HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-80-0791RESOLUTION NO. 8 0- 6 9 1
A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET
FORTH IN SECTION 3 (4) (b) OF THE CITY OF MIAMI
CHARTER,CHAPTER 10847, SPECIAL ACTS, LAWS OF
FLORIDA 1925, AS AMENDED, TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION
OF A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (NASHER PLAZA)
ON ALL OF LOTS 3 & 4 AND A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK
103S; BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113); PART OF LOT 1, J.
AUSTIN HALL LOT 1 PLAT (4-69); TRACT "A", FLAGSHIP
SUB (108-100) AND ALL UNPLATTED LAND LYING S'LY
OF THE E'LY EXTENSION OF THE N'LY R-O-W LINE OF
S.E. 8TH STREET, E'LY OF THE UNPLATTED SHORELINE,
AND W'LY OF THE DADE COUNTY BULKHEAD LINE (AS
SHOWN IN PB 74, PAGE 3) (US HARBOR LINE), LESS
THE PORTION OF SUBMERGED LAND AS SHOWN IN FILE
(METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ABOVE IS TO BE FOUND ON SURVEY IN FILE); AS PER
SITE PLAN ON FILE, WITH A PROPOSED 12% AVERAGE
SIDE YARDS BASED ON AVERAGE LOT WIDTH (25% REQUIRED)
AND 0.0' SETBACK FROM SEAWALL AT THE POINT OF
LEAST DEPTH (50' REQUIRED) MODIFIED PLANS RECEIVED
AND STAMPED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEPTEMBER
5, 1980, SHOWS 15' SETBACK AT THE POINT OF LEAST
DEPTH FROM SEAWALL); SUBJECT TO PERPETUAL EASEMENT
OF THE WATERFRONT FOR PUBLIC USE, LANDSCAPING:
AND WATERFRONT ORIENTATION APPROVAL BY THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, COMPLIANCE MITI? METRO DOTT'S
RECOMMENDATIONS AND THAT ALL BE COMPLIED WITH
BEFORE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; ZONED
R-C-1 (RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE-COMMI?RCIAI,), SUBJECT
t�{, ff ;-, a,•,'„�"9 TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: THAT ALL RETAIL
VESPACE
ALONG THE BAYFRONT BE ORIENTED TOWARDS THE
t
BAY WITH STAIRS AND BOARDWALKS.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Zoning; Board, at its meeting
of September 8, 1980, following; an advertised hearing, adopted
Resolution NO. ZB 165-80 by a 5 to 1 vote (1 absent) recommending;
modification of the requirements as set forth in Section 3 (4) (b)
of the City of Miami Charter, Chapter 10847, Special Acts, Laws of.
Florida, 1925, as amended, as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable and in
the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its
inhabitants to grant a modification of the requirements, as hereinafter
set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
L;;��,�,',
CITY OF MIAMI , FLORIDA:
ITU. ,.�
Section 1. The requirements as set forth in�ec--tTon'3(4)
(b) of the City of Miami Charter, Chapter. 10847, Special Acts, Laws
of Florida, 1925, as amended, are hereby modified to permit construction
of a Development of Regional Impact (Nasher Plaza) on all of Lots 3
& 4 and a portion of Lot 5, Block 103 S;
BRICKELL ADD AMD
clTy COMMISSION
MEETING OF
U C T 3 0 1980
s o 7
M
OV;,
Part of Lot 1, J. AUSTIN HALL LOT 1 PLAT (4-69); Tract "A". FLAGSHIP
SUB (108-100) and all UNPLATTED LAND (lying S'ly of the E'ly extension
of the north line of Lot 3, Block 103S; BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113),
N'ly of the N'ly r-o-w line of S. E. 8th Street, E'ly of the platted
shoreline, and W'ly of the Dade County Bulkhead line (as shoom in
PB 74, Page 3) (US Harbor Line), less the portion of submerged land
as shown in file (Metes & Bounds description of legal description
above is to be found on survey in file); as per site plan on file,
with a proposed 12% average side yards based on average lot width
(25% required) and 0.0' setback from seawall at the point of least
depth (50' required) (modified plans received and stamped by the
Planning Department September 5, 1980, shows 15' setback at the point
of least depth from seawall); subject to perpetual easement of the
waterfront for public use, landscaping and waterfront orientation
approval by the Planning Department, compliance with Metro DOTT's
recommendations and that all be complied with before issuance of a
Building Permit; zoned R-C-1 (Residential -Office -Commercial), Subject
to the following condition: That all retail space along the bayfront
be oriented towards the bay with stairs and boardwalks.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ 30 day of OCTOBER --, 1980.
MAURICE A. FERRE _
MAURICE A. FERRE, M A Y O R _
ATTEST:
LPH� ONGIE --`�—
C Y CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
r11 G
TERRY V . PERCY
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
t
-2-
3
80-'791
CITY CF !.11A.Ml. FLORIDA
INTcR-OFFICE Mr.i�tON�•.NDUM
Tp George F. Knox, Jr, DAM FILc.
City Attorney - Laa Department
Attn: Mark Valentine, Assistant SU'J1EC7 Nasher Plaza - Development
City Attorney of Regional Impact
,,;.•.:Jim Reid, Director L!�✓ ,;�:,,;::,,. Agenda Item 7(a); September
Planning Department / 25, 1980 deffered to October
23, 1980 meeting
Enclosed, for your revie,;►, are substitute pages 9 and 10 of the Develop-
ment Order, Exhibit "B", of the Resolution pertaining to Nasher Plaza
(Agenda Item 7(a) City Commission meeting of September 28, 1980. The
applicant Raymond D. Nasher'Co, through their counsel, Mr, Phil Boggs
of Greenburg, Trourig (377-3501) has agreed to the insertion of a
near paragraph 11. This new paragraph has the effect of further condi-
tioning the applicant's future actions. It is recommended that this
be included in the Development Order as approved by your Department
and for�;rarded to the Department of Planning and Zoning Boards Administration
for inclusion on the October 23, 1980 City Commission meeting on Planning
and Zoning.
cc: Aurelio Perez-Lugones , Director
Planning and Zoning Boards Administration
ENCLOSURE
�i
(1.2) iltonth arc cxpeCtOd to ctcvi.ate :,uhst;lil
t i.a l.1y E r o m the appFOvnls 111C laded i it th i s
dc%•c1.0pm011t Order.
Aiiy add i t i ono l response:; rcclu i. rcd by rul e:; adop t.Od �
by the St;ito of Hori.d;l Doimi'tmolit of CONMILIni ty
AFI•air:
I'hc P.l;lnll.i.ng DI'voctor, C:i.ty of Miami Plann.inc, Depnl'trlent is hOreb"
dosignated to roccivo this report' ;Ind to monitor and ;ISSI.11.0
compliance with this Development Order.
9. The :applicant shall repl.nt u11)1 .ltted lIII(IS on the Site prior
to i,occivin- a building pei'iilit.
10. '1'hc Devolopmont Ordor shall be null and void if Substantial
development has not: begull ill flan (2) ,years of the rucorded
date of this DOvelopment Order. SLIbStailti II dovol.ol)ment
is defined herein as the ..1ch.iovellient of the follol"ing items:
a) CoristruCti.on of. building fOLIMUltions for the pro-
posod development.
b) Cons tl'LiCti.011 of illtcr.i.ill tl',lHic .11CCOS5 i.mprovO-
illeiltS to 111CILlde:
- Stl•.1ping a a.ost -to-South loft -turd land on
the east loci of the Si; Sth Street/SE
Bayshore Drive into vsecti.on.
