HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-79-0098RFC/rb
2/12/79
"SUPPORTIVE
DOczi it EN i S
rLLLUVV'►
RESOLUTION NO. 7 9 9 8
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE U. S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR
THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DUR-
ING 1979-82, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED
PROJECT ALLOCATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN APPROVED AT
DULY HELD PUBLIC HEARINGS; AND FURTHER AUTHOR-
IZING THE CITY MANAGER, UPON APPROVAL OF SAID
GRANT BY HUD, TO ACCEPT THE SAME AND NEGOTIATE
THE NECESSARY IMPLEMENTING CONTRACTS AND AGREE-
MENTS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY
COMMISSION PRIOR TO EXECUTION THEREOF.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
submit a grant application to the U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) for the proposed Community
Development Program during 1979-82, in accordance with the
attached project allocations which have been approved at
duly held public hearings.
Section 2. The City Manager, as Chief Administrative
Officer for the City of Miami, upon approval of the said
grant by HUD is hereby authorized to accept the grant and
upon receipt of same negotiate the necessary implementing
contracts and agreements to implement the 1979-82 Community
Development Program, subject to the approval of the City
Commission prior to execution thereof.
1979.
"DOCUMENT IEX
ITEM NO
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of FEBRUARY
ATTEST:
NGIE, CITY CLERK
MAURICE A. FERRE.
MAYOR
11
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: APPAS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
ROBERT F. CLARK
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
GE o F. KNOX, JR
CITY TTORNEY I
• 79-98
•
5Y
CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Joseph R. Grassie
City Manager
Dena Spillman, Director
Community Development
DATE. February 6, 1979
FILE:
SUOJECU. 5th, 6th, 7th Year Proposed
Community Development Funding
nrFFnENcea: 2nd Public Hearing
February 22, 1979
E NCLCdM/M/1:
On Thursday, January 18, 1979, a staff presentation was made to the City
Commission regarding recommendations for funding for 5th, 6th, and 7th
year Community Development funds. After the presentation, interested
parties were given the opportunity to comment on the proposals and make
additional recommendations.
Comments in 16 subject areas were received and have been reviewed by
staff. Recommendations on each are attached for your consideration.
It is requested that the City Commission approve the program as recom-
mended so that a final application for funding can be submitted to the
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
/rjf
Enclosure
"SLIP2ORTIVE
DOCUMENTS
7S
FOLLOW"
• 79-97
79 - 98
"SUPPORTIVE
DOCUMENTS
FALLOW„
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
ON 5th, 6th, 7th YEAR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FUNDING PROPOSALS
2-22-79
to CC
Os
Cra
S11 11 1 11
AREA
Allapattah
Coconut Grove
Culmer
J
1
ISSUE
Residents expressed a need
for Crime Watch services
on a neighborhood basis.
A request was made to
include legal services as
a project for the 5th,
6th and 7th years, since
the previous legal services
project is no longer avail-
able at the center.
The renovation of Culmer
Center at 490 N.W. llth
Street should be under-
taken with City and
County cooperation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Examine the needs of the area using•crime statistics and
have City Police Department implement a Crime Watch
program in the public housing area which is the area
where the complaints originated. Funding could be made
available to support this program to the level of $10,000
per year. This would replace the community crime pre-
vention newspaper which was not recommended for funding.
Funding of new social service projects is not being
recommended. Legal Services, Inc. has internally con-
solidated their services and services are available to
residents at S.W. 1st Avenue and 13th Avenue. Commu-
nity Lawyers is being funded by the County to provide
legal services in several locations in the County,
the closest of which is South Miami. However, these
services would not be available to City residents. It
would be appropriate that the County provide these ser-
vices for City of Miami residents as well as non -city
residents at the Human Resources Center, which is a
County facility.
The existing agreement with the County requires the
City to maintain the existing structure and permits
the County to operate programs from the facility. It
has been proposed that the County pay for renovations
and that the City then operate the facility. The City
is not prepared at this time to operate programs and
maintain the facility above current standards. This
position would be reviewed if funding became available
from other sources to operate a day care center.
Meanwhile, the planned Culmer Neighborhood Facility,
a County CD project, will be bid soon. The plans now
include a free-standing day care unit which, if funds
permit, the County would include in the neighborhood
facility construction to be completed in the summer
of 1980.
