Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMUSP AnalysisANALYSIS MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT for MIAMI ART MUSEUM LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1075 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD LEGISTAR FILE ID: 09-0024mu Pursuant to Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal for the Miami Art Museum project, located at approximately 1075 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, has been reviewed to allow a Major Use Special Permit per Articles 9, 13 and 17, to construct a mixed use complex comprised of a new Four Story Building (77 feet 0 inches N.G.V.D. in height) of approximately 96,154 square feet of floor area to be used as a Museum with Art Galleries & Exhibition Spaces, Public Reading & Multipurpose Rooms, Bistro, Bar/Cafe, Studio & Seminar Classrooms, Curatorial Library, and Special Event Space, and will provide 220 off-street parking spaces. This Permit includes the following requests: This MAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT encompasses the following Special Permits and Requests: REQUEST, for a VARIANCE, as per, ARTICLE 19, Section 1901, ARTICLE 4, Sect.. 401, PR Parks, Recreation and Open Space, to allow a relaxation of the terms of the ordinance for required off-street parking space, subject to all applicable criteria; Minimum required 242 Proposed 220 Request to be waived: 22 SPECIAL EXCEPTION, as per Article 4, Section 4.01, under Conditional Principal Uses of PR Parks (2), to allow supporting social and entertainment services (such as restaurants, cafes and retailing), by Special Exception with City Commission approval; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per, ARTICLE 9, Section 908.9, Waterfront Yards, to allow a new development in waterfront yards; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 15, Section 1511, to allow any development between Biscayne Bay and the first dedicated right-of-way; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 923.2, to allow reduction of loading berth dimensions as follows; Required loading berth: Three (3) 12 feet wide x 35 feet long x 15 feet high Proposed loading berth: One (1) 12 feet wide x 35 feet long x 15 feet high Two (2) 10 feet wide x 20 feet long x 15 feet high CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 927, to allow temporary structures, occupancies, and uses reasonably necessary for construction such as 09-0024mu Page 1 of 7 construction fence, covered walkway and if encroaching public property must be approved by other city departments; CLASS II SPECIAL PERMIT, as per, ARTICLE 10, Section 10.5.2, to allow identification and directional signs; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 906.9, to allow temporary carnival, festival, fair or similar type event on privately owned or City -owned land such as a ground breaking ceremony; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 916.2.1, to allow parking for temporary special event such as ground breaking ceremonies; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 918.2, to allow temporary off- street offsite parking for construction crews working on a residential project under construction; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT, as per ARTICLE 9, Section 920.12, to allow construction trailer(s) and other temporary construction offices such as watchman's quarters, leasing and sales centers; CLASS I SPECIAL PERMIT, as per, ARTICLE 10, Section 10.3.2, to allow temporary development signs; REQUEST, for waiver of CHAPTER 36 NOISE, Section 36-6 Construction Equipment (a) permitting the operation of construction equipment exceeding the sound level of a reading of 0.79 weighted average dab at any time and/or day subject to the City Manager Exception pursuant to Section 36-6 (c) and all the applicable criteria; REQUEST for applicable MAJOR USE SPECIAL, that the following conditions be required at the time of issuance of Shell Permit instead of at issuance of Foundation Permit: - The requirement to record in the Public Records a Declaration of Covenants and/or Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation and maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner and/or a mandatory property owner association; - And the requirement to record in the Public Records a Unity of Title or a covenant in lieu of a Unity of Title. In determining the appropriateness of the proposed project, the Planning Department has referred this project to the Large Scale Development Committee (LSDC) and the Planning Internal Design Review Committee for additional input and recommendations; the following findings have been made: • It is found that the proposed Miami Art Museum is a component of the overall Museum Park Master Plan adopted by Miami City Commission on March 13, 2008 to be developed in Bicentennial Park. • It is found that the Miami Art Museum project is located within the Museum Park site at the NE corner of the property overall which is bounded by Mac Arthur Causeway to the North; Biscayne Bay to the East, Florida East Coast (FEC) slip to the South, and Biscayne Boulevard to the West. 09-0024mu Page 2 of 7 • It is found that the proposed Miami Art Museum is placed in a site of approximately 5.86 ±acre (GLA) which is part of the approximately 30.00 ±acre (GLA) of the Museum Park site. • It is found that the proposed development project will benefit not only the immediate area by creating a recreational and cultural activities center, as well as complementary commercial uses serving areas, but the entire city with international projection. • It is found that the design of the proposed Miami Art Museum meets the Museum Park Master Plan Guidelines • It is found that the proposed Miami Art Museum is located within one thousand feet from a Metro Mover station. • It is found that the subject property is bounded by Mac Arthur Causeway to the North; Biscayne Bay to the East, and spaces for the Museum Park complex to the South and West. • It is found that the proposed project is not located within an Archeological Conservation area. • It is found that the proposed project is going to be developed in a site of 5.86 ±acre (GLA) with 3.51 ±acre (NLA). • It is found that the total non residential floor area for the 5.86 ±acre (GLA) site 96,154 square feet. • It is found that the proposed supporting social and entertainment services (such as restaurants, cafes and retailing), to the Miami Art Museum must be allowed by Special Exception. • It is found that the proposed total number of parking