Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item #01 - Discussion Item
City of Miami 0 Evaluation of Cable Television License Proposals Table of Contents (Prepared by: Intergovernmental Affairs, June 11, 1981) Page No. Ownership and Control Information . _ • . 3 Applicant Name, Address, Authorized Representative • . ♦ _ = 3 Ownership Information . i . 3 Identification of Owners . 3 �a b; Organizations or Corporations owning 3% or more interest . . + . 5 Stock Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . + . 5 (a? Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + . 5 (b) Stock of Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 (1 ) Class of Stock . . . . . . . . . . . _ ♦ 5 (2) Par Value + _ _ • 5 (3) Vote per Share . . _ + • 5 (4) Number of Shares Authorized. • • 5 (5) Number of Shares Issured • • • _ • 5 (6) Number of Shares Subscribed . • • • • • • • 5 (7) Total Number of Stockholders + • 5 (c) Other obligations or securities authorized or outstanding + which bear voting rights • _ S (d) Control by another corporation or legal entity _ + = 5 Ownership Qualifications . . . . . . . U.S. Citizen/Corporation . . . . . . . TV Network Ownership Local TV Station Ownership Local TV Translator Ownership Local Telephone Company Ownership . . . . Local Newspaper Ownership . . . . . Local Radio Station Ownership Character Qualifications . . . . Conviction in Criminal Proceedings . . . Liability in Civil Proceedings . . . . . Prior Business License Revocation . . Prior Violation of Franchise Agreement . . Litigation Against a Franchising Authority . Prior Default on a Loan . . . . . . . Experience - Current Cable Holdings Current Cable System Holdings . . . • • Average Current Subscriber Rates Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pay•. Subscriber RatesRange Basic - High . . . . . . . . . . . Low . . . . . . . . . . . Pay - High . . . . . . . . . . . Low . . . . . . . . . . . Former Franchises or Ownership Interests Disposition of Franchises . . . . . . 7' • • • • • • . ♦ . i i. • • • • • • . i • • i 7. . • '• i 7 • • ♦ • • i i Y i • • 7 • • + • i + i + Y �,i i 7 i i i • f,Y 1 'Y i '1 i 7 • • i• • i i i i • i 7 9 ... • . '. • i • '• i . g i ♦ i •• i i i -. . 9 40 13 . 13 Financial Resources, Existing Capital Commitments and Potential Building Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sources of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (a) Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Primary Debt c) Secondary Debt . , . • . . • . • • . Terms of Financing (a% Amount, Period, Rate (b) Collateral Involved . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Guarantors .. . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Related Financing Agreements . (e) Limitations on Sale of Stock by Individual Holders (f) Buy -Out Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (g) Assignments of Stock Voting Rights . . . . . . . . (h) Multiple System Operator agrees to countersign franchise agreement if asked , (i) Organized as an IRS Subchapter S Corporation, , 0) Local investor services in kind . , . . . . . . . 15 15 15 • 15 • 15 • 15 • 15 • • • • 15 • 15 • 15 • - 17 • 17 • • • • 17 17 17 17 • • 17 IM One No. Documentation : , 19 Commitment for Building New Cable Systems (excluding Nisei) . , . Commitment for Rebuilding Existing Systeft . . Potential Building Commitment - new franchise applititibhit . . : + . , , , . . , + , 19 , 19 96ttion G: Financial Profoma . . . . . . . . . , . . . + + , , 21 System Growth and Revenue . , . + , , . , 21 Homes Passed by Cable . , , • , , , , , , 21 Year 1 . . . . . . . , , + . ► , , . : , + 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . , , , + + + + : . , 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . . : + : : + : , , , 21 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . , , . + , , , 21 Year 15 . , + + , . , 21 Penetration - Basic Service All Tiers , , . . . + r . . i , P1 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . i , + : . + • : , , , 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . , , , , + , , , 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . 21 Year 10 21 Year 15 . , . , + . . + + . . . 21 Penetration - Pay•TY�Servlce-A11•Serviees . i • y . P1 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . , • . , , , . 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , i , 21 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , . , 21 Year 15 Projected Increase in Reven• Revenue Per Subscriber (S) . , , ► ► , , , . 21 • 23 Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . • +' • 23 Pay Service . . . . . . . . . . . . , i , • 23 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . , , . , , . , 25 Year 1 . . . . . . . . , • , . . . , . 25 Basic/Second Set . . , , , ► • 25 Pay TV . . 25 Installation . . . . . . . . . , . • + • i 25 Other . . . . . . . . , 25 Total . . . . . 25 Year 3 . . • , . ► , . 25 Basic/Second Set , , • . ~:. . i . . . 6 • • a • 25 Pay TV . . . . . . . 25 Installation . . . . . . , . . ► r. . . . 6 • • • • • 25 •. Other . , i . i . i . ♦ . , . i i • . 25 Total . . . . . . . . . • 6 25 Year 6 . . 4. • . . 25 Basic/Second Set6 , 25 Pay TV . . . . . . , , . . . i . . 6 25 Installation 25 Other . . . . . i , , . . . 25 Totai . . . . . . • . , , : . . . 25 Year 10 . . 25 Basic/Second Set , - . `. " • 25 Pay TV . . . . . 25 Installation . . . . . . '. . 25 Other . . . . . . . , • , '.` 25 Total . . . . . . . .. `. 25 Year 15 . . Basic/Second Set . . . . . • • . - , . •` 25 Pay TV 25 Installation . . .' .•=. :'._ . Other . . . . . . . ..:. . • ." . ._ p2555 . Total . . . . . . . . , .. 25 _ Income Statement ,.". �.' . . :; 27 Year 1 . . .' .. .:. . , . •. 27 + . Revenue . . . . ` •. ,' _' ,... ';.. .' , . 21 Net Income . . . . . . . `; .. ; • . • �. .. 27 Cash Flow .< �., `.. ,�. .- `. 27 Year 3 . . . . . . . • � . ~ . ':. - ... '. ..• . , 27 Revenue 27 Net Income 27 Cash Flow .: + ':`.. ' •' • ..'. _. 27 .i, Year 6 •' • '. • . 27 Revenue • .' , ` . . . - '`, 21 Net Income .' , ` . t ` ." ... .. ` . 27 Cash Flow . . . . . . ,; , ' •' , , 27 Year 10 . . . . . . . , 27 Revenue . . . . . . 27 Net Income . . • . 77 Cash Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 1 — e ggp ift 0 Year 15 . . . . . . . . . . . a . i • , • • • , , Net Income . . . a . i . i , : • r s r , , Cash Flout . . • a a • i r • a r • • Sources and Uses of Funds (15 year total) . . , i i • • . • s • : • • , Sources . a , a r a r • a r . • i , Equity . i , , . • r r r • • , a a Loans a , • a • r r • • • . : i Revenue a a • . r a , t r , , ♦ , , a Other . . . • a • • , • • r • . , Total . . . . . . . . . i i : , a • • • . • • • , i Uses . . . . i i i , , ♦ i • , , i i i i Capital Expenditures Operating Expenses . . . , , • , r , : , i , , , i a Interest Payments . • . , a • , a , a • • i a Income Taxes i • • . , • i , i , Loan Repayment . a i s s a ,, • r , a Dividends . . . . . a a , i , t i i • i • » a i Total . . . . . . . i a • &a a —'a a • . i i Ending Cash Balance . . • a i a a • a s i , , -, a Average Interest Rates a i i , . • , -s Capital Expenditures (15 year total) . • i . Antennas, Towers, Headends.'Earth Stations Microwave .. . . . . . a i , , , ► , x Distribution Plant Institutional Network Drops A Converters . . . . . . i a : i a ', , -i 6 a Buildings A Land i i • ,a , a Leasehold Improvements a i • -, , `,i , Cablecasting Facilities Test Equipment, Spares Vehicles a+.+ i i i i Preoperating . . . . : i a a a i i i a ''6 'i Engineering . a . i i. . ► a Y a Pay TV Equipment . a . 'a' i ►,'`► a 'a i , ', Capitalized Overhead 6 Equipment i . i i i :'i . Other • �' i i i i Total • .. . . . . • • • a Construction Costs . • a `. 4. '. i '. . . Distribution Cost Per Mile . . . . . . . i .b "a 4-6 . - Aerial . . . . . . . . . i . i i • i :..i a - . i . - Underground Cost Per Drop and Converter . • i i ii - Aerial . . . . . . . - Underground . . . . . . . . . . `. Depreciation (15 year total) • . . . • . .. • . .». i . • Depreciation Schedules (years) . . Antenna 6 Towers . . . Microwave Headend . . . . . . . . . . .. Earth Station . . . '. Distribution Plant . . . . . . - Aerial . . . . . �'. - Underground - Pole Arrangement . . .; '. Drops :.. Converters . . . . . . . . . .' Buildings - Headends . ' .. - Studios . . . . . ',.. - Offices Leasehold Improvements0 . Origination Equipment . . . . . . 0 .'_. Test Equipment. Spares Vehicles . . . . . . . . . ". Preperating . Engineering . . . . • • • • • r'. s :� • •!. Pay TV Equipment , . . '. Capitalized Payroll 9 0 . Other , ' . ''. Services Purchased�From Parent Organization (15 year total) . . . . . . , . . . . Management Services . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . 9 _Pate No. a 27 27 a 27 a 29 • 29 • 29 29 29 • 29 . 29 29 29 29 a 29 • 29 a 29 29 29 . 29 . 29 . 31 . 31 . 31 a 31 . 31 • 31 31 31 • 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 • 33 • 33 33 • 33 • 33 33 • 33 33 33 • 35 • 35 35 • 35 • 35 • 35 • 35 • 35 • 35 • 35 3! 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 37 37 n Page No. Legal . . . . • . * . 37 Accounting . . . • a • : . . . a . . ■ . t . . • • 37 Customer Billing . . . • • • • • • • • • 9 1 i • a a 37 Programming • • • y : • . • ." . + '. ` . 37 Other . . . . • • • + • : . • . . . . 37 Total . . . . • • . • • . • • . r . . . • . 37 Operating Expenses .. . . . . . • , • • . . . + 39 Plant .. . : • • . • . . + . . 39 Yearl . : • . . • • . • . . . 39 Year 3 . . . . . . • • ► • : • • • . • . . . 39 Year 6 . . . . . . . a • • . • . . • . . • , . , 39 Year 10. . . . . . . • • • • • . • r . . . . , . 39 Year 15. . . . . . • • • . : . . . • . . • • 39 Origination . . . . . . • • ► . . : • • . : . : . . 39 Year 1 . . . . . . . • . . . . • • , , . • • , . 39 Year 3 . . . . • . ► ► • . : : . . . 39 Year 6 . . . . t 39 Year 10. . . . # 39 Year 15. . . . • . , • • ► . '+ . . . . 39 Spelling G b A • r • . . < • • — s r . . 39 Year 1 . . , _ . . : , . 39 Year 3 . • • . • '. . • • . . 39 Year 6 . . . . • . . . . ' ti . r . 39 Year 10. . . ► • . . 39 Year 15. . . . . . 39 Total . . . • . . 39 Year 3 . . . . . . . 39 • Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Year 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Year 15. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Service Areas, Construction Schedules and Construction Practices 41 Franchise Territory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Line Extension Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Construction Schedule (Residential Network Only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Year 1 --- Miles (X) . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Year 2 --- Miles (X) 41 Year 3 --- Miles (X . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 % Underground Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Construction Practices . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Safety and Reliability Construction Standards . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Tower Standards • • . . . . . . . . . 45 Construction PolicyWhereUtilities Are Located Both Aerialiyand Underground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Construction Practices*Mianual • 45 Channel Capacity and System Design 47 Proposed System Design . . . . . . . 47 Residential Cable Configuration . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . • 47 Channel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . • . . , 47 Downstream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Upstream ... . ., ,<. 47 Institutional CableConfiguration . + 47 Channel Capacity . . . . . . '.. ' .. 47 Downstream . . . . . . . . ". '. '. 47 Upstream . . . . . . . . . .' 47 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Converters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Initial Activation 49 Location of Facilities 49 Headend Diagram .•. . . . . . . . . . 49 Plans to Operate orContractfor Transmission Services 51 a Common Carrier 5511b� Cable Television Relay Service (c) Multipoint Distribution Service . . . . . . . . . . . 51 d Other • 51 Satellite Earth -Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Service Level Separation . . . . . . . . . . . 53 (a) Pay Cable Isolation . . . . . . . . . 9 53 (b) Tier Isolation • ., 53 Home Interactive Service Capability '' 53 page No. Heedend/Hub Interconnection . . . . . + + . : ti . .: 55 Interconnection With Other Cable Systems . , + + ► + • s s : _ 55 Technical Standards . . . . . . . 6+ + ► + . , s . + _ 55 Amplifier Cascade . . . . . . . . . . . _ + : + . 57 Longest Cascade . . . . . . . . + + + + . + . + 57 Performance Tests . . . . . . . • • • + + _ 57 System Maintenance . . . . • • + _ + + 57 Customer Complaint Policies and Procedures . _ ► + : . + + • 59 Special System Features . . . . . . . . + + + • + + • 59 Section J: Proposed Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations . . + + . + + + + 61 Proposed Signal Carriage . . . . . . . . . • + + + . • + • • 61 Local TV Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . + + + : . . . 61 Distant TV Station . . . . . . . . . . & + + ► • 61 Statellite Programs - Video . . . . . . • . + • : + + + + • 61 Pay TV Programs • + • ► + . + = 63 Local Programs - Automated . . . + + . . . . + 63 Imported Programs - Automated . . . .. + + • • • • • • 65 Local Programs - Video . . . . . . . . _ • • • + + . 65 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 FM Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Leased Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . 67 Reserved for Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 69 Section K: Local Programming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Local Program Production Equipment and Facilities . . . . . . . . . 69 Access Production Equipment and Facilities . . . . • . • 71 Commitment to Local Origination and Access Programming . . . . . . . 71 ' Operating Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 71 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . 71 Year 3 . . . 71 Year 5 . . . . . 71 Year 10. . . . . . . . . . . . _ . 71 Staff Commitment . . . . . . . . . . + . . 71 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . : .� 71 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Year 5 . . . 71 Year 10. .. . . . . . . . . + . . 71 Hours Per Week of L.O.Programming . . . . . . . . . 71 Produced Locally . . . . . . . 6 71 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Total . . . 71 Percentage ofBudget Allocated To Access*Channel Production Assistant . • • . . . • • . . • • • • 71 Provisions for MinoritProgramming y . . . . . . . • 73 Provisions for Minority Programming (continued) . . . . . . . . . 75 Section L: Proposed Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Rate Guarantee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . 76 Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Monthly Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' " .. 76 First Outlet . . . . . . . . "+ + 76 Additional Outlets . . . . . . . . . . . . ." 76 Pay TV Service . . . . . . . . . . . , 76 Commercial Rates . . . . . . . . 0 76 One -Time Charges . . . . . 6 78 Installation - First Outlet . . . . . `. "• - • • • 78 Installation - Pay TV . . . '• :.""• .o 78 ronverter .-eposit . . . . . ." . ' '. . " 78 78 Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . Reconnection . . . • • • 78 . . . . . . Other Rates 80 Studio and Equipment Usage ., 80 80 Non - Commercial Users . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Commercial Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 80 Leased Channel Rates 80 ! ' Service to Government and�Educational•Facilities :.. 82 Installation Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 - First Outlet . . . . . . . . . . 82 - Additional Outlets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 82 Monthly Rate .. . . . . . 82 Special Rates, Discounts, Interactive Rates . . . . . . 82 Section M: Section N: Employment Practices _ . . . : . . . . ►HSrn lAnonuc • . • • • 84-85 86-87 y c4 �� Vision Coble of Mletht tf:IC. 3550 Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33137 (305) 576.7866 Mayor and Commissionerg City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 It Gentlemen: On behalf of Vision Cable of Miami, we are pleased to submit our response to the Telecommunications Management Corporation Evaluation of Cable Television Franchise Applications. TMC should be credited for a fine job in evaluating the volumes of information submitted by the five companies. We should like to point out, however, that several evaluation points made by TMC regarding Vision's proposal might be in error due to a misunderstanding of those points. The pages that follow are a response to several specific items which we feel should be addressed. Further, we are certain that the City will view some of the areas appraised by T?-1C to be far more important than others even though TMC very specifically did not attempt to apply a weighting, which is more properly your judgement. For exarnole, the City might well consider past Performance and the financial strength to assure the continuation of performance as two of the most significant elements to seek. It is our feeling that Vision Cable is clearly the best choice for the City of Miami because of its quality in many different areas, some of which were not specifically reviewed in the TMC Evaluation: • Vision Cable is unquestionably financially able to build, operate, and maintain the Citv's cable system. • Vision Cable has the highest rating regarding its performance in other systems. • Vision Cable has certainly never brought litigation against any franchising authority nor had litigation brought against any of its affiliated companies by a franchising authority. • Vision Cable has the highest levels of both big -systems and two-way experience. • Vision Cable is committed to spending over $2.5 million on a Cable Television Training Center as a tangible con- tribution to help combat Miami's high unemployment level. • Vision Cable is committed to spending $1.5 million for Miami to develop its programs for the Institutional Network. • Vision Cable is committed to spending $1.5 million for an independent Public Access Corporation. • Vision Cable is committed to spending $34 million to keep Miami's Cable system at the highest state-of-the- art levels throughout the life of the franchise. • Vision Cable will provide a full channel of locally - produced programming for the handicapped. • Vision Cable provides the only free Universal Service which includes all miami's local TV stations thereby eliminating the need for unsightly roof -top antennae. • Vision Cable will provide the largest staff and operating_ budget for its local origination programming. • Vision Cable will provide 21 viewing centers throughout the City; nearly twice as many as any other applicant. These and other strong characteristics of the Vision Cable Proposal stem from the crucial quality which distinguishes us from the others. We have committed innovation, effort, and monies in ways to benefit Miami based on a deep and thorough understanding of the City and its needs. our involvement helped create our Proposal and will continue, unrelenting, to assure that Vision Cable would operate a cable system always responsive to the dynamics of your City. As one determinedtolagcale system ineMiamistonthe servenaslonj we our in - are detee r provide dustry's flagship operation. P I 69 Mayor and Comm'919iOnt" City of Miami Page We look forward to matting with you on June 30 and JUIY 7, T. _ / C` % \V , �' 1 l fi r t. Automated Services, Special Interest Programming a, Local Programs - Automated Vision Cable clearly proposed the most comprehensive and diversified service offerings in this category. Our commitment to develop Vision's "T Channels" (teletext services), in addition to the other auto- mated LO channels which we have proposed, will produce by far the most diversified and complete package of locally created information tailored for Miamians. No other applicant came close to offering the 44 local automated services proposed by Vision, which will include important full-time services like recreation news, restaurant and theatre guides, and 17 Latin channels. The TMC Evaluation inaccurately credits Vision with having proposed only 11 such services, which was regarded as a relative "weakness". TCI, with 23 automated LO services, was viewed as having made the "strongest" commitment in terms of local auto- mated programming services. It does not matter to the subscriber if the channel utilizes a full 6 PSHz bandwidth or Vertical Interval Technology to deliver the service. LOCAL AUTOMATED SERVICES # of Services TMC Rating Vision 44 "weakness" TCI 23 "Strength" Aside from incorrectly totaling Vision's automated LO services, it should be recognized the TCI's 23 automated LO services are mostly the "bulletin board" type; they are part-time services appearing irregu- larly on the various access channels when access programming is not being carried. Consequently, if TCI successfully promotes the use of its access channels, it would literally preclude the availability of its automated LO services. Therefore, because Vision Cable has in fact proposed a far larger number of such services --forty four -- and because Vision's automated LO services will be 00, teadily available on a full-time basis, Vision Cable should have been rated far ahead of TCI and should receive the only "strength" for this aspect of its application. b� Imported Programs - Automated Although Vision Cable's application clearly indicated that we would provide 21 imported automated services - (see, e.g., Section J, pp. 4e-4e3 of 13), Vision was credited as having proposed only six (6) imported services and was considered "weak" in comparison to the 11 services proposed by TCI Miami. Since Vision's commitment is double TCI's service offering, it should be indisputable that Vision has proposed the most comprehensive imported automated services complement, and therefore must be given the only "strength" rating in this category, while TCI should be regarded as neither "strong" nor "weak". IMPORTED AUTOMATED SERVICES # of Services TMC Rating Vision 21 (no rating) TCI 11 "Strength" 11. Access Facilities and Support Vision clearly has the strongest local origination/access operating budget and staff commitments and should have received the only "strength" in this category in view _ of the extreme differences between Vision and the other four applicants. Operating Budget Personnel Vision $2.3 Million 75 Cablesystems $1.6 Million 46 TCI $1.5 Million 39 With nearly three quarters of a million dollars differ- ence and close to a 50% higher budget and staff commit- ment, Vision deserves and should have received a higher rating than both Cablesystems and TCI. Furthermore, Vision must take exception to the "weak- ness'' rating which was received under "% of Budget for Access" since our budget is significantly higher than any of the other applicants to begin with. Although Americable (with only a $650,000 total budget) and TCI were given "strengths" for commiting higher percentages of their operating budgets for access, in terms of real dollars, the applicant companies should be rated in the following order: Access Budget TMC Rating TCI $975,000 "Strength" Vision $690,000 "Weakness" Cablesystems $640,000 (not rated) Americable $327,500 "Strength" Six Star $127,200 "Weakness" These figures are based on year 5 operating budget multiplied by the % of budget allocated to access. Vision clearly should have been rated as a "strength" due to its high overall budget. III. Interactive Services Vision Cable takes issue with the conclusion that each of the applicants has proposed "essentially equivalent interactive computer systems". Vision Cable is the only applicant proposing to install a TOCOM III-B security system --the only time -proven security service, first introduced in a Vision system in 1979 and now completely debugged and unquestionably reliable. Furthermore, Vision Cable stands alone among its compe- titors in terms of software interfacing, for Vision is the only applicant committed to provide Miami with access to informational data bases through an extension of its already existing relationship with Dow Jones. In addition, Vision is the only applicant committed to a Miami connection to the Knight-Ridder Viewtron accessible data services if made available to cable operators. Perhaps most importantly, Vision Cable has designed its proposed system so that from the date of activation, it will provide more than 50 teletext services to keep sub- scribers informed of happenings around the world, and through- out the metropolitan Miami area. None of the other applicants is proposing such a sophisticated and fully -developed commit- ment for enhanced teletext and interactive capability. IV. Service to Institutions The TMC Evaluation implied that because TCl's Institutional Network is longer, it is inherently better. This apprai- sal follows from the general proposition at page 90 that "the longer the institutional network is,...the more institutions that can be connected at standard cost". In point of fact, the overall length of the institutional network is only one small aspect which should be considered in evaluating the capabilities of an institutional network. Vision Cable submits that the availability of sufficient bandwidth to serve all of the institutions proposed to be interconnected is actually the factor of paramount importance. In this regard, it should be recognized that Vision Cable is committed to constructing a separate 400 MHz Mid -Split institutional network.. TCI has proposed only a 330 M.Hz institutional network, while Cablesystems has proposed to share a single 400 MHz system for both residential and institutional services. Vision Cable believes that the City of Miami would be ill- advised to accept the contention that only some 15 or 16 upstream channels will be sufficient to accommodate the programming and other services generated by the Institu- tional Network. when one considers the incredible number of government buildings, public agencies, educational and recreational facilities, and hospitals, which each of the applicants are seeking to include in their Institutional Networks, it is unreasonable to expect that these hundreds of locations can each be aiven a vehicle for the presenta- tion of vroaramminq if the upstream capacities should be as limited as proposed by TCI and Ameri-cable. As an additional enhancement of the channel capacity which Vision Cable has engineered into the proposed design of its Institutional Network, Vision is committed to build 10 individual radial trunk lines from its headend facilities; this will create for Vision an effective upstream capacity of 380 channels and a downstream capacity of 180 channels, broken down into the 10 sectors in which the city appears divided. This will allow enormous capacity for two-way institutional capability within each sector. The City of Miami should understand that Vision Cable's calculation of the mileage of its proposed Institutional Network only included the mileage for interconnecting all the public institutions within the City; the mileages given by some of the other applicants also included distances for interconnecting banks, hotels and other office buildings. Aff Vision did not include these additional commercial locations because it is our belief that the people of Miami should not be required to bear the significant cost of such construction. However, it should be clear above, Vision Cable has left design of its Institutional tional connections of these time in the future as is nee additional costs directly to interconnection, instead of V, System Design from the information given sufficient capacity in the Network to allow for addi- commercial locations at such ded, and will assess the the commercial users desiring to the people of Miami. Vision Cable should be recognized as having proposed the most technically efficient system design which will yield the most reliable and objectively best (least signal degradation) of any of the applicants. In order to provide the City of Miami with high quality signal throughout its cablesystem, only Vision Cable has committed to construct its entire subscriber system with state-of-the-art feed forward amplifiers. This amplifier is usually used only on supertrunk or hub interconnects but Vision Cable feels that its use through- out the entire subscriber system will yield superior pictures to all subscribers. These amplifiers, along with the use of 1.00" Fused Disc Cable, will allow us to keep our longest cascade at 15 amplifiers from our centrally located signal reception point. Because this reception point will service the needs of the entire city, Vision Cable has proposed to use three 10 meter earth stations to further improve the quality to the received signals. The use of a 10 meter earth station for SATCOM I would yield a 53.1 dB Signal -to -Noise Calcu- lation as opposed to 49.8 dB for the 7 meter earth stations proposed by the other applicants. Vision Cable is the only applicant that has chosen to use these larger earth stations for all satellite signal reception. In addition, Vision Cable will install all redundant electronics on its earth stations to further insure system reliability. Vision Cable is also committed to use 1.00" trunk cable on the Institutional Network to keep amplifier cascades very short. With our design a signal going from the furthest Institutional point to the furthest subscriber point would go through a total of 31 amplifiers (16 from furthest Institutional point to central headend; 15 through subscriber network). The same signal in the system that VI. TC1 proposes, for example, would go through a total of 62 amplifiers (16 from furthest Institutional point to 1st Hub; 32 between 1st and 3rd Hubs; 14 from 3rd Hub to furthest subscriber drop). This routing would give TCI twice as many potential points for electronics failure and overall signal degradation and would be totally unacceptable for meeting Vision's technical standards. Vision should receive the highest rating for the tremen- dous sophistication of its Institutional Network. Channel Capacity The TMC Evaluation of channel capacity on the Residential Network wholly ignores the fact that Vision Cable will be prepared to initially offer its subscribers some 50 channels of textual formatted information, above and beyond the separately allocated 110 channels of video programming capability incorporated in Vision Cable's system design. Vision Cable will ultimately be able to program a total of 110 textual channels. This notable system capacity should be included in any discussion of Vision Cable's "channel" capabilities. These textual channels are full-time services over dedicated bandwidths, indepen- dently accessed by appropriately manipulated controls on the TOCOM converter terminals which Vision Cable has proposed. Vision Cable's provision of this formidable number of textual channels should certainly be regarded as a "strength" in terms of Vision's overall franchise application. VII. Sophistication of System As described above under "Channel Capacity", TMC did not comment on Vision Cable's system design, and more specifi- cally, the textual channel capacity which Vision has committed to cor.c'-ruct has not been properly characterized within the TMC Evaluation. At Figure 11, TMC references that Vision Cable will initially activate "50 of the 55 Teletext channels". It should be underscored that Vision will have 55 text channels on its "A" Residential cable and an additional 55 text channels on its "B" Residential cable --for a total of 110 textual channels. w \\ Additionally, Vision's Radial -Hub Design allows the greatest 'upstream and downstream capacity as well as complete narrowcasting capability into ten separate sectors of the city. Clearly, Vision should receive strengths for this sophisticated design. V111. Rates Vision Cable submits that although it may be initially useful for comparison purposes to break down the proposed rates for cable services into the two cate- gories of monthly "Basic Service" rates and "Pay TV" rates, the City of Miami should be more concerned with the combined charges which the majority of subscribers will pay to take advantage of both "Basic" and "Pay" cable services. our experience in major metropolitan markets, like Clearwater, Florida and Bergen County, New Jersey has made us aware of how unrealistic it is to presume that subscribers will only take "Basic" service from the multiple cable offerings to be made available. In fact, 98% of our customers in Clearwater and 97% in Bergen County buy at least one level of pay. The accompanying chart evidences that Vision should be rated at least equal in overall rates with TCI and Cablesystems since our installation charges are significantly lower than all others and our typical monthly charges are in line with TCI and Cablesystems and signi- ficantly lower than Americable and Six Star. Additionally only Vision's Universal Service (no monthly charge) will include the "must -carry" signals of the local broadcasters in Dade and Broward Counties. Vision is the only Universal Service that will replace a roof -top antenna. TCI, Cablesystems and Americable do not carry the local signals on their Universal Tiers, and Six Star has no Universal Tier. In short, Vision has prop^Ged the only significant commit- ment to provide a meaningful free service to those Miamians who may not be able to afford the more enhanced tiers of cable offerings. TYPtCAt SUBSCRIBERS basic an d GalaVisioti (1,owest available Basic Tier for — s11 companies) installation r9on�_ $14.95 $14.50 Vision $19.95 $16.40 Cablesystems $19.95 $13.90 TCI $29.95 $21.50 Six Star $89.95 $14.95 Americable Basic and HBO (Lowest available Basic Tier for all companies $14.95 $16.45 Vision $19.95 $16.40 Cablesystems $19.95 $13.90 TCI $29.95 $21.50 Six Star $69.95 $23.90 Americable aX GalaVision (Lowest available Basic TieL`� Basic, HBO, Cinem r $14.95 $29.50 Vision $19.95 $28.85 Cablesystems $2'7.80 $ TCI $29.95 995 $32.00 Six Star .95 $41.80 Americable $69 sw� 6 1X, Rate Stability TMC incorrectly stated that Vision's rate freeze commit ment was limited to our two year build schedule. In Form L, Page 1 of 3, Vision stated that it will freeze the rates for three years. This is the identical commit- ment as Cablesystems which was rated a "strength". Vision therefore should also receive a "strength" for this important aspect of its application. Over a 15 year period, it is unrealistic to project a 50-60% increase in rates as Six Star did. We submit that rates projected to increase 200% are a more realistthe projection over a fifteen year period and can g ive company a better chance at meeting its financial goals without the need f steauthelapplicantsctoatake into account specifically reque a specific inflationotctor followand that requestunrealistic rate projections don X. Relation to Needs of Miami TMC incorrectly calculated Vision to have one strength and one weakness in this category in the Summary of In 19) In fact, Relative Strengths and Weaknesses (Figur TMC's own Figure 18 indicates two strengths and no weaknesses in its evaluation of Vision's prop osal fulfilling Miami's needs. ,rune 12, 1981 1. Local operations - Americable is the only local operator amongst the applicants which we feel should be Listed as a strength. 2. Roots in the community - All of Americahle's key in- vestors, partners, and management personnel have deep roots in the Greater Miami area and love Miami. The}, live in Greater Miami, own property in Greater Piiami, are taxpayers, work and contribute to the sup- port of the local economy of Greater. PIiami, their children are schooled in c,reater Miami and will diu in Greater Miami. 3. You're not list_inq and rating law suits with munici- palities which the other applicants have and r{,,crica,l le does not. By beinq residents of the community, we are most concerned with the present and future development of the Greater Miami community area and will be most responsive to our fellow neighbors and their and our future needs. Mr. Carl Pi lnids June 12 Page 2 0 We will now )-point out to you the followinq inaccuracies in you evaluation: i, Financial Capability: The RrP did not request Ameri- cable's general partner's equity resources. As a courtesy to you, enclosed, please find financial st, tc,- meat of Charles C. llermanowski. (Exhibit 1) Construction Schedule: Please refer to Americable's form H, page 1 of 5, 3rd sentence, "all areas within Miami will be served within 3 years." BeinU the only local presently operating company in the general "liami area, we are more capable of building and completing this system sooner than an)- other applicant. We stronc11y feel, that your Telecommunications analyst completer: over- looked Americable's main strength, i..e.: a. b. c. d. e. Americable is the only local appl icant presently operating and constructing plant in the C;Lcater "tiami area (AO-50 miles per month). Americable alre,-Ids., has Southern Rell, Florid,- Power & Light ar,.i Dade County licenses. Americable has I, Dade County underground quali- fying license (which takes 3-6 months to re- ceive) and a local working relationship, insur- ance, occupational license, etc. This clearly puts us at least six months ahead of any other competitor. Being local, we arc intimately familiar with the extensive make ready and pole clearance necessary in Miami. Americable is the only company that owns a two acre, head end and office complex in the center of Miami that has ,ilready been cleared by Comj�ucrn and Hughes Microwave. In fact, this same complex, although now being constructed to serve Key Biscayne, South Miami and Hest Kendall (Dade County), will be used for the City of Miami. A1.1 FCC, FAA applications, etc. are on file and pend- ing for immediate operation. It is interesting to note in all applications filed with a two year construction schedule, that none of the com- panies have shown this type of performance anywhere in the country as exhibited by each company in the RFP for the City of "liami . Mr. Carl Pilnic) June 12 Page 3 S Miami Telecommunications A. Golden - two years to build 100 miles = r- B. Daytona Reach - 350 miles granted in 1968 j is not completed yet. Imo` C'. C3i l l ings - 5 ycrll�s to I�ui Id '1 � mi 1L" j D. Knoxville - 6 year' to build 525 miles E, Olympia - granted 1972, 2119 miles, still. — under cotiF�truction Gables}systems Miami A. Syracuse - took 2 Fears to build 305 miles B. Calgary - 3 years to build 620 miles S. Vision: :. Concord- 2 year to hu i' d '.50 :I-.' C'ri `icnononec %,a ` s - plot completed 1 91) miles C a ?edford - ]',^ -,�'es not completed yet at `.5 mon the �;rc� r; o�•:n:;':il. - 17"' es, ),^, .-onths e. six Star: A.1'amon I - 2 1/2 yu �lrs, 27 3 miles, still under - co II Strurt Ioll F. t.`,range Count, - 66 miles, granted 11!79, won't be completed till 12/84 C. Tustin - 73 miles granted 3/79, won't be com- pl cited till 12 /f 3 D, Culver City - 61 miles granted 5/79, won't be completed till R. It rt r 'fir. mr, Carl pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 4 Automated Services & Special Interest ProOt8mmingi Yis totally erroneous. Please refer to Your analysis Volume 1 , Intrc�cluct.ory Sect ion, summary of channel allocations. a. Satellite Programs - Video - You have us listed to provide 20, even though you list it as a strength, we actually have 26. �. ated - You have us listed to Local Programs Autom Fr 9, whereas we ar.e providing 17. q, Local Origination - Your page 99, figure 6 lists once local rigination program for us as, "leased Sunshine o State Network." I refer }'Ou to Americable's �'olum�� I Introduction, summa'ochannel clea�lytions showsand l6 description of each channel local origination channels: a. Ikmericable local origination b. L•'mergency operation center C. Library origination a. Jewish local origination I'lor ida lntcri,at ional University . Spanish local origination q. University of P1iami h. South American T.V. i. Sunshine State Network j, Miami cultural origination k. Orange Bowl - Dolphins 1. Jai -Alai m. Florida Philharmonic n. Dog racing o. Horse racing p. Telehealth 77 L x` -E '4 Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 5 Why was this ptogtaMMihq offlitted ih yotit fePbtt f6t tt5 alone? This does not even include the numetotls ncighbothoocl nattot,>s casting channels listed below: Channel 13T 340 35V 36W MA 38ag 39CC JODD Any person unfamiliar with local. origination lookinct at your figure 0, page 99 gets a totally erroneous impression. Your paqe 1.00, fiqure 7 is also totally inaccurate, carryino two local origination services, when in fact we have 16. 10hat you call a weakness is actually a relative strength of Americable. Miami cultural community access Northeast FdRewater community access Little IIavanna community access Al lapatta cc)mmun i t�- access Manor Park community access Edison Little River community access Coconut Crovc - I,i ickell community access Flagami community access 5. Interactive Services - t'tlthough you do not debit us with any weakness, I refer you to your page 102, figure 9, which is totally misleading. We refer you to Ameri- cable's Volume I, Form I, which clearly lists: a. b. c* d. e. �• h. i 1. i Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 6 fh energy management hs plus many additional services All of our services should have been listed as you chose to list them for other companies. We deserve the same courtesy you accorded other applicants. Service To Institutions - We do not understand your listing us with a wea},ness, due to the 58 miles of In- stitut:ional plant wo shnw. Ve have cl(-,irly indicated in Volume 1, Form 1, paqu 11) of 32, that we will interconnect every Tnstitution in the City of Viami requested in the RFP we have also committed to serve all hospitals, cultural centers, etc. nnce again this is a major strength of Americable due to the efficient, centrally located, single head end design that we employ. This enables our company to economically serve all institutions with Only 58 miles of plants. 7. System Design - The (leoctraphical area of Ptiami is small enough to construct the system with one head end and is a strong plus for Americable. It is the overall trunk cascade in a system using a hybrid mixture of high gain feed forward amplifiers and conventional amplifiers, that keeps the overall. trunk cascade to a maximum of. 15 amplifiers which is well within state of the art performance of existing equipment. Additionally, the hubbinq from the centrally located head end allows for sufficient splitting of the out- put trunk cable to prevent a noise build up in the re- turn system and also allows for segmentation of the city into different community development areas. The 15 amplifier cascade of AmericaN e compares to the total trunk amplifier cascade of 16 as proposed by Cable Systems Miami, 14 by Miami Telecommunications and 15 as proposed by hoth Six Star Nielson and vision Communications. The stroncl, unquestionable advantages that Americable enjoys with a single head end is: 1) greater reliability, (only one head end to maintain). 2) multiple head ends require duplication of off air signal equipment at each hub site, duplication of earth stations at each site or use of multiple rr+ interconnect trunks and/or AML micro- wave equipment. This is the easy part. The tough part is the interconnection of the data ser- vices, security services, burglar, fire alarm, medical alert, etc., and the complications that are introduced into the Institutional trunk network. L Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 7 The further advantage is the savings of the eapital Cost of approximately one million dollars per hub site which has to ultimately be passed on to the customers. The subsequent maintenance that is required is hor- rendous. This is the main reason that 1lmericable knows that they can construct the most technologically sophisticated system in the City of Miami at a much lower cost than the other applicants. 8. Ownership Structure - Your page 92, item 12, althouc;h not on the summary sheet, should absolutely be listed. We strongly feel for the same reasons as mentioned under Construction Schedule, that we have a major advantage over all other applicants. We are the only local oper- ating company in Greater Pliami and growin<; at the rato of 700 new subscribers per week. Not only are we cap- al,l(� of he<linnill (I con:;truction sooner ,Ind fini:;hino the job earlier, but we can be more responsive to the local needs of the community. "ot hi vine hundrec's o,' s .tens thron(7:71out the eountrv, 1,10 'li l l only concern curse' Vcs with t''e ca')le s`,ster, in the Greater ia;i arm«. Ve do not have to follow cor- porate dictates of a large parent company, but can make major decisions instantly. Size, in and of itself, is not an advantage,but in fact, a disadvantage. 9. Performance in Other Systems Operated by 7pplicant Averacie subscriber rate - basic service Your page 93, figure 14, top of the page. Building a dual 54 channel plant, with a third in-;t i tut ional plant, we feel we are entitled to see a return on our investment. Our rates aro totally realistic without any subterfuge that you see in the other propo- sals. I attach Exhibit II which shows that you did not carefully read or do not under- stand the other proposals. Our rates are absolutely competitive. (Exhibit II) ', arae s•; st exnerie:;ce This is our strongest point. Our local franchise in the Greater Miami area has over 700 miles of plant. We have the local staff, expertise, and performance record. Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 46 Page 8 0 Disposition of fr_anchisecs The franchises 1 obtained and developed for Vikoa Inc., were sold off after I left the company. I had nothing to do with their sale or disposition. �1. Rates - Page 93, item 15, 1 refer you ac;ain to Exhibit TT, which shows the, suhterfuno in listed rates. 1 t: is important to note that-_ hmericab.le does not. charcte for FM service, either monthly or installation and considers it as part of the basic service. If you include F�' monthly charge and separate charge for interactive ser- vices, you will find that Amoricable is cheaper than Miami Telecommunications and Vision and competitive with Six Star Nielson Cablevision and Cablosystems "liami. Furthermore, please compare the monthly char( 'ie for a second set, which 30`, of subscribers %..ill have, and you see: Americable's $5.00/mo., Cablesystems Miami 59.90/mo., Miami Telecommunications $8.95/mo., Six Star Nielson 52.00/mo. and Vision Cable of tliami S'3.On to $7.95/mo. 11. Rate Stability - As previousl}, shown in Exhibit II, %;'hich shows the construction performance of the other applicants, %,.e are equal in the time span of a rate increase. Paragraph three of page 94 shows that you contradict your- self whereby you shop, strength for Six Star Nielson hecauso of the lo%.*or rate increases and yet on pacxc I1R (c) financial planning, you criticize Six Star due to their low dC:-)t to equity rates and further question their via- bility and financial }Man. We further disayre(2 �:,ith your calculations of our rate increases for both basic and pay T.V. services. Over 15 years, imericable's basic subscriber rates only in- crease 66% while pay T.V. rates only increase 69g. You apparently calculated the rates using the first year as a full year, while, in reality, it is only three months of revenues. Furthermore, due to our strong marketing expertise in the Creator Pliami area, Americable has included in its revenues a higher pay to basic ratio, which also makes its rates, at first glance, seem to increase at a higher percentage. 12. Regional Interconnect Capability - Page 94, item 17. n,e stronnly differ with your comment that all proposals are equivalent since the other applicants will have to ne- gotiate with every system while nmericable already owns rIr. Carl, Pilnick* June 12, I-q81 Pacie 9 I a and will be operatinol systems in Key Biscayne, -South Hiami, West Kendall (Dade County) , Homestead, FloticlZl City and most of southern Dade Count}y. relation to City Needs once aqain you have failed to or indicate —T'n(li;r mm�ric�hle the rnnr.�m:: and cle-11-1v outlined in our 1)roposal- sei:vices that were clearly Specifically, we bring to your attention pages 114, 115, llr and 11R. )'ou indicate the stronaths of cablesystems %..ith the following proarariminq, and yet. omit the fact that Americable also h,s this same ProOram- minq in its PrOP-)---11a. - Mnority t(,jevisinn production training programs Community prno-luctinn center in several minority neighborhoods T ca Studio locations in both Latin and clack neighborhoods Community or(ia cl nization points at numerous minority organizations shared in two lancuaces e, Digital services time f, Community viewing centers in every minority community g. inq department hiring Proaramm practices which will endeavor to exceed EFO requirements allowing narrow castinq to pre System design dominatcly minority neighborhoods i. Spanish language r oqr -immina from South to -i c o I Latin America j. Inclusion of \-.-Orion s channel k Numerous Positions in the community program- ming department 1. A commitment to involve local black organizations in community programming efforts. All of these were listed in Americable's ;Were not indicated. roposal and Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 pdge 10 14, The weakness for Americable on paste 11R is due to list the above mentioned e your failure, once again, to furthermore, you catactorize the same items strengtts, as strenqths in Cables}•stems column. Upon review of this letter, we expect you to issue an addendum it to your report. [4e feel that \..-, are due this cO"rtesto�achancies is the only fair thing to do. are of thO facts we have — your opinion, but merely take coctnizance feel wi 1.1 iusti.fy a chancic in your laid out above; facts "0 evaluation of r�meric�l le in relation to other comp.ani:' • summary bidding for the P1ialni cable T.V. service. lie, is ]c>c.:l "ii,imi,ans, t l}(. pri�Ir in thc� f.-lct than competiti, vidinct the best service availablc, and, are more at first blush, look like _. jq: i.i:,�-,t the four conglomerates who, c'cluival�nt vice, but, upon closer they ,r,, t�rwi�lin�t are in no way our equal. �inct-rely, Charles Harman WS , General Partner CH/vmt Attachments lj i C cc: The Honorable Mayor r'aurice Ferre vice r'ayor Theodore R. Gibson Commissioner J.L. Plummer C'ommi ss.ion--�r ,losupli C'�lrol 1 Commissioner Armando hacasa C1tV "linca�7C'r Ilow,at"(1 C',.a1"�� %iS51Sta;lt City Clark "1E'rr3ll � PERSONA' FINANCIAL STATEMENT Exhibit CMNIUNMY BANK ()f- Hnk!t.STE AD Name Charles C. Hermanowski Address 17301 Old Cutler imad, Miami, Fla. 33157 1 (We) make the following statement of all my (our) assets and liabilities as of the 10th day of, June , 1981and gtt,o n,4er matet,31 Information lot the purpose of obtaining credit with you on notes and hills bearing my (our) signature, Pndorsement, or guarantee, and q1rre Iti nl,i�l, you prnmptly of any change affecting my (our) ability to pay. (PLEASE ANSWER ALL OUESTIONS, USING "NO" OR "NONE" WHERE NECESSARY) ASSETS (Jointly Owned) T - LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH (Joint or OthPrwi;e) Cast,--`--- ._� �._-. -__.r_ Not•s�aY>ibl• 10'Birikf. Uristcssraa ------( - riann a,n! unrestricted In banks. s _ q or iv _ (See Sc_e_a__'.�. 11t _. 5Q,QQ 24 Utretl Dvrrowln ^--_--__ Pies Payable o ranks. Secure � - Z _V. S. G9YSrSMS^l_Se (�yd;a�el� .- _?OjQQQ __ _ 2:l � rPc( pfjju no univ�e� 5clecl vn, IL 3 Government Agencre+acurltits - --- 2.1, Notes Payable to Others, tinftcuHd _ _ _ _ _ _ 25 n a Accounts and Lnans Retelvabl - - - I / Notes PaYabl• to Others, Secured f5ee Scliod. No. 21 550,000 L,te lnsu race Cash Surrender Value Loans gains-1-OFHs-u-'anre -- - - �- 2V (l, (� (L n nr,t 1r'O,rrt- r,ans _—_See Scnetl. ►vn. 3 261000 26. IS�r Scherf. N•,. 31 r Stocs and Securities Other Than GwranLeed 115 _--- - - - -- -- --- `- - ~---- ---- c Go�9 and Gov't Agencies See Sched. No. 41 2,211,000 29. Accounts Payable post Estile-- --7- - H".•,,Pred •, -two nllmlf (see Schad. N•r. 5) - 17S1.1L11Y---- 30. Inlerett paYaDle _-- - Automob lr� - -- -- -- - - -Taxes sou Assessments Payable P po ntr•, :I _ , .,_„n nan,c , 73 000 31. _ ($et ceheA. No. Other Assets •-' or qaq-�bTe-on Asir£ a e nte,•,.r^t 5. a 5cr•r.rT No. Al -- - 400,000 32, -- -- (See Scher! r+`I-51 nl111 ,o FairfieI �1�,,ricable,Cable Si�.5 �OO,OQO--- 33. OtherLiabilities - l 1. -Toro as�F fs 4j; eTy t�ilned 9 5051.000 34. ASSETS !joilli ly owned--_- 1 !. tarn ~— �— 30,000 36. �-•- - t Acceunts MwIgage A, Accounts Receivable ----.-_- 37. 15 Stocks and Bonds --r J 3e. It, Real Estate 39. r. Olhtr Asselt , "c, •,re) 11 , 0_0 J C 0I 40. 11 ----- I}--41. Tool �,ae„e,et---- -_ ..------------- t 10 3, n0n — -- -- ----- ---------i T T 9 1OM_ ASSETS SSESOLELY Os•NED -- - - — — - — 20. Sue Total 1 _ -- �f 43. 2). -Less Line No 41---- ��_44. _ ^ ft ...._..-. __......_......-....� l l NET WORTH �jtn pr •.t,•,wn -•-_ _--�-p�-pTH---------------- .. �l In ,,r,.• ri a1— _ �45. ( ram ,tie No. 22) GQ, ��'ic, WOR 2�.__Q SIA1__fl�5C75-_ - 2G,585L000 _ f ae. (Linn al pl„SrcTOTAL ME 5)an�^ $ 2_158:,,()r)0 SOURCE OF INCOMr PERSONAL INFORMATION i•irar:•l��l '; It fLr a - Cc 3 Gi1� S 5510 Buunves of occupation Ago 6nnus anti cornmru,ons Cable rn?levision 4, - D,vrr{enM i 10,000 Pa riots Or ofitt ai T my Other venture "eai li+ate income s 45,000 Fairfield Cablevision Associates orn.,rnt.nmt t.mt,.terEst, .etc. _---. 00Q__ I.AnVar_icab_le Associates_ _ _ = Ca_blevision Associates_ TOTAL s 160,000 1.Cable Satellite Associates _ CONTINGENT LIABILITIFS CENTRAL INFORMATION As rndnrlar of co metier -At* any moos PledQud) '�bT , �gji�. �'.,�. G?P•S.—. - - on looses or connects : Are You defend• in any wits or Lap, clams = tegal actions? _ No P,nv,vor, to, aodaet locorete -. ._ _ - - - Have you evot mode a composition settlement? E•platn: No 7a.a _. ._ _ -.- -- --- - - -- -- - - - ------ -•-- --- Olt- weetal debt S Haw You ever taken be,iliNptev s Explain. SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES Vo 1 Ranking Relations. IA lost of all my bnl, accounts, including uvrnvs, end loonsl At Cl Name and Lc siton of Bank rerican SpC'11' i r r rLa.nL-1501 Penn ui nityw-_ 1kistead-288_0 _ Cash "once Amount of Loan _ 44hnit�l Loon How Fndorsad• Guwantauf, M Sec_urad ter- lied busir�es�rrltZ lvania Ave _-- 157 Ave,Ave �/S�/4 .yt' `/�1'/�11/�1' M_— Dill; .lee Offer Sutr y • - '" WWI _ a WYu 41 ltC:a.t LIJL1!'F':-. 1L:u Ott t.1', 2. Account:, Loans and Notes Receivable. (A list of the largest amounts owing to me.) _ { - I TJajjO �1• NA-e and Address of Debtor wngtFAgeofDescription of Nature of Debt I Drs,ription of Security HeldArrrericable Associates $245,0Business lt�an Assets 10 yrs. AmericableAssoc,iates 28549 3. Lde Insurenr"e. (Attach Schedule if necessary) - - — — --- " - - - - ------ ( Vie- io at Cash O 11 Loans A u t of Is Pnri�, yNan}e of Person Insured Name of Beneficiary Name of Insurance Co. Type of Policy of Policy S��Vfalue�r Pol cy P emium Self -- - -- wife — --Prudential life $ 50,00� 2(i,00 20,000 _4,000 No 4. Stocks and Securities Other Then Guaranteed U. S. Government Securities and Government Agencies. IAttarh Schedule !I nec:easar\1 Fare Value (Bonds) Descriptrnn nl Security- - - I Registered in Name of Cost MarkreteVaiue Received i 10 ti4n�rn P. +r Vn. of Shares (Storks) - - — Last Year _ 50 000 Ac$.1,000,000 ton ?-- 50, 000 Acton �nrp stock options �6�? ► -on t 1,000 N. Atl4ntic Ind. 8,000 20 � Cor mini Y D. nx I 5 Real Estate. T- regaand equitable title to all the real estate listed in this statement rs solely in'the name of the undersigned, eYcept is InLnws DFscritrtion or Dimensions or, ImptMemetits hfortgages Due Datcs and Ass ssed Present I Llnnara t •• Amounts of , Market Strert No - Acres I Consist of -- I or Liens- _ Payments _ -- j111e _ Value I Y"ar 17506 FizTCl .Lif , . F7 a t - - - $ 0 000 r- 20146 S<a 123rd iver Mi arid, Fla. 28,000 - — 65400 156.01d .Cciwltr� P4-, Dix Hills, N.00 Y.- 10,0_--- -- ___ _-- 180 000 2101 S. Atlantic Ocean, Cocoa Bi:•ach, Fla. . 150,000 _ 1315 Granville Piker I,anca ter, Oh. 300,000 _ 6. Credit References. (Names, Addresses and Account Numbers) Y ' l Insurance Coverage. _Name and Address of Agertt(s) and Type of Coverage B. Jointly Owned Property OeUils of summery on front page. (Attarh schedule if y) Assets Value _ necessary) Names of Joint Tenants 17301 Old Cutler Road $ 1,000,000 Charles 6 Joan Hemanowski _ Other assets appraised art, antiques & -jQWQ z1' - _ 400r-000-- _, —._ ------ --- The undrrsryned does hereby represent and warrant that legal Urte to all property herein described of referred to, e><ceptir only lointl� sct,edultd herein xc c,rh, i• -n rho—fe name of the undersigned, and further certified that all information inserted herein qs been carrl and lurthvr acknnv ledges that this statement is given for the exprrsserl purpose of induring said Bank toe d cre accommo tur the benclit of thi umdersigned UnJrf penalty for making fare statements of overvaluing property to influence ' e acti e F d bank. r1ti the information contained in this statement is true and correct. June 1 G 1981. S ned V ate-- -------=-- — - - - _ -- ---- -- - - 9 yned prapPrty as se.) 1! r read and rS tnie and to. at the regnncf of dorsigned certifies rho .:t. 41::,.�• tin'.-.; . Vitvil l,�v:...t: WI•Y'K•.LL:Urr iJ', ( 11 ti'1 • Servire Ancricable Ca.51c5yste^s hli six Star 1.'i3ion level of Greater Miami Tele- Nielsen Carle of Miami CmmIuni- Ca`.;levision Mixrri cations FP Installation Charge 0 ? $19.95 $1P.00 S10.M (level Cne) Channels off( -.red* 24 12 21 24 24 Monthly charge 0 0 0 S 3.45 0 FM Monthly charge 0 ? $ 2.50 0 $ 3.00 7btal Monthly charge 0 ? S 2.50 $ 3.45 $ 3.11 Installation charge $89.95 $24.95 $29.95 plus $29.95 $40.00 $40.00 deposit (bevel T.rO) Chan*gels offered 58 45**° 4400 47** *** 36 Monthly c`ar7c• S11.95 $5.95 + 3.95 $4.95+3.00 $11.00 $4.�C _ $9.90 = $7.95 rt•f Monthl;• chargr 0 ? $2.50 0 sr-re.:nc Sr* $ 5.00 $8.45 $4.95 S 2.01 $3.^f. Zbtal Monthly charge w/2nd set -I- FV *16.95 $18.35 + ? $15.40 S33.00 Installation charge $69.95 + $19.95 $19.95 $29.95 $29.95 $25.00 deposit (Level -1 reJ Gunnel:; �jffcsed 78 77** 73J0 90** *** 60 t•imthiy :barge S1?.95 $7.45+3.95 $6.95 + $13.00 $8.50 FM t•tnthiy chtril;* 0 = 311.40 �.00=$9.95 �Z.50 0 $3.00 Sectrr? S^t S 5.00 $9.90 $6.95 $2.C'1 $4.00 7btal MYmttly ,charge w/ 2nd set + FM $17.95 $21.30 + ? $19.40 $1�.00 515.�J Inntallatirm rha rge $69.95 + $19.95 $19.95 $29.95 et4,oq $75.00 deposit j (Level Four) rhanmis offered 104 ** *** Mbnt.hly &a ge $13.95 FM rionthly charge 0 Second Set $ `,. 00 7btal- rronthly charge 8900 7Z $8.95+3.00 = $11.95 $9.50 $2.50 $3.00 $8.95 $4.51) w/2nd set + FM $18.95 $23.40 $17.00 Installation charge $69.95 + $19.95 $14.95 $110 deposit C?narirt«.ls offnrW 122 *• Monthly ch;,rge S12.95 FM Monthly charges $ 3.00 Second Set $ 6.95 7btal Monthly charga $22.90 w/2nd set + FM Installation charge _ $14.95 _ (1evul Six) Channels offered 131 `* ••* Monthly charge $14.95 FF. Mnt-,ly charge $ 3.00 Second set $ 7.95 7btal W)nthly charge $25.90 w/2nd set + FM Installation charge , $14.95 }burs of local pro- gr&,w per week 160 336 65 254 152 Entire city wired for cable 2 1/2 Yrs. 2 yrs. 2 yrs. 3 yrs. 2 yrs. * Channels offered ray include pay television stations available at: an additional cost. ** Includes information servioe channels. *** Includes two-way Cc mnmication channels. *Two-wey eo mn nication channels available fez- an additional $5 installation fee and $3.95/O. COInfrirmation -w-rvirr- and t-%, -wav rymr,mir.Atinn chanrwls available for an addition-11 $3/rW. CAJUN. i Q 1981 _ Engineering Management and Consultation �-- R C Cfwk,n & Associates, Inc. 8775 E. Orchard Road SLI11c k; Englewood, Colorado, S0: I t 303 77(+ a 12 June 1981 Mr. Carl Pilnick, President Telecommunications Management Corporation 6380 Willshire Boulevard 'Suite 808 Los Angeles, California 90048 Dear Mr. Pilnick: The following are our comments on the initial evaluation of the Miami CATV franchise proposals. Referring to page 92 of the Consultant's Report, "Americable's single headend design is considered a weakness for a city the size of Miami.": 1. Feasibility of a single headend While the population of Miami is quite high, the geographical area covered by the city is not. A key factor in properly serving a city the size of Miami with a single headend is the proper location of that headend. From Americable's proposed headend site, the extremities of the city limits extend 5.5 miles to the north, 7.0 miles to the west, and 6.0 miles to the southwest. These distances can be covered with a 15 trunk amplifier cascade from Americable's headend. (In fact, of the five applicants, three proposed a maximum trunk cascade of 15, one a maximum trunk cascade of 16, and one a maximum trunk cascade of 14.) The unique aspect of Americable's proposal is to build a hybrid system of conventional amplifiers and feed -forward amplifiers. The use of feed -forward technology allows greater trunk amplifier gain for a given distortion specification, thereby allowing the coverage of a larger geographical area for the same trunk cascade. As previously stated, the key to success- fully serving the City of Miami with a single headend is its location. Americable's headend site is ideally located for this purpose as can be seen from the trunk routing diagram in the proposal. Americable currently owns this site. 3 Mr. Carl Pel,*.k re: Miami CATV franchise proposals 12 June 1981 page 2 It is important to recognize here that the trunk routing and configuration shown on the System Trunk Routing diagram were not arbitrarily plotted. The trunk routing has been carefully configured to provide adequate coverage while minimizing the overall cascade. Care was also taken to provide for adequate segmentation of the city by neighborhood. A careful analysis of Americable's technical proposal and system performance calculations will indicate that: 2. a. The overall performance of Americable's single headend system is comparable to all other applicants. b. The entire geographical area of Miami can be served with a maximum trunk cascade of 15 amplifiers. , c. Segmentation of the community can be accomplished with either a single headend configuration or a multiple headend configuration. Americable has proposed three local origination studios, two remote production vans, and sixteen portapaks. Return of these signals to the headend will be accomplished by the two-way capacity of the system. Additionally, remotely generated programming can be returned to the headend from any point in the system. A multiple headend configuration has no advantage over a single headend with respect to flexibility or quantity of local origination activity. In fact, multiple headends tend to complicate matters. Advantages of a single headend system The following advantages are inherent in a single headend system: a. The overall system performance is enhanced. A multiple headend arrangement requires either microwave or FM trunk interconnects and usually reprocessing at the hubs. While it is true that by duplicating the off -air pickup and earth station at each hub these signals would not be affected, all other signals would be. Obviously the use of microwave or interconnect trunks will decrease the signal-to-noise ratio and increase the overall distortion of the signals so processed. z 4 coy;). miamGaolesystern 1460 Brickell Ave., Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 358-8828 Mr. Carl Pilnick, President Telecan-uni.cations Management Corporation 6380 Wilshire Boule%ard Suite 808 Los Angeles, California 90048 Dear Mr. Pilnick, Enclose-d you will find Cailesysteas Miami's response to the preliminary evaluation of fine cable television applications for the City of Mimi. We trust you will find the information helpful in clarifying many areas of our cable television proposal and we look fons-drd to receiving your final evaluation. Sinx s PI 46 io 4b GeOetal Comments 40 Cablesystems Miami congratulates the City of Miami on its thorough and responsible approach to cable franchising. The Request for Proposals the City has issued is precise and well developed. Cablesystems Miami has responded by developing a proposal which, we feel, meets the demanding standards required by the City and equals or exceeds requirements in each of the specified categories. In particular, Cablesystems has prepared a comprehensive offering of services based upon responsible financial projections for the operating system. By proposing an innovative hybrid (shared) residential/institutional system, Cablesystems offers a full range of services in the most cost-effective way. This design is supplemented by Cablesystems' funded commitment to construct a dedicated institutional network as demand for a dedicated system develops, and not at the expense of initial residential subscribership as proposed by the other applicants. Cablesystems seeks to maximize community participation in the cable system through its five separate advisory boards, employment practices and commitments to training. Cablesystems has allocated funding and staff support to access, public service and local community programming not only at the outset, but continuing throughout the life of the franchising agreement to ensure that equipment,facilities and staff will always be available. Cablesystems continuing capital commitment for this purpose exceeds that of any other applicant. And, Cablesystems offers service to low income households in its universal service, free of monthly charge, that requires no converter. Also, a low cost professionally monitored security system will be available immediately. An Accurate Reflection of the Proposals Cablesystems' principal concern with the consultant's report and its conclusions is that it has failed to do justice to the high standards set by the city's RFP and h'as not accurately reflected the relative merits of the total Cablesystems Miami proposal. It is our intention to address only those evaluation items that do not accurately reflect the comparative value or utility of the specific proposals. Also, we have chosen not to comment negatively on other applicants' proposals since such activity inevitably becomes partisan and unhelpful to the City's decision making process. Rather, we will refer to another applicant's proposal only to illustrate some point about our own. In the specific comments below, we address these issues: - errors of fact that have slipped into the evaluation; - inconsistencies in specific evaluation categories; - incomplete or erroneous evaluations; - emphasis on quantitative comparison which overshadows significant quality differences. 1. 2: Im additionf there are two serious issues which pervade the evaluation that we isddrem immediately: - evaluation criteria; - repeated evaluation of the same point resulting in doublecounting. Evaluation Criteria The consultant explains his evaluation criteria in this way (page 1): "Each of the evaluation criteria listed in Appendix A was considered with respect to the strengths and weaknesses indicated in each applicant's proposal. It should be noted that in many cases the strengths and weaknesses are relative so that an applicant may be rated as 'weak' compared to the other applicants, while at the same time this weakness may not impair the ability to construct and operate a cable system in Miami." But these are not criteria at all. The consultant has not established any benchmark or standard against which he measures the strength or weakness of an applicant's proposal. And, the consultant's assertion that assessed strengths and weaknesses are "relative" makes the evaluation criteria vaguer rather than more definitive, especially in areas such as financial capability. Relative to what? Evaluating strengths and weaknesses of the applicants by comparing among the proposals and then describing some strong relative to the others, or weak relative to the others, introduces two serious flaws into the evaluation process. First, it banishes objectivity. Everything is relative and the standard of evaluation shifts. For example, in the section "Institutional Network Capacity" the consultant has assessed all applicants except Cablesystems as having a strength, but describes their capacity as "adequate" - a word which by definition does not describe superior performance (refer to "Technical Standards" where Vision was rated "neutral" for "adequate" performance). The consultant goes on to assess Cablesystems' capacity as a "weakness" without ever describing a level worthy of a neutral rating. Second, it results in inconsistent evaluations. The example above shows how the consultant assesses an "adequate" proposal as a "strength" in one category ("Institutional Network Capacity") and gives it a neutral rating in another ("Technical Standards"). Similar inconsistencies occur even where clear quantitative measures exist. For example, in the section "Satellite Video" the consultant assesses Miami Telecommunications with a "strength" for 20 services and Cablesystems with a "weakness" for 16 services (although this is inaccurate - see below). There is a difference of 4 points - a 25% difference. But in the section "Local Origination Programming", Cablesystems offers 12 services, Miami Telecommunications offers 8 and Vision offers 7. Yet all are assessed a "strength", despite the fact there is again a difference of 4 points - in this case a 50% difference -between Cablesystems and Miami, and 5 points 711.6) between Cablesystems and Vision. Repeated Evaluation and Double Counting Cablesystems Miami recognizes the difficulties implicit in franchise evaluations, particularly since several important dimensions are not immediately susceptible to 3, objective appraisal. Evaluation of proposals by segmenting them into categories, each of which is then evaluated independent of the others, is one way of approaching the problem, but care must be taken to ensure that the structure of the evaluation does not cause evaluation of the same perceived strength or weakness again and again in independent categories. This could distort the overall strength or weakness of a proposal. For example, the consultant's evaluation of Cabiesystems' technical proposal focuses almost exclusively on the supposed "weakness" of an integrated (shared) residential/institutional network. In the detailed comments below the advantage of this cost effective way of providing a complete range of services to all of Miami are explained. At this time we draw attention to the manner in which repeated evaluation of this same point has distorted the evaluation of Cablesystems' proposal: Category Construction Schedule Institutional Network Mileage Institutional Network Capacity Channel Capacity Assessment Reason 1 weakness Integrated Network 1 weakness Integrated Network 1 weakness Integrated Network 1 weakness Integrated Network Cablesystems' has been assessed a "weakness" four times on the same issue. The consultant's apparent bias against an integrated network design has further prejudiced his evaluation within categories themselves. For example, the consultant writes in the category "Channel Capacity" (page 92): "Since the channel capacity for institutional service was considered in (8) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services." But in the next line, the consultant continues: "...Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cablesystems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity." This is double jeopardy. Detailed Comments Financial Capability Allocated Assessment - 2 strengths 1 weakness Reqested Assessment - 3 strengths The consultant has assessed Cablesystems' proposal with 2 strengths and 1 weakness in this category. Cablesystems finds the consultant's evaluation erroneous, inconsistent and limited to quantitative comparison without regard to the qualitative significance of the data under comparison. Cablesystems requests a reassessment of 3 strengths. 4. W tttoneous The consultant's comparison erroneously attributes to Cablesystems building and rebuilding commitments in other systems a total of $97 million over the next four years (pg. 95). In the category "Commitments for Building New Cable Systems (excluding Miami)" (page 19) the consultant lists Cablesystems' commitment as $62.4 trillion. This is an error in fact. Cablesystems' proposal (page F-6) shows new plant commitment including Miami as $66.5 million. Cablesystems' commitment for Miami is $39.1 million page F-4 . Subtracting this from Cablesystems' total new build gives Cablesystems' commitment to new building excluding Miami as $27.4 million. then Cablesystems' commitment to other systems is: Commitment to New Plant (excluding Miami) $27.4 million Commitment to Rebuilding $36.6 million Total Commitment to Other Systems $64 million As a consequence of this error of fact, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment to other systems is 83% (p. 88) is erroneous. Furthermore, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment is higher than any other applicant's (p. 88) is also erroneous. In the first place, as the consultant himself notes, the equity status of Charles Hermanowski (who will provide additional funding to Americable as needed) is not indicated. Consequently, the applicant's, or parent's, financial commitment as a percentage of equity cannot be determined. Similarily no determination of financial commitment as a percentage of equity can be made for Vision Cable or its parents. The net worth of all Newhouse companies - indicated as being in excess of $500 million (p. 95) gives no indication of the equity position of the applicant, its parents, or even the group of Newhouse companies (becaose, as the consultant must be aware, net worth is not always equivalent to equity - particularly in large concerns with complex ownership structures. The net worth of The Rogers Broun_ , for exapple, by far exceeds the equity of Rogers Cablesysterns, Inc. Because the financial commitment to other new and rebuild systems, expressed as a percentage of equity, cannot be determined for two of the five applicants it is erroneous to suggest that Cablesystems' commitment as percentage of equity is higher than any other applicants when no meaningful comparison is possible among the five applicants. 60 Inconsistent As noted above, the consultant compares 'commitments to other systems' relative to Cablesystems' parent company equity. He compares Vision's 'commitments to other systems' relative to net worth of all Newhouse Companies, rather than Vision's parent companies. Vision is 310% owned by the Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust and 44% owned by the Newhouse Group Inc., which in turn is 1000% owned by Advance Publications Inc. through intermediate ownerhsip. (0 Erroneous 4. The consultant's comparison erroneously attributes to Cablesystems building and rebuilding commitments in other systems a total of $97 million over the next four years (pg. 95). In the category "Commitments for Building New Cable Systems (excluding Miami)" (page 19) the consultant lists Cablesystems' commitment as $62.4 million. This is an error in fact. Cablesystems' proposal (page F-6) shows new plant commitment including Miami as $66.5 million. Cablesystems' commitment for Miami is $39.1 million page F-4 . Subtracting this from Cablesystems' total new build gives Cablesystems' commitment to new building excluding Miami as $27.4 million. then Cablesystems' commitment to other systems is: Commitment to New Plant (excluding Miami) $27.4 million Commitment to Rebuilding $36.6 million Total Commitment to Other Systems $64 million As a consequence of this error of fact, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment to other systems is 83% (p. 68) is erroneous. Furthermore, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment is higher than any other applicant's (p. 88) is also erroneous. In the first place, as the consultant himself notes, the equity status of Charles Hermanowski (who will provide additional funding to Americable as needed) is not indicated. Consequently, the applicant's, or parent's, financial commitment as a percentage of equity cannot be determined. Similarily no determination of financial commitment as a percentage of equity can be made for Vision Cable or its parents. The net worth of all Newhouse companies - indicated as being in excess of $500 million (p. 95) gives no indication of the equity position of the applicant, its parents, or even the group of Newhouse companies (becaose, as the consultant must be aware, net worth is not always equivalent to equity - particularly in large concerns with complex ownership structures. The net worth of The Rogers Groun, for example, by far exceeds the equity of Rogers Cablesystems, Inc. Because the financial commitment to other new and rebuild systems, expressed as a percentage of equity, cannot be determined for two of the five applicants it is erroneous to suggest that Cablesystems' commitment as percentage of equity is higher than any other applicants when no meaningful comparison is possible among the five applicants. Inconsistent As noted above, the consultant compares 'commitments to other systems' relative to Cablesystems' parent company equity. He compares Vision's 'commitments to other systems' relative to net worth of all Newhouse Companies, rather than Vision's parent companies. Vision is 3190 owned by the Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust and 44% owned by the Newhouse Group Inc., which in turn is 100% owned by Advance Publications Inc. through intermediate ownerhsip. Lim 5. Also, the consultant considers Americable's $9.6 million commitment to other Systems a strength even though there is no specific indication of equity support for this commitment. At the same time, the consultant considers Cablesystems' commitment to other systems a weakness despite the fact that Cablesystems' documented equity is considerably in excess of its financial commitment. The consultant has compared the financial commitments to other systems among the five applicants and has arbitrarily described Cablesystems commitment as a weakness. All the applicants have commitments to other systems. Cablesystems equity is more than adequate to meet its commitments. How can this be a weakness? While there may be some variation in the amounts of equity and financial commitments among the applicants, Cablesystems reiterates that its equity considerably exceeds its commitments to other systems, and Cablesystems' equity position is documented in audited financial statements. There is no weakness in Cablesystems financial capability. We point to our financial capability as a major strength. And, the consultant has not made any differentiation among the applicants access to debt resources. Although all applicants supplied letters from banks not all of those letters specifically commit to the lending of funds. For example, phrases such as "...will give it our favourable consideration...", or "...will be submitted to our loan Committee for its consideration..." found in bank letters to Miami Telecommunications; or "...are presently working towards the implementation of a $75 million financing package..." found in Six-Star's letter from its bank are not commitments. Compare Cablesystems' bank letter: "This letter will confirm that the Toronto -Dominion Bank is prepared to lend Cablesystems Miami up to U.S. $31 million... (Copies of the bank letters are attached to this response - Cablesystems has underlined the appropriate portions). The Consultant's Evaluation, then, is inconsistent in five different ways in this area: - it compares equity with net worth; - it compares the equity of Rogers Cablesystems Inc., only one of the Rogers group of companies, with the net worth of all Newhouse companies; - it compares unsupported commitments with Cablesystems' strongly supported commitments; - it lists an unsupported commitment as a strength; - it credits general bank letters with the same strength as bank letters that specify loan commitment (see bank letters attached). (iii) Quantitative Comparisons and Significance of Numerical Data In comparing financial capabilities the consultant has tended to compare numerical data. While comparison of quantitative indicators can be a useful approach, care must be taken not to ignore the qualitative significance of the data used. For example, in comparing the equity positions of the parent companies of applicants, raw numerical data alone may not indicate the ability of the parent company to meet its financial commitments. In the event of financial instability, creditors will have a prior claim to company assets before commitments to other systems are met. Consequently, the amount of potential prior claim on the equity, as well as the tcg' c7a .L.. "IN Vol. i 1.2 absolute amount of equity, should be considered. The degree of potential prior claims of creditors on a company's equity can be seen in its debt to equity ratio. The greater the financial leverage, the greater the potential claims of creditors on the company. Rogers Cablesystems Inc., parent of Cablesystems has a debt to equity ratio of 1.06:1 (as of its 1980 financial statement): ($000) Long Term Debt $125, 087 Equity $1179179 D/E = 1.06 By comparison, Tele-Communi cations Inc., operating parent of applicant Miami Tele-Communicat ions Inc. has a higher debt to equity ration of 2.6.-1 (as of its 1979 financial statement): ($000) Long Term Debt $166 9188 Equity $ 64,390 D/E = 2.6 The equity that supports Cablesystems commitments to other systems has fewer potential prior claims and encumbrances. Also, it should be noted that a significant portion of Cablesystems' debt is in the form of convertible debentures. This debt, issued in November of 1980, had a face value of $50 million. It is significant that by the end of second quarter 1981 exercising of the convertible option had reduced that debt to approximately $35 million indicating significant lender confidence in Cablesystems - and reducing its debt/equity ratio. Similarly, the significance of the absolute size of the commitment to other systems should be considered in any comparison of these data. This is particularly true when applicants are well experienced operators and own a large number of older systems. Rebuilding of these older systems can represent a major part of the commitment to other systems. It is not surprising, then, that Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., parent of the applicant Cablesystems Miami, has a significant commitment to rebuilding systems. In fact, Cablesystems has the highest commitment to rebuilding systems: 7 systems (out of a total of 25) at a cost of $36.6 million over the next four years (of which $7.4 million is spent in the first of those years). By comparison, Tele-Communications, Inc., operating parent of the applicant Miami Telecommunications Inc., also owns a large number of older systems. In fact, more than 180 systems (501,6 or greater ownership by TCI) are older than 10 years. But TCI's commitments to rebuilding other systems is much smaller than Cablesystems: just 8 systems at a cost of $2.3 million in the next year only. No commitments are shown for subsequent years. Cablesystems' high commitment to rebuilding systems is significant because it reflects Cablesystems' commitment to serve its subscribers with technolooically and physically up-to-date systems. En 0 7. There is no weakness in Cablesystems financial capability. Cablesystems has more than sufficient equity stren th to meet its financial commitments both to the construction of new systems and to rebuilding to maintain 'state of the art' subscriber service. Cablesystems financial stren th is documented and fully disclosed in audited financial statements. Consequently, Cablesystems requests its assessment be changed from 2 strengths, 1 weakness, to 3 strengths. Other applicants who do not show equity support for commitments to other systems should be scored a weakness. Construction Schedule Allocated Assessement - 2 strengths 1 weakness Requested Assessment - 3 strengths The consultant makes an invalid evaluation of Cablesystems' construction proposal when he discusses the "indefinite construction schedule" of a separate institutional network. Cablesystems is the 2DIy applicant proposing to construct, within two years of award of franchise, a system which will be capable of delivering institutional service to every residence, business, private and public agency in the City of Miami. Cablesystems' separate institutional* network is intended to supplement the capacity of the integrated network in areas of high traffic volume. Operation and marketing of services on the integrated network will identify areas which require supplementary trunks and project the appropriate time frame for construction. This approach avoids unnecessary and premature capital expenditures while providing flexibility in establishing facilities as required to satisfy proven demand. The pro -forma clearly provides yearly capital funding for this construction, a portion of the $2.9 million budgeted for institutional development over the life of the franchise. The assessed "weakness" in the construction schedule is in reality a strength of our flexible design and should be shown accordingly. Cablesystems therefore requests an assessment of - strengths. I 0 no Allocated Assessment - 3 Weaknesses E Requested Assessment - 3 strengths riir j - Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations In his evaluation of proposals for another franchise (Cities of Bell Gardens, Commerce, Downey, Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera and Santa Fe Springs) the consultant has said "automated programs are considered to attract viewers on an occasional rather than continuous basis... They do not appear to be significant in attracting additional subscribers but rather serve the function of providing 'fill-in' programming." Cablesystems is in agreement with the consultant's point of view in this matter, yet it appears that this category has received inappropriate emphasis combined with errors of fact, omission and an incomplete assessment of our proposal resulting in Cablesystems being assessed an incorrect 3 weaknesses. Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. While the consultant's report attempts to list TV stations, channels and services under the section "Proposed Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations", when Figure 59 page 98 is reviewed, satellite video services are combined with local and imported automated services. It appears that distant signals have not been considered at all. For example, Cablesystems appears to have been given no credit for proposing to carry Channel 2 from Puerto Rico and Channel 479 Toronto, although these are unique distant signals of significant interest to Miami subscribers. i;t ty,�"1 i l 1 �1 fi.9 - Local Services Automated In the section Local Services - Automated the consultant has, once again, erroneously assessed Cablesystems' offering. Cablesystems' proposal indicates that "all community channels will include text messages when video programming is not being cablecast... " (Form K, pg. 749 Cablesystems' proposal). And, Cablesystems has providc-d more than enough character generators for these services: Page I-37 of Cablesystems' proposal shows 20 character generators for local programming, and an additional 14 (for a total of 34) are noted on page K-26 (each of 14 playback modules has a titler. . This brings the number of local automated channels to 29, some of which are composite with video programming as are those listed for other applicants. The other advantage of these service which is not addressed by the consultant's report is the bilingual nature of many of these channels. In fact, Cablesystems has the highest number of local automated channels rather than the lowest. Automated Services - Imported The consultant only lists UPI News - English and Spanish as imported automated services. A further analysis would reveal that WKID, proposed for carriage, includes the stock market reports. SPN carries the Women's Channel and while Cablesystems _ describes its weather channel as being locally -originated, NOAA weather reports are a usual and natural part of that service. Because NOAA has a meteorological center at Coral Gables it is indeed more logical to describe the channel as locally originated. Cablesystems' proposed ENCORE channels may also be developed by local broadcasters as automated services but CSM did not presume to anticipate the broadcasters' decisions on how the channels might be used. Cablesystems maintains that an inadequate analysis of these categories has been made and that an inappropriate emphasis has been placed on "fill-in" programming. Cablesystems therefore requests an assessment of 3 strengths. 10. Local Origination Programming Allocated Assessment - 1 strength Requested Assessment - 2 strengths In this section, the consultant has assessed Cablesystems 1 strength. Miami Telecommunications and Vision have also scored 1 strength. But Cablesystems offers 50% more video local origination services than either Miami Telecommunications or Vision. Cablesystems 12 services Miami 8 services Vision 7 services In the section Satellite Programs - Video the consultant assessed a difference of _ 4 services (16 for Cablesystems versus 20 for Miami Telecommunications) as differentiating a strength from a weakness, a difference there of 25%. Consistency requires a similar differentiation here. Also, the consultant's comparison (pgs. 71 and 72) notes that Cablesystems offers more hours of programming per week than any other applicant. CABLESYSTEMS AMERICABLE MIAMI SIX -STAR VISION 336 160 65 254 152 Cablesystems feels that the uniform scoring here does not reflect the significant differences in the services offered and requests the scoring be differentiated to recognize this. Cablesystems requests 2 strengths rather than one. Other applicants should have 1 weakness. Access Facilities and Support Allocated Assessment - 2 strengths Requested Assessment - 3 strengths 11. Cablesystems agrees with the consultant's comment that "the degree of technical support provided' is a key factor for access and community programming. Equally important is that this support continues throughout the life of the franchise. Access technical equipment is subject to a high degree of wear and tear, and is _ exposed to the risk of technological obsolescence. Consequently, it is important to provide funds for the replacement of technologically and physically obsolete — equipment. Because Cablesystems' support is significantly stronger than other —_ applicants, Cablesystems request an assessment of 3 strengths. Cablesystems' commitment to the replacement of obsolete equipment can be seen in the capital commitment to origination facilities over the life of :he franchise. In Year 10 Cablesystems commits $1,000,000, and in each of years 11 through 15 a further $300,000 is committed (pg. G-30). Comparing the continuing financial commitment of all applicants in this area - reveals Cablesystems has the strongest commitment to continuing technical support. CUMULATIVE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE - ORIGINATION ($000) (from Applicants' pro formas) Year Cablesystems Americable Miami Six -Star Vision 3 21765 755 2,502 22580 19793 5 39015 980 22572 29580 10793 6 31015 10090 22607 2,580 19793 ;< 10 4,015 29140 3,352 21580 19793 15 59515 21735 41402 21580 19793 t With regard to operating budget, the consultant's evaluation (pg. 101) shows Cablesystems' operating budget for local origination and access (in Year 5) as $1.6 million. but Cablesystems' pro forma (page G-38) indicates $2,040,000. Form K, page 32 states specifically that the budget for special programming initiatives was not included on this page because those items are discussed later in the form. This error 't d has resulted in Cablesystems being credited with only 78 0 of tts commt te programming budget. With these significant issues clarified Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. 12. Setvide to Institutions Allocated Assessment - 1 strength 2 weaknesses Requested Assessment - 3 strengths The consultant notes that "the longer the institutional network is, in general the more institutions that can be connected at standard cost", (page 90). Cablesystems agrees with the Consultant's view. But the consultant has not credited Cablesystems for its 685 mile integrated (shared) residential/institutional system. Nor has the consultant correctly credited Cablesystems for the channel capacity of its institutional service (25 channels downstream, 17 channels upstream) which is comparable to that of other applicants. Cablesystems therefore requests 3 strengths. Cablesystems identified numerous public and government agencies that will be connected to an institutional system, and could theoretically be served with a separate 200-300 mile institutional network. However, an even greater potential exists for communications services among Miami's thousands of private businesses, commercial establishments, "residence" offices and governmental institutions. To be competitive with other communications suppliers, Cablesystems felt it essential that maximum access ind prompt delivery of institutional services be provided initially. The limited coverage dedicated institutional system cannot claim this flexibility; in addition, there is no guarantee that once built, it will be used and/or be located in the places it is needed. By sharing a common network for both residential and institutional purposes, both these uncertainties are avoided, clearly making Cablesystems integrated plus supplementary network design superior to a separate institutional network alone Because Cablesystems offers comparable capacity and much greater mileage for institutional connection Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. Sophistication of System Allocated Score - 2 strengths Requested Score - 3 strengths The consultant has ranked all applicants equal in this category despite the fact that Cablesystems excels in "the ability to provide a broad variety of services including advanced two-way and interactive services to all subscribers". (Consultant pg. 91) Cablesystems requests 3 strengths, other applicants should be assessed 2 strengths. 1. Cablesystems is the only applicant to propose providing a base band converter with addressability, decoding and descrambling capability to all subscribers above the free universal tier. 2. Cablesystems with 17 channels of upstream system capacity has twice the capacity of any other applicant "to provide a broad variety of two-way and interactive services to all subscribers". (Consultant) The consultant has failed to recognize that Cablesystems integrated (shared) residential/institutional concept, combined with addressable converter-descramblers in every subscribers home, represents a level of sophistication unmatched by any other applicant and clearly warrants a ranking that makes this distinction. System Design Reliability is key in a system of the size an of Miami. The consultant has not given pro Cablesystems' design. Cablesystems requests an its superior design. 50 13. Allocated Assessment - 2 strengths Requested Assessment - 3 strengths d sophistication proposed for the City per recognition to the reliability of assessment of 3 strengths in view of In the consultant's category of "Special System Features" no mention has been made of the redundancy and fail-safe by-pass features, proposed only by Cablesystems, for use in all trunk stations. Such a feature not only ensures the reliability of off -air and satellite programming, but more importantly the reliability of commercial and domestic data and alarm services. The sophistication of this one key feature, (please refer to illustration of 'Cablesystems Amplifier' in Section I and Form I page 24 of 32 and page 25 of 32) clearly distinguishes Cablesystems proposal as far superior to any other applicants and should be so rated in the evaluation. It should be noted a superior rating was given to Miami for the limited improvement in reliability obtained by placing earth stations at each hub. Yet, twelve 7 meter earth stations, a 10 meter uplink and 4 sets of towers cannot be purchased for the amounts budgeted in the Miami Tele-Communications, Inc. proposal. Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths and a lower assessment for Miami. Channel Capacity Allocated Assessment - 1 weakness Requested Assessment - 1 strength Cablesystems, in this section, finds the consultant's evaluation inconsistent. It also subjects Cablesystems to multiple perceived weaknesses on the same issue. Cablesystems requests an assessment of one strength in this category. The consultant writes on page 92 "since the channel capacity for institutional service was considered in (8) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services." Yet, in the next line the consultant continues..:' Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cablesystems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity." This is clearly inconsistent evaluation. Particularly so because the consultant has already considered Cablesystems' institutional capacity a weakness even though it is comparable to other applicants (see above). The consultant's evaluation in these two categories has effectively subjected Cablesystems' integrated (shared) residential/institutional concept to double jeopardy. Not only does the consultant believe that the expansion of residential services may limit institutional capacity, but also the development of institutional services may limit residential capacity. Surely it is obvious both conditions cannot occur simultaneously, thus making it inappropriate to indicate "weaknesses" in both residential and institutional channel capacities. The consultant's concern for the lack .:32 of upstream capacity for "Home Interactive Services" is unfounded. The spectrum required for these services is minimal and can be easily accommodated within the 17 channels of upstream capacity (Refer to spectrum allocation chart). It should also be noted that the downstream video channels assigned for institutional business communications can be scrambled using Cablesystems' and Zenith's, highly secure scrambling technique. Not only does this protect the privacy of the institutional communications, but it will also allow these channels to be time shared with residential services. In the evenings when institutional use is lower these channels can be made available to entertainment/educational access programming in either an open or secure mode. Also, the channels designated on the A cable for educational and government access could be utilized at no cost by these agencies, possibly during daytime hours, as a secure institutionally programmed channel - demonstrating the many public benefits that can be derived from the integrated (shared) concept. The consultant's statement that construction of a supplementary (separate) institutional network later will be "more disruptive and less satisfactory" is strictly an opinion and is not supported by actual operating experience. The concept of a separate institutional network dates back to a period when low cost encrypting and signal processing equipment was not available and the separate cable concept was the main source of providing communications security. It appears the consultant has overlooked the sophisticated hardware that is available today which permits the cost effective sharing of communications paths without conflict or "disruption" between users. Cablesystems anticipates that the greatest volume of institutional users will be in the downtown core and along Brickell Avenue where many businesses and financial institutions are located. As market demand develops in this area, Cablesystems will construct the dedicated institutional network required to handle the high volume of traffic. Users can be switched from the integrated network to the institutional network in a matter of minutes, timed to occur when communications services are not required by the customer, for example, during the evening or on weekends. The consultant typifies this slight interruption of service required to change cable as a weakness in this system, however, Cablesystems believes that most subscribers will prefer the lower rates which will be possible due to the use of a hybrid network, compared to the higher rates which would be necessitated by early construction of an under utilized, limited mileage, dedicated institutional network. Because the evaluation in these two categories was based on faulty analysis by the consultant, the expanded capability, increased flexibility and superior utilization of available channel capacity proposed by Cablesystems' integrated concept has been overlooked or misinterpreted by the consultant. We therefore request that the assessment in these two categories be corrected to reflect channel capacities that are essentially equal for all applicants. Rate Stability Allocated Assement - 1 strength 2 weaknesses Requested Assessment - 3 strengths Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. The evaluation is inconsistent with the specific instructions of the City of Miami's Request for Proposals. On page 5 of the RFP this statement is underlined: An average annual inflation rate of 9 - percent shall be used by all applicants in preparing financial projections. Over the life of the franchise the cumulative effect of 9°% average annual Inflation rate is: (1.09)15 = 3.64 - Using this inflation rate, the nominal value of $1.00 in Year 1 will be $3.64 in Year 15. This represents a cumulative nominal increase of 264%. On page 94 of the evaluation the consultant writes: With respect to rate increase projections Six Star Nielson, over the life of the franchise, projects a cumulative rate increase of 330/a for basic service, and 80°% for Pay TV service. This is a strength compared to the other applicants who forecast cumulative increases of over 200% for both services. Oft 16. Relatim to City Needs Allocated Assessment - 1 strength 1 weakness Requested Assessment - 3 strengths Cablesystems is dismayed to find the consultant's evaluation in this area is flawed by in internal inconsistency and an incomplete appraisal of Cablesystems' proposal to the City of Miami. Cablesystems, therefore, finds the evaluation of "1 strength" and "1 weakness" unfounded, and requests an assessment of 3 strengths. First, nowhere in figure 18 (pages 113 to 118) of the evaluation is a weakness noted in Cablesystems' Response to the Needs of Miami. Yet, in figure 19 (page 120), the Summary of Relative Strengths and Weaknesses, Cablesystems is scored 1 weakness in the category. This internal inconsistency is perhaps a clerical oversight, but because of the significant impact of an indicated weakness we draw the consultant's attention to it and request this weakness be removed. Second, referring again to figure 18, Cablesystems notes with pride that the list of Cablesystems' Response of the Needs of Miami fills out more pages of the consultant's comparison than does that of any other applicant. But, Cablesystems must add that this lengthy list is in itself incomplete. Cablesystems Miami has designed its entire proposal to relate to the needs of Miami. Research carried out by the company was documented in volumes included in the proposal, construction manual, institutional ascertainment, community ascertain- ment and community response. Key areas where Cablesystems responded to the unique requests of the city and community members and yet have been neglected in the consultant's evaluation are: 1. Need: - City of Miami Fire Department request for a Studio Production Facility Source: - Discussions with Fire Department officials Response: - A studio facility at the proposed new Coconut Grove Fire Station to be shared with neighborhood programmers This commitment includes equipment, personnel, training programs and staff assistance Cablesystems - $125,000 capital Commitment: - $309000 - staff - time-shared estimate annually for life of the franchise 0 17 . 2, Need: = Supplemental production capability for the Anna Brenner Meyers Educational Center Soutoe: - RFP page 10, #2 and written request from Don McCullough = center director Response: = Two porta studios to be located at and administered by the Center. Cablesystems Commitment: - $150,000 Reference - Form K, pg. 3, 23, 30 3. Need: = 50% of ascertainment responses and organizational letters identify a need to "Bring Miami Together Source: - Miami constituents' response to community ascertainment Response: - Miami Together, a project to be administered by an independent action committee to produce programs, support civic activities aimed at fostering understanding amongst community members Cablesystems Commitment: - $3.6 million over life of the license Reference: - Form K pg. 3, pg. 45, 46, 68, 69 4. Need: - Support for the development of arts programming Source: - RFP page 10 - #10, & Arts Community Ascertainment Response: - Beaux arts channel, production fund, appointment of advisory committee, access to satellite uplink, arts programming co- ordinator. s.= low 18. 5. Need., - RFP (pg. 12) requests maximum community participation in the management of the system Sourcet - RFP page 129 & Community Ascertainment Response: - Five community advisory boards have been appointed to guarantee the ongoing, day-to-day involvement of 42 community members in place at filing Cablesystems Commitment: - $3.6 million Reference: - Form K pgs. 43, 46, 489 509 57 6. Need: - Satellite uplink at WPBT facilities Source: - written request by WPBT Response: - Funding for an uplink at WPBT. All applicants received WPBT's request, only Cablesystems responded to Miami's Public Television Stations specific needs Cablesystems Commitment - $1.1 million Reference: - Form K, pg. 310 46 , Form I pg. 549 62 - Form G, Item 12 pg. G-38 - Special Initiatives 7. Need: - City of Miami Police Department cable television application Source: - discussions with Lt. Pierce and Captain Boemler Response: - CSM spoke with representatives of various city departments responsible for maintaining public safety. Both the police and fire departments have specific applications for the cable system: audio receive points, video communications, teleconferencing, live connection of remote points capable of monitoring traffic and crowd control areas from permanent origination points. CSM has taken these projects into consideration and has allocated the funding necessary for their implementation. 