The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-80-0429�. /01 RESOLUTION NO. F 7 " .129 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A PETITION FOR A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) ON TENTATIVE PLAT NO. 1083 - "VENETIAN HARBOR", BEING APPROXIMATELY 1014-1090 VENETIAN WAY, AS PER ARTICLE XXI-I OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE 6871, AS PER PLANS ON FILE. SAID PAP TO CONSIST OF ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY THREE (123) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND SUBJECT TO REPLATTING; AND SUBJECT TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD'S RECOnIENDATIONS; ZONED R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE). WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of April 22, 1980, Item No. 5, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution ZB 77-80 by a 7 to 0 vote recommending a request for a Planned Area Development (PAD) as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, The City Commission finds that the application meets all of the standards for PADS set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and 1,,IIEF ,AS, The City Commission finds that the applicant has followed all of the procedures and submitted all of the documents necessary in accordance with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, The Citv Commission finds that the PAD meets all of the standards for a Conditional Use as outlined in ARTICLE XXI-I of the City Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, The Citv Commission deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant the petition for the application of a Planned Area Development. (PAD); NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE p+r!,, j I�io�x CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: r, TT t_ f Section 1. The Petition 41 4 P ` tmcRt-Krea-"Development (PAD) on Tentative Plat No. 1083 - "VENETIAN HARBOR", being approximately 1014-1090 Venetian Way, as ner ARTICLE XXI-I of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871, as per plans on file, said PAD to consist of one hundred and twenty three (123) residential units and subject to replatting; and subject to the Urban Development Review Board's recommendations; zoned R-4 (Medium Density Multiple), be and the CITY COMMISSION ' MEETING OF JUN6 1,11360 e:. same is hereby granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of DUNE 1980. . MAURICE A. FERRE ' M A Y 0 R AT G. ONGIE CITY CLERK PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: TERRY V. PHRCY ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: 80-429 I r A, 6J ZONING FACT SHEET LOCATION/LEGAL Approximately 1014-1090 Venetian Way Tentative Plat 41083 "VENETIAN HARBOR" OWNER YARDNER, N.V. c/o Jose A. Diaz -Asper Suite 904, Douglas Center 2600 Douglas Road Coral Gables, Florida. 33134 Ph: 448-9360 APPLICANT Robert H. Traurig (Attorney for Applicant) 1401 Brickell Avenue Miami, Fla. 33131 Ph: 377-3501 ZONING R-4 (Medium Density Multiple Dwelling). REQUEST A PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) on above site, as per ARTICLE XXI-1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871, as per plans on file, said PAD to consist of one hundred and twenty three (123) residential units and sujbect to replatting. RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL IN ACCORD WITH THE PLANS ON FILE AND WITH PLANNING DEPART- THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THF.. URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MENT BOARD. The proposed project meets the intent of a planned area Development. It offers a good design along with an opportunity to provide housing units close to Downtown. Because this project is providing more for the community (such as landscaping both on the project and on the public right-of-way, larger units and covered parking) than would traditional development, the 1.37 FAP (1.1 allowed), the 38.33% combined lot coverage (35o permitted), and the 23-51' height of the accessory structure (12' permitted) are acceptable. ZONING BOARD Recommended approval subject to the recommendation of the Urban Development Review Board on April 22, 1980. CITY COMMISSION Deferred action at meeting of May 22, 1980. ACTION 80-429 boa Clio PIOID InJ0ID-100 LIL 0 10 DI 0 111 ID 10 JbI -650 T Fig] Lrtil lQf r,__ I cifu ... pf fflialut',, lariba n'otC01"op% it 1 ' April 29, 1980 Mayor and City Commission Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie City of Miami, Florida re: PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT -RECOMMEND App. 1014-90 Venetian Way T.P. #10A3 "VENETIAN HARBOR" Applicant: YARDNER, N.V. Gentlemen: The Miami Zoninq Board, at its meeting of April 22, 1.980, Item #5, following an ldverti-serl Bearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 77-80 by a 7 to 0 vote RECOMMENDING a requost for. a Planned Area Development (PAD) on Tentative Plat #1083 - "VLNEIPIAN HARBOR", being approximately 101.4-1090 Venetian way, as per ARTICL? XXI-1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 68-71, as per plans on file, said PAD to consist of one hundred and twenty three (123) residential