HomeMy WebLinkAboutBackup DocumentsSTATE OF s- D•
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
CHARLIE CRIST
Govemor
February 19, 2010
The Honorable Tomas Regalado
Mayor, City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear Mayor Regalado:
THO`.4AS G_ PELHAM
Secretary
The Department of Community Affairs completed its review of the City of Miami
proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (DCA No. IORWSPI), which was received on
December 17, 2009. Copies of the proposed amendment have been distributed to appropriate
state, regional, and local agencies for their review, and their comments are enclosed. The
Department reviewed the comprehensive plan amendment for consistency with Rule 9J-5,
Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and prepared the
attached Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report which outlines our findings
concerning the comprehensive plan amendment. The Department identified four objections and
four comments related to the amendment.
My staff and I are available to assist the City in addressing the issues identified in our
report. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Pable, AICP, at (850) 922-1781.
Since ly,
Mike McDaniel, Chief
Office of Comprehensive Planning
MM/bp
Enclosures: Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report
Review Agency Comments
cc: Ana Gelabert-Sanchez, Director, City of Miami Planning Department
Carolyn A. Dekle, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ♦ TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-2100
850-488-8466 (p) ♦ 850-921-0781 (f) s Website: www.dca_state.f(.us
♦ COMMUNITY PLANNING 850-488-2356(p) &-0-488-3309(f) ♦ FLORJDACOMMUNMES TRUST 850-022-2207(p) 850-92}-7747 (i)
a HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &-4488-7956(p) 850-922-5623(f) ♦
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENTS
I ! _'
Miami
Amendment IORWSPI
February 19, 2010
Division of Community Planning
This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J-11.010
INTRODUCTION
The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the
Department's review of the City of Miami proposed Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section
163.3184, F.S.
Objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C.,
and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommendation of one approach that
might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific
situations. Some of these objections may have been raised initially by one of the other external
review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external
agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence.
The City should address each of these objections when the amendment is resubmitted for
our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in a determination that
the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding
missing data and analysis, items which the City considers not to be applicable to its amendment.
If that is the case, a statement justifying its non -applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2),
F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination as to the
non -applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be
considered addressed.
The comments which follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature.
Comments will not form a basis for determination of non-compliance. They are included to call
attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning
planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar,
organization, mapping, and reader comprehension.
Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other
state review agencies, other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are
advisory to the Department and may not form a basis for Departmental objections unless they
appear under the "Objections" heading in this report.
2
TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES
Upon receipt of this letter, the City has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or
determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. The process for adoption of
local government comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, F.S., and Rule 9J-
11.011, F.A.C. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan
amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3189(2)(a), F.S.
Within ten working days of the date of adoption, the City must submit the following to
the Department:
■ Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendments;
■ A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed;
■ A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in
the ordinance; and
■ A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's
Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report.
The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a
compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent.
In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendments, and
pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly
to the Executive Director of the South Florida Regional Planning Council.
Please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c), F.S., requires the Department to provide a
courtesy information statement regarding the Department Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish
their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or
adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments
are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information
to the Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department
when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event
there are no citizens requesting this information, please inform us of this as well. For efficiency,
we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format.
3
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND COMMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IORWSPI
CITY OF MIAMI
I. Consistency with Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., and Chapter 163, F.S.
A. The Department identifies the following objections and recommendations to the proposed
amendment.
Objection 1: Intergovernmental Coordination Policies IC -1.1.7, IC -1.1.8, IC -1.1.9,
and IC -2.1.1, and Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.3 lack specific, on-going coordination
mechanisms and specific programs for periodic sharing of information to ensure the
County and the City properly monitor and plan for the City's future water supply
needs.
Authority: Sections 163.3167(13), 163.3177(4)(a), (6)(a, c, d, h), (9), F.S., and Rules
9J-5.003(90), 9J-5.005(6), 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 2, 3, (c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.
Recommendation: The City should revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policies
IC -1.1.7, IC -1.1.8, IC -1.1.9, and IC -2.1.1, and Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.3 to
ensure a meaningful process for collaborative planning and intergovernmental
coordination through specific coordination mechanisms, on a continuing and ongoing
basis, on water supply issues between the City and the County, to include the
following:
1. Share information regarding changes in land -use, population and demand
projections, water supply needs, implementing alternative water supply projects
(including reuse and other conservation measures), establishing level of service
standards, and serving newly annexed areas.
2. Describe the City's participation in the County's concurrency tracking program
for water supply.
3. Provide information regarding alternative water supply projects that will directly
provide water supply for the City. The current alternative water supply project is
the Hialeah -Preston Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion. The
updated schedule, description of the project, and coordination efforts between the
City and the County concerning the project should be included in the City's Work
Plan.
4. Revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC -1.1.7 to clarify that the City
cannot direct the SFWMD to comply with City policy in its water planning
efforts. Instead, the policy should focus on collaborative planning and
intergovernmental coordination.
Objection 2: Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Policy CI -1.2.2 is inconsistent
with the requirement in Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., that sanitary sewer, solid waste,
drainage, adequate water supplies, and potable water facilities must be available no
later than the issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy.
M
Authority: Sections 163.3177(3), (6)(a), (6)(c), and 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., and Rules
9J-5.0055(3), 9J-5.006(3)(b)l, (3)(c)3, 9J -5.016(3)(b)3, and (3)(c)6, F.A.C.
Recommendation: Revise CLE Policy CI -1.2.2 to clarify that the sentence which
states "Such development orders may be granted, however, if capital improvements...
are programmed to begin within one year..." does not apply to sanitary sewer, solid
waste, drainage, adequate water supplies, and potable water facilities, consistent with
Chapter 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.
■ Objection 3: The City has not included specific measureable objectives and policies
with meaningful and predictable standards for water conservation.
Authority: Sections 163.3167(13), 163.3177(1), (3), (4)(a), (6)(a, c, d), (8), (9),
(10)(e), 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., and Rules 9J-5.003(82), (90), 9J -5.005(1)(c), (2), (6),
9J -5.006(3)(b)1 and (c)3, 9J-5.011(1) and (2)(b)3, 4, (c)3, 9J -5.013(1)(c), (2)(b)2,
(2)(c)1, 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 3, (3)(c)1, 9J -5.016(3)(b)1, 3, 4, 5, (3)(c)6, 8, (4), F.A.C.
Recommendation: The City should provide specific and measurable objectives and
policies for achieving goals for water conservation related to the Miami -Dade County
Code by doing the following:
a. Amend the text of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) at page 10,
section 3.6.1 to note the following: 1.) All future development within the City
will comply with water use efficiency techniques for indoor water use in
accordance with section 8-31, 32-84, and 8A-381 of the Miami -Dade County
Code; and 2.) All future development will comply with the landscape standards in
sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami -Dade County Code.
b. Amend Policies NR -2.1.8 and NR -2.1.9 to note that the City shall comply with
water conservation measures in sections 8-31, 32-84, and 8A-381 and with the
landscape standards in sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami -Dade County Code.
Objection 4: The population projections within the WSFWP are inconsistent with the
County's adopted WSFWP and the Shimberg Center. Furthermore, the projections
are derived from a data source which is 5 to 6 years old and therefore is not based on
best available data.
Authority: Sections 163.3177(1), (2), (6)(a), (h)2, (8), (10)(e), F.S., and Rules 9J-
5.003(107), (116), 9J -5.005(1)(c), (2), (5)(a), 9J -5.006(1)(g), 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 2,
(3)(c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.
Recommendation: The City should coordinate with the County to adopt a consistent
population projection.
B. The Department identifies the following comments concerning the proposed amendment.
Table B. Existing and Projected Potable Water Demand - Table B lists the capacity
of the Alexander Orr water treatment plant at 248 MGD. This figure is derived from
the County's WSFWP at 13age 3-14. However, it represents the plant's installed
capacity of 248 MGD, and should be replaced with its rated capacity of 214.74 MGD.
2. Population — Page 7 refers to the 2015 population as 412,674 persons. Table A refers
to the 2015 population as 421,674 persons. The typographical error should be
corrected.
3. Reference to Miami -Dade Capital Improvement Schedule — Page 12, Sections 4.1 and
4.2 both refer to the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Miami -Dade County capital improvement
schedule. The references should be updated to refer to the Fiscal Year 2009-10
capital improvement schedule.
4. Timing of Concurrency Requirement — Page 4, bullet 3 of the City's WSFWP is
inconsistent with Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S. It incorrectly states that "...This water
supply concurrency is now in effect, and local governments should be complying
with the requirement for all new development proposals. In addition, local
governments should update their comprehensive plans and land development
regulations as soon as possible to address these statutory requirements. The latest
point at which the comprehensive plan must be revised to reflect the concurrency
requirements is at the time the local government adopts plan amendments to
implement the recommendations of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)."
The underlined text should be deleted.
II. Consistency with Chapter 187, F.S., State Comprehensive Plan
The proposed amendment is inconsistent with the following provisions of Chapter 187, F.S.:
A. Section 187.201(7), Water Resources, Policies (b) 2, 3, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14: Ensure that
new development is compatible with existing local and regional water supplies, protect
aquifers, and promote water conservation.
B. Section 187.201(15), Land Use, Policies (b) 1 and 6: Encourage the location of development
in areas that have the capacity to service new development, and consider the impact of land
use on water quality and quantity, and the availability of water.
C. Section 187.201(17), Public Facilities, Policies (b) 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9: Encourage the
development, use, and coordination of capital improvement plans by all levels of government
and to ensure the availability of public facilities.
D. Section 187.201(22), Agriculture, Policy (b) 5: Encourage conservation, wastewater
recycling, and other appropriate measures to assure adequate water resources to meet
agricultural and other beneficial needs.
E. Section 187.201(25), Plan Implementation, Policy (b)7: Ensure that local plans implement
and accurately reflect state goals and policies.
By addressing the concerns noted in Section I, these inconsistencies with Chapter 187, Florida
Statutes, can be addressed.
0
City of Miami
Response to
Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Objections, Recommendations
and Comments (ORC) Report, DCA No10-RWSP1. Addressing the Application to
Amend the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP)
Dated: December 17, 2009
This report contains responses by the City of Miami to the objections referenced in the
Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report issued by the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) dated February 19, 2010. The DCA issued
objections and comments to the Application transmitted for review by the City of Miami
on December 17, 2009. The objections must be addressed since they form the basis of
potential determinations of compliance by DCA. The DCA objections and corresponding
recommendations are summarized below, followed by the City's responses.
A. DCA Objections to proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan:
1. Intergovernmental Corrdination Policies IC -1.1.7, IC -1.1.8, IC -1.1.9, and IC -2.1.1, and
Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.3 lack specific, on-going coordination mechanisms and
specific programs for periodic sharing of information to ensure the the County and the
City properly monitor and plan for the City's future water supply needs.
Citations: 163.3167(13), 163.3177(4)(a), (6)(a, c, d, h), (9), F.S., and Rule 9J -5.003(90),9J-
5.005(6), 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 2, 3, (c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.
DCA Recommendation:
The City should revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policies IC -1.1.7, IC -1.1.8, IC -1.1.9,
and IC -2.1.1, and Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.3 to ensure a meaningful process for
collaborative planning and intergovernmental coordination through specific coordination
mechanisms, on a continuing and ongoing basis, on water supply issues between the City and
the County, to include the following:
i. Share information regarding changes in land -use, population and demand projections,
water supply needs, implementing alternative water supply projects (including reuse and
other conservation measures), establishing level of service standards, and serving newly
annexed areas.
ii. Describe the City's participation in the County's concurrency tracking program for
water supply.
iii. Provide information regarding alternative water supply projects that will directly provide
water supply for the City. The current alternative water supply project is the Hialeah -
Preston Water Treatment Plant Reverse Osmosis Expansion. The updated schedule,
description of the project, and coordination efforts between the City and the County
concerning the project should be included in the City's Work Plan.
iv. Revise Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC -1.1.7 to clam that the City cannot
direct the SFWMD to comply with City policy in its water planning efforts. Instead, the
policy should focus on collaborative planning and intergovernmental coordination.
City Response:
i. City of Miami proposes to include additional language to the following Policy PW -1.2.4
to transmit information with the MDWASD to ensure collaborative planning efforts:
EQ 1l �Y IL w�l��"I ���2 � N Ilhelit lillll condinue to coordinate �tlhrou IIS 1bg E@Ou ]grs N e 11 ni cd
Coinnindttee and the IKaimu li...l':`,gd un'our nnu11 IIx to udlll2& exiDand and x it utlh
tx xll p i xi t.. t i x Ile t bll„ w ter xIIIItidds and afternadve w txiry xull2gllixx f t i'xxt.tlhe
2 Roods iris: uiirid�N ut.uiWdi:;^ W�, INer xi.u�� 1°ieeds. Such lh irvdin ton tt irvt "W lillll li d u the
ti�an unt iIl ii x Ilii 1, Dd ton and dernand
t iii irvirvr`itii� for iry ... future
i� " tli i � t i� a 11 i � lii 11 i i t tli i t IPt i�iadve water r uiooll orecf
t bllli hrnent of Il v 11 of servlce standardsand servldilri of i 11 V annexed areas.
ii. MDWASD is currently developing a Water Supply Allocation Program to address
adequate water supply requirements in Florida Statute and ensure compliance with the
County's water use permit. Policy PW -1.2.3 will incorporate additional language to better
describe the City's participation in the County's Water Allocation Program.
llliix 11 2
[l i' t itV WxJll g2mix... o�c Il2 irvti ill tV t the tu�ullllxxt extent ll2 xxillJe "W itlh
K imii l p dx..0uui tV..to T ii III t ii N !I:.t to irvVx in t....11 iry ptirygirris torrontor llx"v6s of xxixq x of
each water suppIIy, "W�@ter tirvt°timent and wastewater ti x...
timxnt fadlli!Y f iry use DY gggogg.
that Issue de.v.e.II pi ,Viet (Ii�tx...... „.xx indude the .V..xt blli .a.himxnt
„ . . u
of water and wastewater xi IItt god
u�i� t .
water and wastewater transimis§on and t.ilrvetime....
