HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #17 - Discussion Itemf;
111111111i111•11■111■IIIIII■II IME■ m■
1
iN' ttr4t-:?F-scc .:iro'::UPANuEJM
Joseph R, Grassie
City Manager
Jim Reid, Director
Planning Department
October 6, 1978
Agenda Item
City Commission Meeting October 24, 1978
Workshop: Comprehensive Marine Develop-
ment Study
By Resolution 78-503 dated July 27, 1978, the
Commission authorized a Comprehensive Marina
Development Study for the purpose of evaluating
City -owned waterfront property for marina develop-
ment opportunities and subsequently to recommend
specific marina plans and a program for implemen-
tation. Green leaf/Telesca, the consultants for
the study will pre:;ent their evaluation of all
possible marina sites and their recommendations
for further evaluation of specific sites. The
Commission is invited to comment.
Study Outline
The Study Outline for the three month study is attached which
describes the purpose, funding, scope, tasks and schedule (At-
tachment A) .
CONSULTANT PRESENTATION
The consultants will report on their overall evaluation of City -
owned waterfront property and their recommendations for further evalua-
tion of specific sites for marina development. This presentation, midway
through the course :.f the study, affords the Commission the opportunity of
commenting on the consultants' appraisal. Particular attention is directed
to Chapter II of the report (enclosed) and the matrix on the last page.
OTHER ACTIONS
The consultants presented their report to the Marina Development
Advisory Committee on October 17, 1978 and the Planning Advisory Board on
October 18, 1978. After receiving comments, the consultants will proceed
to completion of the study and present their final report to the Planning
Advisory Board and City Commission in December, 1978.
•
■lull■iuii■i■iii
i
a
ATTACHMENT A
COMPREHENSIVE MARINA DEVELOPMENT STUDY
STUDY OUTLINE
The Comprehensive Marina Development Study was authorized for advertisement
by City Commission Resolution 77-227 dated March 16, 1977 and execution of
a contract with Greenleaf/Telesca was authorized by Commission Resolution
78-503 dated July 27, 1978. This delay afforded better coordination with a
County -wide marina study completed this spring. The contract was signed
August 21, 1978. Funding for the study is from 2nd Year Community Development
Block Grant funds.
The purpose of the Comprehensive Marina Development Study is to evaluate City-
owned waterfront property for potential marina development. It is divided into
four parts, as follows:
Part I Inventory and Reconnaissance
This task includes a review of existing marina operations and marina
site opportunities . A summary will be prepared showing the market
potential for marinas. needs at existing facilities, and identification
of key development issues.
Part II Site Analysis
This task will delineate and evaluate all potential marina sites for such factors
as their bay and landside impact location, general suitibility, and permitting
requiremeHts. A matrix will be prepared arraying the potential marina sites
against these development factors. The Marina Development Advisory Conunittee
will assist the City and the consultant in screening these sites and selecting
certain sites for further evaluation.
Part III Potential Programs
Recommendations will be prepared for development for each selected marina
site including number of slips, fleet characteristics, supporting waterside
facilities and special landside facilities. An implementation program for
each selected site will include development cost, staging, permitting requi-
rements, general feasibility, management options and operations. The Marina
Development Advisory Committee will assist the City and consultant by reviewing
the recommended sites for development and the associated implementation program.
Part IV Comprehensive Planning Overview
A final report will include a marina development plan including supporting
facilities for each selected site and an implementation and staging program
with a focus on public/private implementation possibilities and financing
recommendations, together with the salient findings of Parts I -III. The
report will be presented to the Marina Development Advisory Committee, the
Planning Advisory Board and the City Commission.
The schedule for the study is as follows:
Start of Study - September 6, 1978
Part I and II - October 11, 1978
Part III - November 8, 1978
Part IV - December 6, 1978
■■IIIIIIIIIIII■1■ it
•
CITY
F
MIAMI
1Naterfront Recreational
Opportunities
GREENLEAF ! TELESCA
PLANNERS • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • INC.
/40
PRELIMINARY COPY
c'm
DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
MM
_MM
ME
MM
COMPREHENSIVE MARINA DEVELOPMENT S T UbY
CITY OF MI/MI
INVENTORY AND RECONNAISSANCE
ART fit - SITE ANALYSIS
, CREENLEAF J TELESCA • PLANNER'S • ENCINEER n • ARCHITECTS. INC.
■
•
1.1 I■Illlllllllliiiiimn muuii iiimmm
■
■
•
GREENLEAr / TELESCA • PLANNERS • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS. INC.
1451 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 3311 • 305/377-8411 • CA9LE GREENINC
13 bdt
City of Miami
3342 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Attention: tlr. Jin Reid, Director, Planning Department
Re: Comprehensive Marina Development Study Job No, 1621
Gentlemen, we are transmitting a draft copy of Chapter I and Chapter II for your re-
view and comments.
During the preparation of Chapters I and II, we reviewed over 35 potential sites for
marine development. A systematic examination and assessment of these sites has
resulted in the selection of the following primary sites (Group 1) for further study
and program development.
1 Dinner Key
la David Kennedy Park
3 Miamarina
5 Watson Island
6 Margaret Pace Park
7 Magnolia Park
10 Legion Park
11 Virginia Key (Ind)
lla Virginia Key (Marina)
14 1-95 ,3 SW 4 Street
Secondary sites (Groups II and
due to the limited development
111) will also be further addressed in the
potential the effort will be minimal.
study, but
■■IIII111■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIuImniii1i i i i i iimiiiii 1ii iili■ 1.
•
■
■
City of Miami
Att! Mr«, Jim Reid, Director, Planning Department
13 October 1973 = Page 2
We have completed Parts I and II of the Study Outline, Based on the forthcoming
input from the Marina Development Advisory Committee, the Planning Advisory Board,
the Planning Department, and the City Commission, we will proceed with Parts III and
IV of the study pertaining to the aforementioned selected sites, as may be modified
by your input.
Ultimate priorities will be affected by the actions by the City with respect to the
development -leasing proposals for Dinner Key and the marina -theme park proposals for
Watson Island. Different priorities will be established in anticipation of probable
outcomes of alternative actions.
'Je look forward to meeting with you to discuss this study,
Sincerely,
1
Robert W. Bentleys' ' IA-i\IP
Project Manager
R41E: ipy
Enclosure
GREENLgAF / TELESCA PLANNERS , ENGINEgRS' • ARCHITECTS, INC.
• • • cL-.
al:. c UI'i1i.IU.'d
Florid:
Woof. H.,U1
11
200
-w•ES
IIA
CD
E-1
z
GREENLEAF / TELEBCA
AiIC041TICT• NC
pI ANNs p• /NUIN1♦!p•
s
1051 II PVSNUB MI*Mt i lOM D* 313131
0
W.
0
4
0
Q•
o
W. 49 ST.
IAMI
SPRINGS
J�.
a
v
HIALEAH
a
W
W
4
co
W
Z
N. W. 103 ST.;
WIDENER N. W. 79 ST.
ELVD.
HIALEAH
DRIVE
N. W. 54 ST
Q
z
MIA.MI / .!
'• r1..W. 125 ST. / E. 125 51.
� 123
I:,N.w. 11 L/ > -1 / ST.
1.7 ' Q Qom/
N W. 103 ST. La','
Z �L.
'' f' /: w
+: N. W 95ST
,
25
(.I N. 79 ST.
0v
5T.
•= ) 41
AIRPO'T EXP:'IY . Lam--- II" TUTTLE CSVlY.
•
11
N. W. 36 ST. ��r 4 [i a l
'11
MIAMI li• TERNQI(ONAL ; �., i, a .
1
I`
AIRPORT (ARKING�—,=:J:..�.. :7.••._J F.',7 1 'i.i
19 211 i fTCil'.--'
.-Si I•
= V
II•
y�....VENETIANIWAY (1C'.l: L
LINCD1N I:
�ew O V L' . ..:h.'� '�..lu,rz'r=`C= .. ts-+''• : G ' ...,,^�-• >r-T• 7..:1
--- LEF 't �T �� ^ C
iI \ Ll.'..GLE:
io IZ
WIC .I--.7.4 ; �! t-- t•++I ,Sf-� o%L:�sa-.:;�•+ Fes...^.--cp...,..�:,.._.c•T•-Ai r1 fl ISl•.._
.w
i d !'J. .. 'h � 4
!: iS.V/.7 ST I �Il 15 a0:':N �8 „�Ji
`I�
.I
I
� .�:
CO^Al WAY ` MIRACLE S.W. ST. ,'._,/,,o
,y.`�,,,,� ,.•;x 2°
26) w G::E! ES y?i ' .-f* 4 itoul \(
n I r:,.ram /�. :•-
...•.J: C:GvNTY
,4 ;1 ,:.:+'Stir•\
MILLER DR.
SUNSET D.
11
L.-I BIRD AVE. I.
r
-}.\� /%
401 iye
5. f
NiEt::C�i
JUNGLL
A DR.
M
a
o � :.;;,C".`1':T GLOVE PARK
r �t
2
�4
/ MATHES01• /'7
PART( Vaila
TPCPICM.
GA; CLr:S
Li. S. PLANT
INTRODUCTION
STATION
SITE
LOCATION
MAP
Corm.,.- n iYc,,,1hrina,,,D, MOOLImen, S.tud_y =._City. of _t1_iami
CHAPTER 1 RECP,EA T l ^, A L BOAT I NG REQUIREMENTS
A. WET BpAT Si0?'AGE IN DADE COUNTY
1, Review of Existing information
Up until 1974 little information was
facilities for recreational boating in they Greater Miami area. At the
available
regarding
the heeds dr
urging of The marine tiouncil, Dade County through its Department of Parks
:And Recreation arranged with the Rosenstiel Schooi of Marine and
Atmospheric Science to obtain a grant From the U.S. Sea Grant Progra,..
with which to undertake a study of "Recreational 6catind in Dade County.'
