HomeMy WebLinkAboutSummary FormAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORM Law Department
Matter ID No.
E �
FILE ID: OV - O I S I tS PH. 1
Date: 11/7/08 Requesting Department: Capital Improvements Program
Commission Meeting Date: _I /15,/Oq District(s) Impacted: ®1 ❑2 ❑3 ❑4 ❑5
Type: ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Emergency Ordinance ❑ Discussion Item ❑ Other
Subject: Resolution to authorize approval of proposals and issuance of a Purchase Order for additional work for the
Grapeland Park Project, B-35828.
Purpose of Item:
To request approval of the attached resolution, by a four-fifths (4/5ths) affirmative vote, after an advertised public
hearing, ratifying, approving and confirming the City Manager's finding of an emergency that it is in the best
interest of the City of Miami to waive the requirements for competitive bid procedures provided in the Code of the
City of Miami, Florida, as amended in sections 18-87, 18-90 and under Florida Statutes Section 287.055; authorizing
the City Manager to approve proposals for additional work needed for the Grapeland Park Project (B-35828), for a
total not to exceed amount of $38,000, consisting of $34,888 for basic services and $3,112 for contingency and
reimbursable expenses, with funds allocated from CIP Project No. B-35828.
Background Information:
Pursuant to Resolution No. 05-0137, authorized on March 10, 2005, the City entered into a Design -Build Agreement
dated June 13, 2005 with Recreational Design & Construction, Inc. (RDC) for the Grapeland Park Project. Bureau
Veritas North America d/b/a Bureau Veritas (Bureau Veritas) performed environmental services for the Grapeland
Park Project as a Sub -Consultant to RDC. They are no longer working with RDC for this project. However, DERM
requires additional documents and groundwater monitoring for a minimum of one year for the project. Bureau
Veritas is familiar with the site history, existing contaminants and closure routes, exiting engineering controls,
additional engineering controls, and submittal of the closure documentation and additional monitoring schedule.
Therefore, in the interest of maintaining continuity of work, it has been determined by the City Manager and CIP
that using another environmental consultant would considerably delay closure and ultimately cost the City undue
additional expenditures. The City Manager finds that it is most practicable and advantageous to the City for Bureau'
Veritas to perform the additional work, rather than competitively solicit the work. Thus, Commission approval is
now necessitated in order to approve the proposals submitted by Bureau Veritas to complete the work and
subsequently issue a purchase order.
Budget Impact Analysis
NO Is this item related to revenue?
YES Is this item an expenditure? If so, please identify funding source below.
General Account No:
Special Revenue Account No:
CIP Project No: B-35828
NO Is this item funded by Homeland Defense/Neighborhood Improvement Bonds?
Start Up Capital Cost:
Maintenance Cost:
Total Fiscal Impact: $38,000 a.ucafck
Ciy2z
Final Approvals
5�.1 .1� APPROVAL .
(SIGN AND DATE)
CIPJt�1� Budget kn
If using or recei�RtfWrffi
Grants -tf isk Managen
Purchasing N/A 4ept. Director
Chief City Manager_
Page 1 of 1
Q w►1^®__�_ t2t t &JOB
Manager: Robert Fenton