Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-80-0318RESOLUTION NO. 8 0 - 3 18 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MOST QUALIFIED CONSULT- ING FIRMS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE. 1,11IAPII FIRE RESCUE TRATNTNG FACILTTY AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEM; AL'Tl10RTZTNG THE CITY MANAGER TO UNDERTAKE CONTRACT NEGOTIATION'S WITH THE MOST QUALTFIED FIRMS TO AP•,RIVE AT A CONTRACT W11TCH IS FAIR, CO?1l1ETlTTVE AND REASONABLE; AND ALLOCAT- ING $155,000 FROM 171111" FIGHTING, FIRE PREVENTION AND RESCUE FACILTTIES BOND FUNDS To COVER TILE COST OF SAID CONTRAC'C; AND DIRECTING Till' CITY ?TANAGER TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED CONTRACT TO THE CITY COM- MISSION AFTER ITS NEGOTIATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COMMISSION PRIOR TO EXECUTION THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Commission adopted the Capital Improve- ments Program Budget, including, among other items allocations from the Fire Fighting, Fire Prevention and Rescue Facilities Bond Funds for the construction of the Miami Fire Rescue Train- ing Facility and Closed Circuit Television System by Ordinance No. 8905, dated February 26, 1979; and WHEREAS, in the implementation of the said construction program, the City Manager solicited expressions of interest from qualified consultants and evaluated the qualifications of those firms which responded to his inquiry, then selected the most qualified firms for providing professional architec- tural/engineering services for the design and construction of the Miami Fire Rescue Training Facility and Closed Circuit Television System, all in accordance with the State of Florida's Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, enacted by the Legislature of Florida, July 1, 1973; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to begin the design of the Miami Fire Rescue Training Facility and Closed Circuit Television System as soon as possible in order to reduce costs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Commission hereby approves the selection of the City Manager of the following firms as the most qualified to provide professional architectural/engineer- ing services for the design and construction of the proposed 11Sunpr'y` ,'e�1�.."DOCUJVIEfVT. INDEX ITEM NO % Miami Fire Rescue Training Facility and Closed Circuit Tele- vision System, in the rank order listed: (a) Firm No. 1: A. Taquechel Assocites, Inc., 61 Merrick Way, Coral Gables, Florida 33134. (b) Firm No. 2: Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracido Associates, 1501 N.W. North River Drive, Miami, Florida 33125. (c) Firm No. 3: Zyscovich Architects, 2720 S.W. 28 Lane, Miami, Florida 33133. (d) Firm No. 4: H. Carlton Decker, Architects & Planners, 2649 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 1903, Miami, Florida 33133. (e) Firm No. 5: Russell, Martinez & Holts, Architects, Inc., 1800 Coral Way, Miami, Florida 33145. Section 2. The City Commission hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate a professional services contract on behalf of the City of Miami with the first rank ordered firm listed in Section 1 hereof. If the City Manager cannot nego- tiate a contract with the first rank ordered firm which in his opinion is fair, competitive and reasonable, then he is hereby authorized to terminate such negotiations and to proceed to negotiate with the second most qualified firm. If the City Manager fails to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the second firm, then he is authorized to undertake negotiations with the third most qualified firm. If the City Manager fails to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the third firm, then he is authorized to undertake negotiations with the fourth most qualified firm. If the City Manager fails to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the fourth firm, then he is hereby authorized to undertake negotiations with the fifth most qualified firm. Section 3. The City Manager is hereby directed to present to the City Commission the negotiated contract at the earliest scheduled meeting of the City Commission, immediately following its negotiation for approval by the Commission prior to execution thereof. A pOO FcP�C�'" 80-318 Section 4. The amount of $1559000 is hereby allocated from the account entitled, "Fire Fighting, Fire Prevention and Rescue Facilities Bond Funds", to cover the cost of the above professional service contract and all related design services expenses. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of Argil , 1980 Maurice A. Ferre M A Y O R ATTEST: RALPIrG. ONGIE, CITY CLWK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: Z�4a_✓ C ROBERT F. CLARK ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: GEORGE F. KNOX, JR., CITY ATTO MEY "SUF'�' r..,r,,j,r. FOLL0W Joseph R. Grassie April 21, 1980 City Mana r Selection of Architectural/Engineering . Fire for the Negotiation of Contract Chie� K. E. McCullough, C i n Miami Fire -Rescue Training Center Fire -Rescue Training Cen e Competitive Selection Committee (15) On April 8, 1980, at 9:00 a.m., the Competitive Selection Committee for the Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System interviewed five architectural/engineering firms to evaluate these candidates in the final selection process. Listed below are the firms which were evaluated in accordance with Criteria Guidelines. These firms are identified as the most qualified by rank order: 1. A. Taquechel Assoc., Inc. 61 Merrick Way Coral Gables, Florida 33134 445-9682 2. Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracido, Assoc. 1501 N.W. North River Drive Miami, Florida 33125 325-1015 3. Zyscovich Architects 2720 S.W. 28 Lane Miami, Florida 33133 448-8595 4. H. Carlton Decker, Architects & Planners 2649 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1903 Miami, Florida 33133 858-2121 5. Russell, Martinez & Holt, Architects, Inc. 1800 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33145 856-4941 The following is a recap of how the Fire Department obtained the incinera- tor site and the prescribed process we followed to secure professional design and engineering service for the Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System: U; FOLLOW?? r sn_�2 R ri . 1 Joseph R. Grassie City Manager -2- April 21, 1980 The Fire Department has been moving toward the utilization of the Coconut Grove Incinerator site as a Fire -Rescue Training Center since November 30, 1978, when we first met with the Coconut Grove Task Force to solicit their support in this project. Subsequently, the Task Force was invited to visit the present Fire -Rescue Training Facility to make the members aware of the type activities that occur on a daily basis. Unfortunately, this support was not forthcoming. On April 17, 1979, HSR Architects were contacted to prepare a feasibility study for this program. HSR's report, May 29, 1979, indicates the incinera- tor can accommodate the training center within the proposed budget (ENCLOSURE 1). Since May 29, 1979, there have been open public hearings before the Planning Advisory Board and City Commission, as well as dozens of interviews by the news media. The Commission has approved the incinerator site for the operation of a Fire -Rescue Training Center, Resolution No. 79-806 dated November 26, 1979, the closing of Jefferson Street, Resolution No. 79-807 dated November 26, 1979, and the necessary change of zoning of Jefferson Street, Ordinance No. 9051, dated December. 27, 1979. On February 12, 1980, Resolution No. 80-77 (ENCLOSURE 2), the Fire -Rescue Training Facility and Closed Circuit TV System was designated as Category "B" in accordance with Subsection (5)(a) of Section 16-17 of the City Code, which establishes procedures for contracting of professional services as well as competitive negotiation requirements. This same resolution appoints K. E. McCullough, Deputy Chief, as Chairman of the Competitive Selection Committee in accordance with the City Code. On February 26, 1980, Joseph R. Grassie, City Manager, appointed members of the Competitive Selection Committee (ENCLOSURE 3) for this project, as outlined by Ordinance No. 8965. On February 25, 1980, utilizing the latest listing of architects practicing in the Miami area (ENCLOSURE 4), the Miami Fire Department mailed more than 300 requests soliciting Letters of Interest (ENCLOSURE 5) to render pro- fessional services for the proposed Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System. An advertisement was also placed in the Miami Herald February 29, 1980 (ENCLOSURE 6), requesting Letters of Interest from architectural firms. Sixteen firms responded to this request (ENCLOSURE 7), and on March 25, 1980, the Competitive Selection Committee met to review the qualifications of interested architectural firms. The initial selection process was conducted by utilizing the enclosed guide- lines, initial selection criteria and scoring sheets (ENCLOSURE 8). The top six firms were notified by telephone and letter from me (ENCLOSURE 9), and were scheduled for final selection process April 8, 1980, in the N.E.A.T. Building, 150 S.E. Second Avenue. Joseph R. Grassie City Manager -3- April 21, 1980 A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Miami Herald March 26, 1980 (ENCLOSURE 10). On March 28, 1980, I furnished each committee member with an interim report of the committee's initial selection (ENCLOSURE 11). Each member was also furnished a schedule showing the architectural firm's time of presentation (ENCLOSURE 12) and the criteria to be used for final selec- tion (ENCLOSURE 13). On the morning of April 8, 1980, Mr. Glasser of GSA/Glasser-Sacmag Assoc., Inc., cancelled, via telephone, his firm's presentation due to their inability to meet the insurance requirements for this project. (ENCLOSURE 14) lists the Competitive Selection Committee members present and (ENCLOSURE 15) are the members' final selections which were reached utilizing the final selection criteria. KEM : mm FOLLOW? �4 ENCLOSURE 1 FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT HSR Architect: 443-9493 Ted Hoffman. Jr Ernesto Santos Pedro Paimundez May 29, 1979 Chief H.W. Brice Director City of Miami Department of Fire 3316 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Chief Brice: We are pleased to submit the following report entitled "Development and Planning Study for the City of Miami Fire -Rescue Training Center/Coconut Grove Incinerator Site" in accordance with our contract dated April 2, 1979. We have concluded, based on the information and recom- mendations contained herein, that the existing inciner- ator building and available site can accommodate the program within the monies available. We would like to particularly call your attention to the Environmental and Social Impact section of our report as it contains recommendations that are fundamental to the overall implementation of this project. SincKeV, Ted Hoffman Jr. Architect THjr:fms CONCLUSIONS & 1. The existing building and available RECOMMENDATIONS site can accommodate the requirements of the Fire -Rescue Training Center as programmed in this report. Recommendations: A. Renovate the existing building. B. Close Jefferson Street. C. Retain the elevated paved area in a reconfigured shape. 2. The $1.43 million proposed budget will be adequate. Recommendations: A. Construction must start within 6 to 8 months (Oct -Dec. 1979). 3. The environmental and social impli- cations of this project are complex and important in the development of this facility, but we see no over- riding aspect that would prevent the location of the training center at this site. Recommendations: A. Locate drafting pit inside the building. B. Retain the basketball courts. C. Develop the Washington Avenue connection. D. Encourage local resident involve- ment. INTRODUCTION I iI L L The purpose of this report is to provide the City of Miami with a comprehensive development and planning study that investigates the feasibility of con- verting the existing Coconut Grove Incinerator and surrounding site into a fire -rescue training center Our goals in this study were directed at answering three basic questions. These were: 1. Can the existing building and a- vailable site accommodate the re- quirements of a complete fire training facility? 2. If the answer to question 1 is af- firmative, will the cost be within the monies available? 3. What are the environmental and social implications of this project on the surrounding community? The report that follows provides the background and justification for our answers to these questions which are summarized in the conclusion and recom- mendation section. Our process has included interviews and discussions with a number of indi- viduals and organizations and we would like to acknowledge these persons for their assistance. City of Miami Fire Department Miami Fire Department Chief K.E. McCullough Lieutenant T.C. Adams i L 1 City of Miami Fire Department (cont.) Chief L.D. DeChime Chief R.Z. Coleman Captain F. Jordan Morris Kauffman - Assistant to the City Manager. Jim Reid - Director, City of Miami Planning Department Jack Luft - Planner Charles Alden - City of Miami Parks Department. Dena Spillman - Director, City of Miami Community Development Department. Mike Gomez, CSI - Tatum, Gomez and 1 Smith Construction, Inc. L L L L L 80-318 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION SECTION 1 - EXISTING CONDITIONS .................... SECTION 2 - PROGRAM ................................ SECTION 3 - PROPOSED BUILDING AND SITE UTILIZATION . SECTION 4 - COST ESTIMATE .......................... SECTION 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ........ APPENDIX - BUILDING PROGRAM ....................... 1-8 9-11 12-25 26-29 30-34 35-38 � SECTION 1 r EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 01k. The proposed location for this facility is the Coconut Grove incinerator site located at Jefferson Street and Washington Avenue in Coconut Grove, Florida. The site has been used as an incinerator facility since the early 1940's and the present incinerator was built in 1960. In 1970 the facility was closed. The structure has been vacant since 1970, but for the past three years the lower floor has been occupied by an auto mechanic repair school sponsored by the Coconut Grove Cares which is funded by various public and private sources. Structurally the building is in excellent condition, consisting of a reinforced concrete frame with concrete block in - fill. It does not have any mechanical, electrical, or air conditioning systems except plumbing at the existing rest rooms and a large electrical service on the top floor. The crane used to trans- port the waste from the pit to the in- cinerator is still in place on the top floor, but that is the only equipment or furnishing still present. The building currently has approximately 16,000 square feet of enclosed space and almost 650,000 cubic feet of volume. The 4.2 acre site surrounding the build- ing has, until recently, been unused for any organized activity except for the previously mentioned auto repair school which has access to the lower floor i I L L L L L 2 from Jefferson Street. The City has just completed three basketball courts, two tennis courts, and a parking lot on the North side of the site. Lighting for these courts and also for Grand Avenue Park has also been installed as well as a transformer building to serve the lighting. The foundations for the old smoke stack are still visible on the site between tae new basketball courts and Jefferson Street. — The present available site consists of approximately three acres including the incinerator building. The site is sur- rounded by an 8 foot high chain link fence that is in generally good condition There is one major break in the South- west corner. The existing elevations of the site consist of three main levels. The Northwest corner of the site is ap- proximately the level of the surrounding streets, the elevated paving area is 18 feet above the street, and the entire Southeast corner is about 4 feet above the street. There are excellent mature trees surrounding the elevated paved area and in the Jefferson Street right- of-way. The remainder of the site has few trees or vegetation. The following drawings show the ex- isting conditions. —^ �• �' r I N WASI*WtON AVE. ' •1 •y-y,/~�, r - ',i. i -_� I ._.--._1 __- _--TT-_ _ • �___--1 _ _. .___.. ' \—_•, I I � ! t p - r il; • • I PARKING!- !BASKETBALL COURTS LOT • Bmows II COURTS . s. tee• i 2 1 r TRANSFORMER THOM" AV- 1 VAULT 1 I '� s •: — -- -- - —. 14 M'1 ` ,,•'SOLO c- >•1 a� i' ` r ,- . -.-c ts. �� c • \INCINERATOR...�- ^�.. BUILDING Ar fry •� 1 l - $�I 1J - Obv �� -"" �. ' . • •7b oc ' s.;.. eT pope -fir a.