HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-82-0290RESOLUTION NO. 8 2— 2 9 U
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING. THE CITY MANAGER TO
SUBMIT A FINAL STATEMENT TO THE U.S. DEPART-
MENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT REQUESTING
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,625,000 FOR THE
PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DURING
1982-83; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER, UPON APPROVAL OF SAID GRANT BY HUD,
TO ACCEPT THE SAME AND NEGOTIATE THE NECES-
SARY IMPLEMENTING CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
submit a final statement to the U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development for the proposed Community Development
Program during 1982 - 83, in accordance with what was ap-
proved at the duly held public hearing.
Section 2. The City Manager, a Chief Administrative
Officer for the City of Miami, upon approval of said grant by
HUD is hereby authorized to accept the grant and upon receipt
of same, negotiate the necessary implementing contracts and
agreements to implement the 1982 - 83 Community Development
Program.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this first day of April 1982.
Maurice A. Ferre
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATT / Q�
RA H G. ONGIE
CIT CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: APP VED AS TO F9M_AND CORRECTNESS:
10EL E. MAXWELL GEOIGIE F. KNOX,JR.
A YISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CIT ATTORNEY
CITY COMMISSION '
MEETING OF
APR 1 .D2
......................w..w
N
Howard Gary March 17, 1982
City "-tanager
8th Year Community Development
Applications —
Dena Spillman -
Director
Community Development
= M
It is recommended that a resolution be
approved, authorizing the City Manager
-� to submit a final statement to the U.S.
Department of Housing & Urban Development
requesting funds in the amount of
$9,625,000 for the proposed Community
CIQ Development program during 1982-83; and
further authorizing the City Manager,
upon approval of said grant by HUD, to
accept the same and negotiate the neces-
sary implementing contracts and agreements.
A public hearing on the 8th year Community Development program is scheduled for
April 1, 1982, This will be the only hearing at the City Commission level on
the proposed application for these funds.
This will be the first application submitted to HUD since new applicable program
regulations have been in effect. Since the new federal budget has resulted in
drastic cuts in a multitude of other federal programs including a thirteen per-
cent cut in the Community Development programs, the City's funding strategy
has been changed in an attempt to meet existing needs with scant resources.
1) The new federal regulations have drastically reduced all funding
sources for housing -related programs. In view of this, staff is proposing that
thi►•ty-six percent of the CDBG be allocated to single and multifamily housing
rehabilitation activities. Both the single family and multifamily programs
are highly cost-effective as they leverage private funds and as they are used for
loans, the funds are returned to the City to be recycled into other housing
activities.
2) The proposed application includes no public improvement projects
such as new parks or street improvements, due to funding cuts. In the future,
street improvements done in targetare3 neighborhood will. be assessed to property
owners, as are highway bond projects.
•,.. 8 2- 2 9 0
Howard Gary
3/17/82
page 2
3) As a result of the cut in the City's Community Development program,
the departments of Community Development, Planning, and Trade & Commerce will each
experience administrative budget cuts of thirteen percent. This will result in
staff layoffs.
4) Federal regulations have placed a ten percent cap on funding of
Social Service programs. A waiver of such regulations has been requested from
HUD in order to maintain social service programs above this cap. Social Service
funding is proposed at a level of $1,428,144. This is $119,756 below last year's
allocation. If the City Commission desires, this allocation can be increased to
last year's allocation of $1,547,900.
5) Due to the cuts that have been made in the City's Community Develop-
ment Block Grant, we can no longer maintain the City's economic development programs
at the neighborhood level at their existing funding levels. Therefore, staff is
proposing a phase down of the funding for the Community based organizations while
promoting their self-sufficiency.
a. Starting July 1, 1982, new contracts for the community based
organizations (CBO's) will require the following: During the first six months,
the CBO's must obtain alternative funding equal to at least twenty-five percent
of their expenses to receive the CDBG funds. Therefore, the usual contract of
$50,000 will be reduced to $43,750 - $25,000 to fully cover the first six months
of the program, and $18,750 to cover the second half expenses at a seventy-five
percent level. Unless the program is able to attain this match, it would be dis-
continued after the initial first six months.
b. On July 1, 1984, each CBO will be required by the City to obtain
fifty percent alternate funding. Therefore, the allocation would be reduced to
$25,000 per agency to agencies that receive alternate funding. Those who don't
will be discontinued.
c. On July 1, 1984, each CBO will be required by the City to obtain
seventy-five percent alternate funding. This action would reduce funding of remain-
ing agencies to $12,500.
d. After 1984, the CBO program will be entirely funded through the
efforts of the CBO's themselves.
