Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-80-0268RESOLUTION 8 0- 2 6 8 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH DADE COUNTY AND FINCH-HEERY AND ASSOCIATES TO UNDER- TAKE AN ANALYSIS OF THE FEASIBILITY OF AN INTERNATIONAL EXPOSITION CENTER, TRADE MART, SPORTS ARENA AND PARKING FACILITY IN DOWNTOWN MIAMI. WHEREAS, Dade County has selected the firm of Finch-Heery and Associates to analyze the feasibility of various sports facilities at alternate sites in Dade County, and WHEREAS, the City of Miami is desirous of undertaking a feasibility study for the development of an International Exposition Center, Trade Mart and parking facility in conjunction with a possible multi -purpose Sports Arena in Downtown Miami; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to negotiate for professional services as an additional study item for the conduct of a feasibility study for an International Exposition Center, Trade Mart and parking facility with the firm of Finch-Heery and Associates which firm has been selected through a competitive selection process by Dade County, Florida for a fee not to exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), which funds are to be provided through the Community Development Program. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1p day of "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS „ ATTEST: FOLLOW - / c%g;/. 0 o Ral G. Ongie, City Clerk PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: Robert F. Clark, Assistant City Attorney APRIL , 1980. MAURICE A. FERRE Maurice A. Ferre, M a y o r "DOCUMENT INDEX ITEM NO. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF APR 1011980 ,�,�. 80-26 ............... le, J-/-- _.. CItY OF MIA`.1I. r't.QRIUA T'' Joseph R. Grassie City Manager RVi CN�.1 Richard L. Fosmoen Assistant City Manager INTEP-OFF'IC:Z 'AtE.`-IOPAN©UM OAtF April 40 1980 �ILE 'WeejEct Downtown International Exposition Cente and Arena ALFEntNCES EPicwsuarS In the summer of 1979, the City along with the State of Florida requested the Department of Housing and Urban Development to transfer $22 million of public facility loan authority to the City of Miami for the purpose of initiating construction of an International Exposition Center and Sports Arena downtown on the property on the northwest corner of'Miami Avenue and the Miami River. The Department of Housing and Urban Development reviewed this request and found that it is not possible to transfer the Interama Loan Authority to the City for the project. We have had subsequent discussions with the representatives of HUD and with the Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration on alternative financing for an Exposition Center and Sports Arena Complex. EDA has indicated a willingness to provide a $5 million loan guarantee to the City for construction of an Exposition Center to provide a permanent location for the Trade Fair of the Americas and partial financing of a Sports Arena. As you know, Dade County has recently engaged the firm of Finch-Heery to conduct a feasibility study for sports facilities for the Greater Miami area. One of the sites that the County is requesting Finch-Heery to analyze is the Miami River site which we have been discussing. If we are to interest the private sector in a Sports Arena at the Miami Avenue/ Miami River property and if we are to seek financing, either revenue bond financing or a combination of public and private financing for an Exposition Center and an International Trade Mart, it would be necessary for us to conduct a feasibility study which would provide a full financial analysis of such a project. It is my recommendation that we request the County to expand the Finch-Heery study to include an analysis of the Exposition Center and International Trade Mart opportunities that exist in downtown Miami and in particular at the Miami Avenue/ Miami River site. I would estimate that the cost for such an analysis, if tied to the work which Finch-Heery is doing for Dade County, would be no more than $20,000. This, of course, would be subject to negotiations between the City and Finch-Heery. I, therefore, recommend that the City Commission give you authority to negotiate for additional services with Dade County and Finch-Heery in order to conduct the necessary feasibility studies to move the International Exposition Center and Trade Mart project ahead. It Jr pow � d FO LL,� 80-268 MEMORANDUM 10,0f_17A Agenda Item No. 5 (f) (4) L . To Honorable %riyor rind Members DATE � April 1, 1980 hc)1rd of County Corrrmissionern SUBJECT Contract for r rr,nooed Sporto Colrplex Feazibility PROM M. li. .,t.io, old c�tIIdy Cnun Mr Ir1i Al ICI xxTSTSIDATTON Tt is respectfully recommended that the Board approve a feazibility study for a opor'ts facility conplex(es) in Ende County by the fir,T. of Finch-Heery, at a oLzn oust of 1,89,000 pD13 rc:L7hursable expenses as approved in writirh;^ by the County's project m?n�-i~er. At the tirrrs of submission of the final report, we will subrLit a f-In al acc untin;; of the actual costs of the reirrhw,oab les . "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS IiACKr;RQ11;iI) FOLLOW The feasibility plan is to conoi(ier the va rious types of sports -related facilities that the Louth Florid., area can suprert, the eccncnac =.