This study, carried out under the direction of Dr. Bruce Austin, was
,published in March 1977 and was based on the 1c'�J5-76 data on reg i s terc:d
aters from the Florida Department of Natural Reources: an in -situ
Survey of bertnc:d boats between 1 November and 15 December 1975; a
telepr', ne interview of marina operators undertaken in May and June 1976;
`.
u,. r 275 interviews at the county marinas during`
'and some. . \three 6-week
,
intervals within the study period. Although this study presc!nted great
quantities of information and statistical data, conclusions di -own from
this information require a careful analysis of the statistics and
knowledge of the recreational boating industry to be • of value it,
-forecasting the future needs and demands of the area.
nearly 197t;, an ad hoc committee was appointed by The Marine Council
under the chairmanship of John W. Greenleaf, Jr. to undertake a study of
the impact of.recreational boating in Dade County which could be used to
show the urgent need for additional boating facilities in the Dade County
QREEHLEAF / TEE.ESCA • PLANNERS • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS. INC.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE
EMEMEtill
[or re,� �!ejiaejhab�lo -�-�t�dy�C�Ytyof���_-_~_��
area and the serious economic impact of the lack of those fsc|litids^
fhls oomm|Ltcc consisted of 12 leaders in the marine field* each selected
f- 6 � � his special �nowicdge �the conditions etAst|ng in the areas
�
dff6tts of the committee were divided principally into t�0 par�t4 the
^ ^
��� t� forecast the demaMd for recreational 6oaLiMd fa±il�tias and the
to daterm|ne the aconomic bcnefits to the area that wou|d rasu|t
'
� from meeting -If the damand~ The comm(Ltce, in making its forecast, took
f D
� �advantage of s prullmin�ry rurort o r. Bruce Austin which inciuded the
'
' boat registraciqn in Dade County for 197�~76 and gave the results of his
h b �h � the ozunty. |n making its
in -situ survey of 60aLs then er eo n ,
`
the �mnm c ee i � also took into account the la/ ge number of un~
' »
i t ad dealer boats �n �h� oroa the �cn�nd for berths by seasonal
,-'rmg s ar ,
` �isiLors fact ch�� Dr, �usLln/s in -situ
anu �r��s/cncs, as e|l as the
`
survey was conuucceJ between l Aovembcr and 15 December, at a time when
'
from visitors F and transient boats in the
there is little or no effect
area. The forecast of dockage reouirements �wat berths` was shown on
i �h iou of l�7D �m 2OO� Also
Figure V( i o� this report cover ng e �cr ,
shovun is chc number of dock- sp-1ccs existing at the time of the survey,
`
'
. brokon down into present. Dade County and City of Miami docks, yacht
� clubs" existing private and commercial slips, and unorganized private
'
slins. The difference between the forecast and presently available docks
sho�ud a shortage of 2,500 sIips in lq75, \ncraasing to 6,500 to l�85,
and to |O,OOO by the year 2000. These forecasts didn't takc into account
� dry ocarage of ^ cs at marinas.
�
»
n
�
'
^
�
.
"
o
"
�
�
�
•
MM
MM
MMM
1
■MMMM
Camprenent i ve.M „r i na. _Development Sudv C,i ty of _M.i am i .... �. •--
Oh 15 March 1978, Connell Metcalf , Eddy presented their report on a
Marina System Plan, 1977-1997• This report; based largely ort the March
1977 report of Dr. Austin, sunplemeneed by certain additional field
surveys, covered the entire Dade County area, stressing particularly the
Dade County marinas including those proposed for Chapman Field, Black
Point, and Homestead. In making this study, no distinction was made
,between boats reuuiring wet storauc and those for which dry storage could
be erovided. As a resuit, no direct comuarison uetween the study of The
.Marine Council ana chat of Connell Metcalf Eddy can be made of the
present snort3ae of facilities, except to state that both studies show an
extreme shortage to exist.
Special Considerations
An analysis of the in -situ survey shown in Dr. Austin's report indicates
that some 47. of the wet slips being utilized in Dade County at the time
f the survey were classified as unorganized. This classification refers
to boats tied ea up a tseawalls and private docks along the canals and
waterways in Dade County on private property. While this number
represents aniy a relatively small percentage of the dockage possible
along such privately owned waterfront property, it must be realized that
waterfront property owners are not interested in boating, are not
owners, and enjoy the privacy of their waterfront properties, with
many
boat
the result that although it wouid be physically possible to greatly
Increase the unorganized dockage, the berths found by Dr. Austin probably
represent the normal maximum usage which can be anticipated for this type
of facility.
Also, private ;eawails not utilized for the normal dockage
oRECNLLAr/'f¢LEPc^ ! PLANNERS ! ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS! INC.
CorIVE:hensjY12,Marina Deve l opment C.i t v o..f.,. Miami
.__._ . ... .
of boats pray be available by special arrangement (Or tie,up as a refucte
during hurricanes when public marinas on Biscayne Bay are rccui red tei be
, evacuated.
Of., Austin ` ;
survey showed that whereas something over SCA of the
`mill i i es in Dade County lived in apartment houses and condominiums, less
than i [ were boat owners. while ome th i ng less than SO,,: l i v i na in single
family t•y units account fo,' the remaining c5-S of boat owners in Dade County.
tl�„i
YThe present trend of :)I:inninq and zoning authorities and the developers
Or lay; e waterfront condominium and jpartr.nen_ complexes to limit the use
marina faci i itics constructed as can adjunct to the apartt^Cnt or
condominium to the 0ccup3nt5 of those facilities • is ttsu I t I ng in many
slips being constructed for which there ::ill be no occupant. Since such
faci i i ties are not provided with ;roner I.andpide access 4nd the necessary
it attractiveness to the general public. is limited. even if.
parKirig,
$'uch u%age were to be permitted.
i3 . DFtY BOAT S i GRACE - DADE COUNTY
The in -situ survey of Dr. Austin shows a ratio of nearly two dry boat storage
berths to three wet boat storage berths in the organized marinas existing in
Dade County. The deveiopmelt of dry boat storage facilities in this area,
particularly those utilizing multi -tiered racks, either open or covered, is a
relatively new phenomena which has crown rapidly in response to the ever
increasing deg^•and for boat storage facilities. It serves a special need for
the owner of the larger trailerable boat, permitting him to store his boat at
the' marina where launching and retrieval services are provided. This
ORECNI.CAF ,ESCA PI.ANNERS .t EN4$NEERs r. ARCHITECTS
H,,T;Stt.idy
Cit,, of "I
""hales the 'eed for ti-oilering the boat, owning a trailei'i and providing
storage at the boater 5 home: °wawiand for this type of storage is increasing
;oning ordinances are passed restricting the storage: of boats in front or
side yards and driveWays of individual homes.
The demand is also increasing
as more and more families are resorting to llvihn ih multifamily dwellings
where no soaco is available for boat storage. The dry storage of boats offers
c rases :end barnacles oh the
the advantage of preventing the accunu i a t ion of J
boat hull while significantly reducing corrosion. Where covered storage is
provided, it also gives the boat owner a secure place to leave his boat during
a storm or, hurricane.
The reduction in s i -e of cars to accommodate gren ter gas::'t i ne mileage require-
ments will uce the traiierability of boats, esceci 11y those in the upeer
l imi is of the 16-25 =oot class.
storage at :iarinas.
This will further increase the demand for dry
Or. .Austin found a total of 1,2,85 boats in dry storage during his
This represents about 8.8 of ::he total registered boats in the 16-25
foot
class. Or. Austin also found total of 5,774 wet stored boats during his
survey, which represented 76:; of the need for boating facilities at that time,
as determined by The itarine Council. If it is assumed that the same market
factors have governed the construction of wet and dry boat storaee facilities,
the demand for dry boat storage at the time of the surv^v would have been
1 1 .6, or say 12 t,, of the registered boats i n the 16-25 foot clan.:.
survey
=■I 'Vuu■lull
•1
. ty_ of...Miam,...,.
Corrucehrns!v �t't'tna , OcDevelopmentCi
..,.�u,l i. `_ .... .�,
C. MARKET POTENTIAL FOR BOAT STORAGE IN DADE COUNTY
the forecast of The Marine Council shorn on riqure III of their study
indicated the potential dockage requirements for wet boat storage for the
entire Dade County area to the year 2000, The mar et potential is the
difference between available facilities and total potential demand,
Assuming the doc aJre requirements for dry boat s torace to be ecu i va l ent to the
1 2% `: ins roe i s tered boats in the i 6''' 5 foot class, the needs for this type
o
facility l 1 t'/ .t the year 2000 can be `similarly forecast, The Marine Council
J1-
prai�•ctic,n; rnr :;et :.ertti demna are shown in Figure 1 tccge Cher with the
arnjectiOn of the dry boat storage needs. The market potential is .the
difference het'.:c2Ch available iacil i ties and the .total potential demand,
in 'ilovenber/Dec' ber 1975, fir. Austin made a survey of both wet and' dry
acil itie, .Ixistina in the county. This purvey is presented in Table 1, in
which the marina `., : i l i v i es listed by numbers are those reported by Dr.
Austin. Additional information updating the data on these marinas has been
added as :40 i 1 :i:a a number of f.ic i l i t i es which are presently proposed but were
not contemplated at the time of his survey. These additional facilities have
been identified by letters.
The wet and dry berths programmed for construction to 1985 .ire shown on Figure
1 as well as the total proiectcd wet and dry storage berth demand as discussed
herein. For comparative purposes the total projected wet and dry storage
demand indieeted by Connell Metcalf & Eddy in their 1978 report to Dade County
has been shown. From Figure 1 it will be noted that after completion of the
11101111111•EllEtiNimmmiim
1
,000
1 7,500
15,000
12.500
Tot81 Prjected Wet 1
..• , •., - •
•4
r.°1
4./
7 t, •
*0'
I f
F I GURE
AN O DRY BERTH DEMAND DADE COUNTY
Dry Berth em6nd 4
40 44e
4" )
4
:#3
0,000 ........._
i" P •
,
...,;'
4 ... gry
:
" P. 4
4.3
.