V I t
t
i� �i ix "��i �.� Il�irviiry . ixxu�ui�x ...
txIlixit irv,tirvx irvirvixlitxuirvuit tx tlltiry t:.:t tt :.�.
iii. The City of Miami and MDWASD believes Policy PW -1.3.1 identifies the most current
alternative water supply projects. The Policy further references Appendix A (page 22) of
the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan that identifies specific projects names,
descriptions, construction timeframes and estimated costs.
Note: The County has requested a permit modification to the Water Use Permit but at this
time has not been issued by the South Florida Water Management District. Please see
Appendix WSP-1 — Application for Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-00017-W
(Exhibit 29 and 30).
iv. The City of Miami proposes to revise Policy IC -1.1.7 to clarify the City's efforts to
coordinate with the SFWMD planning and permitting process.
N ,211!liicIII ,���� ���" ���°' ' 1��� N b,2 li t x11 1111 i�V' nate "W li tlh the South
.......................................................:.:........:...:.:........:..........:....................:....:...:.:........:.............:.:.......:.:........:.:...................................................................................................................................................................................
o iId teii i� xi:xi t pixtirvi
water
i.0 SII ��:��di idN i iui��:��di N....N.................................................i..�.�:.�.�.. ...:.......d....tL ....................... .............................................................�.N.....d:.t..t.:.�:...d.....N........t....ted ........pd, ......N.u.N.....d..N...........iri i .
1 x ti01111 S to ll Ihar txuixtli x of the IMOV' ' I'. suet �txx Il:IIla� i � i��t 2 Illi ixx of the
N................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................IL......... ...........
MO and .. Use, ..t�tu�uiry xiu�ui��t�`°i .... u�ui �°i :�x�grv. �° i"��.... xt.ManaggEgot
tx tuutuuiV p p i i i dt.p "W tlh
4 IIxiVitx Ilt iii tuuirvtllVi titV p�IliV t iiNull„tii pt xi
V a utill„iiiipt t.I�V irviptV t IItV„irvitiV txi a uppIIV txIliIVdtixx a utlliixt under IMI t
t bIlx Water 4 Ilei” ent tVb.11.x ti vx tttt t tt.a iii llu udiinx u iry xx tirvVrn xxpi]ft�t... o�i...nx
ii N VVuuitVi xlllltii„xll tx IIIl iid,iLgn AggJtV„i xt i p;tx i N px exp: tV ltt tx ll i ii uuxx txpry
2
2. Capital Improvments Element (CIE) Policy CI -1.2.2 is inconsistent with the requirmewnt
in Section 163.3180(2)(x), F.S., that sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water
supplies, and potable water facilities must be available no later than the issuance by the
local government of certificante of occupancy.
Citations: 163.3177(3), (6)(a), (6)(c), and 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0055(3),
(90),9J -5.006(3)(b)1, (3)(c)3, 9J -5.016(3)(b)3, and (3)(c)6, F.A.C.
DCA Recommendation:
Revise CIE Policy CI -1.2.2 to clarify that the sentence which states "Such development
orders may be granted, however, if capital improvements... are programmed to begin within
one year... "does not apply to sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, adequate water supplies,
and potable water facilities, consistent with Chapter 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.:
City Response:
City of Miami proposes to add additional language to the following Policy CI -1.2.2 to be
consistent with requirement in Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.:
Policy 0-1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for new
development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use
will be contingent upon the ability of existing or programmed public facilities to continue to
provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard for the public facilities listed in Policy
CI -1.2.3.
The public facilities to serve the new development
or redevelopment shall be in place and
available to serve new development as follows:
a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water facilities and adequate water supply shall
be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no later than
the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The
concurrency requirement for sanitary sewer may be met through the use of onsite
sewage treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department of Health. Prior
to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the city shall consult with
the Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (.I ,.I''pVV8" I!''p to determine
whether the adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available
no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent II a urvtllucurvur urvc 4Wi )WA&i':`p IIS [II Ilbeurvc p u], i, lJ e for unlit ii,ng the
4illabllli f cu� Illie for MI ter �u eir f 4�M,,`�pW l'���:�°�p u����t� �f u� liu ��Ilc�u �c�u��tlin
.....................................................i....11...............................................................................................................................................................................................�.....................11............................................�.�1.........�
tarn that lnks Water supples to the �IJffng of ogcw dg"� gc gprru�ent.
3. The City has not included specific measureable objectives and policies with meaningful
and predictable standards for water conservation.
Citations: 163.3167(13), 163.3177(1), (3), (4)(a), (6)(a, c, d),(8), (9), (10)(e), 163.3180(2)(a),
F.S., and Rule 9J-5.003(82), (90),9J -5.005(1)(c), (2), (2)(b)2, (2)(c)1, 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 3,
(3)(c)1, 9J -5.016(3)(b)1, 3, 4, 5, (3)(c)6, 8, (4), F.A. C.
DCA Recommendation:
The City should provide specific and measurable objectives and policies for achieving goals
for water conservation related to the Miami -Dade County Code by doing the following:
a. Amend the text of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) at page 10, section
3.6.1 to note the following: 1.) All future development within the City will comply with
water use efficiency techniques for indoor water use in accordance with section 8-31, 32-
84, and 8A-381 of the Miami -Dade County Code; and 2.) All future development will
comply with the landscape standards in sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami -Dade
County Code.
b. Amend Policies NR -2.1.8 and NR -2.1.9 to note that the City shall comply with water
conservation measures in sections 8-31, 32-84, and 8A-381 and with the landscape
standards in sections 18-A and 18-B of the Miami -Dade County Code.
City Response:
City of Miami proposes to amend text of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan on page 10
section 3.6.1 and Policies NR -2.1.8 and NR -2.1.9 to include the following language:
Water Conservation Plans and Development Codes
Miami -Dade County has developed recommendations for new development that would achieve
higher water use savings than currently required by code. The Board of County
Commissioners adopted the Water Use Efficiency Ordinance 08-14 which created Section 8-
31 of the Code of Miami -Dade County on February 5, 2008, and amended by ordinance on
September 2, 2008. in add lion the Il...andDe Ordinance creatlium CllmoAer 18A and 1311�I3 of
the Il and toyo Code of Ordinances was adwtoy IIS the II�IIitCC oum IICo yThese water
efficiency recommendations represent an additional 30 percent to the water savings identified
in the 20 -year Water Use Efficiency Plan. All
tutuLg y000llopu:uonl wliflNium the Clity Wlillll leo ure :mired to ooimpYtlh
water oonserootlions urneas urea Drooliyoy tlhroo Ilm CllmoAer 3 �I3 ulillyliu2
Water and Sewer Il:��� c datlions and CllmoAer 18A and 1311�I3 a ii De Ordinance of the
Clioimr` i I[)oyo Coun 11 Code of Ordinances. The list of recommendations submitted to the BCC
and the ordinance relating to water use efficiency standard are presented in Appendix D of the
MDWASD Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and are also posted in the Miami -Dade Water
Conservation Portal.
Policy NR -2.1.8: R esei: yedj!bee iit iillll ujinumc to pu,gcJ c water conservaJons e uure
to ynew peskle91„tuoll and oourvmpmerdoll...deveel .puDgot. yzj,lJl IIS „ ueg,g,ured t „ii„n t,91111 „Il�u�tlhe u u�um
11:1p ll uuu:t to tourvo ouu t y.p1112lluaIII oyot tll�uot..ou�`' enforced tlhrou�u:tlll Cllmoptyu 3 toulldj,n p Coyo...oumy � 2
- Water and Sewer Il:��teg datlions pt.u.li.4iiq.......Code ...... �eG li.o.iq....3..1..... �f the Il lli rd...II[)ade Count ode
of liuoIII .C.es�yoto.y.......................................................1
.......................................o,...�A.....1..t..�.y.....�.y....�..3........
I .11lui y Il li 21 5 o to uurvmplllou:mouut the saime or uyore otijinyou�ut...wat�`r
� p Ilmo !I:t "�oullll youmtuumum ..
ooumoourvootlioum a 0000u oo 00 2[ovii to t tllmurvoum:: Ilm Cllmo toury 3 istumIll ,Ilium:: Coto o yotoy Co tououll oury 1t
.........................................................�1.............................IL...................................................................�1................................t.......ll.............................................p..................
1t0 ClhaoDter 32 Water oumy Commoury Il to datiioumo oDyotoy CoiDtououlbeir 1t 201! 13 and Chanter
18A and 1311�I3 l oumy000iDe Ordinance o DyoI of the IlCliard II:')ayo Coun' Co���to
of tyurvdiumoum000.
11
4. The population projections within the WSFWP are inconsistent with the County's adopted
WSFWP and the Shimberg Center. Furthermore, the projections are derived from a data
source which is 5 to 6 years old and therefore is not based on best available data.
Citations: 163.3177(1), (2), (6)(a), (h)2, (8), (10)(e), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.003(107), (116),9J -
5.005(1)(c), (2), (5)(a), 9J-5.006(1)0, 9J -5.015(3)(b)1, 2, (3)(c)1, 3, 11, F.A.C.
DCA Recommendation:
The City should coordinate with the County to adopt a consistent population projection.
City Response:
The City of Miami has coordinated with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department
to adopt the most resent 2008 TAZ population projections. Section 3. 1, Table A and Table B
of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan will be revised to reflect the following:
3.1 Population Information
The City's existing and future population figures as shown in Table A are derived from 404
2008 Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ), 200
and are Gon,.rvu,3teFlt W411 tilQut7G GOFuIiueheFIGuVe iWn. Between 1990 and 2000, the City of
Miami population grew from 358,548 to 362,470, an increase of one percent (1.1 %)1. Although
the City's 2005 Evaluation Appraisal Report (EAR) predicted an increase in population, in 2005
it was estimated that the City's population had increased to 386,879 residents. By 2010, the
City's population is anticipated to increase to, �'..I...„2 , 3; 2015 to 412,674 ,�J „ „ ; and
2025 to j ,, ry j (represents an increase of evgc percent over the ;100&-2008
population). By all projections, growth will continue to occur in the region, with future
development potential and population growth limited by the scarcity of vacant and developable
land.
Table A.
City of Miami
Population Projection Comparisons
YEAR
T ����
° M� &Z
8 TAZ
2010
405T34
444750�Q]...A.2. ,Z,
2015
, a...
2,” ~3 .�.1...a. Q .
2020
:... 2 w:�
.. )
, � ..�...A.,�'w).��.
2025
444,469
44477-6'A..1...a..:.1
2030
46470...A....
..
'Population projections provided by Miami -Dade County Facts, Miami -Dade Department of Planning & Zoning, May 2004
2 Population projections provided by Shimberg Center of Affordable Housing, Bureau of Economic Business Research (BEBR)20€ 5
3
Population projections provided by Miami -Dade Department of Planning and Zoning Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) 20042008 ,,,,,,,,
Table B.
Existing and Projected Potable Water Demand for the City of Miami
WATER SUPPLY UTILITY SERVICE WITHIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S JURISDICTION
Million Gallons/day (MGD)
Year
Population
Projections
Gallons/Capita/
Day
Average
Demand MGD
MDWASD
System Demand
Demand as % of County
MDC
Alexander
Orr Plant
Capacity
MGD
MDC
Hialeah -
Preston
Plant
Capacity
(MGD)
204m
;.244214
'74
225
200
0144/"
155
62-936220
354.96
18
244214,"44
225
205
421,444441„405
155
6"66 44
378.02
1114
244414 14
225
2COO
444,214441N44,"W
155
674t7l 47
396.80
1414
244414 44
225
2CO5
444,9M21,211
155
6"76 25
416.64
44-18
244214,74
225
2COO
155
4-W80 93
434.63
419
2,14,"1'4
225
B. DCA Comments to proposed Water Supply Facilities Work Plan:
1. Table A Existin,- and Proiected Potable Water Demand —Table B lists the capacity of the
Alexander Orr water treatment plant at 248 MGD. This figure is derived from the County's
WSFWP at page 3 -14. However, it represents the plant's installed capacity of 248 MGD,
and should be replaced with its rated capacity of 214.74 MGD.
City Response:
City of Miami proposes to amend Table B of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan to reflect
the rated capacity of 214.74 MGD for the Alexander Orr water treatment plant (See OCR
A.4. Response).
2. Population —Page 7 refers to the 2015 population as 412,6 74 persons. Table A refers to the
2015 population as 421, 674 persons. The typographical error should be corrected.
City Response:
The City of Miami has coordinated with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department
to adopt the most current 2008 TAZ population projections. These population figures will be
reflective on page 7 of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (See OCR A.4. Response).
