HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB 04-13-09 ResosMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: ZB-R-09-0016
Monday, April 13, 2009
Mr. Richard Tapia offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED DENIAL TO THE CITY COMMISSION
TO AMEND PAGE NO. 34, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 11000, AS
AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, ARTICLE 4,
SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND R-2
TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO G/I GOVERNMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2508, 2524, 2534, 2538, 2590, 2600,
2610 AND 2620 SOUTHWEST 5TH STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A"
(HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Upon being seconded by Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin
Away
Mr. Ron Cordon
Away
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
No
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Yes
Mr. Lazaro Lopez
No
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Yes
Mr. Cornelius Shiver
Away
Mr. Richard Tapia
Yes
Mr. Angel Urquiola
Away
AYE:
3
NAY:
2
ABSTENTIONS:
0
NO VOTES:
0
ABSENT:
4
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 3-2
T resits L. Fernandez, Executive Se6retary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 08-01084zc Z.2
Miami Zoning Board
Motion No.: ZB-R-09-0016a
Monday, April 13, 2009
Mr. Richard Tapia offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
A MOTION BY THE MIAMI ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COMMISSION THAT THE BOARD WILL NOT OBJECT TO AN SD -12 OVERLAY TO
ACHIEVE THE PARKING NEEDS OF THE MIAMI-DADE COLLEGE.
Upon being seconded by Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin
Mr. Ron Cordon
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Mr. Lazaro Lopez
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Mr. Cornelius Shiver
Mr. Richard Tapia
Mr. Angel Urquiola
Away
Away
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Away
Yes
Away
AYE: 4
NAY: 1
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: 0
ABSENT: 4
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries 4-1
Teresita L. Fernandez, ExecuW ecretary
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 08-01084zc Z.2
Exhibit "A"
Legal Descriptio
Single Family Residential (R-1) to Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation and Utilities (G/I):
Lots 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42, "BEACOM MANOR",
according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Boob '8, Page 121,
of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida.
Duplex Residential (R-2) to Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation
and Utilities (G/I):
Lots 54 and 55, `BEACOM MANOR", according to the Plat
thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 121, of the Public
Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida.
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations. ,
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
alrea pe tting such use.
Motion: t r c ns' ring rs set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 1100 ve that the
request i be reco mended to the C' Commission for (approval) �(enial).
Signature Print Name
Agenda Item
Date
Lf - 13-.oi