HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-80-0499r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SCHEDULING A REGULAR CITY
COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 30, 1980, AT
00 P.M., AT WHICH MEETING THE ONLY
ITEM OF BUSINESS TO BE CONSIDERED WILL
BE THE CITY OF MIAMI/UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI
JAMES L. KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER,
INCLUDING AUTHORIZATION FOR THE SALE OF
BONDS IN CONNFCTION THEREWITH.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE. CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. A regular City Commission Meeting is hereby
scheduled for June 30, 1980, commencing at 2:20 P.M., at
which Meeting the only item of business to be considered
will be the City of :Miami/University of Hiami James L. Knight
International Center, including authorization for the sale
of bonds in connection therewith.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26rh day of June, 1980.
TTEST
RAL H G. ONGIE
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
ROBERT F. CLARK
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
MAURICE A. FERRE
M A Y 0 R
APPROVED #S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
GEORGE F. KNOX, JR. `T—
' CITY ATTORNEY
"DOMWENTVP
OEX
ITEM NO it
. CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
J UN 3 6 1980
Numm" 8 0�.....-.I-9
�w�e.
y
0
-7-
I le
I
0,
0
• _ - -.A44�L ILL �d•--�,CCa� _
Olk
PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miami Planning Department: April 14, 1980
PETITION 3a) Consideration of amending Comprehen-
sive Zoning Ordinance 6871 by inserting a
new ARTICLE XXI-5 SPD-3 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT, providing
an intent statement, use regulations, and
special transfer of development rights, which
is superimposed over, and modifies the uses
of, the underlying zoning districts.
REQUEST To establish a zoning overlay district in-
cluding a transfer of development rights
which can be applied to North Biscayne
Boulevard.
BACKGROUND This zoning overlay district was proposed
in the Biscayne Boulevard North Economic
Planning Study which was approved in prin-
ciple by the Planning Advisory Board on
October 3, 1979. The City Commission un-
animously approved the same study in prin-
ciple on November 26, 1979.
ANALYSIS Careful analysis discloses that the major
barrier to economic growth along Biscayne
Boulevard is the existence of shallow com-
mercial lots. Developers will not invest
along the Boulevard because they cannot
construct buildings large enough to yield
an investment return sufficient to compen-
sate for the costs and risks of redevelopment.
The proposed zoning overlay district ad- '
dresses this barrier by a) further restrict-
ing the list of underlying C-1 local com-
mercial uses to those which local residents
and commercial property owners believe are
compatible with quality residential and
office development and b) providing for a
transfer of development rights from R-2, R-3,
R-4 transitional properties,up to 100 feet
outside the district,to properties within
the district to allow greater intensity.
The transitional property would form a
buffer, most likely in the form of parking
lots, between the commercial properties
along the Boulevard and the residential
property lying east and west of the
Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING APPROVAL
DEPARTMENT
PLANNING ADVISORY
BOARD Recommended May 7, 1980
SPD-3-BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT.
Section 1. INTENT
(1) Biscayne Boulevard North has traditionally been known
as the "Gateway to Miami". It is, therefore, in the
public interest that future development and redevelop-
ment upgrade and, thereby, improve the visual impres-
sion of this arterial landmark. The intent of these
regulations is to encourage quality office, residen-
tial and retail development in a linear setting. This
district, superimposed over the existing zoning dis-
trict, modifies use regulations and explicitly states
the manner in which development rights may be trans-
ferred from transitional use lots to SPD 3 lots with
respect to floor area.
(2) All other zoning regulations and procedures not affected
by these regulations shall be in full force and effect.
Section 2. USE REGULATIONS
(1) Permitted Generally
(a) Where the underlying district is C-1: As in
C-1, except as provided below:
1. Substance Abuse Facilities
2. Sanitarium
3. Nursing Homes
4. Convalescent Homes
5. Rooming Houses
(b) Where the underlying district is C-2: As in C-2,
except as provided below and in addition to the
exceptions cited in Section (1) (a) of this
article.
1. Massage Parlors
2. Turkish Baths
3. Pool and Billiard Rooms
4. Second Hand Stores
5. Bars, Salons and Taverns
6. Commercial Recreational Establishments
(c) Generally permitted and conditional uses cited
in Section 2 (a) and (b) of this article are
subject to Use, Minimum Floor Area, Yard, Height,
Area, Lot Coverage and Usable Open Space regulations
specified in said respective districts, except
in instances where transfer of Development Rights
are undertaken (see Section 3(2) of this article).
1
(d) As in R-C, subject to Use, Minimum Floor Area,
Yard, Height, Lot Coverage, Area and Usable
Open Space regulations specified in said district,
except in instances where Transfer of Development
Rights are undertaken (see Section 3 (3)and (4) of this
article).
(e) Apartment buildings and apartment hotels not
exceeding a density of one (1) dwelling unit for
each 690 square feet of total lot area, including
(when appropriate) Transitional Use Lots.