We expect this process to be assisted by state law which provides tax
credits to businesses that aid CBO's.
6. In order to reduce the impact of the federal cuts, staff is proposing
a $5 million Community Development float. The float would consist of lending up to
$5 million of encumbered but unexpended Community Development funds through the Miami
Capital Development Corporation, to qualified developers for construction capital.
Funds loaned to them would be at an interest rate lower than market and the funds by
82 - 290
1%
V
Howard Gary
3/17/82
page 3
irrevocable letters of credit. The interest earned from this would be used to fund
a minority business loan program, and to support the departments of Community Develop-
ment and Trade & Commerce.
It is recommended that the City Commission approve the attached program so that it can
be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development in a timely manner.
/cr
Attachment
82 - 290
1
!loward Gar,.r
Cite Mana er
Dena Spillman
Director, Department
- ; ebruary 19. 1982
Overto%•:n interim Assistance
Pr) gram
of Community Development
The purpose or this memorandum is to present a status report on
the activities of the Overtown Interim Assistance Program and to
recommend that actions to phase -out the Program and re -assign
current personnel to other city departments be initiated.
The Overtown
Interim
Assistance Program was
es�ablished October,
1-977, within
the City
Manager's Office as
a CET' project :with
Community Development
funds for program
support, The Program
intended to
provide
concentrated municipal
services to the
residents of
the Overtown neighborhood until
blight decreased and
normal services could
support the revitalized
neighborhood.
Ac,_i-vities and services offered through the Interim Assistance
Program, although closely mirroring existing City services were an
eligible activity because they were only to be carried out in an
aopr.oved Target area, primarily consisting of low and moderate
residents. Administrative responsLbili.ty for tno Program was
assured by the Department. of CommlunI. V, Revelopmcnt in 1979 and
assi.gned to the Department's }lousin- Division.
From the Program's inception through 1980, prod=ram ocrsonnel were
primarily CETA -funded p_artic1pan's. From the onset, a major
objective for the program was to place :as mean,,? of the CVJA funded
staff in classified job titles as such positions became available.
This policy had the stronc support of the Overtop;n Co;,imunity
Development Advisory Board.
Funds were used to purchase supplies, equipment, and other related
administrative and su )port costs. Initially Dade County .illoc;ated
County CDBGJ funds to the Program. Interim Assistance at the height
of its manpower, had over 100 CETA funded staff.
The program activities that were cari-Lod out since 1977 included:
Housin-_ Services Prok,ram Assigned staff made
minor repai-rs to rc5i(enti_al
pro pertios and b1.ockcd/hoarded up
abandoned buiIdin;;s. A hoesing relocation resources component
attemptc?(I to identi.l y structurally sound bui ldi.ng s with vacant
units in order to refer residents in need o'.: ai):ai-Lments.
v 82-290
H
!toward Gar `.r
Cite ,tanager
ebruar,; 19 1982
Overtoc..n Interim Assistance
Program
r)
Dena Spillman
Director, Department of Community Development
_ ,_
The puroose o` this memorandum is to present a status report on
the activities of she Overtown Interim Assistance Program and to
recommend that actions to phase -out the Program and re -assign
current personnel to other city departments be initiated.
The Overtown Interim Assistance Program was es�ablished October,
1977, within the City Manager's Office as a CrTn project :with
Community Development funds for program support, The Program
intended to provide concentrated municioal services to the
residents of the Overtcwn neighborhood until bli 'it decreased and
normal services could support the revitalized neig`iborhood.
Acciviti.es and services offered through the Interim Assistance
Program, although closely mirror.inp e:;i.sting Cir_y services were an
eligible activity because they were only to be carried out in an
aonrovcd Target area, pri.-marily consisting of low and moderate
residents. Admini.strative resoon sibility for t'-le Program caa
assu-med by the Departrlent of Com;,iunity 1)evelopmenl in 1.979 and
assigned to the 1)ep;:rt;:9cnt's ffousin-, Division.
From the Program's i.nccc-pti.on through 1980, pro ,oram nersonnel wereprimar. i Iv CI:TA-funded 1)arti.ci1)anILs. From the onset, a ma jor
object ive for the program l- as to place as many of the CI -:TA funded
staff: in classified job ti.tles as such positions bec,1,110 available.
This policy had the strong support of: the Overtot.;n C():MMLl11itV
Development Advisory Board.
Funds were used to purchase supplies, equipment. and other related
administrative and stu)port costs. Initially Dade County allocated
County CI)BG fund~ to the Program. Interim Assistance at the height
of its manpower, had over 1.00 CF.TA funded staff.