.,,
i ' 31tIVI
.,
matilirmaftWia
/
▪ wee
* I
▪ t
au: I
7.1milvIll211
5,OCO
1
1
2,500
Wgt t
t
4.A4
144a-
3•
1Tota i Pro ie ted Dry t Wit :Berth
Demand (Conleli. Mo,ttale t Eddy
•
t97)
1Pro iec.ted We t Berth Demand
r i re Counci I 1976)
Ber7ths
Prodrommed
for Cons ruct ion
•' ,
Projected try Berth De4and
otit11.3.1
•
aitmesviell:.•wactsion
a lawn
Dry 5,4r 'hs Programmed for Cons t
uction
5 1990 *95 2CG0
=Wm
MM
MM
MM
MM
q±t1ER
| Sherdtof Beach Hotel
19400 Collins Avenue
-
-
�
�
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
Cray Line Cats
450 Sunny isles Blvd.
ĴR[
OF rACtLlfy
)
dock § !7
Commercial 1
Marina
NUMBER 6F BE HS
BKuct AUST U s m e¥ o \ 3
19/5w o1 191H
:@t Dry ' t.
20
Dry
Jerrv'S Zarin' Center
400 sunny Isles Blvd
Commercial
Marina
25
Hi Lilt ear:ne
7G7 Street
Eeynerciu1
Maria
- | 300
Off -Bore
17301 Si Gevn® Cl±t
| Commercial
| Marina
107
M uu Harecr Marine .
17355 2 ;ca/ne Boulevard
Commercial
Marina
22
tau:, Lu:c marina
17!07 eisc&>n, : uievard
ccm er=ial
! MGr|na
11
§
!;O
200
]
slue Marlin Marina
2500 :E :73 3rreer
(oz rciai
IMarina
12
Acua MarHw Commercial
9 &C00 :urnv tales Eauieeard | Marina
60
|
I
Mari
ic
E.0 & per Dlr2 Mar b,a
(county)
I;ni ,venue
|§
29
•f , ., ..
11
|Mal
Harbour Club
10201 Collins Avice:e
privet& !Q
Club ]
-
-
-
`^
��
Gay 'Harbor Hotel
2660 E. Eav Harbor Drive
;
4
Hotel dock 1
3
—
—
;3
evs7onk. Point, Inc.
1950 GE 135 SKreec.
Cur ercial 65
Marina •
300
.
100
i§
Blscaine Marine
13301 3isc wne 61v .
Coles rci3i
Marina | -
97
.
.
15
v :en, Harbour Club
13! era Ccurt
Condominium
Docks
|§
-
.
-
16
Jczkev c|un, Inc.
| 11111 Biscayne Blvd.
Private i
i Club 1 5;
.
77
,
-
�
-
�
�
�
—
—
—
—
N9gER
11
77 | Skyway Marine
| '620 NE 79 Strrit
3 L|ztle'River Marina
724 NE 79 Street
VOL
OF
OF FACILITY !
1Commercial (
Marina 1
Commercial
Marina
N 21bb% OF
B m(L &us\ R 5f;2v {.
1975®9A, 19/a
'»t | Dry Wet . bry
20
50
20 230
Marine elaza xodrtments
1 Marine
NE 22 Street
20
! Pelican Harbor
1275 75 Street Causway
| Harbor west Ya g „
21 70!O ,• V
! RC, ccuct ub Private
22 I Li30 E,st Drive (Harbor lsiand) iCiuh
Flamin ) Yacht aasin
23 1900 7? h 2t2eet Causeway
a;imn Cole Horcl and Yaen: Club
900 Say :r;ve
Club
|Apartment
IDocks
!1.tibl
. •
ic
arina
| (county)
23
272
.19 - (172)
Com ercia1
IMar ina 77
§00
2§
Commercial
|®grina
1
32
62
32
-
Commercial -1
Purdy Avenue MarinaMarina -
%lash
!92
;Miami
; Public `
' South Seacn Alrine Marina -
ee:EB . ,\cltvi )
-
)30
400
%Miami
25
Palm y v Yacht Club
1 Palm~Bay Cr.
l
Private ]
.|cb | 35
_
.
£.
26
Miami Yacht Club 1Prito i 42
1001 Ma Arthur Causeway !Club .
120
-
-
27
Watscn Island Park
MacArinur Causeway
Public !
Boat Ramp -
(city) 4
-
-
-
2E
4
Miami Outb: rd Club Lrivatc ;
55
1099 MaG.\rt,er Ca sew,y
35
.
.
22
actte :nd e=rt 3a,(ront
66 Marina. Inc.
l
wars?: `e!,nd Marina
aackrtner Guuse y
Public
Marina
(city)
| •
43
|
-
-
-
•
IIIIHME1111111.1111111111111111111111111111•111111111111M111111
'UMBER 1
(Watson Isinnu Theme Park
liransient Marina
`, • - • 1 ,"
1
1 Watson is -land Theme i'ark
IMarina North
Omni interna:ionai
' Miami
i r ;
3:-Jyrront Park
Marna
1
h';01 3aishoee T'drive
Dupont J'Iaza ',-1otei Marina
23 ; 300 .6isc.-Jvne ,oulevard
north
! Co. 3aw:c;ore
riceH ?Lire
1165 3rickeil Avenue
/-*
NUmnft OFBERNS
BkUtE AUSt111
TYPE it 075-1916
1 A M E or FACILItY %let ')ry
•
Semi-oublic
Marina
Semi-public 1
Marina 11
, 1
1
ilCommerciai
,
1
,Marina .1
Public
;Marina
1 (citv)
208—
iHotei dock
18
hotel dock
1
Apa r tmen t
,Dock3
1 Condominium
Docks
i .--,tntic ,,,IrH,,-.; Er:at Yard Inc. iCemmerciai
34 I 2-6. S. W. ::•:':.h Street jtiarina
8th Avenue 7o3t Slips Commt:rciai
1
P.,0I NW 4•.r, Ctre,.tt Marina
-:.-
36 i i RRiviera Onrine Service Commercial
201 NW So. iver Drive Marina
1 Tonv's :1.71rin Service
37 1 243 NW Zo. Drive
1 . . P.
M:amt ioncer Club
:38 1 250 NW Na. :liver Drive
1 fa
;Commercial
IMarina
Private
Glob
.t
t
•‘
1 :-:
t !
11
i-Irrill St,2vens Dry Dock Co.
1270 NW 11th Street:.
Nuta'r, Boat Yard
40 1 1834 N..; No. River Drive
41 tlasin
2100 NW No. River Drive
Commercial
Marina
iCom*ercial
Marina
Merina
13
!40
35
20
28
160
4
4
100
Pl'.0sil, .'. 1970
Wet
151
122
270
12
67
(99)
Dry
•
• .
1
•
•
ML
NUM1311,,
A M rj- .,
OF rACILITY l
tIRUCL Atiti I !i Sty
1975-PI/6
Wel 1 Ory
!..)41-1
Wet
00
Poland YaCht 3a5in
42
21'30 NW No. River Drive
_ ___ .......
Commercial I
Marina .
.._
1 _
29 1
,
.
.
Fiarir/a Yacht 7asin Commercial
43 1585 NW 24th Avenue Marina l
v
i
Ft. 1
Riehare 3#:rtrai:1 a Cu. Commercial 4
424 : 36,7., Nw 17 Str,:..... Marina
i
150 l -
Jones ,.ioar Yarc. inc. Commercial
i99 ;,;',1 Cu. River i;rive Marina li
4,7.3c i
'''t i. 1 -
4.
i...
IT.:)rai ;..!i:t.7-cht Club Private 1
1-'6 ! 2!t'.',4 '.4). Li,,I.,pi:lere Drive Club i
4
.1
72
.
I
i A
i Bkcaync_. '..5av Yach!. Club Private
47 i 240 S. :".,..p.o-,here Drive Club ii
i
56
-
1
-
-
, I .ionry Trainer'7, ':....-iwinorc marin6 Co., -ercial 1
46 : 25j-,2 7.o. --',av!-,nore L)rive Marina 1
40
-
-
-
:itv •)f .1i,Imi '...',ar. :2'samo
217,4 Ba'..shure T.)rive
Public
lAat Rair.j );
(city; !!
-
-
-
-
Morrill Yara
l
-d f 72640 So. :2,.....-snure )rivr-
i
Commercial i1
Marina :,1
56
80
-
-
; '..:rove •:::-., f',arina
I 3385 Pan A:neri,.-...in Drive
1
Commercial 0
Marina ri -
?co
-,
-
-
i :1:1,..r V.c',' ocripl
1 ‘..• I I .. L. t • .1 •
52 1 I ,
S. 3,:iv,..,nore Drive
q
Public i
Merino i 370
:1
(citv) 4
-
-
•
-
l
f Seminole '.=..oat Service
—7 1
2160 -..o. Baysil*re Drive
t
i
Fuel dock -
i
-
-
-
i -6nut ,1..1vailinq Club
1 M;:irrin,-.1 :4,cad
Private 1
; lco
Club
40
_
_
55
1 Cranden Park Marina
Crandun Park
Public
Marina
(county)
125
-
97
_
1 Key Bica,n,! ::c.:.bt Club
56 1 1-.7.0 H.-.:r1•:.b.r Jr. (Key Biscoyne)
Private
Club
02
,
25
-
-
CGrr.-r:..,11:-.: Marin.1
1 Coral C...:bles
4 •
Privar.e
Club
I _
-
208
-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI II1111II11lME IMININ
'!U".[EP.
•
1 Matheson Hammbc Marina
Old Cut ! e r Road
ISnaoui-r :reek tsarina
111,:0 Sn<:ooer Creek
homes _eaJrionistelrl
`i uH W, OF E i H s
I Out':AIIYt t rt :iit:n
T,PE 1975'19t6
I» FACILITY � '.t� r. Dry
(� U ti l is ;t
i;
E•tarI s j
i count'%)
j Private li
t Club If
Private
Mi1iLary
::ir,c �-,v '(:;r,1t and C..Intry Club; Private
is
6o I 1411,11 :,lt ,2. :avenue 1 Club
Rusty iTh l ' on :A.3 r i n.a
Rict'E'.ilD,-;r l.. use'.13V
PUD: !c:
Marina
! (c.
Florida 7rwcr Licht
61 Docks
Pirt.e `;;:a
2'i `, .' t
62 3701 -,�t �,
Shag'^car " .. n t
63 I 1 1 �i) .,�...:LE'.C, .e. -: Roodi
i
'` Private
Cor..merc i i
Marina
Comrr.erc1a1
i•'3 r i ne
2,,7vr1:int Park
Canal r)r i
i i Greens Place
67 f Crar, ...,v
66 I Fred's °teat
I Card Sound Rc..,c.
