUSP (Modified) Blue Condominium (Biscayne Bay Tower) 501 NE 36th Street Residential tower to be located along NE 36th Street fronting a Cit .ark alont Bisca ne Ba Wynwood1 Edgewater 15 R-4, SD-20 _ 2 343 0 0 0 480 72,000,000 450,000 — , — ....,..., C:IAlimpeorkVrbanologeWliami Development DatolDevelopment Project Report (04-0220) (Approved) Page 3 of 4 1 1 I l 1 f I APPROVED Date CC Reso. Type of Permit Parking Spaces FAR (Bonus) DRI (Y/N) Name - Address Description Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning Distrct(s) C.C. Diet. Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail Construction Ad Vaiorum 24-1u1-03 03-602 MUSP Quantum on the Bay (Metropolis at Bayshore) 1900 North Bayshore Drive Mixed Use: residential, retail & Restaurant Wynwood/ Edgewater 23 SD-6 2 752 0 0 8,470 845 328,532,563 4,58Z, 839 r0-FebA4 Non•Subatantial Modrj1 w ion m Preliminary Slage: 698 units: 1,900 sfOf/ice; 5,, 920 rfResmuranl; 2,057 sfRetail; 978 parking spacer 18-Dec-03 03-0294 MUSP Rosabella Lofts 421,425,447 NE 22 St.; 418,442 446 NE 22 Ter.; 2221 NE 4 Ave Residential & 4,200 sq. fl. Place of Worship with I 1 parking spaces Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R•4, SD-20 2 258 0 0 0 470 2.49 (44%) 42,000,000 I,I82,140 19-Nov-02 Approved MUSP Star Lofts (Bay 25) 704.712 NE 25th Street 19 story residential complex Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 2 55 0 0 0 75 40,744,027 576,816 13-Dec-03 M drfrcati n In Preliminary Stage 29-Oct-02 16-Jul-02 Approved Approved MUSP Class II Sky Residence Project (341h Street Tower) The Yorker 640 NE 34th Street 444 NE 30th Street Residential Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 21 SD-20 R-4 2 0 36 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 71 24,887,305 Information not given 438,830 Information not liven 11-Dec-01 Approved MUSP The 1800 Club 1800 North Bayshore Drive Mixed -use development project! with accessory recreational uses Wynwood/ Edgewater 23 R-4,SD-6 2 450 0 27,604 4,872 670 5.39 154,125,502 2,232,811 22-May-03 03.432 MUSP The Platinum Condominium 480 NE 30th Street Residential project w/accessory recreational uses Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 2 I l6 0 0 0 195 2.30 Bonus 51,032,944 712,936 C: UllmyworktUrbanologyU4romr Development DatalDevelopment Project Report (04-0220) (Approved) Page 4 of 4 TOTALS 491 15,2031 486 12,068,50411,389,8201 30,904 vim//A 5,218,655,4461 85,514,214 I I f 1 I I 1 1 I DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORT: 1996-Present Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II & Special Exception Projects Projects in Application Stage (Sorted by Net Area > Alphabetical > Date) Date Status Type of Permit Parking Spaces FAR (Bonus) Name Address Description Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning District(s) C.C. Dist. Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail Construction Ad Valorem 7-Jan-04 Application MUSP Hurricane Cove 1818 & 1884 NW N. River Drive Residential & Marina Allapattah 25 C-1. R-4 1 1,036 0 0 0 1,812 2.45 (42%) Information not given Information not given 7-Nov-03 8-Oct-03 Application Application MUSP MUSP Blue at Coral Way Tower Twenty -Seven 3170 Coral Way, 3163, 3165, 3175 SW 22nd Ter. 2700,2730,2742,2744,2746 SW 27th Avenue 2701 SW 27th Court Residential & Retail Residential & Retail Coral Way Coral Way 42 42 C-I, R-2, SD-23 C-1 4 2 190 181 0 0 0 0 4,135 6,400 331 307 22,000,000 32,000,000 986,353 1,047,998 7-Dec-03 Application MUSP Columbus Office Tower 50 Biscayne Blvd. Commercial Office, Retail, and Parking Garage Downtown 36 CBD 2 0 0 661,393 29,508 1,260 160,000,000 Information not given 6-Feb-04 5-Jan-04 Application Application MUSP MUSP Dupont Towers (Dupont Plaza) Everglades on the Bay Brickell Avenue & SE 4th Street . 244 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, Restaurant, Condo/Hotel Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Downtown Downtown 36 36 CBD CHD 2 2 1,290 870 62 0 0 0 29,992 65,549 1,481 1,146 767,054,570 376,767,008 10,643,159 3,528,134 6-Feb-04 Application MUSP Infinity at Brickell (Coral Way Development) 40 SW 13th Street Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, Office, Restaurant Downtown 37 SD-7 2 433 0 46,386 4,654 585 9.95 89,800,000 3,440,906 3-Feb-04 Application Modified Class II 2003-0071 River House Lofts 1 SW North River Drive Residential & Retail Downtown 36 C-1 5 182 0 62,537 22,000 513 1.72 Information not/ given Information not given 12-Jan-04 7-Nov-03 Application Application MUSP MUSP Villa Magna (Bayshore Palms North) Royal Atlantic 1201 Brickell Bay Drive 1001 NW 7th Street Mixed Use: Residential, Retail, Restaurant, & Hotel Residential & Retail Downtown East Little Havana 37 24 SD-5 C-1 2 3 1,208 744 209 0 0 0 34,975 9,400 1,474 1,073 7.24 602,766,932 82,519,500 7,324,426 3,338,569 9-Jan-03 Application Class II The Tower at Grand Bay 2675 South Bayshore Drive Condo addition to Grand Bay Hotel NE Coconut Grove 45 SD-17 2 62 0 0 0 122 Information not given Information not given 7-Nov-03 7-Nov-03 Application Application Modified MUSP MUSP Tuscan Place Kubik at Morningside 501 NW 7th Avenue, and NW 5th and 6th Streets 5600-5780 Biscayne Boulevard Residential project w/ accessory recreational uses Mixed Use: residential, retail & restaurant Overtown Upper East Side 36 14 C-2 C-1, 0, SD 9 5 2 374 293 0 0 0 0 0 6,700 515 476 1.88 (.07%) 42,700,000 180,237,938 645,623 2,556,317 2002 Application Class II 2002-005 Ice (Edgewater Tower) 701 NE 31st Street Residential project w/ accessory recreational uses Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 SD-6 2 100 0 0 0 120 Information not given Information not given 7-Nov-03 Application MUSP Onyx (Biscayne Bay Lofts) 665 and 721 N.E. 25th Street and 720 N.E. 26th Street Residential project w/ accessory recreational uses Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 2 118 0 0 0 170 77,797,320 1,003,064 /rat...,..., m mnei TOTALS 15 C: IAllmywarkl Urbonology Miami Development DataiDevelopmenf Project Report (04.0220) (Application) Page I of I 7,081 271 770,316 213,313 11,385 22 152,433,643,268 534,514,549 Date 28-Oct-03 25-Nov-03 3-Jun-03 28-Apr-03 27-May-03 25-Nov-03 30-Jun-03 3-Jun-03 17-Feb-04 17-Feb-04 Status Prelim. Prelim. Prelim Prelim Prelim Prelim. Prelim Prelim Prelim Type of Permit MUSP MUSP Class II Class II Class II 2004-0003 Name Aguaclara Allapattah Project City View Apartments Riverview Apts. Century Towers Coral 17 Condominium ' El Palmer DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPORT: 1996-Present Citywide Major Use Special Permits (MUSP) and applicable Class II & Special Exception Projects Projects in Preliminary Stage (Sorted by