Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis - NEWANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 2744 SW 7th Street. CASE NO: 08-00400zc; Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 and Article 22 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas has been reviewed as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: Lots 7 in Block 2, of "Harding Heights", according to Plat Book 6, at Page 41, from R-3 "Multifamily Medium -Density Residential" to C-1 "Restricted Commercial". The following findings have been made: • It is found that in 2001 a zoning change was requested on this property from R-2 with SD -12 overlay to R-3, and it was granted by the Commission under ordinance 12066. • It is found that now before the Zoning Board is a zoning change request from R-3 "Multifamily Medium -Density Residential" to C-1 "Restricted Commercial'. • It is found that immediately adjacent to the west of the lot the area is designated R-3 "Multifamily Medium Density Residential". • It is found that this petition to change the zoning designation to C-1 "Restricted Commercial' is not a logical extension of that category and will bring a more intense commercial uses into a low-density residential area. • It is found that "Medium Density Multifamily Residential' categories allow 65 residential units per acre and the requested "Restricted Commercial" designation allows a maximum of 150 residential units per acre Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending denial of the application as presented. Analysis for ZONING CHANGE File ID: 08-00400zc Yes No N/A. ❑ ® ❑ a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive ® ❑ ❑ Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. ❑ ® ❑ b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern. ❑ ® ❑ c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. ❑ ® ❑ d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. ❑ ® ❑ e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ ® ❑ f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ❑ ® ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.