Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board Resolution No.: Z13-11-10-002 Monday, January 11, 2010 Mr. Angel Urquiola offered the following resolution and moved its adoption Resolution: AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDS APPROVAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION, TO AMEND PAGE NO. 33, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM "R-2" TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "C-1" RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3500, 3524, 3550, 3590, 3592 SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET, 710 SOUTHWEST 35TH AVENUE AND 711 SOUTHWEST 36TH AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED "R-2" TWO -MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS ZONING CHANGE IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BASED ON THE REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL THAT A COVENANT WILL BE PROFFERED TO THE CITY COMMISSION TO: 1) ALLOW SAME USES AS A "74" TRANSIT IN MIAMI 21 TO ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE RESTAURANT AND BAKERY; 2) LIMIT HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED THIRTY-NINE (39) FEET; 3) PREVENT INGRESS AND EGRESS ON SOUTHWEST 7T" STREET; AND 4) PROVIDE A TEN (10) FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER. Upon being seconded by Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia, the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote: Mr. Bret Berlin Away Mr. Ron Cordon Away Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia Yes Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta Away Mr. Lazaro Lopez Yes Mr. Juvenal A. Pina Yes Mr. Cornelius Shiver Yes Mr. Angel Urquiola Yes AYE: 5 NAY: 0 ABSTENTIONS: 0 NO VOTES: 0 ABSENT: 3 Motion carries 5-0. Anel odriguez Hearing Boards File ID#: 09-01300zc Z.4 Exhibit "A" Legal Description .IXSa& DEECRIPTICIN: PARCEL "A": LOT 2, OF DEWOLF VILLAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 58 AT PAGE 44 OF PUBLIC RECORD OF MIAMI--DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO., 01-4104-004-0020; AND PARCEL "B": LOT 1, OF DEWOLF VILLAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 58 AT PAGE 44 OF PUBLIC RECORD OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO: 01-4104-004-0011; FOLIO: 01•-4104-004-0010; AND PARCEL "C": THE PORTION OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT POINT 194.51 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SEX OF THE SW9 OF THE SW% OF SECTION 41, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE -SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE WHOLE TRACT IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION 129.99 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 100 FEET; THENCE 37.5 FEET EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE FIRST LINE OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY 100 FEET AND PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WHOLE TRACT; THENCE WESTERLY 37.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING AND BEING IN MIAIM—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO: 01-404-004- 0150; AND PARCEL "D": THE PORTION OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT 194.51 FEET NORTH AND 167.49 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SES/ OF THE SWX OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 41, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST; THENCE RUN NORTH 100.00 FEET, THENCE RUN EAST 37.50 FEET, THENCE RUN SOUTH 100,00 FEET, THENCE RUN WEST 37.5 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING, LYING AND BEING IN MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO: 01-4104-000-0230; AND PARCEL "E": LOT 3, OF DEWOLF VILLAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 58 AT PAGE 44 OF PUBLIC RECORD OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO: 01404-004-0030; AND PARCEL "F": LOT 4, OF DEWOLF VILLAS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 58 AT PAGE 44 OF PUBLIC RECORD OF MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO: 01-404-004-0040; CONTAINING AREA (NET): 32970,72 SQ,FT. Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board Report to City Commission Circle appropriate condition(s): When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered, where applicable, whether or not: a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district. d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc. f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Motion: After considering the factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, 1 move that the request on agen a ite Z.4 be recom ended to the Cit Commission forCapproval) denial). 'Signature Print Name 09-01300zc ` 01-11-10 Agenda Item Date