31
3. Reference to Miami -Dade Capital Improvement Schedule — Page 12, Section 4.1 and 4.2
both refer to the Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Miami -Dade County capital improvement
schedule. The references should be updated to refer to the Fiscal Year 2009-10 capital
improvement schedule.
City Response:
City of Miami proposes to amend Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the Water Supply Facilities Work
Plan to be consistent with the County's most recent Capital Improvement Schedule. Please
see Appendix WSP-2 containing the most resent Sewer Facilities (Table 8) and Water
Facilities (Table 12) of the MDCDMP:
4.1 Alternative Water Supply Projects
Proposed alternative water supply (AWS) projects are to meet MDWASD's increase water demands
through 2030, which encompasses the proposed 20 -year Consumptive Use Permit period. AWS
projects have been identified to meet water demands in the MDWASD service area and may be found
in the 2009/2010 Miami -Dade County Schedule of Capital Improvements lL 3 i i i
� Lid , the 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan and Alternative Water Supply and
Wastewater Reuse Projects Table (Table 1 of Appendix A).
4.2 Capital Improvements Element/Schedule
As demonstrated in the previous sections, the Alternative Water Supply Plan being proposed by the
County should meet the increased water demands through 2030. As a confirmation that the County is
committed to fund these projects, the projects for the 20 -Year Work Plan may be found in the
009/..01 0. Miami -Dade County Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table 8 and 12 of
Appendix A) and with the 20 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
4. Timinz of Concurrency Requirement — Page 4, bullet 3 of the City's WSFWP is
inconsistent with Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S. It incorrectly states that "...This water
supply concurrency is now in effect, and local governments should be complying with the
requirement for all new development proposals. In addition, local regulations as soon as
possible to address these statutory requirements. The latest point at which the
comprehensive plan must be revised to reflect the concurrency requirements is at the time
the local movernment adopts plan amendments to implement the recommendations of the
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). "The underline text should be deleted
City Response:
City of Miami proposes to amend Section 1.2, bullet 3 of the Water Supply Facilities Work
Plan to be consistent with Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.:
Ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities area available to serve new development
no later than the date on which the local government anticipates issuing a certificate of
occupancy and consult with the applicable water supplier prior to approving building permit,
to determine whether adequate water supplies will be available to serve the development by
the anticipated issuance date of the certificate of occupancy [s.163.3180 (2)(a), F.S.,
effective July 1, 2005]. This "water supply concurrency" is now in effect, and local
governments should be complying with the requirement for all new development proposals.
In addition, local governments should update their comprehensive plans and land
7
development regu ationsa& sG Gn4s: °)�m ��
to address these statutory The
APPENDIXWSP-1
The following data represents the Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department Application for Modification of
the current Water Use Permit No.13-00017-W.
This space was intentionally left blank.
WSP-ORC
APPENDIX
March 2010
EM
Carlos Alvarez, Mayor
December 21.20U0
Mo. Terhe Bates
Assistant Deputy Director
Regulatory and Public Affairs
South Florida Water Management 0iS1hCt
P.O. Box 24880
West Palm Beach, PL33418-40OO
Email: tbates(@sfwmd.go
Water &8ewer
P.O.Box 3}0}l6%307l SVV}0hAvenue
Miami' Florida 33233-0316
|30S -665-74r7
Electronic Correspondence/
(]hgin8| via Certified yN8iK
Return Receipt Requested
7001 036000006784 1040
CCN: 53645
File No. 8OC.18.50
RE: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer [)8p8rtnleDt (K8DVV/\8[J)—Application for
Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-00017-W
Dear Ms. Bates:
miamidude.gov
As requested in your |8the[ dated October 0' 2089, which addressed 8]die[ diSCUSSkJDS On
making FDOdUfiC3tiODS h3the existing water use permit, 8DdOSed is CO0p|8teKd @pp|iC3tOD f000
and check number 00418530 in the 8OlOUOt Of $11.500.00 for pPOC8SSiOg the proposed
modifications.
The proposed modifications are based on current water use reduction, as8result of8very
successful implementation of our Water Conservation Plan and water use restrictions, which are
now permanent by county wide ordinance. The County's finished water demand is now 35
million gallons per day (MGD) lower than what was anticipated when the 20 -year water use
permit application was submitted, and this has eliminated the anticipated vv8t8r d8Rl8Dd crisis
that was the basis for the very @[DbitiOUS SCh8dU|e for S8V8rG| near-term projects. In addition,
the adoption Of |HgiS|3tiOD in 2008 requiring phase-out of our OC8@n Outf3||S has Se[iOUS
iDlp|iCGtiODS for our water neC|2[D8UOO and reuse p|8DS that were not COni8rnp|8t8d when the
water use permit was developed. AS part of those p|8DS we contemplate taking an agreement
with Florida Power and Light for reuse Of up to SO million gallons per day of reclaimed vvetar at
their Turkey Point complex tUthe County Commission early next year.
The proposed modifications include the following:
0 eliminating blending Of native F|0[id8O aquifer well water with eXSUDg and proposed
SOu[CeS due tOwater quality iSSU8S and using the BXSUOg Floridan Aquifer Storage and
Recovery (ASR) facilities to reduce dry season pUDlp8gSfrom the Biscayne 8qUif8[. as
originally intended;
o deferring the implementation Of the North and C8Dtn8| District VV83tevv8ter Treatment
Plants' neUSR projects to the CDDlp|i8n09 date in the {}Ce8D {]Utf@|i ieQiS\8tiOO, adopted in
2000, to facilitate 8 CO0pP3heOSiv8 and cost-effective [HUSe p|8O that is completely
integrated with the Outfall compliance plan; and
L09191 SFWMD
Ms. Terrie Bates, SFWMD
Page 2
December 21, 2009
Application for Modification of Water Use Permit No. 13-00017-W
delaying the timelines for the Hialeah Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant and
Floridan Aquifer wellfield and South District recharge projects, by one year in light of
reduced water demands and to provide sufficient time to complete these projects in an
orderly and cost-effective way.
Should you have any questions regarding this application, please contact me at 786-552-8086,
or Ms. Bertha Goldenberg, P.E. at 786-552-8120. We look forward to working closely with the
District to meet Miami -Dade County's water supply needs as efficiently and cost-effectively as
possible while contributing directly to enhancement of natural systems.
Sincerely,
Joh W. Renfrow, P.E.
Director
Enclosures: Check Number 00418530 in the Amount of $11,500.00
Completed Water Use Permit Application Form 0645-W01
ec: C. Wehle cwehle()-sfwmd.gov
R. Diaz ridiaz(a)-sfwmd.gov
M. Elsner melsner(a)sfwmd.gov
J. Marshall jmarshal(a)-sfwmd.gov
B. Tilles btilles(a)_sfwmd.gov
K. Smith karsmith(,5—sfwmd.gov
L09179SFW MD-LC56
MIAMI -DADS WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
POOLED CASH ACCOUNT
P.O. BOX 330316 MIAMI, FL 33233-0316
Check Date: 10/06/2009 Vendor Name: SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MGMT DISTRICT
Check Number: 00418530
Payment Deductions
Invoice Number
Invoice Date Voucher ID Gross Amount Insp Gen Fee User Access Fee
Discount
Paid Amount
PERMIT 92909
09/29/2009 DP34970 11500.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
11,500.00
Processing Fee ($11,500.00) for Application for Major Modification to Miami -Dade
Water and Sewer Department Water Use Permit 13-00017-W
The attached check represents the amount due you as shown on our records.
For additional information, contact (305) 665-7471
Total Total Total
Total
Total
Check Number
Date Gross Amount Insp Gen Fee User Access Fee
Discount
Paid Amount
00418530
10/06/2009 $11,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$11,500.00
11'004 L85300 406 70064 3 21:2696 20650347011'
WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM (RC -1A, RC -1W, RC -1G)
For all water uses EXCEPT dewatering for mining or construction
General and Specific Authority, Chapter 373, State Statutes, 40E-20 Florida Administrative Code
and Basis of Review, Vol III, South Florida Water Management District.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name of Owner, Responsible Entity, etc.
Name: John W. Renfrow Project Name: Modification of Permit 13-00037-W
Address: P.O. Box 330316
City: Miami County: Miami -Dade State: FL ZIP: 33233-0316
Phone: 786-552-8086 Cell Phone: 305-283-5616 Fax: E-mail: RenfrJ�@miamidadeegov
2. Proof of Ownership is required, in the form of a Deed, tax certificate, lease, or Articles of Incorporation
A IIIi "III"'"A l III Kilroot" of t iwu oui sll lilll 'to tll ire III' ouirure — Previously Submitted
3. Name of Engineer, Contractor or Other.
Name: Bertha M. Goldenberg Firm: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department
Address: P.O. Box 330316
City: Miami County: Miami -Dade State: FL ZIP: 33233-0316
Phone: 786-552-8120 Cell Phone: 305-903-9807 Fax: 786-552-8120 E-mail: BMGPmiamidadeegov
4. If the above person(s) filling out this form will sign this Application on behalf of the owner, a letter of authorization
signed by the owner, stating they are acting on behalf of the owner, must be submitted.
A III"""III"'"A 111 III 11 etteuir of Autll oui uzatuou to tll lis t"oui ure — Not Applicable
5. Is this a New Permit ❑ mai/Modification/€+red ® Permit No.: 13-00037-W
6. Amount of water applied for: gallons per day — Previously Submitted not to be changed
7. Has a Surface Water Management Permit or Environmental Resource Permit from the District been issued for
this Project? SWM / ERP Permit No.:
or has a Surface Water Management Permit or Environmental Resource Permit from the District been applied
for? SWM / ERP Application No.:
8. A fee of $11,500 is required to process this Application. See Chapter 40E-1.607, F.A.C. for fee schedule.
A III"""III"'"A llh III Alll 111 llu :etliouu fee to tll lis III' ouirure — Check Number 00418530 in the Amount of $11,500.00
9. Please Identify any District Staff member you have discussed this Application with:
Ms. Terrie Bates, Ms. Karen Smith
B. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY — Previously Submitted
1. General Location of the Property/Project— Previously Submitted
County: Miami -Dade City: Miami
Sections — Previously Submitted
Township (s) Range (s) (or Land Grant Name) — Previously Submitted
2. It will be necessary to submit two drawings to be used as exhibits for this Permit.
a. Location Map, (8'/2 x 11), showing location of the project in relation to major roads.
b. Site Map, (81/2 x 11) locating project in relation to adjacent streets, canals and water bodies, and
showing property boundaries, buildings, on-site lakes/ponds and the location of pumps and wells.
A III"""III"'"A l III 11 ocatuon 'ftp and &:te II'ft to tlhs Ill ouirure — Previously Submitted
Form 0645-W01 (08/03) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use
C. WATER SOURCE and WATER USE TYPE
Please indicate the source of water.
® Groundwater from an underground aquifer: A""III""""'III"'"ACIIh°°i ""III""'aU:e A l"ouir
ell'II's to l lllis 1"oui ure
Aquifer Name (if known): Biscayne and Floridan Aquifers Previously Submitted
❑ Surface water: II II ACIIh°°i ""III""'aU:e III';Ilt 1"ouir
❑ Onsite Lake/Pond ❑ Onsite Ditch/Canaluurellle'to'llllis III' ouirure
❑ Adjacent Lake/Open Water, Name: No Change Proposed
❑ Adjacent Canal, Name:
Type of water use (Please check at least one)
❑ Agricultural Irrigation ❑ Landscape Irrigation ❑ Golf Course Irrigation
® Public Water Supply ❑ Industrial/Commercial ❑ Aquaculture
® Aquifer Storage/Recovery (ASR) ❑ Other (Please describe):
D. IRRIGATION WATER USE Not Applicable
1. Is this permit for irrigation? ❑ Landscape ❑ Golf ❑ Agriculture Crop type:
What is the Total Project Acreage: Irrigated Acreage:
A III"""III"''AOI III II o11111'e III'a 1"ouir Cuiro111 Illu:l"oui uieotuou to llllis III' ouirure Not Applicable
2. Applications for golf or landscape irrigation in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water conservation
plan as explained in Section 2.3.1 of the Basis of Review.
A 111 11i AOI III, u'1" needed, o wateir con seui a,flOn III 11:an 1"ouir g61'1" ouir Ilou dscao e liirrm :ga'fl:on Not Applicable
E. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WATER USE
1. Is this permit for Public Water Supply? Yes
Maximum gallons per month needed: 13,364 MG Average gallons per day: 418.47 MGD (End of Permit)
Permit Duration requested: 18 Years (remaining amount of time in current 20 Year Permit to expiration)
2. A map of the service area for the utility, (8'/2 x 11) showing boundaries of service, water treatment plants, storage
facilities, the location of all production and monitor wells is required.
A III"""III"'"AOI 111ILi ocotaon 'ftp and Seui iice Auireo IIdo111 to tlh:s III ouirure Previously Submitted
3. For public water supplies using more than 100,000 gallons per day, applicants must meet criteria and identify the
demand for each use%omponent including number, type and size of service connections; past pumpage,
projected population data, future expected pumpage, water treatment method and losses and other specific data
as identified in Section 2.1 and 2.6 of the Basis of Review. Tables F (past water use), Table G (projected water
use) and Table 1 (treatment method and losses) must be submitted.