- prohibition of stiffici.ent on-stl'eot pnrking
spaces extendin; SOLItiIOVIl' along the WC -St
side of SF; 4th Avenue on the south leg of
the Sl'; 4th Avenuo,SlI 7th Street intersection
to provide unconstrained through movement
SOLlthbound (by the City).
- on the east lei; of the SE Sth Street/Prickell
AvelILle irlterSOCtion, constl'1lCti011 of a left-
turl, lade .froiil the ex'i.sting center iiledian to
allow eastbound tI•aff.ic to tUrn left into the
project (by the Applicant),
- restriCtlon of peal: -hotly right -turns for ex-
!till- movements from the parkin, lot to SE Sth
Street and i•estricti.on of peak -hour left -turns
Too. exit.iilm, imovo.monts froill the parking lot access
drive to Bl'i.Ckol l AV011ue if concli.t.ions warI'ailt.
11. All traffic improvements not subject to Paragraph 10, abovo,
MiLlirOd of the lj)j).i..iClllt pursuant to Parartraph 2 Of' the
Dovelopment Order, shall be complete prior to the issuance
Of the final Corti.fi.C;lte of OCCUI;11Cy.
12. The appli.cnnt shalt give llot:ice to Richard P. 13rillkor, Clerk,
DZIC1e County C.i.l'CLli.t COLII•t, 73 P130101' Street, Miami,
1:10Fida 33130 fur rocord.iii i.n the Official RCCOI•d5 of Da (10
County, F.lor.i.d;1, as fol.Imss.
It. That the Ci tv Conuni.ssioll of the City of Miami ,
F10I'i.d;l ha }.SSucd n DCvolapnloil t Order foI, the
Nashcr I'laza P1•0iect, a Development of Rog:ion;ll
1-impact located at ;ipproximatcly 623-799 Bi•ickoll.
Avenue, being;
All of Lots 3 and .l and a port:ioil of Lut:.
S and G Block 103 S
ADD ,1NEX'D (I;- l 13)
F N ^,
Lot w
,J. AtISTTN IIA1,L ( 2 - 4 8
Lot l
J. AUSTIN HALL LOT 1. I'Lr�"l' (4-69)
TRACT "A" FLAGSHIP SUPIDtVI:SI.O`: (L0;3-.1(lUj
AND UNPI„ATTED LANDs I,YTNG FAS•CI RLY OF SE, BAYS110111i
DRIVE
I That Raymond D. Nashel- Company, 777 Bri.ckcll Avenue,
Miami., Florida 331.31 is the (1eveloper;
c. Chat. the Development Order with any mod 1 f ica t.i.ons
may be ex,1111L110d in the City Clerk's Offices,
3500 Pan American Drive, Winer Key, Miami.,
Florida 33133.
d. That the Development Order constitutes a land
development regulation applicable to the property;
it being understood that recording of this notice
shall not constitute a lien, cloud or encumbrance
on real property, nor actual nor constructive notice
of any of the Same.
1.3. The applicant will incorporate all original and additional. re-
visions to the ori.gi.nally submitted Application for develop-
ment Approval into one complete document and w-111 provide
copies within 90 days of the issuance of this Development
Order, to the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Plann-
ing Council and the State Department of Cot1111nnAty Affairs.
1.1. Tile Application for Development Approval is incorporated here-
in by reference and :is relied upon by the parties in discharg-
ing their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.
Substnntial compliance with the representations contained
in the Application for Development Approval is a condition
for approval unless waived or mod Lf rod by agreement among
tile parties.
CONCLUSIONS 01: LAI%'
The Nashcr Plaza Proiect, proposed by the Raymond D. Nasher
Corllpany conlp.lies with the Miami. Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and peals
Of the Ci.t"; of Miami , and complies with local laird develop-
ment regulations being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No,
6371; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interfere with
the achievement of the obioctives of the Adopted State hand
Development Plan app.licnhlr to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the
Report and Recommendations of the Srut11 Florida ROOional.
1)la1111i111; Count i..l and does not unreasonably interfere with
any of the considerations and obiectivos set forth in
Chapter 380, Florida StatutuCS.
or_ya'1_
EXHIBIT "II"
Let it; bo kno';tn that: nur„u.lnt to Section 330.06, Florida
Statutos, the Ccmmis-s.ion of the City of t•tiami, Florida
has considered in publi-: h(�-aring held on SepLemb(=�r 15,
1980, thu issuance Of a uc,/clod mcnt Ordcr for 1i�...iler
Pla::a a Devclorment• of P,.:,i.onal Tmpact to be locat^d in
the Cit-v of Miami, at 623-700 I3ric::e11
AvenUe, 1001incj
All of Lots 3 and d and a portion of
Lots 5 and 6
C l o c i. 103 S1�
}I✓ �l.. i. rLT, ADD A:!17..7 .3)
I, O t V
J . ALIS T l:: I1Ai.L ( 2-48 )
Lot 1
J. AUS2I:1 HALO, LOT I. PLA'i (4-50)
,
TRAC'.1' "A" FL::GS HIP SUBD.IVISIO1'1 (103-100 )
N':D UNI LATTI i"D LA- -Dr, LY.I;tiG EASTERLY OF
S. I-WLS"HORw D:?IV
and after due cc,^,sido.-ation of the consistency of this
proposed devela-ment ';,ith regulations, and the Roport
and, Rccc.;r.cndaLions c° .ti:e South Florida P.egional Planni:Ig
Council, the Ccm:;l.issi.on ta,:��s the follo'„ing action: App"O%ia1
of Apulicat:ion for DeVUlO:' ;it t�� �:rC'r'csl 1'tith the fOilO',�i"g
M06 i LIIC-, t-iOnS : ,
" r. AC`,'WITH IkIC ! C.•1'Z IONS
1. The c?e;clarmr.nt is limitud, to a containing
t pro e
project c
not m,ro t;:an 35, 076 sc u'arc feet of cc:7merical s:.ace
and 265,525 foot of o!ifice space; tviat- the
C 01711b i.nccl cc:�r^�1.a1 an:? ofA ice 0pace is IirIited to
300,061 sr,uaro fo,21t- and that a par;:in�,j garage is
limitod to 1,502 spaces. Tllo pr.oj.--ct also i.ncludcs
312,175 square foot of retZil
spoke ovarloo;:ing a Val front Walk. The project,
as i;r uld co:7pri.:;e a floor area ratio of
lo-so tkan ttl'-'. 2.0 a11C)'r!i?C1 fcv thi> Clio Acre Site.
["urLi;or, t!<<: lut COV01.•c,do Shall not e::cuud 58',;
tho r_n��1C).ii :'l 1)!?;:;'::t:.k,1n opon szmcC` at the pla-LI
1��v0.1 is 42,675 a!•,c? thi 11i:.i•crhl, of the Ofi:ice tuner
sha11 11,t c::;c.':i::t'? 1.1 st'o;:1 !3', all 1S 3POCi;:iod by
tho An^1ican t .iti tile? AnnIi.c.ILion for DQvelopla'�;lt
r1p: oval and fll 1:111-�1: l.i;n.i.t•od by a!"P'licablo provisions
a!* i;cinincj Or(li•nance 6781.
'1'r:-1f1°ic: �',i:.'?�:, ,ln:.l riK:'l!1•a'.'i.!"�rl
2. cmII ,711C?
tll'C:l.t.'
