HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 3CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Pedro G. Hernandez, P.E.
City Manager
FROM: Emanuel Washington
Chair, Evaluation Committee
Recommendation
DATE: October 21, 2009 FILE:
SUBJECT: Committee
Recommendation:
Design Build Services for
the Design and
Construction of Gibson
Park, B -30305B
REFERENCES: RFP No. 08-09-064
ENCLOSURES: Ranking sheets, RFP,
Evaluation Committee Approval Memo
The Evaluation Committee has determined that Recreational Design and Construction, Inc.,
("RDC') is the highest ranked Proposer and recommends that Capital Improvements Program
("CIP") be authorized to enter into negotiations with RDC for the purpose of entering into an
Agreement for this Project.
Background
CIP issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 08-09-064 for the provision of Design Build
Services for the Design and Construction of Gibson Park on August 10, 2009. As minimum
qualification requirements, Proposers must have successfully completed two Design -Build
projects with one being a Design-BuildPark_ pro[ect and the construction cost must have
been >_3.000.000 and included the following components:
• Ballfield
• Building with at least 3.000 square feet of air-conditioned space
In addition, the Proposer must have been in business under its current name for a minimum
of 5 years.
CIP received a total of two (2) Proposals. Both met the minimum requirements.
The RFP consists of two parts; (1) a technical proposal and, (2) a fee proposal. The fee
proposals were submitted in separate sealed envelopes and were evaluated after the
evaluation of the technical proposals. Overall, the proposals were evaluated based on six (6)
main criteria: Qualifications of the Proposer, Qualifications of the Project Team,
Qualifications of the Project and Construction Managers, Design and Construction
Approach/Process, Technical Experience, Small Business and Local Workforce
Participation, and Fee Proposal. In addition, the Proposers were awarded additional points
based on the following:
1. Use of Certified Subcontractors
Utilization of Certified Subcontractors less than 5% 0 points
of the construction value
Utilization of Certified Subcontractors between 5% & 10% 1 point
of the construction value
Utilization of Certified Subcontractors between >10% & 15% 2 points
Page 1 of 2
AppI
d: V II[?4 q
Pedro G. Hernandez, P.E. Ci Manager
C: Ola 0. Aluko, Director, CIP
Gary Fabrikant, Assistant Director, CIP
Carlos Vasquez, CIP, Project Manager
Committee members
OOA/GF/cw
Page 2 of 2
of the construction value
•
Utilization of Certified Subcontractors between of >15% & 20%
3 points
of the construction value
•
Utilization of Certified Subcontractors in excess of 20%
4 points
of the construction value
2.
Park Project Experience
•
Design -Build Team have worked together to
1 point
successfully complete more than one park project (as defined by the RFP)
•
One or more park project as defined by the RFP, which also
1 point
includes a pool
3.
Design -Build Experience
•
Proposer has successfully completed one (1)
1 point
design -build project
•
Proposer has successfully completed three (3) or more
1 point
design -build projects
•
Design -Build Firm and the Primary Consultant have
2 points
worked together to successfully complete more than 1) park project
4.
LEED Experience
•
Proposer has successfully completed a LEED Silver or greater
1 point
project
•
Proposer & Prime Design Firm have together successfully
2 points
completed LE
,5Q Silver or greater project
AppI
d: V II[?4 q
Pedro G. Hernandez, P.E. Ci Manager
C: Ola 0. Aluko, Director, CIP
Gary Fabrikant, Assistant Director, CIP
Carlos Vasquez, CIP, Project Manager
Committee members
OOA/GF/cw
Page 2 of 2