Net Area > Alphabetical > Date) Address Description 1960-1970 NW 27th Avenue Residential, Retail, & Office NW 36th Street/ 37th Avenue Mixed Use: Residential & Retail NW 14th Street and NW I5th Residential Avenue NW 25th Court/NW N. River Residential Drive SW I7th Road & SW 2nd Cou Residential 1726-40 Coral Way Residential 903 SW 13th Court Residential Emerald Plaza 3410 Coral Way Residential Keystone Villas of Coral 3590 Coral Way Mixed Use residential & retail Way Keystone Square 3538 Coral Way Mixed Use: residential & retail 7-Oct-03 Prelim. MUSP Nordica (The Sterling) 2525 SW 3rd Avenue Mixed Use: residential & retail Coral Way 23-May-01 Prelim. MUSP The Belmont (Lofts on the Coral Way and SW 32nd Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Coral Way Way) Avenue 8-Jul-03 Prelim. MUSP The Residence at Douglas 2263 SW 37th Avenue Residential Coral Way 18-Nov-03 Prelim. Class II The Roads Condominium SW 21st Road and SW 3rd Residential Coral Way Avenue 27-Jan-04 Prelim. MUSP 500 Brickell 500 Brickell Avenue 17-Feb-04 Prelim MUSP 900 Biscayne Mixed Use: residential & retail Downtown 900 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential w/accesso ry Downtown recreation; retail & office I0-Feb-04 Prelim. Class II 1451 Brickell 1451 Brickell Avenue 30-Apr-02 Prelim. Class II Brickell Bay Tower/Related 170-186 SE 12th Terrace Residential Commercial rBuilding ojeje t Downtown project Downtown 23-Dec-03 Prelim. MUSP Brickell Bay Yacht Club at 801 Brickell Bay Drive Residential : Additional Tower the Four Ambassadors w/residential & retail (Originally (Tower V) built 1968) C:14//myworklUrbano%gyMami Development DaiatOevelopment Project Report (04-0220) (Preliminary) Page / of4 Downtown Res / Condo Hotel 185 0 119 0 C-1, SD-14 3 C-I, R-2 4 C-1, SD-23 4 C-I, R-2 4 38 0 3 125 42 C-1 4 182 42 C-1 4 206 37 0, SD-23 3 57 36 SD-5, SD-7 2 633 23 SD-6 2 516 Once 1,000 0 Retail 2,700 8,729 Parking Spaces 374 213 FAR (Bonus) Construction 14,060,000 nformation not given Information not given Information no given nformation no given 4,000,000 Information not given nformation no given Information not given Ad Valorum 148,000 Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not given Information not information iven not ' iven 5,732 248 1 72 Information not Information given not given 0 13,120 308 Information not Information 0 19,645 922 8.55 Information not Information given not given 0 0 329 Information not Information given not given 0 0 102 Information not information given not given (46%) given not given 30,000 11,900 599 Information not Information given not given 37 SD-5 2 0 0 0 15,527 18 3.25 970,000 700,000 37 R-4, SD-5 2 138 0 0 0 155 Information not information 37 SD-5 2 275 0 0 8,000 458 given not given (February 20, 2004) I i I I i I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I PRELIMINARY Type of Atlas Zoning C.C. Res / Parking FAR Construction Ad Velorum Date Status Permit Name Address Description - Net Area Pg District(s) Dist. Condo Hotel Office Retail Spaces (Bonus) 17-Feb-04 Prelim MUSP Flagstone Island Garden 950 MacArthur Causeway 1050 MacArthur Causeway Mega -Yacht 50-berth Marina, Hotels, Residential, Retail, Restaurant Downtown 22 C-1, PR 2 0 605 0 221,000 1,740 235,000,000 11,200,000 3-Feb-04 Prelim. Class II Florida Grand Opera (Anderson Opera Center) 235-245 NE 14th Street Production rehearsal 527-seat hall, theater, w/ retail, office, and apartment units Downtown 23 SD-6 2 22 0 16,200 4,000 304 Information not given Information not given 25-Jan-01 Prelim. Class II Miacentralis Tower I SE 2nd Avenue at SE 1st Street Mixed Use residential & retail Downtown 36 CBD 2 155 0 0 15,000 270 Information not given Information not given I6-Dec-03 Prelim. MUSP Office Building 27 NE 9th Street Office Building Downtown 23 C-1 2 0 0 60,000 0 300 1.72 Information not Information SEOPW _ given not given 17-Feb-04 Prelim. MUSP Opus Biscayne Blvd & NE 13th Street Residential project Downtown 23 SD-6 2 404 0 0 7,750 543 Information not given Information not given 9-Jul-03 Prelim. MUSP Ten Museum Park (Core) 1040 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential, commercial & office Downtown 23 CBD, SD-6 2 200 0 13,712 10,668 395 4.72 1 Information no given Information not given 28-Oct-03 Prelim. MUSP 735 Condominium 735.745 SW 2nd Street Residential East Little Havana 35 R-3 3 22 0 0 0 33 0.75 2,300,000 2,550,000 21.Oct-03 Prelim. MUSP Brickell Vista (Brickell View/The Astor) 800 SW 9th Avenue Residential East Little Havana 38 C-1, SD-25 3 107 0 0 3,787 Information not given Information not given 6-Feb-03 Prelim. Class II Brisas del Mar 556 West Flagler Street Residential project w/ accessory recreational uses East Little Havana 36 C-1 3 160 0 0 0 80 Information not given Information not given 18-Nov-03 Prelim. MUSP Chanticleer Bayview Condominium 606 West Flagler Street Residential, Retail, Restaurant, Office East Little Havana 36 C-1 3 ' 233 0 22,000 11,000 497 2.49 Bonus Information not given Information not given Information 30-Sep-03 Prelim. Class II Havana Tower 1430 SW 1st Street Residential & Retail East Little Havana 35 C-I, SD-14 3 66 0 0 672 75 Information not given not given 3-Jun-03 Prelim. Class II La Palma 1040 SW 1st Street Residential East Little Havana 35 C-1 3 91 0 0 0 103 Information not given Information not given 4-Feb-03 Prelim. Class II Little Havana 1534 SW 3rd Street Residential East Little Havana 35 R-3, 3 20 0 0 0 31 Information not Information Condominiums SD-14,1 r ' given not given 31-Dec-02 Prelim. Class II 'Little Town 1215 SW 7th Street Mixed -use project w/ accessory recreational uses East Little Havana 35 C-1, SD-14 3 42 0 0 6,028 67 Information not given Information not given 13-Nov-03 Prelim. Class II Orion 420 SW 12th Avenue Residential East Little Havana 35 C-1, SD-14 3 60 i 0 0 0 112 4 4,800,000 Information not given 3-Dec-02 Prelim. Class II Villa Godoy Condominiums 1455-79 W. Flagler Street Mixed Use: residential & retail East Little Havana 35 C-1, SD-14 3 32 0 0 1,431 42 Information not given Information not given 17-Feb-04 Prelim. MUSP Keystone Park Condominium NW Corner of Le Jeune Road & NW 1st Street Mixed Use residential & retail Flagami 32 C-I 4 298 0 9,500 14,128 687 t Information not given Information not given 10-Feb-04 Prelim. MUSP Mediterranea 117 NW Le Jeune Road Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Flagami 32 C-1, R-4 4 185 0 0 8,428 362 1.72 18,000,000 Information not given 27-Jan-04 Prelim. MUSP Ocean Palace (Le Juene Gardens) 850 N.W. Le Juene Read Residential & Retail Flagami 27 C-2 1 492 0 0 2,000 1,012 52,000,000 Information not given 27-Jan-04 Prelim. MUSP The Towers at Blue Lagoon 4865 NW 7th Street