Oc :li,lr l
(ill c00''ti� �t iUrl
`
L it (]t:i:f-'.«' �i'1::1 iiJ
�1!'1�`tl �: :, �);:)
�: :.:�„j :l k::u
t.`•Q« t;l :.n m1,t 1a1
i 1
n 1:a.;c: •i:13
c � c
lt;? miti,�.l.,ng
, t.a ~::ic
a::::i::;:� ,:(1":? G11:::!:i.1f:1.0t1
1:1:'):.`l��lll:i
irl
::11Q :'1C:±.Illt:•�
"SUS P7- 71VE
„
gp-1791
To resolve these prolJlecis,
Tho Applicant shall;
a) Sr Sth Stv(-m)t
Pay for, and construct
R. left turn lane from
the existing center
median on SD Sth Street
to allow eastbound SE'
Sth Street traffic to
turn left (north.varcl)
into the flagship
Center proporty, per
City standards and
Signing.
The CZ t;: shall
nocnmmettd to the Dark, County
Departru.nt of Traffic and
Transportation that signalized
traffic controls be installed
at the intersection of SD 8th
Street and SL PLtyshore Drive
by the Dade C.,c,,lty DOT'i then
warranted and, in connection
therewith, shall include an
advanco, signal ("presignal")
approt'.14.atel;; 90, south of
said intersection.
Provide a Left turn
lane on the east leg
of the intersection
of SD Sth Street and
SE Bayshore Drive.
Pay' for 0111--hUndred
Reclu""t, coat participation from
(160) percent of the
fUturf-; developors ccntributitlg
cost ofinstalla-
to the trat'fic impact at SL Sth
,and
tion of a traffic signal
Strc-:rt gild SS l;a;'shot" Drivo,
and controller mech,
anism at SE Sth Street
and SE Bayshore Drive
or such lessor perce:lt-
age as may be deter-
mined thrOUZh cost
participation agreements,
I developmental con di-
tions or offers to
contribute by other
future developers.
(The cost of purchasing
"
and installing the
. .
advance signal ("pro -
signal") south of the
intersection is to bt?
borne by the owner of
Hot'61 Intercontinental -
Miami.)
Accept a peak -hour vight-
turn restriction on exit-
ing movements from the
parking lot access along
SE Sth Street if condi-
tions warrant.
Modify the existln,; left -
turn stacking; lava on the
east leg of tale SI, Sth
Stroe.t/Bricke:ll ieitor-
section.
PI`Ovide� a left -turn b.ty
(stripin;) oil SE Sall
Ste(,)c.)t to serve the:
drive -ill teller.
(Sttbsti tutu Page 0-)
4.1
T
Vi It I
"',ocull
Vi E
FOLLOW
T-�
I C.
T 7 FF IC
C+AUGHTCN
HC7---L
F F. " C
TO NIAS.HEIR
SITE
(,Substitute Pine 3)
The :Applicant Shall;
Participate and contribute a
pro-vata share to the install-
ation of si(;na.lizZtion at or
nF;ar the „arage e.•:it of the
Hotel Intercontinental -,Miami
oil SE `v'th Street and the
Clauhhton Island Bricip if
warranted,
. b) Bricl:ell Avenue
0
Tho Cit, shall;
R(ecorr,nenci to the Dade County Dept,
of Traffic and Transportation a
studv of t11Q noel .for signalination
at or near tale oaracc;, exit of the
Itotol. Intorronti.nental-'Miami at
SIB, Sth Street and the Clauhhton
Island L,,vidge and to install such
si;;nal.i ati.oil, if warranted.
Request cost participation from
:future developers contributing to
the traffic impact at or near the
gara;;e exit of Ilotel Intercontinental-
11i ami ,
Accept a peak -hour left -turn Complete arrangement with the
restriction on exiting move- C.lai.iCIlltolt Island developers to
meats from tho parking access insure that the dual left --turn
drive along, Bri.cl:cll ;Avenue improv(aI-jent.s of. the Briclr:ell A•..enue
if conditions ,varrant, nV::cllafl SE %th and 3th Streets
are�eci to b�; the tiro parties na ed
herein by the condition %gill be
co,,plwted as needed,
Recommend to the Dade County Depart -
Mont of 'Traffic and Transportation
that signal display equipMent, con-
iisupr'ORTIVE
tlollers, loou detectors, and poles
at the intersections of Brickell
DOCUMENTS
Brickell
Street c{modi.fied
Avenue/SE Sth
!� U C, �J
lrenue Street beth
FOLLOW"
and rei.ilstalled per consultant
recon•.nendations when warranted
and as funds are available. If
warranted, re -Stripe the existi-n-,
southbound laths oil Brickell Avenue
between SE 7th and Sth Streets to
permit dual south -to east left turn
lanes to eastbound SE Sth Street
and t%'ro throu-11 lanes,
Stuck; , in any futura developr;ient
plans subriittecl for development
reviow oil tho parcel bounded by
SI: Bay.shorc Drive, SE Sth Street,
I31lickell ;Avonui: and :Ambassador
I vivo , the need for a right turn
Line on tho so'.ith leg of the SE
Sth Stroot/Bricicell Avenue inter-
section. If warranted, tile City
w,J.11 attempt to secure needed
daclicattI:li13.
Study tho truncation of the esist-
i.il:; con,-ol, ►nodian terillintle, oil tile,
so.ith log of the Brickell Avenue/
sill. Sth Str,)ct intersection to
allow sivnal controlled unrestricted
wort -to -south left turn rnovementS.
Request of Dade County Department
of 'Traffic and 'Transportation, ro-
stripin,-r of the innor through lade
oil tho, 10of SE Sth Street
and Cris Avenue to hermit an
ol)ti.onal right turn movement from
t11i' land.
(Substitute Page 4)
The :lpplicanc Shall:
pavvicipaLQ and contri-
bute a pro vita share to
the construction of an
additional northbound
lane on the c:an Me
oC Bvickell Avenu(-:,
bet,voen appi•ox.ilna.tely
300' South of SE Sth
Stvflef; and 300' north
of SE 7th Street or
other similar, 9treet
i"t1prOt'e.^,le:lts on the
v,-Ost side of Bri.c.i:e ll
:1Ve11LIQ southbound be-
twc,en 300' South of SE
Sth Street and 300'
north of SE 7th Street.
C) SE rat -shove Drive
Toy ,ethev with the Owner of
Hotel Intercon tinental-
Miatn9., jointly prepare a
re- striping and markin::;
plan :Cor SE 3ayshore Drive,
then transmit the plan to
the Dade Count; Department
of Traffic and Transporta�
tion for approval. It is
further understood that the
City will not issue a
Certificate of Occupancy for
`lasher Plaza until the re -
striping vtot•?; has been in-
spected and approved by the
City of 'Miami. Public iVorks
Department.
d) S11 7th Street/Si,,'
4t1r SCi'a„t
'Cho City Shall:
I?Qca)I;C;!'nCl to th," Dade Courlt",
Depar'tmunt of Traffic and
'Cratlspc)rtrttion that apnropria.tr:
Brickell Avenue strr-,m:t irtiprove-
monts be f.i.nc.li"ud and request
cost parttel.pation fror:r other
deycl.opers contributing to the
tvaft i.c impur,t on Bric cell Avenue
b(.tv,e,�n 300' ::South of SIs" Sth Street
and 300' north of SE 7th Street.
ti
E.''� ( �lljlP
Z...I�.L.e.�ffll ,
Roquest of the Dade County Depart-
ment of 'Traffic and Transportation
the re -striping of the center
throu:;11 traffic
5)
TIVE
t^a"
'rho PIpn UC :..nt aii..11 1
c)
Promota the use oL
'ruInIic transit by
C00rdinatinc 'with t I I e
motro Transit Author-
ity and Dade County
of::ice of '1• ans.)or-
tati.'.`.n AdriiniStration
and by J� � .4Lil.1r the
n• aesSary arlun»tic's
GtC.) to enccurarjf.'.
bus to and
is om t1:n Plaza.