19, 9. Need: CfImewatch Communications R Source: - Community ascertainment, numerous discussions with police, fire, public safety and civic organizations Response: - CSM has addressed this need in several ways. As noted in the evaluation (figure 18), relation to city needs, CSM has committed $500,000 over the life of the license for crimewatch funding. In addition CSM has designated a staff position for a crimewatch advisory board, allocated a channel for crimewatch on the universal service and created a secure cable channel available only to members of crimewatch organizations as designated by their respective boards. Cablesystems Commitment: - $500,000 crimewatch program fund Reference: 10. Need: Source: Response: Reference: - Form K, pgs 47, 48, 49, 66, 72 - Form G, Item 12 pg. G-38 special initiatives - Cable communications at the Knight International Center - Knight Center Project Development Director Dean Robert Allen - University of Miami - In discussions with Mr. Allen Poms, Knight Center Project Director, and Dean Allen of the University of Miami, CSM learned of the need for a sophisticated television production and transmission facility at the Knight Center. This facility will become a focal point for much international activity when completed. Both sources indicated the need to have the necessary TV production capabilities to record and transmit material relevant to several "types" of communities in Miami (e.g. civic, educational, professional and national). In addition to augmenting the capabilities of this facility on a local level CSM, via the proposed satellite uplink, will be able to transmit material nationally and internationally. Our commitment is to designate a studio facility, playback facility, translation center, mobile production facility and numerous staff positions at the Knight Center. - $125,000 - studio - $105,000 - translation center - $115,000 - mobile facility - 150,000 - staff positions - estimate - Form K, pg. 2, 5, 6, 18, 199 59 - Form I, pg. 50, 54 and 62 20. 11s Need'. sautee: RO§Pbhse: Programming meeting needs of visual and hearing impaired RFP pg. 10 - #4, and Community Ascertainment - CSM has fulfilled this special need by designating a channel for the hearing impaired, a cable programming coordinator specifically for this channel, local and national programming material, signed and/or captioned local news broadcasts and establishing a formal relationship with the cable industry's only Deaf Television Resource Center (located at our Toronto system). In addition, CSM will, if allowed by the National Captioning Institute, provide head -end decoding of network programming. CSM will also carry the talking book service on our FM service. Cablesystems Commitment: - $1509000 capital cost of channel allocation - $21,000 Hearing Impaired Coordinator salary Reference: - Form K pg. 55, 56, 66, 70, 71 12. Need: - Support of access production using existing Miami facilities Source: - RFP pg. 10 - #2 and community ascertainment Response: - CSM has identified most existing community production centers in the Miami area and we have incorporated thirteen such centers on our application. By doing so we have further fulfilled the access production needs of Miami. We have designated either equipment or origination capability at the following locations: Knight Center, Anna Brenna Meyers Telecommunications Center, Coconut Grove Fire Station, Wynwood Community Center, Archdiocese, WPBT, Teatro Los Mascaras I, Treatro Los Mascaras II, Allahpattah Community Center, Youth Co-op Project 79, The Fellowship House, and the Dade County Public Library. Cablesystems Commitment: - $230,000* Knight Center Facility - $150,000* Anna Brenna Meyers Telecommunications Center - $125,000* Coconut Grove Fire Station - $150,000 Capital Costs for Catholic TV Channel - $10,00L-rigination point modulators Reference: - Form K, pgs. 30 and 31 *These items appear elsewhere in this section. 21. 13, Need: Access programming that does not violate contemporary standards of a community taste relating to violent material RFP, Appendix II - City of Miami Television Regulation Ordinance pg. 2 - D(2) (a) Response: - CSM has been the only applicant to address this special need noted in the Cable Television Regulation Ordinance. Cablesystems Commitment: - Not applicable Reference: - Form K, pg. 37; Form K, Access Channels and Administration, Statement of Compliance, #2(c) Cablesystems requests an evaluation assessment of 3 strengths. Taken together with the removal of the weakness (described above) Cablesystems score should be: 3 strengths 0 weaknesses ROPERS � rt I = G,JUSYSTEMS INC. Suite 2602, Commercial Union Tower, p.O. Box 249, Toronto Dominion Centre, Toronto, Ontario M5K 1J5 416-664-2373 June lot 1981 e THETORPM-130MINION BANK USA Par$t A...:e, o P izi r,5 EaV 52rid S!r" NfyhYI*,?,( Ny t(",.65 June 15th, 1981 *6 Mr, R.M. Francis Senior Vice -President, Finance A 4141 1 Rogers CableBystems, Inc- Suite 2602, commercial Union Tower P.O. Box 249 Toronto Domi-nion Centre Torontor Ontario MSK LIS Dear Mr. Francis RE: Cablesystem-s Miami Franchise application for the City of Miami, Florida On April 7tAi, 1981, we issued you our cu=jrment to provide up to u.S. $31-million in bank debt to support the development and construction of the cable television franchise for the City of Miami. We confirm that our financing commitment remains in full force and is in no way affected by Rogers Cablevision recently announced plans to acquire 51% of UA Columbia Cablevision. Yours very truly, 1. Fi p`u 4 9 1 MR - yr' � t +••: • � �•,, 1201 8tiCka-ll ,veAu9 �!iafi % Fi6ridA 33131 . Ab1ril loth, 1991. Mr. Cardenas. .%L'_berto �liami ►elecc-nunication 888 Brickell Ave., _ 33131. Dear Mr. Cardenas: Please be advised that we have received preliminary financial information and a request for a loan in the amount of $4,000,000.00 to Miami Teleco^nnunica- tions, Inc., a Florida CorpQration. As soon as the loan package is completed, it will be submitted to our Loan Committee for its consi- deration and final decision. Once a decision has been reached on this request we will advise you. Very truly yours: ;Nancy Marquez, — Vice President. Barnett Bank of Miami, N.A. - 77 tk THE 13ANIi OF XENV'YORK Nt* ♦OMA'S rrilr dAPan - rpuNOtd 0'64 w •%.tKANotdk ..A41%.rOM City of Miami, Florida c/o Mr. Paul Alden Miami Tele-Communications, !nC& 5781 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 303 Miami, Fla. 33137 Dear Sirs: 0 48 'WALL StRntt, NEW VORK. R. It. IddiS March 34, 1991 I am writing to you at the request of The Bank of New York's good customers Tele-Communications, Inc. (TCI) and Taft Broadcasting Company. It is my understanding that Miami Tele-Communications Inc., is applying for the franchise to construct and operate a CATV system in Miami and that you are interested in determining TCI's financial capacity and its ability to manage its affairs properly. We are well acquainted with TCI and Taft, their management and their current financial condition, and hold a highly favorable opinion of the organizations. TCI is a long-time customer of ours and we currently serve as agent bank on a $45,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility with four other major banks. We also extend the company a separate $6,000,000 revolving credit for short term needs. We are also a major credit bank for Taft Broadcasting Company. We understand that a large part of the company will be held primarily by local Miami residents and local businessmen. We fully support this means of ownership, which will spread the benefits as well as the responsibility for the system throughout the community. While we have not let had the opportunity to examine Miami Tele-Communications' financial projections, TCI and Taft have approached us concerning the financing and we wi certainly give it our favorable consideration. We understand that roughly $25;,+u of debt will be required. Based on our experience with TCI and Taft in the past and our understanding of their current financial condition, we feel confident that the companies are capable of fulfilling their obligations, both financially and operationally. TCI and Taft have had and will continue to -have the full support of The Bank of New York. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions at (212) 530-3106. Sincerely, Martha A. Pritchard Assistant Treasurer I%P:1f r _a ®sma TA"t"T CABLEVISION ASSOCIATES April 10, 1981 Mayor Maurice Ferre and City ccim%i.ssion City of Miami. City Hall Miami., Florida 33133 :Mayor Ferre and %,embers of the City Omissions This letter will serve to unequivocally ccm-lit the full resources of Tele-Cora-ai iications, Inc. and Taft Broadcasting Corrpany to financing the CATV system, as proposed in the application by Miami Tele-Cam, = ications for Miami, Florida. Tole-Cbrrmuucations, Inc. and Taft Broadcasting Corpany are prepared not only to ca rtii.t the funds necessary for completion of the project, but we also pledge the total applicaiton of the carpani.es' experience and expertise. Very truly yours, wL� /1J1 ohn C. Malone President Tele-Cormmmcations, Inc. Denver, Colorado 80222 � �-ikers T�iist Con-i any 2,�O Park A%curie, New YoA, NL-%%- York 10011 0 P.0. Box 31S. C.liurdi Sttcrt Station Nvw fork. `vw York 10015 April 7, 1991 Mr& Charles E. Smith, Jr. President Six Star Nielson Cablevision P.O. Box 3197 5843A Uplander Way Culver City, California 90230 Dear Mr. Smith: I would like to take this opportunity to confirm Bankers Trust Company's commitment to assist Six Star Nielson Cablevision in their acquisition and development of future CATV franchises. Throughout our relationship with the Six Star Nielson Cablevision group we have been most impressed with the technical and management support of Six Star Nielson Cablevision. Our experience with the previous franchise developments in the Mid -West and Southern California areas have demonstrated to us the technical competence, industry knowledge and management ability to appraise and meet franchise deadlines. Based on this, the Bankers Trust Company is and will remain Six Star Nielson Cablevisions' bank and we support their endeavors to develop similar franchises. Further, toward the im development o cal1. we have had discussions and are oresently working lementation of -a $75 million financing package for CATV franchises. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to Sincerely, 7, Mm"Wwwowr AMERICAN SECURITY BANr . R080f J.OAN va00tif tNfi~Mbb Mr. Charles Hermanowski Managing General Partner Americable Associates P.O. Box 859 Miami, Florida 33197 Dear Mr. Hermanowski: Further to your letter of March 10, 1981, American Security Bank, N.A. will commit to make available $20 million to finance the construction of a CATV franchise for the City of `iLami, Florida. ��1iiZLNKItA\7.. �'.IiRFNitR.1:`Z SC"U"TZ A-rTcIR NAYS AT LAW :lin VARK A�'1 \L'R • NEW PORK. `• Y. "11 J O E L S E o 4 p E N A M A N 7. SANeonD e. EHr2rNwF►AN1 N'iLNAEL E SCNULT2 R ,Orn A rj,)Lr)M&N MAnVIN PtNia Mr. Charles C. Hermanowski Americable Associates 20800 SW 167th Avenue Miami, Florida 33187 Dear Charlie: This is to confirm that we have represented clients who have invested in the construction, expansion and main- tenance of cable television systems in which you were the General Partner. You have informed us that you will be filing an application to obtain the cable television fran- chise of the City of Miami with you as General Partner. In the event that you are awarded such franchise, certain of our clients may be interested in investing in the con- struction, expansion and maintenance or t e cable antenna television system of the City of Miami with you as our General Partner. The aggregate equity investment of our clients trill equal the sum of $15,000,000. We look for- ward to hearing from you with regard to the progress of this application JSE:elh FEDERAL EXPRESS El CHMICAL2. _ Dear Sir or Madam: In =-Mectidn with the application by Vision Cable of Miami, Inc. for the CATV franchise to serve the City of Miami, Florida, we understand that The Newhouse Grcup Inc., one of the stockholders, will provide financing in an aggregate arcunt of up to $5n,000,000. The financing will be guaranteed by Advance Publications, Inc., parent of The Newhouse Group Inc. As you may know, The tiewficuse Group Inc. and Advance Publications, Inc. are both part of the organizationN which is cw-ned by the Newhouse family. Chemical Bank has been GoLng business with the Newhouse family and Newhouse canpanies for fifty years. The businesses these cdrpanies are engaged in include new'spaE>ar, book and magazine publishing, cable systems, microwave transmission and radio broadcasting. We understand that the ;,ewhou:se ccupanies are the third largest circulator of newspapers i_-n the United States. Chemical Bank has regularly received semi-annual and audited annual finan- cial statements for the Newhouse ccnpanies. The ocmbined net worth of the Newhouse cat anies is in excess of $e00h Ilion. d by the ew of the�p�s, except for one 80% owned catpany► Y Newhouse family and trusts that they control. From tiro to time, Chemical Bank has made loans to the ;,x-,,heu:ses including one recent loan which was in excess of $100 million. A11 loans have been paid prcrptly and in accordance will all terns and conditicns. Based upon the f inancial strength and guarantee of Advance Pub lications , Inc., we stand ready to lend Vision Cable of Miaru, Inc., or The Newhouse Group Inc., for a loan and/or an investment in Vision Cable of Miami, Inc., up to $50,000,000 on a long-tean basis at its request. The principals are well krow�n by the senior iranager,�ent of Chemical Bank. We have the hightest regard for their integrity, business and financial capabilities. 4� 0 JUN. t 619@"� TELE-COMMUNICA'filOhl�, INC. LCI(1) GENERALOFFICES 54 0ENVEA TECHNOLOGICAL CENTER CALL SOX 22595 WELLSHIFIE STATION OENVEQ, COLORA00 60222 • (303) 771-B200 June 11, 1981 Mr. Clark Merrill _ Assistant to City Manager City of Miami Office of Intergovernmental Affairs 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mr. Merrill: Miami Tele-Communications is pleased to submit the following comments with respect to the evaluation of proposals performed by Telecommunications Management Corporation. Our comments are directed only to those areas which the consultant determined were weaknesses in our proposal. Further, we make no comments relative to the evaluation of any other applicant proposal or evaluation of same, as this was not requested and is therefore considered to be inappropriate. 1. Large System Experience (Pg. 93) The information requested by the RFP was interpreted by us to mean individual franchise holdingss, not systems. We therefore listed each individual franchised community and allocated system mileage to each community. In fact, TCI operates or is constructing a number of systems with more than 500 miles of plant. These systems are each served from a single headend with, in some cases, AML, FM microwave, or supertrunk to one or more hubs. Pittsburgh, PA 1,000 Miles Salt Lake City, UT 900 Miles Knoxville, TN 835 Miles Corpus Christi, TX 718 Miles Davis County, UT 600 587 Miles Miles Madison, WI WA 557 Miles Bremerton, Pima County, AR 520 Miles Lakewood, C^ 500 Miles Based on this clarification, we suggest our Large System Experience be adjudged to be "strong". Mr. Clark Merrill June lit 1981 Page 2 2. Rate Stability (Rate Increase Projections) (Pg. 94) Instructions in the RFP requested applicants to project a 9% inflation rate in pro -forma schedules pliednthisovide inflationll as factorotohich line expenses assms et were so treated. MTC applied forth on Pg. 3F, Form G, of our proposal. In order to offset the effects of inflation on the expense rrevenues inwere factlwasso ldonetfor equalization . This has the appearance of rate inceases, purposes only. No rate increases were projected, as the city's ordinance requires approval by the City Commission for rate increases. It would appear that the Six Star pro-formas were based on a different onthere- than that required, with respect to inflation, by the RFPis fore not comparable. ion we suggest either eliminating this area of Based upon this clarificat all applicants except Six Star "strong". comparision, or adjudging MTC wishes to applaud the city's consultantfor an °aevenhanded andsome competentthe fashion. complex proposals to be submitted anywhere We would be pleased to answer any further questions the city or its consultant may have. SIX ; DEAR June 17. 1581 Honorable Mayor City of Miami, Florida 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Sir: It, Enclosed is our list of objections to the Telecommunications Management Corporation evaluation as prepared by Carl Pi lnick. Six Star Nielson wishes to�unecationthere that hasnbeenfextendednbynthe as to the ex..ellent planning and co City of Miami to the applicants. if the evaluation that was recently pre pirpd by the consultant showed as much forethought and effort as that which the city has extended, we would have no objections. Six Star Nielson must launch the stronqest evaluatio�f oftheiamiwith prcposaPs. proach the consultant has taken ns The conclusions which can bhdrawn te finical commitmentstofneach companyonly andrthe ous but completely ignore e planning for future interactiveneeds arecreditedcommunity. We understand why other applicants applicant even Six Star Nielson ishnot. Itosedaam�ystemst bwhichabe is stechnicallythat the mpossibge. the highest rating PrP Once again, we are pleased to deal with a city as fine as Miami, and are riot inferring any lack of "fair play" on your part, but we do est that little if any weight be given to the report of Telecommunications Management Corporation. Sincerely, 440 So Citrus Avenue Covina Caiilornia 91723 (213) 967-6337 (714) 750 87J04 and Public ,Access Studios ��� __ `_ � ►J f ��� LEGEND .: emu_. � � s• � Master Headend Satellite Receivers, Microwave, Headen CJ (Tower, Sate d Switching and Main Studio) Community Hub M- �(AML Microwave Receive Site) c� Public Access Studio Locations AML Microwave Forward '�5-W� _� S-E and Return k "A -Al" Distribution Trunks •-- Proposed ••� -U= - - "�' and 'B" Institutional Trunk - ,r- (9 Production Center 0 Viewing Center and Neighborhood Access Studio 0 Vision Cables Viewing Center and Access Studio Location p Cablesystem s Viewing Center and Access Studio Location -•4•,�-.�-•��,;;�- i III I � i � i i , �I f �i � lilj ���q���lllll;� �iN�l�i?��u'iitl9Wnliai�l�l • E�'i���Ml�i�'i�Illgpl4l��lfli�i'Ill j 1i'�� =�:. SIX STA.i 0) FORM I CKUNEL CAPACITY AND SYSTEM DESIGN (continued) Page 3 of 32 3. Will converters be initially provided to all subscribers, for all tiers of basic service? (X) Yes ( } No If "no," explain under what conditions converters will be made available, (a) Palmetto Tier: Oak L-30 converter (b) Palmetto Tier with pay option: Oak mid -band converter/decoder (programmable descrambler terminal) (c) Upper non -interactive Tiers: Pioneer VIP,* one-way, addressable terminal with remote control option (d) Upper interactive Tiers: Pioneer VIP two-way, addressable terminal, with remote control option (e) Teletext option: Pioneer VIP stand alone decoder or optional TRS 80 (16k) computer (f) Institutional Subscribers: Oak T-35 or other suitable terminal selected by user agencies All converters/terminals selected for use by Miami Tele-Comm unications are HRC compatible in that they can tune the non-standard frequencies used in such transmission systems. In addition to the above listed terminals, as use is made of the "A" and AA" cable soectrum above 400 MHz for teleconferencing (downstream portion) or other special services, an expanded bandwidth converter such as the Magnavox MAGNA 58 .will be made available. *The VIP system is described in appendix I-9 "Terminal Equipment" and is discussed in further detail in form "N". Vision Cable and Cablesystems are each credited with viewing centers in minority areas. As once again can be seen on Map 1, this also holds with Six Star Nielson. The credibility of the consultant at this point is seriously questioned by Six Star Nielson, and wishes at this time to state that the entire evaluation proces is a complete "sham". Page 116 - Cablesystems is credited with a news production program originating at Radio Station WQBA. Six Star Nielson has committed a $220,000 mobile micro= wave news truck to its production equipment package for a Local Origination News Service yet receives no credit. — Page 118 - The proposed public access policies and procedures were designed to Does the consultant suggest that comply with the FCC Rules and Regulations. to eebhre hmay s in these rules be violated mind. If these rules are no tremoved contactements fromtheweaknesscategory will be made for an FCC ruling. Six Star Nielson has also make the following commitments to public agencies: Paae —T=78 Chamber of Commerce I-48 American Red Cross Miami Fire Department I-48 Judicial System I-49 I-49 Libraries I-49,50 Police Department I-50, J-52,53 c Education I-49, J-54,55 Government Health Organizations J_49,50 the most serious objection to be raised is in the Figure 18 Section (page 113-118), in which various applicants are credited with identical of- ferings to those of Six Star Nielson. Each of these applicants is credited with these offerings with the exception of Six Star Nielson. The purpose of evaluating the proposals is to provide an objective, not subjective over- view, as the consultant has offered. Page 114-116 - Vision Cable is credited with offering minority programming consisting of: Vision Six Star Nielson Black Entertainment Network Y Pages J2, i32, J43 Gal av i s ion Y Y Pages J32, J44 Spanish International Network Y Y Through Local Broadcaster WLTV Women's Channel Y Y J2, J31, J48 BETA Y N Spanish News N Y J2, J32 The consultant's intentions can be seriously questioned that an appli- cant received credit in this area, and once again this oversite occurs on page 116, when Cablesystems is credited with the offering of the Women's Channel, the evaluation process becomes clouded by the inference that these services are only offered by each of these applicants which certainly is not the case. Page 114 Vision Cable is credited with fully equipped access studios in minority communities. The enclosed map shows the location of Vision Cable's studios in relation to Six Star Nielson's. As becomes readily apparent, the studio locations are nearly identical, with the exception being an additional studio offered by Six Star Nielson and ten viewing centers that include character generators. A concern as to whether the consultant received a Six Star Nielson application to evaluate comes to mind? Page 114 - Vision Cable again receives credit for purchase of minority productions for its Family Movie Channels. By the very nature- of the channel any of the applicants would also purchase these productions for Local Origination Viewing. Page 115 - Cablesystems is credited with studio locations in Latin and Black areas. The same argument for this crediting of response to local needs can be made as was offered for the Vision Cable Access Studios. (See Map 1). 36 34 32 30 28 AVERAGE 26 CHANNEL COST 24 ALL 22 TIERS 20 YEAR 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 4 5 6 7 8 3 . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . .. . . 3 • •. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ��� \� . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 rlon Interactive Service III �� 7i�1,11� 1 '11 � I i, 4 2 30 26 24 22 20; 18- 16 14- 1z 6, jl} 36 34 32 3C 2E 26 RATES IN 24 HIGHEST 22 PENETRATED TIER 2( YEAR 0 Non Interactive Service 16 14 12 10 ?8 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 to) �l 77��iljljIl'II11 91111F I 36 34 32 3C 28 26 RATES I N 24 S 22 2( if if p 1� 1! 0 Non Interactive Service YEAR 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 Z' 0) 180 170 160 150 140 130 RATES INCREASE 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 YEAR 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Service n .. .��1 i � I � f . . . . . . . . . . . ........... 0 i IV, K technical The consultant completely �s�hatrdhethe reviewtechnical therterits sectionf isthe t�othvari- ous applicants proposals. Grant time consuming and somewhat tedious, but the system is virtually useless if it does not perform as proposed. An excellent example is in the Miami Tele- communications proposal. Page 3, Section I ( attached) states that the applicant will use Oak L..30, Oak Mid Band, Pioneer VIP one way and two way converters. Since the encryption technique is totally different in the Oak (15.75 KHz Sinewave Synch Suppression) and the Pioneer (31.5 Y.Hz Sinewave Synch Suppression), the two converters will not function in the proposal as stated. These facts can be verified by the Engineering Departments of both Pioneer and Oak. The consultant who gave the highest overall rating to Miami Telecommun- ications has virtually recommended a system which will not function. Six Star Nielson does not intend to perform the evaluation that the consultant is contracted to provide the city, but a careful evaluation of each appli- cant's technical section is essential. Rates In evaluating the rates offered by each applicant, the consultant has chosen to offer two separate sections. The first section is Year I rates and the second is Rate Stability. Each applicant has arranged a different tier structure, for the purposes of comparison; Graph 1 illustrates per cent of rate increase for the franchise period, Graph 2 shows the dollar increase in rates on the highest tier of service offered. Graph 3 displays the average cost per channel of all tiers for fifteen years, and Graph 4 gives a dollar increase of the tier with the greatest penetration. In the following examples all of the applicants are represented with the exception of Ameri-Cable. The reason for this ommission was because of the nonconformity of information in relation to the other applicants. Graph #1 shows that over the course of 15 years all rates increase well over 100% with the exception of Six Star Nielson's, whose rates raise only about 33%. Graph #2 is a display of rates from year 1-15 on the highest tier available. This graph shows that in years 6 through 15 Six Star Nielson has the lowest rates of all competitors. Graph #3 gives an overview of the rate increases for the tier which each applicant has projected as it's most popular tier. All applicants with the exception of Six Star Nielson's rates are much hiqher in years 7 to 15. Graph #4 gives a view of the average cost per channel averaged with all tiers offered by each applicant. Six Star- Nielson's rate is only closely matched by that of fliami Telecommunication, the one important difference being that the offerings by the competitor do not include any -interactive capability. Once again, the consultant has managed to confuse the issue to such a degree that one is lead to believe Six Star Nielson has the worst possible rates of all competitors. Good business practices indicate that to loot: at only the first year rates of a fifteen year franchise is completely ridicu- lous. The impression given is that Cablesystems has the rr►�st attractive package when rates and rate stability are combined. A complete review shows that this is certainly not the case. The work of the consultant is to aid cities in making a responsible descision based on facts, the only fact that is apparent at this point is that the consultant has given such a distorted view of the proposals that his evaluation is useless as means of comparison. 0 • TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORR 6380 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 808 • Los Angeles, California 90048 (213) 653.0810 gedtioh 9 0 tt tNTROOUCTION Telecommunications Management Corp. (TMC), in its report "Evaluation of Cable Television Franchise Applications June 1981" provided the City of Miami with an evaluation of five applications for a cable television system franchise. The five applicants, in alphabetical order, are: ° Americable of Greater Miami (Americable) ° Cablesystems Miami (Cablesystems) ° Miami Tele-Communications (Miami) ° Six Star :Belson Cablevision of Miami, Inc. (Six Star Nielson) ° Vision Cable of Miami, Inc. (Vision) All applicants were given an opportunity to respond in writing to the evaluation report. Section II summarizes the comment and criticism made b%, the applicants, together with TMC's response in each case. Section III indicates, in TMC's opinion, the impact of the applicants' critique upon the evaluation results. 2 j It, CRITIQUE AND RESPONSE In Figures 1-5, the criticisms or complaints of each applicant are listed in detail. In some cases, applicants not only believed they were entitled to more "strengths", but that one or more other applicants should have received "weaknesses". This also is indicated on the charts. The right-hand side of each chart contains TMC's response to each complaint, together with a change if TN1C believes it is justified. Many of the items involve differences in professional judgement, rather than being clearly definable, as evidenced by the fact that the applicants themselves indicate completely different opinions on the same items. In such cases, TMC can only utilize its best judgement. I'Ft;llitF: t AMFk1CA1itl. OV l RLATFR MA17111, _. _ . ;; ... � : . _ :. _ .l.�ll' Ctlial••e1PltiF: AI'1' AVA11T t_RI-I'll1111: Rl{L'IIPIMI:NWF:U Itl'tH11;S'I'I:U ItI:SPL1Ii5l: CIIANI ki Ak'1'[ It ANT u't'llltltS t'Iti'1'ICISr1 CAIANI i1•: I:VA1.11A'1'141tl 1'1'Ctl nrrl.li nu'r i)'1'lllat5 11"t aavd.l ll,J.0 i0i1 cri'.l.c:rra Alrlrl ICd11C t'1.11Iu5 L11c uV.4111.11 1"' Ilnl .Il..:,l i hc!1i t: tLa:111S .flc: i uyC 11i1: iSllull by tllu l'Ity UR C,.i•{c::i C3 S L i. l'ha nlJu !italt.11 .1I 1�a 1111UWU1 :S alai Lli yullla] of lflu IIIUS( '(CI111.111U a'.ft t"1`rl lu:, 1 of tha RVI'. l lllall l t i a:.l[Itrll:i flit u(.uI JI lll•I 511ut11.1 I,a: ll:i .1 a'.,I,1c 'i•tl :i'; :i Lt:lil ill rll.11ltl . :,111:11'1l 111c I Ila1111,1 11.1vIn'1 lu3t> lU ttla: .'wduu niLy 1Jar Irl Ilrt lit 1'1.11 l.rll •1.1.11mit IIII1111.'1 (r•1I 1 L 1 a::i 1 1'ii1.tIH: 1.11 kl•(�l It:.t n 1. I:lal flit:, that tilt: Itf'1• c'.1".bility --- tliai , Ia 111c!it ity 11a•fri 1.11 1:'tu11.}• Ru.;a,ttrcus itdt t uan La, .i 1�,: ll,at: .'1111 i Y 5l.Ilullu_y11.t- llul ul.ul+,t1 ;L i i uua: (u ia•.! 111.11a:.l 1.1lrl .1 lta:t wfol Lll v 1. a'uu.1111•I �.: 11.1. PJ•,t I nal 11•.It 1:.1 Nt, 1 'I'lun It{'1' tr•1Utca Ca•.1 tf1a: .t1r(,16t[.UtC t1/ t tiul•(,l}r a1.0 ulotr11f.11 hall ati:illt Iu'I L.Fu Ch.tn 1a: I('(,1la:.lUL'S illl.l❑a:1.11 vl.11,lllC`;. .Illai' (.t:, ltta'allla' 1�•Itl�tilt:,f tiu.lna'�.It .:ImittLt- Iltl all .I. NCullw rill .lt I.,U I'll. t:•tlal ll,Vu:Aol . t S t t F 10 Ln :1 I;PI� IF li Il l ijhPllllll' iff'I�i I�III Oji,1711II' ��1�I9!�III If!gGlj I!,lil`I I f I�tt:Jrttt:) tiat,rw•tautn) sa hudtllu --- ',Ill tnu.,1 uIt :icttt•1111u V1.1a'.ai It I:1.1111:9 LII.1t "S t 11I: .,Illy I,,.r.11 (,l vs,:Ilt I y ailn:t.11.IUal a[ulll(,.1II1 ill lilt'. I�Ua:IJ1 tL11nl .11U.1 It It. III" II! a :., I,.11,11: .,1 1,1111.111UJ .Ilul uy,lt_t Iuy llti y ta:w na,l tll.ul .airy ait11a:I ,ti,t111.:aIlt Il a-I,e II.R 1Ia.,t tlu,:;. •,l'I'1 Ic.11lt ti :.111 .1111 t I. IIpl 1.1 1 y,.II ,:.Inch I u,:l lain :.:.tllcalulc vt: II, It vXIIIIIIlv,1 tilts tyla: ail I.aI tt,Iit1.1Ilatu .1111W1111u Iit 1IN: ....,Alit t •1 lippiIc.utt I:I.IIiltti tit.,I It t'.111 I.t,,vl,lc 111, nut 11), :,uI VII•vs lid I'lu .1lilt I Ic.tIlts Clv.IILvtt wiLIt :ittt:Il.it11s I,lul..,cv syitcm c„ apIcL1.1 I•IttIIII1 '-' yv,rs It. t:; :r,:;unu:tt lh.,l tlu: l'tty':, tl.un:lUt,t.: u.u1 tta: :;lt u,'l ut l:.i tat :ita::,'lly cutut,.u.11.lIr :uul :,ulr;t..,uLt.,l l•a'n.,it tta� lair .Ia:1.,'; .,1 111,i1'lal'( tut Vl., Ila:u, Ill 1111G taVl:li l., yl:.tl a t•nst raw Ia it c;u hv.lu I I` lilt St l.v Vlvwu.l nn,rar t.lv„t.11.1y t11,111 itl.l.I 1,:.Iut W.,S ctadttv.t wit it .I 5111.[11.l1. tl I to I I11 :. .It 11 . I'I,v v:;.1a t uuull,a.•r „t sail v ra: ots la I•a_n.L: III,uII t lw Ilwt l,a,.l of ,'anlltt 1101 (t'ait v :;.1P1l.ly, IISA Ik:lwa,lt; C-1Il I.Ir a'a.uIll a.•.i .I:.i 1 :,a:tvi,:v „t •I1- Ai,t.l1•'.ull ,,Isa, lt:;l_, slain,. IvI,:,:I, lit Itit- wlt,u.l a:.ltup,ty (I<.,a:ktvllat ,'.:Ill.•I 'I'V 1n .I I..,y-'I'V sv[ V ICc) . w ... ,IIIII Ir..t I,t �a.l Vl.lu:: YJ.Iy a'UIlLilnt.rll 1. tail APrLI.CANT -u„m.lt, tk 1 t'It.I n•l•. tltt t'tt.ul.lc n AITLIVAtrl• f' wr1t1111. Itlr:t'oMME31t)F.I) Itlitltll f hI, c11ANGF I cnntJl t: I<l::;rtulsr: t It IT ll 15P1 I'11 ft'nNl iI•V11kk5 A 1'VAI,IIA9'lUN 1'11A ( APH-ICAII Auttnaalutl :;.:I Vicos, Sl'ci,lal llit urest 1 ,u.lrauuuilltl Lt,.:.11 Auluul,lt.:t1 Luc.t1 1u I.11u.1Lit,u 1'Iu1ll,unmin�l --- V7.1t:., L.U. :;ul V IuuS Al,lttlwl It wi I I,ruVi.I ll, uut h, SutVit:uS. A1,111 wa1,L c l.t illIS 1-11,91. it w 1 1 1 I,tuvitlu Ib, ut,t !, I..41. Sut V l,:uy l,l 't; 11 11t: 1,111t,t,t 11.11 , uwcalil (at:1:u�S) t Lauu,rl a 11 ist. litt,vl,lu.il N.it t u.► 1t:.1I o 19u.1I:111 : s:; ahtn11.1 :it t ut1.11 h rl, , Ill rutIlt .1,. l,a.ic_; 4..-•11:, thu .tl.,l,li�.11tt t�11.uu t) ju..,I ut 1,11IlaLutl .ultunt.rtt:tl: i`. l,l t,I,,,st•s iu,l,t,t ttal .lit CuolatuaJ 5t:t V lt:u:; Ilit'lut11:t1, the tt,t.,l „t I ! :;�rvicus Ib ..•,t t a.,: t.) , I n .run1I..11 I:,.,n %Jt 111 .u,.,t ham, LIw '1 5t:1 V I.:cS tat ..:.1 .1c ...uu>I.1..:t .••1 .. 1 I'.,,lu i1') .,t 111u .:v.,lt,,,tl.,u t.::t �'►t.ttul�• Y, I I:;t: lltu It,t•.111y .,1 1 lln.ltu,1 � .,1.. :.1 l,•. tlu. .u.l,l t.:.,uts ,:. dI it I11"I I tup1 LL.: Lu.l t., t•:111,'11 t In •J t:> �r:l•.: r 1 Lt t,„11 .,nm1,,.•1. ut sulq�l ;' I lt� Lu16 � l li,. ti. "1,,..,1 .,t u1,1," I,.u,ncl i l lslt•11 ,nl .11uk,iIt l,•, 1 t11f .1I,I,l 1.. _ 1•t,.•,1t.,umw.i t,y „t lust :, I.,.:a.':,:,I ..t .1t �- E'•1•i l.ul vltu I,11„il.,ulwln•1. I& n �P�n?�i IlIF4�11 iliPlll1R91 IIqII 11 I ,,p ,,.�,,,�i �l'I'h��i,lll�lllillillGI�ICIi�IIIIUjLJIi'lillllh;l,llljilllll�ul��l I I I �., � I ,I Ij I (CONT114111-1)) I SM APPLI( 'AlIT IVAIMAT11114 rrIA-1 IjjL,!iacLivv :;Clvices --- itiLfulJCtiVt! ,;,,21 v i cos !;4!1 V I Ck! I ll:iL i Lill Ill. .;L. f4ult-1101E. Lhat thu tIj-sL IL will f t tillipit-Ac .Uhl ll,i:,, L:,S(I ill., . j'j.limLi Ljj.&L it Wi I I tjt tul.1 v,,tiuLy A-t A 'I'lit,'111t I wl t:11,1111t; iuSl.i Lilt 11-las Will, ,1117 h:--i ul I a I I L• 11IS t ,j I I I li.:Iv1tu JtII I it I I I I t Ia. I Li I i L;t c, t I tj will, t fit - , t tl,,L III'lic,iti"I - - - - - - - - - - - f ltvsvt tL:,l will, A :.Lj -wILII m, Ljlu k,,jLjiZj Lit 11I La: V I,, Wt lVc a t, ai, Lilt, 111 1'"1111 I it LAIC RPI, L IIIIII AaLcLi I IkL tC_luu ' 't ''It Cl a"'t Iva: S,:j V In 1,7.41it I l::i1_II1 v,- t ,lla:jtj,2.,; L , 1":,t I t tit kt.W, ti, th- C I t Ill 't Ilk I •Itc—Lut", I—' at lull L 1-:•11 '" ll"i w.at.cd, Ill I Lilt I . M,- k t it W I i It11anJ mina Iuit jL lit llllk!, t A Ill, I 7b� w ri(alla; i JiN91NUl_1)) Ilua,lund/IUtI, ,'tlnr i•Itu aL itnl , n/I.t:l ,ills 1• ;iL 1 ucl. 11 il: A1,I,11t'.ull cI"Iu,5 th•11 tIt, t.:c,.lta(,11i1: at._.t of MiaIlk I IL; su1,,1 1 cuult,lh to cullst i ltct t lt,_ yysLa:m wIt11 ,n.0 huadelkd. It t lalnls th.It a Stn,tlu h-1,1._.ltJ ItaS a.lv.u.t.ulus t,Vvt ltnlll i1,lu hu.tJun,iS ilt,:lu•liuy: - ,;tualut till Iah1I II.y Ical itlll lit ugIlIj'lIwI.l Motu oftu,'l IVu 1111)VItilult CIt . t.11.1, .,,.,:ltt ILy. I tl�l ll lit lultal, ul,t. tvla:u�. ApIll i. alit a 1.11m:; t it.tt uwnut - !ilk i1, Lit lu.Jtlit lc Al-ilI•t It.ty" huuu l ►slu,l lilt Lhu aulnlll�l y Shunt. 1L claiul5 that 11y I,cilty .t local .,i,ulal,lt it 11.1-i a Illa jilt a.tvalttayu ,Iv.:l al I t,t hill .t(,(,I t.,.111L 5. !t also t:1.1i1u5 IliaL I L S :ill,,II I S1Lu 1:; ,t11 .I.IV.tltla,tu. l•J.:.I K I.0 S:, Shuu l.1 I,, -- :it I ,+t1•I I II wit, OFSI,t1NSE RECOMMh:NI)ED RF:5Vt'1Ntik t ttAWK APMI CE'AIi'I' I,u'Cluats It t5 a•I rcu.1 LItaL a Si lilt lu Iu.rn i�lttl "a 11 1,tuV l,lu tll.tllll WiLll ,IuuCl I,I,]t Utu '111a11 ty. Iluwa:Va_1 utIll -1' fat LCity titt(l, a:; :;,_rVl.JuS .111.1 r.11u5 Uuln�1 c,aul,ar.tl,lu, .I lilt lltt(,lu huaJarU,1 ,1a:;1•Ilt l:i ,.uuil,lutu,i .u1 ..•1'iI t.lyas. 1,11i lu a tcl, ,:.11t1u 1 un5 'Iloi •.15,•..,1c:, ❑,.I`j l,u a:; l.,nI .1:; t•,t ., Slu•Ilu un,st „t IL.: ,Il,lu 1.at1,: atl I I hu sit, I l ill '1'111 l:, .I :,l t •,i,•1 .,,1V.1l.Lulu, t..t ux Illtl It t f t—Ait.,,l•„Iy .111•,W .t •I01) FII►L St cm 1�.: _::I.a n•1, :�1 t., y h1•Ihur tl u,luunatlu5 .111A ,Itat.11,'I Il..tll,ul ,:..1'•I,:Ity I1, Iht_ liltill,•. Tlw itI.11wl 1t.. (uuu,';' .ImpI1tI -I:> WI I I I,.I•_a. t.•, 1,..: _;I�.t,�,'.1 ,:1,,:,,.1 L—icth, t , .u1.1 t h,u nh„t lilt 1 hu ...tLlu I, ll L, t 1..' m„I,. t,:.1•;tL1, th, u1"11.1.11lt.1 Wl1I t . Utz I..t,t i L..L 1„11 SILu a1"i lu,raI ut:uc, a111.• .11 ,_ it, it ,•V:1IIt',t I„It 1:1`tC,:t I.1 .C:: .iCI. �i,I I. It I, t.11u CILy in it.i I;F't•, 1,a,tu5 12-1 S. N,I t'hait, la_ I lt, t'h.tnyt. 10 " 111ilimill r ..! • ...,. n.x.�. �.., rN . Cxi,CI,iurlcu --- Avcl •111C auhsti► iLCr katu- Ii.l:iic scl-vice r'r_un:hi sCs wi 111 w)t � Lhau '.i 1►11 In lus II Ill. itl. I:xiwriulce --- UI:;1,)siliun t,l t'IJllt:lli:iu:i Allplit:,ull, claims Lhat. its rat aru L)Lally Lnc IisLic wiLIIUIIt any sul,tcltuyu used in ILhc uthcr iu)1,)sals. L'lain,s tit.,t iLs talus .11C L:uwl,ul i1 ivu wish thu Alwl 1111111t;anLs Appl ic•InL .:I•lillls tll.lt t III:i ILL II:i LiI,I I I•I uLit 11„1111 .1 :;Iu.11cl rii.uni aru•1 tt.ut.:h►:,u )Vul 7f111 nll lu:; )I I•I.utt Appl it:anl W11-tt lus C. Ilutnlanuwski) t 1dlms 1.11.1t Lhu 1 r<lncll►sus t,Llatnutl au,i ,.luvul)l,u<l lt,t vikua, inc. wulu sulti .tLur Lu haJ It:tl. Lllu c 1111-rlly r!, I L I l,,i l I."t :Ili I!)t I Ibl l•'•I (ut) ' I1„ l I u•I i,•at t:•i wh i l c t"a Lu:; I,1 )[•)sal lit .11,I,I y I III ful a nuk, r!) Ch.,n• <: ft'an,: 111t,c nl,I u► may uul be ru.11lsLl,r, the a, lual rates uhal•►u,l iu systunls LhaL Ilavu hta:ll 111 )10.:1 .IL ►)11 IIIIlSI I,u ta11151ttl:I t:•1 IU.111:;L IC. A1,1,1 1•ra11t ':, ;rtll. �1 `, .,Vcr,,•Iu i :iuh:,t.nlltal►y hi•IIIL:1 thin Ulu „thus li •III atq,lt,:aul'� tt.:.It,:l ili,uui .1u:., I l.un IIt:,, .tI<. ,.)usl.t�Iu.1 _t 111•►lu :iyst_u111, +'it<unlu th<• .tl.t.li,.lut t:.ul Im 1,.IIrL:,I with )Illy )uu ttau••I,t t.Lr With n,)t,.: `, I111 wtlus •,t I,Iailt , kill Ich I:, at 111 .1 t,:l.,t iv,: ,,,:.lknu:,:, 1'IIt:. ul.,y L•_ .I v.tl I•l I.)Iut 'Ih- a1,1.1ICA It,II I,Wli n„1. IIII I ILIatU .1111 •li:,t ilwt i)u Ill )wlw1 ,lill,s I V'q —11:111,l l t Ly C)l ,11:,t•t,sit l�u, •.•1 ftan, hILit::i I,ulutu t ItlS lL,•111 .IS .1 an:.I k ;cite stability -- ;t,ac tulcio.&Su ,,, 4) ject i4ills ........... AppliC,3111 claillis L11,it Ili: I LvI tilli" III 61")w bit A ail t !it , " I I -I t U.,; I c I a LC 1:LIIl1II1IIU'i I j Wi. MA ililtsl.ict kvu flat w-slit : -",,I t %j,, I vI: U k wl havo) til miIi'll'! 7 11.1 Appi I'%jill cl'all"ti that 1 1- V1 I I I illclua..;u kl.,ilc Talus Mlly t.6',-. ,Ili , I p.ly TV I-Itus 61Y." )V,A I S YCII a ta . I t I. I .l lids t Il'it guilt kjLjI4)II t,vcl Ili.: I-t!A M'I 7 Ir im it usiu,t uuly iwmLh:j It a I !i( I t : I I I Ill., I 11. 11. Its ..11,1 t.LA I III] ux11 I elict-- 41 e. Ili Ls i L Lt, III hi'll"'t to 1),stjic tal.it) which ill-Ilics iLa rjLvii aj,IIuJt 11-it 11i'lic.11c.-I thotio 10 t i! jj t I I. a L WUI.0 bulk evellkluS all't til'l V11-7C '41'* 11C.11 Iqjjjju clL :Vt:lktic "It' wcakiact-'s rl"'Ill Hit.: yl�-117ly t I, I I L L t Ic Lint: it. I - s tin It t V tact V Wc. "I 6-1 Itc•) i, 11I.11 I nl cI tn,nnct•1 iuu --- Ilit ul - ,•,lnuuut it'll to Illlit •I CA,I :;ysLuw uul.tLi,.1, lu t i t y tJuu,ls --- I•Ia,yiSlUnS fill MiuutiLy I' t u. ► t ,l uuu l n, l Applicant- ulaitus that. all 1'►ol'usals a►u nt,t. etluiv.Elunt in this ca),actLy sint:u ►L alru.ally uwns au,) )puraL. -S systullls in l,ui•lhhut irnq aru.ls AppIt,_auL ,'I.,lltls that ilk.: t•V.I111.1t lull tails to Illellt Im, li In u.lt aws .ul,l Services li wilt t 11 t: I.t Ilu I at It. w.l ti 11u I. l.Jil'J with t.II ;I, -It li tvl of Iul ii-I uwny it thu :ialilu Sulvi,:us lot whit:h C ahlcsyst,•u,:. Iut:a'Ivtr,) Stiun,ILll a'1t_,lit ( 11:il 1,1 „v IJa:J) Also ul.11tll5 li thu Ilt:wti isl.L!,I ',s i t 5 wu.lknussus:, w,tl t. 1ILit uJ .I Slt,_11,ILhs lilt 1'.11'lu r!trt�ula•r1:1, t'fIAIJt;I•: Ilu l iuJlt:.Itc•J tJu 1 I lit Thu uvalliaL l,,ll rul.ut t. 1.:on:.I,Juru4t th,' appliu.luts t-,lutvalt:iL it huin'1 0111u,.1 to iiiLurC„ItLl—t L,., uttlt;l. t:,1111u SYSI 'lll:i 11 -1) AppiIuant was uta:,lilc:,t with ./ :;llasn.11ll to 4'ulw h:, 1,.•I, ut the Itl'1' tt:,lua:stLA I.l.al's i„r Ckill, It it, I,lo,lut:l tun .ulJ t St. it'll ,.I Oliva,t Ily Irtu.Jl.,IltlllllPl, .Ilul I,I.1l,i tl,l II'v,.lyln,l Illin„l II IUb III tubU.11 ,:11 .Ilµl Jut'I:i1U111U.1k 111,1 lit 1—:.l1 1•tt.•It.,w�llny.. Appl,l,'.Iul I,I.,V1't,•.1 ,ntl}' ., .,Ilc•-1,.,1.LjI.11.11 rtalu, LiC Ili this ru'lut:st, ,un1 LhiS w.ls iu,lica L—I ,m 1 I /. tlu tit, L'ha U•It: 0 I II ll'I ljll' III, I'Ill�i�l,r l�l I,,, OwlW17 I' I n.tnc I .t l t•,Il,.1l,i l i Ly it(•{•l l.:. 1,l a:I.11 flits Lh.IL l (:• ,•Ullllpl 1110.]IIL:+ l„ t,l flat l- :;'f :.1 UI,IL .,t a: Sl,�lt•1, out. �`J lt•1 .1:; i n,11,:.1t a:,t C l .t ono l h.I t. In Llw a:v.Ilu.,liuu. till:; IuIillll:i ill C,,p,111lLIUu11L5 1„ ulhul sy .Is .I I,uta.uul.l•µ- ul u•(III t`( ln:l ll•I a:I Iu11u, It 1:;. 11 .list, a'l.tlu, tIt.IL ha:r.lu:,,: Ih, tI, ,I,IIt ► IIt- .If,C1,tI ,a,11111,ItpV.'nt .1:i .1 (u'1 ,.,.'lit" .i,1a: „1 u,iully ,:•,uu„l I.,: ,fa:t.:t wiuu.l I„r t'ILtt I,!:• Ilutul,uu.w:.6t (Awa:t It 1:: atlutn.,rtl:. 1„ :.iP{•td:,l li,.Il II., aolululLlllunl 1:. 11I'll,ul 1.11.aU .lI l „I thu „tha:t It a:l.,1111ti thaL tha ,.v.tln.lL I,III 1: 111,'uJ It; i:A u11L in LII.tL I1.: CA11I.ESYS l'EMS MAW tsh,Iul,l 1.,• i :it 1 chill.', 'I'I,u .I[,{,lIt'.u1L'.i uAlkili1tlll'AlLS L„ ul'.hul IW: ltt,l ll Vl f,utlt Iluw [, 1.11,E .11111 tlllul, Chu I'biliIdiny I5 a(q,ruxtul.IL, lY a 111h1 IIl,lla'.Itc-A .15 bolt„[ „Iup1lLta„I Ct, Lhu t' I t '( u t I•ut t l .ut.l I c. I u,' 1 u.lu,t (.lu:..: t l Lual .�� �� I U l Its (•1 ut'u :. :.. ,.0 I )it'l l I L 11,•I 1 ho t 1 .Ilwh I Thu a":.I ltt.al luu ,11.1 Uul ,(uu:,l tut, .1(,i.11,'.u1Ld t['.tl,l I it y ttI t 111.11n;u Lit,: hti.uut a..tl,lu ►.uL u:,u.1 Llw u:,Lunt u1. uwml Lu,uu Lts t<. ul ia.t :,f:A cll,:i .1i ,•11C Ll11lla:•IL,•t LII UuIU— (..,t IIr1 t Ill kI..:I.II Iu:,, .0 l: a:,!: WI Ll1 1 ll,.tlt.[l.11 Clho 1, t:,. I l 1 t l ut: l h.tl Lhu .,i•i11 la:.Il 1,111ts uC Au,ut 1,:•Il,ir .,nal V"Ita,ll ali,l nut IIIOVi,Iu 111t Ut11aLit,tt,. siA Li, Lhat: a ::foul. LIW I.,t lu ut ,.utt,llti Lltluu Lti to u,illl ty 111,17 l,u tuli,ll,la. LII.III. ,ictirutl. (it, C IL's it, Ia. I A G11 114C 2 (C61i L I 111i APPLIVAII'll (At Ur I Of IV Tmv NeSPONSF. R I-:QI I EST 1-:1) 14 FICOMM F. M 1) 11,111 IVAIJIMAIIII ITEM CRITICISM ('11MI1;E CHANGE f'Afli; 0 T1 I I- W; APPI, WANT 0-1-11FIC; Omil ja I u s uquit-y with nut. Nevu It I ku I ill it I I, L;L I I I bv I it:vl th'it CapaljiliLy worth 11 pliopolt-ioll-lt.uIy 111,111 IL:vt-.] of luxilitli (coll t Imud) Cumpa ru ti; LhQ cillil of only rin,iricial -%manit.mill tiny bu -I V,li s)llu ut t.hu Ho, juts 'pollp of .%(,,I A Itituru vilikiliuLat,I I I Ly. A c-iopinlus With Lhu out (huVt:1ljI-llulIt , SlIsAl 'IL; Cablu- sa,a Lh s,f I I I •puti.Ill acqiii:ill ,I IJA7 ClAIII'AllicLi clnllpalll,.; tall -1 is I'l—I L sl c-ml "Ill --, Wi 111 i I :, --t-1-111-07 nkipj—t I —I c-list.11 I 11.s.--IsL.a Cludits Julio].]] kill, ILA Icl %I I LIj L Ill, n I I -jl, I I Is Izi thotic (hat Appllc.&M cl,ilii— that t Ill- I lit, I Is I I. I I I ca I,,IL11 Its .111, 1 111.11 i I. Is. I., Lbali :.ill I i C I ti L :it I I, I I-i 1 1, to Illuut. il!i 1111,111cial 11, a s, I L; 1 -11111;, t I lia 1. IL:, c.,11IIIJ Loiwjit- L,, j ii Isill 1!1 an 111111l:.It I'll. L,j Ill ov idu :,u I v 1, wo Cunslluctiun scltut}u 1 u Au tuula L�ti ::arvicus, ;;Ilu,:i.11 ]ututuat 1'tu- .ir.luuniny -- ::.1LulIiLu VIduu Atitt'walctl .,,-I vicuLi, Sl)t ci.11 Intulus LPl'()- yt.luuuiu•} -- Lucal Auluwat,_,1 ApplicauL clailmi that. IL is Lllc ullly at,lllicaul t,tul,u:;ill,l I.) L:UIIGCItICL, WiLltin LWu }'ual:i „1 awat,l ur tialichix, a sy614-:111 cal,al,la ut i,tllvi,liu.) insLitu- Li,Iua1iiI,svicu L„ uvuly I—ii- luuca, I,uilnu�s, I•tivatu J,Ili ),u1,li.: a•jcIi,.y Ilk Ulu City. At,111icanL clalms Chat it w.,!; ctuui Lull Willi 15, rathul Luau 111, :;.sLu111L,- vi,tuu :;utvlCI--i. fit 'IIl icaut claim:, Lh,IL lut 111dilill li all .:uunllulaiLy channul� dial_ wi 1 1 1 nL:l utlu 1 u:;l ua::;:iaqu:.i Whcll vi,tu.) lnuyrallsluirt,l i:i I"A hutml IIIUVit1u11, Lh,IL IL wi 11 111uvidu :19 lu,:al auLuwatc,t cll.snnaI 4A:, Il.nua:.i :,huu1,J Lti :..flail, ph YA:akul �:i:, JI„ul,t l.: :il ItJI•)lIl '1'I,iaj claillt apl,ust6 uu:sul,lltlttall lu, siucu aL I,:aSL LWu utht:r al,I.l iL;.utLS al:iu call claim Ll,c san,a c.11,ability, Lluuuylt Lhu u:iu ut ticl,aratu ruylticnLlal anti In,LituLlunal ILaLVJ(jtkti, plu:.i Ll,u a,lvanLa•ju 'If uuu cun- st 1llct tun l)h.lSu Illbtca,I ill p,:,:ilLly Lw,). Thu t) ,IiLIlILItua sc1v11:,: -it. 11„L Llnticatcti kin Ll,c ai,l,li,:ant-'u 1•Il.uutul itl,,,:atiull I)Llt,lu,. „I uI, Ow cl.11„11a1c 111,31111" ,li-I.JILAIII III Like .11,111 icat it'll 11111111.11`r . ThuL,._. al,. ,:Ulul,luratl thu .t:Lvi. l,tt,t.utu,l, tathc, th.ut Lhu "I„li ll:l-1,1a1c" ,Iu:i,;t 1t,Livu ulatut i..st L:Ill,:h I:, Il:ia,l I,II •Itt tl.11n Jlli:,a at,1�t 1,:aLit1115. ltnl .A WIwLIt,:I :,Illy.if I'll,vl,,I ,,, •1 .Ai,ii.wLCl ,lallt'1J1.,1 l,.I .1 1,n'J1 Ville" t JI1.IIIIIt:I I:, :;nrI1C I alit. L„ ,'I.slw Ll,aI Lhu i,.uluul LI t„tu hu.:..ul,::. .lII.,Lhut aitLumaLutI VIt:c, %.) tI1.,LIL Ill,ii,:aLll„) Itic ualurc owl ,,:Caul III lln: aul,Iltt.lt, J illt"IILat. lun, ICI unc U1aL i:; .11-1,Lill Ic. tsy IIsI .11•t,tua'Al, PLI, J I.Ii1s.I .I villa„ c.uuaI .l I:l I ',II ,:h.nUlu l:, I:, c. lit va ball L,) l,l l„tt aII1111I I1•} Jll chalUlt-l:.i. APPL1CArr1 urin.11:, Nu Cltallgt- Us lChau,)u rIu Chany� 4 a I:VAIMA'1•itlII 111*1'71'1 i AtltmaLud :;el vices, :Iia:l'1.11 Intt:tc:.l I•li.Ilanuniu,l -- I III I'o I t tall A tl t ilb.t L u tt Liavl Ul lyl uaLluu I.1 iyl aunui n,1 -- v I tlui 1,.11. :;,-;I Vice" A►PIAlCA1419` 1'K1'r►Vt1►: [tIt'iIMMi.11ill+;11 RECIIIr:S'1'1;11 �; CIIANG. Ith:5►t1I1C;►: Nr (1'I'IIERS SUMUM Api,licaul claiul:; Lliat iL was nuL .;tc,litcil wiUt catLyiu•.1 %JEII, :;link. F1.t1k:ul kutlitL:i, TheW1,un'n' :i t'I,.u,n,:l , t111AA tJu.,t 1,,:1 :ic1 VIt•u, a1Nl 1llu I,,,S ail l,la. Uma: i1 I'.I11'l,I<1. t:l l.11+l la.I:i. It aI Lilt cI.I llu:i Lllat- In.lt,t,li 1,l 1aLc eIhl la:, i 11,1:; Luul, Ill a,:a\1 1, ,I a:,ILu,p,t t i l l-111" 1,111111.,uuul ll,I l,y t Ile t:iu:u ,i Lasa t ill Al.l,lit..11lt AaLlus that. IL ll.l:. Iuun t:Iuditu,t WS iIII \I LIell-It It i aln`i with C•Iiautl •1'I'I ,111.1 Vi I„u t'.Il,lu uVull L{1 II,Iil IL `Ill f. w„tu ncI Vila,:,. 1t .1I:a, clallu� li1.tt IL tllu --valtial-i-M Jill Ut,t tulle'.' i L; i :t tuI 1lvl IIIut a Ililltb it I,li,lt.uumllly pet Wuul, til.0u l .I7 iLllut at,I,l ic,ult . 1'IIACIt;I. 4J,:aka Ia::s :,Ix,ul,l i•: :;11„n,1tII A(,t,li,ant- w,1:i cr,r,tiLud WiLII ca[ri.l,�u tit t•JFrI) ((•I,. 5l - Ft. I..,tid:rt►,Ilu) a:i a l'A 'I•V :; t .1L It,1+. Call i.ltlu t.r Tit.willlcell':i l'11.11111�' I W., :, 11i1 I lul It it, c I Lllt-I L{tu .It •I•► Ica 1. l '_, ,'11.11 ILlul ,Iu i,lu i4 1-1-p_uu ,Jl IptIt'll. The- I,tui,,,:iu\l u:,u "t tit,-- BGCUI<G t:ll.11,ll,:1_: t„1 I„1:.11 . Itll „Illy tl:,l :ieI VI1:1�:, %4-IS II 1i I1, t :.1,ut:ltl�;.tl ly lU,li\:at1:.I ill tits: ,I (•i I,L+UI '-, 1 l„(„....,1. Thua(,(•1 I,.:.11lt W.l ,71—ill. Will. Wu.11 ln•I lt.I,t.11 I,,,:.II . lilt,• tit. I t c, I —!I`., I�',:. 111at 1„11 t,l .tit t„tit.1I-1 (•11,t11.1111411111.1 W.1 l„ l:ltII lilt 1111' CLILUL1.1. 1,.l1.,1Ii11'.1 lt:t Illlt,�att',1 ,:,,Ilt„I111 IIt tlla_' 1,:(•„I l., till_ Illl:lll,,\II,It„I'; I,1, t.—I lilt. I„ (Ilc Vat I„11:, a:41LcI I a:.ml lut.,l t„ Ill.it.'.Ilt• tit,. I1 I,: I.,t IYu I till•, L tal.c:c. IL .11.1.,�at:,1 , v_,I1t,. t n:,tlluL llw 1,titluiad Iu.UI :, lout 11 t'u{, t,l 1u1:.11 I,t i111 .I11,p, l.11t) •, :, :1 :.I•,rC1.,1 oliclnitll it al,I,lIcalll ANl.It.A ' Ad,l N, :;t4un•it11'• V* 1'1GURG 'fit tCt)nLinu�a). _ _ AI'1'I,tt•AI4'1• Ckl•1•IQt11: ItI.-Co 1til•:Nma) _. - itEQiI1;S'I'I:I) itl'::;i'tlgSf: CIIANGG AI'11 ICAN'1' 'U'1'III..I.Is t•It rr ll• I :;ta EVAIMA•I•Itkl 1'i'i:rt L•Itnru;l•: _ A111 LICAfff u'1'llla<S S1tun,jL11; Natiy of Lhc pro jucLt- Chat aCu I,arL „t the .:t utll Lair Atilt tiliu .;tCcti, L1," 1 A „licaliL C1a11115 Lli.IL iL5 Act:uSs Nnci l i l is ' I I _ sh„ultllu .i ,uciai iliitiativuti" Catt:,JucY .,rt :iul,l,ulL ,h,llar cunnujtm,:ill to t:uulinuiu.l S Muir U,s I ililuthcr t:att:,�uriue;. au•1 :;ul,rnat. is ,Ilt:atul Lc. lulc.tl tll.ul .iuy t,Llil t .tl,I,i►caul. 1'Iic 40 ut l,u.lycL all.,.r,tutl t'j•uclti,ally %J.Itr.utL an a,hlitir,u.tl 1L also t:laitys Lhat OW' jl.t,hl Ill,ty LIutkgLIl. :;urvice LU 1115t. i ttiti oils :iUl,ll1 tit i C.I I. i uu iu,li,:alt,i .i:; ILs ul,ul.lt.lu•1 hu,ly,A tut I..tt. au,l .n:,u 5•,• a IiuL ill,:l u,lc :;Iv,: 1.1l I,I l„I I.U,UIi i UPI Iuit-i.tt.iVu:,. ,'I.ttuc, that with ll„i:,,. ,:uuunituu:ui:, Itc, hu•I•I.:t. Alq,liCauL .:1.111uLi that. it II.i.. l,ul I,uull Cla'•tllu,j %Jill, fill ill, It: (:;ll.il u,I) IuLl,lul,l I.,i instilut iuu.+1 s';:;la:n,. IL a l :io t: J a i u, l h.l l it ua:• t •'t ,:iu,i1 L�J ultl, .i :,Lt �U•It 1, tui I,,uah]c Lu thu:,.: that ,li,l. ,"a I,I IC.1IiL :I., 11,,, LI,,%t 11 I t 1•a' aI,I,11t:.11lt I,11114,5i11V1 t.r I,1'uvi,ic a,r.Ltu:;sahtc Lu a l I :;uhs,:I i hcI s ah,.Vt: I lic itt:tt it ivcI�aI Lic►. ll also t:I.ilm ,hat Its I l 1+1' :,t I uaw t:h.uinu 1 t:al•.u: i Ly ha:. tult:u Lhu ca1,aciLy tit .1117 nlhul a1,I 1 i,:.lift. i Sttuu,µh S Sll,:uilh:; pl,l•l it:auL ,:laity:; tlt.,t iCs ct.wbincti suL- sLituL►ullal Iwt%lutk is a CtaU•}t►t t .,LI, Al..ul ti.,w th,: ,l u•II� a.Iv.,u L,,.p_ „t tuwv 11,It 1.,1 .',,:.1, 'Pt•1,' cami•,t. kild he 1'ivvuti till ll,plu.,.:huut- 11.:1.III th,. Iflit I'll i,I.I Ik%lill Lu,:u1V,_,I lh.: tli.u:imulu uund,t:r ur :,t I a u•ji 1,:;" iu LIli:; ,:.,t a'Jut i . 1'huu: u••+Y I, „llu V.,1i,11Ly L., Ow, at,luWcut Lhal i,t„- vlllitr) :ll 1 :;uhsCt iht:t:.: will, _,l, aat,lr,usyabka / ,L__.,:l.uol,lter ,:uuvurL,.i Is ,1�:;llahl�• Nil Nu 71 lgll'f II 11 1111 11 1111°i �I�gl�lilhl���ll�jl'll' C' 11 ii rj� ipl ilpinghipn Inllil�l`�h16�Rilf!llli�lil llulilf�l��Il�fq�Illl!!IIl���ii,lll�%I illy !' �i T.II M@1��!'�1� CII.Allibul Applicant claims that- it was wit. ciu4it_ud Willi builol thu wily applicant- U, picil-Ono Iall- salv by -(,ass tv,lt_tlltus till lit Al Ltillik It a I ::i. , c I 's I 111:i t 11-11 M I 'kit. I lia Li I it L bi Id, Ic I cd silt I I ull I I I I It, I n I o pk 1 1 '711') .;u t I 1,: -,.I 1 111 !AaLltm!,, tildlikk alld t 1A4, A th.11 t1wy Applicalil that at ll.i:, lip:.1.11--alli .will IL claliloLi Ih,IL ncclij,: ti,:i amIA I ii-j L71miqiiez; ind I lilt,: suh!,cI aI %ji I 1 1.1 lv i dQ clogill,. I CM flat., i L I U!a cLili,:Ilt i.1 I ly u. ju.1 I LIIu Alaer appliCalit,ii. 2 Stictiqth., 1. 1 ha AppI icant rucuivutl "tAIuIIqLII!;" fl,t- all ateims u.-Ccei-L led"I'd,1111:7 to tatul IiLu earth L;Lal iow.. 'I'llc 1,11 1-Sulu by-jla�ti bill it i -; a still j --(--L i Vu tluuSLiull as t,) w1w L lit. I this fca Lit I u wart All Ls .l t;l,ucial It Is my IcCUIVIIIII %Jill I- Lull L,, ck,mmit-- 'It whcLiwi tistfici,a1,L wilt,: Lti,1q,iLm,i Ili t1w I I.M11— ql iL Iliq ill, tti 10t) I.M-, till I --It u_.t I t I,.-. tt,L.II .-Ikoltll. I J't 1.1.. It,) .Ji.1 I u I tlu:la t i,l-Ilt 1.11 -ilid tli�t_ I t uL loii.i I t I, I I w It::, t I .%Ij,w I Ly L 11,Ati :.}:,I,_:,, till I C 1, Ll2 '.111 1:1: 1,.1 Ic6 11 lUlil-'U:a it d cohl,f t I tnc3LltlitI -I t.,� Wilu L Im: I !111. 1 J I ' I VI 'U:, Ili I It"L I t tit I,Iia I _'iU L V I C ,.i t tit it— lit,: I I. I L I i c.a I I I ',' t t I '-, L I t - , t t I i, - w, I I , , I I ac 1 1 t'd t , Lit. L L it t I. I w- , . it .I. : I L hunt :.CL Vll:a" I tilt I.Ii ly. M ig i katu :;tal,ilit.y -{ hate Itic ruatic 1•ru juuLiunS kulaUult to City 11t.:t.Ati A1,1,1 icauL claims LlIat :;im:u Lltc ki'P acyuit—Cd Lltu as�iUutl,l lt,lt ill; a TL IiiflaL1(,1A Iat,:, a culn- ulaLivc nu0linaI AM: tc.1, ut 264't, i:5 lu l,u —1—tu,l .Ittci 15 yuats. It .,lainai that- it., taLu Inl:l:ua:,un atu t:I,Itsi:;Lt:ttl. with Lllin 1,101cl:l lun. ApplicauL Clalllts 1.11a1L it W.1:. I IttY,1 Iu,:L ly CI---ditud Wll.l, „llu .it tcu,)tit anti uLtc Wuakuu— W11I lu j F i!lulc 18 ul tl,u uV.t l ua 1. I4,11 it clalmd Lll.lt Wlli lu I llu t:V.11ua t lull li:;t I11,J ,I IL:; llw Iluu,l.; of 1.1a11lll is lumlul l.t,au .,ny ✓that 11,111icAllt., It Ill Itr;ult illcolul,lulu arnI 1iIAL; atl.l i t l calla l t u:5I,oIt:'c.. 1 :,t 1 �9NIt tt i nl I,rrnµlc: 1 :�I l,-1P1111 :,IN ,111.1 lt: S :�1_I.11•It.1 Ci '11I1c a1,l,uaclt L.ikctl is tua5trn,tl lu ir, Lh,AL 1,11 u l lu'tu.l c ; atu 1u„)uctu�l to ItOLCll the �' int laLiuu fa. tut . Must ,thcC a1,1,1lcatiLt al5u t„uk thl:; a1,1,Iu.I,:11. tnl,. .11�1,Ii.:anL, .�tx �Lat U1�:1>.�tt, l,tulc�fuJ l alu iu,:t u., s,rs c„ns l,lutaL ly 1•..luw tiro `) t Iutlat t„tt tatc. Lt ttw c 11t11ju.:ttun5 atu I:.�umc,1 to Lc tcali5L1c aua I'll tul,'caLlu, Iln,y W„ul,) tu1,t ,.ul .I sttun•ltll Coll,J1,11-1 L., l ilu ut ltut a1.1,I i,%.IIL:,. Thu .t1,1,1l,%IlkL W.t[; AIW"11,uct.Iy t.:full Atc,I wII ll uuly t :;ttuuytll WtICII it :Jlluul,l h.tvu IU,:uiVu,) 2 1;t.LcIN).L115. tvt, `; rlu ClIaliqu :.iC tun,l Lll ' 1•Juakltc:.:. JLtutly[.1,:: 4) Lm a III Tri 1 I:xf,eriuucu --- F•ranrhiscs with more th,ul miles It ),►.,ut Itata: St-.Ihl I l ty - - - ILILv I IIctd:a,e pro )a:ct ions Ahl,licant claims Lhat its I,t opuses I Matta: a ,1 i sL i na:t iull ►,e t.wa:cn inalivialilal Plana -At hul.lin,ls .Ind sysLuu,s ul,uraLa,1. t'I.,ims that IL ltl.clatc:i ur is aa1l:iLt tict. i U,) III flu (9) sysLctlt:i WI tit un,tu th.t1, ',t)t) liliIus of III.ull f,I,1il la:.,uL ,:taint that It It p1U �ca7l a:,l lilt I,,IC in171c.,sa::i• :l.liws th.li by tit it ►zill.i lh-, 9e I Ill I.,L lltn r.,l c 1 uyut c,t by till - till 1,1„)u,:t iu'I it:i a-x(,._n:,ca IN• it t.,1a1 nc,tuss.lty lu Its lest,: teva:Wt,•s tlt lttts�t th'. lilt I.II 1„1t Itt It .Il lt i.,ln i tit,: SIX 51 .It IJIa:I:,,,U I,t1r tutut.,:i wclu I,.I:>a:.l ,.1, ., ,1l 1 tcl tilt. t:a, W.ci,t t h.ln ItIt t c,llljl a:,t, Wllll Iu:i1,a:CC lu I IIT test. ll,il, .,It,l .,tu Lllasl ,.ilttu 1,1,1. coll.1'.1 I .I h I c r• )I:utu•: 3 M I AM l 'rl I.t:-L llrlrlUlJ t(A C BUrt Ic.l l� ua•:;:i ;t I u11.{th �h„u 1 a1 La st t urn{t It Phis atlaim h.ls slnua v.,l III ILy, sAIWC tl.utlhl�cs .)t'.ultutl irt,lel,enllctitIy u l,l ,,etvic.:,l by .1 , a,uuultn hca,icrlal ,{cncral ly a,a aaUnLanl .I5 ., ilU,lla: sybt-clll. IlnweV}r, uun:h ltt the lufltrwatl„I, L t ha. in its a.t iLt,luc ,l tnh,l u,,I t.jlt l I to lh„ .11111 icat-111h, su,.'11 iysluttts IItit—1 111 t1l" I.,uI with a l„West Iullc,,,1u L.,l.,l, .,t ll_lt1:.1 .It .,I l I w: lh.,l Itit l.,l 1u,1 ,a l > by ,I,1,1i- ya:.11 will tayuLIU 1u,:1,r<,ici lu ta:VCuucs. 11}' II.,Va:�t., L1,>: .,Lar, ly It flow iJlul:..0 I.t„f It.,l.la. :.ctvl.',':, :11U ,Iw,:l•,(�,. Ir.ul•I I.. w.,., 'I'I,,: .,(�(,1�,,1, 11 l.,l;alt Ly .I(•(,11a'.,ut t.,l:cu I,y .tl.l,:. tn,u .,(•{•l11•.u,t, t:l:; ::l_,1 tlia:l:�,u, 1t11 _IL tt,l,•111. Iu,Wv;'ut l't")" ,nuuall' It llw:c - Ilta:l:+.,la J:, :,Illl,a_.1111,`I`1111 ta:1`IL LVU :.Irn11,1 cut1,,,:u.11.ta:, L11,:y .lilt , :1 ulll„1 with ., ®1 r] s n,Ic I'h.,u {, 1 I t4Il.,I,Sotj CAISI.E.VtStol" Ul 1,11 AW, APPLICAUT 'it IT Will' ENDIA It I"( 'OMM 14 1.*(-)l I V ;T FD CHANGE I F. I.; I K PIACAW1 I I E HS Ali- CIlAfJGF EVAIMAT I ON ITEM I c I SM APPI, I I - CAb-f IIAL" a j 11, 1 Lilt � I I , p 11, (it With t lie t I ic t .1111. ll'iti tit,! It cast lit- r11 awil it s at 11/111 jjcv.11ll.lt imp .Illly I'llltll t: L I t It- littit u IUlcl.nct kv.. L t w I y it j . I I u ct "lit .-A 111cL A it ill I:i lit lit, .VA I I k.'s lit I vuli till: I11•Illt. :al L I It' ItWu 1•llll lug I V. -11 1.1 'lloulill I t mal'.1ijultwilt C. at 4*1 w Elm ILI:LHIii:;'rI:I) I l'It1'1'It'1SM t IlAth_1: INAUTA'I•14111 1'1'I:Ft nfll I i('Af9'I' IU'PIII;R , ` I'Le uuly t:uu11I111 uwnl w.nlc Ly t ite .iilht ia:A tits :,n,l the l„rr i,,ti i5 t„r the init ial ia,tes, I,Irin•l whit h ra Lt: will Le held c:uust.ttlL. F:1 1 luny-t.lntle I,l a iaa:l Ian i .,t e a >t lInala: , uuntlim:ut s, .un1 I t t htu e Is fe,Ieral Itul �. „l :.1.,1v 1,lucull.Ll.ul „t t.tl.: I, .IS •tl'f't:•lls y ;ikel, th,• ty well h.lve t:lthet Iltlle t,l n„ t.0„vci lututt. IAtes. ilia: 1 III .1,i 1„t rill 1.1 u r. I I Cc,l , h-it '114 L, I .,l eS htlL t h.: Illll l.,l 1.11 a:� (It"l ..�a.•It It•„.lt .,ula:c t l„,1 „u•Ih.,t/l t ht- 11l I t I-, 1 I .,La_'i •tl a' hI•th- ,t,lltla:n,lth lu In.,la:, tln•1 tLe It,WvI.ILt. 1 I1,:1 a'.ISul,, evvll lilt ulr lh It l:> t::+ll a:llH;ly Itntl,ttul th.11. .11,1,1I,.,I,t Lc li. IItl,l he `I t: ., i,l,tl.,l Illt l.,t lull i,.ulla.l It,j be use.l (t'.J ,,r Lhe ltl•'k'1. .,a:tut I .,� t'J1 L11 ., )� 11,t I.11 lull I•I,:lul .l r.tte tn,:teal it: f'1"Iat turl �,n t,•lst, �a:tvt,:e:, ,Il,l'a=•,Is hi'Ihlyue witus aw, WALC St-11,111Ly Al,l,lic,utt claims that uuly luukiuy it Lltu f I sL yv.lt Ilit et' tlttt:a:n I,,Ii fralit: Isise I,It)vIdes .Ill 1u.lta:ut.11� l,iattutu I,t Lhv lul,•1-1.1IPly r.,te:i. it a'I.1 lllli (ll.li: In }u.115 t.-15, tI,,,l tt has Lhe IuWI: it t:,te5 utl the hl,lht:st t It:l .,v.11 l,tl,l.: IS ,,I,ly ,:luat ly Ili'sI, MIAMl 1, ye.tIts I.tte, l u.:t e.tae ,,huuL iil. will I,: .,I1 t,t lll:l .1lll,l l,:.l illy 1•1l a::i l u,•l u,loe well I've[ 1111►n 1'll.11 111 ye.,l:i .!-Iti Its t.l Lt:s .,le 1„weI lll.ul the ut IIt:t .1pplla.,tlits fat the tier I ,l I, )CC ell .I i Lv i wl Llit: m.,->t IL,t ati l t:,I I CA CHANGL At'I 11t'Awl LI'1'ili':It:; tit, t'lla ll.itr 4* w st,l)III St IUJt. IU1, „I tiystuln --- t',)nvul Let IttA.11 I-ll to City Uutvls -- 1'tuvlsiuns Put Minot iLy 1'1u,,l r:,uun i n•t Al,l'1 want- ulalols that the Luc hnic.Il lout ill' ut I. Ike VA Jl,l,llt•Jnt.s' lrlul,)y.,ls Wei uut 1•uu� Idul u,l. CIJIIII:i t1lat Litt. llal alkl I'tlllla,rl tJullVut-t,JI S pi "I'l)saal It., Il:,a I'y till.,l.1 '1'a:lu-l' IIIIIII, Ilk It:,I t. 11'It:, 111 1 I' I t „l l I1,:. iiL ,:IJtuc, - 'I'hJt Vlslun t'at,la w.,:, t:tt:'IIL' aft WIt11 1,1 tat 111.1 t) Ill! llt)I lly l,tu,lIJlnnli11,1 tiuIViCCZ, a1 11 c.,hlusystuuts wILit (Int: Wlltic It- W,Is nut ,•tcdIIell wItIt ul t ut in,l SaI V ICUb, •) t,t wisIS: It .Ito Iln• nJutu as I'll.)! Vlsl,nl 1'.11,lu IL. 1't,,Ill- ,:,t :,ln,tlt)b 11, II,IU,)1 I1y . gIJUu1111 la:; trJlll la II III-- It'll I,, ,•n I a•:111 t.t t,,l ut l,:l In•I lit nu.l I l y 1,1unt Iu,:.It lul,t, 1.114:, .Ilk J,bltt.iun.Il LitIpliu Jn't 11) vl,rwln'l with ,'II.It J1fta:l 'lalla1.11111:,. lt'ui,l 1 nuu't) tL,t i ntl l,7.,1 u,1 :1.,1 I lilt 1''.t l ' ,1 lit 1l 1e11t;.,t aaf tit) it1 l'ha uv.1lll.It.iull t:un itlata,t LhuSu ,'JLr_'Jut lus t'h.ul'I, C'h,tn'I„ whl':h tha t'ity iu,.lualutl In Its KI'F', an,i t,1,:n:;u,l ul,uu utlltt fuaLult�',-11(a:V, t n,uL.t IMP, 11 t.,t in a,.,.:h l.II' Yr In,l t'•al,..I In th,: 1'I,a ,it.l Ilit Lit. IL L►la t•1t.uu1 'l'l l ! Caul I i La, lll- III,:J11 f lll,l,,:;:,lhl.,.: h1•':.111:,a „I 11,,n a:1'll,(,.ILtl,u a''',I1 .11,. lr,,n 1:1 All.l'a1 11111' a. .,I,••'':1 t,_1 :, l:. il,,t .1 i,ac'1 t [ l hu -If )ItVal t,-1 ,'.tll ,I'V "It l� .,1,:'1 h-u'n,•1:, ,•I ".I, II t I,rl .,1, 1,1 .—t- I,I ,,.11 .1l„ 1:, .., I.u,a.►"I 'Itttcl uIN ly 1,11 tlltt,'lunl tII;I:, t•. L1. �_t.u,l•.ILthlu 1 w t t I, 1 tit "I,r,:l 1 a l :.0 ! I 11 1, 1. It .I I, al t"n 1 1:. III•II, .,I. ,l IIt 11,1. MI.m,I 'It'I .,1.1,11. l , 11- .I , „I I it': kl'I• .,I„ 1 I 1.., 1 I'i ::tuli .,l.I,lll:.ut1:, t,1 'J,::.aIIL1r l,l.Itt� t"1 III II.1 ih•I, I,I,,. In,; t. 1„It .Ilid li., II:ilit l:;D 111u "I 1..1Itb „t uttu„t ity Ill ,,It uumlu�i, ,I"t l t inV„Ivlu,f util,.,t it lus Ill Iun1 JI' It •,n,i '11'a'I:i l'){IIU.1ti ln'1 lit I,n'.ti l,l '.b1t ,11111t111,.t i,l'I•I la;.,lll r in lL,) tit'! .Ilk"it •r t•t ur t'1tu:, •,W1 I,„1 It'lu�: It,i 1n11 .,. ,•y 1u,lu.l un,l a ,1 t 1 s,:l l y to it- aul: Il1U1l, ) ', aL,:, lit t.tn:it tJ1 )a:;l,"I,:.,:, Cl,,:y .,1au tul,a.,Le,l ,11ua ILalns tIIJ1. wul u 'r1 uti I t t:11 ul:;awl,ty u, su,:h�Js cat" I I.l.lu I'tt.uu; (ISE:'I', t.,t:Ivit.iun, uL,,'- :�i,,:,:i (t'')nt Inuu,i) 11, . t'hJ u11t. m Ul r,� jljll�ilI � Ituldtiutt Lo city licutis I ruVisiutts Ful Minot iLy 1't uy t awm i ny (gent in1110d) - That. Visit'[' C,LIe tut:�ivta Ct CA 1. fut Initttll.,5c of nlinut iLy IIlu,ltict.lolls tut tts Family I-Il'Vic while ,my of Ulm •11,1 l I,'.,nt:; tuunl,i ,,Ise pll l cha!, c t h'--sc lnualuul ion, I'll I_O. vI, Lituy t'.11,Ics'tstcuc., in .'Ic.11lu,i Willi sLu.►iu lu, .,l luu In !..Clio .I11,1 h1.,,,1. .,tc•,� whl I,: nul :;y:;t,•u,s .C1,: ,a:Jlla:,I wltil v l a: W 1 11 • I ., 1 I t .: 1 1 1, I„ 1 1,.. .I ,'III:. 1 :; i, t l l ,'• 1 w I I It ,I ncw.; I.,uln,•t I.,I, I,1 u•Il .,lll al I.t,ltu 5L.,l 1uo ll,!I'•i, whllc it Is nut ,:t,:Jila:.i wltlt u,nuwILLioy tltlft lit.,l.l1, lit 1,•Iuw.Cvu n,:w:; tl,nl. t,•t I..". Ilt:v:. SuIvI,',::;. (Cunt inuatl ) 'I'hesu .tl,l,li,.dnls wt:Ia: .Cw.,nl,•'1 "sCt�n,Ilhs'• un tllt Lads ut Chusa fa:.,Luray ,Iltu, t I y ,lucsl. tuna>, not larsl.unsiV,, to Lhv Futm F 7. f I,, tic ILcllis cl caIitc,l ul ;u4Jhccru. l'•, 1, �- �l:lit :;, IIIVuIVcIIICI1l I.li,Iv,:l, hll.uul 'Pt'I wlu, t it tun.! ., nuni,l util a., 'uuuuolty I.rul.us,.s t, IUn,1 ,, ul•L1111 t, 'I'1.,iniul L'cut,:t . pl,I.l to .u11 al l,l nut I,t ul,,,au .ur; L,,lta•1 i t :, ul thir. ty►'t'- 40 w 3" [1tll1i«1il11l11���lrjilii hIF 1 �i AI�11I111NI���1� ��� �I� ����� ����1111� iip�i�giiCli�j�. �s. � Fllillltt. tt (COTAT WUGrtI AI PLICAliT t HITIt!ttf{ lt4:u t1Mru:rrllUa) - - itr;urn::;'PhI) C11ANGG ItP:SI uri;;l; - U'l'lll:rt:;.0 Arr•Lu•nN'r 1'1'Rt•1 t•Itill, ICISt1 t'Nnrtt;t•: AI'Pt.fi'Atl1' tVl'111:125 tt_t's k; I'VAI.t►AT1411l _ As - k NI twat. sh,lul•1 l,u .Iw.0 thu - '1'Iwt.r�•{uit�llluut5 -tnl► ["Itl•Ilnll.u�: of uu 1'uutt ►tl.:latiun to Cit; ,nll {,iucullur.s tlfal vutllltl ►,y the ;;UilkCHIC „[ they n1.rf L� q ►,ulicics to tuull,l}( with lutl:a .It I,tuyeuL, .tltllull.l►, E II'uvislul,s t'l.r wutu .l�si,lllu,l Nt't' Itul�s null kulul,,t 1011s, J y„l,ll_liul-,• rtillutiLy It list: o tllt t ,nlr 011t. if tf •u F/U.,ktll t.11tlll� ,►IIvLlS ►.I 0,11.111f10i it, t llllillti11111b LU ►l 11u1lrrs5i Wa l't w. , li•� t ! ,.1, 1I l 11 ,'J.:.1 1•ll►.11.• .N:•'•""'y '. . It:utit vt .w,_.tl, JCc 1l 11u 111 C,11V r,ll -t 11 t f l,y{lunJ {.lit I•'1L'��, ►,Ill :lt:._, ll =+�' It ,1111 11,. - nli11u1 Ity l:l lllt .11.t wt tu tlw kl•'1' t.:1{uvst. l'11111:utui11,1 t•'il' t,tl lu•{ 1 1 1 u. ► I .1 I I I I U 1 11 •►. t L. l., i i 1 h l � iei I I. R;lIitF. 14 rntstt: uF rlFnare FNC_ vl.>Ic1fI Iti°.t'tIMF1CtiFlftl� • ('Itl'P[ll111: nl'Yl.IVAl { CIInNt,L It Itlf.krlN:;F nl>p1iICnt9P it I; 1;m At fir: IIA n111'l.li'AiPI' u9911:ItS UVAIMA't'11111 I'rta.t i+l't'1 iCdllt a:l.11ws lI1.tll It is 1•wt�ral t'uunu�I1L5 ,_d5, yunlc iu ul,ur; all (u.11lty which Wa-1 Ila,l. n(.a'U1t11:•II I}' I UV IuWanl, IUa:illai lllal: - } - N I II.1In:l •l i `•-l(i., l,l 1 1 1 }, - _ t, lyt, �•l yl.'111 (ra:l t1,1111J ila:a: - 111/ (rl tell l I l 1�{.It I1,11 •Ia{•l lll_.l .,11( Il.l lla'lll:i 111.1 •IIIt IIa.l lt`l 1 tilt l:l t IV,: - Iar Ilt{ J'! :it. l:lll atll•1 -� r tir•I a;I IIUIIII IIIN'lll _ 'I'a:I l:VI5Ir111 'll ,II1111�{ 1.1.1111'I I .ir•t a:UG11i11lIIlUlll tlrl 1. � Ill:;lltlll Ir�ll.11 .tl::ra.Itil.11l•t - ltut a'r,Illllll t-1 a:rl i nail:(ruu.11•nt 1'ul,l ia' Aa• .. . i ut {n rl .,L1 "1 _ �1•Irl ,:,,IIII❑1tlllr till t1, Iala[tr Illl:. _ li,-itcm LA At c-111 -tlll'-•111 t„1 tlw lilt I,t Lll.r p tl.un Ilis� Ia la'•�I IY t 11la• tIt I a:l l.luna:t I,t r Irl rniul:l:`1 (�1 „•I, •11111111II`1 _ I•l"Virll rn{ Illt I,nly tic till I V,:1 = 11 :, a:l V la:a-' j. I.t 1II.1 t lla.: 1.11 'tl-:,1 :it •ll t _ .Illat lr{n'i .11 111`{ I,tl.lr {a.•L h.I _ F 1 - I•.11• (rlrrr{f ., 111111 I Ilrl 5 i t'1 uV 1,11I1r{ sl VII:IJlII�{ a=at llt ul-=+ _ uu,,t ly Lwl.:u as w_,uy ,Ins ulllvl .tirlrl il..,ut 11 El F11FIRIPPO-p IM NO............ PIGt11tY 5 rCtMVP 1Wilil<U) APPLICANT Cii{'rt(pll: RIiC(IMMI':r1t11{lt ` Iti:Ultl:::'1'1•:II ItI:SIh tN:a: t?IIANt l•: L ALUATIO11 1'1'1<ri Cli 1'1' 1C I SN 1'IIAIJI.I: nl'l'I tt'Ari'I' i(1'1'llPat:; APPI. WANT 11'111lat:: :It•,liqu AI)I)itcauL I L:0tIVC1: lit tl,aI t,_IcLcxt 1 AuLuowtutl AI)I)licant. claims Lhat I I wuakit, r:!:, I,,, 61 t.tn,t ycty I.:uS were nuL cI e,ti Lai, au,l Set tiul Vlta;S, Uttatinq as lucat autumta Led SII')tIIA n•1111 I't'I Thu Icl aL►Vu mt:t i L S lit "vutL l,:aI IitLut'Va l" La Sul vices (not. Il) iIWIutlintl tt.:; St 1, lt. W tcicLcxL Vs. trill -tIMU -111LuluaLc.i ,:h,.,uu.;is Stt,_n.IL11 Illtci'aI tulcluxt 5ctVl,.u:9 tt,1,1IL h.,Vc u,)L yet liccn JcLutlilt ttu,l, au.t Lath I'tu,itamloiny --- 1,,:ult:ii,tul..,1 use cui - Local At1L(jW.tt,:d .I t.•it i,• Automat u,t ::C 1 v 1 CUs, Special lulcluSt 1'ta,lt.1,11n1iliq --- Iull,t)I tc,1 An(,)Iltalu,l Appl IcauL claims that It tS tot futiliq 21 itit l)utLu,I altlaWatt l Sul viUcs, licit Lhc G Lital I:Iu.IiLu,I with. Applicant- clainiS III.IL It Lih.,t1111 I,avu Lcutt Lilt: ably MIL! ,:l ul t t "t Willi a sltcli•l.h LCCaUSu Its nual ly 51J•t Ili,lltut olwratin•1 hwlyut and Slatt c(1n011i1111UtItt: lh.ul Cal)lusystems arnl Miautt TC I ,h.ntl•I L.: ,t I,'it•1111 t'It.ur 1.. •It.tl,y,: 11.uui 'ih:ui I .t l I IUIutt::iL :act VICeti -11u Ill,, ltulc,i, the ,ll.t lilt N I, .II ru-cL I lJhll,: .11,I11 Ic.lttt t,t :11)u:,ca ,1 111.111. .)I)ct at I11,1 I,u.l•I)_t IL ais,. [,tul,aScti .J I'll":•t ':"0"' Lu,itict L11an cith,:•r aI)pi it .utt ;. lu huttt c,ISuy, all[)11,:ant"S I,tul.aSal Was .ul,St,l,rlu,i a SLIuIII tit, a14)1111. W1tit athets auai,l,:tu,1 .IS SLI4)n.i. 'tt.,u'Ic a ,LI t:n,1t1I ,'hftn.ltr t 1'h.ut•{. III q Ill! II II 1iui� i� pn AcI:v:it; I%sciliOuti -11111 :;jjppt,jL -- L "I lilt 1:'Itlipilluill st: a v i ct-s Hil,claCLIVe -;v I vicuti :;c I v I Cc lu lutAlt It IiiA I Lilt iuual Iic1 Wo I K mi la ayv ll,:il it lit I C ISM CIIAf4GV AIiI'IJ4--A1I;I' Applicant- (-),tillIS Lhal- LAW;,: ul,uI �, 01111 litid-p-A is LIIJlk Ally (it I hu , It llul tll,lt I t s j(j'L tA Lit I S JAPill L 1,:,i I ca Lu,i Lit :k:.btJ I•I I ) It almill li'l t ul,tvsunt- t, .11 u,ILU L itll lat 11111" 1 Ill L 111,11, 1 Ilk' ,iLli-A Ippl Ic.mL!— ClLlilf':' that Ili, -- I"', CA, It "I thu 'It it it; Lit- 'I'llY 111-1 ":"'It lit,) I lic ()It ly I 1111C I.l-,V4-*II that I I awl 1it11y dL: Vu lul.ualC1111,11il I Ill, lit I I, ict—it iv-- C.11131l1I I t itpl, I I k7,1111 C 1 .1 1 Imi I It's 1 -14, I tit i"IA.1 I II,A w"I 1. 1 :-. It"t ,lit 1", I,ul I'A .,illy It . 4*1-1111-:, Lh.it- I I :; Ly Is Ill "Itcl. 1 11,111 11.y thk, ,Lhul lti,: III iL:i •lilt) f.111Z, aual it to VLd%lJI L I Wt:.IIj 1,::;:v lit I ( ..nIl C.At I. . I I., L mmalm Appl icJ11L W-kt' crcklitcd (.kI,kjvc) rtIr the iLLx U, of t I VC i Lik'li Ilu AL; a V.111,1 ,I,l it 1,.Il I It 1w I L 1..t I I L 'rt)Ck lf-1 �L:,: it I L11,1:11 clal 111-1. 1 ll:..0 Ll,.Jij I Ilk, ulll-, t I A I I I I I %.JLLII tall C- uLtal ly —11 L, !d t,IIIt :II. I I'll'it I, Itlli lk Al, tJhu(hul it Z,Ij,pkjI,j I.,; clIANGE APPI-WAII.i. rJu Clio I II It-' tit, cilaltqu cj.,im Lit -it a 11dl-JI:1- lit) L,tit Lilt 14,0*-, ,:V,-'l J 1. %j,,, t wjO, r0l il,!,t itkit itQLW,,I E 1 t wilt:! JWIL-, t I :ailt 4* Cm 1'It;llitli 5 IClrtrl'l14Uf;lr) APPIAt'AlIT CRITIltllE F:VAI.IIA'I'1t11J IT"I Lit I list 1l.UL I 011s (('taltinuu,l) All CaLu•{ 1 i,•:, t'haIliac I t'aI„u: i t y. (Itcsi,luut 1 .1 1 IJutuul L ) (' It 1'1' Iv ISM IL alst, cIaluts tIto L Is I,i„lutt in:aiLitLiunal I+lant ntllua'lu I tilt sc l -vaL I Vc IIL:C,l it Sc i L Itas ►n-- .lu,iu,l only t11c ulilc.I•{u tl,r i nLt:i,:unnci:L i n,l .t 1 1 Itul+l i I: I list l lutical:, t+illtin IIIu t'iLy. (A. I i lmi that t, ❑ti 1u 1 II lot Intut,'„uuu.:- t iu,j tllu I•I iv.ltu iustituti.,u:, :;lunl►,1 u.,t I'c itl, Itt.lul to tltl nulw.,l1. LIIc 1:11-;I s f„t ,"iWA t IWIL i"It I IIu u:,ul i11:,lu.l,1 ,.t tlt,_ I•„„I l,: ,1 f11.uu1 . r+I•l,ll mit. ,:I.tiuc. that 11 "t:. I'1" II,c iw,::t L,:tt11i11,),1I Iy ul t 1' . ,slum Just,ln ut .,u'; „t lLt 1'I,Iint., 1llat it:, 1:.0 „t luu,1 t„IW-It,1 .tlul,liflut t,:,II- null ly,=,It1'ct L, toll,, lU un (dt :at t It tat ion .InJ sln„ 1 aull.l 1- i ict , •I ,ra,lu n l l III:,i It ul t„II .11 nrtw„11. .11t tvl,luu,�,• ,•1 tllt:,. hl.l.l t,:aul ,:lalm:: plat I lt,_ I.I,'1 t It'll- It. W, ,+I I't S(I IL,uuu l c: „1 lur:tually t„IIu,,LI_I I,1t.,IIto Ll,n, i,1►11,11ly .ut,1 Ito, IIit! ,:,,1..,,:it, I jI 111) nnClt tatanuul:; II,, Lunn i,{uuiu,l. ttl:clins�rF:i► - CIIAtJt;F: Ic,l uI.1 l'I ..v 1 :, 1. A, :.III n11J t•: I,•t.11,I..,I ,. bt I,'IVIt I, I'11u al,I,llc.ulL was utc,Iilu,l wtttl �ttuuytli L.Itan„ in all ul,-t:a[u,luilu:; It i u:L t:ta,l ;atullItc L:attIt taL1 11 tl.lur,,„n'. ultl lu ltl- wuLuI 'I'VI<ul:,, von I,L,t:ut tlu,ttal.lu L„ IcI :,t4c", IL l l,it,vi.iu TVku+:> .1t all Itu►,s r.,Lttul at than ,t :,iu.l l,.: IIC'111U 11,1. Ht"'ll•Ilu „ttt:[ In.{ taCllui Lltan IJu t'l,au, c .nI Inlu:tuul �ystulu ,:al,at,lltty nl+l. .tvat.tat.lc 1 t., „Ll,w al,Pl it:.u,l. ,. Ay suutl, 1l 1s u„L tulaL,!A t„ t.ltu utlulLc, I,t 6 MI z 'I'V sl•lrt.,1 , IIIc ,,y:,lcut t:.11t t:.li ty. r LM ��I'I?lyii,��!!'�Ilitpll�u oii! �Illul I�I'Ipglwp�lllpll �pllllplll9�!1111}Iglplllllll',I' wa•r 1 rain:l,� _ _ 1'It;Ulll: 5 - •rrll�• rtF._ct•t,r,::�: Itha'tlhthll?11P,I/:1J Milll.l['All'l' l'ttl'1'Itt 111: C1IAtttit•: tJ'1'IID:R`; It l:5F'alrl`.;It: A►'I'l.li'Rrll rilnr�(�r: t'Itl'I'It'1!31 A►1pL►f'AtJ'P U'1'lll:It> ' iI1 tJu I VALVA•1•I1111 1'I'I31 VX5 t tcllFtutG with ,tlunJ¢t,5 Chalrl u APplicatit tlwL ►t wa:i 11„► 1,a,visl,nl; all suk,eaLcyi,�lCs•_ :iUl,lll �tlt'atI1,11 A cant claims 1.1 'It l ul l c,,,ii L fut :,14,a1,t I,u 1` t (it systun1 yI Vui r1,1,p1� tllu ('ut.ullLt.11tt,tuwLlu.ititiutfulula- 11t LuxLually tt„u. l:lalul:; Lhat ►t:; I<aaJi.11- I al:;a� alla,w lllu .►,u.ItutiL Ilu►, Uu51y,1 alll „►,bt ll:alll UL Jl:.1 :,Litl'1 l:uu1 lulu oat I .1� as wa:l1 tu„ :.II.aLi I tty _. . IJu 1 tha• city. Lill la/Dt 1t t Isis u1J pay 1't l.11l. jl: _ - t l la t a but t u l 1 i,l 1JI,I la: tJa,ull,tR►II.) t,► lc a►btuach, :➢l: t V 1 a:u I,lay I- .Ih at l 4► U t.Ill i- l'V 1 l .1 s, , Lc •1 1'tt:it it 11c.U1L ,: I .,1 m:i I't' I,Ia.vt.Ll IU,1ll7_tt v.l ruustalurim► uaa: 1 t Itatu:i -- ►'''+ „11 „I ,,,tl:.; uu.t 1`= uuLlut. -- I'V ;il:lVil:u 1 ;„u►.,I ln•I ttla: dv,ull,t ,,,y butVi.:l::, heat_ t l:v.11uvuL7 Va.l : t I t,a t_I 1. a:ll 1,•; tllu {I.a la,l 1 ( •� •1•►Ia: t1111 ttlat .1 la:l.lLtvul•i lU.1t.'.1 l.Ldkl: tlt ►:i will 1J1 ,I :,ul.:;.'1 Ilul:,• :,lll,'a: nuu,►,u, „f :;uL:,,:t it,uls :;ufal l 1,.'a::i uC ll a 1.11lll tllat It Il.lb I.11,'- :;I:I VI.;I.. '111u ta: Ill.ly 1Ul, stl Ull llli:, 1,0111L. .Il:i„ :.,1. 11tf 1Cdllt Ulu ,1nly J �•1 r.u{w11►►„e:llt to I,Iuvlall: Illuallluytit iuclullil,.1 all .,t s Itua: yutviau I,y :,t• ua►:, a,t it Vctn,al L,cl via:u I'I..:t _ _.. -.. - CIIaI111u . t la:u Iltll 't'llt:.; ty cut. ticct_ "flout t,, L" "IImt I.,1' a:lauu to ..- _. (tI,I,111:.111L cIa 1111:; Lllat II. %J.l:, :,14,111,11.: alll:ll,J ttl Ita 1 u 'it.tl,llity tn,.ut,ua.t.l}' a:Iualttual waLIk ,1 5t{all'It11 It.11u livaral,tuu tatu ,JualatlLcu 1u tu.1,1 „I —._ „l:at Llltuu yl:.t, yu.lt.11,tuu. _ r� LIT 1'VAI.IIA'i' I t rtl 1'11:11 kale Stability Italu lllt:l ua:,u 1't a iuct i uu:; k,.:ldLll,t1 LU L i Ly 1luutis t'It I'I' IC I Sri Applicant. CIaIIMs that St:: slat 11iu1L,uu tli.l Ll„t take tul., a,a:uuttl t hu ki'1' l u•luust to 1 A, lulu a�,:uuut. a J1 int lal iun ta..tut. 11 ,:lalw� Lhal a `,n-blll I n,'t ._.Ibu in 1J1 u� Is tlnlu.l1- l:�Lt,', ttlti lu ,.u:;l� atu I.tu}u,'1 ,•,1 iq.l,l ll:aut. CI Ililt:, that IItu un u1t;u,L im:uttu,:Lly L.thu l,tt l:,1 thu ,l tull,ILhs .ur,l tins 1]alu.p,ty. t4l:Clln::;'1.1•:11 CIIAUt;I: Alti'I.ICAtl'I' 1tl'1'111:14S fF d lldhCat,'..1 111i:; N kill; K 'I'hi:, as;ucLiuu may hu uurtu,:L. IL is IIIWAuat whulhul Six SL.Ir gduln n Luck thu 1JL lutIaLiuu taCl„1 iulu at:ut,miL. It IL dill, LLS Ill u1,1,5u11 luwut L.,tc iuuCmtsu uul,l l,u tun i,lurul a CuIaLIVu SLrunylh, .tLj5t111tIn,1 that. 111,:y w,..tu cuCut,:uablu. CHANGE nl'PLICAr!'1' I'tYGllhltS tit Ch.ur,}u L:Il.ut.}u t ;LtullyLh , l l'tuaknu:�� b u L SLLL:II L I I l Ll '''IilliigvII pU III'I911!'lliillp!II lilll'IIIIIR6�II9li'i'!'Il9ili RR 1 ! rRil .' R'R�Ipl�lili lI�RII'111�IP';Rlill,gplllgRlll'911IIIIIRiI �I'ill� ll I II"lll� °fII I I I I I I I� 30 - _= RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Figure 6 indicates the impact of the applicants' critique of the TMC evaluation report, in terms of recommended changes to the original list of strengths and weaknesses. Again, TMC urges caution in assuming that all criteria 0 40 Americable Cablesystems Miami Six Star Nielson Vision r 0 0 TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. 6380 Wilshire Boulevard • Suite 808 • Los Angeles, California 90048 (213) 653.0810 % �% 4b INTRODUCTION . • * * • * .' A. Scope. . . . * . • ,� . . ti B. Evaluation Methodology * * *`• * ' '` EVALUATION . . . * • A. Ceneral. . . . . . . . B. Evaluation Criteria. (1) Financial Capability • • (2) Construction Schedule. • 9$ (3) Technical Standards. . . . . . . . • 88 (4) Origination Cablecasting (Automated Services, Special Interest . 88 Progra-,=ing . . . . . . . . . . . (5) Local Origination. . . . . . . . 89 (6) Access Production Facilities • 89 and Support. . . . . . . . . . • • (7) Interactive Services . . . . . • • • 90 (8) Service to Institutions. . . . . . . 90 (9) Sophistication of System . . . . . . 91 91 I ULPL (15) Rates . . . . . . . . • . 9 (16) Rate Stability. . • 04 (17) Regional Interconnect Capability. . 94 w . " s INTRODUCTION A. Scope The City of Miami issued an Application for License and Request for Proposals (RFP) for a cable television license in 3anuary 1981. In response to the RFP, five companies submitted appli- cations on April 10, 1981. The applicants, in alphabetical order, are as follows: ° Americable of Greater Miami (Americable) ° Cablesystems Miami (Cablesystems) ° Miami Tele-Communications (Miami) ° Six Star Nielson Cablevision of Miami, Inc, (Six Star Nielson) ° Vision Cable of Miami, Inc. (Vision) This report provides an evaluation of the applications submitted. B. Evaluation Methodology The-RFP issued by the City contained a list of criteria to be considered in the evaluation process. These criteria are enclosed in Appendix A. The City requested that the strengths and weaknesses of each application be listed, with respect to the RFP evaluation criteria, but that no numerical ratings or applicant rankings be utilized. The procedure herein follows the City's request. WK 22, VALUATION y A. General ` Figure 1 summarizes the information submitted by each applicant in response to the RFP, which contained standardized question forms. By its summary nature, Figure 1 must condense or omit some material contained in the applications, and therefore is more of a comparative guide than a comprehensive inclusion of all factors. In the summaries of strengths and weaknesses that follow, all application material was considered. B. Evaluation Criteria Each of the evaluation criteria listed in Appendix A was considered with respect to the strengths and weaknesses indi- cated in each applicant's proposal. It should be noted that in many cases the strengths or weaknesses are relative, so that an applicant may be rated as being "wean" ccmpared to the other applicants, while at the same time this weakness may not impair the ability to construct and operate a cable system in Miami. The rationale for evaluating each criterion is given below. (1) Financial Capability -- Figure 2 indicates the perceived strengths and weaknesses for the "Financial Capability" criterion. (a) EquitX Resources -- Four applicants provide share o ders' equity data indicating substantial equity resources. No equity information is provided for Americable's general partner. On a comparative basis, this is considered a weakness of the application. (b) Debt Resources -- The doc,,xnentation included with the applications indi- cated all applicants had adequate debt resources. Therefore, no significant differences are seen. (Text continued on Page 88.) I y II + i FIGURE 1 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION INFORMATION _ - - �-- 111Ai:1 TF'.IX-Clill"ll:1"T1•M14 Tg ,-d �4. y loin IC►.•CTIIIN Al 11NN1:RS111V ANTI CIIIITRnL 1Npr1RN11Tlnq Ap1+Ifcant Namsi A.hlrces, Autlwrized iie�esoriEoAlvc ---- -- ------ Ovlwrshil• Inforwallon (a) IdentlflcAUon of Homers A111:R 11 hHl.f nF' 1:1!1:/; rl.R W Ar I Amelicdbin of Greater Fllawl 2011400 S.N. 167th Avenue Niaml, FL 11187 Charles C. tlerwanows" Gencrel Partner O051 217-7996 —_- r -- C1+.lrles C. Ilrrmanovakl �01 31 Ste0len P. Nnss 1t Richard C. Knigi+t 6t Geonie Munn° B1 AF,raham .iauber Ehrenkranz. Ehrenkranz, (law firm) Part of 401 Schuh : Kenneth E. Bell part of 401 part of 101 Fred R. Sullivan Tisch part of 40, Laurence A. part of 401 Alan V. TishmAn part of 401 Robert S. Birch R. Tisch part of 40% Preston Ilerbert D. Filed part of 401 part of 401 Stephen M. Peck Rltterman III pa+.t Juseph L. Albert 17171e13, JI. of 101 part of 401 William D. III partof 401 Arthur T. Silolln Ills II I AIII' Cahlesystews F11.+m1 1460 Brlckcll Avenue, suite 100 N►aml, Ft. 1111► Philip B. 1310 president, U.S. Cahlesystews Tile. 110r+) 159-8928 U.S. ('ablest' stews Inc. Sol 41 Tiwmas r.. Galldgh..:r 11 Ilcrbert It. Levin 11 E.Ivard I. IA,,"Ion It Paul p. lla�vldal 11 Donald II. Reed. Jr. It Garth C. Reeves, Sr. 4iami Tele-Cuww++nicationw 5781 Blacayne Blvd. Suits 10T ylawl, Ft. )1117 Paul Alden vice Pres►Jent 3 01) 7r1-8200 TCI-Taft Cablevlalon Associates 11.51 LatarO Alta 1.01 Georgla Jones Ayers 0.251 Ilumberto Hernandez 1.01 James S. Blllinns 1 1.01 Alberto Cardenas 1.51 Juan A. Del Cerro W I,Sa Rarael Elortegui Martin Fine 4_01 Richard C. Gerstein 1.175% ourton A. Landy 1.51 John I,asseviFls 1.51 Alberto Loy ).0/ Cvello Lay I.51 I ill David Lizarraga 1•3751 Robert Paul 1.01 Will Saillnes 1.01 Joshue lligh �J u 1 1pi Jill p 111i Jill pi p iPII I!II'Plp� Ii111dRIt PII�111:,?...: I�Ih + !IF�� �� il����41iPP�PgIIIIP�,'I�IIRIiIj� II�--• � till I'l IIII III I h I��Ill llil ��q,� ii + q � li��li�l � �� l� � Illli IIII �I'�,� � � � � p K VISION CAnr.E OF MIIIMI, INC- vision Cable or Miami. Inc. 1550 nlecayne Boulevard (Sulte 605) Miami. Florida ]]137 Nlchael S. Willner vice President 4212) 759-1500 Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust* 311 Newhouse GrOuP. Inc. 41 21 stilly A. DermellO 21 David Blomberg 21 Arwando Collins 21 1lerechel V. Green 21 Barry Kutun 21 Linda merawan 2t Robert McKnight 2t Carrie Meek 21 )ulna Meyer 2t Athalle Range 21 Alewnd Skellings (' Total Equals 971) • Share!iolAers of PCST• Sidney R. Kne[el 27.931]5.201 Geor-le I.. Lindemann 4. 16t Michael S. Nlllner ].16% 691 Seymour R. Askin. .Ir 1 Richard M. While .16 1 uM. Shulman Arthr .629 11.00t Pas�ela T. 11a-1 Charles E. Diets .001 Others not indicated r 4 a A r i i � ICI � Ii�,�II�II�IIV � V�VLIu, li FIGURE I. (coast.) _---�--~ — AItF-.113C IN•1: ►�! t:p.1:Arj:It IliNll CAM :rut:: tunnl—�__�-- fates is I 1-taft Cablevlslon as y {a wholly Ib1 rttganizat{one or l'orporations [wninq It or mute lntnrest gtock Inf�trm+ttlon hat St nnauru lbl Stack of Cot,,,,' t,on ll Class of Shock 21 (nr Value 11 vote i.cr Share 41 Ilnol>Ar of Shares Authori:eJ 51 e1Ui�K r or Sl,aree imbued bed 61 "'z. r of Sha�I Stock old rs 11 Tutal Hu�l+*'r Icl Olin r uhl ly•ttts or securities o„tIvor I or out etaiwllnq which boar vutlnq rights (A) CuMro1 by snot het cut porat ton or Ic9i1 entity --- _ wholly owned TC raft Cable Coel ---- --- Cablesyat""S roc* is owned by o[ Taft Or'jCastinq U.S. steels Inc•• a py1Cd suValdiecy Tclo- N/A trs Cai,lesy nattered Cow1>'ny) end 50l owned by a wholly by Ru<1 owned co,altanY I,OaJ9 os en p„bllc\Y po�le[s Cal.lesYst"1°s Inc• Co,n,aunlcatlons CaoesfCt Ipievelops�ttt In Canada• potters investments awned subsidiary turn wholly is 54.2t �crs fatally owned trust Corporation which ,nlcatlona- inc.1 Rol• owned by Tele-Ct an and te' Taft 0roadcast{nq COOP'" ubllc Wmd. n,r.unications. Inc•., are p __._--- - corporation lFlorida► pac titer sh it• N/A par tnccslt\p class 1: Cass Il St.00 1; N/R $1.00 O 1Qr000' Ut 661 10.000 661 � l0.000 661 Not ►edicAed Not indicated No lio Miam1 Ta1s-C�munications ►s Cable- Yee. ICI -Taft CablsvlalOn partner. U•S• controlled by owns 80% of its Yes, th0 General isware Associates which was of its total eYstems Inc•• is' a ers stock andration wholly owned by Pool voting Cot po based ►n ?oronto, stock (-able Inc.. canada. FIGURE 1 (cont.) Ib) Organizations or torivoratlons owning It or sore Interest Atll:RicAtsix 1► (:RCAwat IIIAIII--- - N/A __— U.S. Cablesyslems Inc. Is wholly owned by Rogers Cablesystems Inc., a pnbllcly owned cnmpany headquartered in Canada. Rogors Cablesystems Inc. Is 54.21 owned by Ro.iers investments LW ., a Rogers family owned trust Partnership Ito Yes, the General Partner, U.s. Cable - systems Inc., is a Delaware Corporation wholly owned by Rogers Cahlesystem Inc., based in Toronto, faoaJa. 0 r k NIAHI TKIX-CIMt1IRIICATRUM TCI-Taft Cablevislun Associates im 50t owned by Taft Cable Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Taft nroadcastinq j Company) anti 501 ownwi by Tole- Communicatious Cable Cumpeny (s wholly owned subsidiary of TCI nevelopment Corporation which Is in turn wholly owned by Tel e-CommnnicntIons. Inc.l Taft Droadcasting Company and Tel! Coal Ica tions. Inc.., are public Corporation (Florida) Class A Class S 11.00 s1.n0 0 1 667 10,000 in 667 IO,000 667 10,000 Not indicated Not IndicA.d No Yes, 141ami Tole-CommuulcatIons is controlled by TCI-Taft Cablevlslon Associates which owns 801 of its voting stock and 751 of its total stock • t 1 �� I l ill II � II'II��lIIIIi I ��1' �'! ��l�'II IIII'IPIIIIp�l9 �I�III���� I Willpull FIGURE_1 (cont. (b) Organitatlons or Corporatlona j owning 11 or more Interest r i �a .r Stock Infnrmatlon (a) Structure (b) Stockn 11 Ciao@ of Stock i21 Par value p 4) Vote per Share Number of Shares Authorited y SI "limber of Shares Issued of Shares Subscribed �) 71 Number Total Number of Stockholders (c) Other obligations or securities authorized or outstanding which bear voltln7 rl,I,tx (d) Control by arlother corporation or legal entity SIX STAR NIEISrNr CAOLEVISION OF HIAHI, IIIC. Six Star mialson Cablevislnn of Miami, Inc. is owned by Six Star Nlelnvned Cablevlslon. which Is equally by Nielson Enterprise@, Inc. and '-lx Star Cablevislorl, Inc. ram' Corporation N/A fin Yes. wholly owned by Six Star Nlelson Cablevlslon. Vltilnll CABLE Or IMAM[, 10C. lision Cable of Miami, Inc. 16 311 owned ,y the vision Cable Shareholders' Trust %nd 44% owned by the Newhouse r:raup, Inc. (which is wholly owned by Advance Publications, Inc., which in turn Is .110ily owned by the Advance Voting Trust a testamentary trust created under the last will and testament of Samuel I. Newhouse, deceased.) Corporation Class A Class S class C Class OI $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1..00 1 1 1000 Mill 2200 250 1000 1550 2200 250 1000 1550 2200 100 10• I •• 1••• 1•••• • - 10 local stockholders 1101 each) ••- Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust ••- Newhouse rlroup, Inc. •••- harry Katun (107) No yes, vision Cable of Nlaml. Inc. is a privately held corporation own-Rdvbllthe Newhouse rro„p, Inc. (441), on Cable Shareholders' Trust (111) and a group of local Investors 125W . • Information on local Investors total' only 22S. 150 shares of class i stnCt representing 31 of egu►ty not Issued. n N a: y "Y+ Yy7 s %c 4 �a1 �k Otr r i I FIGURE 1 (cent.) SECTION n: ONtIF.RS111P!it1Ai.IFICATIOMS j U.S. Citl:en/Cortxoratlon 1 TV Network ownership ' Local TV Station Ownership 1 lAiCal TV TrAl1131A(Or (ownership I,ocAi Telej,hone company (ownership Local NewspAler Oowncrslalp 1A>,:Al.la.lio Station UwocOshin NII:RII'Altl.li OF I:NI:ATI;It Itf�\fil U.S./ Partnership No No Nrt No tlo too I r h NtM11 TEt:E-CI)wRR1IFAEpIl191 3 c t'ABRI:SY :TE.tCA IIIMIII i �. U.s./Corporation U.S./ Partnershllr NO flu fb too xy tlo 2 No f;.. Yes, Garth ceves fit owner) Is the Ilo� Iwblisher of the Miami Times new9lHI a_ Yes.iterhort t.wln Ill owner) is vict President and General Manager of M7^A of '.. , AM/rM and Is a winoritY stockholder FM M� Radio .1_ Mlaml, Inc. which owns tynA � �i�" qi� �u� i n i u� i iu!io�io�"""I119�IV� Ih�!Slj sE. x „. � ��I!;�I�I!elq�a'�II�p�IPllll'lll�llll'hli,lllllll"Igll'll�ll I I P� IlUllallll l'��; i'i'f�;�IIIIi,I,IfII IIIIIiIIIIII�, gli;j�ljl��l,�llll llllj� l II11111111111111Illlllllll�il�lll���l I III I� I i I I I � II,I� III, I'I'I III ��glll'Il � IIIII ru t ?2C 1 (cont.) SIX STAN N/F.r.SON CADI.EviSirlll or MIAM1, INC. SF.RIfM_ Ds oN11EaSI11P (111AI.1rICATIONS 11.9. Cltlren/Corporation U.S./COrpotatlon TV Network ownership No Local Tv Station ownership No Local TV Translator ownership No Local Telephone Company ownership No Local Newspaper Ownership No Local Radlo Station Ownership IV - VISIOUP CAety- or 11TANf. INC.. U.S/Corporation No No No No tlo Yes, S.I. Newhouse, Jr, and Donald C. Hewhouse, Co -Trustees of the Advance Votlny Trust, each own 501 of the Corporation ownlnq the license to operate NSYR-AM and FM Syracuse, New York, NApl-AM and FM In Dirsinghaml. Alabama, and KrPA-FM In llarrisburg, Pennsylvania. 1 N 1 ' ;:; 03 �, i FII:t1F.F. 1_(cont-) ;:IaTpvl t': CIIARA(9'rit QUALIFICATIMS iConviction in Criwlnal Proceedings Liability in Clvll 1•toeeddings 1 , t' Prior Business License Revocation Prior violation of Franchise Agrcewent Litigation Against a Pranch,sln.l Author i ty f ,1tN:NIt:AR1C of Gpt:NTi:R 11(Atit No Ro —` t Nf1111i TkC6-CMMtIg11CA't'ttitls. IAIIT.I::►Y:•iTt:ll.`-r IIf:Allf=-__-_-1+- __ No MY 921 No No In 1919, ttlnncapnlle Cablesystews Co. U.S. Cablesystewe subsidiary$ brooght action in the llennepin County District Court to prevent a City council resolution resclndlnq Choir tranchlee award, The rullnq was subse.luently appealed by Hinncalolts Cabiesystems am npheld by the State Supreme Court- 0 as civil suit for unfair or anti- ,# owpatttive bnslnese Practices Not yet settled. antitrust). sxY No +ueccaaes penJingt one Involving an In►unctlon against cessation of distant illother norouyh carrlago of two of Green Tree, and tile by TCI involving cases brought the cities of a�` ar, against ot fferson. MD claiming violation of IcFifth. as"] - antitrust laws. First." Amendment rights and fourteenth Meven case various outer slate "Ift one for specific no longer Pe o for perfurwance nd dat"lvell- one for, c+emeges all Inverse breach of contract and injunctive condemnatloo, two seek an of earrlaye of ,,,&,rout cessation distant signals, one seeking an In$unction restreinte`foo ottfranchlse cable until cowl of transtor. and one to prevent reJuction A11 cases sett of subscriber fees. Nn, p,11p11 IQ pw. Vil l li l lu III,plilullli�@IR!lI,R31I!AIAoArPI F '! i�. �� � jj1.�ipiiijlq,l�li'i�'1���i1l11II;I�j�p�';Ngq� I��I1 I 1i Flf;URE 1 (cont.) 61=10N CI CHARACTER OUAI-11ICATIONS Conviction in Criminal Proceedings Liability In Civil Proceedings prior Ousiness License Itevocatjon Prior Violation •)f Franchise Agreement Litigation Against a Franchising Authority Prior Default on a loan SIX STAR 11IF340N CASI.EVISiON OF MIAMI, INi No • Yes, Violations of anti -fraud and registration requirements of rederal Securities Laws against a prokerage firm owned by a company officer and owner, Stuart 11arris. • Three major owners of Six Star Cablevlslon (Stuart llarris, Roger Maggio, anti Paul Skuleky) Be part of Cable/Tel were charged with having fralelulently sold cable television franchise Interests considered as unrealetered securities which should have been been tinder SEC jurie:lictlon. Consent decrees were entered. Mo to None VISION CA111.1 OF NIANf, Ifli No Yee, an intermediate Owner of the stock of thte Newhouse Group, Inc.. wag convicted of conspiracy to set ianimum prices for the resale of Its , newspapers (19681 f;a r�ieflil i I Ilip1111 ql1 11Pllp ,, " �� s� ��!i�a��P�,�Ai���ola�i,�'?I�I'II� II �IIII�IIIIIIIIIIIII�I�I � !!Ilil'li'Ili',II 9I 'illl'I � 'll ICI ���,� I 1111l1lt,ll11111111dill'III'�II�III��'iiil,Ipllllp�ll.�ll�l�l!I��'!'J�!IIPI'III',II����III�,�)11111"�III!,I, I I A I 9 r r' FIGURE 1 (cont.) - -- — — — -- -- ---- __ —_ ---__---- •--.. __ c�)u.rns e.rrer.: If1nItE H1N10 ?F.P.F.-FtlFlilllil[@Nlfflilr: 11111:1111'A111,1: I)t' r:Il1:h7CR 11[,H// _�— �ecruwl u:_ rxrr:1111:ex:1: - 1'nuar.�rr llz IN)1_._ItIfN_�5 - — 25 Cal.le systems in the United serving ing 1 290,000 subscribers i7 aberOsr Current Cnblr. Systcm Iw1dlMls 17 cable ayelems In f'Inrlda anA /ervinq 1r28o,000 aub/crlbcrs :fates, t.'an+ula aMi lreland /erv/Mi tivetago Currcnt Subscril.er Natc/ 1,100,Oo0 subscribers $6.71 lnformaliun O#It alKecificaliy requested $10.95 S 4.25 flteland)t $5.751U.S. Information ./.•t speclflcally re.pre/ted s " it Information not speclflcally requested 1 , Stl.ao F, 1 IP information not albeciflcelly requested i f ipli vl^ IIIIII 119 II' III"1111119R^1111111'lll�l�Al -09^"�A�����'�I �i"����,��II�f����I I�O� A ��T �I!�Il�il�il�l,ll�illl!�'illl�llgll� I�1�`lilpllll'��I' i IIII!�� �I l IGIiRC 1 (cont. ) 1 tj SI:C_T1ON O� EXI'I:RiEMI.'E - CURRENT CARLE Ipl.Dirn_S ii Current Cable System noldin9e 1 Average Current Subscriber Rates liasic i j Pay Subscriber Rates Range Dasic - lligly LOW Pay - Iligh I.ov 1 r, p SIX STAR NIF:I.SI/N CADI.F:VISIOM OF MIAM1. Ill 20 Cable systems In California, Missouri, Kansas, sold Michigan $9.35 Information not specltically requester $9.00 $S.00 informatiun not epeclficaliy requested s - VISION CABLE Of IIIAMI, 111C. tit Cable systems In 16 states 57.77 information not specifically requested $12.95 $ 6.00 information not spectflcjtty requested n' II'I' IIIP IIIIAI9gallp'91 Is ,. �0l�p�li9�4ili��������l�l�i��i'�i�' �����I�����I�II�Iljli�Ilill III���■I1�.���� I III'IIIIhII�' I�IIII'III;III^lli � I i I��II II"�Ill�i� it �I';�L III i i7lllll'11 I Nl��il�l��ll�l Dill il�� I � � i I 9 FI/;URE 1 (cont.) -__— AlI1:R ll'Altl.f: OI' f:It1:ATl:R Itf brit 1 sm'TIt1N Es_ I'UNf11:R 1'RAlIC111SES OR U_M1f.RS_ IIIP_ INURE_STS 111slxisil last of^1'ranchises between 1975 and 1900 dlepOsrd Of 116 franchises by sale. 1 f � --------------- er•Irt.rsYsrl:ns ntA111' MIAl11 T1:RY. tOfr11MH1'MClW1S _ Nune, only d"no in tlIO past to I respond to Can.nllan NequlatOry A.tencY reryuirouents or r.tion.li..ti.n Detween 1969 and 1979 dlepOss+�kof more than 19 franchises by e exchange or because of the Isolate dt location of a systee that was actr '`� as part or a larger 'Imckagee Oa because o` anCaba�,nment of housing Project Y U!1IJg1'JI1 I'��"I���IlI�'illllllll,� 11111i�I1I11111111MIIIIIPI�I�III,III !��111 Six STAR MIEI»:INI CABI.EVISIOM OP MIA11I, It1C. E y� VISIINI CABt.I OF MIAMI . IIIC. Disposed of 3hiles exchanye�e^ 1916 and 1900 byals or ql ,pei ,a�u I�,ilgaI9J6 �RI���PiliiRtl�il!li!i1191ii �111�IIIII�II��� 'Ii l 'I'I'1 p I9 I'!UI9ijlfi���l - f v 1 I ii I I mi Ili IIIII III III!1 111111 7771 � I I FiGUR� 1 icon Sr'_CTIIRI rt-F(NAlic III RE�(111RCFSt ISTTttG CAriTAI. C(* I"Ic rs Ann PtrTF:MTtAI. nu�i,niN�: Cr!rl TntIrrs Srn.rcen of Flnaneln•l 1A) C,p.ity tb► r.Im,,ry M-11t Ie) Se'"'Inry Debt terws o[ rinAnrin4 � -• __ .----- In) Plount. rerlrxl. RAte Ih) collaterAl lvl —Iv-, tc) G..nrantore lal RelAte.l rinamwitnl Aq►eemellts TFLP-41 9111111IVA'l'fr111Yr t'AI1Lt:;'rYC.Tlafi� nrmrn ArW.n1CAnt.6 r/l- t:RrnTC1t ttl,1f11 ------ $1511 1111PI,lied by the 1,1wited rartnets S20M from AmerlCAn Security dank l'Itar Ic!1 C. ticrmaltow-lk i Will 5111.1.1the AJAltional funds an re•ptired I+Pr partnership agreement $2011 (or a yenrr At the Prime rate pins 21 All Assets I t'hallas C. tlermnnowslll ;14M snppl fe.l bir Rngers CahtesystPms Inc. i)1M [rum the Toronto, flowinton Rank WA, $)IM for 10 years At t11e lorime rate pins 1-1/2f system assets lAl The General rnrro rala baatls accoratn,/ partpels on a 1' to their n.me:ship • A partnership agreement • A ttanchlse Aml lervicc Agreement i16N sapltiled by TCI-Taft Assoclates' S24M from the dank of New York 4110 N/A $NM for 6 years at m Isw tnterastr rate r Physical sy.,tem, assets TC1 and Taft Rroadc"tt"I ShArM.ldere' a.rreement System ■.wnwq.!ment a.tFeement II II PH IIp'1111111111111111111'111 1i1��11)I � I. � FIGIME 1 (cont.) 61'LT_1u1� F+ _FIN�NCiAI. PESOUPCES EXIST! CAPITAL• C�r�MstITNENTS AND POD L 9U-1- INr_COtMI'fMENTS Sources of Financlwi (a) rqulty .;I][STAR N/F./ �9,N vlSj4W CAP6F �,►' nr11Ml. IIIC. CRRI.FYl3tON OF MAMt. 11N'. $IO.1N supplied by Six Star Nlei son Cahlevlslnn aml Its partners $12AM from Rankers Trnat (bl Primary Debt mulled by Six Amount not Imllcated p (c) Secondary Debt Star Nielson CablevlalOn and Its partners Terms of Financinq (n) 6woont. Period. Rate (b) Collateral involvewent ic) Guarantors ld) Pelated Financlnq Agreement $12.4" for s years at 1-1/21 to 2-1/Il over t1M Prime rate System a-lapta Slx Star Nlel+on Cahlevlalon Partnership a-, normal banking agreements i21.6M saPo led by the Newhouse :rout+, , and by shareholders of fnc.. Inc. 2lslnn Cable of Mlaml. $21.6N fell" Chemical nark of Nev York None 521.6M for 10 years at 1/21 over the Prime rate tlnne Mivanre Pobllcatlons. Inc. INone, other than the shareholder agreements 40 FIGURE I (cont.) lei 1.1mitatiorm on Sale of Stuck by lrnlivi.lnai Unlde►q if1 Ilny-rtnt Agreement 1.11 Itsslatlments of St(Ick Votlnq Itlght s (h) ►lultlple System ni�crator ngrees to coonterslgn ftanchlso ngte~. nt If asked 111 orgnnited as An IPq Sufa hapter S Co► I+nv n t 1 nn 111 1A►eal Investor %er•riers In kind ;an.1.1••/.P1.1. (+1 r.rl'1'r11: 111.++11 Sale or reasslgn(wrnt will he to either 1►1 The Partnership, Ill The ceneral partner or Cl The t.lmlted Partnerq As to Gt partnershli+ interest 'put.' aflrr 6 yearq for minlw(nm -( S1. "N etll votlnq rights invested with 1lu•rles C. Ilerm.11"W kl Vt." fkt -- l r;�•I.crtr:�+.ts erne► The partners f 1 rat , and 1 hell tltn general partner, have a right of first refusal to porchane any ,nits which a partner wants to sell to a reran+ not currently a Partner at. a price offered I+y a thir.l Party The partners. nt their sole option, may al.n lender their units fur rel'urchaae by the general partner at an approved value either three years from the (late partnership a.1reraent signed or for a malerlal violation of the- franchise agreement None ven uID /.peal partners 'will receive a 201 interest of the partnership for services ren+lered In connection with the sttccessrul acgslsltion of the city of III cable televlsinn franchise.' M k nrr,+ln rvr.l:-(r.•w:P*:fFri�k^:c Shareholders have rl•lht of fllrnk refusal on Rely sale or transfer or sharp" to a third party lhowl 410 of the 25% stock ownership hedfi by Mla(wl residents. St i+ nnn-votln" Trf will Itnld 9011 or tlte' vptllNl t shares F yes. J 1 FIGURE 1 (cont.) leil,lelintlo" tin Sale 11"JIVI dial llolders o[ Stec► by lfl "-(kit 11rlrvewent Jill A'sl'ittments of Stack votlna 111011 Jhl Multlple Sw yslefilerator agrees 11 counter aInn Irenchlse Wilemrnt If asked lit Organl:ed ws an iN4 Soli hapter S Corl+ttrnt ion fjl V,cal Investor services In kind S111 ". AN t/lF.l I'M CA111.FVISitNI (IF 111AM1, IItC. 1kt Individual stockholders N/A V1::I()N CAIMF OF 111AM1, INC. teguires written cont,•nt + jl+alo. 'AhiP of HIAmI, lnc., for prior pledge, enc,tmbrancP, „r other 1lsixts1tlon of Clans A Common stock, w1,Ich Is held by Individual Investors. The NewhouRe Croup, Inc., ITNtill es IISN Anl/i the f the C vlslonCahleCSha [holders Trust IV(';Tt as holder of the Class n com,mtn stock PAch will have the rigt+t t,� purcilaae the other's stock hol•11nns. The Class C option can be e><erclae,l only after thedietfourth ofte annlversAry of the q ttlami [,^Initinted 0.Pthe afifth ss option 1of the grant date. A[te[ anniversary the first annlvernacy of they �u`� C option period Commencement, TNGI or VCST denlre to dispose of any or all Clang n or Class C stock held by thew. they most first offer then noch and stock to the cnrl,OrAtion' alternatively t Thetile lo. al other chareholders ITNGI or VCST1. (ownerli the of Chtsto tl, t—ciht Bout Bally have the rig :!-A at the greater o[ time hr.twecn year 211% of original purchase price • Cash flow of Company for the last 12 months multlpllPd by 1. Icsa senior debt, pro rated over l Of ownerships Not Indicated yes No Newlwruse wltl loan jewel rcha011ie erellol stockeat all funds IleedPtl to 1 9♦ Interest t k 40 6M 40 6M FIGURI. I (cont.) oor►msntation Commitment for ealldlnq Mew Cable -'yrttma (excluding Mlamil Coxr.itment for Nl,buildlnq Existing system. Potential Building CoMwltmont - new franchise applications AMI.pICA"Lr or Cnr.ATEII ►IfAIl1 letter of commitment (ran AMerlcan 4ecurity (tank for S20M to finance system construction Letter iron Ehrenkrsns. Ehrenkranr 6 clients thatSchultslrmhave inventednlntother ion f systems where Charles C. llermanowskl was tl.e General Partner and expressing Interest In Investing WM In equity funds for this franchise 452 miles. $9.4" cost over the next years 20 miles. S0.2M cost over the next year 2 COMMUI.Itlev reqn1ring an estimated 125 miles at a cost of $5.9" CADI.I:SVSTf.11S ItIAMI Letter of n Dominion Dnncommitment for eup to )1Mrinto financing 19so csnadlnn Cwbleaystems Ltd. annusI report copy of the Psrtnerahip Agreement Copy of the Franchise Development anti Service Agreement 2719 Mlles. $62.4M coat over the next 7 Yemen 1112 Milan. $16.6M coat over the next 1 years 32�llesat a communimy an ties $100 1M estimated 9 I11AMf TEI.E-00►MtpMICA1r1tIMS- Letter from the sank of Mew York establishing TCI's $45" long and S6M short term line of credit an well se expceseing confidence in the cepablllty of TCI and Taft fVl- filling their obligations. and Interest in lending S25M. Letter from narnett hank advising that they have recelved a request or a $4M loan from Miami Tele- �nmmunlest. lone. Inc. I.etter from TCI-Taft tlelfulilresourcee Aswocletes tt�walltlM of Tsle-colmminicatiOns. Inc and Taft nroadcaeting Company as well so mwdttbq tha funds necessary for the completion of the project t 1979 Tel e-CoM unlestIons. Inc. annua4, report to Trie-Communicatlnns. lac. Consolidate# Statements of Oyerations (necember 31. 1990. 1979 and 19791 1980 Taft Broadcasting Company annual report Copy of the Shareholder's A""Ce"'ent And the Cable Television System Halvagement Agreement ).221 miles. $24.7" cost oval, the Ilk 3 years 445 miles. $2.3" cost over the next year iq communities requiring an estimated ll1I6 Mlles at a cost of f127.1t/ Ilk- F TGU 1 ? 1 (cont.) 1 _ ----- -- - --- - -- I SIR STAIR t1t1:1.:�1N CAM.FV1Sfr1fl r1F MtAM/, HIE. p�tfxecntsl.lon Commitment for onilding New Cahlr Systems lexcludlnq MI81011 Crweemltseent for nehulldlnq Existing gywtemw Potential ouilding Coxwltments - new franchise applications vtStri CAll. 01' r+r/1rlt, 'tic 1'etter from Chcmicel pink cowwlttlnq otter from hankers Trost C.•+^I+a^y +� to SSOM In financing. vrifirming Ill Crwomirment to athei p nal :Ix Star Nielson' blew l�entOn ioftCCTV Letter from Southeast Ftrat 1lait would icqulettlon and franchises. Also confirms Alscuwalons lle willing to make cloans toating sthe tlocal In Irrogress concerning the lnancinq rPsl.lCnt Invest^rs entAtIon0 franchlwedevclopment packs+T Financial statemen^ndfSa. Hlelnoix Star lclson F.nterpritfes. Cableviwion noldiml Company 1792 miles, $21.4111 cost over the newt I, 1 years 1271 "lies. 321. Y cost over the next g Yeats ' fMne _----- I 7 comeminitiew r luiring an estimated 2.111 miles wt a cost of $51.IIM 116 miles, $9.2M cost over the next 1 years to 79 miles requiring $177.2M80 msted ,16at acost eprv��,ii��r�l �i � r � � �i �i�il�u i i I m ignil!IIII�+'ig;noilnelnn"!+'P!�R,!,i91M�!"P! 171i ETR �4,d9�F e� pni}�'�p:YIIFIl111A1'gS���ST'gI4PlI,Pei'�alnrt�J�rdI���Rilq�u�ilPphpl?I"el�l�9if!9nn�n�� � L�, � � � � 1,1�%�;�I��ii9l9��i�����l I��I" ��'�I I'�IIIPI II I I1°liliUlf�� SF.GTION (tr PINANCIAI. rnury M �at`y Grrwtb Onto Revenua "owes Passed by CA110 year 1 Tear ) Tear 6 Tear 10 year IS Pam:tratlon - 11.aalc Service - All ?legs Year 1 Year 1 Year 6 Tear 10 Tear 15 Penetration - Pay TV Sarvlce-M I Sery YeAr 1 c.1r 6 Year 10 Year IS 29.690 145,000 IS9.000 171,000 181.000 12% 14% 401 489 Sol 411 46t SS1 67% 71t 44,000' 140.Si1 151.241 154.904 159.607 40t 421 461 Sol SSt v IIrr,/:9 •rrtK •hr.rU1111i1FJr'kir.11� 45.691 155.456& 16i.97Z 971.51i 184.195 491" S51' 581" S81" 581" " Tiers 2'. 1 and 4 fill SQ. Q1e S6.Oi 56>. 011 56.Otr F] � t � 1 ��I¢�pl�ll!lIII�11111"pll@�''�i'ulgpllll�llllllgllp4pl ii lllli 'I III UI III III I III'°III'gllllipi�il,lm9�� � � i i i FTGUZi: 1 (cont.) S5CLjt N Gr f INf►NCI!\L Irpo ItM11 I "stew GrOMth enJ Iloveuue Ik,we passed fly Cable + Tear 1 year i year 6 Tear 10 year IS ' penetration - 0aste Service - 1111 Tiers Tear 1 Tear 7 Tear 6 Tear 10 Tear IS penetration - ray Tv - all Services Tear 1 Year 1 Tear 6 Tear 10 Tear 1S SIX STAR Nlitr.rxr cnnr.F.Vrsgo" or rnnH/, 111C. 10.140 1�l.7e2 154.2112 160.262 167,782 20• 161 S1s 51t SIS V1srvNt Can,r Of' 11TA"t. tile. T1.606 151l 158.226 167.929, 100.799 to Us, 519 SS6 SSW, M I I i � rIII III{ :!111'It rr.I,t; ttl" ra•t'f;t'I:p Itl Jtl ---- -- Tier Tiers Tier t It a tit Iv 167.2 156.2 Y' Year 2 _ 21.9 22.1 ' Year ] _ 16.7 )7.2 1 year 4 - Iteercas••• • 1 TCNtr s -_ 1. t 1.1 1 Tear 6 10.9 6.6 year 7 - 7.4 year • • • Tear 9 12.7 6.2 Tear 10 ' • • Tear 11 _ I R 2.6 Year it _ 6.0 6.1 Tear 13 - • • Tear 14 10.6 10.6 year 15 - J - - ,Pier - T1era Tier I II & III IV,' year 2 161.0 161.1 N.4 15S.4 2].l Tear 7 27 R 17 0 28.9 71.1 Tear 1 Tear 5 tlf!l'rCl�e• 0.1 OC,eit!te' 1. 1 Year 6 II.R 9.5 12.r► veir 7 • • YPar R • • • Year 9 I0.6 R.S 22.5 Tear 10 • • • Tear It • 2.f 2.6 year 12 • Ikerease• 1.1 Year 13 0.6 7.7 1.0 Teat 1/ • Te1r 1S 10 I,e. 14 than O. i R chamlr ) •ar 4' •ar 6 rar 0 rar 10 ear 12 rar IA NI/t111 TY.I.0 •C"•»:''r:ts': n•�.r:S _ - - -- - Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier t tl It1 it Ili IV 17.4 19.6 ]7.0 year Year 5 -20 - 11.6 11.8 11.2 12.6 11.9 Year 6 -20 26.9 - 27.0 26.9 12.0 12.9 12.4 12.0 11 1 Year 7 Year !f - -50 27.0 21.1 12.9 12.E 12.6 Year 10 -Ina 27.0 2I.0 27.0 21.0 12.2 12.9 Year 11 - Service tervlcr• 1T.8 19.6 Year 4 1L5 12.7 Year 6 12.6 12.9 0 1,2 5 12.9 YPar 10 t2.1 12.7 IYear vear 12 t2.S IIA Yca► 14 KI Knot Minh Pay, Pay W Year 7 26.9E 26.6 Year 7 21.0. 26.9 Year 11 27'.0' 26.91 wear 11 2?.0` FIGURr 1 (cont.) I i - _ ptojecled Inc[e�e In Revenue Per $iMecil6ei:_1li - -------- !sonic Service SIX STAR ['AI11.r.Vt :I(NI nr MIA111 All Tlero Tear 4 10.0 Tear a 10.0 Tear 12 10.0 111,31 and Itaxl servlcra Tear 1 5.0 Year Tear 6 5.0 Tear 1 S.0 year a 5.0 Tear 9 5.0 year 10 5.0 Tear It 5.0 Tear 12 5.0 Tear 1) 5.0 year 11 5.0 Tear Is S.0 VISItIII 1'AI11.F. nF I1tAM1. DW Tier Tier Tier Tl.•r Tier Tier I I1 fit TV V VI err 1 - 16.7 14.1 15.e 15.1 IS.1 ear 6 - 14.3 12.9 19.2 11.7 15.9 ear 9 - 16.7113.6 11.5 ear 10 - 14.1 12.0 me 15.4 11.0 12 - Is.6 14.3 15.2 15.6 15.4 ear 11 - 11.5 12.5 15.9 I5.1 16.7 ear Pay Pay Pay Pay "In1 I II tit 11.1 1Y -ear 1 Is.! 16.1 17.7 17.7 11.9 fear 6 11.5 11.4 15.2 15.2 16.1 fear 9 14.3 15.4 15.e 15.9 14.3 rear 10 12.5 13.l 1).6 11.6 12.S year 14 14.3 15.3 IS.) IS.) U .1 A* FIGURE 1 (cont.) .._.. _�_�_w _._._�•._�.1.._ ••a'htt ..r•t.i..�tl r!`i '.Ti t! f1t.�•'t :kVer w year l naslc/Sec#"" Set Pay TV 501,597 Installation 065.960 Other 25,116 Total Year l IfaRlt/Secr•ta/ Sot S4,146,454 nay TV 9.947.467 tnllaI latir.n 1.999. 15S Other 149,197 Total S1S,192,671 Tear 6 aaslc/Secont) Set se.2a1,e9n Pay TV 15.885,597 lnatallatlrrn 1.763,670 Other Tota{`_._.._ year to na.tc/C.v-on.) Sr•t Stl,e18,222 Pay TV I1.711,125 lastallatlon 2.200,610 01for r 1. t96,911 Tntal S41.021.496 Tear IS n"lc/Setrrrwl Set S1R.662.686 Pay TV 11,405,126 Installatloin 1,111,592 Other 6.717,999 Total S:t,6i1,605 dF:p^'',n •rFItY �ItR�tr S 47T,OOa �7t,00a t�t9'.n00 tss.naa $1,272.nna S 6,R6LOrt0 7,aRR.Onn t20.0rt0 t.62n,nna SIS.eSR,anO stn.z9e.Rna 1 '1, s 26, nnn 597,000 4.S74,OOa s2s.90S,n0a St4.:-2.nna t4,R66.afr0 R4/.nn0 7,771.01111 $111.411%nno S101955.000 21,771,ng0 44,nno t 1'.9Rs,Onn s �•f, t �R, nnrt tTW; Fir TREE-Fr.—WN'[r i.T r'N.5 S1.06r.5na 600' 9ls.an0 $2.921?"(1 51.937.100 7.20t.Ro0 Ito. 9nlr S.6I2.400 S20,1150,2ntt slt.tti,if•r ♦,rI2.000 29,100 -1, is 1, man S2R,n55,70a SIR.a79,2Rr. t � , ar►2 , 20n 27. 7M ta,146,Rn" S4F.90t,son SI5.66t, :ggr 21',671.200 29, 9om 1' 1, 675, 7n1M s59, nat. Inn, CIGt;tT I (cont.) peve� �u' Year 1 paslc/Secnml Set ray TV Installation j Other i Total year 1 pas{c/Second Set ray TV Installation Other 1 Total year 6 omit/Second Set ray TV Installation Other Total - Tear 10 naMlc/cecoml Set ray TV Installation other Total Tear l5 Raslc/Second Rat ray TV installation Other Total SIX STAR 11t1:1.::nN CAn1.FvlStf)m OF t11111i1. 111C. $ 11,000 109.000 149.000 14,000 $ 149,0n0 $6.056,000 9.603.000 1,124.000 1,10n,n00 �16,887,nnn $12.105.000 18.101,000 101.000 2.149,000 $12,656000 $14.561.000 24.059.000 55.000 2.4ss.000 $41,129.000 $16.770.000 12.119,000 59,000 2.921.000 $i1,R05,0n0 VISICIft CAM:: or MtAm. INC. • tncloodes rot S 92,000• 51,000 18,000 1.000 $ 164,000 $6,866,000• 6,308.000 124,000 701.000 $14.199.000 $13,414.000• 12,248.000 1.229,000 2,S76.000 s2v.647,0nn $21.124.000 • 19,850.000 161.000 5.142,000 $46,871.000 $10.515.000 32.149.000 202.000 11.907.000 $ 74.113.000 0 ilnnin��;u�!Ip,i•}oleo!LIIilprem��^1�;I'.iiiliu��lll�,�IIl����'I'11�4a�A�RAaIA�l14�'1lyllll" a` r :. c> s-x ;,�.:. ��'i�,�,�� �� FIGORV �l-,(cont.) Incn�!e Slate�nt :.il/'i!IYRp1,1 fit- c„t.-:rrrr rw 51.617.000 11,0�1,0001' ( s7o.annl SIS.7�t,000 .1,49n001• 1,156.On0 S27545,Ono 2:123.000 S.56n.000 S:7,027,000 15,159,000 • 19,6R1.0no $59,61R,000 16,1/4.000 • 20.212,000 • im:cx�e taxc" PA141 by Prel+x IrclIm" 3hfovn. p.irtncrf, r..f,prr5r.r�N�' rtelflE S 1,272,000 11,922.no07• 11.011,00n1 S15.659.000 (4.45R.(1001• 94.000 52S•995.0n0 ( u.7,nnn1 • �.R14.n00 sle.ont,non 6.111.0n0 • 10.R16.000 S54.1511.n00 R.607.000 • 12.258.000 by vifflial • pirtaicrt�xrrrr�tax 1ma+wcl-show$% n1:.11tTtCr.l:••r•••'21b!:et�'h•17f•�:► S2.921 ,701E (1,676.600P (2.104.100V S20.950.200 o .146,200M 2,919.500 520.055.70n 2.a�o.eorn R.016.Ifln' tv S4�',OOA,S00 7.964.700 R 12.403.400 $59.041.100 9.R9t.000 1*.926.200' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEII.. 'I 11I I III ! iP( 11 FjGUtti, 1 (cont.) Income Stetewent year Rw�enue Ilet lncowr Cash rl(w Tear I pevenne Net tncnose Cash F1.7 Yea c -�— Revemie Ret Income Cash flow Tear 10 Revenue "at income Cash Flow Hear 1S Revenue pet Income Cash Flow ------•--------__•` —'---•vtslar cnnl r. of 11tnllt, tI1C• SIX STAR "wi :off CNnI.F.VISION of "Thfil . s )49,000 12.530.0001 (1,R15,0001 $16.982.000 (1,407,0001 I,s O.0nn S12,656.000 1,994,000 e,sR7,non $41130,000 4:909.000 0.445.000 Ss1.007.000 5.471.000 6.068.000 S L64.000 (2,057.0001 (I.S36.000) $14,199.000 (2.146.000) 1.017,000 S29,467,000 6,317.000 10,224.000 $46917.000 7:550.000 12.045.000 571.961.000 16.333.000 11.647.000 4V iipi iiiiiilii i illuilliiiliigi��!