HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: 08-051
Monday, June 9, 2008
Ms, Ileana Hernandez -Acosta offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin
Mr. Ron Cordon
Mr, Miguel A. Gabela
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza
Mr. Chaties A. Garavaglia
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Mr. Cornelius Shiver
Mr. Angel UfqUi012
Yes
Away
Away
Away
Yes
Yes
Away
Yes
Away
Yes
AYE: 5
NAY: 0
ABSTENTIONS: 0
NO VOTES: Cl
ABSENT: 5
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secreta-�y
Hearing Boards
File ID #: 08-00400zc Z,5
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION:
EXHIBIT "A"
2744 S.W.-,L,' STREET
MIAMI, FL 33135
LOT 7, BLOCK 2, "HARDING HEIGHTS"
PLAT BOOK 6. PAGE 138, MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle a ro nate condit;oWsL-,
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable. whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment,
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p) it is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion a After considering 07te factors set forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance e that the
requ�,,st on ager dt item be recommended to the City Commission. for
0, r
prov(d!a7) (denial).i
D
Signature Print Name
Date