HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysisCity of Miami
Planning Department
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a puboc hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -making body NOR
rodew the information at the pubdc hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-1 7429
12/28/23
ANALYSIS FOR
SPECIAL APPEARANCE
Staff Analysis Report
No.
PZ-23-17429
Location
43 Northeast 53 Street
40 and 50 Northeast 54 Street
Folio Number
01-3124-010-0150, 01-3124-010-0060
01-312-40100-050
Miami 21 Transect
"T5-O" Urban Center Transect Zone - Open
MCNP Designation
Restricted Commercial
Commission District
5 — Christine King
Commissioner District
Office
Little Haiti
Planner
Zhaokai (Kyle) Liu
Planner II
zliu@miamigov.com
Property Owner
Robert Vecsler, on behalf of 53rd Street Apartments LPC/O
Omni America LLC
Project Representative
Alfredo L. Gonzales, Esq.
A. REQUEST
Pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8 of Ordinance 13114 ("Miami 21"), as amended, Alfredo L.
Gonzales, Esquire, on behalf of 53rd Street Apartments LPC/O Omni America LLC (the
"Applicant") requests to waive the time limits pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8(g).7 to eliminate
the required 18 month period between petitions for a change in the zoning classification of the
parcels generally located at 50 50 Northeast 54 Street, 40 Northeast 54 Street, and 43 Northeast
53 Street., Miami, Florida, collectively, the ("Property"). The subject site contains 0.98 acre. The
existing zoning is "T5-O" Urban Center Transect Zone — Open and the existing FLUM is Restricted
Commercial.
PZ-23-16020 50 NE 54 St— Page 1 12/28/2023
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -making body will
review the information al the pubc hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-17429
12/28/23
B. RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8 of Miami 21, as amended, the Planning Department
recommends Denial eliminate the required 18-month period between petitions for a change in the
zoning classifications based upon the facts and findings in this staff report.
C. BACKGROUND
Property Information
According to the formal 11000 Zoning code, the Property is zoned in "C-1" Restricted Commercial
and "R-2" Two -Family Residential. The intend for "R-2" is to allow the construction of up to a two -
unit residential structure (either attached or detached) on a typical lot. The typical lot size has
minimum dimensions of fifty (50) feet of frontage by one hundred (100) feet of depth. This category
allows a maximum density of eighteen (18) units per net acre or approximately 2,500 square feet
per unit. The intent for "C-1" is allows structures used as any type of residential facility except for
rescue missions, to a maximum density equivalent to "R-4", subject to the same limiting
conditions; any activity included in the office designation, commercial marinas and living quarters
on vessels with specific limitations, and mixed -use or commercial activities which generally serve
the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by pedestrians
and private automobiles. This category is located preferably in areas directly served by arterial or
collector roadways, or directly accessible via mass transportation system. The intent for "R-4"
Multifamily High -Density Residential" is to allows single-family, duplex and multifamily structures
up to and including high-rise apartment structures with a maximum density of one hundred fifty
(150) units per net acre.
According to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP), the intent for Restricted
Commercial is to allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent
to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions. The intent of
"High Density Multifamily Residential" is to allow residential structures to a maximum density of
150 dwelling units per acre, and maximum residential density
The Property consists of three (3) parcels located along Northeast 54 Street and Northeast 53
Street and per the survey prepared by Biscayne Engineering certifies that the size of the three (3)
is approximately 42,750 Square Feet (0.98 acres) see Figure 1.
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 2
12/18/2023
Figure 1: Aerial Photo of Subject Site (red outline)
PU$L/
6,4(11
G 9'p
Q
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance wM1h timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicade decision -mating body will
renew the information al the pubic hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-17429
12/28/23
9�ReV1 C CO'
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St- Page 3
12/18/2023
,co Quel.rch�1
4 `«0 f1p
4
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wM1h timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicade decision -mating body will
renew the information al the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
J, PZ-23-17429 44,
12/28/23 <C
�►�9-4-V/ Ew CO
Adjacent Properties and their associated Land Use designations, Transect Zones, and Existing
Uses
SURROUNDING USES
Miami 21
MCNP / Density
Existing Use
North
T5-O
Restricted Commercial
150 du/ac
Commercial
South
T5-O
Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
transportation and Utilities
150 du/ac
Hospital
East
T5-O and T4-O
Restricted Commercial
150 du/ac
Low Density Restricted
Commercial
36 du/ac
Commercial Vacant
West
T5-O and T4-R
Low Density Multifamily Residential
36 du/ac
Restricted Commercial
150 du/ac
Commercial
Residential
Table 1: Surrounding Uses
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 4
12/18/2023
�. T4-Fki
NE raSTH ST
NE E.17d ST
H..y S.,RD
w1':1 !r<<10
T3-L
1-
Figure 2: Miami 21 Transect Zone (Existing)
Proposed Project
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a pubic hearing
accordancein with timelines set forth in the city of
MiamCode.The applica de decision -making body NOR
renew the Information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
T6-8-O
inr i'9ow ,h
agI tf
ysktn SAF
The Applicant seeks to improve the Property with a mixed -use Residential Multifamily development
that provide sufficient buffers to the established neighborhood while providing a mix of uses and
new housing in a Commercial intensive area. As a part of the project, the Applicant has proffered
a Covenant stating that 10% of all units will be "Workforce Housing" and will be rented at 100%
of Area Median Income.