-act to the co:,.,unity, altern?t_ site loc aticr:s, fiI anc;n� alternatives, and a development, schedule. T.".e scope of the proposed ccriplex(es) is not limited to any particula^ professional, part i.cipa t, or spectator sports activity. C)n .rani-ii7i 22, 1.9 0, t. �,'i''7 :C: 'C`:�'� :he se_e-C ion i-roce:7z .'1 t C i, ezt for 'Or th' sel:'c`h.cn c. a cc �ult�%_nt t0 r;..0 .., t:: to ",:e aC':ei't_.:c. in t :lnl 1 _t,rc�V Jr)I ;,r:: :Deal ne•:.=,narers roc c tin:-, ceri':s c;' t''-e E= ',Q) an(: :7I'CpC Siis. At c? Clll' .: tied YUt;11C ....; I';':�� i'iVc? 1'I1 ii(Irr-, invit('ci to rn,'ke forty minute i''..h(':, at10a:� to 3 ('rcrr ittee :cer .ill: the project. Tr:(2 Cc; :; i�t� weed and recc.,.....::ed t e l'r:.; of, ..t- sub-ccn.Ju?)s the mo,:,t nu,?11f_ed A �C...r)ti(it UI'i l.'r7rLltt;.'(. :•:�:c ant.y ne to �- � � '--d ::npre� .ns � ppoin�cd ath ,.otia��.d rho. at�aC.. CC..... ,.wive cot lT.;'r7ct. rilvided into four phases frith a draft proposal to be eo:r)leted within twf ll ve ::eeko . ;::c proposed project is to be funded from the follo:'ring t.l a ••(r t'eV::ue ;(itlt'CeS $39,000 General Fund Continl;ency Account Plus Reimburoable Expenses $*,?5,000 Tourl.:,t Dovelopm•nt Trurt Pund Orange Bowl Irloriernizatcn and Rtt .novaticn $25,000 Econr,::;i.c D:nr(.lorment Ad: dniztration Grant :,cct lcn 3V '11 u' vontt :a:;t t'rrl:; ne;_7)t; i:ited ba ,ed on the completion of the scope of services by t.;t: 1:, the total nucibcr of per. -,en hours to ccrr}hlete each tank z n.i their lreil��. l":Itr:,, t,Irru':, a 111ull-1p1lur of 2.5. 'I'n.io project involves export: specialty t'or• tale pul po:,e (A' E,011e1'atin„ anA reliable infor ;,ion for tlu. d vr-lopmont of tiv� multi-u-se ;,ports facility col::pl-x(es). Tlhe following ru•r' th':, fi iir:, arh i tlr�l r roles as prcvidcd in the , (rerrgj OOW Role Firm Cost Project managerwr nt, concept Finch-Heer"j $220925 planning, facility program- ming and production of the f'i nril document, it(�:,tUdif-; mid schematic Post, Buckley, Schuh & 24,750 Erlrur(:;) Jernigan, Inc. F,conomics, financing Alfred Gobar Associates, Inc. 9,000 alternatives, feasibility M;u-kot. research J. Jerome lA�wis & 15,000 Associates, Inc. Project coordination, Polizzi-Hcery 17,325 construction estimates and scheduling $89.L000 As-pecial consultants, the following individuals may be employed to assist In the preparation of the plan: Robert ff. Kent, President, Atlanta Coliseum, Inc., The Cmni Thomas F. Liegler, Director, Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center, Anaheim, California Robert 0. }carter; President, Houston Sports Associates, Inc. At.t,ticrunrr►t "SUPPORTIVE _ DOC�►.� ���� ����TS F0LL0V''v„ ti i MEMORANDUM O I.07 _ 17 A to M. R. Stierheim County Manager DATE March 25, 1980 SU M UCT Sports Feasibility Contract r 14om Peter N. Weiner � � �•.�5�.�..•r�-�+ Negotiations Chairman of the Negotiating Committee Pursuant to your request, the negotiating committee, comprised of Mr. Stacy Hornstein, Dr. Chuck Pezholdt, Mr. Dick Montalbano and myself met four times with representatives of the Finch, Heery firm to negotiate a contract for the sports feasibility complex(s) study. The committee has negotiated a comprehensive contract (copy attached) which will give Metro Dade County an overall feasibility study regarding major league sports franchises and facilities as well as reviewing potential sites for such facilities. The contract falls within the scope outlined to the committee, in terms of financial coir.nittment and, during negotiations, it was apparent that the county will be receiving the best possible service for a comprehensive study on a cost effective basis. The comrrrittee unanimously reconvnends to the County Manager that this contract be presented to the Board of County Commissioners, subject to prior approval by the County Attorney's Office and your personal review, so that work may begin expeditiously for the 14-week study (once the Board