HomeMy WebLinkAboutprevious legislationrim r- x^x141U" Xry;4e L:iY S.4. X $OFFICE
J-:02-111
2/4/02
RESOLUTION NO.
,3O MO. 1610
A RESOLUTION OF THE MI.AMT CITY. COMMISSION;
WITH ATTACHMENT, ACCEPTING THE.RECOMMENDATION
of THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE. THE FINDINGS
OF THE SELECTION COMMtTlECs, PURSUANT TO
REQUEST FOR.PROPOSALS, FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED
FIRMS TO PROVIDE. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR
PUBLIC WORK$ CATEGORY "3" DESIGNATED PROv ECTS
FOR 2002 THROUGH 2004 LISTED $Y SPECIALTY :N
RANI( ORDER; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE PROFESSIONAL :SERVICES
AGREEMENTS W:TH EACH FIRM IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED THE AMOUNT INDICATED IN ATTACHMENT "A`•
FOR EACH SPECIALTY FOR EACH FIRMA; ALLOCATING
FUNDS FROM INDIVIQUAt .PROJECT ACCOUNTS.
BE IT RESOLVED HY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1.. ThetecoMmendation of the City Manager to
appreve the findings of the selection doMmittee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the moat qualified fi:ern9 to provide
professional engineering construction management sarvices for
Pubiiw Works .Category "B" designated projects for 2002.through.
2004, listed herein inrank order, are accepted:
1. The Corraddna Group, Inc
2 Nuva Consultin;9 Inc.
4: ,,Marlin i ngineertg Inc.
4. Civil-Cadd Engineering Inc.
5. CES Con. aultante, sic. (ALTIRl3ATE).
E. PBSCT (ALTERNATE)
i
C T co SIGN
FEB t 4 2002
assaketos
of
Uft. 1- k%i U,� 5 46
C!TY CLEWS: OFF ICE
305 858 161 . to
Section 2. the recommendation of the City Manager
to approve the findings of the seleotit;t committee, pursuant
Q Requeet for Proposals,, :as, to the :Vet gtaa ified firms to
provide •Frofeasienal ADD fret)µ+.reMent services .fox :Public
Works Category "E" desi•gneted projects for 2002 through
2104, listed herein in rank order, are. accepted;
1. PBS&3'
2 R 0 Architects f Planners, UM!
j. Gurri Matute, P. A. (ALTERNATE).
Sec;lon 3. The recommendation of the. C.ty Manager tc
approve the findings of the selection coMMittee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firms' to provide
profe_siona.. architecture/ .engineering services for Public Works
.Category "8" deSignat.ed projects for 2002 through 2004. .listed
herein in rank.o.rder, are accepted:
1. OSA Southeast, Inc. CC.A. P. Eng. COnSui.tat ts, Inc,'
2. lodiga Servi.ce.:Cotporativrs
Section 4: The recommenciatiOn of the; City Manager to
approvethe findings. of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request fox Proposals, .as to the rno3t que►Zfedfirms to provide
Professional a.rchitect;u:»► services for Publ.c Works category "B„
designated projects for 2002 Ch:rot gh .2004, 1,2aMed .herein in rank
order, are :aCcePted;
1. G.urr= Matrutfl oh
2. Zyscovioh►Tno..
I. R J s : tisenbo:tt a Araia ectx, P.A.
4. RA B. Chisha1n ;ArC1sl;tets Inc.
• sorme l lo. 1)1404, 4 'Partners, ttic . 'ChlaT: RNAtE 1
E. PBSJ FAIa'TERN. T1 4t
Page. 2 of. 7
02144
City CLEF, OFFICE 305 ri58' i1;1.12 • F, C41
Section_ 5. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection commit ea, pursuant o
Request for Proposals, as to. the most qualified firma t.o provide
professional envi-r.r nenta< engineering services for Public Works
Category "B" designated prodect.s fax 2002 through 2004, listed
ha_ein in rank order, are accepted:
1. *TC Group S.er:vicas Inc.
2. H.J. Rose Associates,• Inc.
3. URS Corppratiors-
4. END Engineers, :Inc.
5. Nova Consulting Inc. (ALTERNATE)
6. Consulting Engineering & Science, Inc. (ALTERNATE)
Section .6. The recommendation of the City Manager to
approve the .findings 'of :he sel'ectioF committee, pursuant to
Requeet for Proposal_., as to the most qualified firs .o provide
profeeeional general ang naerirlg services for Public. Works
Category "B" designated projects for 2002
herein in rank order► are accepted:
1. RoSS Associates, Inc.
2 Kunde, Spreecher ,& Associates, Inc.
3.. MetricEnginaeting, Inc.
4, :PB$&.7
5 Merlin -Engineering, Inc.
6. Pi S Engineering Cocp,
7. pa Cdrparati on (A ,TERNATE)
x.miey—Horn .and Associates, %no. (40ERNAT )
Settxion 7. Th6 recanmenclakion of the City Manager to
approve the findingso.f the selection committee, Purs.iant to
Request for •Proposals, as 'to. the most: qualified firms to provide
Page 3 jai 1
xhrough 200.4, listed.
