HomeMy WebLinkAboutDocument Submitted into the Public RecordAlonso, Elvi G.
From: Gomez -Chen, Marta
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 11:26 AM
To: Alonso, Elvi G.
Cc: Smith, Angela I
Subject: July 29, 2004- File # 04-00842
The discussion regarding this item will be:
DISCUSSION AND SELECTION OF A NEW CITY ATTORNEY,
Thank you.
7/23/2004
(f, L tg tam , Vhirtrra
ARTHUR E. TEELE JR.
COMMISSIONER
July 28, 2004
Subject: Selection of the City Attorney on Thursday, July 29, 2004
0 0
O. 330` d6
M.149J(FLORIT6A 33,3-0708
" I S05) ND-5394n
--n"`-FAX (305050-51.99.
-v
Refer (1) Memo dated July 22, 2004 from Arthur Teele to Colleagues
subject: Dear Colleague letter (City Attorney Selection
Committee's Recommendations for Position of City Attorney -July
29, 2004)
(2) Memo dated July 22, 2004 from Arthur Teele and Alejandro
Vilarello to Joe Sanchez and members of the City Commission
subject: City Attorney Selection Committee's Recommendations
for Position of City Attorney
Dear Colleagues:
At the CRA Board meeting on Monday, July 26, 2004, the Interim City Attorney advised
the Board of Directors of the pending reassignment of the current CRA city staff
attorney, Jim Villacorta. Needless to say, this personnel decision came as a shock and
evoked considerable discussion among the Board Members present. It was also disclosed
that although the CRA is paying 100% of Mr. Villacorta's salary, over the past six
months, he has only been available to the CRA approximately 60% of the time. Further,
it was learned that a number of other City agencies are involved and will have their city
staff attorney reassigned in spite of expressed concern of their respective Boards (i.e.
Bayfront Park Trust).
As Chair of the Commission, in the past I have chosen to minimize and ignore the recent
"snafus" on the consent agenda related to the street co -designation, but on cold reflection,
I have determined that the "snafu" is symptomatic of a very deep and real (legal)
management problem that should be addressed immediately. This is particularly
troublesome in light of the upcoming budget hearings and the specific consideration of
the proposed budgets for the City NET and Departments of Communications, Human
Resources, and Parks & Recreation
This correspondence is to advise you of my intention to urge the Commission to consider
the following issues as the first order of business at the Commission meeting on
Thursday, July 29, 2004, at 9:00a.m:
1. Selection of the City Attorney [See Meeting Agenda Item # DI.1(04-00842)].
2. Discussion to defer selection of the City Attorney to September 9, 2004.
3. Appointment of a one -person committee (preferably the Commissioner with
the least longevity) as the compensation and benefits committee for the City
Attorney designee and to report back at the next regularly scheduled City
Commission meeting (September 9, 2004).
Warmest regards.
Faithfully,
Arthur. Teele, Jr.
t!Iitg of tam , li riot
ARTHUR E. TEELE JR.
COMMISSIONER
July 22, 2004
P.O. BOX 330708
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33233-0708
(305) 250-5390
FAX (305) 250-5399
Subject: Dear Colleague Letter (City Attorney Selection Committee's
Recommendations for Position of City Attorney -July 29, 2004)
Dear Colleague:
Please find attached the memorandum dated July 22, 2004 Re: City Attorney Selection
Committee's Recommendations for Position of City Attorney, signed by both Alejandro
Vilarello and the undersigned.
This memo respectfully recommends that "final action" be taken on the subject memo,
(subject to any "unreadiness by any single Commissioner"), be scheduled for Thursday,
July 29, 2004, of the City Commission meeting. If there are concerns on this timeline
and approach, I would then recommend that each Commissioner schedule private
(individual) meeting(s) with each of the three (3) applicants prior to 2:00 p.m., Thursday,
July 29. To assist and facilitate the administration of these meetings, the City Clerk has
designated the following individual to be available to each Commissioner and further to
stay in close and constant contact with each of the three (3) applicants for the next seven
(7) days:
Anna Medina
(C) 305-302-5282
(H) 305-223-9489
(0) 305-250-5366
Finally, for your perusal, attached are the six (6) evaluation forms submitted by the
"Members of the Selection Committee. If you have additional questions, please discuss
them at the close of today's Commission meeting.
Warmest regards.
Arthur E. Teele, Jr.
CITY OF MIAMI
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Vice Chairman Joe Sanchez and
Members of the City Commission
FROM: Arthur E. Teele, Jr., Chairman
City Attorney Selection Advisory Committee
DATE: July 22, 2004
RE:
City Attorney Selection Committee's Recommendations for Position of City
Attorney
Pursuant to Commission Resolution R-04-0305, adopted May 6, 2004, which established
the City Attorney Selection Advisory Committee ("Committee") to advertise and review
applications for the position of City Attorney, and make recommendations to the City
Commission, said Committee held three publicly noticed meetings.
Each Committee member reviewed every candidate's application and submitted an
evaluation report to the Committee, utilizing an agreed upon methodology. On July 21, 2004, the
Committee met and the members present considered all -evaluation reports; collegially -evaluated -
the candidates and determined, utilizing the reports, a consensus recommendation of the most
qualified candidates. The Committee then voted to recommend the consensus top three
candidates to the City Commission for its review and con ' _ o s for the position of City
Attorney. Said candidates, in alphabetical order, are: W- ren B' t r, Julie O. Bru and Jorge L.
Fernandez.
c:
Alejandro Vilarello, Vice Chairman:
Manuel A. Diaz, Mayor
Joe Arriola, City Manager
Alvin B. Davis, Member of Selection Committee
Lucia A. Dougherty, Member of Selection Committee
Oscar Rivero, Member of Selection Committee
Jose Villalobos, Member of Selection Committee
Maria J. Chiaro, Interim City Attorney
Priscilla A. Thompson, City Clerk
Victor Igwe, Auditor General
Joel E. Maxwell, Deputy City Attorney
(A) OavYY\A4 14Z.- s"-la.