HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-81-0629t b:
RESOLUTION NO's +
'1 ,AtSOtt!TION APPROVING COMMENCEMENT OF NEGOTIATIONS
`dk AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
tkVICES FOR THE OVERTOWN SHOPPING CENTER; SAID
NEGOTIATIONS TO BE MADE BY THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF MIAMI AND THE OVERTOWN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,WITH M. R. HARRISON CONSTRUCTION COR-
PORATION, WITH NEGOTIATIONS TO PROCEED WITH URBAN
PLANNING STUDIO AND EDNA MINGO AND ASSOCIATES, IN
THAT ORDER, SHOULD NEGOTIATIONS WITH M. R. HARRISON
CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION PROVE UNSUCCESSFUL IN REACH-
ING AN EQUITABLE, REASONABLE AND COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT►'
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 81-158, adopted March 1`75
1981� the City Commission authorized the City Manager to
contract with the Overtown Economic Development Corporation
(OEDC) for the construction, leasing, and management of the
Overtown Shopping Center; and
WHEREASs Resolution No. 81-158 provides that the OEDC
undertake the direct responsibility for the construction
of said Shopping Center with the said community -based organ-
ization providing economic development_ services for the
Overtown neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the OEDC will contract directly with 'shopping
center development teams with the City Commission being,
afforded the right to approve the ';contracts to be entered
into between the OEDC and the shopping center team selected
by said OEDC;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION QF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA.-
Section 1. As provided under the contract between
the City of Miami and the Overtown Economic Development'
Corporation, commencement of negotiations by the Management
Committee, established under said contract, is hereby approved
for an agreement to provide design and development services'
to the Overtown Economic pevolopment Corporation for the-
Overtown Shopping Center; said negotiations to commence with
`M. R. Harrison Con:ptructiron Corporation and to proceed with
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
JUL 09i�1
8b
V
N
MItMbRANbUM
Howard V. 6ary June 3, 1981 ctLE
City Manager
y�e}r Overtown Shopping Center
Selection of Shopping Center
A • `. bevelopment Team
�RGM Jim Reid ,` RLFERENCES
Acting Assistant City Manager 1
• 4N�:1 ✓aV Rf. S.
The City has received $19580s4OO
to construct the Overtown Shopping
Center in conjunction with the
Overtown Economic Development
Corporation. City approval is
sought for commencing negotiations
to provide architectural/engineering
design and construction management
services for the shopping center.
BACKGROUND
In late September 1980, the City received a grant from the Economic Development
Administration in the amount of $1,580,400 to construct the Overtown Shopping
Center. The grant was to be matched by local funds in the amount of $395,100.
The shopping center will be constructed in the vicinity of N. W. 3rd Avenue and
14th Street adjacent to the Culmer/Overtown neighborhood facility. It would
provide much needed shopping services for the area, additional jobs for the
residents and significant opportunities for Black entrepreneurs.
On March 17, 1981, the City Commission authorized the City Manager to contract
with the Overtown Economic Development Corporation for leasing, construction
and management of the Overtown Shopping Center. The resolution states those
contracts are subject to the approval of the Miami City Commission.
RECOMMENDATION
The Management Committee established under the City/Overtown Economic Development
Corporation contract has interviewed five shopping center development teams and
recommended to the Overtown Economic Development Corporation Board and the Miami
City Commission that negotiations be authorized with the first ranked shopping
center team until an equitable, reasonable and competitive agreement is reached
or, if negotiations fail, meet with the second ranked shopping center team for
the same purpose or if negotiations fail again, meet with the third ranked
shopping center team. Upon completion of negotiations, as outlined above,
the agreement will be presented to the corporation and to the City Commission
for approval and authority to execute it. This procedure is expected to be
completed in the latter part of June 1981. Thereafter, the shopping center team
will be given a notice to proceed.
On May 29, 1981, the Overtown/City of Miami Management Committee interviewed
five firms seeking to contract with the Overtown Economic Development
Corporation for the design/development of the Overtown shopping center.
After presentations from the five firms, four City representatives on the
management team ranked the firms in the following order:
1. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
2. Urban Planning Studio
3. Edna Mingo and Associates
and the three Overtown Economic Development Corporation members of the Management
Committee ranked the firms in the following order:
1. Urban Planning Studio
-2. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
3. Edna Mingo and Associates
Since the Management Committee is structured with equal voting to enable City and
Overtown Economic Development Corporation representatives to reach agreement on
major issues, there was a long discussion on the pros and cons of each of the two
top ranking construction firms. Subsequent to that discussion, City representatives
on the Management Committee allowed the Overtown Economic Development Corporation
representatives to caucus on their first choice based on two assumptions:
1. Either of the two top ranking firms was capable of carrying
out the job.
2. The City would respect the judgment of the Overtown Economic
Development Corporation Management Committee representatives on which firms should be ranked first.
After deliberation, the Overtown Economic Development Corporation representatives
reconvened the Management Committee and indicated that after discussion, they
had ranked the firms:
1. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
2. Urban Planning Studio
3. Edna Mingo and Associates
Since this coincided with the initial City recommendations,'a motion was made for
joint agreement on the above rank order,
$ m 6 28
On May 29, 1981, the Overtown/City of Miami Management Committee interviewed
five firms seeking to contract with the Overtown Economic Development
Corporation for the design/development of the Overtown shopping center.
After presentations from the five firms, four City representatives on the
management team ranked the firms in the following order:
1. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
2. Urban Planning Studio
3. Edna Mingo and Associates
and the three Overtown Economic Development Corporation members of the Management
Committee ranked the firms in the following order:
1. Urban Planning Studio
2. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
3, Edna Mingo and Associates
Since the Management Committee is structured with equal voting to enable City and
Overtown Economic Development Corporation representatives to reach agreement on
major issues, there was a long discussion on the pros and cons of each of the two
top ranking construction firms. Subsequent to that discussion, City representatives
on the Management Committee allowed the Overtown Economic Development Corporation
representatives to caucus on their first choice based on two assumptions:
1. Either of the two top ranking firms was capable of carrying
out the job.
2. The City would respect the judgment of the Overtown Economic
Development Corporation Management Committee representatives
on which firms should be ranked first.
After deliberation, the Overtown Economic Development Corporation representatives
reconvened the Management Committee and indicated that after discussion, They
had ranked the firms:
1. M. R. Harrison Construction Corporation
2. Urban Planning Studio
3. Edna Mingo and Associates
Since this coincided with the initial City recommendations,'a motion was made for
joint agreement on the above rank order,
a
On Thursday, June 4, 1981, the Executive Committee of the Overtown EcOndffiid
Development Committee met after polling the Board and voted to accept the
recommendation of the Management Committee:
On Tuesday, June 16, 1981, the full Overtown Economic Development Corporation
Board met and endorsed the recommendation of the Management Committee and
authorized contract negotiations.