HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 1730-42 SW 7th Street &
1731-35-37 SW 8th Street
CASE NO: 2003-0679
Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordi-
nance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for an amendment to the Zoning
Atlas has been reviewed as follows:
The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows:
Lots 9,10, 11,12, Less the North 5 feet thereof and Lots 41, 42, 43 and 44, Less the
South 10 feet thereof, all in Block 2, AMENDED PLAT OF LAWN VIEW, from
R-3 "Multifamily Medium -Density Residential" with an SD-12 Buffer Overlay Dis-
trict and C-1 "Restricted Commercial" to SD-14 "Latin Quarter Commercial -
Residential District " with a Pedestrian Pathway Designation along SW 8th Street.
The following findings have been made:
• It is found that immediately adjacent to the south of the subject properties there is an
area designated C-1 "Restricted Commercial"; and it is also found that immediately
adjacent to the east the area is designated SD-14 "Latin Quarter Commercial -
Residential District"
• It is found that the character of the south side of SW 7th Street is not residential and it
is also found that similar petitions have been granted in the past for the south side of
SW 7th Street.
• It is found that the change to SD-14 "Latin Quarter Commercial -Residential District"
with a Pedestrian Pathway designation along SW 8th Street is a logical extension of
that category. This will allow, for SW 8th Street to function as a vital neighborhood
commercial corridor, and will also allow greater flexibility in developing the property
in a manner that will be beneficial to the surrounding area.
Based on these findings, the Planning and Zoning Department is recommending
approval of the application as presented.
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
CASE NO. 2003-0679
Yes No N/A
❑ I ❑ In harmony with Comp. Plan; does not require amendment.
❑❑ ❑ In harmony with established land use.
w C1 [ [ Is related to adjacent and nearby districts.
U ❑ ❑ Is within scale with needs of neighborhood or City.
El ❑ ❑ Maintains similar population density pattern.
❑ J ❑ Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn.
❑ ❑ ❑ Changes or changing conditions that make change necessary.
L� ❑ ❑ Positively influences living conditions in neighborhood.
CJ ❑ ❑ Has similar impact on traffic; does not affect public safety.
�� ❑ [.1] Has similar impact on drainage.
• ❑ Li Has similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas.
Cl ❑ ❑ Has similar impact on property values in adjacent areas.
El ❑ ❑ Contributes to improvement or development of adjacent property.
�� ❑ ❑ Conveys same treatment as to owners within same classification.
Ll ❑ ❑ Property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
[� ❑ ❑ Difficult to find other adequate sites in surrounding area.
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
[� ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ [l ❑