�!!nl�l ,,3 � ; I I "P�I��RI�IIIII�I'I��IIpP!'illl OP FII�t1RE_1 (cont.) Suurce� enJ _Usc_s o[ Fouls IlS Ye..r• totrl) Sources- Filu I 1 y lAians Pevemvo lit her Total Uses Cnpltwl Fsln.,xlltnres (11�crnt {ml Fxtienses interest Prywents Incowe Taxes Iran Pepayment. tl1 v 1 delt�h Total o r.nf.t.::v�T� n . nrnitr n111:n1VAIVIX M r:nraTt.R $15.000.000 lo.n00.000 52),IOS,A00 5561.Ins, 000 514,006,000 . 29,100.00A 462, 259,000 2,416,000 r SSnt,99S.1100 S 79.90S,000 118.S75.000 22.917.000 .. 29..700.000 11,800.000 I-olh,-) 2.416.000 • S501.911,000 Is* I-arine;o resl,ous161c for their owl* Income la><eel S 6l,onn 11rn1ttL ?1:):1:-r:nFrnnttnncttrr.: S117.10m.som 26,4004110 511F.007.1100 6,046.low SS90.205,.900' 40 s @?.Its 9011 131'.56I/.9ne 16,224.706 61.204.900 26,004,800 67,710.200 $590.105.400 S; 160.000 �'I li' i19 iil' JII In�g1iiiii�'�i4l�I�IhI!ieli���l 1 ��F�I�� uI4���III�RR�h�I��I �Ii �Ai i �i� i I� Ill �III'i, I �IIIII I'll il'i�'I�. � � u� p I�I�ii' II �. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11�1��III111 „ , ,,,..__..,... ,._.. 'i'�II�II',III'illli'I�il��'IAIli911'�I��I' II�,I�CI�I"I� F1GUlti: 1 Icon)-. ) --- - ---------.__..._---�---._----- --- l3tR STAIRNI/:Id rNf VISItNF rn117.1 OF N1nt1Y, 1lll'. rnitl.l.VlSlOf1 tti Ill�flt, 1t1t . Srw_rces_ atM1 Uses of rood• (1S Year -Total) sources cgtt 1 ty I,nanw 11e�ettus Other Total liner Carltai I:xremllture.• Oreratlnq F.xlrensee Interest rayments ItK ram+ Taxes Loan nerayaent O1 V (detests Total tml i nq ra slt ns 1 Once Averagn Interest Rates $10,100.000 32.400,000 507,721,400 454S.421,000 $ 54.766.000 140.572.000 24.550.000 31.126.000 32.400,000 54,477,000 $54S.1191.000 $ 470,000 t5• 21.6I6.000 571,lf01.000 j621.07�.000 s 90,��9.000 129,1)I.000 16.900.000 s2.522.000 21.618.000 $542.686.000 4 711,1flN.000 11t . ' a{ III�I'lllllpllll�lg0llmail„III �p in i ii PViI�ugV�lupllpgio�llP!l�I9Rtp. � � �� �j�'II�I�iI�I�'�w'IRII�,i lq!, "1I!III!IIl11 rlGURE 1 (cont. ) Cal,ltal Cat.crfdllnres (15 year total) /,ntrnnA�, Tnvrrtt, Nraden,la. f Wirth Sl �l l.en� rt 1 c remove nietrihntlnn Plant tn�tltutl,.nnl Netvntk prom &, Cnnvrricrw ttnll,linga c lavwl t.r.,ne"Id le-rrovewenl* CAl)IrfnRtlMt racilltles Teet r.qull_nt. SpA►es vehicles rfe.petatlnq Cnq 1 nee r 1 n'j PAY TV EgnilAu1nt CarllAllzrd et,rrrhrnd f i:gnll,em`nt Ot over Total rr•r.::rr.n nr.rtt rrre�.'•sstnr►•. nFAttt :m feltAM.o; fell. 52,59n,000 Hot Indlcatefl IA.Ala.nno 809.On0 22.785,000 6.000.000 581.000 2.735.000 1,092.000 2.540.000 Not lndlcntMl 190.000 770.000 toot Indicated 2.202.000 S76.a12,000 S2,806,000' 1nn.nntl 20,879,000 2.986,000 A0.157,000 Nut Indlcatrel' 700.000 5.515.000 1.150.000 Rot Indicated 300,000 200,000 700.000 r1n1 In•l icatcd A.Al2,000 (Alarm -- 1Annltot Ing), Nt:,NF 'OI:EI:-f:f•r211v'ap'FT!t�•':� S?. J'21`.r..00 j".4f1IF 27.620., lOfF R29.40(y A6,2es.eotF 1, s lr►. onrF r,�o2.noa 825.800 100,000 sT.�oo 16s,onlr s�r.7FT•.00rn 1) Ill Rri {I nIIIP J Il,I I III ir�� =.k 'I I'I �Illull '"'!'I'V Ii I'll' it FIGlrrr 1 (cont.) C.�pit I F.xPentlltures I15_y^ar total) Antennas, Towrrs, lleadends. Earth Stations Mlcrcwave ulstrlbutlon rlant Inetitutinnal Netw"Irlc Drops a Converters nnlldlnya • Irnd I Leaaeliol,l 101'rovcwents CablecastlIrl Facllitlea Test F.qulpnent Spare■ 1 vehicles t rrpope rating Engineering ray Tv Equilw.ent Capitallzed Overhead 6 Equlpslmt j Other Total .;Ix %TnR 111 EN:n1l CAn1./.vIS10M OF MIA -it, 111C. $ 1,623,000 1.460,000 22.714.000 605.000 22.656.000 300,000 2.580,000 306.000 10,000 714.000 Nnt Indicated 1.741,000 $54,789,000 Vt51(tt► Cllnl'.. nr M►Alll. II1C. $2.550.000 i60,000 12.204.000 055.000 28,117,000 2.300.000 150.000 1,791 000 . 768,000 502.000 1.601,000 39.269.000 $90.489,000 • Sl4" to upgrade eyStem eont{nuousty. beginnlnq In year 1 F 1) ���� � 1� 1,, .�,i 4f�i'iIIp�R popnl,�, i� �I��;�ggi�i�l��IpqiNillliivll�l��IlUqli��lllp��#III!�II�I����iIIIIA�IIIIIII��IIB�������I���, I FII�UItC 1 (cont.) _ - ----- h/n:Vh7,hr.F, Cyr (mr."Mt' F:F•,�tt C_o_mltr_uct ion Casts blstrlhntion C""t rer "Ile $22.050 Aerial sin0.250 - uf"lergrrnlml Cost Per Mop nnA Converter - Acr1Ol - Ibrlergrnnn.i (lS Year. tolnll_ Tier 1 $115 v.,q It i 1tt Tier TV 5105 Tier 1 $115 Tte.z it i it, $215 Tier IV Itlntl All Cnstq Ore per dual drop, $47.405.000 � r ,. /:ridip •.kr,:•.. e..•;^.•q!MK.».'{f1i+.«r. St9. tom SSrt, R ta• $d' 5206-fir* Tler t Tiers It, ttt. IV St7lt' Tier V. Vt S261 Tier 1 S 9S STt1�05 Tiers 11. ttt.IV S1911 Tl'ers V. VI S275 1 W Sf y.S1T.006 $66,767.300 1m9Q«FR.".�'pP"gf" "^'"^"�' °e rip =1a�1''4s+r!gniiPiiIIII'l�IRJI��I�il!hgAISP�!��II f �i Irl 0011? I��ifliil fllilijlIII i I� r FiG(1RC 1 (cont.) Conetr_uci{on Cost• . Distribution Cost per Mlle Aerial UMergroond cost Per Drop - Aerial - tlmlergrarnd Six r.TNn MIr 1N1 vtst011 CnnGT: or 11TAIII, file- Crn1.t:VIS1f1N ()r Mt11MT, 111C. -_ $20.000 55n.500 Tier f $ 00.00 Tier" it 1. it, $2S5.00 (2m1 drop, add S25.001 Tier 1 $115.00 Tier" It i fit S310.00 (2nd drop, add $75.001 $52.192.000 S16.246 $21,098 Tiers I t If $ 81.00 Tier tiT SiT9.40 Tier IV $19R.60 Tier V $274.20 Tier V1 $129.60 Tiers 1 t if $ 88.00 Tier its SI94.40 Tier IV $201.60 Tier V $279.2(1 Tier Vt $134.60 545.501.000 Ile reclatl I SclrMlalcs lyeetsl —r ------ - -- wlltenna • Ttrvers Mlcrorave IteadettJ Eart.h ttallon ItistrlMtllnn rllnt lerlaf Underyrnt►ml rr.I a ilr ranyt7enl no opn Converters ton IIdltrts - ticnden:ls - 5tltdlus offices I,t.a�cMld improvements O'IflinatIon t?p►Ih.enf. Test liptll"ent, 51•ate+ Velliclet; rreperntlny Engineering my TV Egnitwment Capitalized rnyroll Of tier avilmoP4n1t: fit, f..r:,'tr.ir ►1t•sir 14 IS 10 Is IS Is IS 7 to 25 to 7 7 tot Indicated IS S Itccllanlc t:►Inipment Frarx�hlse Proi++t►al Application a►rt City Cnst Finance Fee Comtnt t er Rid Ina CRT lln.lems Ft►rni Lure err r T TOP to t0 in IR R Not ImIlcate.t 11"t Itulleated N..t Indicated 1n � hnl 1 os 9 Iol,lic vaue s i.rult�'n1. 1A 7 Not lrnilcated f0 10 R not Indicate@, Institutional R Rurrilar Alarm Itqu l r. In tltldlr TI:61-t'r.:'!tt.l:fr 1.'I off. AS eS IS IS is. Is S- tint twiteateer 2g 25 25 In 5/1'0' tit 5 rS IS Is is r tw qr F i t FIGURE 1 (cont.) Depreciation Schedules (Years) Antennss & Tovcre Iticrorave iteadentl rarth Station Dlstrlbnttoo plant acrinl uncle r q rortnd rote Arrangement nrop't converters M�{Idings _ Ilee.len.ls Studios Offices l.eaaeltold lt■provcswnts Orl.tlnatlon rgnlpoc^t Te+t Cq%t11~nt, 511aree vehicles prenlMratlnq Gxl l neer 1 nq Pay Tv Equipment capitnilzed payroll Other Stt STAR MIrl-r- ill c11n1.F.visin" or HfAlll, itlC. to 10 to let 10 10 to 5 S 10 10 10 t0 S S S to 10 10 to prnic Otltton SrK-^rlty F..prlpment 10 to vl5loll cAm.F fit ntnni, 111C. 110 ye,r C(mmq lte schedule assumed) 10 10 to 10 10 10 to 10 In, IS IS 45 to to 10, 1101 ID to to t0 Not detallett 10' R R 1) m 9�ID4I�i�ilRl�nllle��l�ih4,. I � piIl�llf� ' R .f1,11111,�ll, 1 FIGURE I (cont.) 1'IG)�f•C 1 (cont.) Scrvlc ar Purchasel_Frow Parent_ oryanlzatlon ll5 rear total) Management Servtces Legal Accounting Custoamer 011ling orogramaiing otAer Total SIX STAP Ifff1l M CAIILCVIS1O11 or "TA1/1, 510,057,d�0 f/0.057.000 Vr.t("I CAnr.r •,F HIAMr. INC. 1 t t FIGURE 1 (cont.) _...._... _ _.___... _................. ...._. ~./ .•r' 1•rt1»�r•tr^nr.•rit- �hw.P..F�Trtr, nr:.•tr Ol+eraUmi t:xi•enses riant Yenr 1 Year 1 Year 6 Year 10 Year 15 Ort9ination Year 1 Tear 1 Year 6 tear 10 Teal 15 set IIn') Tenr 1 Year ] Year 6 Year 10 year 15 TntaI Year Year 1 Yrar 6 Year 10 Teat IS S 199.o0n 2,181,onn 2,937.000 4,114'000 5.626,nn0 $ 1S9,000 5.647,000 9.709loon 15,167,000 20.974.on" $1,099,000 ],559.000 6,021.000 9,n6S.000 12,706,000 $1.851.000 11.is?.000 18.649,000 28.346,000 19.106.000 $ A00,n00 t,t2t,n00� 2,672,nom ], 899'. only 6,751r.one 5 789,nn0 5,,69.On0 7,e61,onn It,22n,00n 16.9R7.000 $I.05].non 5, US.000 7,1]9,000' 11,m.041 IR,161.nnn $2.250,000 12.309,000 17.971,000 26,403,000' 41,goo, OnO. r•ls�rrr T•:rrr a •ttarrN•�r rr. ,.s S E9.nnOr 077'.001M t,ln�,onoj t.4]4,000� 7,.1? t.000k 52, 727',000 6..96.7,000E R,215.n0a: t2.]7T,nnm 16,702,onn S2.0Ri,n00 6,467.n0n 9,II2'.nnn It,972.000 16.490.nnn S*.027.0n0+ t E. ]07,n00' I r.6sto.onu1 26.200.001F ]6,77N,now 41 FIGU t`.; 1 (cont.) SIX STAR MtrtSm, CNdLt.'VISIO" Of "'AM" 111C. ' .eratin ttt nses Plant " s 62,000 Tear 1 925.000 Tear 1 2,441,000 i Tear 6 3.954,000 Tear t0 6.128.000 year iS � Or�lnatlon s 1,220.000 ' Tear 1 6,871,000 Tear 1 12,569.000 year 6 17.155,000 Tear 10 24,109,000 Tear lS Selling G 6 A s 207.000 Tear 1 3.164,000 year 7 5.226.0011 Tear 6 7.044.000 Tear 10 10,260.000 Tear 15 +ntal 1.489.000 Tear 1 10,982,000 Year. 1 20.236,000 Test 6 20.151,000 year IO 40.705.000 Tear 1S VISlf*l CnntE: 'IF IIDIIMI. INC. s 61.000 1.674,000 2,238.000 3,355.000 5.246.000 $ 75.000 6.044.000 10.073.000 14,397,000 21,470,000 s 28,000 2.561,000 4.895.000 8.411.000 13.982,000 s 164.000 10,281.000 ►7,206.000 26.16S,000 40,694,000 !9 SI:mull lit_ SF.RVICF. AREAS, t'OMSTPUCTION Sl91ClIlILRS AND C011STRUITIMI PRACTICES - rennchlse Territory I.Ine Cxtenslon Policy Coostroction Schedule t, (Pesldentlal Networlt only) Sear 1 --- Milos 1>tl Tear 2 --- 111108 Is) year 1 --- Niles ftl '.1'LPIt � PLL ol` Ia'1.:; fla: f:1.J11 • 11.1t+ provided • All areas of the City served within 1 years Inytallntion rates Include the first ,so feet. Drops Vreater than ISo feet, np to 300 feet billed at time and walerial. over 100 feet world rerpelre possible extensions to the CATV system 141.2 (2011 112.1 443s1 269.6 fill) I " Nap Provided • All areas of the City served within 2 years Veserves the right to charge no a time and materials basis for costs in excess of those for a standard aerial drop In excess of ISO feet 2O7 (lost 479 (lost r. t... ......_ • Ilal. provided " All areas of tlnr City servedi within 2 years All areas of the- City served'regaar of density. Will cable any new development or annexed area within, 1, months of being dtranled approval ter extend services. regardless of density. will nerve all residential units wlthdut excidtsinn precluding the need for a long drop pulley l A 210.8 1122► 484.9 11i8!) 20.6 f&V • Projected' growtfr ...-AWE a pTcum 1 (cont.) 81"CT low 111_SE_RVICE ARr.AS. Co"ST_RIICTItx_I SCI Yl41I.ES AND CoNSTRIKTIl1N PRACT'CF.S Franchise Territory I.Ine Fxtenslon Polley construction SC1ledule (Resldrntial Network only) Tear 1 --- Miles 111 Tent 2 --- Ili lea 11) Teat l --- Mlles (1) • 111wlrrgrouml Plant Rf11 !STAR NIr.ISn" CAn1.r.ViSIMI or IIIA111. Mr. • Hap provided • All areas of the City served within 7 years Will provide service to all parts of the City havinq a density of at least 50 potential subscribers per wile. will provide service to Arras within the Service Area having less than the required density If a written petlllon is received frrss a stinlwnm of to subscribers per mile at a cost formula provided will work with developers and itilitirm for joint use of trenches and crngsingq to feed new housing developments will serve areas annexed by the city using the parameters outlined above For overhead drops over 150 feet. will charge $15 pins Sl per foot over ISO feet. If utxlerground and the subacrlbrr provides trench. repaving, hack -filling ,nd planting-S1.75 per linear foot of otnlerground In excess of 150 feet 120 11711 480'IGR11 tor, (1511 VISIMr t'Ankr. 11V MIAMIE. 111r. • Map provided • All areas of the City served' within 2 years All areas of the City Included In the initial service area. will provide service to any presrntly undeveloped dwelling units in the Initial service area and any addltional areas annexed by the ('Ity within one year. will pursue joint trenching with utllltles will not charge any additional fee for hookups requiring service drops over ISO feet In length 190 12011 494 (7211 Lj 11 I I ��ll!iiiP�plIIIII!il@�li�lie�ll~III'IIIAV!'allllil��lllll����il,I�4ilF11j , a'1. I� �e i�l1,11li101III' 1 I FIGURE 1 (cont.) Conatrrlction rracticcfl Safety mnl Reliflbllil.y lrnlstnlction standards .I•I f L".t tel: ..l• .a•`": TIT fit 'If • four tyl•e9 of .plallIV rnntrs.l is Iksislure 1'rtlnlln•t • SI an.luf ( braeketa us•`•1 • will analyne.l•.c..) u1stet''Irunnd stlec l f scat Ions will employ, multlpl.• •non•+-•'t"Ingllnq • gr.nlndlnq cs•'1•'slvely • A11 un.lerer•'t•."1 cable In eoswhsll. All • nsnppl Iesd rower •• ),late dl In 9at'" tlrtnlrnl pedefltaly • All unolergMund {•assives n.ounred In above .lroand perlestalfl • All boring prneedltrefl In acrosdancc with Inca) orrllnnnces • All undecgrousnl construction .111 conform to rxlsCosslllcllty c .,figurations when { Construction Codes I,lhrred to Incit"les finical Iwildlnq and sty ccxlfla occupational Safety and Art SCTF. - CRTV Ilealth and SafctY Ifanua I HAtlnn,I Electrical Safety Cole (19111 tiatSona4l eC rriif►acttan i177f1) nett Y- rractlCes ulatlnns FCC Rules flow, Req I�scal. Comity and slot•• troll{ty Cowles 1•rst11{,syes s1lpl.l led wish ill ,, tow nt r l n to use. npprnverl pafety e•I 1 accordance wi 1 Is the cnnstrnrl inn cn•le• VChlcles etsulpl'ed vltis safo•lY rqu i i,ment p,,ality control pro trams used tr. monitor coil riletlon tplallty All indortyrnund cable In conduit Cons►ruetInn rtntes a.lhored to 1nctitle• natlonai Elerlrlcal Safety AT LT llamtal. Construction rrocedores (Olue (look) - tit --TA safety Isannal 11.1tlonal Electrical tn�lealtis Arl tlCcupatlnnal Safely "rl Collstructlon Practices PC1 Safety rollcles All federal, state and municipal eonstrtoction reglslrcmcnls - Otility cnnittriletltm rerlulreme.nts __ epee ....._.. .. _. .. ...... 11t:.1/N '`t.l:!' ••r7tlt•`.t••�aR••t:S• R11 attachments to in's.er ntltbtles• s.•condarles for the porixls., or powerinq CATV dlstributlon e•I"If- melst shall enllrorm to stalwlnr't "peclflcatlon9 noverninq such at taclm'ent s • will conform witltln.'fl Tj`cnpyafity ltflnual ape avflllahle upon re•fuest) • StanrlhY isOM•'!r provl.le.1 • All u,d,rlrnund cable Jacketed. flooded and enca"ed in conshrlt • will keep coa1s1al slices to a minimum • will 'burn In' all active e.foll.- went far 10 days • still one completely mn.lular aq•llflera • will use ,rr%•eatPllve procedures to combat the problems cal,,I byflpherlc salt cant ;nntl vanry1t111,11% winds ( 1 lollstnir►1 Construction Codes aollserrtl to InellwletW FCC Rules etwl Reyulat{ona CTt . Technical Standards alit 1 SPeclllentlolss FAA Msstractlon lAirklnq and t.l.lht Inq National Fler.trical Safety Code 1191?) Na ationl F.Iccorlrat Cowie 1197 nSIIA Safety asset Ilealtil Atfllwla HCTA Standards of rcx'./ F.n.11ncerimt Pra.'t Ice, .an r►nr l.in rawer and t.17ht Cr1ml Y t'rnsl nlrt Inn Praise Icefl pelt System conanlsP.icctrlcalt ion ticcs bytea l 0s111d i ntl l:o'lea City of wlaml Cable Televl•lon orinance � �i el �.i�,.,r y"TF Ti' �r.,. Ir FtGUit" 1 (cont.) constrrrctlon Practices Safe) and RellabliitY construction SiE t:TAR 111AII'll. - --� CAn1.F.VIS1gN qP fitAty, 1ItC. • Pole line conntnrctlon In ACcordAnce /ltllity company Pole Ieane Aq►eement• and the National Electrical Safety Construction Practises Manual • Will attach the CATV strand on the same side as the telephone strand If present. If not. will place all ognlpment on the street side of the pale • Will Install 1/4' htlh ntrcmllh, en wire gAIVAnized, zinc cnatlrlq Taupporting strAr"I • Standards provided for sulq+artlnq strand attachment to poles, Anchors, goy strand size, and guy attachment • The CATV strand shall Ire horxled to all telephone atrsnd or other existing Pole gronnds In Accordnnr•e with the otlllty company Pole tease Agreement, except that there shall be minlamlm bonding between parallel CATV and telephone stramin at tha [first, in. and every tenth pole VIS1fHr r:Anv 'IF Nuttlf, fill' - All construction shall twr Its accordance with the National Elect tic Safety rode - 1Mndiwxrlt lnI. lot I I I t y CnmpAny Pole lease Agreements, standard CATV practices and All State, County and M%iniclpal Cnden, As well aq the codes of the (hcvpatlnm�l Surety and IlPalth Adminlntr.atlnn. • 14111 provl.le all employees will' the proper sarety e.plll-,ent • w1I1 ,ttA,-h the CATV strand on "0 s.lme 41.1e ns the telephano etr3rwl it prrarnt.. 1f not. will plAco all Plllipment on the 9tr"t ntlle of File pole will Inatatl 1/4' hlgh strength, seven wire ;Alvanliell, zinc contlnq -A- .9u1`1,orting strand • Standards provided for supportln'! atran•l attachment to poles, anchors. g.ly at rand A1ze, and lily attachment • The CATv ntran.l shall he bOlwtrhl to A11 telephone stran•I or ether Pr.fatlnl I —le (ITO"... In In accordance with the utility c(,.pnny Pole Lease Agreement, except that there shall he minimum bon.ling between parallel CATV a'I telephone 9trande Al the first, in9t, and every tenth Iola V 0 1� FIGt PM 1 (toot.- �•--- ___._ .... __—.------••--••- I ;.rpirt•'4PLt: tq' f"PT.:TfP Ill.+'TI Tbwer-FtArNlArds Constractlttn Itrltcy Mbete 11UIItlos A►e t�ocatcd north 1►wrlalir-wfNl IMNler�rotfnd ---- construction Practices NAnual r 1.1, V.SYr. rf tff: tirralh will comply with Electronic • Structurnt Standards wit l conform to Electronic inrtnstrles Assl.riatlon IndustriesAssocfatinn StAltdAnt StantlArd PS-222-C • obstrnctlon marking and IlghfInq Tower finish hot dipped ga11►anlard l conlorw to F'M stAn.lani according to AST" slmNlard ASB6 wit i witIGP-iF Ftarklnq and ilghtlnq will conform to FAA standar.ls "flat - will unclenlrOttnd wheree • will conform to t - other utllltles are underground requirement - - tlAtlfmwl Eleet[Ie !:wfety CtNle _ ll Is a city ClintIs equ•il to or less espenalvn _ D.r.dr Colony CO+Ie than that Of Aerial construction - City Of Flinml Code Southern Pell System CongttuctlOn - Attachment to et<istinq utility des or poles are Practlecw FlOridw Power i t.l.tht ronstruCtlOr Is "Ot prncticAl net Available to Practice•+ - other utllltles are prepared participate In )nint utNler- Uodergrottnrl rlrnund { nq rxlstlnq.structures can be ntlllre.l • will unl.•rground where utilities - in system design are underground • All necesenry not{flcAtlons made And permits obtainers tw:) dated In wplrtNl { K included to AIMw`Mlis r.. . I'- . . .—.... - . f11J•rtl TI:IJ' t•,••••;t�1:1r•A�'Irr�::; Putt to wlthstAnd 12% wish whtds will conform to FCC Rules and aegolatlons will confnrw to FAA ObstntctlOn Narklnq. Lighting and Placement Standards Will comply Elet:t.ronic Industries AgenClwt{on PS-222-C underground collie Initially plactal - where sin nerlat utility service exists - where Only FP1. concrete polew es l st - where telephone duct avollAbilitles can he secured Aerial cables will be relocatwlQ,�lce er ground In any overlfee.l utility w area In which either utillty elects wtnr1 to nve Its service tlergrottnd A kn 1 I . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ * r - - - - - -- fnctollirP IM appefNtl>b - - -- film �� � ir. n, � �n�nu� ii � i aim � inilwol li�i�uisill�ll'!P!PlliliFl!! � ! III � FIGt RE 1 (cont.) Toyer, r—,t a_ -,r Construction Policy tlhere utllltles Are_ fa__ted-both Aerlell and lhldergrwnri Crnstracllon•Prsctires gan_nat SIX STAR p1F:1.5011 CA111.BVISIrN1 t1F MI11t11, 111t:. • WI11 wwet or exceed the starslards contalned in Electronics industry Assoclates n5-222-A actor wnc, wi thnFAAlACt10/1/60-IF sceordanee tto ltnriergrournflnq 1s forecast for ntilltles are aerial those areas where Conduit used In underground plant except In a emery few case Include+t In OPT---"* VI .totl CA11lX-:1F 111AM1, 111C. • Will confors, with Electronics In•lustry AssociationStandard �'1 ns-222-C end all apt)icnhift standards • will confors with ell +pplicahle FAA Ctandards Will ,ndmrground wherer All utilities are underground Onderground construction Is en ecor,o,slcal alternative to aerial construction Irandatea b., locawith oth lltler Joint participation utlllti,s can be accowpl►shed will join the last at"'ty as it woes, lines mwlerground Cond•,It used only In special cases (6 wiles of 121) _--- — Tnclu,led in al,pendlx _ FIGURE 1 _(cont.) _ �^ secrlON 1+ _ CnntntFt. Cnl•ACITY AND SYSTF.f1 t/ESI(:N por Red Sy.7 ties Resitlentlal t'airlc Confl•tnratlnn Channel Capaclly Iknrostream Iipsl ream lnstitut1on11 Cable con[(-na.atloll Atll:Rtl'Al+tt Di I:RGATt7P 111+\III Rinal-• haati-A in wiles of dual Trtenk, each c-lirir 54-400 mlz downstream and 5-10 ►itts Illral 1 elM 52 (x2) lo4 Cltnnneis i fit 4 (ro21 R Channels pima 2 fills for data tranamlasior k 1'!•.I+Gt'Sy.'�TFIY� IIPAtif I Ilea&!Wl p1t13 2 Icahn 6RS miles of dual Trunk, with one cable. 5- 12. 52-402 1/11s -town ttrenm anti the other I50-402 11117 dowlwlream anti 5-10" fiils upatrealn Ih•al.leu! la+ allot Inatllotlennl netw-irka ar-• cnmhlne•1. 42 r SR - 100 Channels• FM 11 Chancels (Shore-1 with I- -lti tilt 1011.11 Scc Ah•,ve• Se wiles (lnitlallyl of 8111.1 Trull with 174-400 101z downstream Anl 5-IOR ►111z Igrslream • dill co/t.@trrlrt separate Institutional cat•le wh-rn last I [ Ied toy demand or bnslnoas users 25 Channels (•hared with 17 Channels IS Channels plus 11 fins for data transMlsalon 4.11 wiles of sopertrank to inter- connect the na-le County nperntlnn center no Galloway Poad for rm-•rtl••ncy Alert and Instltilt innal Aeeeas • Mir_rowave Interconnectlon to t1-Ilar•ent Flynt ems. Tier 1 - none Tier 11 - plone0r Ill'-2000 Titer IIr - rlon••cr nT-1 ion a.l.lresnalrte Tier IV - rluneer SIT-1100 Intrracllve 17 Channels residential) II mtles for reglnnal Intercnnneetlon Ties, 1 - to -no T l or It r+nd III - Z••n l t h ZT- 2000 a.t-Ireasalrle drar-ramirler (nr etli+all Tier IV tlnternct►vo?) - Itnrrls Ill"do ) 6744111 home terminal tranVm"it'rq, an-1 interarl iv.• key I.."1. •- __ —; - • •I-----•-• __. . ...._- MANE T/:RI:-•rv[NIUIIr••h'61t-n IlcAdend plus, 1 Milts, y1S,7 wiles of duet Trunk. esck rahte, SA -NO Mllz rinwnvtream allot S-10 Mllr. q.atream 0 Se 1a21 a 116 Channels, ► PIF 4 (x2) 9 Channels 219.0 Mlles of sill,/le Trunk with 174-130 M112 downstream and S-IS to 106.75 tills upstream t J 26 rhaunels 16 rhnllnel9 plus date( 26.1 Mlle.@ fnr reglmtal program exchanrle, detlicatt•ll studio -hub cable links. TV station direct cmnrectlnns, and Interconnection with the F.ducAllol/al Telecommunlcntlun.t C-•nter Tier I - 03h 1.-10 - Co., It 21 chAnnel mill-La+w1 \ cnnvr r t ere /dlvrwirr Tier ft. Ill. IV - pioneer VIP 0110- way addressable or tw.r-way luternrttve lbignavolt Hioina Sit (alltrve 400 t01r.) -q W1 r• ` IGURR I (cont.) ------- - _ — r �.� -- SIR STAR NIrlrool V►SIfNI CAllf.r OF IIIARf, IIN`, ' CAIIt.EV1Sil7t1 OF MIAHI, IIIC. x SECTION I+ C1tANNEL CAPACITT` AND SYSTEM DESIGN 1 derni and 2 hubs Ilea ! Hende+ul and 2 hubs Pro,osed s stew Des�n 6R1 wiles of dual trunk, each cnbfw. :�"` qr ltealdtntlal table Con(lyoratlon 106 miles lost year 1, 769 wiles 151 of dual Trunk, SO-102 Nllz downetreem and S-)0 Ntlz "• projected by year cable 50-100 MIX downstream and upstream 3 each 5-10 Nllz upstream = Channel Capacity SS lx2) • 110 Channel@ ♦ F►1 3 flownstream SI ♦ SI • 111 Channels ♦ FM 1 (x2) • R Channels tp•streaw 1 (x2) R Channels 199 111 wiles of single tnmk with 5-116 E Institutional Cah14.Con[IgnFat�lgn I)1 wiles (at year 1, spites projected by year 151 of single Trunk Nnz downstream and 16R-100 MIX with 246-396 Mlz downstream and 6-IS6 upstream opstreaw ,a. 1 Channel Caimcity 25 Channels IR )B . nownstream 25 Channels Upstream I wiles of fiber optic Trunks between t?th4r Nnne the sub -head ends and the Teleco,wxunicatlone Center Tier I. II - Pioneer RC-2000 Tier 1, it - llamlin SPC-400 Converters — — — Tier III - Pioneer BT-I100 addre"ahle eom 55 4A Addressable Tier 111, IV - Tocom Interactive er Tier V - Tocom SSIOA Addressable Dlncrawbler Teletext Tltr VI - Tocom SSIOA interactive FIGURE 1 (cont.)_ Initial Activatlrm• bucatinn of TACllitica r•nrct.r.::v:ar.n:: ntnnl nncntrntn.r. t1r rrt:r,•rt:n nr,�nt Al capacity activated Initially. All resldnntlal ltotwork caparlty howntttream channels limited to 96 on tlo, activate,l Initially. A meparate enidentlal network AM 16 on the InstItoll lrn.-O network will fee of 'Ancontriocted when netihttlonal network torrents" tfor •lnstitul tionalscrvlcetinl cannot t.e ostricted usage satlsfted through the Integrated netw,tk tlap provided Itnlicatlrtg local. low' of the hea,lend Deadrnd Diagram nlork 'llagrnw, provided daps ptovlded Intlicatlnq Iteration of facilities plonk diagram provided' WAIII T171,t:. r rgt111M11t'A71rNlS ' 111 opstrr•aw capacity act{vate,l Initistly. w,vnstreaw activation limited to 1114 ; :hannels to limit Interference with - other speetruw users !lap provided' Itvlicati'mr tocatlow nr facIIItIP9 "lock diagram, provtde.k I --------- �-. pTGtrr 1 (coat.) ...-_�!.____------. __----- -•------•- ------ } ---- — --- SIX STAtf NICt: Mf VISltxr cnnr.F. 9-6 MAfl t.An1XVISMI Or NtAfll' 111C. �— - — y7 of the III lCw"wtreA,q rhannets • All channel CApaclty Activated initially except for Teletext. tn,kin, M tivatlon and Ail of the apstreww channels on thn resldentlal net.mrk ar.tivatod 50 of the 55 Teletext channels „I11 be activated Initially In ItIAIIy 21 of the 25 dovnntreaw And op- wtrenw Inetltutlonnl nrtaork netivaled Initially i channels �___�--- --- ---- Imileating lor-Ation of Na Provided Indleatlnq location p ixrcatton of racllltles Nap provided facilities ,rftrllltles dlAgraa provided Block dlagraw provided ut Tw-way interactive a psadend Olagrw d, t - 1 I i FIGUPE 1 (cont.) f•Iwns lu Oltcrwle or COntrart for Trenswlsslan Scrvires Isl Gnomon Cwtrfer Ohl cable. Televil'I'm Relay Service p l :faitllntlat all st:lindlogo Service Idl fttlM[ Swtelllto.F�rth Slwtlotts :•t1t.N11'1nLC t1P t:nf'l.'r/:n nr,�nr door Tire following cnant.tnllles served from the Hlnwl tow•!" sit, by bidirectional wtcrtn+ave system with a nliniteunt of two chnnnela for Interconnect: Rey nImc,�ynn_ Coral 1'.al•Ics (Pendlnq franrhlar) South 111awi nal Ilarltrnrr (IMtMling rranchise) iMteestend. Florlda City and South [lade County f interrnlmcrt only) Ilene Nnnr 12 ten-w^ler snd i seven meter TyPll•s provide", oKI•t.ra:l:Trtit: 11fAtt1 �+!asrd telephnne pairs mny be ntllis.•d In recelvo programmi nq from Mca rm11O I road••asters +hen the %1.lnals cannothe roreiv.) Off -air (:eserven 1 he r I I)Ilt to Itt t I i Ze thin lechnnlo•lY sMmld it prove technlcallY reaslhle and cost offectivd. I1 TVPrI•s provider: I1f1�11P TFFB"•P+.181ptlINF'ntrM:S tln.te except for note)lite-hased cable prngrnmwiml antl narrow-ba-1 direct linos provide-1 by way of telephntto lensed lines t►sPd for re•lbn.al Interconn."•tlon purimmes, for links with higher educational Inst(t.t1Ion. awl lot It mohile unit rot. -IV Inlrl n also use stlorowmve transmission for lair:/F.FP supi.ort of I've' remote pro.fraw orininatlnn l llnne ~ Nlll fund anti �rTelevintonene Statloslstit or a low pn In Mlawl (" 12 seven meter "Yews 11 for each hub) r.e-- atd t ten t+r s.tellite uplink provided 4 -- F LGU tr 1 (cont.) __ --- ----------- --- Silt "AR Ntri.STNT visifNl CAnI'.R t`r IIIAHI, n+? i CAnf.NiSTI>fi OF TITIVIT, 1fIC. For r Piwn• To T>l�erste or Contract — — Tllon Services ranewas Leased telephone lines will he ntlllied '' "one for reception of newswire rad (w) Cowwun Carrier t1jer Unta Rase servlcps and weahee radar y j Input wlcrowwvw to convert wain headendtn would file for a Nohile CAnS nand for Loral origlnatlon r.NG I i Ib) cable Television Relay Service AM1. ,11stribution huh locations and other License interconnected systems None ic) Multipoin. nlstrlbutlon Service None would provide for the Installation of None ITrS microwave receivers If desired J Oil) Other by the City end/or county for Network cnrrlagc on the Institutional tot 1� _i--_-----_-_-_—l- l water at he!wdrnd. 1 s1s' ] ten -eater Tv1►O's provided satellite firth stations - —1 l i - --- — seven eachTVFM winter Tv110 fit ewcb Ind, at headend T1111111111rop 11111 j^�" "'"°"'1'°1 FIGURE 1 (cont.) Service heel-Sep�tratlon lal ray Cable leolatitm Ihl Tier Isolation 110wo toot cractive $etPICt! rapnbllltY Alti.ltlt•llpi.h lq- Glti'11T►:11 IttA11► • Tlerm I and It to use negative apt{i notch fllter traps • Tier 111 to use Ploneer 11T-1700 mldrrs?able convertet • Tier IV to nsa Pioneer RT-1700 lwn- way lnteracttvP converter • Tier 1 And it Isolated by converter and hand relect filters • Tier III services tsolatrd by Sync snrperss{on • Tl.r IV Isnl+ltinn providrd on a twsi- way interactive basis rloncer VIP sr_curlty ami coswnmlcnLlon system �•nlr►.t�yl:'tt.te: nrrdll All WAY aerviccs to live a comlllnation of basriwvnl syac suppreslon and dynnmle Video Inversion hrailend scramhllnn. All m p°y smhledby the sa•`e Tier 11 n/ pu pr�rtramml nn lechnl.lne used for Pay security Rr?lrlrte.l access A -I downstream data cI,nnurls to use a high-rass filler recess to a-2 ap?trChannels ass Channel protected by high-1 Hill Initially install a data/eosin+ten processirni systr. to provide services Incilldinq - Fire, Intrusion and medical alarm ertvlces - llpi"l.n polling and Irirlrsl - ray -per -view Meter readinq Status monitorinq "IAIIt tl'GC-1'tI►1lt101t�'aTItM1 r All pay services acrambtert tool" sinewave sync suppresslnns, atml it unique sync snppresion uses bg Pinneer equllement All tiers lsolate,l by scramibt{n.r. Parental lurk rntt features avaltable• t �a to Pion^er VTP securl�y S strer. will limb Itnderwritern 6eiwratoriest apilroved home security alarm trchrology and services, security qunr:t service and eeergenry mcdlcat terhn{c{ans to respond to ata►ms 4. -. �ilu"111111l1 � ��1 !�� hlill�l li�iip�gp� FIGURE _1 (cont.) r Sertice 1"el SeQaratlon (a) Pay Cable leolatlon fbl Tlor isolation Ilo�sa interactive Service Capability 4 f X !iT1in ll1 rl.!:n" C11n1.t.visto" or t1111til, 111C. The Pioneer nT-I11f0 system eelnq ad-irelfeable converters will prnvi.fe (tnlati-n Tier 1 luhacribets will have .% 21 cliannol convert"r tnc-20001 that will allow access to other services Tiers It i tit controlled by the- addree+able tlesrrawabl inq (unct inn of the nT-1100 terminal Pioneer v1P Interaetive syetes has capability for wille range of service" ViR1t)ft r7tnt.r nl' nt/1M@. tt1C. - `pI 1�9�!A�P91i6��Q I FIGURE_ 1- (cont.) -_ Neadcnd/club lntrrcor►lcctlott tntnreonnectlrnt Nith 011ie[ CeL1e S atemta technical Standards 2•tli:Rll•At11,F rr/ ►:n1 /1•ri:R 111Ar11 via Am microwave 1 Carrier to noise -41 fill lntermilllulatlon prn/lnrts -57 fin Gilnst. Felines. Iloal -A2 .10 "olio l a t l on Ion i/etween cables 60 fill isnlnt Conli.oslte triple I/ent -52 do ni-directional Cross 1 !loll _48 ,In Ow" 11 a M.ixlmlml slgnal level at 12 dnmV receiver ►/,pain t.evel stabilityIan rrellnency response y 2 fill channel1 -200 no Envelop• delay on "Vol ellnnnel ►-AIlm"s- STllr. fIMMI Ilendenll t-onnerte.l to the twl hubs win tr1111e calllo. 1.11111Iinnal eupertrunk. an.l to Ill If#* earth stations b; tiller npties cable 11s111q FM nmdlulatlrnl Vln u1Lra-high performance bl-dln•ctlon.rl Triniks utllizina Ill ea.•11►latlon an11 three-quarter or rnle-Inch s17e 11w-lnss cable 2nd order beat ratio 60 do 60 filltio III order beat ra it 11110 t-nmposlte heat ratio 55 do 52 fill Cross mlwlulatlon ratio Signal In noise ratio 42 do Differential gain 21 Dlfrercntlnl t•Imne 2- 200 no rnvelnpe det,y mix. 1letvnrk generated ectln -40 .In for 1000 no delay M1ANt Tr.l.i:-r(1►VI %I. ATI►MIS The four maxi-hnhs (nt••rcuenr•et1{ y: via six 1/2" enbles, with threw operating In each dlrectlon- rach hub Ions off-nlr nntlnnns and' satellite earth statlunR. Via Atli. or FIt video microwave Carrier to file! 46.4, do Cross modulation -55.It fill Compnslte triple bent -SB.S fie carrier to hum _10.0 11D gin. / "Miu1ation Fr enc renpons! l JDin (bnNllaychannel) ► y sl Differential galo 0.5 .In Nax.� r :i Chrnminance/IuminanCe 1 r delay 1'!O no Max. ...wIlII11(iiI 1� F'CUt f: 1 (cont.) tleadend/luh tntecconnectlon tnterconncetlon Mith Other + Cable l >Wtema Teehnl�al Stslwlarde SIX SIII Nirf-so.1 C11nI.EVISION or M1M1t , 111C. Ilondend connected to the two hnhs vie Ihnthes AMI. mierowave cyst lnlby ,t,,"llnq theirt with ^Tr nkncables systems by other systems PAY be Interconnected by microwave or super Trunki Carrier to noise 16 do _6� do Secornl order prod+lete -11 do Composite triple 'Mat _10 do 11nm modnlat►on rre+luencY response �O.Sdn - single. Channe, rtrum 11/12 �O.Sd0 respnnso Group delay loo n secs. 30dn Sabecriber tap Isolatlnn 164111 peturn loss virlott citni.e -r stiml, 111C. leadend connected t, the two hubs Via General Cable Fused DISC III supertrur+k, snpplementrd by a 6-til+er optic system options Iletedt via the existing in -it Itilt lcu+al Network Via direct hardline cable between one of the hubs and the other Cable system Via microwave connecting headodl• Carrier to noise 66..1 do 5an Second order heat an Composite triple beat 58'� do Cross modulation dP) UP ort r FIGURE(cont.)(cont.) - Mlttllflrr 1.\�:r•nlc ;•:rr Ir-► •Il.r:_ttr .:r• n rr:r. r11-.r.I IS anittlltil•rs .w.•r 1.S n\tlgs 'rest IncI "Ie1 Carrier to not Rr Ghosts or 4101oes - IUn11 Ct-Inlosite Irlple brat rallo Cross r11r1t1111tltinn Cross talk Chrow•1 tlr•lay rrcttlsency response pad IatIon -r.1p Isolation sl►hscriber level Fo r.plency .•:.lint :.:::rn� nfrlff lI. an1•ltf lea'\ t+t•rR Is.T 111i 1'ez - ;:i•Inal it•vr•Is ar sel••lcrit.-rrs' 1-•Iwhlals rrcgnrm:y stahilit.y of slgual rn-cr•ssors and 1lralnlnlnrs Carriter to nisi: ratlo I n t e r r•It--lu l a l{ on 1111a levt•, t;yelrm rrrilm ney respnnso rrcrlgrrlry revi•-in"r- of brA11rn"I e-11111MM•111 pad i a t i.-n Snl•s-•r{t•er isolat Fr-n Ili flerrnt ial gain Ili f fr•I rne.lal 1.11.1 iv Crass W.A.11.11 Ion r{cturr al"I Sulu-, quality Lrvrl of rm-rintlt• delay t*#,mIrls{te Irirle beat 11aln1rnanre prtw•r-b/res drsrr111e11 for: Ile•Ider-1 t►nuk - t.lnr pad{atIon •rr•c11n{--al Iu-partment staff drst•ril-r•41 rinnt. mainleoatl-•e Coat•at•r service 1-.ngin-•.•r {o•t r:ervir-•R owld.•a-ign I tlri NII 'FF� r ••'o':rynrFlf WIN to--m-118ft•nc "' 1001...s .rests IM-1114ter Gal" Noise FI'aurt• Carrier to nolse, 11,10 reerinlat 100 visual frequency Mural rrrgllenry Cllanuel restinnstr pr signal lrakage rc ho 'Triple bent - Cr•\SS r-1!M1111.11' 1111E rroccdnres d—crtl'- 4 roar rreventative mAnten:nwe- %tatne menitur Ins Swecp systew Pinintenince Starr titsrrit—f f to dP) i �i ini ail Il llllli it Ali III II� 1I0 7� �I� FI.GUt Ts 1 (cont.) _, itler Cascade I,o/lgeat Cascade Psr[ora�snce T tea s_ � I Systew�,5n SIR STAN "MIS(IM cAnGrtltstf" or PI/AM. t11C. Is amplifiers (IS Trunk, 1 hrldger. 2 line r1ttemlef"I over 1.5 mites Trots Inclltdet rretplency troormisries Visual And oVal earner slgnal levels llum wedulatlnn Individual channel fregneney response System nolwe and undeelred co-cliannel signal Intermndnlation And Cross mAniati-in Terminal Isolation Radiation measurement Maintenance prorednreA described fort Amplifier levels siqual quality System response Power supplies Technical staff described vrnunl f.AntC Or 141AMt, INC. IS amplifiers over 9.2 wiles Test Incaw— signsl levels Cnrrler to noise ratio lhtm Ieiel triple beat Composite trip Annual prtxlf of performsnee Routine mtIntenance described fort - Signal levels - System sweep - Signal leakage - neat and moisture Technical etAff described FIGUIM t (cont_) :,tn•t•Ifv.n1.1: ta• rm:-lTr.r. nl,•nr — Ilcles and 1•ollf:lrs arttl pntt:!Miorrs descrlM•d It': Nl.f.:'y='Tott"• It6+\ttl' 1lclry Arel prncrthtrrs .tescrlited' - Ctinlnwer- '' -- I'raluren lnell"I" FeAtules (ncludcr Fire, Intrusion and t"rdicat alnrtw .,Il 5jstPw Fetlntes services j+ _n_ _ - _ Force Uln{nq �.In1nn ltolling parenlai control key - .� r-view) Pay -per -event CAI -ability - Channri "llnlloring II•Y"1'e ea tabillly - 11r•ter rra.lIng Premium deny i _ . Status xntntoring e Constant syst" ulnitltor{n•1 - tlarrowcwstlnq - Telldon InMrlxntipn retrievalt1iA nosllc eoi""atnls - C"ergem y alert sysG•" q - Slapdby floMer provllled - 1+afa services r." .rgency alert sy-Ite" Stnlwllly Power Provldrd • All goverol"e'It , educat(opal, I,cnith ,tral Incitlties care and cult ill Ioa, initially CO�.eivi.iclttwltl~Sltchan„el network And P ron•,er + Cr Intetconnectlon to County Emergenly • ttht•ratlona center LcF' t' ft Ipnal Tr 1 rcora"tn 1 rot I t•n+ t11,1111 71a.Y. l rtttlugll+'i"I 1te7S Vol fetes And Procedures de1.:rlbe4 If nisr.rvlr pro,tra""l^g to e nl• {,tlli,nr ItrtMl ll l st r lc• 4 pit ►acillties lisle', In RFAl p t be 2•t0 axon ticxts A►l+• Iqrt forConn each. Allocated enlnres Inciu•lnt C," "unity Infor"atlon Rn►rlewrll Service Pny-Iter-view Ilo"e alarm service Videotext. Full Interortive Itn"e em"i•+tteo service Energy "anaget"ent Silopping at home yank i nq at. lat"le - Status "n"It.orinq rwergency alert AYstel" Statttlhy power Vrov{dcl) r /nst I h+tl<nlw to he passe., by Inst Ito- edncntlonAl.noft tionni netrleoltll cw►e,lculturpo-crial ae snit human rvlcP� facliltioe. Plow ,•ajar Itotelx And bankp. At faC!l/t�es with relstlrg prl..lrat""Inil resources on Will it" I"ow.diAtely ronnecce/lver►ors two way bill" PmAPrMot, to.-krA for Anil rharactPr q '""C'"W 'clal uxe 1 onblle Covollnicatlonit. C•�arlll and Control C"ters for Pollee feel+t• Cp•Imter-assisted •In+true►ion Sotfwn•e [or Fire ,.Vt. TralnlMI tlxt+tldr TV trapsl"{tter• for 6 1 �HC rescue units Cale►As At city re•IHO'+t , )fl rt_•x"tf P TV' for rrlrte surveillance. I II II II 11 r �� A "N,�F�pesty"!P"�CI9q� 41 II �I 11PP11 I III I FIoI piGunE 1 (cont.) Cu_alnwar Complaint policies an,t proceaure� SPeclat 9Yat— Pestures- SIR STAR plrIA M/ CAPLEVIS11X1 OF ",A",. 111C. Collcles wmt procedures Aescrllxxl reeN�res include• intrusion, [ire alarm police/ emergency medical alert - ()pinion polling - Energy wnnagewent. 'Peter reading Shop-at-ho"m Trat display Data transmisslo Pay -Per -view capability States wnnitorinv Ewergeney alert systcw Stnndby Power provided • Seperste staff to operate and wonttor alarm services Government facilities , schools, to • be connected, on rMI�''St, to the Institutional Network at no eoet vISIt1N' CAB6F. Or mumi. 111C. policies and procedures described Features inr.lodet - institutional fetMOfwtilewith T'a^Ma discretely p og - r1re, Police and medical protection _ pay_per-view Energy mAnagewent Text di+Play polling _ information data bases - status Y a EP•ergcnCyle►t system StAndby power Provided • Separate staff to operate sod monitor alarm services • rovernwent facilities, schools. colleges, hospttAls to he com,eeted No to institution 1. l'td ops charge for uP Or d k -f o11r11 Ii�pl�ii1011�fi�������� FIGURE (cont.) R►tt:RICANLI: fig. t:I•I ATI11 Il/alit $P.CTto" _J_I rlt(tl•(►Si:il_SImIAt. CARIIiACE AND CIIANNEI. ALUICATIIINS ---- -- - - ---- Iln Tier ifs j rrgtoae.l Sitlnal 1`ArrlAge i -- - - -- Clot 2. 4. 6. 7, in, 17. 21,45 1t1am1 Incal TV stations Ch St Ft. Laalnrtinle on Tier lilt Chs S. 12 Hest palm nearh Ch 20 Fort 11yer-I Distant TV Stations 1atw1111.R Prttgtaws - Vid"D ty.nt.f.S:l:Tr1/': ti/hill ($n Tier It! t 11, ?. 1. 6, 1. 10. 11. 21. 45 Miami t'h SI Ft. l.auderdato t'hs S•, 120 bent Palm nench rlO, i chantlels fnr rePr"Itinq "'cal 111aw1 glatinn hroadrasts • Compo,l le network fill iTlet 111 ---- - 1 n 9 - CbICA�"•ITler ifl) Ch 9 - rblcegtt (Tier lit) New York (Tier 1111 t9n 9 Itew YnrkiTl-•r II 1 I'll 9 17 I,tla•+ta ITler III) t:h 11 Atlanta (Tier If ) Ili 1-11 2 can ,loan, Puerto RICO/Ch 19 T.+rnnto. Canada • part -tide "C;hle 1re'w, petitr+ili--•- _._-.t♦iPf Zt11 - -- - ------------- ---'- - (It1) . Christian 11rondcantinq Network (Tier I11 ITler ill Olurbir-1 Cable News Network till) Nlckelo/leon/AIIC Arts CRS AWL, i Cultnte filer 11) IISA fletworlt (ill) (I T I) Spanish international Network (Tier It) (Tier III 1:`.:rtl Nnt lonal Cbr1,t lan Network 11i 1 F.SrN (Tier ii► Trinity nron.IcantinO Network ;;` (--SPAN IT!er it) ,I,wigh Televislou fill) osA/Cntllnf+e/OFT/NSC progtamming Network/ 1-ickrin.iron • fill) (111) Satellite --.-IPIrance (Tler ill) Service Nrtwnrk•- The ilaslc Cha'aci i.l9til•g Netwol'^ clorletlwn love ltt11 fill) Al/iutlachlan C—,i"ity love (Tier 1111 AHC Arta (Alpha) ( 11) People That Trinity DroadcnstiI'll fletwnrit IT{rr 111) COS Cal.te (TTit Rotke(eller Center TV (Tier IV) ToleviRiOnRatw+tk C-SPAR Illlr rt,ram Notvnrk Sat-rn f1;,1 American r4locatlnnnl Nat (onal Christian Network• Ir, IV) iVl RI r Ikl.lrrin !:atl•IIIIC N.!iw"rR• (1►1) C.ratxl (tic "pry iwhl " Avn{Inl.le)(TI.•r f%,41pin Satellite Network. Cll/rwerlca• (TL+ Ill) Vlde.l S)Mrts Network* • rnelwtsite wits, other prtlgrae••In•i 1 • Crlmf"twll.r with "tiler prtw1rammlll.l IIrANF TrIP.IC••t"tlrllnpto, All lo11S not Tier If or Chg. 2. f. S. 7. 1n. 17. 21. 45 Want Ch St rt. lauder+hrlec plus reserved channels fort Chg. 11, 19 Waal �, } Chq. 42. 79 Hest Palo trench 1✓ Ch 69 110 11 ywwxl Ch 9 --- `- Ch{Ca.f" (Tier t/t1 Ch 9 New York (Tier iV 1 Ch 17 AtIAnla ITler IV 1 1 Hatlnnal ('inrlstInto Iletwnrk•- Tlle MIMIC Chan/lel liv 1 Cal l lope• Ifl 1 (7il.unlelllll) IISA Network/NSO/F.ngllab (lit) rTl./r.RN iflckolodenn/AIIC Arts Ilttl Nndrrn Satellite Network/Vl.leo concert Ilal) cervlce Network AppalAchinn Cnlltllnmlty American &11x-Ar1•/Is TeI.Visloll11Ne'wtrk' ESP" Satellite Prtxlraw Netwtrk fly las Ve.,as I-tve \ (IV PrTA fly 1 Cn5 Cable 1 T 1 nF,T• Cineterlca• r.-SrAN• Cable News ile(work 1 tt) 11V ) • ComfMslty with other pr.x,ramol"If �rb' WI 11� of $R : J Fl : ut '. 1 (cont.) SECT TON .� _ PIIOPOSt 0 SIrNAL ShaPtACF. ANU CHANNEL ALLOCATIONS Proposed Slgn+l_Carrlage Local TV fit&# tons --_-Oletanf. TV stations TlatelIIto Progrews — Video pTx STAN M1F:1� MI CAn/.r Slf"I of MIAMI , 11M.. visin" CAnLE "I IITAIIT, l"r- On Tier It On Tier I/ 7 In 11, 21. S Miami Cho. 2, �. 6. . • i71ig 2, 1, 6, 7, ln, 11, 23, 45 MlnP1I Ft. Lauderdale Ch SI Ft. 1anJerde ch 51 • ITler 11) ha 5, 12 Meat ratio peach Cho S. 12 Melt Pw11w Pench • with other pro9ra•wlnq • Network till-In1 coi•poalte With Composite other progrAwminq Ch 9 Chlea t^ - -- (Tier 11) (Tier III I'h 9 Chlragn• (IV 1 h 9 New York (iv ) Ch 9 New York Atlanta (Tier tit) Ch 17 Atlanta Ch 17 (eyndlcwted pr09ram tT i.crmltteA by the FCC nlack out time) _ — _-- hriatlan proadcasting Network (it) Clnemerica• It) IISA ftetwork/UET/Calllope/English Nickelo•leon (it) Christian nroAAcawtlnq Network• (fl) Channel/C-SPAN (If1 Network/Tee international Pbannel• (it) Satellite Program Network/ Appalachian Coim•unity Service Network/ ,/ plack Entertalnment Television• 111) Ser+ice Nei Nlrwlow on Mall Street Ittil Appalachian Corwmnity ,rk ABC Arta (Alpl+a) ESPN vAern Sate 111te Network fill) USA Network/CAtllope/MSfS (it) international Network I1/I► 1.08 vegan Network 411) (Ill) .'•pwnish American Educational TV Network (111iv ► People That Love (tit) Cable Newe Network IN ) Cable New• Network (itll People That Love ItV ) ES!'" ll CBS Cablo (when a+wllwhl�) (t t•lckeln.leon Lwa Vegna Llve/Cinemerica• ITItT I) C-SPAU (itl) • Trinity Prondcwwtlnq Network (ill) The Iiealth Channel' IITtI The Mosaic Channel• (ttt) Cps. Cable• fiv Iry 1 PrTA• fiv ) ABC Art+ IAlpha) • Iry 1 Times Mirror Shopp(nq• (IV ) Alternate Pns • Cowpn-Otte with other prngraawlml • Risen Available C�u.i,iiu p ii iPpini0pni qi�p �llVIA91llill�l�llill'.p�i��lrl9E'��d _ ,� ..i '.'"'�"' TinialPHill FIGURE 1 (cont.) ray TV prugraws Inca) prrrgrmtls - Aotowatrrl r.flt'Rtt'►nl.l. nr cr1A-rov ttTdliT Tile fklvle Channrll (Tier (Ttrr iV) TV) Si. wt 11.e i.aa Vegas I.Jve• 1when available) " Ilnt.e Theater Network• 11.)Me heat (Tier iV) IV) (Tier IV) cilleW'x* IT IV` IV1 pay -per -view lrtl T er Ivil Ilo.1e nnx O[[trr 11cmef (Tier TV) At Crmgxls I to with of her pro.)ra...l nq CAnt.l ::Y!. tl.lt!. IiTAltt Ihtse Pox [,f f ice 1111► fill 1 SI" Dwt foe rite fklvle Champ) fill ) IL,eW Theater Itel work (ill) CInexlax fill) (lit) nalavtalnn (i11) Rainbow pay-per-vlrw/Inca) Snorts ( III t:1s V,•gas T.Ive Network tt} (I(IM ritm is Subscriptlun - ---- — dub q,(lortunlNe9 (-^•raulnh) (Tier 1 lie al her lta.lar (tier t fill Spanloh Mews cr,..unity nulletln nd. (SranlshllTl"r carkerare 1 Cablerare TranaportwtBllletlolnoard (tl) 1111 CATV Progrnl. Guide (Spanlshl (Tier I (Tler 1 Contntunity 111) Jnh q+portunitics $1lnrtr _I (Tier I lit) Co,slunity nulletln Oonrd AumllTnwo mile) (Tier 1ro (ITT) CATV program Guide local Origination rchMhrle ITl-r I rllgllt Sche11ules IT 1 I� IllrtMl TIAX-VI: rtYlllt•A'tlfeR; 'Ine Latin" it It tip Inwc Thcafer Nef.alrk tit 7niavlslon 1 tr Inlet! non Office 1fr Iravo/rtolden Oldies (ir { nentax F.alrrclalesleay-per-vlewl 1tit :venlns Ilghtiaht (pay-I/er-view{ (tlrl' (lit) May Cable 11r neuters inrt 17ti ti t•,.IleMovie Channel l 1 51.1wt toe ISt111nr) 6it1C (2) v rrogratw Gul,le/Tlttte Noathrr Ulniclrat nulletln OOar+14,421 fit (1) crl.te rrevent.Inn 111111etin nrlard• if)! r •�J,IIC Library nulletln Board !:nuth A.terlean Newswire •utltl-Ethnic nulletln 11oar,l• IiI 1 tit ullelloard• Co.M111nIty nu h tll W IMvie Guide nlack eullelltl Boards nelghhnrttooal nuttetin noard• • Bnnrd (1/ ;pnlor Citizen nul)e11,1 111 .i,ib nank • Friendly City nulletln Hoard* It1 null•tllnrtnoard• 111► County County roverm.rntletin Gnvern.tent nulletln 1loard• 111) .ztate S1lorpinq G11l,te• Alley Oullefln rtoJr,Ivnrr►de ITT) Klas Civil oefenne-rKrgemy 111) i11) .,,wish Telegraphir• Agrney' null etln noir,1' Tourism and Convention Rthlcatlonal nnllNir Ilnard (0) �1) il. l-„r,pt+site with other retw)ranwlml .,,---'-"" .'^x'."""".",_..��..-,�.-r'r '.,. s�. "4 'I7� U ���IIII I l�,...���.�_ FIGURE I (cont.) ray TV P"Mrsws - Ilrxesl Pcrtgrnsls - Antr+matr•rl l.1B'RIC4BLt, tM' CriATl:n t1lAlii The M„vle Channel (Tier iV) ITlpr IV) SlmtwtIm+e I.as Vegas I.Ivem (when nveilabl1�inr milavislon iV) (Tier IV) ll.roe Theater IMtwnrk• (Tier IV) Cinemax (Tier IV) nay -per -view 01 (Tier IG) Br ivO• 11rome now office iTler iVI rABCr ::YS f r.IC: Ii f Ail l' Ik,+me Mw ttf f ice till) (till Shl,wt l me fill) The Movie Chalnwl (Ill) Thoater Bel w1.rk I114+e till? Cinemax (1f1) talavision fill) Pa I nlxlw Sports ( i f pay-per-view/lncat I �s Vegas Mile IlIt) (ill) pal+I lc Subscription Network m Cr",w),11te with other pro•lrnominq I ,Inh q+portunitles (..p•P�r11sh) (Tier 1 Spnni"h News iTler 1 Community Bulletin Pd. ISrauisM ITler 1 l'AN 1•rogrnm Gul.le (Spanish) (Tier 1 (Tier I Job Orportunitles Pulletln hoard (Tier 1 Community CATV Program) Guide Schedule (Tier 1 lTl^r I local origination ....__l• rigi tatio IT C. f treat her 11-131' I t 11 tiarketPlace fill Cahlcfare 111) Transportationr! Guld 111) Commsunity Bul let in POard fit) ,,.cal flown/til.lital Sl+orts Aronrnl Town Guide (ito flii,Mt T1:r:1:-ttVrlt�Blr'ANitr ; 'Ine Intlno fP tip ionise Thenter Netwrl: ttv ;nlavlsl0n fit k"n now Off ice a tit Irnvo/(:olden Oldies tit tit I "edam :venlos Fmpoclales(eny-rcr-view► ligl0inht ()»y-lier-view) little 'lay Cable flity tfit V Reuters Wit ,.Ile Movie channel My all.,wt toe l t! ) Itlll,c►► LiNG (2) rmgram Guide/Tlm,e weather fit •tuniclpal 1d111etin Board" 12) If) crimerrevenflon Bulletin no ard• (f) ,,jJ,lic I.►hrary Pulletln [bard ,:outh Amerlcnn Newswire ON •h+itl-Ethnic Pullerin Iloard• fit W frr+,mmllnity Pulletln nnord• Ii) t"Je Guide slack Bulletin ) (11 tie l q hbo r hood Blr�etln Board" ;polio[ Citizen Pulletln BOnr11• (1) .tub Bank' Friendly City Bulletin Board• 11) Cultural Arts nu►letin tktnrd• till County Gnvern,m••nt Pul let in 110. 1& fill 111) State Governmwnt Bulletlu Board• (ill Sl,oppin4 Cu1de• Altcy Bulletltl•rr�werrlde till 111.1s Civil nefense-rmer.tp"c, y • till fill) .lowish Telettraphic A.Ie111 Y Bulletin lw%"r,1' 11 Trn,fis.m and Convention t• ,heat iOn.1 "lilt it Bnnrd 1�) if , C„NIN'site with other rr•N1rallm tool FIGURr. 1 (cont.) Pay TV pr"ro" laical Programs - Automated Slx STAR NtErRM1 CAPf.F.VIS1O11 OF NlllHi, 111C. Ome Thnater Network It 1fill Inemax fill Nowtime (ill r11-TV iatavlslon• I111 I111 he i/Ovie Channel (1i1 lose Box Off Ice 'RS Pay Cable (when RVRllable) fill) ray -Per -view 141 ,Ports. theatre, movies, Itll vocational) • Composite with other pronrammlml 11 1 Program GOlde (1 1 Weather/Ttwe Poard! .lob llRnk (ill Bulletin Grocery ShoppinV (II11 lilt) vacation Travel fill) Peal Estate Revi" lilt) Unto Lease Purchase novie Preview• lintel Servlce (lit) ll service 4111) Ilospltal Service • Composite With other pralrRia lnn VISuar CAIILF OF IIIA111, 111C. IlO1•e Box Office flit) fill) Fhowtlme fill) Cinemax (lit) The MOOIP Channel (ITS) Galavlsinn lilt) rront nn« fill) 711erler Net«Ork "O'"e P�Ckcfeller Center Television• fill) (11ti1 Puhllc Suhscrlber Network' Play Cab). (fill Reuters tDR • When avallahle Belli Wanted Rulletln Board 12)'(l Government Rcce+s Sc11oo1 lunch MMSRge Poard• It / ll 1, Boar,) of E11ucRtion He+sage goacd•11 1 Cnmmllnity Hessage Board' (t 1 Program I nfde fill Swap c Shop (fi) Radar Weather (fit)' NlRml Ne«s Racing Results Reuters (Tvl 1 Slwl`p) ng Compa r son • Co1•posit, with other pro9rRwm►n•1 r 0�1 imlxrrted 1•rAgraws - MttawAtcal \ iRtca- Vialt,,,Cal Prrmtrin�s i i • r /\Itr.f��~ t � �1= •trr•Ilr \t":pii'►.P1.1: AF /:I.1 /•TI:R Illniil ITler TO ltrl dews (F/m11 iAt1►" Ilea llie r lips News (Spanlsh)' Reuters News Arms Stock itarvet`T' r 1) I40AA weather ITler T11 NAM Radar )tow ,tones News and Stock" (Tle� its xen's Clia"nel (Tier ill wrx force Tnne 121 — - — - - -- — Catholic Television (1) "lack Inral origination Itt) 111 ty Cathol tonal Acres (i) watell (1) 141/Crime tlnlverslll/? Florida International government Access of the Americas (Ill) rrogram Ittl rrocirmms (ill Jrwlsh "cress nlami Nisncn Spanlsh Local orlit) 1e.cal "eliglous (Ill flit I;nicrgenry rll.erat ton Center (1 1 County Srlmlol "nar'l orlglnation rnlillc Access Inflation Station (ill hate 1'he Library Access if 1 11 1 l.mtos 111011"l ill fill Dade School Channel (1 1 Itearinq lmpared/Seniors (ill rnbiIC Access t tllami Together Amer ICAbie IncAi Original inn ( 1 1leanx Arts/Classic "Ovles . (fill fill NlAwl City Government 14) Ii 1 Crime match ISecure) 1111 University Of Mlanii Community Access (till tncAl Proilrawming• Nlawt Cultural Access (till CnmonnityAAc Cdgewater Little Itav"nA CnownrittyArcces lilt) (III) Aliarattah Community Access (till Nanor Park CoAmnin(ty Access Little River Comwtnsty+ri••`s FfIlson - Coconut Grove Community Access (lit) fist) Fiayawl Cimmminity Acees" (IV 1 Telehealth Associates 11 1 OAsle S-hoots iTFS nr:•nr TIJ.1: tn•an:nra:Aruate pq f4P lie ttvwen's Channel / (fill' oM color weather Radar (1111 P Spanish Language Service Ittl) t•F Spanish Newswire .,shington City News Service silt) Ieuters Hew" -Views Irt newswire (till lilt Spanish wew"wlre Economic Reptut fill) fill Inrket Anil Newsr_able filltr IV)" Jones CAhle Hews 11\ IhtniclpAl Access+ 141• (416 it I it 1 RduratIon^I Access 111srano-Maws II ) Tele-Cable Spanish rnbllc Television (I ) Friendly City' lilt) Touclaw aim) Convent ton Access' C-nlersftlll Conference and Convention olyxirtunitles lilt) Small nusiness international Trade I,Commerce/City In ItItl Venture F.xocutive News 11e11ort 'IV 1 co nlnidad IlispanA Gouty rovernro"t Acce"s• Ill (it 1 State coveritwent At-cess• Im•p, twent (if 1 lit ) City of Nlawl rollce Alley/Ilan"" narl.erA• 111 1 Itlaa FioridA plate/ReglonAl Mews ttlawl roll/1 I1S1) 1 Narrowa:ast/The tbill (-F.thn{c Arcess• Ill tt-race Access• II) Ill Mack Access• ighhorhood itnrrowenst Access• gP41) Senlor Citizen Aec-eA!• Ill 11,iwAn Services Access' \ t►owen' A Acccss • Interfaith Access• ht l l Itt1)' Jewish Arc till) till) Archollocese Access• 111 1 Cultural Arts Aa:resr• III it consumer access• Al the T[ACk #IV) • Cuwh'site wilts older pioglJnwlrnl ..,-.,->....� � `II 11 i FIGU:W' 1 (Cont.i 1� teFt rn+9rar's ' Autolrl%ted vl .nl+l CAnI.e IF n*Ant • ux�. StII rrnrt ntr-.t.so%r CTM.FVIStMI OF I41AMI. INC* News view/Spanish News Financial "el`ort �t�k�i Inanclai lip"Orl HnTen's Channel - ----_� eh It tli.ocnl OrlglnaNnn (1 1 -- �t ton nlnhorigin• tnetlon / ~ (Ill 1 cal Or1g Fa�1►IY Features (t111 11,1111,hnr1,,,�1 orlglnation� �t 1 ,lied 11an�11caP1'—I Local Itesrinq 11"t' (111) Of(glnatlon sn,l able H^ ll) St,,rts 1% 1 n(ack i�cTl oles (English) naslc Skills 1 rx1 ill) V(nlon C vies ISP^nlehl ;It) Access (�l 1/ on 1, vinton C^hte No C,r,vF•rn1^ent Acce- (1 rx% 1• i p" 1111 p„bl Ic Mccss It 1 FAneattAeee,a t2l (I ► Government Tce1•ss 14) I11 pul•llc CltlLens Access' (111) Tccese 121� till Senior cess 121 fill) F.ducrInt Tcces+ (11) rtasc Ac pcllglnus ttil p3ta (till Access• College Access (111) tledlc^1 Access' rot Ice Ncceas .color cltlLen Access (tell Fire Access II 1 Library It 1 ro""l q Black Access' site with other Prwl lit slanlc Access • Colrlp Cr,wt,oslte will% other I,rograa,n•Ing ill) N�,1•otis Channel tatln Newswlre (1►1 till (111) (1111 IIPI UPI tlewawtre Financial flews (11) till) ' (Ill now .%ones IIPt SI,01ts wire tilt) IIPt Florlas flews 1 � •is t �n 0 R ,. • i �,.��%��, I I I I �� �_ FIr:URF 1 (cont.) _ _ __ 1'►•ht'.rS►S11►14 ,ITAI/i Aitlatlt-R1im- t,r 1:11CATr1; It1Pi11 1natltlot Ional I,,tsiness Channels (tRf system /Inlntennnce 121 data IF1 111,1.n @„omen, nata InformAt Ion Retrieval 421 r1111 1,a Text Retrieval 121 (IV y) PowTV (rebmmhrast l (f T t) ne„tern TIs1c aharrlI Tendon 14) infnrlAat Ion rtel rleval South roree T11n1n9 (2), Tcl {don Encore I11 nroadcantin•r (repeat Ili) TV prulralssl _ __ . -- - -- -- - - - — - -- - ll Channels listed: in Channels ifstellt - 19 local stations _ IR loal stations c _ 1 satellite services (•IFMT-Chlca.lo. _ 4 pay cable a111nllc1113t JISAI., OJSC-o Network. Warner - 1 rlay Chle test. $902) w Rending flrr the blini ►11191c Channel) S nnlsh) Iinglleh. 11 _ I CAFM - _ g Satellite Services JWFIIT-(l+fcalo. Televlslon, _ 2 SI1or1 wave _ 1 (nuntry Itleshvllie) _ Mace Wl+trrlt. tMale Matlonal Classical _ 1 l't+,nlln,nity na,llo Llrestyles. _ 1 r1/bile Access Network) R Rascrvcd for the fntnre _ 1 Government Access 1 Spanish Urcal nnri!inn0irnz _ _ _ 1 111ternate I,ncal 1 - 1 Talkini Rooks 2 Challncls (on A-1 csirlel locllsllnq 1 ch-onnrt for leased tollrlsl Snide Into. 7C11a11ne1s nn A-2 cahlel 13 on A-1 cable. 111c1+w11n.{ 1 ch. for low -power TV t eh. for pay -per -view 2 cha11n1•I0 Ion A -I cable) • 1 Is I.ensnd I.ncal SI+,-1nlsh 4channcls loc A-1 cablel gti.11l TI>L1: -1'h11111Rtit'ATI„'JS mages (Ilearin9 ispare/l rcogrexallfrl) fit) onnty interconnect lido Conferencin•I Ifi (F.Ip.s1•rvifTt) - hop-st-How" , 17 Channels listed. 19 local statlrnls R aiw111sted Stereo AlMllry Foe x pay services and TV netwufltSAr, chi _ 1 Ri-Ilm{ual sfllalicast ....'w - I Sim" all /•ubllc Access _ I F.dllcntl0n/Rleck - -s - I Educational Access }, _ t Airport Traffic _ 1 Airport Traffic _ 1 Talklna Rooks Iorted services IItFItT-Chlcarp.l _ nf+ " h. RISC. voice of A,urrica, f VR11-N Italtll J ,�� 7 Channels (on A-1 cahlel t11c11r11ee 2 comPnolte With other alwl Atrot teased ad.ITe,41111t110 M� 1, prO•IrAPPI1141 2 Channels' 101/ A-1 cahlel Reserved ►nr hl9h relnlill lercnnnect•.? /ofera reserved for cnuntY f+.rllce needs yu, l 1 FIGURE 1 (cont.) i � 1 i i � 1 1 . j i S111 !:TAR "fersnl1 I VIS1011 CJ%n1.r of 111AIII. INC. CAn6EV1%t(W1 of MIAIII, 111C. Mattel piny cable professional Education 121 FSK-Data (2) Ilome Rank i nq Medical Records Retrieval M,nicipat Traffic Control Utility Status Monitorinq Contlnulnq Education 421 Unman Services I.ow Speed Data 421 lligh Speed Data 421 29 Channel" listedr - 2S local stations satellite services IIWMT-Chleago.' Disco tRetwork. Goad I.Istening Mnalc) 1 Channel (on A-1 cable) — - — 7 Channels (2 on A-1. S on A-2 cable) Tier V - So teletext channels Tier VT- TnteTactive Services, hnw 3nnez Data Rank Rnight-Rlddcr Data Dank Ranking/shopping/polling (1992-91) interactive Game! 1199)) home rducatlnn 111 1198)) PAY -Per -View Mvies 1199)) Pay -per -View Sports 1199)) 46 Channels Il%tedr - 29 local stations 13 simulated stereo for television networks and pay services 2 shortwave signals mondon. South America) 1 citizen nand i NDAA weather 1 service for the vlsually hall icapped I Channel (on A-1 cable) 22 Channels (4 on A-1 cable, is on A-2 cable) 1 W i FIGURE SECTinIf 113 LlK'At. t ISWMAItI1Nl: • 4ocal rrograw rrotlncllon Irinllg.tant Arno racllitlos N111•it'0.1•t.r rtr Fa•r:'rf It rlf.✓11 -etn.tin lor:Ate.l of Aeadernl Stlnllo will nlso he used for secrl`r I•rndnct Ion 2 r•mnl.c slodlos II•tl.r•rty rlty And Little iLly 1,9.0 fm O1:!-k a,el $panlgh orlglnatlon Atel tigers Total COgttt I pain 5t2410 clln,nnn 2 liemnte ctivilos 160.On0 1 11nbile Van 40.000 2 rottnpneks 12,000 $172,nnn Total • Shwllo locations determined by needs • F.xcinglve Rrccss costs, Van -.I 2 ltnblln �q,nOn 16 rmtspar-ks - - -- Total 20R,000 • Cost not listed specifically. In,t i,rlleated As 'saran or e•lttivalcnf r..Inil,ment or remote stn.11nv' ntf•l/i Trf.r a•t Rn:IrLA: r"u'. •tr ;•tI —------- --- - - — -- • Stu•ilo loratell In the vicinity nF Stlnllu0 Incited Ai Rnlght C• ntcr, Fire Gtatlon, f.ltlIe 27th Avenue anit 7th Street N.M. Coroti.lt Grove Liberty City, plus 6 Stll,llo ilt Risn be used lot'Ilavana, 'Product cetilers ai"I 2 Rcce$$ inn Cnmmunity Pro.h,ction 1•orta Studios at the rdoeatinnal Total Costs, Communicnfiong Center ton Studio $4000110 • Stvlin4 wl l l also he ,we.i for arresn , Ho ►1 i leOVanitlnt - p/ odo.a ion 0 47504' 'Mlal Cogtgt Total 1 Shldlo racilitlee $500.000 1 rM,l,ilc Ih,it 115,nnn 6 C.,,•motilty Prodltctlnn ,000 192 Centers 192,000 2 rorta/St1l.tlns 1 miner Cnnt rol and � r•layha,-k FArllltleq 27.0nn - ('enl ral An-1 Remote elayback raclllticq 593.500 Total $1.577.500 • All locaf ltz„$ ,Still egniprn•ot are the ,ame as for Inrol orinin•,ti•,n i a1+r,ve 1 1 • 14111 share the I "I "rinsnatlon 1 ntlMlio and' p 6161 Ncrarione and NAIn 114y, still N.N. 9th Aven1/e - "Ill Rollo provl.lo S JwIir-ate.l access stnding at el,ectrlc(i Incationg t:11C 11161••1-' develm cvgtgt --nital -'cce"" ^•ta•Iln ! )Fi non Arcesg tool) IIe Van 130,000 South Access S►udlo , Q000 troth Access Sludlo Vam 12► `,no0 !Mirth Stti.lto ACceg9 , 000 4 Patton Access oil" llos Facllltlrs A0,0o0 lhn,icil•Rt Access rlo'lam liemortal Colle.le 45 Roo Access Studios C."mmonity View111+t nn.i Center, IIDI �g,non or14inatiml Access Automate.) Display ►SO,OOo Sy9tems 11ty)-1rr.,r.lg) �2%) 7►angml t t 1„1 I,.1w rover TV 15, 000 t:.111 I p•m•nl ('ivy C,lnvetit Inn (*,-titer 17,nnn ir- 01 N. RtiF.1h, C••nferenCe inn. non Ceoler • It••.licnted !0114111•il inn,nn0 Ahy Telert•mmutii.•atlnuq 1fill. udJ !'sorer rludlo r'nmmutilty iMl.lt An, AAA Tilt -I $1,/17,0•1� i'IGURC 1 (cont.) J SECTIOM�f1L 1'--aOGMMMING raw production Fih"IP"ent Io001 p OVA Facil ties i -- V1SNtli CAaI'.F. U► r1tAHt:. six sTAa nler� t.l+ __-- CAaI•F.VIS1n" OF HTANT. IIIfi — ........ �..... � gtudlo focnted on the east side of twecn H•M• llth H M. 7th Mcnue lath Street St.nllo located at the new library and U.W.Street access use In the Guttural rrolect a�Ce�� Studio will be used for will also he used Tor • only when not belnq used for local • Studio use orlgInatIon • Total ('oatat . Total Coster 6 4 I proaluctlon Center. 5g60.1)1 1 I�ca1 Orlglnetlon Studio Facility 90.000 Control Center 220.000 1 tenter 1 white production Unit t Fdit pec{to Truck 1 1:1+A Ttetwr+------- .. $1.270.114 Total Total t indicated 6 tAltures Costa no ltal ersl'c •• $1.911 total cap inatlon and for both local orlq acres" lncliltles the 7 I,ncntinns prnrlded for _ the local to acres• atwilos Map provided lmticatingsttdlns and ostst nbilc access a{ghl.nr- Exclusive access c Of the ) p C8 te.a end H- • the 11 Vlewl"n Access Studios Units Lodi Access Studloa 2 Ibh'le Production rstic"O00/Year A costa[ - public Access CurPo $I00, • Fucluaive $600.000 crant Aceeaa Sludlos -- �• 2 ""1.1le Video p"tote 470,Onn Truck 5.000 Totsl 10 Color Monitors 2101�0 e • Costs not imlicated arks smt Csw'era capital expemiltares A rortap �,an co"e a •• gi•AM tarsi cap 'nation and 10 C.barmet'r local orlq $I,085.000 access lacllitlee Tot a 1 r 2� rj 44 14 j �^s yip r J p # r— "��'' i i� r i � � � i •�,n p. �� �, , I u i�.��i i m 1� in ni. i ��i�l �I 1p � ...b ,i �� �w, m2F�. . a ,w. :, � ��t����� ianP.ff"�I � — tuli�'h•1'HIUS 1�T►,V (Cont..). . R �•.nl art• .a - •, s t6m _._ -.. - -• - L.SOF.�otr r .._— -- - - ' ._ ►eatlon aml S 5T?,oOd LtOtt.f1011 . Ih al or1A I,,llo'.00tt Cowmltr•cot � ,,Winn inn g155.^00 Mrro•t NcA 50e.000 — - tar t-tl •:!r,. . 2me gS11.0 1� Fu11-t►op 2 rart-t Foli-time 2 i.atc-t1� tR � 2 part -cline is full-t1"" 1R full-time uat [ • 2 tart-c►me t,oslt►on„ time I,ualci I furl- !� t � ' ��II�I�'��IIIII!!IlIL�I!�� � a.�•. � I�II��� � I�� �� �I 9 FIGURE 1 (cont.) Commitment to 1,ocal origination and Access Programminq orerstinng tiwlget year l Tear ) Tenr S Tear 10 Statt COswllpent vast 1 ttwrs_Per_Ileek Ot 1..0._Proremmin!1 Produced 1•ically Other Total Percentage of Dudget allocated �c`cees 1 iinnel F�alucElon �issl sEonce STX .TAR NTEtSMI CIt111.F.vISin" or "wit, $ 41,000 559.000 910,000 1,211,000 6 part-tlmro 5 Full-time 21 Fart-tlmc 15 Full-time 24 rarl-time 21 Full-time 21 Part-time 21 Full-time 2 Part-time ro-JR141ns equal • I Full-time_ Position vtSlOtt CADI.r OF 11TRIII, 11 % r g 100.000' 1.174.000 2264.000 2:671.000 Part-timeb 5 rnll-tlwe Is part-time 60 Full- IMP 22 Part-time 64 Fu11-lime 24 Part-time 67 Full-time • 2 Part-time Positions equal I Full - time posttlon 4 4d SEE r' IGtinr•. 1 (cont.) pro.lalons (or H{tartly Pralraiemlltg ;J lr.l•It *.,.I.,.. rot' tart:* rtC Itl'�rlf • 2 remnte stonilon • 1 Spanlrlt local orltiln.rtinn slordlo in Little IlavanA • 1 "lack local origination stud{" In the black crmntttnity • Slnilo rtttlmloyre" from time local area rr Itl.l.! l'S': i It!'. 11MF11 • So.SN fmnl over life of franrhlse For minority rragratmninn and training prolcc►a lllnorlty television production trainin•1 rrotiram t'ap{tal conts to facilitate mlrrnr lly channels. App T $150,000 ralllrl outlay per ch.rnnel. total .rn"► approaches $I -A" • S1.111 commitment over life Of franrhitte to purchase a "Alellltr uplink as part of A source Of nitl.,nal win•rity r•rogratmxin.t • Funding for staff vomiltion. a within the cnmm•1111ty prograt•ming deportment fur c•m-ordlnators Of "lack. Spanleh• 1,mt1 Fkttm•n'" pro•iramtilny • Affiliation will, "t:'r to provide Inca) hlar•k progrwttmminq to the OFT net wart • •i•el i.bmn Input terminal" at mtm.•rnn" minority ottlanlzatlon" ' commmtily rro•lucti000 cin several predminority y ne ighl.nrlmoo•Is :to.l in I..cal Ion" In Loth I.At In .111.1 "lark nel•Iltt•nrl"W"ls CommmmitV orlglnat^rnIolnts at mnnr•toua minority t, Isatinn" • tlemlrers of mien•, ll y groups on every advisory ixtatd effecting lornl pr—oramminq • 111•,ital services time-shared In own -Metlmen three langn�.te" t.,•„m,,,nl,y viewing -enter" In every minority C001"Imltl- programmifit, del•arlmcnt hiring p,.mclicrs wIJch will andeavor to cxrrrd t:rn re•pmlrrmrntn (rnntIlon•dl NtAttt t17r.1: rt•'1!1Pplr':y'IreG.S will establlnh a VorAtion"t Trainlntt Program for the Ili*' advantaged, etl.milt►Ing SSO,OnO annually for S years will provide Spanlnb emmbllc Televtwlon with S100.tt00 11er year for administrat: Iv- an;t prt•gr.ittming costa will estahllsh A cultural Arlo' and Ethnic lierltage Fu,nt to dlslnt• urnnte lotallln•1 ahnnt Sl.ri!1 Over the life of franchise will provl.le $%q,ona In scholarshllY" to Miami area colletles will provitle loll .teal skills training at convenlent locations throughout the city to maximize lime Involvement of minoritler In Pto•ll-a•s prr•.luctitln) 4111 provide Flotilla Nertrl+) J college with ltr.th a Fit radio And televislon acre"" prtrlu.tl•tn at -AI I • will Prnvi-le sl.ec{alize.l progrANNintl for nreclf►c au.11ences, de.11cnte chnont•Is to minorlty Interests Anl Insure the Acre""ittlilty of pro.luctlon tools to minority lreas or the city • will produce pra•iratta.eing of Intern"t M ..Ine•rl►{e" Nlll Inc"roinrale A Itnn-'•rWlt� org3nitAtlon to deteemltle the f.ollcle" and handl.• t6l•ubllc arcass adminlstratlon Or the A net�or►. M111 Tana with $IZS.nn a '';On ym•ar i. 3115 dud for year t, i •or wear 1 with a 1'. inc.••.•"•• snrrr.ma l vt• yc.tr will etprll, a compotiml l y Pelat It . Au.litnrlum At the MIam1-p...le tnmmunity Cullegt. 'pew ""l-ld renter Caml•ud will p,ovlde to nrgluoal At-cenw r.!nters, the coertntrtity vlewimt Centers and sites on. The tnstltotlnnal flelaorit with full p loll re active cal..1h{IIII ., MAIIl System dezlgn aUninerityroe QhM+r�1 to predomlttately 1lnnds Sl�naI Carrlage of tt11lt1cnitrlrrl Televillon of Toronto IN1'VI froT gpanisll Innaaage programming ::rn1th arnl t.al.ln nmerlca • I,,cI on of the Ih m1•I,'s Chanl,el I1IATSI X1 $1,ft1 Ill, Of I ,nvolvcmentet aimed t tIWII Iniaml T„qn • A news pr^dlrctlon progras, orlglnatInq at rrdln atatlon Nfld11 • terminal at It remote Telldon input loerl minority newspapers • A minority enterprise business s1e rdminlrstration l,ustacsaeinvolvementln minority Io,.a1 provamwlnq tnity • li„n,p tons i,ositlrn7 Inloc-the coltmll pri,gramminq Department • w com.ltment to In^�unity al Mart ort&^I gat long e1 forts pro.trarminq 01r110 or • It channels ledIr �tel, fnq part to minority i I r FIGURE l(cont.) ■ c prolln�lsio[or n111_rlcT rroyra�r.tnv Sl% STtlfl NIF.I ttft Cf111I.1:vtStoll of "I"', It1e. .......... Public access Poll Cleo And l.rocednres deecrtl,ed w c VISIoIt CIIB1.1'. of MAW, I"C' Public Aceeee Policies and ree described rrocrdoeccr!ee Fully staffed end equlpp ed etudtOs locnted In minority communitlee rAte Local Orlgtnatlon Channels SePA for 01ack. I.Atln end 11And icappe,i prOgra'"a'Irq Mill Offer (AlAV1910n, Bieck ' Fntertalnment Telev{ :arf, tile A e SPnieh Inter netlonal Network, BetA and ills tx,men' a Channel • Will encourage the 95Ively pnreue rlcceas Corporation to agrevel minOrlly Involvement • will purchase minority commrlrrtty rrrnluct{ons for the Family Novle Channel e • In the Plane to lnvoilfrM"ePfOgraw Advleory resl✓jnatb development anlshl • Carrlage of 1'h. 21-Mt.TV (Sp on ail tiers of ecrvtce raid Internships in cable tOlecl,Nfi^. • for all re Idents of MIAmI, winorlty g ng • jolng Eetablfehment Of a Career T�atlone Center to Provide cable ope cen- once. $]5I 0oo Initially nail eltscOmmllted to the $150,0on Annually Center • Narrowcaetlmi aervlce on fire aubacr It— net,a,rk • 21 Viewlnq Center, In minority communitlee etote • FmPloywent prncticre ew.;reding and Fr+lernl requlremente W1 Ut' 4: 4) FICURC 519C7'Ioll LI rR(„•o51Y+ IU1T1:5 mate I:1lA►atller Mslc.9'!rvir:o X./l�lhlr 14�tes Ilrfft outlet '1••r.l:ir•:Inll: r11' ra'Li71:p 111.•flf r:oaranteed ant ll ctwwi•letleo of aysl"m 43/nsl rltct ton Tier 1 124 Cliff.) Tier fl 459 Chg.) Tier fit 178 Chs.) Tier IV 11e4 chs.) Tier f Tlern if. fit L IV Tier 1 The Movie ChAnitel r„jtnvislon Tire, if B tit The Iluvie Chffnnet t:alavIsIon Tier IV nravo 1pmw TheAte• Nelw/rk I.A, ve'lan Live C 1 newlax nainvl,lon 11'"Wr now tiff,," 511.1wt Ixw: The. 111rvIe Ph.111nel p.,y- Per - V 1 ew ::.rww• n, renr.l.-nt till rree I $11.95 $12.95 511.95 S 5.fln $14.95 S14.95 $ 9.95 $ 9.95 $ ♦.9% $ 4.95 5 4.95 $ 9.95 S 9.95 S 9.95 $ 9.95 S 9.95 var 1es r'i.Cfp.Y.'.TF.:k'� ItlPlif t'narante-I for 1 yearn from stale of frall.•hlsr• AM.lrtt f).s.rw r-MlOrtl..n Lrniertert it► Ivs•s IIIan 71 Iwnnt!"t ller 1 112 chq.) Free S 5.95 11er It (45 chs.) 11er I l f I I I ch, plu, cllnlre fi Any: opt ion prlck.Wl - 1 I' S 7.45 filln) (IIl it) - 2 oplicn parka-le-0 S 8.7n lift r'i - I epllolt package, S 9.70 tier tP- '•rechim Interactive kSei111 ^wl tier 1 F/ee Tier It '?few Its - 1111y opt inn c.nnhinat Inn S 5.05 Tlrr IV- Prr111{11111 IntrtactivP tiinn•+1 1.Onw• Theater Iletworlt S Lome 11oK office S 7.95 S .95 t'Inenla• llnx Office pion r'InelwOw S18.50 1;ome f.A, V^.lA T $ 8.95 fhowl iw.e $ 8.95 nalavlslon $ 8.95 Iva ► nix.w 9-he rinvle Channel $ 0 .9 i rlrl.11c- tllhaerll.tlull Ne1w+►R 't 1•rrxltere Ill AvAllable) 9.0n . • Tr101a►iv.• prier n.1ors ^nhjrrl •1. nr•1•.tlallon alw1 will arr.•nd till salt Irl n an.f tirry ire% ►r•i•tlrr.l. '''Y111rA) rrlsts: In,t:rl lit Inn - al cost IM.n1111y I1.11e - Irt nutlet SIS.no 7n•1 r.ol Iel $I0.00 )1 1 011t let S 5.011 A.1.111 I..na 1 S 4. n11 lrn:.nlr trla: rs.•^un:rrv:atr•:[ti. .unrantevett lint It co"101'64 ion OF wistr.0 :on, t rue. t ton Tier t' fir Cho.? Tier It t4* chw-II Tier ttt fI chs1.111 Tier IV 149v chff'•11 Tier t Tier it Tier-IIf Tier IV lio., theater Network nine Latin" nravo/(:olden (Httl'e,t qon.. Be" Of f Ir1• GAlavision Chnwt 11Ke ClnewAw The llnvle ChAnnet pay-rer-V iel. FrrC - S S 6.95 S 8.95 v C% lint It1.flhAte4i S 4.75 $ 6.95 S It . 9 . S 1.95 S 6.95 $ 6.95 S 6.95 S 695 Var ips fietetx/)ne/1i nowat, peO prnrt"t•ce ha,is ®ae 1 1,i�� rI( i n!'s 1 (cont.) 51:CT1011 Lu rROPOSED_RATES Rate f(usra9tec � basic Service — --- -- -- -- MonthiY Rates rtrst outlet i A"Itlunsl Ontlets Pay TV Servlctf Silt STAR N1E1 ultl CAPI.FVIS1ON of NlAttl, Ifit'. Guaranteed ontll completion of system construction Tier 1 (24 chs.) $ )•4S• Tier It 147 ehn.) S11.00• Tier tit 1141 else. pills data haste aece9141 SI1.000 • Includes monthly converter fee $2.00 nit Tiers mini Pay One Service Two Services Three Services ray-rer-Event ray-rer-use t • Avero9e n�d•9rrtber Ne^otintrd, 'or to 50t rmittrtlnn S 4.95 $10.50 $16.00 $21.00 $ 7.00• S 1.00• vt.Slttll CAlli t. Or IIIA11I. tflC- Goaranteeed until completion of system construction Tier 1 124 chs-1 Freels Tier I1 (16 chs.) t 4.50 Tier I I 1 (50 chs.1 $ 8.50 Tier 1V 112 chs.) S 9.50 Tier V 172 rh9 plus Teletextl$12.95 Tier VI 172 chs plus Teletext and $14.95 tnteractivel • See 'Converter Deposit' Tier t Free Tier It $ 1.00 Tier Ili $ 4.00 Tier IV S 4.50 Tier V $ 6.95 Tier Vt S 7.95 110me "not office S 7.95 Cinemax S 7.95 showtlme S 771.955S Tire ttuvie Channel 115.03 Any Two rhove $29.71 Any Three Alrive $26.90 Any Four Al.nve $ 6. n0 Pllnvislon Network $ 1.95 none Theater 1.95 Frnnt now Public Subscriber Network 11.nq neuters lion $10.00 t-Iny Cable S .00 Not Itwttentf-t r 40 FISURC 1 (cont.) -- - ._-- _ _.. _......_..—_-----•----_-- --• I. .....,nt:rlr•tirT.c nF .:P1•:.T1 a t1l.plt lost 1h1e-T11ac Clnryr•s-_�—...._.—�-- - 'irsl Iwtl�lt tallwtlnn 1 Ins allatlrm - Mdltlnns) t>,ltlet 1 I tnlltellollltn - 1'wY TV M!� Tier 1 569.95 1 Tiers 1T. ill L 1V � p.•1 Indfc..teJ 7 Tier 1 Tier1V 1 s 1T, I11. Free If installed at the same time nr locwtlnn as the first nnt- let. $21.95 It different Tlora 1. 11 L ill Free wlrMn Ordered with paste Service. 516.00 if later Tler IV - Free $25.00 Ti.•r I1 $75.00 Tier tit $110.00 Tier TV $15.00 Tier t Tiers 11. ITT. IV $21.95 Tiers TT. Ili. IV 571.95 IPr t $17.75 Iers TI L 1t1 ter 1V-Prrminm Interncllve 52�.95 SIQ.no' 'Ie►s 1. 11 L 111 'Ier IV -Premium luteractive $11.95• nat.e it Installed with Initial Installation, later ,reminmTofiS9.95 chargc.l a ono -time 1 alcove these rates rree with the Ingta9ttfion of later haeir nhle + rvic.•. $ 0 thine tk.'t Indicated Phil. Indtcated v nrr•ne tv1:r..or.::u�r:ta•r•r.l•.nrt , a' �Icc I � 529.95 Piers If. It" c rV !t9'. 9S rler I tint 11141cated rler III. ttt L IV Free If Installed With first. outlet. 519.75 if later Ilnme Theater Iletwork-free on Thrs t[t L lV If Installed at same flaw as TIC" 1 or 1t. $19.95 If later Oravo/r,olden Oldles-flee on Tiers TIT L IV If installed at %— time 1 11-$19.95 if Inter All other services J CO On 'vier I only-S40.00 one-time or I SI.2S fnr I6 mt.111:119 510.00 Vacation Piscnnnert/pecnnnect S 7.50 17 FIG IRE 1 (cont.) --'------ ---- -- -- -- ----- Six STAR NIF.t.^•(,N VfStt)IT cAnr- or I1f11M[, TIIC. � a^ CAn6F.VISf(1N ()1' I1IAN1, it1C• ' one-Tlse_ Charges 40.00 Installation - First outlet 529.95 all Tiers Tier It $29.95 Tiers IT, IV, V i VT $14.95 Installation - Additional Outlets $10.00 IL Installed with first nutlet, Not Indicated *. St9.95 It later till Tiers) i Flee If installed with naslc Servlce. Free installation - Pay TV $15.00 If later Convertor ilepasit None For Tier i onl a converter is required that can he purchased for $111.Pn or leaned for S2/month for 22 nonthS. A repair service contract In available for $1.50/month $19.95 Not Indicated t ' Relocation Not 1le11cateJ Reconnection $19.95 K �Y� i I h��� sq all i n ;I it u q u 'll l l q l ' II I IPI I II P III'I 9 iIII I' I I FIGURE 1 (cont.) Other Rstew CUwl In atttl F.q l mnt !!sane Itutl - C•rerwcrclat !idlers raxwe re I -I1 lint• r s M h11+:N1t'Ahi.F. Ill• /:aCnTFI !!rant11 Flee Air Time lust 0- S rxin,lles S20.00 40.00 6-IA minntes 60.00 11-15 minutes IOA.00 16-30 minutes 1nA.An I1-60 minutes P1 e-ProtUtra ion Rcmnte Sarver �t.lsnn 1`lanning Confrrt•nce Screening S75/luw-/t - ront pro.tnctlon $ Jo/lrxn t ,-Li•vlal* F.d I t i nq S IOA►xa t vl,kt,t.yr` Ilnhhinq VIRe.rrnpa Cnets y.rt Indicated - mime rime (0100-l" no 1 hour $'00.00 1/2 ilnur $120.00 1/4 holtr $100.00 win prime Time $20o.no 11111tlr 1/2 hrrttr $100.00 1/4 haul $ 50.00 Free nales negotlate.l ludlvietlally. x.ent determined by personnel and e,ptll pllrq re-pllrementf7• marketptaceconsistent will: i lte prcra l l l n� _ -- rUll-time 6nlls Vi.l•ro Cltannel� S4t5-S6nOg/ematth mat. tart -time 6!th video Channels 57.SA-SI10/1..••rr mat F,111-tim•• 0.25 ftllz data channel 5/r.-51t 6/xx,nth go Ix ro l-t lma 0.50 flllz d•tt., t panne) Sit-i'.'IF/nrntl• n,a�t. - Fol1-1 {me I.0 Iltlt �l.tla rh+uulel Sp1-510'.n/month m.,t. - Yull-t{mo 2.0 Nllz dela challnrl SI'.7-51•Ir.O/mnnlh max. p,r.-lei ':v{Irh1n•1 hnta Nt•►M.nk Sinn for connect ton. $25/month u.•rss fen null S1.00/loon park.•la i minilTFIX. rr••.tw+tllt{AT►/t!jh For non -call), prn.luctlnns S>11.110 SSA/h•+ur Nnbllc Var. SSA/Dour, $loll/tidy F F.dltlsin S25/Ilour _. y rot cahl� mnhl.rt Iona ''`re Free For non-callle ►1rothlct.lons Sttuf to 5125/IMur 60A/daT Iwtbile Van $ 95/hultr, S rdIt1sin S 45/hnnr For cable prrnluct lnus Studlo S 50/Itotlr 1 nubile V.111 c N Faltiw-t 20/IN ur W O 1 Meximl/m ehr•lin time Inclrldinq [eheafeal - 20 mlltuleft - t0 minutes S25.n0 425 $15.01 - 45 rllnutes $45.OA _ 6a minute" - Alx/vc 6n minuten SI/min•tt. Pre er.,.hrct Inn 55/In„tr/t•arm.o Remote 1•Ianni,M rnn!er,r„co S1,/Intr /1•"r�nn _ _ grreenitnl $1i/h xlr Post Pro.luctlen• - t:dltl tg S15/ItOnr 512.St1/11011r - UtthbLat llndln Rrcerdin•1 $i/Islnr nit.tlo Ih+hhlrnt S1/!lour _ - Alu11n F.,l i t) rnl S> .50/I.olr- • All ch""es 111110 nxrter{als 61 FhUR I 1 (cont.) -- - -- - _ _ _-- ---- - Vie cnpf i r`r MAW. 111C. Stt STnn NlVl/r'lift r'nn1.Ev151011 OF MIMIC- ttN�. — —_-- __ _- -•• Otl±lr Rstes Shldlo and EqulPoe�t Vsege fin -Commercial Users poranore la l losers l,s_wsea channel dates ree for first 5 sdnotes• met Ilflrltlat t for additional time nnll•ss 1 !s a suhaidized pro)rct Studio rates -$75 for spot pro& ct ro.tect on/hour -$too for l'rngralP p pepmote rates _$150 for spat prodacllon/Iwur -5100 for one hour resmote pro.ljctton plus edleage Negotlnted at tittle of request tree Studio production p~te proructiono Supervision and instruct ion 5150/100111' $I50/hoar S 70/man-hoar Non-colw�erclat nsers-(ree Icommercint users 910/ha►f hour per 1.000 custaaers :Syfi5 I I __FIGURE 1 (cont.) IAfll:nit-APLC or nurATI:n litAfif service to t+ove_lownl. and EJ1lcnllona) racllltles Installation f'e+,• tree Fllst Iillllet cost AAditional outlets Free Monthly Rate ---- ----- - • illstallatintl chartrs way lip waived speelAt eater, ul"lountst tnterectOve d++1ln•1 initial construction anti vale• prrxnnt. lona1 I+cr itills -- -- • lw+nthly rates on Tiers 11. 111, nna iV discounted 101 to senior rltl7rn5 • lo+lk rates AVAllablet nrgotlal" based on nllmher of units • nlscoants for eul+scribers of wultipl• pay srrvlcr". Additional - • 11 • rr mail and / rx+n t It. With CAIILI:SYSTrll! 111Ai1l' Tree cost Tree WAFtI TEr/:-loifltgitr:ATttlllti• Free, Cast Frees l 1�1 disccrlu•t an monthly cable 3ervlc. Tiers ii. lit n+ri tv hroeldPrt chit.1 to -I11 ren!ofc an9 Interactive capability row a" hatallraper•d hotseboun+ts additional Si.0f1 over hasir monthly free • ills f^es .valve., darinot itt alas tv provided textfirst 4n di/s of service- to new • ern tl. capability for an additional 55.00 I .11 CA 5 over the Itasic xrtnllll;• fee with OD Slandarl lnetallallon is a 150 !^ot Interactive to -Irup. Cempany reserves the right Atil to cllnrge •-Oct At time Oliva materials nervlceofr eidrrly�citlzens a A I m for nratansn dArd halwllcaplt • MtIR rater avAllAl.le to multiple Except for Tier i, home terminal dwelllnq baildings f-e waived for Initial 60 day • A S1.0o/month Jleronnt far tnkiml p^rina fnllowin+l activation AM) two ar more ilAX1 pay services during perlavllc prn+motions A $1.00/month discocnt for takinq parental contrnl device Available ralavlslon and the Latin nonrter for free o» all Tiers except Tier 1. pa+F.agt. Tier 1 stahsc-ihers charge.l labor • parental control drvices nvallaLle alld materials for a cant of matpllal refundable Comity Serve 1 (data None) <19.95 drlrtvll Installed- $5.00 first ootlet fay 1•rt-view ,ptlon available to Cr,ml,o Serve 11 at either cost plus Tier I I 1 sal+srt11"' 101 or .11110acrlbela may provide Alarm 11•Ihl and alarm hozser Iivelr oyn AIiel0u0mf•utrr available to Ilse handivappe.l flit •+ neater" 11►e S19.95 Inslaile'l $99.95 •n+r-lime ioalallal loll rhar•le of fltgt nutlet pills S15/m++nlh e1.50 Il+Awe "ecnrlty avAilable with varylwl • rr•000my "rme Securily gervlce options. charges rAngr frrxs S49.95 Available for S8.95 a month and and lop e p far InNtllatloin and $2.9% an Installation charge of $99.95 of antl lip mxmthly Installed after cable InstAllatltill. ""S it at the same time. S60.00 If at. t he same time as rremitum Intrra-r11vr InstallAtlnn Soph{<11 At d S+•rurlty Service•t avallai.lr with rates e•1t1•inq with the nl.l loot- taken r II F1 GUT_ f— Stx STAR NIF.t� ---� ^ OF NIRltI. ItIC. set. Ica :e t:rwe[n`ent std �_—�catlonnl t�wcltltles fnwta/latlon Fees rivet Outlet AM R1onwl Outlots gonthly Rates SDI— a� tess. Dlseountss�'— flags VfSI(NI CA . OF lanai. l Free 16then at cost Free on charge up to . Tiwie and waterlalw Free Free- --- for Tiers Itt. 11u1k rate dl�rnunt of up to 5 avwllwl.le to wPartwents parental lock -out device available for w On l^1e 510.00 Inat3llat{OO charge Avg Peale • security Services g�,0o button 529.95 InstservI. e wnnthlrt wecurlty s^r$14ws-1 th1Y iwvcragcl Installed. • inetallVtiva►vedrfo at lewsucpd in 1V. V' service is Introd Jaya after an area es for Tiers T Instaliwtfen charges Installation w ere Per Outlet IV. V. Vt and lel•s for Tiers III. 1, chnrg• r trip fiwsle are an a perfor • Security services ,,liable S10.95 S99.95 and up installatton. and up onnthlY i P t I FIGURE 1 (cont.) Atll:plt'Allt.f: /lt' t:111:ATl:lt HIAf11 • t•Inrl rml•lovment /111purtunity a1M1 Affirmative Action p•onla�ws J.,41,r Ibell • rerrnitinl ?norees Jascrlt.e.l ` pnliclr� for nsinq nolon lal•nr dogcr IIved • .r l evancr_ Lnn.t l i nq 1.1 ex-eJ//res dent r I bed • Vietnam Veterans alwt larlesaplIell ilorkerIt empinyment Po clrser l b—1 CRI11.6Sy!:7t;f1!. 11 t A11t Affirmative Anton pro.lram deseribr.l It.nlers C'. len,flm'Rndnhenitly ailh •en }nye.l 1 Y Lnlh I/elnnq A,"I empinyr aswoclatinns for many Years." HtNlf T .,.r-CfM'rnRtlCltTttN1!: F.�Insl Employment rhilnr►unity pro.lrams laser ilx.1 Reerullmrnl praetiros desctlhed • will estai/i ish an internshll• pronram • H111 Conporatn whit labor-unlnn organizatlnna on is fair And w111e1 basift with uon-affiliate,! Contractnrs I PIG' IKC I (cont-) �t?ION It/ FAMAYT14"M PRACTtCFS 5111 STAR 11161X"'ll VlStlnl CARIX (IF litAllt' 1NC CARLF.V/StoN OF /ITAttt, INC. --- — ___-1— F.gtal Fmployment OPportunity • F.gva1 r"I'loyment OPportunity program de-wrll,Pd policy loscril-4-4 • M111 hire IOnt of Its employees locally • will hire minorities In a percentsye Proportionate to, or higher that. the minority representatlnn In the City Of Miami F am f t) 11, 1 1111 e FIGIMr. 1--(cont.). r:Tlp liltt.•-rrl for 1•r:-sir, 113% ~--- • ►tarketlnq plan drscrlhe.l SF.'t.'T I rRl N s - 111:'.l'1:1.1.1tN1:11U!% ,111 monitor Will* pwrticiNot i"0 Where ppllcahlel pevlsious of the CrnwMrnlcatlnnw fact Development of telrL.xt stardarde treater economlr's ••f scale 1n and were service throuih Ir•.me terminal units The author I?At ton of Inw Miner tV stat tons I.Ow cost comput 1 nri cal.ahi l 1 t tes 4V Suhetwntlwl I,eu,.tr,li••n of new 1*01:3e comPiter/rntettalument technolo•l i rs petter lechniqucs of spectrlm* conservation _ The entry of a n,w clay'• Of C,.m ,n 1 carriers 514nitleanl chan•les In the dweuuLsco of dl.Pnsahle tiwr and the style rT of Work tic lwrvelopment of fiber C.1% tranemiseion systems IU!IUlpgpgqp� Ip�i I� I� �IIII I I I 111911�I'�IIIU II'I!I�Illllp III !IIIIII"��i' FIGURC 1 (cont.) i0 i011 n t1SC66 mf1"E MiS i Sf 1t 1iTAn tltm ntl Canl.rvISION nr miml, 111C. • dis agnreselsystemlmarketlik•• dletrltnitlon system state-of-the-art VI$IOtl CAPIE OF FlI""- 111C. Will otter 24 channel• of diverslfle" prograiming at no monthly charq' • 1t111 equip 21 viewing centers for free nelghbnrhocA viewing. These renters will alvo he ronnectcd to the institutional lletwork and yrovlded with teicrsptlon decoders • Will establish and maintain a Vision Cable Television-l'""nq Center to provide cable television ter-hnical and operstio.al experience. Ilas committed $350.000 initially and 5150.000 annually to the Center. • Ilan Initiated 'Operation Scrapbook' an part of an on-gotnq effort to Identify arol re+pond to local needs • Will provide $100,000 anmtally to city for development of Institutional network services i. C 46 I =88- dj. Financial Plan -- The higher 3.2:1 debt -to -equity ratio proposed by six Star Nielson, on a relative basis, makes that financial plan more vulner- able in the event of lower revenues or . higher costs than anticipated. (d) Commitment to Other Systems -- As a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitments to other cable systems is 83%, much higher than any other applicant, and this is considered a relative weakness. (2) Construction Schedule -- Figure 3 indicates the strengths and weaknesses for the Criterion "Construction Schedule". Three applicants, Cablesystems, Miami and Vision propose to complete construction and provide service to all areas of the City within two years. This is considered a strength as compared to the 3-year schedule proposed by the other two applicants. Cablesystems proposes to construct a separate institutional network only after the demand cannot be satisfied through a combined residential/institutional cable. This indefinite con- struction schedule is considered a weakness. (3) Technical Standards -- Figure 4 lists the key technical standards proposed by each applicant. This criterion is considered essentially "neutral" since all standards proposed exceed FCC minimums. Consequently, no strengths or weaknesses are assigned, although it is desirable that an applicant list as many standards as possible that the system will be designed and tested to. in this respect, Vision's listing may be considered as marginally adequate. (4) Origination Cablecastina (Automated Services, Special Interest Progz4mrung) This category includes the following program groups of Figure 1: ° Satellite Programs - Video • Local Programs - Automated 0 Imported Programs - Automated 4. -9g- (1) Satellite Programs - Video -- Americable, Miami and Vision propose to provide 20-22 services of this type, as compared to 15-16 for Cablesystems and Six Star Nielson. The difference is considered to be a strength for the first three applicants, (b) Local Programs - Automated -- In this category, ?•liami proposes 23 services (although most are shared with video programming), which is almost twice that of all other applicants. (C) Im5_orte6 Programs - Automated -- Miami is at the hian end, proposing g to import 11 services, and this is considered a strength. At the low end, Cablesystems proposes 2 services, which is rated a weakness. The three other applicants propose 5-7 services, which is considered neither a strength nor a weakness, on a relative basis. Local Oricination -- "Local origination" programming includes those local video programs (automated programs are considered in (4) above) for which programming is provided by the cable system operator. Figure 6 lists the locally originated video programs proposed by the applicants, as distinct from the "access" channels for which the community is expected to provide the bulk of the programming. Figure 7 indicates the strengths and weaknesses of the proposals in this category, with Cablesystems, Miami and Vision considered as offering a strong selection of programaing, and Six Star Nielson, with 4 services, in the "neutral" category. (6) Access Production Facilities and Support -- For access and community programming, the key factors are not so much the number of channels of,feied, but the decree of technical support provided, in terms of cablecasting equipment and support personnel. Only with this support can local groups be successful in using the cable system for access purposes. Figure 1 lists the critical support items, which iftCltde the following: 6 Local Program Production Equipment and Facilities operating Budget ° Staff Commitment ° Percentage of Budget Allocated to Access Assistance Figure 8 combines these items into three groups, facilities (since both local origination and access facilities generally are available for access use), operatina budaet and staff (taken at Year 5), and % of budget committed to access. The strengths and weaknesses are indicated, with those items not rated in either category considered as neutral. (7) Interactive Services As indicated in Figure 9, all applicants propose to install essentially equivalent interactive computer systems at the head - end, and all will offer security alarm monitoring and text services initially, with other services phased in at some later time. All are considered strong in this area. (8) Service to Institutions -- Figure 10 illustrates the items considered indicative of the capability to provide service to institutions. These include: ° Institutional Network Mileage -- The longer the institutional network is, in general the more institutions that can be connected, at standard theslongestMiami, network and th'ismiles, has by far is seen as a strength. Six Star Nielson and Vision propose 137 and 114 mile networks, and these are considered neutral. Americable's 58 miles is considered a weakness. Cablesystems proposes to share a single cable trunk between residential and institutional use. if insti- tutional demand is higher than anticipat-d, a separate cable would be constructed later. This is seen as a weakness, so far as convenient service to institutions is concerned. a U - 91 - IflAtitutional Network Capacity -- All applicants have adequate capacity for initial institutional services, except that, again, Cablesystems' capacity is contingent on not being required for residential services. ° Connection to Network -- All applicants propose to connect all public institutions to the network. (9) Sophistication of System -- There may be some disagreement as to how the "sophistication" of a cable system can best be defined. For this evaluation, it has been interpreted as the ability to provide a broad variety of services, including advanced two-way and interactive services zi! subscribers. Within the context of the application information, this ability is related directly to the type of converter proposed for use, and whether it has features such as addressability (the ability to send prograrrrning or signals to specific sub- scribers under computer command), decodinc or descrambling (the ability to decode information or programs sent in coded or scrambled form) and interactive caoacity (the ability, through a keyboard or pushbuttons, for the subscri er to send information back to the system's headend computer). Another factor relevant to being able to offer the widest range of services initially is the system capacity that is operational at the inception of service to subscribers. If, for example, upstream transmission capacity will not be activated initially, that will inhibit the introduction of two-way services. Figure 11 indicates the proposed commitments of the appli- cants in these two areas. As noted, all applicants propose the most sophisticated converters available for the highest tiers, and all will activate sufficient capacity initially to permit the introduction of virtually any type of communications service. (10) System Design -- A number of features normally included in the overall category of system design (such as technical standards, service to institutions, system sophistication, channel capacity) are evaluated as separate criteria. Consequently, only those system design features not evaluated elsewhere are included in this category. 0 r s i 92 - These include the following! b Headend and Hub Configuration b Satellite Earth Station Configuration ° Longest Amplifier Cascade ° Special System Features Figure 12 indicates the evaluation of these items. Americableis single headend design is considered a weakness for a city the size of Miami. Miami and Six Star propose to provide satellite earth stations at all hubs. This is useful in the event of malfunction of any single hub, and it also reduces the transmission path of the satellite -delivered sicnals, which in turn results in higher picture quality for the subscribers. In the two other catea_ories, all applicants' proposals are considered strong. (11) Channel Canacity -- Since the channel capacity for institutional service was considered in (8) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services. Figure 13 indicates that only the Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cable - systems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity. This might be particularly critical for upstream capacity, which is needed for home interactive services. Although Cablesystems promises to build a separate institutional network later when needed, this solution is more disruptive and less satisfactory than providing an initial independent network. (12) Ownership Structure -- Figure 1 indicates the ownership structure of each applicant. No inherent advantage is seen for any particular ownership structure, and therefore all applicants are rated neutral in this category. (13) Perfo r-mance in Other Systems Operated by Anolicant -- To analyze the system by system performance of all other cable systems operated by each applicant is beyond the scope of this evaluation. Within the context of information provided in the applications, the category of "Experience" comes closest trn this criterion. .93� Pigure 14 lists three items considered relevant% 6 Average Subscriber Rate - Basic Service The subscriber rate is one general indication of consumer benefit, although it must be used with caution since different levels of service ` may be involved. For these proposals, the average rates of Americable are substantially higher than those of the other applicants, and considered a weakness. ° Large -System Experience --- The experience with large systems, such as that required for Miami, is considered pertinent. Here, CablesystemF and Vision are considered to be strong, in te.`ms of systems with more + than 500 miles of cable plant. ° Disposition of Franchises The applicants' record of disposition of franchises in the past may be an indication of unsatisfactory operating performance. In proportion to the number of systems currently operated, Americable's disposition record is considered a weakness. (14) Emplo=ent Practices As indicated in Figure 1, all applicants pledge to imple- ment an Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action program. This category is considered essentially neutral, since no major differences are apparent between applicants. (15) Rates -- The most important rate items are the monthly charges for basic service (first outlet) and for pay -TV service, since these two generate the bulk of total cable system revenues at present. Figure 15 indicates the applicants' proposed rates in these two categories. Cablesystems and Miami propose the lowest basic rates, considering all tiers except interactive, and also lower pay -TV rates. vision offers lower pay -TV rates, but high basic rates, while the other two applicants are at the high extreme in both categories. h"M aa 46 � av, a ' 94 - (16) state Stability -- The items included in "Rate Stability" are t e gua ts antee of initial rates made by each applicant, of -future rate increases made in the applicants' proforma_financial projections. Cablesystems offers to freeze initial rates for 3 years from the date of franchise award. If it meets its two year ar onger construction smolt otherhis applould be a icants, whonalleguarantee rates than those of mos until system completion. with respect to rate increase projections, Star Six a Starcumula- tive over the life of tte franchise, prof rate increase of 33$ for basic compared todthe $other pay-TVservice. This is a strfor ength .*nulative increases of over 200$ applicants, who forecast cu for both services. (17) Regional Inte-connect CapabilityAs Figure 17 indicates, all applicants are willing to interconnect to othercable upon onystems, with the distanceseinvolvedlar tech- nology utilized dependentP All proposals are considered equivalent in this category. (18) Relation to Needs of Miami -- In evaluating �eeneedscriterion Miamihow thethe followingditemse systems relate to were considered: Commitment to Public Agencies and Community Provisions for Minority Programmingd commitments of . Figure 18 indicates the propose their relative perceivedhstrengths cants in these two areas, and weaknesses. AMERICABLE Strengths Equity Resources Financial Plan 1.3:1 debt to equity ratio Commitments to other $9.6M over next 4 years Systems weaknesses Equity status of -Charles Ilermanowski Equity Resources (who will provide additional funding as needed) is not indicated Financial Plan Commitments to other Systems CABLESYSTINS MIAMI SIX STAR NIELSOM $117M shareholders' $64.9M shareholders' $57.5M shareholders' equity @ 8/31/80 ecluity @ 9/10/79 equity @ 12/31/79 (Rogers Cablesystems (Tele-Communications (Nielson Enterprises. Ltd.) Inc.) Inc.) $220M shareholders' $37M shareholders' equity @ 8/31/80 equity @ 12/31/79 ('raft Broadcasting. (Six Star Cablevision Inc.) holding Co.. Inc.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.20 debt to equity 1.5:1 debt to equity ratio ratio 1527M over next 3 years $23M over next 5 years S417M over next 4 years VISION The combined net, worth of all New- house companies indicated as being -in excess of $500M.' 1:1 debt ratio $30.6M ov 3 years - - - - - - - - - - L- - - - - - 3.2:1 debt to equity ratio '�I � � ��i!°II�A!IIIPilillll#iP�il9pl�!!��Ililll'�I' AMERICAIII.0 CABLESYSTCMS MIAMI SIX STAR NIELSON VISIOIi $117M shareholders' $64.9m shareholders' $57.5M shareholders' The combined net Strengths equity P 8/31/80 equity @ 8/10/79 equity P 12/31/79 worth of all New - (Rogers Cablesystems (Tole -Communications (Nielson Enterprises. house companies I.td.) Inc.) Inc.) indicated as being in excess of $500)i, Equity Resources $220M shareholders' S37M shareholders' equity P 8/31/80 equity P 12/31/79 ('raft Broadcasting, (Six Star Cablevision Inc.) Noldinq Co., Inc.) Financial Plan 1.3:1 debt to equity 2.2c1 debt to equity 1.5:1 debt to equity 1:1 debt to equity ratio ratio ratio ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Commitments to other S9.6M over next 4 years S27M over next 3 years S23H over next 5 years 530.6M over next 'U00 3 years Systems - Weaknesses Equity status of - -Charles Ilermanowski Equity Resources (who will provide additional findinq as needed) is not indicated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.2:1 debt to equity Financlal Plan - - - - - ratio - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - Commitments to other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sg7M over next 4 - - - - - - Systems years J — — ---- --- M1AMI STX STAR N1E1 St'" WSW" (� AMER iCA111.E CA111.F.SYSTEMS the All areas of the n Stre�� _ All areas of the City All areas of the City City served Schedule - within 2 years served within 2 years served with!- 2 years Construction Schedule (Residential Network Only) Year I --- Miles (1) Year 2 --- Miles (1) Weaknesses Schedule Construction Schedule (Residential Network only) Year I --- Miles (1) year 2 --- Miles (1) Year 3 --- Miles (1) All areas of the City served within 3 years 143.2 (201) 312.3 (431) 269.6 (371) 207 (301) 478 (701) A separate institu- tional network will bi constructed when the demand for institu- tional service cannot he satisfied through the integrated (residential/institu- tional) network 230.8 (321) 484.9 (68%) 190 (28Er 494 (72%) All areas of the City. - served within 3 years e a 120, (171) 480, (681) 1'06 (151) sP 7 FIGURE 4 TECIINICAI, RTAHDAR AMERICAPLE CAIII.FSY!;Tl-*MS Carrier to noise 1 -44 dII 43 d" 60 (111 Second order products 60 (in Third order beat ratio 55 do composite triple beat. -52 dB Frequency response 2 do (any channel) intermodulatIO" Pm&-Ict -52 do 48 do 52 do cross modulation it lium d" lium modulation42 -40 do for 3000 ns Network generated echo delay Isolation between 60 do cables Subscriber tap Isolation 21 Differential gain 2- Differential phase Chrominance luminance 200 ns Max. 200 ns Max delay Maximum signal level 12 do vnv at receiver Level stability 4.Od0 Return loss DS tea,;, M1AMI.;I)t STAR N 1 V.SON Y1SItU1 do 46 do 48.1 do 46.4 66.1 do 64 do -47 do 55.7 de -58.5 do do 56.7 d& 3 do 40 do min -40 dD I* tie 0.5 do Max. 170 ns Max. too ns MA*- t& (IR rk ii�illll�l Illil ill � ��, � I I � I P I�� I II II III I illll II I �ii �111�911�1�!I,�IIIlII�Alll��ll�, � -f,jjjpq 11 1 141AM1 sac au..c ........,..._ AHERICARI.F. -_--CARI.ESYSTt:MS --- --- - _ - Strengths 22 services • 20 services Satellite Video 20 services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 services Local Automated - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 services imported Automatcd Weaknesses Satellite Video Local Automated Imported Automated 15 services CD 16 services -- _ - - - -- r 12 services it services 9services7 services - - - -- ------ - - ----------------------- 2 services I AMF.R ICADLE L.O. Programing Local Origination P A (I.Pased) Sunshine M State netvnrk CADLESYSTMS rogram of the Movies ,veal MIAMI Friendly City SIX STAR NIELSON VIS Family Features English Originat mericas Tele-Cable 11ispano- Hearinq 1'mpared ia•ni Women Miami Sports and Theater Orii9inat nral Reli.11ous At 'rhe Track Basic Skills Black I.o e Inflation Station Florida State/Regional Originat nntos Miami News narrowcast/ The Miami Poll Handicap eirinq Impared/ Cnm.fni-larl tiiapana Originat en±ors Neighbor Executive News Report Narrowca iami Together vision eaux Arts/Classic English Channel rime watch (Secure) Vision Spanish Black Channel rogramming i P low lo Local Ion cal ion cal ion ped Local ion hood stinq Cable Movie to o Cable Movie W Strengths { Video L.O. Services I I 12 services I 8 services I I T services iieaknesses Video L.O. Services 2 services 0 1 ill�!'pl, 1 I'll �Illii.I I101 Strengths Facilities (L.O. and Access) Operating Budget and Staff (year 5) 1 of Budget for Access weakness Facilities (L.O. and Access) Operating Budget and Staff (year 5) 1 of Budget for Access up to 501 $630,000 $655,000 -Staff of 18- - - CAMRSYSTUMS MIAMI SIX STAR t1[EESOM 1f6SitN� $2.5M $1.6M $2'.4M S1_e1t SIAM staff of 46 $1.5" staff of 39 S2.3M staff of 75 651 i i - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - i i 151 i i 301 I N O r i J ws E �III� Strengths Interactive Equipment interactive Services Weaknesses Interactive Equipment Interactive Services AMERICAR1-R-- _ Pioneer VIP security and communication system Security Service Data (6) Text Retrieval (2) FIGURE-9 INTERACTIVE SERVICES Y--('ARLf:SYSTFMS---- - ---MIAM1 _..----- Will initially install Pioneer VTP security a data/computer system, will use processing system to underwriters provide services Laboratories approved inciudinri home security alarm - Fire, intrusion technology and and medical services, security alarm services guard service and - opinion polling emergency medical and teletext technicians to respond to alarms - Fay -per -view - Meter reading - Status monitoring Security Service Security Service pay -per -view Shop-at-Ilome (Compu- Home Business Data Serve) Reuters Information Information Retrieval Retrieval (2) Text Services Time Shared Telidon(4) Back -at-home Telidon Information Energy Management Retrieval opinion Polling six s'rAll NIMSON tElSlfil! Pionner VIP inter- active system has capability for wide range of services Security Service Text Display Mattel Play Cable Professional Educational (2) Home nanking/Shopping Continuing Education (2) Human Services Data (4) opinion Polling Energy Management TOCOM III-0 security and Interactive communications equipment used. with capability 40 for wide range of services Security Service 0 50 teletext channels 'Energy Manage- ment opinion Polling Dow Jones Data Dank Knight-Ridder Data Bank Banking/shoppintl/ polling (1982-83) Interactive Games (1983) dome Education (3) (1993) Pay -per -view Movies (19R3) Pay -per -view Sports (1981) Strength Inat. Network Mileage Inst. Network Capacit Connection to Network AMF.R 1CA111.6 FIGURE 10 SERVICE TO INSTITUTIONS CAn1.F.SYSTrMs — -MIAMI 219 min 26 ch. downstream 37 ch. downstrenm 16 ch. upstream 15 ch. upstream - - - - - - - - - - - - - - All Govt., educational All facilities listed will pass all public health care and in RFP facilities, plus cultural facilities banks and hotels. Nil initially connected initially connect all with existing and provided with communications 54-ch. converter resources, and provide interface equipment Weaknesses 58 mi. No separate Inst. . inst. Network Mileage Net, combined with residentialtrunk -- 25 ch. downstream, inst. Network Capacit 17 ch. upstream shared with residential network Connection to Network SIX STAR NIEISON _ 25 ch. downstream 25 ch. upstream_ All Govt. facilities and schools connected at no cost V iS [OIF— -- 0) IR ch. downstream 38 ch. upstream All Govt. facilities, schools, hospitals connected at no cost. I r 0 w I----------- I --------- 9" 1111110 mr-7 I 11�11' R R i I strengths Converter Initial Activation Weaknesses Converter Initial Activation AMERICAn1.E CADI.F,SYSTUMS I MIAMI SIX STAR NIELSON Tier I- none Tier II - Pioneer BC-2000 Tier III - Pioneer BT-1300 addressable Tier IV - Pioneer BT-1300 interactive All capacity activated Initially. Downstream channels limited to l96 on the residential network and 36 on the institutional network because of FAA restricted usage 1- - - - - - - - - - - Tier I - none Tier 11 and III - Zenith ZT-2000 addressable descrambler (or equal) Tier IV (interactive) tlarris Model 624487 home terminal transmitters, and Interactive key pad All residential net- work capacity activated initially. A separate institu- tional network will be constructed when justified by demand for institutional service that cannot be satisfied through the integrated networ Tier I - Oak I.-30 - Oak 21 channel mid - band converter/ decoder Tier II, III, IV - Pioneer VIP one-way addressable or two- way interactive Maqnavox Magna 58 (above 400 M11z) All upstream capacity activated initially downstream activation limited to 104 channels to limit interference with other spectrum users - - - - - - - - - - -1 - - - - - - - - - - - Tier I, II - Pioneer OC-2000 Tier III - Pioneer 9T-1300 addressable interactive 97 of the Ill down- stream channels and all of the upstream channels on the residential network activated initially 21 of the 25 down- stream and upstream institutional network channels activated Initially VISION 10) Tier I. II-Ilamlin 51,C-400 Tier Iii, IV Tocom 5504M Addressable niscrambler Tier V - Tocom 5510A Addressable niscrambler Teletext Tier VI - Tocom 5501 interactive All channel capacity activated initially except for Teletext. 50 of the 55 Teletext channels will be activated o initially - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - -- II I i� I y. e� , I��II� Igll'I III61��I� I III II11'II d a Strennc the 1leadend/I10h Con[ignration Satellite Earth Station Configuration Longest Amp) ifter Cascade Special System Features Weaknesses lleadend/flub Configuration Satellite Earth Station Configuration longest Amplifier ICascade ISpecial System Features ro w FIGURE 12 SYSTEM IIESIGN --- � —� HIASIX STAR ELSOti FiSi0M MI NI 1S AMEIi ICAg1.F. - - - - _ _ - - - - III Status monitoring Emergency alert Standby power Single headend �- - - - - - - - - - - CADLESYSTEF lleadend plus 2 hubs headend plus 3 plus 2 hubs eadend P Ileadend ( ,)us 3 hubs - - - - - - - - - - - - hubs _ __ - - - - - - - 1 earth stations for l earth stations at headend, t at each each hub (l2 total) hub (S total) - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 l5 L4 - - - - - - -- 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Status monitoring - - Status monitoring alert Status monitorin�l Status monitoring alert Emergency alert Emergency Standby power Emergency alert Emergency Standby power Standby power Standby power IIIIUIIIIIIIIIiII �� H r� ji FIGURE LI CHANNEL S��nClTy (RESIDENTIAL. NF.TWORIO vislow CABI.ESYSTF"rl tHAMI SIX STAR NICL601141 AHF.JRICADI.E StrengLhg FM It 120 F FM Channel capacity 111 + Downstream - --------- j1pstreato fi W.,knesses Channel capacity 1000 FM 17&& Downstream Upstream • shared With J;qt. net.,may Use as many as 25 channels- *0 shared With inst. net.#May us:haa:,ell many a, 17 AMERiCAOt.F. current cable system 17orcable ida asystems in holdings Strengths Average Subscriber Rate - Basic Services Franchises witil more than 500 miles of plan Uisposition of Franchises CADLESYSTE.MS 25 cable systems in the United States, Canada and Ireland serving I,300,000 subscribers MIAMI 528 cable system in 37 states, serving 1,280,000 subscribers SIX STAR NIELSON1A151010 -------------- 20 cable systems in 1316states California, Missouri, 1 Kansas, and Michigan $6.77 $7.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 t _ r 12 (1 under , _ _ - - - - - - - - - - ------- - - - - - -- _ _ Disposed of 3 • franchises between only clone in the between 1969 and 1975 1976 and 1980- past to respond to disposed of more than None Canadian Regulatory 19 franchises. Agency requirements 01 — rationalization _ ---- weaknesses y1O.45 ----- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - --- Average Subscriber - - - - - - - - - - 2 (both under Rate - Basic Services _ _ - - - - - - - - - 1 (under construction) - _ Franchises with more r None construction) _ - _ - _ - _ than 500 miles of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - plant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Disposition of Between 1975 and 1980 - - Franchises disposed of 116 franchises. rpp ■ . i� II Y t� p11ppp'' �� �.vymfl. SI� III IIIII ^- }�IIf jI '� °i'� 1f 1i.