A 111' 111'"ACIIh°°i wateir su 111 111 ll'y deuieou d couielll utotoou s and 'III oN1'es III', C ou d III to t1lhi:s III"'ouiruio Updated Tables F and G
Attached
4. For public water supplies using more than 100,000 gallons per day, other necessary information requirements
may include if applicable: explanations of per -capita greater than 200 GPD, water supply system
interconnections, water received from or distributed to other entities, and aquifer storage and recovery. Please
submit Tables H (for per capita use greater than 200 GPD), Table J (ASR), Table K (interconnections), and Table
E (water received from or distributed to other entities) if necessary.
A III"""III"'"AOI III, u'1" needed, III aN:es III°°III, .11, III( ou d III to tll ire II1' ouirure
5. Applications for public water supply in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water conservation plan as
explained in Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review.
A 111' 11i AOI III, u'1" needed, o wateir con seuireot:on III 11:an 1"oui" III u111 111ic wateir sulll 111 ll'y to tllhl:s III' ouirure Previously Submitted
Form 0645-W01 (08/03) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use
F. INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL AND OTHER WATER USES -Not Applicable
1. Is this permit for Industrial/Commercial? Nature of the Business:
Maximum gallons per month needed:
Average gallons per day needed:
2. Industrial/commercial applicants using more than 100,000 gallons perday must provide information on the water
balance for the operation, including all sources of water and losses of water for processes, personal/sanitary
needs, treatment losses and unaccounted uses. A flow chart for the water balance should be submitted.
A III"""III"'"Aylll°°IIIwater Ill sllsu ce andflow dhart to tlhu:s III' ouirure — Not Applicable
3. For uses other than Irrigation, Public Water /Supply, Industrial or Commercial, but excluding mining/dewatering
(Air conditioning, pool heating, mitigation, etc.).
Describe Water Needs:
Maximum gallons per month needed:
Average gallons per day needed:
A 111' 111'"Aylll°°III o ui otten e plana uou and cao:.ellotlions a sedto deteuiruie:ne tlhe ouieou nt of oteuir you need — Not
Applicable
4. Applications for industrial, commercial and other water uses in excess of 500,000 gallons per day require a water
conservation plan as explained in Section 2.4.1 of the Basis of Review.
A 111' 111'"Aylll III, u'f" needed, o water cou seui gluon III II'on f"ouir l:ndu slue uoll', couieuieeird:oll' or otlheuir oteuir sulll 111 ll'y — Not
Applicable
G. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IF YOU ARE USING MORE THAN 100,000 GALLONS PER DAY
1. The withdrawal of water must not cause harm to sensitive areas, wetlands or saline water intrusion. It may be
necessary to supply modeling to address impacts of the water use.
A111'111'"Aylll III, u'f" uneeded, ureod0l:ung or documuuieeuntotooun ou~u euuoliuiouuuineu loll uurnIll octs'to thl :s Ill ouirurn — Previously
Submitted
2. All applicants withdrawing water in proximity to saline surface or groundwater, or withdrawing saline water that
may come in contact with fresh surface or ground water, are required to develop a saline water monitoring
program as described in Section 4.2 of the Basis of Review.
A 111' 111'"Ay 111 III, u'f" needed, o sal:I: ue water ninon~ :tout ing Ill uiroguirourn — Previously Submitted
3. Except for Public Water Supply, reclaimed water must be used when readily available, unless it is not
environmentally, technically or economically feasible to do so, as explained in Section 3.2.3 of the Basis of
Review.
A111'111'"AGI III, u'f" needed, our eoolluotlion of''tllue f"eosulll ulllity of usli:ng uire6l:4oureed water aind o II'etteuir froure youur utulllity
uiegord�5::uu5 tlllueliui 000ullol ulllity of uire6:4:ureed oteuir to tlhu:s III'ouirure — Previously Submitted
4. An aerial photograph of the entire project site is required.
A III"""III"'"Aylll III our oeui ooll'' IIIIIuo'to5ui"olllllu— Previously Submitted
5. Section 4.1 of the Basis of Review requires all wells and pumps be equipped with a calibrated meter or other
acceptable water use accounting method.
A 111' 111'"Aylll III cao:Illl uirotlion uirelll oui is ofthe water use accou ntuing uieetlhod f"ouir eadii elll: aind Ill e11i'olll — Previously
Submitted
Form 0645-W01 (08/03) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use
H. ATTACHMENTS
Please make sure you have included the following attachments with your Application:
❑ Proof of Ownership ❑ Table A for Wells
❑ Letter of Authorization (where required) ❑ Table B for pumps
❑ Location Map ® Application Fee — Check Number 00418530 in the
❑ Site Map Amount of $11,500.00
For Irrigation water use, also make sure you have included the following attachments: — Not Applicable
❑ Table D for crop information
❑ Water conservation plan (if needed)
For Public Water Supply water use of more than 100,000 gallons per day, also make sure you have included the
following attachments:
® Table F for past water use ❑ Table I for treatment method and losses
® Table G for projected water use ® Table J for ASR well operations (if needed) (PROPOSED)
❑ Table H for projected water use ❑ Table K for interconnections (if needed)
greater than 200 gpcd (if needed) ❑ Table E for water received from or delivered
❑ Water conservation plan (if needed) to other entities (if needed)
❑ Service Area Map
For Industrial water use of more than 100,000 gallons per day, also make sure you have included the following
attachments: — Not Applicable
❑ Water balance and flow chart ❑ Water conservation plan (if needed)
For Commercial or other water use that is not irrigation, public water supply, or industrial, also make sure you have
included the following attachments: — Not Applicable
❑ Explanation of how you determined the amount of water you need
❑ Water conservation plan (if needed)
Attachments for additional special requirements
❑ Saline Water Monitoring Plan
❑ Feasibility evaluation of reclaimed water use
❑ Aerial Photograph
❑ Letter from reclaimed water utility
❑ Modeling or documentation of impacts of water use
❑ Reports of calibration of water use accounting method for wells and pumps
I. CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the total project acreage listed above is owned or
controlled by me and encompasses the project referenced in this permit application. In addition, I agree to
provide entry to the project site for South Florida Water Management inspectors with proper identification or
documents as required by law for the purpose of making analyses of the site. Further, I agree to provide
entry to the project site for such inspectors to monitor permitted work if a permit is granted. If I do not use
the water for which this permit is issued within two years the permit may be revoked. If this application is
not complete within 240 days, it may be denied pursuant to Rule 40E-1.603, Florida Administrative Code.
John W. Renfrow Director, Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department
Print: NarrgLe of Owner o;,4pthorized Agent Title
Form 0645-W01 (08/03) PERMIT APPLICATION for Water Use 4
Nw, NW 215TH ST
I� w u
�Im
��I 111111 IIIIIIIII I IIIA
tzz
III 11, 1111111 IIIIIIIII !MB��
�P SR 826 EXT
DF -1 g X b 'er �uII II,ul,ll ND7TP FA -3
"" w
p III
�I I IIIIIIIIIn "IlIII
X �I V
LU
Pr posed Hiatt ,.
FF �' h RO we I o
LU
�p6 �IIIII.IIIIIIIIllll��i
IIIIIIIII mn IIIIIIIII mI IIIImIIIIIII m rn
ULIX
79TH ST
O ULIN V
� N � w
w cn m Q
Y NW 36TH... m 1195 A
d Po�
J2ouul iJ
II II11111 IIIII
SR 836 XT SR 836E ,_.,
m,, ---- - ...1111 Ips F p
co
SW 8Ty w� ,
_ i...:
I,ry
IIIIIr-11% m ._- "m O
F ASR MW p=
�R 87IIIIIIIIII N° V
• IIIIIIIIIIIII
SWWF ASR MW V^bIIIIII,,"°II' IIIII',"°
w
IIIII IIIII�IIIII IIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpI q Q' ✓ mm� �'
IIIIInIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu111111111
��� IIIIIM"moi
�IIIIIIIIII� III
mil ulllnmmin11111nIII
�rw
�� � IIIIII,�IIIIImI
Im : II IIn� II
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIImIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Iu11nIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIInIIIIIIIIII M1I� Nnlllllllllllmnnup,�
�mI�11IIIIII "ql CHI
LU
n ��III
j,,,SDWWTP
FA-5
�� IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIre1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII,' IIIIIIIIIIIII w Legend
IIIII IIIII„�, II�� V
> Il lµ existing FA well outside MDWASD network
a .
LU
ql III n 111111 g existing MDWASD well
IIIIIIIIIIII III�IIIIIIIIIII. IIIIIIII,.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIID
Z ro osed MDWASD well V..•. *FPL — Highway
IIIIIIIII SMI 'll�l � ���
S 392ND
m 00) I'
ENP -100 Nil, ?O
< �o 1111111 Miles
SII 0 2 4 6 8 10
III
Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department Figure 13. Floridan Aquifer Monitoring Network Design
3071 SW 38 Ave updated 12/16/09
Miami FL 33146
EXHIBIT 8L
Table 5. Floridan Aquifer Monitoring Wells
Highlighted wells proposed for MDWASD Floridan Aquifer monitoring network
1. Data for Wells from DBHydro, wells not in MDWASD network.
2. Feet Below Land Surface (bis)
3. Currently Drilling CHI Monitoring Well, ilnformation provided is Proposed only.
TZ - tri -zone
DZ - dual zone
Exhibit 9E
PRESSURE LEVEL
WATER QUALITY
BORE HOLE
CASING DEPTH
MONITORING
MONITOR
MONITOR
WELL ID
LOCATION
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
DEPTH (ft)'
(ft) z
INTERVAL (ft)'
FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY
516 -620,1140 -
DF -1 '
N. Krome Ave
25 54 35.831
80 28 06.935
1800
TZ
1230, 1700-1800
Maintained by SFWMD
ENP -100
Everglades National Park
25 22 57.096 80 36 10.71
1333
620
620-1333
Maintained by USGS
FKAA
Florida City
25 26 36 1803031
1500
1067
880-1353
Maintained by FKAA
1120-1330, 1535 -
FPL'
FPL Property
2521 01.416 80 24 28.204
2304
TZ
1920, 2100-2304
Maintained by FPL
NMB
NMB
25 56 58.44
80 12 54.909
1900
1020
Maintained by NMB
NDWWTP FA -3N
NDWWTP
25 55 05.037
80 08 49.465
1510
1410
1410-1510
Continuous
Monthly
1490-1588, 1790-
SDWWTP FA -5
SDWWTP
25 33 04.976
80 20 49.073
1890
DZ
1890
Continuous
Monthly
855-1010, 1350 -
ASR MW -1
WWF
25 42 01.374
80 28 29.193
1396
DZ
1396
Continuous
Monthly
845-900, 1110-
SWWFMW-1
SWWF
2569
8039
1200
DZ
1200
Continuous
Monthly
1000 - 1100, 1400
CHI Monitoring Well 3
Currently Constructing Well
1900
DZ
1500,
Continuousl
Monthly
Hialeah RO
New Hialeah RO WTP
Proposed FA Well
Continuous
Monthly
Highlighted wells proposed for MDWASD Floridan Aquifer monitoring network
1. Data for Wells from DBHydro, wells not in MDWASD network.
2. Feet Below Land Surface (bis)
3. Currently Drilling CHI Monitoring Well, ilnformation provided is Proposed only.
TZ - tri -zone
DZ - dual zone
Exhibit 9E
New Monitoring Well Completion Schedule
WELL ID
SITE USE
NETWORK
DATE WELL INSTALLATION COMPLETION
SWW F-1
Located near SWW F for water elevation well -wetland monitoring.
WQ/WL
12 Months after issuance of CUP
WWF -1N
Located NE of West Wellfield for water elevation well -wetland
monitoring
WQ/WL
12 Months after issuance of CUP
SMH-1
Located near South Miami Heights wellfield for water elevation well
WQ/WL
12 Months after issuance of CUP
Ever -1
Located near Everglades Labor Camp Wellfield for water elevation well
WQ/WL
12 Months after issuance of CUP
Newton -1
Located near Newton Wellfield for water elevation well
WQ/WL
12 Months after issuance of CUP
Hialeah RO
Located near new City of Hialeah RO water treatment plant
Floridan Monitoring
Based on City of Hialeah RO plant construction.
