HomeMy WebLinkAboutVol. III. 8. Traffic Study Attachment I. FDOT & Person-Trip level of ServiceAttachment I
FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Table
City of Miami Person -Trip LOS Table
TABLE 4 - 4
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO-WAY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS*
UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS
Class H (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
FREEWAYS
Interchange spacing > 2 iiii. apart
Level of Service
Lanes Divided
A
B C D
2 Undivided
210
730 1,450 2,060
4 Divided
1,940
3,140 4,540 5,870
6 Divided
2,900
4,700 6,800 8,810
STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS
Class I (>0.00 to 1.99
signalized
intersections per mile)
6,670
4
Level of Service
Lanes Divided
A
B C D
2 Undivided
**
400 1,310 1,560
4 Divided
460
2,780 3,300 3,390
6 Divided
700
4,240 4,950 5,080
8 Divided
890
5,510 6,280 6,440
Class H (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
FREEWAYS
E
1,610
Interchange spacing > 2 iiii. apart
Level of Service
Level of Service
Lanes Divided A
E
C
D
Level
ofService
180
1,070
2,620
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
6,670
4
2,310
3,940
5,350
6,510
7,240
10,010
6
3,580
5,930
8,270
10,050
11,180
15,240
8
4,840
8,020
11,180
13,600
15,130
12
10
6,110
10,110
14,110
17,160
19,050
50-84% 940 1,800
12
7,360
12,200
17,020
20,710
23,000
E
1,610
Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not
within primary city central business district of an
urbanized area over 750,000)
Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart
Level of Service
Level of Service
Lanes Divided A
B
C
D
E
2 Undivided
180
1,070
1,460
1,550
4 Divided
390
2,470
3,110
3,270
6 Divided
620
3,830
4,680
4,920
8 Divided
800
5,060
6,060
6,360
Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not
within primary city central business district of an
urbanized area over 750,000)
Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart
Paved Shoulder
Level of Service
Bicycle Lane Level ofService
Level
ofService
Coverage A B C D E
2 Undivided 500 1,200
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
4
2,050
3,350
4,840
6,250
7,110
6
3,240
5,250
7,600
9,840
11,180
8
4,420
7,160
10,360
13,420
15,240
10
5,600
9,070
13,130
16,980
19,310
12
6,780
10,980
15,890
20,560
23,360
BICYCLE MODE
(Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway,
geometries at 40 mpli posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists
using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number
ofifirectional roadway lanes to determine two-way maxiiiiiiiii set -vice volumes.)
Paved Shoulder
Level of Service
Bicycle Lane Level ofService
Lanes Divided A B C D
E
Coverage A B C D E
2 Undivided 500 1,200
1,470
0-49% 310 1,310 >1,310
4 Divided 1,180 2,750
3,120
50-84% 240 390 >390
6 Divided 1,850 4,240
4,690
85-100% 300 680 >680
8 Divided 2,450 5,580
6,060
PEDESTRIAN MODE
Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and
within
(Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway
primary city central business district of an urbanized
area
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians
over 750,000)
using the facility.) (k4ultiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number
Level of Set -vice
of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.)
Lanes Divided A B C D
I-
Level ofService
2 Undivided 490 1,310
1,420
Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
4 Divided 1,170 2,880
3,010
0-49% 600 1,480
6 Divided 1,810 4,350
4,520
50-84% 940 1,800
8 Divided 2,460 5,690
5,910
85-100% 210 1,080 >1,080
BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)
NON -STATE ROADWAYS
Major City/County Roadways
(Buses per hour)
Level ofService
(Notc� Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction ofhiglier traffic flow.)
Lanes Divided A B C D
E
Level of Service
2 Undivided 870 1,390
1,480
Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
4 Divided 2,030 2,950
3,120
0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2
6 Divided 3,170 4,450
4,690
85-100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1
ARTERIAL[NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS
Other Signalized Roadways
(alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent)
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level ofService
Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors
Lanes Divided A B C D
E
2 Divided Yes +5%
2 Undivided 450 950
1,200
2 Undivided No -20%
4 Divided 1,050 2,070
2,400
Multi Undivided Yes -5%
Multi Undivided No -25%
Source: Florida Department of Transportation 05/17/07
Systems Planning Office
605 Suwannee Street, MS 19
ONE-WAY FACILITIES
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Multiply the corresponding two -directional volumes in this table by 0.6.
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/sin/los/default.htiu I
*Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels ofservice
and are for the automobileftnack modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as peak hour two-way volumes, they actually
represent peak hourpeak direction conditions with an applicable D factorapplied.
This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from
which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications.
The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridoror intersection design, where more mfined techniques
exist. Level ofservice letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across
modes and, therefore, cross model comparisons should be made with caution, Furthermore, combining levels of service of
different modes into one overall madway level ofservice is not recommended.
Calculations are
based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and
Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for [lie automobile/tmek,
bicycle,
pedestrian and bus modes.
: Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults.