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATION
5th 6th 7th
$ 10,000 10,500 11,025
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
r.�r�rl�iYi�� III I I I
•
•AREA
Culmer
J
Edison -Little
River
ISSUE
Residents express con-
cern that the economic
development program in
Culmer is not achieving
the perceived goals of
the community. A re-
quest was made that
the program be improved.
Objection was made
to the recommendation
to not refund the cul-
tural arts program
in Culmer.
Dade County is withdraw-
ing funding from the
Little River Commerce
Association over the
next three years, the
City was asked to fund
this activity.
Residents of the Buena
Vista area asked that
the whole area get re-
built streets and that
it not be done as an
assessible project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATION
5th 6th 7th
Total funding for economic development activities
in Culmer remains at the same level as previous $106,050 111,352 116,920
years. However, the recommendation of which
agencies should receive partial or full fundir
would be made in May after further study and prrU'7
to the beginning of the new grant year. PPOR TIVT-
FOLLOyv„
An agreement for a new implementing agency for 21,000 22,050 23,152
the project is being finalized using existing funds.
It is recommended that funds be conditionally recom-
mended in the three-year plan at the same level as
in previous years, pending favorable evaluation.
As Dade County withdraws funding, consideration will
be given to assisting the agency to obtain other fund-
ing through other federal programs. Another alternative
would be the possibility of incorporating these ser-
vices into the City's overall economic development
program.
The current estimate to complete Buena Vista streets
is $10,000,000 for rebuilding. Community Development
funds in the amount of $1,000,000 is being allocated
over the next three years. Alternatives for use
of these funds include rebuilding of a few streets
or remacadamizing, landscaping and improving swale areas
in most of the area. Without leveraging the CD funds
with other funds, such as highway bonds, the total pro-
ject cannot be accomplished. Use of bond funds would
mean a prorated assessment for the ratio of bond funds
used. The recommendation remains at $1,000,000 of
CD funds to be used to remacadamize, landscape and im-
prove swale areas. If leveraging with bond funds is
acceptable then more can be accomplished in the area.
-0-
-0-
-0-
100,000 600,000 300,000
•
.AREA
Edison -Little
River
Little Havana
ISSUE
The City should complete
the N.E. 2nd Avenue
beautification project
as previously committed,
particularly the block
from N.E. 78 to 79
Streets
Contractors training
is funded by the County,
therefore, the City should
not fund the agency.
Catholic Services Bureau
wants to establish a new
day care program at the
Community Center.
Centro Mater, a currently
funded agency is request-
ing an additional $24,000
to provide additional
programs aimed at curb-
ing teenage delinquency.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In this area N.E. 2nd Avenue is being designated as a County
arterial in July, 1979. The design for the improvements
has not been completed and it is recommended that the
current budget of $100,000 be maintained for the 79th
to 84th Street Area. Further funds are not recommended
for this commercial area where an assessible project could
be developed. An alternative would be to use the $100,000
for design of a project from 78th to 84th Streets and make
the constructin a joint bond fund and CD project with a
prorated assessment for the bond portion.
The small amount of funding proposed is to supplement County
funds and to provide specialized information to contractors
and bidders who want to bid on City projects.
The Department of Citizen Services is currently evaluating
the need for a day care program at the Community Center.
There are other organizations in the area providing these
services, including a City of Miami Day Care Center in Little
Havana. It appears that expansion of existing centers might
prove to be more cost effective in light of the salary
structure proposed by the Agency and the requirements of the
proposed program. It is recommended that no new funds to
awarded at this time until a more detailed needs analysis
is developed. when this report is complete, if these ser-
vices are needed, the City will assist potential providers to
obtain other funding.
This agency currently receives CD funds in the amount of
$30,000 per year. It is not recommended that the scope
of the program be increased at this time as need has not been
established and additonal funds are not recommended for
other social service projects.
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATION
5th 6th 7th
-0-
-0-
$ 5,000 -0-
-0-
-0-
$ 31,500 33,075
-0-
-0-
-0-
34,729
AREA
Little Havana
ISSUE
Umbrella Agency -
$50,000 was requested for a
new cultural services prog-
ram.
Additional funding was re-
quested for Action, a trans-
portation program.
Industrial Home for the
Blind requested $50,000
to expand an existing prog-
ram.
