HomeMy WebLinkAboutMaster Score SheetsRFP 105049
DRUG SCREENING SERVICES
MASTER SCORE SHEET
Part I Services
Part 11 Services Parl III Services
Part IV Services
Part V Services
c mploynlxnl Dlue screenlnU Senl<es for all Propecllve Clty
Enrpluyeas
Sworn Flto una arta A'�conol Scraonl no services(Random DOT Dnie and Alcohol ScroanlnU Sorvl<es teall(lolll alfa
Random and ReasonableSu spiclon .,on antl Alcohol
S. n Pollco D coliol Scraonh, Sor
nl
Reasonabin Suspicle 1 OniU and Alcplrol Scleoninp sarvlces
antl Rea Sona- 5-P111.11 t - 1:a Pursuant to IAFF Labor Poll Accldenl Tesllnp Putsuan, to DOT Federal Gulllolinos)
scr onlnU s.11... for AFCSME. Local 871 Employaas
.,
(Random antl R-,sOpl bio suspicion iuslinp Pursuant to
I., current Ern ploy—Inclton,C AFeSME Local 1901
Apreomonl
IPmsuanl to AFSCME, AFL CIO, Local 871 Labor AUmomonl
FOP Labor AUreamann
n s ice, asr M u. a
II
'292
-So)id Waste Employaas)
categories
g
Second Highest Ranked Firm -
Employees and u- asslllodrE--I,o Employees
Concentra Health
Services Cate9ones
Ilh
HPa, categories
Concentra Health °fall
calegones
iExcl udlnU Sworn Police, 5—.1 Fbe and AFSCME Local 871
. solld wasro Employaosl
for Part II:
---- - for Parl III.
294 Servicesra
for Part IV
Category A Category 8 Category C Category A Category 11Ca Iegory C Category A Category B Category C CalegDry A Category B Category C Category A Category D Category C
Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Druy Testing Medical Review Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Dntg Testingllr Medical Review
Facility Facility Officer (MRO) Facility Facility Officer (MRO) Facility Facility Officer )MRO) Facility Facility Officer
(MRO) Facility Facility I Officer (MRO)
Services Services Services Services Services
r. Total score
HighestRanked Firm.:,
'Mery-Medlcal
Total score
7. Davelo ^'
Marc Medlcal :' Total Scor.,
r Health Care 'i" Total score
�. ".
Mercy Medlcal "r
Total,
t. Marc Me@Ica! -:
v --, Y
or all three
mart,
of all three
Concerilra Health
4— "" at.,..300
Davelo Ment .,;;
of all 3
1"r' •r.-,^295 Genler -I :a� -" of all 3
"^ ' 298
DeVelo Ment + „.
3
,, �, r .� 299 Davelo
29A
'292
1 ITlent n:-:
Concentra Health
• 294 Services
categories
g
Second Highest Ranked Firm -
8
293 Services tale Gnes
Concentra Health
Services Cate9ones
Ilh
HPa, categories
Concentra Health °fall
calegones
for Part I,
for Part II:
---- - for Parl III.
294 Servicesra
for Part IV
Services fcr Part V:
-
Note 1 Due to a potential chain of custody issue, the
evaluation committee recommended that the
total scores for categories A, B. and C in each
part be added across and ll,e firm who scores
me highest when adding all scores across be
the recommended vendor for award. The
evaluation committee also recommended that it
would be in the City's best interest not to have
hvo parties involved to provide services for
categores A, B, and C because of the chain of
cuslodyissues.
Note 2. The eva!uatIOn committee meeting agreed that
i' negotiations fail with the highest ranked firm
That negotiations can be tire,, made with the
=_econd highest h1ol However, due to the chain
of custody issue. the evaluation COmmillee
would lite Ihat negotiations be made only with
firms that ale able to provide services in all
categories (A, B, & C) within a part.
Pleparet by. yusbcl Gon[a let. CPPB I1aw—a