02'. 144
rio, r - d7"4117G ' f C; i. f'f' CLVRY.S. OFF ECE
3135 858 161
professional landscape architecture services for Public Works
Category "V .design t.ed projecta•for 2002 •through 206.4, listed
herein in rank •order, are accepted:
3 Falcon & Sueno
2. Curtis & Rogers. Design Studio, Inc
3. Kialley-torn snei Asscoiates, Ind.
4. MAW,. Inc. (ALTERNATE)
E)
section S. :The recommendation Qf the City Manager to
Approve the i°indingat, of the -selection committee, pursuant to
Request far Proposals, as to the most qualified firms to provide
professional, mechanical engineering services, for Public Worke
Category "A" designated projects for 2062 through 2604, listed
herein in rank order, are accepted:
Louis ►7
Aguirse & Associate!, P.A.
2. gdhnson, Hernandez Associate$ inc.
3. Gartek Engineering Co,rporar,iori (ALTERNATE):
Section 9. The .reComOendation of the City Manager to.
approve the finding,:, of the select .;on ecim'nittee, pursuant to
Request for Propnsa1s,, as to the most qualified firms to provide
pr.efaiSional structural engineering: service for Public Works
Category "8" daactgnar.c pro ect's for : ' 02 through 2D04, 1 ,ated
herein in rsni os:der, are atceptCd:
1. San Martin Assooiatts, n
2 , A±ratxt, Inc.':
1. EAC Gr nsult3ng Ind..
seta;vz i0... The te.commenda:tion of the City Manager to
approve the findings- at the selection committee, pursuant to
Request 'for. Proposals, as to the mash 'quali2,ie0 :Firms to provide
Page. 4 .of 7
AO,. 4 41
rtHY...06.047... kls.:47 CITY CLERYS CFFrCE
205 p58 t616 F.0E
professioral surveying and mapping services for Public Works
Category "B" designated. projects .tor 2002. through 2004, listed
herei.n in rank order, are. accepted:
I. PBS&J
2. Pernando Z. Gar..e.L1 P. L. $., Inc.
3. waidener Surveying and Mapping, P. A.
4. Craven Thompson &:Associates, Inc.
5. Williams, :atfield & Stoner, Inc.
6. Leiter, Perez: & Associate's, Inc.
Section 1.1. The xedOMMendastian off' the City Manager to
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to .the most qualified firrrss to provide
professional value ar:a],ysis and cost estimate services for Public
Works Category "B" designated projects .cts for 2002 through .2004,
listed herein in rank order, are accepted:
1. A2 Group, Inc.
2. PBSAJ
3. Grace & NeeeM Uddin ,(ALTERNATE)
Section 12. The retospendatiOn of the City Manager _o
approve the findings of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposes as to the most qualified .fire: to provide
ProlesSional air conditioning :aervirces for Public Works Category
dent hated p.ro3ects for 2.002 thWoUgh .2004, listed herein is
accepted;
"_.>wace :& Naeem Uddin
Section 13. The ;recommendat .tin Of the. City Manager to
approve the findings of the •aelection committee, pursuant to
Request fob Prppaaa1e, es to the mc,st quasi .*iec firm .to provide
Page :S a`f 7
02- *44
PI Y-2 '20M eiS; t77 Crri^ CLERKS .11IFF1 CE
EV3 1610 F.07
po`essiona L life saf<etjr services for Public Works •Category „5il
designated projects for 2002 through 2004, listed 'herein is
accepted:
Gurri. Matute, P.A.
Section 14. The recommendation of the •Cit.y Manager to
approve the tindi.ngs of the selection committee, pursuant to
Request for Proposals, as to the most qualified firma to provide
Professional r.00fing.. services for Public Wor}is Category .05,.
designated projects for 20C2 through 2004, listed herein in rank
.order, are accepted;
3., Building Dtagrscstics . AS,$Qc, ateev PA
2. Zrternational Logistics Grciip
Section.15„ The City Manager is author;r.zediJ to negotiate
and execute Professicjna? ServicesAgreement*, in a form
acceptable to the. City Attorney, with each firm ,in en amoun. t not
to exceed tie atiyotlnt *.ndicat:ed in Attachment'AA„ for each
Specialty io'r .each firm. with funds ° :allocated from individual
prbjeet eccourtta.
Tha herein aritharltation :a further eugjeer. to Copipyiep a with .a.0
raqNireme te, that may be inp: Qbeek by the 'City Attorneys; .inalud rq but not
iims.asd to these prea2r bed Thy eppaiesele City. gharrter and code
provte:ien,
Page 6 of 7
02-:: 144
131m1..4,...4WZIet
v5.5 est 161.0 F.CP
SIRPtiors, ,6. This Resolutipin hali 'pecome effective
immedlately 'von ttS a4option and siimature ot the Mayor.A/
-PASSED AND ADOPTED chi.e.44th day of Febtuatir
ATTEST:
4.---1141..el
Sy1vCit -Schaidar
Acting Cit. etk ,
APPR $04t14 AND ORRECTN4ss:t/
N VILAR
TY ATTPANEY
W5,915:111
M1NUEL A. DIAI, MA
,2002,
zno efeyPr dose not sign this Aesn4otioor Lt aball bongos attitctsSe At
tine mid of tsr celeetiet days from the dime it, was P110100dnd adoPted• Zf
the Neyor voteee .this a0;4014ant it sbaIl beccme effective minmediataly
tPOn Otgrridg 0: tha veto by the OityCOMOisaison,
P440 7 O't 7
Q2,0 144 ,