1 PD I 1 `'
'farina ,,
(counrv)
IComm:rcia1
Marina f
i
}Comm rcial
ria r i na
156
29
37
16
10
16 37
15
7^
1 '-
13
24
1. 11
Wet I Or
150
70
1
it
`or`•)r'.�`.r` irr ;••�� rY.a."�7t.t ��r . P1120.';t J� �d i r i `/ (i i'iiAritl
urt-enti'J r',r0r r:ii`,r t!d construction for wet slips in Dade L unty there t/i i l
s t i i l r'F_o i h 5 ilor Cage of 4,500 slips for the y— r 1965 and a shortage of
,,ornr. 5v0 1r'`r� brat „i'_rthsc inies`.i a iustnincd rarinr? +Ievelot)rent program is
undcrtai,,T. ;.Hs. •,ji i 1
}: .`10111A
cantinun'.
worsen,
RCO.fi l ft :tC
Ike. .J tuu r Y� tt (I� : r .%• i e. • nc l
�i � r '>rr ..t � r.' t��ied 'rt
3O t h
the rut;: :ia= i n i :.; _t.c% .7.o.roali
elc i r+e Dade Couhty area ►
'1cttai f r, Eddy reports were focused
the ;o%fr%ia,:%l6nt :,f 'iJitirr ar oa facilities in the south bay area
Cyr :Ide Counv. :t3sic ~mot: useful to project the needs ofi
tt10-A;tV The boa:: 'o;,/or rC"_,:istrat$on dat;i which had been
identified
these Irens.
,faciaiti s
�1 rJ
G!:'.i� ,lt::+`U:•r 'as developed for nine areas of Dade County
macc for br)`tinr; demana For the residents of each of
prele.re:nces or boat launching and storage
'S-',?..mined along with ;:referred destinations of the
311(Vd`/S, :.'e find that marina t•aci 1 i ties within
the City of ,licmt '•,ould largely :verve zip code areas 1 thru 5 of the
survey, :'hick rear r'.7enr: pbo?it r?'^ i of the total population of boatinn
reg i s tra t: ion of ay.:. Courlo" ,nr' :y shortage of some 3,250 wet and dry berths
by i•j:35 for the fliami area.
1
'. ur?ching lt.:m®s - City. Of :gam'
he`'ba`a t i cg rc c: i ; i: r a c ion in Jade County
shows -
that approximately 90% of
the boots registered are traiierable so that any marine oriented program
)74.25make
previsicm for handling this type of cr•art if the citizenry of
• Comortnfti,si%,e.'Win%� e,vr•fohint Stud?, =.._.r,.it=y _rf_,.iii.ami
the community 1% to be served& Dr. Austin spent considerable time in
his tutuy observing launching ramp operations and in obtaininq
ii3fbrr13tion on their use and frequency of operation.
•
i
•
=
MI
MM
MM
MM
•
■
■
■
■
Iodated.
ity:',Itlich were Cot !rcl':dea in Dr. Austin's survey as well as the number
bon ra`1ns cased on a lane width of
i8�1C�t";11rir lanes 7t r'3Cn of �.t)i_'
ailproxi ltely 13.i feet; also Stilti : are the number of parking :paces
available at eac:h `acil its; ror the storage of vehicles and boat trailers.
`•-bi e 2_ lists thd number and name of the marina From his study together
with the width of its launching rart) for those facilities servinJ the
piddle and north part of the county within which the City of Miami is
Also nown are :.er t,a i n d i t i ona i launching ramps t: i th i n the
.registration hnS ..een analyzed for residents in the middle and
north part oi tile count.' to determine the portion of boats 25 feet, and
under :fn )ch t., expected to use launching facilities in these areas.
norderto determine the number of eraiierabi@ boats likely to utilize
the Iauncnl n^. ramps those boats 25
Feet in length and less which were
ound to be either in wet burns or in dry storayte at the marinas have
been :e,.uctcd; also deducted are 5u.'.• of the boats in the 0-15 foot class
based on the assumption that many of these will either be used as
dinghies for larger boats or are located in fresh water lakes and
wVl,. lly utilize coastal :lunching ramps.
-`c3t$:'t'ir3y5 and therefore Jo not �ISner�t
Information from Dr. Austin's survey, it was found that 65 of the
rNclistrotion can, be expected to use launching ramp facilities.
MINIMIIIIIMIEN
i
3
10 i-lau i ove r teach
20 Pelican Harbor
26 Miami Yacht Club
Li 1datsOn Island Park
,47 Biscayne t'acnt Club
49 City oF Miami C.G.
53 Seminole eoat Service
i5 C raneon Park
56 ley :�ischyne '' cty Club
A Leeson Park
3
C
• Nate
TALE 2
AMP W1iifiH & SPACE
rilue Marlin Maritsa
Curtis Park
Marninnside Pnrk
i 0 T A L'
Ratnp
Width (Ft)
50
295
147
44,
130_
300.
20
50
80
100
1453
Launching
Lanes
4
2i?
:11
Oar Trailer
ParkiHd
145
130,
Cor.prehen s v l n,r. i na--.Devc l oornen t Study = Ci ty ofMiami._
Ako. that boats in use on an average summer weekend da-y can be exoected
to reach 7-1/2"', and that peack hour use an any boat ramp will equal t011.
of ;.hose boats using the facil iiy. Dr. Austin's observations indicate
the t ane width to oe 13.5 feet and that the number of cars and trailers
parked at the facility could equal 63 of the total daiiy use. Based on
this information Table 3 has been prepare,, which shows this information
fsr 1975.
►c?,s2,
1987, and 1997 based on the forecasts of total boat
ren.i•rtration contained in the Connell Metcalf eddy report.
orirarinq_q the totaistihci' Taro I./idths
Fcrccas t for the
1-acilities would
only 75Z or
these fi:;ures.
and launching lanes with those
area it was determined that the existing launching
957; occupied by i9U2 and that parkirg f ci l i ties for
the anticipated traffic will be available. In evaluating
it ,must be realized that on special holidays such as
rchrth of, .July, Libor Day, and Columbus Day, when special nautical
act ivi tie*.;
re' •::c hedu i e1 in the area, the number of boats in use will far
exceed the average summer weekend figures. Also. as launching facilities
approach :heir maximum capability, operating inefficiencies and equipment
breando::n can cause serious delays and frustrations to those using the
facility with the result that as the capacity of the facility is
approaches, its use becomes less desirable and the desire to.
'suppressed.
is
launching ramps in Table 2, it wa:, found that one
is at Baker's Haulover wi th 22 launching lanes.
end of the county,with somewhat difficult
GREENLEAP/TELESCA • PLANNERS •-ENG•NEER$ • ARCMIITECTS..INC
r
N
n
11111111111
u
1
Total
Xiatc: Rc)istratioh
1975 Middle
No th -
Total 28,200
1982 Middle 24,080
North 16,150
Total 40,230
1987 Middle 27,250
North 18,010
Total 45,260
1597 Middle 32,0110
North 21,900
Total 53►9l5
i"rai lerable.:
Boats
67.5`.•. of Total
U4 a t 5 i t► tt
Ave.rager
-SEtmc r T-•`r'
7.5-4
11111
G c�
c� f- ; UFici i k 11ra1J.
11
11111111111111111
ztn
MM
111111111111111111•1•111Miiiiiinnim
RdMi•
4-ace
Car :,r i *iir.: i l.er
F.DrIt i,c j- at
fta i 1Y •, U � �
i
+�4
111111111
i
■
■I
�91
II
i
i
IN
IP
1111
1111
IIIII
i
i
i
1
Tot,i
Late Rcgistratioa 6=7.5% of Total--
T
-1975 Middle
R� N�I'Lh -
r Total 28765. 100 :_ 14,750
f
'r 1982 Middle 24,080
North 16,1150
Total 40,230 27,200
111
1987 Biddle 27,250
North 18,010
Total 4�5,260
AA
A�
i
30,800
2 x.3 1 tr
36, 60ti.
1111111111111111111111
1
11111111111111111
1111
11
111111
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111imomini
Vllt1 fill
at- Ife4f
15 tf"t; (.. CrC1.L G3.,4 Ce'-
I
1111
1
I1iii
-Car 4at.t- t!'kziler
F.lriKi�ay, ae
„290,
it 460
A
i
2
A
i
■1
■MEM
rl i na DeY,, c,tir-+��n t Stud - ►:? o f "1 i m i , . ,-a, » � ,.» ..
Car!���-c�hr'rr;;. �aes .�t• y...:_ r i._ . .._. �'• 9...,
access and therefore may be less desirable then some of the m l°ro
conveniently i ocd tcd ac i l i t i L The prouosa l of Diplomat Wo r l d
;Enterprises to construct c theme park on Watson Island will require the
losing of the 16 launching lanes presently located there, Also, it
,hog i cl be pointed
Bove greltly reduced) the car and trailer parking available for the
Seminole eget Service located there, r:,nd therefore lessen the capability
t•, this tacil i ty. .raraon r•3rk. t1_.e other major county foci i i ty with
22
r eau res the crossing of Ri ckenbacker Causeway and the
ieunciing lanes
out that _he modifications at Dinner Key Auditorium
' Wlyttien t toil. The heavy traffic jams on weekends considerably
t i i
,iSsens the desirability of the use of this Facility.
µesu i t of the foregoing, it is obvious that the construction of
aunc!, i nc, facilities Cv ;.;;e c i t•; , on city -owned property will be 1 i m i tee
strictiy :v t!le `inanc:al eapaci1 ity and not by the need. The
r Gl.l acer„en t cf the 16 launching lanes on Watson Island by an equivalent
facility hculd take priority in any development program which is to be
undertaken.
Since the -earliest days of Miami, the Miami River has played an important
art in the marina activities of the area. The first settlement of Miami
was on the banks of the river and much of the life of the early settlers
was closely reicted to it. The river has always been a working river.
