The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-79-0435"SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW„ RESOLUTION NO. ; "�;9 ' 3 5 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PERMIT TO CLM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO FILL TWO BOATSLIPS, CONSTRUCT RIPRAP BULKHEAD AND REPAIR AND COMPLETE A WOODEN BOARDWALK ALONG THE BULKHEAD ALONG THE SHORE OF THE MIAMI RIVER AT SNUG HARBOR SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF PLANS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND THE U.S. CORPS OF ENGINEERS WHEREAS, CLM Development Corporation is the owner o Lots 7 through 21 of SNUG HARBOR as at a riprap recorded in Plat Book 9 Page 79 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida'. a WHEREAS, CLM Development Corporation proposes type bulkhead along the Miami River and to fill tw boatslips and o construe a partially eroded section of shoreline, a repair and complete a wooden boardwalk along the new and existing bulkhead; WHEREAS, shall be read WHEREAS, and the State's biological reportand: findings thereof into the record and made a part thereof; and the proposed project biological resources; and WHEREAS, turbidity screens boatslips prior to filling; and should help, improve the will be placed across the DOCUMENT _ IN,p, x WHEREAS, CLM Corporation has made and, Federal, permits;. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT THE CITY OF`MIAMI: • ITEM NO. application for State RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF /f CITY COMMISSION MENG OF "JUN 2 5 t`Y7 earturui te79.7 4, 3 -79- ':/3J 4•-! Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to issue a permit to CLM Development Corporation to fill two boatslip construct a riprap type bulkhead and repair and complete a wooden boardwalk along the shoreline of the Miami River adjacent to property known as Lots 7 thru 21 of SNUG HARBOR (91-79). Section 2. The issuance of said permit is subject to approval of plans by the Department of Public Works. Section 3. The issuance of said permit is contingent upon approval and permits from State and Federal Governmental Agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED this. 25th ATTEST: CTY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: ay o Maurice June 1979. "C Pp'flpT!\!r FOLLO U" APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ASKS STANT CITY ATTORNEY GEO F . KNOX, 4pc. , CI ATTORNEY -2- 79-435 i•FIUM: Donald W. Cather Director June 4, 1979 Fill and Bulkhead Permit at SNUG HARBOR The attached resolution is for the June 25, CLM Development.Corporation, the owner of Lots 7 thru 21 of SNUG HARBOR has requested permission to fill two boatslips and construct a riprap type seawall along a partiallyeroded shoreline of the Miami. River. Plans for this project will be approved by the Department o Pub1c Works before issuance of any permit. Additional permits for this workare to be obtained from the. U.S. Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental" Regulation of the. State of Florida. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDS ADOPTION OF THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION SUBJECT TO SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF PROPER PLANS AND THE NECESSARY PERMITS FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1979 Comm.Meetin WKB:vh <' 435 3301 GUN CLUB ROAD P.O. BOX 385B WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION SOUTH FLORIDA SUBDISTRICT BOB GRAHAM GOVERNOR JACOB D. VARN SECRETARY WARREN G. STRAHM SUBDISTRICT MANAGER Mr. Le a Taylor CLt4 Development Corporation, 2833 Bird Avenue i anu, FL 33133 Dear :sir. Taylor: Re: CLM Development Corp. , DF 13-18793 is As' we advised you on April' 12, 1979 your application incomplete`. without local approval, pursuant to Section 253.124, Florida Statutes, for filling waterward of the existing mean/ ordinary high water line. Please submit the enclosed copy of our biological comments together with your permit application to the Boardof County Commissioners/City Council or their authorized permitting authority. Section 253.124, Florida Statutes, states tthatethe county commission/city council ". . • (biological) report and findings thereof." It further states, "The report shall be read into the record and duly considered at the same meeting at which the board of county commissioners or other authorized body takes final action on the application for permit You will need to obtain a copy,of the minutes of the meeting or an appropriate indication of the local approval. This letter, resolution or copy of the minutes should be sent to this office. Your application' will remain incomplete without valid local approval.If you have any questions concerning this procedure, please contact us. Roy M. Duke Permitting Section I1ead State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION PERMIT APPLICATION APPRAISAL PART ONE: ;�Z.9 On site inspection x......, Yes- ............ No Date of Inspections 3 Permit Application No, : .. DF...13....1.8.7.33" Dated'. , ..3126/79 , . If revised.` date of revision: .......,.... ..... ........ CLM Development Corporation ,,,,,,, Applicants name: 2833 Bird Avenue g M' ` = iami, Florida Address: 35 - Township .. ......3S......,,_ ...... ,Range Location of project: Section 1000 *1.•1. North Ri.lrer Dade Local references on the Miami River. 41E County prive, „ Project water dependent?. Yes No Water classification of project area: IV Water classification of adjacent waters: boardwalk, — bulkhead,, rit, rah Purposeof project: •Filling,, Description of proposed project and construction techniques. Quantify-- area of project which extends into wetlands A. and/or waterward of the apparent mean high water line. III oses to` fill. two existing boat; slips and portions Applicant propons. -ulkl%and ead, of an ;eroded shoreline, install_ a total rip-raape'bulkew-ead_eaiting repair and coriplete a wooden boardwalk along bulkhead. Total amount of, fill placed waterwardific of theiline of hniques mean. high water is` 500 cubic yards. were not addressed. DER Form PEf1M 16.10.(Dec 75) Page 1 of 5 435 a. BluitItysic..t1 features of general urea (include comments concerning extern ot development of lufjo ming pi noel The adjacent Miami River is heavily utilized by a variety of commercial vessels (fi.sh,shrimp boats, tugs, etc.) as well as private recreational boats. As a result of this heavy traffic, as well as associated commercial establishtnents bordering on the Miami River, water qualityhas been degraded and aquatic ' habitat lost due to the cumulative effects of these enterprises. Waterfront properties in the vicinity of the project site have been btilkheaded and numerous boat tie-up facilities (dolphin - pile, docks) exist. • No significant aquatic biota were observed within the general area, and biological productivity throughout the Miami River was very poor at best. C. Biophysical features of specific project site (and spoil site when appropriate, include identification of bottom types). The specific project site reflects the sterile conditions mentioned above. Currently numerous house boats utilize the shoreline adjacent to the site. There is no apparant hook-up for sanitary facilities, thus domestic waste empties directly into the river. The two boat slips the aopl.i.cant wishes to fill are currently in a state of disrepair and serve as •a storehouse for stagnant water. The shoreline adjacent to the project site is bulkheac:led with a marginal dock, except for that portion the applicant wishes to fill, which is natural rip -rap. No biota were observed within the project site and biological productivity must be considered poor. Difi Form PERN1 16.10 IDec 75) Page 2 of 5 Ahlir#va..NAN"...**WuRe.u.K.miNeivoymorgodum PART TWO PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION MAY CAUSE: i n in nearby bodies of water. Increased rates of eutrophicat o 211 RedUced caPacitYirytinft.giisshhboadodieswoufdwiitaetepr;opagation. propagation and harvesting in receiving of shellfish billtY of the ntert Interferenceerence with the ahoafb taatntoogesmucecoe,ssfully support 3 with the abilityof fish ment or feasibility successfully supportand wildlife population, liminating the ability of surrounding wetlands to filter, and wildlife resources. its. age of the habitat to 4.414 4444444 ''' ' • 10, Discharged sUbstan 'mal, or plant life, 11. Chlorides to exceed 250 mg/I in bodies of freshwater. 5, 6. f7rgadatiOn':of,•-local,Water,quality by redUcing or stabilize or rgedettte to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable studge form nutrients. s SUffictent„.,td:be.:...defeterro,., ltiOn due to,increaied-. 7 Discha 'I scum,andother materl i chargad meterialinaMountsw,, bi WhiCh could be stoXicr harntful.to, 18, 1-ea . 0.30 mg/I.; ... f-cial uses ot the • 19, lArorsnent°icetxoceexeaceed?:°5 rngidLing waters to exceed 15 mgila'nd tastes which interferewith ben" 1 •-- oils and greases surrounding t oil, resulting in objectionable - odors- above background. 22, Visible birtindgeswceanters. standard candle tur , w 5 ppm bidimeter d to X 23. surrounding to bexioecineoegtnn 5t1°e jaTrtUi as relate alseeds whichwould wthoeuvicailuccaeluus sc°eetnliusLoalnvecde c°0xiVidgit.nlotto's•betidmeep.ressed bel° or 24. Dissolved c/xxVyggen demand to depressed or make the 'cal dxdygteo exceed 26. Dissolved so ' execeoefd freshwater as Specif ic conmducctotahnt 25, Biological o exceedsonodmegmilandvagtmuear.tInethndlydagvhattoa.gpecr:oeoarsedground levels more than 100% above back Cyanide or cyanates vary more than 27. exceed 500 29. The pH of receiving waters to tsoicrwd detectable in receiving bodies.of water. 