An objection was made to
the amount of funding going
into the Specialty Center
project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
"SUPPORTIVE
SDP DOCUMENTS
TS
„
, aCUMENOW
F�
The proposal received from this organization suggested
dual responsibility for administration between the Florida
Repertory and Umbrella which represent$ a potential for con-
flicts in program coordination between the agencies. No
rationale is given why two such diverse programs have been
joined for purposes of this proposal. Further, Quality of
Llfe Programs are at the lower priority spectrum of service
category. Funding for this program is not recommended at
this time.
After evaluation by the Department of Citizen Services,
Action was awarded 13 CETA positions, which will offset both
the funding and staffing problems the Agency has reported.
In lieu of this action, and other funding received by
Action from City and County Community Development and Fed-
eral Revenue Sharing, it is recommended that no additional
funds be awarded Action Community Center at this time.
This agency currently receives $107,000 in City Federal
Revenue Sharing Funds, CETA funds, and income from the sale
of soap which program participants make. The proposal
submitted does not propose serving residents of Little Havana
specifically. There are some record -keeping problems with the
Agency, and the proposal did not contain sufficient information
on which to perform an in-depth evaluation. Additional funding
is not recommended at this time.
RECOMMENDED
5th
-0-
$ 10,500
-0-
PROJECT ALLOCATION
6th -lth
-0- -0-
.11,025 11,576
-0-
-0-
This project will provide a community -wide benefit. Other 1,000,000 2,000,000 244,000
sources of funding are being investigated. However, applica-
tions for Federal funds are judged competitively with other
cities' applications and may not be funded. Therefore, suffi-
cient funds to attract private investment must be earmarked.
Should other funds be received, CD funds allocated to this
project can be reprogrammed.
AREA
Model City
Wynwood
ISSUE
Area residents want
Manor Park funded as a
Neighborhood Strategy
Area.
urchase of YMCA site
at 58th Street & 15th
Avenue in King Heights
Area
Recommendation by several
target areas to increase
social service agencies
funding to reflect in-
flation.
The Garment Center ex-
pansion project was ques-
tioned as to the benefit
for the residents of
Wynwood. It was suggested
that it be subject of an
Urban Development Action
Grant application. Mer-
chants of the area also
stated a need for buses
to transport people to the
area.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Although this was originally considered as an NSA, there is
not enough CD money to start another NSA. The City will look
into using some of the housing bond fund money in this area.
This property is located within an NSA and is well -suited
for housing re -use. Strong consideration will be given
to acquisition of this site with either CD -or City Housing
Bond Funds within the next three years.
It is recommended that all social service projects funded
through Community Development receive a 5% increase in the
5th, 6th and 7th years, to reflect inflation.
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATION
5th 6th 1th
The Garment Center expansion is a project which will benefit the
economy of the City and provide many jobs for low and moderate
income workers. Due to the close proximity of the Wynwood
area it is expected many neighborhood arena residents would benefit.
This project will be the subject of an application for other
Federal funds, but those applications are reviewed in competi-
tion with the projects of other cities. It is felt that local
investment is warrented in this area. The County is responsible
for public transit in the area.
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0- 300,000 250,000
500,000 500,000 600,000
.• •
`.,irrrr!Rill
PROJECT
"SUPPORTIV
DOCUMEN! ;
5th, 6th and 7th Yeats'-J��-'��� r
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATIONS
CITY OF MIAMI
5th
6th 7th
3 Yr. TOTAL
ALLAPATTAH
NSA Rehabilitation
Streets
Land Acquisition
Public Housing Mini Park
Curtis Park Improvements
Market Analysis
Transportation Program
Crime Watch Services
Sub Total
COCONUT GROVE
Land Acquisition
Street Imrpovements
Housing Rehabilitation
Graphic Employment Training
Mental Health Clinic
Sub Total
CULMER
Culmer Housing Revitalization
Dorsey -Wheatley NSA Street Improv.
