HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 2701 SW 27th Court.
CASE NO: 2003-0729
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 and Article 22 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed
for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 on Block 24, SOUTH BAY ESTATES SUBDIVISION (5 -
54), from R 2 "Two -Family Residential" to C-1 "Restricted Commercial".
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that the subject properties are currently under the same ownership of the
immediately adjacent lots to the west, facing SW 27th Avenue, a major transportation
corridor.
• It is found that the frontage of the subject properties is on SW 27th Court, and that the
character of this street is residential.
• It is found that this petition is part of a Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) for a mix -
use project named Tower Twenty-seven.
• It is found that the Land Use designation for the subject properties is already Re-
stricted Commercial, and this application, if granted, will bring into compliance the
Land Use designation and the Zoning designation.
• It is found that the theoretical potential commercial activities created by this amend-
ment will not be an intrusion into the existing residential neighborhood due to the fact
that the project includes town -houses on the subject properties with no vehicular traf-
fic on 27th Court.
Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of
the application as part of the Major Use Special Permit.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
CASE NO. 2003-0729
Yes No N/A
In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
- In harmony with established land use.
Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
❑ Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
C' Maintains similar population density pattern.
C 7 Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
Ill E. Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
LWL' Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
Has similar impact on drainage.
Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.
vej