1000 Ingli at aloly: waters. to be in above bo 30, or below IldrmalPH t the The lower pH vale to be Iess than 6.0. 32, The eteurpepet pH va.lu detectable in receiving (urider Chapter 31. • s of waterto exceed . 33341 prvicciojerssciutgircVnatttooleovbeeifilstihnteoreocereoxiciveeeientdgabrceoradlt.eI eriaL) established°di eSof water. 17.3' r 1°r ida Statutes) for the existing water Worm counts • . •?,', .',L.,Th": ''' 1' ir" 12.exceed 250 Chlorides to mgil in groundwater because k)r1 in Perc° a 13. Chlsurorides erunoff rates. more than w above normal brackish or saline waters to increase 1145., Copper residues to exceeid.o°171.59m/Igil. _ 16. Chromium residues to exceed: 0.50 mg/I hexava.le.riti 1.0 mg/I - I hrchilitirn in e u Zinc residues to exceed. the rec.ewing waters.; mg/i.i;fi effluent discharg , • or 0.05 mg/I after reasonable mixingin reported as p.,e , • h nolic-type compounds, calculate h no to exceed 0.001 17, P e exceed 0,05 mg/I.; • f• l'ern (111,1 1(i 1() 'Dec 75) l'atie 4 c)f 5 "-yr • fr.! ( A t) • ft i PART TWO PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION MAY CAUSE: 11.1 1, Increased rates of eutrophication in nearby bodies of water, Reduced capacity of shellfish propagation and harvesting in receiving bodies of water. Interference with the ability of the habitat to successfully support fish and wildlife propagation, Interference With the ability' of the habitat to successfully support fish and wildlife population. Impaired management or feasibility of management of fish and wildlife resoUrces, Degradation of focal water quality: by reducing or eliminating the ability of surrounding wetlands to filter, stabilize or transform nutrients. Discharged substances which settle to form putrescent or otherwise objectionable sludge deposits. Floating debris, oil scum, and other materials, in amounts sufficient to be deleterious, 9 Discharged material in amounts which create a nuisance. 10. Discharged substances in concentrations or combinations which could be toxic or harmful to human, animal, or plant life. 11. •Chlorides to exceed 250 mg/I in bodies of freshwater. 12. Chlorides to exceed 250 mg/I in groundwater because of a reduction' in percolation due to increased surface runoff rates. 13. Chlorides to increase more than 10% above normal in brackish or saline waters 14. Copper residues to exceed 0,5 mg/i. 15. Zinc residues to exceed 1.0 mg/I 16. Chromium residues to exceed: 0.50 mg/I hexavalent, 1.0 mg/I total chromium in effluent discharge;. or 0.05 mg/I after reasonable mixing in the receiving Waters.; 17. . Phenolic -type compounds, calculated or reported as phenol, to exceed 0.001 mg/I.; 18. Lead to exceed 0.05 mg/I.; 19. Iron to exceed 0.30 mg/I.;. 20. Arsenic to exceed 0.05 mg/I.; 21. Oils and greases in surrounding waters to exceed 15 mg/I. 22. Visible iridescent :oil, resulting in objectionable odors and tasteswhich interfere with beneficial; uses of the surrounding waters. Turbidity to exceed 50 JTU as related to standard candle turbidimeter above background. 24. Dissolved oxygen to be artificially: depressed below the values of 5 ppm. 25. Biological oxygen demand to exceed values which would cause dissolved oxygen to be depressed below 5 ppm or make the biological oxygen demand great enough to produce nuisance conditions. Dissolved solids to exceed 500 mg/I as a monthly average, or exceed 1000 mg/I at any time. Specific ,conductance of freshwater streams tobe increased more than 100% above background .levels or exceed 500 microhms/cm 28. Cyanide or cyanates to be detectable in receiving bodies of water.' 29. The pH of receiving waters to vary more than oneunit above or below normal pH of the waters. 30. The lowerpH value to be less than 6,0. 31. The upper pH value to b.e more than 8.5. 32. Detergent levels in receiving bodies of water to exceed 0,5 mg/I. 33. Mercury: to be detectable in receiving bodies of water. 34. Coliform counts to exceed criteria established (under Chapter 17.3, Florida Statutes) for the existing water ctassiticjtinn in the project area. Dt'11 Funn 1'FNM'16,10 (Dec 751 P.iye 4 of 5 PART THREE If certification is approved or waived, PL 92-500 requires that effluent limitations be specified as part of the certification. When applicable, specify; 1. Monitoring required of the applicant (include frequency),. 2. Effluent limitations (i.e., those, limitations_ established under Chapter17.3, Florida Statutes, for particularwater classifications as well as water quality standards). Be specific, Recommendations for water quality; control during ,construction DER Form PERM 16.10 IDec 751 :Page 5 of 5 435 20 • O - :TA 38-5 .reL"/:/G4G 1%W CC'1?..L-7G"l:•G• _.CCU *,577 '1c7' '- 4-- A /-' .00 19-3 10- 5 S ,8 4 r de7e/C/e. T77 %" -A '4', 72 Lac F/GO' • • 9. 435.