Land Acquisition
Overtown NSA Land Acquisition
Economic Development
Interim Assistance
Cultural Arts Program
Sub Total
$. 450,000
50,000
150,000
150,000
60,000
15,000
31,500
10,000
$ 916,500
100,000
350,000
50,000
136,500
$ 636,500
200,000
150,000
200,000
106,050
200,000
21.000
$ 877,050
$ 460,000
33,075
10,500
503,575
100,000
200,000
300,000
143,325
743,325
$ ---
510,000
34,729
11.025
555,754 1,975,829
910,000
560,000
150,000
150,000
60,000
15,000
99,304
31.525_
100,000
300,000
200,000
150,491
750,491
35,000 350,000
150,000 150,000
200,000 500,000
111,352 116,920
200,000 200,000
22.050 23.152
718,402 1,340,072
300,000
500,000
850,000
50,000
430,316
2,130,316
200,000
385,000
450,000
900,000
334,322
600,000
66.202
2,935,524
-I�III II
PROJECT
5th, 6th and 7th Years
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATIONS
CITY OF MIAMI
5th
6th
7th
3 Yr. TOTAL
DOWNTOWN
Ilummus Park Land Acquisition ---
NSA #1 Relocation 100,000
New Town in Town 50,000
EDCOM 625,000 625,000
Elderly Services 16,800
Sub Total $ 791.800
EDISON-LITTLE RIVER
Buena Vista NSA
Rehabilitation
Street Improvements
Land Acquisition
Sub Total
LITTLE
NSA #1
HAVANA
Street Improvements
Relocation
Riverfront Park
St. Improvements
Community Center 56,000
Transportation Program 10,500
Homemakers Service 89,250
Centro Mater 31,500
Cuban Memorial Blvd.* 20,000
Sub Total $1,257,250
550,000
100,000
100,000
$ 750,000
250,000
300,000
500,000
250,000
125,000
250,000
17,640
642,640
550,000
600,000
1,150,000
375,000
500,000
250,000
50,000
500,000
500,000
275,000
800,000
--- 625,000
18,522 52,962
818,522 2,252,962
550,000
300,000
850,000
250,000
150,000
500,000
1,650,000
1,000,000
100,000
2,750,000
500,000
825,000
1,500,000
--- --- 56,000
11,025 11,576 33,101
93,712 98,398 281,360
33,075 34,729 99,304
--- --- 20,000
$1,012,812 $1,044,703 $3,314,765.
Ilialiiiitiellii111111
PROJECT
5th, 6th and 7th Years
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATIONS
CITY OF MIAMI
5th
6th
7th 3 Yr. TOTAL
MODEL CITY
,King Heights NSA
Revitalization
Rehabilitation
St. Improvements
Land Acquisition
Tacolcy Recreation
Tenant Education
Sub Total
WYNWOOD
NSA
Rehabilitation
Streets
Land Acquisition
Senior Transportation
Sub Total
TARGET AREA WIDE PROJECTS
Garment Center*
Special Center *
Economic Development
Building Demolition
Dinner Key Island Park *
Tre Planting
Little Havana Fire Station
Historic Preservation
Handicapped Mobility
Contractor Training
Sub Total
$ ---
400,000
150,000
52,500
21,000
$ 623,500
100,000
75,600
$ 175,600
500,000
1,000,000
200,000
25,000
400,000
100,000
676,000
50,000
80,000
5,000
$3,036,000
$ 300,000 $ 250,000 $ 550,000
400,000 --- 800,000
50,000 • 700,000 .750,000
-- --- 150,000
55,125 57,881 165,506
22,050 23,152 66,202
$ 827,175 $1,031,033 $2,481,708
300,000 400,000 700,000
100,000 900,000 1,000,000
100,000 --- 200,000
79,380 83,349 238,329
$ 579,380 $1,383,349 $2,138,329
500,000
2,000,000
200,000
25,000
100,000
50,000
100,000
$2,975,000
600,000
244,000
200,000
25,000
100,000
50,000
100,000
1,600,000
3,244,000
600,000
75,000
400,000
300,000
676,000
150,000
280,000
5,000
$1,319,000 $7,330,000
PROJECT
5th, 6th and 7th Years
RECOMMENDED PROJECT ALLOCATIONS
CITY OF MIAMI
5th 6th
7th 3 Yr. TOTAL
OTHER PROJECTS
Planning and Management
Administration
Project Repayment
Contingencies
Sub totals
GRAND TOTALS
50,000
700,000
190,000
759,800
$1,699,800
50,000
.700,000
200,000
818,691
$ 1,768,691
50,000
• 700,000
200,000
878,076
$1,828,076
150,000
2;100,000
590,000
2,456,567
$5,296,567
$10,764,000 $10,921,000 $10,921,000 $32,606,000
*Other funding sources such as Urban DEvelopment Action Grant,
Economic Development Administration, Urban Parks, etc. will be
sought for additional funding.