Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-80-0495/0' /l` RESOLUTION NO. 8 0- i 9 5 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO PAY TO EVE DICKIE AND ELLEN ELA, WITHOUT THE - ADMISSION OF LIABILITY, THE AGGREGATE SUM OF $20,000.00, INCLUSIVE OF ATTORNEY'S FEES, IN FULL AND COMPLETE SETTLEMENT OF ALL CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A LAWSUIT INVOLVING THE CON- VEYANCE OF EAST � OF LOT 52 POMONA SUBDIVISION AND EAST � OF LOT 26 OF POMONA SUBDIVISION AGAINST THE CITY OF MIAMI, CONDITIONED UPON VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY OF MIAMI AND OTHER PARTIES. WHEREAS, EVE DICKIE and ELLEN ELA, through their attorney, John M. Murrell, Jr., filed a complaint aqainst the CITY OF MIAMI, DAVID F. ROBERTSON, MARTHA H. SHEPARD, MARK HAMPTON, GENE A. LEWIS, and FINANCIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DADE COUNTY and alleged that the City improperly conveyed the East � of Lot 52 of POMONA Subdivision and the East 2- of Lot 26 of POMONA Subdivi- sion, which had been previously conveyed to the City for street purposes; and WHEREAS, the land which is the subject of the lawsuit was conveyed by the City after having been used by the Plaintiffs for road purposes and access for ingress and egress to their property and both Plaintiffs had built garages utilizing the said road; and WHEREAS, the above case has been investigated by the City Attorney who recommends that this case be settled for the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY ` OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: "DOCUMENT I UnEX ITEM NO.—,-57,. Section 1. That the Director of Finance is e e y authorized to pay to EVE DICKIE and ELLEN ELA, without the admission of liability, the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) in full and complete settlement of all claims and demands against the City of Miami, involving the conveyance of the East � of Lot 52 of CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF JUN26 198U MKUNM No.....8. . 5 Pomona Subdivision and the East � of Lot 26 of Pomona Subdivision, upon the execution of a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Preju- dice of the Complaint, Counterclaim and Crossclaims and of a Notice of Discharge of Lis Pendens; such sum of $20,000.00 being an aggregate sum which includes payment of attorney's fees for both Eve Dickie and Ellen Ela. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 day of DUNE I 1980. _ MAURICE A. FERRE M A Y O R ATTEST: RALP G. ONGIE, CITY CLE PREPARED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: J N J. PELA , JR., ASSISTANT CITY ATTORL APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ir 80-495 *10 �IrV QF MIAMI. Ft-OtflDA iNTER-OFFICZ MEMORAP401iM City Manager June 3, 1980 Ang Bellamy Eva Dickie and Ellen Ela v. City of Miami, et al. Circuit Court No. 78-8146 _ e ge F. Kno Jr. _ Ci ttorney City Commission Meeting of 6/26/80 Attached find original memorandum to the City Commission enclosing the original draft of a proposed resolution to be submitted to the City Commission at its meeting of June 26, 1980. GFK/RFC/rr Enc. 80-495 r\ r ,.%..I � I � % r The Honorable Members of The City Commission e F. Knox, Attorney June 3, 1980 Eve Dickie and Ellen Eta v. City of Miami, et al. Circuit Court No. 78-8146 City Commission Agenda of 6/26/80 This suit arose from the adoption by the City Commission on April 28, 1977 of Resolution No. 77-381 which authorized the conveyance by the City Manager of the following parcels of land: The East � of Lot 52 to David F. Robertson who owned the West of Lot 52 and the East � of Lot 26 to Martha H. Shepard who owned the West 'i of Lot 26. Defendants in the suit, along with the City, are David F. Robertson, Martha H. Shepard, Mark G. Hampton, Gene A. Lewis and Financial Federal Savings and Loan Association of Dade County. Defendant Robertson, after receiving the property from the City, subsequently conveyed the East �i of Lot 52 to the Defendants Hampton and Lewis. Defendant Financial Federal Savings and Loan Association of Dade County holds a mortgage on the above described property of Defendants Hampton and Lewis. Defendant David Robertson has filed a Cross -claim against the City for any amount that Dickie, and/or Hampton and Lewis, are successful over and against Robertson. Defendants Hampton and Lewis have filed a Cross -claim against the City for an amount that Financial Federal is successful in a Cross -claim against Hampton and Lewis, for punitive damages for failing to issue a building permit for erection of a fence and for claims asserted by Plaintiff Dickie, for loss of use of property. The land in question, which was conveyed by the City to Robertson and Shepard, had been conveyed to the City on January 25, 1926 for the purposes of a street, however, the street had never been paved. The Plaintiffs, Dickie and Eta, relied upon the location and orientation of Brooker Street and used the unpaved street as access for ingress and egress to and from their property. The Plaintiff Dickie's garage was constructed so that it was only entered from the street, and Plaintiff Eta's garage doors are similarly located. The action of the City Commission in enacting, Resolution No. 77-381 was based on the fact that Florida Statutes, Section 255.22, allows a municipality, upon demand by a grantor or his successor, to (Quit Claim property which was not used for 60 consecutive months for the specific purpose for which it had been deeded. On two occasions, each Plaintiff had inquired as to the status of the property, and were assured by City Officials that a public hearing would be had if ever the street was to be closed. Through an error, a determination was made by the City that the property had never been used for vehicular traf- fic and notice was not given to the Plaintiffs, Dickie and Eta, before the Reso- lution was adopted. Additionally, it appears no visual inspection was made by the City before taking the action. 8.07495 ! i The Honorable Members of The City Commission -2- June_ 3, 1980 The Plaintiffs, through their attorney, Mr. .John Murrell, Jr., have asked for the amount of $24,500.00, which consists of the following break- down: $15,000.00 to Eve Dickie, dimunition of value of her property; 1,650.00 to Eve Dickie for expenses of necessary alterations to her property; 2,000.00 to Ellen Ela for dimunition of value of her property and necessary alterations; 255.35 reimbursement for Court costs, filing, service of summonses, certified copies and depositions; 5,574.65 Attorney's fee to John 1•J. Murrell, Jr., attorney for plaintiff. The above estimate as to dimunition of value of the Dickie property is based upon an appraisal completed by Evelyn Gross, a member of the National Society of Fee Appraisers. The other amounts are repair estimtes from Wilfred S. Hall, a contractor and Childress Tree Surgery. The amount for the Ela dimunition was provided by plaintiffs attorney based on other estimates in the case. After extensive settlement discussions and negotiations the Plaintiffs have agreed to accept a compromise in the amount of $20,000.00, as follows: $13,289.00 to Eve Dickie; 2,000.00 to Ellen Ela; 4,611.00 to John M. Murrell as attorney's fees; 100.00 Court costs, deposit. The above amounts reflect a savings to the City from what the plaintiffs would he able to prove as damages in dimunition and for repairs and additional compromise has reduced the court cost and attorney's fees incurred. Such amounts, cost and fees reflected above appear to he reasonable. In exchange for this settlement there will be a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of their Complaint, removal of the Lis Pendens, dismissal with prejudice of Cross-clain and Counterclaims. Attorneys, for all the parties involved have been contacted and will agree to the settlement in this manner. After investigation and consideration of the merits of this case by the City of Miami Attorney's Office, this Office recommends that the City of Miami pay the total sum of $20,000.00 to the Plaintiffs, Eve Dickie and Ellen Ela in settlement of this case. GFK/JJC/wpc 8Q-495