Its I
DO
FOLLOW
r"'4
..
Inc Ci; anal
lane, on t:he cast•:rn 1"-'J
ol. tliC S!d 7th
•�t11 i,v�?nUe .1I1::C:C:if'.^.�:»�;1
to perni.t an ontional
a;f: ;t-to-south loft turn
movement to SW lIt 'n r vr--nue,
and ruatriping of the
4TC:•ltf'ra1'10^t 50L1t:1' :Oi.17C.
through lane all: the t-"o
an -roach larlcS to r"2--
m»t an Optional Soutn-
to-'&l 't rlclht turn C1c•/C-
ment t0 SJe;thO!ln'.: 5.i 7th
s trc^ct.
Prohibit s1.14fici'ant- on-
strcct parking s,.ac�s J N
along the t�.�st sld- o S;i
flt`1 �.v'�1;!1e `rom SW7t 1
w'
tn`_'(-' SCt, 7n SO!.l .11 °1.
.17
Vidle
saut:, Fund riovo•"_s .
t'lor': Closer with t:1e
Brict:ell As sc^.iation and
the Applicant to o`•cmote
mass, transit use nv
oLLice Len -ants in the
Bric};ell Avenue corridcr
an'i to actively o:,coura::e
the aeo,.tion by 8ric::ell
Ar^a e^Plovee, c'- zr.°• and
all trat'-ic rl� tisu:•e:,r ^..e-
santed In the South Florida
Re,ional Planning Ccur,cil
rCPorI- including vole^t: ,-y
-�. ri11C1 P«� rc• 7-s..`m
rl�1.� 5h<1 ,
variaal4 t}'oz•:•; hour sch'uriules
such 1-s Stargori,�d t;o�'r: hour s
f
fle;:-tima, c;tu; a v
week, andlc„•e..-sL:tis —4..:.c:.
t:raIIS u!s1 i c "rJ^lot,, ^,^
Of
par'--ting p::oh.i.biti011 and L11-
Eorcor"'on.t, whiC11 are in-
tallcwd, to r^.1:;i1^.i:.o Lho use of
availahl' racici',;:sl.' cz,),icity,
3. Th Ci prQO•:r0, i.n rOr;j1111c"".011 %-,'1th tho ;;ia;'l.i
.� "� t 1(1, „ tt1J.11 L'4'n rr : 1..}
. .s an'. � o})i-l.i.tl :itL .•�, .i. r .1 � rlol N 1
or th1.0 C1:7�-..'t:h Iaan�l 1f�,n.�'1t
SI-- u(Iy to bC.1.111C.,o the dc-! ir(2d uo':'. ot: the;32'.Lr';:i?11, i';lll'1i1
v,VC 11:., Dii :(J11t Ella:. l lrc-a ..1r, a rl:tjo v 1)l11'11
t ,.r11t C".l ..f •�nr. 1. r, 1. H. �,. �.ln r«i :1 :c?L .• _.1 t.li? OUt� 1.0 1.1. ... .. .t:lk:..ul . 11. � r.! .n 11•JU°?:;::,;;��'
tp SLlC;1 11!;1-'. �t'11C' .;t:: " 111::3t rL:i111L In r0CI. ."I °'
(:L�.
to• sup.-crt th°.
;.0
L ,.�. ��..•.�. •..... ?.l 1. w'�).l.J slha1 1./ 11 .1 :. :. \.,�'.111'i-1' �L:. ,i a•'°'
t. .7 , .''� .. �: u;li� rn :.1 ;1; r• :'• ..1;1 .1 1•}. ( �� .:,� !, / N^
1.
r* 80,-791 '
7
0
Council Eor r, r'cr "o thei: ago^t ,
b; tCity. Further, to imnlomcrlt the �c:'�?tee: plan an -
he
jJrCCjraM of lmr)rOvcmonta, the Ci`" wi11 fOr.,iu10to ,;,orllt--"�'
prccedU: os, t;? F`v,lluato the cCm7r^.honsivc and col loctivo
impacts of development occurring '.rit;lln the urici;�Al/
i!la:: i Avcnuo�Dunont Pla"a area.
E;nvi r0:11;1,2ntal
4. The !Applicant wi11 obtain a complc:: Jourcc permit fro„1
the Florida Dopartment Of Environment Rogulations.
5. i'he Applicant is onCOUral:10d to use only native vegetation
species in the final project lardscabO plan, but is not
re-luired to do so.
6. The Apolicant will, prior to tho issuance of a building
Permit for the project submit a final site and dovolop -
ment plan, sho';ring detailed lan d:;capo and design treat-
ment, for Planning Dopartmant roviva and aPDroval for
a) shade and landscar;o trealU-mont of the plal.a level
and site parimotor; and b) sensi.ti,ie doslgn troatmont
Of the parking structure.
i 7. The Applicant slza'_1, prior. to the issuance of a Certi"ica�e
or Occ ~_ ::: a) submit lap^sca:;,� Plans fOr a Bet-,"ont Wali:-
c•ray foran--'- approval of t,:o Planning anc, P.u:-,lic
Doi -artr,aIIt.s b) i rovide and construct a Pal front
per approved, plans; c) dedicate a twc.r.t';' (20) foot c.
pubic easo e-nt l,;t,:,?',lat'�ly uPland of the ,mncan n: h t?r
1-no
.and d) Drov?dd for per.petuai maln.ten]nce of the ?av_
front "la tI , it e . rI a ,.. t o ? ...t r a.-- .7 i :.a..
'G .�u. at his vein e:.; e 1se_., i,. .J _r g u,,,.e..s�..,cu �.,•
this paragraph is furtnor cOndltioned by the ..'ater runt
C',Zarter rtmendment as interpreted by the City C0 ,liss,on
upon the reccmmcn.dation of the idiami Zoning Bcard, as
fcllo:;s:
General
8. '-he Applicant shall submit a report, tc•relve (12) Months
from the date of issuance of this Dove Iopm•ant Order and
each twelve (12) months thereafter until a Certificate
Of Occupancy is issued, to the South Florida Regional
Planning Council; the State of Flor_da Deaartment of
Community Affairs, Division of Local R'osource ;!a:zare-
Mont; all af`�_cte a por sitting agoncies and the Flar.ni:Zg
birec'tor, Citl' of tli arii Pla::ning De^artrent. Z'his re-
port shall contain, for the prQce`edi ng tv:olve (12) montris;
A general description Of construction t.)rogress
in terns of construction dollars and er•.lnlo:'ment
COM!)arra::l to the SCileClllle in the Arnlicant's
Application for Development Apprctial.
- Specific pr.ogrc.ss in responso to paragraphs
2, 4, 5, G, 7 and 9, sT:•'ocif-ically dorionatrating
prior• ,_;s on and compliance frith paragraph 10,
it ".(.2i 1g cl. rs ' '
! Url fond i:+14•t :u.1.,.1,1.SSion of this
ra ort is not a substitution for socclflc
r.Qporfts rc�Cluireej, b�' •tll'�SQ _:1ra�jrat?115.
A 11.:it Of all [?t?r:'ILtr, O: c1fJ7rOL'll'7
aL.plie� for, ar)-roved or denied.