approves it). The committee is satisfied that the contract outlines specifically the responsibilities of Finch, Heery and its consultants as well as the responsibilities of the County. The contract outlines the following areas of study: A rr:arket and feasibility study; site analysis of nine (9) preliminary sites and detailed analysis of three (3) specific sites (with the option for additional specific site analysis); a financial matrix, including economic paraimeters, regarding operational and capital expendi- tures; an overall vie;, of the major league sports market; and a comprehen- sive scher,atic design of possible facilities. The final report, to be presented ,;ithin 14 ire Ea from approval of the contract (subject to starting date), will docu:rent the above findings. It is clear that within the scope of this time fran.e, close coordination from the County Manager's office, through the project coordinator, will be necessary to insure a smooth and orc:erly study. The cc--.mitte.e feels that the attached document represents a comprehensive plan for the study as e;ell as one which reflects cost effective econcmic measures. The cost of the study (fee) is $89,000 with additional reir,bursable expenses and capability of additional facets at signified costs. In addition, the committee is satisfied that the negotiated fee (and other aspects of the agreement outlined in the contract) represents a fair and equitable rate of compensation for services requested. PNW:as Attachments Jaiv+i3' 0 Agenda Item No. 5 () (4) 4-1-80 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH FINCH-HEERY, FOR TI1E DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI -USE SPORTS FACILITY COMPLEX(ES) FEASIBILITY PLAN; AND AUTHORIZING COUNTY MANAGL'R TO EXERCISE CANCELLATION PROVISION CONTAINED THEREIN WHEREAS, this Board desires to accomplish the purposes outlined in the accompanying memorandum, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board approves the agreement between Dade County and Finch-Heery, for the development of a multi -use sports facility complex(es) feasibility plan, in substantially the form attached hereto and made a part hereof; authorizes the County Manager to execute same for and on behalf of Dade County; and to exercise the cancellation provision contained therein. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner , who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows; Barbara M. Carey Clara Oesterle William G. Oliver Beverly B. Phillips James F. Redford, Jr. Harvey Ruvin Barry D. Schreiber Ruth Shack Stephen P. Clark "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW" The Mayor thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 1st day of April, 1980. DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RICHARD P. BRINKER, CLERK Approved by County Attorney as 2 , By: to form and legal sufficiency. Deputy Clerk. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this day of,-,�,_,, 19801 by and between DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political sub- division of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and FINCH-HEERY, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." W I T N E S S E T H: FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants here- inafter contained, the County hereby retains the Consultant and the Consultant hereby covenants to provide the professional services proscribed in connection with the development of a feasibility study for the development of a comprehensive sports facility complex(es) in Dade County. The final plan is to con- sider the various -types of sports -related facilities that the area can support, economic impact to the community, alterna- tive site locations, financing alternatives, and a development schedule. The scope of the proposed complex(es) is not limited to any particular professional, participant, or spectator. ,%.Ports activity. i��. �.. -, j �� i �- I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1.01 The project for which the professional services of the Consultant are to be performed consists of the perform- ance of certain specified work tasks which form a com- prehensive sports facilities feasibility study, and is hereinafter referred to as the "Project." 