It has served as a principal refuge in time of hurricane and much of the
marine commerce has been and continues to be loading and unloading along
IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111III■■IIIIIIIII
oc, tt
cuinf,t�r;Ft.�`�Py r� �t�.�F i i. if, r�ltinr.rr�n�t �o C i L;i o Min*,
MP Major boatyards i.nd repair facilities servinn cotmerdiaii
lts baths,
4isitihcl yachts, an►i pleasure boats ate all, with a few
F,nals,
r;+ct:vtians. located along the riven
he ontire length of the river is heavily Used foir the berthing of boats
ct r both open and covered storage ih btth commercial and private
i ..
facilities, +o facilitate the river's 'use, its ts channel was dredged tb a
i
Tenth of l5 feet by the Corps of Engineers and fairway lines established
■
•
■
liont) its length,
000 ed iliaii Riverfront Development
eccnt' report on the Miami
riverfront develcrmc:nt by Wallace.
cCarg,'Robtrts Todd and Econonic i,esenrch Associates clearly points
out the rewlcvelocment pressures on :he lower stretches of the river
north to tl.W. 5th Street. It shows how the redevelopment of downtown
retched this portion of ;.he Miami River with the resulting
substantial increases in land values for properties along the river.
•
This report suggests the redevelopment of four riverfront parcels east
cr.;.;d. 1st Avenue for which they assigned land values between $9 and
•SZO per square foot. The present marine oriented activities in this
;area of the river, although of considerable impact to the overall
'economy of the business community, cannot develop the full economic
potential of these properties and ultimately will be forced to move to
• other locations because of such economic pressures. On Parcel No. 2,
the report suggests a marina apartment house complex on the north side
4RCNIT(CTS. IHC.
1111=11111111111 1111111111E11111 1 II II I I III 1 III I IIIu111111IuU■■
Comprehens i yr Marina Devra looment Study = of . �.._._w.., Miami
Of the river on the block between South Miami Avenue and S.W, 1st
Avenue. Already plans to develop a sports arena in this area ate
:being considered, which would preclude the possibility of marina
development. Although this is the only site where major underground
utilities do not preclude marina construction, no marina would justify
the land cost in this area without an accompanying high density
deveiop;rent of the remainder of the tract to share the burden. It is
therefore, believed that if serious consideration is given to the
development of a wet boat storage marina in this area, it must be as
part' of a iarger project as suggested and therefore cannot be
considered in any firm estimate of facilities to be provided.
•ctwween Flagler Street and N.W. 5 Street, the report suggests
redevelopment of both sides of the river based on its close proximity
to the new developing government center. This could bring a large
dumber of people to the river from the government center particularly
'at lunch time and after work so that the proposed riverfront specialty
tenter could be a popular and heavily used area. Except for this
specialty center the marine activity suggested in their report for
this section of the river represents little change from that existing
at the present time. Their suggestion of developing a commercial
fishing center with a marina serving a part of the fishing fleet on
the east bank between 1-55 and Flagler street represents little change
in the present use and we believe is highly desirable.
s i 1?r_v0.0,P ud� i ire Pf t1i ii,
t,r� �r�rri�r�r5�tvri.,tf�rtnr!..._ U.. t�e_rit... � e � � ,�.�.,.,,.�...�
b, Small Cargo Boots
The redevelopment of this entire stretch of the river from Brickell
Avenue to N.W. 5th Street will displace several docks presently used
for loading and unloading of cargo vainly From the Bahamas, the
Caribbean Islands, and Centrai America. These cargo vessels are small
and are operated non=union crews so that they can not be
accnrnrnocated at the Dodae Island Port or Miami which is strictly an
ill -union operation. However, it should be pointed out that certain
areas along the river west of U.W. 27 Avenue might be developed for
thistype of c:7merciai shipping. This type of commerce means many
Millions of dollars of business to Miami retailers and all efforts
should be made to encourage its continuance, even though economic
ressures may require its relocation.
tarine Repair and Services Facilities
,:number of marine repair and service facil i.ties are presently located
along'both shores of they river within the proposed redevelopment area
ich• will ultimately have to be relocated since their operation
cannot be economically justified in view of the rising land values and
Slrrce this type of operation is not compatible with the higher and
;:More intensive use planned under the redevelopment program. Boat
repair facilities, particularly those where work is performed on the
hall can be unsightly, noisy, and foul smelling and as such, are not
esirable neighbors for higher types of usage. In addition,
Considerable landcide areas are needed on which to store and work on
ships being repaired. Such facilities are essential for the regular
•
MONIMMIEW
erg
MIME
BMW
RI
NOR
BIM
•
comprehensive Marina Qevelonmeht S_tudy. qf,Miami
-r•
and emergency servicing of all vessels using the waters in this area
including Biscayne Bay. Any reduction in existing repair and services
ih this area will have a negative impact on boating and adversely
affect the economy as boat owners look to Other areas for needed
,:tervices.
--tdMMary
us
1
The review analysis of the marina eeqUi renietits for the
city based on
,resent conditions and 5h deveicoment proorams either presently under way
r'-oe.nlarped to be untertaken in the near future shows the following!
A shortage of dry and wet berths in the Miami area of approximately
250. The proposed Miami River development study, if adopted. would
eliminate approximately 100 wet berths along the river for a total
shortage of 3,350 in i985. Wet and dry berths have been aggregated
because the construction of additional dry storage will relieve the
shortage for .zome of the smaller boats that would normally be in wet
tore. making additional space
berthed.
available For craft that must be:wet
. There are presently 106 launching ramp lanes serving the population in
the general Miami area. Under average summer weekend conditions at
eak hour, they will operate at 95% capacity. The elimination of 16
launching lanes from Watson Island when it is developed a theme
park will cause the remaining facilities to be 20% beyond capacity
under peak conditions.
—
-
•
—
—
—
-
—
—
CorT,2.:V7jv"Pilrj.tla RevOinnt11...AtOY.,',cilY of tliami,
as mete
r
is ah urgent need for new areas for repairs and servite feel,'
ities ih the Miami area to replace areas where development pressures
ere forcino out existing facilities and to provide additional facil,,
Ities to serve the Present fleet in Biscayne Bay and encourage its
,“
further development,
—
The establishment of Biscayne Bay as at Aquatic Preserve, the levying
' ‘;0
of an annual lease Fee on private users of bav bottom lands and the
, high cost reai eFtare will largely discourage or prevent the future
k
development of private property For marine oriented activities and
thus limit such development to publicly held lands.
GRgri)14..0 M. I CIASC KANNg115 EltigINgER # ARCHITCPTS,
7,3
IIIIIIIIIii iiiiiiiImiii IIIIII■ ■
Deve 1pf tRICn t S ti: i - r i lv !of M i am i
ax there is an urgent need for new areas for rebaihs and tetvice fati1a
ities in the Miami area to replace areas where development pressures
A are , existing facilities and to provide additional fati1A
forcing out
i t i es to serve the present fleet in Biscayne Bay and encourage its
`urther development,
the establishment of
eqiscayh'''_ Bay os an Aquatic Preserves the levying
an annual lease fee oh private users of bay bottom lands and the
hi.,h cost ,r ,jai r:�tare largely discourage or orevent the future
for marine oriented activities and
development of private property
thus limit such development to aucl iciy held lands.
its
Comer1. t'i
cheh ` ►urine Develonne t Studytvof_..Miyami.,.._..._....__
CHAPTER II
..., INVENTORY OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY AND POTENTIAL FOR MARINA DEVELOPMENT
•
•
■
the city presently owns a nwiber of waterfront ;narks and other sites which were
examined with View
connection with the proposed recreational boating prodrarn
mm
m
mm
1. 01nher Kt
■ The first and most irrtdortant i s the t0 i nn er Key complex extending some 64000
■
■
=
■
ii
includes some 250 moorings leased to the Coconut Grove Sailing Club; 370 slips
in the Dinner Key marina proper; dry boat storage for 350 boats on the
property leased tc the Grove ;ev Marina; 70 son odd slips on the property
t t• the dry boat launching
lessee tc Merrill -Stevens for its marine activities;
f toast Suard seaplane base facility; 110 wet storage slips
ramp at the, former P
at the facilities leased to Monty Trainer; and the docking facilities of
Biscayne and Coral Reef Yacht Clubs with total of 125 wet slips, both of
v.hichoccupy city owned bay bottom.
nt the David Kennedy Park there is a Nobble Cat rental operation on propperty
leased from the city. In addition, there are numerous uncontrolled moored
■
boats in the bay outside of the present marina area. The ready unlimited
access or this area to middle and south Biscayne Bay as well as to offshore
areas and its central location to a large segment of the population in the
toward determining
their suitability for development in
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
feet along the bayfront from Coconut Grove 5avfront Park south of MacFarland
avenue to the David Kennedy Park on the nortn. This complex presently
�,
•
area, make this an ideal location for recreational boating.
■
■
Combp,en� iyr' 1a r i na llt:ye l eamen t Study �. i t`�, (� _ Miami
�h
A master plan for this area published in 1974 envisioned a major expansion or
this area and showed how this could be accomplished. Although environmental
restraints not existino 3t the tine of the development of this plan no•/ limit
the extent to which the plan can be implemented. there are still many elements
which should be further considered and programmed for implementation.
The David Kennedy Park
r:ons idcrab i e
the northern end of this complex includes a
area of water Which although limited
in depth, should be
incorporated into the recreational activities of the area.
�. Alice Wainwright
Park
mm
This ,park. lying immediately south of the Bickenbacker Causeway and east of
Brickeii ;venue, stretches some 1.200 Feet along Biscayne Bay and is
buikhe.Jed. The Dark is undeveloped, maintaining the natural character of the
land, except for picnic iaGll lte:i along >1 gthe waterfront which has a very
i
pleasant surrounding. The park has iimited vehicular parking along the street
Fronting on the park.
s felt that the present character of the park shouid remain undisturbed in
its natural state, and that any marine facilities should be limited to the
replacement of the fingerpiers which previously existed in order to facilitate
the use of the park as a marine destination. The beaches along the
RIckenbackcr Causeway offers launching facilities for the small boats using
the area.
The reconstruction of such
docks would greatly eni•'nce opportunity
for marine access for use of the picnic facilities.
GREENbEAr rE1.E5cA • PLANNER$ . ENC,,lNEEH$ + ARCHITECTS INC.
Corlpr hr ns.iv Maj.ina,Dovelopment .Study ' ri,ty.. 0F_...Minmr
Misrarina
the rliamgar ina. adjacent to Bayfrorrt bark in downtown Miami is the second r ajiir
;daring facilityof the city. It is on the Intracoastal Waterway anti has 'ready
access to the ocean through Fisherman's Channel or the Miami Ship Channel.
