HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB Reso. ...... ..........
Miami Zoning Board
Resolution 08-061
.#
Monday, July 14, 2008
W. Corneiius l hive{ offered the following Msol Sti n and moved its adoption
Upon being seconded by Mr. Bret Berlin,
the motion was passed and adopted by the following Vete;
Petr. Bret: Berlin
iulr. Ron Cordon
Mr, Miguel A. Gabel@
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza
Petr. Charles A. Garavaglia
kis. Ileana Hernandez -Acosta
Mr. Juvenal A. Pina
Mr, Cornelius Shiver
Mr, Angel Urquiola
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
AYE: 9
NAY: D
ABSTENTIONS: Q
NO VOTES: 9
ABSENT: 0
Ms. Fernandez: Motion carries -0
F
-feresita L. Fernandez, Executive S tary
Hearing Boards
File l e 08-00542zC Z,7
EXHIBIT-A-
O"'s itiI i A N D 1 12, 3C)CKRDI C. A 1 1""" UBD�Ml ll)!�Ill
N H9 Y Si
AS R I` CORDFD 'N f -I �A'I' [V.)OK PA(A'
J
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements of Zoning Board
Report to City Commission
art _o-ro nat cco��ditron ��:
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application rinade under Article 22; the report and
recommendation of the or ing Board szhall show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered;
where applicable, whether or not-
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Mara and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) he proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
d) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change.
g) Changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety to a
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as the
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as the
existing classification.
rn) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property in
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within the
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
P) It is difficult to fined other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in districts
already permitting such use.
Motion: After nsidering e rs set forth in Section 221 of Ordinance No. 11 00 � . e that the
Wiest on ag `da �:`tellicom mended to the City Commission for,proval) eraial}'
nature Print Marne
Agenda Item Date