F. st:a :.-Icnt as to '. 1� j r ' p r�a:0�'1 pct
rl t 1Or a ,
ccnctruct ion changes in t;i,: cr:sui.ng t';101v4
r
(1 2) months are expected to deviate S Uh., tan
t1a11 tI'om the approval.s in,:luded in this
dovelop!:1ollt l)1'atl'
,any addKioncl.l responses required by rula5 adopted
by tile_' State of Florida Department Of CoClfiiunit,•
AttaLrs.
The Planning Director, City of Miami Planni.n:; Dopartmolit is hereby
dcs ignatod to receive this report, and to Ii,on l tot all(,' assure
compliance with this Development Order.
�. Tho Applicant shall vapLat unplatted.lands on the site prior
to receiving a building permit.
10. Tile Development order shall be null and void if Substantial
development has not begun in two (2) years of the recorder}
date of this DaveLopment Order. SUbStrantial CleVel.oplllent
is defined herein as the achievement of the followtiig items:
a) Construction of building foundations for the pro-
posed development.
b) Construction of interim traffic access irlprove-
lnents to incl.Ud.::
- striping a west -to -south left -turn land on
the east legr of the SE Sth Street/Sr
Bayshore Drive intersection.
- prohibition Of ,Sufficient 011-stIoot pa1'king
spaces extending SOUtherl,' aloe; the 1•,est
side of SW 4th Avenue on the south lea of
the SW 4th Avenue/SW 7th Street intersection
to provide unconstrained through movement
soutllbound (by the City) .
on the east leg of the SE Sth Street/Brickell
Avenue intersection - CO11StrUCt1011 Of a left -
;, turn lade From the existing center median to
allow eastbound tI'affi.c to turn left into the
project (by the Applicant).
!/ % - rostriction of peak -hour right -turns for ex-
e....l.-, (1 W �,7 g movements �1 t i 1 n t ..
v 1/ itin,_, mu.•c..,1�.1ts fro.,1 the parkin log to SE Soh
,Street and restriction of peak -hour left -turns
for exiting movements from the parking, lot access
drive to Brickell Avenue if coNitions warrant.
11. All traffic improvements not subject to Paragraph 10, above,
required of the applicant pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the
Development Order, shall be complete prior to the iSSuance
OF the final. curtifLcat0 of" occupancy.
12. The applicant shall give notice to Richard P. Brinker, Clerk,
Dade County Circuit: Curt, 73 West•. Flagler Street, Miami,
Florida 33.130 for rucording in the Official Records of Dade
County, Florhhq as Follows:
a. That the City Commission of the
City of
Miami.,
Florida
has LSSued a DOV01Opmcnt
Order
for the
Nasher
Plaza Project, a Development
of
Regional.
Impact
located at approximately
623-799
Nickell.
AVenU(:)
ho I Ali;
All of Lots 3 ,And •l
5 ;And 6 Block 103 S
and a porti.oll of Lots
(B-.113)
r
ram" 0%111�
Lo t
Lot 1
J. AUSTIN HALL LOT 1 PLAT (•1-60)
TRACT "A" FLAGSHIP SUBDIVTSION (103-100)
AND Uy;PLAT" ED LANDS LYING EASTERLY OF SE BAYSHORF
DRIVE'- (EXTENDED)
b. That Raymond D. Nasher Company, 777 Brickell Avenue,
Miami, Florida �'3131 is the developer;
c, That the Development Order with any modifications
may be examined in the City Clerk's Offices,
3500 Pan ;lmcrican Drive, Dinner Key, Miami,
Florida 33133.
d. That the Development Order constitutes a land
developmment rcl,ulation applicable to the property;
it being understood that recordin'; of this notice
Shall not Constitute cl lien, Cloud 0I' CrhCtliabranCe
on real propert;•', nor actual nor ConStl'LlCtive notice
of any of the Sa1;1C.
13. The applicant ;,,'ill incorporate all original ar,d additional re-
visions to the originally submitted Application for dc'.'elop-
ment Approval into ono complete document and will provide
copies within 90 days of the issuance of this Development
Order, to the City of Miami, the South Florida Regional Plann-
ing Council and the State Department of Community Affairs.
14. The application for Development Approval is incorporated here-
in by reference and is relied upon by the parties in discharg-
ing their statutory duties under Chapter 330, Florida Statutes.
Substantial compliance with the representations contained
in the Application for Development Approval is a condition
for approval unless Waived or modified by agreement among
the parties.
CO\CLUSIONS OF [,AP.*
The Masher Pla:a Project, proposed by the Raymond D, \'asher
Company complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood
Plan, is consistent with the orderly development and goals
of the City of `(i:.lrni, and complies with local land develop-
ment re,,;ulations being Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No.
637.1; and
The proposed development does not unreasonably interforc with
the achievement of the objoctives of the adopted State Land
Development Plan applicable to the City of Miami; and
The proposed development is generally consistent with the
Report and Recommendations of the South Florid:l Regional
Plallnin;; Council and d0Q.; not unreasonably interfere with
ally of the cont.iderations and objectives sot forth ill
Chapter 350, J71orida SLat'llt'uCS.
ZONING FACT SHEET
LOCATION/LEGAL Approximately 623-799 Brickell Avenue
All of Lots 3 & 4 and a portion of Lot 5, Block 103S;
BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113); Part of Lot 1, J. AUSTIN
HALL LOT 1 PLAT (4-69); Tract "A", FLAGSHIP SUB (108-100)
and all UNPLATTED land lying Southerly of the easterly
extension of the north line of Lot 3, Block 103S of
BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113), northerly of the northerly
right-of-way line of S,E. 8th Street, easterly of the
platted shoreline, and westerly of the Dade County
Bulkhead Line (as shown in PB 74, Page 3) (US Harbor
Line), less the portion of submerged land on file,
(Metes & Bounds description of legal description above
is to be found in survey on file).
OWNER/APPLICANT Raymond D. Nasher
Raymond D. Nasher Company
777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1110
Miami, Florida 33131 Ph; 358-9362
William B. Brickell and E. Langdon Laws
As Trustee under the Will of
Mary Brickell Laws, Deceased
loth Floor, First National Bank Building
Miami, Florida 33131
(Attorneys for Applicant)
Robert H. Traurig and Philip G. Boggs
1401 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida PH; 377-3501
ZONING R-C-1 (Residential -Office -Commercial).
REQUEST A modification of the requirements as set forth in
Section 3(4)(b) of the City of Miami Charter, Chapter
10847, Special Acts, Laws of Florida, 1925, as amended,
to permit construction of a Development of Regional
Impact (Nasher Plaza) on above site, as per site plan
on file, with a proposed 12 % average side yards based
on average lot width (25% required) and a 0.0' setback
from seawall at the point of least depth (50' required);
and
"�'7) -- Variance to permit construction of a Development of
) VF Regional Impact (Nasher Plaza) on above site, as per
" 1 i -. site plan on file, with a 0.0' waterfront yard area
t��-;� f �� f
J (15' minimum & 20' average required) and providing
FOLLOW ?Y 1587 of 1620 required off-street parking spaces. This
application subject to approval by the City Commission
of a petition for modification of the requirements as
set forth in Section 3(4)(b) of the City of Miami Charter,
Chapter 10847, Special Acts, Laws of Florida, 1925, as
amended.