USGS Salt Water Intrusion Line Wells
Locations will be determined by the WASD SFWMD USGS DERM to
update Salt Intrusion line along County
Salt Monitoring
36 months after issuance of CUP
USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 1
Located Near Snapper Creek Wellfield and US -1*
Regional Impact
36 months after issuance of CUP
USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 2
Located midway between the Proposed SMH wellfield and the Aquifer
Recharge Project.*
Regional Impact
36 months after issuance of CUP
USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 3
Located North of SWWF near C-2 Canal*
Regional Impact
36 months after issuance of CUP
USGS Ground Water Flow Wells Cluster # 4
Located Northeast of Hialeah -Preston wellfields*
Regional Impact
36 months after issuance of CUP
* Exact location to be determined later by MDWASD/USGS/SFWMD/DERM
Exhibit 9F
Updated Table F (10/30/09)
Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD)
Past Water Use (2001-2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11
12
FINISHED WATER HISTORICAL USE
RAW WATER HISTORICAL USE (a)
Ratio
Finished:Raw
Population
Per Capita
Total Annual
Average
Max Month
Ratio
Total Annual
Average
Max Month
Ratio
Year
Served *
a cd
Usag (gP )
Use (MG) )
Annual
Use MG
( )
Max:Average
Use MG
( )
Month
Use MG
( )
Max:Average
(Total Annual Use)
Use (MG)
Month
Use (MG)
Month
TOTAL MDWASD WATER SYSTEM SERVICE AREA**
2001
2,073,679
151.27
114,493
9,541
9,927.5
1.04
117,159
9,763
10,129
1.04
1.0233
2002
2,103,951
157.06
120,614
10,051
10,961.4
1.09
122,931
10,244
11,163
1.09
1.0192
2003
2,134,223
158.55
123,511
10,293
10,676.1
1.04
125,884
10,490
10,878
1.04
1.0192
2004
2,164,465
156.91
124,301
10,358
10,861.1
1.05
126,685
10,557
11,063
1.05
1.0192
2005
2,194,768
154.91
124,098
10,342
10,734.8
1.04
126,670
10,556
11,031
1.04
1.0207
2006
2,225,040
153.52
124,677
10,390
10,988.6
1.06
127,019
10,585
11,170
1.06
1.0188
2007161
2,235,179
142.92
116,602
9,717
10,485.4
1.08
2008(6)
2,213,833
139.59
113,104
9,425
9,786.7
1.04
5 -year
Average
-
149.57
-
-
-
1.05
1.05
1.0196
(2004-2008)
3 -year
Average
147.74
1.06
1.05
1.0198
(2006-2008)
* Source of Projected Population Information: Miami -Dade County Planning and Zoning Department (DPZ)
** From MDWASD Raw and Finished Water Historical Data 2001- 2008
*** From DPZ population projections updated through August 2008 contained in file titled WaterusbyServiceAreaRev 11-14-08.xlsx
(a) Raw -to -finished water ratio is 1.02. MDWASD is in the process of improving its raw water metering/accounting system.
(b) For 2007 and 2008, Population Served represented August 2008 updates January 2007 Population Projections provided by the MDC DPZ, and total annual
use represents amounts provided within the service area.
CDM
Update TablesF_&_G_120909.xlsx
10/30/2009
UPDATED TABLE G (DRAFT 10/30/09)
MDWASD RAW WATER DEMAND BY SOURCE
1
2
3
4
1 5
6
7
a
21
22
23
24
1 25
1 26
1 27
28
29
30
31
RAW
WATER AAI]b � (MGD)
PROJECTIONS (2009)
Biscayne Aquifef'�
Florida. Aqu'rfer
-
South Miami
Heights
Finishetl
AADD Finishetl
Water
Reuse/
Reciter"
Fim6hA6tetl
Finishetl
Atljustetl Fla he
South
Dade"
Membrane Softemmd,
Hialeah-Preston/
Total
Hialeah
Hialeah -Preston/
Total
Total
Year
.
Populatiori"�
Water
Conservationlbl
Waterl`i
Water Use
Transferfrom
Park/
SW Wellfieltl
Ale..der-OarBiscayne
RO
Alezantler-Orr
Florida.
All Sources
Use
Water Uselal(MGD)
MGO
(MGD)
Water Oemantlltll
(gpctl)
Elevatetl Tanta
Everglad Laboi
Elevatetl Tanta
Former Plant/
For er
Increase
Lime Softening
Aquifef"�
WiP�'�
Blentlind'�
Aquifer
(gpctl)
Credit
Cretlit
(MGD)
LeisureCity/
Camp/
LeisureCity/
Roberta
Naranja
Newlon
Naranja
Huntedg)
System -Wide
2009
2,238,700
145.4
325.51
0.86
0.00
324.65
145.02
3.75
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
324.41
331.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
331.01
2010
2,263,566
145.4
329.12
1.75
0.00
327.37
144.63
3.80
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
327.09
333.79
0.00
0.00
0.00
333.79
2011
2,288,432
145.4
332.74
2.64
0.00
330.10
144.25
3.85
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
329.77
336.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
336.57
2012
2,321,552
145.4
337.55
3.91
0.00
333.64
143.72
3.90
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
333.33
340.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
340.18
2013
2,347,012
145.4
341.26
5.18
0.00
336.08
143.19
3.95
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
333.54
340.44
2.90
0.00
2.90
343.34
2014
2,372,509
145.4
344.96
5.96
0.00
339.00
142.89
1.83
2.95
2.50
0.00
0.00
333.54
340.82
6.72
0.00
6.72
347.54
2015
2,401,027
145.4
349.11
6.74
0.00
342.37
142.59
0.00
0.00
2.50
5.65
0.00
336.43
344.57
7.41
0.00
7.41
351.98
2016
2,426,789
145.4
352.86
7.51
0.00
345.35
142.31
0.00
0.00
2.50
5.88
0.00
338.73
347.11
8.10
0.00
8.10
355.21
2017
2,452,550
145.4
356.60
8.29
0.00
348.31
142.02
0.00
0.00
2.50
7.84
0.00
339.90
350.23
8.31
0.00
8.31
358.54
2018
2,478,312
145.4
360.35
9.06
0.00
351.29
141.74
0.00
0.00
2.50
13.12
0.00
338.35
353.96
8.31
0.00
8.31
362.28
2022
2,581,358
145.4
375.33
12.12
0.00
363.21
140.70
0.00
0.00
2.50
18.62
7.12
337.34
365.58
9.98
0.00
9.98
375.55
2027
2,710,166
145.4
394.06
15.19
0.00
378.87
139.80
0.00
0.00
2.50
18.62
21.56
337.34
380.02
11.97
0.00
11.97
391.99
2030
2,787,451
145.4
405.30
15.19
0.00
390.11
139.95
0.00
0.00
2.50
18.62
31.21
337.63
389.96
13.97
0.00
13.97
403.93
amUpdate_Table G_102909.xis
11/12/2009
UPDATED TABLE G (DRAFT 10/30/09)
MDWASD FINISHED WATER DEMAND BY SOURCE
1
2
1 3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
is
19
26
ADJUSTED FINISHED
WATER AADD (MGD)
PROJECTIONS
(2009)
Biscayne Aquifer
Floritlan Aquifer
South
Datle(el
South Miami Heights
AADO
Finsihed
Finished
AADD Finished
Water
Reuse/
Reclaimetl
Atljustetl
Atljustetl
11
Membrane Softeniny�l
Hialeah
Total
Hialeah
Hialeah
Total
Total
Water
••SURPLUS"
E-glade
Transferfrom
Year
Populatio&)
Water
Water Uselal
Conservation"
Water
Finishetl
Finished
SW Wellfieltl
-Preston/
Alezand -Orr
Biscayne
RO
-Preston/
Aleza d -Orr
Floritlan
All Sources
(Col. 19 -Col.
Use
(MGD)
MGD
( )
(MGD)
Water Demantlld)
Water Use
Elevatetl Tanl
Labor
Elevatetl Tanta
Caribb. Park/
Increase
Lime Softening
Aquife�a)
WiPl�l
Blending
Aquifer
7)
(gpctl)
Cretlit
Cretlit
(MGD)
(gpctl)
LeisureCity/
Camp/
LeisureCity/
Former Plant/
Naranja
Newlon0l
Naranja
Roberta Hunte,al
System -Wide
2009
2,238,700
145.4
325.51
0.86
0.00
324.65
145.02
3.75
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
318.05
324.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
324.65
0.00
2010
2,263,566
145.4
329.12
1.75
0.00
327.37
144.63
3.80
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
320.67
327.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
327.37
0.00
2011
2,288,432
145.4
332.74
2.64
0.00
330.10
144.25
3.85
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
323.30
330.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
330.10
0.00
2012
2,321,552
145.4
337.55
3.91
0.00
333.64
143.72
3.90
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
326.79
333.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
333.64
0.00
2013
2,347,012
145.4
341.26
5.18
0.00
336.08
143.19
3.95
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
327.00
333.90
2.18
0.00
2.18
336.08
0.00
2014
2,372,509
145.4
344.96
5.96
0.00
339.00
142.89
1.83
2.95
2.17
0.00
0.00
327.00
333.95
5.05
0.00
5.05
339.00
0.00
2015
2,401,027
145.4
349.11
6.74
0.00
342.37
142.59
0.00
4.10
2.17
4.80
0.00
329.83
336.80
5.57
0.00
5.57
342.37
0.00
2016
2,426,789
145.4
352.86
7.51
0.00
345.35
142.31
0.00
4.10
2.17
5.00
0.00
332.09
339.26
6.09
0.00
6.09
345.35
0.00
2017
2,452,550
145.4
356.60
8.29
0.00
348.31
142.02
0.00
4.10
2.17
6.66
0.00
333.24
342.07
6.25
0.00
6.25
348.32
0.00
2018
2,478,312
145.4
360.35
9.06
0.00
351.29
141.74
0.00
4.10
2.17
11.15
0.00
331.72
345.04
6.25
0.00
6.25
351.29
0.00
2022
2,581,358
145.4
375.33
12.12
0.00
363.21
140.70
0.00
4.10
2.17
15.83
6.98
330.73
355.71
7.50
0.00
7.50
363.21
0.00
2027
2,710,166
145.4
394.06
15.19
0.00
378.87
139.80
0.00
4.10
2.17
15.83
21.14
330.73
369.87
9.00
0.00
9.00
378.87
0.00
2030
2,787,451
145.4
405.30
15.19
0.00
390.11
139.95
0.00
4.10
2.17
15.83
30.60
331.01
379.61
10.50
0.00
10.50
390.11
0.00
Update_Table G_102909. AN
cm 11/12/2009
Footnotes
(a) Annual Average Daily Demand (AADD) Finished Water Projections between 2009 and 2030 assume 145.4 gpcd total water
system demand prior to application of credits (e.g. conservation).
(b) WASD is undertaking the 20 -year water use efficiency plan and expects reductions in per capita water consumption. Water
Conservation projections were revised based on the 2008 Annual Water Conservation Plan Conserve Florida Redport (March
2009). Real losses in non -revenue non-revenuewater (e.g. unaccounted -for -water) are assumed to remain at less than 10%. The
conservation amounts experienced in 2007 and 2008 were deducted from the 20 -year conservation amount and the remaining
conservation amounts were distributed for the remainder of the 20 -year period (2009-2027).
(c)Not Used (TBD).
(d) Adjusted after taking credit in finished water demand projections for reductions in finished water use associated with water
conservation.
ation.
(e)South Dade (Raw: Finished) Ratio = 1.0: 1.0
(f) Membrane Softening (Raw: Finished) Ratio = 1.18: 1.00 (85% Recovery)
(g) Beginning 2015, withdrawals from SMH WTP are considered offsets from Phase 1 GWR near SMH (Metro Zoo)
(h) Base condition raw water use (346.37 mgd) represents values agreed to by SFWMD and MDWASD and demonstrated by
modeling to not cause a net increase in water from the regional canal system. Biscayne Aquifer base condition raw water use
allocation of 346.37 mgd equates to 339.74 mgd of finished water annual average daily demand (AADD) assuming a 1.02 raw -to -
finished water ratio. Phase 1 South District Water Reclamation Plant (SDWRP) Reclaimed Water Projects for Groundwater
Recharge (GWR) and for future West District WRP (WDWRP) for Phases 2 and 3 Canal Recharge as shown in the table below
and assuming a gallon -for -gallon offset. The applied (MGD) amounts represents total Biscayne Aquifer withdrawals to apply a
gallon -for -gallon offset.
(i) RO WTP (Raw: Finished) Ratio = 1.33 : 1.00
Q) Becomes standby once SDWRP starts up.
(k) Population represents August 2008 updates to January 2007 Population Projections provided by the Miami -Dade County
Department of Planning and Zoning.
cmUpdate_Table G_102909.xis
1/1212009
SDWWTP
Applied
AADD
Implementation
Phase
Reclaimed Facility
Recharge Area
(MGD)
(mgd)
Year
(mgd)
Offset
1
24.3 SDWRP
S. Miami Heights
18.6
15.83
2015
2
24.7 WDWRP
Alex -Orr
21
20
2022
3
18.8 WDWRP
Alex -Orr
16
15
2027
Total (est.)
67.8
55.6
50.83
(i) RO WTP (Raw: Finished) Ratio = 1.33 : 1.00
Q) Becomes standby once SDWRP starts up.
(k) Population represents August 2008 updates to January 2007 Population Projections provided by the Miami -Dade County
Department of Planning and Zoning.
cmUpdate_Table G_102909.xis
1/1212009
Table 4 - MDWASD Floridan Aquifer Wellfields Operation Plan Summary (12/09/2009) Pumpage by Wellfield
1
2 3
4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11
14
Wellfield Data
Individual Wellfield ANNUAL Pumpage / Allocation (a)
Remarks
Design
Number
2007-2012
2013-2017
2018-2022
2023-2027
WTP Subarea and Wellfield
Capacity
of Wells
(mgd)
BG (mgd)
BG (mgd)
BG (mgd)
BG (mgd)
See Footnote C
Hialeah RO WTP
24.00
7
0 0.00
3.033 8.31
6.311 17.29
6.311 17.29
Hialeah - Preston WTP Blending (Project Canceled)
Blending at Alexander Orr WTP Resulted in
Hialeah - Preston
0
0
0 0.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
Distribution System Water Quality Problems -
Project Canceled
Alexander Orr WTP Blending (Use of Aquifer Storage and Recovery wells for Blending Canceled)
Southwest
7.00
2
Full Scale Blending Cancelled. Only Minimal
0.000 0.00
0.000 0.00
0.000 0.00
0.000 0.00
Incidental Blending as result of Aquifer
West
10.50
3
Storage and Recovery Well Operation
MDWASD System Total
41.50
12
Total Not -To -Exceed Pumpage Annual Average
0.000 0.00
F3.033 8.31
6.311 17.29
6.311 17.29
Notes
BG = Billion Gallons; MGD = Million Gallons per Day
(a) The maximum projected pumpage for the entire MDWASD water service area shall not exceed the annual allocation permitted by SFWMD.