Residential Flagami 28 C-1, R-2 1 1,646 0 0 0 2,838 Information not given Information not given 13-Jan-04 Prelim. Class II 2003-334 Grove Enclave 3024 McDonald Street Residential NE Coconut Grove 46 R-2 2 22 0 0 0 44 Information not given Information not given 19-Mar-03 Prelim. Class II Lofts in the Grove (Grovehouse) 2694 Inagua Avenue Residential NE Coconut Grove 45 0, SD-13 2 20 0 0 0 21 Information not given Information not given 7.Oct-03 Prelim. Class II Oak Park Village SE Corner of Oak Avenue & McDonald Avenue Residential NE Coconut Grove 46 R-1 2 10 0 0 0 20 Information not given hn.,n, Information not given 71) line) C. LlllmynorklUrbanalogylftami Development Data)Development Project Report (04-0220) (Preliminary) Page 2 of 4 I I I ( 1 I 1 1 1 PRELIMINARY Type of Atlas Zoning C.C. Res / Parking FAR Ad Valorum Date Status Permit Name Address Description Net Area Pg District(a) • Dist. Condo Hotel Office Retail Spaces (Boom) Construction 274an-04 Prelim. Class II 2004-001 3305 Holding Company, LLC 3305 SW 37th Avenue Office Building SW Coconut Grove 46 SD-2 2 0 0 2,399 0 10 Information not given Information not given 16-Dec-03 Prelim. MUSP 4300 Biscayne Boulevard 4300 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential, retail & office Upper East Side 15 C-1, SD-9 2 176 0 27,582 4,000 289 Information not given Information not given 25-Nov-03 Prelim. Class II 5101 Biscayne Boulevard 5101 Biscayne Boulevard Residential Upper East Side 15 SD-9 2 98 0 0 0 124 Information not given Information not given 25-Nov-03 Prelim. Class II 5225 Biscayne Boulevard 5225 Biscayne Boulevard Residential Upper East Side 15 SD-9 2 92 0 0 0 122 Information not given Information not given 27-5an-04 Prelim. MUSP 7460 Biscayne Boulevard 7460 Biscayne Boulevard Mixed Use: residential & retail Upper East Side 9 C-1, R-2 2 71 0 0 4,500 158 Information not given Information not given 16-Dec-03 Prelim. Class Il 1800 Point 1800 SW 8th Street Mixed Use: Residential & Retail West Little Havana 39 C-1, R-4 3 53 0 0 3,958 82 Information not given Information not given 25-Nov-03 Prelim. Class II 2120 Property LLC 2120 W. Hagler Street Residential West Little Havana 34 C-1 3 13 0 0 0 19 Information not given Information not given Prelim. Ayesteran Towers 700-790 SW 27th Avenue Mixed Use: Residential & Retail West Little Havana 33 C-1 4 141 0 0 14,000 334 Information not given Information not given 27-Ian-04 Prelim. MUSP Brisas Del Rio SE Corner of NW 24th Avenue & NW 16th Street Road Residential West Little Havana 25 C-I, R-3, SD-4 1 831 0 0 0 1,824 Information not given Information not given 16-Dec-03 Prelim MUSP Renaissance Pointe 2000 SW 8th Street Mixed Use: Residential & Retail West Little Havana 39 C-1 3 374 0 0 19,030 663 Information not given Information not given 10-Feb-04 Prelim. Class II Terrazas de Miami River 1861 NW South River Drive Residential West Little Havana 25 R-4 1 324 0 0 4,800 536 Information not given Information not given 10-Feb-04 Prelim MUSP Windsor at Douglas 1523 SW 37th Avenue Mixed Use: Residential & Retail West Little Havana 40 C-1, R-2 4 96 0 0 5,998 180 10,000,000 information not given 10-Dec-02 Prelim. MUSP 39th Street Project Biscayne Boulevard and 391h Street Residential Units w/ recreational amenities Wynwood/ Edgewater 15 SD-8 2 146 0 0 0 265 Information not given Information not given 18-Nov-03 Prelim. Class 11 5th Avenue Lofts (Le Lofts) NE 36th Street and NE 5th Avenue Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 2 32 0 0 0 52 Information not given Information not given 27-Jan-04 Prelim. MUSP Avant 238-274 NE 34th Street Mixed Use: residential & commercial Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 C-1, SD-20 2 WI 0 0 12,000 184 10,000,000 Information not given 30-Sep.03 Prelim. MUSP Biscayne Bay Village 1901 Biscayne Blvd Mixed Use: residential & retail Wynwood/ 23 SD-6 2 437 0 0 19,400 701 122,423,377 1,764,804 (Finger Development) 2010 North Bayshore Drive Edgewater 8-Apr-03 Prelim. N/A Biscayne Blvd./NE 23rd Street 301 NE 23rd Street Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 C-I, SD-20 2 63 0 0 4,800 119 Information not given Information not given 2-Sep-03 Prelim. Class 11 Cynergi 2700 N. Miami Avenue Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 C-2 2 100 0 0 4,624 256 Information not given Information not given 10-Feb-04 Prelim. MUSP Gallery Art Condominium NE corner of Biscayne Blvd. and NE 24th Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20, C-1 2 172 0 0 0 228 2.81 (63%) Information not given Information not given 16-Dec-03 Prelim. Class 11 Ice 2 630 NE 31 st Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 2 100 0 0 0 219 1.69 Information not given Information not given 3-Feb-04 Prelim. Class 11 Moon Bay 500, 510, 520 NE 29th Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4, SD-20 _ 2 61 0 0 0 70 Information not given Information not given nnet C: UllmywnrkVrbanologyMiami Development DaralDevelopmeei Project Report (04-0220) (Preliminary) Page 3 of4 PRELIMINARY Date Status Type or Permit g $ Net Area Atlas Pg Zoning Distriet(s) C.C. Dist. Res / Condo Hotel Office Retail Parking Spaces FAR (Bonus) Name Address Description Construction Ad Valorum 19-Aug-03 Prelim. Class II New Wave 725 NE 22nd Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 R-4 2 78 0 0 0 90 10,000,000 Information not given 10-Feb-04 Prelim. Special Exception Puerto Bahia 501 NW 36th Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 C-2 5 199 0 0 0 397 16,000,000 159,200 17-Feb-04 13-Nov-03 Prelim. Prelim. Class II Class II The Steps on the Boulevard Two Midtown Miami (Buena Vista Phase II) SE corner of Biscayne Boulevard and NE 24th Street NE 35th Street & Florida East Coast Railway Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Mixed Use: Residential & Retail Wynwood/ Edgewater Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 21 C-1, SD- 20.1 1, SD-27 2 2 120 331 0 0 0 0 19,320 16,128 200 403 Information not given 40,000,000 Information not given Information not given 26-Nov-02 Prelim. Class II Wynwood Lofts 250 NW 23rd Street Residential Wynwood/ Edgewater 21 C-2 2 36 0 0 0 40 Information not given Information not given TOTALS 68 C:Ullmy ork1UrhanologvWhamt Development DatalDevelopmeni Project Report (04-220) (Preliminary) Page 4 of 4 11,560 605 1113,225 528,736 21,688 v') S539,553,377 $16,522,004 Aplicacion de Audiencia Publica: PZ.19 03-416a (enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & asociado aplicacion de MUSP Aplicante: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC Peticion en oposicion a la solicitud del M.U.S.P, enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra, y el re -zoning que va a permitir Ia construccion de DOS TORRES DE 27 PISOS CADA UNO con un total de 744 unidades comercial/residencial en el 1001 NW 7 STREET en la zona residencial de La Pequena Havana. Nosotros, los abajo firmantes, deseamos expresar nuestra oposicion a la solicitud del M.U.S.P. (referido en la seccion de arriba), al cambio del use de tierra asociada y el rezoning que permitiria el proyecto "Royal Atlantic Miami River" en el en el 1001 NW 7 STREET, en La Pequena Hav;- La propuesta altura y tamano de este proyecto es demasiado grande comparado alas casas y baja densidad que tienen los vecindarios que hay alrededor. Este proyecto congestionara mas el trafico, nos va a traer contaminacion de ruido y luz, congestionara nuestras .escuelas publicas, y directamente impactara nuestra privacidad y derechos propietarios de los residentes que viven en o cerca de el Rio de Miami. Por to tanto, nosotros le rogamos a Ia comision de Icuidad que le niegue este p ido de el aplicante. Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma: li Nombre -It'IO (� t-Ik(Direccion: 2 Firma: Nombre: 0 tC'' (20 t Direccion: A - )JGL) (2 c:ic 3 Zj f zl D4 Fecha: Firma: Nombre: %--1, Direccion: k t Fecha: �(7�0c4- i Firma: Nombre "C),",o Direccion: -I ZD ',Oct)jZ C Fecha: 4F� IG`�? riro Norp re S0(S 1 S 0-0 I C 1 Direccion AAO t3 flec 33( 21 Z (2f© Fecha: 1 Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: IQ Firma: Firma: Nombre: % Nombre Direccion: V w ) late ( Fecha: Z((z/a(( Firma: Direccion: 750JetO�- Fecha: 1 f 2 `VD f Firma: Nombre:W1e12 Pl Nombre DirecciontOl S NW 6 Si' 4-7 `FC- Z1(7,/oci Direccion: Fecha: Firma: ombre t2 .� 6sf **6 Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: _'-k' \' _e G vV\ `"Nombre Direccion: \173\ "`� S Direccion: MpV- y *1-c c-c-\ 33 \36 Fecha: t\irma: Nombre: Direccion: Pu A-015--0-- P\c''' 1O4aC row • ask 1 �k• POI @mot c uc� TT"- Fecha: — - 'O�1 Fecha: Firma: Nombre Direccion: Fecha: i3 Firma: fr oNe366 Firma: Nombre: `+J d ')irst-- / (.0/ f? coNombre Direccion: (D 3 (o 0) co a S%-�j Direccion: Fecha: T" C Fecha: Fir a: a.v2-6,, 0 cE Firma: Nombre: )`-! 4'1 kri Jam' Nombre Direccion: /0-36 47r> 6 5/p'2 Direccion: Fecha: 2, _/2- — 0 4' Fecha: r J ' Firma: � "�L= F� Firma: LJ jROJ Jz[��ombre: �� Q {i ti Nombre Direccion: / yy sr 47% Itz Direccion: 1007( , 7:( 33(3G Fecha: Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion: Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: if Aplicacion de Audiencia Publica: PZ.19 03-416a (enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & asociado aplicacion de MUSP Aplicante: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC Peticion en oposicion a la solicitud del M.U.S.P, enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra, y el re -zoning que va a permitir Ia construccion de DOS TORRES DE 27 PISOS CADA UNO con un total de 744 unidades comercial/residencial en el 1001 NW 7 STREET en Ia zona residencial de La Pequena Havana. Nosotros, los abajo firmantes, deseamos expresar nuestra oposicion a Ia solicitud del M.U.S.P. (referido en la seccion de arriba), al cambio del use de tierra asociada y el rezoning que permitiria el proyecto "Royal Atlantic Miami River" en el en el 1001 NW 7 STREET, en La Pequena Havana. La propuesta altura y tamano de este proyecto es demasiado grande comparado alas casas y baja densidad que tienen los vecindarios que hay alrededor. Este proyecto congestionara mas el trafico, nos va a traer contaminacion de ruido y luz, congestionara nuestras escuelas publicas, y directamente impactara nuestra privacidad y derechos propietarios de los residentes que viven en o cerca de el Rio de Miami. Por to tanto, nosotros le rogamos a la comision de la cuidad que le niegue este ped. de el aplicante. Firma: Nombre: /b--/r C. )/1'61 Direccion: Fecha: IT Nombre: Direccion: 14) Fecha: Firma: Nombre: ja: � Nombre ,1.u-/%Z./dog_ OPc9O G' /91/-P(3 Q3)Direccion: a Fecha: Firma: LACE Nombre ( O ,/t4''/L �i/rn•, /L 33rz 1-e• 3 3 d.-4. 6 Direccion: V—/3A�-e(0 M��� /7 i, %-_ J ,,; 3 / ,e / g- O v Fecha: -- �_' `77 4c- 2erif Lb / S (7) 9/ 3-s%tiNombre % r\12 S /d t= 2__ Q L1 Gc G "'t �-r-9 t Firma: Direccion: dta N Cv j.3 , t/J.1. (&/cP ` I�� ,/a-✓- Direccion: 7 `/ % N 75/-_(-3_) .� 1 2 v Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firm Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: 2G Firma: 0-6, Firma: ©R� //2/4, ,P --- , Nombre 126",-1 i / 7,fo /_ We(for) Merl ; / ,4./ eS71-e 1,9" e /40 I/9 e0042a g& vD 74'e /ir^f,23/a--v-- ) 0 e Q• /t/(- (//(} 4-715e (W--,614 (&26'S7-1;-Ci :P66-9 a2/3 /94(0D<6 /Nm/ r-/,v�- /S f-thf Direccion: /1,"J//w 7 lD fci /2 4,1/ j=/ L53/'J Fecha: Firma: fil a4;,ct, l�v� Nombre/f%22 () / A • Direccion: 03V /ST (17b-s-D 4figiN Fecha: Firma:i I7;-4I N./0T fit Nombre �tJ .S--e � Direccion: trU Ala! / /9 -°r (/ /A Fecha: 50 Firm /j! /z7ie)/fleS41 Nombre4W---P 9 /7---o40.LJQ � PO ,f1 6/2/�/�r%Q 0,0,c/f).) Direccion: � ,LZ) % /L() T U /�1/�/7// Ff ,/ )- - / /7// t/ ,g,. / D-- i1 - d`7 Fecha: .'—. (-' O </ Nombre: ll Direccion: �00�ed/J fif/Q (/)D�J Direccion:/O3 v , 1 7sr‘70VD od)rq m/� /�/ /)" `� ' A m /f Fir _ & )- 7^ Fecha: 7( Fecha: /% 3 ( Nth C164(ei ' Firma: '%/i , (0 01,017 )6/z�i9/zi r:&> ly Nombre A#/ f 8 p //S Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: FiV't rma: g A0 /2001:MI4,0/0 06 '7/' ! Firma: j Nombre Of OW 01,69 —/ Direccion:;v 1 _3 � �, ( / 6)..) , %fe, /s>i/ /7, 3 C. Fecha: _ / 2,( "Firma: 76;63)0 Nombre V ��L j ,(/� d� — / OV ti2 7 S /. C / Direccion:-Ara ,U t) /3 iqt' .:9. 11\ ✓r Fecha: 3c7 Firma: � 7/2- C-Pd'S V2c7 G — 5'-�,_,Qr 9�%12 Nombre: Nombre Direccion: 7'��• �����Cf�� Direccion: l ✓'^rLv 7 sr. / 7) ,;i ' Fl, Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: 4y(1 Firma: Nombre: 07‘e /U S 1;t6 94212-5 3 /c4__c 4, c,),A, Fecha: Firma: I--' " �� Nombre ��% %(16 f'a/(1-1 7ST.- l/ / i) Direccion: -/ /,, F/ / C -/q — d (/ Direccion: POP tt /) /qt/,a, reiD' L fi'7f qG1%/� Fecha: c / v 7( Fecha: 4(7c;-,/ w u> / ,.71/, 600,9 /C/7/ , 3 3/ 5`(7— D- -e 5 l� Fi l rma: Nombre Direccion: Fecha: Ai /3 fc), (7°3� II�/'fli —11 1 Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: c,tli S,o.f/ S8 F0o a /3 ALI (7iD Direcci6n:7( /Ad /3 /(2')/9, v7.) VFecha: �1/� Nombre: Direccion: /t! Gi)cr���, tegvi •3 d Fecha: 114 Firma: Nombre: aEzi-ze" Nombre a 79n- /7i0 x% a c Firma: NombreO � ✓����� Direccion: 0 a%tr%/ WitO, D. iv Fecha: de r% /4 Nombre 2, )// # /2i Direccion: 7 / Direccion: � V GL) /3 /06, J 4ln?/. ' d r 9mr �, - �/ � � r""l � f r / j Fecha: ^/ 7-0 Fecha: ! 