*Not applicable for that level ofservice letter grade. For autornobile/truck
modes, volumes greater
than level ofservice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and
pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable,
because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input valuE defaults.
TABLE 4 - 7
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS*
UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS
Class If (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
B C
Level ofService
Lanes Divided A
Lanes Divided
A
B C
D
I Undivided
110
400 790
1,130
2 Divided
1,060
1,720 2,500
3,230
3 Divided
1,600
2,590 3,740
4,840
STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS
B
Class I (>0.00 to 1.99
signalized intersections per mile)
E
3,670
Level of Service
1,270
Lanes Divided
A
B C
D
I Undivided
3
4
220 720
860
2 Divided
250
1,530 1,810
1,860
3 Divided
380
2,330 2,720
2,790
4 Divided
490
3,030 3,460
3,540
Class If (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
B C
Level ofService
Lanes Divided A
B C D
I Undivided
100 590 810
2 Divided
220 1,360 1,710
3 Divided
340 2,110 2,570
4 Divided
440 2,790 3,330
Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and no
within primary city central business district of an
urbanized area over 750,000)
Level of Service
E 6 3,730 6,040 8,740 11,310 12,850
850
1,800 BICYCLE MODE
2,710
3,500 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of
t bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number ofdirectioiial roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
Lanes Divided A
B C
D
FREEWAYS
I Undivided
280
660
Interchange spacing > 2
mi, apart
650
1,510
1,720
E
1,020
2,330
Level of Service
4 Divided
1,350
1,440
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
3,670
2
1,270
2,110
2,940
3,580
3,980
5,500
3
4
1,970
2,660
3,260
4,410
4,550
6,150
5,530
7,480
6,150
8,320
270
720
5
3,360
5,560
7,760
9,440
10,480
1,000
6
4,050
6,710
9,360
11,390
12,650
E
890
Interchange spacing < 2
mi. apart
Level of Service
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
2
1,130
1,840
2,660
3,440
3,910
3
1,780
2,890
4,180
5,410
6,150
4
2,340
3,940
5,700
7,380
8,380
5
3,080
4,990
7,220
9,340
10,620
E 6 3,730 6,040 8,740 11,310 12,850
850
1,800 BICYCLE MODE
2,710
3,500 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of
t bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number ofdirectioiial roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
Lanes Divided A
B C
D
E
I Undivided
280
660
810
2 Divided
650
1,510
1,720
3 Divided
1,020
2,330
2,S80
4 Divided
1,350
3,070
3,330
Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized
intersections per mile
and within
primary city central business district of an urbanized
area
over 750,000)
Level ofService
Lanes Divided A
B C
D
E
I Undivided
270
720
780
2 Divided
650
1,580
1,660
3 Divided
1,000
2,390
2,490
4 Divided
1,350
3,130
3,250
Paved Shoulder/ Level ofService
Bicycle Lane
Coverage A B C D E
0-49% 170 720 >720
50-84% 130 210 >210
85-100% 160 380 >380
PEDESTRIAN MODE
(Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of
pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maxiamin service volumes.)
Level of Service
Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
0-49% 330 810
50-84% 520 990
85-100% 120 590 >590
BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)
(NoW Buses per hour shown are only forthe peak hour in the single direction ofth. higher traffic now.)
E Level of Service (Buses per hour)
810 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
1,720 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2
2,580 85-100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1
Other Signalized Roadways
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level ofService
Lanes Divided A B C D F
I Undivided 250 530 660 Lanes
2 Divided 580 1,140 1,320 1
1
ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS
(alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent)
Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors
Divided Yes +5%
Undivided No -20%
Source: Florida Department ofTransportation 05/17/07 Multi Undivided Yes _5%
Systems Planning Office Multi Undivided No -25%
605 Suwannee Street, NIS 19
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 ONE WAY FACILITIES
http://www.dot.state.fl.usplanning/systems/snVIos/default.litm Increase corresponding volu me by 1 �2.
* Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels ofservice and are for die autoniobileltruck modes unless specifically stated. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must
be divided byappropriate D and K factors. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications, The computer models from which this table is derived should be
used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Level ofservice letter grade
thresholds are probably not emninumble across modes and, therefore, cross model comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels ofservice ofiliffierent modes into one overall
roadway level ofservice is not recommended. Calculations am based on planning applications ofthe Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality
of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/tmck, bicycle, pedestrian and box modes.
: Cam t be achieved using table input value defaults.
*Notopplicable for that level ofservice.letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level ofservice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle
and pedestrian niodes, [lie level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because them is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.
NON -STATE ROADWAYS
Major City/County Roadways
Level of Service
Lanes Divided
A B C
D
I Undivided
480
760
2 Divided
1,120
1,620
3 Divided
1,740
2,450
Paved Shoulder/ Level ofService
Bicycle Lane
Coverage A B C D E
0-49% 170 720 >720
50-84% 130 210 >210
85-100% 160 380 >380
PEDESTRIAN MODE
(Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of
pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maxiamin service volumes.)
