HomeMy WebLinkAboutsubmission-3REVISED SIGN ON LETTER FOR DELIVERY AT 11-13-03 CITY COUNCIL VOTE
Mr. Angel Gonzalez, District 1 Commissioner
Mr. Johnny L. Winton, District 2 Commissioner
Mr. Joe M. Sanchez, District 3 Commissioner
Mr. Tomas P. Regalado, District 4 Commissioner
Mr. Arthur Teele Jr., District 5 Commissioner
Miami City Hall
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, FL 33133
Dear City of Miami Commissioners:
We the undersigned organizations urge the Miami City Commission to protect the first amendment
rights of organizations who are involved in the FTAA Ministerial events. We are concerned by the
proposed ordinance, Alternative Draft 10/15/03 of item J-03-772 on the October 23, 2003 City
Commission agenda, which would add section 6.1 to Chapter 54 of the City of Miami municipal code.
The proposed ordinance attempts to change current regulations that govern parades, demonstrations,
rallies and assemblies in a manner that restricts the first amendment rights of participants in these
events.
We are a group of national organizations who are committed to peaceful and permitted events at the
FTAA Ministerial. We are working with local groups in Miami to organize events that show our
opposition to the proposed FTAA and to offer our alternatives to this trade agreement. The safety and
well-being of the residents of Miami and the participants in the FTAA activities is of great concern to
us.
As defenders of the First Amendment, we object to this proposed ordinance as a general matter because
it interferes with people's constitutionally guaranteed rights of association and expression. The
ordinance does so by providing extremely broad, but vague definitions of "public assembly" and
"parade" and then subjecting such gatherings to an array of new prohibitions. The definitions of "public
assembly," "parade" and the list of prohibitions leave enormous discretion to enforcing officials,
promoting subjective application based on officials' interpretations of individuals' views, intentions
and messages.
Such subject matter discrimination is constitutionally prohibited, but this is what this ordinance's vague
definitions would authorize. Two tourists walking together carrying a wave board or boom box and two
protestors carrying a megaphone both would fall into the ordinance's definition of a parade and both
would violate the prohibition on "any length of plastic does not exceed 3/4 inch in its thickest." The
very fact that the ordinance would technically authorize officials to detain the tourists in this example
demonstrates its unacceptable breadth. However, it is foreseeable that the police would not treat all
violators of the proposed policy the same, but rather would target protestors because they are
protestors. INTO THE
SUBM1TTED
PUBLtCRECORDFOR
ITEM sk. C ON »-13-03
Indeed, the text of the ordinance makes clear that the new prohibitions are aimed at those intending to
participate in protests connected with the FTAA Ministerial. The ordinance's ninth Whereas clause
states that the policy change is aimed at "certain upcoming events," a reference to the pending Miami
FTAA Ministerial. As well, until very recently, the ordinance was written to sunset on November 27,
2003 — shortly after the Miami FTAA Ministerial — also revealing its true purpose.
The stated goal of the Ordinance is to promote a safe environment for all to express their views.
However, passage of these proposed restrictions and the enormous discretionary authority they would
provide enforcement officials is likely to cause more harm than it prevents by provoking unnecessary
confrontations that antagonize non-violent protestors who are simply seeking to express their views.
A policy as vague as the proposed ordinance will undoubtedly face court challenge. Its passage would
also tarnish the city of Miami with an image as a city that rejects democratic process and ideals and that
seeks to strip individuals of their rights. The Constitution should not stop at the Miami City line.
We urge you not to pass this ordinance and we look forward to working with you to ensure that first
amendment rights can be expressed in a safe and secure environment.
Sincerely,
AFL-CIO
Alaskans for Peace and Justice
Alliance for Sustainable Jobs
and the Environment (ASJE)
Essential Action
Center for Progressive Political Communication,
Blue Bell, PA
Campaign for Labor Rights
Citizens Trade Campaign
Cross Boarder Network for Justice and Solidarity,
Kansas City Missouri
Cumberland Countians for Peace & Justice,
Rev. Walter Stark
Delaware Valley Politics of Meaning Network,
West Chester, PA
Democratic Socialists of America,
Greater Philadelphia Local, Phili, PA
Florida Fair Trade Coalition
Global Exchange
Global Justice Ecology Project
Grassroots International
Guatemalan Human Rights Commission
Health GAP, Global Access Project
Indiana Alliance for Democracy
Indiana Fair Trade Coalition
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
International Brotherhood of Teamsters,
President Mike Scott, Local 769, Miami FL
Jobs with Justice (JwJ)
Korean Alliance for Peace and Justice
Living River Cluster
Minnesota Fair Trade Coalition
Mexican Solidarity Network
National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Nicaragua Network
Pennsylvania Fair Trade Coalition
Pennsylvania Citizen Action Network
Public Citizen
Quixote Center
Quest for Peace
Resource Center for the Americas
The Sierra Club
United For Peace and Justice (UFPJ)
United Church of Christ
United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS)
United Steelworkers of America (USWA)
Wisconsin Fair Trade Campaign
Young Koreans United of USA