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 5
12/18/2023
4
PU$//
411
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance wM1h timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicade decision -mating body will
renew the information al the pubic hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-17429
12/28/23
44,
REV! Ew CO
D. ANALYSIS
The following is a review of the request for waiver of time limits pursuant to Article 7, Section
7.1.2.8(g).7 of the Miami 21 Code to eliminate the required 18-month period between petitions
for a change in the zoning classification for the Property.
Criteria: Waiver of time limits. The time limits set forth in this subsection g. may be waived by a
vote of at least three (3) members of the City Commission when such action is deemed necessary
to prevent injustice or to facilitate development of the city in the context of the adopted
Comprehensive Plan, or any portion thereof.
Analysis:
Based on the Project's Background, including it's zoning classification under 11000 Zoning
Code and it's Comprehensive Plan designation, the current Project does not present a case of
injustice. The project's planning and execution align with the established guidelines and
regulations of the city's Comprehensive Plan. The project's progression adheres to the prescribed
timelines and procedural norms, upholding the Intent and Guiding Principles of Miami 21.
Finding: There is no injustice.
Criteria: Policy TR-2.1.3: "The City will encourage increased density of development within
walking distance of transit corridors and Metrorail stations (as referenced in Policy LU-1.1.10. and
HO- 1.1.9)."
Analysis: The presence of five (5) bus stops within a 500-foot radius of the Property not only
designates it as a transit corridor but also presents significant advantages for urban planning and
community development. However, the Property was rezoned to "T5-O" Urban Center Transect
Zone — Open in September 2023, aligning it with the surrounding zoning and effectively meeting
the above criteria. This zoning classification already supports the objectives of enhancing density
near transit corridors and Metrorail stations, as outlined in Policy TR-2.1.3. However, proposing
a rezone to a higher transit zone of "T6-8-O" Urban Core Transect Zone — Open would be
inconsistent with the above criteria. The "T5-O" Urban Center Transect Zone — Open designation
adequately accommodates the desired density and mixed -use development, promoting efficient
land use and accessibility near transit hubs. Escalating to a "T6-8-O" Urban Core Transect Zone
— Open zone could lead to an imbalance in the area's development scale, potentially disrupting
the existing neighborhood character and undermining the strategic objectives of sustainable,
transit -oriented development. Therefore, maintaining the "T5-O" Urban Center Transect Zone —
Open zoning is more in line with both the city's policies and the practical considerations of urban
planning in this area.
Finding: Inconsistent
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 6
12/18/2023
4
PU$//
'-N to
411
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance wM1h timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicade decision -mating body will
renew the information al the pubic hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-17429
12/28/23
44,
RSV! Ew COY
Q
Criteria: Policy LU-1.1.3: "The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the
city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses...strategies to further protect existing
neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering
requirements will be incorporated into the City's land development regulations."
Analysis:
The request to waive the 18-month time limits denotes the applicant's desire to rezone the
Property, thus increasing the intensity, density and height while aiming to create a more dynamic
urban landscape. This raises concerns about potential encroachment into the surrounding
neighborhood. The strategic location of the property, nestled between restricted commercial land
to the north and a public facility to the south, initially appears to offer a unique advantage in urban
development. However, the higher density and intensity in the area would be the first in the area.
When compared to its surrounding lower transect zones might lead to challenges in maintaining
the integrity and calmness of nearby residential areas. It is important to consider that the increase
in density and building height ideally start at the intersection of the street rather than in the middle
of the neighborhood. This approach allows for a gradual transition in urban density, creating a
more balanced and visually appealing streetsape.
Finding: Inconsistent
Criteria: Goal LU-1: Maintain a land use pattern that (1) protects and enhances the quality of life
in the City's neighborhoods; (2) fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining
areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic development and the growth of job opportunities in
the city; (4) fosters the growth and development of downtown as a regional center of domestic
and international commerce, culture and entertainment; (5) promotes the efficient use of land and
minimizes land use conflicts while protecting and preserving residential sections within
neighborhoods; (6) protects and conserves the city's significant natural and coastal resources;
and (7) protects the integrity and quality of the City's existing neighborhoods by insuring public
notice, input and appellant rights regarding changes in existing zoning and land use regulations.
Analysis:
Developing lots near street intersections on the main street is strategically more beneficial
compared to the middle of the street, considering the goals of enhancing neighborhood quality,
redevelopment in the declining areas, and promoting economic growth. Intersections offer higher
visibility and accessibility, making them prime spots for development that can serve as community
hubs, therefore improving quality of life. The higher foot traffic near street intersections promotes
economic development and job creation more effectively than developments in less prominent
middle street locations.
Finding: Inconsistent
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 7
12/18/2023
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with bmellnes set forth in the City of
Miami Code.The applica de decision -making body will
review Ure intonnaion at the pubc hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-23-17429
12/28/23
The Planning Department recommends denial of the Applicant's request for a waiver of time
limits based on the analysis and findings of this report.
�DocuSigned by:
St��aan �n S'f itn,t r
`-3A75CAC5AF7E446...
David Snow
Interim Planning Director
DocuSigned by:
G\A- S'futn tx
3A75CAC5AF7E446...
Sevanne Steiner, CNU-A
Assistant Director
,-DocuSigned by:
.O at 6-11(.0 �w
`— D7991 CCFF0424A9...
Zhaokai (Kyle) Liu
Planner II
PZ-23-17429 50 NE 54 St— Page 8
12/18/2023