Level of Service
Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
0-49% 330 810
50-84% 520 990
85-100% 120 590 >590
BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)
(NoW Buses per hour shown are only forthe peak hour in the single direction ofth. higher traffic now.)
E Level of Service (Buses per hour)
810 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
1,720 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2
2,580 85-100% >6 >4 >3 >2 >1
Other Signalized Roadways
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level ofService
Lanes Divided A B C D F
I Undivided 250 530 660 Lanes
2 Divided 580 1,140 1,320 1
1
ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS
(alter corresponding volume by the indicated percent)
Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors
Divided Yes +5%
Undivided No -20%
Source: Florida Department ofTransportation 05/17/07 Multi Undivided Yes _5%
Systems Planning Office Multi Undivided No -25%
605 Suwannee Street, NIS 19
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 ONE WAY FACILITIES
http://www.dot.state.fl.usplanning/systems/snVIos/default.litm Increase corresponding volu me by 1 �2.
* Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels ofservice and are for die autoniobileltruck modes unless specifically stated. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must
be divided byappropriate D and K factors. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications, The computer models from which this table is derived should be
used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Level ofservice letter grade
thresholds are probably not emninumble across modes and, therefore, cross model comparisons should be made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels ofservice ofiliffierent modes into one overall
roadway level ofservice is not recommended. Calculations am based on planning applications ofthe Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality
of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/tmck, bicycle, pedestrian and box modes.
: Cam t be achieved using table input value defaults.
*Notopplicable for that level ofservice.letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater than level ofservice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle
and pedestrian niodes, [lie level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because them is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.
TABLE 1-A
CITY OF MIAMI
LEVEL OF SERVICE TABLE
NOTES:
[1] The Person Trip Level of Service is derived by dividing FDOT's Level of Service by the LOS E for each type of roadway.
[2] The FDOT maximum service volumes are obtained from FDOT's 2002 Quality/LOS Handbook.
FDOT'S 2002 QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE
[1]
PERSON TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE
ROADWAY
CLASS
TYPE
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
CLASS I
1 LU
0
220
720
860
890
0.00
0.25
0.81
0.97
1.00
ARTERIAL
2LD
250
1,530
1,810
1,860
1,860
0.13
0.82
0.97
1.00
1.00
3LD
380
2,330
2,720
2,790
2,790
0.14
0.84
0.97
1.00
1.00
4LD
490
3,030
3,460
3,540
3,540
0.14
0.86
0.98
1.00
1.00
CLASS II
1 LU
0
100
590
810
1 850
0.00
0.12
0.69
0.95
1.00
ARTERIAL
2LD
0
220
1,360
1,710
1,800
0.00
0.12
0.76
0.95
1.00
3LD
0
340
2,110
2,570
2,710
0.00
0.13
0.78
0.95
1.00
4LD
0
440
2,790
3,330
3,500
0.00
0.13
0.80
0.95
1.00
CLASS III
1 LU
0
0
280
660
810
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.81
1.00
ARTERIAL
2LD
0
0
650
1,510
_
1,720
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.88
1.00
3LD
0
0
1,020
2,330
2,580
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.90
1.00
4LD
0
0
1,350
3,070
3,330
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.92
1.00
CLASS IV
1 LU
0
0
270
720
780
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.92
1.00
ARTERIAL
2LD
0
0
650
1,580
1,660
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.95
1.00
3LD
0
0
1,000
2,390
2,490
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.96
1.00
4LD
0
0
1,350
3,130
3,250
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.96
1.00
NON -STATE
1 LU
0
0
480
760
810
0.00
0.00
0.59
0.94
1.00
ROADWAYS
2LD
0
0
1,120
1,620
1,720
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.94
1.00
3LD
0
0
1,740
2,450
2,580
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.95
1.00
GROUP 1
2
1,270
2,110
2,940
3,580
3,980
0.32
0.53
0.74
0.90
1.00
FREEWAY
3
1,970
3,260
4,550
5,530
6,150
0.32
0.53
0.74
0.90
1.00
4
2,660
4,410
6,150
7,480
8,320
0.32
0.53
0.74
0.90
1.00
5
3,360
5,560
7,760
9,440
10,480
0.32
0.53
0.74
0.90
1.00
6
4,050
6,710
9,360
11,390
12,650
0.32
0.53
0.74
0.90
1.00
GROUP2
2
1,130
1,840
2,660
3,440
3,910
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
FREEWAY
3
1,780
2,890
4,180
5,410
6,150
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
4
2,340
3,940
5,700
7,380
8,380
0.28
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
5
3,080
4,990
7,220
9,340
10,620
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
6
3,780
6,040
8,740
11,310
12,850
0.29
0.47
0.68
0.88
1.00
NOTES:
[1] The Person Trip Level of Service is derived by dividing FDOT's Level of Service by the LOS E for each type of roadway.
[2] The FDOT maximum service volumes are obtained from FDOT's 2002 Quality/LOS Handbook.