HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-81-0367t t o ifn iic er VAR cif 6tj6kt
AA
�.
}
gfty ap MI IUIi: I�l�i
t5um
rs:
ftlek d ,
b fi€ Apr I
a.
Gi 141iiar '
u��ztlicsii�'ins
101 St itch ftbtA
Plan ltl� a�'d Zbfllflg tOft rd
E �a Na�SA 14 ' Apr'i
O`1'fp1x �Vi��1�.111is
efid to t
G
Acts 1Jl redt6r
tNCLOSUAit
Pl`a1lni i epArtPient
The bepa�tment has no
anted to the stiiject
bbjectioft to the a tensions. of the ;tiaP ances
;property;, Ancillary actittities stzclis
pYattrig grid legal `agreements are proceeding in a routine manner.'
Its. uPPORTi
r
oc MitN
OLLOW
01NI1t FACT: thtff
LOCATION/L OAD
Appr6kifateiy JOIXIS ,t: It th And
Traot !Ali
�entativa plat #iO70
WT BRIUELL TOWER 'SUB,`
OWNER
City Natibnal, Bank f Miami
25 West E,i a1 er treat
Miami, E1brida 33130 phone #577-
APPLICANT
0arry Kutun, Esq.
_
3960 Biscayne Boulevard
suite 607
Mi aifli, Florida M137phone #676-7171
ZONING
R�CB '(Residential, Office)
- RE�UE6T
Varia�hce'fro;m Ordinance 6871, ARTICLE XI 2, Sections
3(2)ie), 3(4)(a)I 6, ARTICLE XXIII, Sections 2(2), to
�permlt.constructiohof
a 60�-unfit apartment tower of
-
above siteas peri plans on file, with the following
variapces:`
(a) East side yards 16►0':proposed (62.3' required),
(b).West side yard. 30.6' proposed (62,31 required);,
(c) Allowing parking within the first 20 of the front
yrd'area (no parking allowed within this area)`,
(d) Floor area ratio (FAR),, 2,754 EAR prbposed:(l:5 FAR
allowed; .702 additional EAR.r6commehded by the`Urban
Development Review Board (UDRB) for a total
recommended' EAR of 2.202).'
(e) Compact cars: 40% proposed (30% allowed) of total
number of off-street parking spaces required.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLANNIPJG DEPT.
DENIAL OF THE FLOOR AREA RATIO, PARKING WITHIN THE FRONT
YARD ';AREA, AND PERCENTAGE OF„COMPACT>SPACES VARIANCES.
APPROVAL OF.VAR3ANCES TO PERMIT A 16' EAST SIDE YARD'AND
A 30.6' WEST SIDE YARD,.AND OF A..702 FARiBONUS J TO'TOTAI
2.202 FAR),
An FAR bonus of .702 hould be`gr'anted based on the'devel,op-
ment's proposed, amenities and in accord with ARTICLC XI-2,
Section 5(2) of. the Zoning Ordinance:.
The unusual shape. of the site does create a hardship in
terms of meeting side yard setbacks. The requested'side
Yard, variances are justifiable if the.FAR is reduced to �
SUPP£TI'
DOCME