spaces (approximately 220) for the project is below the required number of 242 parking spaces. The reduction only can be granted by approving the requested Variance. • It is found that the Economic Impact Analysis, prepared by Miami Economics Associates, Inc. on November 16, 2008 states that the Miami Art Museum is a non - for -profit entity; hence, it will not be required o pay ad valorem taxes on its new facility to the City of Miami, nor Miami -Dade County nor the Miami —Dade County Public School District. • It is found that the same Economic Impact Analysis, prepared by Miami Economics Associates, Inc. on November 16, 2008 states reflects that the project is expected to cost approximately $ 32.500,000, and to employ approximately 720 workers during construction (FTE -Full Time Employees); The project will also result in the creation of approximately 77 permanent new jobs (FTE) for MAM operations • It is found that the Large Scale Development Committee reviewed the project on October 22, 2008 to address the expressed technical concerns raised at said Large Scale Development Committee meeting. 09-0024mu Page 3 of 7 It is found that on October 14, 2008, the City of Miami Public Works Department provided a review of the project and commented that: (1) There is a 10 foot wide platted "water utility" easement within the footprint of the proposed building. Re - platting of the property is required to remove this easement from the building site. Exception: the "water utility" easement is defined as a "private easement." As such, a building permit may be obtained to construct upon the easement subject meeting the requirements of City Code Section 55-14. The existing watermain located within this easement must be removed or relocated in accordance with the requirements of the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department. It is found that the proposed project was reviewed by the Internal Design Review Committee on July 14, 2009, and the following revised pertinent comments were made: Museums Area Design Guidelines: (1) Provide details of the modified Museum Drive layout and cross-section, (2) Provide revised plans with modifications to the roadway incorporating wide landscaped walkways, as detailed in the Museum Area Design Guidelines, and pedestrian connections from Biscayne Boulevard and the Metromover station to the Museum Plaza and Baywalk along the Northern Perimeter of the site; (3) Provide revised plans identifying how loading vehicles will access and maneuver into the loading area along the northern perimeter of the Art Museum site, (4) Provide revised plans identifying public entries are required along the Plaza Frontage. Architecture: (1) Provide revised plans concealing views into the parking area from the Park Promenade, Baywalk and Museum Drive, (2) Provide details of the methods and enhanced materials that will be applied to the parking area. Special treatment shall be provided for lighting and mechanical systems within the garage that will integrate this equipment with the structure of the facility, (3) Provide proofs of the outdoor video system approval by FDOT. In the event of failing the permitting process for the proposed outdoor video for the north wall facing 1-395, provide revised plans showing alternate solutions to articulate this facade. Urban Design/ Site Layout: (1) Provide revised plans extending the pedestrian sidewalk across all driveways and loading entries along the northern perimeter road from Biscayne Boulevard to Biscayne Bay, (2) Provide revised illustrations of the transition between the project and the park, and (3) Provide revised plan showing all proposed planting materials labeled and referenced on planting list. • It is found that the proposed project was reviewed for design appropriateness by the Urban Development Review Board on July 15, 2009, which recommended approval. • It is found that the proposed project height of 77 feet AMSL at the proposed location does not meet the review criteria, and does not require a Height Analysis or Letter of Determination from The Miami -Dade Aviation Department, as per Determination Number DN -08-09-076 issued by Miami International Airport on September 30, 2008. It is found that on December 4, 2008, the City's Traffic Consultant, URS Corp., provided a Sufficiency Letter - Review # 197 of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Miami Art Museum project stating that the development approval of this site should be conditioned upon the following Transportation Control Measures (TCM) recommendations being implemented to recognize the credits given towards the transportation concurrency management: (1) Encourage museum• staff to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services; (2) Providing information to potential transit users on Miami -Dade current local and .regional mass transit route and schedule. The information will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six months intervals; (3) Promote mass transit use by 09-0024mu Page 4 of 7 encouraging museum staff to purchase transit passes and make them available at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu if subsidized parking; and (4) Encourage employees to implement staggered work hours. It is found that The Spinnaker Group submitted an Environmental Impact Analysis Statement conducted by Jason Biondi which states "it is my professional opinion that the proposed development site is appropriate and will have a favorable impact on economy, public services, environment and housing supply within the immediate neighborhood after reviewing the potential environmental impact associated with this Project". It is found that with respect to all additional criteria as specified in Section 1305.2 of Zoning Ordinance 11000, the proposal has been found to adhere to the following Design Review Criteria: (1) Site and Urban Planning; (2) Architecture and Landscape Architecture; (3) Pedestrian Oriented Development; (4) Streets and Open Space; (5) Vehicular Access and Parking; (6) Screening; (7) Signage and lighting; (8) Preservation of Natural Features; and (9) Modification of Nonconformities. Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the requested Development Project with the following conditions: 1) Meet all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances and other laws and pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2) Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the option of the Department, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Planning Department, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the PROJECT security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Planning Director why such recommendations are impractical. 3) Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire -Rescue indicating APPLICANT'S coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire -Rescue in the review of the scope of the PROJECT, owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply. 4) Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the PROJECT has addressed all concerns of the said Department prior to the obtainment of a shell permit. 5) Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor/Subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Application for Development Approval, with the understanding that the APPLICANT must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide. 6) Prior to the issuance of a shell permit, provide the City with a recorded copy of the MUSP permit resolution and development order, and further, an executed, record able unity of title or covenant in lieu of unity of title agreement for the subject property; said agreement shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 09-0024mu Page 5 of 7 7) Provide the Planning Department with a temporary construction plan that includes the following: a temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; a construction noise management plan with an enforcement policy; and a maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Major Use Special Permit. 8) In so far as this Major Use Special Permit includes the subordinate approval of a series of Class I Special Permits for which specific details have not yet been developed or provided, the applicant shall provide the Planning Department with all subordinate Class I Special Permit plans and detailed requirements for final review and approval of each one prior to the issuance of any of the subordinate approvals required in order to carry out any of the requested activities and/or improvements listed in this development order or captioned in the plans approved by it. 9) If the project is to be developed in phases, the Applicant shall submit an interim plan, including a landscape plan, which addresses design details for the land occupying future phases of this Project in the event that the future phases are not developed, said plan shall include a proposed timetable and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 10) Pursuant to comments by the City of Miami Public Works Department, the following conditions shall be required of the applicant: (1) There is a 10 foot wide platted "water utility" easement within the footprint of the proposed building. Re -platting of the property is required to remove this easement from the building site. Exception: the "water utility" easement is defined as a "private easement." As such, a building permit may be obtained to construct upon the easement subject meeting the requirements of City Code Section 55-14. The existing watermain located within this easement must be removed or relocated in accordance with the requirements of the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department. 11) Pursuant to design related comments received by the Planning Director, the applicant shall meet the following conditions: (1) Provide revised plans and cross sections of the modified Museum Drive layout incorporating wide landscaped walkways, as detailed in the Museum Area Design Guidelines, and pedestrian connections from Biscayne Boulevard and the Metromover station to the Museum Plaza and baywalk along the northern perimeter of the site; (2) Provide revised plans identifying how loading vehicles will access and maneuver into the loading area along the northern perimeter of the Art Museum site, (3) Provide revised details of the methods and enhanced materials that will be applied to the parking area for lighting and mechanical systems within the garage to integrate and conceal this equipment with the structure of the facility, (4) Provide revised details of the proposed pavement material that reduces the visual impact of the parking area, (5) Provide proof of approval from FDOT for the projection of video onto the structure facing 1-395. In the event of failing the permitting process for the proposed outdoor video for the north wall facing 1-395, provide revised plans showing alternate solutions to articulate this fagade, (6) Provide revised plans extending the pedestrian sidewalk across all driveways and loading entries along the northern perimeter road from Biscayne Boulevard to Biscayne Bay, (7) Provide revised illustrations and final elevations of the transition between this project and the park promenade to the south and baywalk to the east, (8) Provide revisions to the Landscape Plans as follows: (a) Proposed MAM landscaping is in conflict with proposed Park and 09-0024mu Page 6 of 7 baywalk designs by Cooper Robertson and Partners (Park design consultant), (b) Landscape plans need to show edges of pavements and limits of planting beds to clearly define the landscape areas, (c) Landscape plans require size and quantity specifications as part of the plant lists for all plant materials, (d) Landscape plans must show the limits and extent of ground cover and shrub plantings under the tree and palm canopies. This is not shown graphically, and (e) Provide revised Landscape Plans that address the aforementioned comments and clarify planting design. 12) Pursuant to preliminary comments of the City's Traffic Consultant, URS Corp., the development approval of this site should be conditioned upon the following Transportation Control Measures (TCM) recommendations being implemented to recognize the credits given towards the transportation concurrency management: (1) Encourage museum•staff to participate in ridesharing programs through South Florida Commuter Services; (2) Providing information to potential transit users on Miami -Dade current local and .regional mass transit route and schedule. The information will be updated, when necessary, at no less than six months intervals; (3) Promote mass transit use by encouraging museum staff to purchase transit passes and make them available at discounted prices or no charge, or in lieu if subsidized parking; and (4) Encourage employees to implement staggered work hours. 13) Within 90 days of the effective date of this Development Order, record a certified copy of the Development Order specifying that the Development Order runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 09-0024mu Page 7 of 7