Section 3. SPECIAL TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
(1) For building sites which have a minimum of 120 feet
of street frontage along Biscayne Boulevard and a
minimum of 15,000 square feet of SPD-3 Lot Area and
which have adjacent transitional use lots in an "R"
District, development rights for the floor area may
be transferred from these "R" District lots to the
assembled SPD-3 lots (principal site). The floor
area ratio for the total site, including the transi-
tional use lots shall not exceed 1.80. Transfer of
development rights may occur only after transitional
use lots have been cleared of existing structural
uses.
(a) R-3 or R-4 transitional use lots, not exceed-
ing 15,000 square feet of total net area, may
transfer their floor area development rights
(equivalent to an FAR of 1.5 times the net
square footage of said lot) to the principal
site.
(b) R-2 transitional use lots, not exceeding 15,000
square feet of total net area, may transfer
their floor area development rights (equivalent
to an FAR of .6) plus an FAR Bonus of .9 for
site assembly equaling an FAR 1.5, times the net
square footage of said lot to the principal site.
(c) Transfer of development rights from R-1 transi-
tional use lots to an SPD-3 site is prohibited.
(2) Where transfer of said development rights occurs for
uses generally permitted and/or approved as Conditional
Use in Section 2(a) and (b) of this article, the Use,
Area, Yard, Height, Lot Coverage, Minimum Floor Area and
Usable Open Space requirements specified in their
respective districts may be calculated based upon the
total site, including the transitional use lots. However,
development may occur only on the SPD-3 portion of the a
total site. -
E
00.
(3) Where transfer of said development rights occurs for
uses in an R-C district the Use, Yard, Height, Lot
Coverage, Minimum Floor Area and Usuable Open Space
requirements specified in said district may be calcu-
lated based upon the total site, including the tran-
sitional use lots. However, development may occur
only on the SPD-3 portion of the total site.
(4) Where transfer of development rights occurs minimum
lot area requirements for residential uses are as
follows;
No. of Units Minimum Lot Area Required
Ft.
1-12 6000 + 1500 for each
additional unit over
four.
12 or more 18,000 + 460 for each
additional unit over
twelve to a maximum
of 65 units per acre.
Computations are to be based on the area of the total
site, including transitional use lots.
(5) A legal document binding the transitional use lot to
the principal site must be approved by the City
Attorney and recorded.
Section 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL
(1) The purpose of the Development Plan Review is to
accertain that development, redevelopment or additions
to existing sites or structures is in accord with the
intent of the District and for the benefit of the
general public, in accordance with the provisions of
Article IV Section 41.
(2) Where transfer of development rights occurs (Section 3
of this article). A development plan shall be submitted
to the Urban Development Review Board for their approval.
(3) In recommending upon or approving development plans, the
Urban Development Review Board shall consider the location
size, height, spacing, and extent of use of any building
or structure, and their appurtenances, access and cir-
culation for vehicles and pedestrians, streets, parking
areas, yards and open spaces, and the relationship to
adjacent property. The Board shall not approve
3
such development plan unless it finds that such
plan conforms to all applicable provisions of
this Ordinance, that the safety and convenience
of the public are properly provided for and that
adequate protection and separation are provided
for contiguous and nearby residential property.
4
R=2� X 1.3 FAR
TRANSFER
15,000 SO. FT. ....
TRANSITIONAL USE
LOT 312E
SPD-3 X 2.0 FAR
22,500 SO. FT. EQUALS
LOT SIZE j
22,500 SO. FT.
45,000 SO. FT.
` R-2
22,500 SO. FT. '
BROSS IMPROVEMENTS
)00 SO. FT.
ISS
>ROVEMENTS
67,500 SO. FT. GROSS
IMPROVEMENTS
SPD-3
ILLU�TF-?�•�TION F='ICl/ I
TF=?�•�N�F-�F� OF- C•�E\/EL�F=IMF= ftiJT
F=?IGF 1T�
• PLANNING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT City of Miatti Planning Department: April 14, 1980
PETITION 3(b) Consideration of amending Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance 6871 by:
1) Changing the zoning classification
of properties fronting on the east
side of Biscayne Boulevard, between
N.E. 50th Terrace and N.E. 55th
Terrace from R-4 MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE DWELLING TO R-C RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE; and
2) Changing the zoning classification
of properties generally fronting
on the west side of Biscayne Boule-
vard, between N.E. 62nd Street and
N.E. 64th Street, including properties
extending approximately 311' from the
west side of Biscayne Boulevard on
the south side of N.E. 64th Street,
from R-4 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE
DWELLING TO R-C RESIDENTIAL OFFICE;
and
3) Changing the Zoning classification
of properties lying immediately
west of the commercially -zoned
property fronting on the west side
of Biscayne Boulevard, between N.E.
64th Street and N.E. 69th Street,
from R-4 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE
DWELLING TO R-C RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE;
and
4) Applying the proposed SPD-3 BISCAYNE
BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY
DISTRICT to properties currently zoned
C-1 Local Commercial and C-2 Community
Commercial, fronting both sides of
Biscayne Boulevard, between N.E. 60th
Street and N.E. 78th Street (Little
River Canal); and
5) Changing the zoning classification of
property generally known as Biscayne
Shopping Plaza, generally bounded by
Biscayne Boulevard and the Little
River Canal, between N.E. 79th Street
and N.E. 82nd Street, from C-2 COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL TO C-lA PLANNED SHOPPING
CENTER; and
r
7
6) Changing the zoning classification
of properties along both sides of
Biscayne Boulevard, between N.E.