�,l�iw fit, ,; i III �Ne"C ISiS,,, ml � • s i Rim ! a .. f III I I I l�r III I^ ME11IC11111.E � Strengths Basic service First outlet CABLESYSTeny Tier 1 (12 ells.) FraF. Tier IT l45 $5,95 chs.l Tier.111 (77 c1js. Plus choice of any: (ITT A)-1 opt. ion package $7 4 (ITT B)-2 option $8.70 packages (ITT c)-3 optiop 59.7C packages Tier 1V-Premium Miltsonal interactive Tier 1 (21 chs-) Free Tier 11 (A4 $4.95 CIIS. ) Tier 111 (73 $6.95 chs.) Tier TV (99 $8.95 chs.) Itome Theater. home Tlieatec Network $3.95 Network $3 95 8 9r� Cine Latino $3.95 home Box Office $7 9s Bravo/C,olden $6.95 Cinemax office Oldies Office$5i95 Home Box plus Cinemax $ Ileme Box �alav►slon $ [a s Vegas 0.5' $8'95 Showtime $6.95 $6.75 Showtime $8.95 Cinemax (:alavision $8.95 The Movie $6,95 Rainhow The Movie Channel Pay -Per -view Varies Channel $8.95 Public Sub- scription $15.00 Network Premiere (if available) • Tentative price @ P r Iiume So, office $1.95 ` Cinemax Showtime $7.95 The Movie 5 Channel Any Two Above 00 Any Three Above $20. Any Lour Above 526-8n $6.00 r:alavlsion home Theater $3.95 Network $3.95 Front Row publ is Sub- twork $10.00 Ne scriber IDR $10.00 Reuters may Cable $8.00 � N f FIGURE 15 (cont.) 1WERICAOLE CAOLF.SYSTEMS HIAMI weaknesses Basic Service nt y Rates First Outlet Tier I 124 chs) Free Tier It (58 chs.) $11.95 Tier III (79 chs.) $12.95 i Tier IV 1104 chs.) $13.95 Pay TV Service Tier I The Movie Channel $14.95 Calavision $14.95 Tiers It c III The Mnvle Channel S 9.95 Galavislon S 9.9' Tier IV Bravo $ 4.9. Ilome Theater Network S 4.9 Las Vegas S 4.95 live Cinemax $ 9•95 calavision $ 9.9' Ilome Dox Office $ 9.9` Showtime $ 9.9_ The 110v i c Channel $ 9.9` ray -per -view Varle. six STAR NIELSON' VISIOW Tier I (24 chs.) Freu• Tier It (36 chs.) $4.50 Tier Ill (60 chs.) $8.50 Tier I (24 chs.) S 3.95' Tier IV (72 chs.) $9.50 Tier It (47 Tier (72 chs- chg.) $11.00' plus Teletext) $12.95 Tier ITT (84 Tier VI (72 chs. chs. plus data plus Teletext and base access) $13.00' Interactive) $14.95 *Includes monthly • See 'Converterne sit' cony -�'-" r Mini one Two Thre pay- Pay- Avo F F VIStow six STIm KirrscNs ____-- Year 4 Year 8 Year 12 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 11 Year 14 Year 15 All Tiers ! 10.0 10.0 10.0 Mini and Maxi services 5.0 S.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0 ��u�� ihuuiu ���i u iii liuiiluu i 'ql I'IIUp"I' III'llll''llpli"ip,ll�lllllllll'll'lll'lll'lll'III'IIII�'ll!Illlllllll��lll�lrlrlmllj�pj�lllII, i 4 Op "II�Il � l! 1 I 1 ICI li 1 1 1 I PI(XM 16 11121t.1 AMF:R1CA01.1: CA06F:SYSTEM5 MIAMI 579 ::TAR' NIRISON Ileaknesaes Rate Increase 1'ra ectrons' jBasic Service Tier Tiers Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier -- i II & III 1V If Ilt IV t tI III IV ivrr 2 - 163.2 156.2 Year 4 11.4 18.6 17.8 Year 4 - 26.9 26.9 26.9 ' ear ) - 21.8 22.1 Year 6 13.6 1L8 12.6 Ycar 5 -20 Pay Service r 4 - 36.7 37.2 r 5 - [Ys rrase• r 6 - 1.1 1.3 r 7 - 0.9 6.6 r 8 - 3.4 r9 - • • r 10 - 12.7. 6.2 r 11 - • r 12 - 1.8 2.6 r 13 - 6.0 6.1 r 14 - • • r 15 - 10.6 10.6 Tier Tiers Tier I II 6 Ill IV r 2 161.0 163.1 153.4 r 3 23.8 24.1 24.1 r •1 37.0 78.9 33.) r 5 txcrease• Ikcrease• r 6 0.1 0.1 1.3 r 7 11.8 9.5 12.9 r 8 • • • r9 • • r 10 10.6 8.5 22.5 r 11 • • • r 12 • 2.8 2.6 r 13 • 0.crease• 4.1 r 14 9.6 7.7 1.9 r 15 • • less Ilan O.It champ) vo-ar 8 12.0 13.2 11.9 Year 10 12.6 12.4 12.0 Year 12 12.9 12.4 13.1 Year 14 12.2 12.9 12.6 Nud Mini Service Service Year 4 17.6 19.6 Year 6 12.5 32.7 Yom 8 12.6 12.9 Year 10 12.5 12.9 Yiw 12 12.) 12.7 Yc r 14 12.5 11.4 Year Year 7 - 26.9 27.0 26.9 Year 8 -50 - - Year 10 -100 27.0 27.0 21.1' Year 13 - 27.0 27.0 27.0 Null Mini Pay Pay Year 4 26.9 26.6 Year 7 27.0 27.0 Year 10 27.0 26.9 Year 13 27.0 26.9 VESIfg4� Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier TI I It Ill IV V Vt .4 - 16.7 147 IS' 4 15 .G - 14.3 12..8 184 7 15.E .8 - 16.7 11.6 11.5 14.1 IS.I .10 - 14.3 12.0 13.9 15.4 13A .12 - 15.6 14.3 15.2 15.6 15.j .14 - 13.5 12.5 15.9 15.4 16." Pay Pay Pay Pay Mint 1 it III IV I'ay: .4 16.4 16.7 19.7 19.7 13. .6 13.5 11.4 15.2 15.2 16. .8 14.3 15.4 15.8 15.8 14. .10 12.5 13.3 13.6 13.6 12. .12 16.7 15.7 19.0 19.0 )L 14 14.315.3 15.3 15.3 13. i I II I IIIII��II,I,II �I�I� MIAMI Via AML or FM video microwave SIX STAR HIME-bvn' mill interconnect with neighboring systems by extending their trunk cables Other systems may be interconnected by microwave or super trunks - l options list, - Via the exist Institutional Network " - Via direct hard- line cable between one of the hubs and the other cable system' - Via microwave-,; connecting headends FIGURE 11 REGIONAL INTERCONNECTION AMBnICADLE CADUESYSTEMS Via AML microwave Via ultra -high Stre�ths performance hi directional trunks - Interconnection to utilizing Ff1 other Cable System modulation and three quarter or one -inch size low -loss cable Weaknesses Interconnection tc Other Cable Systel ! Stren the Commitment to Public Agencies and Community weaknesses Commitment to Public Agencies AMER1CAOi.E CAOLESYSTFl73 I MIAMI Interconnection to Se00g)0[undinq for County Operations Y Center and Educational Miami Crime Watch Telecommunications Center Gill provide 3 mobile communications, command control centers to police Dept. Will provide computer - assisted -instruction software to Fire Dept. for traininq will provide TV trans- mitters for 6 EMS units Will provide 50 remote video cameras for crime surveillance Not indicated will donate $100,000' annually to City for development of institutional services r r w 0 '�+' �S�Pra"' II 1 II FIGURE. 18 (cont.l CAnf.F.!:Y3TFMS MIAMI Sq,SM fund over life vocationallTrnininq Df franchise for minority programminq Program for the Uis- and training projects tlaiforng Sspag00nnoally Minority television S years production training will provide Spanish program public Television with Capltal cost" to $100,000 per year for facilitate local administrative and minority channels. prottramminq costs A{,proximately $1501000 capital outlay per Hilt establish a channel, total cost. Cultural Arts and hnic Atle Fund approaches $1 .OM to disbisrset grant" $1.I14 commitment over totalling about $1,SM life of franchise to over the life of purchase a satellite franchise u{+i ink as part of a source of national willprovide $5O,000 minority programming in to Miami area colleges Fund►ml for staff within the will provide job and )N)sltlons community programminq skills training at. department for Co- convenient locations the city ordinators of Black, women's throughout to maximize the Spanish. and Involvement of mlrr,rltle programminq in program production Affiliation will' BET to provide local black H111 provide Florida to the nr•,1 protirammIntl network hothMenOraaFM`radioeandth television access Tel idon input terrnirmin l,roduct ion strrdlo at numerous minority t.r.{ani zat ions VISION Puhlic access Policies and procedures described Fully staffed and equipped access studios located in minority communities Separate Local origination Channels for Black, Latin and llandicapped programming will offer ralavision. Mack Entertainment Television, the Spanish international Network. Beta and the Homen's channel i will encourage t> Public Access Corporation to e agressively purstle I minority invole- 1 ment Will purchase minority community productions for tho Family Movie Channels k R VICUIRB 19 feant_1 AMERICAnLE CAnLESYSTRMS MIAMI SIX STAR NELSON VISIOW Plar.s to involve Strengths (continued) Community production wit] provide minorities In the center in several specialized programminc advisory responsible prodominantly minority for specific audiences from program neighlxorhoods dedicate channels to development Studio locations In minority interests and Carriage of Ch. tx,th Latin and Black insure the accessibilit 23-IILTV (Spanish) neighborhoods of production tools to on all tiers of minority areas of the service Community origination city points at numerous Paid internships minority organizations will produce in cable television programming of interesi for all residents Members of minority to minorities of Miami, including groups on every advisory board will incorporate a non minority groups Y 9 P effecting local- profit organization Establishment of a F, porgramming to determine the policies and handle th Career Training U Center to provide Digital services time- administration of the cable operations + shared in two and public access network, experience. sometimes three will fund with $125,00 $350,000 initially lanquages for year 1. $175.000 and $150,000 annually Community viewing for year 2. $200,000 committed to the centers in every for year 3 with a 71 Increase each Center. minority community successive year. Narrowcasting service Programming department will equip a ommunity oil the subscriber network hiring practices whicl Relations Auditorium will endeavor to at the Miami -Dade 21 viewing Centers exceed EEO require- Community College New in minority ment world Center Campus communities System desirin allowinti will provide the cr•ployment practices narrowcastin q to axceedlny state and predominately minorityredera) Regional Access Centers, requirements neighborhoods the Community Viewing Centers and sites on- ,ignal Carriage of The litstitilt ional Mutivultura] Television Network with full of Toronto (m,rv) interactive capability FIGURE 19 I Stre_ njths (cor CMILF.SYS'rFj4s finish language )gramming for South l Iatin America cluslon of the men's Channel A•rn t x ) .611 11fe of anchise project med nt minority evolvement (Miami )gether) news production rogram originatinq t radio station r)RA remote Telidon inpc erminal at local ,inority newspapers k minorily business Iinterprise Itlministration ,osition to enssire Pinority business involvement in local programminq Numerous positions In the commilln i ty depart- ment ment A commitment to involve local black orrlanixallo`s In cnmmilin t 1 y i `1 ef(orts. 1 1 FIGURE 18 (cl �en the (col I 7�-11;�li�,1-1���-i-.��.,�.-i",,.-.,-,��'��-,�-",�,�������� Nll q� e a { r �1 FIGURE 1s (cont.) I' Ne ikn�eg9e= Provisionsrogra ing for Minority 11MER1C1►OI.P. remote studios Spanish local ,rigination studLo in Little Havana 1 Black loch origination studio in tle black community studio employees from the local Brea s 1�9 If I. SUMMAIty Figure 19 summarizes the tns anhewnuumbberseinnthe d in the previous section of thisreport, column of Figure 19 indicate the number of items considered as -a strength or weakness for each evaluation luation arsterio - nor a weakness, areered as not included. i.e., a n. or Figure 19 ymust have emaany strengths ind with useoveralFcategories, an applicant may have Y portant by Y the City, while another considered relatively unim s► but in more applicant may have fits ewer strengthpriorities categories. Consequently, the City must take and areas of special interest into consideration when reviewing the results of this report. - 120 - rIGURE 19 S'MhAY W RILATM STRENGTHS AND WEAlctaESSES AMERI- CABLE- HMI SIX ST VISION CABLE SYSTEMS NIELSO S I W S IW S I W S W S I W Financial Capability 2 1 2 I1 3 - I 2 1 3 i- Construction Schedule Technical Standards Automated Services, 1 1 - 3 3 - - (2 I l l i Credal Intexest Procra.Tang Local Oricination I- 1 Access Production 1 2 2_ 3 - 1 1 2 1 Facilities and Support Interactive Services 1 2 - 2 I- 2 I 12 2 Service to Institutions 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 - 2 I-j 2 - Sophistication of System 2 I- 2 I 2 I 2 2 System Design 12 1 I 2- 3 - 3 I- 2 Channel Capacity Ownership Structure I - Performance in Other _ 3 3- 12 1 I 2 I 1 3 I - Systems IIII Employment Practices( - Rates - 2 2 I- 2 I- I - 2 ( 1 I 1 Rate Stability I 2( 1 2 ( 2 12 12 Regional Programming Capability Relation to Needs 1 I 1 1 1 2- (- 2 1 I 1 of Miami III TOTALS -- STRENGTHS 15 21 29 18 23 i WEAY"IESSES 16 11 3 10 1 6 ■ ...ed All a rr-' 1 .` �-I "'tom-. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES The city will award the license to the applicant who can demonstrate the best overall capability and willingness to provide cable communications service to the citizens of Miami. All of the information requested herein will contribute to the evaluation of applicants and the subsequent selection process. In general, applicants will be judged according to the following criteria: financial capability construction-chedule; technical standards; origination catlecasting (automated services, special interest procram,mi ng ) ; local origination; access production facilities and support; interactive services; service to institutions; sophistication of system; system design; channel capacity; ownership structure; performance in other systems operated by applicant; employment practices; • rates; rate stability; and regional interconnection capability; how the system relates to the needs of Miami The following factors will be accorded a preference and will be considered as priorities. The city seeks an applicant who will: (1) Propcse the mcs: co-ip!-efensive offering of services provided that such an offering does not exceed the financial capability of the applicant to construct and operate a cable communications system. (2) Seek to maximize community participation in the management of the cable system u. in one or more features of that system such as the access channels, institutional network or leased channels. (3) Allocate adequate facilities, funding and staff support to access, public service and local community programming Page 12 s _ . '!/' eft �^ t t 0 0 (A) Seek to develop services to fulfill the commercial and financial needs of the city's business and banking community and the information and communications needs of the city's service institutions. (5) Provide services to low-income households by proposing a `universal service" option which would offer the subscribers the access and public service channels for the cost of installation alone and/or the development of a number of community viewing centers in public libraries and community centers. xOTE: Refer to Section 7, pages 7,8 and 9 of the Cable Television Regulation ordinance for Legal Requirements. 1 December 17, 1980 January 2, 1981 April 9, 1981 April 10, 1981 2:00 p.m. May 12, 1981 June 8, 1981 June 18, 1981 June 26, 1981 1:00 P.M. TIME TABLE FOR THE CABLE TELEVISION PROCESS FOR THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA r Commission approved Request for Proposals (RFP's). Advertising and release of RFP's to prospective proposers. Commission selected Mr. Carl Pilnick, President of Telecommunications Management Corporation (TMC) to be cable t.v. consultant to Miami. Five (5) cable television proposals received by the City of Miami -Office of the City Clerk. Comparative Summary from TMC received by the City. Copies mailed to all 5 cable television applicants. Evaluation of proposals from TMC delivered to City and each of the 5 companies. Cable television applicants' responses to consultant's evaluation mailed or delivered to consultant and City. Copies distributed to all companies and commission. First Public Hearing - Special Commission Meeting - Final report by TMC submitted by Carl Pilnick. Representatives from 5 companies invited. Second Public Hearing - Special Commission Meeting - Attended by Carl Pilnick, each company will make a presentation and public may comment. FNTEF,741Nfl4ENT by �FMFa._ '* AMERI-CABLE * ,, a JUN, 1 5 lei 2. Roots in the communit,• - All of hmericable's key in- vestors, partners, and management personnel have deep roots in the Greater ��.iami area and love Miami. They live in Greater Miami, own property in Greater Miami, are taxpayers, work and contribute to the sul)- port of the local Occ);10M of Greater "iami , their children are sch()()lcd in greater �'iami and will die in greater Miami. 3. You're net lis_t_inq sand r_ atinq law suits with munici- palitj-cs wi)ich thF, other applapplicants have and America}_l.e does not. By beinq residents of the community, we are most concerned with the present and future development of the Creator Miami community area and will be most reFsPO�nsive to our fellow neighbors and their and our future needs. Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12 Page 2 We will now point out to you the followinq itiaccuradies in your evaluation: 1. Financial Capability: The RFP did not request Ame.ri- cable's general partner's equity resources. As a courtesy to you, enclosed, please find financial st-te- meat of Charles C. 11_rmanowski. (Exhibit 1) Construction Schedule: Please refer to .lmeric.able's form H, page I of 5, 3rd sentence, "all areas within Miami will be served within 3 years." Being the only local presently operatinni company in the general "Bari area, we are more capable of building and completinc: this system sooner than any other applicant. We stronoly feel that your Telecommunications analyst ccmpl.etr�': ("Vcr- looked Americable's main strenoth, i.e.: a. Americable is tho only local applicant presently ol_,orating and constructioy plant In the Greater ''i >rti aroa (60-50 miles her month). b. Americable alread,', has Southern Pell, Florid; Power & Licht ai-I I)ado County licenses. c. d. Americable has a Dada County underground quali- fying license (which takes 3-6 months to re- ceive) and a local %..orkinq relationship, insur- ance, occupational license, etc. This clearly puts us at least six months ahead of any other competitor. Being Local, we arc intimately familiar with the extensive make read%, and pole clearance necessary in Miami. Americable is the only company that owns a two acre, head end and office complex: in the center of Miami that has ,il ready been cleared by Comi-.ucon and Hughes Microwave. In fact, this same complex:, although now heinq constructed to serve Key Biscayne, Soutb Miami and West Kendall (Dade County), will be used for the Cite of Miami. A1.1 FCC, FAA applications, etc. are on file and pend- ing for immediate operation. It is interestinq to note in all ahpl.ications filed with a two year construction schedule, that none of the com- panies have shown this type of performance anywhere in the country as exhibited by each company in the RFP for the City of Miami. Carl Pilnick June 12 Page 3 1�afii 'Telecommunications: Golden - two }ears to build 100 miles Daytona Leach - 350 miles granted in 1968 is not completed ye` -* i?i7linc?s - 5 rears tc, huild miles Kno�:ville - 6 yearF to build 525 miles c �A9 miles, still. ohimpia = grantu I 1 )72 , •- under conr.truc•tion Cahlesysysterts Miami - took 2 Fears to build 3(15 miles A. Syracuse $, Calgary - 3 years to build 620 miles Vision! c:oncord - 2 �►e.r;, to ... `tcnorionce ',1 l "s - itnt cos:.,' etec. - 1 vei.'. ► 15r► miles � ,• < , t co~:p?. eted yot at i 5 Mon S , ?edford - ..,,• -� r . . C d, Six Star: _ , 1/, yc,4�r ;, 2 miles► still under �--- A. 1 amon .+ Cc,unt, - Gh mils, c1r1:�ted 11/79, \,'o11't, F,, grange be completed till 12/8a C. Tustin - 73 miles granted 3/79, won't be com- plc'trd till 12/R3 R Culver City - 61 miles granted 5/79► won't be D. completed till Carl tljiru�e 12, Page 4 . I interest Programming' r 00tammingito �Vjdcs & Special Please refer Automated �8el otal y erroneous, plez Tn,,-�, of channel yo,jr analysis Is v q Volume I , intro(lucLclt' Oct ion, sUTn al I ()cl t ions - -Video - You have us listed Satellite Proqram though you list it as a a, t provide 20 . , even have 26. strength, We actually �Utomatec' - You have us listed to as e are provid. nq 17- b. Local Programs Tr whereas provide figure 6 lists nne Your page 99, ticased sunshine origination C) I umo Local orig' or us as 4 T'oc procIram to AmOricable's local originationI rcfer you a+ -ions and rk - 11 -hannel all0c -- shows 16 State summary r y 0 f I t(, Network." 11 p U which clearly IntroductIO each channel description Of. local origination chai:nels: a. An b c L d L f. h. i. j. k. 1. n. 01 p - ri.elelIc-alth Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 5 why was this VtOcltamminj omitted ih yout tepott f t us alonn? This does not even include the numerous noicihborhood hat'tOW- oastinq channels listed helm.: Channel 33T Miami cultural community accoGs 34U Northeast Fdgewater community access 35V Little navanna community access 36W7 Allap-Itta cc�mrIun i t y access 37AA Manor Park community access 38B$ Edison Little River community access 39CC Coconut (,rovc - i', ickell community access ODD Flagami community access Any person unfamiliar e;ith local origination lookinci at cur figure 0, page 99 gets a totally erroneous impression. Your 7 is also totally inaccurate, carryinn two p,-�qe 100, ficlure ices, when in fact we have 16. local origination sery you call a weakness is actual]} a rel��ti�'c� strength of. Americable. 5. Interactive Services - Although you do not debit G��ith any weakness, I refer. you to your page 102, figure which is totally misleading. We refer you to Ameri- cable's Volume T, Form I, which clearly lists: 1. pay -per -view sports i- U i Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 6 to ehetcjy fbanagement h. plus many additional services 1+1 of our services should have been listed as you chose to list them for other companies. We deserve the same courtesy you accordoa other applicants. 6� Service To Institutions - We do not understand your listing us with a woal:ness, due to the 5R mi leis of In- stitutional plant show. Ve have indicated in Volume. 1 , form 1, L aqe ll� of 32, that we will intcrc(1nnk_ct every Institution in the City of Viami requested in the RFP we have also committed to serve all hospitals, cultural centers, etc. once again this is a major strcnath of Americable due to the efficient, centrally located, =inc,le head end design that we employ. This enables our company to economically serve all institutions with only 58 miles of plants. �. System nesicln - The cieo(iraphieal area of PIiami is Small enough to construct the system with one head end and is a strong plus for Americable. It is the overall trunk cascade in a system using a hybrid mixture of high gain feed forward amplifiers and conventional amplifiers, that keeps the overall trunk cascade to a maximum of 15 amplifiers c•:hich is well within state of the art performance of existing equipment. Additionally, the hubbing from the centrally located head end allows for sufficient splitting of the out- put trunk cable to prevent a noise build up in the re- turn system and also allows for segmentation of the city into different corununity development areas. The 15 amplifier cascadc nf Americalhle compares to the tot ll trunk amplifier cascade of 16 as proposed by Cable Svstems Miami, 1.4 by Pliami Telecommunications and 15 as proposed by hoth six Star Nielson and vision Communications. The strong, unquestionable .advantages that J\mericablc enjoys with a single head end is: 1) greater reliability, (only one hood end to maintain). 2) multiple head end:, require dual ication of Gaff .air signal equipment at eac--, hub site, duplication of earth stations at each site or use of multiple rm interconnect trunks and./or ArIL micro- wave equipment. This is the easy part. The tough part is the interconnection of the data ser- vices, security services, burglar, fire alarm, medical alert, etc., and the complications that are introduced into the Institutional trunk network. Mr. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Paqe 7 9. The further advantage is the savings of the capital cost of approximately one million dollars per hub site which has to ultimately he passed on to the customers. The subsequent maintenance that is required is hor- rendous. This is the main reason that Americable knows that the% - can construct the most technologically sophisticated system in the City of Pliami at a much lower cost than the other applicants. Ownership Structure - Your page 92, item 12, althoucth not on the summary sheet, should absolutely be listed. We strongly feel for the same reasons as mentioned under Construction Schedule, that we have a major advantage over all other applicants. We are the only localoper- ating company in Greater Miami and eirowinc} at the ratr of 700 new subscribers per week. Not only are we cap - al,]( (if he(l i nn i nq con.'A ruct ion sooner clad f in i';hirlkl the job earlier, but we can be more responsive to the local needs of the community. t'nt ]lc'vi_nc 'luIldr ecc:-, o " sv :ter?.: throw:.lout the courtry, 1.7e ,.li l l_ only concern ourse.'_ves with t',e ca'•:)le s�,ste;- in t'.-►e (,roatcr . i.a:,i iron. we do not have to follow cor- porate dictates of a large parent company, but can make major decisions instantly. Size, in and of itself, is not an advant:lge,but in fact, a disadvantage. Performance in Other Systems Operated by Applicant a. Average subscriber rate - basic service Your page 93, f iyure 14, top of the page. Building a dual 54 channel plant, with a third institutional plant, �%e feel we are entitled to see a return on our Investment. Our rates are totally realistic without any subterfuge that you see in the other propo- sals. I attach Exhibit II which shows that you did not carefully read or do not under- stand the other proposals. Our rates are absolutely competitive. (Exhibit II) Tarc.e S_,st�...: expericnce This is our strongest point. Our local franchise in the Greater Miami area has over 700 miles of plant. We have the local staff, expertise, and performance record. P1r. Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 8 C, hi spbSitioll of franchi sec s The franchises T obtained and developed for Vikoa Inc., were• sold cuff after. I left the company. I had nothing to do with their sale or d i F;pos i t i can . dates - Page 93, item 15, 1 refer you again to Exhibit_ IT, which shnti•;s Or, e.uhtcrfucto in listed rates. Tt is important to note that Americahle not. charcle for FM service, either monthly or installation and considers = it as Dart of the basic service. If you include FrI monthly charge and separate charge fer interactive ser- vices, you will find tilat Am(-ri-cable is cheaper than Miami Telecommunications and Vision and competitive Six Star Nielson Cablevision and Cablesystems "inmi. Furthermore, please cord,are the monthly charcte for a second set, which 30", of subscribers %-.ill have, and you see: Americable's $5.00/mo., Cablesystems PIiami 89.90/mo., Pliami Telecommunications S8.95/mo., Six _ Star Nielson 52.00/rro. and Vision Cable of Pliami 53.00 to $7.95!mo. Rate Stability - As previously shown in Exhibit I1, which shows the construction performance of the other applicants, we are equal in the time span of a rate increase. Paragraph three of page 94 shows that you contradict \•our- self whereby you shoe: strength for Siff Star Nielson because of the lower rate increases and yet on page RR (c), financial planning, you criticize Six Star due to their low debt to equity rates and further question their via- bility and financial l lan. We further disacirec a:iti; ;,Pour calculations of our rate increases for both basic and pav T.V. services. ever 15 years, '."Moricable's basic subscriber rates only in- crease 66°, while rates only increase 694. You apparently calculated the rates using the first year as a full year, while, in reality, it is only three months of revenues. Furthermore, due to our strong marketing expertise in the Greater P1i�imi area, Americable has included in its revenues a higher pay to basic ratio, which also makes its rates, at first glance, seem to increase at a hicaher percentage. 12. Regional Interconnect Capability - Page 94, item 17. We stronely differ with your- comment that all proposals are equivalent since the other- applicants will have to ne- gotiate with every system while 7%rnericahle already owjjn -. t"r. Carl. Pilnick June 12, 1.081 Facie 9 and will be operating systems in Key 'Aiscayne, South Miami, C'est Kendall Made County) , Homestead, rloriOa City and most of Southern Dade County. 11, Relation to City Needs once again you have failed to r.nt e or indicate undrr ?Aruor i cahle thr })rograms and services that were clearly outlined in our proposal, Specifically, we hrinq to your attention pages 114, 115, 11f. and 114. You indicate the strrnaths of Cablesystems ith the folloc,-inq proLiramminq, and yet. omit the fact that Americable also hies this same prorratn- mina in i is proj—nsal a, Pinority television production trainin<t programs b. Community prndtictinn center in several minority neicxhhorhonds c, Studio locations in both Latin and black neighborhoods d. Community orrran i T,at ion points at numerms minority organizations e. Diciital services time shared in two lanauaaes f. Community viewing centers in every minority community g• Prooramminq department hiring practices which will endeavor to oxcoed Ero requirements h. System desion allowing narrow castinq to pre- dominately minority neighborhoods i. Spanish lanquatie programmina from South to Latin America j. Inclusion of %..orien's channel k. Numerous positions in the community program- ming department 1. A commitment to involve local black organizations in community programminq efforts. All of these were listed in Americable's Ar_oposal and were not indicated. P'ri Carl Pilnick June 12, 1981 Page 10 IA. The weakness for Americable on pacle 11R is due to your failure, once again, to list the above mentioned strencihts, furthermore, vnu cataoorize the some items as strengths in Cablesystems column. Exhibit Z PERSONAL r-----1 • FINANCIAL STATEMENT COhWUN" B,"K of Hn4%SrT.AD Name �.-a Charles C. Hem3nowski _ ll�,! Address 17301 Old Cutler Road, Miami, Fla. 33157 I (We) make the following statement of all my (our) assets and habilities as of the loth day of, June , 1981 and giLp n!tirr matefOl Inlfumation for the purpose of obtaining credit with you on notes and hills bPanng my lour? signature, Pirdorsement, or guaranteB, and q�rP° tti !r r!'', YOU tftnr•tntly of any change affening my (our) ability to pay. _ (PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS, USING "NO" OR "NONE" WHERE NECESSARY) ASSETS (Jointly Owtted) — - LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH 1Joilit or Otha w s,) ---- — - I, City -- ... - --._-- - -- NotesWay-able to Banks, Untltsirerl - i unrestricted In haniks. S 450i O 24• U-rect burrowing-- -- _. Q 9 - . 4 -- -- — -- - - -- — - 11..��ole{ Payable O Banks, Secure G9ytrP?1tCI_Set� llt1_(rlydrfl_'1l4Gtlj_201_QQQl'-cLRltrruwlra unit'er-_- 3. Government Agenues S1turtlles - - - - Notes Payable to Others, unsecured s �.lrfl• 4 Accounts and Lnan{ Recelvabt - !. Nolen Payablt to Others, Secured - __ See Sched. No. 2) 550,000 41 Ute Intufance. Cash --Surrender value Lo`anf punt? LTie jij��ijnct ^f r )C n n•,t fr•�urt uan5 See Scnetl. Nn. 3 2fj On� ( 2a. l5^e Schaq Nor. tl 4. 't ---- ---)- - -I- ------J -- l �- - - - - - ------ - ---- - - - - Slors and Securities Other Than Guaranteed U.S. rt• Gov't and Gov't Agencies LSer. Schetl. No 4) 20, 211r000 29. Accounts Payable - - - R.ai Estate _i7 [idert ,vm nmSc_ -ry—. N•—i. S) ---- 10. In1lre{t paYaDlt795.QDD AuiOn, obr -. - --- --- --- ---------- ----- � Taut and AHesfinents Payable I P t: r3r•_e•r f non nd•,rr 73,000 _--1-=1. (Stir Sr her? '4 Other Ansel, "'--- �---7fiarlpapiFayabTe-onA�iT'Es Tt 7 nj. r4 it 400,000 1 32. (See Sched fur). 51 rgrof"', Fairf. e id l citable Cable .7ci 33. Other LI&bIIIIit ��P-M'��:L' i . icdbl _�- 34. itrr.,,:r) - )• TOTAL _A S�eTS Sb:ely own �9 505 000 _- _ _x t.....__. r. 4SSL1 S !sj( uj j •.1y own0d) - --- 35. 30,000 A. Acccunts mirtgage L Accounts Peceivable --j ---_ - 5 Stocks and Flood{ - — — ---- ---- peal Estate On On /. Other Assels r,.,N4t A. f TOTAL ASSETS SOLELY O1•NED --(00a999 ). Sub Total S - -_ 1. _Lest Line No 41 : NET WORTH r i.,. .;n wn -- --._ - ....._._.-._..,.- _..._... ). TQ1ALhk59T-5_ -- — - !2p,5851900 _- SOURCE Or INCOMr : Y]t t�Qi1C: It fLr 3 - Coif) S S f30r,u{ anti commtttiont f ------ 10,000 #lost I sl„e income _ S 45,000 - Oche.tncnme rtl a r"� etce.-_- : TOTAL Z 160,000 _ CONTINGENT LIABILITIES As rndorw or co makes On leaser or contracts Leger! cls,m{ Prnrisrnn lot federal hKorne Ta.es Olh- Wade[ debt t:o 1 Ranking Relations. American 36. 37, ] t3. 39. 40. 41. Total Liabilities 1C13rono 43. �T,�-------------41S ., , :.-, 00r, 45. ( rF )m line No. 22) AQ 111[TOTAL MT!71!S-ari NET_ ATTT_46. (Linn 41 phis line .:5) 20 1 5951_��0 PEASONAL INFORMATION Business or occupation '-Age Cable Television 4 Partner Or oIIKM in tiny other veriturs Fairfield Cablevision Associates 1-Anlericable As_ociates _ Cablevision Associates 3.Cable Satellite _tell_ to Asscr_iate_s - - GFN`RAL INFORMATION Areany ~Is pledP°tiy... CGWiL' sS ,, LC;T`S.�. -- -.--- Are You defendant in any Wits or legal actions? - - - — - -- - No tt - Have You ever made a cutnpoution settlement) EvplainNo _ Have You ever taken henkruptevr Explain. NO SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES - (A list of all my dank eaounts. sncludirse eavtn= end ltinsi Sc �gT mmi ty _- ut.iQnwide 36. 37, ] t3. 39. 40. 41. Total Liabilities 1C13rono 43. �T,�-------------41S ., , :.-, 00r, 45. ( rF )m line No. 22) AQ 111[TOTAL MT!71!S-ari NET_ ATTT_46. (Linn 41 phis line .:5) 20 1 5951_��0 PEASONAL INFORMATION Business or occupation '-Age Cable Television 4 Partner Or oIIKM in tiny other veriturs Fairfield Cablevision Associates 1-Anlericable As_ociates _ Cablevision Associates 3.Cable Satellite _tell_ to Asscr_iate_s - - GFN`RAL INFORMATION Areany ~Is pledP°tiy... CGWiL' sS ,, LC;T`S.�. -- -.--- Are You defendant in any Wits or legal actions? - - - — - -- - No tt - Have You ever made a cutnpoution settlement) EvplainNo _ Have You ever taken henkruptevr Explain. NO SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES - (A list of all my dank eaounts. sncludirse eavtn= end ltinsi Am* end L oration trill Rank _ _Cash "once Amount of Loan kUturitV of Loon Host' rndomwd, GuMMleSecured ed, de Sered ..1; . � tat-1501 Penn lvania Ave sr+r-ltred business ralat.i Rank of. Rxm ,tead-2880 SW 157 Ave See Other .50c See Other .50c p Accnunt_, mans and Notes Receivable, (A list of the largest amounts owing in me.)Wn — - Narne and Address of Debtor wngt Age of Debt Descriptrnn of Nature of DebtDrs,rrption of Security Held E*n�rr•' `_ Americable Associates $245,00 3 yrs. Business loan - - _ Assets � 10 •-r:,. e-= iCab le Associates 2 icon" - 285100 He Insurance. (Attach Schedule it necessary) — -- --- ---------rFate - i w.il Cesh To�l Loans A ur�I of is f'nl,�; ` Amount urr, c er gamst ear y Name of_Persnn-Insured — Name of Beneficiary_ t Name of Insurance Co. Type of Policy of Policy Vague Policy Premium Asagne•1 Self. wife Prudential life $ 50,m 2G,00d 20,n00 4,000 No I I Stocks and Securities Other Than Guaranteed U. S. Government Securities and Government Agancies. (Attach Schedule !f ne- essar� I e Value (Bonds) i Description nl Security + Registered ter Name of Cost present - ' To lrint•i Pria T Received +� of $harps ($tnrkO _ ' r� ---_--.— - - - - — --- - Market �a tee Last Year 5o, o'D actor, _ 1,000,000 S0, 000 Actonrp stock options- -26- 4(TO 1 , 000 N- Ati tic Ind. 2n0C6;inun:ity—`ss-7;ZT00— Real Estate. Ti,� tPga1 and equitah!e title to all the real estate hste:l m this statement s solely in' it nTnr of the undersigned, eycept is frwnw, Desc,'ritlnn or Dimensions or Improi ements h'r,rtgages Due Dates and Ass, ssed PresentMarket ( ll''t'a' f i, -• Streit No, Acres Consist of ! ur liens Amounts of s, acne . _. Y, -at •.. Payments Value I I .506 Fam. Lin , Fla_, _ $ 00, 000_ r _ )146 na 123rd ive, Mi ', Fla. 28,000 1`65,000 56._01d .Cou.7tx~ P.O., Dix+Cate �s, N.Y.- .30,000_ 1180L000 -_01 S. Atlant' Ocean,Lit:,�ch, Fla. ' 150,000 ) } 315 Granville il:e, Larr, Oh. _ -- - 300, 000_ Credit References. (Names, Addresses and Account Numbers); 1 iy:'1 Insurance Coverage, Name and Addiesa of Agents) .end Type of Cnveragit I -- -- - - ----•--�z_.-s•-_-_. �:: <.=.z.•_._�-.max-•.�-..y..�.�...�__.�- _ .. _.__ _ . __ .— _ Jointly Owned Property Details of summary on front page. (Attarti schedule if necessary) _ Assets Value _ — Names of Joint Tenants 17301 Old Cutler Road S 1,000,000 Charles b Joan Herma rdski Other-assct5 appraised art, antiques 4001_000---- t, und• rsiyned does hereby represent and warrant that legal title to all property herein described or referred to, exceptii only jointly nvyned Dropetty m sir,t t• ' r I,Pdult d herein m c,u It, ,, ,n rhP or;!o name of the undersigned, and further certified that all information inserted herein as been r-aref read and I+ inie wo nd turthr-, ;rrknnvvledges that this statement is Owen for the exprt•sser) purpose of Inducing said Bank toe nd cre f accommn tion 'to, at the regptost of 1• he brincfit of the rinJers+gnvd Unirr pPna'ly Inc making false statements or overvaluing property to influence a actif a f t1, " d bank, 1 tndersigned cettrftes 0— le mto•mauon rnntalned in this statement is true and correct. y ,� June l G1_] 981 -- - --- — - _ Signed- -- — T ;fix` ... . 4;rui7 CNZLE OJ.1PA.1:1LL OFILP, r'I'L'i _ -- i rvicie Aricricable Ca`,le yste^s Xiama Six Star Vi3ion Level of Granter Dlharu Telcr Nielsen Cable of Miami Crmwni- Cal_:evision Miari cations Fri Installation Charge 0 ? $19.95 $li'.00 S10.n1 (he+vel Cne) Channels cffered* 24 12 21 24 24 Nbnthly charge 0 0 0 S 3.45 0 FM Nbnthly charge 0 ? $ 2.50 0 Total Nbnthly charge 0 $ 2.50 $ 3.45 Installation charge S89.95 $24.95 $29.95 plus $29.95 $40.00 deposit cl.evel r.�) Channels offerer.' 45*** 4400 47** #** 16 Pbnthiy c`argc• S11.95 $5,95 + 3.95 $4.95+3.00 $11.00 54,5r $9.90 = $7.95 r.1 hbnthl-.• charg(- 0 ? $2.50 0 $3,w s - and S-r S 5.00 S8.115 $4.95 $ 2.01 7'Dtal Monthly charge w/2nd set + FN. L16.95 $18.35 + ? 515.40 $13.00 Installation charge $69.95 + $19.95 $19.95 $29.95 $29.15 $25.00 deposit (Level '.IxL�.) Ctanne:z L):fcced 78 77*" 7300 90** 60 1Auht`hiy �'arue 95 $7.45+3.99 $6.95 + £.3.00 S8.5C FT' 1•tnthiy cvtry:* 0 311.40 4,2.5059.95 0 53.0 6c c'n,? S^t S 5.O0 $9.90 $6.95 Tbta? M.n'_�ly ,charge w/ 2nd set + FM $17.95 $21.30 + ? S19.40 $1.i.00 S15.3'J Instal latir;,i r!oreie $69.95 + $19.95 $19.95 529.95 $75.00 deposit 4 (Level Fct:. ) rhlnrMis offered 104 •• ••* 890C 7: Nbntl-;y rta: ge $13. 95 t*3.95+3.00 $11.95 $9.50 FM rnnthly charge 0 $2.50 $3.00 Second Scat ; �.00 $8.95 $4. 5^ 7bta. ronthly charge w/2nd set + FM $18.95 $23.40 $17.00 Installation charge $69.95 + $19.95 $14.95 $110 deposit (Level !'1'rr•) C7h,=vIs offerW 122 *• Monthly ch;.rge S12.95 FM Mnthly charge S 3.CO Second Set $ 6.95 7btal Monthly charge $22.90 w/2:nd set + F" Installation charge _ $14.95 (lrevul Six) ©hannels offered 131 •• ••* Hinthry charge $14.95 FM Mnthly charge $ 3.00 Secorxl set $ 7.95 Total PY)rnthly charge $25.90 w/2nd set + FM Installation charge , $14.95 Hours of local pro- grams Per, week 160 336 65 254 152 Entire city wired for cable 2 1/2 yrs. 2 yrs. 2 yrs. 3 yrs. 2 yrs. * Channels offered may include pay television stations available at an additional cost. '• Includes information service channels. *** Includes two -•way eartmuhication channels. *Two-way o3munication ctk:nnels available for an additional $5 installation fee and $3.95/ru. `*Inforrrotion P.-rvi,.s aryi rwr>-wav rrin chanrrls availahle for an adc:itiorvil $3MU. n �t a s X? �•� � `t Phone.305 255-3770 ENTERTAINMENT by * AMERI-CABLE * your Satell,re connection 20800 S Vv 1671h Ave Mlaln` Florida 33187 aj,,tr,,,y (ldit .s P O Sot 859 Mii Flnrvda 33197 June 181 1981 JUN. 1 0 1981 RCCAEngineering Management and Consultation „.tk'n & Associates. Inc. 8775 E. Orchard Road S vik, Englewood. Coiorac.(, S(1:: i 303 7() 4 12 June 1981 Mr, Cart pilnick, President Teletommunications Management Corporation 6380 Willshire Boulevard 'quite 808 Los Angeles, California 90048 Dear Mr. Pilnick: The following are our comments on the it evaluation of the Miami CATV fran,.hise proposals. Referring to page 92 of the Consultant's Report, "Americable's single headend design is considered a weakness for a city the size of Miami."': 1. Feasibility of a single headend While the population of Miami is quite high, the geographical area covered by the city is not. A key factor in properly serving a city the size of Miami with a single headend is the proper location of that headend. From Americable's proposed headend site, the extremities of the city limits extend 5.5 miles to the north, 7.0 miles to the west, and 6.0 miles to the southwest. These distances can be covered with a 15 trunk amplifier cascade from Americable's headend. (In fact, of the five applicants, three proposed a maximum trunk cascade of 15, one a maximum trunk cascade of 16, and one a maximum trunk cascade of 14.) The unique aspect of Americable's proposal is to build a hybrid system of conventional amplifiers and feed -forward amplifiers. The use of feed -forward technology allows greater trunk amplifier gain for a given distortion specification, thereby allowing the coverage of a larger geographical area for the same trunk cascade. As previously stated, the key to success- fully serving the City of Miami with a single headend is its location. Americable's heaaend site is ideally located for this purpose as can be seen from the trunk routing diagram in the proposal. Americable currently owns this site. °s rr a s`i t Atj 401 12 June 1981 Mr, Carl Pelnick page 2osals Miami CATV franchise prop Hite here that the trunk It is important to recognize the System Trunk routing and configuration shown on lotted. T e ide gouting diagram were not arbitrariconfpgured to p trunk routing has been carefully the overa5egmentat adequate coverage cascade, while ile provide for adequate Care was also taken to of the city by neighborhood. of Americable's technical ► A careful analysis erformance calculations will proposal and system p indicate that: f Americable's single The overall performance o headend system is comparable to all other applicants. ra entire geographical atrunkfcascadec an The Of be served with a maximum 15 amplifiers. can be Segmentation of the community headend oration. accomplished with either headend configuration - configuration configuration or a multiplelocal origination three and sixteen Americable has proposed roduction vans, studios, two has. P nals to the portapaks. Return of these s'9 the two-way headend will be accomplished by the system. Additionally, Of capacity ro ramming can be returned remotely generated point in the system. to the headend configuration has no A multiple headend gheadend with origination advantage over a single headend of local to flexibility or qua multiple headends tend to activity. In fact, complicate matters. Advantages of a single headend system le The following advantages are inherent in a sing headend system. erformance is enhanced. The overall system P ement requires either a• le headend arrang A multip or FM trunk interconlects andusually microwave at the hubs. Whi and earth reprocessing the off -air pickup that by duplicating nals would not be hub signals would be. Obviously station at 1lcother shgse s'9 nett trunks will affected, a the use of microwave or Interco processed, decre ase the signal-to-noise ratio alsdsonPrease the overall distortion of the si9 � b � �,� a, � asp � ''�.�. i � , _ F i �' :�� fro, Y �3J i u Oeherel Comments Cablesystems Miami congratulates the City of Miami on its thorough and responsible approach to cable franchising. The Request for Proposals the City has issued is precise and well developed. Cablesystems Miami has responded by developing a proposal which, we feel, meets the demanding standards required by the City and equals or exceeds requirements in each of the specified categories. In particular, Cablesystems has prepared a comprehensive offering of services - based upon responsible financial projections for the operating system. By proposing an -- innovative hybrid (shared) residential/institutional system, Cablesystems offers a full =— range of services in the most cost-effective way. This design is supplemented by Cablesystems' funded commitment to construct a dedicated institutional network as — demand for a dedicated system develops, and not at the expense of initial residential — subscribership as proposed by the other applicants. Cablesystems seeks to maximize community participation in the cable system through its five separate advisory boards, employment practices and commitments to _ training. Cablesystems has allocated funding and staff support to access, public service and local community programming not only at the outset, but continuing throughout the life of the franchising agreement to ensure that equipment,facilities and staff will always be available. Cablesystems continuing capital commitment for this purpose exceeds that of any other applicant. fi And, Cablesystems offers service to low income households in its universal service free of monthly charge, that requires no converter. Also a low cost + Y 9+ q + a{ professionally monitored security system will be available immediately. An Accurate Reflection of the Proposals Cablesystems' principal concern with the consultant's report and its conclusions is that it has failed to do justice to the high standards set by the city's RFP and Hlas not accurately reflected the relative merits of the total Cablesystems Miami proposal. It is our intention to address only those evaluation items that do not accurately reflect the comparative value or utility of the specific proposals. Also, we have chosen not to comment negatively on other applicants' proposals since such activity inevitably becomes partisan and unhelpful to the City's decision making process. Rather, we will refer to another applicant's proposal only to illustrate some point about our own. In the specific comments below, we address these issues: - errors of fact that have slipped into the evaluation; - inconsistencies in specific evaluation categories; incomplete or erroneous evaluations; emphasis on quantitative comparison which overshadows significant quality differences. 1. 2. o serious issues which pervade the evaluation that wP In addition, there are tw_ address immediately: evaluation criteria; repeated evaluation of the same point resulting in doublecounting. Evaluation Criteria his evaluation criteria in this way (page 1): The consultant explains "Each of the evaluation criteria listed in Appendix A was considered with respect to the strengths and weaknesses indicated in each applicant's proposal. re ive It should be noted that in many cases t'we strengths weaknesses o theeotherapplicatnts, so that an applicant may be rated as while at the same time this weakness may not impair the ability to construct and — operate a cable system in Miami. has ot ny But these are not criteria at all• measures ant strengthnor weakness e ofan benchmark or standard against which he and a licant's proposal. And, the consultant's assert i n that ataguersratherr than more PPmore weaknesses are "relative" makes the evaluation definitive, especially in areas such as financial capability. Relative to what? Evaluating strengths and weaknesses of the applicants b Y lative to he others, ME comparing among the proposals and then dens twoserious bing some tflawsrong et into the evaluation or weak relative to the others, introduce process. First, it banishes objectivity. Everything is relative and the standard of on shifts. For example, in the section "Institutimsal Network as having a strength, but acity" the evaluate applicants except Cablesyste consultant has assessed all app �� _ definition does not describe describes their capacity as "adequate a word which by �— superior performance (refer to "Technical Standards" where Vision was rated "neutral" .� for "adequate" performance). The consultant goes on to assess Cablesystems' capacity as a "weakness" without ever describing a level worthy of a neutral rating. -- ie sho how the Second, it results in inconsistent evaluations. as T ae ex engthabo n onws category consultant assesses an ' adequate prop cur even where clear quantitative measures ("Institutional Network Capacity") and gives it a neutral rating in another ("Technical -- Standards"). Similar inconsistencies o exist. For example, in the section "Satellitefor 20 ideo" the serrvices andsCablesystemsswith ma Telecommunications with a strength There is a "weakness" for 16 services (a!th nigh this is But ininaLLL^the section Origination difference of 44oints - a 25% offers 13 Programming", Cablesystems offers 12 service , Miami despite the fact theresis again a and Vision offers 7. Yet all are assessed a 9 difference of 4 oints ; in this case a 50temsf andeV Vision between Cablesystems and Miami, and 5 points 71°io) between Cablesys Repeated Evaluation and Double Counting se evaluationsg Cablesystems Miami recognizes the difficulties are implinotimmed'atelyin franc t susceptible to particularly since several important dimensions 3. appraisal. Evaluation of proposals by segmenting them into categories, each t16jcCtive app y approachingthe of which is then evaluated independent toeensure that the structure of the a aluationdoes problem, but care must be againnd not cause evaluation of the same percsilo d e strngth orweakness l strength ora n aknesof to independent categories. This could d proposal. sal For example, the consultant's evaluationvoe "weakness" of eans1 integrated (shatechnical red) focuses almost exclusively on the supposed of residential/institutional network. In the detailed n emofeservc es totall of Miamieare this cost effective way of providing a complete9 explained. At this time we draw attention to Ca nnersin whip Lg.al: evaluation of this same Po►nt has distorted the evaluation Cate or ,Assessment Reason 1 weakness Integrated Network Construction Schedule Institutional Network Mileage 1 weakness Integrated Network Institutional Network Capacity 1 weakness Integrated Network Channel Capacity 1 weakness Integrated Network Cablesystems' has been assessed a 11Wefour worktimes des gn has furthe d red consultant's apparent bias against an integrated net his evaluation within categories themselves. For example, the consultant writes in the ity" (page 92): category "Channel Capac ed rvice was "Since the channel capacity for institutionaln� al services." Butrn the(next l nee, the category considers only capacity for residentiale if s considered a w consultant continues: "...Cablesystems' capacity as ►allocat d by the other applicants, institutional service requires as much capacity Cablesystems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity." This is double jeopardy. Detailed Comments ths Financi al Ca abilit Allocated Assessment - i weakness Reqested Assessment - 3 strengths The consultant has assessed Cablesystems' proposal with 2 strengths and 1 the consultant' weakness in this category. Cablesystems finds s evaluation erroneous, inconsistent and limited to quantitative comparison without regard to the qualitative significance of the data under comparison. Cablesystems requests a reassessment of 3 strengths. �a (i) trtoneous The consultant's comparison erroneously attributes to Cablesystems building and rebuilding commitments in other systems a total of $97 million over the next four years (pg. 95). In the category "Commitments for Building New Cable Systems (excluding Miami)" (page 19) the consultant lists Cablesystems' commitment as $62.4 million. This is an error in fact. Cablesystems' proposal (page F-6) shows new plant commitment including Miami as $66.5 million. Cablesystems' commitment for Miarni is $39.1 million page F-4 . Subtracting this from Cablesystems' total new build gives Cablesystems' commitment to new building excluding Miami as $27.4 million. then Cablesystems' commitment to other systems is: Commitment to New Plant (excluding Miami) $27.4 million Commitment to Rebuilding $36.6 million Total Commitment to Other Systems $64 million As a consequence of this error of fact, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment to other systems is 83% (p. 88) is erroneous. Furthermore, the consultant's statement that, as a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitment is higher than any other applicant's (p. 88) is also erroneous. In the f irst place, as the consultant himself notes, the equity status of Charles Hermanowski (who will provide additional funding to Americable as needed) is not indicated. Consequently, the applicant's, or parent's, financial commitment as a percentage of equity cannot be determined. Similarily no determination of financial commitment as a percentage of equity can be made for Vision Cable or its parents. The net worth of all Newhouse companies - indicated as being in excess of $500 million (p. 95) gives no indication of the equity position of the applicant, its parents, or even the group of Newhouse companies (becaose, as the consultant must be aware, net worth is not always equivalent to equity - particularly in large concerns with complex ownership structures. The net worth of The Rogers Groun, for exarple, by far exceeds the equity of Rogers Cablesystems, Inc. Because the financial commitment to other new and rebuild systems, expressed as a percentage of equity, cannot be determined for two of the five applicants it is erroneous to suggest that Cablesystems' commitment as percentage of equity is higher than any other applicants when no meaningful comparison is possible among the five applicants. 60 Inconsistent As noted above, the consultant compares 'commitments to other systems' relative to Cablesystems' parent company equity. He compares Vision's 'commitments to other systems' relative to net worth of all Newhouse Companies, rather than Vision's parent companies. Vision is 310% owned by the Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust and 44910 owned by the Newhouse Group Inc., which in turn is 1000i0 owned by Advance Publications Inc. through intermediate ownerhsip. �m�MYeN x 5. Also, the consultant considers Americable's $9.6 million commitment to other systems a strength even though there is no specific indication of equity support for this commitment. At the same time, the consultant considers Cablesystems' commitment to other systems a weakness despite the fact that Cablesystems' documented equity is considerably in excess of its financial commitment. The consultant has compared the financial commitments to other systems among the five applicants and has arbitrarily described Cablesystems commitment as a weakness. All the applicants have commitments to other systems. Cablesystems equity is more than adequate to meet its commitments. How can this be a weakness? While there may be some variation in the amounts of equity and financial commitments among the applicants, Cablesystems reiterates that its equity considerably exceeds its commitments to other systems, and Cablesystems' equity position is documented in audited financial statements. There is no weakness in Cablesystems financial capability. We point to our financial capability as a major strength. And, the consultant has not made any differentiation among the applicants access to debt resources. Although all applicants supplied letters from banks not all of those letters specifically commit to the lending of funds. For example, phrases such as "...will give it our favourable consideration...", or "...will be submitted to our loan Committee for its consideration..." found in bank letters to Miami Telecommunications; or "...are presently working towards the implementation of a $75 million financing package..." found in Six-Star's letter from its bank are not commitments. Compare Cablesystems' bank letter: "This letter will confirm that the Toronto -Dominion Bank is prepared to lend Cablesystems Miami up to U.S. $31 million... (Copies of the bank letters are attached to this response - Cablesystems has underlined the appropriate portions). area: The Consultant's Evaluation, then, is inconsistent in five different ways in this - it compares equity with net worth; - it compares the equity of Rogers Cablesystems Inc., only one of the Rogers group of companies, with the net worth of all Newhouse companies; - it compares unsupported commitments with Cablesystems' strongly supported commitments; - it lists an unsupported commitment as a strength; - it credits general bank letters with the same strength as bank letters that specify loan commitment (see bank letters attached). (iii) Quantitative Comparisons and Significance of Numerical Data In comparing financial capabilities the consultant has tended to compare numerical data. While comparison of quantitative indicators can be a useful approach, care must be taken not to ignore the qualitative significance of the data used. For example, in comparing the equity positions of the parent companies of applicants, raw numerical data alone may not indicate the ability of the parent company to meet its financial commitments. In the event of financial instability, creditors will have a prior claim to company assets before commitments to other systems are met. Consequently, the amount of potential prior claim on the equity, as well as the 1.1 absolute amount of equity, should be considered. The degree of potential prior claims of creditors on a company's equity can be seen in its debt to equity ratio. The greater the financial leverage, the greater the potential claims of creditors on the company. Rogers Cablesystems Inc., parent of Cablesystems has a debt to equity ratio of 1.06:1 (as of its 1980 financial statement): ($000) Long Term Debt $1259087 Equity $117,179 D/E = 1.06 By comparison, Tele-Communi cations Inc., operating parent of applicant Miami 7ele-Communications Inc. has a higher debt to equity ration of 2.6:1 (as of its 1979 financial statement): ($000) Long Term Debt $166,188 Equity $ 649390 D/E = 2.6 The equity that supports Cablesystems commitments to other systems has fewer potential prior claims and encumbrances. Also, it should be noted that a significant portion of Cablesystems' debt is in the form of convertible debentures. This debt, issued in November of 1980, had a face value of $50 million. It is significant that by the end of second quarter 1981 exercising of the convertible option had reduced that debt to approximately $35 million indicating significant lender confidence in Cablesystems - and reducing its debt/equity ratio. Similarly, the significance of the absolute size of the commitment to other systems should be considered in any comparison of these data. This is particularly true when applicants are well experienced operators and own a large number of older systems. Rebuilding of these older systems can represent a major part of the commitment to other systems. It is not surprising, then, that Rogers Cablesystems, Inc., parent of the applicant Cablesystems Miami, has a significant commitment to rebuilding systems. In fact, Cablesystems has the highest commitment to rebuilding systems: 7 systems (out of a total of 25) at a cost of $36.6 million over the next four years (of which $7.4 million is spent in the first of those years). By comparison, Tele-Communications, Inc., operating parent of the applicant Miami Telecommunications Inc., also owns a large number of older systems. In fact, more than 180 systems (500/6 or greater ownership by TCI) are older than 10 years. But TCI's commitments to rebuilding other systems is much smaller than Cablesystems: just 8 systems at a cost of $2.3 million in the next year only. No commitments are shown for subsequent years. Cablesystems' high commitment to rebuilding systems is significant because it reflects Cablesystems' commitment to serve its subscribers with and physically up-to-date systems. 7. There is no weakness in Cablesystems financial capability. Cablesystems has more than sufficient equity stren th to meet its financial commitments both to the construction of new systems and to rebuilding to maintain 'state of the art' subscriber service. Cablesystems financial stren th is documented and fully disclosed in audited financial statements. nt be hanged om 2 Consequently, Cablesystems requests ths.UeOther applicantsewho docnot showrequity strengths, 1 weakness, to 3 9 support for commitments to other systems should be scored a weakness. Construction Schedule Allocated Assessement - 2 strengths 1 weakness Requested Assessment - 3 strengths The consultant discu discusses the invalid "indefinite evaluation nstrucotion aschedule",sofconstruction proposal when separate institutional network. Cablesystems is the only applicant proposing to construct, within two years of award of franchise, a system which will be capable of delivering institutional service to every residence, business, private and public agency in the City of Miami- Cablesystems' separate institutional' network is intended to supplement the capacity of the integrated network in areas of high traff is volume. Operation and marketing of services on the integrated network will identify areas which require supplementary trunks and project the appropriate time frame for construction. This approach avoids unnecessary and premature capital expenditures while providing flexibility in establishing facilities as required to satisfy proven demand. The pro -forma clearly provides yearly capital funding for this construction, a portion of the $2.9 million budgeted for institutional development over the life of the franchise. The assessed "weakness' in the construction and should shown accordingly. schedule Cablesystems therefore our flexible design requests an assessment of 3 strengths. I `O,ls rorrm J a Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations [•r Allocated Assessment - 3 Weaknesses Requested Assessment - 3 strengths In his evaluation of proposals for another franchise (Cities of Bell Gardens, Commerce, Downey, Lynwood, Paramount, Pico Rivera and Santa Fe Springs) the consultant has said "automated programs are considered to attract viewers on an occasional rather than continuous basis... They do not appear to be significant in attracting additional subscribers but rather serve the function of providing 'fill-in' programming." Cablesystems is in agreement with the consultant's point of view in this matter, yet it appears that this category has received inappropriate emphasis combined with errors of fact, omission and an incomplete assessment of our proposal resulting in Cablesystems being assessed an incorrect 3 weaknesses. Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. While the consultant's report attempts to list TV stations, channels and services under the section "Proposed Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations", when Figure 5, page 98 is reviewed, satellite video services are combined with local and imported automated services. It appears that distant signals have not been considered at all. For example, Cablesystems appears to have been given no credit for proposing to carry Channel 2 from Puerto Rico and Channel 47, Toronto, although these are unique distant signals of significant interest to Miami subscribers. Satellite Programs - Video The consultant, has erroneously listed Cablesystems' offering of Satellite Video programs. The following services (listed on pages 77 to 81, Form K, Cablesystems' proposal) were omitted: 1. American Education Television Network (AETN) (pg. K-80) 2. Appalachian Community Service network (ACSN) (pg. K-79) 3. Cinemerica Satellite Network (pg. K-78) 4. Nashville Network (pg. K-BO) 5. Public Service Satellite Consortium (PSSC) (pg. K-80) These services should be included. Cablesystems has no weakness, offering 20 services in this category: CNN Music Channel USA Net CBN ESPN ABC Arts ACSN CBS Cable AETN C-SPAN PSSC SPN NCN BET TBN MSN JTN Cinemerica Nickelodeon Nashville 9. Local Services Automated In the section Local Services - Automated erroneously assessed Cablesystems' offering. the consultant bast once again, Cablesystems' proposal indicates that "all community channels will include text messages when video programming is not being cablecast..." (Form K, pg. 740 Cablesystems' proposal). And, Cablesystems has provided more than enough character generators for these services: Page 1-37 of and an addationaltl4 (forraptotalosal sof 34) ohows gre notedton er generators for local progr 9t page K-26 (each of 14 playback modules has a titler. . This brings the number of local automated channels to 29t some The other composite with video programming as are those listed for other applicants. advantage of these servicewhich is not tdrinsed y the fact, Cablesystemsthas thoethigh st is the bilingual nature of many ofhese channels. number of local automated channels rather than the lowest. Automated Services - Imported The consultant only lists UPI News - English and Spanish carriage, includes orted automated services. A further analysis would reveal that WKID, proposed for the stock market reports. SPN carries the Women's Channel and while Cablesystems describes its weather channel as being locally -originated, NOAA weather reports are a usual and natural part of that service. Because NOAA has a meteorological center at re logical to describe the channel as locally originated. Coral Gables it is indeed mo Cablesystems' roposed ENCORE channels may also be developed by local broadcasters as automated services but CSM did not prese to anticipate the um broadcasters' decisions on how the channels might be used. Cablesystems maintains that an inadequate analysis of these categories has been made and that an inappe emphasis assessment of 3 s placed strengths. "fill-in" programming. Cablesystems therefore requests 10. Local Origination Program"Ilm Allocated Assessment - 1 strength Requested Assessment - 2 strengths In this section, the consultint has assessed ve also scored 1 strength. But Cablesys erns I strength. Miami Telecommunications and Vision have terns offers 50% more video local origination services than either Miami Telecommunications or Vision. Cablesystems 12 services Miami 8 services Vision 7 services In the section Satellite Programs - V�ide20 the forMiami consultant Telecommunications) as assessed a difference of 4 services (16 for Cablesystems versus differentiating a strength from a weakness, a difference there of 25%. Consistency requires a similar differentiation here. Also, the consultant's comparison (pgs. 71 and 72) notes that Cablesystems offers more hours of programming per week than any other applicant. CAB LESYSTEMS AMERICABLE MIAMI SIX -STAR VISION 336 160 65 254 152 Cablesystems feels that the uniform scoring requre ests does scoringrbeedifferentat dato differences in the services offered qu recognize this. Cablesystems requests 2 strengths rather than one. Other applicants should have 1 weakness. Access Facilities snd 5uppott Allocated Assessment - 2 strengths Requested Assessment - 3 strengths Cablesystems agrees with the consultant'sacc ess and communityhe degree of programming. technical support provided' is a key factor for Equally important is that this support continues throw Ihout the life of the franchise. Access technical equipment is subject to Chigh degree eque tlwear rit d ear, ant to exposed to the risk of technological obsoles h sicall obsolete provide funds for the replacement of technologically and stronger than other equipment. Because Cablesystems' support applicants, Cablesystems request an assessment of 3 strengths. Cablesystems' commitment to the replacement facilities overobsolete the l life of equipment can franchise. seen in the capital commitment to originationears 11 through 15 a In Year 10 Cablesystems commits $1,000,000, and in each of y further $300,000 is committed (pg. G-30). ants his rea ic Comparing the continuin finacommitmentcommitment continuingall t elchnical�suppoort. reveals Cablesystems has the seron eat CUMULATIVE TOTAL CAPITAL XPE pro fTUR as) RIGINATION ($000) (from Applicants' pp s Year Cablesystems 3 2,765 5 3,015 6 3,015 10 4,015 15 5,515 Americable Miami Six -Star Vision 755 2,502 29580 29580 19793 1,793 980 2,572 2,607 29580 19793 10793 2140 93,352 140 42402 2 580 2,580 1,793 21735 . 101) shows With regard to operating budgetCalhcnandeaccession (in Year 5) as $1.6 Cablesystems' operating budget for l0 origination Form K, page million. but Cablesystems' pro forma budget a for specialindicates programming,ini iatives was not 32 states specifically that tin the error included on this page because those items are t dS�withd onlyr 78% ofo it • cohmmitted is has resulted in Cablesystems being cred► programming budget. s clarified Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 With these significant issue strengths. Service to institutions 12. Allocated Assessment - 1 strength 2 weaknesses Requested Assessment - 3 strengths 'the consultant notes that "the longer the institutional network is, in general the more institutions that can be connected at standard cost", (page 90). Cablesystems agrees with the Consultant's view. But the consultant has not credited Cablesystems for its 685 mile integrated (shared) residential/institutional system. Nor has the consultant correctly credited Cablesystems for the channel capacity of its institutional service (25 channels downstream, 17 channels upstream) which is comparable to that of other applicants. Cablesystems therefore requests 3 strengths. Cablesystems identified numerous public and government agencies that will be connected to an institutional system, and could theoretically be served with a separate 200-300 mile institutional network. However, an even greater potential exists for communications services among Miami's thousands of private businesses, commercial establishments, "residence" offices and governmental institutions. To be competitive with other communications suppliers, Cablesystems felt it essential that maximum access ind prompt delivery of institutional services be provided initially. The limited cevcrayc dedicated institutional system cannot claim this flexibility; in addition, there is no guarantee that once built, it will be used and/or be located in the places it is needed. By sharing a common network for both residential and institutional purposes, both these uncertainties are avoided, clearly making Cablesystems integrated plus supplementary network design superior to a separate institutional network alone Because Cablesystems offers comparable capacity and much greater mileage for institutional connection Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. Sophistication of System Allocated Score - 2 strengths Requested Score - 3 strengths The consultant has ranked all applicants equal in this category despite the fact that Cablesystems excels in "the ability to provide a broad variety of services _ including advanced two-way and interactive services to all subscribers". (Consultant pg. 91) Cablesystems requests 3 strengths, other applicants should be assessed 2 strengths. 1. Cablesystems is the only applicant to propose providing a base band converter with addressability, decoding and descrambling capability to all subscribers above the free universal tier. 2. Cablesystems with 17 channels of upstream system capacity has twice the capacity of any other applicant "to provide a broad variety of two-way and interactive services to n-!' subscribers". (Consultant) The consultant has failed to recognize that Cablesystems integrated (shared) residential/institutional concept, combined with addressable con verter-descramblers in every subscribers home, represents a level of sophistication unmatched by any other applicant and clearly warrants a ranking that makes this distinction. `.pro `o`'�S .a.w,;�'",7 S dF=•y^'7'�a 's $; {'�'t 1.3 d xy�y a 4Y 7,_ '.. S t J Sytt m„fSeslan Reliability is key in a system of the size of Miami. The consultant has not given Cablesystems' design. Cablesystems requests its superior design. 13. Allocated Assessment - 2 strengths Requested Assessment - 3 strengths and sophistication proposed for the City proper recognition to the reliability of an assessment of 3 strengths in view of In the consultant's category of "Special System Features" no mention has been made of the redundancy and fail-safe by-pass features, proposed only by Cablesystems, for use in all trunk stations. Such a feature not only ensures the reliability of off -air and satellite programming, but more importantly the reliability of commercial and domestic data and alarm services. The sophistication of this one key feature, (please refer to illustration of 'Cablesystems Amplifier' in Section I and Form I page 24 of 32 and page 25 of 32) clearly distinguishes Cablesystems proposal as far superior to any other applicants and should be so rated in the evaluation. It should be noted a superior rating was given to Miami for the limited improvement in reliability obtained by placing earth stations at each hub. Yet, twelve 7 meter earth stations, a 10 meter uplink and 4 sets of towers cannot be purchased for the amounts budgeted in the Miami Tele-Communications, Inc. proposal. Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths and a lower assessment for Miami. Channel Capacity Allocated Assessment - 1 weakness Requested Assessment - 1 strength Cablesystems, in this section, finds the consultant's evaluation inconsistent. It also subjects Cablesystems to multiple perceived weaknesses on the same issue. Cablesystems requests an assessment of one strength in this category. The consultant writes on page 92 "since the channel capacity for institutional service was considered in (8) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services." Yet, in the next line the consultant continues..." Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cablesystems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity." This is clearly inconsistent evaluation. Particularly so because the consultant has already considered Cablesystems' institutional capacity a weakness even though it is comparable to other applicants (see above). The consultant's evaluation in these two categories has effectively subjected Cablesystems' integrated (shared) residential/institutional concept to double jeopardy. Not only does the consultant believe that the expansion of residential services may limit institutional capacity, but also the development of institutional services may limit residential capacity. Surely it is obvious both conditions cannot occur simultaneously, thus making it inappropriate to indicate "weaknesses" in both residential and institutional channel capacities. The consultant's concern for the lack ■ of upstream capacity for "Home Interactive Services" is unfounded. The spectrum required for these services is minimal and can be easily accommodated within the 17 channels of upstream capacity (Refer to spectrum allocation chart). It should also be noted that the downstream video channels assigned for institutional business communications can be scrambled using Cablesystems' and Zenith's, highly secure scrambling technique. Not only does this protect the privacy of the institutional communications, but it will also allow these channels to be time shared with residential services. In the evenings when institutional use is lower these channels can be made available to entertainment/educational access programming in either an open tioal and or secure mode. Also, the channels designated or the A2 cable for edous abl nduring government access could be utilized at no cost by these agencies, p Y 9 daytime hours, as a secure institutionally programmed channel - demonstrating the many public benefits that can be derived from the integrated (shared) concept. The consultant's statement that construction of a supplementary (separate) institutional network later will be "more disruptive and less satisfactory" is strictly an opinion and is not supported by actual operating experience. The concept of a separate institutional network dates back to a period when low cost encrypting and signal processing equipment was not available and the separate cable concept was the main source of providing communications security. It appears the consultant has overlooked the sophisticated hardware that is available today which permits the cost effective sharing of communications paths without conflict or "disruption" between users. Cablesystems anticipates that the greatest volume of institutional users will be in the downtown core and along Brickell Avenue where many businesses and financial institutions are located. As market demand develops in this area, Cablesystems will construct the dedicated institutional network required to handle the high volume of traffic. Users can be switched from the integrated network to the institutional network in a matter of minutes, timed to occur when communications services are not required by the customer, for example, during the evening or on weekends. The consultant typifies this slight interruption of service required to change cable as a weakness in this system, however, Cablesystems believes that most subscribers will prefer the lower rates which will be possible due to the use of a hybrid ed by network, compared an to the highr rates nder utilized, liwhich l mited mileage,dedicatedinstitutional be tearly network construction of Because the evaluation in these two categories was based on faulty analysis by the consultant, the expanded capability, increased flexibility and superior utilization of available channel capacity proposed by Cablesystems' integrated concept has been overlooked these two categby ories esthe be coonsultant. We therefore requst rrected to reflect channel capacithat t esthat are assessment inn t 9 essentially equal for all applicants. 15. Rate StabiliEy_ Allocated Assement - 1 strength 2 weaknesses Requested Assessment - 3 strengths Cablesystems requests an assessment of 3 strengths. The evaluation is inconsistent with the specific instructions of the City of Miami's Request for Proposals. On page 5 of the RFP this statement is underlined: An average annual inflation rate of 9 percent shalt be used by all applicants in preparing financial �t►ons. Over the life of the franchise the cumulative effect of 9°% average annual inflation rate is: (1.09)15 = 3.64 Using this inflation rate, the nominal value of $1.00 in Year 1 will be $3.64 in Year 15. This represents a cumulative nominal increase of 264%. On page 94 of the evaluation the consultant writes: With respect to rate increase projections Six Star Nielson, over the life of the franchise, projects a cumulative rate increase of 33% for basic service, and 80°% for Pay TV service. This is a strength compared to the other applicants who forecast cumulative increases of over 200% for both services. Because the RFP re wires applicants to use an average 9% annual inflation rate, Cablesystems rate increases for both Basic and Pay TV services are consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Cablesystems has taken care to adhere to the requirements of the RFP and to provide responsible financial projections. Cablesystems requests its evaluation be changed to 3 strenghts. Applicants who have not complied with the instructions of the RFP should be assessed 2 weaknesses: one for Basic rate projections and one for Pay TV rate projections. 16. rength ptelatlon to City Needs Allocated Assessment-1lweakness Requested Assessment - 3 strengths tion Cablesystems is dismayed to fieddthe an consultant's fete avara[sal ofnCablesystems' flawed by in internal inthis area is consistence proposal to the City of Miami. Cablesystems, therefore, finds the evaluation of "1 strength" and "1 weakness" unfounded, and requests an assessment of 3 strengths. First, nowhere in figure 18 (pages 113 to 118) of the evaluation is a weakness ems' Response to the Needs of Miami. Yet, in figure 19 (page 120), noted in Cablesyst the Summary of Relative Strengthnal inconsistency stenc Weaknesses, is perhaps aCablesystems clerical overs ght, weakness in the category. This inter but because of the significant impact of an weakness dbearemo eted edakness we draw the consultant's attention to it and request — he list Second, referring again to figure 18, Cablesystems notes with pride that toe the of Cablesystems' Response of the Needs of Miami fillout more But, Cablesystems pages consultant's comparison than does that of any other applicant. rriusL acid that this lengthy list is in itself inco�ete• e needs Cablesystems Miami has designed its company do umented in vol mesire proposal to relate to hin luded in Miami. Research carried out by the p Y the proposal, construction inanual, institutional ascertainment, community ascertain- ment and community response. Key areas where Cablesystems responded to the unique requests of the city and community members and yet have been neglected in the consultants evaluation are: 17. 2. Need,. Soutee: responses Supplemental production capability for the Anna Brenner Meyers Educational Center RFP page 10, fl2 and written request from Don McCullough - center director Two porta studios to be located at and administered by the Center. Cablesystems Commitment: - $1509000 Reference - Form K, pg. 3i 239 30 3. Need: - 50% of ascertainment responses and organizational letters identify a need to "Bring Miami Together Source: - Miami constituents' response to community ascertainment Respohses - Miami Together, a project to be administered by an committee to produce programs, support independent action aimed at fostering understanding amongst civic activities community members Cablesystems Commitment: - $3.6 million over life of the license Reference: - Form K pg. 3, pg. 45, 46, 68, 69 - Support for the development of arts programming 4. Need: - RFP page 10 - #10, & Arts Community Ascertainment Source: Beaux arts channel, production fund, appointment of advisory Response: - committee, access to satellite uplink, arts programming co- ordinator. 18. Y Needi soutce: Response! i{F� (pq. 12) requests maxirnum community participation in the management of the system RFP page 12, & Community Ascertainment Five community advisory boards have been appointed to guarantee the ongoing, day-to-day involvement of 42 community members in place at filing Cablesystems Commitment: - $3.6 million Reference: 6, Need: Source: Response: - Form K pgs. 43, 46, 489 50, 51 - Satellite uplink at WPBT facilities - written request by WPBT - Funding for an uplink at WPBT. All applicants received WPBT's request, only Cablesystems responded to Miami's Public Television Stations specific needs Cablesystems Commitment - $1.1 million Form K, pg. 31, 46 , Form I pg. 54, 62 Reference. Form G, Item 12 pg. G-38 - Special Initiatives - .. 7. Need: - City of Miami Police Department cable television application Source: - discussions with Lt. Pierce and Captain Boemler Response: - CSM spoke with representatives of various city departments responsible for maintaining public safety. Bothons for the police cable and fire departments have specific q. video communications, : F �, aM-1 t 19. 9. Needs = Crimewatch Communications Sources = Community ascertainment, numerous discussions with polices fire, public safety and civic organizations Response: - CSM has addressed this need in several ways. As noted in the evaluation (figure 18), relation to city needs, CSM has committed $500,000 over the life of the license for crimewatch funding. In addition CSM has designated a staff position for a crimewatch advisory board, allocated a channel for crimewatch on the universal service and created a secure cable channel available only to members of crimewatch organizations as designated by their respective boards. Cablesystems Commitment: - $500,000 crimewatch program fund Reference: - Form K, pgs 47, 48, 499 66, 72 - Form G, Item 12 pg. G-38 special initiatives 10. Needs - Cable communications at the Knight International Center Sources Response: Cablesystems Commitment: Reference: - Knight Center Project Development Director Dean Robert Allen - University of Miami - In discussions with Mr. Allen Poms, Knight Center Project Director, and Dean Allen of the University of Miami, CSM learned of the need for a sophisticated television production and transmission facility at the Knight Center. This facility will become a focal point for much international activity when completed. Both sources indicated the need to have the necessary TV production capabilities to record and transmit material relevant to several "types" of communities in Miami (e.g. civic, educational, professional and national). In addition to augmenting the capabilities of this facility on a local level CSM, via the proposed satellite uplink, will be able to transmit material nationally and internationally. Our commitment is to designate a studio facility, playback facility, translation center, mobile production facility and numerous staff positions at the Knight Center. - $125,000 - studio - $105,000 - translation center - $115,000 - mobile facility - 150,000 - staff positions - estimate - Form K, pg. 29 5, 6, 18, 199 59 - Form I, pg. 50, 54 and 62 20. 11, Needl Programming meeting needs of visual and hearing impaired Source., = RFP pg. 10 - #4, and Community Ascertainment Respo�,se: - CSM has fulfilled this special need by designating a channel for the hearing impaired, a cable programming coordinator specifically for this channel, local and national programming material, signed and/or captioned local news broadcasts and establishing a formal relationship with the cable industry's only Deaf Television Resource Center (located at our Toronto system). In addition, CSM will, if allowed by the National Captioning Institute, provide head -end decoding of network programming. CSM will also carry the talking book service on our FM service. i✓eblesystems Commitment: - $150,000 capital cost of channel allocation - $21,000 Hearing Impaired Coordinator salary Reference: - Form K pg. 55, 56, 66, 70, 71 12. Need: - Support of access production using existing Miami facilities Source: - RFP pg. 10 - #2 and community ascertainment Response: - CSM has identified most existing community production centers in the Miami area and we have incorporated thirteen such centers on our application. By doing so we have further fulfilled the access production needs of Miami. We have designated either equipment or origination capability at the following locations: Knight Center, Anna Brenna Meyers Telecommunications Center, Coconut Grove Fire Station, Wynwood Community Center, Archdiocese, WPBT, Teatro Los Mascaras I, Treatro Los Mascaras II, Allahpattah Community Center, Youth Co-op Project 79, The Fellowship House, and the Dade County Public Library. 21. 13, Needs Aeoess programming that does not violate contemporary standards of a community taste relating to violent material Source: = RFP, Appendix II - City of Miami Television Regulation Ordinance pg. 2 - D(2) (a) Response: - CSM has been the only applicant to address this special need noted in the Cable Television Regulation Ordinance. Cablesystems Commitment: - Not applicable Reference: - Form K, pg. 37; Form K, Access Channels and Administration, Statement of Compliance, #2(c) Cablesystems requests an evaluation assessment of 3 strengths. Taken together with the removal of the weakness (described above) Cablesystems score should be: 3 strengths 0 weaknesses 07, Lzwon afc - �L�iz cit roz ` az.� 021 :Liatsioia MY �/Wel J. 4,zue Mr. R. M. Francis Senior Vice President, Finance Rogers Cablesysterm, Inc. Suite 2602, Camercial Union Totter P. O. Box 249 Toronto Dminion Centre Toronto, Ontario N15K lA2 Canada Dear , r. Francis: ROGERS CM) CABLESYSTEMS INC. Dear Bill: This letter will advise you that the Board of Directors of the company agreed to make an offer, Jointly with UA Theatres Group, for the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of UA-Columbia Cablevision Inc. Some questions may arise in connection with the future i financing capabilities of our company n the United States as a result Of this. I wanted to write to you directly and assure you that we provided for all obligations, such as the have fully o construct the cable system in Miami and funds required t activs have been arranged that any funds required for inve and will not impactstment adversely upon your activities. Yours very b Robert Senior Finance /mh 0 s T14t .3A.NIt Or SEW YORK N1E* 1004001 0146+ JANA • 0OuN0t0 1764 9r A.-k*A-40E4 .+AM,LTpN 48 WAU StRttt, srtW Vdak. ir. 4t. 1661S City of Miami, Florida c/o Mr. Paul Alden Miami Tele-Communications, ThOs 5781 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 303 Miami, Fla. 33137 Dear Sirs: I am writing to you at the request of The Bank of New Ycrk's good customers Tele-Communications, Inc. (TCI) and Taft Broadcasting Company. It is my understanding that Miami Tele-Communications Inc., is applying for the franchise to construct and operate a CATV system in Miami and that you - are interested in determining TCI's financial capacity and its ability - to manage its affairs properly. We are well acquainted with TCI and Taft, their management and their current financial condition, and hold a highly favorable opinion of the organizations. TCI is a long-time customer of ours and we currently serve as agent bank on a $45,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility with four other major banks. We also extend the company a separate $6,000,000 revolving credit for short term needs. We are also a major credit bank for Taft Broadcasting Company. We understand that a large part of the company will be held orim,.arily by local Miami residents and local businessmen. We fully support this means of ownership, which will spread the benefits as well as the responsibility for the system throughout the ccrmunity. Iv'hile we have not vet had the opportunity to examine Miami Tele-Communications' financial projections, TCI and Taft have approached us concerning the fi.nancing and :ae -.-iirl certainly give it our favorable consideration. Ode understand that rclwghly $25,X-M of debt will be required. Based on our experience with TCI and Taft in the past and our understanding of their current financial condition, we feel confident that the ccmoanies are capable of fulfilling their obligations, both financially and cperationally. TCI and Taft have had and will continue to have the full suoD_ort of The Bank of New York. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions at (212)530-3106. 1 0 CABLEVISION ASSOCIATES April 10, 1981 Mayor Maurice Fevre anc1 City camiagion City of Miami City Hall Miami, Florida 33133 :mayor Ferre and %lern s of the City Ccstm'ssicn: T":is letter will serve to unequivocally ccxtrut the full resources of Tele-Ca=Unications, Inc. and Taft Broadcasting Company to financing the CATV system, as proposed in the application by Miami Tele-Ccrmunications for Miami, Florida. Tele-Comma ications, Inc. and Taft Broadcasting Company are prepared not only to carmut the funds necessary for completion of the project, but we also pledge the total applicaiton of the companies' experience and expertise. very truly YOUrso, /John C. Malone President Tel , ' cations, Inc. 14 Charles S. Mechem, Jr. Chairman of the Board Taft Broadcasting Company finological Center, Call Box 22595, Wellshire Station, 303 • 771.8200 Denver, Colorado 80222 77 Bankers Trust Company 280 PAA- A,-cnuc, New York, New YoA 10017 P.O.80\ 31y, c1lutd, sttvct st-ItIon ticw York. Nov1(irk 10015 Dear Mr. Smith: I would like to take this opportunity to confirm Bankers Trust Company's commitment to assist Six Star Nielson Cablevision in their acquisition and development of future CATV franchises. Throughout our relationship with the Six Star Nielson Cablevision group we have been most impressed with the technical and management support of Six Star Nielson with the previous franchise Cablevision. Our experience and Southern California areas developments in the Mid -Jest have demonstrated to us the technical competence, meeindustry knowledge and management ability to appraise franchise deadlines. Based on this, the Bankers Trust Company is and will remain Six Star Nielson Caos'bank and we support their endeavors to develop similar franchis Further, toward the imp development of cal1. we have had discussions and are aresently working- lementation of a S75 million financing package for CATV ranchises. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to Sincerely, William W. Archer AMERICAN SECURITY BANK WOM ROBERT J.OWEN vlCt OAE'!K"�• Mii�O _ __ March 176 1�81 Kr. Charles Hermanowski - Managing General Partner Americable Associates P.O. Box 859 Miami, Florida 33197 Dear hr. Hermanowski: ty Banks i Further to your letter of ch200million toefinance rican eth iconstruction on _ will commit to make available$ of Florida. franchise for the City `�a of a CATV This commitment is subject to the negotiation and closing of a loan to the Bank and its agreement and related documentation satisfactory by other financial institutions as L !- Co�cil to include participation the Bank deems appropriate. We look forward to working with you on this project. Sinceraly,, RJO/mbd 1530 SaCU,1V Bank. National AasOCIation. 1501 Pennsylvania Ave American ua. N.W., waanmpton. O.C. 20019 a JnFL 7 E,+eEN+4r3AN7 SA,vrOQ"�' a E.e17EN%PANZ MIC —ArL S SC 4U1_12 R �,, ,-, n A Ij JI- jMAN .�E MAMV+N P1N''31rp _0 0 t:*jtRLNKr?A�A1 7.. EATRENKRNZ 4¢ SCiILLTZ A-r-r<'1R NV yq AT LAw :{7"S ��.\RK�iCt�1 Y(IKK. `. Y. if+l:, Mr, Charles C. Hermanowski Americable Associates 20800 SW 167th Avenue Miami, Florida 33187 Dear Charlie: This is to confirm that we have represented clieand nts have invested in the construction, expansionyou were the tenance of cable television systems in which y General Partner. you have informed us that you will be filing an application to obtain the cable television fran— chise of the City of Miami with you as General Partner. In the event that you are awarded such franchise, tcertain of our clients may be interes�onanceinvesting cable antenna struction, expansion and main of Miami with you as our television system of the City General Partner. The aggregate equity investment of our clients %gill equal the sum of $15,000oa0he progress Of look ward to hearing from you with regard this application. JSEselb FEDERAL EXPRESS gt3utheast tifst National dank of Miami 1• h William R. K c 5eniurVicepresident April 10, 1981 Mr. Michael Willner Vice President Vision Cable Communications 110 East 59th Street New York, New York 10022 Dear Mr. Willner: Confirming our conversation earlier, the Southeast first National Bank of Miami would be pleased to make loans to the following individuals for the express purpose of pur- chasing common stock in a proposed cable television com- pany to be formed to serve the Greater Miami area: Armando Codina Hershel Green Linda McGowan Robert �JcKnight Carrie Meek Ann Meyer Edmund Skellings Willie Bermello Barry Kutun David Blumberg Athalie Range current �art:et Such loans would be subject to Regulation U; conditions and money market rates at the time of funding; as well as a review and approval of the respective indivivals' personal financial statements. ot—tiA .-nur proposed company be successful^ in;itsGsbid infor CI-EMICA^;K Corporsle eenkinO DIVI$161% ,t! o�rk av!°.!. V!w Vgri NY t0�12 %e 2*21310 e5C6 April 11 1981 2lze City Clerk City of Miami 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Sir or Madam: In connectian with the application by Vision Cable of ►liar i, Tnc• for the CATV franchise to serve the City of Miami, Floridawill provide erstaninahatng The Newfiouse Group Inc., one of the stockholders,Will be in an aggregate ar=unt of up to $50,000,000. The financing The ,lwhouse Group Inc. guaranteed by Advance Publications, inc., parent of As you may knew, The Newhouse Group Inc. and Ach anoe Publications. Inc. are both part of the Newhouse organization which is owned by the Newhouse family. business with the Nc-�hcuse family and Newhouse Chemical Bank has been doing _ ccrTanies for fifty years. The businesses these ccsTanies are engaged in incline newspaper, book and maga; the publishing, cable systesrs ► M,cru�;ave Newhouse transmission and radio db broadcasting circulator understand spapez's inethe United States . coapanies are the thin largest Chemical Bank has regularly received semi-annual and audited annual finan- vial statements for the Newhouse ccrrpanies. The ocrrbined net worth of the f $500 million. All �rshofh St��arses' Newhouse oor�anies is in excess oare wholly owned by -- p� except for one 80% caned calrpany► Newhouse family and trusts that they control. Frain time to time, Che.'rical Bank has trade leans to;;ec�hcuses including one recent loan which was in eXCeSS f $1000 sland cor:di*iclion. All osns have been paid pr�tly and i*� accordance the financial strength and guarantee of k vance Publications, uper► to lend Vision Cable of �Liami, Inc. , or The Newhouse Inc., wee stand ready In Group Inc., for a loan and/or an invest --ent in Vision •Cable of Mix-la,c• , up to $50,000,000 cn a long-term basis at its recu well krawm by the senior cranagen nt of Che The principals .^tiical Sank. are Th have the hightest regard for their integrity, business and financial capabilities. sincerely, Orville C. Dewey OCD/eyc SIX (--f AR Dung 10 1981 Honorable Mayor City of Miami, Florida 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Sir: Enclosed is our list of objectionstl the Telecommunications Managpmpht Corporation evaluation as prepared by Ca ed Six Star Nielson wishes to s�uecataonthere that hasnbeenfextendednbyndthe a. to the excellent planning and comn City of Miami to the applicants. if the evaluation that was recently pre- pared by the consultant showed as much forethought and effort as that which the city has extended, we would have no objections. Six Star Nielson must launch the sevaloest uatio�f of the iamitpr-op^saps. proach the consultant has taken ns The conclusions which can bdrawn technf cal commitmantstofneach comp�nyyandrthe ous but completely ignore the planning for future interactive aredcrodited w�thuidenticalcertainly offeringscannot understand why other applicants licant given Six Star Nielson ist.roposedIt is aamosystemst bewhichaistechnically that the pmpossible. the highest rating has P Once again, we are pleased to deal with a city as f bap. we doas arequest are not inferring any Back of "fairtol the �eportropaTelecoRrnun nations that little if any weight be given Management Corporation. fund 17, 1981 Honorable Mayor City of Miami, Florida 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Sir: Enclosed is our list of objections to the Telecommunications Management Corporation evaluation as prepared by Carl Pilnick. Six Star Nielson wishes to state that there is no inference intended a- to the excellent planning and communication that has been extended by the City of Miami to the applicants. If the evaluation that was recently pre- pared by the consultant showed as much forethought and effort as that which the city has extended, we would have no objections. Six Star Nielson must launch the strongest of protests with the ap- proach the consultant has taken in his evaluation of the Miami propOsals- The conclusions which can be drawn from this evaluation are not only errone- ous but completely ignore the technical commitments of each company and the planning for future interactive needs of the community. We certainly cannot understand why other applicants are credited with identical offerings and Six Star Nielson is not. It is almost unbelievable that the applicant given the highest rating has proposed a system which is technically' impossible. Once again, we are pleased to deal with a city as fine as Miami, and are not inferring any lack of "fair play" on your part, but we do request that little if any weight be given to the report of TelecorTlTlUn icat ions Management Corporation. 440 So Citrus Avenue. Covina Caldornia 91723 (213) 967-6337 171 4) ,;-,O 4 NI r SIX STAR NIELSON CABLEVISION T, OF MIAMI9 INC. ni t i., Proposed Master Ileadend, Hub Sites _� ` - , �� _- �N� and Public Access Studios LEGEND Master Headend t (Tower, Satellite Receivers, Microwave, Headend Switching and Main Studio) j Community Hub A (AML Microwave Receive Site) -7, ; 7�7 2 c� Public Access Studio Locations . . . AML Microwave Forward and Return Proposed "A -Al" Distribution Trunks and "B" Institutional Trunk Production Center SMSTAR Viewing Center and Neighborhood Access Studio -1-1 .7 1z: 7 ve - Ka 1:CAL-ea 1%4r 0 Vision Cables Viewing Center and Access Studio Location 0 Caolesystem's Viewing Center and Access Studio Location -e e- , - �: S Sr•�i'��'s{`�i �c�r � Y�'i .e,� k !Y-,� { ? t �yY. 4� lcf--�== �Fatml F ORM, I CHhNNEL CAPACITY AND SYSTEM DESIGN (continued) Page 3 of 32 3. Will converters be initially provided to all subscribers, for all tiers of basic service? (X) Yes ( No If "no," explain under what conditions converters will be made available, (a) Palmetto Tier: Oak L-30 converter (b) Palmetto Tier with pay option: Oak mid -band converter/decoder (programmable descrambler terminal) (c) Upper non -interactive Tiers: Pioneer VIP,* one-way, addressable terminal with remote control option (d) Upper interactive Tiers: Pioneer VIP two-way, addressable terminal, with remote control option (0) Teletext option: Pioneer VIP stand alone decoder or optional TRS 80 (lbk) computer (f) Institutional Subscribers: Oak T-35 or other suitable terminal seiected by user agencies All converters/terminals selected for use by Miami Tele-Communications are HP.0 compatible in that they can tune the non-standard frequencies used in such transmission systems. In addition to the above listed terminals, as use is made of the "A" and "AA" cable soectrum above 400 MHz for teleconferencing (downstream portion) or other special services, an expanded bandwidth converter such as the Magnavox MAGNA 58 will be made available. *The VIP system is described in appendix I-9 "Terminal Equipment" and is ', discussed in further detail in form "N". s�j r Nage 115 - Vision Cable and Cablesystems are each credited with viewing centers in minority areas. As once again can be seen on Map 1, this also holds with Six Star Nielson. The credibility of the consultant at this point is seriously questioned by Six Star Nielson, and wishes at this time to state that the entire evaluation proces is a complete "sham". Page 116 - Cablesystems is credited with a news production program originating at Radio Station WQBA. Six Star Nielson has committed a $220,000 mohile micro= wave news truck to its production equipment package for a Local Origination News Service yet receives no credit. Page 118 - The proposed public access policies and procedures were designed to comply with the FCC Rules and Regulations. Does the consultant suggest that these rules be violated to meet some unpublished requirements he may have in mind. If these rules are not removed from the weakness category, contact will be made for an FCC ruling. Six Star Nielson has also make the following commitments to public agencies: Page Chamber of Commerce T-48 American Red Cross I-48 Miami Fire Department I-48 Judicial System I-49 Libraries I-49 Police Department I-49,50 Education I-50, J-52,53 Government I-49, J-54,55 Health Organizations J-49,50 The most serious objection to be raised is in the Figure 18 Section (page 113-118), in which various applicants are credited with identical of- ferings to those of Six Star Nielson. Each of these applicants is credited with these offerings with the exception of Six Star Nielson. The purpose of evaluating the proposals is to provide an objective, not subjective over- view, as the consultant has offered. Page 114-116 - - Vision Cable is credited with offering minority programming consisting o f : =- Vision Six Star Nielson Black Entertainment Network ages �, J43- Galavision Y Y Pages J32, J44 Spanish International Network Y Y Through Local Broadcaster WLTV Women's Channel Y Y J2, J31, J48 BETA Y N Spanish News N Y J2, J32 The consultant's intentions can be seriously questioned that an appli- cant received credit in this area, and once again this oversite occurs on page 116, when Cab l esystems is credited with the offering of the Wcxnen' s Channel, the evaluation process becomes clouded by the inference that these services are only offered by each of these applicants which certainly is not the case. Page 114 - Vision Cable is credited with fully equipped access studios in minority communities. The enclosed map shows the location of Vision Cable's studios in relation to Six Star Nielson's. As becomes readily apparent, the studio locations are nearly identical, with the exception being an additional studio offered by Six Star Nielson and ten viewing centers that include character generators. A concern as to whether the consultant received a Six Star Nielson application to evaluate comes to mind? Paqe 114 - Vision Cable again receives credit for purchase of minority productions for its Family Movie Channels. By the very nature -of the channel any of the applicants would also purchase these productions for Local Origination Viewing. Paqe 115 - Cabiesystems is credited with studio locations in Latin and Black areas. The same argument for this crediting of response to local needs can be made as was offered for the Vision Cable Access Studios. (See Map 1). YEAR Non Interactive Service RATES IN HIGHEST PENETRATED TIER 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 YEAR 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 11 1 2 3 ® Non Interactive Service 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 mfl� l "■ bill llllll�llll��lld� ' 111'I 6 2' 10 �g 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 IN 170 160 150 140 130 RATES INCREASE 120 X 110 100 90 60 70 50 50 40 30 20 10 Service YEAR 71 11"m ............ NEW" iechnic al The consultant completely disregards the technical merits of the vari- ous applicants proposals. Granted that the review of the section is hoth time consuming and somewhat tedious, but the system is virtually useless if it does not perform as proposed. An excellent example is in the Miami Tele- communications proposal. Page 3, Section I (attached) states that the applicant will use Oak L-30, Oak Mid Band, Pioneer VIP one way and two way converters. Since the encryption technique is totally different in the Oak (15.75 KHz Sinewave Synch Suppression) and the Pioneer (31.5 KHz Sinewave Synch Suppression), the two converters will not function in the proposal as stated. These facts can be verified by the Engineering Departments of both Pioneer and Oak. The consultant who gave the highest overall rating to Miami Telecommun- ications has virtually recommended a system which will not function. Six Star Nielson does not intend to perform the evaluation that the consultant is contracted to provide the city, but a careful evaluation of each appli- cant's technical section is essential. 1 W'�� rF �pr:rt tag � Rates In evaluating the rates offered by each applicant, the consultant has chosen to offer two separate sections. The first section is Year l rates and the second is Rate Stability. Each applicant. has arranned a dtffr.rr,nt tier structure, for the purposes of comparison; Graph 1 illustrates per cent of rate increase for the franchise period, Graph 2 shows the dollar increase in rates on the highest tier of service offered. Graph 3 displays the aver aoe cost per channel of all tiers for fifteen years, and Graph 4 gives a dollar increase of the tier with the greatest penetration. In the following examples all of the applicants are represented with the exception of Amer i -Cable. The reason for this omm i ss ion l as because of the nonconformity of information in relation to the other app Graph #1 shows that over the course of 15 years all rates increase well over 100" with the exception of Six Star Nielson's, 0iose rates raise only about 33%. Graph #2 is a display of rates from year 1-15 on the highest tier available. This graph shows that in years 6 through 15 Six Star Nielson has the lowest rates of all competitors. Graph #3 gives an overview of the rate increases for the tier which each applicant has projected as it's most popular tier. All applicants with the exception of Six Star Nielson's rates are much higher in years 7 to 15. Graph #4 oives a view of the averaoe cost per channel averaaed with all tiers offered by each applicant. Six Star Nielson's rate is onl v closely matched by that of Miami Telecommunication, the one important difference being that the offerings by the competitor do not include any interactive capability. Once again, the consultant has managed to confuse the issue to such a degree that one is lead to believe Six Star Nielson has the worst possible rates of all competitors. Good business practices indicate that to look at only the first year rates of a fifteen year franchise is completely ridicu- lous. The impression given is that Cahlesystems has the rrnst attractive package when rates and rate stability are combined. A complete revie.