The program acti-vi.ties that were c;lr171.0(1 out since 1977 included:
llousin_ Services Program Assigned staff made
minor reprli.r, to r_si-(T•tl i_;11 j)r0J)01-ci0s Mild bl.ockcd/boarded up
a`. andonc-d bu11dins;s. A housing rcloc.ati.on resources component
attempLud to identi fy structural l y sound buildings with vacant
units in Order to refer residents 111 neerl o'-
v 82-290
or
Code-Enforcement/Building Inspection Services.
Staff inspected buildings in Overto::rn and prepared
lists of code
violations. This information was then for.-jarde I to
owners of these
buildings. Environmental inspection staff: made site
inspections
throughout the neighborhood, identified potential
health hazards
an:i carried out follow-up type inspe:,tLolls.
Environmental Maintenance Service. Streets,
parks, and vacant lots were cleaned and trash and debris that
accumulated in the neighborhood was removed. A fee
was established
for this work on a charge -back basis to the
owners of the
properties.
Community Information Service.
Information on
sponsored events; community wide services, etc. was provided. An
early version of the "Crime Watch Program" was
introduced and
staff had a bi-weekly radio program on called
"Inside Culmer".
CETA administrative staff assigned to this service
were responsible
for record keeping on all CETA participants and provided job
placement and employment counseling services to the
participants.
During 1930, the CETA funded contracts terminated. At the same
time, an employment freeze prevented the program from filling
several requested corker -trainee slots in the remaining programs.
This attrition greatly reduced trade skills available for program
use.
Presently, onlv the following personnel remain:
James D. Thomas
Adm. Assistant III
$30,035.20
(Step
4)
Alma J. George
Admi_n. Aide II
19,364.80
(Step
4)
John A. Glass
Environmental Inspector
19,364.8O
(Step
3)
I:d:•:nrd Knox
Building Inspector. I
21,361.60
(Step
3)
The three inspectors continue to carry out inspection related
duties. 'The Pro -rare "'Innaer, in addiLioil to h I s overall.
administrative responsibility for the Program, has been assigned
to supervi se. a CFTA Title I I.-I3 grant . This grant provides
cducati.onal and on-thc-jolt training to some 96 pal-Licipants. Ills
primary r.esponsi bil.i t:y will be to supervise a comprehensive on-the-
job work prot,ram for the trainees once their ed.illcatiorllll training
is completed In May. The grant will be in operation through August.
The Interim Assistance Pr.oi;l'am's an111MI bud -et. is $215,OOO. This
amount, funded exclusively with CDIM, funds, wills approved with the
understanding that every effort would be mndc to reduce expenses
so that the total expenditure would be no more than $200,000 for
the current fiscal year.
Thy I'ror, r�1.11 Office has been hol_lsed, since iLs incepti(�I1,in .1
bd.lilding located at 541 NW 5 Street. This building is owlled by
Dade County and is -,chedul ed to he dc•iaol i sired in late Spring of
this year in order Lo malcc wa\, for a 75 unit public hollsirlg
prdl joct .
Due to the sub-,tint:i:lI1`: reduced level of pro ram activity a
revil".i OI the Prntr:1:1 i.5 : pprO,pri:1te taiLhill thy' C sell cons tra W-s
anal the substantial noods of ilverto%..,i1, Lhe IlZtel"i.l Assistance
pro,,'rim has been sucCe5s11I1.. Its impact on Overtown has been
posl.t ivo and c:ln 1`:, ob joctivCl y.
•i 820
However, the heart of the Program was the use of area residents in
projects that both improved the neighborhood and gavo participants
needed work skills. This key aspect has been removed through the
reductLon of CETA fund,.
At its last regular monthly meeting, the Over.town Community
Development Advisory Board reviewed tF:! Program's future and ranked
the continued operation of Interim Assistance as its 9th priority
out of ten projects.
In view of these facts, I recommend that the following steps be
implemented in terminating the Interim Assistance Program and
transfering its functions to other Departments:
1. Environmental Inspector John Glass be
assigned to the Solid Waste Department.
2. Building Inspector Edward Knox
be assigned to the Department of Building & Zoning.
3. Program Manager James Thomas and
Administrative Aide II Alma George be moved back to the Community
Development Department offices. From this location the work
experience component of the CETA Grant can be carried out. At the
time that the Grant Administration is terminated, decisions as to
future job assignments will be made.
The inter -departmental agreements pursuant to HUD's requirements
for payments of salaries, etc. can be prepared. Equipment and
other supplies assigned to the Interim Assistance Program will be
disbursed according to [IUD requircTr. ents covering such items
purchased with CDI')G fund,,.
82-290