80th Street and N.E. 87th Street,
excluding the aforementioned
Biscayne Shopping Plaza, from
C-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO C-1
LOCAL COMMERCIAL; and
7) Applying the proposed SPD-3 BISCAYNE
BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL OVLRLAY
DISTRICT to all proposed and existing
C-1 Local Commercial properties on
both sides of Biscayne Boulevard,
between N.E. 80th Street and Biscayne
Shopping Plaza.
REQUEST To encourage appropriate residential and/or
office redevelopment along Biscayne Boulevard,
especially between N.E. 50th Terrace and N.E.
79th Street, in an effort to upgrade the land
use and, thereby, the visual impression of
this arterial landmark.
BACKGROUND These zoning changes were recommended in the
Biscayne Boulevard North Economic Planning
Study approved in principle �by.the Planning
Advisory Board on October 3, 1979. The City
Commission unanimously approved.the same study
in principle on November 26, 1979.
ANALYSIS The policy statement concerning North Biscayne
Boulevard in the Miami Comprehensive Neighbor-
hood Plan states:
"R. Biscayne Boulevard: Promote the conversion
of marginal motel operations into moderate -
density residential and mixed commercial -
residential uses through zoning incentives and
modifications, street beautification and rehabi-
litation assistance".
The failing economic health of Biscayne Boulevard
between NE 36th Street and NE 87th Street may be
explained by prevalent inefficient and obsolete
land uses, primarily motels. The proposed zoning
changes are as follows:
- R-4 to R-C zoning changes are proposed
to allow higher density office options _
in addition to higher density residential
options to serve as a redevelopment ■
impetus.
- C-2 to C-1 zoning changes are proposed
to upgrade the quality and image of
Biscayne Boulevard, north of NE 80th
Street by restricting uses to those inure
consistant with this important entry-
way to Miami.
C-2 to C-lA zoning change is proposed
for the Biscayne Shopping Plaza to
encourage revitalization of the Plaza
by way of use restrictions Development
Plan approval, increased parking require-
ment and improved traffic circulation.
- SPD-3 overlay application is proposed
to restrict the underlying C-1 uses to
those consistant with the neighborhood
and to offer developers an incentive
for redevelopment through transfer of
development rights.
These proposed zoning changes strike an important
compromise in that they offer sufficient develop-
ment incentives yet, in so doing, will not allow
for building densities which are so high as to
detract from the quality of life within the
adjacent residential neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT Approval
PLANNING Recommended May 7, 1980.
ADVISORY BOARD
r
1
C C
3 (b)
RESOLUTION NO. PAD
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE 6871 BY:
1) Changing the zoning classification of
properties fronting on the east side of
Biscayne Boulevard, between NE 50th Terrace
and NE 55th Terrace from 11-4 MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE DWELLING TO R-C RESIDENTIAL OFFICE;
and
2) Changing the zoning classification of pro-
perties generally fronting on the west
side of Biscayne Boulevard, between NE
62nd Street and NE 64th Street, including
properties extending approximately 311'
from the west side of Biscayne Boulevard on
the south side of N.E. 64th Street, from
R-4 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING TO
R-C RESIDENTIAL OFFICE; and
3) Changing the zoning classification of properties
lying immediately west of the commercially -
zoned property fronting on the west side of
Biscayne Boulevard, between N.E. 64th Street
and NE 69th Street, from R-4 MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE DWELLING TO R-C RESIDENTIAL -OFFICE;
and
4) Applying the proposed SPD-3 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT to properties
currently zoned C-1 Local Commercial and C-2
Community Commercial, fronting both sides of
Biscayne Boulevard, between NE 60th Street
and NE 78th Street (Little River Canal); and
5) Changing the zoning classification of property
generally known as Biscayne Shopping Plaza, gen-
arally bounded by Biscayne Boulevard and the
Little River Canal, between NE 79th Street and
NE 82nd Street, from C-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
TO C-lA PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER; and
6) Changing the zoning classification of properties
along both sides of Biscayne Boulevard, between
NE 80th Street and NE 87th Street, excluding the
aforementioned Biscayne Shopping Plaza, from
C-2 COMMUNITY C011MERCIAL TO C-1 LOCAL COMMER-
CIAL; and
,i) Applying the proposed SPD-3 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH
SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT to all proposed and exist-
ing C-1 Local Commercial properties on both sides
of Biscayne Boulevard, between NE 80th Street and
NE 87th Street, excluding the aforementioned
Biscayne Shopping Plaza,
All per the attached Map, consistant with the Miami
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan.
N.E. 87 Street
L- LJ
ETI
C - I
C-2
L �/ ®_�
17
N.E. 79 Street fTlfff TT J
Fr-T—r- Little River
L -2
Lill-
T�
7:-
I FIE f-ITE
-1 EH
J�
C - 1
N.E. 69 Street
.. . ......