7 " Firm. ('er&rti ^ . Firma: Nombre: P//Y.rW✓/dam, iP /!J'9 Nombre Direccion: ;/ ©0i/ t) /3 /0t7 , (c26_Direccion: ); ,eii; -%i , / a'J Fecha: Fecha: Firma Nombre: /rl/,Q'ti /9A Direccion: / 0 7 iv al es/- /Nrcimij / 33/a- r" Fecha: t,!ek P fza ,11(2/3__(), S—) '%,C1, r/ / >- Ffrri'1a: Nombr 8'75 "/ //'— Direcc�n:7 V A/J7`(-6J /'1-i% li v Fecha: cv Firma: 5 Firma: Nombre: PiecA)-0°L T 3 / 1/& Nombre,2/ I1 `�il Direccion: //eel ST/- f Direccion: d GU t /3 Fecha: �J/tl Firma: Nombre: Fecha: ^ / I„C g --✓ Firma: Chi-P'c/L die/lf,612iNombr Direccion: VDU ���� /gv�c(��►%� Direccion:%% 3 it Z1 f 3 fD ► CL/ Fecha: Firma: /- (264 Nombre: v��',v��;=p//r1 e Direccion: t !�/�� /)A✓-0, (//-3 p //7// Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Fecha: Firm a:-< Nombre ,0 /U %/'s y i; ,fI /,D Direccion:rx1 Lr f � (?//D Fecha: AZtleirt,CA,cA, �• 5- Nombre 7)7_N? C -0 5 1n/ )Direccion: ��G ��''� /� f�Y.� (/)4 Direccion:���� �'' %�''i��' !���%� ��f Fecha: �fG Firma: Nombre: C/44 I,1 — Direccion: ' J 1�1/-P► (40 /) /fig "14, Fecha: c)" ~� _ D Fecha: Firma: is Co/j ,v Nombre atKi7 Direccion: 00 Fecha: qe9 Firma: Nombre: /1/42/4 Direccion: f/1/ei/ I / • : / .)-v Fecha: 2 - (9- t' `.4 Fecha: Firma G'/It',)5 Nombre At03 '- ? s 2 f Direccion: /zl / ' Fir: actE'L! Ndg �onrJ_ -E-I{,45 Firma: Nombre: u-1 Direccion: /4' Fecha: 6`f Firma: Nombre: Direccion: fYt'3 /lAT yr 5417 167 GLj / ,/, Fecha: Nombre . y1-fq- V cr— ICr' 4. 5otor7) a'1 Direccion: /I/D-3 /0_ 0- r _ tiJ; ar-17L Fecha: 9��G1 �[�4a: -2 Nombre Direccion: / 63 )j, Lcf~ 7 cf 7 /Odd / `f - ry Fecha: :� Firma: Nombre: a4/ Kao i; (Z`- 13 C� - Direccion: / (1-701- //it q // A / Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: • t62,7 Firma: h� 0(14 Nombre /Yl 7 p0/ � t Firma: Nombre Direccion: Fecha: 3 3 0-r- 0 / /3f/cd.� / Q N /% 3 /) `CO/ »p MI Fecha: ( 9 0/} do Direccion:/91 '& !0'/4 l c�S ,I;9/,9/0/f fJL. 3 3 /�-s Fecha: / y/0 y 9 Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma. Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: 11( Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: reA V-aa 4 i7R D4ombre / d 5 '/(N 17 S [3reccion: ,fee iJ; u/ f 3 ,d e r 0/‘? c/V 0 `\ //? / m % /[1, -e) \41 Li- Fecha: Firma: Nombre tzc G z d') . IV AVe. Direccion: Fecha: Q q Firm Nombre/) IY1 B ()St? 6 Vr��� Direccion: 1 C',d /y 'N '74c57( m/ / Fecha: 5V° Firma: hombre /ft'h /' i -7 0 JV D V C' f) 77%0 /(f �C/-3A`G<' Direccion: / .1 J : 1/ 1 e/ .7- /% fly - l - a Fecha: - 1 9- ( c U S1 rZtt �� L-,4\ Nombre OL/Ci is/ 11 Direccionl' ° %3 jV. W. 7d / - try-r/,. /A".‘q Fecha: c4 1' Firma: Firma: 2`Q!R-{,�,c_e-v' Nombre: � 9 C> VP �— Nombre ��C/ Direccion: toc / M-19, J Direccion:A/v` Y-I/(Pi62 1 Q • )7» 4 /17 � �%, ,_9:3 44 1 Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: cCi Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Firma: lit u,eFirma 16/1\„24.A. Nombre: n1R-6a# 4)`7. di 4I r� Nombre .. / 0 y i'. i?L Direccion: d' -' /et 0.(J 1`' Direccion:cr00 /0 a) / 3 iq l!Jr (0 ` -) 0)1,V? 11 ,/, :3 2. 7" Fecha: Fecha: D- / %'-' O ✓ /// o O842--/(1,.)C,h k'ait/9/P 60) j -0c-/ Fecha: NombreMO-% / F�/1--/Il.du�� Direccion:(°G 'v1A)/�/9//-0 ( ) Fecha: c j % e ;Ca: i '� AMA., lam, a fr / Pcz-a Nombre en 42.0v ('d0 ,e )/3/1✓-e0o / Direccionfoo /'✓>/? /qG/pc:_o — ( Firma: ai v �J"P�tV Fir a: /— ‘e_,_ ie9e-te Nornbre: 0/Q/Z✓6,U-el/t? N 1/4/Z' Nombr V/6/0r'.4 ') Ste% Direccion: "7z13 4J/. /7ST () Direccion: P/90' 'V ���-Q //� , ry Fecha: Fecha: )- — / 7 p ` Firma: fki< ( none Nombre: ,Ef- cA Q` k' $ Direccion: rOCo (4/ Fecha: — % J— Q CL Firr'na in (� Nombre: in °t-o ( /' Direccion: Fecha: qm Nombre: 0:5057 /I_a,t2 /472491A4S---//c 7-e) Direccion: 7j) ,i91/-2, J)i7/flit,/ 3 j �✓- Fecha: Firma: — -- cz- L 2 Nombre: Ei/gN5. ////2 Vf-g' ��- Nombre 0(4 g-i2r77T Direccion: Fob /.9v,z),C4 //,, Direccionf6V /8.'12/3 /91/42, (6L71)� fY/le 1/ r- Fecha: < / J --0 [Z Firma: Nombre Direcci6n:?00 /91/--,d<(0/�� Fecha: Firma:-wc, Nombre `J /D / S g filial )O4 Direccion: O5a G,��� .O'J /A /i // //, / - Fecha: Firma: •X 1' 6`46 ---) Nombre6k/aC:-:'I !4e9iW-° Direccion: F°O V t2 /) ✓,, lij j/q //'1 // >-V ( Fecha: Firma:4/6/4P-- r)v Firma Mc(' Fecha: ��' ire (o Firmla: ad6L 4 E- Nombre: Nombre r/2 >� CIP/2-)1q Direccion: exme) // Direccion:r00 N 1-t2 9/ A Fecha: D-' % ~ e c/ Fecha: -- Aplicacion de Audiencia Publica: PZ.19 03-416a (enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & asociado aplicacion de MUSP Aplicante: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC Petition en oposicion a Ia solicitud del M.U.S.P, enmienda de la utilizacion de tierra, y el re -zoning que va a permitir la construction de DOS TORRES DE 27 PISOS CADA UNO con un total de 744 unidades comercial/residential en el 1001 NW 7 STREET en la zona residencial de La Pequena Havana. Nosotros, los abajo firmantes, deseamos expresar nuestra oposicion a Ia solicitud del M.U.S.P. (referido en Ia section de arriba), al cambio del use de tierra asociada y el rezoning que permitiria el proyecto "Royal Atlantic Miami River" en el en el 1001 NW 7 STREET, en La Pequena Havana. La propuesta altura y tamano de este proyecto es demasiado grande comparado a las casas y baja densidad que tienen los vecindarios que hay alrededor. Este proyecto congestionara mas el trafico, nos va a traer contamination de ruido y Iuz, congestionara nuestras escuelas publicas, y directamente impactara nuestra privacidad y derechos propietarios de los residentes que viven en o cerca de el Rio de Miami. Por to tanto, nosotros le rogamos a la comision de Ia cuidad que le niegue este pedido de el aplicante. (9Y ( o Firma: (bk/rtANaoa, Firma: Nombre: )Q iC„Nombre Direccion: )U 5w 2 Si Fecha: o-( 1a 3 Firma: Nombre: Direccion: 'off Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: C� r Direccion: 7 Fecha: 4/-/Gf., Firma: ombre Direccion: f l 9 /0 1.1/%Q<L Fech'a:� Firma;%!Lb kilhiI Nombre 77 Ni4z/ /14 31 R $-' Direccion: oc6 Firma: Nombre: 1 i p t F O-D v Direccion- `ir/t W =13 of-v-t gy..( .:Direccion: 7 0 q #/0 -) .,3/2 Z 1 if /oi II, Firma: Fecha: �Q irma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: �� Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: {lt Firma: Nombre: Nombre echa: Firma: f/77- `9 i ,.-74 Nombre 7 /f/i /3�Yv l/2Tbireccion: /V/0.�� � , 3�/:� .A.41 rip% prio; 4,:p*„f, A rth P.dA 045 ,1,111! 