1.02 The work tasks for which the services under this con- tract are to be performed are identified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. Each work task describes specific services to be performed by the Con- sultant, establishes the type and format of output to be derived by the Consultant and defines the schedule for performing the work. 5 t.80-266 0 PROJECT COOROINATION 2.01 The County's Project Coordinator for this project shall be Mr. Peter Weiner. The Consultant's Project Manager shall be Mr. Thomas A. Hooker, AIA. The Project Man- ager shall receive and accept all instructions and cor- respondence from the County Project Coordinator and shall be fully authorized to make decisions and act thereon and shall keep the County Project Coordinator advised as to the progress of the work. The Project 'Manager shall be a full-time representative of the Con- sultant assigned to an office within Dade County, Florida. The County Project Coordinator shall act on behalf of the County in issuing approvals for work performed, progress payments or for other activities "SUPPORTIVE that require approval as they arise from the execution of the work specified under the terms of this Agree- DC;C;JMENTS F��J LLOW„ ment. 2.02 The Consultant's Project Manager shall be subject to removal for good cause from the Project at the request • of the County Project Coordinator. 2.03 The Consultant shall not begin work on any given phase until the County Project Coordinator has issued a Not- ice to Proceed for such phase. The progress of any phase shall be subject to periodic review by the County Project Coordinator. Notices to Proceed may be given simultaneously. 3. COUNTY OBLIGATIONS 3.01 The County agrees to provide upon request of the Con- sultant the following material, data or services as re- quired in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement: a, access to and copies of the following at no cost to the Consultant: 2 6" (1) historical dat4 and pertinent information on file with the County, (2) a list of previous studies and reference documents in possession of the County; (3) a list of resource personnel for interviews by the Consultant. 4. CONSULTANT OBLIGATIONS 4.01 Consultant shaii perform a market, facilities, and activities study; site study; financial study and master planning (concept design, cost and scheduling) and the various tasks to complete those studies as presented in Exhibit 1 attached hereto. 4,02 Fi nch-Heery shal I provi de overal 1 di recti on and super- vision of this Agreement and shall provide a full-time Project Manager. 4.03 The Consultant shall employ at his expense the fol- lowing teams to participate in the feasibility study as indicated; "SUrj�,'RTNC a. Alfred Gobar Associates, Inc. C h. J. Jerome Lewis and Associates, Inc. DOGS.; ENTS >> c. Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan, Inc. F0L F1JW d. Robert J. Harter, Robert H. Kent and Thomas F. Liegher (optional at direction of County). e. Polizzi-Heery Substitution of any sub -consultant is subject to the prior written approval of the County Project Coordinator. 4.04 The Consultant shall make four (4) presentations. All presentations shall be supervised and presented by Mr. Robert Eskew. 3 R 4.05 the Consultant wi11 submit to the County five (5) copies of the final draft report. . p 4.06. Within two (2) weeks of acceptance and approval of the preliminary draft by the County, Consultant wi11 sub- mit the final report. 5. TERMINATION 5.01 The County may terminate this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon written notice. 5.02 In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for work tasks completed or partially completed in accordance with paragraph 8 of this Agreement. 5.03 The Consultant's claim for such fees and reimbursements in the event of termination shall be supported by such "SUPF''ORTIVE data and information as the County may reasonable re- DOC J.AENTS quire. FOLLOW" 5.04 The Consultant shall turn over to the County all work which has been performed for which payment has been or will be made as provided for under this Agreement. 6. WARRANTY AND LIABILITY 6.01 The Consultant warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person other than a bonifide employee working fully for the Consultant to solicit or secure this Agreement and that they have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bonifide employee working fully for the Consultant any fee, commission, gift, or any other consideration con- tingent or resulting from award of the making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, n the County has the right to annul this Agreement with- out liability. 6,02 The Consultant agrees to abide and be governed by Dade County Ordinances which have a bearing on the work involved on this project, including but not necessarily limited to Ordinance 72-32 (Conflict of Interest Ordi- nance) and Ordinance 77-13 (Financial Disclosure Ordi- nance), as amended, which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein in connection with its contract obligations hereunder. 