U.'E
R-4 :
j 7
;1� 1:r
N.E. 61 Street M
......
C-2
Ir
I.E. 80 Street
M
�T
�7: JrTfrTTt,D Z-r--',l
M, f
L Ll' T I
-HT IL [HEMP N.E. 55 Terr.
R-4
IIjr tjj - 7r77r-T
I ..L=t
[TI ILI) [ri
I T
HHO
JTT f I T-T-i "�Tr' N.E. 50 Terr.
BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH
EXISTING ZONING
north
city of miami planing department
April 1980
N.E.87 Street _
y7
�, -- _T-_[=L_
- SPD-3
71
N.E. 79 Street --i.
Little River
u:. SPD-3
FT
� I 1 L L",u ; y: 3 -i ::au
� I 711trt
N.E. 69 Street'.
,
N.E. 61 StreetM.E. 60 Street
a F f t�c`;<Li)Ei�iiitElFyrT N. E. 55 Terr.
R—Ci '"' 1CCijt)�IIT�I�Lr
IT
,� -- • TrI T Iliri
ElSPD-3 Overlay ii T
District ( .-- WfT1TTT TT• N.E. 50 Terr.
Zoning Changed
BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH
PROPOSED
ZONING
4
north
city of miaml planning department
april 1980
4
a
t ffitami, Ylaribn
•�LwwM
n
May 16, 1980
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie
City of Miami, Florida
re: ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - RECOMMENDED
Ordinance 6871, ARTICLE XXI-5,
SPD-3 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH
SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT
Initiated by: Planning Department
Gentlemen:
The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 7, 1980,
Item #3(a). following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No.
PAD 15-80 by a 7 to 0 vote RECOMMENDING amending Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance 6871 by inserting a new ARTICLE XXI-5, SPD-3 BISCAYNE
BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT, providing an intent state-
ment, use regulations, and special transfer of development rights,
which is superimposed over, and modifies the uses of, the underlying
zoning districts= all as per the attached.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Ordinance Amendment has been
prepared by the City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration
of the City Commission.
S� rely,
' J
elio .E.' to o
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
cm
CC: Law Department
Tentative City Commission date: June 26, 1980.
/`\
Qlitu,,, f ffliami,
lari�tt
May 16, 1980
Mayor and City Commission
Attentions Mr. Joseph R. Grassie
City of Miami, Florida
re: CHANGES OF ZONING AND APPLICATION
OF BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL
OVERLAY DISTRICT - RECOMMENDED
Properties in the vicinity of
Biscayne Boulevard between N.E.
50th Terrace and N.E. 87th Street
Initiated by: Planning Department
Gentlemen:
The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of May 7, 1980,
Item #3(b)(1 thru 7), adopted Resolution No. PAB 16-80 by a 7 to 0
vote RECOMMENDING certain Changes of Zoning and the application of
the BISCAYNE BOULEVARD NORTH SPECIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT to properties
in the vicinity of Biscayne Boulevard between N.E. 50th Terrace and
N.E. 87th Streets all as per the attached.
An ORDINANCE to provide for the above has been prepared by the City
Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City
Commission.
Sind rely '
j
el i z u nes
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
cm
cc: Law Department
Tentative City Commission date: June 26, 1980.
ZONING FACT SNEET ,
LOCATION/LEGAL
Approx. 665 N.E. 60th Street
Lot 1; Block "C"
BAYSIiORE REVISED (9-60)
OWNER/APPLICANT
Anthony & Barbara James
669 N.E. 60th Street
Miami, Florida. 33137 phone A 757-8271
ZONING
R-1 (One -Family Dwelling).
REnUPST
A Change from present classification of
R-1 (One -Family Dtgellinq) to a new
Classification of R-3 (Low Density Multiple
Dwelling).
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL. The proposed change of zoning
PLANNING DEPART-
from R-1 to R-3 is in accord with the
MENT
Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan for the
City of Miami. Only a small pocket of
R-1 zoning exists on this side of
N.E. 60th Street. The subject site is
bordered on two sides by R-3 zoning so
extension of this district should have
a minimal impact on adjacent properties.
ZONING BOARD
Recommended approval on June 2., 1980.
OPP I OD
�l REVISED
655 N.E.
gAYSHOREro ST
.. / •• 1
I � .
to nu a
1
00
�oa�oo
Poll,
June 3, 19R0
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassi e
City of Miami, Floridn
re: CHANGE OF 70NING - RECOMMEND
Approx. 665 N.E. 60th Street
Lot I,- R1 ocic "C" ;
13AYSIIORE REVISED (9-60)
Applicant: Barbara James
Gent l.emen :
The Miami Zoninh Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1980, Item 42.,
followinq an ifivertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 93-80
by a 6 to 0 vote (1 member absent) RECOI.WNDING a Change of
Zoning Cl.issi£ication of Lot l., nlocic "C"; RAYSHORE REVISED (9-60),
beinq nnproximately 665 N E. 60th Street, from R-1 (One Family)
to R-3 (I,ow Density Meltiple) .
Six objer_tions received by mail; five objectors oresent at meeting.