•e CNARLES A/E. (PRIVATE ROAD) • EX157,1NG_ 517'E PLAN- 31 w MOTOR 1 CONTROL E. I S- 0 0 PIT ii ELEY. I LEVEL I MAINTENANCE SWITCHGEAR TRANSFORMER 4 ' I. FLOOR PLAN ELEV.:I2'-6" --R I ^ 0 s Io 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT owl LEVEL 2 TIPPING AREA t �O _ 4 1 It l l SCALE 5 FLOOR PLAN ELEV.: 30'-0" li I I 0 0 5 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE LEVEL 3 6 TOILETS + 41'- 0" f r�- FLOOR PLAN ELEV.: 54'-a" 0 5 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE ROOD r t tJ17, r ;' STAIRS . ----- r t t I t-4 4-t-Ftt +-I +-t4144++tt+t+ t STAIR -« r _ r t I I+r t � --1J114�l111a111111 -11111 II�111 114114 14114 4 + LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN ELEV.: 6e'-3" 0 5 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT r- f 1• C f� f f•''•" ROOF f. TIPPING AREA MAINTENANCE 8 STORAGE L r i_ l 8 ROOF CRANE T6 �a FRETE FORM SECTION LFt---J 0 S 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT r SECTION 2 PROGRAM The proposed facility will replace the existing City of Miami Training Center located at N.W. 7th Avenue and 36th Street. The present facility is totally inadequate both in terms of classroom and administration space and the space required to drill and train fire fighters. There is no area to allow expansion on the present site. The training center has two main functi- ons. One is the training of new re- cruits as they are needed and the other is an in-service program that aims to train and evaluate existing fire fighters. The quality and type of training offered at the Center is very directly related to the proficiency with which the Miami Fire Department renders service and it is rated as one of the best in the country. This reputation for excel- lence prevails in the entire community and cannot be overlooked as a positive force when discussing the kinds of ac- tivities that will take place at the training center. The program for new recruits calls for 14 weeks of rigorous training. General- ly, these classes include 15 to 30 re- cruits. 200 hours of this program re- quired by the State of Florida for cer- tification as a fire fighter includes courses and practical training in the following areas: 1. The Science of Fire 2. Ventilation -(Heat and smoke transfer) I I I I I I I L L L 10 3. Training in the Use of Ropes, Ladders and Hoses. 4. Rescue Techniques 5. Forcible Entry Methods In addition to the minimum state standards, the City of Miami provides each of its recruits with a six credit Emergency Medical Technician course (EMT) (144 hours) and a three credit Fire Prevention course (45 hours) in con- junction with the Miami -Dade Community = College. Also included is a 171 hours Miami Fire Department orientation course that familiarizes new recruits with specific Miami practices and methods. After completion of this program all re- cruits are tested by the State Fire College. Each recruit class is called back to the Fire College during his loth month on the job to determine if there are any deficiencies shown by the personnel in any area. The activities connected with in-service training include: 1. Providing courses and techniques on new and specialized subjects and equipment. 2. Provide a Driver -Engineer Training and Safety Program. This program trains and tests all drivers in the safe handling and maneuvering of fire fighting apparatus and in the operation of aerials and pumps. 3. Conduct Underwriters' pump test on all pumpers. 4. Test new equipment, products, and apparatus. f • w 5. Coordinate use of the training facility by Miami Police SWAT team, FBI SWAT team, other government a- gencies, and various citizens groups. The space program, provided by the fire department, can be found in the appendix of this report. :"A r ` Fy ISECTION 3 PROPOSED BUILDING &SITE UTILIZATION r if Our recommendations for the use of the existing facilities are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Some im- portant characteristics of the site plan include: 1. The decision not to relocate the basketball courts. These courts, which were recently constructed, are located in a less than ideal area with respect to the proposed use. We feel, however, that they provide a much needed amenity _ to the surrounding community and providc tangible proof that the city is serious about improvements in their neighborhooc This is especially relevant when one realizes that there is a strong possi- bility that the fire -rescue training center will be realized on this site before any major park improvements are undertaken. Consequently, we cannot recommend that the courts be demolished when we have no guarantee that the funding or space would be found to re- place them. For this reason, our so- lution works around these courts and still provides adequate area for progran activities. 2. The closing of Jefferson Street. This recommendation is based on the realities of the access required for the drill tower activities and upon a desire to have the training center have a direct benefit to the adjoining park. The configuration of the exist- ing building dictates that the North and West facades be used for drill 13 EXISTING BERM 9 10// I PROPOSED BERM I L L functions and this requires all of the fire fighting apparatus to be able to easily approach and maneuver around these sides. The closing of Jefferson Street would allow the training center this required access and, at the same time, allow a soccer field/football field in the Grand Avenue Park. This is something that has been proposed in numerous plans for the park and would greatly enhance its recreation capa- bility. We recommend that the filling, sodding, and landscaping of this street be accomplished within the fire depart- ment budget and have included it in our estimate. 3. Utilization of the existing ramp and elevated paved area. We have chosen to take advantage of the natural vertical separation the ramp provides to effect a segregation between the fire apparatus circulation and private automobiles. Our plan calls for the recontouring of the existing earth mound and the addition of concrete retaining walls in some areas to recapture some of the land taken up by the existing earth berms. This enables the elevated area to ac- commodate most of the required parking and also, affords us the opportunity of having a separate and distinct -ablic entrance to the facility at the second floor level. The site plan also shows certain recom- mendations not directly connected with the program, but, in our view, repre- ► n n .. F� a� a: .a Z'I i W4 M00 Z W 4 04 Z � C� 3 r i l_ 1 I 1 z z w IX 0 ! U J J Q m w Y a m N L X U 14 sent important considerations in the overall development of the training center. One of these is the connection of the existing park with the basketball and tennis courts. We have shown a 15' wide linear connection that parallels Washington Street which will be paved and have benches and landscaping to encourage its use. We have not included this item in the training center budget because we feel it is something more ap- propriately undertaken by the Department of Parks and/or Community Development. These departments have been contacted with respect to this aspect of the plan and they have stated an interest in funding this item. Their position is that if the community approves, they would authorize the necessary funds ($30,000) from current housing acqui- sition allocations and allow us to in- clude this item in the training center construction contract. This would en- able the work to be properly coordinated and most likely result in a lower unit cost than if bid separately. We strong- ly recommend this procedure for ac- complishing the work. The issue of the remaining housing on the North side of Washington Street is one that we have considered very careful- ly. Other studies and plans suggested the relocation and demolition of these houses for use as a park or general open space but our experience has shown that decent, affordable housing is the single 15 as this. The City of Miami Planning Department shares this viewpoint and we are recommending that this housing remain and become a high priority for rehabilitation or demolition and replace- ment under a Community Development Program. I Another item not directly connected with the fire -rescue training center program is site landscaping. We have shown a generous amount of landscaping in our plan, and reflected this in our estimate because we feel it is important in acting as a buffer to the surrounding neighborhood and to "soften" the insti- tutional character of the existing build- ing. IThe incinerator building itself is, for the most part, very well suited for renovation. It consists mainly of structural members (columns and beams) and, consequently, presents almost un- limited possibilities for interior par- titioning, the addition of floors, and lmechanical and electrical retrofitting. The accompanying drawings illustrate our lconcept for the utilization of the build- ing. The drawings are generally self- explanatory but we would .like to comment on some important features o p e f our recom- mended solution. 1. The Drafting Pit A drafting pit will allow the large Lvolume, high pressure pumps on fire apparatus to be tested and gauges lcalibrated. The on -site pit will 16 also allow driver -engineers to oper- ate pumps in a training situation. It requires a large volume of water (9,000 gallons) from which the appa- ratus draws water and discharges it back into the pit while the pump is being monitored. Its location at r the training center is important i because it is the training center staff who are charged with the sched- uling and monitoring of these tests which are required for all pumping apparatus in the City of Miami Fire Department. During the course of re- searching this report, we discovered the fact that this test is very noisy, particularly when conducting the re- quired Underwriters Test where the engine and pumps are required to loperate at capacity for up to two hours. With this in mind, we could not recommend the test pit to be located on the site and have, in fact, shown this facility inside the build- ing in one of the apparatus bays (see ground floor plan). There are, in this method, more technical problems to overcome than in an outside solu- tion, but we have researched this with facilities in northern climates where Lthis is done routinely and we are confident that items such as exhaust Lsystems, drafting and discharge hard- ware, and pit construction can be solved within our estimate ($30,000). L This method allows us to overcome what we consider the most serious Lenvironmental problem associated 17 Iwith the training center. 2. Elevator Location Our recommendation for the location of the elevator is based on the fact that it must serve not only for verti- cal circulation to the various levels of the building, but also that it must accomodate the need for fire _ fighting drill activities as well. a ••" "'**�`� t�. We have located the elevator so that +'. '.•.+ 'f ' 'a.,, it can open into the upper drill tower for smoke and rescue drills and also provide access as a con- ventional elevator for normal use. �. Its location in the existing re- `, fuse pit is cost effective as no ' 6 q . ' demolition is required to construct the hoistway. The elevator can be a hydraulic type, 3,500 lb. capacity, with front and rear doors. In a related decision, we have provided most of the public functions of this building (museum, offices, auditori- um) on the same level so that the use of the elevator is primarily ' training limited to personnel. g center 3. Addition of Floors We have attempted to minimize the need for additional floor construct- ion inside the existing building due to the increased cost this implies. CWhere it has been required to meet the program requirements, our so- lution has been to take advantage of the configuration of the existing refuse pit by locating new floors in 18 r this vertical space. After investi- gating numerous structural methods, the system recommended consists of I spanning the refuse pit with steel joists that frame into the existing ` columns and beams. The new floors would be created with a metal deck and light -weight concrete topping. rThe use of this technique at three levels inside the building realizes " approximately 6,000 sq. ft. of new space. 4. Smoke and Burn Room This area, located on the upper floor above the drill tower, will have the capability to produce simu- lated fire and smoke situations. Its purpose will be to create an atmo- sphere of heat and smoke in which r fire fighters can train. Access will be possible from the drill rtower area, the 4th level corridor and the elevator so that a variety of realistic fire situations can be duplicated. LOpen, uncontrolled burning is, of rand course, not possible at this site the mechanism for producing the heat and smoke required should be I_ carefully studied and designed as the project progresses. We feel Lthe best solution would be a combi- nation of heaters and mechanical smoke simulators and a small amount L of actual burning of combustible L materials. The area should be pro- r" ea, 19 vided with exhaust systems and sprinklers to control and direct the smoke and heat and have finishes 1 that are fireproof and easily cleaned. r a..sr • a. v/+ � r y �� J. f �•Ni.� , Yc�4w�.�TK JIN _ . AY L L SITE PLAN N�- dgOV »hide 55 1 20 21 PROPOSED BUILDING ' r STAIRd' I�PWER ,+ . HOSE' STORAP I ENTRANCE " RQ0* AP WWTUS' OM . . -}•4-,APPARAT11V,-• •e'-•r.�•.1r1.. _..-..f ENTRANCE—) !tL ObtPME6FT ._ti .} -I Y--t-.._r r /• L LEVEL ELEV. 12'-6" 0 5 10 25 UTILIZATION ril DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY CI= �11 ;'.�1 c!RE 22 I I I X r � •i ' %, ' DhILL '[0 q ........................ -Y '. 1 �- ! ® i -0-mm :. LEVEL, ELEV.: 30-0 0 O S 10 23 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE 23 ✓� , CORRIt?OR � , LEVEL 3 ELEV.: 54-6° LF1 50 2 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY OF MIA?Al FIPS. 24 LEVEL 4 ELEV.- 68'-3!' u-i___i (0 0 5 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE CITY OF MIAMI FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 i 1 T. ■ ROOF EXERCISE AREA MUSEUM/LOBBY l 8 OFFICES APPARATUS B DRAFTING ` EQUIPMENT TEST l( GARAGE ROOM 8 APPARATUS RM j CLASSROOM/LABO RY GYM/MAIN BATH 9 LOCKER ROOMS AUDITORIUM DRAFTING PIT SECTION . _ow-14YL 4 .a•o_ 3 DRILL TOWER 2 1 0 5 10 25 DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING STUDY FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER COCONUT GROVE INCINERATOR SITE SECTION 4 COST ESTIMATE 26 We began the estimating of the cost of this project by evaluating a number of alternate solutions for the use of the site in an effort to produce the most cost effective plan that met all of the program requirements and was within the budget allocated by the fire department. The total budget for this project has been established at $1.43 million. Funds are to be made available through the 1976 Fire Bond Issue which provided capital improvement funds for the Miami Fire Department. This amount must in- clude, in addition to construction costs, items such as fees, administrative costs, equipment, and art work. The estimate that follows is based on our recommended building utilization. Following this is a description of the cost impact that two other alternatives would have. The estimate lists the major elements of the solution and, where possible, the quantity and unit cost. It is based on costs as of May 1979. The estimate includes a 15% contingency which is normal for an estimate based on preliminary plans and also because of the inflationary nature of the economy. Although it is obvious, we feel obligated to state that this estimate depends on construction being undertaken within a time frame of 6 to 8 months from the date of this report. r 27 COST ESTIMATE 1, SITE A. Landscaping .................................. $ 22,000.00 (includes trees, ground cover and sod) B. Paving ....................................... $ 45,000.00 C. Demolition .... ... $ 20,000.00 (foundations of�old'stack and*incinerator furnace) r D. Berm .......... $ 25,000.00 (including concrete retaining walls) E. Jefferson Street ......................... $ 12,000.00 (demolition, fill and sod) F. Electrical .. .... ............... $ 4,000.00 (change to underground service) G. Fire hydrants ................................ $ 4,500.00 1 H. Fence .... ... $ 7,500.00 (8' chain link fence to match existing) I. Site lighting ................................ $ 4,000.00 TOTAL SITE ...................................... $ 144,000.00 2. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION A. Renovation ..... . . ..... $ 350,000.00 ..... .... ... .. (14,000 sq. ft. @ $25.00/ sq. ft. includes new partitions, mechanical and electrical systems, finishes (exterior and interior) and lighting) B. New floors ........ $ 240,000.00 (6,000 sq. ft. (a $40.00/ sq. ft. includes structural members, connections to existing structure and floor deck) C. Drafting pit ................................. $ 30,000.00 ID. Elevator ..................................... $ 50,000.00 l E. Drill tower ...... .... ... .... $ 25,000.00 . .. ... .. .... .. (includes addition of walls and windows for I drill activities, stairways and intermediate l_ floors) TOTAL BUILDING .................................. $ 695,000.00 lTOTAL CONSTRUCTION .............................. $ 839,000.00 Contingency (15%) ............................... $ 125,000.00 l_ TOTAL ........................................... $ 964,000.00 r 3. PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS A. Design costs ...... ..... ........... $ 130,000.00 (includes ME fees and administration) B. Fixtures, furnishing and equipment ........... $ 290,000.00 (includes T.V. equipment) C. Art work .................................... 15,000.00 1• TOTAL DESIGN .................................... $ 435,000.00 1 rBUILDING SITE ............................................... $ 144,000.00 CONSTRUCTION .............................. $ 695,000.00 Contingency (15%).................................. $ 125,000.00 I t PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS .............. $ 435,000.00 TOTAL ................ $1,399,000.00 1. L L L L L 28 T � 29 COST ANALYSIS ALTERNATE #1 Site ... $ 240,000 (inlcudes demolition) New building .. $1,035,000 *(23,000 sq. ft. @ $45) TOTAL ......... $1,275,000 -The 23,000 sq. ft. represents the program for the training center and includes circulati- on, drill tower, and drafting pit. COST ANALYSIS ALTERNATE #2 Site .......... $ 140,000 New construction$ 562,000 (12,500 sq. ft. @ $45) *Incinerator Renovation .... $ 140,000 TOTAL ......... $ 842,500 *Includes drill tower, appa- ratus room, drafting pit, and general repair. SUMRY Comparison of three alter- natives for the use of the building and site. Does not include contingency, fees, furnishings, or equipment. ALTERNATE #1 ...$1,275,000 ALTERNATE #2 .....$842,500 RECO,DIENDED SOLUTION .........$839,000 COST ESTIMATE ALTERNATIVES Alternate #1 The demolition of the existing inciner- ator and the construction of a complete- ly new structure to house the training center. As can be seen in the estimate, this method results in a higher cost than the recommended solution. This is primarily due to the high cost of demo- lition ($100,000) and an increased i cost of new construction as opposed to renovation. Alternate #2 A combination of new construction for classrooms and office space and the u- tilization of the existing building exclusively for drill activities and apparatus storage. This scheme would cost approximately the same amount as the recommended solution. The main disadvantage is that the small area of available site makes it very difficult to situate a 12,500 sq. ft. building in a location that does not interfere with - the requirements of the program with respect to driver -engineer training, drill activities, hose evolution, etc. This alternative would be very attractive on a 5 of 6 acre site, but is not recommended on the present 3 acre site. 30 SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT The community in which the existing site is located is a predominantly black, low-income area and is one of the original settlements in the Miami area. Founded in the 1880's, it currently has a population of approxi- mately 9,300 and has come to be known as the Black Grove. Surrounded on all sides by relatively affluent white neighbors, it has struggled for years to retain its residential charac- ter and unique sense of community. At the same time, this area exhibits many of the characteristics that unfortunate- ly have become synonymous with neighbor- hoods such as this including high unem- ployment, sub -standard housing, and increased crime rates. It is precise- ly because of these facts that this area has been the subject of numerous studies and programs directed at finding ways to improve the physical and social conditions of the local residents. These include the designation of the area as a target area for Community Development Block Grant Funds, numerous public housing projects, and a pro- fessional study, completed in 1976, that dealt specifically with the In- cinerator site. It is not the purpose of this report to analyze or comment on the effectiveness of these programs and studies or to suggest alternative uses of the site. It is our purpose, specifically in this section, to assess the impact the Training Center will have on the neighbor- 31 hood and we felt a genuine responsi- bility to address ourselves to this issue as objectively and responsively as possible. Our attitude was, and is, to study and understand the kinds of activities that will occur on this site and how they will affect and be perceived by the surrounding residents. We are cognizant of the fact that any proposal for this site that is not spe- cifically and directly community ori- ented will be met with less than en- thusiastic support from the community but we must also deal with the follow- ing facts: The fact that the building as it now stands is a dangerous and unpleasant structure physically and has been that way for almost ten years. Psychnlogi- cally, the very presence of this structure has fostered the feeling that we sensed in interviews with some of the residents that there is no real interest on the part of the City to improve the neighborhood conditions. Whether this feeling is justified or not is not as important to us in the context of this report, as the fact that it does exist. The fact that for all of the studies and discussions surrounding this site, we have found no one who has a viable plan for the building or the political or economic capability to initiate one. The most ambitious study to date, com- r 32 pleted in 1976, suggested a compre- hensive development of the site as a vocational/opportunity center and park. It is our understanding that this plan was not implemented because of the complexity of funding sources, adminis- trative programs, and the ultimate cost ($4-$5 million). The fact that the Miami Fire Department has $1,430,000 available for the Fire - Rescue Training Center and our planning study indicates that the program can be accomplished within the incinerator building and surrounding site. Within the framework of the preceding facts, we then looked at the environ- mental aspects of this facility. One of the first things we realized was that this facility is not a fire station. It will not produce an inordinate amount of noise or smoke and fire apparatus will not be coming and going with sirens and horns in use. The main visible activities will consist of fire engines on the driver -engineer course and drill activities on the incinerator building itself. The overall connotation, we feel, will be more educational than institutional and the addition of con- siderable landscaping will greatly enhance the appearance of the site. We have made a number of recommendations that were based on environmental con- cerns as well as a desire to have the community benefit from this facility. These include: � 33 1. The closing of Jefferson St. 2. basketball The retention of the courts. 3. Landscaping 4. Provision of the drafting pit inside the building. 5. Recommendations regarding im- provements to Washington St. — All these items have been discussed f elsewhere in this report. Another factor that cannot be overlooked in the assessment of this facility is i i the fact that the fire department could indirectly benefit from its location in this neighborhood. The Miami Fire Department actively recruits minority [ employees and the kinds of activities that occur at the training center could serve to alter their Perception of fire fighters and, in fact, become an in- herent recruitment and role -modeling factor for the community. Rather than } create a closed and inaccessible fa- cility, the Fire Department has ex- pressed to us their desire to encourage the community to watch the proceedings and to utilize the public portions of the site. We do not feel that these phenomena in themselves justify the lo- cation of the facility at this site, but it is an effect that should not be minimized. The relationship between the fire department and the community is funda- mental to the acceptance of this fa- cility and we strongly recommend that f � 34 Rai d err.+.. as this project progresses, the sur- rounding residents and community leaders be encouraged to become in- volved in decision making roles. In this way, the facility can become as responsive to the residents' needs as possible and allow the community a sense of participation in a process that will greatly affect them. In conclusion, it is our feeling that this facility will not be " a building that could turn this community around " as a previously recommended use claimed. It could, however, based on our findings, become a good, responsive, and healthy neighbor to its surroundings and it is in this perspective that we have made the recommendations we have concerning this facility. r r 35 Cfollows _ APPENDIX A The chart that was provided r to us by the City of Miami Fire De- partment and represents the major desired program elements as well as their functional relationships. This program was the basis for our I` schematic design solution as shown in the section entitled Building and Site Utilization. (Section 3) I I r l_ L r CHART A TRAINING CENTER fiOGK R ! IRE: 1 FI!!ZSHES + i ROCIM + PEOPLE ADJACE.,.T 1 SF F ! C + W EQUIPMENT O:'FICE 1 2 200 ! I _ CAPTAIN'S I +� OFFICE i 1 1.3 120 I 1!:: TRJCTOR'5 4 (2 400 i ! GE'_ LC--, (1) PER ?A4TITIONEDI AREA s ZS:O (41 i CL`FUC—TY?ISx 1 1,2,3 200 hLIIEFTIONIS'"(6) 11jx. 1I13 WAIT— I! I ZING riGGM CC::TCDZAL I 1 :•3?ORATES 150 1,— '14 AND i I ROOM MAIN BATH- 25 ROOM 2 1213,9,10,� 600 LADIES 6 1,2,3.9.10; BATHROOM 12,13 ! 100 IPUBLIC 1 14 ( 80 TOILET MECH HV A/C IN A/C SHEET 1 OF 3 ELECT SPECIAL ITEMS k y 0 TLE:S,CHARGERS CLC TES LOCKER, CHALKBOARD 4' 1[ a.. . FOR RA�IO,INTER- I BULLETIN BOARD } CCN SYSTEM i OUTLETS, CLOTHES LOCKER, ACTIVITIES RGARD. INTERCG! BULLETIN BOARD + HV A/C OUTLETS, (4) CLOTHES LOCKERS { (I INTERCOM i I � i HV A/C OUTLETS,INTERCOM, CLOTHES LOCKERS, OFFICE SUPPLY l PA SYSTEM (OUT— I CABINETS, BULLETIN BOARD SIDE) i I t HV A/C ! OUTLETS WORK BENCH WITH VICE 3' B 6' } t I HV A/C (6)SHOWBRS, (4)TOILETS. (3) URINALS !E!! ,VATCRIES + FLOUR LRAINi SYSTEM I •U1v�L:.+u, -lu' . — .1— uv.••v• I SHOWERS WITH DOORS I } ';J A/C, (3iSHOWERSI LR, PA TILING THROUGHOUT, TOILETS WITH DOORS, SHOWERS WITH DOORS. FL03R GRhZ::S HV A/C LR I TILING THROUGHOUT, TOILETS WITH ! (1)TOILET, (1)LAV• I DOGRS ' i j . W M I 1 Iplll 0111 CHART A TRAINING CENTER ROOM REQUIRE? EST. AREA FINISHES ROOM PEOPLE I ADJACL::T SF F I C W EQUIPNWNT :KBR ROC 25 6,12,13 SGO ( WITH CRYI:::.1 I t j r:KER ROOM 6 7,12,13 250 .."EN'S 'WITH CRYING �AR-EA 6ai,RY i 7 1 1,2,3,4 240 ! i I OITCRIUM 100 3.4.6.7,13! 2,000 _ISSROGM) i ASSROOM 30 3,6,7,12 i 600 uORATGRY 1 ..SSRJOM 30 600 .5: JRATORY 13,6,7,12 1 i RcpOm 30 1 3,6,7,12 600 ROP.ATORY :'AP.A:JS G 0 1 17 2,500 PUMPER, AERIAL U I F ME::T ( i '.RAGE I ! ITCHEN - I 15 1.2,3,4,5, 350 .FFEE ROOM 12,13 3 i W Go MECH HV A/C HV A/C HV A/C HV A/C HV A/C ELECT SHEET 2 OP 3 SPECIAL ITEMS LR AND PA i25 BUILT-!N LOCKERS (CUBICLES) BE`SCHES, TILE WALLS TO 4' HIGH I jZ BUILT-Ik: LOCKERS (CUBICLES) i LR AND PA BENCHES, TITLE WALLS TO 4' HIGH 3 LLE': L': SOAR O, (3) DESK CUBICLES, LR (3)CH"_ RS I PRC EJ:ICa ...:CT!{, CC`:THJL LIGHTING, , LR AND PA SPEAKER CON- TIt. JUS ::E:;K AND PADDED SEATS FOR , CJ :E :LE LR AND INTERCO.'M1 RLcm FOR ,SPR:':fv._rkS, :..t..._''IPE T•_.O ;.PPARATUS C:,Y.PLr..._ C!lA? 'R RS1 ROGY, TA3'r: T.-ND C:iAIFS FOR ' ' j� Fr^, •,T r AND INTERCOM ~Si.'• %. �� . E..;T R_ Y. F : R iLR ' ;. 'tNl::k;Lii•`. 'F_':� APPA"A:VS , qsl !LR AND INTERCOM L' ., ..._, E%:P .ri.:.....0 AIDS AND j O'VICER , LR AND PA Nj ...,..�F'3� FCR nC:ES', LIFc 5ELT5, '_; !E,_v-s FOR C/'.HER ?. , i OFE S:JlU.:;E, 1z X 12 PCh�R DOORS WI:9i 23 FT. CLEAR F;EICH SINK WITH HOT 6 iLR AND PA '(4)TABLL5, (15)CHAIRS, BUILT-IN , COLD WATER, HV A/C ,CABINET EXHAUST FAN I . I i w V 111 II)III Iliximl . CHART A TRATNTUr rr.,vTrn EST. AREA FINISHES ROOM PEOPLE ADJACENT EQUIPMENT MECH ELECT SPECIAL ITEMS SF F C. W 1 CLOSED CIR— 2 NONE 1,000 HV A/C LR AND PA STORAGE FOR FILMS, TAPES AND ALL CUIT TV STUDIO I i AV EQUIPMENT, (2)DESKS. (5)CHAIRS DRILL TOWER NONE EXTERIOR MINIMUM OF 1 FLOOR DRAINS ON LR AND PA i SMOKE A::D HEAT ROOM, REUSABLE ROOT t RELATED (5)USABLE AIL FLOORS, VENT G OUTSIDE ALSO IFOR VENTILATION PRACTICES, OUTSIDE AREA FLOORS 6 FILTER SISTEM FOR FIRE ESCAPE TO THE RCGF AREA, MINIMUM OF SMOKE ROOM I PER:4A::E::T SAFETY NET, FIRE 600 SQ.FT. HYDRANTS --MINIMUM OF (2) PER FLOOR GYM 6,9,10 1,000 HV A/C LR AND PA iMIRRORS FOR GYM WALL(6) I FLOOR MATS(3) WEIGHT SCALES(2) 1 i (1) LARGE i TELEPHONE, FIREMAN4'S SERVICE IELEVATOR SHAFT liOIS.vAY i MUSEUM 0 4.12 1,000 ( I 1 HV A/C LR I DISPLAY CASES, SPECIAL LIGHTING t HOSE TOKER j 0 17 600 ELEC. HOIST j ACCESS TO TOP OF TOWER i 1 I AND CAT WALK. )c)U:JDS DRIVING 0 MINIMUM 25'1 f COURSE DRIVEWAY DRAFTING PIT 0 1,000 FOR TESTING I �• i i PUMPERS j VITA COURSE ca m ENCLOSURE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 80, - 7 7 A PESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIRE TP.AINING FACILI':Y AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM IN COCO!= GRO`IE AS A CATEGORY B PROJECT WITH RESPECT TO THE PLANNING AND DESIGN THEREOF, IN ACCOP.Dr.!;CE WITH SU3SECTION (5) (a) OF SECTION 16-17 OF THE CITY CODE, WHIC-1 SECTIOI1 ESTA3LIS iES PR(XEDU?ES IN CONTRACTI".:G FOR SAID PROFESSIONAL SFRVICF_.S A:ID ALSO ESTABLIS.1ES CO'•'_T ETITIVE N..COTIATI^N .- ^UI?_.71 _':L'i:'S WITH REGARD TO THE CF SUC:: A,",:) A..'FOINT1143 Mi-NETH E. MCCULLOUG , Dr:!'':Y FIRE C IE_ , AS C....I.'L�:I OF THE COM?ETITIVE CON-MITTEE IN ACCOFDANCE WI-1H SUBSECTION (5) (c) OF SECTICN 16-17 0: THE CITY CODE WHEREAS, the City of Miami intends to acquire professional services for the design and construction of a Fire Training Facility and Closed Circuit TV System in Coconut Grove in the near future; and WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that such Fire Training Facility be designated as a Category B project, in accordance with the l/ provisions of Subsection (5)(a) of Section 16-17 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that Kenneth E. McCullough, Deputy Fire Chief, be appointed as Chairman of the Competitive Selection Corumittee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Fire Training Facility and Closed Circuit TV System in Coconut Grove is hereby designated as a Category B project with respect to the planning and design thereof, in accordance with the provisions of Subsections (5)(a) of Section 16-17 of the City Code, which section establishes procedures in contracting for certain professional services and also establishes competitive negotiation requirements with regard to the furnishing of such services. 1/ Ordinance No. 8965, adopted July 23, 1979, enacting said Code Section has not been printed in the bound code volurie; pertinent parts thereof are reproduced verbatim on the schedule attached to thi ur R-+; ,_ CITY COi'141SSION �•�,,,, , MEETING OF i ENCLOSURE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 8 0 - 7 7 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIRE TRAINING FACILITY A2ND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM IN COCC`.1CT GROVE AS A CATEGORY B PROJECT WITH RESPECT TO THE ?LANNING AND DESIGN THEREOF, IN ACCORDAN= WITH SLDSFCTION (5) (a) Or SECTI,,.. 16-17 OF THE CITY CODE, WI!ICH SECTION ESTABLISt;ES Pi?CkcEDT_'.^-ES IN CONTRZICTI`;G FOR SAID PR31 ESSICNAL SER`. _CF.S :2:D ALSO ESTABLISHES CO3,TLTIT_'i =^ I`,^.IC.I . �; I: �`.i S WITH REGARD TO THE I I.. ' F u - 'FOI"T " ,�.i Ji: '� S .C. _EJ r. -INS F.ENNETii E. MCCULLDUGH, DE: 1:TY : I:... C IE_ AS _....:? ?�:I OF THE =-PETITIVE SET. ECTI1=": CC,ti'_MIT EE I`1 A=_R A*ICE W=H SUBSECTIC"i (5) (c) OF SECTION 1 6-17 OF THE CITY CODE WHEREAS, the City of Miami intends to acquire professional services for the design and construction of a Fire Training Facility and Closed Circuit TV System in Coconut Grove in the near future; and WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that such Fire Training Facility be designated as a Category B project, in accordance with the l/ provisions of Subsection (5)(a) of Section 16-17 of the City Code; and WPE?EP.S, the City Manager recommends that Kenneth E. McCullough, Deputy Fire Chief, be appointed as Chairman of the Competitive Selection Committee; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MI;LMI , FLORIDA: Section 1. The Fire Training Facility and Closed Circuit TV System in Coconut Grove is hereby designated as a Category B project with respect to the planning and design thereof, in accordance with the provisions of Subsections (5)(a) of Section 16-17 of the City Code, which section establishes procedures in contracting for certain professional services and also establishes competitive negotiation requirements with regard to the furnishing of such services. 