Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVol. III. 8. Traffic Study Sufficiency LetterMAJOR USE SPECIAL PERMIT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Marlins Ballpark :Devised February 2009 November 2008 Prepared for: Florida Marlins, L.P. CATHY SWEETAPPLE & ASSOCIATES 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8878 office 954-525-4303 Fax Email; csweet@bellsouth.net February 5, 2449 Ms. Liha 1. Medina, AICP Assistant Transportation Coordinator City of Miami, Office of the City ManagerfTransportabon 444 SW 2^d Avenue (1011 Floor) Miami, Florida 33134 Re; Marlins Bali Park -- MUSP (R tt 003) Sufficiency Letter Dear Ms. Medina: Via Wall and U5 Mail Subsequent to our January 7, 2009 review comments for the subject project, we have received a response letter and revisions to the report from Cathy Sweefapple & Associates [CS&A] dated February 5, 2408. A copy of CS&A's response letter is attached herewith. At this time, we conclude that the traffic impact report meets the traffic requirements and the study is found to be sufficient with following commitments by the applicant subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval: 1, Provide a stand-alone document to address Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes for Ballpark Events, identifying safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections leading to and from the Ballpark, connecting oft -site parking, ex#sting or programmed greenways, transit corridors and transit stations. The Applicant shall continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Works and the City of Miami in the development and review of this stared -alone document. 2, Work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County, Tri -Rail and the City of Miami to assure convenient transit services in the vicinity of the site, to extend transit service hours and to provide special transit services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. 3. Work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami to determine the best location for transit connections serving the Ballpark. 4. Coordinate with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County in the preparation of a Network Simulation Analysis that will demonstrate the interactive operational effects of pre -game and post -game traffic to and from the. Ballpark, Special attention will be given to vehicle queuing at critical intersections and traffic operations into and out of the Ballpark parking facilities. Further, the applicant should coordinate with Miami -Dade County Traffic Signals Division to secure approval of the proposed traffic signals. Should you have any questions, please call Ms. Geysa Sosa or me at 954.739.1881, Sincerely, UR;Sh rporatta Sout mun { Rajnmu m, P.E. Seraff N ineer URS Corparation 9343 Wost Carnmerslai Boulevard Suite 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Tel; 954,739.1881 Fax: 954.739.1789 Altachment Co. Mc Anlonfo E, Perez, Planner if, City of Wane Plannq Mr. Jose Goazales, P!_, City of Miamf Ms. Cathy Sweefapple, AICP, Cathy Sweerappfe & Associates "Cathy 5weetapple" To <Ra}_Shanmugarrl@URSCorp.com> ` scsweet�}o bellsouth.net> ` 02/05/2009 10:45 AM cc <Joseph.Goldslein@hklaw,com>, Ci n es. m arra ro@h k la w. com>, hcc m closeGonzalez@mlamigov.co>, "'Fenton, Robert'" Subject RE: Martins Ballpark MUSP Raj — Pursuant to your comments yesterday regarding Staff Comment Number 4, please see attached the Revised Response Letter along with a letter from the Florida Marlins addressing the spectator arrival distribution to the Ballpark. Please call if you have any additional questions or concerns, Cathy Sweetappte, AICD Cathy Sweelapple 8 Associates Trarnpanalion and {Nobility Pfanning 181 North Gordan Road Fod Lauderdale. Florida 33301 954-463-9878 office 954.525-4363 fax M4.049.9942 all c*wEelali 1{ 2MLjl.tlel From: Cathy 5weetapple [mailto;csweet@bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:14 PM To: 'Raj_5hanmu9am@URSCorp,com' Cc: 'Joseph,Goldstein@hklawxom'; Ines,marrero@hklaw,com'; 'JoseGonzalez@miannlgov.com'; 'Fenton, Robert'; 'CDelorme@marlins.com' Subject: RE: Marlfns Ballpark MUSP Raj — Please see attached the Letter providing complete responses to all of your comments and the revisions made to the MUSP Traffic Impact Study to incorporate all the requested changes. 1 have only provided a PIF of the Traffic Impact Study without Attachments. None of the Attachment material has changed. Please call if you have any questions, and please send me an email response to confirm that you receive the documents. Thanks! Cathy 5weetapple, A[CP Cathy SweelaplAe 8 Associates Transporlation and (Nobility PtannwV 101 North Gordon Road Fort Lauda rdala, F rwida 3330 t 954A63-8878 oilico 954524303 fax 954-W8-8942 call csweel�&helisaul h-nQl From: Cathy Sweetapple [mailto:csweet@bellsouth,net] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:18 PM CATI IY SWr3r3'1'A1)P1, U'. & AsS0CIA'1'Iiti 1'RAN811011r'A'i"ION AND M0131LITY 1)LANNINr February 5, 2009 Mr, Raj Shanmugam, P.E, URS Corporation Southern 3343 West Commercial Blvd, Suite 100 Fart Lauderdale, Florida 33305 RE: Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments Dear Mr, Shanrnugam, Please find outlined below, the January 7, 2009 preliminary comments made by youroffice (and highlighted in bold) for the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Responses to each comment are provided as applicable. Fallowing is a list of our preliminary review comments. Issues needing additional information, revisions or corrections need to be addressed to complete the review of this traffic study; 1. For the purpose of traffic analysis the study conservatively assumes that the bail park will be filled to capacity. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment. 2. The traffic study is performed using the traditional traffic impact analysis methodology rather than city's Person Trip Methodology. As much as we agree that the traditional methodology is morestringent than the Person Trip Methodology, at least a statement, if not some analysis pertaining to Person Trip Methodology should be presented to demonstrate the stringent nature of the analysis presented in the report. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comments and has made text revisions to page 2of the Traffic Impact Study to address the comments related to the Person Trip Methodology and the more conservative approach utilized by the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study, 3. The use of 2,5 persons per vehicle occupancy should be substantiated with market studies conducted by the applicant or other data. The Florida Marlins have provided vehicle occupancy data from the 2008 Florida Marlins baseball season for 17 weeknight games and 18 weekend games held during April, May, June, August and September 2008. This data has been incorporated into the Traffic Impact Study as new Table 20 —Vehicle Occupancy for Weeknights and new Table 2E —Vehicle Occupancy for Weekends. The Florida Marlins have utilized the net turnstile count per game along with the total number of vehicles parked per game, to arrive at a vehicle occupancy rate per game identified as fans per car, The net turnstile count per game excludes those patrons arriving at the stadium in group charter buses, as indicated in detail on Tables 2D and 2E. Based upon the actual Florida Marlins data assembled for 17 weeknight games, the vehiGle occupancy utilized In the study has been changed from 2.5 101 North Gordon Rvad, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33341 954.463-8878 office 954.525-4343 fax 954.649.6942 cell Email: csweet@bel;south.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 — Page 2 persons per vehicle to 2.63 persons per vehicle to reflect the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected, For comparison, the vehicle occupancy based upon the 18 weekend games resulted in 3,15 persons per vehicle as outlined in new Table 2E which reflects the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected. Revisions to Tables 2A, 26 and 2C are provided to reflect the use of the 2.63 vehicle occupancy for weeknight Marlins baseball games. Revised Table 213 demonstrates that with this revision, and with other requested changes to the temporal arrival distribution, the elimination of the pedestrian capture, the reduction of the bicycle capture and the inclusion of groupcharter buses, the number of vehicle trips in the pre -game peak hour and in the postgame peak hourwili be lower than those projected and analyzed in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Pursuant to Comments 3, 4 and 7, and pursuant to additional ballpark parking modifications made since November, the changes made to the Traffic Impact Study reflect lower pre -game peak hour and post -game peak hour traffic volumes compared to the data submitted in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. The total with project intersection analyses as previously submitted reflect higher traffic volumes at each study area intersection, and thus the results provide a conservative estimate of future traffic conditions. Since the pre -game and post -game vehicular trips are now lower than estimated in the November 2008 traffic study submittal, the more conservative analyses will remain intact, and no revisions to the pre -game or post- game Intersection analyses wi11 be submitted at this time. The reduction in vehicular Impact can be addressed during the preparation of the Network Simulation Analysis as requested in Comment 13 below, 4. The temporal distribution (distribution of spectator arrival by time) should be substantiated. Spectator arrival at the Marlins Ballpark has been derived based upon the many factors that differentiate this facility from the Marlin's current home at Dolphin Stadium. Several factors contribute to the arrival patterns Including the urban location of the Marlins Ballpark, the creation of the Ballpark plaza located adjacent to the facility, the retractable roof that shades the plaza which will also cover the stadium to ensure optimal weather cond4lons for both the spectators and the playing field, the expected arrival pattems for downtown employees and the expected arrivals of those spectators from Palm Beach and Broward Counties. The Bal 1piafk will provide an interactive fan experience providing pregame activities both in the plaza and in the Ballpark which will expand the arrival patterns for weeknight games, The design commitments made by the Florida Marlins to matte the Ballpark experience a greater family oriented event has contributed to different arrival characteristics at this facility. Pursuant to staff review comments, and based upon the information provided by the Florida Marlins regarding the expected arrival patterns and the liming of opening gates, the Applicant has revised the distribution of spectator arrival as presented In Revised Table 213 in the MUSP Traffic impact Study and as described and quantified below, The interactive outdoor plaza area atthe Martins Ballpark is expected to attract and engage a small percentage of early arrivals between 6;00 and 5;30 PM. Downtown employees who leave work promptly will be on-site before 5;30 PM to participate in the interactive experience. The Ballpark gates will open at 5:30 PM so that spectators can watch player warm-ups on the field before the game and participate in the interactive games located within the stadium typical to the design and operation of the newer ballparks. These interactive games include batting and pitching stations geared to both kids and adults. The arrival distribution from 6:00 to 6:30 PM and from 6:30 to 7:00 PM has been increased to reflect the timing of opening gates, the 7:05 anticipated start time of the baseball game and the ongoing fan experience activities within the Ballpark, The arrival distribution between 7:00 and 7,30 PM has been increased to reflect the anticipated arrival patterns for spectators traveling from longer distances to reach the Ballpark (toward and Palm Beach Counties], where these patrons can travel outside the traditional PM peak hour and still arrive at the Ballpark within the first half hour of the game. This 141 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463.8878 office 954-523.4303 fax 954-549-8942 cell Email: csweet@bellsouth.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P,E, Martins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 - Page 3 arrival pattern is consistent with other sports venues located in Downtown Miami, and Is consistent with the spectator arrival at the American Airlines Arena. The urban setting for this Ballpark, located minutes from Downtown Miami, will allow those spectators who typically work fate in the downtown area to leave thetroffces at 7:00 PM so that they are In the Ballpark by 7:30 PM. The arrival distribution for late arrivals after 7:30 PM has been reduced based upon spectator arrival characteristics provided by the Florida Marlins. See the attached letter dated February 5, 2409 from the Florida Marlins confirming the spectator arrival distribution utilized in the MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Text modifications to convey this revised distribution are provided in the MUST' Traffic Impact Study to address and support the changes made in the distribution of spectator arrival. The changes made to the distribution are quantified in the table below, where 70% of all spectators arrive between 5:30 and 7:00 PM, and 73% of all spectators arrive between 8:04 and 7:30 PM, S ectalorWrival ACtiv%es stall Time End Time May 2008 0istrlpution Feb 2009 Usvibution Ba![ ark Plaza is open for pro erne fan a nano 5:00 5:30 10% 5% Ball ark Gates en- a Ur warm u s on Reid• inlerad ve fan erience In Ball alk 530 6:00 15% 17% OrOnq s eclator arrival for a arae• interactive tan exp1rience in Bal ark 6;00 00 25% 26% Onong spectator arrival for a ama• Inleradive fan exp2flence in Ballpark 6:30 7:00 25% 27% ain s ectslor ardval for Palm 9eachlBroward s ect&rs and downlown workers 7:00 7:30 16% 20°% Late s edator arrivals atter 7:30 PM is a realky at all rnNor s is venues 7:30 1 8:00 10% 5% Tots 100% 100% Spectator Arrival dudkq the PM Peak Ho r I hour 5:30 0:34 40% 43% s Woor Arrival during the Pre -Gama Peak hour 4 hour 6:00 7.00 50% 53% S actator Arrival from the Opening Gate to ika Garne Slad Time 1.5 hours 5:30 7:00 65% 70% S eetator Arrival tram the Pre -Game Peak to 30 minutes after Start T1me 1.5 hours 6:00 7:30 65% 73°% 5. The useof cardinal distribution should be substantiated with market studies conducted by the applicant. The Applicant utilized the cardinal direction of Project Zone 757 for general project distribution and assignment, since the distribution characteristics of this project zone was based upon the existence of the former Orange Bowl Stadium. This distribution was then reviewed with the Florida Martins to determine consistency with the resident zip code locations for season ticket holders for Florida Marlins Baseball. The Florida Marlins expect a slight decline in ticket holders from Broward and Palm Beach Counties based upon the relocation of the Ballpark to the former Orange Bowl site, but anticipates an increase in west, southwest and southeast spectators from Miami -Cade to offset the decline from Broward and Palm Beach Counties. This anticipated shift in the resident locations of Florida Marlins ticket holders was factored into the final project distribution used for the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark; MUSP Traffic Impact Study, Text modifications are provided In the Traffic Impact Study to address the source and assumptions of the project distribution. We agree with the use of specific Peak Hour Factors (PHF) in traffic analysis; how these PHFs were derived should be explained the report. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment and has modified the text under Pre -Game and Past -Game Intersection Analyses to describe the source of the peak hour factors. The existing intersection analyses utilize actual peak hour factors derived from the intersection data collected as included in Attachment II of the MUSP Traffic Impact Study. The future intersection analyses utilize a peak hour factor of 0.95 since it is the standard Industry practice for future traffic conditions. 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-453.8878 office 954.525-4343 fax 954-649.8942 cell Entail: csweet@beilsouth.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009— Page 4 7. A 5% trip reduction for pedestrian and bicycle use is unrealistic. Majority of the pedestrian and bicycle trips are secondary trips by spectators and workers arriving at the ball park through other modes of transportation. The pedestrian and bicycle primary trips are likely to be made by residents who live in the close proximity to the ball park, which is unlikely to make-up 5% (1850 trips) of the trips. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment and has eliminated the pedestrian reduction completely but has maintained a 1% bicycle reduction based upon the Ballpark's commitment to provide up to 400 bicycle parking spaces incorporated into the Ballpark site to be located in both the parking garage and plaza areas. Tables 2A, 28 and 2C have been revised to incorporate this change. 8. l=our new signalized intersections surrounding the ball park are proposed to accommodate the rush of traffic before and after an event at the bail park. Signal warrant analysis should be performed to justify these signals. It is likely the signal controls at these intersections will be warranted only on gametevent days, and only during specific times. The traffic study should specify the special need for these signal controls. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment. Subsequent to the MUSP approval, the Applicant will coordinate with Miami -Dade County on the preparation of signal warrant analyses for each of the proposed signals and on the specific event based timing configuration for the operation of each of these Iraff c signals. Table 11 in the Traffic Impact Study has been revised to reflect the special event based need for these signal controls. 9, Vehicle maneuverability details entering and exiting the site and within the parking garage need to be presented Vehicle maneuverability details specific to each floor of the parking garage need to be shown if the floor configuratlans are different. The Applicant has modified the pians to depict the vehicle maneuverability details entering and exiting the site, including the access to surface and structured parking and within each floor of the parking garages. These modified plans ars being sent in pdf format under separate email transmittal, and have been prepared by Tim Haas & Associates, Inc., the City of Miami's parking garage design consultant. . The following recommendations are made to improve the overall transportation conditions near the ball park, These are not necessarily requirements to complete this traffic study. 10. The traffic study explains that the applicant will coordinatewithMiami-DedeCounlyPublr"cWorksduring the review of the MUSP to identify pedestrian pathways to off-site parking or utilize alternative travel modes to access the site for ball park events. A stand-alone document should be prepared that will address the pedestrian and bicycle routes and identify improvements that can be made to create a safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to and from the balf park. Subsequent to and as a condillon of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to provide a stand-alone document to address Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes for Ballpark Events, identifying safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections leading to and from the Ballpark, connecting off-site parking, existing or programmed greenways, transit corridors and transit stations. The Applicant shall continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Works and the City of Miami in the development and review of this stand-alone document, 101 Nortb Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 954.463.5878 office 954-52511303 fax 954.649,8942 cell Email: csweet®beilsoudviex Mr. Raj 5hanmugam, P,P. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 — Page 5 11. A much higher transit trips reduction, significantly more than the 5% could be realized it the applicant takes necessary steps to assure convenient transit services to spectators to arrive and leave the tall park. Such commitments must go beyond the mere use of existing transit services, For example, the Tri - Rail services are typically available during the pre -game hours. However, the passengers are stranded during post game hours (after 5:30 PM on weekdays and 8:30 PM on weekends), which discourage spectators from using the transit. Similarly, bus route #'s 51, 207, and 208 does not have post game services. The applicant should work with the transit agencies to provide special services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. These special services should be conveniently accessible within the balk park, Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miaml-Dade County, Trl-Rail and the City of Miami to assure convenient transit services in Rhe vicinity of the site, to extend transit service hours and to provide special transit services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. 12. The applicant should consider creating a transit hub within the ball park. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami to determine the best location for transit connections serving the Ballpark. 13. Significant operational problems have been observed surrounding the ball park during game days at the 'old Orange Bowl'. Although the traffic analysis for the 'new Ballpark' shows the intersections to function adequately the operational interaction between the intersections are not realized by the analysis presented in the report. We recommend that a Network Simulation analysis should be performed to demonstrate the interactive operational affects. In addition to the Levels of Service, special attention should be given to excessive vehicle queuing at critical Intersections. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to coordinate with the City of Miaml and Miami -Dade County in the preparation of a Network Simulation Analysis that will demonstrate the interactive operational effects of pre -game and post -game traffic to and from the Ballpark. Special attention will be given to vehicle queuing at critical intersections and traffic operations into and out of the Ballpark parking facilities. 141 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8878 office 454-525-4343 fax 954-649.8942 cell Email: csweet§bellsouth.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2609— Page 6 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions orconcerns with the information provided by this submittal. We look forward to your sign off on the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study, to make the February 6, 2009 fit! ng deadline to the City of Miami for the MUSP, Sincerely, Cathy Sweetapple & Associates Transportation and Mobility Planning r't J � f Cathy S. Sweetapple, AICP Principal Transportation Planner cc: Robert Fenton, City of Miami Jose Gonzalez, City of Miami Ulia Medina, City of Miami Claude Delorme, Florida Marlins Joseph Goldstein, Holland & Knight Ines Marrero, Holland & Knight Jim Ebert, Tim Haas & Associates Victor Caban-Diaz, Tim Haas & Associates Craig, Meyer, HOK Jeff Cohen, Miaml-Dade County Public Works C.LI]=*ePis and So ftslCathy NVelapp"y {7=m.4dslh?a+iin"s Sla mnA9enq Co-nmenlsftsponse to URS Conwits - 2.549,kc 101 North Gordon Road, Fart Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.463.8876 office 954-525-4303 fax 954.649-8942 cell Email: csweet@bellscuth.net Cathy sweetapple Transportation and Mobility Planning 101 North Gordon Road Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 RF: Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic impact Study. Arrival Distribution of Ballpark. Cathy, CLAUDE DEL©RME SENIOR VICE PRESIOUNT, STAD[W DI:VE1.011t,1CNT I spent quite a bit of time yesterday reviewing the distribution of patrons at our new ballpark and I am pleased to confirm that I am in complete agreement with the percentages assigned to each half-hour increment. As you know we presently intend to open the gates one and a half hour prior to beginning of the game but our parking structures and surface parking lots will open a minimum of 26 hours before game time, in addition, our Plaza with over 6 acres of open space will be extremely interactive and serve as the primary location for people to meet prior to entering the game. This area will offer food services, retail, music, entertainment and the latest technology of games for all ages. our initial goal of 5% of crowd arriving prior to 5 pm for a 7 pm game is conservative but reasonable considering that the Plaza will be a signature piece of our new venue and people will want the opportunity to experience it to the fullest. If the success encountered in Baltimore is any indication, we will have opportunity to draw In excess of 5 %and reduce the distribution an the roads during peak hours. In your report, you indicated that 17% of the crowd would arrive in the first thirty minutes that the gates are open j5:30 pm to 6 pm) is consistent with what I have experienced in other urban ballparks. The proximity to downtown Miami will facilitate people leaving the office at 5 pm and going directly to the ballpark to take advantage of the pregame activities in the Plaza and batting practice inside the ballpark, The novelty of the balipark, the intimacy of the venue and the premium views of downtown110. will incite our fan base to extend their stay at the ballpark. PLORSDA MARLINS, G.P. +2287 STAN MARINO BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FL 33056 PHONE: 1309) 826-7901 • Wt 1308} 8x6-7480 { i CDCLORMI:(RMARLINS.COM+WWW,MARLINS.Com r. 4 The next time slat from one hour to game time to start of game (6 pm to 7 pm for a 7 pm game will represent the largest segment of our attendance and your assessment of 53 percent is correct. These numbers are consistent with other stadiurn s and arenas in this market. Finally, your projection of 25 percent of people arriving after the start of the game represents reality for this market and is consistent with what we have experienced at Dolphin Stadium. In addition, l have attended several events at American Airlines frena and Bank Atiantic Center to experience a large percentage of fans arriving in that tune slot. This is not the norm but seems to be more cultural to this market. I also witnessed this type of distribution when I was with the Expos and we ended up playing 37 games in Puerto Rico in our last two seasons in Montreal. It seems that people are fine arriving at a later time, enjoying the setting for a few hours, taking advantage of the social setting and leaving when appropriate, I dna not believe this trend will change in our new venue. Overall, you have very fairly represented our projected distribution of the crowd and once people are fully educated on the ballpark, we hope to convince people to arrive even earlier to reduce the impact between G pm and 7 pm. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Claude Delorme Senior Vice President, Stadium Development CATHY SWEETAPP!-F & AssocIATGs TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING February 5, 2009 Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P,E. URS Corporation Southern 3343 West Commercial Blvd, Suite 100 Fart Lauderdale, Florida 33309 RE: Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments Dear Mr. Shanmugam, Please find outlined below, the January7, 2009 preliminary comments made by your office (and highlighted in bold) for the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Responses to each comment are provided as applicable. Following is a list of our preliminary review comments. Issues needing additional information, revisions or corrections need to be addressed to complete the review of this traffic study: 1. For the purpose of traffic analysis the study conservatively assumes that the ball park will be filled to capacity. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment. 2. The traffic study is performed using the traditional traffic impact analysis methodology rather than city's Person Trip Methodology. As much as we agree that the traditional methodology is more stringent than the Person Trip Methodology, at least a statement, if not some analysis pertaining to Person Trip Methodology should be presented to demonstrate the stringent nature of the analysis presented in the report. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comments and has made text revisions to page 2 of the Traffic Impact Study to address the comments related to the Person Trip Methodology and the more conservative approach utilized by the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study, 3. The use of 2,5 persons per vehicle occupancy should be substantiated with market studies conducted by the applicant or other data. The Florida Marlins have provided vehicle occupancy data from the 2008 Florida Marlins baseball season for 17 weeknight games and 18 weekend games held during April, May, June, August and September 2008. This data has been incorporated into the Traffic Impact Study as new Table 2D — Vehicle Occupancy for Weeknights and new Table 2E —Vehicle Occupancy for Weekends. The Florida Marlins have utilized the net turnstile count per game along with the total number of vehicles parked per game, to arrive at a vehicle occupancy rate per game identified as fans per car. The net turnstile count per game excludes those patrons arriving at the stadium in group charter buses, as indicated in detail on Tables 2D and 2E. Based upon the actual Florida Marlins data assembled for 17 weeknight games, the vehicle occupancy utilized in the study has been changed from 2.5 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-6878 office 954-525-4303 fax 954-649-8942 cell Email: csweet@bellsoutli.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2Q09 - Page 2 persons per vehicle to 2.63 persons per vehicle to reflect the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected. For comparison, the vehicle occupancy based upon the 18 weekend games resulted in 3.15 persons per vehicle as outlined in new Table 2E which reflects the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected. Revisions to Tables 2A, 2B and 2C are provided to reflect the use of the 2.63 vehicle occupancy for weeknight Marlins baseball games. Revised Table 28 demonstrates thatwith this revision, and with other requested changes to thetemporai arrival distribution, the elimination of the pedestrian capture, the reduction of the bicycle capture and the inclusion of group charter buses, the number of vehicle trips in the pre -game peak hour and in the post game peak hourwill be lower than those projected and analyzed in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic impact Study. Pursuant to Comments 3, 4 and 7, and pursuant to additional ballpark parking modifications made since November, the changes made to the Traffic impact Study reflect lower pre -game peak hourand post -game peak hour traffic volumes compared to the data submitted in the November 2008 Martins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. The total with project intersection analyses as previously submitted reflect higher traffic volumes at each study area intersection, and thus the results provide a conservative estimate of future traffic conditions. Since the pre -game and post -game vehicular trips are now lower than estimated in the November 2008 traffic study submittal, the more conservative analyses will remain intact, and no revisions to the pre -game or post- game intersection analyses will be submitted atthis time. The reduction in vehicular impact can be addressed during the preparation of the Network Simulation Analysis as requested in Comment 13 below. 4. The temporal distribution (distribution of spectator arrival by time) should be substantiated. Spectator arrival at the Marlins Ballpark has been derived based upon the many factors that differentiate this facility from the Martin's current home at Dolphin Stadium. Several factors contribute to the arrival patterns including the urban location of the Martins Ballpark, the creation of the Ballpark plaza located adjacent to the facility, the retractable roof that shades the plaza which will also cover the stadium to ensure optimal weather conditions for both the spectators and the playing field, the expected arrival patterns for downtown employees and the expected arrivals of those spectators from Palm Beach and Broward Counties. The Ballpark will provide an interactive fan experience providing pre -game activities both in the plaza and in the Ballpark which will expand the arrival patterns for weeknight games. The design commitments made by the Florida Martins to make the Ballpark experience a greater family oriented event has contributed to different arrival characteristics at this facility. Pursuant to staff review comments, and based upon the information provided by the Florida Marlins regarding the expected arrival patterns and the timing of opening gates, the Applicant has revised the distribution of spectator arrival as presented in Revised Table 2B in the MUSP Traffic Impact Study and as described and quantified below. The interactive outdoor plaza area at the Marlins Ballpark is expected to attract and engage a small percentage of early arrivals between 5.00 and 5:30 PM. Downtown employees who leave work promptly will be on-site before 5:30 PM to participate In the interactive experience. The Ballpark gates will open at 5:30 PM so that spectators can watch player warm-ups on the field before the game and participate in the interactive games located within the stadium typical to the design and operation of the newer ballparks. These interactive games include batting and pitching stall ons geared to both kids and adults. The arrival distribu(to n from 6:00 to 5:30 PM and from 6:30 to 7:00 PM has been increased to reflect the timing of opening gates, the 7:05 anticipated start time of the baseball game and the ongoing fan experience activities within the Ballpark. The arrival distribution between 7:00 and 7:30 PM has been increased to reflect the anticipated arrival patterns for spectators traveling from longer distances to reach the Ballpark (Broward and Palm Beach Counties), where these patrons can travel outside the traditional PM peak hour and still arrive at the Ballpark within the first half hour of the game. This 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8876 office 954-525-4343 rax 954-649-8942 cell Email: csweet@bellsouth.net Mir. Raj Shartmugam, F.E. Mari! ns Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 — Page 3 arrival pattern is consistent with other sports venues located in Downtown Miami, and is consistent with the spectator arrival at the American Airlines Arena, The urban setting for this Ballpark, located minutes from Downtown Miami, will allow those spectators who typically work late in the downtown area to leave theiroffrces at 7:174 PM so that they are in the Ballpark by 7:30 PM. The arrival distribution for late arrivals after 7:30 PM has been reduced based upon spectator arrival characterisfics provided by the Florida Marlins. See the attached letter dated February 5, 2009 from the Florida Marlins confirming the spectator arrival distribution utilized in the MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Text modifications to convey this revised distribution are provided in the MUSP Traffic Impact Study to address and support the changes made in the distribution of spectator arrival. The changes made to the distribution are quantified in the table below, where 70% of all spectators arrive between 5:30 and 7R PM, and 73% of all spectators arrive between 5:00 and 7.30 PM, S eotalor Arrival Activlfies start Trme End Time Nov 2009 oistrihuhon Fab 2006 Distribution Ballpark Plaza iso en for pre -game fan ex enence 5:00 5:30 10°k 5% Ballpark Gates open: Pa er warm ups on field; inleraciive fan ex ehance in Ballpark 5:30 6;00 1A 17% 091ding spectator arrival for re ame interactive fan ex enence in Ball rk 6:00 6:30 259'0 289E Ongoing spectator arrival for pre -game; interactive fan ex erience in Ball ark 6:30 7:00 25°k 27% Ongoing s stator arrival for Palm BeachlBroward s eebtors and downtown workers 7:00 T:30 1546 20% Late s talar arrivals after 7:30 PM is a reality at all major sports venues 7:30 &OU 10% 5% Total 100% 100% S ctatar Arrival dudng the PM Peak Hour 1 hour 5:30 6:30 40% 43% S Oalor Arrrval during the Pre -Game Peak Hour i hour 6:00 TOO 50% 53% Spectalur Arrival From the t7 enin Gate to the Game Stars Time 1.5 hours 5:30 T;OO 6536 70% S clalor Arrival from tho Pre -Game Peak to 30 minutes after Start Time 1.5 hours 6:00 7:30 65% 73% 5. The use of cardinal distribution should be substantiated with market studies conducted by the applicant. The Applicant utilized the cardinal direction of Project Zone 757 for general project distribution and assignment, since the distribution characteristics of this project zone was based upon the existence of the former Orange Bowl Stadium. This distribution was then reviewed with the Florida Marlins to determine consistency with the resident zip code locations for season ticket holders for Florida Marlins Baseball, The Florida Marlins expect a slight decline in ticket holders from Broward and Palm Beach Counties based upon the relocation of the Ballpark to the former Orange Bowl site, but anticipates an increase in west, southwest and southeast spectators from Miami -Dade to offset the decline from Broward and Palm Beach Counties. This anticipated shift in the resident locations of Florida Marlins ticket holders was factored into the final project distribution used for the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Text mad ifica tio ns are provided in the Traffic Impact Study to address the source and assumptions of the project distribution. 6, We agree with tate use of specific Peak Hour Factors jPHFj in traffic analysis, how these PHFs were derived should be explained the report. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment and has modified the text under Pre -Game and Post -Game Intersection Analyses to describe the source of the peak hour factors. The existing intersection analyses utilize actual peak hour factors derived from the intersection data c0ected as included in Attachment fl of the MUSP Traffic Impact Study, The future intersection analyses utilize a peak hour factor of 0.95 since it is the standard industry practice for future traffic conditions. 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8878 office 954-525-4343 fax 954-549-8942 cell Email: csweet@bellsouth.net Mr. Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 20x9 - Page 4 7. A S%trip reduction for pedestrian and bicycle use is unrealistic. Majority of the pedestrian and bicycle trips are secondary trips by spectators and workers arriving at the ball park through other modes of transportation. The pedestrian and bicycle primary trips are likely to be made by residents who live in the dose proximity to the ball ,park, which is unlikely to make-up 5% (1850 trips) of the trips. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment and has eliminated the pedestrian reduction completely but has maintained a 1% bicycle reduction based upon the Ballpark's commitment to provide up to 400 bicycle parking spaces incorporated into the Ballpark site to be located in both the parking garage and plaza areas. Tables 2A, 2B and 2C have been revised to incorporate this change. $. Four new signalized intersections surrounding the ball park are proposed to accommodate the rush of traffic before and after an event at the ball park. Signal warrant analysis should be performed to justify these signals. It is likely the signal controls at these intersections will be warranted only on gamelevent days, and only during specific times. The traffic study should specify the special need for these signal controls. The Applicant concurs with the reviewer's comment. Subsequent to the MUSP approval, the Applicant will coordinate with Miami -Dade County on the preparation of signal warrant analyses for each of the proposed signals and on the specific event based timing configuration for the operation of each of these traffic signals. Table 11 in the Traffic Impact Study has been revised to reflect the special event based need for these signal controls, 9. Vehicle maneuverability details entering and exiting the site and within the parking garage need to be presented. Vehicle maneuverability details specific to each floor of the parking garage need to be shown if the floor configurations are different. The Applicant has modified the plans to depict the vehicle maneuverability details entering and exiting the site, including the access to surface and structured parking and within each floor of the parking garages. These modified plans are being sent in pdf format under separate email transmittal, and have been prepared by Tim Naas & Associates, Inc., the City of Miami's parking garage design consultant. The following recommendations are made to improve the overall transportation conditions near the ball park. These are not necessarily requirements to complete this traffic study. 14, The traffic study explains that the applicant will coordinate with Miami -bade CountyPuhfic Works during the review of the MUSP to identify pedestrian pathways to off-site parking or utilize alternative travel modes to access the site for ball park events. A stand-alone document should be prepared that will address the pedestrian and bicycle routes and identify improvements that can be made to create a safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to and from the ball park. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to provide a stand-alone document to address Pedestrian and Eicycfe Routes for Ballpark Events, identifying safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections leading to and from the Ballpark, connecting off-site parking, existing or programmed greenways, transit corridors and transit stations. The Applicant shall continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Works and the City of Miami in the development and review of this stand-alone document. 101 North Gordon (toad. Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8878 office 954-525-4303 fax 954-644-8942 Gell Email: csweet@a bellsouth.net Mr, Raj Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 - Page 5 11. A much higher transit trips reduction, significantly more than the 5% could be realized if the applicant takes necessary steps to assure convenient transit services to spectators to arrive and leave the bail park. Such commitments must go beyond the mere use of existing transit services. For example„ the Tri - Rail services are typically available during the pre -game hours. However, the passengers are stranded during post game hours (after 9:30 PM on weekdays and 8.30 PM on weekends), which discourage spectators from using the transit. Simitarty, bus route #'s 51, 207, and 208 does not have post game services. The applicant should work with the transit agencies to provide special services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. These special services should be conveniently accessible within the ball park. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -[lade County, Tri -Rail and the City of Miami to assure convenient transit services in the vicinity of the site, to extend transit service hours and to provide special transit services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. 12. The applicant should consider creating a transit hub within the ball park. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami to determine the best location for transit connections serving the Ballpark. 13. Significant operational problems have been observed surrounding the ball park during game days at the `old Orange Bowl', Although the traffic analysis for the 'new Ballpark' shows the intersections to function adequately the operational interaction between the intersections are not realized by the analysis presented in the report. We recommend that a Network Simulation analysis should be performed to demonstrate the interactive operational affects, In addition to the Levels of Service, special attention should be given to excessive vehicle queuing at critical intersections. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to coordinate with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County in the preparation of a Network Simulation Analysis that will demonstrate the interactive operational effects of pre -game and past -game traffic to and from the Ballpark. Special attention will be given to vehicle queuing at critical intersections and traffic operations into and out of the Ballpark parking facilities. 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463-8878 ofrrce 954.525-4303 fax 954-649.8942 cell EmaiL csweet@bellsouth.net Mr. Rai Shanmugam, P.E. Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study Responses to City Preliminary Comments February 5, 2009 - Page 6 Please do not Hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns with the information provided by this submittal. We look forward to your sign off on the Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study, to make the February 6, 2009 filing deadline to the City of Miami for the MUSP. Sincerely, Cathy Sweetapple & Associates Transportation and Mobility Planning [/%pr Cathy S. Sweltapple, AICP Principal Transportation Planner cc: Robert Fenton, City of Miami Jose Gonzalez, City of Miami Lilia Medina, City of Miami Claude Delorme, Florida Marlins Joseph Goldstein, Holland & Knight Ines Marrero, Holland & Knight Jim Ebert, Tint Haas & Associates Victor Caban-Diaz, Tim Haas & Associates Craig, Meyer, HOK Jeff Coher), Miami -Dade County Public Worms C; mumenls and SellingslCalhy SmelappleiWy pammenYsWB l n's SlsdiumlAgency CnmmenlslResponse to URS Comments - 2-5.09.doc 101 North Gordon Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954-463.8878 office 954-525-4303 fax 954-649-8942 cell Finaii: csweet@bellsouth.net Cathy Sweetapple "transportation and Mobility Planning 101 North Gordon Road Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 RE: Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. Arrival Distribution of Ballpark. Cathy, CLAUDE DELORME SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT. STADIUM DEVELOPMENT I spent quite a bit of time yesterday reviewing the distribution of patrons at our new ballpark and I am pleased to confirm that I am in complete agreement with the percentages assigned to each half-hour increment, As you know we presently intend to open the gates one and a half hour prior to beginning of the game but our parking structures and surface parking lots will open a minimum of 2.5 hours before game time. In addition, our Plaza with over 6 acres of open space will be extremely interactive and serve as the primary location For people to meet prior to entering the game. This area will offer food services, retail, music, entertainment and the latest technology of games for alt ages. Chir initial goal of 5% of crowd arriving prior to 5 pm for a 7 pm game is conservative but reasonable considering that the Plaza will be a signature piece of our new venue and people will want the opportunity to experience it to the Fullest. It the success encountered in Baltimore is any indication, we will have opportunity to draw in excess of 5 %and reduce the distribution on the roads during peak hours. In your report, you indicated that 17% of the crowd would arrive in the first thirty minutes that the gates are open (5:30 pm to 6 pm) is consistent with what I have experienced in other urban ballparks. The proximity to downtown Miami will facilitate people leaving the office at 5 pm and going directly to the ballpark to take advantage of the pre -game activities in the Plaza and batting practice inside the ballpark. The novelty of the ballpark, the intimacy of the venue and the premium views of downtown will incite our fan base to extend their stay at the ballpark. N61 , FLORIDA MARLINS. L.P. • 2267 DAH MARINO BOULEVARD, MIAMI, FL 33456 PHONE: 13175) 62C-14OI + FAX: (305) 626-7480 CDELORME@MARLINS.COM • WWW,MARLINS.COM The next time slot from one hour to game time to start of game (6 pm to 7 pm for a 7 pm game will represent the largest segment of our attendance and your assessment of 53 percent is correct. These numbers are consistent with other stadiums and arenas in this market. Finally, your projection of 2S percent of people arriving after the start of the game represents reality for this market and is consistent with what we have experienced at Dolphin Stadium. In addition, I have attended several events at American Airlines Arena and Bank Atlantic Center to experience a large percentage of fans arriving in that time slot. This is not the norm but seems to be more cultural to Ws market. I also witnessed this type of distribution when I was with the Expos and we ended up playing 22 games in Puerto Rico in our last two seasons in Montreal. It seems that people are fine arriving at a later time, enjoying the setting for a few hours, taking advantage of the social setting and leaving when appropriate. I do not believe this trend will change in our new venue. overall, you have very fairly represented our projected distribution of the crowd and once people are fully educated on the ballpark, we hope to convince people to arrive even earlier to reduce the impact between 6 pm and 7 pm. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Claude Delorme Senior Vice President, Stadium Development Marlins Ballpark Major €Jse Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Table of Contents introduction DevelopmentProgram ........................... ...................... ___ ................................ ............... ............................. i Parking............................................................................................................................................................1 Transportation Analysis Parameters ............................... ,............................................................................. ........ ......... 2 RegionalAccess............................................................................................................................................................3 TransitAccess................................................................................................................................................................8 PedestrianAccess.........................................................................................................................................................8 ProjectTrip Generation................................................................................................................................................14 ProjectTrip Assignment. ............. ....................... . .............. -1 ........................ ............................................................. 20 Existing Traffic Data and Roadway Geometry..............................................................................................................29 ProgrammedRoadway Improvements ................... ....................................... —.................... ,....................................... 37 FutureBackground Traffic.....................................................................................................„....................,............,...37 CommittedDevelopment Traffic ........................................................................ ..................,..........,.............................40 Future Background Plus Committed Development Traffic............................................................................................4t} Total Traffic Conditions - Pre -Game and Post -Game Intersection Analyses................................................................42 Intersection Analysis Results and Recommended improvements................................................................................64 Conclusions.................................................................................................................................................................. 64 SubsequentStudies and Coordination.........................................................................................................................65 List of Attachments Attachment I...................................................................................................... FDDT and Person -Trip Level of Service AttachmentII................................................................................................................................................. Traffic Data Attachmentill...........................................................................................................................................Historic Counts Attachment IV...............................................................................................Programmed Transportation Improvements Attachment V..........................................................................................................Committed Development Information AttachmentVI................................................................................................................................. Intersection Analyses Attachment VII......................................................................Bus Transit Information for the Routes Adjacent to the Site Attachment Vill.....................................................................................................Transportation Control Measures Plan AttachmentIX................................................................................................................................... Traffic Methodology Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. February 2009 Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study List of Figures 1ASite Location....................................................................................................................................................4 1BRoadways Serving the Site..............................................................................................................................5 Existing Transit Serving the Site....................................................................................................................11 1CBallpark Parking..............................................................................................................................................6 Generation Analysis................................................................................................................................16 1 D Location of Neighborhood/Off-Site Parking........................................................ .......................... ..................... 7 2ARegional and Local Transit Service in the Study Area.....................................................................................9 Spectator Departure — Post -Game Peak Hour — 9:30 to 10:30 PM................................................................17 2B Access to Premium Transit............................................................................................................................10 Vehicle Occupancy for Weeknights...............................................................................................................18 3A Pedestrian Access — Pre-Game............................................,,.......................................................................12 Vehicle Occupancy for Weekends.................................................................................................................19 38 Pedestrian Access — Post Game...................................................................................................................13 Turning Movement Count Locations and Count Timeframes.........................................................................29 4A Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757...................................................................................................................21 intersection Traffic Control and Lane Geometry............................................................................................30 4B Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757 — 2015 Interim Plan...................................................................................22 Programmed Transportation Improvements in the Study Area......................................................................37 4C Project Assignment Using the Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757...................................................................23 Traffic Growth Rate Calculations.. ........................................................ . ............. ......................................... 4D Regional Project Distribution..........................................................................................................................24 Summary of Committed Developments........................................................................................................40 4E Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) ProjectDistribution.............................................................................25 Intersection Turning Movements — Pre -Game Peale Hour — 6 to 7 PM..........................................................45 4F Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:04-7:00 PM) Project Traffic .....................................................................................26 Intersection Turning Movements— Post -Game Peak Hour --9:30 to 10:30 PM.............................................53 4G Post -Game Peak Hour (9:34-10:30 PM) Project Distribution.........................................................................27 Pre -Game Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Results......................................................................................61 4H Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-30:30 PM) Project Traffic.................................................................................28 Post -Game Peak dour Intersection Analysis Results....................................................................................62 5A Intersection Turning Movement Traffic Count Locations................................................................................31 Proposed Traffic Control Modifications and Proposed Lane Geometry .........................................................63 58 Game Arrival Intersection Analyses...............................................................................................................32 Florida Marlins, L.P. Fehruary 2009 5C Game Departure Intersection Analyses.........................................................................................................33 6A Existing Lane Geometry at Study Intersections and Adjacent Corridors........................................................34 6B 2008 Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements.. .................... _35 6C 2008 Post -Game Peak Hour (9:34-10:30 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements ..................... 36 6D Future without Project -- Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Intersection Turning Movements .................41 6E Future with Project— Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:40 PM) Intersection Turning Movements ...................... 43 6F Future with Project— Post -Game Peak Hour (9.30-10:30 PM) Intersection Turning Movements ..................44 List of Tables 1A Summary of 'Ballpark Parking and Liner Uses... ......... ..................................................................................... 1 18 Existing Transit Serving the Site....................................................................................................................11 2ATrip Generation Analysis................................................................................................................................16 213 Spectator Arrival — Pre -Game Peak Hour— 6:00 to 7:00 PM.........................................................................17 2C Spectator Departure — Post -Game Peak Hour — 9:30 to 10:30 PM................................................................17 21) Vehicle Occupancy for Weeknights...............................................................................................................18 2E Vehicle Occupancy for Weekends.................................................................................................................19 3A Turning Movement Count Locations and Count Timeframes.........................................................................29 38 intersection Traffic Control and Lane Geometry............................................................................................30 4 Programmed Transportation Improvements in the Study Area......................................................................37 5 Traffic Growth Rate Calculations.. ........................................................ . ............. ......................................... 38 6 Summary of Committed Developments........................................................................................................40 7A -7H Intersection Turning Movements — Pre -Game Peale Hour — 6 to 7 PM..........................................................45 8A -8H Intersection Turning Movements— Post -Game Peak Hour --9:30 to 10:30 PM.............................................53 9 Pre -Game Peak Hour Intersection Analysis Results......................................................................................61 10 Post -Game Peak dour Intersection Analysis Results....................................................................................62 11 Proposed Traffic Control Modifications and Proposed Lane Geometry .........................................................63 Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special, Perml Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Fehruary 2009 CATHY SWEE'I'APP1,1' & ASSOCIAT`Is5 TRAM SPQR"l'A'1'tON AMID MOBILITY PLANN1ISIG Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Introduction This Major Use Special Permit (MUSP) Traffic Impact Study has been prepared on behalf of Florida Marlins, L.P. to support the proposed redevelopment plans for the new Marlins Ballpark to be located on the site of the former Orange Bowl Stadium, and bounded generally by NW 17 Avenue on the west, NW 7 Street on the north, NW 14 Avenue on the east and NW 3 Street on the south, in the City of Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida (see Figure 1A). Development Program The redevelopment plan accommodates a new retractable dome Ballpark for 37,000 spectators, with structured parking located to the immediate north and south of the Ballpark being developed by the City of Miami, and surface parking located to the east and west sides of the Ballpark (see Figure 1 B). Four parking structures are provided along with 61,678 square feet of ancillary ground level specialty retail and up to 96 residential units that will be integrated into the parking structure as liner uses. The structured parking will be wrapped with retail finers along the NW 7 Street frontage and along a portion of NW 4 Street. Up to 96 residential units will be integrated into the liners along the south side of the parking structures facing NW 3 Street. Parking The grass parking on the north and south sides of the former Orange Bowl site has been replaced with four parking structures designed by the City of Miami to provide 4,744 parking spaces forthe Ballpark, along with 969 spaces created from three surface lots to the west of the Ballpark and 3 surface lot to the east of the Ballpark (see Figure 1C and Table 1A below), The 5,713 spaces reflect the on-site parking for the stadium, The balance of the parking demand will be satisfied using off-site parking in the neighborhood located within a% mile radius from the Ballpark and in the municipal parking lots located on the north side of the river (see Figure ID). The limited parking configuration on-site encourages spectators to use alternative travel modes to access the site for stadium events. An additional 96 spaces are provided in the south parking structures to support the 96 residential units. No additional parking is provided to support the retail liners during Ballpark events. Table 1A — Summaryof Ball ark Parkina and Liner Uses Parking StructuresE1,2226 Surface Lots Spaces Total Spaces Liner Lues Retail SF P1 —Northwest Lot W1 -West 192 Ancilla Retail in P1 27,011 SF P2 — Northeast Lot W2 —west 126 Ancilla Retail in P2 25,076 SF P3 — Southwest Lot W3 — West 350 Ancilla Retail in P3 9 591 SF P4 �- Southeast Lot E1- East 126 Total Ancillary Retail 61,678 SF Lot E2 - East 71 Lot E3 - East 104 Residential in P3 and P4 U to §6 bU Subtotal Structure: 4,744 Subtotal Surface: 959 5,713 PaNing for 96 DU: 95 96 - Total in Structure: 4,844 1 Total In Surface: 969 5,609 Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Revised February 2009 Transportation Analysis Parameters The Marlins Ballpark is located within the Mlami-Dade County Urban infill Area and the City of Miami Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), which evaluates urban mobility along transportation corridors using adopted vehicular and person -trip based transportation system capacity provisions as outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Pian (MCNP). Based upon the primary site use as a baseball stadium for Major League Baseball, the Marlins Ballpark will create special part-time demands on the surrounding transportation system. This study has therefore been prepared to evaluate the pre -game and post -game peak hour vehicular impacts upon the adjacent study area corridors and at the surrounding study area intersections under existing and future traffic conditions. The following study parameters have been established for this Traffic Impact Study: The vehicular demand for the Ballpark has been derived using persons per vehicle assumptions typical to weeknight Marlins Baseball games, combined with attendance at full -occupancy of the Ballpark resulting in an analysis that is more conservative than those standards adopted by the MCNP as outlined In the Person -Trip Methodology. Only the capacity of the roadway system has been utilized to evaluate the adequacy of the roadway network to accommodate inbound and outbound project traffic (including the impact ofcars and buses). The analysis as performed recognizes transit services in the immediate area serving the Ballpark site however the capacity of the transportation network to serve the Ballpark site is based upon the vehicular capacity to accommodate the inbound and outbound vehicles and buses that will serve the site, not the combined capacity of the roadway network and the transit system. • The weekday evening baseball games are scheduled to begin at 7:05 pm (or later) to reduce the impact of the inbound Ballpark traffic on the PM peak hourof background traffic. The pre -game peak hour will occur between 6:00 pm and 7:00 pm and the post -game peak hour will occur between 9:30 pm and 10:30 pm. ■ Existing traffic in the study area from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm has been found to reflect an average traffic volume reduction of 12% compared to the PM peak hour as evidenced by the data collected. ■ Existing traffic in the study area from 9:30 pm to 10:30 pm has been found to reflect an average traffic volume reduction of 62% compared to the PM peak hour as evidenced by the data collected, ■ The Marlins Ballpark is located on the site of the former Orange Bowl, which accommodated over 80,000 spectators to attraction events. The Marlins Ballpark has been designed to accommodate 37,000 spectators, reducing the overall inbound and outbound vehicular impact to the surrounding study area. The analyses performed forthis study will assume full occupancy of the Marlins Ballparkfora weekday evening baseball game with a start time of 7:05 PM. • The 61,678 square feet of ancillary ground level specialty retail located in the liners to the parking structure along NW 7 Street and NW 4 Street are treated as ancillary uses to the main ballpark event for the purpose of this analysis. Any retail patrons going to or from the retail liners during the pre -game or post -game timeframes have been internalized in the trip generation analysis. This approach is supported by the fact that no parking spaces have been allocated in the parking structures for the retail liners during Ballpark events, • Trip generation for the 96 residential units has been included in the analysis. A total of 96 residential parking spaces are provided in the two south parking structures separate and apart from the parking spaces provided for the Ballpark. Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Revised February 2009 Regional Access Regional vehicular access to the Marlins Ballpark is provided using a combination of intrastate highways, state and county arterial roadways and urban collector roadways as depicted on attached Figure 1A. Expressway access is provided into the immediate study area from SR 835 to NW 1.7 Avenue and SR 836 to NW 12 Avenue. Additional highway access into the study area Is provided using Interstate 95 to SR 836, Interstate 95 to West Flagler Street (via NW 3 Court), Interstate 95 to SW 7 Street or even Interstate 95 to US -1. State and county arterial roadways complete the connections to the Ballpark site via NW 22 Avenue, NW 17 Avenue, NW 12 Avenue, NW 718 Avenue, NW 7 Street, West Flagler Street, SW 1 Street, SW 7 Street and SW 8 Street. Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Revised February 2009 ff Metromover rtyury to Ballpark Site Location [� Ballpark Structured ParkingFlorida Intrastate Highway County Mirror Arterial Marlins Ballpark = State Principal Arterial Urban Collector Q P g 1A State Minor Arterial February 2pQ5 Ballpark Surface Lot Parkin Source: Cathy $weatapple &Assodtatea SR 836 fr�r5 � *rte NW 7 St NW6St NWSst � NW 4 St s NW3St NW 2 St 6 � NW 1 St JN Flagler St �F SW 1 St .� r d } ■ �� e f NW 14 St Surface Parkins � Ballpark p P1 = 928 spaces F2 = 1,316 Spaces W1 = 192 spaces W2 = 126 spares Aad � � Ballpark Structured Parking P3 = 1,226 spaces W3 = 350 spaces YA' • t '}a [ n � ....&iii �! i � _ 1 "� NW 11 St .,,. - February 2009 } Structured Parking Surface Parkins Surface Parkins Figure 1 B Ballpark p P1 = 928 spaces F2 = 1,316 Spaces W1 = 192 spaces W2 = 126 spares Aad � � Ballpark Structured Parking P3 = 1,226 spaces W3 = 350 spaces ,� Marlins Ballpark yY1 "� x.• .,,. - February 2009 Total = 4,744 spaces Total East + West = 969 spaces a.. W1P1 P2 s;i • y •.,A i .a WZ i1 r _ y �S.21 W3 � i� I ' ? A fi%a �s E3 r c - P3 P4 a E i ■. 'S 5 ..! Q I r--^ 17 0 r iy'i ii • t t `� � 5 -;.x . Ss-, r ' � ;-+kms„ r "'',r R4 Y � _ S >rj n, > f N } Structured Parking Surface Parkins Surface Parkins Figure 1 B Ballpark p P1 = 928 spaces F2 = 1,316 Spaces W1 = 192 spaces W2 = 126 spares E1 = 126 spaces E2 = 71 spaces Roadways Serving the Site P1 Ballpark Structured Parking P3 = 1,226 spaces W3 = 350 spaces F3 = 104 spaces Marlins Ballpark yY1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking P4 = 1'274 spaces Total = 668 spaces Total = 301 spaces February 2009 Total = 4,744 spaces Total East + West = 969 spaces Source: Cathy Sweetapple 8 Associates JAI (fit%� tit-ii�p 1 i"'�'r + 1 1 +f' 1'i �� �� * —+• C 17S& .. _.._.'. 7_1 P1 Lot W1 Strilctured Structured. Parkin Parking 9 Parking Y Lot Ell r Parking i_ e? Lot W2 I Fir s i Parking 1 N Lot W3 s E2 t "a Parking Lot E3 i s .. 'A, � 1 1 F k.�� P3FFe .gtfll tined StrllGtUied _ _+ Parking , . Parking i .i "e 77 e y� Y F .I r .• � — 11 • as , Y A., �'_2 IL ' il. y��p �y •'1_ a �'J. _ r xY/,(' Y 44% a --- f-�' I +r.-.1 � •.li �-�.� lyywy!i�yw'��h"iy�' _ �'yre aye JL Slrudured Parking Surface Parkins Surface Parking Figure 1 Vehicular Access to Parkin P7 = 928 spaces 9 P2 = 1,316 spaces W1 = 192 spaces W2 = 126 spaces Et = 126 spaces E2 = 71 spaces Ballpark Parking P3 = 1,226 spaces W3 = 350 spaces E3 = 104 spaces Marlins Ballpark 0 Traffic Signal P4 = 1,274 spaces Total = 668 spaces Total = 301 spaces February 2009 Total = 4,744 spaces Total East + West = 969 spaces Source: Cathy Sweerapple & Associates ` NW 14 St Y 'I 3 , NW 12[ v„e. , • �, ,. � n.iw-`. y.� "moi R r. MPA MPA ij Lot 25 Lot 26 14 w, NW 11 St r a 3 ? i SFt 836 .. a �; • , :fir._: _ a.y, � h NW 7 .5t _J W1P1 P2 .e NV16 St4 "'' E1 - - - y}, W2 _ ti NW 5 St 4 ---, E2 - � W3 NW b St E3 - P3 P4 NW3St _ NW 2 St ,, y • Flagler St SW 1St Fr « •--,la{ µf . _ f' N }* k: r ups Ln N "�r`. dry 47 t c t`�• Neighborhood Figure 9 D Ballpark Parking Areas Location of Neighborhood/Off-Site Parking p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark Wi Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MParking Lot Off -Site Municipalking Lots -Site 2009 Source! Cathy Sweerapple & Asso6otes Transit Access The Marlins Ballpark is located within %2 mile of nine existing Metrobus transit routes which provide excellent transit access to the site (see Figure 2A), Seven of these existing routes circulate either along the perimeter of the Ballpark Site or within a'/4 mile walking distance from the pedestrian access to the Ballpark facility. Transit headways to and through the study area are summarized below and are outlined in detail in attached Table 1 B. • Six of the existing transit routes serving the site operate during the PM peak hour with 15 minute transit headways (or less) on Routes 7, 11, 17, 51, 207 and 208. • Six of the existing transit routes serving the site operate during the Pre -Game Peak Hour with 20 minute transit headways (or less) on Routes 7, 11, 17, 51, 207 and 208. • The Marlins Ballpark is located within a'/4 mile walking distance from West Flagler Street to the pedestrian access to the Ballpark site. Three of the existing transit routes on West Flagler Street operate with express bus transit service at 15 or 20 minute headways or less on Routes 11, 51, and 208. • Four of the existing transit routes serving the site operate during and beyond the Post -Game Peak Hour, providing transit service past midnight for Routes 11,12,17 and 22. Transit access is therefore available along West Flagler and SW 1 Street, along NW 17 Avenue, along NW 12 Avenue and along NW 22 Avenue. • The Marlins Ballpark is located less than a one mile walking distance from the Civic Center Metrorail station (see Figure 2B) and approximately a one mile walking distance from the Culmer Metrorail station, The surrounding area is served by an extensive system of alternative travel modes to facilitate the movement of people through the use of fixed rail transit, rubber tire transit and increased pedestrian activity. • Metrorall Transit service (using either the Civic Center or Culmer Station) provides transit service at 7 and 8 minute headways during both the PM peak hour and during the Pre -Game Peak Hour. • Metrorail Transit service (using either the Civic Center or Culmer Station) provides transit service at 30 minute headways after 9:00 PM, and can serve Ballpark patrons during the Post -Game Peak Hour until 12:15 AM. Pedestrian Access Pedestrian access and connectivity is a key factor in the success of this Ballpark. The limited parking configuration on-site requires that a great percentage of spectators find off-site parking or utilize alternative travel modes to access the site for stadium events. The Applicant will coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Works during the review of the MUSP to identify pedestrian pathways to off-site parking and transit to ensure that crosswalks, pedestrian signals, walkways, sidewalks and bicycle facilities are addressed to facilitate pedestrian and transit access to and from the Ballpark site. The Applicant has identified pedestrian access locations between the parking structures and the Ballpark, as well as the entry points into and out of the stadium, Attached Figure 3A illustrates the Pre -Game Pedestrian Access identifying the vehicular entry points into the parking structures and the pedestrian access between the parking structures and the Ballpark. Attached Figure 3B illustrates the Post -Game Pedestrian Access identifying the vehicular exit points departing the parking structures and the pedestrian access between the Ballpark and the parking structures. Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Revised February 2009 Melrorail ail MetrorFigure 2A Ballpark Regional and Local Transit Service In the Study Area 0 Ballpark Structured Parking "0"Metrobus Route Marlins Ballpark 0 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking November 2008 Source Cathy Swaetappte & Associates Il 1 �1 1 i 1 w 1 i ■ - im =Rim 1 � (I Route R 7 RouteRoute L i' Route Route Route Route Route 207 Route 208 Melrorail ail MetrorFigure 2A Ballpark Regional and Local Transit Service In the Study Area 0 Ballpark Structured Parking "0"Metrobus Route Marlins Ballpark 0 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking November 2008 Source Cathy Swaetappte & Associates NW atSi EARLINGTON HEIGHTS rP' S.R 112 L) FIa>:^Icr S1 16:u z : W!" 36 SR N%V 20 Si IL-CUILMER —'GOE M � mikes am CL IN 1 r� } w ' 0 my Z4 IN UIA. VIZCAYA rF,111 a Cj P AUT GROVE r - Burin Aoad DOUGLAS ROAD Pedestrian Access from Metrorail to Ballpark Figure 213 I�J Ballpark Access to Premium Transit 0 Civic Center and Culmer MetroraiI Stations Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Source: Cathy Sweetappla & Associates Table 18 — Existing Transit Serving the Site Metrobus Routes Service Headways 5 to 6 PM Service Headways 6 to 7 PM Service Headways 7 to 8 PM Service Headways 8 tog PM Service Headways 9 to 10 PM Service Headways 10 to 11 PM Existing Late Night Service Hours Route 6 60 min — NB 60 min - SB nla nla n1a n1a nla 6:00 to 7:00 PM Route 7 1512.0 min — EB 15 min - WB 20 min — ES 20 min -WB 30 min — EB 30 min - WB 30 min — EB 30 min - WB 20 min — EB 30 min - WB 60 min — EB 30 min - WB 10:00 to 11:00 PM Route 11 8112114 min - EB 8min-WB 12114117 min - EB 8112 min - WB 15 min — EB 15 min - WB 15117 min — ES 15 min - WB 30 min — EB 15 min - WB 30150 min — EB 30 min - WB 4:00 to 5:00 AM Route 12 30 min — NB 30 min -S8 30 min — NB 30 min - SB 50 min - NB 40 min - SB 60 min - NB 40 min - SB 60 min — NB 60 min -S8 60 min - -NB 60 min -S8 12:00 to 1:00 AM Route 17 10115120 min — NB 10120 min - SB 30 min — NB 10120 min - SB 30 min — NB 30 min - SB 60 min — NB 60 min - SB 60 min — NB 60 min - SB 60 min — NB 60 min - SB 1:00 to 2:00 AM Route 22 30 min — NB 30 min - SB 30 min — NO 30135 min — SB 40 min — NO 60 min — SB 50 min — NB 50 min — SB 60 min — NB 50 min — SB 45130 min — NO 50 min — SB 11:30 to 12:30 AM Route 51 Flag ler Max 15 min — EB 15 min — WS 17120130 min — EB 11115 min - W8 30 min — EB 20130 min - VVl3 n1a n1a n1a 7:00 to 8:00 PM - EB 8:30 to 9:30 PM- WB Route 207 15 minutes 12115 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes n1a n1a 7:00 to 8:00 PM Route 208 15117 minutes 13115/20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes n1a n1a 8:00 to 9:00 PM Metrorail Stations Service Headways 5 to 6 PM Service Headways 6 to 7 PM Service Headways 7 tv 8 RM Service Headways a tog PM Service Headways 9 to 10 PM Service Headways 10 to 11 PM Existing Late Night Service Hours Culmer NB 718 min — NO 718 min — N8 15 min - NB 15 min - NB 30 min - NB 30 min - NB 12:22 AM Civic Center NB 718 min — NB 718 min — N9 15 min - NB 15 min - NB 30 min - NB 30 min - NB 12:24 AM Civic Center SB 718 min — SB 7115 min — SB 15 min - SB 30 min - SB 30 min - SB 30 min - SB 12:15 AM CulmerSB 718min —SB 7115 min — SB 15 min - SB 30 min - SB 30 min - SB 30 min - SB 12:17 AM [1i Source: Miami -Dade Transit Metrobus and Metrorail Transit Routes Schedules, Miami -Dade Transit website, November 2008. Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2008 40 a 0 0 Inbound Pedestrian Movements from Structured Figure 3A Pedestrian Access -Pre Game Access Locations into Ballpark Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Source: Cathy Sweetapple& Associates AD. -1 71 ------------------ —:— �-— Outbound Pedestrian Movements to Structured Parking Figure 3B lull PedestrIan Access — Post Game Access Locations into Ballpark Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Saurce Cathy Syi"tappla & Associates ww • 0 -1 71 ------------------ —:— �-— Outbound Pedestrian Movements to Structured Parking Figure 3B lull PedestrIan Access — Post Game Access Locations into Ballpark Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Saurce Cathy Syi"tappla & Associates Project Tr1R Generation A trip generation analysis for the Ballpark has been prepared to estimate the trips that would be anticipated for the traditional PM peak hour, the Pre -Game Peak Hour from 6:00 to 7:00 PM, and the Post -Game Peak Hour from 9:30 to 10:30 PM (see attached Tables 2A, 2B and 2C), The Ballpark has been designed to accommodate 37,000 spectators. The analyses performed for this study have assumed full occupancy of the Marlins Ballpark for a weekday evening baseball game with a start time of 7:05 PM. The vehicular trip generation for the project site has been developed using information provided by the Florida Marlins based upon the number of spectators accommodated in the new Ballpark, the parking availability on-site and a conservative estimate of persons per vehicle for a baseball game. The assumptions used are outlined below: Spectators have been converted to vehicle trips using an updated vehicle occupancy of 2.63 persons per vehicle. The Florida Martins have provided vehicle occupancy data from the 2008 Florida Marlins baseball season for 17 weeknight games and 18 weekend games held during April, May, June, August and September 2008. This data has been incorporated into the Traffic impact Study as new Table 2U — Vehicle Occupancy for Weeknights and new Table 2E — Vehicle Occupancy for Weekends. The Florida Marlins have utilized the net turnstile count per game along with the total number of vehicles parked per game, to arrive at a vehicle occupancy rate per game identified as fans percar. The net turnstile count per game excludes those patrons arriving at the stadium in group charter buses, as indicated in detail on Tables 2D and 2E. Based upon the actual Florida Marlins data assembled for 17 weeknight games, the vehicle occupancy utilized in the November 2008 Traffic Impact Study has been changed from 2.5 persons per vehicle to 2.63 persons per vehicle to reflect the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected. For comparison, the vehicle occupancy based upon the 18 weekend games resulted in 3.15 persons per vehicle as outlined in new Table 2E which reflects the 2008 Florida Marlins data collected. Revisions to Tables 2A, 2B and 2C are provided to reflect the use of the 2.63 vehicle occupancy for weeknight Martins baseball games. Revised Table 2B demonstrates that with this revision, and with other requested changes to the temporal arrival distribution, the elimination of the pedestrian capture, the reduction of the bicycle capture and the inclusion of group charter buses, the number of vehicle trips in the pre -game peak hour and in the post game peak hour will be lower than those projected and analyzed in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSE Traffic impact Study. ■ A conservative transit reduction of 5.0% has been utilized consistent with other studies performed outside of the Downtown area. Spectator arrival using Group Charter buses has been incorporated into the analysis based upon the current operations for Florida Marlins Baseball Games. Under a full occupancy scenario, 50 Group Charter Buses carrying 45 persons per bus are anticipated to arrive and depart the Ballpark. Revised Table 213 incorporates spectator arrival using 50 Group Charter Buses, accounting for the bus trips separate from the vehicle trips to and from Ballpark parking. It is anticipated that up to 30 Group Charter Buses will be accommodated in one of the surface lots adjacent to the Ballpark, and that the remaining buses will park in off-site locations through an agreement between the City and Miami -Dade County. Pursuant to agency comments, the pedestrian reduction has been eliminated however the bicycle reduction has been maintained at a reduced internalization rate of 1.0%. A 1.0% bicycle reduction is maintained based upon the Ballpark's commitment to provide up to 400 bicycle parking spaces incorporated into the Ballpark site to be located in both the parking garage and plaza areas. Tables 2A, 28 and 2C have been revised to incorporate this change. Spectator arrival has been evaluated in half hour increments to determine a realistic distribution to the Ballpark for a 7:05 PM game start time. Ballpark, team and player arrival occurs between 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM. Spectator arrival begins at 5:00 PM and continues through 100% of spectator arrival by 8:00 PM. Pursuant to information provided by the Florida Marlins regarding the expected arrival patterns and the timing of opening gates, the Applicant has revised Marlins Ballpark Florida Madins. L.P. 14 Ma# Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 the distribution of spectator arrival submitted in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study as presented in Revised Table 2B and as outlined below. The outdoor plaza area at the Marlins Ballpark is expected to attract and engage a small percentage of early arrivals between 5:44 and 5:30 PM, The Ballpark gates will open at 5:30 PM so that spectators can watch player warm-ups on the field before the game. The arrival distribution from 5:30 to 6:30 PM and from 6:00 to 7:40 PM has been increased to reflect the timing of opening gates and the 7,05 anticipated start time of the baseball game. The arrival distribution during the first 25 minutes of the game has been increased to reflect anticipated arrival patterns for spectators reaching the Ballpark after the pre -game peak and for those traveling from longer distances to reach the Ballpark. The arrival distribution atter 7:30 PM has been reduced based upon spectator arrival characteristics provided by the Florida Marlins. Changes made in the distribution of spectator arrival is outlined below. a The arrival percentage from 5:00 PM to 5:30 PM has been decreased from 10% to 5%. o The arrival percentage from 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM has been increased from 15% to 17%. o The arrival percentage from 8:00 to 6:30 PM has been increased from 25% to 26%. a The arrival percentage from 6:30 to 7:00 PM has been increased from 25% to 27%. o The arrival percentage from 7:00 to 7:30 PM has been increased from 15% to 20%. • The arrlvat percentage from 7:30 to 8:00 PM has been decreased from 10% to 5%. o The arrival percentage for the hour from 5:30 to 6:30 PM has been increased from 40% to 43%. o The arrival percentage for the hour from 6:00 to 7:00 PM has been increased from 50% to 53%. a 45,47% of the Pre -Game Peak Hour arrivals will park in Ballpark structured or surface parking. a 54,53% of the Pre -Game Peak Hour arrivals will park off-site (in the neighborhood) within '/z mile of the stadium, or in the municipal parking lots located on the north side of the river. ■ Spectator departure for the Post -Game Peak Hour assumes that 100% of the Ballpark patrons will depart between 9:30 and 10:30 PM, with 45.47% of the departures projected to leave from Ballpark structured or surface parking. ■ The vehicular trip generation for thecemmercial and residential uses included as liners to the parking structures have been calculated using the rates and equations from ITE Trip Generation, 71, Edition. The retail space has been considered ancillary to the Ballpark during stadium events, and therefore 100% of the ancillary retail trips have been internalized in the trip generation analysis. No parking is provided on site for the retail uses during Ballpark events. An outline of the methodology used to calculate Che Pre -Game Peak HeurTrips is outlined below, and is provided in detail on the attached Table 2B. • 37,000 Spectators less 2,250 spectators arriving by Group Charter Bus = 34,750 spectators • 34,750 spectators 12.63 persons per vehicle = 13,213 trips • 13,213 trips less 5% transit and 1% bicycle capture =12,420 trips ■ 12,420 trips plus 50 Group Charter Bus Trips =12,470 trips • Pre -Game Peak from 6:00 to 7:00 PM = 6,254 inbound trips • 2,815 trips to Ballpark Parking and 3,439 trips to Off -Site Parking Pursuant the changes in vehicle occupancy and pursuant to additional ballpark parking modifications made since November, the changes made to the Traffic Impact Study reflect lower pre -game peak hour and post -game peak hour traffic volumes compared to the data submitted in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. The total with project intersection analyses as previously submitted reflect higher traffic volumes at each study area intersection, and thus the results provide a conservative estimate of future traffic conditions. Since the pre -game and post -game vehicular trips are now lower than originally estimated, the more conservative analyses will remain intact, and no revisions to the pre -game or post -game intersection analyses will be submitted at this time. The reduction in vehicular impact can be addressed during additional operational analyses which the Applicant agrees to perform subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval. Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, LP_ Revised February 20019 15 03 -Feb -09 LAND USE Ballpark Ancillary Retail Liners In Parking Gay Residential Liners in Parking Garage Gross PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Internalization of Retail Liners Transit Trop Reduction of Ballpark Transit Trip Reduction of Residential Bicycle Trip Reduction of Ballpark Bicycle Trip Reduction of Residential Addition of Group Charter Bus Trips External PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips Addition of Group Charter Bus Trips Total Net External Pre -Game Vehicular age P1, P3 and P4 P3 and P4 - 6:00 to 7:00 PM Ballpark Ancillary Retail Liners In Parking Garage P1, P3 and P4 Residential Liners in Parking Garage P3 and P4 Gross Pre -Game Vehicular Trips - 6:00 to 7:00 PM Internalization of Retail Liners Pre -Game Vehicular Trips without Retail - 6:40 to 7:00 PM Transit Trip Reduction of Ballpark Transit Trip Reduction of Residential Bicycle Trip Reduction of Ballpark Bicycle Trip Reduction of Residential External Pre -Game Vehicular Trips - 6:00 to 7:00 PM Addition of Group Charter Bus Trips Totai Net External Pre -Game Vehicular Trips - 6:00 to 7:40 PM TABLE 2A MARLINS BALLPARK TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR AND PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR UNITS ITE LUC I ITE 7TH EDITION RATE OR FORMULA PM PEAK - 5:30 TO 6:30 PM T 37,000 Spectators nla [See Table 2BI 61,678 5Q. FT. 814 T = 2.40 (X) + 21.48 96 DU 230 Ln (T) = 0.82 Ln (X) + 0.32 5.04%n of Gross Vehicle Trips 5.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips 100.00% Retail as Ancillary Use 1.00% 5.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips 68 5.00%n of Gross Vehicle Trips 33% 1.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips 98% 1.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips PREGAME PEAK - 6:00 TO 7:00 PM 37,000 Spectators nla [See Table 2B] 61,678 SO. FT. 814 T = [2.40 (X) + 21.48] " .90 96 DU 230 [Ln (T) = 0.82 Ln (X) + 0.32] ` .90 67 56% 100.00% Retail as Ancillary Use 57% 5,622 5.04%n of Gross Vehicle Trips 5.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips 1,00% of Gross Vehicle Trips 1.00% of Gross Vehicle Trips PM TRIPS IN 6,601 0% OUT % TRIPS % TRIPS 67 56% 86 52 57% 5,622 100% 5,622 0% 0 170 44% 75 56% 95 68 67% 39 33% 19' 5,850 98% 5,736 2% 114 170 44% 75 56% 95 281 98% 275 2% 6 3 67% 2 _ 33% 1 56 98% 55 2% 1 1 67% 0 33% 1 25 100% 25 0%n 0 5,339 99.8% 51329 0.2% 10 25 100% 25 0% 1 0 5,364 99.8% 5,3541 0.2% 1 10 6,601 100% 6,601 0% 0 153 44% 67 56% 86 52 57% 35 33% 17 6,806 98% 6,703 2% 103 153 44% 67 56% 86 6,653 99.7% 6,636 0.3% 17 330 100.0% 330 0% 0 3 67% 2 33% 1 66 100% 66 0% 0 1 67% 0 33% 1 6,253 99.8%n 6,238 0,2% is 50 100% 50 0% 0 6,303 99.8% 6,288 0,2%0 15 Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study February 2009 TABLE 28 MARLINS BALLPARK SPECTATOR ARRIVAL- PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR FOR A 7:05 PM STARTTIME ASSUMING FULL OCCUPANCY [il Arrivals Start Time End Time Revised Spectator Arrival Dletributton Percentage 123 Number of Group Bus Spectators Spectators 37,000 at 45 PPV Remaining Spectators L.S. Gua+aau..$ [3) Persons Per V_eh No, of Tripe fol Less a Loss a 5% Transit 1% Bicycle Reduction Reduction Add the Group Bus Trips Pre -Game Trips Ballpark Spaces Off -Site Spaces Ptayer/TeamlPersonneI Arrival (5) 9:00 2:00 Number of Group Bus Remaining _ Less a Less a 58 Spectator Arrival 5:00 5:30 5% 1,850 1,850 2.63 703 35 7 0 661 298 363 Spectator Arrival 5:30 6:00 17% 6.290 6.290 2.63 2,392 120 24 0 2,248 1,012 1.235 Spectator Arrival 6:00 6:30 26% 9,620 1,125 8,495 2.63 3,230 162 32 25 3,061 1,378 1,683 Spectator Arrival 6:30 7:00 27%1,126 1,125 8,865 263 3,371 169 34 26 3,193 1,437 1,756 Spectator Arrival 7;00 7:30 2{1°/0 7,400_ 7,400 2.63 2,814 141 28 0 2,645 1.190 1,455 Spectator Arrival 7:30 8:00 5% 1.850 1,850 2.69 703 35 7 0 661 298 363 Total Spectators (including teanupersonnal) 190% 37,000 2,250 34,750 2.63 13,213 661 132 50 12,470 5,870 6,000 PM Peak Hour- 5:30 to 6:39 PM 43% 15,910 1,125 14,785 2.63 5,622 2a1 56 25 5,349 2,389 2,320 pre -Game Peak Hour -6A0 to 7:00 PM _ 53% 1 19,610 2,250 17,360 2.63 6,601 330 66 50 5,254 2,815 3,439 [1) The spectator arrival distribution has been modified to reflect the anticipated Ballpark Operations, the use of the outdoor plaza at the Ballpark, the opening of the stadium gates and the arrival patterns observed by existing Martins Fans. [2) Under the scenario which anticipates full occupancy of the Ballpark, up to 50 Group Charter Buses are anticipated to bring spectators to the Ballpark consistent with current practices at IOolphin Stadium Group Charter Ruses accommodate 45 persons per vehicle. Parking for Group Charier Buses will be accommodated in one of the on-site surface lots and in an off-sile location as determined through an agreement with the City and County. [3) Actual weekday persons per vehicle is 2.63 using data from 17 weeknight games in 2408 at Dolphin Stadium (see Table 2D). Actual weekend persons per vehicle is 3.15 using data from 18 weekend games in 2008 at Dolphin Stadium [see Table 2E). 14) A 1% bicycle reduction is included to account for up to 400 bicycle parking spaces incorporated into the Ballpark site located in bath the parking and plaza areas. [5) Player, team and personnel will utilize 250 Ballpark spaces during the work day, but only approximately 58 spaces during the evening weekday baseball game timeframes. TABLE 2C MARLINS BALLPARK SPECTATOR DEPARTURE - POST -GAME PEAK HOUR BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:30 PM AND ASSUMING FULL OCCUPANCY Note: The Pre -Game and Post -Game Peak Hours were analyzed prior to the update to the plans which reduced the number of spaces in the on-site parking structures, while increasing the perking in the adjacent surface lots. The analysis provided conservatively overestimates the traffic departing the parking areas adliaoarlt to the Ballpark. Martins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Sludy February 2009 is (31 f4� Number of Group Bus Remaining Less a Less a Add the Start End Spectator Departure Spectators Spectators Spectators Persons No. of 5% Transit 1% Bicycle Group Post -Game Ballpark OH -Site Arrivals Time Time Distribution Percentage 37,000 at_45 PPV t.an owup8a... Paf veh Trips Raducilan Reduction Bus Trips Trips Spaces Spaces Post -Game Peak Hour •9:30 to 10:30 PIM 9:30 10:30 100% 37,000 2,250 34,760 2.63 13,213 1 661 132 s0 12,470 5,670 6,800 Note: The Pre -Game and Post -Game Peak Hours were analyzed prior to the update to the plans which reduced the number of spaces in the on-site parking structures, while increasing the perking in the adjacent surface lots. The analysis provided conservatively overestimates the traffic departing the parking areas adliaoarlt to the Ballpark. Martins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Sludy February 2009 TABLE 21) MARLINS BALLPARK VEHICLE OCCUPANCY FOR WEEKNIGHTS Dolphin Stadium Florida Marlins 2008 Game Day Parking Recap Weeknights Florida Martins vs New York Mets 04/01/08 10,771 807 2,815 3,622 22 1,007 9,764 2.70 Florida Marlins vs New York Mets 04/02/08 8,389 715 1,841 2,556 34 1,530 6,859 2.68 Florida Marlins vs Atlanta Braves 04/15/08 5,623 602 1,176 1,778 22 995 4,628 2.60 Florida Marlins vs Atlanta Braves 04/16108 5,782 684 1,272 1,956 20 890 4,892 2.50 Florida Marlins vs. Milwaukee Brewers 05/06/08 3,788 479 738 1,217 15 697 3,091 2.54 Florida Marlins vs. Milwaukee Brewers 05107108 4,000 471 819 1,290 17 786 3,214 2.49 Florida Marlins vs Arizona Diamondbacks 05/20/08 4,831 591 1,017 1,608 18 794 4,037 2.51 Florida Marlins vs Arizona Diamondbacks 05/21108 5,796 735 1,225 1,960 21 923 4,873 2.49 Florida Marlins vs Philadelphia Phillies 06/11108 7,518 772 1,589 2,361 28 1,242 6,276 2.66 Florida Marlins vs Philadelphia Phillies 06/12/08 8,073 601 1,760 2,561 27 1,202 61871 2.68 Florida Marlins vs lam a Bay Devil Ras 06124108 7,294 804 1,472 2,276 26 1,152 6,142 2.70 Florida Marlins vs Tama Bay Devil Ras 06125108 7,387 713 1,505 2,219 32 1,450 5,937 2.68 Florida Marlins vs 5t. Louis Cardinals OB11210B 6,458 689 1,187 1,876 32 1,437 5,021 2.68 Florida Marlins vs St. Louis Cardinals 08/13/08 7,595 623 1,430 2,053 46 2,048 5,547 2.70 Florida Marlins vs St. Louis Cardinals 08114/08 5,389 482 850 1,332 39 1,772 31617 2.72 Florida Marlins vs Houston Astros 09117108 4,593 603 735 1,338 22 1,012 3,581 2.68 Florida Marlins vs Houston Astros 09/18108 3,980 497 662 1,159 20 917 3,063 2.64 107,267 11,068 22,094 33,162 441 19,854 87,4131 2.53 6,310 651 1,300 1,951 Marlins Ballpark February 2009 TABLE 2E MARLINS BALLPARK VEHICLE OCCUPANCY FOR WEEKENDS Dolphin Stadium Florida !Marlins 2008 Game Day Parking Recap Weekends Florida Marlins vs Pittsburgh Pirates Dale 04+x04. 08 Actual IVehicle Turnstile 1 5.741 Count 5easonMass Cash 576 co I Tota _- 1,569 Buser.-,, 18 Groups Number of PaI !