Two p.roronents present at meeting; one reply in favor by mail.
An Ordinance to provide for this Change of Toning has been prepared
by the City Attorneys office and submitted for consideration of
the City Commission.
Sincerely,
u e1 in E. Pere i,ugo s
Director.
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
cm
Z . 11 14
Cc: LAW Department
NOTE: Planning Depnrtment recommendation: APPROVAL.
Tentative City Commission date: June 26, 1980.
0
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE
CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF LOT 1, BLOCK "C"; BAYSHORE
REVISED (9-60), BEING APPROXIMATELY 665 N. E.
60TH STREET, FROM R-1 (ONE -FAMILY) TO R-3
(LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE), AND BY MAKING THE
NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT
MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871
BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION Its ARTICLE III,
SECTION 2, THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES,
CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT;
AND CONTAINING A SEVF.RABILITY CLAUSE.
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting of June 2, 1980,
Item No. 2, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution
No. ZB 93-80 by a 6 to 0 vote (1 member absent) RECOMMENDING a change
of zoning classification , as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of
this matter, deems it advisable and in the best interest of the general
welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to grant this change f
of zoning classification as hereinafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is hereby amended
by changing the zoning clasification of Lot 1, Block "C" BAYSHORE
REVISED (9-60), being approximately 665 N.E. 60th Street, from R-1
I
(One Family) to R-3 (Low Density Mutiple), and by making the necessary
changes in the zoning district map made a part of said Ordinance
No. 6871, by reference and description in Article III, Section 2,
thereof.
Section 2. That all laws or parts of laws in conflict
herewith be and the same are hereby repealed insofar as they are in
conflict.
Section 3. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance
be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the
i
I
the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this day
of , 1980.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY TITLE
ONLY this day of , 1980.
A Y 0 R
ATTEST:
RAL G. ONGIE
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
TERRY V. PER
ASSISTANT CI ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
CITY
-2-
3
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL
Portion of the alley located in the block bounded
by S.E. 12th Terrace, S.E. 13th Street, Brickell
Ave., and S. Bayshore Dr., also, a portion of S.E.
13th St., bet. BrickellAve., and S. Bayshore Dr.
OWNER
ZARKIN, N.V.
50 West Mashta Drive
Key Biscayne, Fla. 33149 Phone #361-5566
APPLICANT
Robert H. Traurig
1401 Brickell Avenue, PH-1
Miami, Florida. 33131 Phone #377-3501
REQUEST
The Vacation and Closure of a portion of the
alley located in the block bounded by S.E. 12 Terr.,
S.E. 13th Street, Brickell Avenue and So. Bayshore
Drive for a distance of + 350' from the east right-
of-way line of Brickell Avenue. Also, the N'ly
portion of the bifurcation of N.E. l3th Street
between Brickell Avenue and So. Bayshore Drive for
a distance of + 1651; as a condition for approval
of T.P. #1081 - "B-L-K SUBDIVISION".
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL IN ACCORD WITH THE CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED
PLANNING DEPART-
BY THE PLAT AND STREET COMMITTEE. The proposed
MENT
alley and street closures will permit consolidation
of the land on the north side of S.E. 13th Street
so that it can be developed as one parcel. The
alleyway has not been improved although it does
contain several utility lines. These will have to
be relocated as a part of the plat process. Only
that portion of S.E. 13th Street which branches
out into the property north of 13th Street is proposed
to be closed. There is no problem with closure of
this portion of the street since an equivalent right-
of-way must be put in by the developer. The City
will benefit from these closures since the property
will be put on the tax rolls. The applicant is also
dedicating right-of-way for better alignment of
S.E. 13th Street, with S.E. 12th Terrace east of
Brickell Avenue. All cost of all right-of-way
improvements will be borne by the applicant.
ZONING BOARD
Recommended approval on June 2, 1980.
0
W
Q
141,
12 'T E
aP�s�9
'Pip
c`oSURE
s. E 1 2,/Tr
C.
5. E 12 TERR SIREE'T
toEM.
G1.0SU R%
Q �D
--if-V
s.pa 14
ST.
03
(11110..s��.I�1llt�
t
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie
City of Miami, Florida
re:
Gentlemen:
fosrrl i R 4 .R ^«1E
c ItV M.II,.10"t
June 4, 1980
VACATION & CLOSURE - RECOMMENDED
alley bounded by S.E. 12th Terrace,
S.E. 13th Street, Brickell Avenue
and South Bayshore Drive
Tentative Plat #1081 -
"B-L-K SUBDIVISION"
Applicant: Zarkin,N.V.
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 2, 1980, Item #4,
following an advertised nearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 95-80
by a 7 to 0 vote RECOMMENDING the Official Vacation and Closure
of a portion of the alley located in the block bounded by S.E.
12th Terrace, S E. 13th Street, Brickell Avenue and South Bayshore
Drive for a distance of + 350' from the east right-of-way line
of Brickell Avenue. Also, the NIly portion of the bifurcation
of S.E. 13th Street between Brickell Avenue and South Bayshore
Drive for a distance of + 1651; as a condition for approval of
Tentative Plat #k1081 - 'rB-L-K SUBDIVISION" and subject to
verification of ownership prior to its hearing before the Miami
City Commission.