6.03 The County and the Consultant each binds itself, its partners, successors, legal representatives, and as- signs to the other party of the Agreement. No as- signment shall be made by the Consultant without writ- ten consent of the County. 6.04 All reports and other data developed by the Consultant for the purpose of this Agreement shall become the property of the County. Other than project profiles, the Consultant shall not, without the prior written consent of the County, make available to anyone information produced or obtained under this Agreement except as required by the performance of this Agree- ment. 6.05 The Consultant shall indemnify and save the County harmless from any and all claims, losses. and causes of actions which may arise out of the performance of this Agreement as a result of any sole negligent act of the Consultant or any person employed by the Consultant. The Consultant shall pay all claims and losses up to One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000) of any na- ture whatsoever in connection therewith and shall de- fend all suits, in the name of the County when ap- plicable, and shall pay all costs and judgments which may issue thereon. "SUPPORTIV 5 DOCUMENTS FOLLOW" 6,06 The Consultant shall maintain during the term Of this Agreement the following insurance: a. Automobile insurance covering all owned, non -owned, and hired vehicles in amounts not less than $100,000 per person and $300,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $50,000 per occurrence for property damage. b. Public Liability Insurance in amounts not less than $300,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $50,000 per occurrence for property damage. c. Workmen's Compensation Insurance in compliance with Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, as presently written or hereafter amended. 7. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT 7.01 The term of this Agreement shall start upon execution by the parties hereto and shall extend until final com- pletion of the Project and the acceptance by the County except as provided under paragraph 5 of this Agreement. 7.02 The Consultant agrees to start work hereunder upon re- ceipt of the work order for Phase I, as identified in Exhibit 1, to be issued by the County within ten (10) days from the execution of this Agreement by both parties. The Consultant shall not proceed with any phase of the work until approved by the County and a work order is issued. 7.03 A reasonable extension of time for completion of any phase will be granted by the County should there be a delay on the part of the County of filling its part of the Agreement as stated herein. Such extension of time shall be not cause for any claim by the Consultant for extra compensation. ?`SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS 6 L FO'LUW„ 8. PAYMENT 8.01 For satisfactory performance of the services specified in this Agreement, and upon invoice by the Consultant, the County shall pay the Consultant monthly in ac- cordance with the amounts specified per phase as de- tailed in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and mado a part hereof and summarized in paragraph 8.02(b) of this Agreement. The fee shall be payable upon approval by the County Project Coordinator and invoices submitted by the Consultant for completed work tasks authorized. 8,02 The County agrees to pay and Consultant agrees to ac- ce.pt for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement fees in accordance with the following: a. Th•e Consultant shall receive total compensation for the services detailed in Exhibit 1 of this Agree- ment in an amount not to exceed $89,000. b. Compensation for completed phases may be requested monthly based on the following schedule: $37,500 upon approval and acceptance of Phase I. $27,745 upon approval and acceptance of Phase II. $17,075 upon approval and acceptance of Phase III. $ 6,680 upon approval and acceptance of Phase IV. 8.03 Reimbursable expenses, except as listed elsewhere in this Agreement, shall be defined as those services for which the Consultant must hire an independent con- tractor and shall be performed only by written authorization by the County Project Coordinator. These expenses include but are not limited to: express mail service, consumer research interviewing, printing and reproduction costs and specialty consultants. The County shall reimburse the Consultant monthly for authorized reimbursable expenses as verified by appropriate bills, invoices or statements with no markup and submitted .to the County Project Coordinator for approval. 