?��
-^+v,.r. -,�. :. ..�:, 4'�@.tH'(SWR'�Y+tl' '� s.t-nn t•�:ti,-ct}ym11�V�, ....___._ ..... ..� ..._
�;ir,?sri�uri±ntratn ,.� i .. :hl+ !y" L"9.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNING DEPT, a) APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION OF SECTION 3(4)(6) OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI CHARTER TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF
NASHER PLAZA WITH A 12Z AVERAGE SIDE YARD AND WITH A
MINIMUM 15' SETBACK FROM THE SEAWALL SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITION THAT ALL RETAIL SPACE ALONG THE BAYFRONT
BE ORIENTED TOWARDS THE BAY WITH STAIRS AND BOARDWALKS,
Since a pedestrian level view of the Bay is not
possible at this point on Brickell Avenue, the re-
quested modification to the 25% required view
corridor is acceptable, particulary, since more than
a 47% view corridor will be provided at elevation
48' (30' above the Brickell Avenue frontage). If
the pedestrian waterfront yard area , at least pro-
vides the Zoning Ordinance's minimum 15' requirement
and if it is properly landscaped with trees, plantings,
plazas, seating arrangements, and boardwalks and
stairways connecting the bayfront yard and retail spaces
to one another, then the requested modification will
provide a better urban environment for the benefit of
the public.
b) APPROVAL OF THE PARKING VARIANCE IN ACCORD WITH THE
REVISED PLANS ON FILE WHICH PROVIDE THE MINIMUM
15 FOOT WATERFRONT YARD.
The requested parking variance is acceptable. If the
proposed 8,125 sq.ft. of restaurant area were converted
into retail space, 61 fewer parking spaces would be
required and more than the required amount of the parking
would be provided. This restaurant space will not
generate a need for the customary additional parking
since it will primarily serve the users of the Nasher
Plaza/Flagship buildings or walk-in traffic from the
surrounding offices during the daylight hours when
there will be the greatest demand for parking. More
than ample parking will be available for evening
clientele after normal office hours.
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPT. Dedication of W'ly 10' of Lots 3, 4 & 5, Block 103S.
"S U rPTIli.
DOC;1111-"I,
F'C1L0VI/ "
DEPARTMENT OF TRAFFIC The Department of Traffic and Transportation
AND TRANSPORTATION recommends against the site plan for the
following reasons:
1) All inbound vehicles to the parking garage,
approximately 1000 vehicles, must merge to
one lane near the service area. This will
most probably cause extensive daily internal
congestion during the "AM" peak hour.
2) The divided driveway which aligns with SE
7th Street should have a much smoother
transition to the undivided section inside
the development.
3) The frontage road along the west side of
the building north of SE 7th Street should
be eliminated as it allows significant
merging and weaving maneuvers of traffic
too close for safe and good traffic
operations to the SE 7th Street and
Brickell Avenue intersection,
4) A left turn bay on SE 8th Street should
be provided to serve the drive-in teller
facility.
5) Signalization of the South Bayshore Drive
and SE 8th Street intersection will likely
be warranted when this development is fully
occupied, but will not likely be provided
with the proposed 25°S contribution for such.
6) The developer's proposal for road improve-
ments along Brickell Avenue in the SE 7th
and 8th Street area provide the inside
southbound through lane to be trapped into
the left turn bay at SE 8th Street and the
outside southbound through lane to terminate
at SE 8th Street (since it is apparently
infeasible and impractical to acquire Right -
of -Way from the Barnett Center, now under
construction). This is unacceptable for
this high volume roadway. A solution is
to relocate the northbound lanes approximately
11 feet eastward between SE 7th and 8th
`�' �'•+� _ i , .a i y:►
Streets,including transitions back to the
existing road section north and south.
-wl==�1�+�
Medians on Brickell Avenue should be
modified accordingly.
METRO-DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT
August 29, 1980 �..,.��.'•�``,�
�,`'�. OF TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
Date Eugene
L. Simms Director Department
111,.8... t„L - lies r..___ - -._.. ---
u:
ZONING BOARD (a) RECOMMENDED APPROVAL as amended, subject to perpetual
easement of the waterfront for public use, landscaping
and waterfront orientation approval by Planning Dept.,
compliance with Metro DOTT's recommendations, and
that all be complied with before issuance of a Building
Permit; at meeting of September 8, 1980 by a 5 to 1
vote (1 member absent).
(b) GRANTED Variance as amended (providing 1587 of 1615
required off-street parking spaces) at meeting of
September 8, 1980, by a 6 to 0 vote (1 merribrrr
CITY COMMISSION DEFERRED on September 25, 1980 by Motion 80-717.
�� 0 ; � �t '�
��
�AvtWf1'}i1G`"�J1i4ctFL�lt ,n}Fi?y?'�';t 4y _.Y.'� • � ...._
I
/Pfj4"�L� vB
w
ter,
�f
I
i
"V
Mayor and City Commission
Attention: Mr, Richard Fosmoen
City of Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
September 9, 1980
re: MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS
IN CITY OF MIAMI CHARTER- RECOMMENDED
623-799 Brickell Avenue
Applicant: Raymond Nasher
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of September 8, 1980, following an
advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 165-80 by a 5 to 1 vote (1 absent)
RECOMMENDING request for a modification of the requirements as set forth in
Section 3(4)(b) of the City of Miami Charter, Chapter 10847, Special Acts,
Laws of Florida, 1925, as amended, to permit construction of a Development of
Regional Impact (hasher Plaza) on all of Lots 3 & 4 and a portion of Lot 5,
Block 103S; BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113); Part of Lot 1, J. AUSTIN HALL LOT 1
PLAT (4-69); Tract "A", FLAGSHIP SUB (108-100) and all UNPLATTED LAND lying
S'ly of the E'ly extension of the north line of Lot 3, Block 103S; BRICKELL
ADD AMD (B-113), N'ly of the N'ly r-o-w line of S.E. 8th Street, E'ly of the
platted shoreline, and W'ly of the Dade County Bulkhead line (as shown in
PB 74, Page 3) (US Harbor Line), less the portion of submerged land as shown
in file (Metes & Bounds description of legal description above is to be
found on survey in file); as per site plan on file, with a proposed 12%
average side yards based on average lot width (25% required) and 0,0' setback
from seawall at the point of least depth (50' required) (modified plans received
and stamped by the Planning Department September 5, 1980 shows 15' setback at
the point of least depth from seawall); subject to perpetual easement of the
waterfront for public use, landscaping and waterfront orientation approval by
the Planning Department, compliance with Metro DOTT's recommendations and that
all be complied with before issuance of a Building Permit; zoned R-C-1
(Residential -Office -Commercial),
Two objectors present at ZB meeting,
A RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE has been prepared by the City Attorney's office
and is being submitted for consideration by the City Commission,
S � ORTIVE
' 1
Z.M. #36 `� r
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department Recommendation:
ALL RETAIL SPACE ALONG THE BAYFRONT
STAIRS AND BOARDWALKS.
Sincerely,
Aurelio-E, Pehez�;Lugones
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
APPROVAL SUBJECT TO CONDITION THAT
BE ORIENTED T014ARDS 'rHE BAY WITH
Tentative City Commission date: September 25, 1980•
Joseph R. Grassie August 4, 1980 Flit
City Manager
Masher. Plaza - Development of
Regional. Impact
i
`,• Jim Reid,
Director.
Planning
Department
Per City Commission Resolution 80-468
G�
...
dated June 26, 1.980, a public hearing
was scheduled at 2:30 D.m. for September
�
:t
11, 1980 concerning issuance of Devel-
y"
opment Order for Nasher Plaza, a Devel-
opment o£ hegi.onal. Iinpact.