Two replies in favor by mail= four proponents present at meeting.
A RESOLUTION to provide for this Vacation and Closure has been
prepared by the City Attorney's office and submitted for considera-
tion of the City Commission.
Si rely,
i6 E. ez
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
cm
Z. M. 37
cc: Law Department
Tentative City Commission date: June 26, 1980.
NOTE: Pl.anninq Department recommendation: APPROVAL IN ACCORD WITH
THE CONDITIONS ESTABLSIHED BY THE PLAT & STREET COMMITTEE
I' • r�I. ° .II"' 1•:I. its l11-11 .IP 41111N 1?II.4R1•II IJ1 .,,It r„ pp, Iwiv•1r.w;
\19t11io r1RII II'f.(INI�- P.t.•.Iw
Oft 005
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL 3215-45 Aviation Avenue
Lots 27 thru 33 and N'ly 50' of Lot 36
Block 381
NEW BISCAYNE AMD (B-16)
OWNER/APPLIfANT James G. & Joan Ann Robertson
coo Jack R. Rice, Jr.
25 S.E. 2nd Avenue
Miami, Florida PH: 373-5711
REQUEST Change of Zoning Classification from R-4
(Medium Density Multiple) to R-C
(Residential office).
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL. Rezoning of this property will
PLANNING DEPT. not infringe on the rights of adjacent pro-
perty owners. A buffer area of R-4 zoning
will still exist along Tigertail Avenue
between the R-1 and R-2 districts. Since
the R-C zoning combines office and residen-
tial uses, it will also .function as a trans-
itional area.
ZONING BOARD: Recommended denial on February 25, 1980.
LOCATION /LEGAL
OWNER/APPLICANT
REQUEST
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING DEPT.
ZONING BOARD:
ZONING FACT SHEET
3215-45 Aviation Avenue
Lots 27 thru 33 and N'ly 50' of Lot 36
Block 381
NEW BISCAYNE AMD (B-16)
James G. & Joan Ann Robertson
c/o Jack R. Rice, Jr.
25 S.E. 2nd Avenue
Miami, Florida PHs 373-5711
Change of Zoning Classification from R-4
(Medium Density Multiple) to R-C
( Residential Office).
APPROVAL. Rezoning of this property will
not infringe on the rights of adjacent pro-
perty owners. A buffer area of R-4 zoning
will still exist along Tigertail Avenue
between the R-1 and R-2 districts. Since
the R-C zoning combines office and residen-
tial uses, it will also .function as a trans-
itional area.
Recommended denial on February 25, 1980.
Q
R•2
R40
CttV of Miami, Yloriba
r
March 7, 1980
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie
City of Miami, Florida
re: CHANGE OF ZONING - RECOMMEND DENIAL
3215-45 AVIATION AVENUE
Lots 27 thru 33 & W ly 50, of
Lot 36, Block 38;
NEW BISCAYNE AMD (B-16)
Applicant: James G. Robertson
Gentlemen:
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of February 25, 1980, Item 07,
following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 33-80 by
a 4 to 2 vote RECOMMENDING DENIAL of Change of Zoning Classification of
Lots 27 thru 33 & N'ly 50' of Lot 36, Block 38; NEW BISCAYNE AMD (B-16),
being 3215-45 Aviation Avenue, from R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to
R-C (Residential Office).
Nine objectors present at meeting. Two replies in favor by mail;
Three proponents present at meeting.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been prepared
by the City Attorneys office and submitted for consideration of the
City Commission.
C;�S•inerely,
0_ o Pe - one
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
cm
Z . M. 45
cc: Law Department
Planning Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: APPROVAL.
Tentative City Commission dates April 24, 1980.
I
LO
A
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL Approx. 1581-97 Brickell Avenue
Lots 42, 43, and 44 Block "B":
MARY 6 WILLIAM ARICICELL SUB (B-96)
OWNER City National hank of Miami as Trustee
Under Land Trust No. 5n03138
c/o Murray Dubbin, Esquire,
100 Rivergate Plaza
444 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida. 33131 Phone: 373-3606
APPLICANT Murray H. Dubbin
444 Rrickell Avenue
Miami, Florida. 33131 Phone: 373-3606
ZONING R-5A (High Density Multiple Dwellinq)
REQUEST Request for a Planned Area Development (PAD)
on above site, as per ARTICLE. XXI-1 of the
Comprehensive Zoninq OrdiPance #6871 and plans
on file stamped March 18, 1980 by the Planning
and Zoning Boards Administration Department,
said PAD to consist of a maximum of two hundred
five (205) residential units in a proposed tower
structure, .
RECOMMENDATION DENIAL. The proposed project would overdevelop this
PLANNING site. Thre is no justification for exceeding the
DEPARTMENT Floor Area Ratio (FAR.) particularly since the water
area is being included in the lot area computations.
The FAR should be brought down from 2.68-to 2.2
(based on gross area - including water). This would
mean removing five floors or 40 units based on this
project's design. Such a reduction would bring the
project more into conformance with zoning regulations
and with adjacent developments.
