HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-82-0089TO
"E onf1fiClUlV
Howard V. Gary GATE
City Manager
FRCM John Gilchrist
Project Director
Watson Island Development
BILE
February 5, 1982
Sli F?J<<:T Request to State Cabinet to
Extend Time for Watson Island
D. R. I. Approval
Attach:.Oraft Letter to Land and Water.
Adjudicatory Commission
-- . a-tson island R.I. Ad]
Commission Order
The attached draft letter to the Governor and Cabinet sitting as
the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission requests an
extension to January, 1983 for the City to comply with certain
conditions established in an Adjudicatory Commission Order. dated
September 29, 1981 pertaining to the Watson Island Development
of Regional Impact.
Background
The development of a themed amusement park and marine oriented
recreational facilities on city owned Watson Island has been a goal
ofthe City Commission since 1976. Preliminary planning, feasibility
and financing strategies have been refined. Many legal, political
and regulatory issues have been favorably resolved over the last
three years including issues before the Florida Cabinet and the
Courts of Florida.
The City entered into an agreement with Diplomat World Enterprises,
Ltd. in November 1977, to provide professional services for the
development and management of a major recreational and entertainment
center. The project includes a themed amusement park; a specialty
shopping center with 50,000 square feet of restaurant facilities and
40,000 square feet shopping; performing arts facilities including a
500 seat IMAX and multi -purpose theater, a 1000 seat covered outdoor
theater, a 6000 seat bayside amphitheater for aquatic shows and stage
performances and a television production studio; 350 slip visitor
and recreational marina including a waterborne transportation
terminal; and parking for'3000 autos plus 75 tour buses.
Existing facilities to be retained or relocated on Watson Island
include Chalk's amphibious airline terminal, the Miami Yacht Club,
the Miami Outboard Club, the City's heliport and the City's
Japanese Gardens.
q�
I�
82 89
Howard V. Gary
Page 2
February 5, 1982
Benefits to the City and community include a projected $20,000,000
plus net return to the City during the first 5 years of operation
and increasing thereafter, 1700 man years of construction jobs
during the 2 year construction period, 1000 full time equivalent
permanent jobs, a large percentage of which are first -entry jobs,
annual purchase of $6-8,000,000 in food, merchandise and other
supplies and services and an estimated increase in tourist visitor
days of 335,000 as a direct result of the attraction. It is
estimated that an additional 4000 to 5000 service industry jobs
could be created as a result of the Watson Island Project.
In July 1979 the City Commission approved a bond indenture and in
September 1979 a $55 million revenue bond issue was validated in the
Eleventh Judicial Court of Florida.
In June 1979, Dr. Philip Glatstein, Lynn Glatstein, Leonard Turkel
and Annsheila Turkel filed suit against the City and Diplomat
alleging six counts covering bidding procedures, illegality of the
agreement, illegality of the development and environmental degradation.
Their suit for declaratory injunctive relief was denied by summary
judgement against all counts by Judge Ira L. Dubitsky in the Dade
County Circuit Court.
The summary judgement was subsequently appealed to the Third District
Court of Appeal by the Glatsteins and Turkels and on May 26, 1981,
the Court found that the Agreement was executed contrary to the City
charter, which requires invitations for competitive bidding to be
executed according to detail plans. This finding being diapositive,
the Court did not address any other contention of the appellants.
The original contract and the subsequent amended contract were
therefore voided.
The City and Diplomat then requested a rehearing by the Third District
Court of Appeal, as allowed_within thirty days of their opinion, and
the request was denied. On August 5, 1981, the City and Diplomat
petitioned the Supreme Court of Florida to review the Third District
opinion. The petition was denied by the Court on November 17, 1981.
The Supreme Court denial exhausted the City's potential remedy
through judicial process:._
There also remains one regulatory agency issue to be met by the City.
On July 10, 1980, the City issued a development order for the Watson
Island project, which was subsequently appealed by the South Florida
Regional Planning Council. Administrative resolution of this issue
went before the Florida Cabinet acting as the Land and Water
Adjudicatory Commission in September 1981.
The Cabinet allowed the City's development order to stand, however
requested several conditions to be met and returned to the Cabinet
by March 3, 1981.
82-89
All�
U
Howard V. Gary
Page 3
February 5, 1982
While it has been possible to move forward with compliance on the
issues raised in the conditions regarding dredge and fill,
potential conflict with the future expansion of the Port of Miami
and issues of traffic and transportation, the impact of the Third
District Court ruling plus a subsequent ruling on a second
management agreement between the City and a private firm for the
management of City owned marinas has made it impossible to respond
to the Adjudicatory Commission's condition regarding the projects
fiscal impact on the City within the time frame established by the
Adjudicatory Commission Order.
Condition (4) The City shall contract with an independent
firm acceptable to the Commission and the Department of
Veteran and Community Affairs, to prepare a new economic
feasibility report for the Watson Island Project which
(1) assesses the effects of any possible changes to the
management contract; (2) analyzes the City's revenue base
and its expenditures plan and (3) specifically identifies
revenue sources or proposed expenditures that must be altered
to insure the economic viability of the City in the event
that the Watson Island Project is an unsuccessful venture.
The City has now begun a process to redefine procurement procedures
within the courts interpretation of legislative and charter
definition. The City will require several months to replace City
Ordinances regarding the process and to reissue a request for bids
under revised procurement procedures and to again have a management
service in place for the Watson Island Project.
It is therefore requested that the City Commission authorize the
City Manager, by submission of the attached draft letter to the
Governor and Cabinet,proceed to petition the Florida Land and
Water Adjudicatory Commission for an extension of time in order
to comply with conditions set forth in the Adjudicatory Commission
Order pertaining to the Watson Island Development of Regional Impact.
82-89