0 1/ Ordinance No. 8965, adopted July 23, 1979, enacting said Code Section has not been printed in the bound cote volume; pertinent parts thereof are reproduced verbatim on the schedule attached to thi �-,, ,r CITY COM,141SSION 4 S C ti - "Sec. 16-17. Acquisition of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural or land surveying services. (1) Definitions. (5) Competitive selection. (a) The decision to engage a firm to provide professional services shall be made by the City Commission upon the recommendation of the City Manager. The Commission shall desi;nate the project as either a Category A project or a Categor.i B project, the former Category A comDrisi: `_.' cse projects which are of such nature that one or more Cit!: CC-=4_ssioners will be required to serve upon the '_.•cticn Com:,_ttee as hereinafter provided. A proj not d__>_^nated as a Cateaory A project shall be deemed a Category B project. (b) W (ii) The City Manager sr;all appoint a Competitive Selection Committee for each project in Category B. Such committee shall have no less than six members made up as follows: one representative of the administrative department which shall have been charged the City Manager with overall resnonsibility for the project; one representative of each administr:at_✓e office or board which shall have been identified by the City Manager as being a principal user of the project with a maximum nu.;ber of three such representatives; the director of the Building and Zoning Inspection De_•artm.ent or his designee; the director of the Finance Department or his designee; the City Manager or his designee; one or more professionals in the field of endeavor or practice involved; further, each member of the City Commission is eligible to serve ex officio as a member of the ccmmittee; the number of members on the committee will depend upon the nature and complexity of the project. (iii) All further references to the term "Competitive Selection Committee" in the following sections of this ordinance shall be deemed as references to both the Competitive Selection Committee for Category A projects and Category B projects. (c) The City Commission shall appoint as chairperson of the Competitive Selection Committee either the member representing the department or the member representing the principal user(s) of the project. (7) Competitive Negotiation (a) The City Manager or his designee shall attempt to negotiate a professional services contract for the project with the firm which has ranked first for a compensation which he has deter- mined to be fair, competitive, and acceptable. (c) Should the City Manager or his designee be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the selected firms, additional f-;=s shall be negotiated with in rank order of competence and qualification until an agreement is reached. The negotiated agreement shall be presented to the City Commission for approval. r, of the City Code. PASSED ACID ADOPTED this ATTEST: 12th day of February , 1980. Maurice A. Ferre MAURICE A. FERRE, M A Y O R Q LPH ONGIE, CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPWV7ED BY: ROBERT F. CLARK, ASST. CI:'Y ATTOP11EY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ----------------------------------------------------------- _FOLLOW" 1/ Ordinance No. 8965, adopted July 23, 1979, enacting said Code Section has not been printed in the bound code colume; pertinent parts thereof are reproduced verbatim on the schedule attached to this resolution. 1+11N ENCLOSURE 3 CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To Below Listed personnel DATE February 26, 1980 FILE. SUBJECT Appointment as Member of Competitive Selection Committee FROM Joseph R. Grassie City Manager REFERENCES ENCLOSURES The Department of Fire is soliciting Letters of Interest from architectural/engineering firms for the design development of a Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System. The City Commission has appointed Deputy Chief K. E. McCullough as Chair:nsn of the Competitive Selection Co oittee and, as out- lined by Ordinance No. 8965, I am appointing you as a member of this co7inittee. Evaluation of the interested firms will occi:r Tuesday, ?:arch 25, 19s^, at 9:00 a.m., in the Committee of the Whcle room. The ccmmittee ,•ill select no less t`,an three (3) firms, fully qualified to perform the required services, to :nuke their pre- sentations to the Competitive Selecticn Committee Tuesday, April 8, 19S0, 9:00 a.m..-12:00 Noon, at a location that has not been determined at this time. CC: Chief R. Z. Coleman, Department of Fire Chief L. D. DeChime, Department of Fire J. E. Gunderson, Director, Department of Finance G. Salman, Director, Deportment of Building & Zoning M. J. Kaufmann, Special ;assistant to City Manager Carl Kern, Director, Department of Parks Chief K. E. McCullough, D•_,partment of Fire "SUPPI"IRTiVE DOC ".)11v1 L" [11*6 FOLLOW„ 109� 'A""'NENCLOSURE 3 CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Below Listed personnel DATE February 26, 1980 FILE. SueJE::r Appointment as Member of Competitive Selection Committee 0 FROM Joseph R. Grassie REFERENCES City Manager ENCLOSURES The Department of Fire is soliciting Letters of Interest from architectural/engineering firms for the design development of a Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System. The City Commission has appointed Deputy Chief K. E. McCullough as Chairm_--n of the Competitive Selection Committee and, as out- lined by Ordinance Poo. 8965, I am appointing you as a member of this committee. Evaluation of the interested firms will occ.:r Tuesday, March 25, 1980, at 9:00 a.m., in the Committee of the Whcle room. The co:%mittee will select no less than three (3) fi=.s, fully qualified to per`orm the required services, to make their pre- sentations to the Competitive Selection Committee Tuesday, AD ril 8, 15i30, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 Noon, at a location that has not been determined at this time. CC: Chief R. Z. Coleman, Department of Fire Chief L. D. DeChime, Department of Fire J. E. Gunderson, Director, Department of Finance G. Salman, Director, Department of 5uildina & Zoning M. J. K,:ufmann, Snecial Assistant to City Manager Carl Kern, Director, Department of Parks Chief K. E. McCullough, Department of Fire "SUPP "'PTIVE FOLLOW„ January 25, 1980 Frank'3. Abbott .•• Architects Partnership of PN, Baggesen, Durre & Rose 3195 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Brown, Lopez, Brown Architects, P.P. Coral Gables, FL 33134 4023 Ponce d= Leon Blvd. 7211 SW 62n"' Ave, Coral Gables, FL 33146 Fla., 33143 Abele & Forfar 1450 Madruga Ave. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Kilton Abrams 9035 S.W. 17th Tarr. Miami, FL 33165 Hernando Acosta 2890 S.W. 28th.Terr, Miami, FL 33133 Hugo Alpizar 1640 W. 49th St. Hialeah, FL 33012 Alt —an Architects 2906 Douglas :9Ia_mi, 1a. 33134 Raul Alvarez 710 Ridgewood Rd. Key Biscayne, FL 33149 A.nlerican institute of Archi- tects, S. Fla. Chapter P.O. Box 647 :!iami, FL 33143 ..ntoniadis Associates P.A. 3326 Mary St. :diami, FL 33133 Architectural Associates 16095 N. W. 57th Ave. Miami, FL 33014 Architectural Consultants 8686 Coral Way ;201 Miami, FL 33155 Architectural Designing Inc. 11535 S. Dixie Hwy. Miami, FL 33156 Architectural & Planning Consultants Ltd. 1840 W. 49th St. x307 Hialeah, FL Ps chiteknics Architects & Planners 2000 S. Dixie Hwy. Z216 Miami, FL 33133 Arden, Green Architects 3298 Mary St. Suite n4 Miami, FL 33133 Scott B. Arnold 7550 Red Road South Miami, FL 33143 Arquitectonica 1934 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Walter W. Baggesen 250 NE 47th St. Miami, FL 33137 Baldwin & Sackman 3298 Mary St. Suite r2 Miami, FL 33133 Giorgio Balli 3360 SW Coral Way Suite Miami, FL 33145 Bigelman & Hernandez 9450 SW 72nd St. #204 Miami, FL 33173 Beilinson, Tinney Ill SW 3rd St. Suite 101 Miami, FL 33130 Bellin, .Sarshall & Assoc. 28 W. Flagler St. Suite 301 Miami, FL 33131 B.M. Benach Jr. 2525 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 201 Miami, FL 33129 Jose P. Benitoa 2370 SW 17th St. Miami, FL 33145 Jorge S. Arango William H. Arthur Adonay Bergamaschi 3920 :•rood Ave. 800 Douglas Rd. Suite 303 2649 S. Bayshore Dr. =19-_- Xiami, FL 33133 Miami, Fla. 33134 Miami, FL 33133 `.11t.3t -'95 3ry St Suite 4 Robert Bradford Browne 1 Manuel Cor`inas : L 33133 2^o6S Day Ave. 715 SW 73rd Ave. Suite Miami, FL 33133 Miami, FL 33144 y Assoc. '_-"S3 S.W. 3rd St. Buigas & Associates Moshe Cosicher :i ani, FL 33131 500 N. W. 165th St. Rd. 2525 Collins Ave. Miami, FL 33169 Miami Beach, FL 33140 =ntonio Boada & Assoc. William Cox :525 SW 3rd Ave. 404 David J. Cabarrocas 4621 Ponce de Leon Blvd. !iammi, FL 33129 1 S.E. 15 Rd. Coral Gables, FL 33146 Miami., FL 33131 :orroto & Lee Architects William G. Crawford 3341 Cornelia Dr. Edward I. Cannier 2114 NE 21st St. !ia.u, r^L 33133 40 NE 54th St. Miami, FL 33137 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33305 Tosco -Wilson Architects ,333 Rice St. Channing & Charming Architects Ted Danek & Associates FL 33133 & Engineers 811 NE 79th St. 71 Nv; 54 St. Miami, FL 33138 Miami, FL 33127 'outerse, Perez, Fabregas _441 Brickell Ave. John Colao Homer F. Daniel :iani. FL 33131 10880 SW 164th St. 9300 SW 87 Ave. Suite "3 Miami, FL 33157 Miami, FL 33176 hilip R. Braden •341 Sunset Dr. Collaborative 3 Inc. Danon & Del Pino :outh Miami, FL 33143 1450 Madruga Ave. Suite =2 4212 Laguna St. Coral Gables, FL 33146 Coral Gables, FL 33134 'illiam Reynolds Bradford -'•% - - - - chitect Engineer - -`-} 11 George F. David 0 :ice 186 Terr. .. ��` 924 Lincoln Road Suite 204 ......... . F y r`�. - Miami Beach, FL 33139 :iami L 33179 h rlos P. Bravo Consultants Collaborative Inc. Stephen m. Davis 06 Madeira Ave. 6310 Sunset Dr. 4704 SW LeJeune Road oral Gables, FL 33134 South Miami, FL 33143 Coral Gables, FL 33146 rth:L L. Breakstone Cook, Reiff associates H. Carlton Decker 740 N. Kendall Dr. 411 S. 21st Ave. 2649 S. Bayshore Dr. uite D-105 Hollywood, FL 33120 Suite 1903 ;-T,i, FL 33156 Miami, FL 33133 •2nry E. Brown, Jr. Juan Corbella James Deen r.Howard L. Dut.kin Juan Sily=rio Fernandez 150 S;1 36th Ave. L9420 NE 23 Ave. 1575 W. 49th St. FL 33143 Miami, FL 33130 Suite 207 Hialeah FL 33012 �lipe De Leon '525 SW 3rd Ave. Suite 201 i amni , FL 33129 ntonio De Soto Jr.. 300++-rl 79 Ave. 100 -a.mi, FL 33166 Drge Delgado 001 SW 8th Terr iami, FL 33174 he Design Shop 210 Red Road Suite 201 Guth Miami, FL 33143 lenent DiFillippo 301 Dade Blvd. gym_ o or- ^7 791 70 _cksor. & Associates ? ... Flagler St. :ite 1630 '_ami, FL 33130 �hn R. Diehl -60 SW 87th Ct. :ite 4116 ami, FL 33176 onard J. DiSilvestro :0 SW 100 St. :mi, FL 33156 Harvey J. Ehrlich 2580 NE mia i Gardens Dr. No. Miami, FL 33180 Epstein/Greenfield/Shulman 2221 N. Federal Hwy. Hollywood, FL 33020 Falcon & Bueno Architects 4061 Battersea Rd. Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Joseph Farcus 260 N. Shore Dr. Miami Beach, FL 33141 Eugene Davis Farmer 3630 SW 23rd St. FL 33145 Gilbert M. Fein 6350 Allison Rd. P.O. Box 40-2245 M.ia.2i Beac: FL 33140 David Jay Feinberg 10700 Caribbean Blvd. Suite 302 Miami, FL 33189 Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candela Architect, Engineers 800 Douglas Rd. Coral Gables, FL. 33134 Ricardo J. Fernandez 61 Merrick Play Suite 61 Coral Gables, FL 33134 John E. Fernsler 150 SE 2nd Ave. Suite 1111 Miami, FL 33131 Jose Figueroa 801 Madrid St. Suite 102 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Filer, Ear -mood & Associates 250 Catalonia Ave. Suite 80" Coral Gables, FL 33134 Miguel Font 5941 SW Bath St. Miami, FL 33156 Fontanills & Arche-Urshelm 2320•SW 57 Ave. Miami, FL 33155 Foti-Mullane Architects 600 NE 72nd Terr. Miami, FL 33138 Fraga Alorso and Feito 3663 SW Sth St. Suite 200 Miami, FL 33135 rlos R. Dominguez Eddy Frances 4 Almeria Ave. Christ Fergis 1769 SW 3rd Ave. ral Gables, FL 33134 14411 S. Dixie Hwy. Miami, FL 33129 Suite 205 Miami, FL 33176 --'ras.uer :nig = Associatas Gee, Martinez Architects Franklin E. Grau Assoc. 3730 N. K_•n-'all Dr. �104 100 Westward Dr. 1170 INE 36th St. :" a:s, FL 33176 Miami Springs, FL 33166 Miami, FL 33138 Ronald E'. Frazier Grahars A. Geralds Peter W.P. Graulich & ,s 5300 ti.a 7 Ave., Suite 206 352 N.E. 167 St. Suite "B 2733 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Miami, FL 33127 No. Miami Beach, FL 33162 Coral Gales, Fla. 331=4 William D. Gerberich Joe Greenberg Robert Karl Frese 3790 NW 167th St. 3298 t4ary St. Suite =4 40 NE 54th St. Miami, FL 33055 Miami., FL 33133 FL 33137 William r_iecttaan &Assoc. 'Edward :4. Ghezzi Greenleaf-Telesca Planner. 138 SE 14th Ln 5900 SW 73rd St., Suite 106 & Architects Miami, FL 33131 South Miami, FL 33143 1451 Brickell Ave. 2nd f_ Miami, FL 33131 Frimet Desicn Associates Zrbye Giddens Grossman, Melvin Architec 205 S. 28th Ave. 1600 SW 12th St. 151 NE 40th St. FL 33120 Miami, FL 33135 Miami, FL 33137 Rocer Fry Thomas Gili Juan Gutierrez 2791 Bird Ave. 137 Aragon. Ave. 145 Madeira Ave. Suite 31 FL 22122 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Fullerton Architects Charles Giller & Assoc. Guy, Rollins & Assoc. 7600 Douglas Rd. Suite 703 4100 No. Miami Ave. 1035 E. 26th St. FL 33134 Miami, FL 33127 Hialeah, FL 33013 ;�.R.V. Design Corp. - Norman Giller Assoc. William B. Hall 175 Fountainbleau Blvd. 975 Arthur Godfrey Road 9900 Sw 168 St. quite 224 Suite 401 Miami, FL 33157 'Iiami, FL 33172 Miami Beach, FL 33140 Robert J. Gar,.bach Glasser, Sacmag Associates Milton C. Harry 633 NE 167 St. #325 347 NE 36th St. 2780 SW Douglas Rd. No. Miami Beach, FL 33162 Miami, FL 33137 Suite 302 Miami, FL. 33133 Ricardo J. Gonzalez Harry, Oppenheimer, Ross giddy Garcia 1460 Brickell Ave. 2780 SW 37 Ave. 255 University Dr. Miami, FL 33131 Suite 300 ,-oral Gables, FL 33134 Miami, Fla. 33133 ii�_ __, :•__ _ �.:.. ..��_:. ::::�o:: n Howard 7900*Red Rd. Suite 23 f 3343 NE 2nd Ave. 1800 SW 25th St. South Mia.:i, FL 33143 Miami, . - 33138 Miami, FL 33133 Octavio A. Hernandez Johnson Assoc. Architects La Rocca Lrn na Eg:iler 1490 W. 49th P1. 833 Brickell Ave. Suite 300 244 San Lorenzo Ave. Hialeah, FL. 33012 Miami, FL 33131 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Johnson, Vener Morris Lanidus Assoc. George J. Hladik 12605 NE 7 Ave. 1301 Dade Blvd. 1600 NW LeJeune Rd. Miami, FL 33161 2nd Floor Miard, FL 33126 Miami. Beach, FL 33139 David :Caplan Aldo Lastra Architects Jan Hochstim 1810 NE 153rd St. 2740 SW 37th Ave. 5940 SW 73rd St. No. Miami. Beach, FL 33162 Miami, FL 33165 South Miami, FL. 33143 Alberto R. Lauderman Hof.--man-Santos Rainundez Robert W. Kenworth 6241 MW 110th St. 265 ;.ragon Ave. 1258 SW 3rd St. Hialeah, FL 33012 Suite F Miami, FL 33130 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Khoury, Martinez, Pose Assoc. Richard A. Lefcourt rofstetter, :la::.ae11 Assoc. 353 Alcazar Ave. 1662 NE 123 St. 13921. Sr4' 90th Ave. Coral Gales, FL 33134 North Miami, FL 33181 Mi-amd, F L 33176 Jorge Khuly Leff & Alexander O.K. Houston Jr. 4141 SW 74th Ct. 5995 Sunset Dr. 420 S. Dixie Hwy. Miami, FL 33155 South Miami, FL 33143 Suite 4A Coral Gables, FL 33146 Klements & Associates Lester B. Knight Hudson & Root Architects 3127 Ponce de Leon Blvd. 407 Lincoln Rd. 1550 S. Dixie Hwy. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Coral Gables, FL 33146 V.J. F.nezuvich & Assoc. Richard Levine Robert Hutcheson 2780 Douglas Rd. 3814 NE Miami Ct. 1190 San Pedro Ave. Suite 202 Miami, F1. 33137 Coral Gables, FL 33156 Coral Gables, FL. 33134 Llano, Fair Jerome Fred W. Hutchinson Kotkin & Ocampo 9300 SW 67 Ave. Suite 2 4379 Ingraham Hwy. 7221 Coral Way Suite 202 Miami, Fla. 33176 Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 Miami, FL 33155 Morton, ;.ol:cerg, „lvar_.. L941 S-1 47 St. 2980 McFarlane Rd. Taracido & Assoc. Miami, FIA. 33155 Coconut Grove, Fla. 33133 1501 rVDT North River Dr. Miami, Fla. 33125 James E. Lynskey 3325 SW 97 Ct. mia-- Fla. 33165 Alfred Mandel -kern 3038 N. Federal Hwy. Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 33306 Enrique Marina 2157 Coral Way Suite C Miami, Fla. 33145 Ned Charles Marks 4710 LeJeu-ne Rd. Suite 10 Coral Gables, Fla. 33146 Amer Marnorstein & Assoc. '01 Coral „av Suite 210 oral G: Ala,. Fla. 1311-1 A. Carlos Marti '01 Madrid St. Suite 106 :oral Gables, Fla. 33134 ric Maspons '6886 Coral Way •1iaru., Fla. 33155 ;ohn E. May ;20 W. Hallandale Beach Blvd. illandale, FL 33009 ,orothy A. McKenna 450 S:9 3 Ave. .'_anti, FL 33145 Jaraes Merrifield Architects 1515 NW 167th St. Suite 222 Miami, FL 33169 Joseph Middlebrook Assoc. 3300 :lice St. Suite 6 Miami, Fla. 33133 Kenneth Russell Miller 3139 Coraodore Plaza Miami, FL 33133 J. Milton & Assoc. 18333 NW 68th Ave. Miant, Fla. 33015 Edna Mingo 5018 7th Ave. Miami, FL 33127 Jorge Miro 4776 SL•.1 8th St. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Firoz Rustom Mistry 7211 SW 62nd Ave. n103 South Miami, Fla. 33143 Jaime Monserrat 9999 Na; 7 Ave. Mia-mi, FL 33159 Montagnnri & Assoc. 2500 E. Hallandale Beach Blvd. Hallandale, FL 33009 Larry L. Mounts 1570 Madruga Ave. Su'_te 2. Coral Gables, FL 33145 William Cook Murphy 7100 SW 68th St. Suite Mia.