% shows that this is certainly not the case. The work of the consultant is to aid cities in making a responsible descision based on facts, the only fact that is apparent at this point is that the consultant has given such a distorted view of the proposals that his evaluation is useless as means of comparison. .JINJ. l 6 i99� TELE-COMMUNICATIONBs INC. iCIGENERAL OFFICES 54 DENVEQ TECHNOLOGICAL CENTEA71 62OD X 22595 © WELLSHIRE STATION OENVER,COLORAOO 90222 1303 June 11, 1981 Mr. Clark Merrill Assistant to City Manager City of Miami Office of Intergovernmental Affairs 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mr. Merrill: submit mments Miam i Tele-communications is pleased to erformedhbyfTelecommunollowing � with Telecommunications respect to the evaluation of proposals per to Corporation. Our comment s are dnroureproposal. tFurther, wemake hich Management the consultant determined were weaknesses i applicant proposal or no comments relative to the evaluation of any other ev aluation of same, as this was not requested and is therefore considered to be inappropriate. 1• larva System Experience (Pg. 93) The information requested by the RFP was interpreted mean bye listed individual franchise holdings, nnitsyandmallocatedesystem mileage to each individual franchised community In fact TCI operoftelant.s or 1SThesetsystems o ueach each community. , systems with more than 500 miles P in some are cases, AML, FM microwave, served from a single headend withs or supertrunk to one or more hub s.Pittsburgh, PA 1,000 Miles 900 Miles Salt Lake City, �T 835 Miles Knoxville, TN TX 718 Miles Corpus Christi, 600 Miles Davis County, UT 587 Miles Madison, WI 557 Miles Bremerton, WA 520 Miles Pima County, AR 500 Miles Lakewood, CO Base on this clarification, we suggest our Large System Experience be adjudged to be "strong". Mr. Clark Merrill June 11, 1981 Page 2 2. Rate Stability (Rate Increase Projections) (Pg. 94) Instructions in the RFP requested applicants to project a 9% inflation rate in pro -forma schedules and provide detail as to which line items were so treated. MTC applied this inflation factor to expenses as set forth on Pg. 3F, Form G, of our proposal. In order to offset the effects of inflation on the expense side, revenues were also inflated. This has the appearance of rate increases, but in fact was done for equalization purposes only. No rate increases were projected, as the city's ordinance requires approval by the City Commission for rate increases. It would appear that the Six Star pro-formas were based on a different concept than that required, with respect to inflation, by the RFP and is there- fore not comparable. Based upon this clarification we suggest either eliminating this area of comparision, or adjudging all applicants except Six Star "strong". MTC wishes to applaud the city's consultant for an analysis of some of the most complex proposals to be submitted anywhere in an evenhanded and competent fashion. We would be pleased to answer any further questions the city or its consultant may have. Respectfully submitted, MIAMI TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. JU�J. 1 6 iS?h [CITELE —COMMUNICATIONS, INC. GENERAL OFFICES 540ENVER TECHNOLOGICAL CENTER CALL BOX 22595 S WELLSHIRE STATION OENVER. COLORAOO B0222 (303) 771-6200 June 11, 1981 Mr. Clark Merrill Assistant to City Manager City of Miami Office of Intergovernmental Affairs 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Dear Mr. Merrill: Miami Tele-Communications is pleased to submit the following comments with respect to the evaluation of proposals performed by Telecommunications Management Corporation. Our comments are directed only to those areas which the consultant determined were weaknesses in our proposal. Further, we make no comments relative to the evaluation of any other applicant proposal or evaluation of same, as this was not requested and is therefore considered to be inappropriate. 1. Large System Experience (Pg. 93) The information requested by the RFP was interpreted by us to mean individual franchise holdings, not systems. We therefore listed each individual franchised community and allocated system mileage to each community. In fact, TCI operates or is constructing a number of systems with more than 500 miles of plant. These systems are each served from a single headend with, in some cases, AML, FM microwave, or supertrunk to one or more hubs. Pittsburgh, PA 1,000 Miles Salt Lake City, UT 900 Miles Knoxville, TN 835 Miles Corpus Christi, TX 718 Miles Davis County, UT 600 Miles Madison, WI 587 Miles Bremerton, WA 557 Miles Pima County, AR 520 Miles Lakewood, CO 500 Miles Based on this clarification, we suggest our Large System Experience be adjudged to be "strong". Mr. Clark Merrill June 114 1981 Page 2 2. Rate Stability (Rate Increase Projections) (Pg. 94) Instructions in the RFP requested applicants to project a g°% inflation rate in pro -forma schedules and provide detail as to which line items were so treated. MTC applied this inflation factor to expenses as set forth on Pg. 3F, Form G, of our proposal. In order to offset the effects of inflation on the ateeincreases,revenues inwere factalso wasinflated. for equalization has the appearance off purposes only. No rate increases were projected, as the city's ordinance requires approval by the City Commission for rate increases. It would appear that the Six Star pro-formas were based on a different concept than that required, with respect to inflation, by the RFP and is there- fore not comparable. Based upon this clarification we suggest either eliminating this area of comparision, or adjudging all applicants except Six Star "strong". MTC wishes to applaud the city's consultant for an analysis of some of the most complex proposals to be submitted anywhere in an evenhanded and competent fashion. We would be pleased to answer any further questions the city or its consultant may have. Respectfully submitted, MIAMI TELE-COMMUNICATIONS, INC. by: 1 PAUL P. ALDEN cc: Telecommunications Management Corporation 016 Automated Services, Special_ TiAprest Pro(3rammi.ng A; Local Programs - 11utnmated Vision Cable clearly proposed the most comprehensive and diversified service offerings in this category. Our commitment to develop Vision's "T Channels" (teletext services) , in addition to the other auto- mated LO channels which we have proposed, will produce by far the most diver-sified 1-ind complete package of locally created information tailored for Miamians. No other ahnl icant came cl,_)se to offering the 44 local aw -- omal0-- 3 sorvices pro �c,sc�ci by Va.sion, - - which will include important full-time services like recreation news, restaurant and theatre guides, and 17 Latin ch;lnnel.s. The TttC Evaluation inac(_ur-;ltel.y credits Vision with having proposed only 11 :such 5ervicos, ':'as ret,arded ras a re],-'Live"t:c ,t;ncss". I't I, with 23 automated LO sei-vi-ces, was tl.lewod as having inade t}le "st-rongest" commitment in terms of local auto-- matcd pro(jrlimming services. Tt dces not matter t:o the subscriber if the ch,anlle.l utilizes a full G N,11z bandwidth or Vertical Interval Technology to deliver the service. LOCAL AU=,UkTr D s1�avrC1;S of Services Tr4C Rating Vision 44 "Weakness" TCI 23 "Strength" A ide from incorrectly totaling Vision's automated LO services, it should be ]'c?cogJli Ted the 'PCPs 23 automated LO services are mostly the "bulletin board" type; they are part-time services Aj)p ,1r ing i rr. egu- laxly on the v,triuus ,3 crSS ch,_�1s t:hc�n tcc��ss prograrraning is not being carried. Coll:S0qlie nt.ly, if TCI successfully promotes the use of its access channels, it oul.d literally preclude the :availability of its autoIllated LO services. Therefore, )-)ec:;ause Vision Cable has in fact proposed a far larger number of such services --forty four andbecause Vision's automated LO services will be l F. readily avai.labl.e on a full -tame basis, Vision Cable should have been rated far ahead of TCI and should receive the only "strength" for this aspect of its application. ba Imported Programs - Automated Although Vision Cabl.e's application clearly indicated that we would provide 21 imported automated services (see, e.g. , Section J, pp. 4e-11e3 of 1 3) , Visi.on was credited as having propnsed only !Aix (6) imported services ;and i:as cuiisldered "w-ak" in (.-(*1par1:=C7n to the 11 s:,ervi ces proposed 1jy TCT. iIi:jmi . Since Vision's corrunit:;nent is nouble TCT's !;ervi.ce offering, it should be indisputable that Vision has proposed the most comprehensive impor.tod auto r;lted services complerzent, and therefore must be gi.ven t-he only "strength" rating in this category, while `i'CI Shnuld be r-eclarded as neither "strong" nor "weak". IMPORTi.D WrO*7A't FD SERVICE'S of Services TMC Rating Vision 21 (no rating) TCI 11 "Strenyth" T'. Access Facilities and Support Vision clearly has the strongest local origination/access operating budget and staff ccmmitments and should have received the only "strength" in this category in view of the extreme di fferon<_es Let%;een Vision and the other four appl i c:lnts. Operating Budget Personnel Vision $2.3 Million 75 Cablesystems $1. 6 Million 46 TCI $1.5 Mill.i.on 39 With nearly three quarters of a million dollars differ- ence and close to a 50% higher budyet and staff commit- ment, Vision deserves and should have received a higher rating than both Cabl.esystems and TCI. PUrt}iermore, Vision must Lake t�xcopti on to the "weak- ness" rating which was rccei.ved under " 6 of Budget for Access" since our budget is significantly higher than any of the other applicants to begin with. Although Americable (with only a $650,000 total budget) and TCI were given "strenyths" for commiti.ng higher percentages of their operating budgets for access, in terms of real dollars, the applicant companies should be rated in the following order: Access Budget TMC Rating TCI $975,000 "Strength" Vision $690,000 "PIcakness" cablesystems $640,000 (not rated) Americable $327,500 "Strength" Six Star $127,200 "'eakness" These figures are based on year 5 operating budget multiplied by the % of budyet alIncated to ,access. Vision clearly should have been rated as a "strength" due to its high overall budget. III. Interactive Services Vision Cable takes issue with the conclusion that each of the applicants hris proposed "essentially equivalent interactive c(_)ntput:er systems". Vision Cable is the only applicant proposing to install a `I'OCOM III-B security system --the only t i mc-proven security sorvice , -first introduced in a Vision system in 1979 and now completely debuy,jed and ,incluu5tionlibly reliable. Furthermore, Vision Cabl.o st'3nds alone ��r.;ong its c onipe- titors in terms of. so It interf interfacing, for. Vision is the only appl ic,int cuii ni.tted to provide 711iami with access to irlfoi-r•.iijtional cl,_ita bases through ,in extension of its alrer3dy nxist:ing re].itions,hip with Dow Janes. Tn addition, Vision is the only ;ipp} icant cc,,-zii-teed to a :Miami connection to the Knight-Ridder Viewtron accessible data services if made available to cable operators. Perhaps most iinportantly, Vision Cable has designed its proposed system so that from i-he (late of act i.v,ition, it will provide more than 50 tol etext services to keep sub- scribers informed of happenings ai:ound the world, and throuyh- out the metropolitan Miami area. %one of the other applicants is proposing such a sophisticated and (.c:)l;;init- ment for cn}iancecl toleLext -ind interactive c_•aj} -31)i.l .it_y. :W JQ IVY Service to l nsti tut i ons The TMC Evaluation inpliod that because TCI's Institutional Network is longer, it is inherently better. This apprai- sal follows from the general proposition at page 90 that "the longer the institutional network is .... the more institutions that can be connected at standard cost". In point of fact, the overall length of the institutional network is only one small aspect, wb.ich should he considered in evaluating the capabilities of an institutional network. Vision Cable submits that the availability of sufficient bandwidth to serve nil of the i nst i tui i cans proposed to be inters "nnected is actually the factor of pararount importance. In this regard, it should he recogni od that Vision Cable is committed to constructing a separate 400 MHz Mid -Split institutional. network. TCT has proposed -only a 330 MHz institutional- network, while Cablesystems has proposed to share a single 400 Hz system for both residential and institutional services. Vision Cable believes that the City of Kiami could be ill- advised to accept the c nn t.c nt i can that only some 15 or 16 upstream channels will he sufficient to accommodate the programming and other servic cs genorAt od by the Tnstitu- tional 'network. When one considers the incredible number of government buildings, public ayenci_es, educational .and recreational facilities, "nd hospitals, which each of the annl is Ani s ,ire norli nq to i ncl ude in i hoi r Tns,t i tut_ional Networks, it is un rr. sonabl o to expect that t base hundreds of locations can wach be Avon von a vehicle for the n rrsenta- t ion of progr%3W nu if the upstream C'apici t i is should be as limited as oruposed by ` CT .and :^mpricahle. As an additional unhoncLmunt of the channel capacity which Vision Cable has engineered into the pruposed design of its Institutional Network, Vision is ronmitted to build 10 individual radial trunk lines from its headend facilities; this will create for Vision nn effective upstream capacity of 380 channels and a do;;nst roAm capacity of 180 channels, broken cinwn into the 10 s actors in which the city appears divided. This will allow enormous capacity for two-way institutional capability within each sector. The City of Miami Should understand that Vision Cable's calculation of the milrage of its proposed rnstitutIonal Network only i ncl uAnd the wi l oage for int orconnect ing all the public i nst it ui_ i nns within the City; the mi 1 cakes given by some of the other applicants also included distances for interconnecting banks, hotels and other office buildings. ! x � Vision did not include these additional commercial locations because it is our belief that the people of Miami should not be required to bear the significant cost of such construction. However, it should be clear from the information given above, Vision Cable has left sufficient capacity in the design of its Tnst.itutional Network to allow for 1tddi- tional connections of those commercial locations at such time in the future as is neoued, and wi.l.l assess the additional costs directly to the co;?�rrercial users desiring interconnection, instead of to the people of Mi arni . V. System Design Vision Cable should be recognized as having proposed the _ most technically efficient system design which will yield the ruost rel ilibl.e and objectively best (least s.i.ynal degradation) of any of the appl ic.ints. In order to pt:ovide the City of ?ii ,tmi c:,i th hi yh quality signal. thiou(-h(,ut its cahlt.:;ysfem, only Vision (',Ihle has coIntni t t ed to <_��.,nst t uct its ( ant i t-e su}scriber system with state-of-tite-art food fort:,ard iii-plifiers. This amplifier is usually used nnLy un suport,t unk or }tub interconnects but Vision C'ible f(.>els that its use through- out the ont.i re subs( Tiber system V.?i 1.1 yield :;11perior Pictures to al.l : uh.—scribers. ';he:;e 1111pl i f.iers, along With the use of 1 . 00" Fused Disc will allow us to keep our Ion,jr'st c,t�-cede Tit 15 i^iplif_iers from our c(,ntral_l.y located signal ro�_•(�ption point. Because this rc-ceptiun point will service the needs of the entire city, V.islun Cable has proposed to use three 10 t:.eter cart.}1 to fuither imptuve the kluality to the recci.ved signals. The use of a 10 r?etor e,3rth station for SATCOM I ;-could yield a 53.1 (IB Signal -to -'poise Calcu- lation as Ulipn} ;ed to 49.8 (IB i'or the % !r,,tor eai th nations proposed by the other Vision Cable is the only applicant t}iat hits (,)io�:;en to u:3c Lhose earth stations for all s'it el 1 i to si�jnal. 1 (' (cept ion. In ',ddition, Vision Cable will install all redundant electronics on its earth stations to further insure system reliability. Vision Cable is also cutrunitted to use 1.00" trunk cable on the ?nst i tut i un,i 1. Nutt,,o rk to keep !i;!pl i. f i er casc-- (les very short. With our design a signal. going frum the furthest Tnstitut.i.onal point to the furthest -;ubs,criber point would go through a total of 31 :,mpIifiers, (16 from furthest Tnstitutional point to central hert(I(And; 15 throu jh subscriber n,'t_%-'ork) . The s'itite si'jnal 1n the SySt('m that TCI proposes, for ex,3mple, �aotllcl (jo t hrou(3h a total of 62 anipli:fier_s (16 from flit-thest tnst itutic,nal. point to lst F-Iub; 32 1�-)etween lst and 3rd liubs; 14 from 3rd Hub to furthest subscriber drop). This rutttiny would give TCI twice as many potential points for electronics failure and overall signal doyr.adat_ion and would be totally unacceptable for mieeting Vi-si.ori's technical standards. Vision should receive the highest rating for the tremen- dous sophistication of its TnsLitutional Network. VI. Channel Capacity The 'ITIC Evaluation of channel capacity on the Residential Network wholly i(;noi es the fact that Vision Cab].e trill he pro parod to initially offer its subscribers .some 50 channels of textual formatted information, above and beyond the separately allocated 110 ch,,,nnels of video programming capability incorporated in Vision Cable's system design. Vision Cable Will ul t-imately br_ .-rhle to pro(:ram a total of 1.10 LO.xtual ch.trirns al. This notable siyst-cm capacity should be i nc 1 sided in any (1i-scuss.ion of Vision Cable's „channel" c,rpabil.iti.es. These textual. chrinnels are full-tiiiie `cervices (-)Vt'r (3efli'--ated L';tnr;wldths, lllclepen- dently ,icr-,2ssed by appropriately ri;inipul,lt od cotltrols on the ` OCt)'A7 converter turmi na is which Vision Cable has proposed. Vision Cable's provision of this fol:mi0able number of textual channels should certainly be rer;arded as a "strc nyt:h" i.n te2-111S of Vi.si.otl'S overall franchise application. VI I. Sophist i cat ion of System As described above under "Channel Capacity", Tf9C did not comment on Vision Cable's s\ stem design, and more specifi- cally, the textual chr(nnel capacity which Vision has committed to construct has not been properly characterized within the TMC FvaInation. At Figtir.e 11, TMC references that Vision C.rble will initially .activate "50 of the 55 Tel et(..,xt k:hl-tnnels" . f t should be un(3rrsr(,t c d that Vision will have 55 text ch,-(nnels on its "A" Re�sidontial cable and an oddi-t.ional 55 text ch.,nnel s on its "B" Res i(lential cable --for a total of 11.0 textual chl-inneIs. y. h, Additionally, Vision's Radial-Ilub io>iyn allows the greatest upst:rcam and downstream capacity as weI.1 as complete narr-ot,CaSting capability into ten separate sectors of the city. Clearly, Vision should receive strengths for this :sophisticated design, Vill. Rates Vision Cable submits that although it may be initially useful. for comparison purposes to break down the proposed rates for cable services into the two cate- gories of monthly "Basic Service" r<rtos and "Pay TV" rates, t-he City of AMiami should be more concerned with the combined ch,irc,es which the m i jority of sub�rribers will pay to take rrd\,antage of both "Basic" and "Pay" cable s0r vi r��s. Our experience in major m(Ai-u ol.itan mvrrkets, like C1eaL%•.,rte_r, Florio?a and Bergen County, .dew J01-Sey has made us aware of how unrealistic it is to presume that subscribers will only fake "R,islc" :�(-rvlce from the multiple c :ble ()f fcrin(js to be ;: :?e ivai l,_ible. Tn fact, 98% of our cust«rrers in Cleir%•r,fter ,riid 97'a in llk�r(je_n County buy at least one level. of pay. `I'}le �il'(.c`inp<3I2,.'lncj chart evi.clti'.nce. that Vision should be rat od at least in overall ratr_s A th TCI ind C�0)1 ea; str ms :,i nce our installation ch,:;ryes are sieinif.ic.-intly lower than all. others Ind our typical r-•,onthly charges are in 1 i ne wi th TCI trnd Cab]. csyst(.ms and s ic ni- ficantly lower than 1%,liericlrble ind Six Star. Additionally ()nly %lision's Univcr:sal. Service (no monthly charge) will i.nclu�le the Imust-c r y" si(,nals of the Local brnadcasturs in lade and Rrv,, rrd Counties. Vision is the only Universal. Service th,-at will replace a roof -top antenna. 1'CI, Cab1c,systc,ras and Ai,,iori,.-able do not carry the .local sit,nals VJ1 their Universal 'Piers, rind Six Star has no Univorsal Tier. In short, Vision has proposed the only significant commit- ment to provide a meaningful free service to those ?Miamians who may not be able to afford the more enhanced tiers of cable offerings. i.,otjR TYPTCAL Basic and OaIaViSiOft (Lowest aval'.Iabl.e Basic Tier tot all companies) Installation Monthly Vision $14.95 $14.50 $16.40 Cablesystems $19.95 $19.95 $13.90 TC*r Six Star $29.95 $21.50 $14.95 Americable $89.95 Basic and HBO (T,owest available Basic Tier for all companies) Vision $14.95 $16.45 $16.40 Cal)le!;yst(,ms $19.95 $1.9.95 $13-90 'PCI six Star $29,95 $21.50 $23-90 Americabl-e $69-95 Basic, 11130, Ci.m.,max, c,,jj�lvision (Lowest available Panic Tier) Vision $14.95 $29.50 $28.8.805 Cabl esystems $19.95 $19.95 e'27 3, TC 1 six Star $29.95 $32.00 $41.80 Ame r i c ab 1 C $69-95 Reception only (Replaces Roof -Top AnLenAntennallo Pay Service) Vision $40.00* $19.95 FRYE $5.95 Ca I-) I c 5 �7 S I Pms $19.95 $4.95 TCI six Star $29.95 $3.95 $11.95 Americablc $69.95 Can be paid over two year period. -ate Stability_ freeze commits 'TMC incorrectly stated that Vision's rate ment was limited to our two year build schedule. In Form L, Page 1 of 3, vision Thiseasthat it will the identicalleeze commit- the rates for three years. _ ment as Cablesysteins' which was rated a'1sf. rengtth" for Vision therefore should also receive this important aspect of its app Over a l5 year period, it is L1IlI'CaliStlC t-ol�projIhmttathat 50-60% i_nc_l-pase in racrea�5e 200os six Sare tar dldore realistic rates pi:ujected period end can give the project_ ion over a fi.ftc en year t (,oals company a better chance arijerate inIng cl:ea SOS. rho J2FP without the need for sure se Specifically requestr�d t.hr'Six Stars a specific inflation f.ict_oi and rate projections clo not follc%q that request. _ -- i -- i X6 Relation to Needs of. 'iiaml TMC incorrectly cal cu] atcd t esutn to in have SOne arystrength o f r�th and one „eakness in this c j 3 Y Tn fact, Relative Strenychj8aIindticatesJtwo strengths Os (Figure 9and no TMC's own Fir,ur ro osal weaknesses in its evaluation of Vision's proposal fulfilling r4ialni's needs. 5 City of Miami evaluation of Cable Television License Proposals Table of Contents (prepared by: Intergovernmental Affairs, June 11. 1081) Page No. W0 5h A: Ownership and Control Information . . . . . . . . . . 3 - Applicant Name, Address, Authorized Representative . . . . . . 3 Ownership Information .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 (a) Identification of Owners . . . . 3 — b Organizations or Corporations owning 3X or more�lnterest 5 Stock Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 — (a) Structure 5 (b) Stock of Corporation . 5 (1) Class of Stock . . . . . . . . . : 5 �2 Par Value . . . . . . . . . . . . : . 5 3 Vote per Share . . . . . . . 5 (41 Number of Shares Authorized . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 (5 Number of Shares Issured . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 _ Number of Shares Subscribed . . . . 5 �6) 7) Total Number of Stockholders • • 5 (c) Other obligations or securities authorized or outstanding which bear voting rights . . . . . . . . . : ► 5 (d) Controi by another corporation or legal entity . . . . . . . . 5 Section B: Ownership Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 U.S. Citizen/Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, TV Network Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Local TV Station Ownership* . . . . . . . . . . . . . `, s 7 Local TV Translator Ownership . . . . . . . . . . 7 Local Telephone Company Ownership . . . . . . . . . 7 Local Newspaper Ownership . . . .. ,`. . 7 Local Radio Station Ownership . . . . . . . .' . ; 7 Section C: Character Qualifications . . . . . '. ... . g Conviction in Criminal Proceedings . . . . . . g- Liability in Civil Proceedings . . . . . . . . : . `. . 4. .. g Prior Business License Revocation . . . . _. . b g Prior Violation of Franchise Agreement . . . . .•` . i . . g Litigation Against a Franchising Authority . ., : : . g Prior Default on a Loan . . . . . . . . . . . g Section D: Experience - Current Cable Holdings . . Current Cable System Holdings . . . . . . . 11 l Average Current Subscriber Rates . . . . . Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..'.. . 11 Pay .. . . . . . . . . .. ,. .. . 11 Subscriber Rates Range Basic - High . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Low . 11 Pay - Nigh . .. . 6' 6 . it Low Section E: Former Franchises or Ownership Interests . .. . . . . . . . 13 s Disposition of Franchises . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Section F: Financial Resources, Existing Capital Commitments and Potentials Building Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Sources of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (a) Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 b) Primary Debt ( 15 (c) Secondary Debt . . . . . . . . . . 15 Terms of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 �a Amount, Period, Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 b� Collateral Involved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (c) Guarantors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (d Related FinancingAgreements 15 (P du Limitations on Sale of Stock by Individual Holders 17 — (f Buy -Out Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 =_ (g) Assignments of Stock Voting Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 W Multiple System Operator agrees to countersign franchise 17 agreement if asked . . . 17 —` (i) Organized as an IRS Subchapter S'Corporation; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; 17 0) Local investor services in kind _ _ 17 -71 oboe No. Documentation . a 19 totAitment for Building New Cable Systems*(excludinp Mia;q a i a 19 Commitment for Rebuilding Existing Systems 19 Potential Building Commitment - new franchise application3 i . , 19 �ettioh G: Financial Profoma • . a + , i a 21 System Growth and Revenue . . + + , a 21 Homes Passed by Cable . . . . . . . . . a a i , i a 21 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . a a i i a i + 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . a a a i • + i a i 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . a . • a a a a i i. i a i a 21 Year 10 . . . . . . . a a i i i i i , a , 21 Year 15 . a . i . a . a a i s ti i a . 21 Penetration - Basic Service - All Tiers a + i i a • 21 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . • . i i a a . i 1 . a . 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . a . + a i • i i i a 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . • • a i i i 21 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . a a , a a i a i.. i i a 21 Year 15 . . . a . i : i a a a a 21 Penetration - Pay TVService-All Services , a : 3 i i : 41 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . • a i a i i '+ , • 21 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . , a a i • 21 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . • , a s a c a . 21 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a a a t 21 Year 15 . Projected Increase in Revenue� Per ib Subscrer'(%% • , . i + i i • 21 • 23 Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . • . a , a .a , , • 23 Pay Service . . . . . . . . . . a . . , a , i , a 23 .. Revenue . . . . . . . . . a a . a a , i : i i 25 Year 1 . . . . . . . . a . , , a a . r" • • 25 Basic/Second Set . , , . a rr a , & a a a • • 25 Pay TV . . . . i i . i , `'a i a i a • • 25 Installation .. i a i a 'a i a a a 6• 25 Other . . , a a , i i a . y +' 25 Total . . . . . , a . i i i i i i i, a a is i • 25 Year 3 . . . , & 25 Basic/Second Set • a a . i a i • 25 Pay TV . . . . . . . a 25 Installation . . . . . . . a i i . i i a . ,` , 25 Other . . . . . . . . ba a : a + . . s • a' . 25 Total 25 Year 6 . . . . i a a . a . • • 25 Basic/Second Set •' , `. . a. a 25 Pay TV 25 Installation . . . . . . . . a a a . '. . . 25 Other . i a a : . 25 Total . . . . . . 25 Year 10 . . . . 25 Basic/Second Set a i a '> . ` . : • 25 Pay TV0 a a 0 25 Installation ` `. ' 25 Other a • i . . a 6 i . 25 Total . . . . . . . ', . .. .. . .` 25 Year 15 . . . . + . ':.. . 25 Basic/Second Set ;. _.�,.. 25 Pay TV ., .. .: : .. 25 Installation 25 Other . . . . . . Total Income Statement 27 Year 1 . . . . . . . 27 Revenue.:., `.". .... -. 27 Net Income . . . . . .. ... . ...; 27 Cash Flow`._. 27 :. Year 3 . . . . . . . - .;. : .. 27 Revenue 27 Net Income : . .' .' ` .::- : ,' 27 I ,Pane No. r Veit 15 • • • . • • r r i r r i r r i 1 f i i r + 27y Net Income • • • ► i • i r • i i i i • i i r i i i i 2/ Cash Flow • • r i i . : . . s . . . . • + 27 Sources and Uses of Funds (15 year total) • r i . r . r i i . . . + + 29 Sources • • • . • . • ► r : r i r . r i i : t • i ► • 29 £ Equity . . . . . • . i . i i i . : . + • + . 29 - Loans . . . . . . . ► • f i . r r i r T f • i • . . i . + 29 29 Revenue . . . . . • • i i , r r . . r i . . • 29 Other • • i i r . + . . 29 Total . . . . . . . . • r r . • r • i r. i r i i ► • Uses • • : . r + r i . r • + • 29 Capital Expenditures + : r + + + i • + + i + + 29 Operating Expenses + . + . • • r • • • ► . 29 Interest Payments i + + + + + + + _ _ + ► + 29 - Income Taxes • • ► + • . • i + • • . 29 29 - Loan Repayment • • + + • + • r + 29 Dividends i • + • + • + r + 29 Total . • • • + . ► • + + • 29 — EndingCash Balance + + + + + + ' s 29 Average Interest Rates • • : _ + + r — Capital Expenditures • 31 (15 year total) rt+ + + + + _ Antennas, Towers, Headends,•Eah Stations + + • + _ + 31 = Microwave . . . . . . ► ► + . . . . 31 31 =- Distribution• Plant• . . . . . . • • + + + • + • • 31 = Institutional Network . . . • + + + + + .- • • 31 Drops A Converters - • + • + + • 31 Buildings A Land • . , + + + + • 31 (% Leasehold Improvements . . . . • 6• ► + + + • 31 Cablecasting facilities • •' + . + • + • 31 Test Equipment, Spares . + . i + • : : + '.+ : . 31 Vehicles . . . . . . . . • i + + . + . • . Preoperating . . . . . . • • • '.` r + ► '+ 31 31 Engineering . . . . . . . . . . ► • . . . . ► • . 31 t f: Pay TV Equipment • i • •-• . + 31 Capitalized Overhead A Equipment + . ."`+ + + + Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . + + ► ,� • " ' . 31 Total .. . . . . . . . . . . • • + .- ► 31 s.'. Construction Costs . + + '• ►"'* + • 33 Distribution Cost Per•Mi1e6 . + i '+ + + + • 33 - Aerial . . . . . . 33 - Underground i • .... : '. 33 Cost Per Drop and Converter +' • . +'" + . 6 6- • . 33 33 - Aerial . . . . . . . -61 . '. : 33. - Underground • + i i • • • Depreciation • i< + . . . , 33 �. (15 year 'total) • . + • '•. 33 35 Depreciation Schedules (years)• • + + • i Antenna 6 Towers . . . . . • . . 35 . 35 Microwave . . . . . . . ., • .. • " .. • 35 a Headend . . . . . . . . . , - . i • 35 Earth Station • . . . . . . .` • t • Distribution Plant . . . . . . 35 - Aerial . . . ' ` 35 - Underground : • . ." . - Pole Arrangement . . . . . ", . • ., 35 Drops ` + ', �... ";;;, 35 35 Converters . . . . . . . . . .' .... _ ,.. ;• 35 Buildings . , • 35 - '," `. 35 - - Studios • .'. :. , . " 35 a - Offices . . . " .:... . " 35 Leasehold Improvements .""". • ,` ':'""• '• 35 Origination Equipment +" +J • ""+.'• 35 = Test Equipment, Spares .`. "+. • • 35 -- Vehicles ` 35 Preperating . . . . . . . . , ; . """• ` :. 35 — Engineering . . . . . . • . . . 35 Pay TV Equipment • ,` ", .:; . ` + ' 35 Capitalized Payroll +' . • . • • 35 _ - • Other . . . Services Purchased From Parent Organization (15 year total) . 37 37 Management Services . . Legal . . . + r + . • + + + r + + . • + Accounti• Accounting Customer Billing + + • ' • ' ' ' ' ► i ' Programming . + r + + + + + + ► • • + , • Other + + + . . • . + . + . , + Total + + . + . . ► y : ► . ► Operating Expenses + + • + ► ' • + _ ' + + ' Plant . : • : . + + • + + ► . : Year•1 + + : . . + + : . : • : + + Year 3 . . . . + . + . . + . • . . + Year 6 + + + . ► . + • + + . + . . , Year 10. + + + + . . ► + ► . . + + Year 15. . . . + . + • . , + • . + + + + Origination + , + + + • . . . + + + Year 1 • . . + r . ► , + + Year 3 . . . Year 6 . . . + r + . + ► : + . . ` + . ► + Year 10. Year 15. . . . + + + , ► + +' + +' , . '+ + + Spelling G 6 A . . . . . + : s + + + + . r ► Year Year 3 . . . . + • + r ► + + Year 6 . . . . . . + ► r + + . + Year 10. . . . . + . b Year 15. Total Year•1 . . . . . . . + Year 3 + . . . . . + Year 6 Year 10. + + + + Year 15. + Section H: Service Areas, Construction Schedules and Construction Practices Franchise Territory . . . Line Extension Policy Construction Schedule (Residential Network Only) . . . . . . . . . . • • • . • Year 1 --- Miles M • • • • • • ' ' ' i + Year 2 --- Miles (>e) ' Year 3 --- Miles (t t Underground Plant ; ; Construction Practices . . . . Safety and Reliability Construction Standards . . . . . • Tower Standards Construction Policy .N here. utilities Are Located Both Aerially and Underground •; Construction PracticesManual . . . • • • • • • ' Page No. + 37 37 37 37 + 37 39 39 39 + 39 + 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 • 39 39 + 39 39 • 39 39 39 • 39 • 39 • 39 • 39' • 39 • 39 • 39 • 41 • 41 • 41 41 • 41 41 • 41 41 + 43 43 45 • 45 • 45 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 49 49 49 51 51 51 51 51 51 53 53 53 53 vT X Neadend/Hub Interconnection + interconnection With Other Cable Systems Technical Standards . . . . . . . • i + Amplifier Cascade . . . . . . . . + Longest Cascade . . . . . . . . . , Performance Tests . . . . . . . . . . System Maintenance . . . Customer Complaint Policies and Procedures . . Special System Features . . . . . . . . . Settion J: Proposed Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations Proposed Signal Carriage . . . . . . . . . Local TV Stations . . . . . . . . . . Distant TV Station . . . . . . . Statellite Programs - Video . . . . . . . Pay TV Programs . . . . . . i • i i i i r i i i + { { { i i • + i i i • .. . i i . i i i i i- i i • Page No. Local Programs - Automated . . . . Imported Programs - Automated . . . . • i i ► . + 1, i • , Local Programs - Video . . . . . . . .. Other . . . . . . . . . . . , i 6+ . . FM Services . . . . . + + i Leased Access . . . . . . . . • + Reserved for Future . . . . . . . . . . . . Section K: Local Programming •. . . . Local Program Production Equipment and Facilities + . Access Production Equipment and Facilities . . . . . . . . Commitment to Local Origination and Access Programming . . . . . . . Operating Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Year 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + Year 10. . . . . . . . . . i c i i Staff Commitment . . . . . . . . . . Year 1 . . .' .. Year 3 + :` Year 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . Year 10. • . . . . . . . . Hours Per Week of L.O.Programming . . . . . . Produced Locally . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total ••. . . Percentage of Budget Allocated To Access Channel Production Assistant Provisions for Minority Programming + Provisions for Minority Programming (continued) . . . . . . . . . Section L: Proposed Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate Guarantee . . . . . . . . . . Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Monthly Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . .:i First Outlet . . . . . . . . •. Additional Outlets . . . . . . . .;, . Pay TV Service . . . . . . . .. .' Commercial Rates . . . . . . One -Time Charges •' .•` Installation - first Outlet Installation - Pay TV ,. ronverter „eposit . . . . . Relocation . . . . . .' Reconnection . . . . . .. Other Rates . . . . . . . . . . . .. Studio and Equipment Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . Non • Commercial Users . . . . . . . . . . .: Commercial Users . . . . . . . . . Leased Channel Rates .' Service to Government and�Educational•Faeilities Installation Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - First Outlet . . . . . . . . . . - Additional Outlets . . . . . . . . . . . Monthly Rate • • . . . . . . Special Rates, Discounts,InteractiveRates . . . . . . . . . . Section M: Employyment Practices • • • . . • . . . • • . • • • • • • Section N: Miscellaneous . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . 55 55 55 57 57 57 57 59 59 71 73 75 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 78 78 78 78 78 78 80 80 80 80 80 82 82 82 82 82 82 84-85 86-87 M R 77-77 r, a TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. 6380 Wilshire Boulevard - Suite 808 • Los Angeles, California 90048 (213) 653-0810 TABLE OP COI M-TS 3 S1 T (15) Rates . . . i i i 93 (16) Rate Stability. . .. . 94 (17) Regional Interconnect Capability. - 94 (18) Relation to Needs of Miami. _ . 94 Sy►Y'YaRi • • • • • • • • • • • • • a a • i i 119 • 1 ' T, INTRODUCTION A. Scope y The City of Miami issued an Application for License and Request for Proposals (RFP) for a cable television license in January 1981. In response to the RFP, five companies submitted appli- cations on April 10, 1981. The applicants, in alphabetical — order, are as follows: Americable of Greater Miami kAmerlcaDle) ° Cablesystems Miami (Cablesystems) — ° Miami Tele-Communications (Miami) Six Star Nielson Cablevision of !Miami, Inc. (Six Star Nielson) ° vision Cable of Miami, Inc. (Vision) This report provides an evaluation of the applications WE submitted. _ B. Evaluation Methodology The•RFP issued by the City contained a list of criteria to be considered in t+he evaluation process. These criteria are enclosed in Appendix A. The City requested that the strengths and weaknesses of each application be listed, with respect to the RFP evaluation criteria, but that no numerical ratings or applicant rankings be utilized. The procedure herein follows the City's request. NL Sk 2 4W f EVALUATION A. General Figure 1 summarizes the information submitted by each applicant in response to the RFP, which contained standardized question forms. By its summary nature, Figure 1 must condense or omit some material contained in the applications, and therefore is more of a comparative guide than a comprehensive inclusion of all factors. In the summaries of strengths and weaknesses that follow, all application material was considered. B. Evaluation Criteria Each of the evaluation criteria listed in Appendix A was considered with respect to the strengths and weaknesses indi- cated in each applicant's proposal. It should be noted that in many cases the strengths or weaknesses are relative, so that an applicant may be rated as being "weak" compared to the other applicants, while at the same time this weakness may not impair the ability to construct and operate a cable system in Miami. The rationale for evaluating each criterion is given below. (1) Financial Capability -- Figure 2 indicates the perceived strengths and weaknesses for the "Financial Capability" criterion. (a) E ' t� Resources -- Four applicants provide share o ders' equity data indicating substantial equity resources. No equity information is provided for Americable's general partner. On a comparative basis, this is considered a weakness of the application. (b) Debt Resources -- The documentation included with the applications indi- cated all applicants had adequate debt resources. Therefore, no significant differences are seen. i S►CTI(1N At (11R11:Rti1111• AN11 CoolTRM. j INr(MMAtI(N1 Applicant Ilamet A,klresa. Authurized �: iie�resonEa�I-vo FIGURE 1 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION INFORMATION k ►.ii1:K1/'/.1•I.F. nr (:1!1:AT1-1e f11A11-1 1Y.N1.1!:Yl:III1.S f1f7.fIT Antes icable of Greater Miami 20R00 S.N. 167th Avenue Miami, rL 1)197 Charles C. Ilermanowskl General Partner (joS) 211-7906 Charles C. llerwanowski 401 )t Stephen P. Ross 11 Richard B. Knight 6/ George %undo as Ahrahaw Manber t:hrenkranz. Ehronkranz, part of 401 IOt Schultz flaw firm) Behring part of 4% %cnneth E. Fred R. Sullivan part of 401 Laurence A. Tlselr part part of of 41 40 Alan V. Tishman Al Birch of % 401 Robertpart S. Preston R. Tisch Part of 40 llerbert D. Fried part part of of 401 0" 40, Stephen M. Peck L. f:ittelwan fit Part of 40% IJoseph Albert Fried, Jr. Part Part of of 40% 401 M)Illaw D. Mayer Pelt o[ 10/ Arthur T. shot In Cahlesystews 111401 Suite 700 1460 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Fl. lull Philip B. LIn•1 President, U.S. Cahlesystews Jose. (105) Ise-8928 U.S. Cabiesystems Inca Thomas G. Gai la•Ihur Ilcrbert M. Levin Edward 1. t.tnvlon Paul P. 11asvidal Uonalif 11. Reed. Jr. Garth C. Reeves. Sr. MIA1:1 Tr.LE-t olrtla:lr'nTl•a1S Miami Tole-CowwunicatI0110 v" ,r 5781 Biscayne Blvd. Suit& 361 x Miami. Ff. 11117 • Paul Alden Vice President ' (101) 771-8200 TCf-Taft Cablevlslon Associates 71.51 Lazaro Albo Georgia Jones Ayers 1.011 0.25t m~* ` Ihamberto Ilernandez 1.O1 James S. Blllinns 1 I.OI Alberto Cardenas 1.S1 Juan A. Del Cerro W I.St Rarael Elortaqui ( 1.Os Martin Fine in Richard B. Gerstein I.04 1,175t Burton A. LandY 1.51 .John LassevIlls l,Sl Alberto Loy 1.0/ Evello Ley l.Sl David Lizarrags 1.1751 Robert Paul I.01 Luis Sabine& 1.01 Joshua I11gh Fic,URn 1 (cont.) j$IxT[OM Ar ONIICRSIIIP ANn l'O"TROL i !NPORMAT!OM Applicant Maw, AAdressl Autl►orlred ile1,rescn�iive -- -- ,1 Ovn_rsh 1�1 Sets! on /a) identification of Owners SIX STAR NIr.1.SON CAOLEViSION Or MIAMI, 111:. Six Star Nielson Cablevislon or Miami. Inc. 410 So. Citrus Street Covina, CA 91721 Victor E. Sharar Senior Vice President (2111 967-6117 Six Star Nielson Cabievlsion 1001 VISION CAlll.e Or MIAMI, INC. W shin Cable or Miami, Inc. 1550 niscayne Boulevard (Suite 60S) Miami, rloride 11117 Michael S. Nillner Vice President (212) 759-1500 Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust• 31S Newhouse Group, Inc. 449 Willy A. Dermello 2% David Blumbecg 211 Armando Codina 24 Herschel V. Green 21 Derry Kutun 21 29 Linda McGowan Robert ML Knight 21 Carrie Meek 21 Anne Meyer 2% Athalle Range 21 rwlm,lnd Ske11 in-ls 21k (` Total Equals 9711 • Share!1olArra of PCSTi Sidney R. Knarel 21.812 George 1.. Lindemann 15.201 Michael S. Nlllner 4.16t Soymour R. Askin, .!r 1.69t 1.161 Richard M. While Arthur M. Shulman 1.62t Pamela T. Hammond I.not Charles E. Diets 1.00% Others not Indicat-d FIGURE 1 (cont.) Ibl c/rganisatlons or Corporations awning 11 or meta Interest 1 i 1 1 1 Stock Information (a) St r►tcture (b) Stock of Cor(x►ration it Class of Stock 2) far value l) vote per Share /) NIItwr of Shores Authorized 5) Ilu.d.cr of Shares Issued fi) Numher of Shares Subscribed 71 Tulal Huwl.er of Stockholders (c) Otl►cr ohllgatir.ne or securitles outborized or ontstamlinq which boar voting rlghta (d) Control by another corporation or legal entity Ati►:RICAIN.►: Ill• (;PI:ATI:it III► III N/A rnul.r:��srl:n:; nrnnr U.S. Cablesystems file. Is wholly owned by Rogers Cal)lesygtems Inc.. a p►►blicly owned company headquartered its, Canada. Rogers Cablesystems Inc. is 54.21 owned by Rnqers investments Ltd.. a Rogers family owned trust partnership It/A Ito Yes. the General Partner. U.S. Cable - systems Inc.. is a Delaware Corporation wholly owned by Rogers C-ahlesystem Inc.. base.l in Toronto. Canada. P 1+ MIANY TFOIX-CINMMNItCATIAWS. �� i, TCT-Taft Cablevlslon Asetx-'iatss is, 50% 13 �..n owned by Taft Cable Company (a whOlii owned subsidiary of Taft Broadcasting Company) and 501 owned by Tele- Communications Cable Company (a wholly , owned subsidiary of TCI development Corporation which is in turn wholly owned by Tole-CosmntnicatIons. Tnc.1 Taft Broadcasting Company and Tele- Cnmlaunications. Inc... are publlcty Ownod. Corporation (Florida/ Class A Class S i St.00 $I n0 0 i 1 i67 10.000 U, ." , 667 10.000 667 10.000 r, Plot Indicatett Not ►ndlcAed ^� do Yes. Miami Tole -Communications is controlled by TCI-Taft Cablavlsion Associates which owns, 001 Of its votinq stock and 7S% of Its total stock F[GURF. 1 (cont. Ib) organisations or Corporations owning 11 or more Interost Stock Information (e) Structure lb) Stock of Corporation 1) Class of Stock 21 Par Value 1) vote per Share 11 Number Of Shares Authorised SI Number of Shares Issued 61 Number of Shares Subscribed 7) Total Number of Stockholders (c) Other obligations or securities authorized or outstanding which bear vo! my r i ,lets Id) Control by another corporation or legal entity SIX STAR NIEISON CABLEVISION OF MIAMI, life. Six Star Nielson Cablevislon of Miami, Inc. is owned by Six Star Nielson Cablevislon, which Is equally owned by Nielson Enterprises, Inc. sold Six Star Cablevislon, Inc. Corporation N/A "a yes, wholly owned by Six Star Nielson Cablevislon. V1suml CABLE OI' ►iIAMI. INC. Vlslon Cable of Waal Inc. in lit owned Dy the Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust snd 111 owned by the Newhouse Group, Inc, (which in wholly owned by Advance Publications, Inc., which in turn Is wholly owned by the Advance Voting Trust a testamentary trust created under the le et will and testament of Samuel I. Newhouse, deceased.) Corporation Class A class B Class C class 0 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 1 1 125000 ISSO 2200 250 1000 ISSO 2200 100 1000 ISSO 2200 !00••• 100 1 to I••• I • - 10 local stockholders 1101 each) ••- vision Cable Shareholdurs' Trust ••- Newhouse Group, Inc. •••- narry Katun (402) No Yes, Vision Cable of Miami, Inc. Is a privately held corporation owned by the Newhouse group, Inc. (411). and Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust 1111) and s group of local investors 112SW . • Information on local Investors totals only 221. ISO shares of class i stile► representing It of equity not Issued. ��II!ii,ll9lpl i li I'i bill I IIII I�I ��Il�lill��l��l�'il���� 0 r•ICURC i (cont.) aCCTIOI( ns OWIrRS111P rNIA1.IFiCATIOIIS U.S. CiU:en/Corim.rstIon ' TV Network (n+nershlp i 1 Local TV Stetlon ownership local TV Trenslelur twrnorslllp Local Telepbone Company Ownership lural Rewspaler Ownersl(lp laical .ta.110 Station Ownershil. NICRICARt.t: or t:FrnTr.p tlrntll r a rnnr.ItuY::Tt ti': flrnllE tItANN ?ti66-Cr►FrNMI[E•MFtr)11ZS U.S./ partnurshlp U.S./Corporation• No t 110 11a No. .. lift ism • Nu Yes. earth peeves fit ownerl is the pulblisher of the Miami Times newspaper. Yes.11erl.ort IA•Vin Ili owner) Is Vlcz INw President anal general Manager of K)!!A AmIrm and is a minority stockholder of Radio .1= Miami. Inc. whlcil owns NURA FM � �. ,,�. .� �..,�11111111117 rU VIC 1 (cont.) SIR STAN NIFIX(Rl CANLEVIS10" or MIA11I, llfc. SECTION Oe (%mr1 IIIP (111ALMICATIONS 1 11.9. Cltl:en/Corporation 1 TV Network Ownership Local TV Station Ownership Local TV Translator Ownership Local Telephone Company Ownership Local Newspaper Ownershlp Local Radlo Station Ownership vlStosf CABI.K of Mirmt. IHC. U.S/Corporation No No No No Ho Yes, S.I. Newhouse, Jr, and Donald E. Newhouse, Co -Trustees of the Advance Votlny Trust, each own 500 of the Corporatlun ownlnq the license to operate NSYR-AH and FM Syracuse, New York, MAPI-AM and PH in Birminghae. Alabama. and KrPA-FM In lfarrlshurg. Pennsylvania. I] 'II pI,_URF. 1 (cont.) -xc-ri1vt C: CUAPALTUR p11A1_li'iCAT11x1S Conviction in Criminal Proceedings I.IaLtlity In Civil 1•roceddings Prior noisiness License Puvoc a t i o11 Prior violation of rrAnchise Aqreement I.Itlgation Against a rranchlMln•l AutborIty A111:111r:A IM OF t:'rATFP IIIAIII No No I� i i MTAllt tEr.e Ct>rlFllntlrkllnn:i CAIIl.1:SYSTUM IIIAf1t No No Yes, civil suit for unfair or anbi- Nt1 cowpetitive business practices lant►trustl. Not yet settled. No ,� No Nu No In 1979. Minncallolls Cablc••ystems Co. U.S. Cablesystems subsidiary) brought action in the Ilcnnepin County District Cnurt to 1,revent a city council resolutlon rescin.ting awnr.l. The ruling was subsequently appealed by "inncapOlislCourtems en. upheld by the State Supreme I 1 vueccases pendingt one invulvi" an Injunction against cessation of carriage of distant lother n two of r.reen Veal and the involving cases brouqht by TCI against the Cities of eCOo[ave r ,lefferson.40 claiming violation antitrust laws. First. Flflh, snit 1p fourteenth Awenrtwent rights and various other s ate rights. de s taeven or speclte, no longer pending es, ono fur performance end damaq We relief tor, cramages and Inlunct breach of contract and Inverse condemnation, two seek an,,,, againat caseation of carriage of distant signals, one seekiaq an injilnctlon re9trsinlrtlaheoftor,franclhlse of cable until cosh prevent redaction transfer. alnl one to 1 of suhecrlbur fees. All cases settled. Nn tk► ��:FtM. •x sx FIGURE 1 (cont.) SECTION CI CIIARACyrR QUAUric TioN$ conviction In Criminal Proceedings jLiability In Civil Proceedings Prior Suslness License Revocat)on Prior violation •)f rranchlse Agreement I.Itigatlon Against a Franchising Authority Prior Default on a Loan Six STAR HIF.t40N I vr5tM1 CAIII•E OF HIAMt- INC. CAOLEVISION OF MIAMI, INC.I No • yes, violations of anti -fraud and registration requirements of roderal Securities 1.aws against a prokerage firm owned by a company officer and owner, Stuart Harris. • Three major owners of Six Star Cablevlsion (Stuart Ilarris, Roger Maggio, and Paul Skuleky) a■ part of Cable/Tel were chargeA with having frauJulently sold cable television franchise Interests connidered as unreglatered securities which should have been been tinder SEC )urisliction. Consent decrees were entered. No too Ilona No 9 No yes, an Intermediate owner of the stock of the Newhouse Group, Inc. was convicted of conspiracy to set maximum prices for the resale of its 1 newspapers 119681 Nos Nox None na F11URE 1 (cont.) Current Cable System 1101111"'I" I cubscriffer Rates Ave& 8410 Curren Basic pay .;nItqrFILw_,F Miles R."I")e It"Ic - III -III Uvw Pay III-11% LOW AMRIVAISIX or rItIATCR 111.1kill IIIAM 25 Cal -let sySLOWS let the United States. Can.14ij anti Ireland servinel 1.100.00n subscribers $6.71 111form.11tit1j, ,.it gl"-ciflcally requested $10.95 4.2S flaeland)i $5.7StU.S- Information I"'t "Pecifically requested i2a cable wistemo Im 37 stistes. serving 1,290.000,subscriberst $7.31 InforgItettlom not Stsectfica&tV request" I sit.80 S 4.SO 111for"tion not @IjeciflejIlly requested i F IGt1RC 1 (cont.) tI SEC'r10M_0� EXI•t:R1ENCE - CURPENT CABLE IK)IAIW;S Current liable System Iloldlnys Average Current Subscriber Rates naslc 1 1 Pay 5171 STAR NIi:LSIR1 C/10I.r.VISION or MIAMI, IMC. 20 cable systems In California, Missouri. Kansas, and Michigan $eas Information not specifically r' $9.00 S5.00 Information not specifically requested VISION CAOLE or IIfAMt. INC. 0 el , FIGURE 1 (cont.) 517lTllIN Es F'UNf11:N t"MK911SFS OR UMIF:R5111P II"w.Rr.STS"" - 1 plsposilloll of 1'ranchlees 1 Al1IMICAIII.r Ot' I:It1:ATl:lt IIIAltl petveen 1975 and 19@0 dislon-I of 116 franchisee by sate. l'AIt1.ISYSTMIS ISIMIt Hunt. only dollo in the pact to I respond to Can.I.11an kcyulatory Agency requirements or rationalization "Imit TVIX-Com mlfl7ATNHIS 0etWeen 19ft9 and 1979 disposed of more than 19 franchises by sale or �z exchange or because of the isolated location of a system that Was sctludrea �W as part of a larqur 'package' or because of an abandonment of s housing project by developers e gl:(.TION Et /�pRMER IRAIN.'RISE'S i oR a1e/ERsnl� IxrreRss*s j Disposition of Iranchlses i SIR STAR 111M SMI CAe6.Vls1o" or M/AMI• IIN:. Hone VISI(NI CAn/a. OF NIAMI, INC. Disposed of ) franchises between 191i and 1980 by sale or exchange• r FIGUZE 1 (cont.) Sr:Ctlt»I Ft-rINAl1CIAt. R_ESt1URt:1:.St r><I5TINC CArITAI. C(MINITIICNTS At1n I'trrFNTfAI. IIUIIAI/lr_ C(►IN I17W..11TS S.nrrces or rinancltrg (a) F.(prlty Ib) primary lk-bt Ie) Sem•ondary 1lnlrt Terns or Fllrancing----- (al IMount, rerlod. Mato lb) collateral Involves/ Icl cnarantore /d) Related !'Inwtw 1n,1 Agreements MAIN t't1FN""''VAT InUf'. i n/n:tt/rnnl.e f1F taFn7t:R f1IAft1 —' •-- - --- ------�-.`- ---��._—.!. $1%11 surl,lle.l by the Limited rartnets $2n11 from tlmerlcln Security (tank Charles C. 11ermanowsk1 will supply additional funmis as re.lolred per the patinershlr agreement $2011 for S year* at the Prime rile Pins 21 All assets Chat 1es C. tlerm.'rnewskl IRme S14H sopplled by angers Cablesystems Inc. $,it, from the Tornnto Ix,minlon nark I1/A 51111 for 10 years at the prime rate pins I-1/2t System assets the al genera) mar fer•�la nriq 6aslls accordlml partnets on o Io to theirom,ne:ship • A partnership agreement • A flancblsc otnl service agreement 5IG14 soppllemt by TCk-TN" Assoe&ices, S2414 from, the Rank or New ynsit N/A tt`R'F $24t/ for f, years at a 140 fnreras rate physical system, ass.,ts a "j TCI and Taft nroaacastlnq f r, J SharMrlmlers' a.per•nre"t • system managememrt agreement rim RF: 1 (cont.) SE:CT_IU_N E � FIN�Nt:iAl. PF.SOUPCES e1llSTtttC CAPITAL C("ITMEHTS 11IIU roTnTI111. DUtInIN_r _C�eII?HENTs Sources of r►nanclnq (a) equity (b) Prlabry Debt (e) Secondary Debt Terms o[ Financing (") F Kmnt. Period. hate lb) Collateral Involvement (c) Guarantors (d) Pelnted Flnancinq Agreement Sfx STtlil Nirlr RI Cnnt.ivi. go" or PIAMl. Illr- $10.1t1 supl/tlMl by SIN Star ttlelsnn Cablevlsion and Its partner" $12 1N from Pankers Tv""t Amount not Imll�wted provl,led by Six Star Nlel+on Calrlevtslon and It" partners $12.111 for • years at 1-1/21 to 2-1/2l Cover tlsw- prime rate System an"•t" sIx Star 141n1"on Cahlevl"Inn Part"erehlp a"d "Ormal banking "gf4ements VISIIIN' CAME I1rIWti. tlic S11.6t1 n,nd byt Inc.,he 14ewhouse shareholders of VI"lon Cable of Nlaml. Inc. $21 611 (r,10 Chemical nank of ller Tork None S23.6N for 10 years at 1/21 over the prime rate None lldvam:e Pnbllcations. Inc. INone. other than the shareholder agreements FIG�IRT: 1 (cont.) tel tAsitatlons on Sale of Stack by I Irslividnal Ikwider% If) filly-/Ia1l Agrrvael t 1.11 Assignments of St•Ick Votinq pights Ih) Multiple System flprrator agrees to connlersign f,anrhlge ngteesent If asked 111 Organilr4l nn An IPc SuM hapter S Coll+oral inn li) 14n'al Inve%Inr ger'rirrq In kind ./n.rl• trnl.l: •N• r.ervrt r. ►tl.••/I I:alr• or reassignsent will 1, to either A) Thr rartnership, n) The general Partner or Cl The Llsltrvl I'artnerq As t,. 6s partnership Interest 'put' after 0 year., for sinlsas of $1.�•11 All votlnq right% Invested with Charles C . Ilersanowglt i Tel; The partners first, and then tho general partner, have a right of fir -it refnsat to porrhane any onits which a parll,er wants to sell to a person not rarreully a partner at a price offered by a third party The parF„er%, at their sole optinn, say at -in temler their unit% for rel•urchase Iry the general partner at an at -proved value eltber lbr" years frogs the date partnership agrersent signed or for a saterlat violation of the franchise agreement None ve%: gm I.ocal partners -will receive a 201 interest of the partnerghlp fnr %ervlceq remlered In connection witlh the snccesgful acquisition of the city of ttiaml cable television franchise.' p 1+ (tl'rdtl' •rrCl:. �'re•,•ar;IMR'pk"'.:;- charehotders have rl•lht of fOrntl retunal on any sate or tratlslor or sharp% to a third, party flort4 of the 251 stock ownership hetet hy. Itiawl residents. iv is non -voting. TCr wttt hotft not of the votlnq 1` shares 1-4 yem J 1 IFr FIGURE 1 (cont.) lei �Mlltatiol n sale of StOct „y III My-ftt Ilgrvement Ass{rynments o/ .,tcwk voting ltlghtl Multiple Ryatem OLerator agrees tl counters I"n Iranchlsa agreement If asked orgnnited as an fRs Subchapter S Mrlt+rat ion )�sl InVPrtOf services In Rind SIX STAR NiF.I. (111 CM11.F.-riglINI or I11AMt, 111C. on Indl-idual stockholders N/A VI ,IOtf CAIII.F. OF 111MI, INC. Requires written cons,•ut 4 i vision rAhle of ttlawi, Inc.., for pjr rior sale. pledge, encumbrance, rllsposltfon of Class A common stock. w111ch Is held by Individual investors. holderwoft1the Class roup,C con+noe s stock and the Vision Cable SharehOlders. Trust IvC5T) as holder of the Class n damson stock each will have the right t" pur-.hasp the other's scsnock hOilinne, The Class C Option be e'ercised only after the fourth anniversary of the grant late Of the t11am1 frnnchlse and the Class n option Is Initiated on the fifthAfter anniversary of the grant date. the first sonlversary of the Class C nwshould seofd option peFIOd Coany TW-I or VCST desire to dispo or alt Class n or Class C stock held by thew, they west [last Osodrh then stock to the corporation. elternatively to the other party (TN(:l Or VCST). The local 'hareholders lowners of ciaa�O tle I.o�ryd CI 8ht Outally have the right enter o time between ye,r 2-4 at the gr • 211. Of orlglnal purchase price • Cash [low er company for the Ins 12 months multiplied by 7, less senior debt. pro ra►ed wer 1 of ownership% Not Indicated Yes 1111 NewIMlMe will loan IntlehniserstockeIt all funds needed to I 91 Intere+t 11 t - i 411 x.._. W I I I r. Illllil FIGURr. 1 (cont.) (:0maeltment for eulldlnq New Cable !:ywt,me (excluding Wind) CoemMltment for Ppbulldinq Existing nystens 1•ntentlat Building Commltwnnt - new franclelas applications A11rnlCApm or GREATER mIN'r Letter of C_I tment from American St. curity Dank for $20" to finance system construction Letter from Ehrenkranx. Elerenkranz i Schultz confirming representation of clients that have Invented In other systems %41 Charles C. IlerManowskl vas tlee General partner and expressing interest In Investing WM In equity funds cot this franchise 452 wiles. S1.4M cost over the next • years 2n miles. S0.2M cost over the next year 2 compete It109 r�y csiring an estimated 12S miles at a cost of S5.9M CAn1.I.S:STr16S IIIAMI letter of commitment from Toronto Dominion Dnnk for op to fJlo f l eeeenc l ng 1980 Canndlan Cnblesyatews Ltd.annual report Copy of the partnerahlp Agreement Copy of the rrenchise Development and Service Agreement 2719 miles. $62.4M coat Over the next l years 1112 wiles, f16.6M cost over the next • years 6 eommunitice requiring an estimated 3e29 miles at a coat of $100.1" MIAMI Trl.r-COW101SCAT IWAS Letter from the Bonk of Now york eris establishing TCI's $•SM long and S6M short ter- line of credit ms well as expressing confidence In the cnpabIlity of TCf and Tact hI— Interestling tlo lending S25M.• a aviging Letter how" fecetvedtt ke regu"tt that theyey Jor a $/M loan from Mlawl Tele- roewmunlcatlons, Inc. Letter from TC1-Tntt cablevlalon Aanoclatea cnradttine, Oft full resources of Tel e-Copemunlcattons. Inc and ?Ott nromlcastlnq company as well as Rrmetttlnq ties fends necessary for the comeptetlon of the pro)ect 1979 Tele-Communications. Inc. annuell, rel.or t to Tcle-Communlcatine%8,Inc. IDecewbidAII Statements of OI 1960. 1179 and 197RI 1900 Taft Drnadca"tinq Company annual report Copy of the Shareholder's Agrcem"'t and the Cable Television System Management Agreement 2221 wiles. =I cost ovar the next years ••S mile", 112.3M Cost over the next year IA Communities releirinq an estimated laa6 Mlles at a cos! of $127.3111 F ��i�� i i '!'li 9 Ills 111 ll I I III IIIII I Till M F fGl�11r 1 (cont.) 11oct1xrent" t l o0 ` Compliment for oulldlnq New Cab e Syntem" lexcluding Nlanll Comaltrrnt for nebullJ1nq Existing gyate"s potential oii11 ing C m Itraents - n franchl"e app S1Ir STAR 111r1.:rttl CAp6F.viSrotl oP H1aH1, r.etter frrrra rankers Trust fonryrany conf{raring their ccwwm nt to assist Nlelwon Cablevislon In their Six Star acgrrl.iId l" e,tabll"l~nt of CATV [ranclrlses. Also confirms dlscrr"slon" In pg roress concerning the (rnplewentatlon o[ a S75N flnanclnq packa.re for CATV (ranch{se dcvclolaaent Financial statementson andfSias Star,N{elso" F.nl asps 1 ee". Cahlevinlon lloldlnq CoraPany 1271 "rile", $21. q cost over fire next 5 year" None VIS'Mil t"To1.F. OI' nlatet, 111C• ,otter from Chemical iiank cosralttlnq ip to SSoM In flnanclnq. setter from Southeast Firet National atinq that Ilenwilling to make rink of Moot cloans to the tlocald re3ldcnt lovest�rs 1792 ialles. $21.111 cost over the next I years „ I116 wiles. $9.211 cost over the next 1111 years I SfYTfUN G� f'(N1INCIAI. PR(II.ORMA S�t�� Grovlh and Revenue It.00e passed by Cablo year 1 Year 1 year 6 Year 10 Year IS penetration - 11a8ic Service - All Tiers Year 1 year 1 year 6 Tear 10 • Tear IS penetration - pay TV Service-M 1 Service? Year 1 Ta•nr ;'car 6 Year 10 year IS 29.680 145.000 IS9.000 171,000 181.000 129 ltt 401 481 SOt Id 44.000, 148,551` 151.21t 154.90.1 IS9,601 tOt 42t 46% SOt S5t• 4211 •tt �Bt Slt 58% p It nlnrw •rrr.t •o•r��unn, eanresr� i5.69R 155,M58, 167.171 t?T.Sliz too.tt5 99t• � SSt' 58t" RI • Tlersa T. Y alnf • ' I6.5! 911.Ot 9Is 56. Ot4 S6.6% 'I II Ili ti t FtGU tl: 1 (cont.) S�TitNl t:t _ FIN_AN_CIAI. PROFOPMA �eteai Grw_L_h _enJ Pore_nue IR ape Passed LT Cable Tear 1 i Tear ) Year 6 Tear 10 year IS Penetration - naslc Service - All Tiers year 1 Tear 3 Tear i Tear 10 year IS Penetration - Par TV - All services Tear 1 Tear 3 fear i Tear 10 Tear 1S SIR STAR NIF"I�tttl CAnr.rVisio" or 141AP11, t11C. 10,140 149,762 154,I82 160,29, 167.782 IOt )6% Sit Sit Sit lit 30t 411 41311 4)t VISImi, I:An1r or mAt11. "Ic- 71,600 151.zt9 Ise"126 167,e29 180',.799 It Us SIt SSt 5511 0-51 419 54S 63S 63t i R NP Rt l srrv"�+yc FIGURr 1 (cont.) rtoiected It' �6scr bar 1i1---- nasie service •n t•ir r..[,.:.n .:rrr:rrr nI ,�It Tler Tiers Tier i It a It, IV Tear 2 - i61.2 I56.2 22.1 Year i 21.9 t6.7 17.2 year 1 - Irecreaae' Year S - 1.1 1.1 Trar 6 10.9 6.6 Year Tear q year 9 12.1 6.2 year 10 - Tear It - i 2.6 Tear 12 - .!f 6 0 6.1 Year 11 - • • Tear 10.6 11.6 Tear 15 - J - - Tier Tiers Tier I it t: 11t iV year 2 161.0 161.1 ISS.1 24.1 rear ) 21.8 77.0 24.4 211.9 11�1 roar Tear $ tlecrc-l%e* hecfen9e� rear 6 0.1 0.1 9:S 1 .1 12.q Tear 7 .a 1 1 Tear 09 • Year year Year 10 10.6 q.i 5 22 . • Year Il 2.17- 2.6 Tear 12 • therrease• 1.1 Year 11 i q Tear 14 year l i NtAI1r Tr:Gc t'^ «:` r rr ., • ••,[a. - Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier 11 Tier tit Tier 11r it fit IV 1 11.0 Year 1 - 26.9 26.9 ear 17.i 11.612.6 18.6 rear 5 - - - - ear 6 12.0 1. 12 11 .9 tear 6 26.9 27.0 26.! ear Ifrear 'ear 10 12.6 12.4 12.1 12.0 11.1 7 rear - 2T. ear 12 12.9 12.2 12.4 12.6 year to_ 10 I'. 27.0 2r.0 27.0 27.0 21.ft ,ear 14 year 11 "Ini Service Service Year 1 17.6 19.6 12.1 rear f. 12. 5 12. 12.9 Year 12.5 12.9 Year 10 1'2.Y. 1 2 .1 Year 12 12.4 12.1 Year 14 11 "Milt "tilt Pay, rarv, t✓ year • 26-9 26.6' 2?.O t Year 1 27.0 26.9 rear 10 271.01 26.9 rear 11 27.t► FIGURE 1 (cont.) 1 i Projected increase In Revenue Per $�ibscrl6e_i-41 ^----- ----- 1 Basic Service 1 t six RTAR N11:1- Mt VISI1111 PARLF. OF MIAMT, IM'. fAM-17VIS1011 Or M1AIt1. 111C. Year 4 year 8 Year 12 Tear 4 Tear S Tear 6 vear 7 Year 8 Tear 9 Year 10 Tear 11 year 12 Year 11 Tear 14 year IS All Tierg Tler Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier 1 11 I/1 IV V Vt 10.0 year 4 - 16.7 14.7 15.9 15.4 15.4 10.0 Year 6 - 14.1 12.8 19.2 11.7 1S.9 10.0 Year 8 - 16.7'11.6 II.S 14.7 15.0 Year 10 - 14.1 12.0 11.8 1S.4 11.0 Year 12 - IS.6 14.1 15.2 15.6 15.4 Year 14 - 11.5 12.5 15.9 15.4 16.7 Iilni and Mnxl servict-a Pry PAY Pay Pay Mini 1 i1 itl 17 Pay 5.0 5.0 car 4 16.! 16.1 19.7 19.7 11.9 S.0 ear 6 11.5 11.4 15.2 15.2 16.7 5.0 ear 8 14.1 15.4 15.8 15.9 14.1 5.0 ear 10 12.5 11.1 11.6 11.6 12.5 5.0 car 12 16.7 15.7 18.0 18.0 11.1 5.0 rear 14 14.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 11.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 S.0 5.0 FIGURE 1 (cont.) Rwcmle Year 1 naRic/Secnnrl Set ray Tv Instal latIcon Other Total - --- - - -._ Year 1 naslc/Scannrl Set Pay TV to+lallatlen Other •- Year 6 nasl.:/Seco►d Set PAY TV Installation Other Year IQ Basic/5rNo►wl Sot ray TV Installation Other Tnt i 1 Year 15 Ra.lc/St.ct►nrl Set ray Tv Installation other TOO aI �►:rlcll•,,r1►.r. nr �•!�r •.T; r r1r.•••1 $ 244,442 501.502 R65,R60 25,it6 $1,617,RRn S4,146,151 9.947.467 1,999.151t 1411, 197 S15.712,671 $8.281.890 15,985.597 1.163.670 1.613.401 $77.544.560 $13,819,272 27.211.1I5 2.200,410 1.194,911 517.027.49f. SI4.662.68R 11.405, 126 1,131.592 6,217,909 $i9,f.17,6n5 p a r Ii 1'"'-:"'r'i111: rlt•r.ryF {fr� IS! 'fN.l:!: e'rr•^IRlflw:.'BN•K:: y# S �9t.000 51,06J,S111/' _� 1T1.000 6�18!, 60th 1sS,nnm �1s,Rna �; St,2TZ,Ono 52.911'.lOd �s 5 6,nG2.Rno SI,917,Joe T,28 t , ROtr 7, nA ►t, 000' 1za.RRo� 119.9011 M r,G2R.nOn+ 5,612,�Ort 515,8SR,n0o 52n,RSo,2nrt � ?: e, S 1 n. 29R, 000 11,526,0ort 9,122,7n0' 597,000 f,51t,09n' 7,SRI,ROn 52S,9RS,ORO 52R,ASS,tan S11,S22,000 S1R,R2R,20r. I4.R66,0P0 15,1+n2,2oo RIl,nno 27.700 7,771,0111/ ID,IA6,A"" S In,nn!,nnn S��',9n�,500 $ln,85S.000 $25,664.g07T 21,III.ngn 21.671.200 A , nnrt 29.900 tI,9RS,nn9 11,675,7n1e i54.tsR,nnrt s:.a,nxr,Inrt �IIIII�11�111,1I� ?jG il;T: 1 (cont. Rove nue Year 1 Paslc/Second Set ray TV installation Other T"ta 1 Tear 1 Panic/Second Set ray TV Installation Other Total year-6 nnnlc/Second Set ray TV Installation OtM!r Total Tear l0 Panic/secowwl Set ray TV Installntion Other Total Tear 15 Panic/Second Set ray TV Installation Other SIR STAR Ntt:i 5ON rAR1.F.VISM" OF IIIANI. 111C. $ 77,000 109.000 149,000 11,000 S 149.000 $6.056.000 9,603,000 1.124.000 1.100.000 i16,aR1,000 $12,105.000 le,inl,000 301,000 2.149.000 S12.65S.900 $14.561.000 24.058.000 55.000 2.155,000 S11,129.000 $16,770.000 12.149.000 59,000 2.927,000 Total -----•- ' $S1,R05.000 VtS1Ot1 CArs.e OF 141Altt. tNC. • Inclodes F/t $ 92,000' 51.000 10,000 7,000 S 164,000 S6,866,000• 6.309,000 124,000 701,000 $14,199,000 $13,414,000• 12.249.000 1,229,000 2.176,000 529,647,0n0 S21.121,000 • 19,850.000 161.000 5,742,000 $46,877.000 SI0.515,000 ' 32.149.000 202.000 11.907.000 $ 7�,777,000 r FIGURE 1 (cont.)) Incnwe Stateaent tcer 1 pevenne Net IncrrWl Cash Plow Tear 1 PevenIM Net inc..wte Cam, Prow tear 6 Revenue Net Inel"" Cash £I,w Tear 19 pevenn" Net im"" Caph rt— rear 15 Revenue Net lnca■e Cash Pitw :an-r.fr•pm.r. n£ •:�r.:.Tra rrr.••.r S1,617,000 11,041,0001• 1 510,0001 S15.741,000 it.194,0001' 1.156.000 S27,545.000 2.121,000 • 5.560.000 $17,027.000 15,159.o00 ' 10.691.000 $59,6111,000 16,111,000 • 20,212,000 • in,;os,e taxes pall by Indlvl,tnll etas Ircom,o shown. r.Irtnern. I, r..fF.rka•pr1�•' f1r1111 $ 1,272,000 11.922.nno1• 11,011,00n1 St5.959.000 (4,45N,00n1• 91,Onn 525,995nn0 1 161:0.,011 4 , fr74 .000 Sig .oat "on 6.717:000 ' 10.916,0011 S54,158.000 e,601,000 ' 12.259,000 • imoa,e taxes pall by lnAlvldrwl partners. Prerat In,xnee ahnvn. nr:.n1 tra'.1:••r,�•.Ir�rrl►-r:rr•••:::. S2.921.701b 111676.6n011 12.109,1not S20,850.200' 11,146,200h 2.919.500• S20.055.700 2,R411,o00 R,016.1n0 $44.904,Sn0 7.964.700 12.401.400 S59.041.100' 9.891,004 14,926.200 o FIGURE 1 (cont.) 1�,e Stetewe„� Teer 1 Pwenue 11et lncow� Cash Flow Tear 7 Pcvem�e Net lncnwe cash Flvw Tear 6 Pevenue Net Incnre ceeh Flow Tewr 10 Pevenue Net Inc++ cwsh rlow iTear IS Pevemre Net IncOMW ceeh Flow . . .............. ----•-----"-- V15tON Cnnt r. OF Mtllrtr, "IC - six STAR tltrt 5MI cnot.F1►Irto" OF f11wf1/, $ 349,000 12.510,000) (1,P15.0001 $16.982.000 t1,407.0001 1,558,000 S12.656.000 1.084.000 O,S67,000 $41130.000 4:909.000 6,445.000 $51.907,000 5 471.000 6:068,000 $ 164.000 (2,057.000f (I.S16.000) $14 199.000 (2,146.0001 1.(117.000 529,467.000 6,117.000 10.224.000 $46.817.000 7.550.000 12,045.000 $71,961,000 16,71f.000 11.641,000 M w co t :ll Ys" Y i FIGURE 1 (cont.) Sorrrcer anJ _Vacs-ot__:nnris /15 wear- tot�ll- - Sewrctt8 rgttltr ter ins Revenue of tar Total lives Cwpltwl F.xi+etwlllOr08 • fl�+craf Imt F.xl+anses Interest Payments Income Taxes Igan Repay"ent O I v 1 dell s Total Iaeting Posh itilaftce Awrragrt Interest Rates MAWtfranw •tint:-t:r+rrtnMtr+'a Ft.pl� 11tn:plfMttC I.I. f:Rn wrtR fit d11 $15.000,000 2o.noo,000 571,105,000 5562,InS.nnO $ 76.812,000 142.101,000 20,165.000 20.000.000 101.250.000 $561.134,000 It Partners responsible for their own Inco�+e taxes) S97t,On0 20% S 1 �'.000, 000 29.lon.ano �f.2, 254„000' 2.�16,.000 • 5507, 99'., Onn S 79.905.On0 11R,515.000 22,917,000 29,100,000 J1.800,OOn Pother') 2,416,000 • 95n1,91/,OnO^ (•• Larina;s responsible for their own Income taxes) $ F2.Onn 172 • I•repaymatrC of franchises ►aos g FF,1!1RFS00! sr ,nfrfl.etrfrP 5�0',Ot7',R00" fi,NirC,100f SS90, 20S,ft00 S R7,lli',900 1)/.Sf.8,900 16,22t,700 61 . 28fY,90n' 26,00�,eno t:7,Jte, 2ott SS90.105,400 % toll,0n0 Fmum; 1 (cont. ) f Sources_ and _Uses of rorwls lIS Year Total) _— sources i� cmricy I Loans Revenue other Y Total Nees capital rKremiltures (4,eratinq exl.enses interest Payments income Taxes roan nepayment nividends l Total ilwlinq cash nalance Nvorage Interest Rates SIX ;TAR Rlriz f*1 rnnl.rvinintr or 11111111, 111C. $10,100.000 12,400,000 502,721,nno $5�5,�21,000 $ 54,766.000 144.577.000 21.S50,000 31,176,000 32.400,000 54.477,000 $545,891,000 $ 17n,0oo ---_� � visrrm cnnr.r OF ennnr, lilt:_ $ 2).6)7.000 23.616.000 s7),eol,non $62I.07�,000 $ 90.�lI9.000 )29,u7,oao 16.900.000 s2.522.000 23.638,000 $542.6 LX w`r a FIrmM. 1 (cont.) Capital E_.hcrdlUtre_s (15 year total) pn:enna", Travers, Ileadctds. f Wirth Stet Ions tilctovnve DIhutlnn Plant in"1 ltutl�nn1 Het%fI 1)r��a l Converters m"ll,lingn t I.AIMI 1-11netrold Improvement" Crhlecn"tfnq Facilities Tp"t rgvll+ nt. Spares vehicle" Preolr.It at. lnq Enq i nee F 1 n•) Pray TV F..Iullownt Capllall2rnl lhrerhen.l r Iqulhw�!nt 01 Ile Total lot .-rc;;Ira nl.a/r r;•r�.r.w:'rtli: ItrAl1� $2.59n.non Not Indicatrvl 14.4101.91110 889.000 22.705.000 6.000.000 5111.1101) 2.735,000 1.092.no0 2.540,000 Not indlcatrrl 190.000 770.000 Not Indicated 2.202.000 $76.412.000 S?."06,nnn 100,000 2n,819,00n 2,986.000 40.151,000 Not Indicated 700,000 5.515.0011 1.150.000 lint Irwllcated 7(In.nnn 200.000 700.000 lint Indicated 4.412.000 IRlarw ew.nl for inn) 519,9n �,onn 11r;,HN Thrr.-v.�.,,m•:rt�sror•••:� S T.7+21!.6001 1't9.InIF 27. 8'20'.101P 029. 400p 46.295.800 t.sin. nnnp M. 902.00T 1„235.AOn 1125.11011' 1on.ono 57. to& 165.00n $R7", trL000 i I R�III III�II i' 1 ��pIIiIIIPplllllplllll ggri 'I P'I II�II III I'II� q� p �pI atilt I'llll III q IIIII III II III VII� (d �.; � �Illlhiili l". 9 I FIGU"'? 1 (cont• ) ----._-- .__- --- --- SIX S1AR HIF:t.:'14t • t'An1.EVIC1Ot1 rlr "Imil. Itic. C.,e�t, l exFenalt_ure. 11g_Y,.ar total) Antennae. T^w`rs. tleadends. r8fth Stations Mlcr(wave DIstrIt,"tIon Plant 1 not IUttton al NPotwork Drops & Converters 0u11dinya t 1 rovenents leasehold Cahlecratlr." racllltIo" Test 1-.gults•ent spares vehicle9 rce.)perating Engineering ray Tv Egj1pornt Capitallred arerheed L Equips mt Other Total $ 1.62I,000 1.460.000 22,114.000 685,000 22.656.000 300,000 2,580.000 306.000 10.000 114,000 tint Indicated 1.141.000 $54.769,000 vt5ltl►r cAni.r ^P 11111111, 111C. $ 2 , 550. 000 t60.000 12.204.000 655.000 29,137,000 2.300.000 150,000 1.191 000 . 768.000 502.000 1.60L.000 39.269,000 $90.489.000 • $1111 to upgrsde 8ystew a^ntlnuousty. beglnning In ycsr 1 I 11 � FItaiRL 1�(cont.) ;.Irla•tr'r.t•r.l, rN' FPr':.TCh l�/�J11 Cowfltroct low t'aats UlstrlbuUoo Coat Per Nllc !►trial UrAcrgrrn11Wl Cost Per prop "W1 Converter - Rerlwl - Urvler+irfurrnl �. 11e(►teclaf.lon ----- -----..--- (/S �cac totwll $22.050 S100.250 Tier 1 $115 'lienv ll L Ill $715 Tier IV Tier 1 S115 Tle.- It L Itt $215 Tier IV S105 (Ilotr All costa wre per Just drop► $47.405.000 SEt.A1S sl�.lorr $24.`25 SS/►, W tF 5206.94 52'11'.fS $tip«s�>t.enlr Tier 1 $�I- Tiers It. Ill- IV $1?!b Tier V. VI 52tit Tier 1 f 9S Tiers It. III. IV SI90 Tiers V. V1 S275 1 W 1 sits»���» 101E I�R� rt^"1IAq! ,IRl11111 11111Pl1flWgiv'11ll'Igl1ll ICI' ���� ���� ����i� � � � �� ��� ����� l� FiGURC 1 (cont.) C0"%g2c'1o.^ COsts D10trlbutlon Comet per Mlle , "riot _ Onderq[on�d Cost rer Drop Aerial - 1hx/er4gro""d D—je,rwelutlow — tl S fear total) Sill 1:TA11 "Imra1f1 CNTI.rVIS10N [fr "Iml, i11C. $20,000 350,500 ,tr.lrW C1111f.r. Or 11T/1111. 111C. St6.246 $21.898 Tiers t i It $ 1! 9.400 $ 80.00 Tier t 4255.00 Tier Tier Ill 1V $98.60 I Tiers fT i fif drop. nJd $75.001 Tier V $274.20 5129.60 $329 (2m1 Tier VI Tle[� l a t 1 S 88.00' .0 31)5.00 Tier t $110.00 Tier Tier 111 IV $20$19 6 Tler1 it i fit add $25.00) Tier V $279.0 5279.20 g))4.60 12"d drop, Tler Vt 345,501,000 $52.392.000 _•_ F "11 � lilt f I �I oil riomr 1 (Cont.) - • nttt:Plr•M,t.I. fill- ,:CI:ATr it tit �,II pejreclstlon Sche,lnlcs IXcsrsl - Nntt•unt � Trrrers /S Mlcr�ave 10 Nen,1eM1 15 Earth St At Dletrlt„,t{on rJant l 15 U,xicryrnr,Mt LS IS _ hole f►rranyOVICet T Plop" Converters iru l I J I,r•14 _ tlen•leti,i! - Stl,dlo! nt t ice's Lea�cMlJ iwlrrovevents nrlginat ton F.•Inti""ent TCet t.-W"I11ent. r.1% s vehicles rreyerattn9 Cnmt 1 nccr l n9 ray Tv Eynitment Capitalize-) Payroll Other 10 25 10 7 T 1 trot IMIICnteJ 15 5 rleChnr•le >:qull„"ent Frrnchl4c rrnP^sai �Lplleatlo„ aMl City Cost Finance Fee Comp„ t e r RoJIn4 CRT tVMlews F•orntture 0 -••-- - nrrrtr. �irr:I;.t;t.;»In.eit•r•�rr,rs. i5 1.5 Ito is 1 is r lo' is is t0' i5 10 to g W't Cn,Fi,:aNl,11 In s 2'9• Not {,atic�►,•,i 25 2s tint IMilrate,t' (ndteate,i itr Not 5/t0; 10 � t,NI 104 9 tol,lle v.,n4 5 itY ut tJt t•Iufl^^'•nl in T Not IMlfc�ted" 2 i5 1 1n DS 10 it R IMt In,11CatNF lu4tltutlonal 0 T IS It„rgtir I►lar,el0 IS 7 T y T T T j FIGURE 1 (cont.) _- pr recletlo� Schedn� (nare1 ' Antennae � To.rcre Nicrw"ve 1/ewdend F.wrth Station Dletrlhutlon rI^nt erlal i _ nnderyraltel _ Pole Arrang~.ne Drop" Converters p„Iidlnh" _ Ileeden�le st„dloe off ices 1,"wechold t,.Provepents OfIg111wtIon Equipment Te4t F.q��tlnt. SI'+'ree vehicle• Prenl'aratlnq r.,,q i neer 1 n9 Pat/ rV cgujlfwrnt cap Itwllzrue Pwyroll Other -------------- St:f STY" 111r:1.^.MI CIIIII.CV1 ,10" f1F lltnrlf . ttn; • — 0 year cp,�gslle "rrhMiule weso�.e.11, to to io In 10 10 to s s 10 10 10 10 S S 5 l0 /0 t0 10 Panic pntAo�Ipment SC•cnr i ty 1 10 to ■R Vi511111 CAnr.R of MAIST, itic• 10 10 10 10 10 to 10 to 10 45 4s 45 to, t0 In, 10 10' 10 10 t0 pot detwlle" t0 m 1 ��--_ � (cont~) .._---~-'_-~- - � ' I'=��"� ' �� IIII I I 61 I it I I' 1 IIII III II I �lil J F iGl rG cont l — ---- ---- VIaMt cnnr.F rF NtAMr.. PIC_ ---- _ -� SIX "Aft NtF.I S�N1 _ i �i StOlt OF Nlnit:. C�n1.EV1. ' gc�vrr..s Turchawed Prow parenent Not appricwbru ' 000 prrnlr.stlon ttensgewwnt Service* _ • I,egel Recountinq CustnKr niltinq - progra—,"q other tio.osT.�oo w ___ ryp I IIII"i!@IIII; I ill � 6 . � .. Iw7�Iim, .. ... FIGURE 1 (cont.) 0t,er�Lin�1- F,xlw'„sM plant I a :I�Y.1•It'►.p1,C .N' to6�„.t.tt Itt.•t;t g 799,OOn 2.1BI.00o 2.817.n00 4,Il�.o00 S,626,000 g 159,000 5.6�7,00n 9,789.Onn 15,167,000 20.974.000 51,099,000 1,559.000 6,02t.000 9,065.000 1z,7n6.noo $1.651.000 1t301.000 19:649.000 2s-146,000 ]9.ln6.000 I.t:.tit Tt.l'.t. t; :P.11�1ttai:P►•.:=� ------------ y ts.ontr s �no,nnn O'F'A'.00IF �.lox.ona I.]N,nnn l,g q,on0' 2.672.000 ),R99,0o0 1�C10.000 - f.,lSn,OnO { S I .' 21.000, S 789,000 6.A61.000' It, 215. nn I g,449,000 I2.19?,on0 7,861,non 1102.non' 11.220.000 IR.9R7,000 '! $1.05).0p0 6.�67.000 � 0,.112,000 I. e• s 5,1)5.000 tt.072.000 1118,OOR t6.�9R.QOQ 1 I:2,1304 J IR.161.no0 54,1'21.0n0' t2.250.000 tf.10T,n00 11.650.0110 12,109.000 26.200.000 17.971.000 )6.17t.nolt 2r., 401.000 41,900.000 f 11�i , Ir11i*I Ig;P��9iulllio 'I!il!II „� p I� I1191' �illl III IRilli�'�I!Pl,j'llll�i'I� II I� IiLII�..,l. III '�;I �. rlGU -- V1S11w1 CABLE nF IIIANI, Sll1 STAR NTF.tSrnl Or wAM1, 111C. ------ CAM.EVISNIN .crstln�ta eofe� g 61.000 1.61:.000 rta_�c_ s 62,000 925.000 2.2)e.000 Tear t 2,N1,000 3,)55.000 5,246.000 year ) 7.95i,000 6.129.060 year 6 Tear t0 Tear 15 S 75.000 6,0ii.000 Or19l�tlon s ),220.010 14 6�0)),000 3 1.000 1/,)91,000 Tear 1 12.569.000 21:410,000 year ) 6 I1.15S.000 24,309,000 year Tear 10 Tear l5 3 2e.000 2,56).000 4clliMl G s 1► g 207,000 �.995.000 1 164.000 8,411.000 year l 5:226,000 11.992.000 Tear ) Tear 6 2,0��.000 10, 2611,000 Tear 10 Tear 15 S .000 291.000 1.20,206.000 +»cal s I409.000 17 -- —" 10:902,000 26,165,000 Year 1 20,216.000 40.6911,000 year ) 2S.1S.3.000 40.705.000 Test Tear 10 Tear 15 a I 1 IF A C l � p 1 q I 1' 11jlllIIII �1,p'lll�ll�'APII!fglllp�I glgi� ICI 1� ..i ,, II_L,,n n t'IG(Tl: 1 (cont..) ._ .�. _ - _• ---...._ .. _ t t.rc.> .rr::• Ilr:•.nl _---' __ -. - •,l•►.plt :.rl.r: 1►r rl•L: Tla; r:►,.nr _.. _-.._- .. _. -- -- . _------- --. IIIN Il► SFRVICF. MICAS* lON4t111►CfION Si.CT_.._-_— �- -•_ IST11lICfip11 pPfiC'fICBS PtllCt1�11'F5.11NU CtN _ - - pap pre'viJnd serve) • ap prnvldeJ All areas of llthe city the city served w►th{n 2 years • All areas or l. to cbaMe oo +► tl•xe F/n►+chlse Territory vlthin I years he first 1'eaerves the r1q► and materinls bas{s f^r costs In ex+-ess Illstatlatlonropse, Ater+lth,+ 150 feet. 150 feet. at tl+xe a►a1 In clxre IS of 150tr �trd serial drnp 1.11►o Extension pot ICY n.ld relp�Ire up to l00 ferbl00efcet w< ►xaterist. s •►text pnosll+le extensions to the (*ATV y • tial+ pr^Vld^ 11 areas th+t Crty served J► vlthin 2 years i^f the City All areas serve.i re4erdtes* Al density- N{11 cable any new develnp*ent or annexed area within ] ■onths of helnq "ranted approval ,,tend services. regardless of density• ,tjaI "its will serve all reslTeclullnl^the wlthdut exclnsinn 1' ►licy nerl fore long drnp t" 1 .Is I ~ 2to.11 IY2s1 r. ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II i r IIII I 'INS I I�I� ��� rpggq�IIII�'I II I l�.,,,ll I III�I � I FIGURE 1 (cont.) 0FCT1(N( fit _SERVICE AREAS, CONSTRUCTIIIII eciscrim.es AND CONSTRIICTIf)II PRACT-CF.S Franchise Territory 1.Ine Extension Polley Construction Schedule (Residential Netwtich Only) Tear I --- Miles Ill year 2 --- Mlles (11 Teat ] --- Mlles 41) 1 Itndergrou"d Plant SIR STAR NTCI.';ON CAn1.F.ViSI N1 or I1TAM1, TIN:. • Map provided • All areas of the City nerved within ) years Will provide service to all parts of the City havinq A density of at least 50 potential subscribers per tulle. Will provides service to areas within the Service Area having less than the required density If a written petition Is received from a minlmom of 10 subscribers per mile At is cost formula Provided will work with developers and utilities for joint use of Irenches and crosainga to feed new hrnmslnq developments will serve areas annexed by the City jusing the parameters outlined above For overhead drops over 150 feet, will charge $15 pins $1 per foot over 150 Feet. It underground and the subscriber provides trench, repaving, hack -filling and plantinq-51.75 per linear foot of nndergtound In excess or ISo feet V151011' CAORF. In' MIAMT, IfN'. • Map provided • All areas of the City served within 2 years All areas of the City Included in the Initial service area. Will provide service to any presently undeveloped dwelling units In the Initial service area and any additional areas Annexed by the city within one year. Will pursue joint trenching with utilities will not charge any additional few for hookups requiring service drops over 150 feet in length 190, 1`29111 141 1721X y A 1 f Ili FIGUR 1 (cont.) Conatrttetion Practices, Safety nn_J RellfiblllLy t'•mstntction stfitxlerds .rl r 1• .r L/: •a •.r•.t/ar rtt. �tr • l..nr ty1w," of .ptallty conl.rol • llnlalure proollnrl • ^.I Ando f ( t•raeket s caned • :1111 analyze.l•w':/I on,1"rgrurll1,l s11ec l f lrat Ions • #Ill empiny moltlrle 'non-<rrnningllnq gr"llndlnq e'llrlosively • All ttlulernrntlnd cable In Co/xhllt • All onrlergroanA nmpllflens a'"I Power fittppllr-I nrorinterl In above rlMnn.l redestnlet • All scelergTnon,I 1•Asslves twuloted In al,ove ground f—de"tnls • All boring prnCrdurell {n ArrotdallCC with local ordinnnces • As un.lergrool'.i rnnntrevel Inn will conform to rxlstiny ntllity c^afiquratlons when possll•le Constrnrtlnu Codes •.fllcred to Incitttiet Lnrnl building arttl safety rosiest pccorfitlonal Safety And ilealth Art SrTr. - CA_TV deal th Steel Safety ftnnual _ IlAtlnn.il riCCtrlral Safely Coyle 119f11 "Atlnn.11 F.lertrical Cale (17Tii1 pelt System constrttct Inn PraetlCe" FCC poles find Pequlntloltfi Lncfil, fnunf.y find Stnf•• UIIlity C.files 1�tl,tye" supplied "Ills .lull=rrplire.l to case aprrnve.l .^.nfrf.y e•ptliw"enl in nrcor•1d11ce will, the ennstrurtlnn cn.le+ Vehlclr" e.lolrl•ed wills safety rtlu i l.ment quality control prngrams itself to monil fir cotlst ntct Inn tidal I l y • All ,nder.lrnuod Cable In confillt Constrtictlon rode-1 Adhered to Include: Itatlonal I'leetrlcal Safety 17MIO - AT LT I1jertin1. CennIrnrlloll rrocedores Inlue ponkl - IR'TA Safety IlAnn.11 - Il.•tlo•tal Electrical COdrt Ik'enpatlonal Safety L Ilea lrh nrl nCl Cennt rust Inn Practices All 5nfety roilcles l fe.leral. "fate and monlrlp•tl construction rcgolrcmenln Iltlllty Cnnstructlon rerµllreml•nt" itH:.IfP '.'hf.!' •'••"ttt� . f�'t.'Rr••f! • All Attachments to IA.wer otlEkttettr• aecondarles for file Purpose of prwer{nq CATv dlstriltuklon egtrlp- mplit shal i conrnrls, tti stsltllaret "peclficatlons gnvernlnp saclr attachments will conform With all TCI Seretg itfinual apeciflcstinnfi Icnry available upon re.luest/ • Standby 11ow"r provided • All undergrnuttd cable jackettlel'. f londed and CtK'Ase'I 1n conthtl! • will keep coaxial +pllcns, to R minlmnm • will -burn In' nil Active e•plip- ment [or 10 JAY" will line cnmrietely moelolar nml•1i[le►tr • will use pret•eotnl IVP prtwre.lnres to combat the prol.lems cause.) by high Galt cnntent In the all, Atmnfipheric Ilrlittnlrvi and very ltlgh Winds 1 ronstrnlctlnn Code" adllere.l to Inclttdelw - FCC Rules end neglllatinns, - CTir Technical Standard" fillff i Spec Iflcnt(nits - FAA tthstrt/ctinn Norklno and I.Ioht Inti National Fiertrlcnl Safely Code 11911) - Flrclrl Nat{nnnl cal Crwle 1197e) 0511A Safety A1x1 Ilralth Stalwlarde W-rh Stawin nls n/ Con.i F.nolnrerltM Practices Flnrlrla Pnwer and Light t'nmpAaY Conslrortion Prarticea Hell SYAteft t'on"tructlien Practice" Incnl 01111'111"1 and eleCtrlcAl Coles, City of Hlaml Cable TPIPvf+ion or I nanee Fy�;Ut r• 1 (cont.) Construction Practices Safety j,d Re_p ablitty Construction iStandards 1 i SIX STAR Nll:l.::1111 ('ARI.F.VISIr1tt Of' 111Af11. 111C. • Pole line construction In accordance utility company Pole lance Agreement• and the National Electrical Safety Construction Practices Ma mrnl • Will attach the CATV strand on the same side as the telephone straml If present. If not, will place ell equipment on the street side of the Poole • Will Install 1/4' high stren.1111, seven wire galvanized, zinc coAtluq 'A' supportlnq ntrarol • Stmlards provided for sops—rting strand attachment to poles, Anchors. guy strand else, and guy attachment • The CATV strand shall too bonded to all telephoror strand nr other esleting prole grounds In Accordnm•e with the utility company Pole Lease Agreement, except that there shell be ministrm bonding between parallel CATV anti telephona strands at the first, last, and every tenth pole vistltlr C.APLr ; IF IIIANf , IIN7• • All construction shall be Its accordance with the National Elect Ic Safety Code - Ilandlnrok 191. litillty Company Pole Lease Anreements, standard CATV practices a�Nl all Stnte. County and Moniclpai Codes, as welt as th, codes of the occupational Safety and health Administration. • will provide all employees wilh the proper safety egollment • will attach the CATV at rams on t'rn same aide an the telephone str3rwl If present. If not, wilt place all equipment on the street side of the pole • will Install 1/4' high strength. seven wire gAlvanlsed, zinc contlnn -A- sopportinq strand • Standards provided for supportln•; strand attachment to poles, anchors. qny strand size, aml guy attachment • The CATV strand shall he bonted to all telephone strand or other printing Ix.le V rounds In accnrdnncc with the utility company Pole Pease s Agreeent, except that there shall he minlssas bonding between parallel CATV anti telephone strands .11 the first, lnst, anti every tenth pole FIGUn.. 1 (cont.) ;an.rl• art.l: tot, t'rt.•:r/ r. Itt.•tit Trtver Standards . Structural standards will conform -------- _ to riectronie itwlostrles Ass..rlatlon Statwlard RS-222-C • Obstruction marking and Ilghlln.t will conform to I -AA standar.l AC-7-7460-1r cons_t[uctlon- hull_c]t lAtete Iltillties Are Iocated_itoth APrIRIIY-anti -- Ihtde[gcatmi .--. Construction Practices flanual APrlal • will conform to t - thtlonal F.Irctrle Safety Cade - U.■le County Code - City of rilnml Code - Southern "Pll System Cnnattuctlon Practices - Florida Power L 1.1ght CO tl a I.ruct in. Practic" underground • will utwlergrotttd where ntllltles are un•itrgroan•1 • All neressary notiflcatlons made and permits ol.talnrd Inrltttled In aplrtttlix will comply with Cit•ct►onic tndastrles A-nociation Standard RS-222-r Tower finlsh hot dipped gaitanl7ed arrnrding to ASTH standard ASR6 tl.trklnq and liglttlnq will conform to rAA standards 11 utxlrnlmnml wheree other utilities are underground It Is a city requirement Cost Is equal to or less expensive Ihan that of aerial cunstructivn - Attachment to exlstinq u°illty po1Ps Is not prncticai or l.oles are -- not available other utilities art. prepared to participate In joint under- ortoondlnq rxin►lnq•structures Can he nNlize.l In system design - -- Inch detf to npprtwlls WIMP Trr.r N'r•t' :t't:W'hT1t•'::. • Oult to vlthstand t25 mpit vfnds • will conform to FCC Rnl'en 411141 Regoletions • will conform to FAA Obstrttctlon• rlarklnq, Lighting and Placement Standards • Will comply Ciect.rnnlc Industries Manclation RS-222-C 111,dergrnund cal.lP Initially placal - Where no aerial ntlllty service exists - "here only Fri. concrete Poles exist - where telephone duct availabilitles can he secured APriat cables will be relocatP.i ulwiar- grimond In any overhead utility service area In which either utility elPcts I to t*nve Its service underground a to 1 - -- fnctudet l 1111 opPemft'x F1GU Ul. 1 (cont.) tower Standards I construction _Policy Ilhere Utilities Are Iocated_Itoth_Aerially and underground Censtrtn Ion Practices Manual - Sf11 STAR NIt:ICM1-+----I--- -' vision ('AOLC,rF Miniti, IIIC. cAnt.Evisigm or MIAIII. Illy:. • will meet or exceed the standard" contained In Electronics industry 1, s cl.tea n5-222-A • Tower marking and llghtlnq In accordance with rhA AC-io/ m o-IF No un.tcrgrounJing Is foreeAst for ,hose areas where utilities are aerial ,•ondult used In mKierground plant except In a very few epees. Include.i In appenc/lx • will conform with Electronics Industry Association Standard n8-222-C and all applicnble local standards • will conform with all applicable FAA Standards Will underground who -rev - All utilities are underground - ,Mderground construction is an economical Alternative to serial construction - flarnlatea b•• local authorities - Joint participntlon with other utilities can be accomplished will Join the last utility As it moves Its !Ines on.lerground Condjit used only In special cases lb mites of 121) included In Appendix Ili 6. � III i I � I ill��l IV I I FIGURE 1 _(cont.) ^ �_ FF.CTIa1 1 t Cl folor.l._CAPWITY fill STSTi'JI ICES I r:N prn�oae.l Systen Resign Rewidentlal Cah1p Confi•lnlallon channel Capacity 111"I"t[ea1D (ry,streaw tnstltntlonal Cable M111(1.ltn-atlon �ltatww!1 t!alwtcltY Ilttvns t re.�w Iq,.t reset rN.hpt MII:NIITP/.l: ter .:RI:ATI.p fill Ringle h(ade,.d 72S wiles of doal Tronk. each cable 54-4nn stilt downsl ream nnrl 5- 10 hilt tops l t eaw 52 Ix2) 104 Clonnnels , rn 4 1,2) II c_intnnrls pl.tn 2 fills for data tranamlrslo� cr:a►tP�sTF.1>!: rrlanl I ne 0,!n.I pins 2 hnhs 695 mllrs of final Trnnk, with one cahlr 5-12. 52-402 Mlls downstrenl and the olhcr IS0-402 11117 dnwnatream and 5-108 M117. upst rr.%m . It.-si-lent In, and Inetilutlr.nai netw.trks . . combine.l. 42 , Ss - 100 Chanttets a FM 17 Channels (sh?,ol with innt l tilt 1011a1 Sec ah•we• 59 wllps (lnit{nliyl of 0Illle Tronk With 174-400 I01z downstream and 5-Ins /1117. opstrraw • tllll ronstntrt srparale Institutional cal•Ie when iustlfie.l by demand or Lug{Hess users 25 Channels 1-hnred with )7 Channels 15 Channels pins I1 Inlz for data transminslnn 4.9 sell of snl•ertrnnk 10 lnter- cnnneet tho lade Cnttnty opprntlon center nn Galloway wind for rm••rgr•ncy Ale,t anrt joint llnti.tnal Access • Ml,:rowavr InlrrcnnnectIntl to art incent sywt elel Tlpr 1 - none Tier II - pionrer flc-7000 Tlrr ill - pioneer NT-1)00 addressable Tier IV - plonper NT-1100 1"to ►acllvc 17 Channeiw rrslJentlnl) 11 wllrs for rerlinnal Inlercnnnect Inn Tie, t - n..nr Tire, I1 and III - zenith rr-211110 addrewsahle rlrsrramhlpr In[ eyttall Tier IV (lolleractive) - 1larrle Ikw1e1 6N19/ I"We Ierwhtal L[mtawllbrs, and Ittlptacl IV.• key pad I/f1111N'Ff:RIC••eY�lNlltltf►'h'Ftr•II;a lleadend plus I hobs 115.7 miles of deal Trnnk, each caKYr 54-140 Mllz downgtreaxt and S-1ft Fill q+s t ream 59 Ix2) . 116 Channels t Ffh 4 (x)') • 9 Channels 719.0 slips of ell Trnnk with 174-130 Mltz dnwnstreas and 5.75 to 106.75 stilt upstream t A J 26 Chalmelt 16 ehanuels pin• dat•l t6.7 Belles fnr re•11nna1 prnyrnw pxchange. de.licated studio-huIs cable links. TV stnt ion D i rest crnnteet Ions. and Intervonnectlrnt with the Fdwratinnal -Tel ernwmunlent luns C••nter Tlpr 1 - Oak I.- 10 n,k 21 channel wld-Lnrel cotivcri er Mt.4 •der Tier It. Ill. IV - pinnoer VIP one- way addreawahlc or tw""If Intere"t"Ve Hagltavox 11a•loa 59 (alM.ve 400 MII') FIGURE 1 (Cont.) g1(s1 I1_CIANNEb CAPACiTy m1p SYSTEM nESIGN Pra=.� gYstew Design resident's, Cable Conflyuratlon channel Cal+aclty rlownstre am 111.streaw instltot'onat Chili 9_CPnfig"Fatl9n i Channel Cal+eclty no" Stream upstream ptll!!r �ngrten SLR STAR NIF.I :t1N CAnI.EV1S110N OF NIANt, 111C- 1 1 Ileadend and 2 hubs 767 wiles 6 706 wiles (at year �. 5 projected by year 151 of duel Trunk, , each cable Milt downstream and 5-i0 Nllz upstream SI 1 S7 : ills Channels • FM 4 1*21 s A ChenneIa 117 wtles let year 7, 199 wl,le Trunk projected by year is or I A with 29R-196 M1: downstream and 6-156 Upstream 2S Chennela 25 Chennele None Tier t. ti - Pioneer PC-2000 Tier lit - rloneer 0T-1100 addressnhle Interactive VtStfNl' CAIILF 01. I1lml. ifeadend and 2 hubs ach ,Iles snllf dual Trunk, eCable 5-10 11li 202M1z pst ream 55 (>•2) Ito Channels • EN t (x21 . 9 Channels 114 miles of l Tronk with moo downstreamandel68-400 Ntiz 5-116 upstream is 39 7 miles of flher optic Trunks between the sub-headcnda and the Telecolwmunlcatlone Center Tier 1. It - 1101101111.1 SPC-4100 111, IV - Tocow S501A A11.iressel.te Tier nlecrambler Tier V - Tncolw 5510A Addressable Discrambler Teletext Tlir VI - Tocom 5510A InteractlVP 1? A 0D n,riin iq �q'p�•�I li��,�i � �III,���,�llll�fl • - - - - -- "JAM"JAMTI:I.C-/-rNUllhlll'ATItN14 (cont FIGUR1 .2.__ -_ .._._..__.•__ .T1.n�: nlnttl •-- - - —_ _ nt1lRlr'nHl,l- rtl• ra+/:A7t:V. ItI,V11 _ - - - aetivatNt Init{a11y. capacity _ .---- ,c.{ty network cap,cnte At upstream to lot IMwnstreaw act►votint limited' llwlt Interfrcencn with - _-- _ — — ~'---- Alt capacity activated Initially. Ihllcd t^ 9 6 on tIM ar.t{vatr.l Initially. A Sep' will he InstItnllnnal nclwntk drwaroi by channels to Other spr+'trrna osets Initint Ac tivaflnn Itt+wnstrearw channrlS al renidenttal network nfnl 16 nn �I�r1AA Iw•r•n Ise t cOn.tntctrd wl+rn iust.iflyd In"t itof tonal scrvIntegr t cann^I +` network Inet itnt network for s1t{sfJr., through the integrated restrlcted usage • --- ---- - -._ . _ . - - -- - — — — Indicattv"t local JUM of __ _----_-- --- - -- ---- InJlcatinq location of .hp prnvldr•d faclllti. Indlcatlml Irrr•,t Mtr at the Ital+s t ,rnvlJrd fac{Ilt{es 1'aC111LIelf flap providPJ hea,lrml ----- -- — 1tw atien of - dingrAw pr^vlde+f pl^ck dlagr:rrn prnvlded a — _. — "lock dlagrnm prnividell l---- -- — - - - - - N "emlclsl ItlagraSr —-...._..------ 0 F tGU'ti• 1 (cont.) Silt STAR t lrV:n" V1511111 CAI11.F. t11 111AFlt, INC. CARI.MSifNt OF HIA111, 111r. • 97 of the III downatreAm channels and Ail of the npstrean channels on thn residential network activate( In[ tIAIIy • 21 of the 25 down9trenw and up- stre-w Institutional network channels activated Inilinlly • All channel capacity activated initially except for Teletext. 50 of the 55 Teletext channels will be activated initially location of Facilities Flap provided Irxllcating Inentinn of 11a110 provided Indicating location fac111Ples o[ facllltle+ Inlork diagram provided Ill ?tlt:alt'iP1.T. Ill' t:drr.Tv" Iit,llil for planeflone to chl�cale or l'ontrnr.t TraneolwslOn servlceo 1 lal t'o"""nn Carrier 1 Ih) Calrie T,leviwicm Relar Service 4,1 aattil•ul1%t plot, Itnttlon servlct! Idl rltlw'r The following co11"o"111e4 sPrvcl fro"1 Ole 14I001 love wilt, wy111{n1111u111c ortwo nllcrowave sy- chnnnPls for 111terronneetl Vey 01scayn^ c•nding franrhisr) Coral l:at.tcs Ip- Suulh 111n1"i I1M1 IMr11o1,r ILe1N11M9 frTnchiartl It,~-11•a/1, FIor111a City South Dadr county (inlercllnner.t only) Ibne IIunP _.. -- ._. _ .._-• - -•• --- 2 ten-m^lrr oral 1 em•cn 111etcr TVMI M Satellllo -twcth Rlntlono provldl.l PF{`f.f :rrTF11!: tlriJll P,%srd telPpl%one Pa1rs �nrY,n1i/locMiralllo o rM]PiV1• p►onrammimi n»lrTstP[s Iahen the a1t11111s cannot be erelvrl off-Tir lze thin 'etPrves the right to rove tPchn1ci11V .echnolo•IY sllnuld 1l p fPasil%le and cnst erfecllvP lifrtlf -rant l;•Mina/•fF'kIIfRN:`w I'mm eltrept for 1T1e11Itr-1H1Se1I cehte I•ro.Irammin-I Tnl nn�,ov„Ea1wi'►e hana ;Ines provide•1 by Y 1rTsed Ilne•t Hard for re-11'%11a1 Intercnnnrc'tinn pisrIlo%Ps, for links; will% higher r•11scTtlonal lnslit'll Innn• ant tot "luhlle unit relay 1i11rivnnew. off ft Mina use microwave t i v"..mi s 1 on for r:11c:/F.FP saPl Le pro -Iran orlginatinn l N Ilona ~ Ifill fund fo-tter the sttAbl"w"'t o f a I cur {In 1" Hla"1i 12 ePvPn "Ktrr TVtn%' 1r i t fa or each huh► M1d l ten Lehr s-lette uplink provldrd �Iili� li,l� F%CU1�T; 1 (cont.) Plwnq To Operate or contrast—Mr- T[wnswlsston cervices to) C,,mon Carrier lot) cable Television Relay Service ic) Multlpnlnt plstrihutlon service (d) Other Swtelllte C�rth Statlon� SIX STAR NIr"ON CAR1.:Vt.tuN Or Hrlutt. low Nnne in liftrlbutlon hub locations Aan Iotherd Interconnected systems None None l seven Wier TV"O's at heademl. I sls- weter rVRO at encle Innb Vi.101, c11nr.R Ur ritNHt. 1tK'- will he utlllsed ,ensed telephone Ilncs 'or receplion o[ npwsvlre servlcos. pnta nasc services and vaatlter radar Input #Ould [Ile for a Nohile cons naml License for local origination FNr None would provide [or the Installation Of t,yFtl,elCityasnd/oreCountylf desired carriage on the Inatitutlonel Network ten-,,,eter TVt10's provide") at headend 'I �I IliI, 11I] 11111,J i Ali 11h ii II II i FIGURE 1 (cont.) :Itl .11•A1161: IH Y.ItI'A'fl.a 111A11f I tltnnl Tt•t.r.-t•/lavnnlrr•A•r►trtls 1•nht.lsT::�r.n: ntAnl gcrvlee bevel Sepnrstlonpay ,i r,ervlcos to rise a rnmlrinatlnn - - • n( bavehand nynt- suppreglan and dynnmlc Tiers i ar,tl it to use negative of+riot o I•Y inl -ray Cnble istAnLlon notch filter trope video inversion fie scr:+mlrtlnn. • Tier lit to use rloneer OT-I Ina a+ldres�nble eonvertel • Tier IV to one pioneer 0T-1300 two- way Interact lve converter Ohl Tler tsnlstlon • fier 1 and It lsolatel by converter and hand relect filters • Tier Ill services isolated by sy„c ,,,i,l,ression • Tier iV Inolation provided on I two- Nay i„teraclive basis _..._-__. --- -- pint►cer VIP S—Irlty alai ctnmrm,nlcation dome tntrractive tervice fapnbllltY eyetelm All r,,n pay Tler 11 artil ttl pn><Iramminq scramMle.l by thn Fr'"e lecltnlry+le uacd for PAY sectlrlty Oestrlt•ted accede A-1 do►tnstre data chnnnals to use n high-p filter Recess to A-2 t,I, Ire -am eiwm,els Protected by high-pass filters H111 Initially Install s data/comin►ter rvices procsslnq system to provide se o 1"rindlmt . Inlnlslnn and medical alarm Fire er[ vi.xs ftpininn poll ink and Iel el exl ray -her -view deter readlnq Status monitorlm/ Illl pay services scrssrblvd' nsirup minewave sync s^ppressinns+sl„h s Aolgar sync sopprossion ust�is by I`Inneer equiime"t nil tiers Isoisterl by sceam6tln,t- Parentei lnr k nut featt►rea avm4lahle. Or to Pioneer VTr securlO.y system. will llsh I1nJerwr►ters la►I►oratorles sIM I~ security alarm trchrologY And services, sec,►r►ty quart service and er•ergl!ncY met!Ical teehnicians to rest+nnd to alarms W, t'Ic;URE 1 (cont-) service —Level $eparation lot Pay Cable isolation Ib1 tier isolation �_ in_ toractl�s Service Ca�bllft± gill !ITm Hltl^n" C11111.I:V1510" (If Ilrnnt. /liC- the pioneer DT'1100 system unlnq I.Llressable converfern wiI prnv Isnlatinn Tier t haeclbet" will ►/avelwtll channel converter Inc-20001 that to other "ervlten allow access Tier" 11 1, ill controlled by the addressable dewera..blinq function or the 0T-I100 ternllnal pioneer VIV Internetive aYcsi[e�erolcen I capability for wide range ViStt)fl .Ant.r. (jr 11TA14f. IHC. -11 subscriber Ire willsignals be acrn..bled vla lets t end If lecllni�.le rocr*Vs "CST "cr�l•l.11uq IlrartIn, vlilcn lnversion and It, ppressIn") tier 1 subscriber drops provided wltl. a Vitek low pans trap which will black Tier it signals All other tiers isolated usin7 the o.ldrpvsnl,le illllct{on of L1.e a+selc laced converter TOC11M lil-D security and interactive ci,cww.nlcations equlf..�ent used. with for vide range or services capability a p... up w .FIGURc«1- icont. i 1-1WRICAI•I.1: or CItI.AT1:R Iti IIII 1lesdetd/Ilub InNrrtrornectlltn Intnrconnectinn Mith Other Cable systems Technical Standards via AM microwave Carrier to nolae -41 ,In 111terml„11/latIon products -52 do Clu)nt. Wines. Item modulation -42 .In lsolat ion Itetween cables 60 ,111 Corot■)site triple heat -52 d11 nl-directional cross ion _�0 fillm...htlat Maxlmum signal level at receiver 12 Jnmv Level stability �1.odn Frequency response lany channel 2 till rnvelolte delay -Ion ns nwnr at chn11 nnel 1 _rill rtnr.►•rv�Trrr.: nrAMr � MIAnt t1.Ll;.r•nr0Uns1•�A'Etrttl� IlrnJcn.l .ronn.•cte.l to the two hubs via triple cahir. Iddlrect instal sul,ertrung, aml to natellIt.• rarth etatlons 1,, filter n(•ticn cable using FM modulation Via ultra-11Ig11 performance bl-dir.•ctlonal Trunks utlli:inq Ill ,m••)ulation an.l three.gonrter or one -inch sloe low -loan cable 2nd order Itral ratio 60 do lr.l order Lear ratio 60 tin 11um componite brat ratio Is 55 do cross mviulation ratio 52 do Signal to noise ratio 41 do Iifferential •lain 21 111 f ferret ial 1•I0ase 2' rnvelnpe delay 200 ns max. tletwork jeurrated echn -10 do fo, 1000 ns delay The four maxi -hubs Int••/corm•rt111 via six 1/2' rnitlen. with three operatinq In each directto" • raclr hub tons off -air antennae at1.l natelllte earth statluna. Via AM. or r" Vf.f.Y) mlcrnwnva carrier to pulse 46.4 dn' Crons modulation -55.1' do c,m.poalte triple ttent -SR.S ds carrier to hum wululntion -40.0' ds Ilin. t r Frequency resltonne Jn.` (6 Mltz channel) -1 do Max. 'k nifrerentlal gain O.S Chcnminance/luminance 1 delay 110 ns Max. �!+nlx!t!If+lna;!',!1'fl�l!la mIS?o�it9!'P,Rxf�SI'1n{"�r� ,1111�g I C I I �. I' � I III �� �II rp-JUJI? 1 (cont.) needend/n,�b tntere-onnectlon intercom With other Cable slit s?An MIENf", t'Iin1.F.Vl .TOM OF "I Ant. 111C. ected to the two hots via Ileadend eonn It e MKIb"s AMOIcr neC r III loterc ""e, ingtthelrnTrunkncables ystems by Ither syst eats "Y lie Intrrconnected by �Icrowave or super Trunks — --- —_— — — — Carrier to noise 46 do I _64 dD SccorMt order prodwcts jogeemsite triple beat _fit an -40 do Ihn• wndoletto" Frequency re"Mnwe _O.SdI► _ Single channel _ Trunk sprctnns o/12 0.5d0 response IOo n sees. Group delay Isolation lodn subscriber tap lbdo IReturn lose n P. vlt•.Itxl CAME t,1M I. Ttic. $ r .adend connected to thetwo DlSo hubs la General cstiplemented by a 6-liner npertronk, ptic systelw I options listed+ InstlGrtlonal �t via the ealetlny Networkble hardline csthe - Via direct othereo the I1131)a and one of cable wywtes connecting headen.is-- ` _ Via nilerowave - - I8.7 do 1 fi carrier to nolse 66.1 do 11N Second order heat 55.7 an c0nporlte triple beat g6 7 do t7w cross modulation i, L .. ,Iv wq11111I��P11A'�!�� p�q dill@�il�fi u FTGURI; 1 (cont.)- - • Ml•11rinr t'.o•tr.ale tim•irht f wR. al•. 1•en ftrrwarorr! Trr:l+ •a:rlr'►nLt. 111' r:P• ptY.it rile►a IS .rml•11fir•rt rttr•r 7.5 wilra t.•st im-lrnle: C.+rrirr to noise, Gl.nsts or MI"', Iltrm riw teat rat in C„wl•nsite trig Cross wrnlalnt inn Cross talk (-hrowr tirlar - rregwrncy resl+�nse nad 1 at inn T.tp (solatluo 5nhscr ll t•r I rv,•1 rrrynency prrrcrdnres Iroeltwlr trsl loll for: Systt•w radiation rrrrittency resr"ll:e gignai level Visual pirttore t119.9111y Ir. artt•litirrR t+vrr tr.7 wF1'ea Teals Intatulr: _ ::i•Ina1 lcvrl� al sot.n,•ribrrs• 1.•rminals - rrt.p.�ncl• stabll{ly of s{r1rm1 pn.crasors and m..rlolnt.nrs rarrl.•r to noise ratlo Inlrrm^.lul.ition 'film Ievrl yyctrw frr.lnRny'n^Trot hrsdrnd _ rrc,lnrnry rr.1 p,tn I l.mrnl It.tdiat Inn - !:nl•nrr{Lrr Isolation III frert•ulin) gain w rrrr.•nt-t.rl O.Ane ( rnss m•.•Inl.tt ion I = rlcturr a,wl souml rpraIIty l.r•vrl of rnvrinre delay r,.n•t"si►r 1ri1•le brat Malntrnanrr prr•r•rdnres dray.rllrr•,) 1o►' Ileadernl • Trunk - Llnr Ra4laI inn Trrl.n{ral PIT`lmrnt staff rlrsrril.rd for: rlent wainl.•namm t'.ratx.r•r ttrrvire _ I o,llnr.•r fu•I •:rev{r.•z and d.••r{gn r1t:I1N 'kr':r..•tr,rpnirwq'�rt^.$. to .$Ml.ftrt••rs tn•a•n *.e wNN•m Trtl s Im�ttaie: Gain Nnlne ritnrrr, Carrier to notso- Ilnw mmilllnticon Visual rrr:.rurncy Astral rrr.lnenry Cltamtel rrslxousr! no* signal Ieaka•lr' - echo Triple bent Cr•tss w wlolar inrr t`rrrcrdttres dr3ncrit.rtt forr rreventst►ve waintenarw•r• Station wonitutlntt sweeir syst.•w rtalntcnaoce staf r drsrr livict =-'R'wmR =71'q I FIGUR : 1 (cont.) llmplitler Cascade larmest Cascade six sT11p 1IIr.Is11N cnnl.twlsiorl of NlnNl. 111C. I!t armpllflers (IS Trunk. 1 Irrldger. I line e,tentiersl over 4.5 miles Tests Include' fregnency Loun,lsrles Visual and aural carrier signal level4 Ihfm modnlatlon none indlvldoai Chanarl [re7 y response System nolae ar"I ondesired co_Clranncl gIgnal intermmdalation and Crnss woAalatlon _ Terminal lanintlon Radiation weaanremient maintenance procedure" deserlhed fort ampli[ler levels signal quality System re+poeae power supp Technical staff described VlSllxl CAME Of N111Nt. ttlC. IS smplltlers over 6.2 miles Test Include - signal levels - Carrier to noise ratio itum leirel le best Composite trip r[ormance Mno-1 proof of re poutine mrintenence described [orr - signal levels - system sweep - signal leakage heat and moisture Technical staff described' ■III FIGUREt (cont_) Cltslfww'r ftitsrplainl ryrllcies And r�occdiiic� - -. gpeclnl S�str.0 rest Ise% .. •rn elt mn/.r. ra• r:ur.-lTcr nL•nf pollcics ntwl prmeolurrs 11e9crfflr•d Fratuses Inrlo+lcs - rnrce ton{nq - parental control ll r,y-Per-event Capability - Precool— deny capahlllly - Constant system monftorin•I ttarrowcesting illegnnntic comm,l«is Il,t.1 lervlce, f:mergency nlcrt .y+tem Ctatnllly power prnv1111`d -- -• - -_- « r ` rtfdtll t/l'diit T{:1'.1:-rruplultlr•:�i�ttl•:5:; r�pfa::,f_T..►�� •nt fr.lev an+i pmce+htres: descritled 1' i'e,lures Inr,lodo: - Fire, Intrw ion and medleal slnrm services - opinion lrlilinn Channel mrinitoring (I+,Y-1'er-vlrwl It ter re,dinn Status m+mltoring Tclidon lnforwntinn rel.rlevsl I- Cmcrgeney alert syst+•m el andhy l.nwer provllMd Discrete programml.411 to s noinhi,orlww"I d►stricls pl) f.lcllltfes listed In 11rr. p:17-12. will be r,a.+ected. /ladnct sllocnled for 29n oxrrrtirxrt at $800 each. 0 nl Icles and prace.lures Jest:�l6etlt eatnres laclu•les Conwnrolty In[ornu�Nun RerrfeVutll Service ray-per-VIPW Ilnrne 31,1rw service Videotext wtNen Fall Inter hown cowl service rnergY wA11II'll" "t Sheppinn at home Onnkinn at h+mle Sterue onnitorin•I Emergency alert system S t,IMlhy power provi,lM) ' Instltilt long to I., Pa49^41 by {nslittt- tlnnnl netwr+rk 1nclado All •tw`enternt,Us edncntlo+++rl. health care, cultural end Inx+nn aervit•es facilities. plus major linter and banks. All faclllt�es with exisrl+'n 1'r' lramminn resources ell no n will he Immediately connr•cconverMrs two way basis "w+`tPrnlo[e•sroekoa for and character q nonc+,c~-'eta) use • 1 wobile COMMI111ICAtlons. C'•mwnnJ and Control Centers for Police fA•pt. Co•lwlterass{sted 'instruction Snflwnre for Fire Relit.-rrall+l+Nl ftwtal+le TV trenswitter• for 6 I:11S rescue nl+l is to At city re•p+Mt, rin ruxxrte TV caweras for rrine survefllnnce. F7Gm 1 (cont.) customer Complaint Policies and Procedures Special SYstes restores Six STAR NTri-Sn" CARi.CVISIMI Or MIAM1, 111C. rollcles and procedures described Features 1tw inlet - intrusion, fire alarm police/ emergency medical alert - (ipinlon roiling - Energy tAnnagement. meter rendlnq - Slmp-at-home Text display pats transmission Pay -ref -view capability Status monitoring Emer-leney alert system Standby power provided • Separate staff to operate and monitor alarm services • Covernment facilities , schools, to be connected. on request, to the TnetltutlonaI Network at no cost VISIMI CA91.E pr MIAMT. 111C.' *vq policies and procedures described a• Y' Features Includet w� - institutional network with 10 { discretely prograsrsahle Trunks - Flre, police and medical y -_5 protection - pay -per -view X`,� - Energy management - Text display - rol►Ing - InfnrmAtlon data bases - Status monitoring f - Emergency Alert system - Standby "er provided OF CID • Separate staff to operate and •,'. monitor alarm sprvlces • cover"Ment facilities, schools. colleges, hospitAls to he connected to Institutional Network. No charge for up to 10 drops FIGURE 1 (cont.) Sr.CT10N Ji fMWOsr:11 C11�1AL CAIt11tA(;r. AND CIIAfINEl. ALUICATIMIS rrol,osed Signal Car_rlAge ---- ) Incal TV Stat Isms I "latent 1'V ctatfons' `-- ----- — I !'.atellite rr"rMs - vWeo AIVIMICAIIIJ: in' •:ri.r.Trn fil""I till Tier It: Clis 2. 4. 6. 7. In, 17, 21.45 Ili-" Ch 51 Vt. Laudortirtle on Tier tits Chs S. 12 Hest ralm fiench Ch 20 rort nyer, IT{er 1-1 •- --- •------ ----------- -. . Ill 9 Chicano-(Tirr 111) CIO 9 View YorklTl••,- 11 I ch 17 Atlanta (Tier 11 1 • rart-time t: Tile 7rwa AclworTr _- - (Tier ill Christian Oroadcasting network (Tier III Nlckelo.leon/AM' Arts (Tier M CI1S Arts L ColtNre ITlcr it) Spanish International Network Prier If) F.SrN (Tier 11) t:-SrAN (Tier 11) 1ISA/Col l toPe/nrT/NSC; (T!rr It) Satellite Pronto mling Network/ -•.