Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-0907300 ORDINANCE NO. q, () '' AN ORDINANCE AMENDINC= ORDINANCE NO. 6871, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING: ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGINP THE 7ONIMG CLASSI- FICATION OF LOTS 3, 4 & 5, BLOCK 7 PLUS S104.6' OF WOMAN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION (UNPLATTED), AND LOTS 15-24, BLOCK 8, LOTS 1-19, BLOCK 9, AND W20' OF LOT 4, LOTS 5-12, BLOCK 10; BILTMORE SUB (6-67) BEING APPROXI- MATELY 20-158 NORTIiEAST 41ST STREET, FROM R-3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-C (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) DISTRICT, AND BY r?AKIN(' THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP 14ADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLF III, SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING; ALL, ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. WHEREAS, the Miami Planning; Advisory Board at its meeting of January 30, 1980, Item No. 1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 7-30 by a 4 to 2 vote (2 members absent) recommending a change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; and 41 1ER.EAS , the City Commission, after careful consideration of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF 'T'HF CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of Lots 3, 4 & 5, Block 7 plus S104.6' of Woman.'s Relief Association (Unnlatted), and Lots 15-24, Block 8, Lots 1-10, Block 9, and 1•120' of Lot 4, Lots 5-12, Block 10; BILT14ORE SUB (6-67) being approximately 20-158 Northeast 41st Street, from R-3 (Low Density Multinle) to R-r (Residential Office) District and by making the necessary changes PO in the zoning district map made a hart of said Ordinance No. 6871, by reference and description in Article III, Section 2 thereof. Section 2. That all laws or parts of laws in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby revealed insofar as they are in conflict. Section 3. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of. the Ordinance as a whole. PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th day of FEBRUARY , 1980. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL RFAnINC BY TITLF ONLY this 18 day of -March , 1980. MAURICE A. FERRE M A Y 0 R ATTEST: TI LP G. ONGIETY CLERK APPROVED AND PREPARED BY: TT—HICHAEL HAYGOOD ASSISTANT CITY ATTOFAY APPR=D AS TO FOFJ1 AND CORRECTNESS: . •'ya+il, W 4%. CITY -2- 9073 1 AND DAILY RECORD ;t Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami. Dade County, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF DADE Before the undersigned authority personally ap- peared Becky Caskey, who on oath says that she is the Assistant Director of Legal Advertising of the Miami Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Dade County. Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement or �. Notice in the matter of DAD Pty LEG � N it L r 1( CITY OF MIAMI a3`r1, All Interested will take notice that on the Idth day of March, 100, the City Commission of Miami, Florida passed and adopted the Re: Ordinance No. 9073 following titled ordinance: ORDINANCE NO, "M j in the .... ... .... .... ..X.... X....X........... .... ................... Court, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6l11, THE _ was published in said newspaper in the issues of COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION — March 2 6, 1980 OF LOTS 3, 4& 5, BLOCK 7 PLUS S104.6' OF WOMAN'S P.FLIEF ASSOCIATION (UNPLATTED), AND LOTS 15.24, - BLOCK$,.I.OTb4e19,, k 44A D W20' OF LOT O S 5- 12, BLOCK 10; BILTMOR•T1jifPs Affiant further says that the said Miami Review APPROXIMATELY 20.158 NORTHEAST 41S.T STREET, — and DailyRecordisanewspaper published atMiami, in FROM R•3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-C said Dade County. Florida, and that the said newspaper (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) DISTRICT, AND BY MAKING has heretofore been continuously published in said THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sun- MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. U71 BY day and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III, second class mall matter at the post off Ice InMiami, in SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL I said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN _ preceding the first publication of the attached copy of CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILtTY advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corpora- CLAUSE. — tion any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication /� RALPH G. ONGIE in the sai ewspaper /`G('f)UjU�!` CITY CLERK — CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA �• fF . ....... .... Publication of this Notice on the 26 day of March IM ��' ,o A 3126 _MN-032602 _. p or o and sit �! before this 2�B dl►fr t _..MaL- .... ... .iu.. $1.0. w....8.0 �t ! �r; Florida at Large (SEAL) My Commissi 1922. MR-61.1 19 20 it 22 23 24 i3 t5 t6 I' 18 19 21 22 2'. 24 19 2 21 22 23 � t1 10 9 8 T 6 t4,2 I� 4 - 12 5 13 15 16 IT I8 ! 2021 22232 14 8 '.,-. I-....''. 20 21 12212312 J M91M V& I- !Z I 1 4 41 mogul NO 1--. aim WWAM@i P, Fee I :;! .1k, OA111 jumm- - 16 1719 i 8 20 21 22 �23 24 J-.. 322 N.E. 4 383 14 13 12 11 10 a 7 6 5 3 t o `j 6 0 H16 IT IB 19 8 21 22 23 24 2 N_:_ 4 t M,�2 l N toe 42 S T. O Ito - 40 43L t0 1 4 6� 7 3 6: MORMOMMISP mw r1 S 1 .ate -KM g A� O[7FM OWN WIN OUNG'S ADD r TR.5� N.E. 42Z��G. -'TR Cl! A T� 0 r, - 300 WS16 � Q7N :�.a a r C Iso .a5 �J2a 3 J 2 3 * 1� go - N.E. 39 IST/ !00 X 3 Po- 9-,& n 3 Ni 56 fl! 3 I-- ST ell', I-N � .._.._ i _ 5 zoned;R-3 which prohibits non-residential uses., Office development would be .compatible with the existing residential character of the. street and could- be accommodated within existing apartment structures that,predominate. Showrooms should be restricted to the area U'etween NE 3Gth and 40th Streets. The proposed expansion'.of the Design Plaza north.to 41st'Street is recommended in the Miami=Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan...' This proposal for rezoning has been.,prompted.,.by a'' request,of the Decorators Row Merchants.Associa- tion'for additional space for business develop- ment north of Street RECOMMENDATION PLANNING APPROVAL. DEPARTMENT PLANNING ADVISORY Recommended January''30 I s'0 by'a 4-2 vote. BOARD CITY CO�,INMISSION Passed lst Reading on rebruary 28 :1950 `