Although they opening of drawbridges at the Rickenbacker Causeway and at Dodge
Island is required for masted vessels# these bridges are provided with
Gicarances
in excess of 25 feet#
unrestricted by bridge or;cnings.
which permits much of the traffic to rnovo
me site for. `his marina is completely dove i oiled However
moorings cou l dbe
provided as .gin adjunct to it in the area in Front of Sayfront
�. a
increasing the capacity of this facility with minimum
Suhs taut ia l l y
y. Bicentennial Park
The high bulkhead of the recently completed Bicentennial Park is the westerly
together with the
Park, thus
side of the turning basin for the ship channci.
severely restricts the desirability of this area for genera
limited parking
recreational boating purposes.
This,
Withthe relatively deep water along the bulkhead, this area could serve to
berth visiting Naval vessels or other large ships which visit the area
periodically and are open to public inspection without the need to carefully
schedule such visits and thus avoiding tieing up the facilities at Dodge
Island. An active program to promote the docking of visiting vessels at
Bicentennial Park would increase the activity within the park itself and pro—
vide a greater utilitarian park.
GREENLEAF/TELESCA • PLANNERS • ENGINEERARCHITCCTS.INC,
M
MEE
mrdm
OEM
mow
NEK
MEW
Cr npr r ��. ii�,.i v�'.__i•Z r i na Dcyq,i9r, tIcrq = CitF
i
Yacht Club,
40 boats.
•
i■■1•11111111111111
5, slat:6n i51anri
At thr! present time, the feast side of Watson kland is occupied by the hiami
the Miami Outboard Club, and by .a launching ramp. the bulkhead
aloha the crest side of the island is utilized as a marina accommodating some
The nraoos:d c:uv lepment or ;Watson Island by diplomat World Enterprises into a
theme park envisions maintaining the Miami Yacht Club and the Miami Outboard
Club at their pre5ent locations on a reduced land area and the elimination of
• the launch.ing ramp and the auto/trailer parking area, which will be rcau i red
for theme Park development. The project contemplates the construction of a
transient type marina aiona the westerly bulkhead to replace existing
facil i tics .one provide berthing for vessels 35 feet and larger in ienath. The
project also contemplates the development at' a marina along the north side of
Watson
island
to accor.modate somewhat railer vessels. less than 35 Feet in
length, in ::et berths and also to provide for the short tern or daily
to -the theme park.
6. Margaret Pace Park
Pace Park lying
east of;
visitor
north Bayshore Drive extends some 1,250 feet along
Biscayne Bey next to the Miami Woman's Club and is bordered on the north by a
basin some 600 feet long extending the entire width of the park. The park
develop,.ent at present is limited to passive recreation. The adjoining
residential area can be expected to be upgraded in the near future as the
pressure of development from Omni increases.
i
•
•
•
i
■
■
■
■
■
■
,aMiami
Cr}..S�;f��rr.l"51'i^ C I tl:l (}r�rcioF,��eitt_,...Studv- . ...� jtv -
'his bark :offers the opportunity for replacing he launching faciiities which
will be lost by the proposed deveiopment on Matson Island. the basin
adjo.ihinu the park could be deeloped to provide' moorings for approximately
100 boats at a minimum cost to the city or right be utilized fora junior
sailing program. Any development of this park for marine activities should
also include landside park development For the pedestrian.
A city owned spoil bank on the east side of the Intracoastal waterway lies
about one-half mile `eet 'ram this area. The spoil bank is already used for
picnics ann is 3 destination that shcuid be deveioped under the control of the
operator of any marina facilities that may be developed at this site, bats
can be easily beached on this spoil bank because of its relatively steep
slopes.
7. Magnolia Park
Magnolia Park, lying immediately north of the Julia Tuttle Causeway occupies
the entire city block, south of 39th Street. It contains approximately 2-1/2
acres and has approximately 450 feet of riprap protection along the bay. At
present the park development is 1 imi te_d to passive recreation. Although
exposed co the northeast winds, this site is ideally situated for the
develcprient of a marina which could be extended to utilize a portion of the
bulkhead along the north side of the Julia Tutic Causeway. This Causeway has
a fixed bridge clearance of 55 feet which would not unduly restrict the size
and type of boats which could use this facility. It opens iixnediately onto
the middle bay area:
4'.AEEN� Eli ./ TELESCw PLwNNERS„
C.N4!NEER5
RC►,ITfCT5. INC-
ME
•
MM
iMM
MM
r
04
Cnrnrehens ye ttnri.n ....,peYeinnentS,tddy '_City of Miami
S t .rr, Park
This park lies immediately south of Magnaiis Park and is separated front it by
the yeast ramp of Julia Tuttle Causeway. It has been developed for passive
recreation and is provided ,iith restrooms. In the development of the Julia
Tuttle t,auscway, :3 bulkheaded channel 100 feet :wide was left in Front of this
park for water r_ircuiation in the bay. The low bridge clearances on the Julia
Tuttle• Causeway preclude any marina development on this park:
3. MdrnihJside Park
This park it provided with a 100=foot wide launching ramp and with
car. parking
i±aciiities•to support it. The ramp has seven launching`. lanes.
The park is of ample size tb increase these facilities as
10. Lemon Park,
This t;ark extends from 6iscayne r;nulevard easterly to the bay and includes the
hayfrcnt property behind the Legion hail faci i i ties. It has approximately 700
feet of bayfront, currently has a launching ramp, and is paved for cars and
trailers. :although Legion Park has generally been developea as a senior
citizen facility, some 600 feet of shoreline remain undeveloped on which
marine related activities can be developed without impacting the present park
usage. This property lies immediately south of the Palm Bay Yacht Club and
could utilize this channel for access to the Intracoastal Waterway.
It`is a good location for a marina and should require little, if any dredging
for
boats of moderato
its development.
draft,
and should present few ecological problems for
GREENt.rwr oE,ESCA • PLANNERS • ENGINEERS • : ARCMtTECTS: INC•:
.,.n...... r.Hv...,
1
■
■
■
i s some
development
ivt i1_Dekkelonmt Ott "tudv = City of Miami
f\ irfj.0 ;p it bank containing approximately 10 ncres4 also owned by the city,
1.100 feet: From shore. Consideration should be Given to the
of this spoil bank as a boating destination with picnic .and other
Fncil iticis provided as a part of the overall roar1na development. This area
Would also serve the ilorningside fa>ii ity and would be an attractwn to All
boating in the north bay area.
Virginia, itev
the west shore area of Virginia
Fac i 1 i, tv
Jrrers
l v i nc west of the sewade treatment
the opportunity for ;:he development of marine repair .and
service- facilities which are particularly needed in the area. The access to
the area could be throuch the trench excavation for the force main delivering
sewage to the treatment plant. The top or the sewage force rra i n is ten feet
or more below mean low water, providing •in:D1e death for boats entering the
area. This trench provides a channel 200 feet wide to give access to the
area. It presently has a depth of about 3 feet at low tide.
Another oss ib i 1 i ty for access to the area would be
about to be constructed for the sludge line which will extend from downtown
Miami to Virginia Key.
A second posibility on Virginia Key is the development of a
marina presently
existing' in the lagoon between the beach line and the sewage treatment plant
site on the easterly side of the key. This area is currently used by a
Iirmited number of vessels. With entrance channel improvements and further
deveiopr..ent of the lagoon. several hundred boats could be accor->modaccd in the
area in a reasonable sheltered basin with close access to the ocean.
•
i
rri-v)r' rien51 ,'•
• ��
f yO%60i.
12. Brickell ?ark
This perk contains approximately 3=1/2atrct.,end extends" between Brickell
Avenue; end the channel west of 0lciughten isieniit It has approximately I7
feet of waterfront, it is presently developed for passive recreation. It has
m.
arkitr
no vehicular access or parking. the park is presently used by office workers
E.
E.
ffi• launchinn rano in this area, which is at the mouth of the Miami River and
convenient to 31scayne bay and offshore waters, the 1 imi ted access onto the
't'eav i I y traveled ur i cke i t :-venue limits the desirability of such a de-
•
MEM
MEM
MEM
MEM
tea.
MEM
in the rarer durinn lunch, While it would be possible to construct a boat
velOulfl'ent
th r`
trend toward increasing the density of development in this
area will increase Lhe pressure for the continued use of this site for open
pacernd passive ,recrcati.oh:
This tnctt is owned by the city and being deveioped as a 'hotel/convention
center crr'•piex• This property has Some 500 feet of waterfront along the
river, along which a walkway is proposed. The bulkhead line at the river
co'iid'be used as a marginal wharf for the temporary mooring of vessels util-
izing the hotel and convention center facilities in much the same manner as
the similar facility at the 'Dupont Plaza Motel on the east side of SE 2nd
Avenue.
14. 1-95 at S,, 4 Street
This recently acquired site is ideally situated for marina use as evidenced by
a small boatyard presently occupying the site. It abuts the right -of -:gay of
1-35 which at this point is a structure some 200 feet in width and is elevated
commtniity maKeS it 7A ideni r0C3i point roe their marine Oriented activities,
1-hiS-Hoolimunity, by baCkground and heritage, relates OlOselv to waterfrOnt
recreation and arine 'pe The compination of a dry boat 3toraee
Facility dt0 a launching rvp at this -.ite would ideally serve this community.
I. 1-95 at North River Drive
Thh citt currently hwns the property between tke Miami River and S.W. North
Myer rive extending fror, 1-35 to SW lst :troet. This area is at present
lar,3ely uced bv the fishing Fleet; the Wailace McCarg report recommends
further ,l.r..eloorent t thee activities in the area. Since this site is rela-
tiveiy close to the mouth of the river, with the fishing industry already
located there, it is of extreme importance to the economy of the entire area
and provides considerable employrcnt to members of the latin community of
which this area is a part.
16. LummuS, Park
The waterfront at this park. located on the north side of the. Miami River be-
tween N.W. 2nd ..,nu 3rd Avenues, is currently used by the Miami Pioneer Club
for the dockage of its boats. The limited depth of the property between the
river shoreline and N.W. North River Drive limits.any further increase of
marine activities in the area,
=
•
I
m
I
m offer; the onportunity or developing d rnajor dry boat storage facility in
m
conjUhttion with the deVelooment of the Parks .. . -
. .