•lelrancp (Tarr 1111 Appalachia" Comtnlinity "rvlce Network•' People Thnt Love (Tier 111) Trinity 0roadcastlnl ltrtr.nrk (Tier 1.1) Rot•kefeller Center TV Prier IV) American r:.htcatlnnal Television Network Natlonal Christian network' (Tiel M grand Ole "pry (when ava{Inl.le)Prler IV) Ikrlern Satellite network• Clneorrlca- Vltlen Spurts Network- (Tier 111) • ComCw,slt.e wiltt other pro.iramminn t•r•nr.r.�:l:Trle: tlr/•rik fill Tier 1T' Chs 2. 4, 6. 7, In. 11, 21. 4; 111am1 Ch 51 rt. tnuderdale ('hs 5-, 120 tie -it Palm nrach rills 1 channels for repeatinn local Ilfam( s!atfon broadcasts • Com).•+a l to network fill I'h 9 Chlcegn (Tier lit) 1-11 9 New York (Tier I t 11 Ch 17 Atia+Ha (Tier 111) I h 2 'Ian .1eao. Pl+erto Rico/Ch 49 Tnrniilo. Canada tIl uPh l r,l fill) Cable News network (ill) VISA tletwork (tilt 1:SPtl fill) National Christian Network ` 11I[tlI` Trinity nroe•ic8Rtinn Network aewlnh Televislon Network 11111 1 ickel ntlenn - fill) The tlnsic Channel fill) Chrlatlan nrnadcastinn Network fill) AnC Arts (Aiello) (Ili) CPS Cable I I t ) (:-SPAN (fill S.,t,II Ile rto•tram Network fill) I1rT6 1 Ill 111%lern Network- fill) • Cnml•nslfr w11h other ptnntalmslint 11rAltts Tlrr••a,aauncrr•A'eil/rltr= On Tier rtr Chs. 2, t. 6. 7. fit. 17, ZY. 45 "phav CIO 51 rt . ratNti•rairte Plus reserved channels from Chs. 11. 19 1tlamt CIIs. 42. 79 Nest Palle fiench CIO 69 IlnI tytewwf C'h 9 t'hleago ITler till C•h 9 New York filer IV I Ch 17 AtIAllta ITler IV 1 tr National Christ lan IWI:W,rk- fill) The Nnslc Channel (IV ) C.,IIlot+e- 11t ) 11SA Network/NSG/Ennllsh Ch.nnteUlit) PTI./rnN (fill Nlckeirttleon/11I147 Arts (till Ik,dern Satellite- Network/Video Concert 11a11 till) Appalachian C'nwlmmity Service Netwnrk • American &htrntl•+sal Televlslon Netw.+rk' F.SPN fly I Sntrlllte httr.lraw Netw•,rk llv ) I is Vetlas Live Itv ) nrTA (IV ) COOS cable nrT• 1 1 1 ClnemerIca' ( 1 I C-SPAN• 1 11) Cable News Network (IV 1 - Comflnsite with other pr•w(rammin•t �i, s i„t�.. b. ._.� aa�.i...�_7 ... ... *.�&... a FICUR': l (cont.) S IFCT_ON_ .10 PROPOSER SICNAl_. CARRIAGi ANI/ C1tANNEL ALLOCATIONS Pro�osod Slynal Carriage Local TV stations _ Distant TV Stations Satellite Prrwirasm — Video silt STAR 1tlt:t» MI rAnt.rv,ntml IMF MIAMt. INC. virmott CAME O: tITAMt, 'fir. O On Tier to n Tier It Chit. 2, t. 6. 1, to, 17, 21, 456 M mill rist 2. /. 6. 1. 1". 11. 21. IS "'am' Ch 51 rt. tanderdale Ch 51 Ft. [auderdale • (Tlec tt) Cho 5, 12 Nest PAlm Peach :hs S. 12 Nest Palm Deach • Composite with other programming • Network fill-lnt composite with other programminq Ch 9 _ — — Chlcagn -- ('Tier IT) r:h 9 Chicaqn• New York (IV ) (TV 1 9 New York (Tler 111 Ch q (Tier Ili) 'h 9 Ch 17 Atlanta (M) Ch Atlanta (Syndicated program nlack not time) • it permltted by the FCC DroSdcasting Network (11) Cinemerlca•r1trintlan ISA Iletwork/DF.T/Calliope/English Nickelodeon fill Ilotwo►k• Christian nal Cloanne 1 /C-SPAN Program Network/Telefrance(ttl (1 t) (11) Channel Itt) Chanti"Inel' Satellite Appalacfilan Cnmmunity Service Network/ p1acR F.ntertalnment Television* Irtt flinch amoral Comanmlty Service Network Nlrwlow on Nall Street lilt) Appalacblen APC Art@ (Allrhal t:SPN Irxlern Satellite Network fill) MA Network/Calliope/mr (if) international Nctwnrk (111) I,o@ Vegas Network Ill) Spanish FducatlonAl TV Network People That Love fill) (till American Cable News Network (1V1) Cable New+ Network (fit) People That love I1V 1 ESPN CnS Cable (when Avallable) fill) Nickelo.leon t.As Vegas I.Ive/Clnemerlca• !N 1 (tit) C-SPAII (till Trinity DrnadcAsting Network• Iltll The Tle MuaiclrChat• nnel• tiff) (111) CPS Cattle* nr A V () APC Arts (Alpha/ • (IV 1 Times Mirror Shoppiml• (tv l Alternate PPS 11V l • Congx+site with other pro.tr••llowIn'I • When Available , FIGURE 1 (cont.) 1"ar Tv prvolrams /.nea/ 1"crrgramf - Mttowatrtl . .... _ .. I - _ . __ .. _ ..- __.... _.__ - ......-._----- it _.-. . _ LItl nit'Rrl.l. ver e:r/ ATI.p 111A111 The. N..vle Clwn,w!1 ITlor IV) elnwtl,.,A ITI. r TV) i.tve• (when nvall,hl1rler IV 1.a Vegas 1:,lavlslnn 11.,me Theater lletwnrk• (Tier IV) (Tier TV) ClnemAx pay-per-viewl,l (Tier IV) nravn• (Tier tc) (Tier IV) 11nme now Office rAHt.f::Y!:11.11!: tlf)Itif Ik,gle nnx (office? f l l l ) fill) Sle,vt Ime The Movie Cham,"l tilt) 11'"W. Theater llel •w,rk fill) fill) Cinemax (fit) r:alavislon fill) RAlnhnw r,y-I,rr-view/IncAl Sports TV) ( II) l.,s ve'laa Live rn1,11c S*ih-crlptton Network (fill • Comhoelte will. other prn•lrnmmin•l ,Inh ofq,ortonitles (•^•rAniwl.l Ifralhrr nA.lAr (Ter 1 Itarke(p1Ace IfTI Ill) epanlnh W we Community nulletin nJ. feranl-sh)(Tier (Tier 1 1 Tfbatlpn t:ulde n^faa p° till CATV grogram CII,le (Spanlall ) 1'flcr 1 (Tier I Ccamaunity Dnitetal Itnnrd (tI) ,lob Orrort,mltlew fillilptin"Guide Duar•l CATV I',cal 11cwa/Illgltal elw+rta Are,ln,l Town Cnldr Gilt► Ififl CATV pcogiam Guide I og lucai Oclglnatlon eeh,s,inle (Tier 1 Flight Sche,leles ITler t lwmt rl:1.$:-rr.•I•Ititstv"lert•; ne Lath" !r R lilt ,w.e Theater NettmA ,lavlslon fit 1'1)' me "Off tee fIF ravre/%olden 01d1.•tr Inemax rentos Feel—kales (rAY-rrr-vlewl 111 11111 f.11,llolht (p-',Y-Iwr-view► fill) (III lay Cable flit) ruters MIT Ile Movie Channel 1•ti Iv,w t too (1 S 1 19�I+er1 me (21 program Cutde/Time No!nNIM I1► •lanlclral nullrtin Doanl•l2) Crime rrr•venllon Poll let I" nnara• f)1 it) •,J,Itc Llhrary nolleUn t!oard !south Amerlcan Newswire •hilt -ethnic nullettn Ikrard• jt1 W Coawunity Fulletio Hoar.)• (1) llnvie G„ide nlack nulletlnDoard, 1l) 1 (11 Ne l olhhor hoof ll 11na[.1• ,enlor citizen Dnllrtl„ nnard• fll .tob Dank • Frlen,ily City nullrtin Board" Ill Cultural Arts nullrtin PoarJ• revernmrnt n„1 l.t Ill 110A1r.1• Its) 1 i i ) County Slate Gnvernmrnt nnlletin 11n,rd• 111 i 5hoppina 1:n1de• Itlds Alley Dulletinnoar,11 Clvll nofenae-rmer•lwno•Y rrl,le 1111 tilt) .tewlsh Telegraphlr A.Ir,nry• nulletIn Ikwrd•11t1) Toler Is* and Cnuvenllon F.lucational n„tletlr nna►d (4) (1) • C„m)l%sltr With other 1•I4,grAsm'" FIGURr 1 (cont.) Pay TV Programs i 1 t i local Programs - Automated SIX STAR NIEf SfNi CARL..VIS1011 or miAMr, tuc. lone Theater Network 11 1 'Inema* fill (i l ;nowt toe (illt :),I -TV CalavlRlon• fill Jill The llnvie Channcf Jill 11,r"e now off ice rns Pay cable (when nvallnhlel ray -per -View (4) fill (,ports, theatre, mo+les, fill vocatIonaII • Corrsite with other Progra"ml"1 program Gu1Je_ II 1 II 1 Nealher/Time Rnllctln Ronrd/ .lob Raoik Itll Grocery Shoppinq (till fill) Vacation Travel lilt) Real Estate Review It Anto t.eaae purchase Jilt"I 1lovle Preview* n it lintel Service (Ill) fk!,aage Service (till 11oSpltal Service . e,)"poslte with other progrnmminq e VISIINI CABLE of "AM, I've- Ilome nor office Jilt) Shout i ine lilt) Cinemax The Movie channel Jill) Galavlslon Jill) fill) Front now 110me Theater Network (till nockefeller Center Television• lilt) public Sobserlber Network• (�111 play Cabl± 111) (Till Reuters inR • When avallabie f IT 1' Ilelp Wanted �0► Access Bulletin Board 121•h Goverment n 5clwol Lnnch Message Board• Board of Education Message Roard'Jt i Co�"nity Message Board& it 1 P""Iram G111tte (it) - swap t chop Jill Radar Weather (fill MIam1 News Reuters Racing Re,ults JITI) (tV► CompArlson Shopping • Compo,lte with other progrnw"•Iml .ulnugprill�,,�i�i,r,�l it1 . 1RF: 1 (cont.) .rn:rn rnit: rlr rrrnTrr tll:+flr twllnried 1•rtMraws - Mttowatell r r�hP.r r`\`� � 1tt•: rtrr+ltr 1Mal.h^r - (Till II Ilrl 'Jews (Fnrri'inhF Reuters News a'"stockk l stock ItarPl(Y'lilt News (SP•rnlvl\y Crier t) IIOAA weather (Tier 1)) 110AA Radar now .tones Newt; and Stocks 11710� III ITler III women•s Channel force Tune 121 (lie (110 — — -- -- - -- - Inral Orlginatinn I'll Cathollr Television It) (11 %lack Fir'rlda I" rrnatlonal unlversllt)1 fovernmentlAccessslll/Crime watch Ill rrogr..•1fill) fit) rrogtAms of the Americas (11) .Irwlsh Acres" St•;+nlsh local OrlrllnAlion 1111 I111ml wrlmcn I.I.cal Reltglous (it) I:mcrgeney nhw•raf Ion Center (1 1 l+arie Colmly 'rhool hoard 1\rlglnaritivlIc Access Inflation %ration iTT) III) Lll/rary AccPan (1 I (I I.hmtns The Nlsml t) fit) Dade Scifool Channel (1 ) hearing lmpared/Seniors r00 Ic Access + Americsble meal Orlglnatlon 1 1 fltaml Together Ileaox Arts/Classic 17ovins ill' (iTT) N,Amt Cloy Government (/) 11 l Crime watch ISecurel (iT) University of Niamt fit) Comm+n+lty Access (ill) Incsl rrorirammin•/• NIam1 Cultural N.F.. Edgewater CImw+InitYArcesss I.Itlle I,avans C,,mominity Iitli Alfnpattah Commf\nity Acce"s fill) Manor rark Commanity A!c'fr-pewsrlunity Afrft)5 Flllson - Little River Coconut Grove Co1s•unity Access Ill (ill) Fiagaml Commfo\ity Aeeens I Telchcalth Assrx71111es IT fia•le S-hools trrS • coxlponitc. with, flNher proflramminft •Ir;•Ill TFr.t: t•rr7ua11\:R•rn+N 1 'he tkmlen•s channel (Tt113 RMA Cnior Nether Radar (ll'lll it Spanish I.anquAge Service (illy :FF. Spanlsh Newswire ITTil. lashington City News Service fitly touters News -Views Ittty Ire Newswire itt/t loll Spanlsh Newswire (fill larket nnrl Fconomlr Report Ipt ) No. Newsrabic (1V t how`innes Cattle ?I'-wq (IV I Nnntelpnl Accf•s•1 M• It 1 Educational Access 14)• I1 1 Tele-Cable ulsrano-fliaml 11 Spanlsh r+tbllc TelPvislun It ) Friendly city, ao1) ronvenl loll A'-ccss• IT / (111) Tn+►rleM Convention rontersillil Conference and small Rusine"s ttl'pnrtunities (111) international Trade t crmmerre/City Ln Venture Executive News Rel'Ort till) (1V ) i rrmmnidad 111epanA Ill 1 fit 1 t'nunty covernrrnl Arvens• ^.tote rovernment Af,cegs• fit ) City of Niaml rollre l+rpartment fit i Rids Alley/U+flna Mllrern• iII / rlorldA !:taste/Reglvnai News 141amI r,II 1••O- (I'11 16 Narrowcast/The 111 thllti-Ethnic ArcPss• 11) N-Part Access' (1) Mack Access• Nelghl+orhoofi ilnrrowcast Access' 11) senior Clfiren Access• 111 Ilf+man Services Access• tlomen's Access• Ittl► till) Interfaith Access• (fill Jewish Access• Archrllocese Access' lift) cult11rai Arts ACf•ent• Ile 1 too 1 ronsllmer Access• At kite TrAck • Cf„III"slte with ffthe► If111r11Jmmin•' FIGURC 1 (cont.) Automated Programs - - Video Local Programs CAM-Ir of IltnMt. tin'. Six $TAR NIRIX,hN Or MIAM1,-- - CARt.fVl,If*$ 111) Women, Channel IIP1 I.atin Newswire (1V1 till It11 News Vlrw/Sps^l.h News e +ort R 1 (1111 (III) IIPI Ilewen Financial Felre lAt flews (11) (ill) Flnn++cln1 .•took/Ulnwncial Report Iltl tx+w Jone+ IIPI Short. till) sien•. Channel IIPL Flor{•Is hews __----'`- -- till ---�--`-----Inatinn llsh Local Oriq Eng •1 Origination It / (I 1 It ) ___-------"--- ramilr Features (11) Spanish I.oc• (ocel Origlnatton N�,ighhorhood lnatlon• nrlq It 1 Ilcarfng Impared s,I TheAter (III) till) Ilarnllcarl'" Local l.o cal ,rlginatlon lash) (Eng if ) (11) S p+rt. pane Skills ACCC89 (ll tint, 111 It 1 1 nn 111) Rtack vles Vf.lon CRl+le Mo S wnish) Vlalon Cable Movies ( p till (i 1 I',overnment Efi+catlonai Acce+s 141 Ii Ill l on tit) (t) Publfc Access Access 1�21 (t ) I1 1 Pu1.1IC ACCC9tI . Cltlren� Access (till government Educatlonwl Access Ill (11) Senior pate Rafe Accr.. Ill till) till) Rellglnus Access It11 Itt► College Access Iwllce ACee.. (till Medical Access- Senior Citizen Acce+s' Fire Access Access (till It / Llbrerr R1wck Acce... Access* 11 1 with other prowl rawrsin4 111.paniC a Composite a Composite witl+ other progrewming s o.� P W i.�, dwr 711P1�cI� �R��1���: i i �_ FIf:URE 1 (cont.) _ other /,owswrl ---*ss Ihtserved for restore mull, TIAX •C01n11111fCATitt'IS Attt:wlt•till.r for tutcrarr. Itldlll System nnintennnce 121 Dates IFI Text Retrieval 12) (IV and Pay) South Pfferrican TV Ireltroa•Icastl fill) rnrce Tuninq 121_ 111 Channels listed: 19 local slatlons 4 pay cattle almuicast 1 rlAy Cahle (est. 1992) 1 CAF14 - pending for lltc bltrrt S Satellite services ol�4"l Television: pD DISCO 1a`hrk. GifestyleS, NntionsI Classical Network) Reserved for the future S 2 Channels Ion A-1 cattle) Incltwllnq 1 clnnnel for Ir39",1 tourlsl grllrle Into. 7Chnnne19 On A-2 rahiel 1] on A-1 cattle. lnclttrlln•f 1 eh. for low-110i"Cr TV 1 eh. for pay -per -view rI•Hr.fS�S'1t11g '11An1 lnstltntlonal nusinens l'hant,c)S fill/ f thw••e et,slne•ss Mta � Rentern Information Retrieval 12) 1 Time Sharr-.1 TnlldOn 141 Tclidon information Rrlrleval Encore 1�) nroadcasl{n•t 1►rpenl fill TV 11 CltannO g listed: 18 Inr-al stations 4 satellite services (NFMwroer"'1O• JISA1., Disco Network, 11l.sic Chnnnei) nnlshl 2 Short wave (rnglielt, Sp I Cnuntry (118llel 1 Conwmtnity 'rllo 1 public Access 1 Government Access St,anish hrrD'Inn►1o11 = ) i011 k tcLoc rnate Laewlorl1 1 Talking l"'ItS 2 Channels' ton A-1 cable) • 1 Is tenSnd Local Spanish 9 Channel S lot: A-1 cnblel wages (llenrit,q imparett prorlrase1irvil It) fill aunty h►terconnect Id••u Cnnferenrinq I0 IF.xp-serv,TTT) hOp-at-Ilnwwl 17 Chanuela llstcrl: 19 local stations simireo F1 irs, rest paytservices lated ealld TVlnetwork& 1 ilk-1 imroal simulcast I Spanish 1•ubllc Access t F.drwrntkon/nlecet 1 Educational Access I Airport Traffic 1 Airport Traffic 1 Tallcina nooks import.a Services IWFRr-Chlcarro. t RnC. Voice of Amnrlca, ♦ VP.11- llaltil - - --- J - 7 Channels lot, A-1 cahlel Includes 2 comlw,slte with other progrnwwlnq at" for tewSed addressable 2 Channels• IMt A-1 cahlel Reserved for hlglt re interconnect,' ft,rers j reserved for county Iwtllce needs lE Oilier Six STAR RIEf.SOR igm visiI t*Ant.r or tlrAtlt. 1MC. IIA CAn1.rvigt( i or IMI, 111c. Mattel Piny Cable rrofeaslooal r.lncatlon (21 Fsll-Data 121 llot.e hank i ng Redlcal Records Retrieval Rnnicipal Traffic Control Utility States ttonitorinq Continrinq ralncatlon 121 Ihnaan Services LOW Speed Uata (2) tligl, Speed nata 121 2A Channela lletedr 25 local stations ) satellite services INEMT-Chlcogo, nleco Network, (,.cx+d t.lgtening Mualcl I Channel (on A-1 cable) ? Channels 12 on A-1. 5-on A-2 cable) rler v - Sd teletext channels rler VI- interactive 5ervicesr now .Zones Data Bank KnIght-Rldder Data Dank nankinq/shopping/polling (1982-8)) interactive Gases 419831 11owe Education 1)) (19831 pay -per -view tlovles (19111) ray -per -View Sports 1198)) 46 Channels 11+t0dt - 28 local stations 1) slrwnlated stereo :ervleesvislon networks and pay 2 shortwave signals Mondon, South America) 1 citizen nand 1 HOAR Weather 1 service for the vlenally hanlicapped IIChannel foe -A- 1 cable) 22 Channels (4 (,n A-1 cable, 18 on A-2 cable)' 0% 1 a (I 1 �NI�911111���� qi ii I I FIGURE --- - -to SpCTirnJ G: U11'AI. 1•It11GR111t11lK:to fecal Profra0 Pr•lthoetion l:q+llism nt awl r„cllitles �rl+rlt*AOI.r W. •:1'1; r1 if St,nllo located at header.! St+,•lla w{11 nlso I,n „sed for access I•rndnct Mn ,in,tion C { t and (t.il,erty Y 2 r•m•+tP LIt11P IL.v,11a1 for SI.0111VI1 origination aml oilers Total COntst I momin StuAtO e?lr)lnnn 00 160.000 2 ltrmnte SU+dios In,onn 1 tk.bllP Van 12,000 2 rot till+,cks Total $172.nno • St.etin locations detcrmfne•1 by ""'Is Exclusive access con s, j flnblle Vans �160,OOn• IfI,00n 16 r„rtnpacks Total 2nf1, n00 • lent not listed sper•lflealiy. Intl i,wllcatcd as ',a,•••' or P.ptivalen► e•11111m.ent OF remote %t11d{na• Rr••t1l' •rl'r.F f:••;tp:+lt+^t.: t•Nif+ —`------ _-- Studio for a►ed {n the Vicinity n! 1 St.r.11o•I !.rated al I(nlgi,t C••u►e+. 27th Avenue and 7tb Street N.tt- Cnroant Grove Fire ':till lou, 1.It11P 6 o will alas be used for 1,,vana. Liberty City. pills Centers and ccess Prc•dnctinn acce a 1•ro•luctlml Sll,dlns At the Cd,tcatinnal Total Costs, 1•.,rla C,mtsuoicationn Center I meal Orlglnallon Studio S40Q.000 150.000 • Stlrli.r4 will also let uvPd for acres-1 I tlohlle Van _. -. - 1"04111.:t inn g750,000 Total Tnlal foals, 1 S:ta•lio Facilities '115,000 i tM,bilc unit .• 6 C.••.t••rnily lrndortlnn 192.000 ('enters Is0,000 2 r,.rta/St,sllos 1 ".,,ter Cnnlrot and FArllitlea 27,000 t playback (•,•nlral a11.1 Remote elayh,ck Facllltles 59],500 Total $1.577,500 to All local ions and egnilrm,•nt arr 1 he same as for lot•a1 origi,l.1t1•,n (al,nvel i' • Nlll share the I,x:ai orlglnatlnn 1 etlsllel►`Is6161 stlMllo and 1,r„v1,ll, !lain I/.1Y, f1.:Farlone and N.f1. 9th AvennP S ,ix',f,01C."'e,l _ gill slso provide sludlns st Si access locationq I:xc►ns1 •r a,•eesn cc•s►s, accr"s !"'I'lln S� ]"+. ^ nt rai A,., -pill ll„IrlleS alto 13n, SOuth Access 110. ,#nth Access St.nllo Studio Aece"l 121 110. 60. p„rth o FIRM" FIRM" ACCP9,1 Studion s F,c111ties 90. lh,tlielrsl Access Co11eg,` Florlds lles„rinl IS Access Stud{oil (,,.,,M1„fl{►y viewil,•I nr1.1 fcnters110, Iy Or►gi.natlnn Arceas fWtooAtP.l Ola{ lI151 ISO gystems (Itrybnar.lsl i•,w Power TV Trap+sill. mI 15 Ego I I=nl 1 7 0 00 ono nnn Ono - 000 i non i non i! ,nnn ,nnn .One , non 0.000 o,nn0 1, uoJ mess T.,f -1 $1,117,�,30 oil IInIl I�IIlIIU�IIIIIl1l'i „ .i'.n'x .. WIN : .�1 �i '� , I ARI.F of nlA — CIGURI: Six FTAR i11F.1« 111C . —�— —� or H1AHi. — co"I.F.Vis1/1N �- cast eldr. Of ---�--_ ,, on the Stu,lto ^care twecn N.N- ►Jth Ue - iNC 1^rated et the neW librarY ect Aaemle N"N. 7th ►tth gt[eet Il.e and N.M. Street 11sed for acceee focal ppGP11MN ,,0t A6 P— !O►J R: t sECTf —�`_ llv"'e^ • 5U14 Pr^' the Cultural for access 1^ ne Oaed studio Will being aged [or noc i rogrN Pr«f�tlon fl1 ,'�st P lttes Stu•110 will also use only Wien ortginal►on • . arid well COwtwf • Total l,.o. CostsT •total t111,10 • ort`Jt^atlon 5 prdl^/ ion Center. s960.334 90,000 1 i,ncal , Center • , ►taster Centro Unit iactittr 220.000 Facility i while PcI1TJuctlon --�_ •. rdit iq rewmt^ Truck Total S1.270,134 Total cost" not Ind►cated odituces ital exile Jt QR caP ► total nation snd .. 1,,th local orlg for access fartllltles ��.� ed for the _ - -� "-�- a local to•1 a unctions Prnvld access st1N1106 ............... in,lieattnne` and ro+ld.nl Ix1r- accer Nelnh „access costs • Fact • ►40 if,1•ent. and ofr I Pnbllc the VleWin!1 Clowere and 5tud f JKceea Studios Units 2 while tro.luctloc ratio^ Cecile .. Pta111ct/nn hood Access costs, _ Public Access g100,000/Year -" iacllttles iwcluwloe aeeess $600.000 scant -- - -- •• Access 5t11.11oe tc 2 llnbl1: VI'leo Raw'^ �70.Ono Total g.000 Truck 10 Color Mnn(tors 40, ewl CaAera O000 ate{d {lltures Cts m/tIncltalexle^ • ol cap atlon and k+ C gleorortaparrreneratore with local , for lee .hsracte St.oss.000 access tac111t1ee Tot it ' . II IIP 1 ! III i 1�Tc:UR : t (Cont.) fltPq► Tta.l:.l•I.ratl••Ill'h?Il/tl•i '. - _.. 3U4 . . _ _ - - ttrlglnatlort atlll In L.cnl g 51? /,, T12,OOn 1,SO�.00tt. `- 3 Coal•ltwenc n.-c�s* rrcxl, a,w•in•t 7T,000- i , O.00n g,100.nnrn _ _ _..- t11N1A�� S0e.000 1.191.000 - -- ---- - . 1 ,ernt{n•1 R -- - (55.000 _ _ -- year 1 y..ar S -' - - - - run-time g Full-time g part-time part -titles =� year In .• part-time, Full -llWe .. pare-ttme is 10 Fu11-tIN - g part-time y ------- 1 part-t1me41 lq Ag FulI-tim• •• na[t-time .• part -lit" �0 Full-time ernMt l {twent Slnl[ C _--' T F,t11-time e Part-time lS Full -lima 0 rarl-time AS Full-time A6 Full-time ehllal posit • 2 Par!-N,, 1 t{me !„tnitlon-41 l Flail-' year 1 16 Full-time a Part- tlwt time tw. • g talc' .aItlogin F' year 1 16 Full-time aM c•plal t l Fu11-ti-•t• Pn~itlnn with be filled yt'r[ S year In • A Pert- lime ►--it time {„trltMn .. Same l.onitlans way time nta([ _ -- Full- tart- _.. ..- - - - 2's iMttars Perk......Pttlgrotltn_'i s0 116 - - ailY uthur 160 Total - --- -- - _--- --' - _-- 401 -•— -..._ _•- - _ - tt{• to Sol - --"— et hiltxatrl rercent+tge o[ Pu'9��:N1uc�lon 1►ssi s[ancc � . I I � � �._�.+x*i -x +r .�•<::� PI!1�i �I,Ii! iqiI � " ,:r .r��n . tt .. i I,ip � "'R�� ... N FI(:URr 1 (cont.) Commitment al origlnatlon and Access Prograsminq oierstinnq dw12et tear 1 year 1 Year S Year 10 Staff Commitment year 1 INntrs«Per IteeR of 1..0._Prow 3"n_inq Produced locally other Total Percentage of Padget Allocated To access ��isnnel F�o�lucE�on h"sslsEance --SIX STAN NIF.I.S(111 V151p11cAnt•C OF t1TAf1T, Ttu-- CA11MV1510" or MTA"T, tvw'. _ S �t,aeo 559,000 0�8.000 1,211,000 5 Full-time 6 Part-time• I• Part-time l5 Full-time 21 Part-time 21 hull -lime 21 Full-time 24 Part-time • 2 PArt-tism positions equal 1 Fall -time positlon I S 100.000' t,t74.000 2.264.000 2,671,000 5 Fall -time to part-time" 60 Fnll-rime le rare -else 64 Fall -time 22 Pert -time 67 Flat 1-time 24 Part-time • 2 Part-tlso positions equal 1 Fall -time pnsitlon vI( uRn. 1 (cont.) PMvielons fnr Minority rro•lrammlng I :.ill 1'It '.1n.1: I$1' Ia•t:'�Tf C 111 \III • t rrrm+tc @todlos • 1 Spanish local origination studio in Little ttavnna 1 "lock l/x.at origination studio In tMl black cr.m+alnity • St$silo rmployres from th•• local .lrea tY"I.I.S;\' ".It!; fit Atli • $R.StI fund Over Tire of frat$ci$Ine for minority ptnnrammin•t And training projerts • 111nority trievlsion prothlctlon traininn program rapitai chats to facilitate I -veal minority channels. Approxif"At..•IV SIr.0,0n0 ral•Ilrl outlay per channel. total .rust approaches SI.RN • $1.iti commitment over life of fraorhlae to pfircl$ase a satellite opllok as part of A sOurcr Of national minority nronramminq • Fnndlnn for staff posltloos within the c-mm•lnlly pro.lramminn department fnr c••-•+rdinators or "lack. Spanish. and women', programminq Affi11a11011 will' Itrr to provide local black programminq to the "ET art v.+rk • Trlldon Input terminals at numerous min..rlty or•lanlzations rommn)lly pro•lurtlo$$ centers In severnl prodominanfly minority fir 1 gl.l.orl"toda • :tt$dln L.ral Ions In (+nth I.Atln and "lark nrl•il$I+nrl$rto.la • cnm+mtnity or1.11nAt Ion I•olnts at nnmetons minority or••.n12At1Ons Mrmhers of minotlly groups on every Advisory board effectlnn local pr.••Irnmminq • binital services time-shared In Iwo a ... i s^me!Imea fhtre IAngn�grs • r••mmonily vlewlnn -enters In every minority rrmwnnity rrogramming deparlmrut hiring pt.tclices whl.•16 will endeavor to .!turd tT.n regolr<•ments lrnfit tnardt #IIAlil TI:1.1: r'rrU11�IJ11-:r1.1r1f:S will estnblinh a vorntlntrt Tralninrl rronram for the We- ad•rantaged, eammltiinq S50.01`0 onnnally for 5 years will provide ;panlals roblie Televls1011 with $100,000 l...r year for administratly- no:1 p►rgramminq cost+ will estahllsh A ruilural Arts and Fthnlc Iteritaq'• Fuo.l to dlsborse ornnts local l {fill al+out over the tire or franchise will provide SS0.000 In scholarshllrt to Miami Area college" • will provide jolt an./ skills training at convenient locations thlouyl$ottl the city to maximize the Involvement of minorities In pto.trant prraluctlonl • will provide Florida Memorl+i J College with ttolh a Fit tadio And trievislon arresa pn,•luctinn slodlow is will prnvl•le sl+rr.fali-e.1 progrnmmin$l 1 for specific a+Nllenres, drdlcnte chnonelA to minorlty interests And Insure the accesslhlllty of prntluatlon tool@ to minority wean of the city Will produce prngrAtria Inn of Interest In ••Inorltio4 Hill (ncornnrale a Ann-•rn•Ir organlzAtlou to determine the pollcien And handle the Administration Of Ill@ IN11)1le areess aetwor►. will /un:l with $125.000 for year 1. $115.duo for year 2. S241n.6On •or vear 1 will$ a 7'. Inr$...$sr +• b s•a•rre!+Ivr y.•ar will egoll. a Commttnlly rrlath.n Andltorlum At the Nlomi-h.$.le t'ommunity College Ilrw Ih.rld Center Cami•ub will plovfile to Regloual At•crns ranters, live community Viewing Centers And 911rs on. the Installot iollai grtw•otk with Intl inlrr.$rtivr. rapahilily V nl.t !:V1: rr.tlt: lit Alit System dc3lgn all^••Ing narroviceetr- t,r ly inn nloorlty ncight prednminate r+r- hoodn • rlagP of tolticulturrl signal crr televl.,,on of Torrent^ , inn front �I,�nish lanmta9e progr. Wm !:onlh .r,Nl 1 �ttn Alrr•rlca • Incin.lt,n ^t the t+„m,•n'+ Channel (nntnlxl • Sl.ft1 Ille of f raniovnivcment`t aimed at minority Itllaml Trn(r•Ih�•r) • A news pr-doctlen Pr^'(ram or Ill InatIng at r,1,110 t:tatlon ttnnA • 4 remote Telldo,r "P„t terminal At local minority newspapers • A minorlly busto iness enterprl"" adminl,•lrition 'uslnce slnvolvcme^tetine minority tor•al pro,jrnnm,ing •nitY • th,nernus Ioeltl^-n° In the Comm prorirammin, department • A commitment to In"olve lY al Mark ^r,lanl slit (^lie in c I,rograrwlnq ettnrte • j In le or it t.hannels dedic tcI pf'ng part " minority I, Ll tlrlltre •rrrr. r . ,;; It I�iIII�lIVI I FIGURC 1 _ (cont Troalslvn�� MIn=rl� Pro9[en"�lna III III�I!Ill i ll''II'I' I"I'II'II�'! "�i l� �l��llll!I!p!�I lu!i Ill ilq j�l��llll IIIP n r alit .. Vis"Ott C,IAI.F. t1F Sit ST1tQ NiF.t� rttt rpC. �.• — -- ChRt.s:VtSt01r t1F MtrWt • --__ !�— Public access p,llcles and • Procedures descrlbed Public access potieles and e.lulpped access ' escrlled . Fully started and r,reelures d.• studios located 1n Minority communities $eparate Incsl Orlylnatlon Channels for Clack, r,atln and 11.11 appeml proVr84MIr9 • .111 offer lalevlslon, slack ntertal '.'at TP1rviAlolArl, theta and i d Rt" tnte[natlonal Network, lhP 1lnmvn's Channel /•CClA7 will encourage the Public pursue Corporation to ayrPsslvely Mlnor llY lnvolve,rent lty laity will purchase �"lii1elFawllyy Movie Pro,luctlon� fo[ Channels It1eA 1n the involve Plans to resMnAtbl from pro,lraw advieorY development nish) Ca[r1aQe of Ch, 21-MLTV (Spa • service on all tiers o[ Pall inIn cable Mlawitenlevision dlne ternshlPs tclU • [or all residents o[ Minority groups • Estat+llelrwent of a Career training Center to Provide cable o[ieratloM experience. $350.4 itted to thel $IS0.n00 annually cva+s Center on t1,P • qlr [Owt:aAl lank fee[vIce AubAc,lber network • 21 Vlewln•1 Centers In wlno[It.y communities redln4 Oott• FMployMent PrncticrA went and Ftaleral re.lnlrexme , Ut F FIGURC 1 (coat.) SMT14111 la rMn O it:ir RRTI:S Rate /aaranlee Msic 94rvlre Ma+lhlr R.ltes ►Irel Ittltlet 0 +••t.l:lr'dlif: its, t;1•1:1Tlaf 111.•Itt t7+1'1`.11l;1l:II:IY Ilt!•tlt i 11.1lib 'fF.K4-VW'.•loll! tvi;Pof 14. r.taranlettii lent It vemtl•letlon of nygt•-m Clearanfred for l yrarn from rlatc of ruaranter"t nntlb rnwpfetfnm oil wistew conntrnctInn /ran.hlgr award congtrttctiom ryntem r.wwpfrtlet" projected In legv Man 74 Month-4 Tier 1 (N cha.1 Tier it (59 chS.l Tlrr 111 478 Chg.) Tier IV 1104 chq.$ Tier t riern ff. Itt S tv rlet 1 The ttnvie Channel C.1invieton Tlern 1f 6 111 The ftovle Channel (:aiav(glon Tier IV nravo Ilnme Theater Mrtwtrk Laq Veynn Love I' 1 nrmnw ralaviglon Nrmv! Pox Moor" Shoot Irrw The Movie Channel 11.,y- rer-V (rW S.tme an regIdrnt1 1 rree 511.95 $12.95 $11.95 rr••r- S 5.nn $14.95 $14.95 S 9.95 $ 9.95 S 4.q5 $ 4.95 S 4.95 S '1.95 S 9.95 S 9.95 S 9.95 S 9.95 Variru lien 1 (12 rho.1 r►ee_ tier if (4S citq.l S 5.95 lier 111 (77 chn ptuq cl+olre of nnyt fill A) - 1 np(lon pnckarle S 7.4s (IIi RI - 2 optlen parkagen 5 5.7O fill CI - l opllon packnges $ 9.70 TI^r W- "reclom Interactive Wilfrx.il ! 1."; Tier 1 Free Tier It llrt III - m Rny option rabination S 5.95 Tlrr IV. 1•rrmlltm intrractive Ad -lit Innat S l- l'omr Theater Network S 1.95 Tome Ilex office $ M.95 I'Inemaw $ 7.91. Come Row office plan Cinemax $14.95 i.aq Voga1 $ ".So rhowtime $ 8.95 calavIAtoll S R.95 nalnl+tirr S 5.95 "to 1lnvir Channel S 9.95 Pul.11e Snbncrlpt love M.•I.n.►R $IS.Ont Premier#- flf avallable) S 9.45 • Trn1 at t nr• price Rolen quhir.•t to ne-oot tat ion aorl of 11 .irrrml on tint le1 % and servireq req•tir-J. Typlral roctq: In%tallalinn - at vnnt r 11"nll+ly R.+l•• - lrt outlet SIS.nn 2n.1 nullel $)n.no Ir.l tr11f let S 5A0 A,W1t hm.il S 4.00 Tier f f211 chm.(f Tier ff W chin-11 Tier ftt $Pt ehm.b Tier IV 11191 chro..tl Tier f Tier t't Tier. fit Tier IV llomr• Theater Metwnch tine Lation Rravo/golden, Otdtes floors M•+ Offire t:ntav(a(on chnvtime C l uemalt The Mnvle Channof ray -per -Vies S 6.95 1 r71 fM+t lrrrlljiaterl S R.95 S 1.9% S 6.95 S 6.95 S S.95 S 6 95 S 6.95 S 6.95 S A.95 Vanes Iletrrmtne.b now 0 pert vvvvrreQ ba-fi• 8 r• I� t R!: 1 (Coot-) RATES SF.I.TIOti Lt PROPOSED --- Rats Guarantee 0afic Service RbnlhlY Rates First outlet WItlannl Outlets SIX STAR Nirl :1*8 cnnuhvlslo" or ttiAttt. Int'.. Cuarenteed until cowPletlan Cr systew constr,rct lan Tier 1 124 CIO*.)$11.00' Tier tt 147 el,a.1 Ins data Tier 111 (IR,wwcl, C11aacresR) 517.00' • lnclltdes monthly converter Fee $2.00 nil Tiers $ 4.95 Mint Pay t $10.50 (h,e Service $18.00 Two Services $21.00 Three services $ 3*n0' Pay -Per -event Pay -Ter -use • Avera.te R,dscriber Ne.lot late.(, nP to Sot reAnetinn VtSptll CAIIIA. or IIIA"t. IIIC. r,taranMcd until cowPletlon of systcw construetior. Tier 1 124 cl,s.) Free* $ 0.50 Tier It (16 Cho.) $ 0.50' Tier 111 (50 Clio.) $ 9.50 Tier lv 112 Clio.) Tier V 412 chs Plus Teletext)512.95 Tier vt 1T'letextchs lend $14.95 inter3cttvel • see 'converter Deposit' Free Tier 1 $ 1.00 Tier It $ 4.00 Tier tit $ 4.50 Tier lv $ 6.95 Tier V $ 7.95 Tier V1 $ 1.95 Rowe "Itorrice $ 7.95 Cinewax $ 7.95 Sl,ovt 1 nee g Tit, tluv ( e Channel 19: 00 Ally TWO rhove 12q.71 Any Three Al,ove $26.80 Any lour Ahevr $ 6.00 r�►nv19ton Network $ 3.95 Itowe ThrAter Front now Pub11c sul,scrlhrr Network $lll.nQ $10.00 1leuters 1111 S N.On Play cable Not Imllentp4 VII If 43 :L FIGURE 1 (cont_)---- -- - -- _ rf• ffIF'it# ' �� . •-.. _ hpl.l' lot t.l l':r7t lr 111.\111 r a ..r.r>• - -•--_._.__•...._..� ..�._ -... --- -. S„ rj 11i1:1•Ir --_... _ _._. .. - -• - _• _ - ---- •------ --'- -- 52�. tie Tier t 519.95 ;;; z�, - ----- --_-_ $21.95 Tiers tt. tT f 4 tV z --__ _ _�— -- --- --- Sn9.95 Tier i Tier, 11 IV 16 itl -Prrtelutn interncl [ve S19.9: S24.5 "nit Otte-T{� Cb�rW s Tlnrs if, 11/ L IV Tier 11 !� 11i Sln.nn• tier Tier it. !ft L IV f installation - t'Iral ('utltet Ilr+1 Indicated Tiers 1. -Premlow Interactive $lt,9i• Free If lnela[led with first gtltlet Tier 1 111 iV Tier Iv Installed with Initial - rnttlet. 519.9; 1f later r installation - h.1,11tlona Tiers 11. Installed nt the sar�t• • pale Installat:lon, later $9j95 - Free {f nnt- lncnllnn as the first ell a ane_tlnrr• 1 r�eminntlof clwrq- t{ere or $21.95 If different mow• these rates Ict. Tiers [, it R Ill tree with the Instalintlon of "Cie If inter -hay TV _ tree when ov,eirtl16,OOt•Iftrlatterasie able service. 59.�5 Instalint"ns Service. S Tier IV _ Free St5.On Non- T1.•r 11 575.00 Convert1r I/nlrtrslt'- Tier Ill sito-on Tier iV $15.00 Hr.t Itrtficntett Tier l 521.95 Tiers it. tit. 11I flat ttaticatett NeltKatiun 421.95 Tiers It. tit. iV nectrnnect ion t tln•re Theater Hetwork-free On »•Tlcrst ` IV It ti Inst19195 It latcrnw! Bravo/r-Iden OldScs" time e9rTiert ` fV it Installed At 1 il-S14) if later J rr Ail other services- to±t+ OD on Tier t 0.IV- 540.00 one-time or I si.25 fnr 16 r•cmther Slo.no Vacation Oisconner't/neennnCCt day', FI .,;RE 1 (cont.) p1w_Tlt_e Char es Lutslletion - first outlet i lnstailstion - f\ddltlonal outlets i i installation - Pay TV Convertor Depnelt i Relocation tteconnectlon 91R Finn N1F.I' cnnt.t:VISMI t1+' I11><ftl. 111C. $29.95 All Tier" tied S19.95 If later 011~Tier"lrsl ootlet. Free if installed with nnslc Service. $15.00 if later Nnne VtSIf"g CAnT.n or IIInMI. file. d t $40.00 Tier g29.95 Tier It IV. V ' VI $14.95 Tlere It, ,lot 1/xlicated Free For Tler t only. a conVer u[ter for regnlred that can be Pc $40.00 or leaned for $2/month for 22 months. A repair Service contract is available for S1.50/month Not Indicated Not lndlcated FI-GURC. I (cont.) Rk.11" ant, 4 ""N"S TVIX M19 non -cable prr"Itictinng $So/linitr mobile VAn S5o/11-mr. Ina/llav v.11tinq S2%/hcl%lr Poe cable n1..In•aIon-1 Fre,I rrve T!Fotillct. For "ales n1070tiRt" and el by rtj Ito 2S/1,OUF van $ 95/hu'lT All. TI— C.)r.t det-rolned personnel III r Rm I bi IS/boor Edith" 0 S 520.00 40.00 Use Pfc,"allIal ma PlAce 6-10 60.00 11-1i 16-30 "1"" 31 -4;0 m1plites studio in/hour vall $ 40/hpler • tion o/h,,jr/1-rson ,c 20/livotir co "T "CO.,te Sut ley confl-re"'C' S 10,'Ilol1r /ve I A' irlanninq 6 .;c r Trost l+rahlctlon r.tt I t I -I ri,lia,inq cots rel-at"" IA•`o Channels AM ru II-tIW 0atiml- Ft"'lictm H/C - 20 "I"Itte "t $25.00 0 PrlwO Time 11"po-l"S100.00 .431-SfinnellwAilith m 3)c - .11, vjqjeo Ch.anne I IS t me (w. - 10 ImIllistes q I i. no - 45 Pell"Itt" $ 5.00 4 1 lwlllr 1/2 hour $100.00 t par - 10/11"lly Will dat., clantinel - 6 1 1 - Alit it 1/4 llollr 0-21 I'll" to "I - pre Ion min Olt Ime ver ".in In'? -1-1 t.1 charnel prww, t W"t /j.Irq,11. iIawnIis rrw, Sll/.lr t lw"ow m $12-S"16/-lltI chall,14', qcrernIll-I 1/2 It"low 1/4 1*011T S 50.00 1.0 1nYl .1,1a �fl?-510'01/fflnntli It twilict,"", Pont F 2.0 "'A J:d I t I -I t1ilbbilill unto A Iin lit I/twoor NsI.1111"I Pa- .1..rl .witcht".1 Altillo S?. A fee C'I'llieCt ".11, SInO of $1.00/1000 P-M.ket" fee All I.Arlle" Pill" • C FI�URF 1 - ----- vrstrxr rnrr.r. pr• nrnllr. nlc. —._- - — sr� �tnn Ntr:t.�lxl f111t1.F.VISlrtt1 or r11A11-------- __ r Studio aoa rvoirtent Use e tpn_Cawerclal users Commercial tiger@ 1 /�asea Channel Notes i Fret etual cog, a,u�1L[1V., Free for first S lsinutes, tiler. 11nless 1 for a�lditlnnal ect as a SU1,41d 12Cd Project St111L i0 prod"CtlOn 3I50/hour S150/hoar Studio rotes al.ot production/hol/rhonr R1s'ote proauctlons and $ j0/�ltn-Ixlar -$fg for -SIOo for I.,n,jram rf►MLuCt LOn/ inst[Vctioni relsotr rates pro, ►ml/hunt -SISO for spot -$100 for one hour relwnte production plus — --_—' -----� -- users -free --- Negotiate@ at tlsle of reT1est Non-colw^erel't users SIO/half hour 1,000 ColElverclat per CttstolMtr s FIGURE 1 (cont.) '•over_nwent n_nd Service to t tlltcallnnal rA.-flltles Installation fee• rilwt uAttlet Ikltlltlonal outlet" llonthiy Mte-•---------_ Special Rates, DlScotlnt�._fntereCtive Pat" Ar0:R/1'J►It6f Or I:Rl:AT1:R IMAM 1'ree t•nst rrre • hlslAllatlntl charges may I.e waived darin•I Initial constructIn" and pre+mlt lo"Al prrlods • ftlnlIlly rates on Tiers If. lit, -,nit iV dl"counted 101 to srnlnr cltiTe•ns • holk rates aeallal,let negotlatell haled on nnmher of units • nlscounta for subscribers of multlpl•" pay services. Additional channels discnllI1tcd $2 for marl and $1 for mini • Security Services 515.95/r't+nth. InAlallatlon chartles vary opt Iona lake'+ f•A1tIXSy::TFt11t flfAfif Free cost tree • 1°/ dlsc:null on monthly cattle aervir. cllar'I^ to ill senora and hnndiearla l homel,ol".la • InnialI it tell f^es waive.. during firs) 4n da7s of service to now AI ::a!q St andar.l Inr-laltatton is a 150 {^ol tlfttr. Cemp.lny re"efves the rinht to charge -05t At time a11t1 mate -{all for ntn,ala+lda[d • bulk ralen avallabie to multipl•r dwelllnq bnildilMa • A 51.00/month dlarnant. for tAklnq two or move HAXI pay "ervlcee A $1.00/month discoent for taking Calnvision and the i.At In nuarter package parental rmlttn) 'Irvlces Ova{table for a cnni of materlal refundAhle deltt.V i t fay I.el-vl.•w option avallabtr In Tier i 11 911i,9r1 Iitt•ry Al.rm 11.111 And alarm bozzer :,v.11iAi.le In 111e han.lit•apt"'.1 fol •1 nnr-I IMe Inert al lal ton .-Im r•Ir of c1.Sn is frnitolry Mottle Security Service Available for $8.95 a month and an InntAllatlnn charge of $99.95 If Installed after cahle Installa'nn• S14.95 If at the same time. $ 0 it at ►he same time A" pr.•milm1 1,01era ..five Inst.tllation Sr.l.hl--1 I••a► .1 St•rurIty Servicr•t avallal.le with rates :aIVIllq with 111e of .1 lens taken MAW Tf Ch-lQfil110l11'ATIOtIS Fret - Class Frees + tiers If, itf "na IV rrotldelf Interactive capahlllty fo1l an. athfitlonal M110 Over Itaslc Monthly free Tier" ti, i11 alyl 1V provided text rapabillty for an additlovAl 55.00 over the basic mn11t111;• fee with CD Interactive N ISl discount on Instailatlnn Anil aervlrev for elderly CIII ns 8•1d 1 haml lcapl,wl incept for Tier i, 1.~ terminal f.e waived for initial 60 .lay llerlod Mliorinq activation atyl dur i nrl per Intl 1 c orn..rtt tons • parental collttnl .levlce avallahle for free on all Tiers except Tier t. Tier I •nhsc-illels el+ar'led labor And materials Comint Serve 1 (data h.1ne) $19,95 lnstalle,l. 55.00 first outlet C'mspu Serve 11 at either cost plus ,flit or subscriber" may provide their oyn mlelOcoml.utrr neuters II/R 519.95 Installed $99.95 first nutlet 11111s SiS/rw,ntb n..me Security avallahle with vAry1n<1 option". Charges range f". $49.95 aa.l up for Installation a1tt1 at"1 11p mrtni tt l y 7 r• 1 ur t�. �-jCOTI t 1 ,n—'we"t .and Ce �K1=nai�lt�es InstallatLo^ Fee" Flrst Qntict ^,Idlttonal pullet• Nonthly Pate" Interactive l t!i� et11 t:TPP pIF1-'�N Ci►n1.F.VIQIQN QF Nln„1 • It1C- Free erlals VI .14111 Cwr11',1 QF It1NNtr 1NC- _��_-i l rrce charge uP then at coat to to. rree Tls�e and on, - —� Ill. I for 'Tieca st go free inetallatlwatved for e` aoduc d in IV. V. V1 vice ►a SOt after eer _t � dl�count o[ uP In days for Tter" 1 _ ents nn area installattn avnllat.le to orarti". choutl k-out dEvlc^a`i11at on . inatellatlon r outlet• IV. V. VI o and 11 aye per lens Il/. Is forestm,eAt l Sin .o 1 ".,1c s«r°n a Per trip aV llabte for yi charge avallablet P itlon• lo• geCurltY $e95tjnetallcAc' S250 .00 Security teu tAnd uptinstall $ SI Pon Y S99.95 nthlY but ton 52*eeurtt1 service and upmo "vcca'll lnatailed. . f FIGURE 1 (cont.) RI:C1.10N N:._ _F.MI'I�f1yNF.tIT pItA�TIC1:5 Altl:lllt'A11Lt Or 4.111:1%Yelt NlAlll • I'In�l rwm.lovm"t r>t.portollity alN) At( 1Vital lvc Actlon rl.•�cr lbed • recrnitlnl +ourcen de4Crlbed • rollcle• for using onion lal--Ir deaCT Il,ed • Grlevencc hnndltnq pIrN:Cd,lre4 dc4crlbed • Vietnam VeteransIMieSapleil %pOw*.rrn _IvI,V "ent po deter Ibe,l CAflIX5 V;Tt:113 "'Alit Af[Iresative Ara Ion prorlram d�scrlbcd ' Inc. has mere -1 len�tlTstond .en 1oyC1 Y h' palllly till l,o!h In•Innn AINI Cr•pl0ye• an."C lAt Inns for many Yenrs. NlAtlf TF.LF.-C(N41111MIrRTInN: � I.plei rmployment nhlonrtltnity rroqrows rye F,x�' rr t fie -ter l be,f preetleee deeccllNed ^ }fib ^ gecnlltmeof Will estahllsh no lntelnship pronram till conperntn with 1,31r a -union n fair end equwt r oryenizetionll oo beets with non-af[{Ilate,l cont.cactoro -a t� nr . ll t/ r'T K I r I� 'I !� III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�Iil;lli�i�l I,Ii�II'°j�ji;lii ��p�G* il� .y,.�f''�'i i�i..n. �,��IIPfT „'ICI"_i.P'.jf""'i. ��. I'f �� .. � � :�--� :.��•; M. iq ,.... � � � � � � � � � � � �� I 11 {.,, . mil FIGURE I (cont.) Vl.%lo?l CAPIX OF limill. IW!- Son STAR or MAW. 111C. Opportunity Employment OVI)OTtunity r."4110yor"t Opmr proIrpm dencrilmd I'nI I cy tiescrilC4 . will hire 1001 Of its el"Plo"em locally . will hire minorities In & percentage proportlo..Le to or higher than. the minority reP e ... ttion In the City Of "IAMI I F][G11Rr- 1 (cont.). M-talf. rift'. r !--rrp fill M vor t—Ml will onnitor with flarticillatinn, wherfT llot an'tic"ItIte ppl .jr 3111pt Of he Act flArket,"ll p"VISIons otardards llevelar",,ent if tplvi.�Kt f.cgjfwmil*,, 'if scald- In an4 terminal Tare ,,Vlre thr unitw the AU'rhorl antl,)n of LOW pf'*.-r 1V itwtlnnw .aw CoRt Onpl,litinn C.11,111111tico t,f nele -lite' '"Ne"t- ,,,p.jtpr/4 f n1lectrivill Better "n"Prilatin" now clang ofThe entry 0 CA r r I c r 1* the In nileottlJlulsto n CA n Anil the style CPO,' of work )e r FIGURE 1 (cont.) RGCTION N^� MIScruit E(�S Slx STAG MtI Mt CAPI.IV1.,In" nF t11AMt, /11t still a�rlretrsl+Ply rurgne the distribution system market t. ,,main state-of-the-art VIStlw t•APIX of HIM11, ttlr. NI11 offer 24 channel, of dlverslf lP.i progr jmmin-1 at no monthly cb-'IT 1' still equip 21 vlevinq centers for free nelghlsorhood vlcuinq. There renters will also he connected to the inntltutlonal Network and provided vltb teleraptlon decoders • Hill establish and maintain a Center Vision Cable Television Tralnlrq to provide cable television experience terhnical and operational ,,as committed Initially annually totteCeliter. arnl S1. • Ila.1 Initiated 'nlwratlon Scrapbook' as part of an on-gotng effort to Identify and respond to local neM1s • will provide $100.000 annnelly to city [or development of institutional network services �I�Il�lli�� �!I;� i� �I��� . ,, •. �, f!������i��ll��l�������,�I�,�N�,��,III�'�I�III� Ip �Mim, Hill a as - Pihattdial Plan The higher 3.2 t l debt -to -equity ratio proposed by Six Star Nielson, on a relative basis, makes that financial plan more vulner- able in the event of lower revenues or higher costs than anticipated. (d) Commitment to Other Systems -- As a percentage of equity, Cablesystems' financial commitments to other cable systems is 83%, much higher than any other applicant, and this is considered a relative weakness. (2) Construction Schedule -- Figure 3 indicates the strengths and weaknesses for the criterion "Construction Schedule". Three applicants, Cablesystems, Miami and Vision propose to complete construction and provide service to all areas of the City within two years. This is considered a strength as compared to the 3-year schedule proposed by the other two applicants. Cablesystems proposes to construct a separate institutional network only after the demand cannot be satisfied through a combined residential/institutional cable. This indefinite con- struction schedule is considered a weakness. (3) Technical Standards -- Figure 4 lists the key technical standards proposed by each applicant. This criterion is considered essentially "neutral" since all standards proposed exceed FCC minimums. Consequently, no strengths or weaknesses are assigned, although it is desirable that an applicant list as many standards as possible that the system will be designed and tested to. In this respect, Vision's listing may be considered as marginally adequate. (4) Ori ination Cablecastin (Automated Services, Special Interest Progz,.mr,.:ng) -- This category includes the following program groups of Figure 1: ° Satellite Programs - Video ° Local Programs - Automated ° Imported Programs - Automated satellite programs i Video Ame aeoabie Miami, and vision propos o a pas compared 20=22 services of this typ to 15-16 for Cablesystems and Six Star Nielson. The difference is considered to be a strength for the first three applicants. (b) Local Programs - Automated -- In this category, Miami proposes 23 services (although most are shared with video programming), which is almost twice that of all other applicants. (c) Imported Pro rams - Automated -- Miami is at a high end, proposing to import 11 d a services, and this is considerestems strength. At the low end, Cablesy proposes 2 services, which is rated a weakness. The three other applicants proposeis 5-7 erd neither services, which weaknessldonea relatives strength nor a basis. (5) Local Origination -- "Local origination" programming includes those local video programs (automated programs are considered in (4) above) for programming is provided by the cable system operator. Figure 6 lists the locally originated video programs proposed by the applicants, as distinct from the "access" channels for which the community is expected to provide the bulk of the programming. he Figure 7 indicates the withnCablesystemths and s,nMiami andesses of vision proposals in this category, and considered as offering a strong selection of programming, ith 4 services, in the "neutral" category. Six Star Nielson, w (6) Access Production Facilities and Support -- For access and community programming, the key factors of are not so much the number of channels offered, but the deauiement technical support provided, in terms of cablecasting eq p ort personnel. Only with this support can local groups ar.n sup. stem for access purposes. be successful in using the cable sy 90 Pilute l lists the critical suP) the following: Local Program Production Equ e operating Budget Staff commitment 0 Percentage of Budget Allocated to Access Assistance facilities Figure 8 combines these items into three groups, facilities (since both local origination oderatinc budcetss tand ies staff are available for access use), (taken at Year 5), and $ of budget committed to access. The strengths and weaknesses are indicated, with those items not rated in either category considered as neutral. (7) Interactive Services -- As indicated in Figure 9, all applicants propose tthe o install essentially ea_uivalent interactive computer system$nattext head equivalent and all iall ill �fwithfer sothertservi esy alarm mphasedlin at some later services i, Y in this area. time. All are considered strong (8) Service to Institutions -- Figure 10 tolprovidesserviceitems to the capability include: Institutional Network Mileace -- The longer the institutional network is, in general the more institutions that can be connected, i w at standard cost. Miam has by far the longest network and this is seen as a strenth. Siseg137 andx114amileStr e lson and Vision proponetworks, and these are considered neutral. Americable s 58 miles is considered a weakness. cablesystems proposes to share a single cable trunk between residential and institutional use. than if insti- tutional demand is higher a separate cable would be constructed later. This is seen as a weakness, so far as convenient service to institutions is concerned. 0 considered indicative of institutions. These 91 - ° Institutional Network Capacity -- All Oplicants have adequate capacity for initial institutional services, except that, again, Cablesystems' capacity is Contingent on not being required for residential services. Connection to Network All applicants propose to connect all public institutions to the network. (9) Sophistication of System -- There may be some disagreement as to how the "sophistication" Of a cable system can best be defined. For this evaluation, it has been interpreted as the ability to provide a broad variety of services, including advanced two-way and interactive services 4_L! subscribers. Within the context of the application information, this ability is related directly to the type of converter proposed for use, and whether it has features such as addressability (the ability to send programming or signals to specific sub- scribers under computer command), decoding or descrambling (the ability to decode information or programs sent in coded or scrambled form) and interactive ca acit (the ability, through a keyboard or pushbuttons, for the subscriber to send information back to the system's headend computer). Another factor relevant to being able to offer the widest rance of services initially is the system capacity that is operational at the inception of service to subscribers. If, for example, upstream transmission capacity will not be activated initially, that will inhibit the introduction of two-way services. Figure 11 indicates the proposed commitments of the appli- cants in these two areas. As noted, all applicants propose the most sophisticated converters available for the highest tiers, and all will activate sufficient capacity initially to permit the introduction of virtually any type of communications service. (10) System Design -- A number of features normally included in the overall category of system design (such as technical standards, service to institutions, system sophistication, channel capacity) are evaluated as separate criteria. Consequently, only those system design features not evaluated elsewhere are included in this category. r► 02 Thebe include the following: Readend and Hub Configuration a Satellite Earth Station Configuration Longest Amplifier Cascade ° Special System Features Figure 12 indicates the evaluation of these items. Americable's single headend design is considered a weakness for a city the size of Mi asai . Miami and Six Star propose to provide satellite earth stations at all hubs. This is useful in the event of malfunction of any single hub, and it also reduces the transmission path of the satellite -delivered signals, which in turn results in higher picture quality for the subscribers. In the two other categories, all applicants' proposals are considered strong. (11) Channel Capacity -- Since the channel capacity for institutional service was considered in (8) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services. Figure 13 indicates that only the Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cable - systems' residential network will be reduced substantially in capacity. This might be particularly critical for upstream capacity, which is needed for home interactive services. Although Cablesystems promises to build a separate institutional network later when needed, this solution is more disruptive and less satisfactory than providing an initial independent network. (12) Ownership Structure -- Figure 1 indicates the ownership structure of each applicant. No inherent advantage is seen for any particular ownership structure, and therefore all applicants are rated neutral in this category. (13) Performance in Other Systems Operated by Applicant -- To analyze the system by system performance of all other cable systems operated by each applicant is beyond the scope of this evaluation. Within the context of information provided in the applications, the category of "Experience" comes closest *-n this criterion. A-1 02 ,. Plgtrs 14 lists three items considered relevants Average Subscriber Rate - Basic Service -- The subscriber rate is one general indication of consumer benefit, although it must be used with caution since different levels of service may be involved. For these proposals, the average rates of Americable are substantially higher than those of the other applicants, and considered a weakness. ° Large -System Experience -- The experience with large systems, such as that required. for Miami, is considered pertinent. Here, CablesystemF and Vision are considered to be strong, in terms of systems with more than 500 miles of cable plant. ° Disposition of Franchises -- The applicants' record of disposition of franchises in the past may be an indication of unsatisfactory operating performance. in proportion to the number of systems currently operated, Americable's disposition record is considered a weakness. (14) Emplo«mnt Practices -- As indicated in Figure 1, all applicants pledge to imple- ment a. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action program. This category is considered essentially neutral, since no major differences are apparent between applicants. (15) Rates -- The most important rate items are the monthly charges for basic service (first outlet) and for pay -TV service, since these two generate the bulk of total cable system revenues at present. Figure 15 indicates the applicants' proposed rates in these two categories. Cablesystems and Miami propose the lowest basic rates, considering all tiers except interactive, and also lower pay -TV rates. Vision offers lower pay -TV rates, but high basic rates, while the other two applicants are at the high extreme in both categories. a � : • R i ti . r � ...�`,:.� �. x.�'k ;;,. "�'�.'ii`'�j ,�r �`'�, ryed� e��c� �" a04- b ) tSt abi1_ ity The items included in "Rate Stability" are the guarantee of initial rates made by each applicant, and the forecasts of -future rate increases made in the applicants' proforma financial projections. _ oears Cablesystems offers to freeze initial rateitstwo year from the date of franchise award. ear longer guarantee construction schedule, this would who all guarantee rates than those of most other applicants, until system completion, with respect to rate increase projections,Six Starcumu- Nielson, over the life of tre franchise, projects for tive rate increase ° pay -TV service. This is%afor basic servicer d$ strength compared totheother applicants, who forecast cumulative increases of over 2 0$ for both services. �17) Re ional Interconnect Capabilit As Figure 17 indicates, all applicants are willing to interconnect to other cable systems, with the particular tech - interconnect nology utilized dependent upon the distances involved. All proposals are considered equivalent in this category. (lg) Relation to Needs of Miami-- In evaluating the criterion of how the proposed cable systems relate to the needs of Miami, the following items were considered: to Public Agencies and Community a Commitment Provisions for Minority Progra=ing Figure 18 indicates the peirerelative perceivedcomitments of hstrengths cants in these two areas, and and weaknesses. 1 � n AMERICAPI.E Stre_n9ihs Equity Resources CAd1.ESYSTI'MS MInn1 $57.5M shareholders' $64.9M shareholders' equity @ 12/31/79 $117M shareholders' e<�uity @ g/10/79 equity @ 8/31/80 (Nielson Enterprises. (Boyers Cablesystems (Tele-Communications Inc.) Inc.) I.td.) $37M shareholders' $220M shaee)1�80rs• equity @ 12/31/79 equity @ / (Six Star Cablevision (Taft Broadcasting. 11oldinq Co.. Inc.) - - - - - - - - - - equity 1.5:1 debt to equity 1.311 debt to equity 2.2s1 debt to q ratio Financial Plan ratio ratio - " ears $23M over next 5 year - - - $27M over next 3 y commitments to other 59.6M over next 4 years Systems weaknesses malty status of ___-- :harles IteriOV�ek Equity Resources Jho will additional pfundinq as Xl needed) is not inlicatt Financial Plan Commitments to other systems The combined net wortil of all New- house companies indicated as being? -in excess of $500M1.' 1:1 debt to equity ratio - - - 1 s $ 30.614 over next uL. 3 years - - - - _ _ - 1 _ - 3.2:1 debt to equity! ratio I$q714 over next 4 years 1 s (Residential Network Only) Year 1 --- Miles 11) year 2 --- Mlles ts) year 3 --- Miles 11) 143.2 (2011 312.3 (43%) 269.6 (371) 12% 11T1) 480 (68%) 106 (151) li r r f_IGl1RE 4 TF.CIINICAI. STANDARDS- --- --- ------MIAM SIX :;TAR µIFfS"" 1e1lS1CIg6 CAIl1.F,;YiTlMS —_1---- AMBRICAPLR --- —�_ —_— 41i.3+ a13� —__ _—_ _ —__------- 43 dR 46.4 do 46 do 66 1 de( -------- -44 dil 64 dD Carrier to noise 60 (111 Second order products 60 dD -47"dD 55.7 dW Third order beat ratio 55 dD -511.5 do Composite triple beat -52 do ; 1 dB an.5de Frequency response 2 d0 59.1 ds (any channel) Intermodulation pralict -52 dB 52 de -55.3 do Cross modulation 411 do it -49 do F 40 dD min Ilum 42 do slum modulation -40 dB for 30n0 ns r Network generated echo delay Isolation between 60 aD cables 30 dM Subscriber tap 0.5 dB Max. Isolation 2% Differential gain 2" Differential phase 170 ns Max. l00 ns Max. Chrominance luminance 200 ns Max. 200 ns Max i delay Maximum signal level 12 do my at receiver 4. 4.0dB 16• (Is bevel stability Return 1099 1 p {" Flcultr•_s A�.IO p SERVICE____ ,VICES. PROGRMIliTH6--�_---- v1Stow ;Ix STAIt Ntra-.SO �j --I---CADI.ESYSTEMS I 11MERICJ�RLR —----_--- ____--- ` -- _ ............ 1---� StrenM Satellite Video Local Automated Imported Automated Weaknesses Satellite Video Local Automated Imported Automated 22 services 20 services _ _ _ _ _ - - 20 services - - - ------------ 23 services - - - - - - - - - - - - it services s is services - - - r 16 services - -- --- ---- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - - -- 12services it services 9servicea 7 services ____----- _ _- - - - - -- _---___--_ 2 services 1, FIGURE pROPOSEO LOCAL ORIGINATION nMERICAPLE L.O. Programming Local Origination (Leased) Sunshine Statrs Net,,,ork cnB1.E. program of the Americas m1a,+i women Inr,l Rel i.tious The Ltflation Station .lentos Alsmi Itearinq Impared/ Seniors Miami Together Beaux Arts/Classic Movies Crime Watch (Secure) Local Black Programming a a 6 PROGRAMMING MIAMI SIX STAR MiE1SO14 Friendly City Family Features Tele-Cable ltispano- Itearinq impared Miami Sports and Theater At 'fhe Track Basic Skills Florida State/Regional Nrws Itarrowcast/ The Miami Poll rnm.tnl-lad Ilispana Executive News Report V'ISIM English Local Origination Latin Local Origination Black Local Origination Randicapped Local Origination Neighborhood Narrowcastinq vision Cable t English Movie Channel t Vision Cable Spanish Movie Channel _1 � I q lil I'I lillll illlgl�illlll I IIIII'IIIIIIII!IIII'IIIlI199�iIIIppIUll II p IIIII�III'I II'I I, Igil I"III' I I I� ' " I I'I'�Ili �'� I ' 'I I � I i �I I i � li � I� Neak_ e video L.0• Services 2 services t r 0 0 FIGURE e SUPPORT E5FACiLiTIES AND ACCESS - --__ — - 1FQSl/fti -- SIX STAR' MIF.I:SUM _--- - M IAM 1 CARLFSYSTI:MS- �"�'�'-��--- elf Stren-� th9 Facilities (L•O- and Access) Operating Budget and Staff (year 5) ♦ of Budget for Access weakness Facilities IL-0- and Access) Operating Fludget and Staff (year 51 ♦ of Iludget for Access $2.04 $2.5M _ $2. M4 staff of 75 $1.6M staff of 39staff of 46- 65% - r Up to 501 r $630,000 $655.000 - - - _ _ _ _ _ - Staff of le 304t Strengths Interactive Equipment Weaknesses Interactive F:nuipment lnteractive Scrvi(-Ps AMERICADI.F:-- - IPioneer VIP security and communication system Security Service Data 16) Text Retrieval (2) k FIGURE-9 INTERACTIVE SERVICES MIAMI - ---- -1 -_six STAlt NIF.1.SOH '1UlSION1 Will initially install a clata/computer processing system to provide services including - Fire, intrusion and medical alarm services - opinion Dolling anti teletext - Pay -per -view - Meter reading - Status monitorinn Security Service lay -per -view dome Business Data Reuters Information Retrieval (2) Time Shared Telidon(4) Telidon Information Retrieval opinion Polling Pioneer VTP security system, wilt use underwriters Laboratories approved home security alarm technology and services, security guard service and emergency medical technicians to respond to alarms securityservice Shop-at-ltome (Compu- Serve) - Information Retrieval Text Services Back -a t -1 tome Energy Management Plonner VtP inter- active system has [capability for wide range of services Security Service Text Display Mattel Play Cable Professional Educational (2) Nome nankinq/Shopping Continuing Education (2) human Services Data (4) opinion Polling Energy Management TOCOM 111-9 security and" interactive communications` equipment used",, with capability for wide range of services Security Service r 50 teletext ►� channels N Energy Manage- 1 ment Opinion Pollinq Dow Jones Data Bank Knight-Ridder Data Bank Bank ing/shoppinl/ polling (1992-83) Interactive Games (1993) Home Education (1) 11993) Pay -per -view Movies (198`3) Pay -per -view Sports (19811' SERVICE. TO INSTITUTIONS WAMI AMF.R iCA111.E CARI.F.SYS'PF MS - — 219 Strength Inst. Network Mileage - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 ch. downstream 16 ch. upstream Inst. Network Capacit 15 ch. upstream37 ch. ,m - - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - educatiatiil All facilities listed facilities. plus will Pass all public Connection to Network vcare and banks and hotels. Nil healthin RFP cultural facilities initially connect all initially connected with existing and provided with communications 54-ch. converter resources. and provide interface equipment Six STARNIEISON VISIhNI - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 ch. downstream 18 ch. downstream 25 ch. upstream 39 ch. upstream "y All COvt. facilities Schools, hospitalses. M1' and schools connected at no cost cosnected at no r 0 w weaknesses 58 mi. No separate Inst. Inst. Network Mileage Net[ combined with - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - residential trunk - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 ch. downstream, Inst. Network Capacit 17 ch. upstream shared with - . - - - - residential network - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - connection to Network I it c. j I � � � I I ICI II�� IIIII I �I ICI I Strength@ Converter Weaknesses converter Initial Activation Tier I- none Tier II - Pioneer BC-2000 Tier III - Pioneer BT-1300 addressable Tier IV - Pioneer BT-1300 interactive All capacity activated initially. Downstream channels limited to 96 on the residential network and 36 on the institutional network because of FAA restricted usage Tier I - none Tier 11 and III - Zenith ZT-2000 addressable descrambler for equal) Tier IV (interactive) llarris Model 624487 home terminal transmitters, and Interactive key pad All residential net- work capacity activated initially. A separate institu- tional network will be constructed when justified by demand for institutional service that cannot be satisfied throuqh the integrated networ Tier I - Oak L-30 - Oak 21 channel mid - band converter/ decoder Tier It, 111, IV - Pioneer VIP one-way addressable or two- way interactive Magnavox Magna 58 (above 400 Mllz) All upstream capacity activated initially downstream activation limited to 104 channels to limit interference with other spectrum users ——————————— E—————————— I ——————————— Tier 1, II - Pioneer BC-2000 Tier III - Pioneer BT-1300 addressable interactive 97 of the 111 down- stream channels and all of the upstream channels on the residential network activated initially 21 of the 25 down- stream and upstream institutional network channels activated Initially Tier I. II-1lamtin. sm-400 Tier III. IV - Tocom 55044 Addressable Discrambler Tier V - Toconr 5510A Addressable niscrambler Teletext Tier VI - TOCOm 5501 interactive All channel capacity activated initially except for Teletext. 50 of the 55 Teletext channels will be activated o initially - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - ,.I� II III.. ..III I. 1 I I,II ILJI.�I LIILI�IIIJIIIII III II, III,I,III,I II,I I II I LII �,i�i�� glil III a III I II II III III, I. I _,._ u _. .� ..k ,, 11I.11 LI III! I ,ILIIIIJLIII I,I, IIIII,I ,IJIII � l!I LI:III ICJ Il �,l llllll L. L,I �,IIIII.I.lIA� i .I�I II� IIII IIII IIII I , III I FIGURE 12 SYSTEM DESIGN M))SIOlt i II Stre!jqths licadend/Iluh Configuration Satellite Earth Station Configuration Longest Amplifier Cascade Special System Features Weaknesses Ileadend/flub Configuration Satellite Earth Station Configuration ILongest Amplifier Cascade Special System Features AMER ICADI.F. - - - - - - - - - 15 Status monitoring Emergency alert Standby power Single-headend CA"LESYSTEMS Ileadend-plus 2 hubs- -I 16 Status monitoring Emergency alert Standby power MIAMI SIX STAR NIELSON Ileadend plus 3 hubs Ileadend plus 2 hubs headend'ptus I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - hubs - - - - -- I earth stations for 3 earth stations at each hub (12 total) headend, t at each hub (5 total) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 14 15 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- status monitoring Status monitoring Status monitoring Emergency alert Emergency alert Emergency alert Standby power Standby power Standby power r II'I�III III�� I II I I" �'' ' I II III��IIIIII��� �..._ . W.1111111111�111� A ��������u���������wi��i�����u��i�u�i���iuu�i���iii�uiiii�i�i�,��uuii��i��u�u Current Cable System 11old i ngs Stren�th9 Average Subscriber Itate - Basic Services Franchises with more tlian 500 miles or plan Disposition of Franchises AMBR ICABf.F. 7 cable systems in lorida and Uhio • � MI SIX VIS1010 STAR HIE _ CABLE SYSTEMS 25 cable systems in the United States, Canada and Ireland serving 1,300,000 subscribers MIA 19 cable system in 1 states, serving .280,000 subscribers $6.77 12 (1 under construction) _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NWW, only clone in the netween 1969mane than past to respond to disposed Of Canadian Regulatory 19 franchises. Agency requirements of rationalization ------ t0 cable systems in :alifornia. Missouri, Kansas, and Michigan 131 cable systems in 16 states 1 0 �- - - - - - _ _ - - - - - J Disposed of 3 franchises between 1976 and 1980. None Meaknesses j10.45 - - - - Average Subscriber - - - - _ - - - - - - Rate - Basic Services _ _ _ _ - - - - 2 (both under L (under constructionl: - construction) rranchises with more None than 500 miles of plant ion of Between 1915 and 1980 - - Dis)roaitdisposed or llfi Franchises franchises. Stren the basic Service_ Mont v Rates First outlet -�------- SI1C STAR NIELSON .urntCAl11.E 1 CIIDLESYSTEM3 - i 412 c1is 1 FreF. Tler 1 121 chg.) (44 Free r (4 r ti 5 Tier II $5.95 chs.) $4.95 s.) r.111 177 Tier Ii"t (73 chg.) $ 6.95 ,,.Plus choice Tier IV (89 $8.95 any* i A)-1 option chg.) $7.4 ockatle 11 B)-2 option $8.7 acka4eS 11 C)-3 optiop $9.70 ackages iv -premium er nteractive Atkl$3.95 (tional 11ome Theater $3.95 )me Theater. Network $3.95 Network Cine Latino $6.95 [)me Box Office 8.95 $7 9 Bravo/Alden $6.95 inemax Ome Box Office Oldies 14 95 11ome nox office$6.95 6.95 plus Cinemax $0 5 Oalavision $6.95 ,as Vegas $8.95 Showtime $6.95 ihowtime ;alavision $B.95 Cinemax The Movie lninbow $8.95 Channel $6,95 Varies the Movie $8.95 pay -per -view Channel public Sub- scription $15.00 Network Premiere (if $9.91, available) • Tentative price VISIOM 0 m r 110me Box office S7.95 Cinemax $7.95 Showtime The Movie Channel $7.95 Any TwO Above $15.00 AWve $20.75 Any Three Any ;our Above S26.0n $6.00 �.alavision dome Theater $3.95 Network $3.95 Front Row Public Sub- rk $10.00 Net'D scriber JOR $10.0► Reuters $100 1•lay Cable « FIGURE 15(cont.) Neaknesses Basic Service nt y pates First Outlet pay TV Service AMERTCABLE F- CAB6F..^.YSTENS Tier I (24 chs) Free Tier IT (S8 chg.) Sll.9' Tier 111 (78 $12.9 chg.) Tier IV 4104 13.9 $ chs.) Tier I The Movie Channel $14.9 Galavision 514.95 Tiers t) i III The FIovie Channel S 9.9` Galavision S 9.9` Tier IV $ 4.95 Bravo dome Theater $ 4.9 s Network bag Vegas S 4.9. I.ive Cinemax $ 9.97 Galavision S 9-q� 11ome Dux $ 9.9 office ShowtIme $ 9.9 The 11,IVic Channel $ 9.9 ),ay -per -View Varir_ MIAMI six STAR NIF.LSON' vaaa.sa. Tier I (24 chs. ) Free* Tier II (36 chg.) S4.50 Tier III (60 chs.) $8.50' �r I (24 chg.) S 3.9" Tier IV (72 chg.) S9.50 �r 1f f47 $11.00- Tlplus Tcletexxt) $12.95 er IIt (94 data Tier VI (72 chs. plus Teletext and chg. plus base access) $13.00• Interactive) 514.95 ncludes monthly See 'Converter Deposit, onverter ree !ni Pay $ 4.9 $10.5 ne Service wo Services $18.0 ►� hree Services $21.0 a per -Event S3.00* ay -per -Use $3.001% Average subscriber vicamr. 16 I,Ivtl, STA tj.ITI ro'n 41,1t.c of NAM+,, oa Y. .1t.cm completion pfc, .,.ted itsthan 24 HI, Sut STAR Ptv6slo i ,Z, All Tiers Year 0.0 1 Year 8 10 to Year 12 Mini and If Maxi Services Year 5.0 Year 5.0 Year 6 Year 7 5,0 Year a 5.0 5.0 Year 9 Year 10 5.0 Year 11 5.0 Year 12 5.0 S. 0 Year 13 Year 14 5.0 Year tS 5.0 1115" • It, MIAMI n,]Lxc Rate Increase Tic r Tier Tier Tier Tier IV Tier Tier I II Tier Tiet 8 Tier 11 li IV 26.9 26.9 26.9 Basic Service I It III III IV 11.4 18.6 17.8 ye.,jr 4 - -20 - - - r 2 163.2 156.2 teaYear 22.1 Year 4 6 1 13 11.a 12.6 ".9 11.9 Year 5 Yea r 6 -20 - - 27.0 26.9 21.8 ear 3 36.7 "" 10 2.6 12.0 )*-2 ) 'I 12.6 12. 12.0 year I - -50 26.9 - - - - •17.2 ear 4 - - Werea-lic Year 5 6 1.3 year Year 12 12.9 12.4 13.1 12.6 year 9 year 10 _I(jo 27 0 2-1.0 27.1 27.0 27.0 car 6 - 1.1 6.6 Year 14 12.2 12.9 year 13 27.0 ear 7 - 0.9 6 car 0 - 3.4 ear 9 6.2 ear 10• A, ear 11 1.8 2.6 r 12 - 6• 6.1 car 13 - .0 car 14 _ 10.6 10.6 INIT 15 _ Kud mini HISId Mini pay Pay Tiers Tier IV service Service 19.6 Year 4 26.9 -1 26.6 27.0 1.41Y Solvice 1 11 & 1513.4 Year 4 11.6 12.7 year 7 2 . 0 26.9 163.1 ear 2 163.0 24.1 24.1 YCAr 6 12.5 12.6 12.9 Year 10 27.0 27.0 26.9 "Ir 3 23.9 4 31.0 79.9 33. 1 a ye mr a to 12.5 12.9 year 13 ear car 5 Umt`Ca• 3 y,% w 12 12.3 12.7 11.4 (!Ar 6 0.1 0.1 9 5 12.9 11 ye- 14 12.5 'car 1 11.8 • oar 8 111'r 9 • car 10IO.G 11.5 22.5 • Y(,jr I I 2.8 2.6 or I z• Year 13 DmrI 4.1 1.8 ear 14 9.6 7. 7 wr Is • (*le" lion 0.11L cfvmW-) � ICI �IIIIII� � � �����l�I�������I ������������Iq�� V Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier Tier It III tv V vi .4 16.7 14.7 15.8 15-4 15.1 6 - 14.3 12.9 18.2 1.3.7 i5.91 9 - 16.7 13.6 11.5 14.7 15.0 ' 10 _ 14.3 12.0 13.8 15.4 13.0 2 - 15.6 14.3 15-2 15.6 15.4' 4 - 13.5 12.5 15.9 15.4 16. IN III I pay Pay Pay Mini It tit TV Pay 16.4 16.7 19-7 18-7 13'9 13.5 11:4 15.2 15.2 16- 14.1 15.4 15.8 15-8 14' .9 .10 12.5 13.3 13.6 13-6 12- 15-7 18-0 18 .0 11. .12 .14 16 7 11.3 111 15.3 15.3 13. i NMBRICARL CAOLESYSTEMS 77 Via ultra -high Stre�tha Via AM1. microwave l,erformance bi- directional trunks Interconnection to utilizinq F11 Other Cable System modulation and three quarter or one -inch size low -loss cable Weaknesses tnterc011nectiOtl to Other Cable Systems FIGURE 17 REGIONAL INTERCONNECTION MIAMI Ila AML or FM video nicrowave P P s SIX STAR NIELSON dill interconnect witl neighboring systems by extending their trunk cables Other systems may be linterconnected by microwave or super trunks 1 VRaavac r h->.. t fie ----------------- 1 options listed: - via the existing Institutional Network - Via direct hard- -! line cable between one of the hubs and the other cable system �?r - Via microwave-' connectinq headends I�I�� I II I � III I I I III III, ICI III Il,, �� _ ,+ - r I; S rt en tl_s Commitment to Public Agencies and Community weaknesses Commitment to Public Agencies AMERICAPT.E I' RELATION To CITY NEEDS MIAMI SIX STAR NIEISON CAOLESYSTFM9 $500,000 (over 15 will provide 3 mobile Interconnection to years) funding for communications, County Operations Y command control Center and Educations Niami Crime watch centers to Police Telecommunications Dept. Centeruter- 'will provide co+++P assisted -instruction software to Fire Dept. for traininq Will provide TV trans- mitters for 6 EMS units • will provide 50 emot, video cameras for crime surveillance Not indicated! c`T Will donate $100#00O annually to City for development of institutional services I i IL �', Bill I I �I I I � I � -:� F �- , . , • � � I I I �I I � I'I .III I III II II�� IIII�� I ��, ,� � ��I III �� p I "1 PIIy� IIII I I I �� I I is � -�• I � 1 I I'"III,II 1 II U111 �II,� I,�'ei1 l�l�l�ll!PI II11 I�I,III�.II�P �I 11 f llll�,lllll�$I� �� �I�I I N RELATION To CITY NEEDS MIAMI SIX STAR NIEISON CAOLESYSTFM9 $500,000 (over 15 will provide 3 mobile Interconnection to years) funding for communications, County Operations Y command control Center and Educations Niami Crime watch centers to Police Telecommunications Dept. Centeruter- 'will provide co+++P assisted -instruction software to Fire Dept. for traininq Will provide TV trans- mitters for 6 EMS units • will provide 50 emot, video cameras for crime surveillance Not indicated! c`T Will donate $100#00O annually to City for development of institutional services I i IL �', Bill I I �I I I � I � -:� F �- , . , • � � I I I �I I � I'I .III I III II II�� IIII�� I ��, ,� � ��I III �� p I "1 PIIy� IIII I I I �� I I is � -�• I � 1 I I'"III,II 1 II U111 �II,� I,�'ei1 l�l�l�ll!PI II11 I�I,III�.II�P �I 11 f llll�,lllll�$I� �� �I�I I N N i FIGURE 18 Icont. AMF.R ICAULE Stcen�ths provisions for Minority programming CAnLF5YSTFMS MIAMI ;H.SM fund over life will F nallTraining ish a �f franchise for ninority programming for the Dis- +ro projects ged, committing end training ( j annually forMinority television production training ovide Spanishprogram Television withcapital costs to0 per year forfacilitate local trative and minority channels. programming costs Approximately $150#000`+ill establish a capital outlay per channel, total cost Ethnic at(eritagel Arts nFund approaches $1.0N to disburse grants $1.114 commitmenE over totalling about $1.514 life of franchise to over the life of purchase a satellite franchise uplink as part of a source of national will provide $50,000 minority programming in hips to Miami harea scolleges rundinn for staff provide job and i,ositions within the will p community Programming skills training at nt locations department for co- convenie ordinators of Black, throughout the city Spanish, and Women's o maximi-ze tile Programming involvement of minorities in program production Affiliation wit'� BF.T to provide local blackwill provide Florida programming to the BEI M,eO hrial C llegieanith network television access Telidon input terminal9production studio at numerous minority organizations SIX STAR HIELSON VISION Public access policies and procedures described Fully staffed and equipped access studios located in minority communities Separate Local origination Channels for Black. Latin and Handicapped programming will offer nalavision, Black Entertainment Television, the Spanish International Network. lleta and the women s Cl+ant+e 1 + Will encourage the public Access A Corporation to agressively pursue , minority invole- ment Will purchase minority community productions for the Family Movie Channels FIGURE 18 (cont.I AMERICARLE strengths (continued) I MiAlli crnLesrsTF.11s immunity { ,roduction 1will prc,vldc ed speciaCificpaudiences! ,enter in several rrodominantiy minority for sp. els t ,eighhorhoods minority i1nCerestsand ;tudio locations in Olack minority Insure the accessibilit tools to t,th Min and neighborhoods of production minority areas of the Community origination city points at numerous trill produce of interest minority organization. programmingl Members of minority to minorities group s on every Will incorporate a non advisory board profit organization effecting local- to determine the handle th porgrsn-ing policies and the -aublicsacCessn Digital services time (iminiof network. p shared in two and 0 t rill fund sometimes three for year 1, 1751000 lanquages for year 2. $5 200.000 Cummunity viewinq for year 3 with a 711 centers in every increase each minority community successive year. programminq department Will equip a ommunity whirl hiring practices Relations Auditorium Miami -Dade will endeavor exceed F.F.O require -Community at the New meat World Center Campus System design allowint will provide the Centers narrowcasting to Regional Access predominately minorit the community Viewing neighborhoods Centers anti sites on. Tits titutional Signal Carriage of The Teicvisinn Network with full Mutic-ultural apabIIIV Interactive cal. of Toronto (MTV) SIX STAR NIELSON vlstoer •Iar.s to involve minorities In the ,mvisory responsible [roan proclram levelolmment Carriage Of Ch- 2]-tiLTV Isp on all tiers of service paid Internships in cable television for all residents of Miami. including minority groups r Establishment of a F, Career Training `r Center to cable operations ext•cr ience. 5]50,000 Initially and S150.000 annually committed to the center- Na r,o.CaSt:jnq service on the subscriber network Zi viewing Centers In minority communities I:r•ployment practices ,xceedinq state and l:ederal requirements No 'clusion of the ,mf,n•s Channel WrRi%) 3.6tl life Of ro ect ranchise p imed at minority nvolvement (Miami ogether) nvvis Production irogrtm originatinq It radio station BRA N remote TelidOn input minority neaaocal paPers minority A minority business enterprise administration Position to ensure minority business involvement in local programminq Numerous positions in the community programming depart- ment A commitment tO involve local black ,r.yaniratioTs ia�mnln 4-ommun I t y { 'y efforts. a M t I�. ! FIGURE 18 (c( Stren the lcor ,i �'I'�IIII 1 FIGURE Is (cont.) •I � nMg1tICNOLP. z remote studios Provieion� for Programming i span'sh local studio In ginority origination i little 118v3n3 i slack local stunitydjo ln origination tl a bl ack co"°^ studio emploYces iron the local area y 110 Figure 19 sufnmatijes the strengths and weaknesses noted of ers it the in the previous section catehthernpumber ofhitemsb iconsidered column of Figure 19 ind ss for each as -a strength or weakaseneutral, i.e., neither arstrength nor Features considered a weakness, are not included. d with or Figure 19 must be analstre gths inuseveral Fcategories� an applicant may have m y considered relatively unimportant by the City, while another applicant may have fewer strengths, but in more important =- categories. Consequently, the City must take its priorities - and areas of special interest into consideration when reviewing the results of this report. IAMERI- CABLE CABLE- SYSTEMS MIAMI SIX STAJ NIELSO VISION S I W S I W S I w S w S j w Financial Capability 2 1 2 I1 13 - i 2 1 3 i- Construction Schedule - 1 1 1 1I- Technical Standards - I - Automated Services, special Interest PzograM ng 1 1 - 3 3 - - (2 I l l i Local Origination - l Access Production Facilities and Support 1 2 2- 3 - 1 1 2 1 Interactive Services 12 I 2 I 2 I 2 2 Service to Institutions 2 I 1 1 2 3 - 2 Sophistication of System 2 - 2 I- 2 I 2 I 2 System Design 12 l l 2- 3 j- 3( 2 Channel Capacity j 1 - - 1 1 1-( 1 - Ownership Structure p - - -I- I -I- -I- - j 1 - Performance in other systems - 3 3 (_ 2 1 I 2 11 13 - Employment Practices - - - I- - - I - I- - - Rates I- 2 2 j- 2 I- I- 2 I 1 I 1 Raze Stability I- 2( l 2 ( 2 j 2 I- 1 2 Regional Programming Capability 11- Relation to Needs of Miami 1 I 1 1 I 1 2 I-(_ 2 1 I 1 TOTALS -- STRENGTHS %T-kKDTESSES 15 16 21 11 29 3 is 10 13 I 6 r� e �i �' t'J x :. t3:�Y'. s a a EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PRIORITIES The City will award the license to the applicant who can demonstrate the best overall capability and willingness to provide cable communications service o to the citizens of Miami. All of the information requested herein will contribute to the evaluation of applicants and the subsequent selection process. In general, applicants will be judged according to the following criteria: financial capability construction schedule; technical standards; automated services, special interest origination cablecasting proararw'mi ng) ; local origination; access production facilities and support; interactive services; service to institutions; sophistication of system; system design; channel capacity; ownership structure; licant; performance in other systems operated by app employment practices; rates; rate stability; and regional intercrelatesotocap thebneeds�of Miami how the system The following factors will be accorded a preference and will be considered as priorities. The city seeks an applicant who will: (1) Propcso the most comp!•ehonsive offering the,f�nancSalvices capabpltYded of the such an offering does not exceed te a cable communications system. applicant to construct and opera (2) Seek to maximize cor--munity participation in the :rianagement of't e the cable system v, in one °tional network omore features orfleased that schannels. access channels, institu ,. (3) Allocate adequate facilities, funding and staf support to access, public service and local cormunity programming Page 12 (4) Seek to develop services to fulfill the commercial and financial the cmiaicitty and the informationand comuncations needsofthecy's service institutions. (5) Provide services to low-income households by proposing a "universal service" option which would offer the subscribers the access and public service channels for the cost of installation . alone and/or ublicdevelopment and community centersnity viewing centers p xOTE: Refer to Section 7, pages 7,8 and 9 of the Cable television Regulation Ordinance for Legal Requirements. City of Miami Comparative Summary of Cable Television License Proposals Table of Contents Via. ae No, Section A: Ownership and Control Information _ • ) 1 Applicant Name, Address, Authorized Representative _ • 1 Ownership Information . . . . . . . . . . . 1 (a) Identification of Owners . . . . . . . • • _ • 3 (b) Organizations or Corporations owning 3S or more interest • • Stock Information . . . . . . . . . • • 3 (a) Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • (b) Stock of Corporation . . . . . . . . . . • _ • • ' 3 (1 ) Class of Stock . . . . . . . . • • _ _ 3 (2) Par Value . . . . . . . . . . 3 • (3) Vote per Share • • • • • • • ` 3 (4) Number of Shares Authorized . • • • • ' " 3 (5) Number of Shares Issured • • ' 3 (6) Number of Shares Subscribed • '` 3 (7) Total Number of Stockholders • '' ' (c) Other obligations or securities authorized or outstanding . which bear voting rights •' ' 3 3 (d) Control by another corporation or legal entity • • Section B: Ownership Qualifications . . . . . . . . . . . . • .` 5 5 U.S. Citizen/Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . 5 TV Network Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . • . 5 Local TV Station Ownership . . . . . . . . . • 5 Local TV Translator Ownership . . . . . . . . . 5 Local Telephone Company Ownership . . . . . . . • 6•' . 5 Local Newspaper Ownership . . . . . . 5 Local Radio Station Ownership . . . . . . . . Section C: Character Qualifications . . . . . . . • 7 7 Conviction in Criminal Proceedings . . . . . . • 7 Liability in Civil Proceedings . . . . . 7 Prior Business License Revocation . . . . . . 7 Prior Violation of Franchise Agreement . . . 7 Litigation Against a Franchising Authority . . . . 7 Prior Default on a Loan . . . . . . . . . Section D: Experience - Current Cable Holdings . . . • 9 9 Current Cable System Holdings . . . . . . . 9 Average Current Subscriber Rates . . . . . 9 Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . • 9 Sub scriberRates Range . . . . . . . . 9 Basic - High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Pay - High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section E: Former Franchises or Ownership Interests . . . . . . . . . 11 11 Disposition of Franchises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section F: Financial Resources, Existing Capital Commitments and Potential Building Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . i. . . 13 13 Sources of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (a) Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (b) Primary Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (c) Secondary Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - Terms of Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (a) Amount, Period, Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (bj Collateral Involved (c) Guarantors . . . . . . . . . . . . • 13 13 Related Financing Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . jd) e Limitations on Sale of Stock by Individual Holders . . . 15 (f� Buy -Out Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (g) Assignments of Stock Voting Rights . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (h) Multiple System Operator agrees to countersign franchise agreement if asked • • • • , . . . 15 (i) Organized as an IRS Subchapter S Corporation, • • • , . . . . 15 (j) Local investor services in kind • • . . • • • , . . . . . 15 Page No. Documentation Commitment for Building New Cable . Systems (excluding Miami) • . • . . . . . . . 17 17 Commitment for Rebuilding Existing Systems • 17 17 Potential Building Commitment - new franchise applications _ _ Section G: Financial Proforma . . . . . . . 15 19 System Growth and Revenue . . . . . . . . _ • • _ 19 Homes Passed by Cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 19 . Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Year 10 . . . . . . . . : _ _ . 19 i Year 15 . _ _ + . . • 19 Penetration - Basic Service -*All Tiers . + . . _ = Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . 19 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 19 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Year 15 . �TV�Service-Al1*Services6 19 Penetration - Pay . _ . . . • = 19 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . : . . 19 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . :. . . _ . . 19 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19 Year 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Year 15 . .� . . . 19 Projected Increase in Revenue•Per Subscriber (%) . . . . .` 21 Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Pay Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 . . 21 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . 6 16 . . 23 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Basic/Second Set . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Pay TV . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Total . .' 23 Year 3 . 23 Basic/Second Set . . . . . ." . 23 Pay TV . . . . . . . . . . 23 Installation . . . . . . . . . . 23 Other . . . . . . . . _ . . 23 Total 23 Year 6 23 Basic/Second Set . . . . . . . . . 23 Pay TV . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Installation . . . . . . . . 23 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Total . 23 Year 10 23 Basic/Second Set . . . . 23 Pay TV . . . . . . . 23 Installation . . . . • • 23 Other . . . . . . . . . 23 Total . 23 Year 15 23 Basic/Second Set . . . . . . 23 Pay TV . . . . . . . 23 Installation . . . . . . . . 23 ' Other . . . . . . . 23 Total . . . . 23 Income Statement . . . . . .; 25 Year 1 . . . . . . .. . . . 25 Revenue . . . . . . . . 25 Net Income . . . . . 25 Cash Flow . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Year 3 . . . . . . .' 25 Revenue . . . . . . . . ` . 25 Net Income . . . . . . . . .' . . 25 Cash Flow . . . . . . . . . . 25 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . 25 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . - . . 25 Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . `; , '; . . 25 Cash Flow . . . . . .' . . ' . . . . . . . 25 Year 10 . . . . . . . .' . . ., ,' 25 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . .` . . . 25 Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . ` . . . . 25 Cash now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 25 Year 15 . . . . . ` 25 Net Income • • . i 25 Cash Flow ` • ` ' .• Sources and Uses of Funds i . 27 (15 year total) - . i i . i i . 27 Sources . . . . . . • i . , • ` 27 Equity . . . . . . , i . i , : . i = . i i 1 i i • 27 Loans . . . . . . , , i . . 1 i i . +, . _ i i • 27 Revenue . . . . . . . i i • • • 27 Other . . . . . . . • i ` i i. i 1 i i 27 Total . . . . . . . i. i' . l + • ' ' 27 ' Uses . . . . . . + Y . i ` 27 Capital Expenditures + + ' _ _ ' 27 Operating Expenses . i . . ` ` ` 27 Interest Payments . • • 27 Income Taxes i i 27 Loan Repayment . . . . . . _ P7 Dividends • • 4` ` ` • 27 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 i . i • _ ` ` 27 Ending Cash Balance + + • + • ` . + 27 Average Interest Rates . . . . . . . i Capital Expenditures "• i P9 (15 year total) Antennas, Towers, Headends,�Earth�Stations, + ' ` ` ` . • • ' ` , • . • 29 29 Microwave . . . . . . . . i ` . ` 29 Distribution Plant . . . . . . • ` ` 29 Institutional Network . . . . . _ + • ` 29 Drops 6 Converters ` ' 29 Buildings 5 Land . . . . . . . . . + . • • 29 Leasehold Improvements . . . . . . + • • . . ' . . 29 Cablecasting Facilities . . . • • . + •' • ` ' ` ' . • , P9 Test Equipment, Spares . . . , . - - 6+ • • ' • 29 Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . 29 Preoperating . . . . . . . . . . • . ' ` . . 29 Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 29 Pay TV Equipment . . . . . . . •' 29 Capitalized Overhead b Equipment . . 29 Other . . . . . . . . . 29 ` Total • 31 Construction Costs 31 Distribution Cost Per Mile . . . . • • • •31 p- Aerial . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . 31 - Underground • • • • • • '' ` 31 Cost Per Drop and Converter • `31 31 Aerial ` - Underground . . . . . . . .: 31 Depreciation + 31 (15 year total)• . . . Depreciation Schedules (years) . . . . • • 33 33 Antenna b Towers . . . . 33 Microwave 33 Headend . . . . . . , , , 33 Earth Station 33 Distribution Plant . . . . . . • • •• . . 33 - Aerial . . . . . . 33 - Underground . . . . • . • . . ' 33 - Pole Arrangement 33 Drops . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Converters . . • • • • • • ' . 33 Buildings . . • • • • • ' • . ` 33 - Headends . . . . . . • ' , 33 - Studios 33 # - Offices • . . . • . . . 33 f Leasehold Improvements . . . . . . 33 Origination Equipment ' 33 Test Equipment, Spares • • ' 33 z Vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . 33 i Preperating . . . . . . . . . . • ' 33 Engineering . . . . ,. 33 E Pay TV Equipment . . . . . . . . • 33 Capitalized Payroll . • , , , , 33 Other Services Purchased From Parent 35 Organization (15 year total) . • 35 Management Services . . . Page No • 35 Legal . . . . ` 35 Accounting • • ` • • 35 Customer Billing • • 35 programming . . . • ` 35 Other . . . . . . . ` 35 Total . . . . . . . . . . . ' ` 37 Operating Expenses i • • ` ` ' x � � 37 Plant . . . . . • . . . . 37 Year 1 . . . . . • . . . : . . . . . . 37 . . . Year 3 . Year 6 . . . 37 Year 10. . 37 Year 15. . . . . . . . . . . 37 Origination . . . . . . . . . . . . . ` � ` 37 Year 1 . . . . • . . . • 37 Year 3 . . . . . a . . 37 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 37" Year 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • 37 Year 15. . . . . . 37 Spelling G b A . . . . . . . . . . . . - ` ` 37 Year 1 . . . , ' ` • 37 Year 3 . . . - , , . ._. . . .;. . 3; Year 6 • , . . . `. 37 Year 10. . . . . • 37 Year 15. . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . , 37 Total . - . . . . . . . . . . . � ` ` 37 Year . . . . . . . . . . . ` ' 37 Year 3 , , . 37 Year 6 . . . . . . . . . . . , ` 37 Year 10. . . 37 Year 15. . . . . . . . . . . . . Section H: Service Areas, Construction Schedules and Construction Practices . • 3939 Franchise Territory • ` 39 Line Extension Policy . . . . . • • • • • • • Construction Schedule , , , 39 (Residential Network Only) . . . . . . . 39 Year 1 --- Miles M . • • • • • • • ' ' ' 39 Year 2 --- Miles M • • • • • • • • ' ' ' ' . 39 Year 3 --- Miles M . • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' • 39 % Underground Plant . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . 41 Construction Practices . • • • . ' ' Safety and Reliability Construction Standards . . . . . . • , , , , 41 43 Tower Standards • • ' . Construction Policy Where Utilities Are Located Both Aerially and . 43 Underground • • • • ' . ' ' ' ' ' , , , , . 43 Construction PracticesManual . . • • • • • • • ' 45 Section I: Channel Capacity and System Design . . . . . . • • ' • . . . 45 Proposed System Design . . . • • • • • • • ' . , , , 45 Residential Cable Configuration . . . . . . • • • 6 . . 45 Channel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . . , 45 Downstream 45 Upstream • • • 45 Institutional Cable Configuration • 45 Channel Capacity 45• Downstream . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . • 45 Upstream . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 45 Other . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . 45 Converters • • • • �; . 47 Initial Activation . . . . . • . . . , 47 LU ation of Facilities 47 Headend Diagram • • Plans to Operate orContractfor Transmission Services , , , , . 49 49 _ (a) Common Carrier . . . . . . . . • • . — (b) Cable Television Relay Service 49 49 Multipoint Distribution Service 49 jc) d) other . . . . . . . . . . 49 Satellite Earth Stations . . . . . . . . • . . 51 Service Level Separation • ' 51 (a) Pay Cable Isolation . . • • • • • • ' • ' ' 51 (b) Tier Isolation 51 Home Interactive Service Capability r TL Page No, Headend/Hub Interconnection •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Interconnection With Other Cable Systems . . . . . . . . . . .. . 53 Technical Standards . . . . . . , 53 Amplifier Cascade , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 55 Longest Cascade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 55 Performance Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 System Maintenance , , 55 Customer Complaint Policies and Procedures . . . . : 57 Special System Features . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Proposed Signal Carriage and Channel Allocations . , + . . 59 Proposed Signal Carriage . . . . . . . . . . , . . 59 Local TV Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . , 59 Distant TV Station . . . . . . . , . . . . 59 Statellite Programs - Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Pay TV Programs . . . . . . . . . &: . : . 61 Local Programs - Automated , , , , , , . . 61 Imported Programs - Automated , , , 63 Local Programs - Video . . . . . , , , 63 Other . . . . . . . . . . . 65 . . FM Services . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 65 Leased Access . . , , , , , , . . - , . . . , , , , . 65 Reserved for Future . . . . . . . . . . . . , 65 Local Programming , . . . . . ... , , . . 67 Local Program Production Equipment and Facilities . . . . . . . . 67 Access Production Equipment and Facilities . . . . . 67 Commitment to Local Origination and Access Programming . . . , 69 Operating Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Year 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Year 5 , , , . . . . . . . . . . 69 Year 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 ' t Staff Commitment . . , , , . 69 Year 1 . . . . . . . . 69 Year 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Year 5 69 Year 10. 69 Hours Per Week of L,O.*Programming . . • 69 Produced Locally , , , , , , , , , , . . . . . . . . 64 Other . . . . . . . 69 Total . .. . . 69 Percentage of Budget Allocated To Access Channel Production Assistant , Provisions for Minority Programming , Provisions for Minority Programming (continued) Proposed Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate Guarantee . . . . . . . . Basic Service . . . . . . . . . . . . + Monthly Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Outlet , , , , , , , , , , , , , Additional Outlets . . . . . . . . Pay TV Service . . . . . . . . . Commercial Rates . . . . . . . 'One -Time Charges , , , Installation - First Outlet . . . . . . . Installation - Pay TV . . . . . . . . . . . Converter Deposit . . . . . . . . . . Relocation , , , , , , , , Reconnection . . . . . . . . Other Rates Studio and Equipment Usage Non - Commercial Users . . . . . . . . . Commercial Users . . . . . . . Leased Channel Rates . , Service to Government and EducationaloFacillties . Installation Fees . . . , . . . . - First Outlet , , , , , , , , , , , . , , - Additional Outlets . . . . Monthly Rate o, Special Rates, Discounts. Interactive Rates . . . . . Section M: Employment Practices . . . . . , , Section N: Mfsce? aneous . . . . . . . . 69 71 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 76 76 76 76 76 76 78 78 78 78 78 80 80 80 80 80 80 82-83 84- 85 M,1Y 2 1 1�. "" SECTION A: OVIIJURS111I' Atli) CUIITRUL I NF oRlIAT I till Applicant t7ame, Address, Authorized ltepresciitaiivo - - - ----- owilerskii)+ Into tilt atloll (a) Identification of Owners Aflt:i.l('+J•I.1. tit' 4:1'l::•'1'i It t'.lafll Awv,r,•aL1,e of t:toatcr ill,,uu S.W. 1671h Avc•uu,• Miami, F1, 31187 Char Ics C. llertuauuwski Geue[a1 Pittner (305) 233-7986 C(t.0 les C. Retmauvwski 40% Stephen P. )(ose, It Hit -hard B. Knight it Gv,n ye Kutidt' 6% Ahr:iham Mitd,er 81 1.hteni.[anz, 1'htenk[,u,r, I. S,huliz (law frrm) i.ut of 40;, G,•lllwth E. Imll-in') 1'•ut of 40C Pied it. Sullivan Pett u1 11)1 I --.thee A. TISrl, 1•att .,1 40-. Al.,n V. Tt:,hn,an rari of 40* Itt,beI t S. Birch pat t of 40% Preston P. 'rist It Pal c of f 401. 40'1 t �:,PIJ-::�:•�i ns ut:,!It 1.1(,11 Ht i,-'l.t11 A,•cuuta, Sulu•. i01) Mi.uut, 11. iltil i'htllp B. Llu•1 I'trsidwt[, U.S. Cablesystems Inc• O05) )iH-H42H U.S. ('aLlasystems like. 80e Galld•tilt•r 41 Ih•rbett M. Levin It FdwarJ I. Lnuiou 31 1•aul P. tl.,�vidal it Uon., l.1 If. Itt ed , J1. 41 (*asill C. Rc,•ves, Sr. 31 ft1A111 '11.L1:-i(HiliUi:lr'1:'tf"fIS Miami TO le-Cummtinicati(Ills 5781 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 10) �iian,i, 1.1. 31117 Paul Alden Vice Presider' ( 301) 7'11-82f 1 fCI-Taft Cable .ision Associates 75.01 LazaEo Alb) 1.51 Georqia Junes ;Vers 1.B1 liumberto tier' ,-.:dez 0.25'A James S. Billimts 1.Ot Alberto Cardenas 1.0% Juan A. Del Cerro 1.5% Rafael Llolteyui 1.5rt Martin Fine I.OM Richard E. ':erstein 4.0% Burton A. Lindy 1.1754 .lohn Lasseville 1.516 Alberto Ley 1.5% Evelio Ley 3.111 1 51+ ficrl,ert U. Fried 1•,tt a I'art of 40* David Lizarraga 1. list Stephen f3. Peck Robert Paul Juseph L. Guterman III Par t of 40% Luis Sabines 1.0% Albert Fried, Jr. Part of 40% Joshua liigh 1.0% William D. ftayer fart of 40t Arthur T. Shotin Part of 40% SECTION A: 0WNtRS11IP AND CONTROL INFORMATION Applicant Name, Address, Auttlorized tte resent.ative --- - — ownership Information 1(a) adentification of Owners S1% STAR NIELSON CABLEVISION OF MIAMI, HIC. Six Star Nielson Cablevisiun Of Miami, Inc. 440 So. Citrus Street Covina, CA 91123 Victor F. Sharar Senior V1ce President 1213) 967-6337 VISION CABLE OF HIAMI, INC. Vlt,ion Cable of Miami. Inc. 3550 11iscayne Boulevard (Suite 605) Miami, Florida 33137 Michael S. Willner Vice President (212) 759-1500 Six Star Nielson Cablevision 100% Vision CJble Shareholders' Trust' 311 NPwhoUse Group, Inc. 441 Willy A. Beru,ello 21 David B1umber,1 2t Almandu Covina 21 Rclschrl V. Green 21 Barry Kutun 2% Linda McGuwau 21 HuLelt. tL Kniyht 21 CJI I'1e Mrck 21 Aime Mcycr 21 Athalie Hamer 21 Edmund Skelliuys 21 (� '1'utll C)uals 911) • Share'iol•lr•rc of VCST. Sivuey H. Knafcl 27.831 Ge,.rr yr 1.. 1.i lalelOai,n 15. 201L Micheel S. Wil►ner 4.161 Srytn,n,r It. Askin, Jr 3.691 Hicilary M. While 1.161 Arthur M. Shulman 1.62t Pamela T. Hammond 1.00t 1-001 fib) urgauisations or Corpuratious owning 34•ur more interest Stuck Information (a) Structure (b) Stock of Curpul.tti(Jn 1) Class cif SLOrk 2) Val Value 3) vote per sh.tre 4) Nutnbet of Shares Authorized 5) Number of Shaics Issued 6) Number of Shares Subscribed 71 Total Number of SLuckhuldcrs (c) Other obligations ut securities oulborized or outstanding which bear voting rights Ad) Control by another corporation or }legal entity Anr.lctcAhl.c ,n'-t:el:A•ri:b n1,ul, N/A Partnorshil• t'i�ltll t: i:•'1�1.f L: fll Alll If.!;. C.tbl,-sysleuu Inc. is wholly .,w —1 b� ftoyers l'ablcsysllws Inc., a Ind)) it•ly Owned Company headquartered in Canatld. Itu'lers Cab lesystems 1n17 . is 54.2v owned by Buyers Ilives UoenIs a Itug.-rs family owned trust 1'ar tiler st111i N/A 1Z 1"es, the General Valtilel, U.S. Cable- _ystelm, Inc., is a belawdre (orpulatiun Wholly uwnr.i by kugers (ablesysl.•m Inc., based in Tolonto, ( anada. fll \Ill 'PI:Li:-Cua6lutl U'A'('IUN: Tc l-Taft Cablevisiun Assu<•iates is 50Y Owned by Tdit Cable Cougtauy (,1 whully owned sul,sidiary of Tdit lit oadcast in•I Company) and 50% owned by 'lei.e- Couununirations Cable Company (a wholly owned subsidiaty of TCI (levelupment Corporation which is in turn wholly owned by Tele-Communications, inc., Taft broadcasting Coml:,my dnd Tele- Conl:eunlcatiuns, Inc., are publicly uwnt.i. Corporation (Florida) Class A Class 0 $1.00 $1.00 0 1 667 10.000 667 10,000 667 10,000 not indicated Not indicated RM Yes. fliami '1'ele-Conununicdtions is controlled by TCI-Taft Cablevisiun Associates which owns 801 of its votinq stock and 751 of its total stock 3 ?(b) organizations or COr1K)rations owning 311 or more interest Stock Information (e) Structure (b) SLock of Corporation 1) Class of Stock 2) Par Value 3) Vote per Share 4► Number of Shares Authorized 5) Number of Shares Issued 61 Number of Shares Subscribed 7) Total Number of Stockholders le) Other obligations or se_urities authorized or outstanding which bear voting rights (d) -Control by another corporation or leqal entity SIX STAR NIELSON CAIILEVISION OF MIAMI, 111C. Six Star Nielson Cablevision of fliami, Inc. is owned by Six Stat Nielson Cablevision, which is equally owned by Nielson Enterprises, Inc. and Six Star Cablevision, Inc. Corporation N/A No Yes, wholly owned by Six Star Nielson Cablevision. Vll:Ic,u CAlil.t: OF MIAMI, INC. Vision Cable of tliami, Inc. is 311 owned by the Vision ('able Shateholders' Trust an.l 441 awned by the Newlu Ilse rruup, Inc. (which is wholly owned by Advance Publications, laic., which in turn is wholly owned by the Advance Voting Trust a test amcut.uy trust created under the last will and testament of Samuel 1. Newhouse, deceased.) Corporation Class A Class [I Class C Class U $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 1 1 t 0 1000 1550 2200 250 1000 1550 2200 250 1000 1550 2200 100 10• 1 •• 1••• 1.... • - 10 local stockholdels (10% cash) ••_ Visuu, ('able Shareholders' Trust •- Newhouse Gtoup, laic. •••-tf.lily Vatun (40t) !lu Yes, Vision Ca)hle of Miami, laic. is a privately held corporation owned by tine Ncwhonse c-toup, file. (441). and Vision Cable Shareholders' Trust (JIt) and a group of local investors (25Z)'. ' Infolmation on local investors totals only 22%. 150 shares of class G sloe►: reptesentinq 31L of equity not issued. SECTION It: t119tI1JtS1UP 'IUALIFICINTIONS U.S. Citiuvl/Colpotatlost TV Network Ownelsllil, 1.0m11 •1'V !;tat ion Owuc1 shil, Local TV T1a1,s1.1tu1 Ownorshil, Local Tclel,hone Coml,any tlwnershil, Local Newspaper Ornlelshii, •Local Aadio Statiull Ownershir, AttMUCA111.1OP IIIAIII t'Altl.l'::YUTj fIS 111AM1 U.S./1•artnershil, U.S./ Pal Uwrshil, No 1J'1 ,No No :No ' NO 141 No dlo 1'es, 1L111h Po•eves (it owner) is the I.ulrllshl:•I ul the M alill 'I'rlues uewsl,.tl,el . Ju yes, IIeIh,•I I. Levin (P. owner) is Vic: I'r.rsid,vnt and General Kmayer of tQ!!A IJ4%1't1 .O1J is .1 utinurity stockholtlei of L'adlo .I• Mi.luii, 1J10. which owns l+•1(:AFM I_ I M AIII ' IAX CUIit1UI1IUMON:: 5 ^�t51i SECTION R: 0WNF:R5l11P QUALIFICATIONS U.S. Citizen/Curpuration TV Network thanership Local TV SLat1011 Ownership Local TV Translator Ownelship Local Telephone Cumpany llwuership Local Newspaper Ownership d,ocal lladio Station Ownership SIX STAN NIMSON CABLVVISIUN UP MIAMI. INC. U.S./Corporation No No VISION CAUI.l: OF 1t1A141, INC. 11. S/Corporation No No No Nu No Yaps, S.I. Nrwhuuse, .)r, and Donal Newhouse, t'o -'ri ustees of the Ado Vining 'trust, each own 5011 of the Corpuraliun owninq the license tc operate WSYR-AM and FM :yracuse. York, WADI -AM and FM in Bitminglra Alabama, and W'1'PA-FM in Ilarrisbur Pennsylvania. ►a 81:(•'I'lll'J c: C111MACT11i QIIAI.lF1CA1llltit: I Conviction ill (riOUlnal 1•lut'vediu,ls idat) iIIty in 1•ivil 1•1oceddill' s ' Prier Isusiuess LJeanse Revucatiun 1'riot Violatiutl of 1'.rauchise Ag recanent l.itigatluti Against a Vialtchisi'Ill iiatwr tl y 'radar default •on <a dMill 4•APlX!;Y::i•I11G "'At" ,lrilaalJ'nitla: of tJKl:n'I'I:Ir Ir:11tt1 Ile Nc No Tat N„ 9Jo lu IY1`J, Mlnn, a1,"l i . Cahlesyt.tome. Co. iJoue :. 1'.,1,1.•:y+.t.uls !.uh!.I,li.uy) hloughl .Irl ion In lh'• H1.11lu•1,111 C'nlllty 11ISt1'Ict Coul l 1" I'f""'t .1 t'll1, 1 oula:11 r'•s"Iu1 tun Ica, in,liu•l lha•lt frallchi:... rul ing w.ls !.uhsa•.luenl ly al•I,o.11r.l I,y Mlr111-11'lIis t•ahle'.yslems .ut ul,hel.l by Ih' :I..ta• '•.11n4•I1e Court. fit) i j i tttntn 'Pr.l.t: l�nMlulqu:n•rl":J:: No PeS, civil salt for unfair or •u111- olupetitivar ltusine!.s practices (ant it rt,St). Not. yet settled. tic) Nu 7'a'•^cases l'elldin'J; 'like invulvill.J •1!1 injunttiou .ulalust Iessat lon of cart iege of lisl.11rt signals (It"t'uu-lh of Given Tr':e) and the othe[ twat involving cases hro'lgitt t,y 'r(•i .Igaiu:.t tl a Cit ic" of !'cold'.. , Jefft•IB'lo, `t0 claiming Vi"I.lt ion ,.ntiltust laws, 1'ttSt, Iiflh, .u„1 t,Ulle.•uth Am-SIA"W"t rights .toll 1 u leas utla•1 St at e I iglit s- dcvru ''•+�''6 1" lunyrt lnruding iuclu�le une Lot s{„' 1'vt f'ltul.11lt a and d.uuage•„ on'_ tar tl.uuayes .unl iuioltc t ive rel let fur l[ear.h of cunt[a':t .ul'i invelse eundemll,lli„ll, two seek all iuloncllv,' a-lainst cessal loll of can i•+yc u( distant signals. oee seeking an In)t111ct1011 lestrallting the striing of cattle until collgtletion of fl- ngitise t [aP fifer, and orle to l,levettt lyduct iuu of tubscritter fees. All cases settle'' No SECTIONS: CHARACTER QUALIFICATIONS Conviction in Criminal Proceedings Liability in Civil Proceedings Prior Business License Revocatiun Prior Violation of Franchise Agreement Litigation Against a Franchising Authority :Prior Default on a Lodn SIX STAR tJll:l.tiittl CA111.I:VISION OF MIAMI, ItIC. Nu • yes, Violations of anti -fraud and registration requirements of Federal Securities Laws against a brokerage Jinn owned by a company officer and owner, Stuart Harris. o Three major uwners of !;ix Star cablevision (Studtt Rdrtis, Huger Maggio, and Pdul Sl.ul:kv) as part of Cablel'rel were charye'i with having frauiulently suld _,ihle television franchise interests consldered as unregistered securities which shuuli have be,cn been under SPC jurisliction. r'onscnl decrees were entezvd. No No Clone No VJSJttN CA91.r OF MANI. INC. NO Yes, an intermediate owner of the stuck of the Newhouse Group, Inc., was convicted of conspiracy to set maximum prices for the re::ale of its newspapers (1968) No No Noce No 1 SCCTIuN U: CKI'I:It11aJCC - Clutltl'H'1' CABLE 1101.UlUG5 Current Cable system.11oldings V1 AHCAMA: HI' to+t '1'I h: CII l;II 17 cable systemic in I1orida .u„1 uhio All of these systems 50° ca:n"d by Charles C. Ilermanuwst; i $10.45 5 9.20 25 ('able SySteMS in till• rinitml :totes, vanada and Ireland servinq I,11,t1,00u suLs.r Mrs $6.77 Iulwmal lain nut specifically requested $10.95 $ 405 llrelandl; $5.751U.S. InIms WaLiUn n"t-specifically requested runnl •r1:1.1:-rtxcur:uc,�1.1.�:,:. S28 cable systems in 37 st..tes, serving 1,280.000 subscribers $nil worma"ou not specifically requ—;t •1 $11.00 $ 4.50 Information not specifically reque:A-1 9 SIX STAR NIGLSON CABI.VVISION OF MIAMI, 1II(% VISION CABLE Ok'HIAHI, INC. SECTION U: EXI'ERIENCE - CURRFNT CABLE IIUlAIN1;S 20 Cable systems in Calituuiia, Ifl Cable systems in 16 states Current Cable System 11oldlnys Missouri, Kansas, and Michigan Average Cutreut Subscriber Rates 59.15 $7.77 Basic Information not specifically requested lufurmatiun Not specifically requested Pay Subscriber Hates hanye <Basic - high $9.00 $12.95 $5.00 $ 6.00 Low if'ay - iiigh Infulmatiun nut specifically Information not specifically Loa requested requested 10 SECTION f: FORIWIt FRANCHISES Olt {1hlUMS1111' INTERUSTS -- _ Misixwsiaion of Franchises MILVICAMA: OI' GREATIT III.U17 Iletween 1975 dud 19110 disposed of I Il, franchises fly sale. l'i Hl.l.::y:.l'I:f1:1 IIIAM flunu, unly done ill the 1,./st to rcrsl.uml U, Caoadiau I(equlatury Ageli y re,luireuu-ols or rationalization lictween 1969 an,l 1919 dlsl,usu,l of more than 19 franchises by sale ut exchan,le or because of the isu! it( A locatiuu of a system that was .,cquii—i as part of a larder "hackmlu" m because of an aban,lonment of a housinq project by ,levelopers SECTION E: FORMER FRANCHISES =pR-OWNERSIII P- - INTERESTS -------- Disposition of Franchises SIX STAR NIEL ON I vl::IUtI CANIX OF I11A11I, INC. CAIi1.EVIS1014 OAt1 F MI1, JtJC. None I)ispusc•d of I franchises between 1976 and 1900 by sale or exchange. CAIII&SYSTIU; MAlll $141.1 suppl i,•d by ltogel s Cablesystems luc. $iltl trues the 'l,olotito Dominion flank Ni A $Ilt•1 t.,i 10 yvats at the prime rate plus 1-lil' asnct s 1'h.r ,:. n.•i.,l Ivrtu. rs .u,.l tb.• local paltu,•Is un a 1•11, IAi., l,asis according to t1l"lr ur,ne_till:[' A ln•I`htl. .I,-I,-cment SL'C'I'IUN P: i-I NANC IAl. HC_SO URCCs. EXISTING CAPITAL C(A•IMITMENTS AND PUTt.wriAl. DUILDING COMM 1 T14ENTS Suurces ut t'inan,'iuq (a) F.yuity Ib) i•r imary Debt (c) Secondary Debt Terws of f'ivauciny 1a) Amuunt, Period, WiLe (b) Cullalelal Involved (c) Guat alit lit s A111:HICAIII.1: Ol' GREATLIt II1,V11 $15tt supplied by t1ty I-inlilcd Partueis $20M from American Security liank Charles C. llurmauuwski will sulg,ly additional funds as required per the pat t nership .r'lrcrmeut $2011 fot 8 years at the i+riu,e rat.• plus 21 All assess Cliat sus C. Ilermauow:;ki t.11,vll •rELI:•t:ot.Utlit11CA'Clot.5 $16M supplied by TCt-Taft Asso.-idtrS $2411 from the (lank of New York N/A $24M for 6 years at a 14% interest rate Physical system assets -rci and Taft Hruddcastinq I Nurse lai Shdrholders' agreement q(d) Atelated a'inauc uq Agreements n t..u..•hl,e and service agicuWent Fystem management atireen.ent 13 SCCTION F: FINANCIAL HESOUHCCS F._XIS'fIN_G CAPITAL _COM_MITMENTS AND POTENTIAL HUILDIN. COMMITMENTS Sources of F'inanciug (a) Equity (b) Primary Debt <(c) Secondary Debt 'terms of Financing (a) Amount, Period, Hate (b) Collateral Involvement .