& 814 Net Turnstile__ _ 4,927 Fans Per C 3.14 Florida Marlins vs Pittsburgh Pirates 04/05148 9,764 944 1,854 2,798 21 923 8,841 3.16 Florida Marlins vs Pittsburgh Pirates 04/06108 5,199 416 1,003 1,419 16 827 4,372 3.08 Florida Marlins vs Washington Nationals 04/18/08 7,963 718 1,494 2,212 21 940 7,023 3.17 Florida Marlins vs Washington Nationals 04/20/08 7,162 486 1,525 2,011 21 929 6,233 3.10 Florida Marlins vs San Diego Padres 05/02/08 9,346 827 1,808 2,635 21 928 8,418 3.19 Florida Marlins vs Kansas City Royals 05116!48 10,204 77111, 2,074 2,845 23 1,023 9,181 3.23 Florida Marlins vs Kansas City Royals 05/17/48 11,790 1,209 2,223 3,432 21 938 10,852 3.16 Florida Marlins vs Kansas City Royals 05/18/08 5,787 536 1,014 1,550 22 981 4,806 3.10 Florida Marlins vs Cincinnati Beds 06/06/48 10,523 807 2,005 2,812 29 1,310 9,213 3.28 Florida Marlins vs Cincinnati Reds 06/08/08 6,343 611 1,224 1,835 14 634 5,709 3.11 Florida Marlins vs Arizona Diamondbacks 06/27/08 8,377 953 1,253 2,206 32 1,456 6,921 3.14 Florida Marlins vs Arizona Diamondbacks 06129/08 5,194 553 877 1,430 16 733 4,461 3.12 Florida Marlins vs Colorado Rockies 08101108 7,924 786 1,315 2,101 27 1,213 6,711A Florida Marlins vs Colorado Rockles 08/02108 14,756 1,201 2,969 4,170 28 1,262 13,494Florida Marlins vs Colorado Rockies 08103108 6,103 540 1,043 1,583 26 1,191 4,912Florida Marlins vs Chico o Cubs 08/16/08 26,911 1,864 6,135 7.999 28 1,273 25,638Florida Marlins vs Philadelphia Phillies 09/19/08 12,489 1,125 2,587 3,712 27 1,236 11,253?71,576 14,923 33,398 48,319 414 18,611 152,965 9,532 829 1 1,855 1 2,684 Marlins Ballpark February 2009 Proiect Trio Assignment Project traffic assignment to the surrounding study area roadways has been determined pursuant to the Miami -Dade County Cardinal Distribution for Project Zone 757 (see Figure 4A), using the adjacent street roadway network and the land use characteristics in the vicinity of the project site. The Applicant utilized the cardinal direction of Project Zone 757 for general project distribution and assignment, since the distribution characteristics of this project zone was based upon the existence of the former Orange Bowl Stadium. This distribution was then reviewed with the Florida Marlins to determine consistency with the resident zip code locations for season ticket holders for Florida Marlins Baseball. The Florida Marlins expect a slight decline in ticket holders from Broward and Palm Beach Counties based upon the relocation of the Ballpark to the former Orange Bowl site, but anticipates an increase in west, southwest and southeast spectators from Miami -Dade to offset the decline from Broward and Palm Beach Counties. This anticipated shift in the resident locations of Florida Marlins ticket holders was factored into the final project distribution used for the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impact Study. The assignment and distribution of project traffic on the adjacent roadway network reflects the general project distribution characteristics identified below, based upon the Miami -Dade County cardinal distributions which are presented in Figure 413 for Project Lone 757 under the Year 2015 Interim Cost Feasible Plan, Project traffic assignment based upon the cardinal directions is illustrated in Figure 4C. The generalized project distribution using the adjacent regional and local roadway network is illustrated on the attached Figure Q and is summarized below. To and from the NNE: 20.00% To and from the ENE: 1100°% • To and Rpm the ESE: 16.00% To and from the SSE: 3.00°% • To and from the SSW- 100°% • To and from the WSW; 14.00°% • To and from the WNW: 1500°% To and from the NNW: 12.00°% Total: 10000% The distribution and assignment of project trips for the redevelopment site is provided for the Pre -Game Peak Hour and the Post -Game Peak Hour using the figures identified below: • Figure 4E - Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Distribution • Figure 4F - Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Traffic • Figure 4G - Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Project Distribution • Figure 4H - Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Project Traffic These figures convey the inbound and outbound travel patterns (for game arrival and game departure) to the "on-sife" Ballpark parking structures and surface lots and to the "off-site" parking in the neighborhoods located within a'I2 mile distance of the stadium site. Marlins Ballpark Major use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Florida Marlins, L.P. Revised February 2009 FI11 1042 1043 1046e 1047 1049 PO410A4 "1X745 'i tJ48 155 Inv 576 577 i4lf Figure 4A Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757 F1 Project TAZ Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Source: Cathy Sweetapple &Associates _III M", J 11 II �� � I i �►' F���i'!R� �J � i � • J � • I•' J• 472 471 • r J 1 I• Js ! Ji ISI J j J� I� i• til' I l I i "ti ._ • J • 5 � +I 1 • ` �ii •J ��i.F i ■ 1042 1043 1046e 1047 1049 PO410A4 "1X745 'i tJ48 155 Inv 576 577 i4lf Figure 4A Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757 F1 Project TAZ Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Source: Cathy Sweetapple &Associates Miami -Dade County Year 2015 Cost Feasible Plan. ORIGIN ------------- CARDINAL DIRECTIONS -------------I TOTAL I ZONE NNE ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW 751 TRIPS 151 192 239 132 220 237 202 209 1582 PERCENT 9.54 12.14 15.11 8.34 13.91 14.98 12.77 13.21 752 TRIPS 130 144 211 44 246 146 188 149 1258 PERCENT 10.33 11.45 16.77 3.50 19.55 11.61 14.94 11.84 753 TRIPS 1523 578 1213 343 901 1568 1147 1024 8297 PERCENT 18.36 6.97 14.62 4.13 10.86 18.90 13.82 12.34 754 TRIPS 1380 937 1404 223 850 1403 1376 1447 9020 PERCENT 15.30 10.39 15.57 2.47 9.42 15.55 15.25 16.04 755 TRIPS 1969 2287 882 173 859 2184 1851 2037 12242 PERCENT 16.08 18.68 7.20 1.41 7.02 17.84 15.22 16.64 756 'DRIPS 2234 2301 853 313 967 1991 1785 1551 11995 PERCENT 18.62 19.18 7.11 2.61 8.06 16.60 14.88 12.93 757 TRIPS 1424 894 1232 272 765 1119 1212 942 7860 PERCENT 18.12 11.37 15.67 3.46 9.73 14.24 15.42 11.98 758 TRIPS 1079 764 1041 188 779 1499 1387 1085 7822 PERCENT 13.79 9.77 13.31 2.40 9.96 19.16 17.73 13.87 759 TRIPS 2189 2201 923 671 1343 1911 2160 1772 13170 PERCENT 16.62 16.71 7.01 5.09 10.20 14.51 16.40 13.45 760 TRIPS 525 536 207 81 417 559 474 455 3254 PERCENT 16.13 16.47 6.36 2.49 12.81 17.18 14.57 13.98 761 TRIPS 1756 1330 1150 512 1230 1458 1149 1714 10299 PERCENT 17.05 12.91 11.17 4.97 11.94 14.16 11.16 16.64 762 TRIPS 475 982 611 178 726 466 678 620 4736 PERCENT 10.03 20.73 12.90 3.76 15.33 9.84 14.32 13.09 763 TRIPS 441 597 404 263 491 460 483 599 373b PERCENT 11.80 15.97 10.81 7.04 13.14 12.31 12.92 16.02 764 TRIPS 556 1186 335 274 697 519 939 666 :iirr.: PERCENT 10.75 22.93 5.48 5.30 13.48 10.03 18.16 12.88 765 TRIPS 768 12'78 729 474 1052 748 922 1110 7081 PERCENT 10.85 18.05 10.30 6.69 14.86 10.56 13.02 15.68 1118105 Legend Figure 4B Cardinal Distribution for TAZ 757 - 2015 Interim Plan Marlins Ballpark November 2008 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates CARDINAL DISTRIBUTION PROJECT: Martins Ballpark - Pre -Game Peak Hour -5 to 7 PM TAZ # # 757 Trips 6,264 Trips NNE 18.42°% 1,133 WNW 15.42°% ENE 11.37% 711 ESE 16.67% 980 SSE 3.46°% 215 SSW 9.74% 609 WSW 14.24% WSW 14.24°1 891 WNW 15.42% 964 NNW 11.98% 749 100.00% 6,254 TRIP DISTRIBUTION NNW 30,10°1° NNE 11.98% 1 1 1 18.42°% 749 1133ENE 11.37°% 964 711 27.04%1 1 90.0 �/609 216 ESE 5.ti7°/q SSW SSE 9.74% 3.46% 13.20°/0 Notes: Source: Miami -Dade Transportation Plan to the Year 2030 - Directional Trip Distribution Report, January 2005, Miami -Dade Interim 2015 Cost Feasible Plan. Calculation of Pre -Game Peak Hour Trips 37,000 Spectators less 2,250 spectators arriving by Group Charter Bus = 34,750 spectators 34,750 spectators 12.63 persons per vehicle = 13,213 trips 13,213 trips less 5°% transit and 1 °% bicycle capture = 12, 420 trips 12,420 trips plus 50 Group Charter taus Trips = 12,470 trips Pre -Game Peak from 6:00 to 7:00 PM = 6,254 inbound trips 2,815 trips to Ballpark Parking and 3,439 trips to Off -Site Parking MARLINS RALLPARK SPECTATOR ARRNAL • PREZAME PEAR HOUR FOR A 7;05 PM START TRME ASSUMCHU FU LL OCCUPANCY R�rteW HumWr .110 (21P !IOwp Bus Rarnalnbq ` nI I Lns a j Li a Y Add Ilµ gl�rt ErM SpLe -ArMal Sprelaian ipxlAton 5P.19 G Perwm B°.d 5%1nnrKlll!!%BkV..1.1FIF G—P PnGAma BNlryek OII�H� Figure SC A 1 Project Assignment Using the Cardinal Distribution for 7AZ 757 V Marlins Ballpark February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Assodates v a' I ti H 2 I-95 j 1-195 NW 36 St 20% 1 Z �a 2°1❑ _ NW 20 StLEI ;_ C 260/A' 1.395 1 INW7 9f, , _ 1 1 t t HI _ ---- -- ------------- ---� , 1 1 VV. Flagler_St_. , 't3 [ SW 7 St r ' SW 8 St 1 3°I❑ 3°f° 1 12% 18% 18°1❑ b Ad 11 % ; 14% dZone i *` f 16% 4-01 9 9%1 HI Metrorall Figure 4D 71 Metromover Regional Project Distribution n Site Location [5.52%] 5.52% = [Inbound] Outbound Project Distribution Percentage Marlins Ballpark Iew�November 2008 Saur : Cathy Sweetapple&Aswjales o m " " �18.i5°Ia f " 1 ' 12"'$ -Z rfiv r st ■ P1 I P2 ---- ---- 6%[6%] = Dist % to Ballpark Parking tt]ist %to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4E �F! Ballpark Pre -Game Peak hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Distribution p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yY1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetappte 8 Associates [4%°] 26% —� - �a A -- o m Lb- v q [6.2%1 5.21 r6.6{3.8] f nv s s" k o v uta 7 9 "-------Sy--- ■ 2 MPA ►ApALot NW 7 St i ' 28 Wi +12.296tr _ 6 " � a NW 11 St s 1a ¢ 6%[6%] = Dist % to Ballpark Parking tt]ist %to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4E �F! Ballpark Pre -Game Peak hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Distribution p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yY1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetappte 8 Associates [4%°] 26% —� - �a -- yP3 __ P4v_-' 27.85% s Lb- v q vZR M 18%_ f nv s s" k o v uta 18.15% F78.15°h[5%] 12%4PIP71 "-------Sy--- ■ 2 NW 7 St (D Signalized Study Intersection Wi ; > > � a aUnsignalized Study Intersection s NW 6 St ¢ i _4� W2 E1 a a NW 5 St y Lo CD W$ N(n y NW 4 St 6% 9 +--50% (ou) - E3 P3 P4 .. . F 27.85% 1 NW 3 St 3 B 18%--t27.85°/0 12% 6% ■■ l NW2St a a N � U7, St Q H 50Y. (OU)[4%] L6%[4%,[4%] .,♦-6h[12%] ■-6% 7 13 L T 4� r1agler St $ 14 6%[6%] = Dist % to Ballpark Parking tt]ist %to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4E �F! Ballpark Pre -Game Peak hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Distribution p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yY1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetappte 8 Associates 6%� q SW 1 St e w e ? (D Signalized Study Intersection ; > ; > > � a aUnsignalized Study Intersection s ¢ ¢ a ¢ n a a a Structured Parking Access y N N(n y 6%[6%] = Dist % to Ballpark Parking tt]ist %to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4E �F! Ballpark Pre -Game Peak hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Distribution p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yY1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetappte 8 Associates E a N r -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ni t 4 _610 r l ■ , i , 1 403 HVF TSi, 1 1 i i P1 P2 �t [133] 866 �� o a [2001 4F-- [200] r� M M ���L3331 5o2 �25t C, N [206) 20-51 fm[sv] 9 MPA µPA Lot 25 L0126 I406Y ° I [1271222 -------------' �P3 P4 ' 936 L y' a{OU} Z [133] [133] L[1341 202 [266 of n u n E-202 605 ' m N ♦J 202 [133] 4-202 [967]-166 4--610 1 (967) ' 202 ia2 403 ►—&10 [167] 11 ------------ 4 r o 8 - NW 7 St Flagler St 5 P1 P2 Nw 6 St p p � ro W2 El 202 J o r� NW5St o v N N y cc N a SW 1 st NW 4 St ® 5 /o E3 P�. Pit 936 w 12 NW 3 St I L93S Unsignafized Study Intersection 403 605 202 N Structured Parking Access N N H 77�NW 2 St N r T T �o NW1St Lb NW 1 4 r XX [7(i(] = Traffic to Ballpark Parking [Traffic to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4F Ballpark Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Traffic pi• I Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark Ballpark Surface Lot Parking Municipal Lot Parking 'February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates l a{OU} Z [133] [133] L[1341 202 [266 N `" 4 202 [40p] E-202 ♦J 202 [133] 4-202 1 7 4 r o - Flagler St 5 b 14 y 202 J o r� cc N a SW 1 st Signalized Study Intersection Unsignafized Study Intersection Structured Parking Access N N H of N 0 NW 1 4 r XX [7(i(] = Traffic to Ballpark Parking [Traffic to Off -Site Parking] Figure 4F Ballpark Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Project Traffic pi• I Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark Ballpark Surface Lot Parking Municipal Lot Parking 'February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates Lot e---------------- ' m 10 e ■ i P2 i 26% ---------------- P 3 -------------- -P3 4! -V P4 ' e � yrwasr' 20%J NW 1 St (2%) i 1✓ 16%[5%3 4-20% 20%—► 596 F 4% i F s% [6%] NW 7 St �Fa5c P1 P2 F 10% (12%) � NW 6 St .. E1 4 / Wz NW 5 st [3°6] W3 ,' ♦?2 [5%] } 4% > QUnsignalized Study Intersection a a ¢ a GStructured Parking Access N N E3 N NW 4 St [3%1 4% p3 _ P4 .. f-4% NW 3 St [2%1—+ F8%a w 25k♦ S°I� f-3% �6% NW 2 St [2%1—+ � 4 3°Io r NW 1 St (2%) i F s% [6%] 7 � • 4 F 10% (12%) � Flag ler St SW1st a V Signalized Study Interseclion } i > QUnsignalized Study Intersection a a ¢ a GStructured Parking Access N N N NW 11 St [3%] 6% [6%] = Dist % From Ballpark Parking [Dist % from Off -Site Parking] Figure 4G Ballpark Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Project Distribution P1 I Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark FW__11 Ballpark Surface; Lot Parking 11+1.Fi4i of Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates a 0 a--------------- 0" r i _ Fi _ 1332 5 332 P2 I�aJi NW 2 St [133] 8 200 NW 1 St [133] ^' M ry F 400 [400] 13 7 no -4 6fi6 [800] 4 �v Flag ler St 0 v SW 1 st o lD Signalized Study Intersection Unsignalized Study Intersection GStructured Parking Accessin m ;a v Y�l I V1 Iwo i f► i �► 14 ;400] 400♦ [7331 400 ♦ [1133] M W1v N EEA N NW XX [XX] = Traffic from Ballpark Parking [Traffic from Off -Site Parking] Figure 4H Ballpark Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Project Traffic P 1-1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yW1 Ballpark Surface Lot ParkingMf'A-1 i6t Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweelappie & Associates -�� a ; 2001 P3 �v� P4 a a ; Nvd35t ; t2l [NO] 1332 ► 13321066 [333] 333F ----- - - - - -- 266 266 2 NW r St t 'W1 P1 P2 266 ' NW 6 St E1 W2 : 266 [400]--► NW 5 St E2 ;� i I333]'i [zaa] 266 E3 [133] NW 4 St [200] i +_266 Y PR -. 1266 B 3 M] —"+ F532 ■12 1399'-� [66sJ 868 [2001 ■ NW 3 St [I ■ H1.4 400 p 333 13g9-* 533�r i � 2aa I�aJi NW 2 St [133] 8 200 NW 1 St [133] ^' M ry F 400 [400] 13 7 no -4 6fi6 [800] 4 �v Flag ler St 0 v SW 1 st o lD Signalized Study Intersection Unsignalized Study Intersection GStructured Parking Accessin m ;a v Y�l I V1 Iwo i f► i �► 14 ;400] 400♦ [7331 400 ♦ [1133] M W1v N EEA N NW XX [XX] = Traffic from Ballpark Parking [Traffic from Off -Site Parking] Figure 4H Ballpark Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Project Traffic P 1-1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark yW1 Ballpark Surface Lot ParkingMf'A-1 i6t Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweelappie & Associates Existing Traffic Data and Roadway Geometry Pursuant to the June 4, 2008 scoping meeting with Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami, and based upon data collection and analysis that is most important in addressing inbound and outbound circulation to and from the Stadium Site, intersection turning movement traffic counts were collected in September 2008 at the study area intersections listed in Table 3A below. The location of these traffic counts are illustrated on attached 'Figure 5A. • Turning movement traffic counts were collected at 14 study area intersections from 5:30 PM to 7:30 PM to reflect the portion of the evening peak hour that would coincide with the potential start time of a weekday evening baseball game. Pre -Game Peak Hour traffic counts were then produced for the time period from 6:00 to 7:00 PM, and are included in Attachment II of this study. The Game Arrival Intersections are illustrated on attached Figure 5B. ■ Turning movement traffic counts were collected at 9 study area intersections from 9:00 PM to 11:170 PM to reflect the post game peak hour that would coincide with the potential end time of a weekday evening baseball game. Post Game traffic counts were then produced forthe time period from 9:30 to 10:30 PM, and are included in Attachment II of this study. The Game Departure intersections are illustrated on attached Figure 5C, Table 3A — Turning Movement Count Locations and Count Timeframes Int. No. Intersection Location for Turning Movement Counts 5:30.7:30 PM TM Count 9:40-11:00 PM TM Count 1 NW 17 Avenue at SR 836 WB Off RampINW South River Dr yes yes 2 NW 17 Avenue at NW 7 Street yes yes 3 NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street yes 4 NW 17 Avenue at W. Flagler Street yes yes 5 SW 17 Avenue at SW 1 Street yes yes 6 NW 14 Avenue at NW 7 Street yes yes 7 NW 15 Avenue at W. Flagler Street yes 8 NW 12 Avenue at NW 14 Street yes 9 NW 12 Avenue at NW 12 Street/SR 836 WB OH Ramp yes 10 NW 12 Avenue at NW 11 Street yes yes 11 NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street yes yes 12 NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street yes 13 NW 12 Avenue at W. Flagler Street yes yes 14 SW 12 Avenue at SW 1 Street yes yes All intersection turning movement counts were adjusted for peak season using the Year 2007 weekly peak season adjustment factors provided by the Florida Department of Transportation. The traffic count locations, traffic control methods and lane geometry are summarized in Table 313 below, 'Field surveys were used to establish the existing lane geometry at each of the study intersections. The intersection diagrams are provided in Attachment Il along with the Traffic Count data. The existing lane geometry at study intersections and along study corridors, as well as the existing intersection turning movements during the Pre -Game and Post -Game peak hours are illustrated on the figures identified below: • Figure 6A - Existing Lane Geometry at Study Intersections and Adjacent Corridors • Figure 6B - 2008 Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements • Figure 6C - 2008 Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L,P. 29 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 Table 3B — Intersection Traffic Control and Lane Geometry Int, Study Intersection Traffic Control Existing Future (Programmed) No. Lane Geometry Lane Geometry 1 NW 17 Avenue at SR 835 WS Off Signalized NB-IL,IT Ramp/NW South River Dr S13 -2T, IR EB-ILR WB-IL,IT IR 2 NW 17 Avenue at NW l Street Signalized M9-1L.2T,1TR SB -1L, 2T,1 TR EB—IL, IT. 1 TR WB -1L IT, ITR 3 NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized NB -1L, 2T, ITR SB -1 L, 2T, 1 TR EB- ILTR WB -ILTR 4 NW 17 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized NB - IL, 2T SB- 2T, IR WB - IL, 3T, IR 5 SW 17 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized NB - IT, ITR SB -1 L, 2T EB -IL 3T IR 6 NW 14 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized NB-IL,IR SB -1LTR - gated no access EB - IT,1TR WB — 1L, 2T 7 NW 15 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Unsignalized NB-1L,1LT SB—IR WB-2T.1TR 8 NW 12 Avenue at NW 14 Street Signalized NB -I L.2T. iR SB -1L, 2T, ITR EB - IL, IT, ITR WB-1L,IT, ITR 9 NW 12 Avenue at NW 12 Street/SR 835 Signalized NB-1L,2T WB Off Ramp SB -2T, ITR WB -IL, ILT,2R 10 NW 12 Avenue at NW 11 Street Signalized NB — IT,ITR — Under CST NB-2T,1TR - The west leg is closed due to the Bridge S3-11-T,IT—Under CST SB—IL, 3T, IR Construction. Lane geometry at all four EB — Closed for CST EB — I L, 2T, IR approaches will improve after the completion of WB— 2L, IR W8— IL, IT, ITR the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion. 11 NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized NB - IT, ITR NB - IT, ITR - Lane geometry will improve after the completion SB -1 LT, ITR SB - 2T,1 R of the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion. EB -1 L, IT, ITR EB - I L, 1LT, ITR WB-1LT, ITR WB-1L,IT, IR 12 NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized NB-1LT. ITR 5B-1LT, ITR EB -1 LTR 13 NW 12 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized N13 -2T, 1R SB— IT,1TR EB — ILTR WB—IL,2T, ITR 14 SW 12 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized N13 -2T, IR 63— IL, 2T EB-1L,2T Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L.P. 30 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2049 Ballpark Metrotnover Intersection Turning Movement Traffic Count Locations Ballpark Structured ParkingIntersection Count Locations — 5:30 to 7:30 PM Marlins Ballpark 0 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking i Intersection Count Locations — 5:30 to 7:30 PM and 9:30 to 10:30 PM February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweelapple & Assoclatas Metromover ..y:J ­ Ballpark Game Arrival Intersection Analyses Ballpark Structured Parking 1.r Game Arrival Intersection Analyses Marlins Ballpark Ballparks Surface Lot Parking Pre -Game Peak - 6.00 to 7:00 PM February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweelapple & Associates Metromover ' `uu1v ^. i:• Ballpark Game Departure Intersection Analyses Q Ballpark Structured Parking M I Game Departure Intersection Analyses Marlins Ballpark © Ballpark Surface Lot Parking Post -Game Peak 9:30 to 10:30 PM February 20 09 Sourow. Cathy Sweetapple & Assodales Fik ------------- 1 t � t 1 � 1 1 1 N'N 7 5t I 4 4 � y Iy� �� P1 P2 0; r------- P3 P4 `P�»t-Gianel I f�I NW 7 St ;�TT 1�► � �rt/"� NWSSt -rY I_ �`.' NW5St INW4St 33 St — INW1St MPA I MPA Lot25 Lot 26 VY7 Pi P2� Ei W2 {, W3 I T F�E3 P3 P4 B.; '1TTt.' Hagler St �'t► 5 SW 1 St 3 TT• @ Signalized Study Intersection Unsignaiized Study Intersection �Structured Parking Access r Q Other Signalized Intersection V) ----------[ NWUSt ■ �� 1 1 ill 9 ;441o, TTS.. — 1 I tf tune8na [ 1 So, i9rK7aG [ aConstructan 10____ __ NW 11 St ariage - – Corstr ucti0n[ After gig 1 urv:1r_+nag Existing r Ca noun I I [ } �y' i M11W 75[t 1 [ ? _1 Exna a •� 4tr TT l S' All -.4 74 A m a m y m m m < a' < a a' < rA N N y r�Il N N [� Figure BA 1� Ballpark Existing Lane Geometry at Study Intersections and Adjacent Corridors p� Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark W— Ballpark Surface Lot Parking NAPA Lat Municipal Lot Parking February 2909 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates --------------- .4 ------- ----.4 951 � r a � r::; r sl ■ a1ji- 36 �X0 y Prc-Game ; 1 I I 17 N v e �i�► 8 ► --#------r NW 14 St 82 I" 120; 104 ;E 329, 275 ■ L 319 307, P---- ao 4_90 #� v �30 ti 1 MPA MPA La125 Loi 26 • � I i +�-I �r � l 269 Fo 156 10 Tcecsr�..mn0 Nw 11 st r------- ---_—""_a P3P4 T T � `� 0 69 1 �'c{:drrH Tt + �--5f' ----- a.evw 99 i nvu st r m .r .r 521 F 129 r�rI _ i30 i * ■ y 102 109 5 11 93 0 =---_-___ __ � A 134 171 NW7St 537 W1 P1 P2. 163 Nw 6 st — Et W2 17 �' Nw 5 st E2 W3 53 E3 NW a st I E e P3 B P4 ■ 11 11 12 NW 3 St 27 J' 3 4 T� 27S� T r 8 —► 38 45 " Nw 2 st NW 1 St Z! 152 M 31 ►—•926 �_iD02 X1312 % 116 152 13 30�_o TF' 29 ` + t► 5 240+ F' SW 1st isz-�' T 617 912 •` '� 164 ��12119 (D Signalized Study Intersection ap QUnsignalized Study Intersection a' a' ¢ ¢' ¢ ¢' ¢' a' Structured Parking Access r r v 0 Other Signalized Intersection N N 0) ur N N N Figure 66 Ballpark 2008 Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements p� Ballpark Structured Parking Marfins Ballpark FW --1-1 Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lad Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates 71k 1 --------------- F �— 249 �rl.+rs! 1 a �45 ' 4.2 395 �t I ' l� 4 * 1 F ■ t r -� F r'y5lC:amCl t 1 I 1 I F 18 30 r`--P3-----P4 � ---e 13 i I 1 �� 25 i 66 + ► 4652 1 Prrr s! 1 m vai w Flagler St 5 r I< b !B98 1 , rt► 3 0 528 ► r NW 7 St ±'� ++ 282 -�► W11 P1 107 F a NW B St Q Older Signalized Intersection W2 NW 5 St W3 INW4St 3 St NVV 1 St 110 13 .� 356 66 4 N H vai w Flagler St 5 n N SW 1 St 125+ a N 528 ► r 129 1D� Signalized Study Intersection a a' L'J Unsignalized Study Intersectian a Structured Parking Access Q Older Signalized Intersection rn P3 n M 1 MPA MPA Lat 25 Lai 26 arc - 1 D t F" con 7ccl�on 0-4. 217—+ + I c c c ~ 10 � 6� f P2. d E1 E2 E3 P4 4 �I NW 11St1 i' 381 f- 44 13 `► N H 14 338 a N 91� r a a a' N y N N Figure 6C Ballpark 2008 Post -Game Peak dour (9:30-10:30 PM) Peak Season Intersection Turning Movements p� Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark FW__j_j Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2409 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates Programmed Roadway Improvements The programmed (i.e. funded) transportation improvements affecting the regional roadways in the study area include the projects listed in Table 4 below, The TIP 2009 funding details for each project is included in Attachment IV of this report. Those projects in the immediate vicinity of the Ballpark are identified below. There are several funded greenway and sidewalk improvements that will be complimentary to the Ballpark project. Of significance is the ongoing bridge expansion on NW 12 Avenue across the Miami River, as well as resurfacing improvement to NW 12 Avenue south of NW 7 Street. Improvements to Flagler Street are scheduled in FY 2011 to 2012, coinciding with the opening of the Ballpark. Table 4 — TIP 2009 Programmed Transportation Improvements in the Study Area TIP Page Na. TIP Project No. Roadway Im rovement Cost Timeframe Seclion Al, Page 21 East Little Havana Greenway Sidewalk $925,000 - CST FY 2008-2009 DT2512623 South River Drive SecWn Al. Page 21 East Allapattah Greenway Bike Palhfrrail 51,000,000 - CST FY 20082009 DT41WBI North River Dme Section Al, Page 27 Miami River Greenway Flexible Pavement $2,076,004 —CST FY 2010-2011 DT42NO71 Miami River at NW 12 Avenue Reconstruction section Ai, Page 49 SR 71NW 5 Street Replace Movable $4,100,000 — CSTIINC FY 2010-2011 DT4128081 Bridge at NW 3 Street to NW 8 street San Bridge section Al, Page 59 SR 83611.95 Modify Interchange $24,551,000 — ROW FY 2011-2013 DT4231261 NW 12 Avenue to 1.95 Rams $1,3co,000 - PE FY 2009-2011 section Al. Page 67 SR 933INW 12 Avenue Replace Movable $3,600.000—CST FY 20082009 OT496401 Over Miami River San Bridge Underway Seclion A1, Page 67 SR 9331NW 12 Avenue Landscaping $318,000 — CST FY 2009.2010 DT49CA02 NW 7 Street to NW 16 Street Seclion Al, Page 67 SR 9331NW 12 Avenue Resurfacing $480,000 - CST FY 2008-2009 OT4146431 SW 13 Street to NW 7 Street Section Al, Page 73 SR 9681Flagler Street Resurfacing $2,299,000 — CST FY 2010-2011 DT4180911 NW 22 Ave to NW 12 Ave Section Al, Page 73 SR 96815E 1st Street Sidewalk $559,000 — CST FY 2009.2410 DT4180911 SW 12 Ave to SW 2 Ave Section At, Page 74 SR 9681FIagter Street Flexible Pavement $5,525,000 — GST FY 2011-2012 DT4146331 NW 12 Ave to Bisca ne 8W Reconsiructioaz Section A1, Page 75 SR 9681W. Flag ler Street Sidewalk $553,000 — CST FY 2009-2010 DT4183121 NW 24 Ave to NW 12 Ave Section A5, Page 7 NW 14 Street Widening to 3 lanes $900,000 - CST FY 2010-2012 PW671203 Civic Center to Bisca a Blvd Future Background Traffic, Future background traffic volumes through the Year 2012 have been incorporated into the intersection analyses using historical growth rates on study area roadways. The attached Table 5 identifies the historical growth for the study area using both state and county data from the years 2004 through 2007. Negative growth was identified for the arterial and collector roadways, SR 836 and 1-95, therefore a 0.50% per year growth rate was used in the Intersection analyses to grow traffic from the year 2008 to the year 2012. Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L.P. 37 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 TABLES MARLINS STADIUM TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS 20 -Nov -08 2004 2005 2006 2007 COMPOUND ROADWAY _ PIR STATION AADT AADT AADT AADT GROWTH NW 20 STREET EAST OF NW 7 AVENUE ERN MO -9336 21,380 31,070 21.900 32,453 14.931 EAST OF NW 12 AVENUE ERN MD -9384 27,560 26,680 32,600 31,250 428% WEST OF NW 22 AVENUE ERN MD -9386 30,280 35,850 34,520 34,520 4.47% AVERAGE: 79,220 93,600 39,020 98,223 7.43% NW 7 STREET EAST OF NW 17 AVENUE EfW MD -9340 32,890 35,026 29,530 32,013 .0,90% AVERAGE: 32,890 35,026 29,530 32,013 -0.90% W EST FLAGLER STREET WEST OF NW 8 AVENUE E/W FDOT-0099 13,300 15,800 17,500 15,900 5.13% WEST OF NW 17 AVENUE ENV FDOT-5102 20,500 18,000 18,500 21,000 0.81% WEST OF NW 27 AVENUE EW FOOT -0097 43,500 36,000 34,500 35,500 .5.551 AVERAGE: 77,300 69,800 713,540 r 72,400 .2.16% SW 1 STREET WEST OF SW 17 AVENUE ENV FDOT-5101 23,000 20,1300 22,000 23,000 0,00% WEST OF SW 8 AVENUE EIW FOOT -0098 14,000 14,000 13,500 13,500 -1.20%0 AVERAGE: 37,000 34,000 35,500 36,500 -0.45% SW 7 STREET WEST OF US -1 EM FDOT5091 11.500 11,500 11,000 11,590 D.00% EAST OF SW 7 AVENUE ENV FDOT5096 19,500 17,000 22,500 17,000 4.47% WEST OF SW 12 AVENUE EIW FDOT-5097 18,000 17,500 17,000 17,000 -1.89% EAST OF BEACON BLVD EAN FDOT-5105 18,000 16,000 14,000 1 18,500 O.92% AVERAGE: 67,000 62,000 64,500 1 64,000 1.52% SW 8 STREET WEST OF SW 27 AVENUE ERN FDOT-5104 34,000 33,500 35,500 33,500 -0.49% EAST OF BEACON BLVD ENV FDOT-5103 21,000 20,500 19,500 19,500 -2.44% WEST OF SW 12 AVENUE ENV FDOT-5098 24,000 23,000 21,500 25,500 2.04% WEST OF SW 7 AVENUE ENV FDOT-5095 22,500 19,000 18,500 22,000 -0.75% WEST OF 1-95 ENV FOOT -2545 21,000 24,50D 19,500 21,000 0,00% WEST OF US -1 ENV FDOT-5090 11,000 11,500 11,000 12,000 2.94% AVERAGE: 133,500 132,000 125,500 133,500 0.00% NW'/ AVENUE NORTH OF NW 20 STREET NIS FDOT-5005 30,500 25,000 18,600 25,500 -5.79% NORTH OF NW6STREET NIS FDOT-5403 17,000 17,600 11,400 12,100 .1D.71% AVERAGE: 47,500 42,6130 30,000 37,600 •7.50% _ NWISW 8 AVENUE NORTH OF FLAGLER STREET NIS FDOT-5001 10,100 10,400 5,200 5,30D -19.34% NORTH OF SW 7 STREET NIS FOOT -5000 7,400 6,200 6,300 6,600 -3.74% AVERAGE; 17,500 16,600 11,50D 11,900 .12.06% NWISW 12 AVENUE NORTH OF NW 20 STREET NIS FDOT-1146 22,500 19,800 26.500 25,500 4.26% NORTH OF FLAGLER STREET NIS FOOT -5012 26.000 22,200 21,600 22,000 5.42%0 NORTH OF SW 7 STREET NIS FDOT-5011 15,300 16,000 17,900 15,200 -0.22% SOUTH OF SW 8 STREET NIS MD -9888 11,860 14,880 12,310 12,383 1,39% NORTH OF CORAL WAY NIS FDOT-5008 9,300 7,700 5,400 7,000 -9.04% AVERAGE. 84,980 80,580 64,710 82,083 -1.15% NWISW 17 AVENUE SOUTH OF SW B STREET NIS MO -9670 21,950 21,7513 30,980 26.806 6,89% AVERAGE: 21,950 21,750 30,980 26,805 8.69% NWISW 22 AVENUE SOUTH OF SW 8 STREET NIS MO -9672 21,630 21,030 21,260 21,413 -0.34% AVERAGE: 21,630 21,030 21,260 1 21,413 -0.34% Marlins Stadium Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November2008 TABLE 5 MARLINS STADIUM TRAFFIC GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS 20 -Nov -08 2004 2005 2006 2007 COMPOUND ROADWAY DIR STATION AADT AADT AADT AADT GROWTH NWISW 27 AVENUE SOUTH OF SR 836 NIS FDOT-0552 65,000 59,500 57,000 63,000 -1.04% NORTH OF FLAGLER STREET NIS FDOT-5128 57,000 52,000 48,000 49,500 -4.59% NORTH OF SW 8 STREET NIS FDOT-5126 50,000 58,500 34,500 36,500 -9.96% SOUTH OF SW 8 STREET NIS FDOT-5125 41,000 39,000 39,590 40,000 -0.82% NORTH OF US -1 NIS I FDOT-5120 29,000 23,000 20,800 22,000 1 -8.80% AVERAGE: 242,000 1 232,000 199,800 211,000 A-47% SR 83611-395 EAST OF 1-95 ERN FOOT -2506 103,500 103,500 117,500 117,500 4.321m WEST OF 1-95 ERN FOOT -2240 123,500 133,500 122,000 123,500 0.00 WEST OF NW 12 AVENUE ERN FDOT-2208 136,500 130,500 149,500 129,500 -1.741 EAST OF NW 27 AVENUE ERN FOOT -2232 161,000 161,000 162,500 138,590 -4,671 WEST OF NW 27 AVENUE ERN I FDOT-2210 183,500 183,500 170,509 J 172,000 1 -2.13% AVERAGE- 708,000 1 712,000 722,000 582,000 •1.24 INTERSTATE95 SOUTH OF NVV 62 STREET NIS FDOT-2553 249,000 232,000 211,000 211,000 .5.37% SOUTH OF SR 112 NIS FDOT-2095 213,000 213,000 211,000 211,000 -0.31 SOUTH OF NW 6 STREET NIS FDOT-2505 152,500 152,000 152,000 154,500 0.44% NORTH OF US -1 NIS FOOT -2152 101,500 101,500 93,500 1 93,500 -2.7096 AVERAGE: 716,000 698,500 667,500 1 070,000 -2.19°0 AVERAGE ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR GROWTH RATE FOR THE STUDY AREA: -1.35% SR 836 GROWTH RATE: -1.2496 1.95 GROWTH RATE: -2.19% NEGATIVE ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STUDY AREA GROWTH RATE REPLACED WITH: 0.50°% NEGATIVE GROWTH RATE FOR SR 836 REPLACED WITH: 0.50% NEGATIVE GROWTH RATE FOR 1-95 REPLACED WITH: 0.50°% Nate: Alt Slate count data was obtained frown the 2DD7 Honda TrafAo Iniornlation CO. AJI County count data was obtained from MiamMDade County Pubiie. Works. Marlins Stadium Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2008 O- - • Committed Development Traffic Traffic impacts from numerous committed development projects located within or adjacent to the study area have been incorporated into the analyses using data obtained from the City of Miami Large Scale Development Report dated May 2008, which reflects the most recent report available from the City. A summary (by area) of the committed development projects is provided in Table 6 below. A detailed summary of each committed development project is provided in Table V- A found in Attachment V of this report. The committed development projects include those which are either under construction or approved. Projects within the Downtown DRI or the SFGPW DRI which have not paid their DRI fees, are not included in this analysis. Committed development traffic has been estimated for the study area roadways to ensure that the roadway and intersection analyses incorporate the impacts of these approved projects. In total, these committed development projects equate to 14,103 dwelling units, 1,636 hotel rooms, 1.83 mullion square feet of office and 1,5 million square feet of retail, The supporting trip generation information used to determine committed development traffic is provided in Tables V -B, V -C, V -D, V -i;, V -F and V -G found in Attachment V. A spreadsheet of the committed development traffic assignments to the surrounding study area roadways is provided in Table V -H in Attachment V. Table 6— Summarr of Committed Developments Direction Area Residential Du Hotel Rooms I Office SF Retail 5F Pre -Gam e Peak. Hour Trips — 6 to 7 PM To and From the North Allapattah 1,703 4 109,341 87,451 740 = 365 in and 375 out To and From the East CBC 1,729 1,057 678,230 1,485,324 2,573 =1,087 in, 1,486 out To and From the Southeast 8rickell 4,024 569 998,030 148,752 1,858 = 795 in and 1,063 out To and from the Northwest Ftagami 2,539 0 14,875 81,340 857 = 473 in and 384 out To and From the South Little Havana 2,853 0 28,691 118,302 1,014 = 551 in and 459 out To and From the Northeast Overtown 1,255 0 0 18,700 424 = 227 in and 197 out Total 14,11}3 1,836 1,829,167 1,539,869 7,462 = 3,498 in, 3,964 out Future Background plus Committed Development 'traffic The committed development traffic assignments for the Pre -Game Peak dour at the adjacent study intersections is provided on the attached Table V -H found in Attachment V. The intersection analyses for the Year 2012 future without project include the traffic impacts associated with future background traffic (using historical growth) and the traffic impacts associated with approved but unbuilt committed development projects. The intersection turning movements for the Pre - Game Peak Hour for future background and committed development traffic conditions are illustrated on Figure 6D - Future without Project — Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7.00 PM) intersection Turning Movements. Martins Ballpark Florida Martins, L.P. 40 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2049 nQ� a� 4331 84 + t 4331 ,89—► r m � " 281 313: 325 _ 4-172 11 SIL , ---r -1 31 1 I � m r MPA i MPA .4 -- 652 1 Lol 25 La12S 1 274 1------r I rrv1 r51 1 156 1131 .978 k �' E 2 +_ f,59 r----- ° iiPl��.1 ,�11 1' ,fly NW 11 St i � 1 ' e o i 163 118 ---1• i fw1.�� 166 r P1 11!2 r- - --- -- '- - - P3P4 r �C ti*7, r i'ro.i;xmn ' 1 I � 10t i— 51 _ 621 v 95 rel; ,04 �I_ 6 421 T ° I r r�r 111 ---__---^�' 2 _._ A 1*253 r —#' NW 7 St 1 k 624 —► W1 I P1 P2. 158 v 1 � NW 6 St _ E7 W2 taw s St10 E2 W3 54 E3 N wjj OW 4 St Z e P3 P4 • 41+11. i1a B. 12 3 � NYU 3 St 28 __+� � I 28 8 — 39 46 N W 2 St NW 1 St 282_ +__ 32 ` -1--1266 o 1322 r7 X1639 ■ f-118 i31 +� I I I * 30 �i !1► w"' Hagler St 5 245 J ,--� SW 1 St 201 =! 861 1136 r 167 D; 224 @ Signalized Study Intersection QUnsignalized Study Irlierseclion >>4 a < < ¢ a ¢ Structured Parking Access O Other Signalized Intersection a) y Cn En Figure 6t7 Ballpark Future without Project - Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Intersection Turning Movements P1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark Ballpark Surface Lot Parking Mf'A La! Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates Total Traffic Conditions - Pre -Game and Post -Game Intersection Analyses The Applicant has examined the operations of the study area intersections under existing, future background and total traffic conditions for the following timeframes: • The peak hour coinciding with the start of a weekday evening baseball game (6:00 to 7;00 pm); ■ The peak hour coinciding with the end of a weekday evening baseball game (9:30 to 10:30 pm). Intersection turning movements have been documented in spreadsheet format for existing conditions, future background plus committed development traffic and total traffic conditions incorporaling the impacts of the Marlins Ballpark during the following timeframes: ■ The peak hour coinciding with the start of a weekday evening baseball game (6:00 to 7:00 pm); • The peak hour coinciding with the end of a weekday evening baseball game (9:30 to 10:30 pm). Existing and projected turning movements for the study area intersections are included in Tables 7A through 7G forthe Pre -Game Peak Flour, and Tables 8A through BG for the Post -Game Peak Hour. Project Access turning movements are provided in the tables outlined below: • Table 7H identifies the projected turning movements at the North and South Garage access locations during the Pre -Game Peak Hour. Table 8H identifies the projected turning movements at the North and South Garage access locations during the Post -Game Peak Hour. The intersection turning movement spreadsheets include the 2048 traffic counts, the peak season adjustments, the 2008 peak season volumes, the background growth to 2012, the estimated committed developments in the study area and the addition of the Ballpark trips. Project distribution for the Ballpark site examines the project assignment to Ballpark parking (adjacent to the stadium), and then the assignment to Off --Site parking in the neighborhood located within a '/2 mile distance from the project site. The future with project intersection turning movements during the Pre -Game and Post- Game peak hours are illustrated on the figures Identified below: • Figure 6E - Future with Project — Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Intersection Turning Movements • Figure 6F - Future with Project — Post -Game Peak Hour (9;30-10:30 PM) Intersection Turning Movements The intersection analysis worksheets and signal timing are included in Attachment Vt. Each intersection was analyzed using current acceptable versions of HCS. The existing intersection analyses reflect existing signal timing and actual PHF's obtained from the turning movement field counts (see the intersection data collected and included in Attachment IL) The future with project intersection analyses reflect a peak hour factor of 0.95 which is the standard industry practice for future traffic conditions, and optimized signal timing where needed to maintain the minimum acceptable level of service standard of E (or better). The analysis results are outlined in attached Table 9 for the Pre -Game Peak Hour and in attached Table 10 for the Post -Game Peak Hour. Table 11 identifies recommended signalization and intersection improvements to facilitate the inbound and Outbound traffic circulation for stadium events assuming full occupancy of the Ballpark with 37,000 spectators and based upon the original (more conservative) 2.5 persons per vehicle as submitted for agency review in November 2008. Based upon additional data provided by the Florida Marlins, the weekday vehicle occupancy factor has been established as 2.63 persons per vehicle, thus reducing the number of pre -game and post- game vehicle trips to the Ballpark site. Revisions to the intersection analyses are not provided at this time since the analyses as previously submitted reflect higher traffic volumes at each study area intersection, and thus the results provide a conservative estimate of future traffic conditions. Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L.P. 42 Major Use 5pedal Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 --------------- r E-- 652 ' ' 610 ; rvrsr i 156 918 ; ;'2 :403 � ■ ■ Pic .p.e i ! ' � 1 �71 ' I ' ■ �r i I 35 � e I i---- -Pi -P2- 79 AJ,+,L►8 -- - - - - - -- - . NW 84--+ 2$1`• ,f 317, 325 ' - �, 4-727 1Z�t r4-- II 1 QtP :5 Lot 2n t,o[ .�-i.■L L'.f 274 `------ F 131 159 10 NW 11 St 163 �' T 118 --► � � w e ---P3 ---- F4_--- ' ' Tt T�� ____■___` !'rnGame r 9a6 9'P 101 F 1398 l h 556 605' n 404 4-1262 fi ■ 4 i 95 202�- -__ --- ------ 2 397+ r - - i 137 �' 253-0.r~ 2 Nw 7 St �� T �f 158 —10.W1 P1 P2 i- rnc, i 166 NW 6 St E1 W2 t NW55t 1 E2 W3 M� E3 NW4St 62P4 �3�$1 I- 1;�3 . B 2112 NVtt 3 St 28 t FO' 28 —10- n 8_; rm 39 46 �n NW2St NW 1 St r Zi48 282 367 4-1867 1322 N 1639 1118 155 41----- 13 7 ■ Fl - 4 I 31 --*PP ^o I �T1 30 Hagler St 14 5 245 sVll 1 St 403 I 881 i136--Io.e 16T 224 Signalized Study Intersection m Llnsignalized Study Intersection ¢ Structured Parting Access r a o 0 Other Signalized Intersection to (n Gn Figure 6E Ballpark Future with Project - Pre -Game Peak Hour (6:00-7:00 PM) Intersection Turning Movements p1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark W1 Batlpark Surface Lot Parking MPA LdE Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple &Associates --------------- I 1 253 402 —► +l FW ' 26 a � � i I 119 j n� O 1 Pall -Game■ ■t 31 1732 ------- ------- e � N � vMi 1p IrI i ■ y 4-25 46 ! W1337,, J��i 1I=' 1 ------------ ---- i 4J `1 NW 9 St �'� 263 1 P 4 1109 1 r NW 6 St NW S St NW4St 3 N W 3 St MPA t PAPA ,----__' Lol 25 26 79 ' 14 4Du� I p� r v M t 1723 -1► 21 I 1 245 1119 10 366 31 A 6 fYi Pi P2 E1 W2 E2 W3 E3 P3 P4 . NW1St 172 r ■ 57 4 Flagler St o 5 A SW 1 St 128 539► � � 131 Q Signalized Study Intersection Urrsignalized Study Intersection 7 ®Structured Parking Access r O other Signalized Intersection 17—►i 4 �1 j �73 '�-► 4 1560i I 754 o 744 357 45 13Fl a I y`� ■ y N n! 14 120 1144 93 EI 11St1 Figure 6F Ballpark Future with Project - Post -Game Peak Hour (9:30-10:30 PM) Intersection Turning Movements [-p-1-1 Ballpark Structured Parking Marlins Ballpark Ballpark Surface Lot Parking MPA Lot Municipal Lot Parking February 2009 Source: Cathy Sweetapple & Associates TABLE 7-A MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS iilklOWd17.1 PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 91 7 012 0 0 8 PEAK GROWTH sneT%LdDV•H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE IVEOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT 1N-3361 OUTBOUND IN=3334 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST.% OLT=0 DIST.S6 PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 1 NW 17 Ave al NS NW South River Dr LEFT 56 1.08 6D 0.50% 62 0 52 (1 0.001A 0 0100% 62 TL 1L THRU 487 1.08 526 0,50% 537 93 639 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 630 1T IT Signalized RIGHT 0 1.08 D 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 090% 0 NIA NIA SS (# 5189) LEFT 0 1.08 D 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.06% 0 0.00% 0 WA NIA THRU 1088 1.08 1,17$ 0.50% 1199 92 1291 202 5.00% 240 6.009.1 1692 2T 2T RIGHT 46 9,C8 50 0.50'% 51 0 51 0 0.09% 0 0,01)% 51 IR 7R EB LEFT 33 1.08 36 0.50'A 36 0 36 0 0.001% 0 0.00% 36 1LR 1LR THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% D 0.00% 0 N!A NIR RIGHT 72 1.08 78 0.50% 79 0 79 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 79 WB IFFY 10 1.C8 11 0.50% 11 9 11 0 0.00% C 0.00% 11 1 L 7 L THRU 2 1.08 2 0.50% 2 0 2 0 9,00°.5 9 0,00% 2 1T IT R1GHT 142 108 153 0.50% 955 0 156 0 0.00% 4 0.00% 156 1R TR PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR • 6 TO 7 PM 911012008 PEAK GROWTH ss4'-r.V-H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INSOUN0 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 200! PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN -3361 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND VVITH LANE LANE 'N0. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -I5 DIST.% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 2 NW1]Aveot NB NW 7 St LEFT 181 1,08 195 0.50% 199 0 999 C 0.00% 0 0.00% 199 IL IL THRU 545 1.08 589 0.59% 600 95 695 0 000% a 0,00% 695 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 115 1.08 124 0,56% 127 0 127 4 D-00% 0 0-00% 127 ITR ITR (#2330) SB LEFT 152 1.08 164 0.59% 167 0 167 259 8.00% 0 0.00% 436 IL IL THRU 475 108 508 0.59% 519 92 610 607 24.00% 0 0.00% 1417 2T 2T RIGHT 95 1,06 103 0.59% 105 0 105 0 0.00% 133 4.00% 238 1TR 1TR EB LEFT 124 1.08 134 0,59% 137 0 137 D 0.90% C 0.001/. 137 IL IL THRU 497 1.06 537 D50% 548 76 624 134 4.00% 0 0.00% 758 IT IT RIGHT 151 1.08 163 0.50% 168 0 166 D D.00% 0 0.00% 166 ITR ITR WB LEFT 101 108 109 0.50% 111 0 111 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 111 IL IL THRU 285 1.06 308 0.50% 314 99 404 D 0.90% 0 0.00% 404 1T IT RIGHT 94 1.08 102 0,50% 104 0 104 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 104 ITR ITR Marlins Ballpark Malar Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2008 TABLE 7-B MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS IIIDnl7nnR PREGAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM g""20D8 PEAK GROWTH See Table V•H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN - 3361 OUTBOUND IN o 3336 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE Na. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES T02012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT=15 DIST.% OUT -0 OIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 3 NW 17 Ave at NB NW 35treet LEFT 46 1,08 50 0-5a%51 ❑ 51 ❑ DAD% 0 0-00% 51 IL IL THRU 896 1,08 96801511% 987 97 1084 0 D.00% 0 0.00% 1054 2T 2T Unsignalized RIGHT 37 1.08 40 0.5D% 41 0 41 403 1 12.00% 0 1 0.00% 444 1TR 17R SS LEFT 42 1.06 45 0.50% 46 0 46 202 6-00% 0 0.00% 248 1L 9L THRU 719 1,06 777 0,50% 792 93 885 (1 0.00% 0 0.00% 585 27 2T RIGHT 43 1.05 46 0.50% 47 0 47 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 47 ITR ITR EH LEFT 25 1.68 27 0.5D% 2B 0 28 0 0,00% 0 090% 28 ILTR ILTR THRU 7 1,08 8 0.50% 6 0 8 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 8 RIGHT 42 1 1.08 1 45 0150%5 46 11 0 46 9 0.00% 0 0.00% 46 WB LEFT 10 1.08 11 0.50% 11 0 11 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11 1LTR ILTR THRU 7 1.08 8 0.50% 8 0 8 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 RIGHT 49 7.08 53 0.50% 54 0 54 8 50.00/. 1 0 0.40% 62 PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 911 012 00 8 PEAK GROWTH Se.TehlevM BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE WBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2098 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WTHOUT IN = 3361 OUTBOUND IN = 3330 OUTBOUND VVITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT ais DIST.% OUT =0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 4 NW 17 Ave at NB Flagler Street LEFT 128 1.95 138 0.50% 141 0 141 0 D.00% 0 0.00%P709 41 1L 1L THRU 643 1.08 694 )•5095708 99 807 403 12.00% 200' B.OD%410 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.5095 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00%4 NIA NIA (112281) 36 LEFT 9 1,08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0.00% 0 0.00%0 'NIA NIA THRU 559 1.08 603 0.50% 615 94 709 0 0.00% D 0.00% 2T 2T RIGHT 146 1.08 160 0.50% 163 0 163 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1.63 1R 1R EB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 ❑ D 0 0.00% 0 0.90% 0 NIA NIA THRU D 1.08 b 0.5D% 0 0 0 0 a0D% 0 0,00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 7.09 D 0.50% 0 ❑ 0 0 0.0% 0 D.DO% 0 NIA NIA WB LEFT 1411.05 152 0.50% 155 0 155 0 0.00% 0 (l 155 1L IL THRU 928 1.05 1.062 0.50% 1922 300 1,322 0 0.OD% 0 0.00% 1322 3T 3T RIGHT 256 1.08 276 0.5096 282 0 282 ❑ 0.❑0% 0 OA0% 282 7R IR Martins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2006 TABLE 7-C MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11 r2nf2nnR PRE; -GAME: PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9170!2408 PEAK GROWTH see TaN. v.H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE { 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN = 3361 OUTBOUND IN o 3330 OUTBOUND PITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVN7 VOLUMES RSOF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST.% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY I GEOMETRY 5 SW 17Aveat NB SW 1 Street LEFT 0 1.08 0 3.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA MA THRU 608 1.08 657 0.50% 670 101 771 202 6.00% 200 6.00% 1172 IT IT Signalized RIGHT 95 1.08 iD3 1 0.50% 105 0 105 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 105 ITR ITR (92222) SB LEFT 153 1108 165 0.50% 169 D 169 0 0.0014 O 400% 169 IL 1L THRU 574 1.08 620 0.50% 632 05 727 D 0.00% 0 D.00% 727 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1,08 0 0.50% 0 _ 0 0 0 000% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA EB LEFT 182 1.06 197 D-50% 201 0 201 202 6.00% 0 0.00% 403 1L 1 L THRU 844 1.08 912 D.50% 930 206 1,136 0 0.00% 0 0100% 1138 37 3T RIGHT 203 1.08 1 219 1 0.50% 224 0 224 0 9.00% C 000% 1 224 1R 1R vV6 LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 MA NIA THRU 0 1..08 D 0.50% 0 D 0 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 0 1O.5Q% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Q NIA MIA PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR • 6 TO 7 PM 9110!2006 PEAK GROWTH s..TaE6V-H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2006 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN =3361 OUTBOUND IN.3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE Ma- INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OU7=15 DIST.% OUT -0 DIST,% PROJECT GEOMETRY GECMETRY 6 NW 14 Ave at NB NW 7 St LEFT 28 1.08 30 0.50%. 31 0 31 0 0,00% 0 0.86% 61 IL IL THRU 0 1.08 0 O.5D% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Signa52ed RIGHT 1 4 1..08 1 4 0.50% 4 0 4 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 1R IR (95597) 56 LEFT 4 1,06 4 O.SD% 4 0 4 0 0.m 0 GAD% 4 1LTR ILTR THRU 1 1.08 1 0.50%. 1 0 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 (Gated- (Gated - RIGHT 1 LOS 1 0.50%. 1 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 No Access) No Access EB LEFT 0 IAB Q 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,0% 0 THRU 708 1.0a 765 0.50% 780 76 658 0 O.OD% 0 0.00% 658 17 IT RIGHT 64 Log 69 0.50% 71 1 0 71 0 0-013% 0 0.013°% 71 ITR ITR WB LEFT 5 1.06 5 0.50% 6 0 6 0 DAD% 0 0.01A 6 It. 1L THRU 482 1.08 521 0,50% 531 g0 621 610 18.15% 167 5.00% 1396 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.55% D 0 0 0 D.DO% 0 400% 0 Martins Ballpark Major Use Special Permil Traffm Impact Study November 2009 TABLE 7-D MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11r2DI?nnR PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PIN _ 9!10!2008 PEAK GROWTH Ssa T.be Vt BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PERYEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=9361 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND NTH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION l VOLUMES PSCF VOLUME'S TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT=15 DMT.% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 7 NW 15 Ave at NS i FlaglerSweel LEFT 90 1,08 97 0.50% 99 a 99 4 0.00% 0 0.00% 99 1L 1L THRU 18 1.08 19 0.50% 20 0 20 0 0.00% 0 0.40% 20 Ill ILT UI1Si9nsl eC RIGHT 0 1.08 1 0 1 0.50% 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NSA NIA SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 53,50% 0 a 0 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 0 l NIA THRU 0 1.08 D 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 DAG% 0 l WA RIGHT 12 168 13 0.50% 13 0 13 8 813.OQ% 0 0.00% 21 IR IR EB LEFT 0 1.108 D 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1,08 ll 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 D OSO% 0 1 D 0 0 0_.00% 0 0.A0% 0 NIA NIA WB LEFT 0 t.08 D 0.50% 0 Q 0 0 0.00% D 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 1215 1,08 012 0,50% 1339 300 1.639 0 0.00% 0 000% 1639 2T 2T RIGHT I 29 1.08 31 0.50% 32 [} 32 202 fi.00% 133 4.OQ% 367 ITR ITR PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9)1=008 PEAK GROIIIIH a..T.w.Vdi BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 1012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2004 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED VATHOUT IN - 3361 OUTBOUND IN -333a OUTBOUND NTH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES To 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST.% OUT =D DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 8 NW 12 Ave at NB NW 14 St LEFT 115 1.08 124 0.50% 127 a 127 0 010% D 0.00% 127 1 L I L THRU 493 1,08 532 0.5095 543 67 630 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 630 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 104 1.08 112 0.50% 115 D 115 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 115 IR IR (42377) SB LEFT 43 1.08 46 0.50% 47 0 47 0 0.00°/a 0 0.00%E281 47 1 L I L THRU 556 1.08 600 0.50% 613 90 763 235 7-00% 233 7,00%171 2T 2T RIGHT 117 1.08 126 0.50% 129 0 129 0 0.00% 0 0.00_%29 ITR ITR ED LEFT 76 1.08 82 0.509'. 84 0 84 0 0.W% 0 O.DD%84 1L 1L THRU 96 1.08 104 0.50% 106 83 199 0 0.00% 0 O.DD%88 I IT RIGHT 255 1.09 275 0.50% 281 0 281 0 0.00% 0 0.00% ITR ITR WB LEFT 284 1,08 307 0,50% 313 D 313 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 313 IL IL THRU 305 1.08 329 0.50% 336 97 433 D 0.00% 200 6.00% 633 1 1T IT RIGHT ill 1.08 120 0.50% 1 122 0 122 0 QAO% 0 000% 122 1 TR ITR Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Penni! Traffic Impacl Study November 20D8 TABLE 7-E MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 1112012008 PRE -GAME PEAK FLOUR • 6 TO 7 PM 9!1012008 PEAK GROWTH S.. Tam. Vat BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2D08 SEASON RATE 1012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 1 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2002 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=3351 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND VVITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES _ PROJECT OUT =15 DIST.% OUT =O DIST,% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 9 NW 12 Ave at NB NW1251reet LEFT 76 1.08 82 0.50% 84 0 64 0 0.00% 0 0,00% S4 IL 11- LTHRU THRU 422 1.08 456 0.50% 465 86 554 0 0.06% 0 0.00% 554 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 0 1.03 0 0.50% 0 1 0 0 0 OAD% 0 _0.00% 0 (#3402) so LEFT 0 1,08 D 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 WA NIA THRU 994 1.06 1,074 0.50% 1095 SO 1185 235 7.00% 233 7.00% 1653 2T 2T RIGHT d7 1OB 44 0.50% 45 0 45 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 45 1TR ITR EB LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1.05 0 0.50% 0 a 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.05 D 0.50% 0 0 9 1 0 0.00°% 0 9.00% 0 NIA NIA WS LEFT 285 1.08 306 0.50% 314 0 314 652 19.40% 0 0.00% 966 1L IL THRU 83 1.08 90 0,50% 91 81 172 222 4.60% 333 10.00% 727 11-1- ILT RIGHT 285 1.05 319 1 0.50% 325 D 325 O O.DD% 0 0.0095 325 2R 2R PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 911 0129 0 8 PEAK GROWTH See T.hl. vat BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PERYEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=3961 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LAME No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 OIST.% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 10 NW12Ave at NO NW11St LEFT 0 1,08 0 0.50% 50 0 50 0 0.06% 0 0.00% 50 Under CST NIA THRU 768 Iles 829 0.50% 796 90 $86 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 886 17 2T Swa52ed RIGHT 122 1,08 132 0.50% 134 0 134 1 D 0.00% 0 1 0.00% 134 1 ITR 17R (02359) SB LEFT 62 1.08 47 0.50% 66 0 68 D 0.00% 0 0.0% 68 1LT IL THRU 593 1,08 640 0.50% 653 91 744 887 26.40% 233 7.00% 5864 1T 3T RIGHT A 1.05 0 0.54% 50 0 50 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 50 Under CST IR - Free flow EB pz o .d ltI LEFT 0 1,05 0 0.50% 163 0 153 D 0.00% 0 9.OD% 163 Closed for 1L THRU D 1.05 0 0.50% 50 68 118 D 0:00% 0 0.00% 115 Bridge 2T RIGHT 0 1.D8 9 1 0.50% 166 1 0 166 1 222 6.60% 120 3.80% 514 CST 1R -Free Haw WS LEFT 144 1.08 156 0.50% 1.59 D 159 D 0.0045 0 0.00% 159 2L IL THRU 0 1,06 9 0.50% 50 81 131 0 9.00% 0 0.00% 131 Under CST IT RIGHT 249 1.08 269 0.50% 274 D 274 0--1 0.00% 9 0.0011. 274 1R ITR (1) Ytw 2012 volumes es8mnfed for EB NW I1 Streit using tralfu: tmecaSC tram tntr MPO LRTP and the approach dismnuhon volumes at NW 12 Arc arw rWV 12 St Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffid Impact Sluyr NOVemher 2008 TABLE 7-F MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11 nnon nA PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM W1 W20011 PEAK GROWTH SeeT.okV+i BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 290x! SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2912 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2046 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=3361 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No, INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST,% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 11 NW 12 Ave at NB NW 7 SI LEFT 2 1.08 2 0.50% 2 0 2 0 4.00% D 0100% 2 THRU 456 1.08 495 0.54% 505 92 517 0 0.00% 0 0100k 597 IT IT Signalized RIGHT 25 1.08 27 0.50% 28 0 26 0 D.DO% 1 0 D.00% 28 I ITR ITR {#232Bj SB LEFT 2 1.08 2 0.50% 2 D 2 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 ILT THRU 442 1,08 477 0,50% 487 92 579 667 19.85% 127 3.80% 1373 2T RIGHT 234 1.08 253 0.56% 258 D 25B 442 73.F5%r 233 7.00% 933 ITR IR EB LEFT 360 1.08 389 0.54% 397 D 397 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 397 IL IL THRU 158 1.08 171 0.0% 174 79 253 0 0,04% 0 O,00% 253 IT ILT 143 1.08 154 0.50% 158 0 158 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 158 ITR ITR LHR 4 1.08 4 0.50% 4 0 4 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 IL7 1L 119 1.68 129 OZ, 131 90 221 188 5.00°% 167 5.00% 556 1T 92 1.08 99 OS496 101 0 101 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 101 ITR IR PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR -6 TO PM 911 ❑!2008 PEAK GROWTH See r.ro, u -n BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON PATE 2092 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2406 PERYE.AR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=3369 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012. VOLUMES VOLUMES _ PROJECT OU7=15 DIST,% OUT -0 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 12 NW 12 Ave at NB NW 3 St LEFT 23 1.06 25 0.50% 25 0 25 269 8.00% 0 0100% 294 111-T ILT THRU 505 1.08 545 0.50% 555 94 650 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 650 Unsignahzed RIGHT I 50 1.08 510 1 0.50% 55 0 55 0 0.00% 0 0.001A 55 ITR 1TR SB LEFT 61 1.013 66 0.50% 67 0 67 D 0104% 0 0.00% 67 ILT ILT THRU 500 1.D5 64D 0.50% 551 92 643 0 0.90% 0 0.00% 643 RIGHT 24 1105 26 0.50% _ 26 0 26 657 19.65% 0 DAO% 693 OTR ITR EB LEFT 19 1.08 2I 0.50% 21 0 21 0 0.00% 0 6.00% 21 1L7R ILTR THRU 25 1.08 27 0.5u% 28 0 28 0 D.00% 0 0.00% 28 RIGHT 35 1.08 38 0.50% 39 D 39 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 39 WB LEFT 0 1,08 D 0.56% 0 0 D 0 0.00% 0 0.06% 0 NIA NTA THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 D 0 D D.OG% 0 0,001A 0 NIA NVA RIGHT 0 1,08 0 0,54% D ❑ 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% D NIA N!A Marlins Batlpark Major Use Special Permil Tra16c Impact Study November 2008 TABLE 7-G MARLWS BALLPARK INTFRS£CTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11l20I2008 Martin Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic impact Sludy November 2008 PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9110!2008 PEAK GROWTH See TW. V+4 BALLPARK WBOUND OFFSITE fNBOUND 20DB SEASON RATE 7012 PARKING AND PARKING AND ZD12 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT 1N=3387 OUTBOUND IARKN OUTBOUND WITH LAME LANE MVNT VOLUMES PSGF VOLUMES TO2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =1S DIST.% OUT=O DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY NB LEFT 1 1.08 1 0.50% 1 9 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 THRU 531 1.DS 573 0.50% 585 97 682 289 8.00% 599 18.00% 1550 ZT 2T RIGHT 47 1.D6 51 0.50% 52 D 52 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 52 1R I IR SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 0 THRU 349 1.08 377 0.5095 365 93 478 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 476 IT 1T RIGHT 1()61.08 114 0.50% 117 0 117 0 0,00% 0 0,00% 117 ITR ITR EB LEFT ❑ 9.D8 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 1LTR 1LTR THRU 28 i,p8 30 0.50% 31 0 31 0 0.009E 0 01M 31 RIGHT 27 1A6 29 450% 30 0 30 0 0Ile% 0 0.00% 30 _ w6 LEFT 107 1A8 116 0.50% 118 0 118 0 0,011% 0 9.011% 118 1L 11- LTHRU THRU 557 LOB 926 0.50% 944 322 1,266 202 6.00% 400 12.00% 1867 2T 211' RIGHT 134 1.06 145 0.50% 148 0 148 D 0.00% 0 0.01% 148 ITR 1TR. PRE -GAME PEAK ✓ OUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9110I2I706 PEAK GROWCH Sa.Taxav+i BALLPARK INEOU+VD OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN = 3361 OUTBOUND IN - 3334 OUTBOUND NTH LANE LANE MVNT VOLUMES PSCF Var IME; T02012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST.% OUT=O DIST,Y PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY NO LEFT 1 1081 1 0 1 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 NIA NIA THRU 405 1,08411 0.50% 446 99 545299 8.005% 599 18.00% t413 2T 2T RIGHT 60 1.08 65 0,56% 66 0 G6 0 0.00% 0 0.0096 66 1R 1R SB LEFT 99 1.08 107 D.50% 109 0 1❑9 0 0.00% 0 0100% 109 1L 1L THRU 346 1.08 376 0.6D% 383 94 477 O 0.00% 0 0.00% 477 2T 2T RIGHT D 1,06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 _0 6.00% 0 0.00% 0 1 NIA NIA EB LEFT 222 1,06 249 0.50% 245 0 245 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 245 1L 1L THRU 590 1.06 637 0.50% 650 231 881 0 D.00% 0 0.00% 881 2T 2T 152 1.08 164 0.50% 167 D 167 0 D.00% 9 D.00% 167 ITR ITR 7EFT ❑ 1.48D 0.5095 0 0 D 0 0.00% tl O.QQ% 0 NIA NIA 0 1- 0050%00 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 N!A NIA Q 1,08 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.❑Q°h tl QAO% D IWA _ N!A Martin Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic impact Sludy November 2008 TABLE 7-H MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11rOR17nnu PREGAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9IIOI200SPEAK GROWTH 5e5 Tack V H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 1012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2412 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT 1N -3367 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES P9CP VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DGST_. ,G OUT =O DIST.1 PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY A North Garage at NS _ Slgnaleed NW 7 Sheol LEFT Q 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 OQQ% D 0,00% 0 I L Or 2L THRU 0 1.08 D 41.56% 0 0 D 0 0.001/6 0 0,00% 0 Unsigoa0zed RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0.110% 0 0.00% 0 iRor2R Sig"Ized under SB Future with Project LEFT 0 1.08 D 0.50% O 0 0 0 0.00•% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 Q-110% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0,50% 0 0 0 D O.Otlk 0 0,00% 0 NIA NIA EB LEFT 0 1,09 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0-00% 0 1L IL THRU 764 IAB 825 0.50% 842 76 918 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 918 1T 17 RIGHT 0 1,09 0 0.50% 0 0 0 403 12-0096 0 0.00% 403 ITR 1TR w6 LEFT 01.08 0 0.5D% 0 D D 610 18-15% 0 0.00% 610 1L 1L THRU 510 1.08 551 0.50% 562 9D 652 ❑ 0.00% 0 0.D9% 662 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1.08 Q 0.50% 0 00 0 0.00% PRE -GAME PEAK HOUR - 6 TO 7 PM 9I10I2008 PEAK GROWTH Sec Tnola V -H BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2009 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2005 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=3361 OUTBOUND IN=3330 OUTBOUND WITH LANE UTNE N0. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 21)12 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -15 DIST.$ OUT=❑ DIST,% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY B South Garage at NB Slgnatlzed NW 3 Street LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 D O.W% 0 0.00% 0 ILTR 1LTR THRU D 1.06 a 0.50% D 0 a 202 6.00°% 0 0.0096 202 Unslgnaliaed RIGHT 0 I:D9 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 IWO% D 0.00% 0 SB SlgnaUzed under Fulure With Project LEFT 0 1,08 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0-00% 0 0.110% 0 MA IL or 24 THRU 0 lka 0 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 DAO% 0 NIA RIGHT 0 1 k 0 0.69% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 1 0 0,00% 0 MA 1R or 2R EB LEFT (1 1,06 0 0,50% 0 D 0 605 18..00% 0 10% 605 1L THRU 86 1.06 93 0.W% 95 D 95 0 0100% 0 In% 95 ITR ITR RIGHT I 0 1,Oa 0 0.50% 0 D 1 0 0 0-00% 0 Q:QQ% 0 WH LEFT 0 1,08 0 0.50% 0 1)0 0 0.00% O 0.00% 0 1L THRU 47 .09 51 0.50% 52 D 52 0 0-00% 0 11.90% 52 1LT ITR RIGHT 0 1A$ ❑ 0,5096 0C, 0 936 1 27-$5% 0 D.00% 936 Marlins Ballpark Major Use Speclal Permil Traffic Impact Study November 21)08 TABLE 8-A MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 1112012008 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR -9:30 TO 10:30 PPA +10!2005 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 20011 PER YEAR 2412 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=Q OUTBOUND INFO OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT LUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT=6660 DIST.°% OUT 666D DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 1 NW 17 Ave at NO NW Sauth River Or LEFT 21 1.08 23 0.50% 23 ❑ 23 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 23 IL 1L THRU 264 1A8 285 0.50% 291 0 291 400 6.001/. 400 6.00% 1090 1T 1T Signalized RIGHT D 1.08 00.50% _ 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% D SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0,50% 0 Q 0 0 0,00% 0 0.00% D (g 5189) THRU 472 1.08 510 0.50% 520 0 520 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 520 2T 2T RIGHT 15 1.08 16 0.50% 1 17 0 17 0 0,00% 0 0.00°% 17 1R 7R EB LEFT 17 1.08 18 0.50% 19 0 t9 0 6.00% 0 0.40% 19 1LR 1LR THRU 0 1,D8 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 D,OQ% 0 0.001/6 0 RIGHT 28 1,08 30 0.50% 31 0 31 0 0.011% 0 0.00% 31 wo LEFT 4 1,08 4 0.50% 4 e 4 5 6.00% 0 0.0% 41L 1L THRU 2 1.08 2 0.50% 2 0 2 0.0% D 0.1313% 2 1T 1T RIGHT 42 1.08 45 0,50% 46 Q 46 _ Q,QD% 0 0.40% 46 1R 1R POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:38 PM 911012008 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN - 0 OUTBOUND IN = 0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES 702012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT -6660 DIST.% OUT =6660 DI8T.95 PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 2 NW 17 Ave 01 NB NW 7 St LEFT 101 1.08 109 0.50% 111 0 171 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 111 1L 1L THRU 276 1.08 296 0.50% 304 0 304 1.066 16.0014 0 ❑.00% 1370 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 34 1.08 37 1 0.50% 37 1 0 37 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 37 ITR ITR SE, (N 2330} LEFT 70 1.08 76 0.50% 77 0 77 0 0,00% 0 D.00% 77 1L IL THRU 150 1.08 162 0.50°% 165 0 165 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 165 2T 2T RIGHT 1 24 1.08 1 26 0.50% 26 0 26 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 26 ITR 1TR EB LEFT 57 1,08 62 DSO% 63 0 63 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 63 1L 1L THRU 261 1,08 282 0,50% 286 0 288 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 258 17 IT RIGHT 99 1.08 107 0.50% 1D9 D 109 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 109 1TR ITR WE LEFT 28 1.05 30 4-60% 3t 4 31 0 Q,00% 0 0.00% 31 1 L 1 L THRU 91 1.05 98 0.50% 100 0 100 266 4,00% 0 0.OD% 366 1T IT RIGHT 48 1,08 52 0.50% 53 D 53 1,066 16.00% D 0,00% 1119 1TR ITR Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2008 TABLE 8-8 MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11/2612008 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9.30 TO 10:30 PM gn0r2066 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 200a SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE I... EXISTING 2005 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN 0 OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT$660 DIST.% OUT •6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 3 NW 17 Ave at NO NW 3 Street LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 It. 1L THRU 0 1,08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0..00% 0 0.00% 0 2T 2T Unsigrulized RIGHT 0 IX8 0 0.50% 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.00% D 1 0.00% 0 1TR ITR SB LEFT 0 1,08 0 0,50% 0 0 0 0 000% 0 0.00% 0 IL It. NOT THRU 0 Lea 0 0.50% 0 0 0 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 2T 2T ANALYZED RIGHT 1 0 LOS 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 ITR ITR FOR EB POST GAME LEFT 6 1.08 0 0S0% 0 0 6 0 0.00% a 0.00% 0 ILTR ILTR THRU 0 1.08 0 0150% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0,004E 0 RIGHT 6 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 OAO%1 0 iala LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 265 4.00% 0 OAO% 266 ILTR 1LTR THRU 0 118 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,009E 0 RIGHT 0 1,08 0 0,50% 0 A 0 266 4,00% 0 0.00% 266 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR. 8:30 TO 10:30 PM 9f1012006 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INSOUND 20D5 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN = 0 OUTBOUND IN = 0 OUTBOUND WBTH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES P9CF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6660 DIST,% OUT =6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 4 NW 17 Ave at Na Flegler Street LEFT 69 LOa 76 0.50% 76 0 76 0 O,00% 0 0.00% 76 IL IL THRU 2% 9.Oa 320 0.50% 326 0 326 0 0,009A 0 0.00% 326 2T 2T Signaf zed RIGHT 0 10 0 0,50% 1 0 0 D 0 0,00% 0 1 0.001% 0 NIA NfA (k 2201) sa LEFT 0 Lea 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0,0014 0 0,00% 0 NIA NfA THRU 22D flea 238 0.50% 242 0 242 400 6,00% 400 5.00% 1041 2T 2T RIGHT 61 1,08 66 0,50% 67 0 67 266 1 4.00% 400 6.00% 733 1R IR EB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0,00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 6 1,08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NfA RIGHT 0 1,08 1 D 0,56% 0 1 O 1 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA Ws LEFT 61 L08 56 0,50% 67 0 67 0 0.001A 0 0,60% 67 IL It. THRU 330 1.08 356 0,50% 364 0 364 400 6,00% 400 6,001/6 4163 3T 3T RIGHT 102 1.08 110 0.50% 712 0 112 0 6.00% 0 0.004% 192 IR IR Marlins Ballpark Major Use Spedal Permit Traffia Impact Study November 2006 TABLE 8-C MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 112 012 0 0B POST -GAME PEAK HOUR • SW TO 10.30 PM 914012Q05 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2608 SEASON RATE 2012 PARHING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED VATHOUT IN - 0 OUTBOUND IN= 0 OUTBOUND W!rH LANE LANE Nd. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6660 DIST. J. OUT= &060 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 5 SW 17 Ave at NB SW 1 Street LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.5❑% 0 0 0 D 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 121 1.0a. 347 0.50% 354 0 354 0 0.0% 0 0.00% 354 1T 4T Signalized RIGHT 42 1.08 45 0.50% 46 0 46 0 O.OD% D 0.00% 1 40 ITR 1TR (P 2222) SB LEFT 82 1.08 89 0.50% 913 0 9❑ 0 0.00% 0 0.005. 90 1L 11. THRU 240 1.08 259 0.50% 264 0 264 400 e.DD% 400 6.00% 1053 2T 2T RIGHT D 1,06 0 0,50% 0 0 D 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 WA NIA EB LEFT 116 1." 125 O.SD% 128 0 120 0 9.00% 0 0.00% 128 1L It. THRU 489 1.08 528 0.50% 539 0 539 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 539 3T 3T RIGHF 119 1.08 1 129 1 0.50% 1 131 0 131 0 0.00% 0 DAD% 131 iR 1R WB LEFT 0 1.DS 0 0.50% D 9 D 0 D.00% 0 0.001A0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1.D8 0 0.50% 0 D D 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA FLA RIGHT D 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 1 0 0.00% 0 O.OD% 0 N7A NIA POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 014012D06 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK. INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2612 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN = 0 OUTBOUND IN = 0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT 6660 DIST.% OUT 6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 6 NW 14 Ave at NB NW 7 $t LEFT 8 1.08 9 0-$o% 9 0 9 0 0.06% 0 0.00% 9 1L 1L THRU 0 1.D6 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 D.00% 0 Signalized RIGHT 1 4 1.D8 1 4 030% 1 4 0 4 333 5.010% 333 5.00% 630 1R 1R (95597) SS LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% D 0 0 ❑ 0.00% ❑ D.00% 0 1LTR 1LTR THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 (Gated- {Geted- RIGHT 0 1.D8 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0=00% 0 O.00% 0 No Access) No Access ES LEFT 0 1.D5 6 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 THRU 355 1.D5 383 0.50% 391 0 391 1.332 20.00°% 0 0.00% 1723 1T 1T RIGHT 19 1 A 21 0-50%1 21 0 21 0 DAO% 0 D.00% 21 1TR ITR ws LEFT 9 1.08 10 0.50% 10 D 10 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 1L 1L THRU 222 1.96 240 0,50% 245 D 245 0 0.06% 0 0.00% 245 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1,08 0 0.56%_ 0 0 0 D 0.00% 0 D.00% Marlins Ballpark Maj of Use Special Permit Traffic lmpact Sludy November 2008 TABLE 8-D MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11/2012008 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 9110!2908 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2DD8 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN -0 OUTSCUND IN - D OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE Na. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT • 6560 DIST.% OUT • 6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 7 NW 15 Ave at NB Flagler Street LEFT 0 1,00 0 0.50% 0 0 D a 030% 0 0.00% 0 1L IL THRU 0 1108 D 0.50% 6 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.60% D 1LT 1LT UAsigneli2ed RIGHT D 1.08 0 0.50% 1 C 0 0 0 0.00% 0 1 0.60% D SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% D 0 D 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 1R 1R NOT THRU 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% D 0.00% D NIA NIA ANALYZED RIGHT 0 1,06 0 0.50% D 0 0 400 6:00% 400 6.60% 799 NIA NIA FOR ES POST GAME LEFT 0 1,08 C 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% D 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU D 1,06 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0.00% 0 0,06% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1,08 1 0 1 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% 1 0 0.0% 0 NIA NIA WB LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.0% D THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0.00% 0 O.OD% 0 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1.06 6 0.50% 1 6 1 O 1 D 0 0.00% 0 1 C,0076 1 D 1 1TR ITR POST -GAME PEAK HOUR • 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 91i0+200B PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2D06 SEASON RATE 21312 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2005 PERYEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT SN -0 OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND 4YSTH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT CUT +6660 DIST:$ OUT -6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 8 NVV 12 Ave at NB NW 14 St LEFT 0 Ima 0 O.5D% 0 0 0 0 O.DO% 0 0.00% 0 1L IL THRU 0 1.0a 0 0,50% 0 0 0 156 7,00% 466 7100% 932 2T 2T SIgnalaed RIGHT 0 1.08 1 0_ 0.50% 1 0 0 D 1 0 0.00% 0 0,00% D 1R 1R (0 2377) SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 01013% 0 0.00% 6 1L 1L THRID 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% D 0,00% 0 2T 2T NOT RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0100% 0 0.60% 0 1TR ITR ANALYZED EB FOR LEFT 0 1.06 0 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 400 5.00% 400 1L IL POST GAME THRU 0 1.66 0 0.50% 0 D 0 1 0 0.00% a 0.60% 0 IT IT RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0,50% 0 D D 0 1 0.00% 1 D 1 0.00%. 