*ti., FL. 33156 William Joseph Muse Archi-- 9150 SW 87th Ave. Suite li Miami, Fla. 33176 Jame Dennis Neal 9306 14E 9 Ave. Miami Shores, Fla. 33138 Nichols Assoc. Architects 2600 Douclas Road Suite ? Coral Gables, FL 33134 Rufus Nims 3637 Palmetto Ave. Miami, Fla. 33133 Ocamoo and Associates 7221 Coral Way Suite 201 Miami, Fla. 33155 Ocanpo, Fernandez Renaud 1: 2707 N. Andrews Ave. Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 33311 Offerle-Lerner A.I.A. 7000 S,•1 62nd Ave. Suite D- South Miami, Fla. 33143 •'�ndoza & Esteves Architects Gustavo Moreno Otto Oppenheimer J45 30 th St. - . 109 :•tiracle Mile Suite 200 7801 Coral aay 3900 zzel 79th Ave. Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 Suite 121 Suite 480 Miami, FL 33155 Miami, FL 33166 Bernal Oruna Architects 3333 C:A 7th St., Suite 301 Miami, FL. 33125 E. Matutes Oscar Mat Additions 1190 E. 4th Ave. Hialeah, FL 33010 Phillic J. Ostendorf 104 Grandon Blvd., Suite 305 Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Rafael Piniella 3290 SW 17 St. Miami, Fla. 33145 Ethel E. Pinsker 1190 N.E. 125th St. No. Miami, FL. 33161 Arthur Thomas Pochert 863 NE 79th St. Miami, Fla. 33138 Pace Assocs. Architects Quincy, Johnson Associates 1450 Brickell Ave., Suite 306 1450 ZMadruga Ave. FL 33131 Suite 205 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Par.ccast, Albaisa 3370 Mary St. Coccnut Grove, FL 33133 '.4illiam A. PaPy III 1,17 Al:,:Y:.bra Cir. Suite 227 Coral Gables, Fla. Alfred Browning Parker 2937 SW 27 Av--. Miami, FL 33133 Charles Harrison Pawley 3011 SW 28 Lane wu, FL. 33133 Guillermo R. Paz 3831 SW 107 Ave. Suite 223 Fla. 33176 Ramos, Lemuel Associates 7615 SW 62 Ave. South Miami, FL 33143 George F. Reed 3050 Bird Ave. Miami, FL 33133 Reiff-Fellman & Associates 1449 Brickell Ave. Miami, FL 33131 Rentscher, Haynes, Spencer Richards 2780 Douglas Rd. Suite 201 Coral Gables, FL 33133 Reynolds, Smith & Hills 221 Oakland Park Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 Rider, Little Assocs. 18131 SW 93 Ct. Miami, FL 33157 J.J. Gaston Rivero 1450 Coral Way Suite 6 Miami, FL 33145 Don F. Roban 7375 SW 99 St. Miami, FL 33156 Robinson & Associates 4217 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33138 J. Juan Rodriguez 835 SW 37 Ave. Suite 103 Miami, FL 33135 Mariano Rodriguez 7500 SDI 81 Ave. Miami, FL 33143 Ricardo P. Rodriguez 7171 SW 8 St. Suite 212 Miami, FL 33144 Rodriguez-Tellaheche, J.A. 8384 S.W. 40 St. Miami, Fla. 33155 Roger, Fry & Associates 2791 Bird Ave. N.iami, FL 33133 Morris Ross 940 Lincoln Rd. Miami Beach, FL 33139 Rot::-;7il1ia.,s Architects 3033 Grand Ave. Suite =1 Miami, FL 33133 Theo Roux 1036 South Miami Ave. Miami, FL 33130 Russell & Axon 1800 W. 49th St. Suite 205 Hialeah, FL 33102 Russell, Martinez & Holt 10�0 Coral Way, Suite 204 Miami, Fla. 33145 S3 3 Sezerud, Bc�-are=a, Buff, Eer-.sllc Inc. Coral =.ol_s, 331342 S.H.S. Associates 2630 9th St. :forth St. Petersburg, F1. 33704 Rodrigo J. Saavedra 4864 NE' 12th Ave. Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 33334 Saez & Pacetti 7206 S.1 59 Ave. South 1•1iand, Fla. 33143 Frank E. Sanchez 16600 NZ 3 Ave. Miar,i, FL 33162 Sandy & Babcock 2300 S. Dixie Hwy. Miami, FL 33133 Angel C. Saqui 6912 Biscayne Blvd. Miami, Fla. 33138 Sandy Saunders 470 SW 26 Rd. Miami, FL 33129 o- Suite 201 .Michael A. Scavuzzo 9500 h"4 77 Ave. Suite C Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 Wilbert Schafer 123 Madeira Ave. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Jaime Schapiro 847 NNW 119 St. Suite 201 No. Miami, Fla. 33163 Brad Schiffer Architect 7210 Red Road Suite 201 South Miami, FL. 33143 John H. Schmitz 1015 NE 81st St. Miami, FL 33138 Reuben S. Schneider 9114 Griffin Rd. Cooper Ci,y, FL 33328 Steven B. Schwartz 18350 rw 2nd Ave, Suite 402 Miami, FL. 33169 Schwebke-Shiskin & Assoc. 18800 N.W. 2 Ave. Miami, Fla.. 33169 Harold Seckinger 1271 Coral Way Miami, FL 33145 Serguson, Glasgow & Schus7 2901 Ponce de Leon Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 Se „our, Drexler Architec 9830 SW 77 Ave. Miami, Fla. 33156 Robt. M. Shrum 13205 NZ 16 Ave. North Miami, FL 33181 Donald Wayne Shuey 2300 S. Dixie Hwy. Miami, Fla. 33133 Frank H. Shuflin 9822 NE 2nd Ave. Suite -7 Miami Shores, Fla. 33133 Charles M. Sieger 9300 Galloway Rd. Suite E Miami, Fla. 33176 Jose L. Sierra 2025 SW 32 Ave. Miami, Fla. 33145 James F. Silvers 1581 Brickell Ave. Miami, Fla. 33129 Sanders S Thomas Inc. Vincent S. Schulman Jerry P. Sirnons1777 Biscayne Blvd. 3,500 N'4 53 Terr. 2221 N. Fed. Hwy. _ 1 - =1 CtJiY: r1i:G1:1 jt021 c .I:�.o lo? 'Airacl_ Mile Suite 200 ) 17801 Coral Way O� 3900 z.-4 79th Ave. Coral Gables, Fla. 33134 Suite 121 Suite 480 Miami, FL 33155 Miami, FL 33166 Bernal Oruna ASchitects 3333 t,74 7th St. , Suite 301 "iia:ii, FL. 33125 E. Matutes Oscar Mat Additions 1190 E. 4th Ave. Hialeah, FL 33010 Phi11i:) J. Ostendorf 104 Grandon Blvd., Suite 305 Key Biscayne, FL 33149 Rafael Piniella 3290 SW 17 St. Miami, Fla. 33145 Ethel E. Pinsker 1190 N.E. 125th St. No. Miami, FL. 33161 Arthur 'Thomas Pochert 863 NE 79th St. Miami, Fla. 33138 Pare Assocs. Architects Quincy, Johnson Associates 14^0 Brickell Ave., Suite 306 1450 t-?adruga Ave. FL 33131 Suite 205 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Par.coast, Albaisa 3370 :;ary St. Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Willi r-n A. Pa. y III 117 Al =.7:ora Cir. Suite 227 Coral Gables, Fla. Alfred Browning Parker 2937 SW 27 Avc. Miami, FL 33133 Charles Harrison Pawley 3011 SW 28 Lane Mia.^u, FL. 33133 Ramos, Lemuel Associates 7615 Sid 62 Ave. South Miami, FL 33143 George F. Reed 3050 Bird Ave. Miami, FL 33133 - Reiff-Fellman & Associates 1449 Brickell Ave. Miami, FL 33131 Rentscher, Haynes, Spencer Richards 2780 Douglas Rd. Suite 201 Coral Gables, FL 33133 Rider, Little Assocs. 18131 SW 98 Ct. Miami, FL 33157 J.J. Gaston RiverO 1450 Coral Way Suite 6 Miami, FL 33145 Don F. Roban 7375 SW 99 St. Miami, FL 33156 Robinson & Associates 4217 Ponce de Leon. Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33138 J. Juan Rodriguez 835 S;4 37 Ave. Suite 103 Miam.1, FL 33135 Mariano Rodriguez 7500 SW 81 Ave. Miami, FL 33143 Ricardo P. Rodriguez 7171 SW 8 St. Suite 212 Miami, FL 33144 Rodriguez-Tellaheche, J.A. 8384 S.W. 40 St. Miami, Fla. 33155 Guillermo R. Paz Reynolds, Smith & Hills Roger, Fry & Associates 8331 SW 107 Ave. 221 Oakland Park Blvd. 2791 Bird Ave. Suite 223 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 N.iar.,i, FL 33133 Miami, Fla. 33176 _ ...r�..�_ .:.-,_:: ,;.�___. ::t,.•„ 0. C1JJv�J. � Ur�en :•.__:._tc�_� �.._. 31:d. 84301 ';W�52nd St. Suite 220 20+ Aragon Ave. S'_-te 2—_ B-each, FL 33179 Miami, FL 33165 Coral Gables, FL 33134 lic hae1 Sim,onhoff 3503 .lain Hwy. Mian, i, FL 33133 Issac Sklar Assocs. 1335 Lincoln Rd. Miami Beach, FL 33139 Oscar Sklar 1025 mane Concourse Bay Harbour Is., FL 33154 Richard J. Skrio 1550 X adruga Ave. Suite 215 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Smith, Carr S Assoc. Ave. Ccr al Ga'Zies F 33134 Wray G. Succoo Assocs. 1100 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134 Barry Sugerman 12601 NE 7th Ave. North Miami, FL 33161 Summit Technical Architectural Group, Inc. 11510 W. Sample Road Coral Springs, FL 33065 Robert Swedroe Architects 1674 Meridian Ave. Suite 409 Miami Beach, FL 33139 A. Tacruechel Associates 61 A:erric:; Wav Coral Gables, FL 33134 S mith, Korach, Payet, Haynie 3X Corporation ?a_tnershiD 2901 South Bayshore Drive 173 Fcntaineoleu Blvd. 1718 Suite 9C Miami, :L 33172 Miami, FL 33133 Wahl Snyder & Assoc. Kenneth Treister 1177 NE 79th St. Garfield & Treister Property Miami, FL 33138 2699 S. Bayshore Dr. r900B Miami, FL 33133 ?cdolfo R. Socarras Tripp Tripp :.rchitects 2224 SW 22 Ct. 2701 S. Bayshore Dr. Miami, FL 33155 Suite 602 Miami, 'FL. 33133 Philip S. Solomon T•yrus T. Tripp 5921 Sunset Dr. 17G Madeira Ave. South Xia.•ni, FL 33143 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Armando Valdes 3315 Rice St. Suite 11 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Peter M. Vanderklaauw 1450 Madr,.;ga Ave. Suite 2G6 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Frank Lloyd Vann 101 NIN 12 Ave. Miami, FL 33128 James E. Vensel 2 S. Biscayne Blvd. Suite 3650 Miami, FL 33131 Vidal Associates 516 Jeroni.::o Dr. Coral Gables, FL 33146 Robert Wad.:-- and Associate:; 7220 17r7 36th St. Suite 307 Mia.—ni, FL 33166 Sidney M. Walker 717 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 326 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Wallazn, Mcharg, Robertz Todd Inc. 150 SE 2rd Ave. Suite 111_ Miami, FL 33131 Ralph Warburton 420 S. Dixie Huy. 3D Coral Gables, FL 33146 1430 • :Tq 60 Ave. 420 S. Dixie Hwy, Suite 4G 3uit-e G Coral Gables, FL 33146 FL 33014 Watson, Deutsc^.^.an, Kruse & Yaros Associates Architects Lyon %rchitects 6872 Coral Way 16CO ..1 LeJeu:.e Road Miami, Fla. 33155 Mi:::•i, F L 33126 Maurine S. Weintraub Yaros & Frazier 350 Lin=oln oad Suite 316 5800 Wpl 7 Ave. Miami Beach, FL 33139 Suite 206 Miami, FL 33127 John A. Weller Jr. Stefan H. Zachar 52CO N. Kendall Dr. 924 Lincoln Rd. Mall Mia-d, FL 33156 Suite 205 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Robert Canney West Architect Zyscovich Architect The Daltona Corp. 2720 SW 26 Lane 3250 Sri 3 Ave. Miami, FL 33133 ,Lim^..i, FL 33129 el. Pinsc,n . I i d d o n Armando Cazo 2790 3i_.. Road 2 0 3501 S.W. 8th St. Suite 266 33ad .� �. Miami, ' L 33135 Max E. Finite 7ti70 N"d 36th St. Sui-te 433 !N�i, FL 33166 Robert Whitton 2809 Florida Ave. Miami, FL 33133 Daniel Williams 3333 Rice St. Miami, FL 33133 Wayne C. Williams 2906 Douglas Road Coral Gables, FL 33134 Winick & Smith Assocs. ENCLOSURE 5 0 0 JOSEPH R. GRASSIE ofMU _f ��� _ -• :, City f.la❑awrr rr February 25, 1980 SOLICITATION OF LETTERS OF INTEREST IN RE14DERING PROFESSIO`;AL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR TE PROPOSED F IRE -RESCUE TR7- 1!;ING CE1;^_ R r.ND CLOSED CIRC:;IT TV SYSTEM RESPONSE SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY 2:00 P.M., 19 MARCH 1980 The City of Miami is soliciting Letters of Interest from recistered architectural-engineerinc firms to render pro- fessional services for desicn of a Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System. The Fire -Rescue Training Center will be located on the old Coconut Grove Incinerator site at Jefferson Street between Washincton and Charles Avenue. The existing structure + _11 be modified to house fire appara- tus, a pump test facility, offices, classrooms, training tower, smoke and b,.lrn rocros, gym auditorium, closed circuit TV studio and other related functional spaces. Tne site will be develop- ed to provide fire -__aratus access, drill Grounds, employee par::ing and 117:T;1 course, as oudg is perr.it, as well as land- scapinq and utilities. The total project budgets, including fees for rofessional services, site work and contingencies, is $1,400,000. Your Letter of Interest will be reviewed by a Competitive Selection Committee. The selection criteria will consider such factors as: 1. Experience in the design of Fire -Rescue training facilities and closed circuit TV systems. 2. The ability of professional personnel. 3. Fast performance. 4. Willingness to meet time and budget requirements. 5. The recent, current and projectedvi p(�}il����� firms. ��?._!i ► .i \ + d �: tow Solicitation of Letters of Interest 02- February 25, 1980 6. The volume of work previously awarded to each firm by the agency with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms. i. Location of firms and the capability of the firms to meet any special requirements which may be re- quired.by the City or other acencies having an interest in the project. Please include in your Letter of Interest appropriate comments regarding the above seven factors, and include supporting data where aoolicable. When proposals or Letters of Interest are received which originate from professional or consulting firms within the City, and quality, service, qualifications and criteria dicta- ted t:e __cDect are equal, then firms within the City shall be given preference with second preference given to firms within lade Count:. This local preference and the distribu- tion of wcrk amc:_ firms shall nct violate the principle of selection of the most qualified firm for each project. Ater an initial screeni. , at least three (3) qualified firms will be requested to nnake a presentation to the Selection Com- mittee for further consideration. The Selection Committee will recommend the selection of consultants to she City *tanager who will present the list tc the City Commission fcr final approval. The fee for professional services will be negotiated with the approved firm by the City Manager or his designee and the firm will be required to enter into a formal agreerient with the City of Miami. If your firm is interested in this project, please submit a GSA Standard Form 254 and appropriate brochures showing your firm's ability and availability to perform the required services for the City of Miami. tail to Kenneth McCulleuch, Deputy Chief, City of Xiam_ Fire Dep&rtmen`, 3316 Pan American Drive, P.O. Box 330706, Coconut Grove, Flcrida 33133, by Friday, 19 March 1980. We appreciate your attention and cooperation. S racer 1_'\ tip n n e t XcCulcui iE� C i= C✓/ /�' � ENCLOSURE 6 �a � • t l * ear -old former girifr:end it Goulds area Wednesday' awhile she «'as driving a car owned by Shrt`• Pard, the father of her new bin'• friend, police said. When she rrfused tr) Fn with him. police said, McIntyre Punched her in the jaw and smash-d the 'twin' dOWS out of the car. a I i I r'o rlr;3C. She returnt•d to She^yard %with tn}' dampged cat and told nim what '1•+d Sheppard, who operates an area lounge, said, "Let's go over and get this thing straightened out." act cording to Homicide Detective James MicHugh. They went to %iclntyre's home, but he wasn't there. Approaching the intersection of U.S. 1 and 2_'Oth Street, they f•::counterf-d McIntyre, accompanied _by an umdentilled She1a{Tarn a:l.:::ed '.lii.� ',.e :•lv - _ - - men, who then pulled Funs ano ,1=,;• --%: started shontine. Prince said. The girl duct'rd, and leas unhurt. Sheppard, still 'T!1und the wheel, was shot In the }read. f•iclntyre and the with°r man tica in the Chevrolet, which iwas Liter found abandoned. Niclntv-,e and his companion are A• still beinN souE nt. ANNOUNCEMENTS it IS e M:w..v'Z7c..-`__ '!� '-.:•., , . �� ' eft. �. - .0 a r t rE` f t--'.t`y' o--�- f` f I^ `0 �.,•. 1A C�7 �yY - I {+4i J_"_ i L"`.6•r'->..S LYi•K`Jr J L-Awa..c._-__ r an___ ------ -- - �1I ANNOUNCEMENTS •� � � •.le LttA' enn•et :I IS lr[w' Mn'';rs i :1. lrea MCI':es 1 i1.10 Maps?�- -- ----- Ids "F [ +RF PA �n:F F -..o C-1:0.:a')0 tie 'n.r tilt lr�i•C tc to ;. a! best In,,, 13) .:,, _,.n •l wrw nonr,u,. J_ S� �L ■ r 0 TE O= r.' f. 'u .-" •,nets nor wn. of r•s a••Cw••`•.•11•roilw,ne renal ilea tonNPi �r t./ VV I pity lr •- •- ')�. nYv a ^• rm; cre.I t or » r ^• r^••r a v••Sonrn hon to •nr CM no! ,u to as Deaut'ul a'. n"y rp rn t nr •1•,^, •y c ]S or .r �• PCl,oh Con, -flirt for t 1 -'• I we f0 ntr'1. a.:ar CI .4 �:'.ry nr 'et n•n� n•/e.! • • rMt OlrahM c I `•f-tit a {' V Apr T, It I-r a• P n F1 ^1 t t omn•r vrn 'n• P•rt -nlr pet •of n'01l11'nnwl so,vCP5 hngton. Va. lit Sl'a5 on a o1:5inrS$ [ .ern Dr b er, r '+, : ,• s r •r O'^•rt IN, n:.e w I to nrpor Bled w'th file ep- Ito >� r ti JANE trip 8t the 11TC. r rr,rt ill n r e n i er Nr•,nr As-r p•• p•Drrd term cr tr•e Cary mlel, r P:. 0:/ D et re ,a rep f.r•r+a ral�nn n rm.i('r n,rnr r•�nr j n� ,r n1 C!1•.Jn1! And }n! nrwli he W• a' a 7;J Cn ,(1 }�th! r ^s *dr. Rotnenne r; !S cl: r�'1Ced ITv w� a d c•. r set r a• Ora rlcurrPd to m+Pr mlo a forma' . of tour }! • �xno rt r •n m.►' vS t. IT) ' o :•n TteV o' eLv R; ther a;-•P'rP 1.0,,'ne el'y of We— SeJ.UL1, his Wile. 5;it iia, V'r i, �•fIC �.J E'I and ,r ttt, s.Pr rrc. 1 .cyl t•v 'a s Fe:m ♦ e n s:u' rvm n ill P.l Nrd In tat I I S )hen. CaUj,''r r•, J,:hC; `ISt C: ry re r wept ^..c A .. C. Dac. A ne Cc Act [..r ..ct C.11 51...IPf a GSA sfa I If NAPPY•....... Ru:n Cheiso; b 1C - I`.�C:. �u IC. u ce'no t n r' r[s1 x , r wo a ��ns w d ,nice. S/e s'c: on•C rr:v nil'] n:nrocwlwte sr� t?ec•rvr husnacr;>, : arrr, A;' [. •�,,n'I^ns it _✓=R h'N 'n''^w c'n reef sn rwrn7 rosrr tone's 60",ty I i i- `wt II nnv a'.; Ir,.'a�, ,,. A0•il V7[ FeCP•a' P!:'�:1>' a,C e•a.,a:t..•v to Derrorm the r!- I I AN 1 1111 �1� rues' M :••, ne,rs P *'e 43, •:o bB , acC- :1"ce o i' t 1Pr rIC 11 by the Gtv of MI• AnnourC;oq a n w CIe1ldrCa • `` 114. ( ] (s C• •m. Oe. s•PS. It Ir pi,'C l a',e w 1, rP]:':rmrnit c• toe C'" m Cr 5m IAA,?? Kernelh E. MCCLMou 's• t non ce'•r, "H6voy AC, d -Ties 7 it U 1� • 1) i rCr♦Srn'nnre; wn] a, te'. r,.r F,gnrS e'v' U" A",, r: l:•o- Gc•vrt. C•+!. CVv of &A:A- Free I worn -A, be GuNnned err• t..r• oa,m�n.; rhr O,: �• c' ..:.•• n,: ,,^P"C'f C_7 Cf Fe:e,el Grp t'Pr. GP; artrren}. 3316 Pan Am,rsn ! dew Iry Intl :xl It'1 Ces.g" c nm w n r t 'n : r v _ , t NC {1 - We•' r rn ^rive. P O F.c. 3TG7 n9. Colo 1j' YOU rc sent] parr :lw •• ennrvenerr. crrtn nolu• re .con t e srs c s nc rr Grr ei29, 19 e. and P. v Cr Grorr F Y C! i3la3. by Frr3er. 19 I{ `��;� �tlFl} �.