HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 2003-0802
Monday, December 15, 2003
Mr. Allan Shulman offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN SECTION 1903.1 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD GRANTED THE VARIANCE FROM ORDINANCE NO. 11000,
AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION
401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, REQUIRED SIDE STREET YARD, TO ALLOW
A SIDE STREET YARD SETBACK OF 10'0" (15'0" REQUIRED) FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3689 LOQUAT AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS THE
EAST 40 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, 2ND AMENDED PLAT OF COCONUT GROVE PARK (1-
62), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL. THIS VARIANCE WAS GRANTED PER PLANS ON FILE WITH A TIME
LIMITATION OF TWELVE MONTHS IN WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Carlos Martell,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Charles J. Flowers Yes
Mr. Miguel Gabela Null
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza Yes
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia No
Ms. Deana Hernandez -Acosta Yes
Mr. Carlos Martell Yes
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes
Mr. Allan Shulman Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes
Mr, Georges William Yes
AYE: 8
NAY: 1
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 1
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 8-1
i
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Setary
Hearing Boards
Case No. 2003-0705
Item Nbr:
2
Motion:
Zoning Board Action on Petition for Variance
t the request on agenda item # Q., be (denied)
n that the requirements of Section 1903.1 (were) (were
ied by relevant evidence in the record of the public
a) as stated in the City's finds or fact, or
b) as demonstrated by the petitioner, or
c) on the basis of the following:
The Zoning Board shall make findings that all of the requirements and standards
of Section 1903.1 (have been) (have not been) demonstrated.
Circle appropriate condition(s):
a) Special conditions and circumstances (exist) (do not exist),
which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and
which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
b) The special conditions and circumstances (do) (do not) result
from the actions of the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of zoning ordinance
(would) (would not) deprive the applicant of rights commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the
terms of the zoning ordinance and work unnecessary and undue
hardships on the petitioner
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
d) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment to the individual owner as to the owner of other lands,
buildings or structures in the same zoning district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
e) Granting the variance requested (will) (will not) convey the same
treatment, any special privilege that is denied by the zoning
ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning
district
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
f) If granted, the variance (will be) (will not be) in harmony with the
general intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare
1) as stated in the City's findings of fact
2) as demonstrated by the petitioner
3) as otherwise stated below:
Signature Print Name
2. It"- 5-D3
Agenda Item Date