(c-) Guarantors 4d) Related Financing .Agreement SIX SPAR HIELS Nl CAUMVISION 01' MIAMI, INC. $10.34 supplied by six star Nielson Cahlevision and its pattt,ers $32.4M from l(au):ers Trust Amount not indicated provided by Six Star Nielson Cablevision and its partners $32.4M fox a years at 1-1/2% to 2-1/2t ()vex the prime rate system assets Six Star Nielso,x Cabl"vision Partnership and normal banking agreements VISION CABLE 01' I11AM1, INC. $23.6M supplied by the Newhouse Group, Inc., and by shareholders of vision Cable of Miami, Inc. $23.614 fnno Chemical Hank of New York None $21.6M for 10 years at 1/2% over the prime rate Moue Advance Publications, Inc. Crone, other that, the shareholder agreements 14 act Millitatinus on Sale of Stock by ludiv.idual Iloldcrs 9(fl 41tly-Out A41uemenl (y) Assiyuments of ::tuck Voting It i gilt s (h) Multiple System Operdtur aytees to countersign franchise agreculeut if asked (i) Organized as all IkS Sub.fiapter S Cot {rotation t(,j) Local 4rlVCSL0T ser•'ices ill kind !' I r I' '.I• L1. r rl' r. 'r'r 11' t i t •'' 1 :;ale ur reassiynuuvtt will hr to cithr r A) The Part n:iship, It) The t:eurl•li Partner or t') The Limited P.uln.'S As to WC parttiership interest "put.. after 6 years for miuiluum of $I.SFI All votiuy rights invested with t'harle:; C. Nermanowskf Yes The pal t nrt s; f t r :a , .old then tlw yeuolal p.utnet, have a ttghl of first tehl.:.rl to purchase ally units which a partm•t Waut:; to Sell to a person nut Curt etlt 1),' .t I.at t net at a Ili ice of Iered I.y .l tilled p.uty The p.0 tnr rs, it their !iule option, may also lt'nder their units tur repurchat;v Iry tits genital p.uturr it ao approved value either thr•!e years frotu the Blatt• partnet'ship .nlrecment signed or for a material violation of the franchise .1.I1 t•elile 111 Nuue t'es No Ho Local Laltnets "will receive a 201 iut••test of the partnetship for services rendered ill connection with the stl.rcessful acquisition of the r ily of flianli cabl'• television franchise." Shareholders have right of ftlst refusal on any sale or transfer of shares to a third party None of the 251 stock ownership held by Miami residents, 58 is non-votiuy. Tcl will hull 801 of the voting shares Yes No i(e) A.imitation on Sale of Stock by llndiv,idual Holders (g) Assignments of Stock Vutin:3 Rights 11) Multiple System Operator agrees to countersign franchise agreement if asked Ado Organized as an IRS Subchapter S Corporation Aj) I oval investor services in kind 51X _;TAR NIELSON VI:;lull C'ABI-E OI' MIAMI, 1t1C. CABL1:VISION OF MIAM1, IllC. Nu individual stuckhulders N/A No ves No N/A Requires writtrn t.t,ne:rnt of Vision ('able of Miami, lnC., fur prior sale, pledge,-nc,imbrancr, or other dispuSilion of Class A common stuck, which is held by individual investors. The Newhouso Group, Inc., (TtI(;I) as holder of the Class C cuxuunn stock and the vision Cable Shareholders' Trust (VC;'r) as holder of the Class B r_omuun stock each will have the right to purchase the other's stuck holdngs. The Class C option can be exercised only otter the tuulth anniversary of the glom date of the Miami franchise and the Class It Option is initiated on the fifth anniversary of the giant dale. After the first anniversary of the Class C Option perio.l Cunuuencemeut, should 'I't1A;1 or VCST desire to dispose of any or all Class R of Class C stuck held by them, they must first offer such stuck to the corporation, and then alternatively to the other party ('1't)(;1 or VCST) . The lu al chareholdet S (owners of cl.:ss A and Class U stock) have the right to b.• Ix)nght out any time between ye.r 2-4 at the greater of: 2341 of original purchase price Cash flow of comoauy for the last 12 uu.utt.a multiplied by 7, less senior debt, pro raked ever % of ownerships Not indicated Yes No Newhouse will loan local shareholders Im Documentation Commitment for Duilding New Cable Systems {excluding Miami) Commitment for Rebuilding Existing Systetne :potential Building Commitment — new =franchise applications AfIrRICAD1.E OF /:RCATL'R MIA111 Letter of cumnitmeot from American Security Dank for $20H to finance system construction Letter from Ehrenkranz, Ehrenkranz i Schultz confirming representation of clients that have Invested In other systems wl,eru Charles C. llerinanowski was the General Partner and expressin5 interest in investing $ISM in equity funds for this franchise I 452 miles, $9.4M coot over the next I years VANi.I.SYSTUI; iIIAMI I.etter of commitment from Toronto Dominion Bank for up to $31M in financing 1980 Canadian cablesystems Ltd. annual report Copy of the Partnership Agreement Copy of the Franchise Development and Service Agreement 2719 miles, $62.4M coat over the next 3 years 20 miles, $0.2M cost over the next I 1132 miiles, $36.6m cost over the next year 4 years 2 Communities requiring an estimated 125 miles at a cost of $5.914 6 Communities requiring an estimated 3829 miles at A coat of $100.1M MIAMI TULC-COtIMUNICATI0145 Letter from the bank of New York establishing TCI's $45M long term an$6M short term line of credit as well as expressing confidence in d the capability of TCI and Taft ful- filling their obligations, and Interest In lending $25M. Letter from Barnett Dank advising that they have received a request for a SIM loan from Miami Tele- communications, Inc. Letter from TCI-Taft Cablevision Associates mnuittiitil the full resoulcea of Tele-Conununicatlons, Inc end Taft Broadcasting Company as well as rvunittin q the funds necessary for tf+e completion of the project 1979 Tele-COmmunications, Inc. annual aeport Tele-Communications, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (December 31, 1900, 1979 and 197b) 1980 Taft Broadcasting Company annual report Copy of the Shareholder's Agreement and the Cable Television System Management Agreement 7.221 miles, $21.7M coat over the next 3 years 115 miles, $2.1M cost over the next year 19 Communities requiring an estimated '88ti miles at s cost of $127.314 17 gDocumentatiian Commitment for ituildinq New cable Systems (excluding Miami) Commitment tut Itehuilding Existing systems �spotential Duilding Commitments - new Itranchise applications Letter from If.11lkcrs '1'ru:.t Col"I,.lny' confirmiml thelr conunit,wilt to as::ist i SIX Stal Nlr•lSo❑ Cah10ViSl,Ul In their dcyui5it ion and lis-ATVof ( I Eidnchises. Also confillns discussions 111 1,rug1l:fiS coli',•111lll`J thl• iml,lenudntat loll of a $75M fiu.incing I,ackane for CA'1'V itanilllsc dcvclolmarut Financlal Stdteme111S from gicl:.un tint ci pr ises, Inc, all,i ;Six 51 a NirlSol, Cahlevisiun lloldinq l'ollll,ally 1273 miles, $23. M cost over tit-, next 5 years None 7 couunuuities reyu'ring all estimated 2.133 miles at a cost of $53.8M V1SIf.11 CAISIX (W t11At11, 1NC. STAR N 1 I L'5(ItJ l'AflLI:VI';1niJ 01' MlArll, Itic'. ------ tter [rum Chamica! Yank cunuuitting 1, to VOtt in financing. etter from Suuthedst First National auk of Miallli indicating that it would ,e willing to make loans to the local /.•'.ildl:llt lllvl::At is 1792 miles, $21 .4tl cost Over tile next 3 years - 376 miles, $9.2M cost over the next 3 years 10 cunmuinities retluiring an estimated �7,169 miles at a cost of $177.21 Me Sh:C'1'IUN G: FINANCIAL PROFORKA S Lum Gruwtl� and Itwuuuu llumus 1'asu :d by CaLlu Yudl' I Yu.ir 3 Yea& 6 Year 10 Yual 15 +VaaeUdtlull - lfasle Sul'vJce — All 'I'letS Yuar 1 Yuat 3 Yudr 6 Yuar 10 Fads- 45 Aluuutration - flay TV Surva"-All Sury 2d,ouu 145,000 159,O0u 171,000 181,0Uu 12 t. 34Y 401 4 8:L 50e 41% 46,6 55s 67Y 71% 44,000 148.551 151,241 154,904 159,607 4 0's 42% 46t1 Sol 55r 42i6 44t 4dr 511 Sul :ELL-t6-1111JUlCAIltd::: 45,691 155,456 162,172 171,582 184,115 M& A 55Y• 581 * 5816 581• • Tiers 2, 1 and 4 16.51 58.01 56.0% 56.Oti 56.0% W SIX STAR NIM-SUN CABLINISION OP MIAMI, 111C. SECTION G: F1t1ANCIAL PROFORMA System GruwLh and Heveuue 410116e Passed by Cable VISION CAULF. OF II1AMl, INC. Yeat 1 10,140 73,600 151,219 Year 3 149,781 154,282 158,126 Year 6 160,282 167.829 Year 10 167,782 180,799 Year 15 ,Penetration - 0asic Service - All Tiers 11 Year 1 361 41% Year 3 51% Year 6 ;�$ 551 Year 10 51t 55% Year 15 Penetration - Pay TV - All Services Year 1 17% Year 3 301 Year b 43% 43t Year .10430 41 Near il5 i F E C y 0.5% 41n 54% 63% 63% 20 1`10 ected lncrcas_c In 'Huvenue PCr sera er M- �11a6=1c :-,Or vice 'il I II � •L•. 'q' ��,'t 7.�1'i 1�� ��1 Tier Tivr s 7 r.•r 1 11 6 III IV 163.2 156.2 }.•ar 3 - 23.8 22.1 Y.•.rr 4 - 16.7 37.2 Yr u 5 - Doer cast-, 1'.•Jr 6 - 1.1 1.3 . ''I.+t... , '1: 'lll Tier Tier 11 III Year 4 17.4 18.6 11.6 11.8 )eal 8 12.0 11.2 1.•.11 10 12.6 12.4 %oar 12 12.9 12.4 Tier IV 17.8 12.6 11.9 12.0 13.1 12 C Y1,u 7 - 10.9 6.6 yea 8 - 3.4 V' _.a I '1 - Yoar- 10 - 12.7 6.2 Year II - ' Year 12 - Veal 13 - 6.0 6.1 Year 14 - ' ' Y.e.+r 15 - 10.6 10.6 Tier 'Piers 'rivr maxi Mini 1 11 6 Ill I Sr•lvice serviC.- fear 2 163.0 1(.3.1 155.4 Year 4 17.6 19.6 Yval 3 23.8 24.4 24.1 Y.vl 6 12.5 12.7 Yea 4 37.0 28.9 1).1 1•ear 8 12.C. 12.9 Y.•ar 5 Uccrcase" Ikscroa_w • fear 10 12.5 12.9 Yea/ 6 0.1 0.1 l.i Y.:Jr 12 12.1 12.7 Year 7 11.8 9.5 12.9 Y.,rr 14 12.5 13.4 YcJr H Yeas 9 + " Year 10 ill.( 8.5 22.5 Year 11 • ' ' Year 12 • 2.1: 2.6 Year 13 • lrecrease' 4.1 Year 14 9.6 7.7 1.8 Year 15 • • + 11 Less than 0.1L chanye) Tier Trer Tier Tirr 1 lI Ill IV Year 4 - 26.9 26.9 26.4 Y+rar 5 -20 - - - 1'.•ar 6 -20 - - - Year 7 26.9 27.0 26.9 Yea[ 8 -50 - - - Y •a 10 -1'10 27 0 27 0 21 1 ., r Year 13 - 37.0 27.0 21.0 Maxi Mini Pay Pay Year 4 26.9 26.6 Year 7 27.0 21.0 Year 10 27.0 26.9 Year 13 27.0 26.9 1 six s•rnu r+rersna vlsuxr cnl+r.r; OF ntnrat, INC.cnrlr.t:vlslorl OI' MIM11, lug'. Projected i_n_crease lit Heveu!!Sr e Subscribe-i i$1- - - -l--- Basic Service Way Set vice All Tiers '1•iu17 Tier 'Pier 'Pier Tier Tier I 11 111 IV V VI Year 4 10.0 Year 4 - 16.7 14.7 15.8 15.4 15.4 Year 8 10.0 Year 6 - 14.3 12.8 18.2 13.7 15.9 Year 12 10.0 Year 8 - 16.7 13.6 11.5 14.7 15.0 Year 10 - 14.3 12.0 13.0 15.4 13.0 Year 12 - 15.6 14.3 15.2 15.6 15.4 Year 14 - 11.5 12.5 15.9 15.4 16.7 Milli and Maxi Servicas Pay Pay Pay Pay Mini 1 I I I l I [ :' 1 •i Y Year 4 5.0 Year 5 5.0 'ear 4 16.4 16.7 19.7 14.7 13.9 Year 6 5.0 Year 6 13.5 11.4 15.2 15.2 16.7 Year 7 5.0 Yeir 8 14.3 15.4 15.8 15.8 14.3 Year 8 5.0 Year 10 12.5 13.3 13.6 13.6 12.5 .i.,IC' Ihwenue Year 1 $ 244,442 5 497,0110 $1,061,5UU H�sici Second Set 501.582 471,000 608600 Pay 7V 865,860 149,000 313:800 I11stallation 25,116 155,o00 935,800 Ot her $1,637,11011 $1,272,Ooo $2,921.100 9'otal I yeat 3 B,sic/Secuud 5,•1. $4,346,454 $ 6,B62.000 $1,937,100 7,281,800 Pay TV 8,947,467 1,999.355 7,049,000 320, 000 118,900 Itist,a l l a t 101t 149,397 1,620.000 5,612.400 tither $15,742.673 515,H,8,01)0 $20,850,200 Total Yeat 6 Sd,2d1,d90 510,29H2O U SIL,11i,1C) Basic/Second Set 15,885,597 11,',24,0n0 9,322,J00 Nay TV lustallation 1,613.403 ,it7,000 4,5/:,010 7,529,700 00 Other 1,613,4U3 $27,544,560 525,9H1,,000 $28,055,700 Total Year 10 -- -- Basic/Srecund Sot $13,HId,l12 ;14,`,•'2,000 518,82H,201'. ]5,902,2U0 'IN 27.211.7-5 - 14,Hh6,!1UU H42,mill �7,70U Ifis laliun l,2ull,htH 3,796,911 7,771,11U11 10,146,400 Other Other 1'utal $47,027,496 $ tit, 0U!.noo $44,904,501) Year 15 $18.662.688 f20,855,000 $25,G64,SOU Basic/Second Set 33,405,32G 21,:/f,0^n 21.671,200 lay TV 44,000 29,900 Otherlatiun 6,237,992 6,237,999 11,,uuo Other -11,675,700 Total -- $59,637,605 $54.1,8,000 $59,04L,300 23 Revenue Year, 1 Basic/Second Set ray TV installation Other Total Year 3 Basic/Second Set I'ay TV Installation Other Total Year 6 basic/Second Set ray TV installation Other Total Year 10 Basic/Second Set ['ay TV Installation Other Tutal Year 15 Basic/Secured Set Pay TV Installation S I X. STAR N 11:1 :11N CARLEVIS1ON OF MIAMI, 1t1C. $ 77.000 109, 0(10 149.000 14,000 $ 149,000 $6,056,000 8.603.000 1,124,000 1,100.000 716,883,000 $12,105,000 18,1111,000 301.000 2,149,000 $32,656,000 $14,561,000 24,058,000 55,000 2,455,000 $41,129,000 $16,770,000 32,149,000 59,000 VIS;IIIN CANLI: Or MIAML, III('. • Includes FM $ 92,000• 51,000 18,000 3.000 $ 164,000 $6,8G6,000• 6,308.000 324,000 701,000 $14,199,000 $13,414,000• 12,248,000 1,229.000 2,576,000 Sill, 1.47,000 $21,124,000 19,850,000 161.000 5,742,000 $46,877,000 $30.515,000 32,149,000 202,000 11.901.000 24 Llcowe $CJLellle llt Year 1 Revenue Net 111CU111„ Cash Flow Year 3 Revenue Net income Cash Flow fear 6 Revenue Net Income Cash Fluty YeJr 10 It, -venue Net 111collle Cash Flew Year 15 Revenue Net Incume Cash Flow ,(,37,000 ,041,001)) • 510,000) ,,743,000 „494.000) • S21, S41S.000 2,123,0410 5,5(,0,000 $47,027,004) 15,159,000 18,6H1,000 $59,638,000 16.374,000 20,212,000 • Income t.Jx,•s paid by io`lividu.,l partner. Pretax i!`culrce shown. i , •:1,.:- i1l'�f1! f11:.111 '1'1:1.1. :I..Ai 1 $ 1,272,000 (1,922,000)• (1,011,0(►U) SI5,858,000 (4,458,000)• 94,000 SI",985,mm ( 367.0110) 4,874,000 ;.111,001,04111 6,337,000 Io'816.000 554,1I'd ,uUu 8,607,000 12,2Stl,u00 • Irownu• tax,•y Maid by inaiviaual partwers, vtet.lx i1k4ome shown. $2,921,700 (3,676,600) (2,309,300) $20,850,200 (1,146,200) 2,939,500 $28,055,700 2,848,800 8.016,100 $44,904,500 7,964.700 12.403.400 $59,041,300 9,891.000 14.926.200 25 income Statement Year 1 Revenue Net Income Cash Flow Year 3 Revenue Net Income Cash Flow Year 6 ;revenue ,Net Income Cash Flow Year 10 Revenue Net Income Cash Flow hear -15 ;Revenue stet income cash Flow SIX STAR NII:Id:ctN VISlun MILE OF MIAMI, INC. CAISLIVISION OI. MIN►1, INC. $ 349,000 (2,530,0001 (1,815,000) $16.882.000 (3,407,000) 1,558,000 $32,656,000 1,884,000 8,587.000 $41,130,000 4,900,000 8,445,000 $51,807,000 5,471,000 6,068,000 5 164,000 (2,057,000) 41,536,000) $14,199.000 (2,146.000) 1,037,000 $29,467,000 I 6,337,000 10,224,000 $46,877.000 I 7.550.000 12,045,000 -Sonrcrs and Uses of Vunds (1S year Lot -A) Sources Equity Loans lteveilm. uthor Total e Uses Capital I:xl,euLl i t urns Opeaat in(] Cxl,enses Interest Payments Income Taxes Wall Itcl,a} meat Dividends Total al:ud4nq Casl1 41,1101ucc /J11:HICA141.1. 11' to+1:;C1'I :It Ili •'11 $ls,000,000 20,ono, 000 S27, 1U5,000 �542,105,000 $ 7t,,tl11,000 342,701,000 20.365.000 • 20.0001000 101,250,000 $561,IJ4o000 i� I'atLfe)s ta•sill,nsillc fur tlU�ir ovu inc.'.ma taxes) , ..i.1.1:.%:'1.:1 t1ffoll 514,000,000 29, 300,t1U0 462,259,0110 2.4.16,non 9v5,onn $ 79,•)115, UUU 11H,575,000 22,917.000 29,3UU'000 14,H00.000 1"utl.•I' ► 2,436,000 It 507. 9 11,0110 1�• I'.utnr.s n:sl ,nsiLly tut (Ileac uuu iu.-nmo taxes) ttll.tl! '1'i.l.l:-1'u�YU�UI,�,fl,,.'1S $17,116,SU0 26,004,800 540, 017.801) 6,846. 101) $51)0, 2n5, 4no S 87,311,900 331,56H,900 16,224,700 61,284,900 26,004,800 67,710,200 1590,105.400 Sources and Uses of .rands (IS year Total) sources Equity Loans Revenue OUIcr Total Uses Cdpital Expenditures Operdtinq Expenses Interest Payments income 9'axes Wan Itepaymeut Dividends Total fending Cash Valance fily, STAR NIEL"Otl CAMINIS101i ul' HIAMI, III('_ S10,300,000 32,400,000 502,721,000 $545,421,000 $ 54,766,000 348.572,000 24,550,000 31,126,000 12,400,000 54,477,000 $545,891,1100 $ 470,.000 V151t)t1 CABIX OF MAMI, INC. $ 23,637,000 23.616,000 573,801,000 $621,074.000 $ 90,489.000 329,137.000 16,900.000 82,522,000 21,638.000 $542,686.000 $ 78,380.000 Calli t a l 6sl.eudi lures (I5 ycar total) Ant,•uu.,s, '1'uwers, Ilcadends, Earih Mictuwave Uist.ributiun i'lanl Inslituti„n.11 Netw-ni. Plops J. (:,ulvcrlels Buildings 6 Land Leasehold Imptovemeuts Cablccasting Facilit-ies TesL Equipment, t+ares Vehicles P/euperatiny Enyineeriny Pay TV Equ i pnlent Capitalize) overhead a Cyui.pwent OLIIer Total $2,590,000 NuL InJIC.A J 14,438,000 889.000 22,785,000 6,000,000 5H1,000 2,735,000 1,092,000 2,540,000 Nut iodirateJ 190,000 770,000 Nut indicated 2,202,000 $76,812,000 52,d116,0110 I00.000 20,879,1100 2,986.00(1 40,151,000 Not illdicalc,l j 700.000 5,515,(100 1 , 150, (100 t1oL iudicated 300,000 200,000 700,000 Not in•licated 4,412,000 (Alarm nr.,tlitoriny) $79,905,000 MMI $3,721,600 339.400 27,820,300 829,400 46,285.800 1,530,000 4,402,000 1,235.400 825,800 100.000 57.100 165,000 $87.312,000 29 Ca vital l:x,e0dilutes 115 )'ear wt.�ll Antenuas, Towels. Readends, Earth SLallons Microwave Dist Iihutloll Plant Institutional Network props b Converters Buildings a land Leasehuld lmptovements cahlecastiny Facilities Test I:yuilmH�nt Sl'ares Vehicles Preaperaling Enyinee riny flay TV Equipine_nt Capitalized overhead Al Equipment Other votat SIX STAR N11i1-SuN CAHLEVISPH4 (IF MIA111, INC. $ 1,623,000 1,460,000 22,714,000 605,000 22,656.000 300,000 2,580,000 306,000 10,000 714,000 Not indicated 1,741,000 $54,789,000 VISION CABLE of MIAM1, 111C. $2,550.000 160,000 12,204,000 855,000 20,337,000 2,300,000 150,000 1,793 000 768,000 502.000 1,601,000 39,269,000 $90.489,000 • $3414 to upgrade system continuously, beyiuning in year 3 I d i 30 30 '----------------------- ^ ,1m c"s`u �����«!�_-�-- — wuut,/t)u`ioil c""` Per wu" - ^".i°l ^�at a-cx w'v` ".a c""°",^" - »u,i°/ -mldvyq°=nd y17,675 $29.425 z^"/ x �^ zierti o' Ill, Iv *m Tier V. v/ Tie" Tiers o, ox.w o'^ Tiers V. "1 $215 vxn'`,.zIll ,.,'�n,'''x . _---�' ------ -- — -- i $22.050 $mo'2-,o Tier 1 513", zie'°l/ ^ //1 $za zu°* /v v105 zi"' I v/a � r^..x/ I. o/ $za Tier /v x305 (w"`. All cO°^s ^^" P`^ dy"! u"+` $19,300 vso'u3o - 5/nw.v5 . . ' ` | $47,405.000 $63.517~000 � � -Construction Costs_ :Distribution Cost per Mile Aerial - UudcTytouud Cost IINLY Drop - Aerial SIX STAR tJlta: �tttr CAHI.I:VISION OF MIAM1, I11C. $20,000 $50,500 Tier 1 $ 80.00 Tiers 11 L III $255.00 (2nd drop, add $25.00) tlndergrouud Tier 1 $135.00 Tiers II 6 Iii $310.00 12nd drop, add $25.00) Depreciation _ 415 year total] $52,392,000 V15IvN CA111.1: 01 t11A1.11, It1C. $16,246 $21,898 Tiers I L II $ 81.00 Tier 111 $179.40 Tier IV $198.60 Tier V $274.20 Tier VI $329.60 Tiers I a 11 $ 88.00 Tier 111 $184.40 Tier IV $203.60 Tier V $279.20 Tier VI $334.60 -Ue�reciatiuu Schedules j�e:lrs) Antenna 6 '1'owul s n1cl owdve Ileadend Barth St at ion Pistrihutiun-Plantial - IhIJ�r�iruunJ Pule At', duyeulent UI up:: CunvcrtVIs Ruildlu4s - ue.tJl:ndS studios ull'ices Leas, hold lulpluv mis In igluat iun Lqui{nlent Test Equipment. spares Vehicles prepelatiny F:nq i nee r 1119 pay TV Equipment. Capitalized payroll Met :,'If VI1 I0v11. 11 (XI..., .1 It r;! ,ryl 15 15 10 15 15 15 IS 7 u 25 10 7 7 I not indicated 15 5 _ ri'mch.nuc Bynipmeut 7 1 Ft Jnchise pl'eposal nApplicationalld city Cost 5 15 Finance Fee 17 C, nll{,Uter 7 Radios 7 CRT Modems I - i 111 7 7 10 10 10 10 N a Not indicated not indicated ,,,It indicated to � :lu.l1•:: 9 Fob 1.• 1,{ulian.•1,1 10 Nut indicated 10 10 H 11.1 t. indicated lust Itul 1uu.11 0 I:ulylar Alarw f011111' 10 ItlLtll 't'LL1.•�t'1�"•'1I i:11'^'I l�✓•: 15 15 15 15 is 15 is 5 Not inticated 25 25 25 10 5/10 33 • ;I SIX STAN N,,1N_ CAd41iV1SiON OI' M1AMnM1, ItWJC. Oepret•lation Schedules (years) Antennas L Tuwers Microwave lleadend Earth Station Oistrihution Plant Aerial Under g round - Pule Alrangemenl Drops Converters duildiINS - II�'adl.'IId9 - Studius - Oft ices Leasehold lmpruvements Origillatirin Equipment TeSL E(Juipment, Spares Vehicles Preopetaling Engineering Pay TV Equipment capitalized Payrull Other 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 10 10 10 10 1'antc iiut tun Security Equipment 10 10 V11;1Wl CABLE OF MIAM1, INC. (10 ycir curq,ui:ite schedule assumed) !0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 45 45 45 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 not detailed 10 34 •lie: .:ti. 'ill tll Its it '11.1.�: •l= .'ai:{�:1•'.. S_e_tvices Pulchdse4 i'ronl_P:u_ent ll C�l•1111 ::al loll (L 5 year _ 59.686,000 $27,002,0006 $133,000 Nauayculent Selo•ices .. - I.cya I 338,000 - AccountI'M _ S,i15,U00 _ cusluulc•r Billi0y I`ruq i aunu i WWI S671,41U0 $15,001.000 $27,002.000 Total f • SY of gross revenues 35 Services purchased From Parent or anizatiuu (15 year total) Management Services I.Cya 1 Accounting Customer 0illing Proyramminy Other 9btal six SPAR NIELSOIN CABLEVISIOCI OF MIAMI, IN('. $10.051.,000 $10.057,.:000 OperaL- -- 1:1:l-euses Plant Year I Year 3 yea 6 Year 10 Year 15 Orijinat101, Yenr i Yea 1 3 Yea: G Peal 10 Year 15 Selliu•7 G 6 A Year ! Year 3 Yea 6 Year 10 Year 15 'rot a 1 Year 1 Year 3 Year 6 Year 10 Year 15 �.�r y • `'!.!'11-11•I 1' .1� 1 1 •J '1� 1 1 � �I $ 3'19,000 2.181,000 2,837,000 4,114,000 5,62G,000 $ I59, 000 5,647,000 9,789,000 15,167,000 20,974,000 $1,099,000 3,5'19,000 G,023.000 9,065,On ►2,7U6,000 51,857,000 11,387,000 10.649,000 28,346.000 39.306,000 5 40U,000 1,724,0(10 672.000 3,899,000 I.,7511,Ono 5 789,000 5,449,000 1,8(,1,00(1 11,220,000 16.987.000 $1,OS1.001) 5,135,000 7.438.000 ll,1J4,UJJ Is. 1(, 1.000 $1. 25(I, UUO 12,7U8,000 11,973,000 2G,403,000 41,900,000 ('i ; 111 'l'1 .l .1. 1 :'ii,;l It 'i l'••. 5 15,000 877,000 1,303,000 1,939,000 3,171,000 $2,327,000 6,963,000 U.215.000 12,197,000 16.702.000 $2,085.000 6,467.000 3.112,000 11,872,000 16,498,000 $4,427,000 14,307,000 11.65U,000 26.206,000 36,371,000 operatin4 Expenses Plant Year 1 Yaar 3 Year 6 Year 10 year 15 o[i�ination Year 1 Yuar 3 Year 6 Year 10 YCdr 15 Sclliuy c: 6 A Year 1 Year 3 Year 6 Year 10 Y."r 15 ^Otal Year 1 Year 3 Year o Year 10 Year 15 S18 STAR N11:LSuN CAPI.F:VISION 01' MIAMI. JNC. Vlslutl CABLE 1W IIIAMl, 11IC. $ b2,000 $ 61,000 1,674,000 925,000 2,238,000 2,441,000 3,355,000 3,954,000 5,246,000 6,128,000 $ 1,220,000 $ 75,000 6,044,000 6,873,000 10,073,000 12,569,000 17,155,000 1,470,000 2 ,70,000 24,309,000 $ 207,000 $ 28,000 3,184,000 2,563,000 4,095,000 5,226,000 6,413,000 7,044,000 13,982,000 10,268,0()0 $ 1,489,000 $ 164,000 10.281,000 10.982,000 17,206,000 20,236.000 26,165,000 28,153,000 40,690.000 40,705,000 4 38 Frl srCTION_ it,: sCt(VICE AREAS, CONSTRUCTI0N SCHEDULE'; AND CONSTRIICI'ION I'ItAC'1'll'ta clanchise •1'errrlury :Line cxtensiou puliry CousLrucLiun scheduler (Residential Network Only) Year 1 --- miles lt) Year 2 --- Miles dal Year 3 --- Niles (%) ulideryrouad Slant ., •.LIt:. t-1 :. ttl' �:i`L; °I'1 �i: t ..r•I ILtp provided All .leas of the City served wiLh)n 3 years til];tallatlull rates iutrlu'le the first, 150 (r•et. Ur ups grc•tter (hall l i0 feet, up to 300 feet billed at, time an•I ntalelial. Over 100 feel would require possible exLcusiuus Lu the CA'1'V system t' i t .;i:"t�! 'L: .'Jll Ill •Ili i•.' ?"... t•t )••r i, ...Il.�.t It r•:.r t'l.tp pr, vl.l—I All atoa:; of thv City served within 2 years I'e ;er ves the r i.till to charge nu a t 1-the ,tn.1 mat,,rials l,a5is fur Costs in excess of those fur a standard aerial drol) in cx.•es:: of 1 ;0 feel 143.2 (201) I 207 (101) 312.3 (431) 478 17011 209.6 (371) • flap provided • All art -as of the City served withru 2 years All areas of tile City st•tvetl of density. tltll table ally new develOpiinent ur annexed area within i rra)ths of being glauted approval to extend services, regardless of dvnt:lty. will serve all residential units Without exclusion precludiml the need for a lolly drop I,ulicy 210.8 (321) 484.9 (68%) 20.6 (•) • Projected growth 7.£4 11.6% 5 •+ 39 SECTION 11: _ SERVICE AREAS, CONSTRUCTION SCIIEUUI.ES AND CONS7'ItUCTION PRACTICES franchise Territory dAne Cxt,ension Policy Construction Schedule (itesidential Network Only) Year 1 --- Miles (1) Year 2 --- Miles it) year 3 --- Miles it) 4 Underground Plant SIX STAR N1E1-SttN CA111.EVISION Or MIAr11, INC. Mal, provided All areas of the City served within 3 years Will Provide service to all harts of the city havin,] d d,rnslty of at least 50 Potential subscribers Pet mil-,. Will Provide service to areas within the !;ervice Area having less than the required density if a written pet ►tion is received from a minimuu, of 10 subscribers Per mile at a c-„St foltnula Provided Will work with devr•lol•ers an,1 utilities fur joint list, of trendies and crossings to feed new 11uS111g derVe10pmcut3 Will serve areas annexed l,y t he ('i t y using the Parameters outlined above For overhead drops over 150 feet, will charge $15 plus $i Per foot over 1`,0 feet. If undoryround and the suLscribel provides trench, repaving, hack -filling and planting-$1.75 Per linear foot of underground in excess of 150 feet 120 (171) 480'(68%) 106 (I51) VISIotl CABLE Or M1AM1, INC. • Nal, Provided • All areas of the City served within 2 years All areas of the City included ill the initial service arcs. Will Provide service to any Presently undeveloPed dwelling units in the initial service area and any additional areas annexed ►,y the City within one year. Will Pursue joint trenching with utilities t7ill nut charge any additional fee for hool.ups requiring service drops over 150 feet in length 190 (281) 494 (721) 17.7% Construction !'radices Safetyy .- and iteliabilitt �t Consructicni ----i Standards "1i I1..I 11tq ,:r•:'!I.Y 7tt ,:1 1.-v11•.-.. ,:I P!It ° U.111 lylu•t. „f .fu..I l ty r,mt t ul ° 11„i sf Ule p1,J,tt lllg " .1i l l analy:-,• .1— "l umlvrll uunl SI,t-1-rI wat 11I115 ° 11111 Cuq,l„y oulllill, "n„n�-un,in,lliml. yt„undiug ,Y,'1n•�it•,1y ° All Ii11del,ll"111i,) cable in Ilnlluil ° AI l undct,lruuu,l auq,l i t iel Ali" i,uwCr sUl•pl i.es un.nuit ed i ❑ Jbuvu oIi'tilld pCdestals ° All undergruun,i pastV,•� nr nult od in above ground (,t J ,tJls ° All burnt') proc—l'ites ill .iron 1.1 a,ice wiUi local uidinallres ° All undelyloulld cutlstluct lcm Will cutlfolln to existing utility c--:figur Jtiulls whoa po�sil le t'unstfuctiuil Cu,1Cs i•lhaco•1 to inrludr: Local bullduiy aul s,il,•ty ,states - Occupational Safely and """It" Art - SCTL - (A•!'V Ilea lth a1lA S.ifCt7 tt:uni.i 1 - National t:lvctII"aI sJlety Cade (1977) - National Elect 1 1(.11 C-1,• 111) { hell System Coustill,-t ioti Practices z - FCC ltules and Regul.11 lulls - Local, County and Stilt,- Utility Codes I 7 Supplied Willi and reylillo'l to Cite 'll.ploVed t-if'•ty uquipiu,-lit 111 at•cUld•Illee Willi the cinistructloll ,'-14!n V,•lil,:lc:i cquippCd with saf,•ty e,lu i l,mrut I�UJI IIy ,-„ilt lot pil,llrail.-i used to 111„Illl„r a't,I,:,l rllet l„11 ,I,l.fl if}• All Iln,l,•rgt„wid cable ill coudult Court f oci I'll, t'u,le!; Jdhen•d to ,stet star: flat local I:1,."t i Scal safety CudC AT LT 11a11ual, Construct i0u Plucedurt•s flilue Iu,ok) nC'IA Safety Manual National Electrical occupational Safety 6 Health Act licl Crmstrustiun Practices Itcl Safety 1'01icieS l.11 federal, state dud muniCil•al cnnstlua•tiuu regUiremcnts utility cunstruct11,11 I.•yuiremeutS All attdchments to i+ewer utilities' Secondaries for the pulpuse of powering CATV distributiull metit shall culiform to staudanl speclflcations yovellltug such attachments ° will cuuforin with J11 •1•CI Satet-y ttallual specitledtions (copy available upon te,luest) stalulby pJw.•r provi'l-I ° All underground cable i.lcketv,l, flooded and ent."IS I Ill cundnit ° will keel, coaxial splices to a minimum will "burst in" all active eluip- meat for 10 days will use completely n,Calular uny,llt is 1 Will use preventative Plure,lurrs to cou,hat the prublems caused by Ill -ill salt colitellt in the air, atmusl•h✓rt.' lighuiinl Jtld very high wtll,ls Construction l'udus adhered to iurtuA•: - FCC Rules an,i Hvyulatluus - C'1•IC Technical Stdu,l•tt11a au.1 SpeciflCatiuns - FAA Obstruct inn mai k tiig .flit I,l,Pub iil,l National Electrical Safety Cndc (1977) National 1:ICCtriCal t'ude (1918) OSIIA Safety alld Health StJn•fald5 tICTA Standaids of Guo,1 Lingtllevtiml Practices Florida Power and light CoI+IPally construction Practices Rell System Coliatructiun Pc.+cticvs Local Ouildill,l ant' t:lectrical Ccules City of Miami Cable Tclevisilul Of inallee 41 Construction Practices Safety and Reliability Const.ructiun Standards SIX STAR N I ta.`.;t IN CAMAN IS1uN OF MIAM , In('. • Pule line construction in accordanrc utility cungpany Pule Lease Agtcement. and the National Electrical Safety Construction Vrac'tices Manual ' Will attach the CATV strand 01, the same side as the telephnn,- t:trantl if present. if not, will pl.tce all equipment on the street side of it', - pole o Will insLall 1/4" hi -lb a.tttv,•Ith, seven wire q.,lvanlzed, z111C mating "A" supportinq strand ° Standards provided for suppurtiny strand attachment to poles, auchors, guy strand sire, and guy attachmeut • 7•11e CATV strand shall he banded to all telephone strand or other existing pole grounds in arcorda"Ce with the utility company Pole Leese Agreement, except Uiat there sh,111 be minimum bonding between parallel CATV and telephune strands at the first, last, and every tenth Ix,lc VISlt)tl CAiIIA. OF 11IAM1, INC:. All constructiun shall be in accordance with the Natiuual Llertric :;afety Code - nandbook 181, Utility Company Pule Lease Agreements, standard CATV practices .tnd all State. County and Municipal codes, as well as the Codes of the Occupational `_afery and Health AAministraliou. Will provide all employees With tite proper safety equipment Will aLLaClr the CATV strand oil t're same side as the telephone str etrl if present.. if nut, will place all equipment on the street side of the pule Will install 1/4" hiyh strength, seven wire galvanized, zinc coating 'A' supporting strand .;t..cnJ.crds provided for sul-putlin^ straml aLtachuu•ut to pules, anchors guy strand size, and quy attachment The CATV strand shill be bonded to all telephone stland ur other existing 1.ule gluuuds in accordance with the• utility cumpany Pole Lease Agreement, except that there shall be minimum 1,onding between paiallel CATV anJ telephune strands at the first, last, and every tenth pule 0bwer gtaudards_ Construct ioll Policy llhcaa) Ul_rl-itics Are located Moth Aerially -and :Ilnderq rwuid :unstructiun practices'Houual :atuclural st.unl.,c l:; will c,•ututn• to I:lecttonic Iudu:,1_1 ic•:; ASsoCi.It lull Standard PS-222-C clltst t uct tun m.Itking and 1 iyht iuy will Collfur)o to 1-AA standac,i AC-7-7460-Ir Aerial " Will cuntulm to national F.l,rCt t ic- Salrty Code County Codo city of Miami Cud.! Suuthern Bell System ('unsttuctiou I's acUces clot iIta 1'uw,I 6 Liglit ('uu:;tI uCL lot Pt act Iccs Underground a Will uudergtouud whcle utilities ate undergr,xu.d All necessary uuLI fwat woks Made and permits ubtaiued ;Included ill al,p•_udix will C,nnl,l} with 1:1.•71tiollic In,lusl i )es A,,sOCi,It ton Stalldartl Ivm-22-'-C •1'uw.•r finlr•h hot dippt-d tialValli z.nl acCul.liny to A:;'1'll standard ASBL 11.11 k tu,l an"l light ill,l will Conform to FAA st.111,1.+1,ls It l l unaC1 gruuu,l w1wro: of her ul l I I It•s .Irr ttu,1011ouI - it is a city r,•.lulr,•mI•nt - Cost 1:. v,10.11 to or less cxl,euSIvc I hall Ihat of .$,•I I'll culls[tu,•t tun Att,IChu,eut to exlstiuq utility I,uleS is not practical or boles ate not avail.Ible ulh,•r ut i 1 it ics are pre -pared to pal ticipale in joint undt•1- .11 nun• 1 i uy iml structures call he 01117e1 ill sysleul desi,pl I- llit•lude,i its appcndix - - Iiult to withstau.l 125 inph winds Will conform to FCc Rules and Hequlatiooks ° Will conform to FAA Obst11417ti.-11 markiwl, I.i.lhtinq and Placellwut Standards hill comply el -,-tropic ludustIic:• Associatiun HS-222-C l,nder,liound Cable Initially 1.1 - where no aerial utility actvt, ,• exists - Where only FP1, cuncrety p(II, S exist - where telephone duct availabtIIII,-, can he secured Aerial cables will I.e relocate,[ uu l.•c ground is, any overhead utility selvi,,• area its which cithel utility elect:; to move its scrvi,•e uudergtound lucluded its appendix 43 Tower Standards Construction PulicY Nhere Utilrties Are LOCdted both Aerial and Underground Constructionsprac ices f4anual SIX STAR N l 1-1.1;1l1i CAULF:VISIUti OF MIA"', INC. a Will tnect or oxvved tilt, standards contained in 1:1eclr-onics InduStry Associates I1;-222-A Tower marking and lighting in accordance with FAA AC-70/7460-IF No undergroundrng is for(•t,*ast for Lhose areas where utilities are aerial Conduit used in underground plant except in a very few cases. Included in appendix V1:;N1N CA111.1: oF' mAtll, IIIC. • Will ('unfurm with Electronics Industry Association Standard 115-222-C and all applicable local st.+udards • Will ..ouform with all applicable FAA Standards Will umlerground where: All utilities are undergruund 1lndcryruund cunstluction is an �•cunumical alternative to aer Construction rlandate•r tr• local authorities Joint participation with other utilities can be accomplished Will join the last utility as it moves its lines underground Conduit used only in special cases (6 miles of 121) Included in appendix SF.0 TIUM I : CIIAI MCI. CAPACITY AN" SYSTEM VES I GN Pro(losed 5yslcw Ut•siLLp1 Residerll ial Cal,le Couti.pulatiuu Channel Capacity Downstream Upstream >1nsLituL1011a1 Cable ('011f 114urat-1011 Channel Capacity .Downstream =Ilpstrea/n Q1Shti' 49211ve m-OVs Afll-VICAI11.1. O} I;It1:A'1'Gpt 111.JiI headu.d 725 miles of dull 'I'nu1Y., tech cable 54-400 llliz duwust.r"AM and 5- 10 t•lllt all ,.it rc.uu 52 (x2) - 104 I'llann.•Is 1 1'" 4 (x2) _ 8 c liannels plus 2 11117. fall- data transmissiui 58 miles (initially) of simile 'flunk. with 174-400 flllz downstream and 5-1118 Mllz upstteam 37 Channels 15 Ch.ouaels plus 1 i pill. fur data t/.alasml:: ;:pun 4.8 miles of :nl•.•Itr.Ink to InIOI- runn.•rt if..; L.ulo County ,I+ I al ion I entcl o❑ Gal lowey It1„Id fop I'uu•ip•ury Alert and lnsliLutruu.al l.ca-rtis Microw:lvo i lit ercuum:ct ion to adjacent- systems. Tier I - none Tier 11 - Pioneer 0t'-2000 Tier III - Pioneer 1IT-1300 .+•1.11es::alJe Tier IV - Pioneer IIT-1100 intelActivl• I':�Ifl,l.l�l:�"ILt1; Itli,fil bus 11.11cs of ,lull Trunk, with mn c.11.1c 5-12, 52-402 Milt •IUwnstIl••a111 and it',' ulher 1511--4A2 fill: •L+wnst ream .911d 5-10H Mllx upst n am k.•sI•ta•llt i.II and institutiun.:l uelw•,lks are cu114,11as1. 42 1 58 - 10O Clcraulels) PM 1/ Chanmtils (bit'"', With 11151ittitlullal S,-e alr•vc• I• ". I1 cunstiuct separate institutional cal -le when justified by deman d I,f business users 25 C'ilamuels Isharl•d with 17 ('hannels tesi,leut lal ) 11 uult•s fur rcylo0a1 inlcrruunectiuu Tiel 1 - nano Tier If awl 111 - Zenith "ZT-2000 ad.ltess.able desclaulLlol (ul equal) T11.1 IV (Illtesaclive.) - II.rllis Model 62.1481 house tcluliu,ll tt•I,ISn1itJ+JS, oml lilt ,•1.1"t Ive key pad tdli,tlI '1'1:11:•l'Ilfit110:1Ci,/'U+r:� Ileadend plus 1 hubs 115.7 miles of dual 'Trunk, each caLl.- 54-440 Mllz downstream and 5-10 Mliz vf•sL ream 58 (x2) = 116 Channels , I'tl 4 W1 = 8 Channels 219.0 miles of simile 'Trunk with 174-310 Mllz downstream and 5.75 to 106.75 Mllz upstream 24 Channels 16 Chamuels plus dat• 26.7 miles for l e-f ional f,ru,lralu exchanyu, dedicated studio -huh cable links, TV station direct coouectiuns, .111,1 intelcuunectiun with the Cduvatiunal 11clecumua,tnicatluns Center Tier I - Oak 1.-10 - Oak 21 clt"uanei uatd-hand convc r t e r /d,rc•ode r •1.1er 11, 111, IV - Pioneer VIP one- way addrettsable or twa-way interactiv,- flayuavox t1.1.1na 58 (alxwe 400 Mllz) 45 S_E_CTION I: CIIANNEI. CAPACITY AND SYSTEM DESIGN Prohused .ti�sl�em Uesic n ges}delitial Cable Col►!iyuiatlun Channel Capacity Duwnstrcam Upstream lnstitutioual cat,1Q_gonfigtlr-@Lion Channel Capacity Downstream Upstream QLhvr Converters SIX STAR Nl l;l.Sntl CAIII-EVISION lit' MIAt1I, INC- 1 neadend and 2 hubs lob miles (at year ), 769 miles projected by year 15) of dual 'trunk, each cable 50-400 Mliz downstream and 5-30 Mllz upstream 54 ♦ 57 = 111 Channels t rM 4 (x2) = B chancels 137 miles (al year 3, 199 miles pru)ected by year 15) of sie'lle Trunk with 246-396 M11z downstream and 6-156 upstream 25 Channels 25 Chauuels None Tier I, II - 1'loneer DC-2000 Tier 111 - Pioneer DT-1300 addressable interactive Vislt►N CAI11.1: OF MIAMI, INC- ! Neidend and 2 hubs 684 miles of dual Trunk, each cable 50-402 Mllz downstream and 5-10 Mllz upstream 55 (x2) = 110 Channels + FM 4 (x2) = 8 Channels 114 lodes of sinylC Trunk with 5-116 Iwz downstream and 168-400 Mllz upstream 18 38 7 miles of fiber optic 'Trunks between the sub-hi•aJends aed the 1'elecuuunwliratiuns Center Tier 1, 11 - Iiamtiu sPC-9U0 Tier 111, IV - '1'ucuw 5504A Addressable Giscrambler Tier V - Tocom 5510A Addressable Disciambler Teletext Tiar V1 - 'locum 5510A interactive e d1nitial Act3vat4Ol1 ,Locat,ion of Taaid41.ies ileadend Diagram ,tll PIt'Altl.l: ul GI'I.7,'19 ai 111. tit ,7,1,1 I :'1:-9IIL': 111/,tll All capacity artivat.•J Initially. All r.•s1Lh•ntia1 notw„tl: capacity Ih�1Jl6tteaPl ehaunrls limiteJ to 9b .,u llt, .u•l lval.•t lnilially. A sc-I.uate re::idrntial net4ntk an,l tb un th,• iutaitull..u.tl network will I.L. institutional network becaus.• .,I VA cuue:tluct,•d wh,•u ►ustified by Jowaul restricted usage for institutional scrviceth.tt canuut t,• s.ttisfioJ through tilt! integrateJ oetw,.rk _ - -- -- ----- --_ ---- --- ILy, provided indicating lucatiun of the headend IclocY. diagram prov4dad laps provided indicating 10eatiou of aciIiIies clock dia,lram provided IIIA111 '1'I:1.I: 041111114it•/:flnll5 All upstream capacity activated "tidally. Downstream act ivatiun limited to 104 channels to limit interference with other spe-trum users "lap provided iudicatinq location of facilities Block diagram provided +,initial 'Actdvation i.ocatiou of #acilit-its :ileadend Diagram CAHLCVI:;IUtI (rl' MIlV11, It:C. 97 of the 111 1L0wnstlt•dm chdnnols and all of the ul•str—nm "llatnnels on the resident lal netw0r4. act ivatr•d initially 21 of the 25 downstream an-1 up- sUedm tn.it it lit ional nt•twr,rY. chdnuels activated initinlly Map provided indicating location of facilities •Two-way interactive diagram provided vl::1oI1 l'ABIJ: OF (tlftll, III(.. All clwunel capacity activated initially except for 'Teletext. 511 of the 55 'Teletext channels will be activated initidlly Mdp provided indicating locatiun of fac111Lles Block diagram provided ?t11:k1C:<hla: sli' �:I'f7:ii".1' Itla'll t'laus to Uhctate ur C•,ut.tacL for '1'railstillssioll ServICUS (a) coluncn, Cal raer O(b) =cable Tc levisiun .Relay Service (c) rlult.ipui,lL Oistribatioll Service (d) Other SeLeldicc cartb StdLirr•Is 'he 11.111uwing ruumulnitl,•s !,,•lvc•,t from he Miami low•1 511,• by bid irectiul'al sicluwave Systcm wills a minimum of tw,l •hannels fur intercunuWct: Rey Illscdyu•• Coral Cables (pending fl•uu terse) South Miami llal Itarbuur (pemlrny iranclsr :,') Ifumestead, P1u9111,1 Clty au,l South Dade County ( lilt c•rvonilciA on1y) Nuuc t{orle Ieased t••Ic•I•h"ue I•alr:: may be utiliu•d to lerelcc• pr,gramming from luca radio l n,adr.ssf -Is wlu•u ttu• signals canllnt be lereivrd off -air ves the right to utilize this fochnoluyy Should it prove technically feasible .lud crust effective finne Nurse tllr111 It 1.1 l'III lil+lllc•It 7•tcrt:,.; Nurse except fur satellite -based cabl,• programmoinq and uarruw-Land dir-'t l incs provided by way of telel,hun•• leased lines Used fur legiuual tntercunucction purposes, for links with higher educatiuual institlltiolls, and till mobile unit relay purposes. Will also use microwave transmiss lull Cur tale/Erp supl,ort of live, t'emut.e program origillatioll Nurse will fund and foster the establishmesst of a low power Television SLatioll In Miami meter WHO'S l) fur each hill') l ten-ns•eLer and 1 seven metier TVlto "s 1 TVRu's provided aid 1 ten meter s,tellile uplink provides III uv i ded lants To omrate or Contract For Transmission Services (a) Common Carrier (b) Cable Television Relay Service (c) Multiltuint Distribution service id) Other Satellite Earth stations SIX STAR NIPI-S tN CABLEVISION 01' MIA111, INC- P None AMI. microwave to convect main headendto distribution hub locations and other interconnected systems None None 3 seven meter TVlnt's at !headend. 1 six - meter TVRu at each hub VISI('tl CAMA: OF MANI. 1t10. Leased telephone lines will be utilized for reCt.ptlon of ❑ewswire services, I)ala nose scrviCes dud wedther radar input Would file for d Mubile CARS Band license fur local uriyination EN4 nuue Would piuvide for the installation of 1'rl'S microwave receivers if desired by the City and/or County for carridye un the institutional Network ten -meter TVRO's provided at heddend 50 service I.eve3_SuParation t(a) i'ay Cdble ;isolation €(b) 11'der• Asolatlion aiome interactive service t pability *,lll.l'It'Alll.0 tll' t;ill A•i'1-1< to AM •1-i.•1s I atl,l I I to list. no.lat i.'c ol,t iul nut cr11 f i l l el t t aps 'I'i,•1 11I lu us,• l'iou.•.•r I+T-1 hill ,•1.11csGablc con1'e1t. I ° '1'Iw IV to usr way 1111"la"tivl• ,fUII.•.�I tl•l 'Pier I and II Isulalod by cunvorLer and hani I,-P•rl IIIt.rs Tier III setvives isulatt.-I by Sync suppression Tier IV isolation pruvid,•,I t'u .1 tau - way interactive basis giystvin io wer VIP security and cuuuuunicati-I Ii I rnhl.l::y:.•Il.n:: nt:.ru All l Jy e;cl viers to use d coud,inat it'll ul bascb.ul.l ::yl.c supprv•siuu and dyuauli. vidou inversi a hcadeud scrambliucl. All non PX •Pier 11 Jnd I11 In u.lt aluull llq ...rl au:bi c.1 by the sJ,•vr tcchnl-iuc u.�,•d for pay security It,• sl rlrt,•d access A-1 duwustreanl .lata rl+.uuels to use a Iligh-pass tiller L.•c,••:5 t., A- 2 ulc.t rtanl chanurls I,t••Ir, l,-,1 1.1, high-pass filters laili initially lnstall a data/cuuyaitcl pru.rr:alrl,l syst.•In to provide Selvlovs includiuy 1'llr, luttugion and medical elalm st•l V ices UpLl,iuu pulliml .,lld Ielt.t.•st Pay-per-vi.•w ... _...- .....I..... ttI/M1 'I1l.t:-t.W1111,14ilAT I,INS All pay services scrambled using siuewave sync suppressions and a unique sync suppression used by Pioneer equipment All tiers isolated by scramblin,l. parental luck out features available I'iun-er VTP sccuri"y s;stvlu, will us" nderwriters Lalurratur/es approved home security olaim techl:ola„ly and services, security gaar.I service and emer,lency uledic.11 techniciJus to respond to aldrms 51 service i.evel Sei�aratdon Ka) +Pay Cable Isulation 4b) Wier Inolation s l % STAR tJ l CARIANISION OF M11111, Inc. The Pioneer n'1'-1100 system using addressable cunve1ters will provIJe isolation Tier I sub:criI,Is will have a 21 channel couverte.r (I1C-2000) that will allow access to other services Tiers I1 & III rontrulled by the addressable desrramblinq function of the OT-1300 terminal -Nome Iatteractive Service Capability I Pioneer V1P interactive system has -- capability for wide range of services Vl:;lutJ CAhl.t: OF M1A111, INC. All subscriber signals exclusive c Tiers I and II will be scrambled TOCOM's BEST scrawbling technique (partial v ulco inversion and suppressiun) Tier I subscriber drops provided Willi a Vitck low pass trap which 1 block Tier 11 signals All other Tiers isulated using tit, addressable fuurlion of the assnc converter TOCOM III-U security and interact communications equip+nertt used, wi capability for wide range of sery 04 4leadcud/flub Int,--rcuraiectiuu Interconnection 1llitit Otller cable Systems Technical Standards i MA, lCititl.l' r11' 4:N1:!t1'11t ttt.,III I ti1.I l:1:'ll t1:: !I1P.tlI � I MIP.111 '1'1.Lf: �l',t!Jilllllt�l:l'IUI:S "/ N via Nil, microwave C.,Iricl to noise -41 dN lilt elmodulatloll ploducts -52 d0 Ghost, Echoes, IIuIn mudulatiurl -42 till Isttlatioll between (:allies 00 IIP Cump.lsile triple heal -52 tilt hi -directional cross modulat-ion -43 tilt Maxiuuun signal level .tt I ecciver 412 (INnty Level stability -4.Od11 Fte'luency respollse (ally channel) 2 dB Envelope delay -200 Its oil Worst citallilel Ileadeud ronnecltJ to the two hubs via t 1 iul,• .-.tL1 t•, t.i,ll rt-ct Ion tl super ruck, a l,.j Iit s I t t-II II t' e I r I It bl It ions by fiber nl.t lCfi c.tble usut.. FM modtllat lull Via ultra -high nerfoltnance Li-dirt-ctioll.11 'Trunks utilizing 111 modulation and thrt•e-tluarter or olte-inch size low -loss cable 2nd urd,•1 b,vt rat iu GO dh lyd urdcl l,edt rat I GO 111 1111111 I't ('umposII,• beat ratio 55 111 Cross uu:duldtion ratio 52 tilt ::ign.11 to noise I.ttio 43 tilt Different ial i-iin 2v Differential ydin 2° /'nvelnpe delay 200 Its max. Network gell,rated echo -40 till tut 3000 [is delay The tour maxi-nuhs intt•Ir_urnectd via six 1/2" cables, with three operdting in each direction- Each hub has off -air antennas dud satellite earth station+:. Via AMI, ur I'M video microwave Carrier to noise 46.4 dIt Cross modulation -55.1 d0 Cumposite triple beat -58.5 dI! Carrier to hum modulat ion -40.0 ,I11 [lilt. Frequency response (6 Mllz channel) -1 dlt Differential ydin 0.5 t111 Max. Chrominance/ltint inalice delay 170 Its Max. 53 Ileadeud/flub Interconnection Interconnection With Other Cable items Technical Standards SIX STAR Nlla.`.;ON CABLINISION Or MIAM1, It1C. Ilcadeud connt.ctod to the twu huts vid lluyh.es AMI. microwave Will intetconurri't. with neighboring systems by exteudinq their Trunk cables Other systems may be iutercunnected by microwave or super Trunks Carrier to noise 46 dD Secund order products -64 dll composite triple beat -47 dit Ilum modulation -40 dB Frequency response Single channel �0.5dit Trunk spectrum 4 response a/12 -O.Sd0 Group delay 100 Is secs. Subscriber tap isolation 30db Return loss IGdis VISIOtJ CABLE Ur IIIAMI, ItJC. 11eadend connerted to the two hubs via General Cable Fused DISC III sul.crirunk, supplemented by a 6-titer optic system 3 options listed: - Vra the existiriq lustitutional Network - Via direct hardline cable between one of the hubs and the other crble system - Via microwave cuuncctinq headends Carrier to noise 48.7 dB Second order beat 66.1 dB Composite triple beat 55.7 dB Cross modulatiun 58.7 dB 54 /Dill+laf i.•r �('.+sc.lrle Pea fill 111.11we :System tfldaattenamm dS .unjdii i.•Is uvrl- 7.`, mil,rs 7mcfamingamm C.,rllcl to nnl5e - Ilum ('uny n,tiite t 1 iplrr I,r•at I.It iu Cl uss mudul at ion cross tall. c•luon.a delay Fr-.aluency re:;punse nadiatiotl 'fall isolat.iou Sul,%ct iLor It-vol, Il equenc•y 1•t•,c•edulcs include t,•';1 iuy fur: - S}'stom radidLlou - ::I,�nal level Visual picture yu.jlity 16, ar11•IIfi,•I:• ovel 6.2 miIvs 'Ies1:. In,:lwl,: i•yIlaI I . I Ili 111.1 1 :; I'r,•I,I,•u..y •;t.11,111ty of :signal . ._..,r c; Aml Im •auI (tors Jilt ,•rrr•,lul 11 Inn - Ilum ll•col - !:�r.t.vu II,•,lu.•ulr }• 1,•:.1 •nu :e Fr, lu.•tivy I l•r.1,.,nse of lu•ad.•rld r'plilcn. nt 11.r11 It pm .:11 :..•r 11, 1 1t.oIat ion Ili f.•I.•I,t I'll y.ilu Ili f f l•I 11.1 1.11 j•11ase CI (,!is Ill."Inlal tun I'i,rtula .ur,l sound quality j - L,•vel of rnv,•lope dol:,y - 1'oml.usltcr Triple I,cat M.rl nt. n.u„•.• Iu,.r,-.lure:: des,:ril,ed for II,••I.L•nd '1'1 taut: - Llue H.1�11dt Iuu '1!:'til l c.' !' tl'71'Il+lt L•1 I. •.., 14 .si;yl i `i.•rs uvo, 4.Is mi l.•:; '1'.,tits inrlu.le: Galn rk,i �;e FI"'I rc f,II I ier to noise Ilum Illudulation Visual flequcncy - clianuel rvgsoi,se RF si,jnal lv ikaqu F.: ho Triple beat Cross nlu,lulllt.I'm procedure-; desct it •d fur: plevelltdt Ive m.finlen.Iure Status monituliuy - Sweep cyst rlo Majilt euance staff described 55 S 1 % s'!'Alt N 113,5(113 CAI11XV1SION Ol' MIAM1, INC. Vision CAULK OF MIAMI, 1NC. A:litlet- Cascade j 4onyest Cascade 118 ompliti�•rs (15 Trunk, 1 bridger, 15 amplifiers over 8.2 miles 2 line exten(lers) over 4.5 miles -- --- -- t pertormaoce Tests S sy tem'Maintenance r, sts inCI nde: - i'ruyuuucy boundaries Visual and aurdI carrier Siynal levels Ruin modulation ludividual chauuol fre'lueucy response - system uoisc and undesired co -channel siyual = Inlenuodulalio❑ and Cross modulati)n, Terminal isolation Radi<.cion measurement Maintenance procedures described for: - tunplitier levels - Siynal quality system response 11Owu1, supplies Tet-lunical staff described 'rest include signal leveel:: Carrier to nr>ise ratio Ilum level Compusite trifle beat Annual proof of perfurmance Ituutine maintenduce described for: Siynal levels System sweep Signal ledkdye Heat dud luolsture T,rhlucal stdtf described 56 Customer Conll,laini- of ctirs and Sdrecial System rcalutes '1 ill('l.PI.1' 1•1' I;I'I YVI I' fit •III I , " I i,r i('S and pr,)e odif re..; ,1.•s( .r ihed I .,I Co. I. lilt l It.-) Pa14.11taI contlol key Pay-l•cr -wa nt cal�.lbi I i t }' 1'I onliuln dcup c.lpabi 1 i t y Constant system mnnilur'in'l IlaIIowl, sliuq Ili aynostic conunands Ilala services I:meryeu,.y alert syslew Sl all,lby powel pr ov i.lyd ° All ,lovel unlenl , edu,•at um,11 , h,•el t II c,rte and cultmal lacilitia•s initially connecte,! tr, inatltutional netuork and plovi,led with 59-channel vole"erter _ ° InLe1CUnn(,•Livn to County Gc:rlyen, Y Operations Cculer a 1:•Incat iu,,.Il •1'elecur.:munical jorls ('ent-,I . __._ _._.. __.._..-_- -.._ -� ^-. f1l i.ltl '1'LL1 I, •: if 11871rF 11:•':.`: it!; t11 Alll 'ol lcI .,; an.) prtx•edures deseritied Fir.•, Iutrusrun au.1 medical al•rin sorvires ol.iali"❑ pull iuq chann.rl m„nitorinq Way -per -view) tt,•t,'r n•adiny St al us monitor Inq I'el Idun lnf„nn.rt tun retrieval Cur nlrvu•y .Ilcrt system Sl.uldl.y p,•wer provlJrd hrs,•r••lc pnnlranuui•,y tc B nul,l►Ibot lit" "I ,11 st r I I!t 5 ,fill (a,.ilities listv.1 in l(FP. p-.17-I2,l will I... ,'olultv:te,l. Iludyet allucaled for 1',0 a,luxa:ti,iivj at. SHOO each. Policies and prl)cedures described Features include: - Community lnfurmatiou Petrieval Service - hay -pet -view Ilume alarm service V deutext f All interactive hrnme computer service Enenly ulauayenurnt Shuppiny at bume Rankinq at home status m,.nituriml I:mer•lency alert system - Standby power pra,vidt-d ° Institutions to be passe,! i,t• IustlLu- linnal urtw.,rk ruclu,te all ,r^'�'tI+•'nt edncat ioo.,l, health care, cultural and human services facilities, plu:; major hotels and balks. All tacllitI, with ex ist iCy pr U 11 a1,1111111.1 Ev Suul,•C5 will be imme'llilt .•ly <onnected „n a two way basil: mrnl:•le!urs, "I"'" t •ul,l character lonetatuls sto:•kt•.! t"I nuncomme.rcial use 1 mobile 1'urunuui, atiollS, t''numul,l and Control Couters fur Police 1)"Pt. ° Co•••puteI-aysiste,l "iusttuctlun software for Fire Ucpt. Ttainin,l ° Illrlahlt• TV ttansmlittel i for b rJlc rescue uui t s ° At city re,llleSt, 50 rnelwte 'I,V cameras for crine surveillance. 57 Customer Com(+hint Policies and Procedures Slec ial System teat w es SIX STAP 11I6L50N CADI--VISION Or MIAM1, INC. Policies and procedures described ('t•dtures include•: - lutrusiun, fire dlarm police/ emcrga•ncy medical alert Opinion pull 11k•1 Enemy manayem'•nt, meter reading Shop -at-home Text display Data ttansmissiun Pdy-per-view cpability' Status mnni itorany Cmergency alert system Standby lA+wer provided Scpardte stdff to ul.erate dud munitor alarm services ° r.overtuncnl facilitles , schools, to be cunner.tod, on request, lu the Irlstitutiolldl Netwulk at ❑u cost V15lliN CABLE OF MIAMI, INC. PuliCies and procedures described Feat ut es rncl u.le: lnstitulioual netwurk with 10 discr+-tely prugtamnable Trunks Fire, i-li.re and medical p+olertiuu _ Pay -per -view - k:ncryy wanayeweul. Text display POIIiuq Infauudliun data bases Status muniturinq umergeniy dlert system Stdudby puwcr provided ° Separate statf tO Operate dnd monitor dldrm services C',OVer11111ent facilities, scllouls, culleycs, hospitals to be CunueCted to lustitutioudl Network. Nu chargc for up to 10 drops suerlUN J: 111(oP0:;LD I;11iNA1, CARRIAGEntlp C1IANNIA, A1.LUCAT1uNS pro weed siyual Cairiega: 1,oca1 '1'V Stations oistant. '1'V Slataons SaLe,1441,e pruyrdlos - Video tII:OSI ... - .1 - -- 1 J.al.l!:il:'/la': �SI1•.11I A(ii:HN'IrHla: (1!' ol, l'ier 11: CIIs 2, 4, 6, 7, Ill, 17, 23i4Utl. ,lu.,11e ON 51 Uu Tier Ill: Chs 5. 12 YJeSL 11•tlin Beach Ch 20 F411 t flyers (Tier III_____ - Chicayu•1'1wr III) Ch 9 ch 9 Ism.)Volk('I - 11 1 (-Ia 17 Al l,10 a CI it•1 11 1 • fail -time Table New; Ilelut,11; (Tier ll) ('hlsstinn lit.,a,le.lsliuy tlett:utl, l'1'iel lit Nickeludeon/Al1C At t s ('Pict III CII:; Atts b t'ultul,. I'li. -I Ill ,;IaIaIsh Ia. LcIuaLluut! Ill! twOI1, O'url I1) C- SPAN 11 icl 11► USA/C'a11IuI,, :;a let llle I'1 U41.11ltll,l ll'I 'J,'11J"11.. ,rl ct ran.-e ('I'irl iitl Alq,,llachiau l'uuuuunity GI•lvtr,• N,•twuk•'. - 1'uul,le That Lava• (Ttcl IIII '1'tlulty Illuadcestsnl N,•ts,u1), 1'In•1 I"I poct.cfellt•r ('ent,•I 'I'\! (17c1 IV) Aim-110at. C.Jurati,nl,ll 'I'elevist,.n u,•u,nM IV) Net iunal Cht i_;tI'm 11,11wul k• 1'I'u•t (:land Ole Oply (wh-,11 .,v.,il,,l.l••)1'I'l.•1 IV) tl-Ii!in !;aLelllte ticlwuik' 4-ineuletiCn• Vldeu Spoils Nctwnik' l'1't,•t III C.(111posi L.• with „t+l,•r +'t "'1 t:1111Illl ll,l 11 4, 6, 7, Ili. 17. 11, 45 MIAMI ('11 S1Ft. Lauderdale chs S1, 12, b,e:;t i,a lm Beach 1'111r; ) .'helul.•Is (ur rel,eatinq 100a1 M1,111,i slattun hloadcasts • I.0111,usitt• uetwurl: fail t'll 9 t'lucalo (Tier 111) Ch 9 New York ('Pier I I 1 ) ch I Atla•,ta ('tier Ill) I II 2 1•ucrtu lulu/Ch 49 nl,IrLi I.1 I111 ) l'eLl,• :1, 1: t. NP(wutk Ill l) lilt) I:I•N I,.It 1.11J1 l'1111'•t 1.1 ll lil'I Y:tllk (II1' lull) fIIna ty Hlu.l,l.astsnl N,twurk 'I'r l,•vlr.luu tic lwu[k .Irwl:;h 'I he Illlti l,' t'11.Illlla•1 lilt) Ch1 i st I'll, H1ueJr.t LI) Network (ill ) t,lu' 1,,ts (AIpha) 1i11} t'-!;I•AN ( 1 I I ► !:at, -(lit,- 1'tu•Ir.lm Netwurl. (111) MIT, ( I11 t l... t.•In '.,l olllt.• tletwurk• IliO • ,'uuq.usil,• with other Plugranunih4 ftl�.11l '1'1:1.1:-t'O!JIIIiJII'A'i It�::S on Tier II: Chs. 2, 4. 6, 7. 10, 17, 21, •15 Ill 1':'1 Ch 51 Ft. LautleLdale plus reserved ch,Uulels fur: Chs. 33. 39 Miami Chs. 42, 29 West Palm HeJch Ch 69 I1011 ywood Ch 9 Chicago (TI,•1 I l I ) ch 9 New York ('I'r,rr IV 1 Ch 17 Atlanta (Tier IV I Nalluual Ctllistlan Network- (111) The tlusic C'hannal (IV 1 l a I l luNt• • (l l l USA Network/P1tiG/Enyl ash C'haunulllll) PTL/CHN till) Nickel u. ICult'AHC Arts (ll!) tiu,1, rn Satellite Network/Vtdeu (Villa It Itel 1 Pappalachl,111 l'lslllllll/lllty Ser"Ce Netwa,t M. Atnor ican Cducatiunel Televlsi(jn(it Vt W4)rk" ESPN Satellite PIL—lraln Network ;r I,ts Ve,las Live I (IV 1 HI:'I'A CBS Cable (IV 1 HET• ( l ► Ciueme.ica• 1 I ) ( 111 ('-SPAN C'a J,10 N.�ws 11e Lwurk (1V 1 IN Comlt)sitc with other Via ograuuniny 59 SECTION .1: PB(rpoSEU SIGNAL. CAHHIAGL: AND CIIANUCL, ALLOCATIONS prol,,osed Si3udl Carriage LOCal TV Stations Distant TV Stations Satelilat:e A'rograms - V3deo SIX STAR vl!;I()tl CAW.E OF IIIAIII, INC. C'AISLI:VISInp-tll' MIAMI---INC---- -- --'--------' (a+ 'i,irr 1: On Tier I: Chs. 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 17, 21. 45• Midai ,'hs 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 17, 23. 45 Mid Ch 51 rt. Lauderdale ,'h 51 'hs 12 rt. Lauderdale West Palm Beach- (Tit Chs S, 12 West Palm IJenrh 5, • Cuml,osite with other proyranuniuy • Nt•twork fill-in: composite with other pro,lramnliny C'h 9 - — .Chic., In (Tier 11) Ch 9 C'hicayo• (IV ) Ch 9 New YorY. ('1'ior I1) I'll 9 New York (IV 1 Ch 17 Atlanta ('Tier 111) c'h 17 Atlanta (111) (syndicated pt—Iram black out tiinvi If permitted by the FCC Ciuemerica• (I 1 Nickelodeon (I1) ('hrisliau Bruadcestinl Networ/.• (II) International Ch.+noel• (11) Black Enlertaium,rut '1'e1evJsi,nl• 01) Apl,alarhian Conunurlity Service Network ABC Arts (Alpha) (!ll USA Network/Calliope/MSC (III Los Veyds Network I11) People That love (1I1) Cable News Network (Illl t:SPN l l 11) CBS Cable (tal+cn avallehl+•) (lll) C-SPAN ll[1) Triuily BrO,ld:astil,q Network* (111) • Composite with other proyranuniny 'hristiau Broed,_astiuy Network 111) I;;n tletwor k/bl:T/Call tope/English l'haunel jl'-SPAN 01) utellit,t I'rogrum Nctwurk/'l'elefranc-iII) r'l-pelac'hi.u+ Couuuuuity Service Network/ Wind„w oo Well Street (illl t, dorn Set,•Ilrte Nr.twork (111) palllsll IlltelnJtlC)IIJ1 Network (I11) Iuucr i,•.,n t:duc ,t ionel TV Network (111) l'ehle N,•ws Network (IV ) Pe,)ple That Luve (1V ) I..,s V,•y,,s live/Ciuenu•ric," (111) The tl—Itll Chal,n,'1• (lll) The Mue,ic l'h,uulcl• (Ill) CBS C'eblu• (1V ) BETA• ) ruts (Al 1•!,e)• (IV ,ANC '1'iuu's Mirrur Shuppir,y• (IV 1 Alternate PBS (IV 1 • Wher, dvailable local 1•royrams — aAutomataed • 1'1 I'.Il'/ I•LI. :+1' CI I f• 1'I P Ni NJ Muvia• challn''1 (•ri,.l IV) Shuwtime I,a:; Vcgas live. (when avatlnhll('i !V) r 1 ) I;alJvision Ttleatel b,'tw„rk• ('1'iarr 1V) 11C,Iill• ('rict IV) Cinemax (Tier 1V) pay -per -view (1) (7 lel IV) Nravu Home Box Otfic4, (Tier 1V) • Cuulpusile wltll ut kci Ill a l,llauunlny 01111 il,m„• Ir,x ul l ire (ill) S h„w l I w, + (11t) (I 11) -I'1„• M,,Vlc Cllann•'1 'I'h••at,•t tletwurk (llI) IPam• (111) t'1I1a'lll.lX (t t l ) H.+ i ohs raJ ('ay-1—J.-view/t.u,'al .;ports 1 l 1 (lilt am Vh ws Live Metwork (ltil Put,I it : ubsrript i„n ,Ld, uppurlunitios (:�1•aniah) ('i'ic•r 1 Sl,auish News (Tier I ('nnuuulljly Ilullelin 111. CATV I IugrJln Guide (S(•anish) ('l:er 1 tub Opportunities (Twr i community finlletiu Heald (•!'irt 1 !'ATV 1•lugram Guide !.,,cal Urlglllatlalll :.Llledule I'l ight Schedules u, .,th,•r It 11.,I (I11 Mal krll,larar l l 11 Call I•f al e ill l '17.uu:I,,,rtati„n Guido Ill! Cuntlllullily Itulletiu Huard (111 LI,ca1 Hc•w:i!Iliyital ::ports (I11) AI'Uund T"ll Guido (rill 'illo Latjnc, II 1 Ill i, nur 'Theater tletwurk 111 ;alavisiull (ll I•,ule Dux Office (ll ftavop'.olden oldies 1 I 1 P 1 lla max Svcnur; tapociales 11'a)•-per-view) (ill ) Ilighliaht (pay-per-vtewl (rill flay Carle lilt! neuters WR I111 ) ('I1 -file Movie channel ::h,lwt ime l I t ) I•tugCJnl Guidr/'1'iwe WuathaV 111 '1J11l1'3pJl tlnl let 111 D,,,If ,l' l2) (l) Crime I'revCutjuil tlulirtin Ouaul• (i) il,►ic lAtirary 11,11►eti❑ Hoacd 11) ::ouch American Mewswile• 'lulu-F.thnia: Nulletin liu.rr,i• (ll C•c,mmunity Nulletin UO"Id• 1l) ttnvie Guide ll) black Nulletin Huard• (I) ;Jciyhborhuu! Ilulletln Huar.l• It) $C•111nr C1C lll'I1 Dlll lei 111 Du:ltd• III .lob Hank' Friendly city bulletin Huard• III Cultural Arts Hullt•li❑ Dual,!• 1111 County Goven,mel,t Nulletin Ha,dn1• (11) titJtu Gnvctnmenl Ifulletiu beard• !;hopping Guide. Ill Bids Alley Bulletin Duar,l• (It) Civil befellse-E:mer'lency Uv••rride (11) Telegr,ll,lric Agellcy' (I111 .lowish 'rokirisln Jn,l CUllventlU„ Bulletin Nua13' (II II !:,lucat lunar H'll lot is Huard (4) 1I ) Cuul(,,,site with utha:i hcclyranuuiug 61 iYay IM jrragrams it ocalt �pxograms - Automated S I X STAR N 1 I:1.51)N CAIII-EV I !; luN OF M l Arl l , I llc- Iluu,e 'rheatel Network (tll Cinemax (II) Shuwt i me on -TV (III lidldV181 UI1• (11) 7•he Muvie Channel Bome Box Off►cc available) (ll) 1'llS Pay Cable (when (Il)(III1 I'ay-Per-View (4) lslwrts, theatre, movies, (I1) vucationaII • Composite with uther proyralmniug Prugranc Guide It ) 11 1 Weather/Time Bulletin Board/ .1ub (tank Illl Grocery hoppilcy tilt! (llI) Vacation Travel f11[) Beal Estate Review (Ill) Auto i.ease Purchase l[Ill Muvie Previow• (1111 Ilotel Service Message Service IIII) lluspital Service Ei • Comlx)site with other O i progranm,ing VIt:!(iti CAUI.I: OF t11A1.11, 1t1C- Iluuue Box Office ill, Shuwt iu,e ll1 C i neola x (11 •1-11e Movie Cicarrnel (n Galavisiuu (ll Front ttl,w ❑Ulne 7•beater Network (lt H„ckcfellcr ('enter Television, (11 Public Subscriber Network• (11 Play ca►,l a 0 I(outel s lt)R (I W11, 11 available IIcIp Wanted (I Guvercw,eut Access Bulletin Board Srha,ol bunch Message Board' C ►tuard u( Education Message Board' Cuunuul,i(y Message Board" Pt ug[am Guide ;wall 6 Shup It.,dar Weather Miami News Healers R.ic/uy Results Compaticon Slrupping • C,,1111„,site with other proyrdnur LITZ 1;t111iciteteA a1Ra•ollrams — Automated I 11.0Cal 'I':rutjramb — VAdoo dialIk"I ('17or ll Itvul.ers News a/ld ::to,-k M.uket(Ti .•r I NUAA weal her NUAA Hadar Unw Juuos News and Stocks (Tie, 111 w"Illerl's Chanucl ('lies III Fulce •1•illie (2) II!1:• Ill r•til lll`I thwr: (I:Ilgli:al) (110 111.1 tl.rl.'S (Spalli:;h) (110 ulal•t. LuCII IL iyln.lt tun 1111 ,'•,Ih.,ll.• 'I'clovisloll (41 (11 (1) Florida lntonlaliona] llniVelslty Cducatunl.11 Arc.•:a 14)/('rime Watch (1) Pl oyl.lnl 111 1l1) 1:"vet uuuylt Access Ploylaws of lho Auu•ricas (Il)1 J.•wisll Accoc.; ::I.�llll:ill 1„'Cal elf l.11lldt 1"II 111) Miami t:.,ll„'Il I:uu r,lell,ry up,•l at ion ('.•nt el I1 1 (11) t).,de C-111ty I,.,.11d t)1 I.11 lldt 1.,11 1'llbllr nC'ee'::i I.iblary Access (1 ) rIlc Inflation Statloll fill mile SCheul Channo) Il ► .lurltua )Hanel 1u11.an•diSeniors public Acrlss II ) Il.•ariml 1ltami 'Cuyuthcr jell ruu'rlicable Luc.11 ullylu.ItI'm 11 ) beaux Arts/Cla:aiC Movies Ml.,uli City Guvclnun•llt (a) (l ) CI Rule Witch (:;1•cure) l of Miauu llll Cunuullnity Acr.-!: `: (tie) I•..ral Pru.l t anuuin•t• d'I'i Csity Miami ul tut al N.U. Cdyvw.,tel Cc,unnunity Aires• 11111 Little Navalla Collullulllt}' A•'''' =: (Teel Allapattall l',IIIIIIlulllty Arl•,•ss Flanul Park C•anuuulltp Air. .;., 1111) F:Jisuu - I.ifU'• NIVI'l (l1111'"I"Ity fell) Coconut ,;rove Cunununity A..:oess F'layami Community A1:,4•!a III1) Telchuallh Asss.Cial'•S (IV Dale S^huols IIT!; (I ) Cool —site with othl•r proiiralmuinct '11;Ill 'IIIL ''•'J11•ill' •'a The tiunlen•s Channel (III) NUAA (*olur Weather Radar (111) AP Spanish l.auyuaye Service 11I1) 1:1'F. Spanish Newswire (111) Washington City News Service fill) Iteuters News -Views Mt) lil'I Newswire IIIiI UI•I Spanish N.•wswile Market aurl F.cullumic Itc[Alrt (tv AP Newscablc (IV 1 Ilow .tones Cable News IlV ! Municipal Arcer::: (4)' 11 1 6ducaliunal Acrebs lal• (l I 1'ele-Cable Ilis(auru-Miauu (1 ) Spanish Pllbl is 'Television (I ) Flit-lid Iy City' (I ) Tourism and Convention Access' (I111 Conference died Cuuventu)n C'"'Le"(111) Shall Business Uptx)rtunities (III) international 'rrilte 6 Comm—C.-!City venture (Ill) F]xecutive News Nctu)rt (IV ) Comunidad Ilispalla (if ) Cuuut y Gove, nmuril Acr'•ss• 1 1 1 1 State Guvenuuent Access* lit 1 City of ftidmi Police Vcpattmeut (it I Kids Alley/Noma Ilarbera• (11 1 Fluridn State/Ite•tiunal News (I'll Naltowcast/The Mlalllt PU11%I•'1)• (11 1 Itulti-Ethnic Access' (l1 M-Pact Access* ll) Illdck Access* lt) Neiyhtwrhood Narrowcast Access* (1) Senior Citizen Access. 111 Ituwan Selvices Accel�s• ([1 lloulell•s Access' fill) Interfaith Access• lull lowish Access• Archdiocese Access• lieu Tourism and Convention Access' (ill) Cultural Arts Access• (11 1 Consumer Access' (11 1 At the Track (IV) • comixlsite with other prullrauuuiny 63 SIX S'1'AP d 1 I:I.t;t-N CAHLEVISLO 11 t)1' Ml Arl" It]C. News View/:;l,anish News 111) $nport,ed fi'togralus - Automated Fi11a11ciJt N,•Lort (111) Stuck,/('inancia) IA•l,url (111) womcu's ('haullel (I1) "ca4 aerograms - Video Ileariny Iml,are,i (Ill Sports an,l 'Ihedter (III) Ilasic Skills ltl]) Government Access (1) 0 1 rducational Access (4) (1 un I. 1 nn I11) Public Access (2) ll on 1, 1 l,n 111) Serliot Citizens Access' 0 Data Base Across (2) 11 College A(-C•'95 (III) Police Access 11111 Fire Access (IlJ) (II1) I.ibrary Access Black Access' (l 1 Ilispanic Access' (1 ) ' Composite with other progrenuuiny r d ( i t R ( i VI:;I,IN CA111,E of t11AM1, INC. lJ,luu•tis ('h.uu,e1 IIVI UPI Latin Newswire 01) tlpl Newswire (I1) ()ow .tones Financial News (I1) tipl f;p„rts wire lilt) II1-1 r1ol ida flews (lll) t:nylislt I.0cal origination ll ) Spanish local origination ll 1 tic ighborhuod LUCal origination (I 1 11a1dicapped Local origination' (I 1 B 1,1 k Lo(:al Orlgitl•rLlon (I I Vision Cable Movies (English) (11) Vision Cable Movies (Spanish) (11) publ it Access (1 ) (-,ovetnulcnt Access 141' ll 1 Educational Access Religious Access (III tledical Access' (11) Senior Citizen (11) (11) • Composite with other progratmning AmAtcw iE?►•1 3;e� vases ceased;Aceess ;Jtl.l+tt'�.HI,1: tq' ,:1H'A'1'J'I: 1.11.111 t( hI.1 :•'t :.11 tl:� 111 A111 17) Instltui loijil iiw;mess Channels (18) Systyu, Maintenance u,ln„• eysi ne•:, Ir.lt ., uata 1�) Rutrieval (2) (IV .uid Pey1 Itrule/s In!onnili,.,n ltetiiyval (2) Text !:uuUi Mlr-rican TV(rybloadca::t► (III) '1'tun• Il.irc.l '1'yILdon (4) '1'r•lidon Inlormatiun ReirIeval Potrc Tuntn,l 121 1'm•olr (1) H1,•.1.1cast an., Irepeat TV pro,il.uo::) (11) c'h.uu,.•Is ►istoi: 38 ('h.oulels listed: _ ltl lo,ral station:: - 19 local stations - 4 ::.,t,•IIAte sr•rvir,-s (WPM'I-c'hicu,µ, - 4 pay cable simulc.lst Gi::,•o Network, Warner - 1 Play Cable lest. 1982) blln,l .W411., Channe th,sic I 1 CAFM - ltcadinq lot llle t t;evo ll:uylish, tipauishl 5 Satellite SerVirys (19Ft1'1'{blear. - - 1 Courtly Itlnsh:•illy) Co Disco t4uhan3., !lusic '1'elevi::ioii, Cumllunity t.ifestyles, Natiolial Classical _ 1 ic AYrrssio Nclwork) - 8 Reserved for the future - I (",ovel tllliellt Access I,,,cal urI'll Alit iuu - 1 Suani:di - 1 Altenlatt. Localuri,lina►ins: - 1 '1'alkin•I Hunks 2 Chanrltels lull A-1 c.1111. ) ilIL-ludinq 1 ch:nuel tut 1• a::.•d lourisli ,guide. info. 1lttsierved 40r 9'uture. 7 Channel s (3 nn A-1 cable, 4on A-2 Cable) iucI.Iding 1 ch. tot low -power TV 1 Ch. fur pay-per-viC:+ 2 Clam el:.• (un A-1 Cable) • 1 is Leased Local Spanish dCbauucls for A-1 cahlel F11:.111 '1'II.1 turP1111:1C(,'l'I��':5 Images (Hearing lmpared 1,rugrarnrniny) II) county Interconnect III) Video Cunterencin•I 16) 1I:xp.s,Ivl..$) Shop-at-Itomy (t } } ) S7 Channels fisted: - 19 local stattuns 8 stuuilated stolen au,lu, tut pay services and TV uylwoiks 1 Hi-1 im)ual siuuticast 1 Spanish Public Access - 1 Edurat lull/Hlark - i Educational Across - 1 Airport Tritfl,. t Airport Traffic 1 Talking Rooks - 4 imported Selvices M""'-ibi,-•i l•. NH(', Voice of Auu:rica. 4 VH1- II.Iiti) 7 Channels (on A-1 cable) lucludes 2 C,nnp„sity with olhei pru,lralmniny and 4 fut leased aJItuSs.,Llu 2 Channels, (on A-1 cable) Reserved for high resolution TV; 2 other:. reserved for county interconnects for Ixtlice needs 65 SIX STAR NII1-MIN VISION CABIX Or t11At11, ltlC. CAIiLIiVlS1Ut1 Ol' MIAMI, INC. 3tflnr Mattel I'lay Cable Professiutial Cducatiolt (2) FSK-Data (2) Home Dank i till Medical Re1.Orlls Retrieval Municipal Traffic CuntrOl ut.ility Status nm itoriml Cuntitiutny I:Ju,aliun (2) Iluman Setviceli Low Spe<•d beta (2) Iligh Sped Data (2) -- — — 28 Channels listed: *14 Services - 25 local stations satellite services (WFMT-Chicayu,', Disco Network, Good Listenlnq Music) Ixased Access iReserved for iFulure 1 Channel (oil A-1 cablt.) 7 Channels (2 on A-1. 5 on A-2 cable) icr V - SU teleteXt channels ier VI- Interactive Services: now Jones Data Bank Knight-Ridder bald Bank 1lankIny/shol,l,iny/F.u11 my (1982-83) Interactive Games (1983) Nome rducatiun (3) (1983) Pay -per -View Movies (1983) Pay -per -view Sports (1981) 46 Channels listed: - 28 lucal stations 1; siu,utlated steivo for television netwutks and pay services - 2 shuttwave stguals (London. South lunet ica) - 1 Citizen Band - 1 NOAA weather 1 Service for the visually handicapped 1 Ch,lnnel (on A-1 Cable) 22 Channels ----_ _— (4 un 11-1 cable, 18 on A-2 cable) SECTION 1(: LUCAL PRUCRAMMINC ;Local Program 11ruduction Gyuipment and 4?aci4 i t-its Access 4RroductionrEguipment and F,aciai4 des SIX STAR t1I VI.';(N7 CAItI.I:VISIUN III' MIAM1, INC. • Studio located al, the utw library Ili the cultural Project • Studio will also be used for acce::s use • Total Costs: I PrUdUl:tiOtl Center', I, -()- Facility $9b0,334 1 Edit Facility 90,000 I ENC Remote Truck 220,000 Total $1,270,334 • Map provided indicalinq the loratiol' of the 3 public access studios a11.1 tilt. 13 Vicwinq Centers and Neighbor hood Acc(•ss Studios • Exclusive access costs- 3 Access Studios $(,00,000 2 Mobile Video Remote Truck 420,00n 10 Color Monitors 5,000 8 Purtapacks and Camera 40,000 10 Character generators 20,000 Total $1,085,000 VISION CAnLE OF 111AMI, ltli'. 5tu,liu lucattd un the cast side N.W. Ith Avenue between N.W. 11 Street and N.W. l4th Street ° StuAitl will be used fur access only when not being used for lu origivaILou • Total Costs: 1 Local Urigivatiun Studio • 1 flatter Control Center • 1 Mobile Production Unit • TutaI • Costs uul indicated •• $1.8m total capital expenditures for both local origination and access facilities • Lucatiuns provided fur the 3 access studios • Exclusive access costs: 3 Access ;;Lu,iios 2 M,.bile Productiost Units - Public Access Corporation Craut $100,000/year '1'u t a 1 ----- • • -- • ('usls nut indicated •• $1.8M total capital expenditures for both local origination and access facilities Commitnn•ut to Uu-al Otigialatioo and Access Proyranmliuq operating Iludget Year 1 Year 3 yea1 5 Year 10 ;;taf f-Cununitmeut Year 1 Year 3 year 5 Year 1() ,'.tI1.Pll '.IiI.I, ul -(:I:I A7•I-1t tll.11ll $155,000 508,000 655,000 958,0()0 7 Full-time I fart -time' 15 Full-time 8 Part-time 16 F'ulI -time 8 Part-time ]f, ruI I-t illle d 1'JI L-tllne • 4 Part-time pusiti(3us e,lual 1 Full-time position i!.'1:: I11At11 5 Sss,ou(► 1,)7o,00n 1.604,nQn 1,789,000 19 Full -blue •• Part - time• 46 FuIl -tiw,- •• Pat t-time 46 I'uII - time •• "art -time 46 Full-time '• fart -tint- • 2 I'att - tinge I,.,sitiuns equal 1 F"lI -time position •• ;;.um• position. nlay be filled with Perri-tiun� st..ft ttll•.I11 '11'.Ll:-(1�"ITI'l.11%�I'I(4a 5 768,O00 1,372,000 1,504,000 2,108.000 17 full-time 2 fact -Lim,•• 38 Full-time 2 Part -belt- )8 Full - time 2 !.art-t:m,- 18 Full-time 2 Part -tun•- • 2 Part-time Ilusitions eyu.11 1 Full-time pusitiun yours Per i7ce1: of L.O. Prt�9r`amminy 112 25 _..-- - - ---- - - 80 1'roducod I.ocally 30 229 so -- Other 65 - --- -- 3 36 160 Total - - - 65% Percentage of Oud_yct Allocate) Up to 508 40% _ __ - --- - - TO Jtccess Channel ('reduction 8�ssastancc - - - ' e Commitment to Local Origination and Access Programming O eratin UuJ et Year 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Staif Commitment Year 1 !lours Per Week of L.O. Progranunin Produced LocallY Other Total Percerttal To Accesi AS818tani SIX SPAN tJI1.I.::tIJ! CAIIIANISION of MIAIII, MC. $ 41,000 559,000 848,000 1.211,000 5 Fu11-time 6 Part-time' 15 Full -Lime 24 Part-time 21 Full-time 24 Pdrt-lime 21 Full-time 24 Part-time • 2 Part-time l,oyitions eyudl 1 Full-time Position 14 240 254 VlSttit! CAU1.1: OF MIAf11, 1dC. $ 100,000 1,174,000 2,264,000 2,671,000 5 Full-time - Part-time* 60 Full-timee 18 Part-time 64 Full - time 22 Part-time 67 Full - time 24 Pert -time • 2 Part-time positions equal 1 Full-time position 35 117 152 l u tProvasaulls fur itialuru��• II'soyr,�mwing (•t1V 11; 1.1 I11 ,•II 'ii11: I'I,,.III ° 2 1eluoLc Sludlus 1 Spani: -h local original inu studio is Little Ilavan.I ° 1 Black local oligivatiun studio ill the Llack conununity ° sludro employees frum the local 5s.`,11 fund ovot llte of IraechISe lul uutn,I Ily I,ru,Irauuullvl isd l la In i t„1 I,lo l,•rts Ill nnllty lelevItI"II I'IOdurtiun tr.11itiu'I ptuyl.uu Capllal costs to facilitate 1--al uuuulily c11.lune1S. Appruxitnat'ly 515U,000 c.+;•It.•I outlay per chanucl, total .—St .Ippr a,'h. $1.8m 51 . I M : coon I t Iu,.I, L over l i f u o f fr.rItch lsr I. it I,ul.11dSe a satollilc up11111. as p•,I t ut ,, source of 11,IL lundl u,in„r It}' PI U111.IIIIII111n1 F'undin,l tut !,t,lf[ p,,sitlunS Within the t',nuurinity 11,oIlrauuuilly dol,altmeul fur cn-ul,linlluls of Black, Spanish, .old lI, ,u,rn,:; I,I „'Ir anus i c'I Aftill.Iliun With "I:'I' lu i,lu"t'. IuC.II Ll.,rk pl u,It .uunu n,I to the MA, netw .I1: '1'eI I -it Input trlmlt'.lis at. Ilun-Itnis nultnl ity or,l,ultrat Ions ' t.U111'nllllity I'lo lUrf lull 4'e1,tels ill sevct,Il pro,l;nuivanlly mLnurity IIe f ghl,uI 110,,,1s > titt'dlo Inrattoc0, Ill L„th l.dliu an,1 nl.u•k aci.lhLuthuu,ls ° Cnmm11lliily 011,1111itIo11 poll,ts at nunn-rou:; mill,rlity unl,olizatiuus is of nun„I ity yluups un e :•,•t }' u•1•: t::u1 f l,,ru.t effect my lu, :,l 1,1,.•Il,uuwtnl ° It 1'111 .11 .•,•Ivuv :: llmr -:.haled In t ,., .e•.1 ..•m'•! lull••: till ,•,� lan'I,r,.I,•:: ° C-ImWu,lly vIewli't ''elltels Ill t'Vely uu our l l y ruu:mtla I l} ° 1'ru.I1'.lunujlUl d.•l,arl uu•nt Illrllty ptaclit—cs which WiII endeavor to , xrc,•,1 I:I:ti tryuiruments lt'outiuu.rd) 1111.111 '1111. 1, I'll CIC "1.....; Will establish a 1,raining 1'ru,lr.un for the Uis- advautaged. Cumu,itt i/I'1 $50,0:'0 annu.111y for 5 years ° Will provide Spallish Public'1'eltrnst ,I' with $100,000 per year tut ddn1lnistrativr a11_1 ptt'jr.u.Mil11•1 Will est ahl ish a Cultural Ar+s •111,t Ethnic Ih-rita,le Fund to dr-,bul:•'• y r.I:Its tutall in,[ about $L.`,1 over the life of Itanchise ° Will provide $50,1L10 ill to Miami ILCa Cullvgv ° WI I I provide j,,L, au,I sl.I I Is at _onvelIi,tllt lordt iu:a thL„ I ,1t the city Lo maximi--o Lhe tuv•,1 :, ,_. I�t of mintu it ie[; In Irlu•ILan1 I,l,',lu, t I. •i, ° will provide Flut ida Mennnt 1 11 ('01lege with huUt a IIt Ia'iIo II'•i television ac,'ess pladu,-ti• n ,t,,.il , ° Will prnvile specialized plt..{t.r�muu,l for specific -Ilk es, ,tr,l i, a.t• Chancels to minority intetcsts .111l insure the accessibility of p:,',lu t tools to u,i I'or ity .1 s of the rltq 14i11 produce p1u•Ip1aJu111,) ut u,trl'-;t to n,intlrit lr•ti Ili11 incur —rate a ul 1,111lY,+t lull Lu deteuuille the policies and handle the adnlinistratlull of the II'"'C eetwulk ldlll fw1.1 with 5125,0011 yraL 1. >115,vu0 tur }'e.0 !ur ear t with a 7' Will equip a t'uuneul,Ily Prlat t. Nulitut ium at. till' Nl•ub1-U.1.1,• Couuuuttily Cul1e•le t1eW tJ'nld Ct•nt, I Campus Will provide to Hegiuu,ll ACcee:: Centers, the Cul,unullity viewln•1 Celltt'tS atld sites un. 1•11e Itlstitutional t1,•Lwolk wiUl It'll ililt•lactive Capahllity 71 All CI . t 1, . I I i 1, 1 ..,l I - . - -- - , - ---, -- . - - I -- - - - ... - I .. - - - . - . I . I :.I I : ": I IV. 111"Al )w I W) ll,%FrOWc11aL k nq t.-in.,rity 'a- i'JI11,01- (,.I I r I -vil 'I'vI.-vI---wlI spanla.h I Channel I IA Hi I X 3 111ki j--t ulnlad at n.1n,111ty IlIVIAVOilent (Ml.litil T-I--tl-l) A now I I I" '" 1 a"' 11,1111.111141 at 1110 staLlon WIBA lowotv TO-likh'il 1111 tit ti.-LI1411,11 it local 11.1not Ity swWtip'll-is A [it I 111 11 se aLlIll 111 I !A I 'it P Ill I" '' I I 1"I• to nuronit v Iliv.1veiriont in the Community A ct-111,11itli-I'llt to '"k-lv" iow, ill community I'l.-Ilartmin-1 etfolts whole or pal I. to minority ill %I'll uoinq .111. it -!IS 72 Vrovisions for 41illoritY Vrogrnmmityu ;;I:. STAR H11:1-S 1t1 CA111.I:VISlu11 uP Ml"11, 1tIC. Public access 1•01icies and procedures descrfbCd VlSlutl CAI11.1i ill. 111"11, 111C. Public _,cuss cies and procedures described Fully staftcd and eyulpped access stu(jius lu.'alet in minority Cou,mutlities ° Separate lA,cal t)tiyivatfon Channels for Black, Latirr and IWudica{,pcd pr oyra•tuui cy ° Will offer t:alavisiun. Black auish I:niCttaL❑urnt •1•elevisiun, the SI lnternatiuual tietwork. Beta and the l9opuyr'S channel Will encuurayC the Public AcceS% Curpuritlu❑ to a.ltesslvely pursue minority invulvcment ° Will purchase u,iuurlty Cuuuuunity productions for the t•amily Muvic• channels ° flans to luvulve miuurlties in the advisu,y iblc tram program deveIol.mCnl t'alriaye of Ch. 23-WLTV (Spanish) un all ticts of sctvicc ° pald iutCn,ship: in cable television fur all rrsidrnts of lliawi, minority yruup:; ° EstebllaaunCut of a Career 9'raininy lnually arations Center to pruvidC cable ope egl,er,ou,•alOuuu:,ittcdally to tiled $ItiU.UUtI anly Ccutrr ° Narroucastrnl service un the subs,,iber uctwuik ° 21 Vieuiny centers in minority cuumnuriLies Pmploywcut practices exceediny slate and Federal reyuicements 73 S6Crt014 1.: pito oS1;11 P_JV!_S liar C.ua+autec Ilaslc $elvlCe Mon illy Itates rirst Outlet Additional (+nelets tl'ay TV Sorvice Commerc4a+l itatr t:u.0 .utll•t.d uut i l cunllr{et it'll ut syat em ,must 1"uct iull 'Pier 1 (24 chs.) •I'ler I1 (58 chs.' 'Pier TII (78 chs.) Tier IV (104 chs.) '1'Ivr 1 I'ivl:. 11, IlI 6 IV 'Piet 1 Thu Movie Channel Galavision 'I'ici s 11 A. 11, 'I'lle tluvie Chatlnvl t;alavisiun 'I'lel IV IfI dvu Ilume 'I'I,calvr tl,•ty.4ltk Las Veyas Live Cinemax Galavis;un Iluuu: Ilox of 1 Ice ..I uwLime The Movie Chauu,'1 I,ay-Per-View I Same as residviltidl $14.95 $14.95 $ ').95 $ 9.95 $ 4.95 $ 4.tir, $ 4.95 $ 9.95 $ 9.95 V,rl" i e s . ;,11.1 `.l:'l l :1:� I11 !•I11 fi l: Ill 'll 1.1' -t �''� 14U1t"iii 1,':a 1'uar.ulty J tu, i yvar:: frum dale ul It.lurhi:•r award 1,, ll•sn �yy!l`Ilt ,'I,IIII.1,'t 'till III I, ,'it'll lit t hall 24 In•,Ill :I:i livt I (12 ChS.I Fir $ 5.95 7 ier l l (45 rh:.. ) '1 iet 111 I I I rhs IIIuS clu>il•e c•f .Iny c (III AI - 1 u{,t 11,u {,uvhaya $ 7.45 1111 l+l - 2 u;,t l' It pa.:ka,ll':; 8.70 $ 70 $ 9 1111 1'1 t 'lilt A"it { ,l,'k ayes h'litIto T I..1 It' - "I,-F IWtl I'll Cl avtive I' l S 4.',it •I l,•, f 1 Itcl 111 _ I�1• „I.11,.11 ,I11L1ilal lull S 5.9', ') At 1 1'� 1'1 IIIlnlll llll,'ral't lve 1•umr "1'h.•.,l,u Ilrlwutk $ 1.95 $ N•9S 1'um,: I+oR of f ire $ 7.95 1' i uvul.l x I omv Box lit f lre I,lu:: Ctuvnwx $14 . 95 O.SU ].as V;••ta:: $ 8.95 :' low tAUW $ 8.95 I l,I1 av A!;;u" $ 8.95 Ituinhuw $ N.95 •"hv Movi,• Cll.,novl i{Il iuu Nrlwurk 15.1111 Muhl1, Soh;, , c 9.95 I•tvuli,•I,• Ill available) •1.� I,l.11 lv I,r;e,• n+l,•:; ul,lrrt to IW.Iotiallun and will ,h•I• IiA .,u uutivts a11•1 S.'sv;evs ro,l•I;r••,I. !Yplval costs: luntal lat iun - at Mtnlhl� It.,l•• - 1:t uullvl :I'i.uu ?IA -It 1,•t $10.011 It t•tll I,•l 5 5.0u A-iIItiunal 10 4.00 ;a,laut.x•d until completion ut s•;st Cul ..11-Iuctiun 'Pier 1 (21 Chg.) Tier I1 444 chs.) tier ttt (73 chs.) 1'ivr 1V (99 chs-I 'rice I ,vier 11 riei III 7'let IV Ibwly T ivater Nvlwl)rk Cole Latino Brlvo/I;olden oldies IlnnlA hn� Ot f lcv GdldvisiO11 -:howl. 1 pie C i Mona x Th.- Muviu Channel Pay -Per -View tl,.a ul�lic.+l,�.l $ 4.'I'i $ 1.95 $ 6.95 $ 6.95 $ 6 95 $ 6.95 $ 6.95 $ 6.95 Varivs Uvlelulinrd oil.1 {,cr project bast+ 74 SECTION t.: PROPOSED HATES Rate Guarantee Basic service Ftunthl y _ Ra Les First outlet Additional Outlets way AV service Coauaercia3 eat*es six STAR NIELS011 CARI.F:V .S 10N Or f" At" , lilt' . GuarauLeed until cumpleliun Ct System construction Tier 1 (24 chs.) $ 3.45• 'I'ler 11 (47 chs.) $11.00• Tier III (84 chs. plus data base access) $13.00• • includes munlhly converter fee $2.OU all Tiers milli Pay 1 $ 4.95 orle Service $10.50 Two services $10.00 Three Services $21.00 Pay -Per -Event $ 3.00• Pay -Per -Ilse $ 3.004 Average subscriber Negutiatcd, up 30 501 reduction V1:;Icltl CAOI.E OF HIA111, 1NC. guaranteed until completion of system construction Tier I (24 chs.) Free* Tier II (36 chs.) $ 4.50 Tier 111 (60 chs.) $ 8.50 Tier 1V (72 chs.) $ 9.50 Tier V (72 rhs plus T'eletext)$12.95 Tiet VI (72 chs plus 'teletext and $14.95 lflter]cLi Ve) • See "Converter Depusit" Tier I Free Tier 11 S 3.U0 Tier III $ 4.00 Tier 1V $ 4.50 Tier V $ 6.95 Tier Vl S 7.95 Home [lox Office $ 7.95 Cinemax $ 7.95 Showlime S 7.95 The tfovie channel $ V Any Twu t i—v,• $�4.75 Any Thice Above Any Four Athove $26.80 Galavisiull $ 6.00 Iloun• 'libeler Nelwwk $ 1.95 I't out ROW $ 4.95 Public Subseliber Netwulk $10.01) Neuters IDU $10.00 Pldy Cable 4 8.00 Nut indicated 75 Uhc-'flan, ('Iltryrs Ilttita l laL t..11 - F1 rsl OUt-lUt Instal tat imi Additional (Jut3a-t. llist aI1.11 I'm - hay TV COliverler w1josit lielocatlon 4teconnection 10 :11,1,'h1,1.I' •11' ,.I'l .1; 1' 111.011 I'Irt I $HY.95 iuls II, Ill 6 IV $69.95 Tl' r J n.rt ,uJic.,tud '1'icib 11, 111, 1V - Free if ilist :ll:r•A at the sane time or location as till: first out- let-, $23.95 if difteleut Tiers I, 11 6 III - 1'14•e when ordered Witt, Itaf;ic Service, $16.00 it lat.:I 'Pier IV - free Tier 11 $L5.00 'Pier 111 $75.00 Tiel IV $110.011 Tier I $15.00 Tiers 11, 111. IV $23.95 :Piers 11, 111. 1V $23.95 'fi,r 1 $24.Y5 Ti,•, IV -I, mium Il,lrt.,,-llva• $24.95 Tiers 1. I b 111 $10.00• T!vI IV - PIt•uuum Ilit viart ive $14.95• • Hat .. it inst.611-1 Wrtit iIli t101 ilist II lit i,Ill, lat .I instal l.lt ions rh..ry.•.l .. unr-t i.... r of $9.95 above these rates Frce Witt$ the installation of tasia- •-ahle service, $9.'J5 if later Now. n•,t indicated not. indicated 1111.1111 '1'I:1.1:-•0•i:':II/.II'i•i I. '.S Tier I $2`J•'J`• 'riots I1, III & IV Tier I Not indict-1 Tier 11, :11 t: IV Free If intAalied with litst outlet, $19.95 if Iat.v flume 'fhcat rr 'let w"t k-frao r,l: 'I'icrs 'll t, IV if Installed at same time as Tr. is I or I1, $19.95 it later Bravo/Golden 01'lies-ttee oil •Picts III ,. IV it installed at S-ne time as Ti.•t ll-$19.95 if later All other services - free oil 9'ier 1 only-540.00 one -lime of $1.25 for 36 months $10.00 Vacation Disconnect/Necunhect One -Time Charges Installation - First Outlet Installation - Additional Outlets Installation - Pay TV Converter Deposit Relocation Reconnection SIX STAR Nll:I:70N VISION CABLE OF MIAMI. INC. CARLINISION Of- MIAMI. INC. $29.95 all 'Piers $10.00 if installed with first uutlet, $19.95 if later (all Tiers) Free if installed with Basic Service, $15.00 if later None $19.95 $19.95 Tier 1 $40.00 Tier If $29.95 'Piers 11, 1V, V h VI $14.95 Not indicated Ftee Fur 'Pier 1 unly, a converter is reyuiied that can be purchased for $40.00 ur leased for $2/mouth for 22 mouths. A repair service contract is available fur 51.50/month Nut indicated Not indicated 77 01 hcC RJtes Slutlo nod I?lllilnn,llt usayc Nun - conunetcial us,ts cunmle-c l:ll usrel s 'dYat t Ahl;t tIl' Oil' 'l'1 1 111 .•t,l rl"C Cost At •1_1ntc $20.00 tl- 5 minutes 40.00 6-10 minuLuS 60.00 11-15 Iuinutc,5 100.00 16-30 minutes Itl0.00 31-60 minutes I'1 r•-1't oduct toll $10/hlnu /hcr ;uu p"t"ite Survey l0; hour/I•,u sun Planning ennt,Icn`„ , $25ihuur Screening Pusl Product ion / .,-id•�•t:,l• Gdit illy $111/trot t vul,vt.q•• UuL1.ifill V i,leutalle Costs n„t indicated _ - -. _ __.---_ __._.-~`_ +`-_-_— - l•rltnc '1'lnlc (tl:QU-11:00 p.m.l 1 hour tt,uased_Uhanue t{talcs 1/2 hour $100.00 --- -- -- 1/4 hour tluu Prime 'Time $200.00 I hutlt $10(1.00 1/2 huut $ 50.00 1/4 hour it., Les u�yuliatr'drbowra kelau1 L'Iuit'lruul d,•,etermill1 by l• uiruuent::• 1<JLr•s coaistellt with te1 the I,teeJiliu) mJ:kctplace I'ul1-1 tun• 6r111: VId••o ch,11111 is PJrt-t lu,e 67L1: video t'hannels t'ull-tlu. U.", rill, ,tJtJ rhallncl 516-'i Its 6 h u�IS. 11111' l I1u,• 11.ill rill:. d.1t.r ChJnp,`1 111I1 llu,,• l-0 Nil! •1Jt.e clleuucl $87-;TLu;O/,u ,1101 mJx. �'ul!-time 1.11 1411Z dJla Ch,uulel $1"7-$I1)uO/1,n,I,lll m•". _ pacCet ::wltc•hiu•l data Nerwotk $1()0 for cuullur t iotl. S'`"/mu�ii kcl � erc.•ss tee and $1.00/1000 1• rll:.lu rll.l. rt,•;l,.ctr•i;ru,as •or non -cable productions Studio $50/hour $ 300/rl-ly Mobil, Val: $50/hour, Editing $25ihour r•ur r•ah1.: nr„3n.�tinn: k'rc•• For null-ca!,le l:n.ductiurls Studio $125/hour Mobile. Van 95/hour. S60U/day I:ditiu,l $ 45/11our For cable productiuua studiu $ 5U/huut Nnhil, Van $ 40/huul rditinl $ 20/hour llli tut [eh,Jt sJl Flax lln•1u1 Studio tillul �`J - 20 11111lute" $25.00 - 30 minutes 535.00 _ 45 nlitlut('s $45.00 _ 60 minutes 60 minutes $ 1/minatc _ Abuv,: PIC 11ru,iu,:t ion $5/InxII: Pt r:iun _ ita•mr,l t• r P1Julllhy Cun.er�n�'' $",'hour/1•,•L 5"u _ _ S,reenI I'll 15./Ir),lr Pogt Pr,,,luCt toll" $15/hour _ l:,liti -I $12.50/trout _ Dubbin.l - Aurlio Pec,t)iwl 1 $5/lwur $i/hull[ Audio DIIIII $7.SO/hull•' = Audio Edition nlJteti'lls I • All cl.argcs plus m Other. Nat•,s Studio and-rqui nol u�tt Usage Non-CUImOerclal Users Mmmercidl users Leased Channel Rates SIX S'I'Ait NI WOM CAIt1.I'vIStUt1 Of- MIn111, 113C. Free for first 5 minutes, actual cost for additional time unless qualified as a subsidized ptoiect Studio rates -$15 fur spot pro,lu(rliou/hour -$100 for 11ro,iram prudu.rt inu/hour Remote rates -$150 for spot production/hour -$100 for one hour remote production plus mileage Negotiated at time of request VISltrtl CABLE OF 111AM1, HIC. Free Studiu production $150/hour Remote proAuctions $150/hour Supervision and instruction $ 30/man-hour Non-commercial users -free Conunercial users $10/11alf flour per 1,000 customers 79 Selv,ce to G,,venunenl and vducati.,ua1 re'711Ities Instal tat I'm I"- - ritst nutlet - Additional Out leLs MoriLhly Rate Special Rates, Discounts, duteractive Rates All AUCAPIA: III-* tdtl:ATI:It MANI I'r(-O Cost rree ° Llslallatiuu charge:: uL.y b,• waived doling initial coast:uclloi and pi"IllutIona) periu,ls ° tlonlhly rates on Tiers 11, 111, and 1V iliac,"u,Led 10* to s,ru h,I cif ison ° Itull, rates available; urp,tiale�l based (tit number of units ° [)ISC011tltS fur subscl IL101S cf Iuultiple pay St•IViCVS. Ad'IIIlon..l chancels III scuuutt:d 51 f0t nldxI .unl $l for Imltll Security seCviCes installation charg,:s valy with options taken t'nH1,I:5Y:;1'1.fC: fltAM free cost 1`r dln.uit un utouthly cable a,•ivi,:. h.0 l•-• to :11 :,•nor:: ani h.un11,•aure,l houurhounls lust III II I"n f••e•: w,live'l during I est 41•,lays of service to new .tr..is I ° til.utd u.l in•.lallat i.ul is a I50 f'•nl �, C-ml,.tuy tt•sa•tv,•s the ri,lht '. to'rh..:,p• -opt nl time aid matcrial; ust..uidard h'(II. rate-;; available-• to uutllipl•. A-1II1i,l bulldl mlr. A ;t.Ull'm,nlh ;11n,•nunl for takin.l l w,I "I n-ic f1AX1 pay b.•rvict•s ° A 51.U11.'m I'll) Ji .,'u:ut for lak.tig I:al..vi:.t•,., ai,l th,• L..t in ouarter Ia,.-L.I,p• P.I cnt.II r. I I .icv t: a•y avai l..Llc (ol .r ,'o: i of water lal Iorun,labie dop. .; t ay I ,•I -vI, w „l,l ion ..Venable to Twt III AI :Im I I•Iht .,wl al,iiw buzze( .rva:1..L1,. Iu th,' handacappod for a one-1 un• In'.lal l.Il teat chi,µ• ut $I.°,0 ° rcollomy Ib,me Sedulity Service available for $8.95 a munch and all inea dlldtioi charge of $99.95 it installed attor cable installation, $74.95 if at tit,: same time, $60.00 if at the same time as Premium luteractive. )Ilstaltatlutl Sophisti:at'_d Security Services available with rates varying with the options taken ,uAra1 •1•c1.1:-rufuluull•A•,•Inn:: Free Cost [111= ° Tiers II, 111 awl IV I:ro•:Id..l interactive capability ful/ an additional $1.00 over basic moodily frt e Tiers II, ill and IV provldrd l,•xi c::pability for an ad,litiuual $5 00 over the basic munlhl•• fee with interactive 15111 dlseoillt un Installation aid services for elderly citizens a^•t h-old icappod ° Lxcept for Tier 1, home terminal fee waived for initial 60 day period following activation aml during periodic uro„utiuns ° Parental control device available for free on all Tiets except Tier 1. 'Pier I subscribers charged labor and materials ° C•ompu Serve I (data b..se) $19.95 installed, $5.00 first outlet Cumpu Serve 11 at either cost plus 10t or subscribers may provide their uyn miciocomputer ° Reuters 1UR $19.95 installed $99.95 first outlet plus $15 11ionth Rome security available with varying options. Charges range from $49.95 and up for installation and 52.95 and np musthly service to Government and Educatiunat Facilities installation Fees Flrst (hltlet NO tiuna1 Outlets Munthl}' ltatey Slecidl Rates. Discounts, interactive Rates !;IX STAR tl l F:I. loll CAIII-EVISION OF MIAM1, INC. Free Time and materials Free bulk rate discuuut of uh to At availablel, to aartments ut faoneLimB$10.00 �", t ,ei`i nst •illatti n charge Security selViCC':: available; {,dac button $29.95 Installed. $4.00 monthly: security , (avera)e) installed, $14 mouthly vl::lOf1 CABLE OF IIIAMI, INC. Free No clear,{e up to 10, then at cost Free lnstdlldti,ln chdrgay for TierS 1I1, IV, V, VI wdiVed for at least 90 days after service is introduced In ail ared lnstallatiou chdryes for 'Piers I dud 11 dre her outlet.. lnstallatlot, charges for Tiers III, IV. V. Vl are ou a Per trip basis ;.curity servicfor $99.95 and up instal latlon. $10.95 and up m.nithly SECTION M: £MPLOYMtlNT PRALTI t'f:S AMIMIl'AI11.0 UI' GItLA'1'I:R NIAMI ° !'•lual t'mnloVwent Upputlunity and Allttrnalive Action ptuytdjms d-•scr i[it •d Vvct uit my suurct•s d_•..•'t lhod ° It, lr.:itr!i l..t usiull till lun lab:.r d.•sc r i hod GI ievance ham!l tug ptuct Junes described t'Alll.l:!iY::'I'CN:; 111AM1 ° Affirmattvo Actiuu pro-lram d-scribui ° Ituyrt s L tld.rsyslems, 111C. has "eajul""I .: 1.•mlthy .u:d healthy .;ith hus It utvuns dud c•11114"Yee astiucialiun- for many years. M I M I 1'Ci.h-t'ttl7lfUN (CAT 1utL`: f:gnal llnpluyment oplrn runity I•ru•It wu, desc ibed ° Reccuitmont practices desl•trbr.l ° will establish an intrrnsftil• pr(nlr.lul ° will cooperate with IaIA)r-unrt.n organizations oil a fair and e.pta: basis with uun-affiliate:! CultttaCt.-tc. L«plppl M; I:MIII.l1YMENT PRACTIM SIX ::TAR vision CA01.1: OF tIIAll 1, CABLI:VISION UP MIAMI, IM.- _ Equal Bmploynient 01111ortunity policy described Equal t:ml,luyukeut opportunity proyr.•u, desci ibc,l Will Dire 100% of its ewployees lucnlly %Jill hire nunurities in a percentage proportionate to, or higher than, the minority represeuLation in the city of Mirmi w ut it star i"lls Bette, techiliqu�--s of spectrum coliservat ion The entry of a carriers of tlislK,s,tl)le time an,l the style of work lievel,opmellt, of fiber optic transmission systems 84 SECTION N: MISCEI.LANEOUS SIX STAR NIELSON CAULEVISION OF MIAMI, INC. o Will aggressively pursue the distribution system market t-c remain state-of-the-art VISIiftl CAIILr. Or M1Mll, IIIV. ° Will Offer 24 channels of diversified programming at, no monthly charge • Will cyulp 21 viewing centers for free ueiyhburlcuod viewing. These •enters will alsu be cunuected to the Institutional Netwurk and provided with telecaptiun decoders " Will establish and maintain a Vision fable Television'llainitbl taunter to provide cable television technical and operational experie;cce Ilas conunitted $350,000 initially and $150,000 annually to the Center. o Ilas initiated "Operation Scrapbook` as part of an on -going effort to ideuLify and respond to local nerds " Will provide $100,000 annually to city for development of institutional network services CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Mayor and Members of the DATE June 9, 1981 F LE City Commission StInJECi Receipt of Consultant's Evaluation of Cable Television License • Applications Howard V. Gary PEF-RENCE5 City Manager ENCLOSLRES Cable Consultnat's Evaluation Copies of Consultant's Letter Attached is a copy of the consultant's evaluation of the five City of Miami cable television proposals for the City of Miami license that was received on June 8, 1981. The consultant has simultaneously sent to each of the five companies the results of his evaluation and requested that any comment or criticism be delivered to the City no later than Thursday, June 18, 1981 with a copy transmitted to the consultant at that time. Also attached is the letter that the consultant sent to each of the bidders regarding the schedule for preparing the final report. As you can see the consultant is at least one week early in preparing the cable television proposal evaluation report. To comply with the City Commission's previously stated policy of completing the cable licensing process at the earliest possible date it is now possible to move the previously announced public hearings ahead by one week. We would like your approval to establish 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 30, 1981 as the time and date of the first public hearing where the cable consultant will make a final report on the five cable television license applications. This date replaces the July 7, 1981 public hearing previously established by the City Commission for this purpose. The second public hearing would then be held Tuesday, July 7, 1981 for the purpose of hearing presentations by the applicants and for receiving comment by members of the public. This meeting may be held in the evening as a convenience to the public. Please let me know if these meetings meet with your approval: Tuesday, June 30, 1981 at 9:00 a.m.-FIRST PUBLIC HEARING Purpose: Briefing of the City Commission of the cable television evaluation process by Telecommunications Corporation (TMC). Tuesday, July 7, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. -SECOND PUBLIC HEARING Purpose: Presentations by the applicants and reception of comments from members of the public regarding cable television. To: Mayor and Members of the City Commission From: Howard V. Gary City Manager page 2 June 9, 1981 Several members of the press who requested copies of this report received them on June 8, 1981. Normally, the City Commission would receive copies of this report prior to it being distributed to the press. Future reports will be delivered first to the Commission before being made available to the news media. CM/ah i 1 S i TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. f 6380 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 808 Los Angeles, California 90048 1213) 653 081 June 5, 1981 LETTER SENT TO EACH OF THE FIVE MIAMI CABLE TELEVISION APPLICANTS rqr. Paul Alden Miami Tele-communications suite 303 scayne Miami, 5781 $1Florida B33137 = - Dear Mr. Alden Enclosed is a copy of our evaluation report of the cable television franchise applications submitted to the City Of Miami. Any comment or criticism you may have wnohlaterect thano this report should be delivtransmed itted tothe tus at the same time. June 18, 1981, with a copy pages It is requested that responses be limited to twenty p g applicants' comments, we will prepare Upon receipt of the apP June 26 so a response. Our target dte is twill�haveethe lresponse report that the City and all applicants by June 29. Thank you for your cooperation. T ELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP TELECOMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT CORP. 6380 b I' HirQ Boulevard • Suite 808 • Los Angeles, California 90048 Q131 653.0810 ON IN IN IN I 1 I I N ■ d ■ d ■ ■ N TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title I. INTRODUCTION . . + _ . s _ _ . _ + _ • • A. Scope. B. Evaluation Methodology _ EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . _ A. General. . . . . . . . . . . _ 8. Evaluation Criteria. . . . . . . (1) Financial Capability (2) Construction Schedule. . . . . . . • 88 (3) Technical Standards. . . . . . . . . 88 (4) Origination Cablecasting (Automated Services, Spec -al Interest Programming . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 (5) Local Origination. . . . . . . . . . 89 (6) Access Production Facilities 89 and Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) Interactive Services . . . . . . 90 (8) Service to Institutions. . . . . 90 (9) Sophistication of System . . . . 91 (10) System Design. . . . . . . . . . 91 (11) Channel Capacity . . . . . . . . . . 92 (12) Ownership Structure. . . . . . . . . 92 (13) Performance in Other Systems Operated by applicant. . . . . 92 (14) Employment Practices . . . . . . 93 (15) Rates . _ . . _ 93 (16) Rate Stability. . . . 94 (17) Regional Interconnect Capability. 94 (18) Relation to Needs of Miami. . 94 Ill. SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 I. INTRODUCTION A. Scope The City of Miami issued an Application for License and Request for Proposals (RFP) for a cable television license in January 1981. In response to the RFP, five companies submitted appli- cations on April 10, 1981. The applicants, in alphabetical order, are as follows: • Americable of Greater Miami (Americable) ° Cablesystems Miami (Cablesystems) ° Miami Tele-Communicaticns (Miami) ° Six Star Nielson Cablevision of Miami, Inc. (Six Star Nielson) ° Vision Cable of Miami, Inc. (Vision) This report provides an evaluation of the applications submitted. B. Evaluation Methodology The RFP issued by the City contained a list of criteria to be considered in the evaluation process. These criteria are enclosed in Appendix A. The Cite requested that the strengths and weaknesses of each application be listed, with respect to the RFP evaluation criteria, but that no numerical ratings or applicant rankings be utilized. The procedure herein follows the City's request. 0 II. VALUATION A. General Figure 1 summarizes the information submitted by each applicant in response to the RFP, which contained standardized question forms. By its summary nature, Figure 1 must condense or omit some material contained in the applications, and therefore is more of a comparative guide than a comprehensive inclusion of all factors. In the summaries of strengths and weaknesses that follow, all application material was considered. B. Evaluation Criteria Each of the evaluation criteria listed in appendix A was considered with respect to the strengths and weaknesses indi- cated in each applicant's proposal. It should be noted that in many cases the strengths or weaknesses are relative, so that an applicant may be rated as being "weak" compared to the other applicants, while at the same time this weaknessmay not impair the ability to construct and operate a cable system in :Miami. The rationale 4-or evaluating each criterion is given below. (1) Financial Capability -- Figure 2 indicates the perceived strengths and weaknesses for the "Financial Capability" criterion. (a) Equity Resources -- Four applicants , provide shareholders' equity data indicating substantial equity resources. No equity information is provided for Americable's general Gartner. On a comparative basis, this is considered a weakness of the application. (b) Debt Resources -- The cocumentation included with the applications indi- cated all applicants had adequate debt resources. Therefore, no significant differences are seen. (Text continued on Page 88.) I LjU I EEEEI I CTI(Iri A: Alit) 0114110111. Fl.siew, Xhllvss, Alit horkzt!J 1!1 ot mat i mt i f i cat ig.11 of t)woi#srf; SUMMARY OF ANILICATION INFORMATION ,*,I!! '. 14 " ,I V 1 11 . I I't : i, 1, " . I 4A Mwt W %Ill-' lit lli•"" '"i -ion ,;.w. 161th Av,-IIkI-! rl. M87 C - I Ic I III, I II4,w.;k i petal I", I diet jj)r,) 2 1 3-79FIC Chat 1,-:; C. I k I It Al,, lit .-tiky•m.' e. 1.tll t z I I IW I 1 1111) -t 11 1.. p.,111 ill -I It, :'II I iv.ut t nun I.,. A. I - I I 'I vhll" I It :;. Ult"ll p,It p.,, I •.f lo I ti. [,-k I-.,t I .,f 10 t I.- I It t .1 .10 * t f 4 rl,lyl't I "If 'I it f At 1 11.11 '1 . ill t I . I .I , .I 'I. ill .'.'It 10" Fl. t pl. i It I. 111-It111 �l I A[ ' I i :-I I I I I - ' I "., miatilt Tele-C1,11MMIlIt"1l iollS, 50111 Ilis"471114 %li -talt. 11. Ill U.stil AltiMl vl,.,! lllcslticllt 1 101) 7 ; I - R 2110 i 1']t;llltl: I (cone.) ION A: t+IJtJt:R5t17[',. Atilt l'4)N'1'It()I. I n Ft RMA1.1 tt11 Alq,lir:otL Nara••, ►.ddress, Authori2ed Itr j t went aF i ve ttwn.rrsl+i�, Infutptation. (a) Identification of Owners SIX STAB N t I:I.SWJ CABI.I:VISION OF MIAM, ItIC. Six Star Nielson Cahlevision of Niuni, Inc. •140 So. Citrus Strect Covina, CA 91121 Vi.-L.,r E. Sharar 5rniu[ Vice Prt•sidr•nt (211) 761-6317 Six SLa1 Nielson Cablevision 10M. V1SI(W CABLE OF MAW,. INC. • icm v,swe of Miami, Inc. 1Ivio Biscayne Boulevard (Suite 605) rtiami, Florida 13137 tti, h.n•1 wiliner Vic.• Presi.l.rnt. (212) T59 1500 Vir.ion C.Iblc SharehoLitvs' Trutt • m Nrwh, ,,tsr r;t,n,p, tile. 44t hilly A. Ilermello 2t ltnvi.l tiluimhorq 21, A,man,lu i'o,lina 2i tl.•, :.rh.•L V. r:r.•.•n 24 B.trty xutnn 2i Lit„1,. flrt;.,w.ut 2d It„Lott tL•t:night 2�t ('.it t i.• H.•vk 2I Ai,m: At h.t I I It.ul,lo 2 f. F,lu,u A !A.,II,u,, 2e u, ..1 I •r:. nr ^.(ST: tti,htoy P. f<u..[••L 21-llIt u t, L. Ltn,lrnt,.tttt 113.2010, tit, h...-1 S. JJil lnor 1.1610'. •, yu—nt !J. °;kln, .tr ).61)'A kwh—A Ft. whil,• I.164 Atlhnr tt. Shulnt.+tt I.t,21 I•.un.•la . 11 mm—tnl Lill)? L. 01c11 i.one uth, t•, m,t im(lr.lt —I FIGURL !b) Ill 'Jaw zat ions or COR I—I'Ations ownintl 18 ell- ITIM4. interest til..t�l. lntnrtnal iun t t) •:IlucUuc (L) -I. of (-„I I„JI at ton I) CI tss of Stt.e•k 1) ! , a I V.II t1.• i) V.A., I•..•r Sh.tle2 Q) It lhillr,'I Of 5h.11e,, A"! lit.[ 11. e•el Nuud.. t e,f Sh II es IS.;ue:•.l I•) tlund,ct of shaI os !,Illls�-r ibe'l 7) '1'••t .tl TIM111 •r 'If St ucl:hrlleli•rs (.•) tlt l,.1 .•LI I l.It i,•uti ••l .:. •eni it tes ' nth„r i.: ••i •n „ut:.t ul•fiml whit-h Iwal t•1) t'••IIt I „i by t,l',t It,-[ • , I I •'1.11 it'll Ttll.L'It'AHI,f: nP ra+C �.'1 LR tII m I I IVA I';•ItI.! ::';:• 11.115 111-AtII! 11•' r.,Ll••::';M -mt; Ilit! . is whtilty „t•.'n, 1 L• M.y,_r�: t':eblere:}'sh•ms inc., .I 1a11'lirly utauel rtung..uly hr•ueb111.111rt.•,t in t .ul...1.I. 1+.,.1.•l s e'uble .}^;tr•uIs In.'. in 91.17 ,nant•,I by t+uy •r Invrvtnn•nts {.t.l., .t P.p•t+: f.tmlly •.mlwd trust th ) eyst.•nu: Intr., i�: . tlel.n�urr t.nl,ur.lti.'n tah•,lI}' .n4fto,l by Rn,le•t ( .Ihl, :; •a,•tp llu bus, ,1 lit 111, rjI I'lAX „I,ItlrtiICAT14IN!; '1'l'1-'I'�tft I'ubI-I,IsI�-it Anti- 'IaLos 1-3 5uv: 3 „wno.i by '1'..ft 1'uhle t_-011"Ity I•t wit,.►IV uwnetl snl'•t i.l irll y t't 1'..f t m oad, ast iml c"111paity) .u1.1 ill`• .'wn.•,1 by Irl,•- I .numnnir.It l.n.s t'ubl,r ," oq, ur; t.. wh.•! ly wnr,1 ,nh:t il.lry ,I 'I't'1 17,•i' l• lnnent. .'. �I {�•11 .It i••n mhi:•h i . tI turn +h.•Ilr w11. •1 I y I', lI - '•'ll'inunl, tt i• ns, In, '1 - .tt lit., ..lr,u:t. I t nl I'•aq u.'r u..l f�•l, t'�nu"'uni• .It t, •I's, Im I1: F•nbl i��ly ,•.-r,��1. at INt"I I.L0 Class N he I 10, 11u0 � 661 IU•Ono 661 1 tl,!Lift N,.t lr.tt .i ;4"t tn.il Ii,•;t rhr tltuot '1'.•l_•-C, m.1;nnli: r.tt t•nit: 1:, li ,.,nl.l.,l1.•.1 l,y 'll't-'1'ttt t'.rhl..••t-:,,n• .L•:r..,,•t.lte•s o-:hlrh ••�nt� itny ..1 It:t .,,t iu•l ::t •••k .tu.}. ii"• •.t ir:, t•'t .tt t i f (cont.) liq 4nqaniZdLbMS 01 ownill-I it of more interest !jtvvk Informat ion le) Stl uctui .? (b) Stock of Cot l.)Iation 1) Coliss of Stock 2) 11.11 Value 1) VLc I -I !;Jldre 4) itlittiber of Shares AtlthotiZO 11,110'.-I of Issued IM11111,21 of Shares Subsclilled 7) mimi-i of Stockholders (c) othei giloli,lations or so--orities is"Bnimd "r mdmWQi"q which bea, vWillj li-,lits 1,1) foal r ol by anut 1w s unt I irat ion ol ent-ify SPJ SI*Alt UIVI-SOrl CA1II-FVl!-l0tJ OF 1`11AP11, Its('. Six SLar mirlaorl Cablevisi"" of lliaml. In,:. is cmmd by Six Sias mielmon Cab], -vision, whi,-h is moilly mw-1 by t1i'.1s"11 Fliterl'i is'-s' Hw. !',tar Cabl.-Visi,nl, Ti,-. (or Imra L inn N/A Yes, wiscilly nwnmd by Six Ftar (viblevislun. VISI()IJ CAHLF OF MIAMI, INC. visim KII-le t,f Mami, Ilw. is Ill owulal by the Vision, KIM Ant,holders' 'Trust. a"d 440 ..m"I by 1W N-whictse Mot"., Ill,-. (whi,-h is wholly ,wite(I by Adv.owl! IIIII'l Icit i,ms, Inr., whi,-h ill tilril I!; wholly ,ward by Ltw Advitice V,)till-I '1'lust 4 1 tWA ct—it.—I mi-lur Ll— I.Iqt will opt t.-st.111-Fit of Samuel 1. (Airporaticill Vows A Vows H class C Clam 1, 51 of) $1 .00 51 .00 I. 1 0 Intro 1 ,50 2200 2',0 1001) 1 1114) -12 1) 0 It 0 10011 1 0 2t)n tun Wit A. I it a 10 hwA sl,wkhohlois (10t 101) Vt!;i,,ii C.itilto Sh.irt-h,)I,h-rs' 'N'tist th-wil'also GImIl" III.-. wit I itim (40.'.) rN ,ji, c.d.k. of MI.-Ij, Tar.. is a 1-1 iv.It,-Iy two! 'wil.-Ol It,,, the Inc. ( .1 .1 t and V a u I- w, Ov , I - 1, 1 !; , 'Trust I 11) .111.1 ;1 '11 )f Io, .11 1 liv.-:0 et ; 125'! 1 ". 111fiql1l'It I'm "ll lu, al invvstors ti't it!; "I. I Y cl.'s., i. st,,cl, —IntLy not Kim"l. (Cont.) I!IIALII• . ICATJOIJS IV Th-tw"I I, -'hip I"— I TV !;I..I ton p ]., " ... I Tv 'I . I II.:0,10.1 tibil. I-WII'-I sivil, I " -� - f I XI -I i ( , !.I It 1'.11 - I'. I it - I s I I I I , vo r t no r slot No I r Ir I v - r ship Ff.) No tic) rh) G it I It P'."V-4 I I, .�wnarl is the I wilwt ? it, vkc. P1.111.,jer of KVIA Art f"I t 7 -,1 wki-w I,I,-I , -t WI -WA V!i ti.s./Corporatiort fit) Fit) 11" N, 1'' IGURL 1 (cont.) ;I.t"IA4iI4 It: OWNKRSIlI1, p11ALIF'ICA'I'IONS II.s. rit izen,"Ctrtp 1,111 ion 'IV Not wr,Ik (hit -Is Itip L,.11 TV 5l at iorl Owuct ship I.., II IA, 'It Itlsl.,tot Ownership L"..II 'I, I t l,ll nn• C'mil,,Iny Ownership Dwal Ilt•wp.Ip,-t Ilwuelshlp I., I, .II H.I,Iio St.II i•,n tiwnet ship !; 1 S s,rAti t111•:LSt,p CAItIANt: IMI ItF MIA41, INC. ion No No Nu No No Nu VISION' CAHI.F. OF ft[Aft't, ENC. D.t;/Corpura-ti�on tlt, No Nu No rb , y. _ s.1. N,whuuse, Jr, an.l Dun.1111 F. Newh •u ;r, t't,-rruste+•s of the A,Iv iiwe V.,tin•1 'I'rw;t, each c,wn 50w cif the Cut p"r,,t tun wniit- I tht! 1 irense tt, ul .•I al•• WtMI-AM and FM )yt acnstr, 'l,�w yutk, WAPI-AM a -1 FM ill Di ri„1,P11,.10,, Alabama, m.1 W'I'I•A-FM to Hat r isl-nr 1, P,-Imsy t V.,,, I., 1'IGUItJ: 1 (cont.) ?r1Ll•1t'f11IM: III' 4;111'.A'1•I'l: rilAN[ 1i1'1 . I'IIr,I>41'rf It 4.111AI.II Tt'A'1'l1ltl: nr. i. t i. rn In Cr imtn rl lit tic"' 11 it -IS I I .I.11i1; iu t'i�•tl t'tfwc,l.lin'Is r. u•.It 1•rtI I'I I•.1 VI,.II.II In11 of I't tUCll l:;t• q lt..•n,••nt 1.1I I.I.tI 1•Irl /11.1I17::T t f'1 .tll•'111 sin•) i.,lt Il, rt I t y' 1'I i.n U..:fauli +n.a roan r•nrtrr ..:.rltr:: n°rtrrn t•TAtfr 'I'r:fryN. C Itlt+;rfrr.'fT• ttrl -tor gm ME Iit 1'ti'r, 'tlnn..I{ •I1:: I. ;—, :.I ..:nc: : ib-, 1.11.,1,, ) I,I „I I, II II lIt Ch.• IL'l1ln'I, In I%n1IIt•; ill !.I rI.-t r'It`; I'•.tJn.:I I t• .'•I,It 1••1, r. .i in•llu•I tIt.•II fr.tl.rht . p:It,1. lh.• 1n11n•I t<1•: r,ttl.s• .In1 it I .tl.r.••,1,•1 Ly 'II nn. ..l .11i. .'.Ihl r•: y•i I, u. Il lu 1.1 1,'i I h.• :1 .t, !:.tr,rI It . :,,II t I-1V11 ::ull fl.r will Fit I (Ir ailt''I- i t i Vi. Luxilt_ (,r—A, I.tir� 7 I,uttitrnst) . Not pl•t a s rl.t i 3 am I'.t....'. 11i 06 r-10l ift; ,NL• Itl'_•,1„t 'VI .1 rI to ltllllt 1'111 1, 1•11 tlt:t •'..ti•l.II 1. f n rl 1,11! .,t J t;t.110 tii-r71.tIs (li,II "I'll) ,.( •;1 • it '1'r. , l In.l 1 to• ,.t I- r t•.;,, t11.11 n_.t I!, iI11...- •,! •,u I,1,•. .�• .:.1. ..•t t..t.,..rl. 110 '1.111IIInI1•1.111. �t 1.. �: t, l I t t t It. _u li nt it tn�;. . i •nt 1 . , lit h An-n Inn•nt . t Olt t, IPA .. i,,,.. ..t h,.I ;, .t . t..ht :. ecn ,�d ,.•�;, 1,0 1 ,u I•'t l'•n.11n•t nM1 L11'ti u.,l In l...... I'.I .- n'h „f tli •Ill l u't I11.1 111''.'I .,• . n•I••uu,.Il teal, 1•.... •.. r. 01 to l...,rt I'•, ,II•;r ,nt :-, t.ntn l::. ,.a. �.r. Ilt•I .uI 1:. Jill'. t I•J11 I,' :t I I I11 I:'l 1 h.• ::I I II„}In.l . ..1.1. until '"{,1,•t. I.,n ••f t I .In,• llst'. t •.l it-, f('r, Ilbt •,Iu• (:, I'• •. ur 1. •lu,'t I,'It .I �:tll•s, ,. ,. Elm FIGURT: 1 (cont.) CHARAt"1'KR 011ALIrICATIONS ttntvietion in t,liminal N[uceo.linys I.i.tLility in t'ivil 1•roceodings I's iot Husin,•ss License Hevucal ion PI iuI Violnt i,,n if P•t.+nchise A,11e,-•acnt Lit i,i.nt ion AgaiusL a t'raurhisint Ails Ism i t y PI i,,[ jwtattlt on .t Lean s t x s'rAlt a t r;rsort t'AIi1.I:V L': {1N! tIP F11 Afll, 1N1'. N•+ yes, Violatintt:; of anit-frau,l ,111t1 rtc.li_arat io❑ rr,lttitonont:: ut I'o,lcral c,�ur it ir:; L.Iwc; against a Lrok,•ra,lec'fill" owned Ly a company ,If fir,•r an,l „wrnrr, :'tu•tt II It I ia. •:i r St.0 l'htt„ rill,[ „wu,r:, •,t . l•abl,•vi:,i,nt (Stu,tt Il.tr, Is. Itc'�I,•r ma•Iliu, arol P.rul .;t11:Y.:.) AS part nl t'.,hl••/It.•I w,•r,• rlt,,t•L .I with fc.ntlul,•ntlp t,•l,:vi::i„n fr.+n••lii•-,. i••t,•rtst:: nr:t,n•t •tt urtr,: tt:;tct1 A , nr it i,-:: wht,•h -:h,ntl.I h.,v,• Lt ••n h,•cll ,ntl•1 SI t' jut i :li• t i. t. nc:,•nt ,tr,•t r,•:, w.•Ic ,•nt .•r ,••I. N�+ It's Ifs No v/::rr,rrR tCAISIX OF ttl-Afitt.. III(- tL , yo-•, ;ut i11tetnue8iat.e owner of the If the tlewhouse Group, lnc., w,ts rolivicte,t of Conspiracy to set Irr,IXltlnllr, pricps f,u the resale of its nt-wspapers (1968) 1'IGUEtL 1 (Cont.) :1','"I'1,41 U: I:�.II.ItICrk'I: �- r't11:RCr1'1' ,' 1W I'l III )I.I t I III',,; rur l,•I,t t'.Ilrl,• :;yst em 11„ldi n,ts i:r,•r I,1,• t'tn'rertt Sub.rriLnr ItaL,tS 17 -,tb1• sy:;tams ill I'Inrilbt .111,1 ulli,t All tit IheSe sy:;t,rmc; SO' ,nane•1 1,y I'h.ttICS C. Ilerm,uttn.rslci $10.• 1, $ 9.20 $11.99 4.95 2% 1'Ible ;Sterns in th,: IiRi ted ;t.rt.•s, t ul.uln .rn•.1 Ire_l.lrnl srrvin,l ], 100,0t1t1 sul,wrih,•rs •:f.. 17 ruf.,rvLlt iun n„t st'.Wific.rlly rr•]u„•a,.,I $tll.Wi S 4.25 Ilref.utd); Intunn,rt iun n„t sl , I i f it-,111y ro,11ti at 1 Iti;•rll t'[;1, •,i: it:i .: t,_•,;� 1 .,. r 2H c:tbte s•,'stvtuS. ill servin,i 1.,280„000 Subsr.ri,bcrs ...} $7.i1 Inlurfn,tti'm n,t ,;p,IrtFi L, t Intorntnt►„n it -it r:I>rc:lCt,ratpy rc••lucrNcJ- 1'IG[1RI: ] (Cont.) ;CC'I'1ON I): hXI'►:It14:r►Ct; - Cllltkl:ll'f rnlu.e u�g.rlrua ('ulteltl ('able System H�,Idin.ls nv,•1 a.µ• ('111 1 -fit Subset iber Rat es Habit: lay S"Imcl tber It.ttos kanye ".sic - Hiyh Will Pay - High IAIW c•nul.evrsrlOrl (IF nrnrar, lu1•. _I SIX !;TAR ISIIJX,1)rI 20 cable Systems in Calit.,n,ia, missuut i. I-allsaS, aad michiyan $U. Ili Infurmatiun rr,t spe,:ifically r, lue•ste.l $9.0U $5.00 I"I'"rmat i,111 but spen i f it•a l l y t ecplested vf:nllrr CAULE 0k 111WIL, fill' - Ill ('.tble systems in 16 states $7.11 Illf.,tmatiun Hot specifically rv+p :ate,1 Information not specif.icatty t ryu.•sSA 1-'I(-'UIZE I (cont.) 111 ,,*ii vIcAM-1: 01' 1.14 AVIT I'll,NI'll ,,,I I'mo of I.Y S.11C. tllk,. 1.,isr to ll'orwc-o" I 9W) nu .ra than ur lwj- I'm t-a r I , , f u FIGURE' I (cont.) ----- INTERESTS "I s/» STAR w/oso^ v/,"w ,xmP OF wmxmr, mr. Co»/-1-vV,n1/ .