8t04 In the event the County Project Coordinator directs the Consultant to perform services in addition to those de- scribed in Exhibit 1 within the general scope thereof, the County shall pay the Consultant for additional performance thereof a multiplier of 2.5 as computed by (a.), (b.), and (c.) listed below: a. the Consultant's actual payroll cost which is de- fined as sums paid to personnel engaged in such ad- ditional services subject to federal income tax; plus b. a sum equal to 130% of (a.) above; plus C. a 'sum equal to 20% of (a.) above. d. The following principals may be employed on the Project: Robert Eskew Nick Polizzi J. H. Finch Thomas A. Hooker Wilton Ferguson Walter Revell Alfred Gobar Earl Murphy Henry Teague 8.05 The fee for additional services of the principals shall be determined by a multiplier of 2.5 times the salary rate calculated in 8.04 ( a . ) of this Agreement, but in no case shall the rate exceed $50.00 per hour. The ag- gregate sum of all payments for additional services shall be limited to a sum not to exceed $10,000. 8.06 Printing, graphics work, and reproduction costs inter- nally accounted for and invoiced by the Consultant are considered reimbursable expenses. 8.07 The Consultant shall be reimbursed by the County for out -of -County travel sustenance as set forth in Florida 8 „SUPPORTIVE L)OCUMENTS Statutes Section 112.061, provided said travel is authorized in writing by the County Project Coordinator and is not included in the requirements of the individual work tasks set forth in Exhibit I. Local travel will be reimbursed on a mileage basis at the rate of 17 cents per mile. An accurate record of travel must be submitted with request for payment. Such request shall include the date, total miles, park- ing and tolls, destination and purpose of each trip. 8,08 The Consultant shall be reimbursed for all long dis- tance telephone and communication services attributable to work performed as stated herein, provided such ex- penses are not included in the requirements of the individual tasks set forth in Exhibit 1. 8,09 The Consultant shall not retain any outside services other than as provided in this Agreement without specific written approval from the County Project Coordinator. 8.10 The County shall have the right to audit at reasonable intervals during regular business hours such books, re- cords, accounts, receipts and vouchers of the Con- sultant as it may desire in connection with any services performed by the Consultant. 8.11 Reimbursable costs to the Consultant shall not include charges for office rent or overhead expenses of any kind, including local telephone and utility charges, office and drafting supplies, depreciation of equip- ment, professional dues, subscriptions, etc., postage, stenographic, clerical, or other employees' time, or travel sustenance not directly related to the Project or not authorized. n TISUPPOF;TI',' ,HOC Lj i v�? F INJ j S FOLLOW Off„ 9. MISCELLANEOUS 9.01 All services shall be performed by the Consultant to the satisfaction of the County Manager, who shall de- cide all questions, difficulties and disputes of whatever nature which may arise under or by reason of this Agreement. The County Manager's decisions upon all claims, questions and disputes shall be final, con- clusive, and binding upon the parties hereto, unless such determination is clearly arbitrary or un- reasonable. 9,02 Any notices or other written communication from the Consultant to the County shall be considered delivered when posted by mail or delivered in person to the Coun- ty Project Coordinator, County Manager's Office, Room 911 Courthouse, 73 West Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130. Any notice or other written communication from the County to the Consultant shall be considered de- livered when posted by mail or delivered in person to the Consultant at the last address left on file with the County. 9.03 This Agreement and the exhibits hereto embody the en- tire agreement and the understanding between the parties hereto and there are no other agreements or understandings, oral or written, with reference to the subject matter hereof that are not merged herein and superceded hereby. TISUPPOP TIVE DOCUMENTS 10 _ FOLLOW ly IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. ATTEST: Deputy MR of the Boar Witness: DAD COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By County Manager PINCH-HEERY By • �G� for Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc. By r for Finch!, A' exander, Barnes, Rothschi' & aschal, Inc. 11 .. 15