HomeMy WebLinkAboutZB ResoMiami Zoning Board
Resolution No.- 08-013
Monday, February 25, 2008
Mr. Charles A, Garavaglia offered the following resolution and moved its adoption
EEM=
Mr. Bret Berlin
Yes
Mr. Ron Cordon
Yes
Mr. Miguel A. Gabela
Yes
Mr. Joseph H. Ganguzza
No
Mr. Charles A. Garavaglia
Yes
Ms. lleana Hernandez -Acosta
Away
Mr. Jorge Luis Lopez
No
Mr. Juvenal A. Pin@
Yes
Mr. Cornelius Shiver
No
Mr. Angel Urquiola
Yes
AYE:
NAY:
ABSTENTIONS:
NO VOTES:
ABSENT:
/1-111
Teresita L. Fernandez, Executive Secretary
Hearing Boards
File 1D#. 07-00797zc Z.3
LA UIN
Major Use special Fermili
Lois, -13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, of "CITY OF tai ILM SO ;� N 1'B"
according fo the Plat thereat as recorded in Plat Boom B, Page 41, of
the public records of Miami -Dade C:o«n=y, Florida
v
Li
11
C
Section 2210. Nature and Requirements Of ZOning Board
Report to City COMMission
When pertaining to the rezoning of land under application made under icle 22, the report ar�d
hererrenda bl of the Zoning .-nerd shah show that the Zoning Board has studied and considered,
where applicable, whether or not.-
a) The proposed change conforms with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Pan and
does not require a plan amendment.
b) The proposed change is in harmony with the established land use pattern.
c) The proposed change is related to adjacent and nearby district.
) The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the city.
e) The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not
increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilizes, streets, etc.
f) Existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property
proposed for change. py
9) Changed or changing conditions mace the passage of the proposed change necessary.
h) The proposed change positively influences living conditions in the neighborhood.
i) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on traffic and does not affect public safety
greater extent than the existing classification.
j) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on drainage as the existing classification.
k) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on light and air to adjacent areas as
existing classification.
1) The proposed change has the same or similar impact on property values in the adjacent area as
existing classification.
m) The proposed change will contribute to the improvement or development of adjacent property
accord with existing regulations.
n) The proposed change conveys the same treatment to the individual owner as to owners within ti
same classification and the immediate area and furthers the protection of the public welfare.
o) There are substantial reasons why the use of the property is unfairly limited under existing zoning.
P) It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding are for the proposed use in distrix.
already permitting such case.
Motion: After considering factors set forth in Section 221() of Ordinance o. 11
raga o agenda dterr� be recommended to the City CO -M r�ission for (approval'(iad). ;ether ala
signature ... 44
print Marne
Agenda Item
Date