HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-0907300
ORDINANCE NO. q, () ''
AN ORDINANCE AMENDINC= ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING: ORDINANCE FOR THE
CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGINP THE 7ONIMG CLASSI-
FICATION OF LOTS 3, 4 & 5, BLOCK 7 PLUS
S104.6' OF WOMAN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION
(UNPLATTED), AND LOTS 15-24, BLOCK 8, LOTS
1-19, BLOCK 9, AND W20' OF LOT 4, LOTS 5-12,
BLOCK 10; BILTMORE SUB (6-67) BEING APPROXI-
MATELY 20-158 NORTIiEAST 41ST STREET, FROM
R-3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-C (RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE) DISTRICT, AND BY r?AKIN(' THE NECESSARY
CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP 14ADE A
PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871 BY REFERENCE
AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLF III, SECTION 2,
THEREOF; BY REPEALING; ALL, ORDINANCES, CODE
SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT; AND
CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning; Advisory Board at its
meeting of January 30, 1980, Item No. 1, following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 7-30 by a 4 to 2 vote (2
members absent) recommending a change of zoning classification
as hereinafter set forth; and
41 1ER.EAS , the City Commission, after careful consideration
of this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the
general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant
this change of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF 'T'HF
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is hereby
amended by changing the zoning classification of Lots 3, 4 & 5,
Block 7 plus S104.6' of Woman.'s Relief Association (Unnlatted), and
Lots 15-24, Block 8, Lots 1-10, Block 9, and 1•120' of Lot 4, Lots
5-12, Block 10; BILT14ORE SUB (6-67) being approximately 20-158
Northeast 41st Street, from R-3 (Low Density Multinle) to R-r
(Residential Office) District and by making the necessary changes
PO
in the zoning district map made a hart of said Ordinance No. 6871,
by reference and description in Article III, Section 2 thereof.
Section 2. That all laws or parts of laws in conflict
herewith be and the same are hereby revealed insofar as they are in
conflict.
Section 3. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance
be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
the same shall not affect the validity of. the Ordinance as a whole.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28th day of
FEBRUARY , 1980.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL RFAnINC BY TITLF
ONLY this 18 day of -March , 1980.
MAURICE A. FERRE
M A Y 0 R
ATTEST:
TI
LP G. ONGIETY CLERK
APPROVED AND PREPARED BY:
TT—HICHAEL HAYGOOD
ASSISTANT CITY ATTOFAY
APPR=D AS TO FOFJ1 AND CORRECTNESS:
. •'ya+il, W 4%.
CITY
-2-
9073 1
AND DAILY RECORD
;t
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami. Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE
Before the undersigned authority personally ap-
peared Becky Caskey, who on oath says that she is the
Assistant Director of Legal Advertising of the Miami
Review and Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday,
Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at
Miami in Dade County. Florida; that the attached copy
of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement or �.
Notice in the matter of
DAD Pty LEG � N it
L r 1(
CITY OF MIAMI a3`r1,
All Interested will take notice that on the Idth day of March, 100,
the City Commission of Miami, Florida passed and adopted the
Re: Ordinance No. 9073 following titled ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO, "M j
in the .... ... .... .... ..X.... X....X........... .... ................... Court, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6l11, THE _
was published in said newspaper in the issues of COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY
OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION —
March 2 6, 1980 OF LOTS 3, 4& 5, BLOCK 7 PLUS S104.6' OF WOMAN'S
P.FLIEF ASSOCIATION (UNPLATTED), AND LOTS 15.24, -
BLOCK$,.I.OTb4e19,, k 44A D W20' OF LOT O S 5-
12, BLOCK 10; BILTMOR•T1jifPs
Affiant further says that the said Miami Review APPROXIMATELY 20.158 NORTHEAST 41S.T STREET, —
and DailyRecordisanewspaper published atMiami, in FROM R•3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-C
said Dade County. Florida, and that the said newspaper (RESIDENTIAL OFFICE) DISTRICT, AND BY MAKING
has heretofore been continuously published in said THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT
Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sun- MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. U71 BY
day and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III,
second class mall matter at the post off Ice InMiami, in SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL I
said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN _
preceding the first publication of the attached copy of CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILtTY
advertisement; and affiant further says that she has
neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corpora- CLAUSE. —
tion any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the
purpose of securing this advertisement for publication /� RALPH G. ONGIE in the sai ewspaper /`G('f)UjU�!` CITY CLERK —
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
�• fF
. ....... .... Publication of this Notice on the 26 day of March IM
��' ,o A 3126 _MN-032602 _.
p or o and sit �! before this
2�B dl►fr t _..MaL-
.... ... .iu.. $1.0. w....8.0
�t ! �r;
Florida at Large
(SEAL) My Commissi 1922.
MR-61.1
19 20 it 22 23 24 i3 t5 t6 I' 18 19 21 22 2'. 24
19 2 21 22
23
� t1
10
9
8
T
6
t4,2
I�
4
- 12
5
13
15
16
IT
I8
! 2021
22232
14
8 '.,-. I-....''.
20 21 12212312
J
M91M
V&
I-
!Z I 1
4
41
mogul
NO
1--.
aim
WWAM@i
P,
Fee
I :;!
.1k, OA111
jumm- -
16 1719 i 8 20 21 22 �23 24 J-..
322
N.E.
4 383
14 13 12 11 10 a 7 6 5 3 t o `j
6 0
H16 IT IB 19 8 21 22 23 24 2 N_:_ 4 t M,�2 l
N toe
42 S T.
O Ito - 40 43L t0
1
4
6�
7
3 6:
MORMOMMISP
mw
r1 S 1
.ate
-KM
g
A�
O[7FM
OWN
WIN
OUNG'S ADD
r TR.5�
N.E. 42Z��G.
-'TR Cl!
A T� 0
r, -
300 WS16
�
Q7N
:�.a a
r
C
Iso
.a5
�J2a
3
J
2
3
* 1�
go
-
N.E. 39 IST/
!00 X
3 Po-
9-,& n 3
Ni
56 fl!
3 I--
ST
ell',
I-N
� .._.._ i
_ 5
zoned;R-3 which prohibits non-residential
uses., Office development would be .compatible
with the existing residential character of
the. street and could- be accommodated within
existing apartment structures that,predominate.
Showrooms should be restricted to the area
U'etween NE 3Gth and 40th Streets.
The proposed expansion'.of the Design Plaza
north.to 41st'Street is recommended in the
Miami=Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan...' This
proposal for rezoning has been.,prompted.,.by a''
request,of the Decorators Row Merchants.Associa-
tion'for additional space for business develop-
ment north of Street
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING
APPROVAL.
DEPARTMENT
PLANNING ADVISORY
Recommended January''30 I s'0 by'a 4-2 vote.
BOARD
CITY CO�,INMISSION
Passed lst Reading on rebruary 28 :1950 `