Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 1814 Brickell Avenue FILE NO 10-00624zc _3 :_ Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordin- ance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The request is to change the zoning classification from R-3 "Multifamily Medium - Density Residential" to PR "Parks and Recreation" as follows: The subject area consists on a parcel located between SW 19th Road & SW 15th Road fronting Brickell Avenue, more specifically described on file with the Hearing Board Office. The following findings have been made: • It is found that the subject property is a vacant lot currently owned by City of Miami. • It is found that the property will be used for Park uses and this change is to have the proper zoning designation on the site. • The proposed change of the designation will allow the subject property to be developed as a Park. • It is found that the approved Miami 21 zoning designation on this parcel and the southern half of its block is T5 -R. The designation on the northern half of the block is T3 -R. The area across Brickell Avenue is T6 -24-R. • It is found that under Miami 21 when seeking to change an existing zoning category, the Ordinance allows for successional zoning change to the next zoning category. However relating to the 11000 Zoning Ordinance categories, this application complies with that requirement by requesting a zoning change that is a more restrictive category. Miami 21 would allow this zoning change to PR (Parks and Recreation). Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the application as presented. 1 Analysis for ZONING CHANGE File ID: 10-00624zc Yes No N/A. ❑ ® ❑ a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. ® ❑ ❑ b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. ® ❑ ❑ c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. ® ❑ ❑ d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. ® ❑ ❑ e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ ❑ ® 0 Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ❑ ❑ ® g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. ® ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. ❑ i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. ❑ j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. X /1 /1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.