units and subject to repl att i nq and subject to the Urban Development Review Board's recommendations; zoned R-4 (Medium Density Multiple). Six ohjections by m�i.l. Six replies in favor by mail; eight proponents present at ZB meetincj. A RESOL,UT10N to provide for this Planned Area Development has been prepared by the City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration Of the City Commission. I re ez- ugo es Director cm Planning and Zoning Boards Z. M. 22 Administration ce: Law Department NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: APPROVAL IN ACCORD WITH TILE PLANS ON FILE AND WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UDRB. Tentative City Commission date: May 22, 1980. CITY OF MIAM1, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ro. Mayor and City Commission DATE. June 2, 1980 ME Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie Item g Agenda June y6,1980s- Planning and Zoning Agenda room ref io„ E - gone pErFRt:NrLS Director Planning and Zoning Boards FNCI.bSlIRFS Administration - Attached please find a report by the URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD regarding VENETIAN HARBOR as supplemental information. _ CITY OF MIAMI, FLOP )A 'I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM '80 r.,,, -7 » :04 TO Aurelio Perez, Director °11 April 2, 1980 CILE Planning and Zoning Board A i n st rat i.on 5"B'F `.' Venetia Harbor Biscayne Island pom , enn Bu f ul rr I,I NCC5 Urban Development Review oard At the Urban Development Review Board meeting of March 18, 1980, t;he Board recommended approval of the subject P.A.D. Project, with a floor area ratio of 1.37 and a principal and accessory parking structure lot coverage of 38.33'�. The recommendation Is subject to approval of a detailed landscape plan by the Board, and subject to the landscaping of county owned lands west and north of the project to be delineated on the landscape plans. The recommendation is based upon: - the substantial landscape treatement of the project and the additional areas of county lands. - covered and enclosed parking structure. - Landscape treatment of the roof of the parking structure. - large size of dwelling units. GB: ROW: dr . W V •+I.1 A ` ;, r r., MI MI, FLC RIDA JUr; E 6, 1980 To the Honorable M:-yor and City Commissioners of Mi-:rni : This petition is regarding the new highrise to be build at Venetian Wfiy end being presented to you tonight for epprovrl. We the undersigned live within 300 ft., of seid property and are the most-ffected by this structure, which by looking ,!,t the model seems to be attractive, but thOn it is difficult to imagine thet 17 stories will lock slightly birp-Er th,-n the mcdel. I -et us tell you ,.%h, t thy:: fee r of this ccnstructicn is. The owners -re requesting e veri:,nce in high. Instead of the 13 stories ellcwed, they want 17 stories. Here goes our brckyerd privacy. The next problem is one.which is un voidable, but with less heilghtt it would pr.ob,=bly help, even if its little bit. We suppose the pilings will be brought in by barge, otherwise the bridge will collapse. We like this to be established before this commission. Do you re?lize whet it me?ns to your home, when the developers have to drive pilings in-tc filled bottom in order to put up 17 stories? It means that within 300 feet or m:-�ybe even more, your walls ?nd ceilin�G will develope cracks. The houses will shake not to talk wh?t damage it will c•:use to the pools your underground pipes e.t.c. The added tr--ffic to the bridge is not the most desirable natter either. This poor bridge is in such bad shape, r -2- that with the other highrise going up, already we stand in line, because if a cement truck goes over the bridge I traffic in both directions is stopped. Two gus.rds with walkie-talkies are stationed on each side of the bridg, to give, the C.E. when it is s:,.fe to cross/ so the bridge will not collapse under the added weight. We live at our properties for long timc and sometimes th, bridge is out for days and everybody has to go to Mir-mi 'e,E ch ova-r the McArthur Causeway, which does not help our gasolime bills. We respectfully submitt to you before approving this vari=.nce that ,you g,t in touch with the D;!dt County ngineering Dept., who is trying d;spAratwly to keep this 40 year old bridge- in working order. We also want the agre,mcnt that no pilings should be carried over this bridge, to �,void further overloading. We have to insist that the responsible parties carry insurance in favor of the indersigned property owners, for damE,ge which could occur, from drivin7 pilings or ':ny other dam;:ge which may be attributed to the development of the pr:rcel before you tonight. We all think nth t whey, the developer bought said p,�.rcel, that he knew exr.etly its limitations. We are tired o f your constant ruling in favor of priv,-te developers, just because you might have more tnx revenues. We feel that the developer shculd be allowed to build, what is now granted to him under present L w 13 stories and that no vari=.nce should be given to him s sm:-.11 as it may see m to you, it seem ,-wfu]l bia to us. Think you for your consideration Sincerely,