� n/an,. /11C.' _ ___U________________'_-- -------f---------'------------ n� ~,o of + 'r^""xis°° u,tw"^" 19/6 FIGURE 1 Wont.) rl'I tTl I': I'IIIATICIAI, l rrr: CAV I TAI• c om-11 Tf11:PTS r,nn t,rt'I:MI'IAI• VIIII.t1111•i t"t,i•1'11T 1t:rITS I,rl I.�Its Ity 11,) 1't imal y 11.•ht. I r) Svr. m,1,1 t � Ut:bt 1.tur. ••1 I'inancinl 1.,1 .;tmnnll, Pvtind, Rat, 11.1 t'••Ilat.•tal lu:•t/1wn1 I'll la•late.i Cin.oneinq Agreenwilts ',ni.vICAIt1.1: 411' ratLA'11;1: r11,1ril I1'1tl slippiietl Iry tho Limited partn••t : $2011 inmv lunor 1r7.111 S •Cnr it 11. ink. t'hrtt.•!; C. Ilornl.utuwst.i will :n{,l•1'i .r l,lil i, 11.11 1nn.IS .1: I -[.Ii r,t t,• r th.• I,.tt 1 n• t ship a-11 • ••rv•nt 5211111 f"I H y•' 1I s at t.h•• l•r in+. r..t • low N All assets Ch tt l« ;; C. Ile:rmantrwr.ki rt4l:r.r Sit;'rt:rt;; it Ali iI Ili su{q,li.+•l I,y Rugorer Cah►esystem:: Inc. irltl fr.nn thy '1',.ttnitrr 1tr.minion Hank II'A {Iri t•,r IIT irat:: at tIn• Ili I'll,- r.tte I•Pa: 1-I%J• system .r:....•ts fh.. t:.n.•tal Pal tnr•rs .uui tla• Itatal iaItIwI!; un a I.ro rat.. Lasiti .1r••nt.irn•1 in thoir nvnr: sh:l. A ttan.•hi•:.. .unl' .,.•rvirc J-11—.m.•nt tilAETt 'I'i?fa: C•u!firsriU'fiftrK:� $ l6rt stlpE l ied by 9'C C-'C,1f t As .o.• i,tre" ! s $24ri frrnn the Ilank of tl(,w 'i.•rk 11!A La I't'I a11.1 Taft Irr,,a,l,'vA1rnl Fs 1'II;IIR}: 1 (cont.) 5Ct r i un I 1' Rt A1J(' I AI, ttliSUtI RC't:S Lrit:;'I'i qd CAPITAL C(IMMITMI:IJTS Aptt 1'crl'CN'I'lAt. BItlLltlp , f••,riM1TM1:t4TS (,1) L+Ilty (h) Pt incary 11"M (r) St•corld,(f y Iit: hf i'etms of Finarlcin't (a) Am.mrlt. Period, Rate_ Ibl Gtllat11AI Involvement (t•) (:I1J1"ant ors (d) ltelale•d Finaneirly Ayrrement SIX !;TAR 1111•.1.51lti vR; rO(J CABLE Or rt IAIV , IIIC . rnlli.EVISION (W MIAMI, Irif'. $10.34 sul,ptie,l by six St.+r tiiclson I*Iblevision and its PatUu•r:; $1L.4r1 Lrnm H.ulJ;rrs 'i'r u:a A n,.nnt m,t iucl i.r.lt c•�! I,l �cvi•1c,1 I,Y ;ix '.;tar fJiols•,II Cat.1eviSion '111A it 1, 11 111--1 s $12.411 fnt 8 y,•ars at 1-1/2t. to 2-1.20 ., ..•t fill (V ime rat•: ::yt.Lrm n�a••1:. :,tx ;;tar tlit:lsuo Cal,levisicul Partnrr.;llil, ,ln,l norm.11 b,ulkin-1 .nit ,.enn•nts •).CrI supl,licd by the rlvwhfcusc� (;ImIp. Inr.., and by shareholders of Visif,n Cal,le of t•liami, Inc. $21.6t/ fr•nn (•hrtntcal Bank of riew York J� S2I.6M for 10 years at t/Zk over th,. prim, rate Rolle A.Ivanre Pclblicalinns, Inc. tL,n••, other th.Itf till. sharehotder I,Irc emrnts FIGURE I (cont.) 1 .11 j"lls on wMe of SUwk by "I MWOM ""Mmmt An—i-11inwIlti; NiqhIs 11,1 11,111 11.1- !;-p;I, eut OI,e, lr 'I'll "S to Mit (11 -,1 111 1 1, A I I lilt 11 arc: ..it I S111"'lulpt yr S I!" Im M i-It 1,1 I,oc.tI illvvsl m -,icvs In kiwi - , I.- or r-issi,intit-nt wi I I I-- I -, - I ( t-l' It aw I-airt"ership, it) 'rhe 1iwr I P..Ittler of 41 Th., Llv,itei Aa, to 6? I'll til-I !;I'll' Illf"I;t "I""" '111vt #1 yv,jj_,; file riliflit-111111 III '.•l ."1 All voting ri,lhks ISIV1"4t1`l with 4""" l"'; V, Writim-taski I Yes Fitt-.t, mi.1 t Iwn tit-& 1, ir t ney , I r i•lilt of f I r-;t. t" I!;,. ally '11lit-s Whi-11 -I si I per::,)n wA -it Iy I c, I f to r I-. I •he 1, it t 1. -1 It t It, - I I I -;. . II I'A"t t III I I units tt,treI -11n -it I t It, - - I I - I I - - I , 1 1, , I I [I,-[ . . t It. Ill I ,1 eitli.-I ilk,, t. ye if•, fir -it tit,, I .. ..o lit s1,11j.d ,r f,,r r , I I I- t -lit Mu=m Tes W I ""...tj J•Mil "wild lec'.1ve 1 20% I It Lit,- 11-ittlieRS111P for its with .1c,1111siticill of the City of rIl.lmi cab[ tc!--vt:,i'm hanohis,." Shareholders hxj� ri'llit of fliq:;t, roftis.,t un asky sale or rr.mU-r tit shatv", 1-1 al third 111117 M=W js,, -iuwk. 'rcl will lull't 80, 'If Ill I. v;.r1n., t Vares r. Y "!3 vic,111111 (collt. ) 1•.1 I.iIli I It ion on Sale of Stock l,y in•lividual Holders ( f I ttuy-Out Ag1 vo!uIent. (g) Assiclnmcnts of Slock Votinrl !tights (11) fhlltiple Systrm O(•etator agrees to counlc•rsi,tu franchise agreement if asked 1i) org:u1ized as all IRS SuhChapler ., cotpor al ion (11 !.ucrl investor setvices in kind SIX TAN [7lKLSOrt CAIII.lNISI011 OF MIN'll, Ill('. No individual stuckhuldho s fJ/A VI:;Iorl CABLE OF MIMI, INC. Requires written cons..•nt of Vision Cahle of Miami, III,-., fur prior sale, ple l,le•, encnutLr,ot,• , or other li::(•ostt ion of Cl.tss A common stock, wht,•h i!; hel,l t,y in.livi'lual investors. fh�• tlewit•,us,• Gre,up, III-_ (Trhll) a:+ hol JCt of th,, class C , ommmi sLock .unl the vi:ct•m C.&I,. ah.u.•hol,le.rrs' Trust (v("t7') a:: ttoLler of th.r Claris II —, In ••n sl " P. wil l have t.be r iglit t 1 1. "h. a>r t In• nt her's sto,:k It'd ]In :.• II%,. Cl Is.; C -ptI ❑ van 1•c CAI Ia 'I!v, i I'll Iy 11fte•r thu t`kIl a nn i v,•t!,.IIy of the •Ir.int ,late of the Mi•uni fr.on•bI!.0 a11-1 Lhe Clara H nl•t inn Is trait i.1te•,1 .11 the fifth 1111liv.•I[7aly "f th. ,item ,fate. At L,'I the f I I st .uu,ivCr:.Iry of the Class C „l.t inn 11 i—I •ncn •Iir,•un ut, :;lu,ul,l Tri-; t „r V, :I, ,.1•..: t t ,r t • . ,1 t svo!;.r „f .Illy or .111 ,'I.I:a It ,.I t'Ies; C ,t,,,:k h••1 1 t h, y 111-1sL first offer SIn•h sly„�k, l•, lItl„1. et irnt, an�1 th,•n ,111.•t n.11 t•.:I •, tI, thy• "l hor p.1I ty 1') . 'fln• lo.•al .:It.IrrIn.,1�h (,nan•n:, of I_— A clar;s U „torkl have Ih•• r1•�ht to L• b eyl,t out any t inu• b�•t w�•. it qtr lL-tl if: " 2l1l. of i1 i•Ilnel Inlr�_hatic pI t� ,• Cash flow of rnuv,.u,y b, l the 12 n. n,th., i.iu1 t 11,1 iC t by 1, 1, ;:: ,,•ni,n �ICbt, I,I" I It r�l ••v,•r a •,t ownC1 sh I (.:, riot in.li,•,.t,al 'rus M. ri�•whouse will Iran local sbareholdi'LZi Ill fund:: needed to pitelm se stock at 92 tnterCst FIGURE Irucumentation t'uranitment for Poildirq New cattle ;.yAtnie (excluding Mintni) t',1mu,►tment for Nr•bullding Existing :yut e'It a {'utent fat Itu.,It►1n,3 Co rtmitment - new franchise applications AI11:;4it'AI%Lr fir GREA -cp MIAMI Letter of coungitment from Am,rriran Security (lank for $20M to finance system constnlctlon Letter from F:hrctlkranz, Ehreokr.utz L Schultz cunfirminy r.-(,ree•entatiol, of Clients that h.lvv inve:cted in other Systemi s wine Charles C. Ileclnattow4ki was the General Partner and expressing inteceett in investing $ISM in equity funds for this franchise 452 miles, $9.4M cost over the next 4 years I 20 miles, S0.2M cost over the next year 1—il 2 cununultiee rcost ring an eatilnateri 125 Inilce at s of $5.9M CABI.I.SYSTrits (UAI41 M(AMI TL'LC-('0111-1 141CATII)NS of New ork Letter of runnnitment from Toronto Letter hli4hluythe TCIHs11$45M lo~gyterm Ixmtinion nark for up to $31M In It flnant•ltu( nd $6M short term line of credit is well ,Is exl,te:ssing confidence 1n the rApability of TCI and Taft ful- filliug their obli,laLiOls. .Ind t1 nu'II Interest In ►rn,lir,l $25f1. 1980 t'anadian Camusystems L I. . an r.:por t Copy of the Partnership Agreement Copy of the Franchise Development and Service Agreement 1-Ctler frimi lldrni'tt. Hank advi4illg that th.•y b—'. a n:•lueet for a $4tt l,.an frt-n, Mi.uol 'Cele- i',>nun,tnicatluna, Letter from TCI-Taft CAblvviaton nss.tclates ,t�nultti,.l tin. full renourcea of Tele•-t-•voun,niratl,uty, Inr_ and "raft iltl.ulc,tstlntl Cnm{,•tny a4 well as e�nrtltltt.•l the fun,lu necr:Isnry for the co,npletiun of th.• {v„Ject t I`ll') 'tale-t'n nunun i. ,tr 1tn14, Inc. a11UUA_ rrl,urt `=� 'S'.1.•-Cou�,nunit•.It_i.,„_y, Inc. C.,n:Ir,il•latu{1 SLat, nu•uLs of (li.:ret I"" l�•'•'embcc )1. 1g80, 1971) anal 11078) 1480 'raft L1roa►cA:Itltt,l Company annual report Cul,y of the Sharr.hol,ler,4 A,irce--meat and the Cable Televisl,un System Management Agreement --_--- - )!2l mila4, $24.7M coat over the next 2719 miles, $62.4M cost over the next l years 3 years -- -- - ----- --- ----- ,--- ---- ---- - 1a, mile". $2. )M cult aunt the next 1112 In11e4, $)6.6N cost over the next year 4 years 6 Cotmnunit(es re•lulring an e4tlmeted 10 Communities requiring an estimated' 3829 miles at a cost of $100.1M 3886 miles et a cost of $12T.7f4 FIGURE, 1 (cont_)-- --- 11'w'111Iulltal ism ('. 11111I11 tlllt'OC lflr tlllil.lina) tiew Cable Systems (exclu.liny Miami) t'unnuit.11W"t for Itelnti).11n•1 t:%1Stltly :Syst-ems 1•ol4•ntial HuilJ3ltq Conmtitrta•nts - Herr 1lnnrhiSe al'1'licat ions 5rX : 1'Alr N11.1'�Itl VtSlt,rl rvII.F. (It' t11At11, lur. - Lctt.•r Crum ('humira► Yank cuuuniLtim3 Irlt••r tram Hu,k..r:: Tn,at t'•.u.l•.,i.'' n to $`Ot-1 ill financing. r..•n(Irml ml th.•ir • nuuillin, 1,3 to .r:�:ist I' Six St", tJt••1 .n t',l,l.•�i•.t�n, to tL.•ir tt••r fom, Suuthr,tst FirsL tlatiurt.tl a.r•3nisit iun an 1 .•st fl.11::hn..•„3 f ('ATV L.rIt ff•ntthis.•:;. Als., r..nfilv.•; lia u.,`.t.,n:; lianwi'11i I-111u nf,k.•t lt.,urc L1(tthrt3W•'•t11 i11 IF" u l�f u.l n•` rn nr.•n.i n•3 inq.l'.11WIll • It tnl, ..f a 51`,H fin ui •tn•I �rsi.b uL iuvt .:L•ns I�x•ka.l.� for 1'A'IV tram�hisr �1.•v.•I�•(n,.•nt Finanri.t3 e.l tt.•m.•nt rrnn Nt 1f•,rJ� I::•.n t.nl.•Iln is.•S. Tnr. .n,�1 :�lx �'-,Llev3siun Ila. Llin•f l'••tn1••n.y - _.. I ' l i mi lr:;, 521. `I nt uv, r t 1,.- IWO 11 yt'at., [tone 7 communities retiuiriny an tstin..fte.t 2,31) miles at a cost of $"'HM 792 lodes. $21.4t1 frost over the next I y.•.trs 316 cC,SL over the [text years C> 10 rumN.tnit i.-s r-ptirin•1 an estimate. 1.169 miles at a trust of $177.2Ft FIGURE 1 (COIlt-) !'!(OFUIRMA Veal Year Year yea I veal t ,),, - jja.jI,: !;ejvjcv - All TICL:, it I Year War Year 10 Y.r 15 - PAY TV SCrVJCC-AIJ Se""Ce Y"r I V-1 I !,"I G Was III Year IS a 4, Outo 1411,551 IS1,141 154,904 159, ho I M 42* U6 sut 5 h's 4s 6%1 ISS,156 162, 02 171'sul 101, oil), 41t, 5OL' WO 5HL' %8.* TLWrS 2, l aWl 4, FIGURE I (cont.) .;TX STAR vj!;wfl CAM.F (IF t1l"AMI, CAPI-EVISI(IIJ tIP t11nNi,IIW- .;ysttfol Growth al!'l ttevunue. 10,140 Year 1 149,102 year I I54,202 Year 6 160,202 Year 10 161,7112 Year 15 I aL i,)jj - 11asic Service All TiCts 20% Year 1 160, Year 3 511 Year G 51*. year 10 5 1 VA Year 15 -1-V All SelviVe'S 17% Vim, 1 301 Yuar 3 411. Year 6 41% Year 10 43% Year lei 13,600 Ist,mg 158,126 167,829 100,799 l* H% st% 55% 556 O.V 4t% S4% 63% 61% FIGURE: 1 (Cont-) 1'10)ected Inccease III Revenue Per v:Ii,scrt ,f er 71SJ-- - -- n r.;tSeI v11'.' 'Her '1'irr:: 'I't�•r I IT 1. 111 IV y••Ir 3 - 1l.fl 27.1 Y.•.Ir (. - 1 - I l . 1 'i•• it 8 - �••1 Y-II 9 - y,t Ir lu 12. J 6.2 Y.•II R Yo IV 12 Y.•11 13 - 6.0 Y+' Ir 14 Y•r.Ir IS - 10.6 I11.6 I I ,. 111 IV Yru 2 161.11 161.1 't• .rt 3 21.8 2.1.4 . e..l 4 17.n 2H.1) v.• 1, H Y••nt Y Yctr 1l • Y.•.0 12 • 2.r !.(• Y.: U 1 3 • U.•.•r.•:r,e• 1. 1 Y••ar 14 9.6 1.1 I.H Y•'•It 15 J. 1✓•:a th.rn 0. t'J. Ifi.nlyn ) 1't•.+r 4 t,Ir 6 1 e.+r fl y.•.,r In y -ar t2 y••.Ir 11 I. 1 •- •t, r.:.AI rrr�.rtl 'rt ;.i �.''• . 'I't•rr •Pier '1'ter 'Pier 11rer 'rwr 11 Itt t?r I cl I'It IV 17.1 I.fi 11.H Y-ir 11.ti II.H 12.r .••tr 12.0 I1.2 I .`) •nr 6 -211 12.6 12.1 11.0 Jc.tr 7 2F,.�r ?l,q 2f. 12.9 12.1 1t.1 Ar 1?.2 I2.9 12.;• Ir 10 ►no 7/.0 1.0 ;••.rr 1'1 - 21.i1 1J.tb :'J.f1 .. _ rt.I:ci rani Max I: MI.uI, t.ervi.'•• .• rvi••.. Pay W„ 11.6 19.6 Yr.0 412.11 Sn.9 2fi.n I_ 12-1 ;:..tr 7 21.0 !1_it r. S 12.It "ulr l l 2'T.0 Fwum� 1 (Collt.) NORMA "asic service I X 5TAR All Tiers Year 1 H. () Year B 10.0 Year I1 10.0 t1jr1i and Maxi ';ervic Inc. 'Pier Tier Tiot Tior III TV V VI Year 4 14.7 15.8 15.4 15.4 Year 6 14.1 12.8 18.2 13.7 15.9 'iea r 8 16.7 11.6 11.5 14.1 15.0 Y"m 10 - 14.1 12.0 11.6 15.4 13.0 y, IF 12 - 15.6 14,1 15.2 15.6 15A Y. -,I r 14 - 13.5 12.5 15.9 11-4 1 f, . 7 Year 4 5.0 Year 5 5.0 Year 6 5.0 vvir 7 5.0 Year 8 5.0 Year 9 5.0 Year 111 5.0 Year 11 5.0 Year 12 3.0 Year I I 5.0 Year 14 5.0 Year 15 pay Pay Pay [,.IV "111-1 II 111 11.1 P.C.' 1 16. 1 P). 1 14, 1 11.9 ,at 6 11.5 11-1 15.1 15.2 11,.7 ear r 8 14.1 15.4 15.8 15-8 14 - I car 10 12.5 11.1 11.6 11.6 12.5 oar 12 16.7 15.7 18.0 10.0 11 - I (!,IF 14 14.1 15.1 15-1 15-1 11.1 l 11;U1:1; 1 (. o nL. ) I •1 tl +1 b I' +p TV 1 n-.l nI 1-11`r11 ,11h,•1 -I , 4al s za.1,•1a� ',t1I ,'iH2 H6`,,HhO 54,116.151 H,911,4"1 494, INN 119, Ill $H,:HI ,H')Il 15, HUI. %9; I, lb 1,611) 1,611,401 5 21,'+11,',h0 jI t,HIH,t.'2 ll,J11,1:'. ` 21111 , h i N i,796,911 mj�ummmumu= 510,662,688 S S,409. 126 2,411,592 b,:'f1,994 ,;�t•/,64/,6tIS I q I 0U0 171,(10n I19,nnn 1 5`r, "00 $ f,,flb_,0011 1,31.1W,Illi11 i!11, nllll 1.62H,n00 i 1',, mnH, on-) t:in, 2.1H, Hot, SHI,0011 2 , ', I : , t)'t t1 I.I,µi,6, 0u0 'i 1ri,UU; ,tintl .'n, H5•,, ut)tl 1 1 , tl+la �I of, 1,OUP hole 11S', 4 n 11 4.1, Hot) 9?t, Tot) -�1,H11,1n0- 1,2NI,4011 I Iti,')h0 �i ;II.II•,IP1 `I, t?,fi lili 1,), 7nt1 i,IM ,Hgn 5114,012M. 't11. I S, 400 , _011- �lltt !O,Ilh,tau S11,""",Sot) 1,1j1., 9n,) �21,h11,WO )),400 II.h1S,1t)n i FIGURE•' 1 (CO11t SIX STAR rJ►r:rsltrl l'AI'.LF:V ISI, H! UN tifAttl, Itl,'. 14 fV1•IIU�! Y (SJf l Basic/Secowl Scat Pay 9'V Insraliatiell QLlwt tip Year I Nasic/Second Set pay TV Installation tH her Total N 6 it,ls is/,.: Clrnd SCt lay TV lost al lat i"n WWI ,wa a 1 Yen to Basic/Swund Set Pay TV lustallatiun Other Isdal Year 15 Basic/S,•ound set l'ay TV Installatiun i 1t her Total $ 17,000 109,000 149,000 14,000 $ 149,000 $b,056,0110 8,601,noo 1,124,000 I,►no,onn ilt,,H03,ou0 S12,105,000 1H,tnl,non 101.no" 2.149,000 $11,656,nnn $14,561,nno 24,000,000 55,non 1,4S5,0u11 $11 , 1 29,001) $16,110,001) 12,149,0nn 59,11n11 1,H27,nnn $S1,001,non VI,I,RI EAnLF. t1F rlrArtl, ux • Illcimles FFl $ 91,000- 51,000 10,000 1,000 164,000 56,H6b,000• 6,1n0,000 324,000 101,000 $14,199,nuo $11,414,000• 12,2.10,000 1,119,000 •,076,000 s!9,a47,un0 $11,124,000 ` 19,850,000 161.000 5,742,000 $•1Fi,Hi1,n00 $10,515,000 11,149,n011 2n2,noo ►1,9ol,nno S 14,171,000 FIGURE Wont.) G" TNT hi In�.anc t.nlum.�ut. Yc.lt 1 5l.b11,011n koveuur (1,041,00n►• UPI nwh yea! 1 51s,)n),nnn krvcnm` 11 . 4m1, Ono) 11••1 ltu,+mc• 1 , 1 ,t,,n0n catih now 'fell V ;:/,sas,00n R,�v�aun: 1,1 21,000 tl,•c lur.,mte ,560,nno ow l'1„w Year 1�) 541,nz7,nnn Hut In.•,+rum lfl,fiflt,uno ... ,"sh r).,w Year 15 55q,blfl,nn0 R,•vOlnle 16, 114.ono pw•t. Ln:..mc 20, 212,000 ,Qsh Flow 5 1 ,. 271 ,.11(lll (1,922,000)• (1,011,11110) 515,fl`n9,nno (1,45a,0001• 94,001) ,ga ,nuo � 1t,7,000) • 4,e14,"On )N, U111 ,i)1111 r;, sll,unn (n,el6,onn fl,6t17,nno 12,15k,000 [I it I:n:t,•, 1. 1,1 by Ililt ivi(141AI vat t1u1 11.1 .m.• shr�wu. 52,424 100 (1,676,600) (2,10'1.100) S10,ki11,1110 tt , 1n6, 1ni1) 510,1150 711n 1,x4a,xnn fl,0I6,1no 1 N 7,96•), )On I 12,to 1.4un 55q,u4:1,1n0 q,Hgl,nnn 14,916, luil F1GUItF 1. (cont. ) lnrome St<+tcanent. Year 1 Revenue N•e l 1 nr Omc Cash Plow Yeat 3 RevvMVD Net life"me rash Pl-w YUat G Revenue Net. Income t•ash flow Yeat 10 R'rvenue uul Income C.+slt Plow Year 15 Revenue Net lr+come Cash Flow SI% :•PAR 1111;1.54tu vIS[otlCARIX OF MIAMI,. Fur. CAhL►V[Slfttl of MIAMI, lug'. S 164,000 $ )49,000 (2,057,000) (2,5.30,000) (1,536,000) (1,815,0001 $16,882,000 $14,199,ono (1,,3701,000) (1,407,000) 7,000 1,558,000 $29,461,000 $32,656,000 6,137,000 1.884,000 10,224,000 8,587,noo $46.877,000 541,310,000 7,550,000 4,908,000 12,045,0011 R,4a5,non 513,(01,000 $SL,8U7,000 16.333,000 5,471,000 17,647,1100 6,068,000 1:1GURI. _a,nt.rt s a,d INys w Ponds (In year lutal) 9 "11 CM r{nity I:ru,s I!r �. •nut• „1h,•r f„1 tl Ilt•,•s r.t{,il.11 1':tj,cn.titulr�; lot eSt Payrim"l S in, „ln,. Tax—: S 1: ,in R••I,.tytnr•ul Ui :•I•Icu'is M I n.111r1 C-IS11 Istlanrc L.ryl 1t11 A!•i.l nl 1., , '.'11 1! r;+ "1 $IS,n110,M10 2o,non,000 'i27,105,11111/ :,hbL, IIIS,1l tl 11 s Il ou.unn 142.701,000 211, 365,000 210,nn11,nno ►n1,25n,nno $50 , 1 14,1100 (• rolt1wis tr.{nn,il,lr f.,r th,•rr y'1 / I , Utltl -14 , 000, 000' 29,100,0001 4hA, 259, 00n •501,99n,n0u �� 79,y115,Ot10 1 IH, 51>, Mill 2:,9`7,nn0 14.H00,000 1••,•Ih••r••1 2,m,naln ::,ul,'111,000 1�' I.trin••. r :4-11sit,l" rur tWt uwo I lit' -lit-, I .ta, r;) r 1•t ,•I, tylaellt „Y I r,uu hi o;v t.eu•s i ;;11, 116,500 mno4,Hom 540, 01 1 , mon 6,846, rlln $ 9l, 11I.Aull 4,.4 , 41141 Iti, ':4, 100 61,!H1,'IIIU 16,004-0110 G/,iln,lnu ( N 1.,jum 1 (cont. ) solo, es ant] 11s_es eft FMIds 415 Year Total) Soul ces Cyl1i ty Loans Revenou tit tics USltS Capital I:xprndilares 1q,viatinq Expenses Intcecst. Paym._nts Income Taxes IA1an Repayment 1,i v idcnds T.A.1I En'liny Cash H.11ance SIY. STAR 11117.S"PI v1swil CARLP al; FIfAtII, lqt'. :In,Iun,o00 12,4no, 000 502,7211000 $5.15,421,000 $ 54,166,Win 140,572,000 24,S50,000 11,1.26,000 12,400,000 54,417,000 $54''i,H91,U00 $ 470,000 $ 23,6S7,000 2t,616.000 573,801,000 $621,014,000 $ 90,4119.000 329,137,000 16,900,000 82,522,000 21,610,000 $542,686,000 $ 70,188,.000 11! N NMI \' 1.11.11 •61Aitulr•:• 11', y�••.rl 1 •,1.111 ,•,� ••un r,, 'f•n.,•1 : 11,•a�1, •tt,ls, 1'.I1 t 11 ICI.1 r Ilnll 1•AI I'I-slit 'Irt W,11. I, 1 �. 1. ,'..lit',•11,•Iti I,,11,tlit lt• n L.n„I 1 • .•�L••I.1 Inq•I..w•ua•ni:. .I•I.�• ,:•t luy I'n••1111 ir•s: i• •.1 1 I,Illnu••nl ;•1•AI ,..e I I �.. .1 ..•1 II Iml 1 n Iln•••�r srnl 1• ,•, '1'V 1.•I,lllnln •111 �' I�I l nl I: •••I •n;. •l In• s•1 n )'•luli•nnrnt /6,tt1 ),llllll . ,rtu6,lhilF },121,e�ulF tt9,i110 I00,000 '7,11!0, )110 ,to H17,b110 it"1,1 ntl 7,')9h,000 1F 11t5.(i00 Io' ISJ.000 , I ,'111i,i1I H1 'l,.t 11u11 C;1tr,l' T UII, 01111 d,dll., u00 i,515,000 1 1 t'i. loll 150,g00 , !t ";, 3110 ib t Ir„lic.lrr,t I(It 7,01ill lilt) '000 tilt) ,00.411111 T(NI,11110 _ '.1„t 111.11 al -A Ih i, 0111) q,.tl7,illl6 t,ll nCm In••Illtut 111`I) ;.H7, 11 .', t1110 j;q,')11 �r,i111D FIGURE 1 (coast. ) 1'.t4,it.+l EXI-el lttlr tls IlS y.,v t„t.tl) nnt.•nu.is, T..wrt s, tleadends, 1:art h St nl t.niS m i rl t,wavt. Ilist t i1mil i„n Plant I nSI It.UI ir•rt.tI r)vtw„rk Itr „I,s t. l't,nveerters Huil,limt:: a t.nnJ 1,,•,,s.•h,•IJ lmt,tnvt•mt•nts t',.1,11•.•.rsl iu► F.rci 1 it iu:: '1'.•:.l I:.Init,m.•n► :;{•errs V.•Iti. l••s I l i r„ 1 l:mt utrrt i ny t'ny 'I'V l.•luil•m,•ut c"pit.tlized rw.•th•:n1 t: Fyoipwent Otth.•r T,,t11 SIA STAR NLF.I,;rrt) Vl!;lt)fl t:A1t1.F: OF MIMI, 111'. t'nPl.l'ViSIr)I3 UF' t11Ar1I, ItN'. 52,550.000' $ 1,621,(1410 160,000 1,460,000 12,204.000 22,714,On0 855,000 605,On0 28,311,000 ).2,656.001) 2,300.000 - 1501000 1an,0n0 1,79) 000 , 2,580,000 168,000 106,000 502,000 1,601,000 IO,Ot10 714,000 _ rot inJi.r.itr`I 1•3,269,0110 " 1,741,000 ;9n,ae9.nun j��, 7H7,Ot111 " $late to npgra.f.r system , uutin,n,u 1y, he.linnirt,t in year 3 (cont.) juit Cost.5 111 -it I ilnrt i1m C.'st an.1 ..:I; I'l, III IA I *'I't I, I 1 1.11 1 $22.050 $100,25() 'Piet IV lor, Tier IV $3011 (rJot.: All COStS "T' P'�t '111.11 $ 2116 . wik ,r1,.1.I $ a 3 'rwri I I , I I I, IV s 178 Tier V. k1l t I 1 5190 F1G1J121: 1 (coast. ,'unstr ucl I'm COSCS Uisl t ibut I'M t'usl. Pot Fli to Acrial - Unden7round cost Per 1110p - rwI ial 'lindc rg rou nd Urptecidtion (15 y..at total) rA111.t:vlslun ul' O1IAFtt, Itll'. S20,000 $50, `i00 rier [ $ 80.00 Tints 11 Tirt I $115.()0 •ri�:rs tl fi, tII $11n.00 (211d 111(11), .ntd $25.110) 552,392,000 Vf3tort CAI11.1: OF ttl.Arrl,.. IIIC. $16,246 $21,898 t [let's I l [I $ 81.00 $179.40 'Pier IV $198.60 i 'Pier V $-' 1.1. 20 Tier VI $1z9.60 Tiers t a [[ $ 88.1;0 'Pier II[ $IH4.40 Pier IV $201.60 Tier V $219.20 Gy Tier VI $))4.60 1, $45,501,000 .1 pj(;Ujjj-, 1 (cont.) ev i jL it, t'l.t.-filla I. ''*."'Is fit, J.wwAvt- to :;t 18,11 it's Ill fires It i•Itn•tl tun I^[uilnn•�nt t 1Illiv.-nt , !;1,,t res — i If 7,1,! ! It 1:1 1 - I I --I 15 10 15 15 15 is 25 7 Clot irnlitxltr.l 15 I*i anch P1 Oposa ApI,I il' O'St I c. 7 116 10' 10 to in til 't i lid I t fj,)t i fur (A 111 10 It fl, it it-, wat"A' Lut.tl It .trill I,plil- Ill m I '.It 1 11 1 1 1 , -fil . 1, ': I - , .'. P. kS Ilrprecialic,n Schedules 1 ears) Ant -I'll S: 6 1'uw,•rs fl i c 1 owave H. • ,ct v nJ 1, tit at i•m ibut inn Pl.utl Aet ir11 111nlcry t on ttd P•,le At ra1,-IC"WIlt ,'„uw•t lot tv Hutllin'Is _ ilc:advnds Studios - ttf t ices L,:ns,•hnlJ Ipill t t,VemPnt" ut i•ttuet ion t:yuil,menl q,•:a t:luilrtn,•nt, Spares V,rhlcl•rS I'1• "P•=1 at iu'1 l.u•liu.•.•r my -IV Cyuipinant. c'•1p1 t 11 i ra:d P.,yl of I ut6,•, I; 1 X SPAR 1`11 f:LS„tl t'AHt.LVt:;InN tIi' fltAtt(, Itu'. 10 10 10 10 tll 1 �1 10 5 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 10 10 10 10 I'.u,ia Itutiton ;:crnr i ty t:lPtipmc•nt 10 10 VfSI /tt CAISIX (IF MIAMI, ItIC. 10 ya•,r composite scht,dute assumed) to 10 to 10 10 to 10 t0 10 f 45 45 45 to 10 t 10 tJ , 10: ON In 10 1„ 10 to t11,t J,r[ail1.•.1 10 _ I.-wum; 1 (Cotlt. ) ;.t•tvir.'s 1'u1rlt,t::,•�I 1'nnn I•.trrnt O it •t. siti:.tt toll (15 y.r.�r lut.rll '1 ut 1 1••ut. •Itt .act Y1�•e�5 1, ytl .tn�l i n•t t •,t�.t •n�•�r Htlliul FIGURE' six !,.,rAlt till-l-SON Vl!;E(011 CABLE OF f-IIAMI, Not applicable FIGURE' I (c: o n t .) ----- $ 41111,Ono S 3'.49,00t) 1 , 72.1,1100 2.181,000 ),4i72.Ono 2,811,000 1,yy9,Ono 4,114,000 i;,J"O.000 5,626,000 , Ifill ,000 5 159,000 '1,4.19,000 5.6.11,O110 7,861,000 9,1119,000 i1.22n,000 ,.167,000 IG,'1H1.000 14),l)1.1.000 yl,O;t,nu0 $I nIp'),000 1 is 000 1,Y,9,000 7,.1 H,(l01) (1,021.1100 ) 1 .la.1 0.)1) I).n(,S,nno IH,lt.1,1100 2.1) mill 51.H;7,Ono 12, 1OH,000 11,3871OOo ►1")11.000 18.649,000 .,, 401,On0 28, 146,000 11, mo,Olin 19,Inb,Ooo g 15,nu0 1 1317,1100 SO I I Olin 1 , 9 19, doll f,111.O110 $2, 12/,011li 6,961,000 ,1.2is, Ono 1 2 , 01,111)() 16 10 .Ono F Ogs, uru) nnn W 000 Ii,H12.(1n0 16,.Ivli,.It.0 1. 54.417,i1n0 14, 1D'),Out) i ,000 26.2on ,000 rr,, S1l,00t) FIGURE 1 (cont.) (11,c1nlin� h:xl.enses Plant. Y,•.11 1 yval y.rat 6 Y." I r 10 Ycar 15 IMEMMMIM Yc-•.r I yc.tr 3 Ycnr 6 yritt 10 YL•..1 15 11 in•t .: s A oat l Y.-Al- 3 Yodl b Y�•.,r to •^n t 31 Y,r•lr 1 Y.aa r 3 Vest 6 Ycnr 10 Y,•.lt 15 SIX :;'I'AIt tJt hl�L, OJ Vl::lurl CABLE c,P rl[AFtl, Illi - C! t41.1:V i S t 1U t11' MIA J , I tlC .-- 62,1)00 925,000 2,441,000 3,954,00 0 6,120,000 l,tzo,onu 6,sJl,nuo 12,569,000 17,155,000 2.1,109,000 g 207,000 ),184,000 5,226,000 7,044,000 10,260,000 S 1,489,000 10,982,000 20,236,000 28,151,000 40,705,000 5 61,n0U 1,674,000 -),218,000 3,355,000 5,246.000 $ 75,000 b,o•14,000 10.071,000 11, )91,000 21,470,000 s 2e,uuu 2,563,000 4,895,000 8,411,000 11,982,000 $ 1b.1,0(10 10,281,000 17,2n6,n0o 26,165,000 to,690.000 i'7Gl1Ri: 1 (cont.) SI'i'I'l,lrl 11'. SRitVlt'F: APLAS, COW"'RIICTItIU In IX!; Alm rnn: 11.111.•rlotl UPAC1.1t•EG I i o,'llI!; a 'IT'I I il,)IV Lin,• I.:.l r11SI011 I'Ol i•.,' t t u, t i<at BchedaIl II<rsid.•nt i•11 Il(twork only) mIIIm I "I ms I Y I tit los o 11nd,•r.11nr111d Plant • P11I, 1,roviJed P.11 .In`as -If til.• l'tty sI rvi•,I o:ithitl 1 years Installati,•n 1lt.rs iu.AtvI, th.• rir::r I `,II 1,•ct. I,t,,{,:: 'It rat,•, than I'TO 1••,•l. uI, t,. tun 1,:.•t ►.i I I, I .It t Iw,: ,m I n,at of i.Il IV- •r Inn I••,•t •.., III l,l I...Iul t.. Ist;iI'le ..rxt"Itsi„n�: to Ihr r•AIV ::•;st.m 141.2 (2111) 112.1 141%) Plat• I•rnaid-I A11 .o,•ns .If the t'cty scrct.I within ' YO.Ir`; rvr•; tit,. I iqht to ,:har7e ,In .1 t t:n•• `ol,l nt,,t �•r 1.11:; Ua•,u; f„r co:;ts it, ••.•� ,..,.• „f th,•:u• (••r a :;tandar,i n,•ri,il dr�q� 107 1IM, map r,rnvi,h:d• All •&r•a— ,If ttt,r t'lty ::u•rvc.l• Within 1 y•••os 11 arr1:; .,f tit.• t'it}• s,-rvt•.i ri.gaiA`le,.is t drnstty, t•�t I I able any IK.W v. l.•put.•tII ,o ant.•;vn1 ar.•a within 1 n .nthr; .,r Lvinn It.,nt,•,1 .II,Lt,.:ai t.t .-�ttrn,l .,.•rvtc,••;, t.•.Inr,llcti� •.f .I+vI•ut}'. loll s,•Iv•• .ill r•••;iJt,urial nntte. witIt, nt , _.In�;i•n, I•r,,•ru•Iltnl tin• m•r,l r„t .I I•ut•1 .It,•1 t•:•1 i,:•; 1 i0.tt l tLI! M lHt,,l ItiNil k F1hURi; ] (C011t. ) SUCTI(Itl Ile ;p.RVICr AREAS,_ COM-rinic,1•Itlti St'nla1l11.1'.S Alit) CONSTIMCPi9N PRACTICE!; t't•+nollisie TellitOly LIn.• Ex Lensitill Policy I : In et rucl it'll Schedule (P•rsid•`nt ill) tletwurk 01110 'i••n1 I - -- t1i les (It) yI•at 2 --- tti lta It;) Mies (16) 1 14„iettllonnd Plant :,IX SPAR pll.f»;I-ltl VfSf(Itl CAnf.E. OF MAMt, tut'. CARLt:V t!: fill (It' ttf Atll, IIR•. 1,1.11, pruvid—I All an,t, I,f th(• city s, fvt'd within I y,•.1rs will t'nlvi.l.• s,Ivicv to all t•-trls r•f th'• t'it'i hnvitl't ,t 't,n'ity 'If it l,•.tst 50 ut t nt i.+l ,nt•scr M, I's l,rr Ini 1. tJi l l 1 pn,vldc ::,:Ivi•r In an••1s within tho <a•Ivir•,• All- ItI,in'i It ss Ih.Ilk th. rcyuir..'t •1••n:it� I wrItt,•n {'t•I it lull i': r,•t•I•ivt•,1 fr,;n .1 Ilnjnitnnin '%f 10 snhsr•r il,••e s +1 t �. I;;! f"r❑n11J lt,,vi•t'•,l {J111 wnti, will, {'•v''I"{"'r In't 'It i 1 j„jn1 u•;.• ,.( t n•m•h,•,; I n,1 .-r,..,stn�1 fur Lu locd new hunsln�i 'L '.',-1•,{aa'•nt s IJi 11 S -1 vv• .+r•t�u: .uu,••x,••I by t I I'1 t y nuni tht- irlinnn•Irt outIitv.A lt. i„r uv,rthl•L1 '1t"{,; u,rt 1',0 f,•'t will •h,,ry'• $IS lulu:. 51 i,•r (,ut •,I•r 1`Il (,•I•t it 1110, unl Ill.- snLa••r jh• t I L•k fiIIit„l nuvidl•s ln•nrh, n•{'1•_'iII.1. Muni plant in•1"1 . ! i 1•••r 1 in,• ,nr f•'•t of un•irr'{ruun,► ill rx, t•; of 1`,n ft.vt 120 (II1.) 400 (I,H'd) I06 (l54) 11.51 lt.+� l.n,vjdrd All. art•,is of the city served within 2 years At I .trca•-• of tht Cily included in the init i,,l s,-rvict all". will pruvj.le S,•Ivi,:,• to any pr,rs,-uLly ulldevt.tc,i,v,l dw,•Ilinq units in the initial s"t-vi.-C ar,•.I .un1 any a,1.litiun,+1 .+revs anucs,.•d l,y t1v, Pity within ont' year. ujII Inlrsu.• ill jlit trenching wjLit uLiljtjnS t;jI I not char,i r any a"Ill jtlon.11 ft•e fur hookups rv,plirin'i service drtops uvtrr 150 fI,_t in le•n,ith I l(um . 1 (cont.) I '.•n;.t t u't1 took 1`t .1rt i..c•t, '• 11,•t •i .w ! N.•I i,tbi I i l y t'.•ust rolot it'll t .,wt.tt Al i .__..__. _I I•lut 171•` .tt ,Iuitit.:' runttr,l ;L.takite I"'). 1111 SI •11•1.,f t I,I .n: C.•t •, it A „ .:ill ..u:..tlp�•. 1•.r,,I nn•1.•t•{tnnrnl sl�l•.: i 1 tc.1t inns 111 .'ult l„; rn 11 t II.1, ItI a uvll r•tlto l' yt—Ind Iw; lu';I A11 if10., ,,^u1,1 •*..11, l• In t.ml,Iil AI I nu•1 'It ""I"' .,u{ I t f t. I.r,:a..t .,'lIt,l I.... a„n,ntl.1 in ,ILA•'_'•' All InrU:r•II.p1l"l I t'•+tv• un•unt,•.1 in ,,1.�„• ,It�ut,,.1 1„r p...t.tl It I 1, J•rt• to t, ,•Lit 1.uu• wish I�u•.tl ul.lin.ln,:,•:; All urnL•1 {1„u„•t nn�;tlnr 1. i:yl ill r.nit 1111 t„ rsl:;t in•1 Lit Iltty i,1t1I,It.IM" wlr.l, tnl'•::11 1. It ttt't in.t, 1'•„1•••; tan Ir•1 In im•I u, 1.•: - I,. ,, .tl L•,t 1,1tn { .ut 1 .:.1(rt y .•1 .unl Ib.•.11 t.h~ Art 1'AfV II.:•tI 1, .nnl ::.,1••ty tt.unl it - q.ttl•1n.11 1.1••rtt Ir.11 :'.tl'.ly • 1.• (1911) ,".l'' 1VIM) N.tl i'.m.11 I.I•'rl 1 1" 11 - it. -It `:Y';t. Lit Fit' It'lI••'• •ul•1 N•'•I,ll.,t i,•nr: .ul•1 !:1.It• 11tt1ily f'utt,I,••;• snta.I I,•.1 v1ith , 10 11"InIi„.I t:I nN•' ,14,rov.••1 :: it'!' •. t yuilcln•nt to a:1IL 111.• ,.,.nl;tt',Wf lull •. 1, . V.•Ilt,:los •'I„If•I"'.I wtth s.If••ty ,•,Iulplo. lit lt}' r.1 t,rl+'llaul•t u::r•1 r�' UP,nil,.r , t-t ro.-t I'.n •I,t.tl It:. At I 'nIJ•'t {I I'lmt 1t,1• to ccw hltt .�n::t tort l�n, ,'•,•11•-: +.IL.•r•.t t., inrlu•1• : (1•t Y I. ut• Al ..1 ;l.lnu,l, n:,trurlIIIlk ,•ilt •,t I��li.11 '�Ifrt •: 6 11.• Ill It A`1 1'�•n:-.I nt,-t t• n I'r.l.•t i,'.'ti lu'1 ti.tf•ty f''l:t.,t.~•ul•1 rtnu+i.'It •1 r.11 f••.1••r.l l , r•.I",t t III i'•II I,'•{IIIr, I11•'lll lit II II } • M.0 'I"t i,m r•.1n1r. lu•'I,1: All ,,rt.lchmr.ntI t.. Iu.t•:et util'it:trs' ti.•.:nnJ.tI, ir`:; f. I ►hr• I•ttrl..w,se uP t,.,w.crin,l CATV •11lift It.url"11 r:yuifr of„nu , tr st.ulllar.l m,•Ilf tih•111 .: {�rrtll.'.It ion•: AW"Utu1111i slush td,ll '�n�t• Lilt •.:Ith .Ill fl'f ':•1 f..•t '; 'l,,lltl.t•I •'.{., � I t I'.11.1�'n�; I:',•I"i \I I tit. ,,ll..un•1 r ILtr I.,••t,•:t,'<1. fl1 to �nt.Inif tlt 1 I Y.•.•{. �, 1}.1 I I ,,Il t�<•ti t„ t ❑, I n l ntl lla tlt l I "t,�u r. In" ,11 Lt i•.• r{'l1{;.. m••Itt f.�r to .11;:. 1.111I n•:.. r,n„t.l,•1 .•I; u,�:, 1�111r ,n,t,l if lots: 5.IIt ,:•I,t ,'lit In th• JI, {hrlt' 11.Itol II,'i ,n,l l'•'f '; I11•itl t 1'•.t i ! I •List C'l�'1 1�•I'� � ., t• w. t�-,n I,I :;1 r�,• 1 il. `1-II t: t�,.t , n.l I.t.11tt I n.l r I t,•.,1 ., It..t y ,'.,Ju ll,lt l••n 11 t l••�� :A nn•I,, 1S tll'Y'A :A un1n11 I:n,Ruu•rt iu•i ton:,t t'l•-t 1� n i I "A -- It,•I l 6y:,t g ut ,. Wv, l u.....>u {,n.•,I It'lll,linl •,11'1 t'I.:rttt,.11 l'u.l,• , lily i,f M1l l.u„t I'ILI•' Pr1,•V 1`: 11 111 FIGURE 1 (cont.) _.— E Six S'rAlt 1`7I1:1-StIIi CAH ANVil"" "'. MIAMI, ItJC. " Pole line Cun:a tort iun in a ,n,r 1.uI, c utility c•nnp.ul}• 1'ulo L,i:;e AII,',nu•nl.+ anQ the tlaf i,mal tAccirieal :7a1cty Cun_:Lnl,-t inn Proct ic•o:+ tt.tnu.rl " 14i 1 I at 1 ach t hr CA'I'V st I and nu t h• Same eitle th•: t,•1,•ph••ne ::f r.t n,] if pt I•sotlt , if In l , will 1.1 eauij."wilt un the ctr,•et siA-' of the pile " VAII in:.lall 1 4" hI lh •e n•n.It It, sevvii wire lalvn,i: •1, tin. +til•1 "A" ;Illipnr t i 11•1 st r nml •' aan,J.0 ,J :: 1•n,vll,•,1 fr.r ::npp•,rt tlrt st r.ln,l al t•t.'hnu•nt to I nl, s, an, h-Ir ;. quy st raiA :;17,•, a11,1 rluy 111,I. hm,•nr fh. CA'rV st r.Ima 1AI-1l h,• h, mb• 1 to all tulul,hunc str.Irol ,v ,.I het oxi.;t to l F' ,tr •Irunl, L•; in n• •' r,i•Inrr with tiv' lititily Cungauty A•Ircemont , ex,•epl I hat I h,•n• r•h I l l I Ill iitirnum b,m,ljn•1 t„•tw•n pu.Il1,•1 CA'1•V an-1 tel,•phull,• StI Ilniti at the fit st, last, and every tenth 1•,•le vi-stoIF MILE or MAW, IML' " All c,rr,strltction shall be in at'I:ur lance with the I'Litional tAect ric :;.Marty Cult- - IIarl,lb,.,,k fill. (It i l i t y Curnp,uty Pule L• .lsl• A•,r,-iiwnts, stan.lar,l CA,ry prael t,•eS ,uuf all Statr•, Cnuuty '110 fhutL 1p.11 I'. nt.•s, as w,.•11 .I:: the c odo:: ,.,f I.tto u,:, I I " I I itlnal `LIIr•ty I Ilo•IltIt A, tlni it s i t.I t iun. ^ tJlll pu,:,i,le all empluyre:; wjth the prup,•r, s.I fety u,ln ipmont 1Ji 1 t at L•-n:11 t ha l'A•t'V Stt.IIt, l lino Si h• ,Is the Co l,'ph„nt sir nr; •if pr,.•nvnt. If 11ut., will pla,:e .Ili th Si, I., ,•1 tl,u rnt e,JlllJ Inent a St rC'cC pule Will inst.Il l 1, •1" hiyh st r,. seven wit, l.Ilvenfu,l, tine ,. •,tin•t "A" supputtiu,l stlan,l ^ t.InJ.IrJs prnvi 1eJ fur sul h,,r t tn•; st r.11l•t att.L•hu„•rIt to 1�•ul,•s, •In,-hnrs. ,1,1•r tit tali,] SIU', r111y 1'ho CA'1'V Strnrl,l sh,ll he b„n,n ,t tIl all trlephulL• stt.url „t t•th,•t L . j::l ir�J Ault• tltnnals in .Ircur,lanc..• with the utility rump.Illy Pule L,•a::e A,II,:r•menI , earepl that thcte •.flat 1 b.• nuntnrul,I hutwo .1k 'al.Il let CA'1'V .In,l t •lel,h:,ne sttan,l:, o th.• first, 1..si., "It,I t•vety tenth I"Ill: i'i(;Ulti: 1 (cont.) f,•urt :�l aud•+rtt tl,ttu•rl iuu 1*01ir•y tllu lc Utilities /,, .• I,tr.lt c,1 Huth Al:r i..tl ly, and ttu,l• t•tt„nn•1 :;lrnctltra1 stamllt,ts will "I ("rill in taarttuhiI In,ln:;t t II•:: A .s••,•iat i,m Anttu.•ti.m mit ktu•1 unl II Ihl In•I wi I l c,tut,ttnl III r'itA :;r .un1.1I,1 AV-7- WWII' A.•t i.tl ^ Wi1I r,mfurm t.,r - t1.1t iunal {'I.•t't t i,' r:nft•t y tint,. Crtuuly C—Io - 1'11 Y .•f tll.tutl t'ra1r• _ ., .ul lu•t rI Hrl l Sya,•In t',uca t n•'t I.,n f�rart_i,•,•:: - I tut I,la I•„w,•t s Lt tllt t',u,:•! t,1�'1 t"' 1•I,u.t 1 .. ttll,l••t,!t,nnrl .. t1111 uu.t••tyI•,nn.1 k•L,.r,. uttltlt.•s t•It''kiwi Al I nL•r ••ss.0 y n•,t 1 f i• •1t ......' n1,nl, .In•1 I,„1 ull (:i I,lrl .I I rtI'll Inclu,lr,l in alq•«anli>: nu,atl �; n, a n.l ! t .I• .. I• .. I.:i11 cun.l•ly with I:IuCLT011lc ru.iustriot'. Aa,xrlatiftn :;tan.lar,t Hs-• 22-I• 'I•,w.•r fiul•:h h,�t :ii{•l" J •ralennt.:,• t n•r•,t .11u.l to 't51'tl a:nr. l.I r,l A`i l!t, 11trtlut an,l Ii�Ihtln•I will c,.nr�gm t • • t AA to u,•Iar.L•; Jtll ull,l. t.tl,•un•1 whot.": ,It h,•1 it i I I I. i— ar,• umlrrgImull •wily r••,luin•mrnt 11 I t„ or 1, :!- oxl.I•n::1�:•.• t11u, 1h.0 •'I ..••r1.11 "oust Itwtt•,n - At t•r'hnlont. [,t , ?:1 Sf It1.1 .It I. i_: it. It III 'I'.111I I.r nut I ,.I i 1 111, r..1•.1r,•,i r„ t h••r Ili i I t t t t,•:. .n• 1 I�Itt t�il.11 .� Iu 1,.1 t1r uu.l.•I II•nn•limt I i.I•.t Iu-I •;t r�n•lut.�: ,•.In 1„• n1 t i t.....1 to ::y:t .m •L:t•tn Inrin•1.•,F in .I{.p,'ntl'ir liulI. tit with:t.uO 125 Inllh wtntl3: wi 1 l ,•ouf-ran to Itt•. l u 1 .11, Will runt„rm h, FAA „h•, I -I u.•t i•,n Dt.+rktu,l, Lliht In.1 "1u1 hl.I�•,•nu•nt 221 :;C.t n.1.1r•1:: t!11I •.•a•q�ly !'1•.!Iuni,• 1nJustrif•:: I;nlet�tt.,un,1 r:,hl, InIt I Itly 1.1 rr''•J- t•Pub•r I of I I I t.1 •;ct V i,.•.r I•xltit:; Whrty truly FPI ,.,,n•'r,•C,• I,f.►.,..; exItit .. WhrtI. I••I1.1,1, n• .Irr't .1�:.1i11h11tt.1«a r ut 1,. "C"I I I .hl, ,:tll k.., t..l.•. 1t,•,I ,ml,•t .,•th•�.J ut 111i'y '•,'; i'''' r• Iu wltl, h •'tlh• I •,t 111t; '1' I Ln f r IGURI3 I (cont.) Tawer Standards l'.unstctiction Vol icy Where_ tit i 1 it ics Arc_ t,oCated troth Acriallx and_ Uuder�mm�d �'+1nst r tic, i c,u 1'r act ices Manual r;IX STAR gIGL:a NI CA1tl.F:VIS[tftJ t)F MIAMI, Irlt'. Wi 11 m,•et or t,xcl—d t tit, st .unl f r,l:: cuntaitu•,j in F:icctr•xll,:s {mlu•:t ry Aaa„ciatvs It:;-221-A m.1rF.iu-I .111J l ight+n•) in accrr+lartc,r with FAA AC-70/14f•0-IF it,) unaar,)ruumii'ill is fur-t•c.t!It f,•r thusc areal; where itt it dies .ur •+rr t•tI cutldgit uso,l in unJet.)ruutl•1 e•xce•l,t in .I V,•Iy f,,w lnclnded in .+pp�n,lix Vltilot1 t'ARLF: ttl•' t11Ar1I, INC- W+11 rnnf,,rm with F.lectrunicv I mfu•;t ry Ass. trial iun l=�c iblr+f.x.tl Rti-221-(' an,t all ah1' stan•l.tnls Will inuf, rm with :+IL ap{ ►i,:al,lr FAA :•l.ut,l.u,ls tit 11 un i,•r•)nntn,l wh,•n - All utilities .trc un,lrr.)ruun,l - lhtJ�•r•lnntn,{ ruustru,•titm is an . ,:, n,,:u, t•_.tl dlt,•t n.+LiV,' to tur l•tl 111-A rill t iUtl •+.tnttt•.t Ir• luc,,l authorities I•.11tt l:.ulirill.ttiutt with uth,•r ut i 1 i t iv5 ran be accompi ie:ho,l Will j,•iu Lhc 1•1tst utility as it its l in••s un,l,uyt unit l Y ,u'ltit :;{,ecial cu:;,•s t',a,.l•u t InrluJ,a1 iu al,{•endtx FIGURE. 1 (cont-) SI'.I"I'ItIN 1: C11nNlllil• t'APAC11'l Alin 1•I nIa15V,1 :Y::l rm It. :lyn 11. si•lI-ill i•II r.1111.• t'Iall i•nnnt il.n t'II• • I 1' 11 • IV. i l •r nr,unvt I V,111 Iry.:,l rV.un In a itilt il,n.11 I III.: 1'I1nCi•tuI It tun I'11,uu,•I t'.Il,acity h•�wust rc:Itn ' IllrSt tu<un 111 11V 1 I Cllmt•r t1!r:l �ru Itn•tlnt,l• ut• rl<[.r�l•r.lt tlt,lrlr aiu 111• II.-I.:t,.l 12,1 n'il.•:: (if 'Aril 'Tu rnk, 'A-•11111 tlllt. .l'nanvt r.•nm .null `, 41) till: ul,st I oam i (s2) Int 1LIl 1 tr.Ill::mlS::I nr ;H mil• :. (,lilt l,Illy) •,( tiitrtlr 'Tl uni: Willi 171-4110 ttll:: .bnrn•a I• Im unl `, It)tt till: tip"t t I••un I"-'1+s.1 ::•1 ::'l 1. n:: rlIMlI I,, ttl;,tit f'.I I. I', "'i1'C l�'�•'T II •;t nHr, mi I I• , .,[ Jn 11 '1'r�mV•, with Ill) .. ...,hl.. 12`,: -dill till: I,,wnst IV.ro1 .u1J th•• „t1 r 1`'0-dill !III Llt:na n•.un .uul I III" mil: nl••;lr.•.1nt . H•^:I•IVtIr i II .Itid i n:.t ttnt t, .n..l iwt,•r It1:. ,1rc ..nn4,I III •.I. ,Il I •;11 IOn I'h.Itn1'•Is 1 I-M it IFI'tll •'•.n ,ltn*t .:.•I I.'t .'tr IwA it•',I-.,n.�l •.Il-1r o. h•:n lu:;t 11 I.-�I I�q .1'•w.'ml hnrin,•,:: n:I,,r: •`, .'huulrle. 1•-hnt�•1 ::II I� 17 .'h.Inn.•t : 11 I'It.rtuu•1 1. •1 L•nt 1.'I' I'II'llow I:: l•ln:: 1 I till: (..t 1.1t.I t•II. I' �'; I,•1, d.N wj 1,•,: •,t •:u(• II' n't; lI II'l rt .,,nu.rl th•• Unl.• (',only nl••�r II tin •..•nt.•r .m 1611lnw 1,1 R.•n.t InI I :a.•I 1•.n.../ hl''t t u111 In:.I tltlt t,In,11 A• rI••::, fit, I..w.IV'• t.' .Lll,l.•.•nt •:y:a�m:.. �l•i.-, I - n.ln.• 'I*I 1 11 Pinm' r 1:•' lnun -1.1.I lil - 1't.•nu••I I•1 I It)t) r1,ll.^•.. Ti.•t IV 111'-1 lilt) Into•' I•'11:.• 1 i 1.111r••: (,,r rrqi.,11:11 It.l.•I, nitn••rt I••n I'II•t I - n'nn• - l0t)t) irt II .I I'It.••::, &I I. .11••,.•t•unhll•r („r .•1(n.Il1 '1'I.•I IV I Int'' I. t Iv••) - ILu 1 1:: Dtn,lrl I L.1 tr.'11t'tIII in,Il tr.lns.uitt.l:•. 1n1�' r•t IV L. l�.nl IIV.a IV, fit I� 1-I Ln:; l'. IIIIIIS miIuti "f 1111,tl "I'rnnk, .t' h IrIht•. i•) ..1.1q NIL' ,1„wwo r,.:•nll .1tl,1 `i- ..10 till:, Il•,a rr•nn 5:I tc 1 1 11, ('h, uutI l:; I I !I 1 1•,'I It t'It �11)1url : 11 mil•.•; I I r >; 111,111: I'r unk wilt' 11t) milt ,1.,wn•:tt"All, .uul ,. 7'• t'. IV (I IS till 111••+t t I••'m I 11, t'11..Inn•1'� 1,1�' � t't 'n, i n111.•� .•II r.••I I•,n,,l j,t:•.Ir .In. h•u1.1•, f.•Ji. It •1 SIWt1.•-hul. l l sl.0t inn �tllart :'•ni'.•• t t ui:,. ill 111L.•1.'. gym..••• t i„n wlrll tin• F.lu, r it .i ,•1.•'�q:unnni:�.It I'mr. • ••lit .•t k -'! Il •::m l duel I It'd I I••I I1 lil, I`.' - 1't n'•••1 VIP •nn- ,,.j .Ll�t'•::., ,I,I. •' I --w,. •,• IIIt, •1.I•In.I :'.,< tL'•In I 'IH ( 11r,v•• dull 'Ill • 1 -- FIGURE 1 (COIlt. ) CIIANIIEI, CAPACITY AND !;Y5'1'fa4 UI::;It;tl 1•1e.pused ::yetem Uesiyn II.•si-ieut i.tl Cahlc COO iyu!atIon I,hanuel Capacity Ik,WUsir.la+n Upstream )nst it ut io+,ai Cable Cctnf ignl ation rhann,•) Capacity Uuwr,sl ream 111'st trailt ill lice !;IX !;TAR 1111:1.S.1" ('AIi1.1:Vl:illitl "r MIAM1, III"- 1 Ib•adc•nd an.! 2 hubs lot, mil.•s tat year [, 71,9 mile:: 1,+e,jerte•1 Iq year IS) „f dual 'Inu,1:, ea,rh cable SO-400 r111t lowwItn•tul ,'I.A ,- 10 11112 ul,stre,,tn 54 . i l 1 1 l Cl+.+nrn•1 s, !'P1 S"7 mi Ics tat. }•••,r 1, 1'19 u,i 1, s ptojecled 117 ye•,r 15) o[ _;in•,le• 'I'n+n1: with 24(,--1')6 Mllt .iuwu:;tt•.nn an,1 G-1`,6 upst rr• nil 2 i Channel s 25 ('h.tnncl s None• Tier 1, 11 - Pioneer RC-2000 Tier [IT - 11-wer [rr-1100 ad.lr.:;sable interactive VISP1rY CARIX OF 11tA141, Itl('. 11.•:ulowl and 2 hubs ,HA miles of dual 'trunk, each. cable 50-402 Mllz d,;wnstream and 5-10 Mliz ,pstream `,5 (x2) = 110 Ch.uu,ets r F^t 4 Ix21 A Channels Ild males of sin.11e 't'r.u+k with 5-lib date lowlist ream and 108-400 Mllz uI sl ream 18 19 1 mile••: •,f fiber optic 'trunks hetwr.,n the ::uL-h.•...lends .uu1 thu 1'•.•le.•e`mnurnir.tt inns Ccnler I1.I111 in :;PC-400 'Piet i[1, IV - 1'„c,nn 5504A A,Wrvssabh Uisrt,nubler 'Piet V - '1'nr,m. 5',IiIA A.1d[e•`s.:ah[e l,i�.'t.nnble:r 'I'elctexC VI - '1'_11, 51.,10A inh•cact the FIGURL__1 I,,it i 11 Act iVAt i1.11 I. «r•tt h•n .lf 'Facilities III 1,1.•ml 11ia•f� tim - •.1�!;,I,�,.,HI,I. ul 1.rt!•rrt. lit `lil All 1•nf,•lr.ily .11:tiv•Il.•d iniltdlly. t1.anlsttr.uu +'hann..1. t«. 9h « 1 itnill•.!'.it t t.•,iJ1•ntiaf netan.tk .unl 16 Im Ih.• iusl itul innnl nctw.11k 1".. 1u:.« ««f I Al ".,t r i"I k2A Its r+P• t1.1f, fu,lvi.lud indic.ltinq lo"At i1m of f It•' ht.I•L•nd Iil•••'k .li:+yr.un I,rr.vi.led AI I r«...i.lrnt 1-11 n.•rw•«rk r.1l ..catty .u•tiv.It1••! tniti.111y. A sef•,tr:lte in,;t ilnt i•«n.11 lWt,W f wiI I h1r :• u1 a t u1 t 1. 1 wIw11 ju::r i f i «•d by l«•nl,nn! for inst ittit I.n's ervi••r th•11 c.un,.,t 1. Itie:fi_l Lhr.nl.Itl Ill.• int—IrM01 n.•tw.•1k 111f•s provided it'll re,ttf"it lu«-aeiotr 1.t faciIIt ias All upsrrr.nn rlf«I.•lty '"IvIll." u1itt.111y. t1..w11st: t 1•.1111 wL 1:'•1411•n Iuni h,ulucl;: I./ I iultt lilt rr (.`lour,- wl111 ,1tlu•r s••'trum I I S I s •1.111 providett urd is-+•.lt irnl boat ioR 'If t.IC i I it ie-r1 i'IGURI' 1 (Cont.) Initial Activation l,(,.•ali011 n{ f'acillt.iaE. lw.tacna Ili a-itam slx stAlt tAlll.t.vl::lnn qF FIIArtI, It:"- ) t of t.h,• ill ,b,wnnt ream rh,tnncl s .u.a all of th,: "I"A r,•am el,•+nnrl> on th•� id.-nt i.,1 IN•i Wnrk .n-1 ivat .-A init 1.11ly 21 of Ilie :`i ""wn:.tt"m I%'l ilp st r�•,,m In:;t iI Ot ion.t► nr•tw"O '11"M cl:; .wt ivat.,4 init ial ly tLtl, proviaoJ imiirat imt 1�„••+t i•m of fncilitit•:t ,I,wt+-w.lv interactive diagram pr.wi.l.•a vlsrt,n CABLE I,F tilAtil, tut'. ^ All .rhann,l ,el.ty .u:tI"t.r,l initially exce['t for Teletext. SD of the ,S 'relet,2tt channels will be J,:tivat.nl initially Nap provided' i nct ic.tt. i ng l ocat ion of facilities Itlock diagram provided FlGilltl: ] (Cont.) t'I 11,•. t„ ,tp,•latt• ur t'r.ltl1act fur "t l.u,t:mi•:: it'll St•ry ic'S 1 II t • tnnr•11 0.,1 rieI 110 I thlr 'I',•Ivvisittn Rt11 tI, ;"Ivict• •t, pl, :an,l, ,n• r•rl l:lrl' nl.,nl I I11" lullnWln,{ t',1U,Ilntnitl.•:; :i•+tv,A Ir,•m sit" h , hi,lilcrti•u,•11 th• rti,uni tt.•,�••r Y mi, low,tvo• ::}st• w t�ith :1 min IIMSM .,f tW„ h mnoi toot tntrn onnr:ct G,:y Itisr ryn• (r,ut'Itl':''1 ;in,.tl It Mi.uni Hnt Il lrhour (l^•rnlln•{ f l nr lli :0•) l•I t y to l I nulyl {o.u:.•,1 l.•1. ph•nu• p.tlr : m.,y L.• nt 11 i ••,l n„ r.imminl fr - not lni_a rnll t r .,•i,•ast.•r : Wh.rll tI%- :;ignnls Mu'" I" i, ..it•••.1 off-.%Ir i.••:,•r•.•t•=: tI,,• rt-lht to itI111 thu- (rt'hlgllt,g'� :;hnul,l I pry•'"• ko,•hni•'.tll; I tl•,nr I I, , i•il 1. tl,ulul ili:at ii../L it.0 tiurvic.-• tl„nr•... 1. , n.. .._-. r.(!Vf.:tl IttCtCr '1'Vlt,l'S 'l 4sgl-nweler and I tit :a /Lions pr.,vide,I n,•ne .•xct•pt f,rt : tYo•i l tt•-1,•c;utl *,Ihl,! prngr.t0oll tit-; it ,I n.,i i•,:,-G.unl ,lin"t Ines pruvide�l h'j w•I „t t••It•phernr I,•.Is. d 1 in,•"� 11 ;.•,1 t,or I•••11„n,t1 lut •�t „•w,r,'t. i,rn IIiik arltlt ht•Ih•.•I ••,lur.lt Iou,t1 lu-,I it ut t• n:., en-i I••i l,kll It u,::mlt.r;I"n ;•,t 1,.1. .,f ► 1 n t 1 •[.loll .,:•, ur 1•tll,.,l l•.4 t t-n h' r tt•I t ;tlJn•ill of •T toW {,nwec ','••I'"t u,n ::t. Lit rll.tm l' t tl , ,-•,•'I1 tl•Il•1 {)"even meti•t .tut 1 ten. wot••t: •L.al1 tl,. FIGURE (If c0litlact Fur It carrier R,!iisy service (' .) I)iStlil)utinn Servit*v (.1) other' .;'Itellitir! Earth Stations ,IX STAR CAIII-INIS110 AMI. ill I c row.-lvi! to ")"'! I ' main lit -'i'l# ."'I to distribution hub l()ojti,)tjS jrj(I other etCMMv(.tc.I !;y-4tem'; tiolic tjorl-2 I severs "It-1t4'r 'I.Vito's at livadeful. I Itictict TVRO -it 11"tj VI.-Ijotj CABLE OF MAME, Mi'- ttulphone lilies will h':! 'St"'Zt'tl Fur r---otltioll of newswire_ services. 11,1ta- servi,. �e. s and w,,-jitlior ratlar input tilt.fur a M,,hile CAPS, IWO j.ic,jjS.- [,,r local origination Ell'; 11flivill'! fur Olt, il-L'illat i'-II lak-1--ve receivers if jesir, t1j, city ana,lor c,.jiljty for r"11'tlale ()n tl,c 1 3 ten -muter -1-vn,)-s provided PIGURE Level so{ret.11 it'll I.tl 1 .Iy C•t1/1u ts,<1.11 itm tl,l 'I i•rr 1stlleti,m II•nn•• tnt<•rat:f-isr• _ rvi,:o f'aj,.ItliIity Ii, t.. 1 .unl 11 to u:.r net.lt ive •,{•t l.a ❑„trh titI _.I t.taps ^ 'I'ic•r t 11 In its,, I`i, alert W1i 1 1011 I L t snl,I1 t-rrnvt'It , r 'f l,•1 IV t,r ato- Pi,+ln •,[ RI -11n11 t,:.r lilt c•I.n•t ive rmv.-It,•t fi••r i •u,l 11 i•c,,l•IIr•:1 11y ..al�•,•tt••t .n•i 1•unl r,i•'•'1 fllt•r•, T 1,•r Ill _.••rvirvs isul.lt ,.l Ly :'; n•• ,:u{qr •. .::inn i'i• r IV i:. ,l.tt nm pr,•V1 1•i1.114 er V11• :. ^'ur ity .uul t•uunnunl,•,It 1+aI Sys rIII Al pny St•Ivlcos fu use .! c:,'mhin,I[i,ru of h,rx•hual ::•r'I,t- ::upprf•si.+n .tlnl ,lyn.uni, vile„ iov,:r si„n h+•,l.lend .^,ct,In1111in.1. Al I m,n pas•; 'Pier I t .'I'd I I I {r,,,It .nuuu n•i '.•,'I 110,1•••1 I,y th<- v. 1,•r.hnt•Inc nv�l I•,r 1•ny nts•nrit'y '. H, •a I t••1,•�1 n-�.,. • . .,-I •trr.�n:are.+al .1 it 1 ,'ll.u,in•I:. t,• n::, •+ hi ih 1•+:: f I I 1 r r 11 .; t-, A-1 nl,:tI kill •.h.Itnn•I I.r.•t,.;•t'A I.y hl.lh-I•Ir,s fI1t,•r:: 1dt11 till tI'll Iy in�t,l►l .r ,1.+t.t{,:,nniut,•I I,r,1,•,•s.lu,l syst,•m to pr,reiJ,• :.ervt, , ., rro Im1in•I Flt• tntrn:: 1. al .ul�l m+•,U ••.11 ,I �Im - tIp1l+i,rn p•'11tm1 .,u,l t,•I, t, <t tt,•t,�r1 t• •+Itn•t :II .It a': IIII+I111•I Ilbt Al I pay .,ert•i, c:; .,. t.mlh C,•,P n:;in,I S l uew•Ive sync snp{ t ,nSs inns .m4 .1 unt,lnt• sync snpl'r,s:;i,m u:,,•,1. by I`i•nte,.r ••,Iasi{mn•ut A11 1 it r: 1•+t,•,1 t , ., I.+ml',1 II„I. {'It<•ntrl'ln,:Y. ,nit t.•..-+tat•:•:: tvitlabic•. P i�ar•rI WIT ...,•nt t • y ,I . m, ,.I I I , J- Iln,lerwttrvIs Lall„t.It,+t Ie•; •.11't t �.� t 1„�ttu• s�•,'nt ity-+l.trrn t,•�rltr.Il•�. t'j u+1 :u•rvlre;, ..,rurir}• la,lr: .,�,�I .jolt e�m•rP•u,•y uu•!i�•.;I t.•••I+nt- ,I,.• to r.•,p+ut,! Lu •+l.ura:. FIGURE I (cont.) S,!rvi,-e l.eVLI Separation (a► ray Coble Isolation (b) Tier [so[ation Ikane Intetactive.Service Capability , X :;,rAit p I I.I.-:,+t, rnln.rv[:;I,ttl ur nlun, Int•. 9'ha I'ion,.cr It'1—I 100 sy:il,•m ultin'I t,Llress:+l,1r; runvet l,•ts Wit i I•r:.:•+ 1. i sn1,+L ion 'I'r,•r I suh:,-ribrts vI I I 111v,• .t 11 rh.rtu+c1 cunvert,.r WC-141001 th.,t M+II +Il„w a,ct•::l; I„ uth,C s,•rvII- I'i,:ts 11 6 Ii( r."ntr��lI, I Iry 1h,. nl ir,•l::;,+bl•• ,1,•::r[.unh{ iml fun.-1 th,! H'I'-1100 r,•rrnin.+l I'umc:vt Vll' intt•r.+,•t iv,• rapabi l ity for wile t.cnge v IS IUrI CAIIt.F. OF tl1. All , ItIC. All subscriber signals exclusive of 'ricrs I anti It will be scramblu-d via •I'rIt'rrM's ItF.S-r scrarthl in•I Feclutigue (part ial viJ•:r, inversion and su1Ir,r.;Lion) 'Ir,•r I •auL::rrih,rr ,11"I's pn,vid"', with a Vrt,•k I"w p't::s tr:+p which ''+rll bI 1, 11. TIC•t If si•In.tl s Al l ,t h,•r 'l i,'+ i s„I.+t,•,1 us+n•I Lh.• .+d1n•:•:.+►Je [un,:l ion f the assu,-+:+1,-.1. runat•r t cr Ttrrtr!1 III -IS security .urd intcr-activa• .'nnmuni,:atior+:; a•yuipnnent u:ed, wit11 .-,+pnhility for wile ramie of 3e1vi1:1ro: I'lt;URE 1 (wilt.) Ill. .1, 11.1. 11111, lilt• 14*1/I nCi7l ifill 1n1.'1t',•h1H•l') 1+til Willi 1It1wit Call11!' �;l �,1 a.•luti 'll I'll -I'll 111 I,1--1 All I2 f{r. r11 j_ via At•11. it, I':I w.Ive 1' It I I.•I ill 1116!4' Int••tn�:..lul.Itinn !n.nhlrt:: I:h.1..t Frhulrt:, H.uo I•,.11 ,t Ism hrtwr. n .r.lhl, s 1'I Jltrrt l,,l, 11 rt n•: •: ur �, h, l -, I l :•n fl,.l�nnm •.t•n+11 1,•v,•1 ,t h .Hurl 1 tn•., I.q,. J..•1.•'i 1 1 ,II• r1.1 : ,: I'! It.; tll bill 11,•nk•n,t rrnun•rt,•:1 h, Ih,• Iwn hub•.: vi.I !.Irllr.•rt i.,n.,l tmp,.-rtr+ulk .1 t,:Irl h tit.,t lnnt: b,- f 11,.•r -'1 it ,..., .',II,I,. I - I IvI PM ill, ,.1111.111,•n Cl•1 nitt.l-h1:Ih r.•r f,+l m:uu•r hi .It1.,11•u1t1 lulks lit hilt I';I It I,.t. 11j,1 thtr.-•{unrt,•r ,,r' . W. 1,1•�t: nl : 1.:w-I. .., t•.thlt• It t.1r I., ttl :•ra••r 1••1t r+tr flip., •: v;t{>tilt, tn•.II r.lr it l'f•': nn iul It Inn rat I- ::I II1.11 t:' 11:,IS t It W I,i((,t•nl,Il Hain Ili f r,•trllt 111 t nv• l v"- .1, I;"I. .11. •n•n.-r A I.I •h, itI;it1 I I !.I '.!tl't:l• ;..1 1, :,:. 'I'hr tutu u,,xI-lillbs U1t ••, .,r u,•:'"' i.I six 112" 1. 1h1, •:, wltt. thr,• npt-r.1tIn•l it, ,•.nh Ai I, 'Irian F'It'll hub has n[f-Iir .Int••nn,Is :n1.f Irt•llit.• o+rth 5tIt11111:.. V,.1 AML 1.1 FM v111r 1 :Ili: rn::,I :•*• t.0 r r1'1 t. n.•tar rII'l1 I-.. .It .t r i,•i rn hum un .,In l,lt I'm r ::{•,nn:.• In till. rh.uun•11 + hr:Inln.u,1•,•;lun.tr;.ul.•. ,I. I.I,, FIGURE I (cont.) lilt :I t:011111 N't. itill With Other t7-1!"L !jY:3t ems S lida 0 s SIX STAR MlArl" lti(:' Ill!'04-114 1111,11ws AM. will lilt With ll'*j'jlII'ot iwI syslrins byxtelnlinq their I'itllik 1,,, sia. 46 Als j'.IrI wr to rwis'- or(j,r - 64 414 I r -47 -Ili Ilmn Ino'bil'it i'lll -40 '114 Ftf-'I'loncy (At'llim-1 .1, 1 uuk sp..:t rum it/ I I Im it ilwr It,, I. if I it 111t;S VI!;I(Irl CABLE OF flIAME , 111C. to the two IlkilIS %I!-,ed DISC III by I 6-til-er Vi.l the exiStinyI list it is tiomll 14-t-w"Irk Vj,j (lir,-('t hardlillf! 47,1111c' I,.Awt!vII one of the hubs an,l the otlj,*r SyMull, head —Is vi., '-.Ailluct carrior ti, 48.7 dtl 66.t '111 58.7 dB ;l'JO�C l (Cont.) � ' ` - -_-____ _1. � � /`''' - lilt ' vi°."i"."'" 'p"r ..'`. .-.. ,/.m "'~��`'^``^'/t"' '='sit .,^v.^ ., /^ " `.`.... ' ` 4c` ` `^ ~ - .~.'^' * '/""'^�� n.'�.��,`. m -.k r FIGURE' 1 (colit. ) lunill i l ier- Cascade L.nolest t'ascdlle Pet t •n m.tnt:e Tust s •,y•;tetn tlaintenanr;e SIB :;'I'nR HIl:I,Slltl VI:;IUn CAULF. OF MAUL, ru('. CA111XVIS1011 t)F• M1Artt, lur. ------ Is amplifiers f15 Trunk, 1 brid•I•:r, 2 line extcn,lcrs) over 4.ri milt , 9'ests iVIC 141,1C. 1•teyuency I,la)nllariea Visual Ito aural .eerier si•I11.11 1ev••1s - Ilum mullnlat i••n - Imlivi.hlal c.h:vulel fn:•{uclli Y t e•il'011so - Est r•In n,.ise .+rnt un,tr•.;ire•1 i nt ••I nu,.I,11 n11„n an., 1r1,5•; m�uln 1,\t1 111 •relmiIlaI is ,latio n Ra.li.jt i•,n me.lsur••ment M.l ll,t cn.ul�:c {,nn•••►urt•ti .I•"il'f lflt',l (l,t t lunpl i f ier levels S iyn.tI •{u tl it}• T.,.:hn iaal :ita(t .1•rtwriLe.l IS ,t,,,Plificrs over 8.2 miles Test include tii.11lal levelti Carrier to noise rdt10 11u11, level sitI, triple beat Annual I,n••lf of l,erfornlancc Rln)tine maintenance described for: - Siynal lPVCrS ,y:;t,:nl swoop - 5i.{nai lea Y.aye - Ilcat arnl m•listurr 1'e hlllc,{1 stilt dssl ribe,i 1,1GUm: 1 (cont.) L',u,l,nnt•t t'tn•Ipl•tinl 1'ulirics ,,nd I'.t, "A'st.:a: ;11..•,•i•II :;ystr,n r'r<rtotv:: ... :, I11, 11I.I III ':t,', 111, r;, .rti I'kII it'ies and pl,I•:edurt•s d.•::,:rihc.l I, .tut.., uiCIIIA": l,nt•n tuuiny I,rrntat control key l ,•i 1 .•t •_vonl , a1•al.i lily 1'I t•n•iur, ,1.•ny cal. it' i l it-,' 1 • •nbl ult Sysl t•In In, II I I ,tt I Il'1 1L,1 t 'Ivi...... All •PIll , c'tn, .,l lunal, h,••,Ilh "It IC unl nitnl.tl f.I. i11Lil:: IItIti.tlly tr.nut.•,tI,, t„ In::lIt-it,I'm a u••tv,.I k an,l pr.ri it1,••t wi t It I l I:an:u'1 on"rt I I•I Intrtcrtnr..•t:t ir,n tt, I'. mill}' r.t:,•I•tt•In'y opor.itions c'cntt•i ti l:•In,-.,t it,",I 'I'.•Ivi"Ir:u,tinlr.It.it'n•; t'I'ult, "I I'..t,.i• rS:- 111'011. r•tIIir.r."; and proet•dilr.•s r1.!st-rit,r:d .•M ill" ., IW.Iitdt•: F'irt•, intnt::ion an•1 nnr•.liral ,Hann �:rrvirt•s ,IIIIni•,u {_•,l1 tnq rl,uu,rI in- nit,iritiq (I••t';-I'cr II.!JI r.•III I n'1 In- 011 t„ 1' I l l'l '1'• II.1•,n II r, IrI, II I,it r.'t ri•'^nl 1-.i•I,•t'I•nr•i ,1.•It ':}'slt•w ;I.,,I.IIq t••,a:.r 1'rnot'11�,1 Itt:;rr,.1,. I'r„:Ira,unll.,,t t•� tl n'•t•Ih11.Illn.t"1 ,llst�i,r•s nt 1 rnt i I It la•:: { i::r,•.l Ill will t"• unnt•.•!,••l. Hud•trt all,I••nt, l fnr �',0 .vnr,, •�t i•nl�; at :$111) c.!.•h. rt1 -.III. i r.;.I , , ;!. 1. r , ... nl tcit•; ato procedure.; dtrst•t 00-1 F,r.ICunr:; rnclu•Ir�: - L'nnununit'i Ltfonuation iorErlov.t{' .rtvt, I• P ly-1,ut-vt-t•w Iwun• .,I wo ':r•tvl,'e Inl1 Intrl•:n't Iv'� tU nn.• •..,nnl,ut:.r I'nt•rl} ,n,,n r,Ir•ln.•nt I!Inkin•� ,t lu•u,•• I.mrr 1••nry .rl..rr :t ••m 1 In::t itur t•n,•; r 1„• {,,`.,:...1 ; Insttt„- I i'n.'I i,.•t •,J '.t F. In�ln,t,• :Ili IIru'rit. t••i„r.,r i�••,,1 h••.,I!1, .-tr•. u1 t.'ItA � . n,t lnun.,I, q..I ,•i, ,.•, f wIl is I. I'lui+ I twIIILIt. Jlth xI A it., t,I,• it In•utn,l tc •,"It,'u': nll h• t:nn,••1! ,t•.t ,n•,., t...t n n nnJ •�h.,r a..•t ,•I .I,�n,., , ,:, 1 nn 1,11•r � tw.nt,i .,t i:u, ,.n•LIn.1 .. „•1 ,-.,nt t,.l •.tit rt t •i 1'�•I I• . I1„t:t. ... •, fc:.,, ,� t.•t Flt,. 1,�.1.. '1'; ,lulu'{ 1,ai.,l.l,• t4 t t uu;Ir,Ir 1''I t,I Ir ' At '7l l y 1','•lnl•':t , ',Il,-•Illlr•ras FIGURE 1 (coast.) ('ustoma�r complaint Policies and PtoevdUlCs ;a,.•cial ::}•stem Teatur.!s - S IX STAR tl I f:LFOr! ('AhLt:V R; U)tl' tlt' Fit AMt, I11C_ !'oli(�ics anJ prnlredttros ,icslrrib,•�I Intrusi,nt, firr• alarm p„)i,•,•;' ,�mc r.p•nr•y tne.li,•.tl alert npiuinn 1 ,llin•1 Fner,ly m:ul.vFen,,.nl, Metter 1,'mlilll - f,•xt display Itata t r•Inbml 5S inn - v.,y-I'••r-vi.•w 1•.1l,a1)iIity - St,,tu•; m,mit„rin•i Liner.p•n,;}• alert system :,tau.11ry 1--r 1,10cid,•.1 nt 1; t t,' nper.,l.. an.1 s 5, pur.tt, niunitnr .Il.trm .,••rei,'•':: ^ (:n•✓rtnnir•nt fa,:tltllc•>; :•-h„nls, to 1„• cnun,•,•tr•d, .n rr.Fn,•::1 . to lho hraitilt inn.tl tl••twnrk a( nil e.,.it VISION CARIX OF MtAML, INC- t,,tljcjes and pruce,lures described Fr,ttule5 tn•:lude: Instiruticru,,I netw,/tk with 11) ,Ilsrtoln•1y prn,Fcamm.,ble Trunk:; t'jn•, F"'tie:e and MrdiCal I.rn,tc!"I inn 1' IY 1„'r-vi,•w ly ill-ut.ty.•Mrnt - t•'xt .fispluy In(„nn,tt inn date bAh'!s monitnrinq Frn•r l,'tl,'y .,lrrt system p„wer provided ., .,,.I,,11-.,t. .,la(f to upi•rate .uul rm'nitnr uL+no .,etv+ces •� I:nv,•rnpu•11t f.u�ilities, s.:hunls, nlie. l,-s, 11—;F jtuls to b, cuu111.rte,1 lu Insl It lit Iuual Ili.twutk. flit ch.trye fill up t•t 10 111,lps FIGURE' Customer ibmplainll`ulicics and 1•nrcedutcs ;;per-ia1 :;yslem t•c:atores ---F__._ - --- - - - - -1 __ - . - __ __ - - - SIX STAP NTFL;tNI /'AHLI:VI:;loq t)F' MIAMT, lnr. Policies and pr ce,hire dt•sr ribr'1 1'..atute:: irn:lmtr•: Intru•;i.nt, fir-, alarm poli...... . �tnrry..nry modir•.a1 alert tll.inirm p••lltml Fm•t•{y motngent-,ttl, meter rv•aJin•t ;:Itr�1--.tt h,nnc T.•xt •)isl1lay Ir.tt.t 1 tan4trtiSsi�m vi•-•w rtlabiIity - til alas nn utilrtrinq Lnn.•rp•n,:y alert s}•stem Stat�•Ihy l ,� r tnrn•id.•1 ^ $.T•er,tt. t t•t r.l.erat. .tn•1 nn,tti t.,r al.trm s.•rvir•-,•: ^ r„v.-t nun•ttt t a.• i 1 t t i.•s .••'honl s, to 1„ rnnw•,•Lr•d, rm n•'Ir:••st to thr In:.litntional tt.•tw.u'F. VISIorl CABLF. OF rd IAMI:,. TtTC_ Policies and procedures described' Fc.tl ut Or. IIt" It le: In:;titutinual netwotk with TO �f i s.•t t tc l y pnt.ir.unta;tbie Trunks Fire, p..lire and m•�dical protc.•t ion I.,y I.•I I-.nr•r IY mn na.lruu •nl 't••:tt .tisl..lay - Fr.11tu•l Infr naa[ ton d.tta hoses liner 1. m y alert system - Ft.utJLy {•••wer F[ovidc.l sop.I r.tt,• e;t ,•ft to "1"1't t.r and nr.nitot alarm :;--1vtres Grr,r.•tt,uv•nt fa.�ilitios, s..hocrls, .•u11i`�ir�y, h••:;{•il.tls to he ctn4µ•,•t r.l tr Tnsl itut ionat tt.:twnrk. No c•hnry�• fret tt{• to 111 drop:: . .I T I t I! I -) : 1114 W,$13 .10 S 14 JJAI. cmuilAill: Atill ALLOCA,riom; Sli,111.11 Call i -I'll! St at inn:: 1.1 -;1 -till 'IV 7a.41 it 'Its Ir- fit A. I 1 4 111 1 )1 .1 1 1 11 It I I J i nn Tier tin It 2, -1 I I 51 1, t . ;., I If, it I i - - r TIT: I S. 12 fit it, 1 7 1 a 11 20 1 .. ( I* 14 1 r ITI 9 . I,, t t t - If I lit, • r , 10 " !; I J. . I wi i III III (III ISl 1.111 Iti—ol"'iSl ifill if I I I I/ AM A 9 1 S W; A I' I S & 4"111111 I I,t,-1 it -it i'm I I If-, w, q !;PAtJ t :,.I 1 PJ,c.% 1 1 6-p rll whi lit I Im Ill it At lit I "t i 11 a. I - I cl I. if J:ot %V1.1 f).-I W. -1 1. W1 11. ,1 1,,-r I'l —It I I M 6- r, In,11, 21, .1" HI fill a LaladUr , 1.11 1, clla3 [.ahn Ilt.,Wll I-111F. for rel-f-Itilm Uw.11 Ill. c"lop-it" fill At I It 2 t 1:;.*x t 1, -1 WI , t 1'.;I-ti I"l, 11 41" I-j tan w -1 P I "1 1 ' 1:;t ll, l "' -t %;"I is 111ti till jIll.0 It P , . .. ,I, - it . , '. ,,If .1 - .; I I I . ,,I I It I it It, - u 11, I'll all mll IIA !11 !11 :,'1 — *.", .1, 1t*.:� ,if, 'tier it: Its. 1, lit, 1:1, I'll Ill I'L . L ph" , f.,1 42, 4 'it ') ch ch T P I I ''III 1 1, 1 - 1 1 1 1 ) VI Lor m F_ t *If r I t; if- I- t t 1: r It I 11a. II. I 'Mi t I I, .. w,wk" I III I V N,.tl fit I A cwI v I Ilot work c,anpw; '. with otIwt Ill l"IF.Oltlitli I'I(WRE 1 (cont.) ::1'\'Tlut) ./: 1'Ib1PutiF:11 SIGNAL CARRIAGE: Atli) CNANNI:1, AW.WATIONS [•r•tt,us•td Si,lnal Carria�l� L,,,:aI •I'V Stat ions III sl .tilt TV Stat i(ms ::.r C e l l i L•t 1'rugrama -. V ideo SIX :;TAR ttIcv:;,trl Un Tier [: chs. 2, 4, f:, 1, 111, 11, 21, 45• Mialli ('hs 5, 12 W. st Palm Be nch It ('taul,t,sile with nlher t,ru,lramminq ('11 9 th•w y,uk l'1'i,•t t[) Ch 11 Atlent'I f'Ii,•r 1[I) (syn,ticatvA lv,,,lram Itl n,•l: ,n,t I I,,,,•1 (•in••merica• 11 ) tlicY.clu.le„It (11) CIII i:;t ier, tit .ladr.u;I itt'l th•l w,.I k ill) [nt,•tnatinnal ('hrtur.l• (tl) Itl,o�k I:nl,rrt.ttnlm nt '1',•Icvi::i• n• (I1) AI4'.tl.11•I0,11t Cwuntini t y :'• t :• tc,• tJ,•t a ,r Y• AlW Arts (Alld,.t) 111) It:;f. rL•Lw„rk/('.tlli„{^•itCn: (it) V,yc: N.tw•,tk (I1) 1. •,q�l•• That Lew,, t111) t'a►,lt• IJ••wr: tl,•twuk Ilttl ,•[t;, 1.tl,le lwh,rn nc.ti l.thl.•) (IIII I ) SPAN 'I't intty Pr,,,tJ•'ant imt Not w,n Y.• I I I (ICI) • Com[•uc:ite with tttt.or [,r. It,nnuu l,l vlsnlrt rnnt.l: nY• rnnnt, lnr. of, Tier 1: hs 2, 4, b, 7, 1Q, 17, 21, 45 MI -Ili 1, ,1 t't. Lauderdale (•1'k�r It) ,Its 1), 12 West Palm Reach` • N,•tw„rk fill-in; cumpttsitr whit r,th,.r pi—jranuuin,l I•It g 11, w 'i„rk (IV ) t'h 1! Atl.utta (Ill) • 1 r [•c, Ili t t of Iq Lhc FCC hri :t i.nt HruaJ,, uain.) IJctw,.rk (il) ISA ti,•ttJ,rki NI`.t/t'•,11 iu[,c/En,)lish I'n„)ram tkrtw\,rk:Cclefr.uur(li) 1111 Ih•l11t.• rgq,.IIA'It I.tit C,nunntllity vir,r Net \Jiltk/ wlll,l,w „n Will ::ttt.•t (Ill1 IU Irtn `:at••I1 tte Nctw,.tk ( :[ult:;h Int,rn.ttl„n.tl tJ.•tw•uk :Ill) f,lp,•1 I,'•tn l'Ll, ,t i,ln.11 'ry rJ..tw•,t k 111 L1. N•\Js t!••t w,.tk (IV) (IV ) I'. •I I• Ih•II I nt• (IV ) N 1.4..• 1,•�L �•n V.^LIs I.Ivo/Cintym•1 i,.,t• (Ill) • Ih,• FUc.i. ('h.u,wtWl (IV ) P1.'I'A• (IV I. 'rink•:; ttin„r Shul,l,iMI (IV ). Alfrnwt.• I'NS lawn a�•ail.tble 1 1GU1tL' 1 (cont.) I ny TV I'10-11-ttm; I: ,r.l l 1'1'ugl'..tntT - Aal /+mar..•II !. I It :.1.M 01 I,vf ;. ti l' ;II •III '1'tl•• Fblvi,• Cil.uun•1 I;A I.,vis ion Itrllno Theater t1,:1wnlI" l' 1 lit •pl.l a p,ly-l•er-view CO 11.11.1,• ilia lit f it.t. ('1'1.•1 I VI (Ti.-r IV) .Iv.11l Illll l •' IV) I 1 IV) ('I'i•1 I7) (ri• 1 Ivl ('I 1• I IV) ('I'i• t IV) • 1'1•1.11—• it.', witil .tI v., I't—It .u•!Ll 11; 1 I :oklI:'I!.;!JI!, riI;.ttf I,vu,• Rua 11f If ire :h,twr lift,' I'lu• FUr:ic rh.uul••t Iranr• '1'h•••1f ter rlrrwt>rk :' i nl•n1.1a ILI i I�uhl i. Sllbs.'ri1,r i.nl tl.•ttJurY. .L,L niq,ul 1 uuit 1..rb ISI +anirJ,) I I;,•1 ! l:,.Ith.•r It.nl.lr t1.,t t• t t�l n•.• ::1•nll':11 (b'ws '.!I)(I1. ( I I••1 I 1 11,1'•t .11 !' C. .It1!,1•Illlt y 11,11 It -till III. (. 1'•1I11 '1'1 "rl •1t It+ll 1;111.1 f' :111,1.' (: 1111 ! CA'fV I1„,1r,un 1' ( i•.•1 (Y'1••1 1 •11I::i .,.,tuml/nity Rlllletill Runr•1 1 1.•h ui•{urtunitios ('1'i •r I I:,.'.,1 tIl".J`:'i11tI4C:lI `t,r .rt:; l't 111111111111ty 11111I.•t Ill (1, ,.It •I ('I'I,•1 I 1r r'�III.1 't'. ,•.J 11 1•tllllr' 1'tu•lr.lm Glwl.• .n'I'V t•uc,11 l/riyinatinll Srh.•,lul+• (.1.1.., 1 I I II•r II m 0 ,'tne G:Itinr+ 11. nut• 'I'hrdYet• tlutwurlt �:,tl lvisi,ul i nl •n1:1 x .rnt u�; ha per (.I l,.:; (o,f•; -1,t•r vl•rtJl II.1)111 tht 11'''i'F^ 1 i/•,:1 I.ly ,'•Il,le I'rul orf; IItR !,•rlt ul,.• •. „, Il.)In ,:llI li •�'I'nn.• \J.•.It h••r t l ! II1111,•l l•.11 1'lll l•'2 111 !l. r,ll.1• (.'1 tl1 • r lwl• PI••,J.'III i..I, Rnl l• 1 11, R•,•.nl' 11 ) !rlif Libl.tr•; ltoll,-till i,.tl�i I' '.. nllh i11:1.•1 t•'•111 'I. N'•btl l (I) a% 'Inlll l'thlll,• R•111. ,-ill t.•.It.t' (ll •nn,Itllli l•; hul l•t in H,•tl 1' III Itl;1.'1'. R111 I,'1111 I!'•.11 1' 11) :I,•1•Ihl�.,rh,,,.,i I+ul l!�t in w•-111' Il? . Il lllt i'll 1.:.'I1 1'-.I t•'l 111 Id 11) 111•.'Inll'; 1'It'; I wl I• ! lu I,11t1I1 f1 nit. , I:•111•-1 lu ! „11• Ilnl I• • ul P. 111) . u!' llll .�I lrn••ul f' (11) •t .1 r.� (:,'"'•1 nm.n1 I:�II 1� t In Il.0 rl•l: ,111. 1 i'llll•.I It, (ll? 1�1�•11 Il.�f,�n:.t•-I u..r 1•. r., '. •�111•h (III) .I.wl•, 11 'I'rl..t, .I I.111, ;51• n, ;' Ilr .,il I)' I t1 Ii„III l•,'III .Ilir'1it 1, Ill tl I"11 'TA • 1.'.anl ••":Il•.• WIIt• „1 t4'I 11'••11 11!II'dill•t FIGURF I (cont.) pay TV P10111rams 1; 1 X !;TAIC if I 1 1 f;4 lrl A III 1..V If; p III ( IE' ri I All I I I I riotwt)rk Itfl 1, 1 lit-InAx it, ry 4:.l I •t V IS I'llo Movi, f t I,:,- w; P,ly t-.Iy l"., V I -;pol I to • I te with ()ttwr pro,jr.tutinlit'l r I'll 1 .11 ill-! (fit) Nit— 1,12,110 M(wi.. • Cmlpo!;It,2 With other pr."11,11I vl:;[()tl CAIlLF ()I' MIMI, INC- OffiCe till) vw wvle Frollt Ibl'i Network 'rL '" 1 ti,,rw(,rk- (tit) IUH Iva L-Ible tiulletilj noard 121*41 Ac,(.'"s-, t,,I,Icjj ti,5'j,1q, it lw.srd of Huard` (t Illo'll %III GoIt,,.! (I it A.. I W. he I tilt) tit ."I rb-ws I? F.1"lli-I Rl'ilts ( III) (IV) I with otlier inll "Ar cont .�. 1 1. , 1-1 I.II - ; I It I it I .,I I 11.- it 11'. 1 ('I p-I 1) P. -I It .!I s Clews an, I SI, wv r I. I V Cr i-• I I rjijAA Wo.1t1wr 1) HIIAA 111.1,or ill D"W -ws all'i U) Ipt II It'll IMII I. I , , * I I f * "' I cv la; 1W t iI I A.. ,• - I t 11-wiiiii A ...... f t It,- A111,1F I —It- !,J•.itllsll 1.— 11 MIAMI it. it IwI • (I fit Intl 1- 1-1 it, I II I im I .. ........ it til.-I m'!.o 11 , I l.t t I I.. E I -'.. - I - 1 I1vt ti I I m.m Vo • I �, -; i f , a,tlrlb -,I`iW, I-, ...I " A1111.1 I WI Tlw IJIIAA U—sth"t It Of-" lull Ap I-iwplaq— [I I -At !I. w: -.j I r-- t I In 1 , I I -,, I .1 rl,•w 1full 1. t Im. it '. j '. , 'j, I , 111 1 rlit I -At I ',.1 1, III It—, I Tj Ill t I1.11 Ji A—', II . ....... A— ultalnl fj I -t A, A At the T i I v I . ( , .11, 1 , , ! , I t I - .. I 1 11 "1 1111 FIGURE I SIX ';TAII MIAMI, 1[14, wom.-Ills ramily twariwo Iml-r-I :;kills Ac*,,t,!;!i jon., pot-lic Ac1-055 Citizens A, llata jj,s, r% ...... !js (2) Fire A,,of-!;s Library • coloposite with Other Pr011f.1111minq Vl:ift)fi CAIIIJ: OF MIAMI , Fill' - IV) in N-WSW 0 )p I rjowswi re )t,w I(me!; Fill.-ticisl News SporLS Wirt, Fi,)r I'Ll TIUWS Oriqinatioll Or iq inAt 1011 II I 1,,:al ori,miation (I It 1-11C WI •A L'wat ol i-liflatiollh (I tjovio:; (FlI(O iSIO (il) old ic A, -Otis E.,jw-,tLioIlAI A,,(*,,:;S (2) 1(,.1 1 A... •ess �jjmv; flo,li -,11 III) I k i, I CiLizon Acco-, with Other (ro,jr,timn IM) FIGURE I (cone.) ..11 I: t1 •,I't.I. to AI.ArI'I' I:,,A It lit i,vLll Hnsin,•:a I.) gill Intl :aI•m N.Iintc:nuu<•�� 12) Ia1t,t ltI► '1'••xt (2► (IV .•rnl 1'''+I I1,•n,s Iif rm It i1,t, Itrt t i,:vol 1 ► P-0 •r H,tricv-•,I It Autc-1 IC 11 TV 0,•br'•,I,1. ,,•.t 1 11 I I I ,{'ru •;h.rt.,l 1'••li.tn,t Id) i„n Ib•1 rir•v.tl ,tu 'fnnirrl (=) I,r'I iJ u, Inf„nu.,t 1 tl Rr.,d�I, r.1 :;• in•I Irrl�rnt till :it A 19 ih.unn•I:; li`a ••.1: Iit I, it .t nl Inn•, !At Itnu:' I ..tt• Illt,-;''Tvlr• ti 1'tl'F1I'-rhi t'r _ I..ty r,Ihl, ::Inn11r'o-t tlt t,l.. h1 !l.aw„rY.. r:In,• r 'Lt•.1<• rh. nn I1 _ 1 ('APr1 Itr�,�lln,1 f.'I lhr• LIIi„I In •lln�rt \:I\, ll'.I„tlt:.hr :,1,, i':hl S :ntr'llitt' .,•I vir• (lJl f1'I'•I,i .rr' ` 1 r,�utl t y Itl r:ht•i 11,•1 _ Ili::r„ tl• ttr �tL, rtu••Ir 1',I,•v1 :I. nt, l 1', .,uwutlit; Rulln ostyl,•:,, IIIt 'I, itl l I nhl t'• A•","'• t1/'ttJ.•1L.) _ 1 l;•tHM,-tit A.. .... _ H it, -st.IV••rl tar th,• futn„ I.--1 Ittt•ttu.It1,11, _ I llt,�til.It, I,,n•.11It i,tin.1/ icr,. It- 1 ('fltnnr•Is ([In A-1 ,•.11,10 �nt:lmlin•, I rlr.nnl'1 fill 1 .Is•.i t•,isri:a .Int,l!• info. 7rh.lnn• Is (1 nn A-1 c•.Ihlr•, •lrtn A-1 r•,thlc•1 I nClnlltny 1 1•h. r•,r 1, 11J_1.r rw••1 'I't•I 2 t'hourn•I •• (un A-1 • 1 is I,•.r:r•1 I.. ,'.I S1 uti:;h 31'hnnn••I:: ttl.'.tll '1111 1,I1•l;14. It •CI' ntd•11a (111�arin,t Un►�.1rr,1 1•rurlralrunluyl (11 aunty Inter,xnulert 11 I ) l l,J,v, C„nf.•t.•n••i n•. Ikt 11'::1.. tir t••,.t'•.I Shin,-,tt-Ilnw,• (t ! t 1 11 I'l,.uun•Is Ii:•t,•-1: ::t 1t inn:; - H .. i:nu1 tt••r1 st�•r•., .I u,l i�� tr.r srry It','s .uuI 1'V nottJ.Ir Y. •; HI-linlu.,l sunuIc tst. 1 f.hlr It 1 rtt; 111 u•I AtrI,"t I'rIttI. - 1 AIr1"art '1'rtftl'' c"lit. „I• II,,iYtl � 1 1 ! I'h.uun•Is I,�n :�-1 ��.11.1,•1 In,•lu,h.•: •nnt.n.:Ilr •.,tt11 ,�rh,•r ,1 .rn'tr.uniatu.l 1-h.uun•I., I..n i. t , .,1•Irl ` lilt 1„n f' r ,.•;.•rvrJ f.0 .,,till[•; Inl ,�rr, •tu,r•.' 1 I.t1I,— n,'t Ic F }} FIGURE ociver M,,Ltc'l P111Y Professional fAlwation (2) FSK-1-1,1t -1 (2) IjL)jIlt, liankill,l P"trit'"' j(, Control t,111nicip.0 TtAfr utility ('untitnlin,l F,fu, at um (2) i 2S cliall1w, o. I t st... I 25 Inral St it I I), 1.1 1. it .- zwrvi,S 1) i so,) ri.-twork, (10)(41 Milt; i,:) (:11,1nnel Ion A-1 0,1blO ,n A-1, 5 (in A- 2 cable) v151vfj CA1111: OF 'ier V lj te-letext- ell-Illnels vi Tnt,-1.10 iv(' St-rvii!Cs: now Jon,"; 11,tt;j (lank p,,lik i wl Sill, pp i I 1,182-B 1) illo-1 act ive I'm 13) ( rll)vies sports for iclevisunt Servicus -it it 2 slwl t%-,Iv" L i c fur 010 visually 11,110 icapr,l (.)n A-1 cable) 22 ('11,11111els 14 un A-1 (7.0110, 19 in A-2 CAtAt-J FIGURE' l (cont.) •-,"1'1"'1 1 : MWA1. I"IBaa:l,fl{11tN: 1., cal 1•I•.-11a11t Pr•.au.a t•.n E•p111.11 ilt uel F.n'iIiti'a ' lti.lin (r,r:.lttr.l at ( hr•.1.1•'rrl • :anai„ will al:;.. LI• ,rsc.) (.,r e,-, .... 1•ru,lnc•1 i.ln ' ! I. nvrto st ua i.., (t•i},.•Ity t'ity el,•1 Lit t 1.• Il lv•In.1) f.•t UI., k unl nll t 1q in.,t I'm 7:1•aisti an .l u•..•r :: I lain �tu•liu r,ln en .I :;t u.l 1. r.: 1it 11,(11111 I tt„l i I.• V•Iit In,tinn -1., 1!,nnn _-- l ;'1 ,,,1••': 1.,..,r.':1 .1 t' {`•1 i.t11t l'.'Ilh •-1 , `.itll,l l., ll,l:.l l".'a 111 la l.• VI.:I.IItt")' fit 1 ,• ('u,•r,llnl .:r.r!I• 1'Irr ta•If lc'It, !•Itt II. l.II I,•ct t1.1•i. It-It•,u,-1. L1E.•rt; t'Ify, Plus f. ;;t.uai., wlll :11':,, h.• u•;,•a f•,r •immIIIII V I'lllan,•t 1, -it Cellre rs and acc-•ss {rt,nlnc't I'm I',•I to : tua iu:: .it tIw G•le.:at inn•,1 l'r nnnnNt l,',11 i(.w; ('olltt,l .,r I .t tilt•,•; wtlI .11 Sn L.• e.;.•,1 f„r .,•'.�,•:••: l t-cat (11 t•l u,et I•nl Stun l<. j.{t1U,•ltJ l) In •,Itirt Iran I MIA) II-, V.ul Ir,O Dill) A :•1 ,pll„ 1.11'1 1111.•:: >1, till.flnll 1 h.Ltl• Unil IIi,Mnl ... I. 1'•a•,menlly {'t I,•1,n't I, Y1 1'1.', null I. 'I nl.tl $•1: !p't ,11011 L,•11 111 I1„•: IS(1, 111111 t l.lyl,.r-Y. Fe,'l l tl I, G ?J,(Inll c.•nt 1.11 nrl I;. r,..l • i I.I I",1•.rP. 1 n tliti•.:: ','i1.';OD I 1 _. _ .... -in nra rn A.11 Int ,t 1. 115 Ina r•Intlnu•-nf ,r t 1, St till ltl luc at itgl , ,L•tc i Ly ra Inlc as („r I.•,'a l .•r t 1 l n.11 I 0. Exclusive ar,: e _ FI•,IIIIC t/.Irli $1hll,flQti� I6 Vol tal.a,.M , dH,mw it I( .'()H, titi0 Iv it I l:;t, a ::I•• rif 1,•nl ly, I,ut in•li,:.Il.r,l a:; s.11n,• . I ,'yuIt.al,-lit .••Iullamnit '.1 r,•nnIt. :dual -W, ^ tit It dha re th.• 1•. •.: Il ,:1 1.11 t..,t ,,,;, l steal.) ,In.l 111.. vla,r ,t rnit„•: It 11, F.rL..1.• ..n,l M.,IIt nl;', ,n•I +•1• I fl.l•i. 11t11 A,.'em r It ,1.... ..i rnll',, .It .I• , 11 �'I 1„• ..t i„n:: ..•. .., tb L�i 1,�,• .' ui . ,. ,� ` I ,S, uUu 1 1i1,•lell IIU,Iuill tl+,th i„'.-,,.. al n,l t•, ri,•Ith ':te,lt„ Ar.. .; 1 ,n. 1.-. Ile, tiu1 bn mill ttunl,'iI.11 ..• 1' 1t111• rtn ,lull . FI••l i,l.. t!rr •1 IeI ,'•1•I 1.•p •,, .1 ntin anuunitti Vi.•,a 1I. .n.l ,,11•I 1n.II I•,It ,'rnt,•I:, (lit) .:'i, null •:•;:,t,•mr, (F,..11..,11a,1 1,„N t"Mt,•I -I'v •I'1 it'I 0111) tit 11, I.f M- t:n1 lit a'„nf••.. nl'•• In0,I1111P I"rvet.•t 1 h.atr.,t.•,I :.teal,..; Itit),n110 ll,t, Mitt 'Pclrrl.v,nulll• it.111,000 Inu,uud r••nn r 1 , .Ilillllllllt •� Il.'I 1 1,•Il:i FIGURE I (COnt-) SUCTION K: I.00AL 1144CRIV411ING ,I still F*.t-: i I s T.,c , AR it I CAM,F`1151-44 (4. illkni, locat.-,l at ill,- 1ww lit-r-Ify in tit,• otittirat fur IS. 1" It I C, -:',I S ion Ity -, 'n is, is ffam] 51,211I, tit I ilplicat ill -I tit.• ir t It, - I I Vi-*Wil-'l ct-iit--rs mill A, !A till Ill!; 'rl wv. I "Ll 1)(111 lit mm 11, - F Tut. —II 51 , i)jj " , U00 vl!,lorl CABLE OF MAJ11'. fill'- loc'Itc.-I oil tit-, east Sill.! of II.W. /tit AJ-,Iltl,' LwLweell N.W. I ith I-Ml Street wi 11 bi. wjn w.L 1—ilill 1IS-1 f"t ,,riqln-lt ill" • Ur—loct-l"ll tillit pital expell-11 till, ("T t—th 1-l"Al ,riqlllatiuIl MIA 1111111-:;Ii r,wilit for Llw I las i vo SS C"I l-rat I'M 100 , y. 4 1 toll (Cont.) :watt t Ill, fit. Y.-al I ..vat. 11"oss Vol rithct Tctnl pet a:cut axle: of Pud.prt A110CM011 innt(J.1 it F r r ILI IL .,!*1 1,1, j 4;; 1 ',if V VI !, I ym, 000 I Fill 11.1 r IS tim.r t i fill. 16 Fit lilt, R 11.1 r t t inn' I'll ine 1%,tt-tine • 4 Pa r I. - t ' [it, * Ill P" I. if I I - t i aw position v.i r r Iv Yul t all„ illw .• . 1 -.11 1- - t fill. P, t r L t ime Part-t I— M-w Iao- - I.t 90 116 .lei 0, .vw to 168.000 l.1-1 -, . o0o r)04-, 000 7,1OR,000 I I if I I - r Ill- 2 p", t I :j Fit I I - t I ill, * r I tj F%L I I -t, i Ino I%j & I of F I i I I - t i Pill Part-t IM Fill I-t hill' �ia�a+a�a;+� FIGURE. I (COIA-) tol,ijunitm,-jit to local 01 i,iillatioli and 11113-1ct Year 1 Yee 3 Yea 1 5 tear 10 ('"Pull it men t )t L.f). ps I k HEMI H'.011C i i oil !;IX STAP 11TEL.",011 CAMANISWIl 1)1* MIAM, till'. 41,1100 s5q,OnO 048.001) 1.211,On11 6 1 - t It," 21 11111-till"! 24 Part -till 4 part - t in.., 2 1,.% t I - t I it,. - 1!4 1 L I 0IV- v, 111-1 14 240 254 100.4)00 1,174,000 2.26-1,000 2,671,000 11 F1 I - r M, - Part -tune 1.0 file F1 18 11 1 r t - t i ate 61 ' Ft 22 Part-timer 67 Full-time ::: , a r t - t i111V 24 Part-time • 2 11.1 r to - t k 11w position:; e, Ilia I I Full-time position 152 101 F1��I1RI; 1 (Cont. ) 1'Isn'isitnl:; 1•tt ;tiu.,sil} 111I.1s.numin'1 i I, ,..1.t ,It 1 :, 1 '..II I - rI I•I st 11,11, is 1 (aLu11e11 Il.xr.tl ul i it it i,nl titu,tin Iit 1.1LI.lr' ILIV,I11•1 ^ 1 H1.11•l. 1.''•II ,rrl,lilLtl iun >.tu.11,I iit Lit-- hl.l,rk ,,am,,mity " SLlr,lut rlq•lu}'• .. frt.al tit.. I,.rtl .Inca }it. ,tl hlrnl t.v,•r lito of frmi-Itlr.•• I•It tit I.,.rrr•,Iranuoirl,l .ul,l tll unl It} t.•I, vis1. it {,rn,lu,rt 1 r.tlnirol t'r",1ram .. t't(it.11 „c:t:: t•, f.1,-iI it.11.r 1•u'.tl min,.t lip rll.ultu•Is. Apt •II xi0-1 IY ;15f1,111111 r.l"It'1 ,n,tt,r'i {,cl t'h,tntn 1, 1ppr 51.If1 uu„Itnu•nt ,'.•'I life „( f r.In:'hl:., t„ (•uI,'h.t;,, .t .,..t .•lilt. t11•I t la. .t'. t,•Ir t ,•1 1 .,,nu,'•' n It i,•n .l u.l n•[11 nl•,•II-uomin•I I,II111,„) ff 1,'I'.;1111M!, w1t1111, l ll• n,.n 1,1• 1 I • , .Iall'.l 1pi ,I.-(..11.'., (, 1 „ „1 Itn�lt •,I :. ,•f itl wk, `;I .tit ,h. f 11I1 ,1 1"i w1111 lit 1,.,-11 1,1.,. k t•t• ll.tm,nit,.t l, I h,Itl I I1,•t ,. •I.r_i t•I�n In( ,1 r.•I .will tl:: .rl n, u,•,.1 ,., r. IIII11„1 ll'� ,I 1.1i11 unl,Lil [ t ; I't •, 1- 1 1,,,1 •''-1•I •'t 1„ „ ..I 11 ( ! ,•I'•I'Ii 11, 1 i11 I'j :Ill ll. •1 ll'r t, •i•Ihl ,1 h,., •1�, 'tt u•ll,. 1 ..',.t 1„1,': In 1-•1 It LIt Iit -I, .'••ril�„11111 '. „I t I {"•1I.t '.: 1, 1.'1, 1, I"tl „111,'•I 11 ': ,•1 .1.. 11 I .:,1 t I, I.:• MI .It t., 1.1..1•., ., .� I ell.l ,-t f•'Ct It1,1 I,IIII ,1 ...�, 1.�,� tip,. �.1. ,I,•.1 n. t ,. , I - m ' 1 n, ..; I hl, , I II;•I11 l,.lr •. 10 ••1'� 111 , .•.t • 1 ,mm�n I I ', "•i' II' I • m1,rv,1 1I -, wU.1r } I'I ,,•It luntll ll l ,I•'I'•11IIn,'Ilt I111 lily 1 .1 .1,•t 1"•':. WI:1,'1, W111 ,•II,1,•.t •: 'I r,I 111;.1.11. 11 ! ,. I , ,'cl -i: I, ; I, .... . wl 11 .•tJot'l I .h •1 V., it ,•In II 'I'I•tlnln•( Pr�.•11•.nn f,•r ftit, Ili ::- .ui".I i,• d'I'''I. , t,iuwl l t ln'I ",,I O^Il fJtt1 I,I,'c1.1� :'.1;•,nI Al 1'nbtir I'••1.. ii::I ,It t trh $I110,Ot10 1.••1 l f•,r n•hutri•,1 t..t 1c,. ,n 1, (�1. .(t •..,,ul n•1 .;t •; tit 1 1 st .LI I'th 1 ,',11 t PLhr. 1' II, r 1• 1•p• i'ut„1 T,• ,11 •:I,UI •., it. oit „l', I I f "f t ,il•''I11 WI I 1 will 11, F:111 (u"'1.1• I, •1, .;nl � Ill:: 1 „ul„1 t lr..•tt}• r ..,1 ,�1 ih, il,".•1,.• nr „( 11;1,:, ,t 1' 1•': In I I' II 1„t I,�. 1,,:'I , 11 rl', I., mil:, ,t 11 .' .1 ,.., : ,f , l h• 1' , t•„ 'rill In,.r,,. , .!• :, 1, •11 l„ I,.I ,.iglu•• �• 1 "1 1,' 1••'• ., 11„I111 •,t I..t 1.'11 •,1 I lw' 1',1.1 1• . ' Nhlll"I Illm 11 flu• 'I I.u,l 1,..'1,. ,',au,wnit} , .,I l,� 1•• L'. .. l-:•11,1 t'rnl, t ' will (.t,I•.•nh• t, br,ii„n.11 Rr. .;.. l•.'lll ,'1 ::, lh,• t', •Pdm U1l[y V1.•W Iit•I n •.11t ut l,.n.11 tl.'I✓nit Kith lit i ut t'1 ,.•:t l•.-,. .•I .III l it y },ICQDC - - '---- -_'-_- '»/ I - *.,' .^ .»^`.+. /' .x /°v i"/""" ov ni~vav rry,~mm�w/ m/"o^«I .,.`.,..u. 'vo/ '^""°^ "St '~/ ~'~.ru, ""/" lit ," /,../" ../ m.x.,^/*p/ ° ,, p,."`. ,^/." m~,'' / ^,.° wv* ' | .'°^.. '/.+" "./°/ ^ ^ ",,../, ,/"."`.,.^`,'^.°^",.. I'll' lit . cx".."�".'/,./.'/ | ,,. ,, ~"~'''` F, I FIGURE 1_ (coat.) _ Pl„visiuns ftrr tiimu ily f'tugrapuninq sv mft if n:rsnn t'Ai1Lt:VI..;IorI oF' Mill.",:, ftl,'. 1,1111tc Mc,.";, 1+,1jt'irti Mu.l prncc.lures ,1.•s,'r ilr+•,1 vt::rt,tt CAIIIX OF ttfAt"It, rtll'. I 1.u110 I,: .trC,•ss pnl is iris Mill Putly e:t.:+ff,•.1 .110 v,luipl -.l :u:ccss i stullil,s 11,,••ltcl in tniu.Wity i't ,lllpn 111 i t. l • • S ti.•I,.,r.,tc L,��•I: uri,IlnMtiun t:hatilwis f.,r bl.,rk, L,,t i❑ Mrol Il.ul.lic.+ppr,l I,l n•Ir M•rnli VI; Will „tf.!l 1:.+1.IV1:ilull, IS1.1,k I nl .�ct�ttnun�nt 'I'••1.•visi. nl, th.• tip. ulie:h Ilet.l •' Wi I l ,nr„nt,,•1,• 1 h.• 1'ul,l i,: �c•:,�:•': .n11.:.aiV,rly 1•urs,l.. nlim•, tt•; invnlv••u,,:ut Will t•uc.�h•,�c wiu.rr,ty ,f•,umu,ntt)' 1 he FA I y Fk,V 1.• C L.,nn.•1 s 1I.u,:: t„ lnv„1:, ullnutltlrF it, tb,r .,•Irte:..Iy , ..,1. .u:. it.lc fr,.m pl.,.lr.,m ^ Irr1.rl.• .•Y ,'h. !1-WI. I'V 1•,,,,1 tit •In:h 1l„ in c.,l•l.2 trlr •1 .i„91 felt ,I1 ,r::i,f.•nIs :.1 tti•uni, jn.�in•tin.l In r ' l:,tnl�lislm!rl,t ut .I ,'nt.•••[ •I•r.Ilutnl l •.•nt rl 1„ I,, „v 1.1+.• � .,L!,. „I.c, .It i„W. S)j0, 0110 111 t t. I.,I l'/ ..Il•1 ,I•,u•nuh ..I�I�u.,!1, .•inn itt•�l Sul 1jl •t nrt :a .IV ., i1 'Jj.•y:iu•I l.•Ul.r`: ill lil,put it'J .. Iu.1.lnyl„••„t I. r.,rt ,r.••: ,.ti.. .•.Iln.l :a ,t.• u,•1 F.•Irl II ,."luitt•110.111' -1 FIGURE i'mill.,1111 Osjf. , I t. . I , I ly -ry selvice, I . ..... I., 1 1, a I I Mit v 01.11*.1 lit vtA until Compt %-,,I kst, r tit' Lit 'I I 'A 4 A A 444.4 I ri I ,! , I. III 'M I u i r i I i t, I t 4 , I y r t i I it Mp! pt .. M I- ri IT (5H 7•1 011,; phl-i cAp-I- III (7H St IV (104 2 npt i-Al I - y.l i.,11 1, IV IV -rier,; If, lit 1. F IV P1 !: t,w- :IS iai J., .11'. '1 It-.., t , - t flo t 1.." -1 P. H tit, III 11 1 1 1;,i�irmt-od Illiti't" o,msIrrtivt'inn v, CIM'"X It. X (I . lit 14,� It It ipt PM V,. I, it it I'M Mid I I I I MIA I . ...... 1 121 Chs.P t 1 la-1 t'lls - I r 111 ( i I c I IV 149 11!; Ilett_-tA1I!lW& oil w pOL, (Cont.) I.: PRoPosm wrtis A.Mitiffs'Al Outlets P"y Service ("'llum'scial Rates FIF 0 L'iW, SIX STAR CA111-INISt(M or taunt, Inr. (;tmrantev,J until vomid'!t Wit I system construction 'rior it (41 ch:;.) -;I I , lit) 'tier lit (R4 A-- 0-7, 11-it-I b'I'Se ACIN'S".) M-1tilly c'mV-1rtVr rL., $2.00 all Tiers t-lini Pay Ow. Service. Two Service-4 'rhrec Services Pay-Per-IM-nt Pay-Per-tise * Avera,w :;0,soribor IW—wtilItt'j, lit, to 50* ro,luctioll visii-rl vAIII-F OF HIAM', 141C. Until ec,"'PletiOn Of systt-in cmistrurti011 ,r w, 1 (24 ells.) Free"' 'rivr 11 (36 ells.) $ 4. 50 -I- i v I I I 1 (60 chs.) $ 8.50 Tier IV (12 "Ilb.) $ 9.50 V (72 .11. ., pltj!; V 1 (72 chs 1,1-ls Teletext .111-1 I i. t -- r 1.1t iv- -) "cmiverlcr Dppllsit" C t 11. slwwt The tl.)Ii,. ( '11,11111f, I Aw/ ThIl"' At,}' F—It "kk"'vt* livtw,,tk t't out "-w ilwl tj,.tw,,Fk [jor illtivat":! Fr-•v $ 1 Uo $ 4 .()() 4 so 6.')5 $ 1.9s $ /.,).3 $ 7.95 r 26. lit) 6.06 1 ou 3.410 FIGURE I (COIA-) it It . 'e— I list .II I It itill - A 11 i I i 0 1 IA I 00t 14.1 to I,w.lt It'll It.-o"1111-1 1#, ��.1�raa r 11 1 14'.0,11 .1- , , j - 0 '• t , i , 111 ,r11 ., v-wl -1, - -- -- - - - - -,*-, - -, $1 , I - 1). , I , )l T i L't s; I I , I 11 16 IV st") . W, Tier i 11,0 1 O'l w.,t cd ti, III. IV r.... i I i list'l I , —I at 41111. tints ,r 1--al Wit AS fines nit 1.., 1 if '111'r-4.,lit W-00 it I.It"r ,ril-1 IV - Frul. I,i,!r tv 1 (lit $ 00 lit, TV 2 1 t : q t:'. - : � - -P. 'I I i 'It .01 r ti tint II( . ilt I till. I lit -I w t: i V., with I Ill ti'l lit -,t -t I t I r . -it, i tit.. t I with t 11, f 1..I a t J11=1 rl. 't I 111 1117 - I t C" I ,ri,-r I I I, ! I I & IV F wi I -it ,.,it 1 9. 9r, i t lat "I I v i t I t I• is All 1-tIWr 'i"t CO 011 lit) t I-- k't It, 11—lit It i10-00 V.w it I - m sc. mll-- t 1t, Ail �Av FIGURE --- — -- -- - -- - SIX STAR fSTCLr;Otl VtStotl CAHLF Or MM-It, ltic . CAM .I<V1::t.)tl of MIM:, one -Time Chartles S4o.Uo -, $29.95 all ri rs rier I lstallalitm - F'irst Outlet Tiel ff $14.95 u Tt.•rs fI, IV, V 6 Vt $1A.95 11lstallation - Additional Outlets $19lw .95 if later(a1lTierftst loutl�+r, test in.lit�ated Insl .l lat inn - Pay TV F'tee if installed with Itasit ::, rvtc••. $15.00 if later Nunt'- Fur 'I,i,.r I unly, a converter is t'uuvetter Deposit rc�luit.•.1 tlr;lt t'an be parchasad t0i $lU.t�O Ieer:.•�) fur $2/month tot' } 22 m"nths. A rt:p,tir service contrrt.-t is .rv�ilnble for S1.50/month $19.95 rL.t I nit.:ate-.l 1` Ite 1 uc.l t ion .i tint tmiic.tted $19.95 11ve'lllnt•ci, ioll i (cont. t CIS Ail 1*311W 11-15 t 6 iniit,rS I (if) 01) 11 -60 !;m V'-Y$IQ�h,.nn "I"'I Son it /I to L,Itt It, ti. Ild 1 -.0 if 00 1, 'es 'oo.00 o 1114 Ivmt $ on . 00 1.1 ime T i 1.1'. VoO.00 $ Pr r•c t 1111 It It,,; .111'r 'Ji't.", ch.wilawl'; fill" f'' ,'halm. -IS It. I X P. 10 It 11.11 '1 W, 0 (to 1',i, v, r it, m-c. I 1 V tit 1)", It —it lay Ilv; 5 .11, , It, :'11 n.(1111-1111 tia". It,, 1,0111,; !''1" '1 W 1 A,0111 011111-ilt-1 , l •In wr Awl,lill I*Tllt my • All .*6,11'11"i 1-l'"; (cont.) other Itat es Studio ARM F-plifnelkt. Nun-Collunetcial Users collaw. I I I Is.. Is nix -;,rAll rIlArl IM [(,t first f"I "'lliti"11-11 tlttl,! Willi..-Itj 1111.1 IS .1 w-11 $150 1 !it •A III oI I I. -$400 f,,, limir r4-n,I,tv I'lo.lu"ti-m glue. milea.p time of request Vl!;Iijri CA14,F IIF MIAMI, INC— Free pr'-duction $l50/hour pro-luct ions :;upervi ,ion and i wi t ruc! I iog, qon-rcannn�rcial users -free voillinercial users $10/half hour per 1 '000 .J m 1� I , I All ��LliU�l�: l (C011i.. :•'t 1.:r II1 G-ven3mvii.L and 'I:•turn t i. a1a 1 1'a•: i 1 it i t •s inst:llLlLlnu t.• Fi t sl (lost I'A h 1•lit i,111•11 •lilt lr•t:; tb•ntl,ly Ital•: :.{.•,•I,II ltat••s, 11isl:uunts, Intc�I,n:tteL. It.It ^•: ,1i11 I'It'AI41.1' !II' f;IWATI V ! to-v l'ntit F t co Itt ,l al I.IL inn ,'ha1 i'':• Ili IY 1— %`11'.I 'l liltltrl iniU.Il c:,In!Atit, tl..11 1111 tl•n thly t.tt, ,In ri, I:, I , II I, kit, it' .li:.. nt.l „I lit t„ nl 1 • 111.•nr ^ hnll, t.1l r,:. ao ti lahi,•; .o ••i•,t 11l,•1 nft nm!alc't milt •. M1,t •;nh:;rril•,•ts .f molt 1{ 1• t'a, I :'i•'r A,1,111 1nn.11 cllanu••Is ,11::.• ml.t .l :_' 1•Ir !n••;i Itrl it tnI mitt " lit lty _,,•I 'i,.:• ;I',.9'./n•n1th, ttr;t.Illat.t,�n chat•I'•:. I1y with nllt inns taY.I•:t I',l!'.1.1 tl:: illr1f11' Free 0Ast F11•I- I °'I III:, lint A.1. nn,nthly rII,AI— to •II .,-n'•,r:: :lit! ILu,.li,•a1:1�,•1 h.nm•huun•1:: .• Iu.•t 111 It i n t..,... I:Ii•.�.•.I •lurIwI f 1t':t •1,I I'••s f .or•:1,�•• t•� n•::.r it I1: r t lit it 7�n1 is a 1`•tl ` •�I .tt� � ..nq lit)' r. ..•r• � ., I h. 1 7 1lrl t•, !�h1:p ,•..' tl t uc., an•1 mat.rl rl r•.: it -,.t un1 Ir•1 If, : IV III 0 1.• t" ru71t l{.I• •I,r�111mt l•u11,11t1•t', ;, :;I.n!: u.•i.th •!I o lilt tIn 1.tl.Iu1 f1AKf I.I. ....I oi.•,•,-. • .� }1 lit) I 1, JI .•'••:lit t.,t t.tt.l n•t ;., I.rV 1'.1 �•! It1,i thr i It 11. 'trL,r l,•1 i�. I,•I. 11, .. I.Ir..li1J1 •R1i .1 !,.I.'.... Iv,ItI.It.I• tnA I..t u,tt,•A I II i, f itA.l lhlr .1••i ,,.. I 1 'llrr, III .�rt�;r. IL• t:. AI - u I 1 r:,t .In•t .I I.It n, t.u; :.•r I Ir:111,!. lr th• hunl,r yq.I •,i 1�•1 I .,n,. t In.. Ili.. rl I.It •..n r1L1r-•1.• ,f it, q... •rI'll It i• ., •[•: 1., I:.111 ILII f,•1 >I!.�'A a !unnth .1 Ali an Irr,rall tL l..n •'h .1,I•. ,�f 'i'19.•)`r 1t 1u:.t 111,,1 allr r , aL1I- I v-,tallat Iron, �. I IF II tK- _, Inn• t lu.c, 560. 1111 11 II Ihr.• s.Im• llmv .1s I't',�m1uul I nt .�ra.�t I.•.• 'n•a .Il l.It 1�.0 ,rs I11.,11•with I.,!��:• "a1 , 1n�1 with tTl';.H.i'Li:1-f.-t'rHli;rrlll'•`I'!'t�'t{:• Fr• .• •I'i,•t!: I1, llt aut lY I�r�.t•7J.,.1 1 !1Y.• 1. I,•t I V. I•.1{`.IhI I-Ior I�If .III .tIllttl...n.% }1 li!1.,C.•1 I..I.:I•' I",lit 111•: f n:• r . yt,•r•; It. Ilt .1mt !:' {r,•',.i,F•t t•�:.r t ,'.t{..11711ty (•�r In ILtitl.till 'i�' . •r ti,, t..r •:1• n„•ill hi- l� ,:1;1� Int.•1a� t It• ��, h Aitll� I,,7n ! I.'i I" 11 1 11 u1 I t'.rr••nY 11 ,'„nt t•t •I• .: t.-� Ir 1i I.I!•I.• !.•I tt,•, . !I III t I, t ! rt• t I'I,.t t •�u1.•,.� 1L� t . .{L�r 1„! I.rl,.:t toll I" II i't A 1'. ,'„nil" �I •.� I I,L11 1, ,1 �I'r.'1', t�,.ny.0 ..., , .• 1 1 1t .-11 h. t � :.1 t.l n . ! 1111 ur�ulr.,t Ih.•1 •: m. r; !'t.,•1 t.1,• tlu•II •�,yn u1�I••�1Fut rt k',it•r:, Il,it 5.19.'1'� Inr,t.Il II_i '•'1•I .I.. I I I 1 l ,1t 1 1 I I n. > I', 'In, lit It IInn1 .•nl it l' I•:, 1i1 !hII• with vu';In•1 t I.nn j4 Q.'I •. 1n,1 Ilp fnl Iu•;raloat 1, it u1,1 nl nor nnr .t troy (cont -;tqvioe Lo GOWIFIMetit and St olit let A-littl"Isal (111tteLs 11"'al,ty It"t-S All 444 4 4 1 a Xmas& 1 1. .if.'( !;'I'Aft fit A-!"(Irl CAl"-LVl!*1l()tI MIAMI, IIIC. Tine ni,ttvi-I'lls li,ilk rat'! ditiruutttof 111' to runty !�.-tvi".-!; Av,lli l"It ton $214 ." iwit 'It .110 "i"Iltilly; !-OM it y ( tv"T.1,111 ""1 111-1. vi!;WrI CAIII-1: OF MAW, MC. Freeob.ir-le kill to I(), then at rust Frve ch,irqot; IV, V. V1 w,%iv,.A for at: SO t . v 1, - t. is t I kw —I ul lit -it L'M ch.1 I , Ict, fur.1r., p-r ol.ttelL. t il,;t,k I I I f.,r ri,.t-, it,, Iv, v. vl (lit I r it, 1-foOl I I y v Iva I • 't vi .Ill,[ lit- Y p im �IL 1, AAA MAM mmammm PTG,1JRF IM111.0yr.11311, 1'RA,rW1;S ANITIcAtil-L 01* (;10:AT1,Jc M1\111 At( ni t ill') , : i , - s t—T w; i it I till It I. T i h, .. I v to V. 17 CAMA!!;Y:�1'111'; f1tAM1 Aff i r n,at ivv A,'l t,_111 pro-Irain as 1,•tiqthy an't JI.- " I t by hush urltnt..110 . rt,r ,%.,sty tjj,jtjj co!1111111CATPIN!i it Lit"'I -tilit.-ft with it, I,- a t vl:;l,ltl CAtiLF 11F IIIAFll, MC. F.,Iu.tl 1.mplt�yuwnt opportunity In�tr•'m alr :a:[ ttu•�1 Wtll hire loll& of its employous 1 ",,.t 1 1 y ^ Wtll Ifiro [it im.trities in a perceut.t,pr pr l'trt iunetc tn, or hiyhrr th.ut, th.• mtity nrl,tesrnt.ttI'm in tho City f Miami FIGURE l (oout.) -----------'--- n"/ ^,pn,"ll/" � Al it 'A it 18 if 41 A 1 -4 -1 .1 It A -4 14 A R 41,14 1% MW vW v- W W_ W, i'ImIm" 1 (utJnl. Sut, 10t1 IJ: r91SeB1,1.ANt:Vl1S SIX ::'1'dlt MII:It, ql t'AIIlAV1::11+r1 ut• MIAMI, INC Will a,1,ir, s . i v.:l Y prat sur t In Jislrihutiun ::y:aem mark,•t t [,main st.+tr:-,.,f-Lh••-.+rl vl!;It,ri t'AHLt: OF MM-11, ttll'. tJiII ,ft,er -14 chc]MWIs of fiversiti-1.1 prn,Ir.manin,l -It I n,• Ithly chary,, r7i11 r•yuip 21 vt�win,t centers for (t,•r n,•i,lhhr,rh.n„t vi,:winy. Tht•s+ ,•.•nt,•ry will .+lso be c,au+c,rt,:d to lh,• Incaituttuw+l r4,-twork roil I t„vi,h•,1 with t�l_:.,(,tiun Jc,:.„l�rs ^ Utll ,•:a•,I,lisl, n,J m,+int.+tn a it t'.thlr '1',.Irvi::t•n+'IT,+initrl C,•tit,•r Lr. I•r,vi•l,•,;.,L1,tclr;•i::it,n t,•,rhnir.+lu,.l cq.•2r.+tiun.+l lnrti�•:,.:,'. IL+s ,r IIInitt'-d '150,000 ir+tt i•+lly ,u,•1 jl', tt, 0t111 nunt.+l ly t,r Lhr• t'rntrr. ^ Il.u: trait i.tt,•,l "�q��•[.+t i,m ..,'r.+{dnn,k.. .[•; I•ntl „f an ,,n-, ,in•1 ,etF�,rt t., i.1,-rat t f y an l ru::l n l to Will I t„vi,l, $ID0,0110 •+nnu.+lly t„ .:ity f„r ,L•v,.•1„{nn,•nt „f twAltution+l ngtw,rtk servi.r.rs t co J 1 4' r 1„E.uy i+..+=F tti (c) Financial Plan The higher 3.2:1 debt -to -equity ratio proposed by Six Star Nielson, on a relative basis, makes that financial plan more •�ulner- able in the event o` lower revenues or higher costs than anticipated. (d) Commitment to tither Systems �s a �_ablesystems' percentage or _q, financial commit.ents to other cable systems is 33 much hi -,her than any other applicant, and this is considered a relative weakness. (2) Construction Schedule -- Figure 3 indicates the strengths and weaknesses for the criterion "Construction Schedule". Three applicants, Cablesrstems, :Miami and Vision propose T P� to complete construction and provide service to all areas of the City within two years. This is considered a strength as compared to the 3-year schedule proposed by the other two applicants. Cables.stems proposes to construct a separate institutional network only after the demand cannot be satisfied through a combined residential;"institutional cable. This indefinite con- struction schedule is ccnsidered a weakness. (3) Technical Standards -- ^inure 4 lists the ke technical standards proposed by each applicant. Th-is criterion is considered essentially Ir "neutral" since all standards proposed exceed FCC minimums. '•nesses are assigned, Consequentl::, no strengths or :neap. list as many standards although it is desirable -hat sr. applicant r' as possible that the system will be designed and tested to. In this respect, Vision's listing may be considered as marginally } adeaua� (4) Origination Cablecasting (Automated Services, Special Interest Programming) -- This category includes the following program groups of orFigure 1: ° Satellite Programs - Video ° Local Programs - Automated ° Imported Programs - automated Irkss 1r, (a) Satellite .pro eo ;r :� _ ici�e-icabl�, ■7 ami 3ncr ' `(�-'�') �e rt `r_'�i .L �.h 1. :+ �-` `.)F� "C)1'�.l��i r��l n n Nielson. •7 �apnl..ic:�nt s . ' ' =_r_i gym-!�.t er (b) _,Ocal - 'S proar 3It11�1 r,r- r 1 S 311 tC...-. (c) rm3.)orted p_ro,r_ m. s iS` 1 �t ;nrcu; 1 Str-2nr-t:(1 :pit iie i 1.1 'n�-1, _ .+'S-'stc'T,'1S aronnses weakness. � '"he j�rt�C+ )h 11 Gar ?.),)' n} s :)ror)0 EE -" r r1Si(ler Se-_V1: C's r 'r basis. _ne , for . ter, rrif;r tr,7 13nsi-e. ')Lo�JraICIS 1' t0??t3 ) 1r,r :l! n Y)rOr r:,n1I11i n }i- the Ir nose<_' at.' he gin: ,a )rat ;p `he .)ro :1� ..ti .)ter^� '=f? _ _ nels o� '.which _ --. t:1e JrOr'^,1r1^11?�f' na *renc;tns znd geakneF.ses Of i1e ur.e i.::irrit-�s .'i and . i s �abl�s._,t-�,.ls r •.,i:�r•ti ion ')r!iJC^_ialti and.'.-I1 :111.5 �a}r�r;n;-_• r 'J1 �11 _ ^( rw e 1^ �' 7r.. ^rSS i':�F'rnri �Sa:•t -, „ �+ e C70••`l :nor` r .%Cc'_3S ,f)r , r aC*OrS areh 3Cr'SS ind OP.I?ur-otr _. :J'1t :he ;e ree 7f ;Or o much the ::umber �� , 1ar:r.eis o _ r=d, ter:-,s Ir s<ai�l-�castinr acul_�ment -echnic_zl Sunnor 1 �rouos and �Cr3Orine i )nl': :I1' f1 -C31S 311nUOrL n lOC3 - r- :n `1Slnr; ' nr? - 1kj?.± �`•'3tE?T� -or �Cngc ,7. �irDOSeS. pE' 3':CCE'SS�::1 _ - - - 90 - Fissure 1 lists the critical support items, which include the following: ° Local Program Production equipment and Facilities ° operating 3udcet ° Staff commitment llcca`c 1ccess �JJ15tance Percentace o= �ud�et -`eci - Figure cor^Lbines these '_`ems into three facilities (since both local origination and access _aciit-,es=enerallY a ~ ,.y a. t f are available for access 1sse), operating budge_ S6a� (taken at Year �), and o� 'zudcet ccTlmittea �-o access. aLe l:i til those items + e :re3seS ��� file StrenGi.i1S a. C :v d: tYa. either a�ec .r o•"•sy �ered as nc t rates jr, ( ) interact-4--re Ser '"es -- a aoolicants =ropose to install c ted in �-* —*-- a�"- - - head- s Lr:�i ste:j,s at the essentiall_ a .':i'%a lent _��era=ti•,e computer s. c. ;1ar.,, mon it oring and text end, and all 4i-1 ^- _a se - �+ + ;ices c-i aSed In at some later services initial" �~je�~ `hs-area. timae. :11 are ccnsldero 3 zer-:ice _ -nS _ __ - -- �= considered indicat; of is :re l0 trates t:Yc-i^e a_o inst4 tutons. :here the caoacii_t_ to . include: Inst-4 yio^a_ :;e- :,r ''="�eage -- :he -Cnc_er ��"- cra :et.�cr:. _s, 1n. qe-era_ theVins_it�sty l - z ste e co^ned, the .,,ore insti�--t:-=s _na= .. c s �, • 4 ,n at standard costa. - -, c:nis has b t e �o hest -:e .'�:orL = ^ is seen far a st_ e.^.� .... _.. s , tar �e- a �.. �. J _ r. r �. J e _ 3.. and these are ay _ ��S..Sta 1S miles 5a _s ^seder=� a '.,;es",ness. .... __"nK be- een crcccses to Snare re Jdent_a an _" .it•.:t cna- .:se._i- �er t•l4n �l•� �._1.. r gate ✓• , t--,tional demand _ _ �` ter. -e cc^.str---:te _a a separa _e caw-e , t.-- - - -:his is seen as a •�:ea :ness, so gar as c crver.ent sery _ce concerned. weinstitutional cro,:�cse- nn _ _ - s i.p "•.a• J -� �_� ,- �A-',��-:y a� _� �.o•: _..•__ "�^��_.. __� �y ice;, ,I mw-� .. _ _.. a 7* -,-..J Vli.___...r .. '�J ...n-.,�.w. -,^aY. J e...al ia3_i^_.. , :._ j.'i- aS Lee -I and mac.. '_. a ��era......a_ a� _�" _-•=�"=__.,.. :_ .=�� :inn _c :��_.,__�e_�. -�, .man s ..;c ar2a e,--: a 1 a,-. an =s - Jse .e rs ^e urm' erV3: category c_` s_ - _e� .�s� ' _ .. as .ec^:^._ca= standards, service ��?'•y�n'=lea_-O:^ ......n^.!_ 7aGac-t_•' are �•: s- ;a _e : as Jenara'-e _-- e�' n . .onSect:en: _ I �..- ose Jys -e*^ `ea:'sres n:D _ elsewhere are - ...-.-dec _^ _Z;s No or orthese include the following.• : Headend and Hub Configuration ° Satellite Earth Station Configuration Longest Amplifier Cascade ° Special System Features Figure 12 indicates the evaluation of these items. Americable's single headend design is considered a weakness for a city the size of Miami. Miami and Six Star propose to provide satellite earth stations at all hubs. This is useful in the event of malfunction of any single hub, and it also reduces the transmission path of the satellite -delivered siunals, -,hich in turn results in higher picture quality _or the subscribers. In the two other categories, all applicants' proposals are considered stronc. (11) Channel Cacacit, -- Since the channel capacit•: for institutional service was considered _n (3) above, this category considers only capacity for residential services, FiGure 13 indicates that oniv the Cablesystems' capacity is considered a weakness, since if institutional service requires as much capacity as allocated by the other applicants, Cable - systems' residential network will be reduced substanti311y in capac;t,�. This might be particularly critical for upstream capacity, which is needed _`or home interactive services. Although Cablesystems promises to build a separate institutional network later when needed, this solution is :Wore disruptive and less satisfactory than providing an initial independent network. (12) Ownership Structure -- Figure 1 indicates the ownership structure of each applicant. No inherent advantage is seen for any particular ownership structure, and therefore all applicants are rated neutral in loss this category. (13) Performance in Other Systems Operated by Applicant -- To analyze the system by system performance of all other cable systems operated by each applicant is bed: and tre scope of this evaluation. Within the context of information provided in the applications, the category of "Experience" comes closest rill to this criterion. ri 17A (16) ?.ate stability -- t` _tai.ility" are the ^uarantee of init_a_ ra ::a _ eac azplican`, and t e --crecasts of fur ture • 3-e _.._rases :".ade �.. _. e ...:,C iS3i:tS __Cr"d �in3nCld1 pro e-4.- s . r� -Sc - arates r Bars =rom one ;ate _ranchiSe -award. _ _ e=yS 1 `_.�i� ear _.^.an Nielson, ilover a*:he _i_?aC` the y.ra,:chlse,v:r^.• ects1^ cumuia- t1Je "ate 1::Cre Se _or GaS1C Ser%1Ce, a%C 3U'� �cr ` Th . '-renczn :::, ared tc the ether Via•,;-T`1 ser ; _ce . _ is �s s - - a =orecas i cu:,.uIa _ncreases 01 o• er . JO'. ..or both J"e_r.:.ceS. =:e _oral :nter.:c ne qure I indicates, a ac_�__ c.' d nts are '.111.ana� to 1J - y �`�I _y�^.s ;lt e particular tech" interconnec = tJ �- nolog* utlllZCC. ::'a^''_n .:ent-:nor t •• s ance5 involved. acn; :a _ant In tails category t 13) Rela`_o:' t In the propcsed cable systems relate co the aeed's cf :iami, the following items were considered: ° Com.mitment tc public Agencies and Community ° Provisions for Minorit Prccramning :iure 1-2indicates the croposed corunitTents of the appli- cants in these -•wo areas, and their relati-ie perceived strengths and weaknesses. D A A A A I a a *. * a * a a .9 a a N 9 a ��:��l1llitlll�1��� 3 SCHEDULF j, UC I AM I SLh STAH REEL';"" v U; Lilt Atm.'MICAIII-C All aria Of the ;t -I uljt IIS CjtV served Cit"ittl, 1 years - At I ()f ,,trs schedule S,[VL,l withIll within y OmsLI'LICOOII schedule (itusid_flit i,11 NuLwurk ulily) --- miles 0.) al --- miles ct) Cuikbt-ruct-iUll schedule (i,,,,,idL:nLial Network unly) I - vs (t) 2 --- miles (e) year 3 --- miles o') All areas -L Sul.v,(i wit.hil, 3 YUAIS 143.2 (200 312.3 (430 269.6 (371) 207 ( 10-- ) 478 (70;.) A 5,-1101-ktu 11"" — I Llol',11 JJL- 'tW"lk %" , I ti, Wjj,.-lj t he toll.11 c,innot. -j"tibricd till"Ll'111 At 1*11 2 10 .8 ( "-' C) 484.9 (681) All areas ('f the CI.t7 served Witill.1, I yu,.Afs 1,-Io (L7'6) 4811 (b8l) lot) (15%) Igo (218L) 494 (720 1'I?CIINIt'A1. S'1'ANDAitD MIAMI -- -- - - SLX STAR OLE1.51)1J Lblt A141.311 L.AB L[i - _ 4a. 7 c18 46-4 dB 46 a6 caII"i l to nuisc -44 d8 41 tilt 6.1. III$ 6fi.l dB ur,iar products ,,,iur 1,cat ratio ',.,II+l,J51 Lct tl'1pic 1,cat i'I,�,iuuu,;y ruSl,unSu I n t o uuu,1 u I a L l u rl pl c>`3tua ,+„�� u,u,lulaLiun Ilulli Ilun, u.„lulatiun t tlnl k yuuuraLud uclto I::ul,,tiun I,utWt'.uit ,LlCS iltur tap t al.tLiun UttteruutIli +lain I+t1 r,_tel,t i.,l I'llasu i'lu ,+In i twucu Lum i 11,111CU 1, lay i•1.,xiunuu signal luvul Iut]CI Vul Luv�I SLAM ity itvtutn loss -52 cllt 2 dB -52 dB 48 lib 42 d1J b0 dB _00 ns rtax. 12 rits my 4.0d8 b0 ,Ili -4"7 d1i 55.7 dB 5+, ,Ili `'8.5 cilt t l dR 52 tilt it -40 Its for 3000 'is ,luIli y -`,5.3 dB 40 dB utin 0.5 ,lts M"Ic. L`l0 ns Max. -.to dB' l00 its Mal - 16 d8 58.7 d8 vIG11RE: 5 �tiL9'I:I� SE:kVTCI ` i__si'i i.IAI. I ITEkr_;'I' PRiiGRUNMMING c It; • _— --- r•I t AM SIX V Ar•1E:kICAI[L[i c'nflLl.oY l'1:P15 ;;t� unythS 5aLvl I ite: Video 20 services [,(,cal Aut-O nOtCd tnq,,,rLcd Automal-e l IJ�at:nussca :;atulliLv Video Automated lmixwrted Automated 1 - - - - - - - - - 9 Survicus - -It) services_ -I Survice5 2 scrvicus 2l1 SuLvlccs 23 S,:rvices 11 services 15 S,:rvtces 12 S,2rV LCUS 1' L 1 sery is us it , it IV '19 IN IN b .;IK b1Alt MIAM Atli x I VAII I X Fati, i I y t LI r US JIL!,l r I I I ", I L.O. v L'� LIM --- -------- �u�'���� viuu" _ —. — '-- - srx orxp ____ -----'-- — m�xnr cmo�s'�rxp� omux�c�o�x� _ x sezv'c—s 1% 7114 7ra '% la I a 4 4 a 4 a a 4 4 ti t. r,_ nyths Fa,•ilities (L.q. and :1.•�u5S) lwr.,tiny liud,let and 51.E t f (Year 5) ut Nudyct tur tJ,_.�i:nuss t'a�ilit�es Il..u. and t�l eratin,l liud..leL and staff (Yual 5) ?, of tiudyet for A,.cess AMIT I(: A11LF. I)p to 50 $6i11,000 $655, 000 - - - Staff -of lN- - - - � V LSGoIF MAMI SlX :?GAIt f1lF.[SU1k $1.614 staff !,T ab $ $l.�ihl staff or 75 staff of 19 - - - - - - - - b5` 30'6 15% u �aaai�awuzxEw':ac, .axrs�ui;a�z :it rUIPJLh� lit el jCt jVk2 F1IL1 11"'lellt l,,t,j.ActjvL! Services liiL,!rJCtjv,: LkIIIII)II-111' t u rac L I Vv I v 1 IcAlil-E -iolle-ci VIP S,-Ill- I t ki"I 7L)IjjlIILII1lC1lL I", Security sorvicv Data (6) ,roxt k,jtricval (2) [,;ill - <F. 9 v E, Cl I AM I Lu STAR W-t r i'cl j, I, )It I J<J_!l I L,_*'_'Lil opilli-li 1,011 ill') WI I hots lt:s '1i P I- V I ILY t y r L lit a L I it.lict-ly L ,ic)miur VIC' lilt '21: w-ri,vu 'i7zitull' I"s :ap-lbillty t"L W1111, ,f scrvi,-s IY I -Y 11 a - I j,j L jiI Ilk 1,, 11, t J-" j),IL a I tc t- I V ►• It;[Ilil: Ib 1<V 11'1: 'l'1.,. l dST LTLlT L0NS- - -..- V65 Loll sr>` �;•i•nli 11Lt:Lst,r1- , — - MIAMI c;t I unytlt 111SL. Nutwurl: blilv.,,lc lt,sl. WcLwctrIt C.,{`+c1t. t'c,uuucLi,,tl tcl IJcton,tk LJc,lkuus5es I,tst. NCLwork Mi1Oaye lt1SL. Ni.Lwclrk L:;iI,.1ci. cuitneeLi011 to Network 17 ch. dc,anlst "ll' 15 ch. uI, icc.un AI l t;,,Vl . , educ',,L i<n+1 h,•.,lth ,:.tt� .,rni c•u1Lur.11 i.t,'ilittus i it i L 1 .11 ,,nci I»•,Victcd with 54-ch. convuCLcr 58 All ilk NIA, Plu Le InSt. t'et cuntt,i u._,I With resident i.tl t t uuk 17 cat. u{ �t ru.un tAllilcd with residenli,,l ncivr,rk 2l9 mi. ------------ ;l, .:It- d„wnStrc.un iL1, S, Plus tulli.tlly c:.utttc�L .oil td l t 1, �- :� I S t lit • ; '�. ,ILtin l(t 1,.:•I r- l c,ll:i r �__„utrcu5. .ttt,l c:,iu i [intent - - - - - - - - - - l 2, ch. i,;witsLrc.lnt 25 ch. ,j,jtru,m All 18 ch. dOwlts" c-Anc lij ch. 11llStrealn Gt,v L. ccnutucta,t 9 l'[t;llltl: FI1 :iGlty 1 CIS IONS VIiS ill. ;IX STAR t IAMt ;t1N IAtII It Il Att1.L' :;L rcnyth lnst_. Network t•lilcaT last.. NuLW,)rk Col)•icit_ t'uuucct ic,tt to Nctwork tJcakno__sses li,sL. Nctwork Mil0a9l-' lust. N(.Lwork Cal>acit t:0111le:tiou to Nctwork t7 ch. do wl :;t r"eaui 15 ch. ut,str.-'JM All t;,tvt . , utlu.:.-it i<twil health t'aiu .,n,1 cultural t.,•:ilittus initially .,,nuvt:t�i and l,t.n'iticti with 54-ch. Lut- 5d mi. All tat: i l i t ic::; I t t..•i t it NFt' 219 till . Cit. . I f,wtlstru.Il1I 16 ch. ,i..wnstrc.ittt 25 ch. ul,at-ream l tt ch. ul,st tc.un - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 1tt,lI-' All COVt. r.t, Lt,_s tail 1 I..i�s ..tl t l.s lot ol.l tat ilttt.s, I ,,It•1 tv .t c l[i. t'+11 ):UIII,I: �-LC,1 JL IiJ 1-3 wtth t:un,wattt,.,it t,rr.; rusuurcus, .trnl l,I ov i.iC i utluil>mc:nt _ — ld t;lt, .l;awnstru.uu id ch. uNstr�ain All t•tlnneCtr_,1 aL t,,, �•u5t . , -I'---_ _ _ . _ _ .. _ tk, st:paratc cuml,in.al With - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - res i,icnt i,i I t I uuk _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51t•11—i with rc si,.lcuL is l ___. . - - I . _.-_I converter Initial Activ,,LiUli Convol L4-,I: ii,itidl ACL1V1LI()1I S()pjl IST I CAT 1014 (11* "y b I_VXI CAll LESYSTEW; AMERICABLE I 'her I- li-IL: BT-1300 ,Hul IV All cal-WItY initial ly. chalifluls I 96 (,II t lit: I t2L:ldulit 1,11 lietwoll. "I"i it, "li tAw inSLItlit becallse Ill IVAA r,st,l ict �,l it:-; I'p. ill I I Wt .A t I t"d t III It), 11, I Ot I", I it, I W, -I 14 1 AM I ;IX STAR 'l' L L: I. I L 11112 1,: C 1),i,-1 Jow I II L t I . W t L Vc 1)7 cat Lit,' lit - '"W11- t.,Ilh I" I Inlo'-'It 111d 'I I t lit I A ic I I It :A I it I I I I I L t l— I lo t. init I'll ly - - - - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - -- - - - - - - - v ES-LIA IN -1.1 1 t - IL11111 lit TIuL III, IV . vidl."'IS 011" ui:icr.mlblcl V 'I',,_ All 0 A :'d,il l ' L r V I ,)"Ol Al. 1. Ak,111111-1 '--I! 'I" t ' :* I L L tit) l", X w I Aim A 14 a A as a X`01019 IN FIGURE 12 51'59't:Pi UIS It;N AML••ItICABLE CAIILESys,mMS St I �m�ihs u�.Lil�lld/►int, l'JI1t lyUriftlJll - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - lull Coil t Jill -at loll I,uIN)Vst Ampliticl' 15 It; t',IscJ,ic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :;1,�,:ial 5ystum Status unnlituril,y 5L,1t115 nwnlL,trin•I F:nwr,)l:ur.y .11v1 t . 1 �•,tl u►rs Emar,)uncy Jt�rt Stdu,ill, 1,Jw,:r Standby hc,w. t I 1 tJcntl.I,it55t:S � u�:J,l,.nd!H111, Sinyll: hu.,dend -- iqui ,IL hill - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - - I :,., L,• l i l t l: F,l l h 31 lull la,ill l,)„tclLlUil - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Luu,)l:st Auq/1 i t lur t'.t yW, I, it: - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - tl,vcial System I'l'Jl Illus MIAMI i,tuu 1 hui.L, j ,.rJ t.fil 5t.11 1„U:i t�,l _•.I�'h huh (l tut .l I 1 SIX SPAR NIELSON c'J.icl,i pluc; ! inli.S ,atttl st_,L1„115 .1t I 1.1 11 .t111= II,u 111 tut 11P) :,Lat,I_i moll I.G1t I tl,) Pantly�I,Cy .1l�tt 1'auuryc:t,, t IlcrC til.ul.lh}' i�'•l'1''I :;L.ln,it.•;• l,,,wcr U11S•ION, I IU. ILI C I Ili IIIuS i tit.,tu5 WnuIL„tIII ; ;',tJll,l t., •t I,UlJC1 � - - - - - - - - - - -17 - - - - - - - ('llalllwl Cap-AcIty 1),)Wllsl Lealli Upst I cant ('11,11111LA Cal)acity I)owtis L ream I I I Is t 3-va III A14LR I CAB LE lit I FM 8 c "'TwORK CAPACITY (RESH)ENTIA1. t4l CABLESYSTEMS ...I W I t 11 1 Il:;t Iw InXi 11 5L: Jci III.Illy J.; 17 1'11.1111WIS MIAMI I six sill 1 _'Ii t FM IN ---�- 111�IGN[CALILF. - f Curr.:nt: CaUli: 5}':il�•m l7 cables �ysttm,s in tlul,tinys Pluri.ia au,l u►liu :;t 1 �•nytit:i Avct ,,•Iv_tiul,scriln:r It.,t� - lsasic Services I't_,n,•Ilis,a with mere t ll.u, 5ltp u,i t.a of Ilan ulsl,.,siti,,u of I I au,ali sus IJ�•� kllu55es e,•:,•ra•)t. 5ut,scrit�et. 5111.45 t't .lu.'hi ses wi (!I uu,r� � iduuu Lh�n 50(1 ❑Ilya ut i ul,,nL 1,tsl,usitiun ut 1'rau,:hisus tfetw�un 1')75 .ln.f l9H0 cfis(,osu.l ut IIEi franchis�5. t'it;[Jltli Id Et1'6'Itlhadt'F: _—� CAIli.ESY:i'1'I•:M:i $b.'/7 J' MLAMI _—`— t7 st"IC�•s, :,urviu•I 1 , l3U,UQ11 sttb�,_r IL,.rs $7.i1 _,u,:it t u,:t lulu -• - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ ;yq,,, ,utly .I,uu• to th,: kfutwu�:n 1`lr,'i .,u.l 1�119 I,.lst Lu ru5t,un,l to .iisl�us.:•1 of Itnrr� tlt:ul t'.,n.,Jl.,l, it,•,lul•,t,.,ty 19 fr.,n.�his��. iuf,'In'y t c.],I l t,rpu•n1.5 ul tdl tun.,! Iz.lt ic,t, SLX S'1'AN NIEL51)N 20 ,.,/bl,: sy_;C.�wS to 1�., 115a:i, .,rnl ;It�hl•;,,n jN.i1 uts[uN-- in ti, 5[..,tus j 7.7/ t r.ul.:tt i:i,a I,,: t•.., :. Ilunr l'J"li, .tu.l t`)ifU. - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - F - - - - - - -- 1 (Loch un.i�r �:,,I15Crili'l iunl I (urnl,�t .:uustru.:Liun)' -----------r-------- , 1% A A A 19 A 1A * 114_ a fa Is A A A x jg 19 Ar AFIFRICAIII-E Basic Scrvicaf Mltnthly Rates First. Outlet Pay 1v selvice UIGURE 15 RA CAI) LESYSTLMS III,; chi, 1, Ot AIL`/: "pt I 4, I V- III Lit!; ",II m, t'I"t , MIAMI $4.95 (7' $ tier IV t8l) ,-Its.) $8.99 li"ill" ' I'llic'ItOr Thu'ItIA N�Lwt)rk $ 1.97 ('lilt: 1_111-1110 11'alw, BOX box fit 1 1"'' I'llis C1llo!1i,1x Lj!, Sio,WL LIM-- ,8 "i j t; I IV 1� l"I. 9 VaL 1,:S I'mi Nt 5. oo I vj $9 .91� 'I'( -lit .1 t. 1 VU SIX STAR NIELSON Ljt,:: k)rtLC1' Iwo Aj'W.*, eats' Till ct. I I L J,w I S I ,I- r I, R(1W Cabl k 10 so im Am Aw �119 A a Alf I'IGURL 15 (a.;OnL. ) LJuaknesses I+.,slc Service fiol-dhly Rates 1••irsL OuL1eL Pay TV Service 'fief' 1 (24 clis) Free Tier 11 (58 chs.) $11.9 'Pier II1 (18 ells.) $l<.9 Tier IV (I(14 chs.) $1.1.9 'Pier I 'I'lle moo i e Channu1 $14.95 Galavisiul, $14.95 't' i ea- s 11 ✓ti 1 11 The Muviu Challrlul (-"A I a V t ii i U l l $ 9• I) � 'Pier IV Ilunlu 'I'll Itut NcLwul k. $ 4 .95i 1..16 V"'I.,L hive $ 4.9`, CInuulax $ 9.95 4t.11_IVIsiolI Ilcnau ISOX utt Icv $ 9.9� Shuwt IIII,-' $ cl•`�� 'life t1 iv i e Ch.uult:l $ 9.9' 1'ay-l'ur-V I"%V Val it!.. CABix,;YS'1'RMS MIAML SIX S'rAlt NIELSON-- 1'iur LI (47 ells.) .11 .utl" Pier III (fi•i l,atiu .,, c:ssl >l Lull, ...,mt Illy Milli 1'.17 7 •i.7 line ttvl,.,.. ;I(1.5( Chruu SUI V iCeS Pay-Pur-k'.VeIIL $ 3.00' Averaqu c;u 11 it;ui V1S LOP 1'1' I i I-Ac11=.1 I' I t l l l ( io1- i' I t r Ill 010 c: h�i CI,: IV ('12 chi.) $'I•'' 1'1 -Ib 112"s. plug 'I',•I, t,,:;t 1 :,1- - I')'•r VI (i-' chs. LluS 'I'ult•t'•:a u..t l t,:ultl: it. S LS STAR Il1ELSON _-_-_____. __ .._.._-.._---- Ah1F:hICAiiL1; � CA15Ll.•,i:�l[:;•1:: i•T [ APT - SLlwnll:hu ItaLe t:Uat-allteV ft<.,u, ,l.tto ut tt.u„•tlt:;c.� AWAI,t I:..te 1u..tvac;l: _ 1 - ___. {'to)"ct lulls A11 Tier. - -� SQl'viC0 -- - Year •i.. d LU.0 10.0 Year Year 12 10.0 i4int Ina I -- ,:.,:.1 5�•rvtx:e5 1- , .,,•t v t re - Year :1 S.0 Yelt 3.0 '• - 'fear t, :,.0 Year 7 �•t) +I Year 8 �•0 Year It Year l0 .11.0 Year ll i.0 I Yea l[ ;.0 , Year LS ti.0 i 'fear la 5.0 Ycat i f l -. Sam MAN Am 40 A AV t..ba:.1 r {..r. ,rtr- t is l nt•t l I s"tilt I:1+'rtl�l 1 t - f � , t l ! {! j 1. , i . t t.. ' ' „!. ' ,. 11 a III t�� '' .. .�, :a.•, .`,,.y �r„, t � 1.,I t. It.t. � ' .' a :J ,.�lu -. It t l.'. :1.!< 11.•' , n 1.t , 1.'.r \, a It, ttt,t J., it „ t• 1 . ji �•, ,, r !i 1 1 f I'• S ' j t,�- jj . i i..,t 1 t •t, ; ).0 n..,: 1, .t, it: v. i i` t i .u.. t .• 'i 1 ,'1 1 t,.it t `. t;.it ., ., 'i. ,t It .t• ,+ \•.,t l t tY .ti .'! , t:.t_ ,,;., i i 1.. 11 .a •I I. •, \. tt „ is •,.t. .. •,.: i �. 41� l t..,., tI. ' f � � j 1 1 , gilt1-1, RAIRS Ina '10 am so son so" M-9 -li A I I tiTIA40 it IN ECT I( IN AflOt WAIIII.C. vm; 1,11AMt SIX STAR NIFI-SON VISION IVI-i AM. till,'t VI'l lilt 1.1 III.Ili Vi.t AM. I'M .11 lwl Cal-l" :,}!,1 .411 11 t 41 oill"I Cablo �1;ystellls III 1C I , 'W'I'VO lit V1.1 1 11" ':,1 ilIJ l % t Ilia( I t lLl 1—I, ill it ;4'1 t %: I t: �111;1 %11.1 .11 1 , "t I Itch I lit -I ct It, i I I lit I 'I �.i. �i to i i i i■�#� a a S s• ar . r Rt¢:t •.., t t tinir.I hill t r • f L ',U r<:tt; ,f e� .I;d,.tt 1 i,.,.t j. t. li i. t: t! t! CAPLESYSTEMS MIAML I Lit Inq lilt it'll I t I L I I Il. I t t I v I (Wil ;, , I t I I ,f vi. 1 1; 1 _; t I t ; I I ox ll.Ililt- t t I t i , j I 3bll I bl' 11 t i I,t t 1 1 11, 1 .1 S I . liM I I t t t I t I,.II I j I so t I I L t A, Jirl t t I L 1 :1 t I S t h': I I. f I I Owl II.l I is v, l t. I : I - r , r At I I I ','I Ih to Ill ov ld'' 1, with jjt• t w,) t k I-M r illi,j ala,l t"'lovIlillill Tt.l 11j"ll t, 1�nll,,lln toll stil'il'i at mil")l 1011S SIX STAR NIELSON v LS ION ��:-!{��aaaaaaa�+��r� FIGURE 18 (COIlit-) MIAMI ,tiell-It Its SIX S-rAR NIELSON VISION vzasUt% umm^/cxu1.1,; _usyssll -a -_--_-___-__-____-_-/__- _ VLSEott ---- -''---- I I sno STAR m»ucsvw I \s .i.,!i'^I^a ." ^" p^1" ^` *u"xWy |'/',v..wpi^`/ u %iu■!■■i1= a -0 0 Aw 'Aff AN iff Aff jw FIGURE 18 (Culft-) minority Pro,11 -I'll' i"A AMERICABLE lellit,IL: StUdiUS islack loo"i ,,I-i'lillati"ll stu,fin in studl') CIIII'lo"":cs tile 1".:Al .11t:A MIAMt six STP publ ic ", pol it: ics j,r,j,.:L:dLllI li9 - r III. SU*MMARY Figure 19 summarizes the strengths and weaknesses noted The in the in the previous section of this report. numbers column of Fi�:ure 19 indicate the number of items considered as a strenath or eakness for each evaluation criterion. i.e., neither a strength nor Features considered as neutral, a •t�eakness, are not included. Figure la must be anal_- ed with caution. For example, an applicant ma. na•;e many strengths in several categories another considered reiatie - unimportant b: the Cit:, :chile -ewerstrengths, but in more important applicant ma: hate the Cit•,• must take its priorities categories. Consequently, interest into consideration when reviewing and areas of Jcecial the results of this report. A i 3 x_ 4 I vs� 1 SU,i.�fARi +)F FULA I'IE n .:t ;''11S :;C KL NE, SnS r'l1:P.- ,3 L- •1- iAPI APLE' E:!.S1I :tI'Lo'O":j VISION a w 3 :1 S it S ft .:n�tr•.icticn o.,aQ:11i.. - : _ i - - : i - Tcchnic.il Stan,lar's - - - - - - - - - ;u to i ?• r , ., e' - - - yc;r.a 3n�•-ial �t�rast ' r�:r��•r..irn: ocal ;r3. 1n 1F_ _n - _ - i - - - - ..es:.... Performance in -tnor _ _ - - � _ J 5 stoms :;; tr?ovment Pr3ctl:.es 2 Rates i P. o ar-ioP.. tc .seeds z 1.- - of Miami E .WEAKNESSES:S � • I � 7 i 1� W,-A 3 U ,�r j 1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PRIORITItS 1 The city will award the license to the applicant who can demonstrate the best overall capability and willingness to provide cable communications service to the citizens of ,'iami. All of the info rnation requested herein will contribute to the evaluation of applicants and the subseouent selection process. In general, applicants will be judged according to the following criteria: financial capability construction schedule; technical standards; origination cablecasting (automated services, special interest procrammina); local cricination; access production facilities and support; interactive services; service to institutions; sophistication or syste!^; System design; channel ca:acity; ownership structure; performance in e`^er systems operated by applicant; employment practices; rates; rate stability; and regional interconnection capability; how the system relates to the needs of 'iami -ill be accorded a preference and will be considered following The factors tors w as priorities. The city seeks an applicant who will: (j) PropcG�� the most CG"�,'E'r.°nslve offering of services pro .ded :hat financial capabil'._y of the such an offering does not exceed the applicant to construct and operate a cable communications system. (2) Seek to maximize community participation in the �anacement of the as the cable system or in one or more features of that system such institutional network or leased channels. access channels, (3) Allocate adequate facilities, funding and staff support to access, public service and local community programming Page 12 J (4) Seek to develop services to `ulfill the commercial and financial needs of the city's business and banking community and the information and communications needs of the city's service institutions. t (5) Provide services to low-income households by proposing a "universal service'' option which Nouid offer the subscribers the access and public service channels for the cost of installation alone and; or the develop ant of a number of community viewing centers in public libraries and community centers. !COTE: Refer to Section 7, pages 7,3 and 9 of the Cable Television Regulation ordinance for Legal Requirements. :i U01 i Page 13 City OF MIAMI, FLORIDA IN-MIR-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION *PHG.F ROV.GIE City Clerk DATE July 2 s 1981 FILE SUBJECT REFERENCES out memorandum dated June 30 transmitting Minutes of ENCLOSURES Public Hearing on Cable Television. On June 30, the transcript of the Public Hearing which was held on June 26th on the issue of Cable Television, was distributed to you. Pursuant to request from Commissioner J. L. Plummer, Jr., page 3 of said transcript was amended to clarify time of receipt of his memorandum informing other members of the Commission of his inability to attend. Attached hereto please find a copy of "amended Page 3" of such transcript. Kindly have said page substituted in the cited transcript which you now hold. Thank you. '"�.�.`•:°'may. _ - _w CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM To. THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COMMISSION V • FROM 1ph G. Ongie City Clerk DATE June 30, 1981 SUBJECT REFERENCES! ENCLOSURES. kiLt Pursuant to Mayor rrsCablerequest, Televisionenclosed whichherewith heldplease on June 26transcript of the public hearing on in the Citv Commission Chambers. Following Mayor Ferre's instructions, we are also sending a copy of the above cited minutes to the herein below listed individuals. RGO:ist cc: Howard Gary, City Manager George Knox, City Attorney Clark Merrill, Intergovernmental Affairs All Cable Television Applicants (as listed in the attached page) +% dw TO CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Maurice A. Ferre and Members of the City Commission CATE June 19 � 1981 FILE sue�u.7 Special Commission Meeting of June 26, 1981 Commissioner J. L. 111 REFERENCES FRO 0 ENCLOSURES Due to a previous commitment, I will be unable to attend the Special Commission Meeting of June 26) 1981. y CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Honorable Mayor Maurice A. Terre and Members of the Cite Clmmi sion Commissioner J. L. 1 FROM DATE June 19, 1981 FILE SU9,E:.- Special Commission Meeting of June 26, 1981 P.EFERENCES ENCLOSURES Due to a previous commitment, I will be unable to attend the Special Commission Meeting of June 26, 1981. r •. City of Miami CITY 0 F N'1A.:91 Ft c RtI)A INTER-OrtriCE MEMORANUur•i (Honorable Members of the City Commission ' Mayor Maurice A, Terre lti� 4� .Ise a•* E. junc 18, 1981 =3 Special Commission }Meetings and Public 1 Hearings r Cable 1V E`y C(,Oq t!WI, R I am calling a special conunission meeting and public hearing for Friday, June 26 at 1:00 }'.i�i. for the purpose of ��IC to brief the Cite Conunission as to the results of t}leir evaluation process regarding Cable 'll'. I am also calling a special connnission meeting and I hearing is earitating Oil ons Tuesday, July 7, at 4: 00 f'.M. for tileurpose of hear ink, I-r by the applicants for Cable 1V.