Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE Approximately 4227 NW 5 Street CASE NO: 09-00029zc Pursuant to Article 4, Section 401 of Ordinance 11000, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as follows: The request is to change the Zoning designation as follows: The subject property consists of one lot fronting NW 5t" Street (a complete legal description on file at the Hearing Boards Office), from R-2 "Two -Family Residential" to R-2 "Two -Family Residential" with a SD -12 Buffer Overlay District. e It is found that the zoning designation of the subject lot will remain the same with the addition of an SD -12 Buffer Overlay District. • It is found that the requested change to SD -12 on the subject property is in order to provide a parking lot to the adjacent C-1 "Restricted Commercial" area fronting NW 42nd Avenue. It is found that the requested change will be beneficial to the adjacent area by expanding the existing parking area north of the lot proposed for a zoning change to better serve the parking needs of the existing commercial use along NW 42nd Avenue. It is found that the requested zoning change designation does not require a change to the underlying land use designation and therefore does not requires an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan. It is found that the applicant will need to acquire a Special Exception with City Commission approval allowing surface parking in the SD -12 Buffer Overlay District and will need to provide new landscaping to the proposed parking area which will beautify and buffer the parking use from the abutting residential zone area. Based on these findings, the Planning Department is recommending approval of the application as presented. Analysis for ZONING CHANGE File ID: 09-00029zc 1'EMWL1 C$ r<ii'T,I ® ❑ ❑ a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and does not require a plan amendment. ❑ ® ❑ b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern, ® ❑ ❑ c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby districts. ® ❑ ❑ d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city. ® ❑ ❑ e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ❑ ❑ ® f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. ® ❑ ❑ g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary. ® ❑ ❑ h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood. ® ❑ ❑ i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a greater extent than the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the existing classification. ❑ ❑ ® 1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the existing classification. ® ❑ ❑ m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement -or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. ❑ ❑ ® n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare. ® ❑ ❑ o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning. ❑ ❑ ® p) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use.