\11•t.e �,It}I. _coca t ay e, , In,'Pes TLse of ef•,Ofl•: ors MVUr, jlfSQ, f. F C 1 j 7J 11 se ni e e ` n r s E to ,t s r( 1 Cxt. 1�1 s.. �oseon R. Gress• t a C ecem[,e+ :e 1%'8. Gry Mane�er I/DEA Ag^CS �•r C: n;C)Sri. "'r" �f.- I CTv r s• � '- F - r 'u aJf o :cF Fabnre•v'!o l0l0 3 f Qr I c AC N, . 9SJ-45.1 rector Of tr`e C r 'I(iJ+f •'li°.'; r r U� .TE OF t F.ti Lpe . AND lopes 'o w nw mnMlty Rrr e,f en• ^ ---.- ' �i3rd�n C �l:tit .••d .lr ;I-. ,N GOt s". e ' � lerpr ses lnr mnt,murn feaso.4 ot- NOTICE .t• �VJ • "t DCnQ 1i;'.•in�:. •-PJra^rr porlcr tv 1- pernr'cetf 11 el:a. P_z -CNC ARINK „ DJC'tOr� li'I ,� lta;. » e^• p•.ep^, q•r. tors I! sJc". ev e•PctlPc HG"veA of °t+O VEMENT _ _ 4:'C• t•+[ .vr_n filet me Fr p r5 a 1 to •rt EP4 }�n�r0 [.^. �frS �•tl..r:.11 l il l T C Y 4 O I Tne BOCer ^_ Ca Ge Yw^• 71e-sa-1a•Jn �'lar, i'.Y.. ^�"d 5 ,`� : n^s»,� n •sir •n rr.mD•an:r n re e: ccCrc.rc• a cucic nt•r'n; on I ►I.Ot Death MDNotices!! •;ram •. - `•+^. s. rrr r r e HE, N.r •lr,wnit ✓ ..,a'cr 196 a. 7.J'Lm •n IrK . _ nC.'Se. lirll)re �. in .•1 n^d t- n c A� 0. n•�s»••, c• c t t rd n pas D4 sop ire,+cr :. ° a:e .Ness P n-.,et the Duo.", i ,y ,^ `y PPe:a .-0 a 300 E•Scavne APOLZAN' Shr ll'a, a c ,PerSlCor at ,FI! sP•vrn» ss ^ s(bm•,•rpeoro[r•rrS"J'e3?1 s- a ,.�• .••er'o',c• "i'vv nce•rr. nt Hoc-•n m�sr roe-mvw ,,r_•r ns ha..e. eta nor,M amp F.orrea NICO__GS (NICK) fl6, re' Shriners C.,IiC(C, 5 f r r,.a] In Lou a.rr. °c E eno 3'9 4 un 5'•c- T s ^r s Dr'v� <or, Irtl to P'u c,,p cirtract,r i s r w rn n rw•vv ]5"i6 3 v'v►C hr a rau'v'^,er tS•:lile. cars 'r. sr.-.• C• ins •P•^ • c'B Fr]rra Vol, n •e-tt'•o crsuns file oc- 1 t t rt, t•„ v 1''-^••,^ ,n e- c' e•D'essn •`a"r re»s Frore,cr A�o•ar. Serve s e sv. c :er e' eta., p•o; ur e"-r', C' V' rtarr•`rm Getrorl f • '.r r r.l^ h•n`il, r•!1t n o -41,e ,«n'n, aelryr. :cn. RAhA•J. FtJN. ce w r cn.s sup. .--,•tacit of p"sI''ee wild B - Of . "•_ .+. r`St t.11C I •. , f."n C : a a sery e s c- o-e . r s C•es' t r _s a^.n sic HONc In cr.wr De et err _.,.,cps rc•rr c}c?^!rn:!r?:+!UmP^'t n.wv t•' ••!», ar P'Itcrt to or cD �s>•C I mrnls. r..Cr.•ti, . ,r: .� n lair... .,c'S C..:•r, cr ., ,; '-,crc.t•nrnr: ro S.01) r.l n•-rr .� r r C;'e • nI -r P cn' Sir ' C!. `) an' ,l ,Lf•C1nCr .^rC .... .r. .,r.. r a^n �a.: 'en et •ne ,Ja]r epe w.r,.e ••Dm ao•w .war I`+ 13•n j ltt�ll�)P • f •• rn . 1 a rat C' a�•s»... S1wr a-.:_:+ •/ e' 3:,a noon •^ 'r S c .s' Street. Cede I hip CD(:nell 1 t r,.r Ql•n l ... ' S•a'P P•o,e( No e"cJ' 1C N r Fr!S C. H r ^at Dncrf s --n o! I De',t•. a •,1• . ... f••^I. ilia r,M, •.,P r1r P.. r 1;$-••-n..e, N01 A,,a', -'r tine °' P,ri;', I•!m No a :e::. I elr c' r1 rOmTUnil i .r r .t, - _r.,,a ;a•I r A Ora.sr o• r..N .v,a•t s rC•7 In .••a ♦r��•n err NO ae f I v ��a D nri rs�m Joe lsCr O, ,r C �l'S; t.�r�l:.'c, t rC501 iC'.:.,, n _ rr .mar � � •f aa.c'a•w•;s end nrnt•p['nn•,t P_ .i •+ - c^••,. r .-,ppr. prop' w rl.. ,.. ,. a• c+. r.•.. on•d er Inc I Hra, F ::pets Vote Rrr• Cr. rCh of t C,ral ia$r\, a tine atop A-- r , n rrC 1nr $P• ta:! 1 sell or E non svrr.e. F,, -un on S• F•c•.'.rn twin vc...-„m•rrt A let'" cf %,,-1 Or. `rc. a•t•rtert •c ;t'nr w to me con. c't Swa-er. t: The-- ail' () S'J ,'wtl n:c• :°�: t,`• r rile w'on9 w+n'n! w"t•nn I Foo!n, �ensaCo'a. L: • Tf hC r n6' f.'irU L.. �- DU11 » n D• mPOf 1C fM SUC[n 5'Ur v,•wt rlcerreC I•o•r, other it Pn Vo'w, Kv . Fro,ejcr Sv,•'.':cv,; \fill be at :,'1? Van Cr­ i PLE.0ENTA'_: fCN' ocne•e^.;•Co•-r`1uDon I1#l#',rrr ac•',f�'D•rt o•noat w+r De ava's. MIC'.. Irmo Lae-': n; r.a homed CPlenow..rs .1 •his a - c! w: aturnen's in 9>M COIL ' -On � Mrerini. Baroare Greene del rG:3i t a 3105 Ch3�: N1 3t 11 3..%. 7nP •Ste-; q cc •p'N wln.nmrrr ly rcevs a••r 1" D'C ore rot ,%N,. r01--c In er • areen 6 -nil Tetra f sf'nrr,s is servrC cc .^t, C• rDM,n; de'P I ,)GT D•t'-C• O"ice I M'n^.'. D•oLe ?„•rs. Friends orCat. wc• ne rem cet'ruwry tA. 1q$3 In +noon D.rr •.„a^• •: ., nr Cer or T't pr rn:fnl SMe be arc ClIZITniN Me'Cn 3 rV. di.�nr r iwil F•0 p M. Fn. l:-4 ••r.`\ A J.'S Dr MO SrCc'irr 'n nil ar.pUnr not h9War 9rt•Ce SLAG_ FSLM Ste[:'• noyrt ;Ttlt, I'e: II 6110 De MIAMI LA\ES CHt- TTSchwartzman. I l 1 I I t t t less torn rive te•crnr L"e) or t o e'r.e fcr re•re+ •ran 50c D n 13:5 W a9 St. ei,a.een M. �l'�l �, ll �•�Liil li lla 'ate ct ht» OaIFC D'J e'T4xT•. Sn.c _U•rtr tf an De e,. ,.nw'•rrM.,me ill tY r'�w:e nest 4iCH 11 :.M Se'. r `9•n :•� .�(.. 'n1 term et a Co" I'•d cn1c. or cn- cr,,nT ^.,nr G,,p,nr sere rIo't' eneoe'-termeni Oeo- a I -^o .+.^N JJ..I1�S A,pr+i '_Ui: •., s-.rr mortal Perw. s cnrca c- n •.c'. tilt na•�,nr Pr•s:•s ors'•cut 0' wor^.'rnnp ,r l Contractor -. ' �v:;;. A h:' .�e•. •,p en t or s•aY -e„ ^r n Ned Sc nO e.r_LJ wr ern s•a•rr* en•s an* our It r Was v a Co n t I'a c t or M r,P S•aI! n• r,P» N,,.a, ed cr the F r.vr n'd s arrw•.'reC rn,•s r c� or ,r e W r, n ro IMENTS FrOr-,Mv a, `c. _. ra Cur r•r. 5n':'n 7r•ry end Der eo'e 'o, orw ter"erne^IS tote an so At •nf W IS PUT- (SHAM { • �.,� I nS for •ne :. ^rep :eQ l:r^: „•+• n'ne /nr t,'.,emr-:-ece n1'rr and Sr.•tr nr a'rn; Wr�nM Na'emrfHt C. er- M. Snn.rs :A%%er .•°C - n^ `.f rr: ::5 �Chl:'a.. �- Fe :7. 15PJ Srr cw•^t -<. _e c' t^r r_'.ra c' :mac C' Autnori'v- ,:,•. nsr. nu De wtxnateC 'c Dr ^.':a'1,••i a �sf a^:: I:r, l ^,iU ^1; �n r,e Ecr ougn C' i••: ca r•. Tht M'ern Gn]e never and SPwr , ].,c L-Pil'r:t As a Pall of tilt he 1M65 corn e:w snvlr,P. h I a`' el ns s rrlLed L. cr. •'r c N- rile : A,11o' IY 'tserrrs •ne r - ': •. •rcl .ea e. P S•we[ GJ7 iii elft-bell c' for •;n• C l:'.:::i L:O: ,.l'nQ '•L'jc ;iCtl'• o In the • euc e t !•C a. : :✓c r ev a^.y4v , D s •c wa.r ei. piste c• `rh-e ti.t N V1 Seccnd C,:,rcr o' M emr Snpr rt C}'`_:IC r:D.•irS1S C ;d'1'' l a qe a t. r•rormy,rin :dortortad,er A_,_ A,am Fo•ea 3317e no es, u v l\nmr^.Or i e'lndar fJn• L J _ F c . A fi a l rut to D dt ate• •^w„ r; e":n V t+1L7 + Eester^ S Mr. A see aI vrc ",:'••rC 1 Cid `..'� :�', vAr r c_ C•✓•r' •rne,.Cs•P-tn• vols.nllr : beer en E, tnC F••i1 C.' ,•e•.r p•o,ru scYa+rt w,Ir De s,d• :ii:I]n h;v.:C l r :^t „ [ F - /Me^ :ece f.a r arC Sr» i s site 'N as "t `ore . IT, ,a a A,r ! 19 a =c ns c• ,.(r nre•rnV rs h"""I I Rohe " I SVrI pm Dr .•` Jl. :.'.la:._:^.:n .. as a iCJdlr:, • l' L 5 5 ,•: r. p.1r lvrn• FI. .0a C..r :�•: •• tt,:•r a•, ♦ C •, ;n. C e CrFu^t ^ I- C"" sn M l• I f, ,, •^ c. t •• - - Nn e• ^ e •r 40. Frr a v;9 'will wa. err U 1-I [1 s.� Iv Qww r ^C ^•P'a� s ice.., rs l:. �,se: L•. fo ne 1::oatzarow•,c a rr•, n-0'1 A N1.v.tuc n es:e 1. F c n•IaMiy �« 7. and %vas 4oLnc'.1*,; r chairman for a m P rC•. in r tt. r'r (• -. - • c r - c �C.C' IA�r t• _: r^r, .•f. Cr•I•I.� f :..'n SC• (' lC nt:f. Fir H�CrO •••eD s: FVN. . - NCMc IOV. tJ l'C'•r, lJE"-.r .. hnlvi;tg 0• ♦ PRT r, r.fNT .CsF .S a s It �t: 1ve71e' t A.e ,•t,er teyvr. n .eras' c• a. -0. _ r '[G .f won y lcc D� w Wros•r• .r.t . »c":: _., tr.: r:•c• ,. - f -]NIN RLE t:. NF `e ' (r t n' ra Sr•ts,t i',e,e•n C' also i'• ::s a _ nrrers tow• r '• Y 1., a r. n: !. e a •':,'i ,•• c'4 f ;INAL ♦4 F r .. Jfr 71'.LI a ] JJ: Ot'. 0' 1 rr1 DC O•n,rI1C L rn•. .'1 merlr,er of the _Ins. F Nr» sort r't TtrI tons ^pert o No. •n �•' A. w ') N,, •.._.Ru.. Vv Q:S' .,ar rl. ..we HntP le H.? is su-..I ed D'.' .'1�$ SCi^$, It - I G--J J v .r, ;�, .. Sweep r. ,FC' to. rt'l. nlw E.Lt - as•.r ... v.r c r hcrtLr Short merle F•r•r 'cbDr C•�Dw•rmep•r .♦^. rlrt• pn Ma•Tn, F:a, D vi.n. and Morton; and free gran dCnII- t.•, �1.11 vb, / !c�C_,-ls SvStERw •.pl- ..tom a„INf• -n...r yr• .� I dren. AO r.0 .Or.).e;w l 'eel as nrt&1 ,•InQ Le'. M•n t. ,rCa .L �tlt 1:����•�\ The family rrq ur•ata cthfl 8t10 f1G t]r 1 ♦INt•t T:4F war N'tr.Ff F'C; IIrI c• In•r•eN 'r•^ r;Mer Pc A rer•.sry 1, '! .0 .a LILLIAN 7p Sent to the Cvs:ic Fit, ro!;lc I)-111 ''r"1nm, to' Pw ,�•- �rd <mrP, r... rpylrr!•i•,o ma . a :A :`c Ivl: i I assrc aw ao'Nc_.I icenr.. r, •s a rr,r s- rr . n•r n ��... v..�a se•r ".1 •cr o• �.•.,.. r ) iva0.. _, 4vP: A rrs,.:enr •• .w. r ► ti, .N.. .a�.rn .r ,r a-r sV"c' • rr ]rail n; Ce-:e• Ne . ►Y fP., - m•-i. r \ v sv.i. o• Fur.d, t'niversriy o M;,-Imi sc root " ` 'a r'r --------- - AD•rva, r IT, is i^ •-• !"sir N'- vans• s^c'cs•, r•c 1. Nrm hrrss..ra •• of fed:ClfiE'. �nV va_1N'' .•r.P,.P^. ire e.,%L ; T.1E "•,r�- u ♦Rn-;c v,vec e. tau!- SNr..a unfr� ::rC f . •t_rv. a»'.'^.• .t, a'cn r*a 1 11 In r'o,rs1 • •! erK•✓e'.•t. • DaG_ i. _ -I'.'v Ha a"+r.a.e - FLO4r:,A Mr.•.,[. C' Temn•r ' 7]. ••.B^or '^P tr aT_ Gar.. .\a•.• D.•r^D 'Pt' •n . Nh(es, ilea LIN_T.-..,r.P. v:y FU,_G NG I-il _Inc erntast., `1f1 1))1 • !1+ i Anc '-epee ♦rrr't'•nr a' �i1}Siwl'n rile mt. I'a n� Ic-ti. 5•no.t ••�� lw is r•E ;Nil AVFN,'E - U J A 'u^!•r t1'• ►ll�� �)• �.dN1 L1I.(IS. i Lr •u,e lend :, •vn'rcr rIA cG�'G♦ 3)137 M [ 3L V n.• IN r TG h':T.)F VS wO' "e••-•p' In h: rn h"'•P a^•7 Da,e a n•01 w' Fr Clolrn enru'• T.r t' non. aM O r .I t.•• •.per lP•n••rrN to rn.rr cnrnld a-c..rn_ n.r..0 'nr rP.a'rC r,r. . •, s:. •: et ',t 1'r H•C1 •,r Sate?ry •rs DI lent PNfC I Lon Sw' ltrnrnli !" 10 P n••"'�: aa0•ea r' Vr ,; w ,'P rr'I'r•• ci•r•��':'r- ,• prop Of hie •J • Da^• w o of It, ewrd In The k. (;o(I 11611 Dir rector I W,•••a,CS• a y' tn•a'.rs • •`.l C yotdS.t'n Ltti^ rr✓ 1II'70oVMor1 I RIVEc•clnc O•••"r ho. a.GIle, M. air inr',e ^err. :,n•. r v.: .,!♦ C-'%- t s et Fn'•nt t++'.wn•c+, DC1 muse I In I o'37-,•, B . 3J111 I et D.,;.r't :• et wN ai 4^^ t• S..0 ^•''I•` air •ve •wDY uo°,- : wets (: 1.,^. Ie. Ir. A, -".con S"•i':Cc for ��:.•: fi. c.dswardC. a ',r t.•rv' r;vns•s n �^vrt';a- t.e[ ^. r' '.Pt Tn1 `n- 'rC.r '^ n.rf'rr.nnrt•; "✓r,s•t. 5:...e'r t an (;Ur,rwi,i 1 �7:1Si,': f•S �'; c: / crt as..•Pr e..•s' See c,< Dm;r .w .; Ices ' . item 1079. Te epronf Ie1 t• 't 't. a"`�C•. r• 11t ra a •t ..rl f'C1 c..f' • `�• ve tev OeCJ•; c"P;i r�rq tlNe C�ROt..l..l., . 111 :-♦.:aMSUPP -r»1•. _.. will .NSUPPOYEe v.T _N :n•. sr waver ♦ N• a DOCUMENTS 21 el" , 40 40 ENCLOSURE 7 Al- '00 AO 41) Ap 914ZHDDODTIXIC DOCUME-NT, S. p FOLLOW O'' ( FIRE-:?ESCUE TR? A;; � CL0SCO C_'^ TV S' rmr•t.ncrrux a ARCHITECTURAL SC _- Io': ^*JTDr.LIticS FOR Ra^ING,=. -CTi ' zMS 20 SELECTION PROCESS A Selection Committee has been designated by ,7oseph R. G assie, City.. Manager, to review the qualifications O: interested a_c:.___ct-_al f_rms. This Committee will meet as a body and re•�ie_w all submictea infcrmaticn with the objective of se_ect_nc at least _..fee firms for a Final selection _ re=_en_a__on and _.._er._e• . T:.e selection proc- ess w411 �e as _ci_ as poss_b1e to f_n-1 t..e Wiest cL`a14F_ed 1ir... to .. .ze Jro' e ct . ray.. mem'_-e _ or the committee will review ea... F...'s sub�i__ed _..fo_..,a__�n and rate each fir-1 on each of six. items. Each f irm wi11 be c_ven an ide.._____a__cn n :7.e-- Upcn cc:-__et_cn o: ea_.. membe_'s review, s:__es w__l be ta1__ed _o __:e a C0nse.._us rating t0 ea,... fir..,.^c t.._ee o_ so :_rr..s wi 11 be advised thereaF_e_ to m e e »__.. ,..? :o- -= -c- final presen _a- t_cn an.. interview. even: t..e__ are an'; cuest_ons C S :,, C e r n. n z t:.e Fi_...s, a staff _...-__ w_-- %zP available to - _.._s- z_on I -e_ n.._ca_ _^_._...=__on- In _-e event _..e _ e a_ _ _ _ e_ ._mC. _..e _ZJ _ a -e �. _ _ _ms , s u._'- _hat it _s hot clew_ ace _. = e== __....e.. Fir-,s, _h each me.mbe_ w111 be as..es : a _he __--=_r...s. The new consensus rani: score should ..rsa'e -..e tied -ooslt_on. II. CRITERI A GU__, ___ ..=2:1S - INIT _AL SCLr-C110N A. Rating, Guidelines: 1. ?revious professional experience in designing s_:a_lar projects. Rating total. 30 While it is umlikely that a particular firm has desi-^ed a fire trainir, center, other projects r..ay -e s_..,_Ia_ in scot = a�^? conplexi y and o�c to be vie as __v _ _-1e to t..e f__-.. Two _-•pet of projects _..a_ s::culc ze 0- interest to the ce-,-.---e_ are reno•:at__n work, especially o: heay., s-ruc_..=es, and sc'noo_ haLl.__nSs. To rate 30, a Fir- ct: to have a recent ex- De__ence recc_z Ln rent at_on work, schools, or "SUPPORTIVE si-_lar prcjeCts, recea= '_ c_eats, and a general variety o: practice DOCUMENTS -_ -= -- -t 17% FOLLOW" Hopefully, each firm will submit photographs of completed projects that de.mcnstrate its creative capabilities. An aesthetic tour d= force does not necessarily :,jean ....at the project was suc- cessful. it could have been _ostly on_.. And, it could have won professional a•.:ar.._. The test is whether the cl_e^_ :c_..c _..e ~_ _oje__ to his liking. Repeat clients are zood_.nd__ators that the firm sat_s:_es and most l:kel, achieves what the clients want --in short, is sensitive to the client's recoirenents. To rate 10, a firm ought to have repeat clients -- three or more; to have won some professional awards for design; or have been ci•ren recognition by some reliable orcanization for its work. Additional'., the f_rm's principals should be out front in the design field, either by having been elected to hick office in professional organiza- tions, by having written abcut design and archi- tecture, b,Y having ^.e1_ s•-c-stantial posts in the academic world, o_ by .:e_. _ involved in similar activities which i11..strate that the principals are creative and sens-..ive -zractitior-�rs. 3. Organizational and professional start. Rating total. 10 This project will require an organization that can produce a quality design in a short time and under quite a bit of pressure. its organiza- tional make-up will be critical to its success. I: a firs: is very lar (35 or -, cre) , there is a possibility that this project will be too small the he principals to Cetve_, involved. If the fir^r is too small (5 Or less) there is a possi- h_lity t..._ this pro4-ct is too big or that the principals will be out looking for additional work after the contract _s signed. These are two extreme possibilities and have to be weighed carefully. 4. Design experience o: team which will work on this project. Ratinc total. 10 :he usual_ .e_=-_ approach in an architectural f__ is to ass_an : pr_nc_pal in -chance, a project architect (or job captain), and one or more designers or draftsmen tc assist the _project arch_.ect. ncc_t_0nal'y, _he calls upon specias _ e_ _..e_ _.. na_se or as outside con- sult -ants, fc_ :natters re_at_..c .o landscape do 6. architecture, specifications, cost estimates, as well as for the engineering aspects of the project. This project calls for the ea-.:ivalent of a three -person team working.co ..inucusly on the design and construction ze_•Lme.._s. There should be a principal (_.. a s-.a1_ s r 7sd4- um - size: t h _s perScn ':v a17.o .'.'e _'-e j c a -ztain .."n activei y participates in _..e CeS - . _O=eSs, and several experienced de:_ nets anz de___lers, plus the specialists. There s^o:._d be at least one or two support staff avai_a*z'_e for inter--m periods I hroughout the design .Ideally, the firm should ind-icate that some five or so different persons will be associated with this project in the arc:._te is office for architectural matters, with em.. hasis on having a principal being active _n the design process all through t'r.e design period. s proposed end nee_ing consultants. Rating total: 30 This item is similar to IteM I. Architects usually employ the same engineers who can work well with them, although larcer firms will spread the work arcund amor_ a n-..._er o= en_ neer_nc consultants. _he f__..,s that deserve the highest _at_ngs w_11 be those ..hat have used good encinee_ inc Keep mind that t:^.e eng_nees-. - on a prcjec_ Of this ty=e will account fcr about 6-1 percent of the costs. Location. Rating total: 10 This item is self-evident. Rating Form: Form A, entitled "Architect;.ral/=ncineering Selection Criteria - Initial Selection Process," will be used on the initial selecticn. Each me -:!Der will rate each fir:,. acccrd_n•- to .he six criteria reviewed above. Then, all firms will be rated :,%• consensus _c deter - .nine _cn:; o_ae__ng .he _e_ect_on Com—mit_ee will then decide how many firms to write fcr the =_..a_ selection. "SUPPORTIA DOCUMENTS FOLLOW" 0 OItM A FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM T CrT ri-m?(1N DT?nrVSS H1<1:111TL:_TUUK8L/LUk,LV111.11114v 01,L,E,-•iva.---— CRI`1'ERIA RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 /0 Previous professional experience O S in designing similar projects. 30 O /0 0 S /0 0 0 Examples of designs indicating creativity and sensitivity to 0 project requirements. 10 Q -5- O U (} 2 organization and professional staff. 10 5 /0 Design experience of team that �0 will work on this project 10 O O /0 0 2 5 Proposed engineering consultants. 30 )0 D Location 10 /0 /0 �� 7 7 7 Miami 10 Dade County 7 Florida 5 Outside Florida 3 YES YfE Vs Affirmative Action - YES - NO TOTAL 100 1 U �' ,� S 5�7 17 ` /3 Zi 01 Ca t. J. D. Debar, Asst. Director Training & Safety DATE': Marcl► 25, 1980 4MMITTEE MEMBER: -��- - p -- ---- -- --- — -- V11 _ t 1, A CIIU:-RP,SCUE TRAINING CI NTI:R AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM ItIITIAI 5FLECTION PROCESS ARCIIITrc,rultA[./i I GINi;[ ItItJG SGl.r:c'riun �rcI'ITIIIA 11 12 - 1 3 14 15 16 CItI'frItI A RA'CItlG 5 16 Previous professional experience D in designi.tiq similar projects. 