HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Reso�"Ov op 4'
I
��* IXt11P /IIIfI 1F ��
Miami Zoning Board
Resolution No.: ZB-R-09-0073
Monday, November 9, 2009
Mr. Richard Tapia offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
Resolution:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN ZONING ORDINANCE NO.
11000, THE ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL TO THE CITY
COMMISSION, TO AMEND PAGE NO. 12, OF THE ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE
NO. 11000, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
ARTICLE 4, SECTION 401, SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS, BY
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM °R-311 MULTIFAMILY MEDIUM -
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO "R-411 MULTIFAMILY HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 6886 NORTHWEST 7TH
AVENUE A/K/A 755 NORTHWEST 67TH STREET AND 890 NORTHWEST 69TH
STREET, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS EXHIBIT "A" (HEREBY ATTACHED), PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ZONED °R-3" MULTIFAMILY
MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.
Upon being seconded by Mr. Miguel Gabela,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following vote:
Mr. Bret Berlin
Mr. Ron Cordon
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
Ms. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Mr. Lazaro Lopez
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Mr. Cornelius Shiver
Mr. Richard Tapia
Mr. Angel Urquiola
Mr. Miguel Gabela
AYE:
NAY:
ABSTENTIONS
NO VOTES:
ABSENT:
Motion carries 8-0.
Yes
Away
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Away
Yes
Yes
Yes
A6 el Rodriguez
Hearing Boards
File ID#: 09-01007zc Z.3
LEGAL D. SCRIPTION TO ACCOMPANY SKETCH
PARCELS "A' AND "B", KNIGHT MANOR UNITS NO'S ONE AND TWO, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT
BOOK 48 AT PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING AND BEING IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
LESS
BEGINNING AT THE SX'CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "B", PLAT OF KNIGHT -MANOR UNITS NO'S ONE AND TWO; THENCE NORTH 00
DEGREES 07 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PARCEL "B", FOR 188.01 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST FOR 206.01; THENCE SOUTH OO DEGREES 07 MINUTES 27
SECONDS EAST FOR 126.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST FOR 18.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST FOR 61.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST,
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "B", I FOR 188.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO LESS OUT:
THE NORTH 100.00 FEET OF THE EAST 165.00 FEET OF SAID PARCEL "B", PLAT OF KNIGHT MANOR UNITS NO'S ONE AND TWO.
NOTES:
1) BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N89`41'44"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF N.W. 69 th STREET.
2) VALID COPIES OF THIS SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION MUST BEAR THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE ATTESTING PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR.
3) THE AREA OF PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON= 9.388.± ACRES (408,959 Sq. ft).
SCHWEBKE-SHISKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS—ENGINEERS—LAND PLANNERS — 3240 CORPORATE WAY—MIRAMAR, FL 33025
PHONE No.(954)435-70.10 FAX No. (954)43 =3288
ORDER NO. 996905 PREPA UN MY SUPERVISION:
DATE. 0$-06-2009
THIS IS NOT A " BOUNDARY SURVEY" MARK STEVE JOHNSON
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. LB -87 FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 4775
REVISIONS
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEE
tt
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
Circle appropriate condition(s):
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under Article 22, the report and
recommendation of the Zoning Board shall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not:
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
p)it§i ifficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already pertit 'ng such use.
Motion: # r iderinmeta �kset forth in Section 2210 of Ordinance No. 11000, 1 move that the
request a be recom"I'n nded to the Ci Commission for (approval) (denial).
I
,Y'gnature Print Name
Z.3 09-01007zc 11-09-09
Agenda Item Date