Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMaster Score SheetsRFP 105049 DRUG SCREENING SERVICES MASTER SCORE SHEET Part I Services Part 11 Services Parl III Services Part IV Services Part V Services c mploynlxnl Dlue screenlnU Senl<es for all Propecllve Clty Enrpluyeas Sworn Flto una arta A'�conol Scraonl no services(Random DOT Dnie and Alcohol ScroanlnU Sorvl<es teall(lolll alfa Random and ReasonableSu spiclon .,on antl Alcohol S. n Pollco D coliol Scraonh, Sor nl Reasonabin Suspicle 1 OniU and Alcplrol Scleoninp sarvlces antl Rea Sona- 5-P111.11 t - 1:a Pursuant to IAFF Labor Poll Accldenl Tesllnp Putsuan, to DOT Federal Gulllolinos) scr onlnU s.11... for AFCSME. Local 871 Employaas ., (Random antl R-,sOpl bio suspicion iuslinp Pursuant to I., current Ern ploy—Inclton,C AFeSME Local 1901 Apreomonl IPmsuanl to AFSCME, AFL CIO, Local 871 Labor AUmomonl FOP Labor AUreamann n s ice, asr M u. a II '292 -So)id Waste Employaas) categories g Second Highest Ranked Firm - Employees and u- asslllodrE--I,o Employees Concentra Health Services Cate9ones Ilh HPa, categories Concentra Health °fall calegones iExcl udlnU Sworn Police, 5—.1 Fbe and AFSCME Local 871 . solld wasro Employaosl for Part II: ---- - for Parl III. 294 Servicesra for Part IV Category A Category 8 Category C Category A Category 11Ca Iegory C Category A Category B Category C CalegDry A Category B Category C Category A Category D Category C Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Druy Testing Medical Review Collection Drug Testing Medical Review Collection Dntg Testingllr Medical Review Facility Facility Officer (MRO) Facility Facility Officer (MRO) Facility Facility Officer )MRO) Facility Facility Officer (MRO) Facility Facility I Officer (MRO) Services Services Services Services Services r. Total score HighestRanked Firm.:, 'Mery-Medlcal Total score 7. Davelo ^' Marc Medlcal :' Total Scor., r Health Care 'i" Total score �. ". Mercy Medlcal "r Total, t. Marc Me@Ica! -: v --, Y or all three mart, of all three Concerilra Health 4— "" at.,..300 Davelo Ment .,;; of all 3 1"r' •r.-,^295 Genler -I :a� -" of all 3 "^ ' 298 DeVelo Ment + „. 3 ,, �, r .� 299 Davelo 29A '292 1 ITlent n:-: Concentra Health • 294 Services categories g Second Highest Ranked Firm - 8 293 Services tale Gnes Concentra Health Services Cate9ones Ilh HPa, categories Concentra Health °fall calegones for Part I, for Part II: ---- - for Parl III. 294 Servicesra for Part IV Services fcr Part V: - Note 1 Due to a potential chain of custody issue, the evaluation committee recommended that the total scores for categories A, B. and C in each part be added across and ll,e firm who scores me highest when adding all scores across be the recommended vendor for award. The evaluation committee also recommended that it would be in the City's best interest not to have hvo parties involved to provide services for categores A, B, and C because of the chain of cuslodyissues. Note 2. The eva!uatIOn committee meeting agreed that i' negotiations fail with the highest ranked firm That negotiations can be tire,, made with the =_econd highest h1ol However, due to the chain of custody issue. the evaluation COmmillee would lite Ihat negotiations be made only with firms that ale able to provide services in all categories (A, B, & C) within a part. Pleparet by. yusbcl Gon[a let. CPPB I1aw—a