(b) New Upper Floridan Aquifer RO WTP (10.0 mgd Phase 1 by 2013); (5.0 MGD Phase 2 by 2027): (2.5 MGD Phase 3 by 2027)
M
X
Floridan Users
Permitted or Application in-house
Miami -Dade, Broward, Monroe
Permit
Permittee
Wells
Pumpage (mgd)
13-01556-W
La Gorce CC
FL2
0.5
13-00059-W
North Miami
FL1-FL3
16
13-00060-W
No Miami Bch
F-1 to F-4
12
Site certification
FPL -Turkey Pt
3 -Jan
14
13-00029-W
Florida City
F1
2
13-00005-W
FKAA
FA -1 to FA -5
10
13-00017-W
MDWASD
ASR -1W to ASR -3W
4.5
13-00017-W
MDWASD
ASR-4SW, ASR-5SW
3
13-00017-W
MDWASD
HialeahlRO - 7RO
20
06-00054-W
Miramar
F1,F2
2.7
06-00120-W
Sunrise
Melaleuca 1,2
2
06-00120-W
Sunrise
Park City 2,3,4,7
6
06-00120-W
Sunrise
Sprintreel
2.5
06-00082-W
Deerfield Beach
WF -22
1
06-01474-W
Broward District 2 (2A/NR)
F2 -F5
6.6
06-00146-W
Broward District 1
F1 -F4
6
06-00123-W
Ft. Lauderdale (Prospect)
F1
25
06-00123-W
Ft. Lauderdale (Dixie)
F2
8
06-00038-W
Hollywood
F2 -F18
19
06-00954-W
Gulfstream Park
3
0.2
44-00001-W
Card Sound Golf Club
A(4)
0.6
44-00002-W
10cean Reef Community
2,3,5,6
1 1.4
44-00284-W
ISilver Shores MHP
IWELL
I0.02
EXHIBIT 23
Table 5-2: Schedule of Real Water Loss Reduction Activities
January 2007 through December 2026
Activity 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
5.3 Recommendations for Real Loss Reduction
5.3.1 System Design Active Review)
5.3.2 System Management
5.3.2.3 Asset Maintenance or Replacement
5.3.2.4 Reduce Maintenance Response Times
5.3.2.5 Active leakage Control and Sounding Pilot
5.3.2.7 Pressure Management
5.3.2.8 Speed and Quality of Repairs
Perform Venturi Comparative Tests-WTPs
Perform Venturi Comparative Tests -wholesale customers
Conduct wholesale customer unmetered connection survey
Pilot Fixed Network AMR Pilot
Enhance GIS database
ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS Million Gallons 650 13001 1950 2600 3250 3900 4550
ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS Million $ $0.297 $0.595 $0.892 $1.189 $1.487 $1.784 $2.081
Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
5.3 Recommendations for Real Loss Reduction
5.3.1 System Design Active Review)
5.3.2 System Management
5.3.2.3 Asset Maintenance or Replacement
5.3.2.4 Reduce Maintenance Response Times
5.3.2.5 Active leakage Control and Sounding
5.3.2.7 Pressure Management
5.3.2.8 Speed and Quality of Repairs
chieve target real loss of 5 billion gallons per year X
Achieve target Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) of 3.0 X
ANNUALWATER SAVINGS (Million Gallons) 5200 52001 5200 5200 52001 52001 52001 5200 52001 5200
ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS Million $ 2.378, $2.3781 $2.378, 2.378 $2.3781 $2.37812.378 2.378 $2.3781 $2.378
Updated 11-16-09
M
X
N
C)
Table 6-2: Schedule of Apparent Water Loss Reduction Activities
January 2007 through December 2026
Activity 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
6.3 Recommendations for Apparent Water Loss Reduction
6.3.1 Reducing Unmetered Supplies
6.3.2 Improved Meter Accuracy
6.3.3 Commercial Meter Types and Sizes
6.3.3.2.1 Compound Meters Usage Compared to Same Size Turbine Meters
6.3.3.3 Looking Forward(setting Economic Meter Testing Goals
6.3.4 Improved Calibration of Wholesale Customer Meters
6.3.5 Wholesale Customer Unmetered Connection Analysis
Conduct field accuracy testing of commercial meters
Pilot AMR to improve data handling and reduce labor cost Pilot
Characterize residential water demand pattern
Determine economic optimum for residential meter replacement
ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS Million Gallons 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800
ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS (Million $) 1 1 1 1 0.7881 1.5761 2.3641 3.1521 3.941 4.7281 5.516
Activity 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
6.3 Recommendations for Apparent Water Loss Reduction
6.3.1 Reducing Unmetered Supplies
6.3.2 Improved Meter Accuracy
6.3.3 Commercial Meter Types and Sizes
6.3.3.2.1 Compound Meters Usage Compared to Same Size Turbine Meters
6.3.3.3 Looking Forward(setting Economic Meter Testing Goals
6.3.4 Improved Calibration of Wholesale Customer Meters
6.3.5 Wholesale Customer Unmetered Connection Analysis
Conduct field accuracy testing of commercial meters
Reduce Apparent Losses to 10 billion gallons per year X
ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS Million Gallons 3200 3600 4000 4400 4800 5200 5600 6000 6400 6800
ANNUAL VALUE OF WATER SAVINGS Million $ 6.3041 7.0921 7.881 8.668 9.4561 10.244 1-1,0321 11.821 12.6081 13.396
Update 11-16-09
430
420
0 410
0
2 400
c
:r
390
0 380
L
CL 370
a
360
M
350
M
340
M
E 330
0
320
310
300
2005
MDWASD Finished Water Demands and Water Supply Projections 10/30/2009)
2010 2015 Year 2020 2025 2030
Project Names (per 2007 AWS program):
1. ASIR Ultrav elet (IJV) P S Rf8Gt OR SyStern for ASIR Sys. @ W&SW Wellfelds (7.2 MGP ASPVblend, $6.41M) 5. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 2 (4.5 MGD, $25.01M) (WTP Capacity = 15.0 MGD)
o n...�.t�., n,.,,.1 Plen ting Wellfeld at H aleal4lPnesten (4 .7 MGP $10.31M) 6. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 2 (21 MGD, $482.01M)
3. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 1 Capacity (8.5 MGD, $93.OM)(WTP Capacity = 10.0 MGD) 7. West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge Ph 3 (16 MGD, $317.51M)
4. South Distr. W.R.P. Groundwater Recharge Ph 1(18.6 MGD, $357.51M) 8. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. W.T.P. Phase 3 (2.0 MGD, $9.71M) (WTP Capacity = 17.5 MGD)
1111212009
W Comparison of WUP Projections and updated Per Capita Projections 103009.xlsRe Ased Step Char[ 103009
CION
Alternative Water Supply Project Development Deadlines Tied to
Increased Withdrawal Above the Base Condition Water Use
Average Milestone
Project / Milestone daily flow Completion Date
Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 1
(10.0 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
Completed
• Notice To Proceed Construction
12/8/2009
• Turnover/ Project Completion
12/25/2012
Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 2
(5.0 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
1/15/2025
• Notice To Proceed Construction
7/30/2026
• Turnover/ Project Completion
10/31/2027
Hialeah Floridan Aquifer R.O. WTP Phase 3
(2.5 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
1/15/2025
• Notice To Proceed Construction
7/30/2026
• Turnover/ Project Completion
10/31/2027
South District WRP Groundwater Recharge Phase 1
(18.6 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
Underway
• Notice To Proceed Construction
8/30/2011
• Turnover/ Project Completion
10/31/2027
West District WRP Canal Recharge Phase 2
(21 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
1/15/2016
• Notice To Proceed Construction
8/30/2018
• Turnover/ Project Completion
12/31/2021
West District WRP Canal Recharge Phase 3
(16 mgd)
• Notice To Proceed Design / Permit
1/15/2021
• Notice To Proceed Construction
7/30/2023
• Turnover/ Project Completion
12/31/2026
EXHIBIT 29
Reuse Protects and Deadlines
Project
Reclaimed water
Quantity of Reclaimed
Reclaimed water used
Implementation
generated from and
Wastewater Applied
for
Deadline
amount to be treated
1.
South District WWTP
18.6 MGD
Recharge South Dade
Dec. 31, 2014
21.9 mgd
finished water assuming 15%
Miami Heights wellfields
treatment loss. The recharge
or other project
volume may vary depending
on actual treatment loss.
2.
South District WWTP
75.7 MGD
Biscayne Coastal
Dec. 31, 2020
89.1 mgd
Finished reclaimed water
Wetlands or other project
assuming 15% treatment
loss. The applied volume
may vary depending on
actual treatment loss.
3.
South District WWTP
1 MGD
Public access irrigation
Existing
1 mgd
water landfill ca
4.
West District
21 MGD
Recharge Southwest,
Dec. 31, 2021
Reclaimed Water Plant
Finished water assuming
Snapper Creek, and Alex
24.7 mgd
15% treatment loss. The
Orr Wellfields (Alex Orr
recharge volume may vary
WTP / Central water
depending on actual
treatment loss.
system)
5.
West District
16 MGD
Recharge Southwest,
Dec. 31, 2026
Reclaimed Water Plant
Finished water assuming
Snapper Creek, and Alex
18.8 mgd
15% treatment loss. The
Orr Wellfields (Alex Orr
recharge volume may vary
WTP / Central water
depending on actual
treatment loss.
system)
6.
West District
6.5 MGD
The scope of these
Dec. 31, 2025
Reclaimed Water Plant
minimal treatment losses
projects will be
6.5 mgd
determined as part of the
Ocean Outfall legislation
7.
North District WWTP
7 MGD
Dec. 31, 2025
7 mgd
minimal treatment losses
implementation plan due
to the Secretary of FDEP
8.
Central District WWTP
1 MGD
Dec. 31, 2025
1.2 mgd
minimal treatment losses
by July 1, 2013
TOTAL REQUIRED PROJECTS = 170 MGD
Dec. 31, 2026
9.
South District WWTP
Up to 90 MGD*
Cooling of FP&L
proposed Units # 6 & 7,
and existing Unit #5
OTHER POTENTIAL
LARGE SCALE PROJECTS = 75-90 MGD
GRAND TOTAL = 245-260 mgd
Miami -Dade is committed to providing 170 MGD reclaimed water + 75-90 MGD,
contingent on FP&L receiving authorization to construct these power facilities and the
Dec. 31, 2026
feasibility of the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Rehydration Project.
EXHIBIT 30
TABLE J
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR -1-W, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not
done a full recharge and recovery for it.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Biscayne aquifer water from West Wellfield wells WW -29, WW -30, and
WW -31 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection
for storage.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant
Year
Actual/
Projected
Million
Gallons
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Storage
Loss
Other Loss*
2012
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2012
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2011
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2010
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2010
Projected
Recovered
6.72
0.00
6.72
35.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
* Please specify the type of loss: N/A
Instructions for Completing TABLE J,
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect
both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of
unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected
water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested
allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial
raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is
withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the
raw water source.
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete
Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we
contact you, this is what you would recognize it as.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us the source
of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify
which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us
the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being
recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment
plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water.
Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.
Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount
of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both
storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both
amounts.
Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered.
Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary
explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on
Table 1, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.
TABLE J
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR -2-W, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not
done a full recharge and recovery for it.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Biscayne aquifer water from West Wellfield wells WW -29, WW -30, and
WW -31 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection
for storage.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant
Year
Actual/
Projected
Million
Gallons
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Storage
Loss
Other Loss*
2012
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2012
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2011
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2010
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2010
Projected
Recovered
6.72
0.00
6.72
35.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
* Please specify the type of loss: N/A
Instructions for Completing TABLE J,
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect
both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of
unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected
water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested
allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial
raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is
withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the
raw water source.
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete
Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we
contact you, this is what you would recognize it as.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us the source
of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify
which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us
the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being
recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment
plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water.
Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.
Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount
of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both
storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both
amounts.
Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered.
Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary
explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on
Table 1, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.
TABLE J
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR -3-W, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not
done a full recharge and recovery for it.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Biscayne aquifer water from West Wellfield wells WW -29, WW -30, and
WW -31 after treated by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection
for storage.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant
Year
Actual/
Projected
Million
Gallons
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Storage
Loss
Other Loss*
2012
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2012
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2011
Projected
Recovered
0.00
67.22
208.39
194.94
208.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2010
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
0.00
100.00
103.33
103.33
100.00
103.33
100.00
103.33
N/A
2010
Projected
Recovered
6.72
0.00
6.72
35.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
* Please specify the type of loss: N/A
Instructions for Completing TABLE J,
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect
both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of
unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected
water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested
allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial
raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is
withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the
raw water source.
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete
Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we
contact you, this is what you would recognize it as.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us the source
of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify
which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us
the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being
recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment
plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water.
Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.
Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount
of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both
storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both
amounts.
Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered.
Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary
explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on
Table 1, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.