30 5 Ex.�u�ples of de signs indi.cat_-ing creativity and sensitivity to S Z project requirements. 10 Organization and professional 10 Q r 7 Sr staff. �p /U Design experience of team that will work on this project 10 r /0 Proposed engineering consultants. 30 S /D J - 70 $� / D Local:ion 10 7 /J /0 % J0 Mi.nm1 10 Dade County 7 r1orida 5 Outsido Florida 3 yt s Affirmative Action - YES NO TOTAL 100 �(�/ r �j ' [/ �, L10 3 - i A l'1R1;-ltE: CUls TRAINING CGtt'1'L'R ANO CLOSED CIRCUIT TV sYs'rr:.m i nT CrT_rr-ryn 1 PROCESS ARCIIITIiC'1•IlIl1��E11liItIGG1(llll: bL',1.L'l.cic►r+ c..ni+r.►i. 1 2 � ) •• 4 --- 5 G 7 0 /0 CRITERIA RATING Previous professional experience to designing similar projects. JO n 10 10 O 10 S IS ;S 10 0 L} $ Q 2 2- F:xamplen or designs l++dicating �-reaLlvlty and sensitivity to project requirements. 10 Organizatl.on and professional sLaf[. 10 O S ip 4-2 2 Ueslyn experience of team that will work on this project 10 O 8 o A `- Z & 2 4 Proposed engineering consultants. 30 O 10 O 41_ 2 ` 5 10 I.ocaL 1 on 10 t•I I n rn l 10 I)ncle CounLy 7 10 10 7 % 7 7 10 rlorida 5 Out.gl.dn Florida J ,affirmative Action - YE To'rnt, 100 10 SO 4-'7 10 33 20 _ 44 23 40 A. rim:-ItrsCUE THAININc CEIMM AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM of 9•rnlJ nnncrss AIiCIli,rrC'rUitAt, rNCItlrrltItlG srw..-c•rlOrt CRITE.111A - lnli lLl• �•�••" __ 11 12 13 14 15 10 16 (� CitITE1IIA RAT IHG 'revlous profcasir,,nal experiencQ r ' J0 In designing siml.lar hrojecLs. ;xamplcr, of dcsl(Jns Indicating 2 :reattvlLy and !;cr►siLiviLy L-o A 8 pro jc�.e redulremenCs. 10 )rganizat_-Jon and professional rLaff. 10 uesign experience of Leam that 10 R 2 gill work on L-hJs project 1 4 Proposed engineering consultants. 30 10 `- Loc at: 1 on 10 'O (O 7 10 10 tt1,1m1 10 Undc County 7 rlorlda S Outside Florida 3 affirmative Action - YES - NO TO'rAI. 100 A f 3s �lY 20 37 �I CLOSI'.t1 CIItCUIT=.Y: 1-=� ['11t1:-Itf:SCUG '1'ItAIt� St:Lt:CTI!_i�i�bSS —_- - © 9 �o r G 7 3 4 ' --'— - IiC11I'1'(=C'1'UIlAi./GtICI111:GttItJ_G SCi.L•'C'i•IOt1 CRI'1'1•.ItIA - 'r— A ------ 11 A'1' I t 1 G CItI'rl:itIA Profes,iot►al experience ,0 previous pro ects. in designing I .t. c ns ln�licat-ing ��j (� - Examhlcet of dcsi) to crcaClvlt-y and sensitiviCy 10��-- _ _1 �--- !)roj�'ct" rofessional 10 a t t d p ---- — -- 0rgan izatloft staff. that exP erience of team 10 Deslyn --- wi11 work on this project__ _.. - —'-- I J0 -----' --�_ Proposcd engineering consultants• 1" -- 10 Location `0 tL? i 10 t{lnm� Dade county lo r i d a r"` �� •V�! outside rioriaa ,l t io n - Y L`5 Le -—tf— Af firatatvAction too— ZA -------L l o o—_- ToTAI, A f1Rl:-I1I:SCUL TRAININGCI N'I'`l;it AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM TIAI SELECTION ARCIIITrc-r'URAL/ENGIII EEIII NG SGLEC'l'ION crilTrRrn CItI'f1:ItIA RATIIIG 1 12 • r 'revlous professional experience n designing sln►l.lar projects. 30 `D :xamplec or deslgns indicating ,reitivlty and sensitivity to G CJ ,r.oject rerluJ.rements. 10 1-J ►rgani zatloll and professional 10 resign experience of team that -7 +ill work on this project 10 % Proposed engineering consultants. 30 r.ocat:Ion 10 tt 1:1 m 1 10 Dade County 7 IFIor1.dn 5 Outsidn rlorida 3 Affirmative Action - YES ttO TOTAL 100 - INI 13 14 15 16 ,Lo I l o I -zo I to 1 10 1 —1 1 to I ko I'RUCL•"ss 1HIN 1HIN u t p1t�� n C1:N'i't:11 nr1D -�—• PROC"S 't` li A I H I tl V-�_-_-----------' _`J---^-ll �• 1, i. C'1' I O N / 0 ..` 1'IIt`�n{:SCIf{: _ Ittl'I_Ynr_ `'Lr----`�' p 9 SEL1:C'1'IOtI CK1.'l'iiIt_IA 5 G 7 -_ �RCHI'1'1:CCt)ii_ �t• I;tiGINl.Gitf['�-- ---- �`_ 2 3^-- it A'1' I t{ G io�►a1 axpurienco 30 �,' /[------- i. Previous pCofe imil,lr projects. ting 2. E x a In p i C L o f 10 ___ ___•__� itivity crcaLivity and scns _- project requirLs. en�en ff f c Org�rofensional 103. an t zaLion and 1 f team that 10 c experience s 1 o 1. Design project will work on Lhi/ c I 0 —� inccring consultants.10 ,_____- _------- 5. proposed eng �.. Location 10 Dade County 5....-- Florida outalao r• loriaa 3 e Action HO 7. Af (trio -------' 100 T O T A t.�- � ry 1'-IIIsSCUL'' `I'itAlriltiG CEN'1'l:K nND CLnSGp CIIIGUI'I' TV a'{S'1'I:td - It4ITIAL Sy C�'ION PIIOCCSS NGI14EEIt111 SPt'�'C'1'IOt! AnC11I'rrC'CUI1AI. CCRI'1'L'ItIA _ 14 15 16 n AT 111 G 11 12 13 ------ --- C It I'1 I: it I A ----- ' 1 ►previous proEesstonal experience 30 in designing similar projects. i ►;xau.plec of cicsigns Lndicating creativity and 10 to 10 �,roject rehui_remenl�. _,,.` — — l ion and proEesslonal jroaniza 10 ucslgn experience of team that 10 .All work on this project 1,roposed engineeriny consultants. JO 10 I.ocat: ion Mlnmi 10 ' Dnde County Florida 5 outside Florida J Affirmative Action - 1O -- 100 T0'rAl. C �' 0 � �-)l 7 1/0 /0 7 /0 " -' clrtr:-nr:scur, 'R rnnlr�Iric crrr'rr: AND CLOSr:D _ CIRCUIT .�... `l'V 5ySTEM AFiCt1I'1'rC'1'ultAI. L•:NCItJLC1iINC SELECT1011 Clil:'1'EnrA _ I wrlAI. SE'I.1C'1'ION PROCESS— CRITERIA RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 Previous professioi►ill experit"I" / ` Z 0 'O th .J to in designing similar projects. 30 ND Examples Of designs lndleating creaLivity and sen!jitivily to project: requirements. OrganizaLlon and professional sLaff. Design experience of team that will work on this project Proposed engineering consultants. Location 1-iiaml 10 Dade County 7 Florida 5 outside Florida 3 Affirmative Action TOTAL YES Ho 10 10 10 30 10 100 1 ."W NEWEEM rl, Irlq.Is Ir i za i l as io a� 7 7 9 1 /o A 051 r'lnri-IlrscuL THAI MIG ct.rr�rrrt AND CLOSGr) CTItC�j'i' T� SYSTEM Anc11I'irCTU11A1.Zr11cltJL'r1tI11t: S1;'1,ECTI011 CItI'1'LnIA - irii i ini, CIII'CEIIIA nATltic, 11 /0 12 13 3D 14 15 /0 16 fi� j0 Prev.lous professional experience fn desiynlnq similar projecLs. J0 Example, of dcsi-qns 1.ndicaL'ing and sen,illviLy to creaLivity 10 1,ro ject redul.remenL!; /e ur��anlzatlon and professional 10 / `� iilaf[. r Destgn experience of team that 10 will work on t- Lids Project ;t proposed engineering consultants. 30 /J .3C 14 t.ocaLIon 10 N 1 am 1 10 0 l0 1►ade County 7 . Florida S OuLsido Florida 3 Affirmative Action - YCS v� T . TOTAL 100 r% �� tot) FOR, .A rIIII:-Iii:S000 TRAINING Cl:t TE'R AM) CLoSI:O CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM . TIocr vpwrner rnneEs-s ARCIIITI-.C'I`URAL/GIJ(;IfiLLI(i,il, 5r:,., Li,u�� RA'1'itlC �«►.,,,. 1 '2 3 4 -- - 5 6 7 0 9 -- CRI'1'CIiIA 1. Previous professional axperience in designing similar projects. 30 2. Gxik,nplee; of designs Indicating creativity and 5eliSitiv.ltY to project- requi-rements. 10 O i ►o :. R 3. Organization and professional staff. 10 4. Design experience of team that will work on this project 10 I r ; O 5. Proposed engineering consultants. 30 �, I 2� 30 0— �o n 6•. Location 10 D %o Plinml 10 Dade County 7 . rlorida 5 Outside Florida 3 - ---- 7. Affirmative Action - Y1:5 - -- No 100 ?3 TOTAL A (2 ['Till:-III:sCUI: '1'RAItlIt1G Clstl'1'lill At1D CLOsGp CIRCurr TV SYSTCM .. T...T w r rrT r. r9•Tn 11 anocrSs ARC 11mcCTuItALIENGINL•'L•"ItINU :iL'I.f1l_llUfl F-IlliliI\l.. 1 12 13 14 -- 15 16 - CIII'fGItIA RATING revious professional experience n designing similar projects. 30 :xampler, of designs indicating -realivll.y and sensitivl.Ly to ID j Project requirements. 10 irganizatton and professional B s. taff 1a to t� ►eslgn experience of team that � g 10 LO Zr O Pill work on this project 10 ,ropose(l engineering consultants. 30 2Ir ocal.lon 10 I� 10 to �tl �ml 10 Dndc County 7 rlorlda 5 Outsido rJor.ida 3 .Cflrmative Action - YES --/- -- - - -- --- - -- NO 100 P3 S� T O'P A I, Cllll:-RE SCUE '!TRAINING CI:tJ'll-At AND CLOSED CIIICIJI'r Tv SYSTEM C'1'UItAI. [;1JC'NG[ IIINC Sl:1.PC1'IO1J CRITERIA- INITIAL SELEC1'IO11 PROCGSS TCRIn Rn'rlNc 1 2 3 I 4 I 5 6 7 ARCIII'1•C 2B CIII 1. PrevIOUG professional exparlenco 30 /0 in designing similar projects. t. E'Xalnples of designs lndicatlng to i creativity and sensitivity project requirements. 10 1. Organizatlon and professional staff. 10 a 1. Design experience of team that will work on this project 10 27 ;. Proposed engineering consultants. 30 ,O 10 �;. Location 10 ltinmi 10 Dade County 7 . r1orida 5 outside Florida 3 7. Affirmative Action - YES ISO TOTAL 100 9 1 /0 a O Ti - Z� ?p 20 zS 27 �0 20 W 01- t OY STI- rinr:-ur:scuL 'crinlrllrlc cl.rr•ierc Atli) cr.o�l.r� CTIICUT'1' 'CV .. o.�n.rn►l omit, v SS ARCII vrrcru ItAi. r:11GINrrRIW; SEMEJ:TIUII R11TI11G Uu1-11,itt,► 1 1' 12 2S - ......-•.•_ 1 3 1.1 - 15 __= _ 16 - CJtITEr1IA revious Professional experience 'jib itdestgninq stmi.lar Projects. 30 gamples of designs indi.eati.ng to reativity antl sensitivity ,roject requlrements. 10 rgantzat-lon and Professional 10 0 taff. resign experience of team that p/ 0 C 0 S ill work on this Project 10 roposed engineering consultants. 30 �o -2 l0 7 '• / ,ocal:lon 10 7 1p 111am1 10 made County 7 Plorlda 5 OutsJ.(Io Florida 3 ffirmative Action - YES TOTAL 100 C,60fio2 T CC40seZ) ---iov i r,A-L, sez*-7 m m A-0- ;tfar--- Vim m VA- 10A). 12kTIO S-- --- 127 bb 5 0 4-y 4-7 1-7 C s7�0 t� ;_20 61 . ....... S6 4- t .V-13 0 0- 10 60 707A- U. rp" go 11"I.- IE IL '500 - 446;-- . ��.6_ _ __ 56 6-1 &6, 1D. _.36� i- 5<<�: -- l f "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW ENCLOSURE 9 ov(emmw Ll March 26, 1980 Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracido, Assoc. 1501 N.W. North River Drive Miami, Florida 33125 Gentlemen: 1OSEPH R. CRAS51i City Manage This letter confirms our telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that your firm has been selected for further consideration to provide architectural a-nd encineering services for the Fire -rescue :'raining Center and Closed Circ•.:it TV System Project. You are invited to neet with: the Select_cn Ce=d,:.tee o: 1pril 8, 1980, at 9:00 a..,, at _50 s.E. 2 P.ven•,ie (N.E.r.. _ . b4_ldinc) , l2th Floor Con- ference ference 7-no ., and to nai--e a ��=se:itatiOn of VC'.._ _-rnls qualifications and ca.a�i1_ , to undertake _ne des_am of this _ roject. You will have about 15 _4nu__s ;7cr .o., a.eser _a_icn, a`ter `_:e cz=-. ttee merbers may W=sh to astir yol: -or additional ln_o=atlon. In a_1, the _ resentation an lnterv_<<+ is scheduled for .. mutes. we req,:est that those attending the meeting :be t: e active :'_.nc _ als and designersfCr ti:_s project. We also re?Uest :at active _ "_`CiPais '�".0 cesianers of yo'.= engineering and other consultants also he present. Enclosed you Will _`ins more details concerning the scope of services to be provided and the criterion :or the presentation. We are locking forward to meeting _•ou. If you have any further questions, please contact Kenneth '. MCCullcuc, , Deputy Chief, Administration and Budget, Miami Fire De. _r•tment, _3316 Pa.^. American Drive, P.O. Box 330708, Miami, Florida 331-33, phone 579-6300. Sincerely, Kenneth r-. McCullough Deputy Chief of ic.-ainistration N�a:r,, . -re Derma. -ment Enclosures 'L 1} 02pffeflum March 26, 1980 Russell, Martinez & Holt, Architects, Inc, 1800 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33145 Gentlemen: 1OSEPH R. CRASSIE City Manager This letter confirms cur telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that your firm has been selected for further consideration to provide architectural and engineering services for the :ire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circuit TV System Project. You are invited to meet with the Selection Committee or. April 8, 1980, at 9:35 a.n. , at 150 S.E. 2 Avenue (N....A.T. Building) , 12th Floor Con- ference Rzom, and to mE:Ke a presentation of your fi='s qualifications and to =_4ertake the deskn. of t1nis _ roject. You will have about 15 rLinutes fcr your presentation, after which the cc-.._:.i:tee members may wls", to ask vOu for additional lnfo:-::,aticn. In all, the presentation and interriew is scheduled for 30 ;ninu:.es. We request that those attending the meeting he the active _rincipal_s and designers for this project. We also request that the active _principals and designers of yo,= engineering and other consultant_ also be present. F.ncicsed you wi11 finA- more details cencerninc the scope of services to be p rovi7led and the c__ter_cn for the presentation. We are looking forward to meeting you. If you have any further questions, please contact tiCn.^ne-_'' : . McCullough, Deputy Chief, Adrdnistratlon and Budcet, Miaumi Fire De_ artment, 3316 Pan American Drive, P.O. Box 330708, Miami, Ficrida 33133, phone 579-6300. KEM:= p E oCUMENrS Enclosures FOLLOW,) Sincerely, Kenneth E. McCullough De-puty Chief of Ad= nistration Miami Fire Department ~ 0 JOSEPH R. CRASSII I _, �� City Manage March 26, 1980 A. Taquechel Associates, Inc. 61 Merrick Way Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Gentlemen: This letter confi_=s our telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that your fir-, has been selected for further consideration to provide architectural a_nd engineering services for the Fire-P.escue .raining Center and Closed Circuit TV System Project. You are iny_`_ed to meet with the Selection Co:-•.-.i ..tee on rprii 8, 1980, at 10:10 a.M., at 150 S._.. 2 ?venue A.T. Building), 12th Floor Con- ference mom, and to make a _ resentatlon of your fir-ml s qualifications and caoab_lity to r,dertar:e the design cf this project. You will have abo-t 15 -:inu-es for your _ _esentation , after whic n `-he cc..��.ittee members may wish to ask you for addlticnal info^,at_on. In a111., the presentation and interview is sc e6uled for 3C minutes. We rec•.:est that those attend.inc the 'fleeting be the active � _-nci_ als and designers for this project. We also reauest that the acts._ pr_ncl_a1s and designers of ycu= engineering and other consultants also be present. Enclosed you will ,retails concerning the scope of services to be provided and the criterion for the presentation. We are lock_. _ for- and to meet_nc_ You. If you have any further questions, please contact Kennet`. -. mcCullouch, Deputy Chief, Administration and Budget, Mia :,� _ _re Dear:: en 3-_6 Pan r^_ri can Drive, P.O. Box 330708, Miami, Florida 33133, p:.one 579-6300. Sincerely, Kenneth E. Mccullouch Deout%, C`.ief of Administration Nia.:,- _ _re Devar meat KEM:mm "SUPPORTIVE Enclosures DOCUMENTS „ENTS FOLLOW" r ^.s:,.. Tom. c•t: ^' '_ JOSEPH R. GRASSIE City Manager March 26, 1980 H. Carlton Decker, Architects & Planners 2649 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1903 Miami, Florida 33133 Gentlemen: This letter confirms our telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that your firm has been selected for further consideration to provide architectural and encine_rine_ services for the Fire -rescue .raining Center and Closed Circuit TV Syste:a Project. You are invited to meet with the Select -on Cor.._ttee or. April 8, 1980, at 10:45 a.m., at 150 S.E. 2 Avenue (N.:..t,.T. Building} , 12t.. Floor Con- ference Roan,, and to maKe a presentation of ycur fi= s cuali_`ications and cap ahil-ty tc "_. d.z?rtaJKe the desian of this prciect. You, will have about. 15 .._n: =eS for yo•... presentation, after w.i:c.^. the coi.:.;tlttee merl'bers may w-=h to asf; you for add-t_onal infcr=aticn. In all, the presentation and intervie•... is scheduled for 30 r.,inutes. We request that those attending the meeting be the active principals and designers for this project. We also request that the active principals &,d des:cne_s of your engineering and other consultants also be present. Enclosed you will find more detai'rs concerninc the scope of sex -vices to be provided a ,c. the cr_teri= fcr the _ resentation. We are locking forward to meetin7 you. If you have any further questions, please contact Kenneth E. McCullough, Deputy Chief, Acimin i st ration and Budget, Mia.:.i . ire Depc r:�=ent, 3316 Pan rneriCan Drive, P.O. BOX 330708, N.ia^i, _lcrida 33132, ,:.one 579-6300. KHM s taa►.. ,� a r ..�, ,� "i Enclosures Sincerely, Kenne -} E. McCullough DeoutChief of Adninistration •: Via.- r_re Department t r C�vr\ ( nub tiV March 26, 1990 Zyscovich Architects 2720 S.W. 26 Lane Miami, Florida 33133 Gentlemen: l05Erm R. CRASSIE City Manager This letter con_izzns ecr telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that yo,-r fir=, has been selected for further consideration to _rovide arc.._tectural and encineerinc services for the Fire -Rescue Training- Center and Closed Circuit :'ti' -_.'stem Project. You are in it_,. to meet wit.. the Se1ect_cn Ccm._ttee on F_ _-1 8, 1980, at 11: 20 a. r.,. , at 150 52 n.Ven :e (::....c ... B "._ldi:,(;) , 12 _:. Floor Con- ference %Dcn, and to .rake a _ resent___sn of ycur f4_...,s ,'.lalifications and capab___ _ tc nder ake _ne de=_icn of this _ reject. You will have ao•. t 15 .._.._t es for yo--- _ resenta..ion, after w_c:-: t -_ tt.ittee members rLay tc cam.. vc for a:...___cna'_ in orma io.n.. --n -i, the presentation an ..ter, _t: _s sc:._d n ._ems. we request _: those attending the :te?=_. _: e c_tive _:7c__ aj S and desl=ers for this project. we also request that the ac__ve _ _..