The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutprevious legislation• r4 ---ev,--.A:c4.4tf.d4b L11.T E.)?.E.; EFF1c,:E J-02-11I 2)4/02 RESOLUTION NO. 02-• 144 :.7e5 a‘p 16TO F.Q:2 A RE:SMUT:ON OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER no APPROVE THE FINDINGS OF THe SELECTION COMMITTEES, PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WORKS CATEGORY "3" DESIGNATED PRO,MCT5 FoR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED BY SPECIALTY :N RANK ORDER: AUTHORIZ/NG THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT WO TO EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A" FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRM; ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM INDrVIDOAL PROJECT ACCOUNTS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, r o section The recommendation of the City Manager to aPProve the findings of the selection Committee, pursuant to RegtleSt or ProPoeals, as to the MOSt qUalified firms to provide professiOnal engineering constrOction managaMent •services tor Public Works Category 91" designated projeOta for 2002 through 2C04, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 2. The Corredlno Group, Inc 2, Nova Consulting Inc, 3 MAxIin Engineering Inc- 4- Civil-radd Engineering Inc, 5. CIS CQnsuItants, Inc. UiLTERNATE) 6. PBS.C.7 (ALTZKNAlt) • .* et, 10' MORMONM1MingtaiNa6tHEKVaiVigilWilONVANA:8NRPSg0-:OWMPOI.',U4iVieriliRaMgkriAi.N5iiifignakiiMWgn3t#4,37Siti£V39Xer46W6P-,,CP,-,433 U,P q6 CITY CLERKS. CFF10E 1610 Section. 2, Tha recommendation of the City Manager t0 apprCve the findings of the Selection corurittee, pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the most qua'if ed firms to provide professional ADA requirement serVices or Public Works Category ' " designated projects for 2002 trough 20 4, i`sted herein in rank order, are accepted: 1,. PAS& 2. R 0 Architects + Pj.anr<drs, Inc. 3. Gurri Mat'ute, P. A. (ALTZRNATE) approve Request tion 3, The recommendation, of the C ty Marleg r the .findings of the selection cotutittee,pursuant cC to fox Proposals, as. to the mostqualified firms to provide: Professional architectural :engineereingservices for Public Works Category "'B" designated projeots for 2002.through 2004,•listed herein in rankorder, are aoGepted; CSA Southeast; Inc.. (C;A.P, Eng. Cvna'ltants, Inc:) ;bdigo Service Corporation Section 4, The. recommendation of theCity Manager to approve the findings . f Request for Proposals, as professional architecture the selection committee. :pu,rsa :art to to the most quali.tried firms to provide cervices for Public Works Category ,"S" designated pro)ects for 2402 through 2004, listed herein in ranks Order, ere aCCeptedl Gurri ? atute PA 2. ZysooEieh, arc, 3, R.J. He senbcttle Architects, P.A. 4. R.E. Chisholm : Erchitects, 5. Sersriella, PljaMil e. ,Partners, Inc. (AJ+TEPNATE) 5. PBS3 FA TE tNATE) `!H!@ftlFt3tfIng4If.d;ti?itiN.o BrRi3pae:e? Bak<arih868r Page 2 of. 7 0°Red"detc. H_=?3i=YGfiHddeelPMne 02 14:4 305 85C 1613 F.C4 Section 5. The rec6mmenda jon of the. City Manager to approve the findj,ngs :of the selection committee, pursuant :d Reersest for Proposals., At to the most cual.lfied firma to provide p:t<atessa.o e env3.rcr;nenta:i engineering Services: for Punw1c Works Category „13" designated projects fox 2002 tr.r.a.ug a 2004, listed hsxe r. in rank order, are accepted: 1. RTC C;ra;4p. S.erV:i ce s 2. R... Ross sssociates, Inc. 3. UR. Corporation: 4. TWO &ng veers, 5. Nova consulting Ina. (ALTERNAT ) 6, Consulting Engineering. & Science, Inc (ALTERNATE) Section .6. The :x:e:comrnersdat.ion of the City Manager ro approve the findings of -h;e selection committee, pursuant to RegUest for PWoposals;, as to the most gua1lfied:firms to provide. Prd.fe.ss 0nel. genexal eng.tne:ering Services for Pub1 .c Works Category ,,:a„ designated projects. for 2002 through: 2004, listed herein in rank order., ere AcCentedr 1. i?. J, boss Associates, ;Inc. 2, Garde, Spreche<r & Associates,, Inc, 3.. Metric Engineering, Inc, 4- PBS;7 S. Marlin engineering, ino, 6. PHS Eng neer:ng Corp, 7, MS Corporat_on (ALTERNATE) 6. nelley-liort end Aa opiaie:4, Inc. (A4TFANATE). Seetidf 7 The re:.c lendat.ion of the C:.ty Manager to approva the firsciings o* the selection committee, pur:uant to Request for .Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 3. of 7 02- 144 3 1-4-v—eldwe Vji;,11T Lia7 ILLEWS EFFTLE 3Q5 S58 leda P.E5 prefessionel landscape architectv;.re services for Public Works Category ".13,# designated projects for 20.02 through 2004, listed herein in rank Order, are accepted: falcon 4 Bueno 2. CUrtie & Rogers Design Stua±o, Inc; 3imley-Horn and Associates, Ino. 4. EDAW, Int. (WERNATE) Oection B. The recOmmendatton Of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection caMmittee, pursflenr to Request for Proposals-, as to the most quald firms to provide .profeesional mechanical engineering services for Public leid.rAs CategorY "1r deAlgnated PrOjeots for 2002 through. 2604, listed herein in rank order, are.eCceOtedt Louis •a Aguirre 0 ASsociatis, Johnson, Hernandez Aseodiates Inc. Gartek Engineering Corporation (ALTER4ATE1 section 9 The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuan•t to Request for ProPoea1e. aa to the most qualified firms to provide ProfesSLPhel $trUCtokal engineering services for Public Works •.Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein in rank order, are accepted: 1, San NaPtifl Aslociares, Int. 2. Avert, Int. 3. EAC Cons14.11:iftg., Inc. Section. 10. The recommendation of the City Manager to approve the fin4ings o4 the selection committee, pursuant to Request ttr Proposalt, as to the most qualified firms to provide Page 4 of 7 1811-6.V.MOCOM.Wwci. „ , 1) afro 4 4 4 : CLERKS CFF10E :3N5 358 1E40 F.N. prctessioral surveying and mapp:.nrg services for Public Works Category "B" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed herein n in rank order; are adapted:: 1. $S&J 2. Fernando Z. Ga,e11 P. L. $., Inc. 3. Meidener 'Surveying and Mapping, P. A. 4. craven ' hor pson & Assoc::ates, Inc a 5. Williams, Eatfield & Stoller, Inc. 6. Leiter Perez & Ass.ocietes., Inc. Section 1T. The recommeridatian of the City Manager to a:ppro+ie the 'irdings of the selection committee, pursuant tc Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms ;,Q provide professional value aral,yeis and cost estimate services for PUblic Wo.rka Category "R" designated projects for 2002 through 2004, a.istea herein in rank'order, are accepted: A2 Group., Inc. Pa.s&J 3. Grace & Naee i Uddin (ALTERNATE) Section 12. The: re:c:v rmendet ars of the City Manager to approve the findings of .the selection committee,: pursuant to Request for Proposals, as to the 'mbs.t qualified firm to provide profeSei-cna'. air oonditianing setvi; es for P.ubti;c Works Category "..B.' designs ed projjecte fox 2042 th"ough 2004, listed herein is e epted: GraCe & Naeem tiddin Section 13. The .recommendation Of the City Manager to approve the f.tndin:gs of the selection C mmittee, pursuant to. Request for Proppsaia,, as to the most qualified fIrm to pro ride Page :5 of 7 02- U4 .1HY-2 200Z 014 CITY C.: 45 J FFICE 3e5 et,e1 Iola F.07 pre`ess;io7a . life safety services :for Pu.biic Works Category 5„ designated pro'ec:s for 2002 through 2004r listed .herein i. accepted: 1. Gurri Matute, ?.A. 5e tion 14. The recommendation of t•h.e City Manager tQ approve. the findings of the selection committee, p: r'suan: tc Request for Proposals, as to the moat qualified firms to prev�de profess anal roofing services for Public works category "g" designated prdiect,s fvr 2Ou•2 through 2004, listed her'e~.th in .,rank. order, are accepted: 1. BUIld,'.rig Diagrost:.es A:s.soc sates, PA 2. nternetja1141 Logistics Group Sect#en The pity Manger .is aut.']or .aedW to negotiate and' execute P Ofess pfa? Ss vices. Agreestents, in a form acceptable .to the. City Attorney, with sac:?: firm . n an arioi:n.t not to exceed tad amount. indicatedAttach cent 'le for ca.Ch specialty for each firm, with fund-s al_i cate:ti from individual prof eet account• , 1( "he herein authorization is Further sUOJect to -co € ;IATIOe with :a' i x 0iraman8 that may '1Na iMp ,sea tty the City Attorney) including in= not provisions. itad thou° Dreecribed by appl.icacic City Ch ir.;,ar .and Cede 8:8 eag06Of. :4.4: t : LL KB [=1,4] rE 3g5 1810 F.08 Siec.on 16. This Resolutorn shall become effective immedlatel.y upon !Its acioption and .si.gnat:a e of the Maynr.z' SASSED AND ADOPTED ATT U. Sy v Saheider Acting Cit. lerk APPR AN 0 VIL REILC i Y ATTORNEY W5975c"; F3 his.14th day of ' bkuaxy , 2002, MINUEL A, D.IAZ, MA If ,ns t4Y0.4 done not bign tntc Ae3a3.0 ian, it shall becomes el solve At Oa and .of aer,, c401140r days +rdm the data It waapOseed end Adopted, re. : aleor ye_bes this 1tex0x404414 3t shall rac 0. a'ffecw4nrn ive ediateely porn Override o' she veto by then city .COMmis,eiom. Page 7of:7' 02 144