TABLE J
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR -4 -SW, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not
done a full recharge and recovery for it.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name -Table 1): Biscayne aquifer water from Southwest Wellfield wells SW -11, SW -12,
SW -13, SW -14, SW -15, SW -16, SW -17, SW -18, SW -19, SW -20, SW -25, SW -26, SW -27, SW -28, SW -32, SW -33, and SW -34 after treated
by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection for storage.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant
Year
Actual/
Projected
Million
Gallons
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Storage
Loss
Other Loss*
2012
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
150.00
155.00
155.00
150.00
155.00
75.00
0.00
N/A
2012
Projected
Recovered
67.22
194.94
208.39
201.67
67.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
150.00
155.00
155.00
150.00
155.00
75.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Recovered
0.00
100.83
201.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2010
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
155.00
150.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75.63
151.25
75.63
N/A
2010
Projected
Recovered
0.00
6.72
0.00
52.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
201.67
100.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
* Please specify the type of loss: N/A
Instructions for Completing TABLE J,
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect
both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of
unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected
water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested
allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial
raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is
withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the
raw water source.
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete
Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we
contact you, this is what you would recognize it as.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us the source
of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify
which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us
the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being
recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment
plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water.
Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.
Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount
of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both
storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both
amounts.
Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered.
Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary
explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on
Table 1, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.
TABLE J
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): ASR -5 -SW, No Cycling Plan has been done for this ASR so we have not
done a full recharge and recovery for it.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name -Table 1): Biscayne aquifer water from Southwest Wellfield wells SW -11, SW -12,
SW -13, SW -14, SW -15, SW -16, SW -17, SW -18, SW -19, SW -20, SW -25, SW -26, SW -27, SW -28, SW -32, SW -33, and SW -34 after treated
by Ultraviolet reactor for disinfection prior to injection for storage.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, Treatment Plant Name - Table 1): Alexander Orr, Jr. Water Treatment Plant
Year
Actual/
Projected
Million
Gallons
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Storage
Loss
Other Loss*
2012
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
150.00
155.00
155.00
150.00
155.0
105.00
0.00
N/A
2012
Projected
Recovered
67.22
194.94
208.39
201.67
67.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
75.00
155.00
155.00
150.00
155.00
105.00
0.00
N/A
2011
Projected
Recovered
0.00
100.83
201.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
2010
Projected
Stored
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
151.25
151.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
75.63
151.25
75.63
N/A
2010
Projected
Recovered
0.00
0.00
0.00
52.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
201.67
100.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
* Please specify the type of loss: N/A
Instructions for Completing TABLE J,
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Water stored in and recovered from an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well will affect
both overall allocation and the timing of raw water demands. A certain amount of
unrecoverable water is needed to establish and maintain a buffer zone between injected
water and native aquifer water, which must be accounted for in the overall requested
allocation. Typically, water is stored in ASR wells during times when demands on the initial
raw water source are low and/or raw water source water is in plentiful supply, then it is
withdrawn from the ASR well during times of high demand and/or limited availability of the
raw water source.
Identity of Aquifer Storage and Recovery Facility (From Table A): Please complete
Table J for each ASR well. Use the same identifier for the well as you did in Table A; if we
contact you, this is what you would recognize it as.
Stored Water Source: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us the source
of the water being stored in the ASR well. If you are storing treated water, please identify
which treatment plant(s), as listed in Table I is providing the water.
Recovered Water Destination: (if water plant, which one from Table 1): Please tell us
the destination of the water being recovered from the ASR facility. If the water being
recovered is sent to a water treatment plant prior to use, please identify which treatment
plant(s), as listed in Table I is treating the water.
Year: Enter the calendar year, either past or future, represented.
Actual/Projected: Enter the recorded (for past years) or projected (for future years) amount
of water (in millions of gallons) to be stored or recovered for each month of the year. If both
storage and recovery have happened or will happen within the same month, enter both
amounts.
Storage Loss: Enter the percentage of the water stored that cannot be recovered.
Other Loss: If there are losses other than to storage, please specify and if necessary
explain the loss and enter the percentage of the loss. If you have reported these losses on
Table 1, Water Treatment Method and Losses, do not report them again on this form.
APPENDIXWSP-2
The following data was extracted from the Miami -Dade County 2009-2010 Capital Improvements Program and Multi -
Year Capital Plan. This data presents the Sewer Facilities (Table 8) and Water Facilities (Table 12) as represented in
MDCDMP.
This space was intentionally left blank.
WSP-ORC
APPENDIX
March 2010
N
W
April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Application No. 7, Capital Improvements Element
TABLE 8
SEWER FACILITIES
Project
Number
Project Name
And Location
Purpose*/
Year of
Completion
Prior
Years
2009/10
2010/11
Expenditures
Revenues
(In Millions of Dollars)
2011/12 2012/13
2013/14 2014/15
Six Year
Totals
Future
Years
Project
Totals
Funding
Source
1)
Central M -D W.W.Tr.Mains & Pump St. Improv.
3/2013
3.52
6.52
28.65
20.08
28.00
0.00
0.00
83.25
0.00
86.77
490,521,
W.W. System - Central District Area
7.02
5.52
26.15
20.08
28.00
0.00
0.00
79.75
0.00
86.77
1170,1171
1222
2)
Gravity Sewer Renovations
1/2015
34.49
14.15
15.28
10.94
9.95
2.62
0.40
53.34
1.32
89.15
490,1170,
Systemwide
36.89
11.75
15.28
10.94
9.95
2.62
0.40
50.94
1.32
89.15
1171,1222
3)
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
1/2015
0.90
1.71
2.23
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.70
6.77
0.71
8.38
497,521
Systemwide
6.86
1.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.52
0.00
8.38
4)
W.W. General Maintenance & Office Facilities
3/2015
0.26
7.80
16.88
19.78
9.87
6.30
4.70
65.33
8.02
73.61
490,521,
Systemwide
2.39
6.80
16.88
18.65
9.87
6.30
4.70
63.20
8.02
73.61
1170,1171
1222
5)
W.W. Telemetering System
3/2015
4.16
3.73
2.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.45
0.00
10.61
490,1171,
Systemwide
4.16
3.73
2.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.45
0.00
10.61
1222
6)
Lift Station Upgrades & Struct. Maint. Impr.
3/2015
4.65
4.22
3.33
4.33
5.88
6.86
6.86
31.48
3.96
40.09
490,1171,
Systemwide
4.65
4.22
3.33
4.33
5.88
6.86
6.86
31.48
3.96
40.09
1222
7)
South DistrictVV.W.Tr. Mains&Pump St. Improv.
3/2012
0.00
3.18
4.37
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.65
0.00
9.65
521,1171,
W.W. System - South District Area
0.00
3.18
4.37
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.65
0.00
9.65
1222
8)
Wastewater System Maint. & Upgrades
3/2015
15.54
10.60
16.43
16.43
16.42
16.42
16.42
92.72
16.43
124.69
490
Systemwide
15.54
10.60
16.43
16.43
16.42
16.42
16.42
92.72
16.43
124.69
9)
Pump Station Improvements Program
3/2015
30.54
11.60
14.25
13.00
8.00
3.00
0.00
49.85
0.00
80.39
490,521,
Systemwide
33.04
9.10
14.25
13.00
8.00
3.00
0.00
47.35
0.00
80.39
1170,1171
1222
10)
Corrosion Control Facilities Improvements
1/2012
10.97
1.20
2.06
3.07
1.50
1.50
1.50
10.83
1.37
23.17
1170,1171
Systemwide
11.82
0.35
2.06
3.07
1.50
1.50
1.50
9.98
1.37
23.17
1222
11)
Wastewater Engineering Studies
3/2010
6.39
1.66
0.50
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.26
0.00
8.65
1170,1171,
Systemwide
7.22
0.83
0.50
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.43
0.00
8.65
1222
12)
Sanitary Sewer System Extension
3/2015
22.58
21.26
9.62
8.59
5.47
4.88
8.81
58.63
59.43
140.64
490,1026,
Systemwide
25.58
21.26
8.12
7.09
5.47
4.88
8.81
55.63
59.43
140.64
1135,1171,
1222
13)
Peak Flow Management Facilities
1/2016
11.62
15.96
93.27
90.05
155.38
244.53
147.72
746.91
342.03
1100.56
490,521,
Systemwide
18.63
11.95
90.27
90.05
155.38
244.53
147.72
739.90
342.03
1100.56
1170,1171
1179,1222
14)
W.W. Equipment & Vehicles
3/2015
12.88
7.64
8.57
8.58
8.58
8.58
8.57
50.52
8.57
71.97
490
Systemwide
12.88
7.64
8.57
8.58
8.58
8.58
8.57
50.52
8.57
71.97
* 1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
0
Fn
0
� 0
W
m-0
00
7
N
April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Application No. 7, Capital Improvements Element
1=Existing Deficiency, 2=Future Growth, 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
0 �
mn
0
00
m-0
W
•
Table 8 - Sewer Facilities (continued)
Expenditures
Purpose"/
Revenues
Project
Project Name
Year of
Prior
(In Millions of Dollars)
Six Year
Future
Project Funding
Number
And Location
Completion
Years
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014115
Totals
Years
Totals Source
15)
Central District Upgrades - W.W.T. P.
3/2015
2.93
12.34
45.08
27.79
3.66
6.37
2.39
97.63
0.00
100.56 490,521,
Virginia Key
7.24
10.01
43.10
27.79
3.66
6.37
2.39
93.32
0.00
100.56 1170,1171
1222
16)
North District Upgrades - W.W.T.P.
3/2013
1.78
3.28
9.15
35.56
42.90
17.15
7.89
115.93
0.00
117.71 490,521,
2575 NE 151 St.
2.57
2.49
9.15
35.56
42.90
17.15
7.89
115.14
0.00
117.71 1170,1171
1222
17)
South District Upgrades - W.W.T. P.
12015
5.15
6.17
14.90
11.16
2.88
1.28
1.28
37.67
0.00
42.82 521,1170,
8950 SW 232 St.
5.55
5.77
14.90
11.16
2.88
1.28
1.28
37.27
0.00
42.82 1171,1222
18)
W.W. Treatment Repl. & Renovation.
32015
5.57
14.45
4.29
4.29
4.29
4.29
4.29
35.90
4.29
45.76 490,1171
Systemwide
5.57
14.45
4.29
4.29
4.29
4.29
4.29
35.90
4.29
45.76
19)
Pump Station Generators & Misc. Upgrades
32015
0.18
1.42
12.26
6.68
9.68
5.28
5.28
40.60
4.80
45.58 490,1171,
Systemwide
0.18
1.42
12.26
6.68
9.68
5.28
5.28
40.60
4.80
45.58 1222
20)
W.W.T.P. Automation Enhancements.
32014
6.45
1.64
2.34
1.27
3.73
1.83
0.00
10.81
0.00
17.26 521,1170,
Systemwide
6.45
1.64
2.34
1.27
3.73
1.83
0.00
10.81
0.00
17.26 1171,1222
21)
W.W.T.P. Miscellaneous Upgrades
32015
0.00
0.66
3.96
2.95
0.98
3.10
2.87
14.52
0.00
14.52 1171,1222
Wastewater Treatment Plants
0.00
0.66
3.96
2.95
0.98
3.10
2.87
14.52
0.00
14.52
22)
North M -D W.W.Tr. Mains & Pump St. Improv.
32010
3.33
1.74
0.59
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.88
0.00
8.21 490,521,
Wastewater System - North District Area
3.33
1.74
0.59
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.88
0.00
8.21 1170,1171
1179,1222
23)
South District W.W.T.P Expansion (Ph III)
22015
0.78
1.77
2.18
4.69
3.66
5.23
11.57
29.10
5.67
35.55 490,521,
8960 SW 232 St.
1.28
1.27
2.18
4.69
3.66
5.23
11.57
28.60
6.67
35.55 1171,1222
24)
South District W.W.T.P.-High Level Disinfect.
22015
105.00
147.57
201.58
76.93
40.27
19.80
0.00
486.15
0.00
591.15 490,521,
8950 SW 232 St.
159.50
105.53
189.88
76.17
40.27
19.80
0.00
431.65
0.00
591.15 1170,1171,
1177,1222
25)
Village of Key Biscayne Reuse Distr.System
32009
1.10
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
2.00 914
Village of Key Biscayne
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
26)
Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Rehydr. Pilot
22011
1.68
4.50
4.70
3.12
3.12
2.12
0.91
18.47
0.00
20.15 914,961
Systemwide
2.18
4.00
4.70
3.12
3.12
2.12
0.91
17.97
0.00
20.15 1222
27)
North Dist.W.W.T.P.Reuse Proj.-Plant/Pipeline
22012
0.32
1.44
3.27
4.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.45
0.00
9.77 521,914,
W.W. System- North District Area
0.82
0.94
3.27
4.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.95
0.00
9.77 961,1222
28)
Central District W.W.T.P. Reuse Project
22012
2.04
6.48
11.09
12.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
29.75
0.00
31.79 521,914,
W.W. System - Central District Area
3.04
5.48
11.09
12.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
28.75
0.00
31.79 961,1222
29)
South District W.W.T.P. Reuse Project
22015
4.10
8.91
69.52
137.61
99.76
10.10
0.00
325.90
0.00
330.00 521,961,
Ph. 1 (30 mgd)
17.01
0.00
65.52
137.61
99.76
10.10
0.00
312.99
0.00
330.00
30)
West District W.R.P. Canal Recharge
22025
0.00
10.14
17.37
29.63
13.35
2.06
48.36
120.91
494.90
615.81 961,1222
Ph. 2 (21 mgd) (WR -B)
0.00
10.14
17.37
29.63
13.35
2.06
48.36
120.91
494.90
615.81
1=Existing Deficiency, 2=Future Growth, 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
0 �
mn
0
00
m-0
W
•
N
01
April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Application No. 7, Capital Improvements Element
TOTALS 300.07 337.48 645.06 584.44 495.16 453.28 382.26 2897.68 1502.09 4,699.84
405.73 266.66 617.15 580.34 494.45 452.57 381.56 2792.73 1501.38 4,699.84
Source: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department and Department of Planning and Zoning.