Per Chacter
380, Florida Statutes, the CitV Commission
bLL�)re
granting.
a Devel.c2r.ent Order must consider the extent
to :)
=---
%.lhi.ch
a) the develo merit unreasonably interferes I;lith the
objectives o£ an adopted state land development
plan applicable to the area;
b) the developvl',ent is consistent '.pith local land
development regulations, and
c) the devclo4.;;lenL is con:3istenL with the raporL•
and: recnmmend,iti.ons of the regional planning
agency. '
The Report avid R, con;:ne iulati anss or tho South Florida Recli.onal
Planning Couilcil are attached z's "Exhibit A" and the Devol-
0:71(.:nt 0rc;cr., as rec(lir.:;ended by P;,.B Resolution 21.-80 dated
JuLy 16, l)-30 is att.ach(2d as "1?::hih.i.t 13" to tho draft
Gf ty C;011lllia l.On R.-2soluLioil approval "•;.l.th modi.-
Iic:.Ttion s. Also, on Saptomb(:r 8, 1980, the "on:inq Board
S-ias to consi.der th('.L1: 1:ccC,",miclldation oil CUtliU1"I!ll.ut' t0
the �,iLiteriront Charter Armi iidmont.
Per Ci".'' CC)::.:Tii.:i:ii.O:i act.i.011, ' t-he matting Of Septel"Ibar 1.1., 19'(30
has r.c scheduled to S,-ptcmbor 15, 1980.
JR:J.Y'::111)
I
...+a.i.iFYl\t tt•.�x ♦ ••
A
IUSEPH R. Ca t Si,',
C!y
July 25, 19'0
i•layor and City Commission
Attention: 14r, Joseph-R, Grassie
City of i`iianri, Florida
re: DE`/ELOPi1ENT OF REGINAL IMPACT -
RECOi11,10 nED IdITH NODIFICATIOiJS
pprox, b--6:-T9-y Fi-E eII—Avenue
All of Lots 3 & 4 and portion of
Lots 5 & 6; Block 103S;
BRICKELL ADD AM (B-113) and
Lot 2; J. AUSTIN HALL (2-48) and
Lot 1; J. AUSTIN HALL LOT 1 PLAT(4-69)
And Tract "A"
FLAGSHIP SUBDIVISION (108-100)
Applicant: Raymond flasher Co.
G--- tit Iemen:
The i•liami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of July 16, 1980, Item 111,
following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution Plo, PAB 21-80 by a 7 to 0
vote RECOP:;iEilDIiiG APPROVAL 'rIITH HODIFICATIONS of a Development Order for masher
Plaza„ a Development of Regional Impact, located on All of Lots 3 and 4, and
portion of Lots 5 and 6, Block 103S; BRICKELL ADD AMD (B-113), and Lot 2; J.
AIJSI Lit' :-I'ALL (2-418) and Lot 1; J. AUS'i111 HALL LOT 1 PLAT (4-69 and Tract "A",
FLAGSHIP SUBDIVISION (108-100) and UNPLATTED LANDS LYING EASTERLY OF SOUTH
3WS}TORE DRIVE (EY,TEi;DED), being approximately 623-799 Brickell Avenue, after
revie,,ring the report and recommendations of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council (July, 1980) and consistency with local land development regulations
as per map attached. (SEE ATTACHED DEVELOPi4Ei11' ORDER).
There were no objections.
A RESOLUTION to provide for this Development of Regional Impact has been
prepared by the City Attorneys office and submitted for consideration
of the City Commission.
Si rely,
A�ez go►l
rflh�1,joh—'.Pic
Director
Planning and Zoning Boards
Administration
c (rl
cc: La'a Department
MOTE: Planning Department recor,;;iendation: APPROVAL WITH 1H0DIFICATIOINS.
Tentative City Ccimmission date: September II 1980,
f
f,.
�3
1 l
14 __..
.,
If ISO
� 11
------- - - -----
/p•\
PLA:I.iING FACT SHEET
APPLICANT: Raymond D. Nasher Company; June 27, 1980
PETITION: 1, APPROXIMA'1'l [,Y 623-790 BI TCI•;EL,I, AVENUE
All of Luts 3 and 4 anti a portion of Lots 5 and
G Block 1035
BRIChELL ADD AMEND(P-1.1.3)
Lot 2
J. AUSTIN HALL (2-4 S)
Lo 1; 1.
,T, Ai:STIN II:1i.,L LOT 1 PLAT (4-60)
TRACT "A" FLAGSHIP SUP,DIVISI0:1 (105-1.00) AND
UNPLATTED LANDS LYING EASTERLY OF S. BAYSHORE
DRIVE, (EXTENDED)
Cc�nsidrvation of recot;urending approval of a Development
Or'dc:r for Nasher Plaza, a Development of Rc4ional
Impact, located on Br] ck.oll. Avenue, bot ,'con SE 7th and
Su Sth Stroet, as required by Chapter 38O,O6 Florida
Statutes.
REQUEST: To €;rant a 1,evelopment Order for a Development
of Reggional Impact: so that constrticti.on documents
can be pl'ocessed by City Depavtmo_nts,
L':1ChG1?OC:;D; The lla!,mond 1), Nasher Company has proposed
.usher Pla ;a, xhlch'qual.ifies as a Developtrcnt
of Rep. ion il. Impact (DRI) , P01' Chaptel' 350,
I' lov i.da. Statt.les , the clovelopol, has submittod
an application for Devel.o►)mont approval (ADA)
to the South Florida Rc gional Plann.1.11"r Council,
Licfore granting a development or'(lcr, the City
mu -t con, i.dov the extent to which'.
a) The dcv(:lopmont unreasonably interferes
NVIL11 the objectives of an adopted state
land devo l.opmo. n t plan applicable to the
aria;
b) The dovelolnnent; is consistent: With Local
land atl('
c) Thu cluvelopmont: is con."Astent v ith tho
report and of the rcg"Onal
pinnning agency,
�tll):So�llll'111: evt'Il ts al'(; r1S f ol l.oa;s ;
June 2d, 1DSO - Snut.h Florida1111c,n;ll Planning
r)i ,``, ;� rounoll notified Mc City that:
`-'�-'�.�,1"; � � the ADA v.,as co.::plotr, and that
local public hoarinjts could be
scho.dulad,
Rr,^xn �•,-�!n-,s;rr�•'t�;m v�•xr�R'»�`,�r+,+fit _..
OOS p
June 26,
1.980 - By Resolution 80-468, the City
Commission established Septomber
1.1, 1.980 as the DRI public
hearing date.
July 7,
19SO - South Florida Regional Planning
acted affirmatively, proposing
amproval with conditions (see
enclosed report).
Jul,; 1.6,
1980 - Plannin,,r Advisory Board ,vas to
consider a recornmendat ion for
approval with conditions by
' Resolution PAB 21-80.
Sept. 8,
1080 - The Zoning Board will consider
a recommendation on conformity
to the Piaterfront Charter
Amendment.
A',ALiSIS;
(see Analysis
attached)
REC0.'411"MAT10,NS ;
PLANNING
ADVISORY BOARD
APPROVAL, with
modifications, of a Develonment Order.
by Resolution
PAB 21-80 in a 7-0 vo .e .
CITY COMMISSION
DEFERRED action on September 15, 1980.
DEFERRED action on September 25,1980 1,1otion 80-717.
"SUPPORTIVE
DOCUMENTS
FOLLOW„
rIN
POINT
I.A
.S 19 ej woogj
CA
. . . ..rr; . .. . .
