The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutO-08873`fit/ t s 8/5/8 ORbtNANCE No, ...8 g AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORD/NANCE NO, 687I, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING SECTION 2 OF ARTICLE Xt=4 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE RnCC DISTRICT TO PROVIDE A NEW LIST OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL tt8f 8; AND TO ADD PRO-, VIStONB FOR EXPANSION OF NON -CONFORMING USES PER ARTICLE XXVIII, BY ADDING NEW PARAGRAPHS (m) AND (n) UNDER ARTICLE XI-4, SECTION 2, SUBSECTION 5; REPEALtNc ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CON- FLICT INSOFAR AS THEY ARE IN CONFLICT; AND CONTAIN INO A SEVERABILITY PROVISION. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of July 19, 1978. Item #3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 42-78 by a 5-0 vote (3 absent) recommending amending Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871, as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to amend said ordinance as hereinafter set forth; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordi- nance No. 6871, Section 2 of Article XI-4 Residential Office R-CC District be and the same is hereby amended to provide a new list of permitted and conditional uses, and to add provisions for expansion of non -conforming uses per Article XXVIII, by adding new paragraphs (m) and (n) to read as follows: (m) Record Shop. (n) An addition to a conforming or non -conforming building or structure which contains a non- conforming commercial use subject to the pro- visions of Article XXVIII, Section 1, (1), (a) through (f) or Section 2, (2), (a), and or Section 2, (3), (a). Section 2, That all laws or parts of laws in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed insofar as they are in conflict, Section 3, Should any part or provision of this ordinance ONLY this 24 day of odtobet PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: \\ G. Miriam Maer Assistant City Attorney be detlated by a court of cofivetent jutisdittion to be iftvalid the sate shall not affect the validity of the ordinance 68 a Whole, PASSED ON MIST ItEAIANO BY TITLE ONLY thi0B0___day ofSePtember ) 1978, PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND PINAt READING V TITLE 1978, Maurice A. Perre APPRQYEP AS TO FORM- ID CORRECTNESS: Geo e F. Knox, Ci Attorney MAYOR r 8873 • APPLICANT PRTITIO; REQUEST . BACKGROUND EXPLANATION PLANNINd PACT SHRRT City of Miami Planning Departient ► Consideration of a llehdinc# Ccitttt rehensiVe Zoning drdinanoe 6871 by at`ttetidinq Section 2 of ARTICLE Xt»4 RESIDENTIAL of PICR R-CC DISTRICT to nrov de a new fist of Permitted and conditional uses; and to add brovisions for expansion of non -conforming uses Oer ARTICLE XXVII t ► To expand the nerttitted and conditional uses and to accommodate limited expansicin of non- conforming uses in the R,oCC Zoning district. On May 17, 1978 the Planning Advisory Board held a workshop to consider whether to expand the list of conditional uses in the R-CC district to include antique shops. As a result of the workshop, the Planning Advisory Board directed the Planning Depart- ment to prepare revisions which would be consistant with the use list for the R-O-2.1 Zoning district as proposed by Dr. Ernest R. Bartley and Mr. rrod Bair, consultants for the City for overall revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The R-0-2.1. District is ultimally intended to replace the R-CC District. The intent of the R-CC Zoning district is: ....to provide opportunities for creating high quality low intensity professional office development on a compatible scale with a low intensity residential environment, and to encourage through development bonus and site plan review provisions,a compatible mixture of offices, low density apartments, and necessary commercial services". While the list of permitted and conditional uses can be expanded, it is questionable whether the uses should be expanded at this time to the extent recommended by Messers Bartly and Bair (see attachment). This full list of uses is not considered to be • 8873 AtCOMENDATIM PLANNINd DEPARTMENT hededtafy dotffiekciAl tetvidee it the ft2kCd bidt±idt,Ahoh,=dohfotMih4. 'tied ptoVittibh would toVe to btinq the cd ditri8t into dbhEottity With dthet 26ftifte4 diStrictss' DENIM of the expansion of uses and approval of the now,conforminq Use proViSioh, PLANNING IDEVtRA8n, June 21st, 1978. ADVISORY tOARD RecOMmended APPRoVAL, of an atendment to permit a record shop and expansion of nonconforming uses, July 19, 1978 by a 5-0 vote. CITY COMMISSION ADOPTED on lst reading September 28, 1978 r 8878 .1? the follOWihg Conditicihal uses Ate ptesehtly ihdluded in the 11,,CC.2ohihg district and ih the drat RO-2$1 digtfidtt (a) Dttig„Atqte§ (b) Newgstand or 8uhd1±y, (d) g125qty. (d) Fruit Or Vegetable Market (e) natdWare ot Matind 14ardWate (f Fish Market, Met Market or Delidataggen (g) Shoe RePair (h) Bakery Good g Shop (i) Barber Snops# Beauty Paflorg (j) Dry Cleaning Agencies or Pressihg establishments (k) Laundry Agencies (1) Restaurant The following uses are included in the draft PO-2.1 district but, not in th R-CC district, wearing apparel photographic supplies hobby supplies florists antiques toys book stores music stores gift shops package liquor photographic studios tailoring dressmaking millinery drapery coin operated laundry and dry cleaning OP° 8873 MIAMI REVIEW AIV5 DAft? i 'ECORtb Published Daily eitcept Saturday, Sunday an. Legal Holidays Miami, bade County. Florida. StAtE OF FLORIDA cOUNty OF bAbE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Becky Caskey, who on oath says that she is The ASsistaht Director of Legal Advertising et the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal 'Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in and, County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisemeht, being a Legal Advertisement or Notice ih the Matter of OtTY OP MIAMI Re! Ordinance No, 8873 in the X X X X Court, was published In said hewspaper in the issues of Oct, 30, 1978 Affiant further says that the said Miami Review and Daily Record is a newspaper published at Miami, in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami, in said bade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiaht further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication i, the said ample `0," , •�•k i . • 99nZtU ar Nofey'Pmil 'PDX? ' ret.•T F,Rtrida Large oo (SEAL) ,,t,iir,,,v,%"' My Commission expires July 17, 1982 MR•80 CItY bP MIAMI bAbi eOUNtY, 1=L81ttbA LEbAL NOTICE All interested will take notice that an the Nth day of October, 192a the City CotnrniSSion bt Ml6tnl, Florida adopted the tolibwing titled or- dinance: ORDINANCE NO. WI AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871, THE CbMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY AMENDING SECTION 2 OF ARTICLE XI.4 RESIbENTIAL OFFICE R•CC DISTRICT tO PROVIDE A NEW LIST OF PERMITTED AND CONbrTIONAL USES; AND TO ADD PROVISIONS FOR EXPANSION OF NON. CONFORMING USES PER ARTICLE XXVIII, BY AbbiNG. NEW PARAGRAPHS (m) ANb (n) UNbER ARTICLE XI•d, SECTION 2,SUBSECTION 5; REPEALING ALL OR- DINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT INSOFAR AS THEY ARE IN CONFLICT; ANb CONTAINING A SEVERAB.ILITY PROVISION. RALPH G. ONGIE CITY CLERK CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIbA Publication of this Notice on the 30 day of October 1978 10730 .. M103005