=
m . itS ClOSe ordXimity to the mouth of the Miarni 'River miniM120 traVeLtime
m ,
t:owpti.,,,MArInj_Pevolonrient Study -.0Iv
soge 7 lent aboVe the Miami River level. This sic e under the strudtrg
•
r4:!duired to and from the bav and its bcation within the 'Latin American
•
•
•
II rh i pork containing approximately 10 .acres, extends socte `3o0 feet alohd the
mm Miami'i iver westerly cl' 0,W, 17th Avenue, The park: is nresently developed for
i
m passive recreation, it is heavily brooded with trees native to the area,
Access to the park Is somewhat tortuous and parking is extremely limited: The
i)r`Vt'toomlqnt „itutov
its ��fytiiarr�i,
Sewell Pari•
riv+irIrort is low and in its natural state.
Any developenet of this nark for
marine oricnte:i aurnoses wouid encounter severe ecoionical probler's as well as
opposition from residents in the area. It is uroed that the shoreline of this
mm
mark be urovided with substantiai bollards, piling, or other facilities which
could ha utr1 iced to assist in tieing up boats during hurricanes,
MM
1G, Gerry Curtis ark
Thi.s:pirk, lying .on,
Avenues -
use
presently
does rot appear that further marina development should :be considered
the north side of the
Miami 'Ri pier bettieen. 22nd end 2i th
1h-i. area.,
19. 11eireese Golf Course
The city owns the half section of land south b1 the Tamiami Canal extending
between. Douglas road and LeJeunc Road where: the Melreesc Golf Course is lo-
cated. Although this property is outside of the city limits and beyond the
specific scope of this study, it was felt that the waterfront along the
Tarniatai Canal should be developed with boi laras, pilings, or u'her facilities
which could be utilized to assist in tieing up boats during hurricanes.
has
an 30-foot wide launching
ramp which Is extensive
y.
MM
MM
MM
MM
C.(:mtlrt•nr'h',i viz r ?rina Devt•i?1(smrht ) ftCl`, City of Miami
22nd Avt.h't
hn city owns this Lract of about 7z1/2 nacres oh the.sotJth bank of the ";tJlr�lt
brano;t of the t1iarni River, which lies west of 22hd Avenue and north of tl,W.
It: street. This tract is partially developed for nark purposes, Limited
headroom under N.W. 22nd Avenue precludes any use of this Property for marina
i.)urnOses Sinless n net:: bridge of higher clearance were constructed. Irffle
and rclitee ec000miC considerations would ::reclude such can improvement in the
near future.
21, Fern
Thi`,
the
pu µhi) st".,
l ei'.rl.
,are;. S ies_ ,or'th of .t1':c south branch pf-, the ::t1iG tYi
22. Tract Along t:orth bank of Miami River at NW 17 Avenue
The city vwn: e :mail tract of land along the north bank of the t',iami.;.iver
N.W. 17 .venue which 7Qpears to be an unusucd portion of the ;highway
right-of-way. This Property is too l ini ted to . be sof any use for marine
purposes.
iiO va.l Le- t-
tier lye
:mar:I;nC
23. Tract SouthBank of Miami River Between N.W. 17 Avenue and
The city owns a tract of land on the south bank or the river between NW 17
Avenue_ and 1-95. This property appears to be a single int and is oEEE f i
sufficient size to be considered for marine development.
leg
11111".-
iMff
Co^�orc�t��n•��+%e.;fCi��r�z rlev,OPhrirnt •StidY , City off.. +`i_nri1
24. Tract oh 'Jorch Bank of Miami River - NW 12 Avenue
The city b:ns this tract on the north bank of the Miami River and adjoining
the r'tdht=cf-w,iv of '111 12 .-avenue, It extends 100 feet aloud the river dea
creasing to about 25 feet at N,W, 12 Street, While this tract offers limited
oeportuhit ies `or marginal docking, it should not be considered as a part of
the citv's ^arina devclepment program,
25. Lot Litt1 r'..ivt r NE C=4 :3tre t
The 'City -owns a single of o-t the qicio of the. Little River at the
•res,.cri•v .t,k or the Belle :head Island development, This lot, although
bordcrini~ :he
river,
development htoorarn,
:_c, Lot L.:
too small for consideration in the city' marina
river: NE 77 Ave nue
The '.it'i also owns', a lot on the ';oath Side of tht Little River betwt?en NE 2
Avbnur. ,;ic ?:tie F1 C Railroad. This lot is above the tia 1 twatcr barrier atud.
between . two bridles with 1 irii tea headroom and, therefore, offers no potential'
for i.nc i u: ioni within the marina program.
27. Biscayne clay Between 28 and 29 Streets, NE
The city owns .:n excavated area of some 3 acres' extend inn' westward about 1;50
feet from the bulkhead line of Biscayne Bay between 28 and 29 Streets. How-
ever, the
lack of landside property' at this site precludes its development by
the city within its marina program.
/
,• 'P.ANNFP5:•±' FNr,INrr AR ,,
eve ior^ eh t 5 tuciV. ., t of
•• n
the 11(1(10 Island ,cohort expansion, As such► it will be entirely used for
k
•
coritrrettial puraoses and will be unavailable for recreational boating►
■
'n, Stadium
zz
ii 5 Stadium, uE.nlchh, by the city some years ago Fer aduatrc sports, a ers
Lu:.:r.iu•; C .1 jnd 15 largely owned by the city and is destined to become a rant t Of
77 3 potential For the nroVisloh of moorinos which could be utilized zed during a
•
•
■
hurric3rc, The south side or this property adjacent to the Rusty r'el idan
restadr.ant h.`ls been leased or private '=,3rina development ano has been con=
3itJCred ,in this study :as :;n existing iaci l i t` .
GREENLEAF / TC . SCA + PLANNERS , ENGINEERS . ARCHITECTS. INC.
11111111111111111111111111IN
1A LE
sultialLti'( M55E3.ttitti
0
• A vt' &
0 rJ '
4) u =
R c u u
o. 0 U ¢
0 h d
u I....v I....
.1
J .0
Site
u o m `-
No. 1-0-Cation im :.:1 3 a.
1 binner-Key. • .A A 3 8 B
la i?avid Kennedy. •A A R 3 8
2 Wbinwright Park •8 i3 C 8 A
Miaalarina A $ A 3
+ 3iccntennial Park.:
5 `Ja tson island -
• Margaret Pace ark-,:,.
Macnoita 'ark
S.tern Park
10 Legion Park
11 'Virginia r;ay
lla
12 3rickcll Park
13 Bract
14 1-55.2 Cw b Street
15 1-95 .. U. liver Drive ►ve C C ? 3 8: C -C B B E Good commercial marine site
3 8 0 No further dev. Fully utilized
:A 3 C 3 0 Storm refuge potential
oti1irat imp
AvaiPabte
u
v
0
c n-
,
u 5
.A 1
N = Comments
txci 1 l e! t
deed
t� I F
Poor
Very post
8 9 0 N Present use can be expanded
8 3 0 !i Junior sailing club
ii C J 0 Off -snore mooring/destination do'CL
3 3 C 3 Add moorings at 8avfront Park
3 a C C Cestination dock
C 3 3 A Good marina site
B C A Smail boat ro. end/ramp. '+let and
dry beat storage
0 C 0 3 ^-,ough water bay. Marina
C 3 C } E`;ot a :oter.tial site
C 8 C 3 Future ramp exn ansion
C 2 C Amall boat. Ramo expansion
O c O 0 A 3aat repair/service. Marina
8 3 Marina
E Not a potential site
C E Hotel/convention site. Marginal
berths
17 Sewell Park
16 Gerry Curtis Park 3 B 8 B i'> 8 C 3 0 Present marine use is adequate
19 t!elrsese Golf Course 3 B' 0 0 A A E' 8 0 Storm refuge potential
20 Tract west of 22 Avenue B E C E C p 8' 8 E No potential, bridge restriction
21 F_rn isle ?ark B E 3 E C C C 8 E 1io potential, bridge restriction
22 Tract-r!iani River !:W 17 Av E 0 c 0 B C C 0 E Nr,t a potential site
23 Tract -Miami River ,W 17 Av 0 0 D 0 8 C B 0 E Noc a potential site
24 Tract -Miami River NW 17 Av 0 0 0 C B C 6 8 0 Not a potential site
25 Lot Little River NE 84 St E E 0 0 C C C 8 E Not a potential site
26 Lot Little giver HE 77 Av E E 0 E C C C E E Not a potential site
27 Biscayne Bay 23 & 29 St, ECECPBCCE Not a potential site
2E Lurnmus Island 8 B E 8 0 E E 0 8 Commercial/port expan;Isx1
29 Miami Marine Stadlum B 8 B A B B B C 0 Espanslon potential 14 Mini
A A lry boat storage. Ramp
EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL_Si:ITS,
Based on an inventory of marine oriented lands owned by the City of Miami) a preM
liminary assessment was made to determine the suitability of such sites for poten=
tial recreational boating facilities development.
The Site% Location Map indicates the various sites studied, as outlined in Table
INi , Site Suitability Assessment, In addition, certain offshore spoil islands were
analized. It was determined that the offshore islands, west of the channel (Sites
30-33), would not be suitable for a structured marine facility; however, two islands
west of the channel (Sites 34-35), may be suitable as a destination point for
limited park -picnic activities accessible by a boating mode of transportation.
• Teacher's Island, south of the Julia Tuttle Causeway could be developed in as-
sociation with the Margaret Pace Park marina development. Site characteris-
tics include:
• Sandy beach area
Deep water offshore from west shore
- Shallow water at north point of island
• Island vegetation
Bus Bench' Island (no nave on chart - bus bench on island), north of the
Julia Tuttle Causeway could he developed in association with the Magnolia Park
lommmw
Marina. Site characteristics include: UMW-
- Fine rock on wrest shore
- East shore is rocky - not suitable for shoreline docking
- Deep water offshore from west shore
Island vegetation
Based on the Suite Suitability Assessment (Table II-1), certain sites were consid- f
ered for potential marine development. These sites are classified into three 4
groups:
• Group I Suitable for boating activity development
Group II Suitable for mooring only during major storms,
as a protected area
Group III Suitable area as a destination point associated
with other park -open space activities
Certain development -management proposals are presently being considered by the City
of Miami for Dinner Key and Watson Island. The ultimate outcome of these proposals
will have an impact on the development of the other selected sites.
