Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Analysis - NEWANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 2508, 2534, 2538, 2590, 2600, 2610, 2620 SW 5T" STREET and at FOLIOS 01-4103-037-0280, 01-4103-037-0431, and 01-4103-037-0430 CASE NO: 09-01084zc Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The subject property consists of lots fronting SW 5th Street, SW 25th Avenue and SW 6th Street (a complete legal description on file at the Hearing Boards Office), from R-1 "Single -Family Residential" to R-1 "Single -Family Residential" with SD -12 "Buffer Overlay District" and R-2 "Two -Family Residential" to G/I "Government and Institutional". The following findings have been made: • It is found that this Board recommended denial of the original request to change the R-1 and R-2 parcels to G/I "Government and Institutional". • It is found that now before the board is a zoning change request to change the R-1 "Single - Family Residential" parcels to R-1 "Single -Family Residential" with SD -12 "Buffer Overlay District" and the R-2 "Two -Family Residential" parcels to G/I "Government and Institutional". • It is found that the Planning Advisory Board recommendation to the City Commission was to leave the north 25 feet of the R-1 parcels as residential and this application to SD -12 will leave 20' feet of landscape area as a buffer to the residential area. • It is found that the requested zoning change for the south two parcels zoned R-2 "Two - Family Residential" to G/I "Government and Institutional" will not create an intrusion into the residential area. • It is found that the requested zoning change will allow the College to meet its parking needs without adversely impact in the surrounding neighborhood. Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the application as presented. Analysis for ZONING CHANGE File ID: 08-01084zc Yes No N/A. ❑ ® ❑ a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. ❑ ® ❑ b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. ® ❑ ❑ c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. ® ❑ ❑ d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. ❑ ® '❑ e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ ❑ ® 0 Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ® ❑ ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. • ❑ ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. ® ❑ ❑ i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ DIIIIIIIIIS IRA k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.