Data provided by the Office of Strategic Business Management.
1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
C)
mn
0
r T
M
00
7
Subtotals
Table 8 - Sewer Facilities (continued)
336.16
635.05
574.88
479.37
374.01
280.52 2,679.99
951.50 3,931.04
405.21
Expenditures
607.14
570.78
478.66
373.30
279.82
2,575.04
950.79
3,931.04
Purpose`!
Proposed Additions, April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Revenues
Project
Project Name
Year of
Prior
CL -E 72 Inch Influent to Proposed W.D.W
3/2015
(In Millions of Dollars)
0.00
0.00
Six Year
Future
Project
Funding
Number
And Location
Completion
Years
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12 2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
Totals
Years
Totals
Source
31)
9 sGa n.e Beni Goast Wetlands oer (52 Fngd)
W2Q1
048
0-99
Q -W
949 0.89
0-98
8-99
0-98
E21 98
Q1 99
1171
52.23
W. -W. syslemw de
118.42
9 -BB
9-86
9 -BB
9-86 9 -BB
9A6
9-86
4.49
624.99
624.99
6.47
32)
North District W.W.T.P - Injection Wells Improv.
3/2015
0.24
0.17
0.36
2.73 1.33
0.00
0.00
4.59
0.00
4.83
914,961
0.00
ND Floridian Aq. Monitoring W.W. Systemwide
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.36
2.73 1.33
0.00
0.00
4.42
0.00
4.83
0.00
33)
South District W.W.T.P - Pipeline from SD to
3/2015
0.40
1.35
14.25
13.24 0.00
0.00
0.00
28.84
0.00
29.24
521,961,
0.62
Metrozoo W.W. System - South District Area
0.00
1.40
1.35
13.25
13.24 0.00
0.00
0.00
27.84
0.00
29.24
1222
TOTALS 300.07 337.48 645.06 584.44 495.16 453.28 382.26 2897.68 1502.09 4,699.84
405.73 266.66 617.15 580.34 494.45 452.57 381.56 2792.73 1501.38 4,699.84
Source: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department and Department of Planning and Zoning.
Data provided by the Office of Strategic Business Management.
1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
C)
mn
0
r T
M
00
7
Subtotals
299.55
336.16
635.05
574.88
479.37
374.01
280.52 2,679.99
951.50 3,931.04
405.21
265.34
607.14
570.78
478.66
373.30
279.82
2,575.04
950.79
3,931.04
Proposed Additions, April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
34)
CL -E 72 Inch Influent to Proposed W.D.W
3/2015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
87.19
87.19
961
Reclamation Plant (WDWRP)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
87.19
87.19
35)
CR -D 72 Inch Reclaimed Water Pipeline
3/2015
0.00
0.00
3.36
6.47
4.13
52.23
52.23
118.42
3.58
122.00
961
SDWVVTP to FPL (Turkey Pt)
0.00
0.00
3.36
6.47
4.13
52.23
52.23
118.42
3.58
122.00
36)
WE -B Injection Well
3/2015
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82.73
82.73
961
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82.73
82.73
37)
Miami Springs Sewer System
3/2013
0.52
0.62
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.00
1.55
1035
Miami Springs
0.52
0.62
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.00
1.55
38)
Outfall Legislation
3/2020
0.00
0.70
6.24
3.09
11.66
27.04
49.51
98.24
377.09
475.33 1171,1222
Systemwide
0.00
0.70
6.24
3.09
11.66
27.04
49.51
98.24
377.09
475.33
Subtotals of Proposed Additions
0.52
1.32
10.01
9.56
15.79
79.27
101.74
217.69
550.59
768.80
0.52
1.32
10.01
9.56
15.79
79.27
101.74
217.69
550.59
768.80
TOTALS 300.07 337.48 645.06 584.44 495.16 453.28 382.26 2897.68 1502.09 4,699.84
405.73 266.66 617.15 580.34 494.45 452.57 381.56 2792.73 1501.38 4,699.84
Source: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department and Department of Planning and Zoning.
Data provided by the Office of Strategic Business Management.
1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
C)
mn
0
r T
M
00
7
N
00
April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Application No. 7, Capital Improvements Element
TABLE 12
WATER FACILITIES
Project
Number
Project Name
and Location
Purpose*/
Year of
Completion
Prior
Years
2009/10
Expenditures
Revenues
(In Millions of Dollars)
2010/11 2011/12
2012/13
2013114
2014/15
Six Year
Totals
Future
Years
Project Funding
Totals Source
1)
South M -D Water Trans. Mains Improv.
312012
0.00
0.00
1.01
5.51
5.29
0.00
0.00
11.81
0.00
11.81 1171
South Miami -Dade County
0.00
0.00
1.01
5.51
5.29
0.00
0.00
11.81
0.00
11.81
2)
Water T. Plant - Alexander Orr,Jr. Expansion
3/2014
4.43
10.25
22.29
33.16
5.61
1.20
0.00
72.51
0.00
76.94 495,520,
6800 S.W. 87 Ave.
5.77
9.38
21.82
33.16
5.61
1.20
0.00
71.17
0.00
76.94 1170,1171,
1178
3)
Water T.Plant- Hialeah/Preston Improv.
3/2015
3.86
5.96
21.33
19.23
9.78
15.59
7.44
79.33
0.00
83.19 495,1170,
700 W. 2 Ave./1100 W. 2 Ave.
3.86
5.96
21.33
19.23
9.78
15.59
7.44
79.33
0.00
83.19 1171,1178,
1221
4)
Wellfield Improvements
3/2015
3.27
8.93
69.50
34.00
14.35
1.50
0.00
128.28
0.00
131.55 495,520,
Systemwide
3.27
8.93
69.50
34.00
14.35
1.50
0.00
128.28
0.00
131.55 1135,1171,
1221
5)
Water Main - Extensions
1/2014
1.05
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.53
0.35
2.28
0.14
3.47 496
Systemwide
3.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.47
6)
Central M -D Water Trans. Mains Improv..
312014
3.99
0.05
0.00
0.00
1.12
2.60
9.10
12.87
6.18
23.04 520,1170,
Central Miami -Dade County Area
4.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.12
2.60
9.10
12.82
6.18
23.04 1171
7)
North M -D Water Trans. Mains Improv.
312012
2.33
8.96
5.34
4.41
1.40
0.26
1.41
21.78
1.33
25.44 495,520,
North Miami -Dade County Area
3.85
7.72
5.06
4.41
1.40
0.26
1.41
2026
1.33
25.44 1135,1171
1222
8)
W.T.P. Replacement & Renovations
312015
11.81
8.37
8.03
8.56
7.03
4.78
4.78
41.55
4.78
58.14 495,1171,
Water Treatment Plants
11.81
8.37
8.03
8.56
7.03
4.78
4.78
41.55
4.78
58.14 1221
9)
Water System Maintenance & Upgrades
3/2015
29.73
19.30
20.14
20.14
17.92
17.92
17.91
113.33
17.92
160.98 495,1171,
Systemwide
29.73
19.30
20.14
20.14
17.92
17.92
17.91
113.33
17.92
160.98 1221
10)
Water Distribution System Extension Enhanc.
3/2015
67.82
22.79
28.76
26.22
11.47
15.75
27.45
132.44
79.94
280.20 403,495,
Systemwide
70.80
19.81
28.76
26.22
11.47
15.75
27.45
129.46
79.94
280.20 952,1135,
1170,1171
11)
Water Equipment & Vehicles
3/2015
13.39
6.47
7.09
7.09
7.08
7.08
7.08
41.89
7.09
62.37 495
Systemwide
13.39
6.47
7.09
7.09
7.08
7.08
7.08
41.89
7.09
62.37
12)
Water General Maintenance & Office Facilities
312015
7.06
4.87
12.54
12.91
3.02
1.55
4.10
38.99
5.19
51.24 520,1170,
Systemwide
7.24
4.69
12.54
12.91
3.02
1.55
4.10
38.81
5.19
51.24 1171,1221
13)
Water System Fire Hydrant Installation
112015
8.20
4.17
2.87
1.58
1.58
1.57
1.57
13.34
1.50
23.04 403
Systemwide
12.97
1.47
1.46
1.45
1.43
1.42
1.41
8.64
1.43
23.04
14)
Water Engineering Studies
32009
5.85
1.41
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.56
0.00
7.41 1170,1171,
Systemwide
7.16
0.10
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
7.41 1221
15)
Safe Drink.Water Act Mod. -SWT Rule&D-DBP
32015
6.16
15.49
34.97
86.49
137.97
127.24
46.55
448.71
0.00
454.87 520,1170,
Systemwide
15.73
15.44
34.97
81.52
133.42
127.24
46.65
439.14
0.00
454.87 1171,1178,
1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
0
Fn 0
0
00
mT
X
Z 0
co
n
CD
7
N
April 2009 CDMP Amendment Cycle
Application No. 7, Capital Improvements Element
TABLE 12 -WATER FACILITIES (continued)
Expenditures
Purpose*! Revenues
Prgect Prqect Name Year of Prior (In Millions of Dollars) Six Year Future Prgect Funding
Number and Location Completion Years 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Totals Years Totals Source
16) South Miami Heights W.T.P. & Wellfield 3/2012
11800 SW 208 St.
17) Water Telemetering System Enhancements 3/2015
Systemwide
18) W.T.P. Miscellaneous Upgrades 32011
Water Treatment Plants
19) Alternative Water Supply
19.34
16.57
34.62
38.39
8.24
25.90
3.85
0.60
0.44
3.85
0.60
0.44
3.96
4.43
12.79
10.29
0.85
10.43
A. ASR Ultraviolet(UV)Disinfection System
3/2011
3.38
1.00
for ASR Syst.@W&SVV Wellfield
0.00
7.88
0.00
R. Sn thw. t iNenFeld UFAMon to ng W4_*
11 (2007
-2
9-99
serest
95.52 1170,1171,
4-24
4-44
Q. ne: dan Aqu fe, Blend ng Wellfield
3/2099
973
6-99
1178,1221
0.44
W$}
4,22
D. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer Reverse
1/2012
12.94
7.98
Osmosis (RO) WTP Ph 1 (10 mgd)
0.43
42.88
2.59
E. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer Reverse
2/2017
0.00
0.00
Osmosis (RO) WTP Ph 11 (5 mgd)
0.25
0.00
0.00
F. Hialeah Floridan Aquifer Reverse
22028
0.00
0.00
Osmosis (RO) WTP Ph 111 (2.5 mgd)
0.00
0.00
0.00
G. ASR - 20 Year Water Use Permit
3/2028
1.20
0.80
Regional Impact Projects
2.04
0.00
H. Installation of 36 Inch DI Water Main
32011
0.52
2.82
NW 87 Ave from NW 154 St to 186 St**
0.00
0.52
2.82
20) Automation of Water Treatment Plants
3/2010
0.35
0.35
Systemwide
7.88 1170,1178
1.05
0.00
TOTALS
0-.G9
214.49
151.92
1-24 520,912
8-49
299.99
122.74
**Project number 19, component 'H", is a proposed addition, April 2009
CDMP Amendment
Cycle
4-24
Source: Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department and Department of
Planning and
Zoning.
9,09
Data provided by the Office of Strategic Business Management.
0_.O9
13,1-1- 520,959,
9.88
* 1=Existing Deficiency; 2=Future Growth; 3=Combined
Projects "stricken through" are proposed deletions
3.50
0.00
9,00
9-99
3-50
9-84
27.89
3.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
2.66
2.66
0.35
0.00
316.64
274.61
23.99
1.00
0.00
0.00
76.18
0.00
95.52 403,520,
22.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
57.13
0.00
95.52 1170,1171,
1178,1221
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
2.77
0.43
7.05 495
0.44
0.43
0.43
0.43
2.77
0.43
7.05
1.51
1.50
0.25
0.00
20.48
0.00
24.44 495,1170
1.12
1.50
0.25
0.00
14.15
0.00
24.44 1171,1178,
1221
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.50
0.00
7.88 969
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.88 1170,1178
0139
0.09
0-09
0-.G9
0-09
0:00
1-24 520,912
8-49
9-94
8-99
9-99
8-99
9-99
4-24
2:88
049
9.99
9,09
x2.38-
0_.O9
13,1-1- 520,959,
9.88
9-94
8.84
8.94
6,18
9-99
a3,1-1- 998,1178
9.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
45.29
0.00
58.23 520
9.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.35
0.00
58.23
0.00
1.35
7.38
4.09
12.82
0.00
12.82 998
0.00
1.35
7.38
4.09
12.82
0.00
12.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.10
6.10 998
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.10
6.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.85
0.00
2.04 1178
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.48
0.00
6.00 520
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.48
0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
1.05 520
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
295.03
228.25
205.63
132.26
1,329.73
130.60
1,674.82
288.19
222.20
204.95
131.75
1,244.44
130.39
1,674.82
C)
0 C)
0
W
M17- _U
7