GREENLEAF / TELESCA • MANNERS.'• ENr-+INFERS
.ARCH ITECTS, tINC
r
■
•
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
—
11■
MEM
TABLE 11-1
tttE SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
A
A 1:lccellenl:
i t M r >
L U C ++ W L L 4
L" catlor� N roi .`0i a aL vim, vs £ Comments
Dinner Key A A B B 8 B B D B Present use can he expanded
1a David Kennedy
2 Wainwright Park
3 Miamarina
4 Bicentennial Park
u 6 Good
N i o a C Fair:
D Poor
E u u 11 0
n 0
V, c c vu° E Very Poor
I; L y c
A A B B 8 8 8 0 8 Junior sailing club
B B C B A B C D D Off -shore mooring/destination dotk
B A B A B B B C B Add moorings at Bayfront Park
B B C A A 8 B C C Destination dock
5 Watson Island B A B A C C 8 B A Good marina site
6 Margaret Pace Park BBB 8 C 0 B C A Small boat co, end/ramp, Wet and
dry boat storage
7 Magnolia Park BBBBBDCDB Rough water bay. Marina
8 Stern Park C D B C C B C D E Not a potential site
9 Morningside Park A 8 8 A B C 8 C B Future ram expansion
10 Legion Park C B B A B C 8 C A Small boat. Ramp expansion
11 Virginia Key (Ind) t B D B D E D D A Boat repair/service. Marina
lla Virginia trey (marina) B 8 C C B D C B 8 Marina
12 Brickell Park A B 0 B B C B C E Not a pctentiai site
13 Tract » Miami River B B B 8 8 D B C E Hotel/convention site. Marginal..
berths
14 1-95 is SW 4 Street B 8 B B D D 8 A A Dry boat storage. Ramp
15 1-95 9 No. River Drive C C 8 8 C C B B E Good commercial marine site
16 Lummus Park 8 B C B B B B B D No further dev. Fully utilized
17 Sewell Park A 8 D C A B C B D Storm refuge potential
18 Gerry Curtis Park 8 8 B B B B C B D Present marine use is adequate
19 Melrecse Golf Course B B D D A A E B D Storm refuge potential
20 Tract west of 22 Avenue B E C E C 0 B B E No potential, bridge restriction
21 Fern Isle Park B E B E C C C B E No potential, bridge restriction
22 Tract -Miami River NW 17 Av E D E 0 B C C D E Not a potential site
23 Tract -Miami River NW 17 Av D 0 0 D B C B D E Not a potential site
24 Tract -Miami River NW 17 Av 0 D 0 C 8 C 8 B 0 Not a potential site
25 Lot Little River NE 84 St E E D 0 C C C B E Not a potential site
26 Lot Little River NE 77 Av E E D E C C C E E Not a potential site
27 Biscayne Bay 28 G 29 St. E C E C D E C C E Not a potential site
28 Lummus Island B B E B O E E D B Commercial/port expansion
29 Miami Marine Stadium B 9 B A 8. 8 8 C D Expansion potential Is limited
i•
GG
mm
•
■
1
Proceeds 1 Proceeds Moorings
3 3 2 Jr, Sailing Club
5 5 4 Moorings
1 Proceeds Proceeds Marina
4 2 2 Ramp
6 6 5 Marina
2 4 3 Ramp
1 1 1 Service
7 :%,;:__.,�. 6 Marina
Ramp. Dry boat storage
Storm protection
Storm protection
Destination dock
Destination dock
Large boat destination
Small boat destination
beach
Small boat destination
beach
OROUP 1
1, Dinner Key
la, David Kennedy Park
3•
5.
6.
7.
10.
Miamarina
Watson Island
Margaret Pace Park
Magnolia Park
Legion Park
11. Virginia Key (Ind.)
lla. Virgini1 Key (Marina)
14. 1-95 & SW 4 Street
GROUP II
17, Sewell Park
19. Melreese Golf Course<<:
GROUP III
2. Wainwright Park
9. Morninaside Park
4. Bicentennial Park
34. Teacher's Island
35. 'Bus Bench' Island
TA1311 i 1 2
M EL6 MENV PRIOltitt
Dinner Watson
Key Island
Dinner Key
Watson
Island
GREENLEAF / TEI.ESCA • PLANNERS x ENGINEERS • ARCNITECTS," INC.`
A
r
LEGION PARK
v
iktrz
L
E
>-
Lu
CD
CG
}
SW- 4 Street
(10) (11) (11a) (14)
1 2
2 .3
5
N/A N/A' ;.N
•
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
IM P A E T
Landside Traffic
Waterside Traffic
Neighborhood Compatibility
Historic Preservation
Public Acceptance
Dredge and Fill
Water Quality
Water Hydro -Dynamics
Wake/Wave
Support Services
Air Pollution
Aquatic Resources
Aesthetics
K E Y:
DINNER KEY
1A13LE 11,3
1MrAti ASSESSMENT
DAVID KENNEDY PARK
MIAMARINA
MARGARET PACE PARK -
MAGNOLIA PARK
(1) (1a) (3) (5) (6) (7)
2 3 3 2 2 2
2. 3 3 2 3 3
:t 5 5 2 '.4
:N/A N/A 'N/A N/A N/A 'N/A N/A
5 Positive Value to the Area
4 Some Value to the Area
3 Minimal Impact
2 Small Negative Effect to the Area
1 Possible Adverse Effect to the Area
N/A Not Applicable
5= 5 3 4 4
N/A 'N/A N/A N/A
GREENLEAF / TE{ E$CA `+ P4.AN4ERS' a ENGINEERS
IMPAC
Landside Traffic
Waterside Traffic
Neighborhood Compatibility
Historic Preservation
Public Acceptance
Dredge and Fill
Water Quality
Water Hydro -Dynamics
Wake/Wave
Support Services
Air Pollution
Aquatic Resources
Aesthetics
KEY:
tAt3LE I1.3
IM'ACT ASSES511ENt
DINNER KEY
DAVID KENNEDY'PARK
MIAMARlNA
WATSON;ISLAND
MARGARET PACE PARK
MAGNOLIA PARK
(1) (la) (3) (5) (6) (7)
441,
LEGION PARK
VIRGINIA KEY (marina)
(10) (11) (lla) (14)
2 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 1
2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3
,S 5 5 '2 '4, 3 5 5 4
N/A -VA, N/A N/A' N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
''3' 4 4 4 ' 4 4
A- ` N/A .N/A N/A 3 2 2. NyA
5,' Positive Value to the Area
4 Some Value to the Area
3' Minimal Impact
2 Small Negative Effect to the Area
1 Possible Adverse Effect to the Area
N/A Not Applicable
GREENI-EAT ' EL( SSA.�i, P� l►NN ft
N/A
3 3 3
0
pe
W
0
SC
W. 49 ST
HIALEAH
j Hitr',11 WIDENER N.W. 79 ST. u; ,..
aA•jj ;j�
` a 2J �;> 1�� �JO
I
i W
O z c `9S� w Ij 3I
= d m >� ? � it 55 5T� ta
7 1
Z i -;o ` o
tAlAtAl
HIALEAH I N.W. 54 ST. 3) 032 I W
�. � CP.IVE 1 i a 73
SPRINGS '�I,� '
1 i ��IAMI1L} j
I a� AIR POP.T = PWY__ _Lam-- JULIA TUTTIE CSYIY. 5T
5 I
N. W. 36 ST. %' i{ i W. •. " I)
f':. 7 a all
1j W
'1 MIAMI IL'TEr":FAA i IvONAL . \L`�Qo �, a ,.95 035 z �� ;�
•s \'•'! IQ I N. W.20 ST. - ap
�
'>1 � �•• •VCNETIANI4YAYf101L11 a .I
AIRPORT
�PARYIN j.
I I l`Q• •I ,iTOil: ", F'.�2 uNCOt�+
`� �s't ;l L:' .... RD.WALL it
_ , `. /J/� , . •._..-.+.e....+�� y; ,.1..a' - W , I (try ' '•
y . 1 `� •+ ' 1 1,1 r.� r �
t: `,���_4•• I FLAGLER /I ST l ' :� ty` THL.Ip
4 FLLGI'.?i CT ^:, m{ 1;�. ;, 3 j
N. W. 103. ST
N. W. 125
N. W. 119
(7 )
N. W. 103
,! E. 125 ST.
7 123
-§),/� ST.
u it
BROAt
•
■
C a
a l'J
TRAIL „ti �..5. W. 8 Si 1`J1--•- ' ' 12
95
WIDE
ELVO.
t
;26
i
n1I
1,1,25
;I S W. 7 ST I
t I �,1 7+esT 14::-. ^P^ Fti?1�ZIUCt.+rrr,S c-it..AIAM1
�a3�T t�.
w S
IRACtE 22 -,,,..•_i�''' ,r"y ,2Q
Mil[ �"'..�'�"'�'� �l
?
< KILLIAN CR
JUNGLE.'
N. W. 79 ST
CORM WAY
CORAL
,.i GABLES
Q
bn BIRD AVE.
SUNSET CR. -..,
KA CR.
•
c.
�I
PA R\
�•rC}!!lp
TaCPICAL
GA k0LNS
U.5. PLANT
INTRODUCTION
STATION
M I SW ST
•
.?L
IA
•,t••t KEY
CCC^":UT GROVE PARK
•CL:riAlts
I
1.
�-(7
v)
Azi
SITE
LOCATION
MAP
f • � � CX:i:i•,•.L:,tR Y.
Z (TOLL)'�fA:!
VIZCAv,"
CCJNTY
MUSEUM ?•P j A !+.a l R
P A • l 1
.<?;
11
28
63115.
FISHES'. 151A,NC
I I A
• .^;::!A CEAC11
CRAt'mC
O P E F N L E A F / T E L E B C A
PK •NNI NY (NOINStiRY *PICI»ITICt■ thIC
,apt •PIICI[•Ll •Vprl1U■ M1daM1 PlOP11O* 33,3,
isitsmiekt
11111