The corrected interpretation of lot area which now
allows an owner of water front property who holds
title to contiguous submerged land to include that
submerged land in the lot area, makes it necessary
to compare calculations based on net lot area (not
including submerged land) in order to relate this
development to past development on Brickell. This
"Villa Regina" project is proposing a 3.38 net FAR.
The greatest FAR which has been granted in the past
in this neighborhood (with the exception of the new
development La Santa Maria, where a 2.946 net FAR
or a 2.0 gross FAR was requested) has been a 2.4
net FAR.
eA eA
The proposed combined lot coverage is 36.53%
of the total site (including water area).
This translates into a 46.19% coverage for
the net lot area. Thirty-five percent maximum
is allowed.
The side yards for the principal structure
vary from 475' to 172' on the South side
(averaging more or less 109.751) and 63'
to 153' on the North side (averaging about
1081). These are the setbacks required of an
84-foot high building. The proposed structure
is to be 264.33' tall. Even by using the average
yards provided (108' & 109.751) the maximum height
permitted would be 206.75'
If the FAR of this development is lowered to 2.2
(gross area), 85,749 square feet would be removed
from the building, the building height would become
220.98' (less 5 stories), the yard requirements
would be reduced to 115.991, and the combined lot
coverage would probably be under the allowable
35% since 66 fewer parking spaces would be required.
Reducing the intensity of this development to a 2.2
FAR would result in a project which is more in
keeping with the intent of the R-5A regulations and
with other development on Brickell.
The Urban Development Review Board recommended a
floor area ratio of 3.22 base+ upon the net land
area which equates to a 2.53 FAR including baybottom.
The Board based their recommendation An the fbilowing:
- shoreline treatment and marina facility
- preservation of existing vegetation
- all parking in an enclosed structure
- covenanting the baybottom will never be
filled or bulkheaded.
- large dwelling unit size
- landscape treatment including the roof deck
- large front setback provided
- the siting and architectural quality
The Planning Department recommends a maximum 2.2
FAR. This 2.2 includes a substantial bonus for
the large unit size and recognizes the preservation
submerged land. The Department has taken the
position that any higher FAH would not only permit
development which is out of scale with previous
development in the area but it would also grant a
double bonus for the submerged land.
ZONING BOARD Granted as requested June 9, 1980.
Mow
u�
lot
00
pgjt�fe .
A y
pdo, ,
004
"loll ni
u
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr. Joseph R. Grassie
City of Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
104PI1 R. CRASSIE
4 -IV M.maRPr
June 10, 1990
re: PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT -Recommended
Approx. 1581-97 Brickell Avenue
Lots 42,43 and 44; Block "B";
MARY & WILLIAM BRICKELL SUB (B-96)
Applicant: City Nat'l Bank TR
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 9, 1980, Item #10,
following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 121-80
by a 7 to 0 vote Recommending a request for a Planned Area Development
(PAD) on Lots 42, 43 and 44; Block "B"; MARY & WILLIAM BRICKELL SUB
(B-96), being approximately 1581-97 Brickell Avenue, as per ARTICLE
XXI-1 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 6871 and REVISED plans
on file at the Planning and Zoning Boards Administration Department;
said PAD to consist of a maximum of two hundred five (205) residential
units in a proposed tower structure; subject to 70' dedication of
right-of-way; zoned R-5A (High Density Multiple Dwelling).
Two objections received in the mail= one objector present at ZB
meeting. One reply in favor by mail.
A RESOLUTION to provide for this PAD has been prepared by the City
Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City
Commission.
ncere l
e - es
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
cm Administration
Z. M. #37
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: Denial.
Tentative City Commission date: June 26, 1980.
{" • .i •�. ,��',I'.�,n�•+1•Ir�. �I�•11".I'IK�IIl1•, I111'�KI^1►•:1 uu�l'�. ��.., .,�I�� t�,.II lllli urS'•lMln�
0I R111011RII II (.WiI�- III, to,
r. 000
0
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSMEN OF THE
' WYNWOOD AREA, AGREE WITH THE DECISION OF THE WYNWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD IN THEIR REQUEST
OF A THREE MONTHS WAIVER, SO THAT A COMMUNITY BASED
V PROPOSAL CAN BE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE IN THE WYNWOOD TARGET
AREA.
NOSOTROS LOS ABAJO FIRMANTES, RESIDENTES Y COMERCIANTES
DE WYNWOOD, APOYAMOS LA DECISION OE LA JUNTA ASESORA PARA
DESARROLLO COMUNITARIO AL SOLICITAR UNA EXTENSION DE TRES
MESES PARA SOMETER UNA PROPUESTA ORIGINARIA DE ESTA COMU-
NIDA A EL ESTABLCIMIENTO DE UNA OFICINA PARA DESARRO-
L EC0 MIC
17
Ap
•
71
I
�
23r N
a� c6l oa I 355-E-
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSMEN OF THE
WYNWOOD AREA, AGREE WITH THE DECISION OF THE WYNWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD IN THEIR REQUEST
OF A THREE MONTHS WAIVER, SO THAT A COMMUNITY BASED
PROPOSAL CAN BE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICL IN THE WYNWOOD TARGET
AREA.
