HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-81-0547g put
.
, , t,�Ot,11TION f401 �
5 4 T
x
`Un'k�",Q
pp
XmOLUT�ION RESCINDINq P,E80LUT1014
1,10. 81-188
'TITLED ►tA 13;;S0LUT1011 ORDEI?II1 r ICI►
W 3
TREI;T HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT AND DESIG
�1ATI140
�y
T IE PROPERTY AGAI14ST WHICH SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS i
8I1AL!, BE MADE FOR A POR'1IOIN OF THE
COST
THERE0P AS N. id. 23 STREEl HIGHWAY
IIMPROVE411814T t
DISTRICT H-4466"
,
F
VI:, IT RESOLVED BY T11E COIvNI.581014Ov. THE CI 'Y
.8
.0
1"I, ' F`LORIDA t
Section1. That Resolution N . 81-188 pa0ed
dopted March 17, 1981, entitled. " RESOLUTION ORDERIN(
Wo 23 STREET HIGHWAY II-IFROVE14EIlT AND DESIGNATI SIG THE
ROPER`1'Y AGAINST WHICH SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SHALL :BE
ADE FOR A PORTION OIL THE COST THEREOF AS N, J. 23 STRI
IGHWAY I,-IPROVE11,IE1dT DISTRICT 11-11466't ,be, and the same I
ereby, rescinded.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, -.this :. 25 d,ay of JUNE
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
JUN? 5 1981
MOM............................
y �; � �,vte�i� ti'rs F F � i�F"skh,: �t m���'"���s�rsG:��'-� ���`z'v�� �'�i'i �i Z�� k%�.,�I�i�,��s�r '7a�i �? �tI` ,�, t '�+ . � ` `err.• �,�� t �' jq e t 1 �
;'$gs �r r � 'a�. �. �� n" 'y'. ��� . x z '�'�: E��7'`� ������s t,�.* �,�•�; "� ��t��i4t �i of 1 �'e; �: � (Y-� F �a ,j. � if J�'"�� �
's -::'
All
M Az
Mi
I 9 d tt,r g�a 1 r t d k r xs 1 rK s" 41�n •'.?rt di' k'
a J aI�l+tff
' ' •;uJ�u �.istt =2 ,+e LiuG«
SAW,
�p �s 1 ( c 1)y)yt Tz (t:tkt r3 t Yy'ty L� L'6s4 Cyr`
�..L�� 1'�c'"I�G�E'� � t i } �, ri S} P�. s y. E� �•� f'h �'.aut'1'�
t .] l..s l
' G `�` s 'r; r•��Gt��rJ���� J��F?I°,'' �1�'y�yl.'iS'c�('��{{��tr(t.�V-hta}1�,�i{.iye1�C��.yi�i�.,y3.C�r'iy�`T.�{ ,i
} d y
bon ld `r1. C tithe:' s x�fi
lion
r.art{J , r
.cir' 1!•li t- o , Y �� { �l;
% / 7tite low - —
�`
Thq
'
tmen`" of Public Works re('f;t`,'mends the
resolution rn✓ i .7' t vtrinrit'j^'
�^ ent1� l c.� tt ^n�LTr� T `
resolutionNo, F1-1 i r yM.1 s 4K
OPMERITT��vv M.W. �� r"+RF7T Hil'-+; AY ITrtPP''}jTZ'.jT` y."t 3 jai Ea' � Is
p{t 7•� L' Ct T.T +`'t 'j't�i i"' rtt�L^ j.�t�!1 PT•P�'ST AGAINST i'rHIC:7
y= Hf'i lJ :J t.�:)I J:�A .l rn I^.',7 rta� ({ a5 r1 )
t.a r•1 t1: T n e~ e` r' •? 1 "i -• e- A T `' A P- 1 1 its t r k t
i - ..m- , k 1
TIOM OF THE MST T77REOF AS
17
NEWLIil3. ,!t�V IMPwni T yt�,_ DISTRICT
` -tl t;`r�� • �.
ly
t
1. ig
1 tt tky
�n l7n the City Commission c3jorte_td resolution ►
fiarch 17, � 1, h. 1 7 designating
y h y�y�r�y�
T7 �.! y`�, �� nn �y +�y�`-i. �% TTrI'ii'i'1J�'mAnt;....j l(.l ;:S P.:t 3. 'al �'tulii r-� Q V4.V4t ." ){,t4£"Fj.
J r,.. t a
i
y assessments Vall he made for a par`: on of ss
Ar 4r� 2;:-� which .:r?ci31 �. - �e t
./ tie cost of the improvement. This improvement would 1nr' provV�eCQt
concrete tTYS and/or
or
new asphaltic Pa�elne1 , Sil '�i{q c0nCi'a ^
•) ; c,t .,.mat n
gutters,
�-o t'tM .t+'a i1'ln :'A 321u 7 and tf ip 2) an N.W. 2�,, - yam, ei .t a ♦ jn�
'1 �:1i 'u. �7 t.. a, 72 Avenue. mrs� �4 ,`.ln ass (ar_,.able. highway imprpve , y
1 Avenue, . i
[� {. funded with • Highway I � ,^ i R o n d 7.
TOMS.
Department
, ," mn + of Jno- 3' i ?h'nDevelopment notified }l?
jf
2unit
` vr!tof nrZ'L..Development t'v Aliv.-r3l-i%a
V f�
1 1, t z 4
funds Development should
t i., � v a 1'��'. f,ar� the Del>'ir +_221€'nt '1f
IlrxT?;i'i"H..;-nt Co tCt. n -0`r Z 2`.t..t.nt i7
1 j i e in N u3.
Public :'or1 n to recommend ,.;rojec , ;,,v rc�t:tl,� ��e � �c,��*il� . � i
thin
3 r• tJi ' v e a � help . pen 1.. ' �' , additional ��L+ 7. �21 is o.� :to �
1 y
t :t h eP tot' :anL. of Public c nt1v�'�/ 2 was the FITj Em't ��
ek
projects4S T r 1,. {f ! r',v '', . ('^kv March "Ta' 101, ��� .rc�2Yt? sl��+� `.'i,13� taT�V,°.
t
j eet l ! h y ,t to t .. t1. oil _ ,{l r
j't !� r h j ! a ti n t_ -,� t. - + for r � *" t � ('' • 2�� a i n s
{.
'
l + AM!
. �� t^ t. n� �.t- o�T t7} r,•: i�:t'.�Lt i1; yrt�1��?1. �^1'k'1 {r �#
j i.: renamed � t. ! to -..lt. • 1 � i�
22e t_T Qlree—1 Tr�?'tem ent t'1 are IT, nnl a contrict: as 3'.'J32't�e€�
1 "{ °'2T'r
buct, thi , Mit" I. �a 1
. � I r f9 I. 9�ir*t a tt ids
c