1 6 1 ITR ITR VVB LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 1L IL THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 DAO% 0 IT IT RIGHT D 1.06 0 0,50% 1 0 0 D 0 0.00°4 0 0.00% 0 ITR I ITR marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 200 TABLE 8-E MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11/20/2008 POST -GAME. PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 9110!2008 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2006 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2005 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN -0 OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND WnH PLANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES 70 1012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT • 6660 DIST.% OUT • 6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 9 NW 12 Ava at Na ' NW 12 Street LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 ❑ D 0 0.0091 0 0.00% a IL iL THRU 0 1.06 0 0.50% a a 0 466 7.00% 466 700% 932 2T 2T :Signalized RIGHT 0 1.08 0 1 0.50% 0 0 a 0 0.00% 0 0.00!5 0 (# 3402) 5B LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1,08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 6 0.00% 0 0.00% a 2T 2T NOT RIGHT 0 I.DB 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 1TR ITR EB ANALYZED FOR. LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA POST GAME THRU 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 a 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1 I.DS 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.0041 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA WS LEFT ❑ 1.a6 D 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 a.a0% a IL 1L THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 ILT ILT RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% a 2R 2R POSTGAME PEAK HOUR .-S: 30 TO 10.30 PM 81101290$ PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK 1118011110 OF15CTE INJDOON43 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PERYEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=O OUTBOUND IN" OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No, INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES 702012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6660 DIST.% OUT =6660 DIST,% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 10 NW 12 Ave at N6 NW 11 St LEFT a 1.08 0 0.50% 0 a D 0 0.00% 0 0.00% ❑ Under CST NIA THRU 411 1.08 444 0.50% 453 0 453 2,198 3300% 666 10.00% 3317 1T 2T Signalizetl RIGHT 92 P 1.06 99 1 0,50% 101 0 101 0 0.0❑'d5 D 0.00% 101 1TR ITR (# 2359) SB LEFT 40 1.08 43 0.50% d4 0 44 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 44 ILT 1L THRU 237 1.08 256 0.50% 261 0 261 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 261 1T 3T RIGHT 1 0 1.08 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Under CST 7R -Free Flow EB LEFT0 188 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 000% 400 6.00% 400 Closed for IL THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% a 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Grldge 2T RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 CST 1R• Free Flow WB LEFT 80 1.08 86 0.50% 88 0 88 0 GAO% ❑ 0.0014 88 21, 1L THRU 0 1.08 a 0.50% D 0 0 0 000% a 0.00% 0 Under CST 1T RIGHT 72 1.08 78 0.50% 79 0 79 0 980% 0 0.00% I 1R 77R Markns Ballpark Major Use Special Pefmil Traffic Impact Sludp November 2008 TABLE B -F MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 1112012OD8 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 911 012 4 0 8 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INSOUND OFFSITE fNBOUND 2005 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING . AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2096 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN=O OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND VOTH LANE LANE Na, INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6560 DIST.% OUT=6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 11 NW 12 Ave 01 NB NW 7 S[ LEFT 0 195 4 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 THRU 216 1.05 233 0-50% 236 0 238 866 13.00% 666 10.00% 1770 1T 1T Signaled RIGHT I 1 1,06 1 1 0.50% 1 0 1 0 D.40% 4 O'Do% 1 17R 17R (#2328) SS _ LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% 0 O'.DO% 0 1LT THRU 173 1.08 187 0.50% 191 0 197 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 181 2T RIGHT 114 1.08 123 0,50% 126 0 126 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 128 1TR 11k ES LEFT 207 1.08 224 0.54% 228 0 228 1,332 20A0% 0 0.00% 1560 1L 1L THRU 80 1.08 86 0.50% 88 0 88 333 6.00% 333 5.00% 754 1T 1L7 RIGHT 67 1,08 72 0.50% 74 q 74 0 0.00% 0 0.0% 74 ITR ITR WB LEFT 4 1.08 4 0.50% 4 0 4 0 0,00% 0 0,00% 4 ILT IL THRU 66 1.08 71 0.50% 73 0 73 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 73 1T RIGHT 31 1.08 33 O.SD% 34 0 34 1 0 0.00% 1 0 OA0% 1 34 ITR 1R POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM 911012008 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE )MBOUND 2006 SEASON RATE 2412 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED 'AIITHOUT IN -0 OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT • 6660 DIST-% OUT- 6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 12 NW 12 Ave at N8 NW 3 5t LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 090% 0 090% 0 ILT ILT THRU 0 1.08 0 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Unsignalizad RIGHT 0 1.08 0 050% 0 0 1 0 0 0..00% 0 0.00% 0 ITR ITR SB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0,00% 0 ILT ILT NOT THRU 0 1.08 D 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 333 5.00% 333 ANALYZED RIGHT 0 1.06 D 0,50% 0 0 O a 0.00% 0 0.0O1A 0 ITR ITR FOR EB POST GAME LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 666 13.00% 666 10.00% 1632 1LTR ILTR THRU 0 1.08 0 4.50% 0 0 0 0 090% D 090% 0 RIGHT 0 1.08 4 0.50% 0 0 f 0 533 8.00% 0 0.00% 533 INE LEFT O 1.06 0 0.50% 0 ❑ 0 4 0.00% D 0.00% 0 WA WA THRU 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 0 WA WA RIGHT D 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 4 0.00% fl 0.00% 0 WA WA Marlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Sludy November 2008 TABLE e -G MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 11120/2008 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 0:30 TO 10:30 PM VI0I2008 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK WBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND ?DDS SEASON RATE 2612 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2008 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WETHOUT 14=0 OUTBOUND IN -0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6650 DIST.35 OUT s6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 13 NW 12 Ave at Na Nagler Street LEFT 3 1,08 3 0.50% 3 D 3 0 0,00% 0 0.00°/6 3 THRU 259 1,08 280 0.50% 285 0 285 0 0.00% 0 0-00% 285 2T 2T Signalized RIGHT 25 1,08 1 27 0.50% 1 28 0 20 1 0 0.00% 0 0.001% 28 1R 1R [ 2198] SS LEFT D 1,06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0,013% 0 THRU 149 1.08 161 0.50% 164 0 154 533 8100% 333 SAD% 1030 1T IT RIGHT 29 1.08 31 0.50% 32 1 0 32 0 0.00% 0 0.0035 32 ITR ITR ES LEFT D 1.138 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.013% 0 0100% 0 1LTR 1LTR THRU 15 1,116 16 0,50% 17 4 17 0 0,00% 0 0,013% 17 RIGHT d 1.06 4 0.50% 4 0 4 1 0 0.00% 0 _ 0.013% 4 WB LEFT 41 1.08 44 0.50% 45 0 45 D 0.00% 0 0,00% 45 IL IL THRU 279 1.40 301 0.50% 307 0 307 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 307 2T 2T RIGHT 52 1.136 56 0.50% 57 0 57 0 OAO% 0 0,0035 57 1TR 1TR POST GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10:30 PM I 911 "008 PEAK GROWTH BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND] 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2006 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN 0 OUTBOUND IN = 0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT 6660 DIST,% OUT =8660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY 14 SW 12 Ave at NB SW 1 St LEFT 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 9 0.00%. 0 0.00X. 0 NIA NTA THRU 167 1-136 180 0.5036 164 0 184 0 0.00% 0 0.60% 184 2.T 2T Signalized RIGHT 20 1.08 22 0.50% 1 22 0 22 1 0 0.00% D 3 0.00% 22 IR 1R (a 2220) SH LEFT 52 1.00 56 0.50% 57 0 57 0 9.00% 333 5.00% 390 IL IL THRU 158 1.D8 171 0.50% 174 0 174 533 11A0% 0 0.00% 707 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1.05 0 0.50% D 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NSA NIA EB LEFT 109 1.08 118 6,50% 120 0 120 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 120 IL 1L THRU 313 1,08 338 0.50% 345 0 345 400 13001A 400 6.00% 1144 2T 2T RIGHT 1 84 1 1.08 1 91 050% 93 0 93 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 93 ITR ITR WB LEFT 0 1,08 D 0,50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 0.00?. 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% D 1 0 0 D 0.OD% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA )As rlins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study November 2008 TABLE 8-H MARLINS BALLPARK INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENTS 9 112 R 00(IA POST -GAME PEAK HOUR • 9.30 TO 10:30 PM 911 0120 0 8 PEAR GROWTH Seo Tame Vas BALLPARK INBOUND OFFSITE INBOUND 2006 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2XII PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN - 0 OUTBOUND IN m 0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. 3NTERSECTIDN MVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT =6660 DIST.% OUT 6660 DIST.% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY A North Garage at Ne Signalled NW 7 SVCet LEFT D 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 0 1.332 20.00°% 0 0.00% 1332 1L or 2L THRU 0 1.08 0 0,50% D 0 0 0 0,00% q 0.00% 0 Unclgmllzed RIGHT 0 1.06 0 0.50% 0 0 _ 0 1.332 20A0% 0 0.00% 1332 1R or 2R Sbpalized under SB _ Future With Prpjeot LEFT D I 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA THRU 6 1.08 0 0,50% 0 0 0 0 a0% 0 0.00% 0 NIA NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,D0% 0 NIA NIA EB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0,00% 0 IL IL THRU 3851.08 394 0.50% 4G2 0 402 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 482 1T IT RIGHT 0 l.W 0 U. 0 0 0 0 74,50% 0 0.00% 0 ITR ITR WB LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 D 0 t8.t5% 0 0.00% 0 1L 7L THRU 230 1.08 246 0.50% 253 0 253 0 0.90% 0 0.00% 253 2T 2T RIGHT 0 1.0e _ 0 0.50% 0 1 0 0 0 0.00? 0 0.0046 0 POST -GAME PEAK HOUR - 9:30 TO 10;36 PM 9118=5PEAK GROWTH San Tedre V -n BALLPARK 030UND OFFSITE INBOUND 2008 SEASON RATE 2012 PARKING AND PARKING AND 2012 EXISTING FUTURE EXISTING 2D01 PER YEAR 2012 COMMITTED WITHOUT IN = 0 OUTBOUND IN = 0 OUTBOUND WITH LANE LANE No. INTERSECTION NVNT VOLUMES PSCF VOLUMES TO 2012 VOLUMES VOLUMES PROJECT OUT 6660 DIS756 OUT =6660 DIST,% PROJECT GEOMETRY GEOMETRY B 'South Garage at NB Signalized NW 3 Street LEFT 0 1.0E 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 O.DO% 0 1LTR 1LTR THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0,00% 0 100% 0 Unslgnalized RIGHT 0 L08 0 0.50% 8 0 0 0 0.00% 0 D,00n% 0 SB Signalized under Future With Pfajecl LEFT 0 10 0 0.50% 0 0 0 1,732 26.00% 0 8.00% 1732 NIA 14Or2L THRU 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 400 6.00% 0 0,009E 400 NIA RIGHT 0 1.08 0 0,50% 0 0 0 832 14.00% 0 0.00% 432 NIA 1Ror2R ES LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 1L THRU 46 1.08 50 0.50% 51 0 51 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 61 ITR ITR RIGHT 0 9,08 0 0.50% 0 0 1 0 0 0.00% 1 0 8.80% 0 WS LEFT 0 1.08 0 0.50%0 0 0 0 O.qO% 0 0.00% 0 1L THRU 25 1,08 27 0.50% 28 0 26 0 0.00% 0 0.0094 28 1LT ITR RIGHT 0 1-081 0 1 0.50°% 0 0 0 0 O.OD% 0 0.00% 0 Martins Ballpark Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Sturdy November 2008 Table 9 — Pre -Carrie Peak Hour intersection Analvsls Results Int, intersection location for Turning Traffic Existing Future without Future with No. Movement Counts Control 2005 Project Project 1 NW 17 Ave at NW South River Or Signalized B B C 2 NW 17 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized D ❑ E 3A NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized NB = B NB = B NB = B SB=B SB=B 58=D WB=D WB=C WB=nla EB=E EB=D E8 =F 3B NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street Add Signalization to accommodate Special Event B Inbound and Outbound Demand 4 NW 17 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized C C C 5 SW 17 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized C C D 6 NW 14 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized B A 8 7 NW 15 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Unsignalized NB = 0 NB = D NB = E Sia=B SB=C SB=C NW 12 Avenue at NW 14 Street Signalized Signalized D C E C E E 9 NW 12 Ave at NW 12 St 10 NW 12 Avenue at NW 11 Street Signalized C C B 11 NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized ❑ C E 12A NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized NB=A NB = A NB = C SB=A SB=A Sia=A EB=E EB=E EB=F 178 NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street Add Signalization to accommodate Special Event D Inbound and Outbound Demand 13 NW 12 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized C C D 14 SW 12 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized C C D A North Garage Access at NW 7 Street Unsignaiized We nfa WBL = F A North Garage Access at NW 7 Street Add Signalization to accommodate Special Event Inbound and Outbound Demand B South Garage Access at NW 3 Street Unsignalized nfa nla EB = E WB=A NB=F SB = B B South Garage Access at NW 3 Street Add Signalizatlon to accommodate Special Event D Inbound and Outbound Demand Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L.P. 61 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 Table 10 — Post -Game Peak Hour Intersection Analvsis Results Int, No. Intersection Location forTuming Movement Counts Traffic Control Existing 2008 Future with Pro ect 1 NW 17 Ave at NW South River DrISR 836 WB Off Ramp Signalized A B 2 NW 17 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized B D 3 NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized Not Anaiyzed in Post Game 4 NW 17 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized B D' 5 SW 17 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized 8 B 6 NW 14 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized A D 7 NW 15 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Unsignalized Not Analyzed in Post Game 8 NW 12 Avenue at NW 14 Street Signalized Not Analyzed in Post Came 9 NW 12 Ave at NW 12 SUSR 836 WB Off Ramp Signalized Not Analyzed in Post Game 10 NW 12 Avenue at NW 11 Street Signalized A E 11A NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized C F [1] 11B NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized C D with imp ]1] 12 NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized Not Analyzed in Post Game 13 NW 12 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized 8 C 14 SW 12 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized B C A North Garage Access at NW 7 Street Unsignalized nla EB = A WB=A NB=F A North Garage Access at NW 7 Street Add Signaiization to accommodate Special Event Inbound and Outbound Demand B B South Garage Access at NW 3 Street Unsignalized n/a EB = A WB=A SB=F B South Garage Access at NW 3 Street Add Signalization to accommodate Special Event Inbound and Outbound Demand B [1] Assuming full occupancy (37,000 spectators) and a conservative 2.5 persons per vehicle, the northbound approach on NW 12 Ave at NW 7 Stwould benefitfrom an additional NB through lane. The receiving northbound pavement is being widened to 3 NB lanes with the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion currently under construction. Examine the feasibilityof adding a third N8 through lane on NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street. Marlins Ballpark Florida Martins, L.P. 62 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 Table 11 - Proposed Traffic Control Modifications and Proposed Lane Geometry Int. Study Intersection Existing Traffic Existing FuturelProposed No. Control Lane Geometry Geometry and Signal Timings 1 NW 17 Avenue at NW South River Dr Signalized NB —1L,1T Adjusted signal timing for Post -Game. No SB-2T,1R changes to cycle length. EB — ILR WB—IL,1T, 1R 2 NW 17 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized NB — IL, 2T,1TR Increased cycle length to 120 seconds SB —1 L, 2T, ITR during Post -Game, consistent with the EB-1L,IT, 1TR Pre -Game timing. WB — IL IT ITR 3 NW 17 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized NB —1L, 2T,1TR Signalization Proposed for Special 5B— IL, 2T,1TR Event Inbound and Outbound Demand ES --1LTR WB—ILTR 4 NW 17 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized NB — IL, 2T Adjusted signal timing for Pre -Game with no $B -- 2T,1 R changes to cycle length. Increased cycle WB —1 L, 3T, 1 R length for Past -Game to 120 seconds, consistent with Pre -Game timing. 5 SW 17 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized NB — IT, ITR SB— IL, 2T EB — IL, 31,1 R 6 NW 14 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized NB — IL,1R Increased cycle length for Post -Game to S8-1LTR --gated no access 120 seconds, consistentwith Pre -Game E8 -1T, ITR liming. WB—IL,2T 7 NW 15 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Unsignalized NB—IL.1LT SB—IR WB -2T ITR 8 NW 12 Avenue at NW 14 Street Signalized NB-1L,2T, IR SB — IL, 2T, ITR EB — IL, 1T, ITR WB—IL,1T, ITR 9 NW 12 Avenue at NW 12 Street Signalized NB-1L,2T SB — 2T, ITR WB — Ill., 1LT, 2R. 10 NW 12 Avenue at NW 11 Street Signalized NB-1T,1TR—Under CST NB-2T,ITR The west leg is closed due to the Bridge SB— 1LT, IT — Under CST SB— 1 L, 3T,1 R Construction. Lane geometry at all four E8—Closed for CST EB—IL.2T, IR approaches will improve after the completion of WB -- 2L,1 R WB — I L, 1T,1TR the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion. Increased cycle length for Post -Game from 140 to 150 seconds. 11 NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street Signalized NB -- IT, ITR NB — IT, ITR [11 Lane geometry will Improve after the completion SB — i LT,1 TR SB — 2T, IR—Added SBR Overlap Phase of the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion. EB — IL. I T, ITR EB -1 L, I LT,1TR WB — ILT,ITR WB— IL. IT. 1R Increased cycle length for Past -Game from 140 to 150 seconds. 12 NW 12 Avenue at NW 3 Street Unsignalized VB -1LT, ITR Signalization Proposed for Special SB-1LT. 1TR Event Inbound and Outbound Demand EB — I LTR 13 NW 12 Avenue at W. Flagler Street Signalized NB — 2T, IR Increased cycle length for Post -Game to SB— 1T,ITR 120 seconds, consistent with Pre -Game ES —1LTR timing. WB —1 L, 2T,1TR 14 SW 12 Avenue at SW 1 Street Signalized NB— 2T, IR Adjusted signal timing for Pre -Game. No SB — IL, 2T changes to cycle length. EB — IL, 2T A North Garage Access at NW 7 St Unsignalized NB =1L, IR Signalization Proposed far Special EB =1L, IT,1TR Event Inbound and Outbound Demand WB=IL, 2T NB=1L,1R or 2L, 211 B South Garage Access at NW 3 St Unsignalized NB = ILTR Signalization Proposed for Special EB =1 LTR Event Inbound and Outbound Demand WB = I LTR SB = 1L,1TR or -21L, IT, 1 R EB=IL,ITR and WB=IL,ITR [11 Assuming 31,000 spectators and a conservative 2.5 persons per vehicle, the northbound approach on NW 12 Ave at NW 7 St would benefit from an add ilional NB through lane. The receiving NB pavement is being widened to 3 NB lanes with the NW 12 Avenue Bridge Expansion. Marlins Ballpark Florida Martins, L.P. 63 Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 Intersection Analysis Results and Recommended Improvements The intersection analysis results indicate that forthe Pre -Game Peak Hour, all signalized study intersections were able to maintain an acceptable level of service of E or better with the Ballpark traffic. For the unsignalized intersections along NW 17 Avenue and NW 3 Street and NW 12 Avenue and NW 3 Street, signalization is recommended to improve the ability to manage traffic control into and out of the Ballpark parking areas along the south side of the stadium to accommodate special event inbound and outbound demand. The Applicant has included intersection analyses that depict the signalization of these two intersections, and is recommending that the City consider signalization during the speciat event inbound and outbound demand in order to maintain acceptable levels of service. The intersection analysis results indicate that for the Post -Game Peak Hour, all signalized study intersections were able to maintain an acceptable level of service of E or better with the Ballpark traffic, except for northbound NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street, The Applicant has recommended examining the feasibility of adding a third northbound through lane on NW 12 Avenue at NW 7 Street, to help accommodate outbound traffic over the expanded NW 12 Avenue bridge which is still under construction at this time. The NW 12 Avenue bridge improvement already includes the construction of three northbound receiving lanes on NW 12 Avenue north of NW 7 Street, therefore the Applicant will explore the feasibility of adding this additional NB through lane on the south side of the intersection to improve outbound traffic circulation. The Applicant will work with the City and FDOT during the Traffic Study review process to determine the ability to deliver this improvement. Conclusions Given the analyses performed in this Major Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study, the study area intersections have the capacity to accommodate the Pre -Game and Post -Game Ballpark traffic under scenario that assumes full occupancy of the Ballpark (with 37,000 spectators), and under a conservative estimate of 2.5 persons per vehicle, Based upon additional data provided by the Florida Martins for 17 weeknight baseball games during the 2008 Florida Marlins baseball season, the weekday vehicle occupancy factor has been reestablished as 2,63 persons per vehicle, thus reducing the number of pre -game and post -game vehicle trips to the Ballpark site. This revision, along with other requested changes to the temporal arrival distribution, the elimination of the pedestrian capture, the reduction of the bicycle capture and the inclusion of group charter buses demonstrate that the number of vehicle trips in the pre -game peak hour and in the post game peak hour will be lower than those originally projected and analyzed in the November 2008 Marlins Ballpark MUSP Traffic Impart Study. Marrins Ballpark Florida Martins, L.R. 64 Major Use special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2669 Subsequent Studies and Coordination The Applicant will continue to work with City, County and FDOT staff during the development review process to provide additional information where needed to simplify the process and to make sure that the information provided is easily understood. Subsequent to and as a condition of the MUSP approval, the Applicant agrees to the following: 1. Provide a stand-alone document to address Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes for Ballpark Events, identifying safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections leading to and from the Ballpark, connecting off-site parking, existing or programmed greenways, transit corridors and transit stations. The Applicant shall continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Works and the City of Miami in the development and review of this stand-alone document. 2. The Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County, Tri -Rail and the City of Miami to assure convenient transit services in the vicinity of the site, to extend transit service hours and to provide special transit services to accommodate post game passengers on game days. 3. The Applicant agrees to work with Miami -Dade Transit, Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami to determine the best location for transit connections serving the Ballpark. 4, The Applicant agrees to coordinate with the City of Miami and Miami -Dade County in the preparation of a Network Simulation Analysis that will demonstrate the interactive operational effects of pre -game and post -game traffic to and from the Ballpark. Special attention will be given to vehicle queuing at critical intersections and traffic operations into and out of the Ballpark parking facilities. b. The Applicant will work with Miami -Dade County to implement signalixation and intersection improvements to ensure that adopted level of service standards are met pursuant to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Marlins Ballpark Florida Marlins, L.P. 65 Majcr Use Special Permit Traffic Impact Study Revised February 2009 List of Attachments Attachment I FDOT and Person --Trip Level of Service Attachment 11 Traffic Data Attachment III Historic Counts Attachment IV Programmed Transportation Improvements Attachment V Committed Development Information Attachment VI Intersection Analyses Attachment VII Bus Transit Information for the Routes Adjacent to .the Site Attachment VIII Transportation Control Measures Plan Attachment IX Traffic Methodology