NOSOTROS LOS ABAJO FIRMANTES, RESIDENTES Y COMERCIANTES
DE WYNWOOD, APOYAMOS LA DECISION DE LA JUNTA ASESORA PARA
DESARROLLO COMUNITARIO AL SOLICITAR UNA EXTENSION DE TRES
MESES FORA SOMETER UNA PROPUESTA ORIGINARIA DE ESTA COMU-
NIDAD PARA EL ESTABLCIMIENTO DE UNA OFICINA PARA DESARRO-
LLO ECONOMICO.
�4 .
1
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSMEN OF THE
WYNWOOD AREA, AGREE WITH THE DECISION OF THE WYNWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD IN THEIR REQUEST
OF A THREE MONTHS WAIVER, SO THAT A COMMUNITY BASED
PROPOSAL CAN BE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE IN THE WYNWOOD TARGET
AREA.
NOSOTROS LOS ABAJO FIRMANTES, RESIDENTES Y COMERCIANTES
DE WYNWOOD, APOYAMOS LA DECISION DE LA JUNTA ASESORA PARA
DESARROLLO COMUNITARIO AL SOLICITAR UNA EXTENSION DE TRES
MESES 'ARA SOMETER UNA PROPUESTA ORIGINARIA DE ESTA COMU-
NIDAD PARA EL ESTABLCIMIENTO DE UNA OFICINA PARA DESARRO-
LLO ONO I 0. ,
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSMEN OF THE
WYNWOOD AREA, AGREE WITH THE DECISION OF THE WYNWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD IN THEIR REQUEST
OF A THREE MONTHS WAIVER, SO THAT A COMMUNITY BASED
PROPOSAL CAN BE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE IN THE WYNWOOD TARGET
AREA.
NOSOTROS LOS ABAJO FIRMANTES, RESIDENTES Y COMERCIANTES
DE WYNWOOD, APOYAMOS LA DLCISION DE LA JUNTA ASESORA PARA
DESARROLLO COMUNITARIO AL SOLICITAR UNA EXTENSION DE TRES
MESES PARA SOMETER UNA PROPUESTA ORIGINARIA DE ESTA COMU-
NIDAD PARA EL ESTABLCIMIENTO DE UN„ OFICINA PARA DLSARRO-
LLO ECONOMICO.
•v w
r
CITY OF MIAMI
NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
CONTRACT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SIXTH YEAR CDBG FUNDS
Agencies City C.D. Amount of
Target Submitting Staff Advisory Board City Source of
.%rea Proposals Recommendation Recommendation Contract Funds
Allapattah Allapattah Mer- Allapattah Mer- Allapattah Dev- $50,On0 City of Miami
chants Association chants Associa- elopment Author-
tion ity, Inc.
• Allapattah Develop-
ment Authority, Inc.
Small Business Oppor-
tunity Center, Inc.
Edison -Little Little River Com-
River merce Association
Tri-City Community
Association
Little River Com-
merce Association
Board met on June $50,000
4, 1980 but did
not make a recom
mendation of an
agency for funding.
City of Miami
(Note: Matching furds are
available to the Little
River Commerce Association
for this program from Metro
Dade County)
qW
Little Miami -Dade Community Small Business No meeting was $50,000 City of Miami
Havana College Opportunity Center, scheduled in the
Inc. Little Havana area.
Little Havana Develop-
ment Authority
Small Business Oppor-
tunity Center, Inc.
(Note: Matchinc funds are
available to +i.! Small Bus-
iness Opportunity Center
from Metro Dade County)
Model Cities Martin Luther King Martin Luther King Martin Luther King $50,000 City of Miami
Neighborhood Associa- Neighborhood Asso- Neighborhood Asso-
tion ciation ciation
Miami -Dade Chamber of
Commerce
.
Target
OV*Yto*O
u
0
CITY of, 14IPAI "r pROG?-W-
LOVITI�
DES
E% O--- - C YEAR CDBG flR
NEIGBBG�D ..nt�TIDNs FDR SIXTH
Agencies
tting
P �sals
-Dade C000unitY
Riami
College
.Be1ghts
tiew Wpieve
Commaasbin9tonlopwOnt
unity Inc •
Conferences
Business pox
tun11 tenter: Inc.
itY
cono
OVertown E _ Cowration
DeveloPment
City co�'unitY
Tri- iation
�'MpOd p'ssoc
Business DP cox
call Center, In
tunity
City.
Staff tion
co�enda
Economic
overtOOM cor-
DeveloPment
ration
C.D. Board
J,dvisory tion
Recoupenda
Economic
pvertown Cor-
Development
poration
small Business Center.
Opportunity
Inc.
unt of source of
Amity Funds
Contract
004 City of Miami
$SQ�
Board meeting Kay 28,
'leschedwasdcancelled due
tog° helac'-Meetgag um.
ain
will
onBoard ne 16. 1980 to
discuss this item-
0 City of %i ami
$ 50, �
i