Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #09 - Discussion ItemFROM: CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM 1979 HLE: Yacht Clubs Non Resident Differential Formula REFEREticcstinterimStatus Report The non residential fee structure advocated by the City was presented individually to each Club. .: This formula was based`upon the.` Ad valorem property tax unit cost,' derived from: Total property tax base Total City population Tax unit. cost., Rounded off to $',39, 171, 187.00 350,000 The formula represents a per capita cost for City of Miami for non resiclent Club members. as applicable to non -City of Miami tir>i,ig' the unit cost formula resident members Coconut Grove Sailinc_Club:, non -City' of Miami resident Miami Yacht Club: 590 members Miami residents (531 members Miami Outboard Club: 370 members 86% of total membership non -City of Miami residents` (319 members x $112 = $35,728.00). . 111.92 112.00 services' provided by the 612 members 74% of total membership (453 members x'_$112;; = $50,736.00). 90% of..total membership non -City' $112=`$59,472.00). Total non -City of Miami resident rental fees would $145,936 based upon existing membership. June 7, 1979 A preliminary negotiation session was ropresentatiVes of the Miami Outboard Club. represent held with of June '12,`1979: A joint meeting was held with the City Manager and. staff at which all three Clubs were invited to attend. This joint meeting; with the ::Clubs; was held for the purpose of establishing a format and time table for pending negotiations. July 3, 1.979: A negotiation session was held with the Coconut Grove Sailing Club representatiVeS. At this meeting the Club represent- atives were'`informed of the motion of the City Commission meeting of June 24, 1979, which deals with the proposed Charter Amendment No. 2 affecting leasing and contracting of the City's waterfront ..yrJQta.t iv* 1 property. July 5,"1979: A negotiation session was held with the Miami Yacht Club Commodore representing his .-organization. At. this meeting the Club representatives were informed of they. motion of the City Commission meeting of June 25, 1979, which deals with the proposed Charter Amendment No. 2 affecting leasing and contracting of the City 's waterfront property. In each case the Clubs indicated that after a review of the proposed non resident differentialformulawith their membership, .they would respond to the City in writing. JEG:WHH;bf,; cc: Humberto'