A�f
to
C
fill)
Ex 15 t Ing
Flagship Bank
Building
.-A
S.E. Oth Street
FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN RENDERING: BUILDING & PLAZA
I I
TO Planning Advisory Eoarcl
CITY OF MIAMI, FL.ORIDA
INTER•OFFICc MEMORANDUM
DATE July 11, 1980 FILE
Nasher Plaza Development of
Regional. Impact
Jik Reid, Director
Planning- Department
Proipct Descrintion FOLLOW,
Nasher Center is comprised of a IM::irrlum of 35,076 scl.uarr, :feet of
commercial use; a maximum of. 265,525 square feet of office use in a
13 story tower with combined commercial and office uses not to exceed
300,601 square feet, and a parking• garage not to exceed 1,592 spaces,
The Ella a will contain pedestrian oriented retail and support services
Surrounding the open-air landscaped Court. A landscaped walk,'. -ay would
t be consructed along Biscayne Oat,, -,with an additional 32,175 s.t. of
retail space.
South Florida Rel;iona.l. Planni.nc;• Council. Rec:omr,l�ndcltioils
The South Florida Regional Planning; Council recommended approval of
the project with modifications oil Jttl; 7, 1980. (Refer to Council.
Report).
The Re ional Plannill,r Cotlnci.l. :found that: tho "35 million project would
have a bellef.ici.al. economic 350 temporary coils tl'uction
jobs and 1125 permanoilt ,jobs upon coirp:lIndoil, some 560 of v.hicil tvoul.d
be now,- jobs. Tho 'analy-'3iS filVU101' Sll 'MStS that: annual net 1'e%•ellltes
to local units of governmont upon cninplr.tion of the project: would be
$100 , 542 to the City of Miami, $1.20 , 070 to Dade County and S75,452 for
thr) Dacle Coi.InLy School I3Uiii'cl and 1M,772 to the South Ploricla CI'atc'r
!.lanag-;emient District .
In their ancLlvsi.s, thO Ro •ional. Plannin". Council found that: the project
would have lit:tlr impact eitlwr oil the environment or on Inullicit)al faci-
lities, and Services, except :for tvarfi.c I1CCOSS and Ci.l'CLllati011. `I'llc'
Council found Oaf: all. cri t ica.l inL•el-: uct;Jmls in the impact area
currerltl.;,; operatic d level. of SOVVICO "C" or batter; bIlt: that 39,070
nex trips por• clay vdl.l occur b}• :1.98•1 CNAlc3ed by the addi t ion of 1,380,5710
sctlul.rr fcec of net rentable office spaco in the 1:3r:icl:ell. corridor plus;
the phll.�;ed do v(.opincnt of Cl.au"lltoil Island so that key intersocti.ons
Vil.l..l. bro-ak du-vn (Le",e.l Of 5(?rvico "Ea" o1' 15'O1' fe) dul'ing ei.thor the a.m.
01' p , Ifl. 1)eak IMLIV pe1•:IOdS in 19S I , i.1'1.0tipOL: ti %•e Of V 110ther NilS1101• Plaza
;val'c: btli.l.t. 'I'heso i.ni:cr�ceci:.i.on:; ore SE Sth Street/I3ricl:ell Avonue;
SE 7t11 Str�'c�t; C.rickeaa :1�.(.nue; S ., 71.11 2nd Aventle and SE 3rd
St:rent/SE 2nd AVC:. nuand S1 Stil :;tl'cr�L'/`i,13;.i;~harc' Drive, IIN.Copt :for
tion of 51-: „tAi Drive (121") `;ashor Pla:,a
COntl'i.I LILQS ]f):'ia thllll Ci", of Hin traffk; at: OwF:o .1.11t.01•SectiOrlS, T
hrea
cI: th('SC ill LiJ..*7.?C.•t'OilFi CoU1Cl Ije iniproved to 1 level of :it i:'.lC.(3 I'D" in
198•1 by Mcdi ficaL-ions reccinn,,,o 1cioci fig.' thQ COLMI-'il.
iiiiiiiiii;M=
rN
Planning Advisory Board
Page 2
.July 11, 1950
The Council. recommends that the City undertake a growth management
plan in the Brickell'Area and that improvements be addressed at
several intersections. The growth manarroment plan is needed to:
- assure the availability of adequate public
services and facilities, including competitive
accessibility, to support existing programmed
development as well as to attract; and accommodate
future development;
- assess the individual and collective impacts
which proposed development will have on the
character of the Brickell area which both
developers and the City hope to preserve;
- balance development proposals with the collective
impacts upon 'the supporting public infrastructure; and
- address and resolve issues by recognizing a public/private
partnership throuIIII which the developer receives equitable
treatment in relation to othcrdeveloptnonts and the pttblic
interest is protected by assuring that proposed projects
bear a fair share of real public costs necessary to sustain
the projects.
Relationship to Local Land Development Retzulati.ons
This project is consistent with tho ;;Choral. development policy
statements for the Bricl:ell Area o:f the Miami Co►npr�hettsive Neij;hborilood
Plan, as :follows:
"C. Brickell Of t'ico: Concentrate
office d ve lopmen t along Bri.cke,11 '` � j„ �,� � .�,�
Avenue and reinforco pr..destrian ac- �; �, , tt,r t_ 51
tivities. Encourage nee %- develop-
ment to provide needed ground level
public ameniti.e:. and linkages. Pro-
vi.dc pedestrian and street
improvements betwoon proposed transit
stations and office center,"
Furthor the project is collsi.stent with R-C-I z:oninr'l district specified
in C'ortprehenslvc Zoning Ordinanc o G571. wh i.ch has a base FAR, of 2,0,
Recommendations
The Planni.n.q t•ecotrmend; of the project subject
to modifications %y1lich haver br,(-.,n included in the Linvolopmcnt order,
Improvernc�ttts to cr.t•tain intersections have boots by the
OF'-l`
Planning Advisory Board
Page 3
July 11, 080
Regional Planning Council, Which have been modified in the
following respects:
the recor.mendati.on that additional rignt--of-•;,ay
be provided on the west side of L; ickcll Avenue
south of the SD 8th Street/Pric}cell Avenue in-
tersection has been eliminated .
- the Dade County DOTT iS responsible for certain
restripinr at the SW 4th Avenue/SW 7th Street
intersection and for signalized traffic con-
trols at Sz 8th Street/Si, 1.3ayshcre Drive.'
- provision of a right turn on the east Side
o£ Brickel]. Avenue south of the SE, 8th Street/
Dric}:ell intersection and truncation of the
center median will be studied by the City.
- interim improvement:31 to be completed in t-v:o
years have been curtailed. by the foracoing
modificaticns and the fact that the City, as
party to the Development' Or.d,33:, cannot obligate
the performance of ci.ther Dade County or the
Claughton Island devol.oper.s.
The Planning Department additionally reco=Wnds the: following
traffic improvement:
reprorr.a^minr, and rei:lntallation o£ signalized
traffic centrals at the. SF, 8th Strc:r_t/L3ric}:e11
and SE 7th St: cot/F3ri.ckeJ.]. inter. acti.r:ls, by
Dade County DOTT .
The Planning Den;irtl;;snt also raccmmends final nl.te and develop-
ment plan app:-o:ra1 of the conntruction documon"E; by the. Plan-
ning DcPartnoth
•.nt a) to reviaw 12 lancl:ar.tll:o trecltment of
the pla%a all,:] hzyfront will.}:';!,'ly and b) to ilchieve a sensitive
design treatrilent of tho par}:l.:lg garago. Who Uepart:cent n1so
pref;( —ro. that 9,;-ound-f:lo(.)r cG:Ill!1(:rv,.j l : p,%ce bo used for puclos—
trian-oriented convcni.enco rathor than comparison
shopping but has no rc ecmr.rnc:rlU.On.
—"rn?sr.�!Pw,mP1tn.»,-a»r„H,.•n:.h•� •.o�.,xy.,�, ,rnn - - - - -