114 ipohir Direccion: Fecha: Firma: Nombre: Direccion: Fecha: ci - / r b `f Fecha: Firma: Nombre Fecha: (Irma: ombre cpA— 11 4F, Direccion: 75-q mu ►3 FOJe-- Fecha: �I firma: Nombre S Direccion: 7 // 2 /9 v 3t0 ///? zoOU 2,9267 Direccion: dlAg/o Fecha: I f Fi ma: Nombre: Firma: Nombre Direccion: Tel- -1%61)-!3 Gip Direccion: Fecha: 2 - . D - O f - Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion: Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion: Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion- Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Firma: Firma: Nombre: Nombre Direccion: Direccion: Fecha: Fecha: Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 4.4 1 b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESI :1) MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND I AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW I I IE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STO I IV COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST THE MIA.MI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above i:ferzni ed M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allay he "Royal Atlantic Miarni River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Sprier GS•dc The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale withthe single fa; y and I nv density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and Smoue: ing ort and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over itilhe ur public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spri. • g Gan en residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Con itiss or to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the op &alit t ad neighbors can reach agreement on the proposed project. Sign Name: • Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: 7- Print Name: Address: Date: 3 Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 11 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: U18/2004 Sign Name: C1:00 I/Win*/ Print Name: r„".„... (3Er t_t9D0 tx.) ktx.ailk Qt»tAddress 91AA-4A-, t . •1 t. T. - DQWEt kihriAl 130V A3:1 D Date: / 0 /6- A). / hto Ft 3 3/1 5 36 Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: rn 1 cm a3t3 - Date: / d Sign Name: IA I Et: '4; tPrint Name: Address: MOW" LI, • , • / • 170 ) '01/104f Public Hearing Application: PZ19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ20 ; :9-041ft b (re✓mning), & associated MUSP applkatlon Applicant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST I :D MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND I iE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW T I IE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STOI:Y COMMERCIAIIRESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST �N THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above ;1 et m ed M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to :slow he "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Spcin.; GJai•de ts. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single farm I ,, an i 1 +w density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrom i I _rig u+e is, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over tan t ur public schools, and directly impact the privacy and piaperty rights of Spri; a* m residents living on or near the Alarm River. We, therefore, urge the City Comi :Liss*,to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alive, Defer the matter until the age m icar t a id neighbors can reach agreement on the ggrggio project. Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: nanooa -to D N W & as iM (z�. •i Or: , 33+3Io ►CD Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 4,1 to /y Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 :3-041( b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUEST . i D MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND 11 ` AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW T 1[E CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STOII_Y COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST I IN THE M1AMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above ;rfcien red M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow he "Royal Atlantic Miami Rivet" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Span! Ge7r �s. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single fam y aad ) riv density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and siuroun ing :ari is, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over :ttiliiz our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spn ;; Gar} en residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Con i nissioi to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, pc& the matter until the ap :1 icar It t ad neighbors can reach agreement on the proposed project. Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: 13 Print Name: Address: to &2004 Sign Name: It f. Print Name: :tinge - e- Address:: Nf,t) P2 s J 9, i'1 Mi P i-Xo -off teSS Pik,, Ca.L lDot tyvL 1 ILA+,r it'i WuAn`n+►,a [ �t_ -tip \ fib. fit' 4r- n t Sign Name: S e nJ •,{‘►1 %a-v-r K - L `. Print Name: r' 1 rJ - ,,,,, v tr-eAddrrss: r \ c' , et— '5 3 73 b Date: N. Sign Name: • ���, `1= t Print Name: 9410 "(eixr-tAddreaa: 3Q„ao,a0'4 Sign Name: Print Name: r. Y Address: 9 y5 Ma 7 , ;'f•' i j _ �» i4.m I , F'/ Date: - — o n Jir s3/3' -127 IL qa s AnJ 7 _ l t 2D—Of ' IV Pul is Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 ( t-041E b (re .oning), & associated MUSP application Ap licant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS,, LLC i PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTVD '•D MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND U''E AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW 'I ). :E CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STOI _Y COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST i N THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above fear :ed M? ;.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to .410H he "It( :'al Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Sprin Gai•dd as. The 3roposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single farru I ,' and J )w den 1.ty character of the Historic Sprang Gardens Neighborhood and surrounil rag ;irc as, anc t will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further oval' ►ur put c schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Sprii ; Gar en resi ents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Corn' sisstoi to Det the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the apj i _ ican t nd nei_ ibors can reach agreement on the proposed project. Sig : Name: Prit ' Name: CJ ?u L e s tVA oC/t Ado ess: / a 3G w w ,,e174r444si Re. rv► •�, r� Pc . 35 18C Dal . • 1-0 ) 'Lev 1' Sig Name: Pril Name: Ad. ess: `Lm' vni, F? 39 /.36 Dat /i2ayoy Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sig Name: ��N.Sign Name: Pril i Name: Adi ; ess: Dat ram"' Print Name: Address: 0.,e.i4titf 33/36 iIao/o�} Date: Sig Name: Sign Name: 21 Prii Name: lr'noL'1ftr -) 'Rarno l'N Print Narne: Ad' , ess: t o9t-o NIA, J. R; V Er 'Dr. Address: `'11i&M,, Ft- 313G. 1/9-c, /O `i_ 1/20.: )04 Date: Sip Name: Print Name: Z 3 Address: Date: Sign Name: 2 Print Name: C Address: Date: Sign Name: 2 5 Print Name: Address: 21. Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: , Sip Name: 1 7 Print Name: Address: 11 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: tit wow o Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: /YR " 0 9 Date: et,4, 64"6944frAiign Name: Print Name: 0 #Address: Date: Sign Name: Name: Address: tr4 4vt's-,43,4. Af4.11, 31.13t, t• 20, 04 ara1R.7)0.4 lobo botoconvei.,-7),-. A44).0,4 44.- 3 3 /24. Par,tAiX Ahv .7 A KcovA L. -CA WiEg•-.. I 2 Date: Sign }Jame: Print Name: Address: Date: V2-1 ifia; 7 s ..e .r)? 114•Pi a .! • 4. I cightor- ))," III,Paltsi PI 3: 6; a-INA-1;1.as. 7-1 C ct lo tA: (\f\ t trw 13p 13 t— -24 C - (\c; e ftiv of IA_ N1 exnfv% 1- 24 o Sign Name: AlPirrardkk Print Name: 'Tv\ q Address: c5&9L& Pg\IM Ot VV1-1 f Date: k Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: q5/ -7-13 ST.4 - 36 3 3 3- 4 3 3 3 5- Date: Sign Name: s Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: 5 Print Name: Address: 5-3 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sip Name: 5--c Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: ?tint Name: Address: 1118/2004 itw S 2.1 1.6 0 03-13J,'N5refto - 7v( 1j,j 7Th Q:D fit I 4 is ; J- 3 7 i i • (k01 P4--14A- "S 3 2 Date: Date: Awe. /Zia& _Lb IAN7A A A 1er3c N.W. 10_616 sms4upn A 4 - Sign Print Name: 6 Rp jj jj_ Address: 170 Al w F Pyriz, e•-t FL 3 ± Date: 'NA g•J - 21 r Sign Name: hie....e...-A , Print Name: dr.s.c544s4, "ese, .... N vin1444i Address: 9440 Alc., /D , • t. t • #71e4 p F-c.. - 3- 1 .'3<: ,.._ . 6 k )1rt 5Pre‘ 57 4 6 Date: ign Name: L A/Prbt Name: 'i 1R n/ vt/ rJ 0arif AtA/ElAddress: 042,•- fva A-ri 3 b c 1.vaf Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 0 Date: Lift97 Sign Name: r MI'A- I Print Name: Address: 621 e--fflaP if Date: 2 # iv .! iv r f • v--;-11-7-) tLlJL-: 6 6 3 AT--yes5ictr I] Di 0 etH. - Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: 4 Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: -it; Q,rPrint Name: 36. & to '1 rt, c Address: Sign Name: 6 / Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 1- a- I - a Y Date: - —Sign Name: dJ i L a a a rtA o .Y d Print Name: - A of 3-Address: t - 2 i- 0 4 '/- Date: j qts 110"1 Sign Name: ecLEyint Name: 3Y3 ' w S 4 ' Address: 2 I - o - Date: Sign Name: Print Name: 93 r a/ U) '7 loge/Address: ham/ , 1 3 313hh Date: Sign Name: ,." a Print Name: Address: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 1/18/2004 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 3 Sign Name: Print Name: of Address: 477' Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: QK Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 5 t, Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: f Sign Name: Sign Name: !r� Print Name: 0'5 f Address: i / 1. 2- ( a L( 4J• 3 41Pei3 Sign Name aed,ci j_ .eZ Lop e Z Print Name: Apytz,,vi `q Rrq c71 2_24 o/Al y Address: ?-,-� 33/3.6 (&P Date: Date: 1(Y ai-'i Gam— Pan S-e_� Sign Name: 'vv‘ cd. c-. ( 4 r C Print Name: -we) G, S s ddress: Jo -e l3tiry A, r Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: l I % , Name: rMtrA Print Name: 1 Address:% _ aw• Date: (�fk ITign Name: - e;(O (a 1;20 i rant Name: to r1JLL) Bit- . Address: 1 Date: ^Sign Name: S e 1 t i e 'Y(ak 1)rint Name: (a '1 i) L, : ~i Ata -Address: Print Name: a \}j? Address: 1/18/2004 5 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03.416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & assodated MUSP application Applicant ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND USE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STORY COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST ON THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above referenced M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow the "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Spring Gardens. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single family and low density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrounding areas, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over utilize our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spring Garden residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Commission to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the applicant and neighbors can reach agreement on the posed project. .1 Sign Name: ign Name: C. i cdie (�octU �M Print Name: Print Name: ,4104:,, �� 16 if o Address: C)7-p k) Lk)1 V Address:icily,' ti c r L .15) i 24o Date: ! a21 !) c f Date: 4419749 Z.. Z, 2.0 ill Sign Name: V y sign Name: Pen / ° I Print Name: Print Name: Pp,-,t_l p e. S F s I, e r Address: S` 7� � k Address: 93 o Al kv %1%�' ►', P., a !o s to Iv la3 Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Sj ,V t) Date: ign Name: Print Name: 1 v : ► t Address: -.,1U,. Date: _VW ±2-) 20 a!- ' Date: Sign Name: i CC , - - Sign Name: Print Name: Print Name: Address: Address: 1/18/2004 i t4-r►'; -L 33)3 1) p—j 1 Z •. ez 2,13 s.tQ / s�-1 /c v eon e. gaI( Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-016a (land use amendment), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (NLU.S.P), LAND USE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STORY COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST ON THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above referenced M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow the "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Spring Gardens. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single family and low density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrounding area and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over utilize our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spring Garden residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Commission to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the applicant and proposed project. Iy Sign Name: Print Name: Address: neighbors can 10‘ Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign N Print N Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: l i Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 1/18/2004 • s J- .4 l- It 4 1 ♦ AMEWAtiffirr ANSMISPW Date: Sign I�a e: 4 Print Name: (0 Address: 3? 3�-- L Date: n;i6V b u kb Gt— a c,((s1 c� Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: / Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 0 1 3 O 16 AJ CtA 13-7AIT Llos /-'1 tAr1- l ,3+36 ,3' Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND USE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STORY COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST ON THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above referenced M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow the "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across fi+om Spring Gardens. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single family and low density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrounding areas, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over utilize our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spring Garden residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Commission to Deng) the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the applicant and r nneighbors canAl : - '. ton the proposed project "sign Name: Sign Name: Print Name: 1�1�Zit�.��� • r Print Name: Address: Date: l Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 1/1sr2004 //ii,, Z -D Date: `( c P r Sign Name: Kcdfierrne_ E E. /4Goa: an Print Name: 7.13 Nw 1o, . Address: Mjam, FL 33;3C �oy Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND USE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STORY COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST ON THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above referenced M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow the "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Spring Gardens. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single family and low density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrounding areas, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over utilize our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spring Garden residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Commission to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the applicant and neighbors can reach agreement on the proposed project. Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 1� Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 1/1$/2004 1 i1/.4/yi / -- KATI•Ei.e M CA rER ►oZ5 �.W. W cr. MIAM1 FL 23a20p4 Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 1..0 -i- ign Name: Print Name: Address: d 0 a Ili 0-) I% C 16-1 4 y... r,•3313L Date: ,? 3 Ce-g / e o sl . Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 3� Public Hearing Application: PZ.19 03-416a (land use amendment), PZ.20 03-0416b (re -zoning), & associated MUSP application Applicant: ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS, LLC PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF APPLICANT'S REQUESTED MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT (M.U.S.P), LAND USE AMENDMENT, AND RE -ZONING TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 744 UNIT, TWIN 27 STORY COMMERCIAIJRESIDENTIAL TOWERS AT 1001 NW 7 ST ON THE MIAMI RIVER ACROSS FROM SPRING GARDENS. We, the undersigned, wish to express our Opposition of the above referenced M.U.S.P. application and associated land use amendment and rezoning to allow the "Royal Atlantic Miami River" project at 1001 NW 7 ST across from Spring Gardens. The proposed height and bulk of this project is out of scale with the single family and low density character of the Historic Spring Gardens Neighborhood and surrounding areas, and it will further congest traffic, cause noise and light pollution, further over utilize our public schools, and directly impact the privacy and property rights of Spring Garden residents living on or near the Miami River. We, therefore, urge the City Commission to Deny the applicant's request or, in the alternative, Defer the matter until the applicant and neighbors can reach agreement on the proposed project. ' 'Liign Name: / Print Name: Address: f m 6 6� Im Sign Name: Y -ft- c `,-7 - i Print Name: Date: i ign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 1/ign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 1/18/2004 r U Address: Date: Name Name Meric.i 4Q17 esPrin1N / D/Dn UJ ) st4So7Address: IY) 1 ec rn l IC/ 3% 3 b a -) q - U 4L Date: Sign Name: Print Name: a/ !) !l LUj/ . Address: f iettoj TL33/3 ' D 33/ 1 Date: Z°I Sign Flame: Print Name: l� ll-O fl��4A ddress: m Ii•m 1, ,3 (`2� .K4A,u) C- E, eA) (o(r, s i q lP 3oL f- .; : r- ( 3 3 1 3 L - o C iD t/f Sl f40/ -tR— oy Date: 13 0 Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sib Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sig11 n Name: Print Name: Address: Date: SignName: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign"Name: Print Name: Address: Date:3 j Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 1/182004 -/a f1/o Y Date: Sign Name: Ace L, S'G// c2 Print Name: d7-C �< Lta rr-�-4-/ Address: Date: ign Name: int Name: Date: Sign Name: Print Name: Address: 30 Date: ign Name: N -fl C Print Name: t2 ti 0 SW S' Address: t "tt F(A 33130 2 — D ci Date: Sign Name: / 4 c S iv „ j" /t v e '3 Print Name: •�/4/i, � fvA' 37/3o Address: - o Date: c, & e -' Sign Name: k r,- ( 13(049.1 Print Name: Address: site te5A v 24 Zit l by Date: 2 Sign Name: Print Name: Address: Date: 5'� I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ROYAL ATLANTIC DEVELOPERS / MIAMI RIVER MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL r � r r�ID rry®..� rr01 r r3m r rJ� rr��_ rral®' _ rr�®, rMIN r�{® _,® r r�� rrj®` M rr 3un rraw r ram®' r rang rsfi® rAng 6Bir? i@i r r ,j®uffi :TP111r r FEBRUARY 15, 1987 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I THE MIAMI HERALD 1 I I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 VOICL,'jmer-v.# = w„erw„ CXE&MIemmZWng Bua -eaBW - B , 13111,1 L. oz Zoning MOW R., R ., Rw. - BrIdell .a N. Office A... Dairensas r—1 1 j R.. = R .> - B .w.w„,rorcle...d„w.iw� w sw e - mre al./R Rs u eh wm mvrocNPnWerWlggiue(FAR rearvtn SLL,6 Ca. a0il wptl irreena Y_emiertltl0.S0400P. LJ R+ RLL1 R,., - wpm s.o p.,.aw 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN 4 4 1'4 Streetscape &IL`ghting Greenway Access Link 4.444444,;444.4;;-44 s su ina-wi •..t +ram . �. S. River Drive Greenway IJ■j -. ,eps� Greenway Access'Link4 Note: Step Back Heights From Rivers Edge Mid-Rise� J4 aJ G rceaway N.River Drive High Rise Development Miami River LOWER RIVER Note: Secondary use above industrial waterfront domusiikos Greenway S. River Drive Greenway Waterfront Miami River Industrial UPPER RIVER Note: "Mid -Rise" buildings to be limited to SD -MU & SD-CWR overlay districts Greenway Access Link S. River Drive relenway Industrial Use - ' I Gre�nway Giveaway N.River Drive Miami River Blueway Industrial Use N.River Drive Industrial Use MIDDLE RIVER The River as a Multi -Modal Corridor • MIAMI • DADE C Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER This vacant .'te adjaer • residen LuI '• paildng the f'f't t 11'4 PALMA - Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 23 MIAMI RIVER CORRIDOR URBAN INFILL PLAN VISION FOR THE RIVER Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Tnc.-June, 2002 Prepared for the Miami River Commission 31 amatit %/4 • CONDOMINIUMS • •-•