___ als a7.d desicners of yc,= enaLneering a»d other consulta; _s also be present. Enclosedvs-,; will find more details ccncerninc the sco_oe of services to be nrcv ded a^d _:,e cr_ter_en for the resentaticn. He are loc,kinc forward to meeting you. If you have any further questions, please contact Kenneth ... McCullough, Deputy Chief, Administration and Budcet, :Pia..,_ Fire Department, 3516 ?an A%meric:n Dr Jve, P.O. box 330708, Miami, : lcr_da 32133, ph on e 579-6300. Sincerely, Kenneth E. McCullouch Deouty Chief cf Ad-inistration X; a.;,i. Fire Deca=ment P P ol FIVE Enclosures U0C" 1 I411 E JOSEPH R. GRASSI! City Manager March 26, 1980 G.S.A./Glasser-Sacmag Assoc., Inc. 34 .E. 36 Street Mi i, Florida 33137 Gentlemen: This letter ccnfira:s our telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 25, 1980, wherein we advised you that your firm has been selected for further consideration to provide architectural and engineering services for the Fire -Rescue Training Center and Closed Circa_,. TV System project. You are invited to meet with the Selection CO-.;lttee on April 8, 1980, at 11.55 a.=., at 15C S.=. 2 Avenue (N.-E.A.T. Building), 12th Floor Con- ference Foom, and to .-,.ake a presentation of your qualifications and capability to u:.dertake the desig of this . roject. You will have about 15 .._-,utes for your presentation, after which the com;.ittee members may wish to ask you for additional information. In all, the presentation and interview is scheduled for 30 minutes. We request that those attending the meeting be the active principals and de=_i--ners fcr this project. We also revuest that the active _=rincioals and desi--ners o: your engineering and other consultants also be present. Enclosed you will find more details concerning the scope of services to be provided and the criterion for the presentation. We are looking forwars� to meeting you. If you have any further questions, please ccntac- Kenneth E. McCullcuq:., Deputy , �izis�za.. Chief, A `i _ on and Budget, Miami Fire Dep art -men , _316 Pan Drive P.O. Box 330708 - American , Miari, Florida 33133 phlone�579-6300. 4 � i, x .tma► FOLLOWj� Enclosures Sincerely, Kenneth E. McCullough Deputy Chief of Ad.-.in4 stration Miami rare Department - "u..�."0o�L� ..~.' % ENCLOSURE 11 INTERIM, RZEPORT t1RE-RESCUE TRAINING CENTER AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM INITIAL SELECTION ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING FIRMS TOTAL POINTS 1. Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracido, Assoc. 566 2. Russell, Martinez & Holt, Architects, Inc. 505 3. A. Taquechel Assoc., Inc. 500 4. H. Carlton Decker, Architects and Planners 496 S. Zyscovich Architects 447 I-F.A G.S.A./Glasser-Sacmag ASSOC.# Inc. 445 7. Jackson and Nunn 403 S. Ted Hoffman, Jr. 391 9. Santos/Raimundez, Architects 388 10: Otto H. Oppenheimer and Associates 371 11. Edward M. Ghezzi 363 12. Carlos R. Dominguez 286 13. Leff and Alexander, Architects and Planners 249 14. Channing and Channing 117 15. Antonio M. Boado 90 CHI=F K. E. MC CUXL2�ZFi, CHAIRMAN COMPETITIVE SELECTION COMMITTEE DATE: March 25, 1980 w ENCLOSURE 12 SCHEDULE FOR THE FINAL SELECTION OF ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING FIRM FOR THE FIRE -RESCUE TRAINING CENTER AND -CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM APRIL 8, 1980 - 9:00 a.m. N.E.A.T. Building 150 S.E. 2 Avenue 12th Floor Conference Room 1. Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracidb, Assoc. 9100 a.m. 1501 N.W. North River Drive Miami, Florida 33125 325-1015 2. Russell, Martinez & Holt, Architects, Ind. 9s35 a.m. 1600 Coral Way Miami, Florida 33145 856-4941 3. A. Tacuechel Assoc., Inc. 10210 a.m. 61 Merrick Way Coral Gables, Florida 33134 445-9682 4. H. Carlton Decker, Architects & Planners 10t45 a.m. 2649 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 1903 Miami, Florida 33133 858-2121 5. Zyscovich Architects 11t20 a.m. 2720 S.W. 28 Lane Miami, Florida 33133 448-8595 6. G.S.A./Glasser-Sacmag Assoc., Inc. llt55 a.m. 347 N.E. 36 Street Miami, Florida 33137 576-5811 "SUPPORTIVE FOCI 1�EI��T N ENCLOSURE 13 III, CRITERIA GUIDELI14ES - r 22:AL SELECTION A. General Each of the firms in the final selection process will have been given information about the project in some detail and will have been requested to prepare a pre- sentation for the Select' -on Com*:itteer in the same order as follows. The ._rc w'y11 be allowed about 20 minutes fcr its presentation after which the members could ask questions. The entire process s:.on'_d take about one-half hour per firms;. S. Rating Guidelines: 1. Capability to complete the design and construction documents within five months (150 calendar days). Ratinc total: 45 This item is divided into two sections. The first section deals with the architect's in, - house capability: its professional sta:_, the support organ«at_cn, and the method of approach; each cf w*.-ich rapes 10, fcr a maximum o: 30. Please re._. 3 in Section II. _n edcition to des..__'__. _ he.. the firm is s tructt:red, how th4.s pro Ct n111 f__ _n z C t he rID's wCSK load pattern, and »ho will act_a11v perform the work on this -rcjec, the firm shc_ld convince each mem':er that have thoucht a�Cut the cf _.._s _ rc ject and that they have an effec__:e c____ : roc -a.... Kee: in mind t -. that the =_r- ill have c•=_taint -ime restraints and that thc :_rn whlc:. ..as a positive approach to aCCC.- 115.._.Z t *-;e wC_F: On, SCheaU1e ouant to rate hic .. flrm sr.e_ld be able to cite examples to assL_ _ the co:^m_ ".eF that it has had s sch ex- erien.c_ in _cd•,cinc cccd designs in a short time pericc. -_..ce tne _ _act_ce of arch_tect,.re is an art -c_-, e_-Ch es: e___.._e ..as h-een one of sc:-,e Mi_ta}:es , as We_. cs ti:� ,.s -e fir-, that .^.as a Cood hi-stcry c= 1ea_.._. C a. r-uz _`. S _5tahf'S W11. oe we1_ we _.. aces_ .e__nc as ...'.e c c..e. e seccn_ Sect_0n _s a^C__ t.:e crC'-_sct's consultants. s_..ct,.rae1e___=cap, :tech ac_caI and ci . _l encineFrs and landscape arc: itects, for a tct-- rap_. c c_ �_.t w_e a _ec _renient that tnesE CC... 1tc t5 at the Presentation. ion. The CC......__teE 5.., ___ act; _'nc:n c'_Est_cns -n case Cn�}' _hE a_C..__=Ct 7,a5 the r_Sentat_C� SC t hat _ r ..::? C..... _t7 ES ...Cr.^._E_ 5 _ _ _ _Ea_.. a.... _ _..e__ SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW background. A team that has worked together before provides an advantage in that the individ- uals will not have to cc through a learning process at this project's expense. =is project should be designed with a systems approach to yield an end product that iS of good aua11tV, has flexibility in the structural, eleCL_ icai &.nc: mechanical systems, is easy to n.,ainta_n, and is low energy using. The encir.eerin.c cots of the building will be about 60 :ErcEnt cf the total construction tests so the end:neerinc as,ects are important. There will c_so be a rECuirement for attention to the site work and appearance of the entire project. In summary, a firn scor_nc 4= cuSht to have demon- strated to the committee that it has rood experi- ence in wcricinc on this type of project under tight time constraints, that it has developed a tea-m of co ns,.__ant_ in this ex;-erience, and that it has ideas a}cut zhls pro-ect. The consultants =_`:cold also be c: nvincine that they have t. e know-how, both tec..-Aologica lV and to deliver the des -rid Product. Projects completec: on time aid withi:i the budget. Rating total: 15 The firm she'1 _e sat_SfV t..e =c ,..._ttee-mer.bers that it has had experience in meeting deadlines and in keeping desi , .s with_-: budgets. This aspect is very i.per_ant. will be un fa i r o ask the rm -c de I- c so'-_cns However it will be _n�order to as}: ,...e _ __nci_als about measurers t,ev aVE taken on p`-O ects that will a_su_ : coL',m _tee Of _he firms ' s cOr:petenCy and cal a_._1_ y ..c na'.._: :.__ _ :o -Ject and tO com- plete it on t_ E and wit.._.. -he budczect. To rate 15, the out' .c preser.p at least three case studies of _ rc,,ec __ tna_ ha:•_. heEn. CC:'_ _eted (nct Under construction) in the _p-ast two Fears, der'on- stra ing the firm did tz-, cvc-rcOme escalating construction costs. _rn's ar__rnative action procram and capability. to meet the City's requiremer.ts. Rating total: This is self-explanatc-y. Exan=les of firm's wcrk that indicate creativity ar.; ser.s_tivity to the =rcject's reeu_renen, 'rating total. 10 =_e se _e•._ew Iter.. 2, _nA- er _.._t_a_ S__ect__... studies which demonstrate its creativity and design capabilities. S. Previous professional experience of firm on similar projects. Rating total: 10 6. Quality of presentation. Rating total: 10 This is purely subjective;. To some people a good show is a sign of talent. If you see and hear what pleases you, then rate the firm accordingly. 7. Fee Structure. Rating total: 5 (OPTIONAL) The purpose of the interview and presentation is to select the top qualified _firms for the project. Fees can always be necetiated. How- ever, the architect may not reel comfortable discus-z_. _ his -fees with cc ns.._tant present. Therefore, the Cha_zna.. _:.cu'_d c_V_ the arch-- tect an c_:crtunilt to have his consultants leave or staff•, as he _sties. The pr'_nci. al should be _repaxed to d-sc'-ss fees in general, giving the co,:.m_..tee a _ance of the cost of his services and prefsrr met^od of ccn.-ractlnC Prior to the inter _ e--, ..G `. - , the f __ n will he sent a typical contract and detail_ e_ scope of services the City will expect t..e f__M to =erfor-_. Therefore, it would seer a^ rc_ _i_te that t:.e fir.., be in a Dos_tion to discuss the --_ter of fees and the contract =rovisions in the above context. C. Rating Form: Form b, entitled Selection Criteria - Final Selection Process," will be used in the interview and Presentation. As in the Initial Selection Procedure, each rne.mher will score each firm according to the criteria and a consensus will rank order all firms. T:^._ Se_ect_cn Cc--mittee will then decide on w•.._ch -f__...s should be recc-*ended to the City Manager. IV. CO!'MUN-1C: T:C1; To CONSL' T;_.1:TS Attached are the following cc:':IAunication documents that will be sent to the consultants d'.:__:1g the selection process A - Advert _sement, issue date. - - Invitation .o Selected Consultants issue date: ENCLOSURE 14 FINAL SELECTION OF FIRM FOR THE FIR- RESCU TRAINING C=:TCR P-ND CLOSED CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM APR_ S, 1980 MEat?,S OF TH7- COMPETITIVE SFLEC':ION COMIN,ITTEE: Chief K. E. McCullough, Chairman - Present Chief R. Z. Coleman, Department of Fire - Present Chief L. D. De Chime, Department of Fire - Present J. E. Gunderson, Director, Department of Finance - Absent M. J. Kaufmann, Special Assistant zo City Manager - Present Carl Kern, Directcr, Depart„ ment of Parks - Present G. Salman, Director, Department of Building & Zoning - Present "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW" .. - - - ---- ----- -- -- - - a*rnr ncrrnz• l C AktllT'1'I.C'IURAI /litJCIN1S1?R[tJ(;_;I_I.I CTJ0N CRITERIA-_1'TNAI. SULEC'I'TON PROCESS 11NI:SI'NTATION AND I11TERVIGI.1 C0NSULTA NT CRITL•'RIA RATING 1 2 3 4 S 6 1. Capability to complete the design and construction documents within 150 days. IN-IIoUSC CAI'ABf1.I'1'Y 30 pawl- �� 7 q I a. IIrofessioiial Staff 10 d b /� • V. Support orUanization 10 C. Me( -hod of cipproach 10 i.NGINEERING CAl'ADILITY 1s �� 3 �l a- Structural engineer 5 engineers 6b. I IJS10 �12. / 2 Electrical anmechanical c. Other consul Lasts 2 2. projects completed on tine and within budgets. 115 ) 3 3. Affirmative action Program and capability to meet City's requirements 10 ID Al 10 4. Exalnploa of work that indicate croativity and </' 0 sensitivity to the project requirements. 10 S. Previous professional experience on similar 10 projects. (� % 6. Quality of presentation. 10 a TOTAL 100 od ARC IIITECTURAL/L•"NG1NF:L'RTWG SILT?C11'10N CItITL'RIA - l'INAL SELECTION PROCESS ` 1'RI:SLIJ'!'A'1'IOPJ A111) 1td'1'LitVILt7 CONSULTANT CRI'1'Iil2TA v RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Capability to couif,lete the design and construction documents within 15U days. 30 f Z'7 -1i 2� Itd-11011 SE CAPAUTLI Y �� 1 ►=�te�SiU11aI staff lb. Support organization 10 c. t•letliod of approach 10 1s �3 �2 t2 IZ 13 t e1Gitlt:cJtJ14(; CAPAR rr.TTY a. :>trucI-ur,,l engineer 5 b. L"'lectrical anil mechanical engineers 6 C. Other consultants 2 2. Projects completed on time and within budgets. 15 �� 10 3. Affirmative iction program and capability to to !ID 1� r0 10 10 meet City's requirements 4. Examples of work that indicate creativity and 10 10 to 7 I� sensitivity to the project requirements. w Previous professional experience on similar projects. 10 'v_ ►O 70 10 , N Quality of presentation. _ 100 'TOTAL 1 N lJtl_:_1(I:`_CUI•:_TRAINING _CENTI:R-11r_1U-(I,OS►_:I)_ CIRCUIT TV SYSTEM \ ARCIII'I'CC'['URAL/GtJGINL'L•'RTN1. G SL1 FINAL CRTTERIA - INAL SGLPCTION 1'1(OCI:SS 1 PRESENTATIION AND IN'i'1•,RVIEW CONSULTANT CRITERIA RATING 1 2 3 4 S G 1. C.1pal)il.ity to complete the design and construction doclllllt?,Itr. within 150 days. IN-IJOUSE CAIIA131LITY 30 � �� �7 to -to a. I'rofessi.onal Staff 10 b. Support- organization 10 C. rieLhod of approach 10 GIJGINEERING CAPAJITLITY vSLructural 15 a. enc ineer ,1 b. G.lectri.cal and mechanical engineers Q `\ C. OLlier co1lst11Lants 2 V 2. Projects completed on time and within budgets. 15 7. Affirmative action program and capability to 10 �� 10 ,�- nlcet: (: i ty' reciui remenl.s 4. Examples of work that indicate creativity and 10 sensi.LiviLy Lo the project requirements. 5. Provi.oun profeoni.onal oxporionco on similar C ' 10 L projecLs. G. Quality of presentation. 10 � l TOTAL 100 — �7 AI(Clll'1'(iC'J'UliAl./1':c�GitJl,l:tilrJc SI:1.1 C1IUhJ _CitIP1:iZIA - PfNA1. SE''LECTION_PIZOCGSS % — --- - —PRESENTATION MID 114TP.I(VIEW ✓� CONSULTANT CRITERIA RATING 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. Capability to coral)lete the design and construction documcnts within 150 flays. 30 24 �2 -19 28 25- � 1N-JIOUSE' CAPABILITY a--Prufesuiolkal Staff 10 1 b. Supl)orL ot-ijaii izatlon 10 C. NeLhod of apl)roach 10 ENGI111:t:11ING Q I _CAPABILITY it :;t"rtICL'tlral u�IcJlneeC 5' b. Electrical ttnLl mechanical engineers 8 C. Othar consultants 2 2. Projects completed on time and within budgets_ 15 10 ID 10 (o 10 i 3. Affirmative action program and capability to 10 10 10 1 meet City's requirements C) 4. Examples of work that indicate creativity and 10 % 7 sensitivity to the project requirements. 10 S 5. Previous professional experience on similar 5 3 9 S i projects. 10 S 6. Quality of presentation. 10 to 10 10 10 TOTAL 100 81 73 8� 78 73 ■ i AItCI1T'l'GC'1'URAt.,/LNGItII i:121NG SI:LI:C'1'[UtJ CRITERIA - PINAL S[•:LGC'1'ION,PROCESS -J-- 1'121."!;LO1'ATIO11_Atli) 111TI�12VIE1-1 CONSULTANT RATING 1 2 3 4 5 G CIIITERIA - 1. Capability to complete the design and construction documcnLs within 150 days. 30 23 IN-11Ur1SE CAPADILITY 10 a. l'rot�s_,ion.�l Staff 10 b. Suppurt_ organiz LtiOn C. McLhod of al,hroach 10 r•_NCIN1.1luNc cnl'nt+tr.IrY 15 15 !3 P7 /I/ a. ;CrucCural unginuer S 8 b. Electrical an(T mechanical engineers C. Other .2 2. Projects completed on time and within budgets. i5 13 l/ 13 %% 3. Affirmative action program and capability to 10 I `� meet city's requirements 4. Examples of work that indicate. creativity and 10 sensitivity to the project requirements. 5. Previous professional experience on similar 10 projects. 10 6. Quality of presentation. ( rJ TOTAL 100 U AltCill'C1:C'1'URA1.%LI1GINi:GR1TIC; Sf:1.I.C'1'IUN CItI'I'hRIA - PINAL --------- -_- RV I1:i1 Si:1.1'C1'[0 t1_ l'ItUC1::;`: t,1t1_�:L•:N'1_A'1'.[UN AND 1111' It `)•- ��--- CONSULTA tl'1' RATING C111TER1A 1 1-_- 3 `I ' G 1. Capability to complete the design and construction documents within 150 days. Ttd-IIOUSL' CAPADII.1TY a. l'rofess.ional Staff 1 b. Surq)ort organization C. Method of alli>roach 10 10 GNGrNEERVIC CAPABILITY it Structural engineer S b. Glectrical and mechanical engineers 8 e_ Otller colijul.tallLS 2 2. Projects completed on time and within budgets. 3. Affirmative action program and capability to meet City's requirements 1, i:xamples of work that indicate creativity and v sensitivity to the project requirements. gin O` J5, 0 Previous professional experience on similar r C projects. O rn �- C Quality of presentation. 'P O'P A L 30 is Is 10 sr 1.1, ilo is Ili' I to i 2J 1 ►3 1 13 1 is 1 15 1 13 10 • Ito I lo I Q I to 10 . 10 8 b 10 100 SM. 91 9 C. 9S TABULATION MORON, WOLFBERG, RUSSELL, uVAP.EZ, MARTINEZ TAHACIDO & HOLT TA UECHEL DECKER ZYSCOVICH 1 I 2 3 4 5 85 74 64 79 76 MC CULLOUGH KAUFMANN 87 75 88 76 89 KERNS 73 65 85 68 77 DE CHIME 81 73 83 78 73 COLEMAN 92 82 93 83 88 SAL,MaN 89 89 96 85 - GUNDERSON - - - - - TOTAL 507 458 529 469 403 AVERAGE 84.5 76.33 88.16 78.16 80.6 1. A. Taquechel Assoc., Inc. 2. Morton, Wolfberg, Alvarez, Taracido, Assoc. 3. Zyscovich Architects 4. H. Carlton Decker, Architects & Planners 88.16 84.5 80.6 78.16 S. Russell, Martinez & Holt, Architects, Inc. 76.33